User talk:Ultramarine/Archive 1

1298:

war" and wars make nations stronger. But I am going off on a tangent. My question to you was prompted by the curious observation that communism is now the most heavily criticized ideology on wikipedia (i.e. has the longest criticism article), but you continue to concentrate on it and experience diminishing marginal returns for your effort. You might not realize this, but I personally agree with much of your POV - your utilitarianism and support for democracy, for instance. However, I like to build a balanced encyclopedia. I think you could be an invaluable contributor if you toned down the POV of your writing. Would you consider an email conversation to attempt to defuse the present crisis to some extent? --

1122:; this message is being sent to all four of you. If any of you are willing to allow one of the others to act as representative (thereby reducing the number of parties to the mediation), or knows of someone else who should be included, please let me know. I am willing to act as mediator; if anybody is unwilling for me to serve in that capacity, I will instead help you to find another mutually acceptable mediator. Mediation is, of course, a voluntary process, and you are not required to participate in mediation. The page is currently protected, however; a successful mediation of this dispute will speed the process of getting the page unprotected, so I strongly recommend that mediation be pursued. 619:

you think for a minute, that i'm going to worry about you and your capital letters and your editor friends who have already blocked you, you should probably think again. We should be civil here - first because we probably agree about far more than we disagree, and second because the alternatives are absurd. If you read the wiki guidelines - you're threats are clearly not porportionate even to the offenses you alledge. I'm curious about your proposed solution to the energy challenge - which in a nutshell is that we're hoarding it all, and there isn't enough if we stop hoarding, and there might not be enough even if we keep it all to ourselves and our hummer solists NASCAR worshipping friends.

185:

section perhaps? Maugeri's paper was also written before August 2004 which, from the sources I've read and i think the article includes, was a watershed moment for peak oil because Saudi Arabia's largest oil field was unable to increase production. Also, we do already cover what Maugeri points out which is reasons why historical global production has not follow a bell shaped curve which was an asuption somewhat separate to the theory itself, it is not a bell curve because supply and demand change due to global politics , technology, and logistical constraints. I just got your talk page response, creating criticisms section is good.

1745: 1287:, by contrast, have displaced numerous liberal democracies across Southern Europe and Latin America. Yet there are no articles dealing with criticisms of those systems - indeed, there are not even criticism sections in their respective articles! My question, then, is why do you concentrate so much on communism and not at all on the systems and ideologies that achieved the most success against liberal democracy in the 20th century? -- 1733: 1509:

heavily "criticized" subject on wikipedia can hardly be surprising given that a non-trivial part of the intellectual ellites (and that would arguably be the largest part in countries like Romania and other places that experienced it first hand) view the communist ideology on par with fascism. Yet comparing parallel articles related to fascism and communism on wikipedia one would think that communism is kind of a walk in the park.

371:

you). Goodluck in being a major contributor to the article – you'll need it (and more than it) ! See the specific comments I left on SlR and RJII, as well as the lengthy one on Luis Rib's, for a more elaborate depiction of my position on this. Sorry for so abruptly intruding on your talk page space, thanks for taking the time to read this. You are under no obligation to respond.

429:

What is the logical basis overall to say that geothermal on a total earth scale isn't renewable? Perhaps it's better if we say that geothermal energy is "problematic" or "inconsistant" because it may not be cost effective to follow the spots around (or something similar). Geothermal overall still meets the definition of renewable I believe, what do you think?

469:

just added, for example. If you look at the style I've been using, can you tell me what the main idea is of how I can differentiate between the style proposals and whether there is one that would be easier for me to use that would not completely change the gist of what I've tried to do? Sorry I'm so confused. Am hoping for a mentor on this subject.

235:

the remaining half of oil becomes increasingly inefficient, to a certain degree all the easily extracted and refined oil was done so long ago (so in that sense the peak is more serious than just a half way point). Also, that section should perhaps be moved underneath market solution as more efficient technology is basically the market solution?

1859:. What I did was move some paragraphs around, merge a number of sections and rephrase some text. You seem to assume that any modification of your text represents a "deletion of well-referenced material", which means that you instinctively revert it (or, in this case, move the original text to another article). Will you please do me the favor of 302:

has done nothing but waste other editors' time). I don't want to ask for mediation, because I do not think the problem is about some dispute between me and RJII. Certainly, my main problem with RJII is not the dismissive way s/he deals with me on the talk page -- my only concern is the contents of the article. I have filed a complaint at

1486:, in its "neutral point of view" variety. I remember the wikipedia from some time ago which was heavily baised towards wooden language as the easiest way out from conflict and towards the mtyhical NPOV, but recent articles of general interest looked much better. So the logical place to document this pattern was in contentious pages. 1726:, I feel that this shows that your edits are excessive - a couple of minutes here, a couple of minutes there. Over 100 edits in the last 24 hours! How can you give measured opinions in such a short time? Particularly problematic is your habit of making multiple edits, which makes it very difficult to keep track of changes. Please 1490:

your generous efforts. I don't know if this helps much, other than to reinforce your conviction that a little more balance would do much good to some really funny bias masquearading as NPOV, but as a Wiki contributor I was often motivated by gestures of appreciation coming from the most unexpected places.

1578:

I thought you'd like to know about it, but I have a request - Ben once tried to re-direct the "Nuclear Power" article, and I need some help in remembering just what happened then. Do you know the details, like where he tried to redirect it to? "Nuclear Debate"? What happened to the "Nuclear Power"

1205:

If you need my help in any editing controversies, let me know. I think the article has moved in the wrong direction since Ruzmanci started editing it. I just haven't had the time to place into challenging any of the specific content this person has added. But I can vote in favor of any changes you

1166:

I guess I'm back, but now facts only. I've read about anti-communists and figured out I'm not one of them. I just dislike Communists, and take pain from seeing young educated people believe those people who perverted my motherland. Well, I wish you best of luck if your library can save those articles

950:

and related topics. I have been adding a lot of information (biographies, historical context) to balance out the POV in these contentious areas, and I was feeling a bit set upon for a while. This is my first foray into a controversial topic, and it has been most intriguing. I am impressed you can get

728:

has shifted into Price-Anderson, which is the insurance policy for American nuclear power plants. We're starting Mediation now. The key point of contention is "Whether or not the government has a POV and can verify assertions as fact" (the results of this Mediation will probably be cited in Nuclear

501:

Thanks for adding the ASPO image everywhere. The World Energy Council 1993 image on Future energy development seems to be "pessimistic"? Perhaps a little too pessimistic as it appears to have predicted an oil peak in the mid to late 1990s. Is there any source or moderate organization that is known

406:

Hi. I don't want to have the page removed, but the current content does belong in Wikisource, as it can't really be said to be an encyclopedia article. So I'm not proposing to have the page removed; diffs will still be available for the purposes of arbitration. With that in mind, would I be able to

1245:

Hello VSmith, Femto, Iain.mcclatchie, Skatebiker and Ultramarine. I need help with regards to the damage(in my opinion) done by user Theo Pardilla. Please look at his contribution page, and in the history of some the articles he contributed to, please look at my contributions, under Sillybilly. What

709:

are appreciated. I haven't had time to counter Gatti's ranting lately, so it's good that someone is standing up to him. It has been my experience that such supremely biased contributors eventually throw in the towel, so keep it up. I will be chiming in with edits from time to time when protection is

618:

Dear Anon, I understand you enjoy edit wars - I don't Even if an edit was more or less than you would propose. It is better to do something than sit on one's hands for fear. I have been threated with prison time for removing (illegal) advertisemnts from public roads and parks and telephone poles. If

428:

that frames the issue of geothermal not being renewable because sites "cool down" eventually. More than technically that is not depletion and not unrenewable I believe. The overall energy "flow" of geothermal energy on earth remains constant, but various "hot spots" do move around on earth, right?

1763:

and hoped that everybody would put similar material on that page (but nobody seems to want to). Maybe it should be retitled "Forex fraud" or just "Retail Forex trading" (together with a section on how not all retail brokers are scam artists - at least some of them are registered). In any case the

370:

Greetings, we have yet to speak, but I thought I should send and make you privy to the aforementioned forward. While I am withdrawing from the article talk page, feel free to engage me with specific items on my talk page (though we have yet to do so, I thought it would only be fair to offer this to

301:

Your creation of a page for "definitions of Capitalism" was a very constructive way to deal with the ongoing conflict with RJII. I am really appaled that s/he wants to remove that link. I am trying to figure out a way to call others' attention to what RJII has been doing (my own view is that s/he

234:

I am not against the new technology section you added but it's not just non-conventional oil that has the problem, it is conventional oil that is becoming non-conventional extraction energy efficiency wise. According to Hubbert's theory the peak is very significant because after that extraction of

1512:

Yet, I don't care how noble the cause is or how idealistic are the principles involved, but from what I can see, the disgrace of being subjected to the kind of painful BS that happens in Requests_for_arbitration/Ultramarine is way more than is worth for any kind of "intellectual" cause. Yet I feel

1153:

Hi, I've just read your user page, I guess I classify as right-extremist. I'm really sorry for losing control in there when I saw something that looked like "old-skool" Communist stuff, from language to methodology, and trough incompetently trying to counter it, I've just discredited my cause. I'm

456:

I noticed you added something to the discussion on footnote style. I have been trying to use footnotes because I often try to thoroughly support my statements with citations (so future fact checkers won't have to consider deleting things they don't know if I verified or not), and I feel that using

1696:

Hi, I removed a number of edits on this day from your user space page. Though they appear to come from your account, they clearly don't read as if you've created them. To be honest it's quite worrying (unless you've got a mate who thought he'd have a bit of a laugh) that someone can get into your

1489:

Although from my perspective the main articles to which you tried to bring some balance are an embodiment of wooden language -- albeit in a less conspicuous form, I was almost shocked to see the egregiously wooden variety in the pages dedicated to your "trial". So I extend my deepest simpathy for

1297:

The democratic peace theory is an argument for democracy only if one considers peace to be a good thing. Many fascists would concede the point that democracy leads to extended periods of peace, and then go on to argue that peace is a sign of weakness and decadence, since "every generation needs a

468:

I have to manually adjust footnotes when I make changes to paragraph order or add a new citation. Maybe they mean numbers that automatically jump to the Notes section. I don't seem to be able to visualize how the footnotes are going to appear when I look at the style # 4 proposal that I think was

1508:

I will confes my bias, having never believed in the Church of NPOV -- it may be like communism "nice in theory" but unattainable in practice, nevermind the fact that I observed the "benefits" of communism much closer than my younger compatriot (Mihnea). His observation that communism is the most

1274:

There is one thing I find extremely puzzling about you, Ultramarine, and I would greatly appreciate it if you indulged my curiosity. You have stated your desire to defend liberal democracy from "various left and right extremists", and have invested considerable effort into a relentless attack on

1533:

or extensive uses of popular web material(excluding other materials published in peer reviewed journals), which suggest google work, rather than impartial research to write it. This is not limited to this article, but others directly or indirectly raising the subject of intelligence and "race."

355:

I made the decision to withdraw from the article talk page. Sadly, I am rather confident that the intro will end up glowingly pro-capitalist, representing the views of the Right and Moderate Right, and underrepresenting that of the Left and Moderate Left (again, it should be expected under this

184:

My intepretation of Maugeri's paper is that he is not criticizing Hubbert peak theory itself, rather he is criticizing the extreme "doomsday" supporters of Hubbert peak. So perhaps we should move Maugeri's criticisms to the implications of a world peak section to balance out the "catastrophe"

1105:

article is mediatable. From looking at the history and the talk page, it seems that there are two divergent versions of the article that differ in a significant number of ways. It would be in Knowledge's interest to coalesce these versions into a single version. I would like to arrange a

1369:

Ultramarine, Could you certify the basis of the dispute on the RfC that I have filed? I need someone who also attempted to resolve it according to one interpretation of the rules, please recall that you did attempt to do so on the page where we request unprotection. Here is the location

325:

two users. You have to decide what you think is the basic issue: the way you and RJII interact, or what RJII is doing to the article. If it is the latter, you want a different mechanism than mediation, although I am not sure what it is (unless you want to argue that RJII is a vandal

1497:

as way out from the broken or at least stucked (see TragedyOfTheCommons) AttentionEconomy that is currently the world of wikis. It looks to me that you are spending an inordinate amount of effort (emotional, intellectual and otherwise) towards very little effect because of the root

1278:

points out, no liberal democracy older than 3 years ever became a communist state. Communism certainly has threatened the foreign policy interests of liberal democracies in the 20th century, but it has never been a significant internal threat to the liberal democracies themselves.

1758:

Hi, I liked the material you put under retail brokers in the Foreign Exchange Market article. But I think that retail trading is such a small part of the FX market that it shouldn't have such a large %age of the article. To deal with this issue I'd earlier created an article on

1631:

An arbcom decision limits me to one revert per week. Unfortunately, that puts me at a serious disadvantage on pages such as "Criticisms of communism". I just wanted to let you know that I am failing to assist due to necessessity, not out of lack of consideration. best wishes.

931:

of section 2 is now on a separate page.) Oh, and remember to assume Good Faith. I am trying to help that section by getting the references right. That doesn't work if I have to do it in three places and once. Implying that I am trying to hide critique is less than polite. Best,

276:(my mistake I read too fast) The 3RR rule was designed to stop or slow down edit wars in progress. If you legitimately did not know about the 3RR or for some reason belive my ruling was unjust feel free to e-mail and I will reconsider or reduce the block. I am also checking if 1867:

on top of my own edits if you object to something? You say you will be accused of revert-warring if you edit (which is entirely untrue), but do you believe that moving your material - and hence the revert war - to another article will reflect more positively upon you? --

1106:

discussion amongst the editors in question with the goal of reaching a single, mutually acceptable article so we can end this dispute. Please get back to me over your willingness to mediate this issue. The four editors I've identified as party to this dispute are

1032:

Are you contesting the freeness of the elections of 1990 and 1996? If so, on what grounds? That it created a tyrant doesn't makle an election unfree, or we would have settled the issue by definition, whereas I for one prefer to thinkof it as a question of fact.

1718:

article. It seems to me you deleted them in a fit of pique because other editors rejected images that you had added. In my opinion, some of these images could only be described as anti-Stalin, which makes me think that your deletions were not rational.

1414:

There is only one paragraph that you have to read. It is marked with ULTRAMARINE SIGN HERE. I purposely set off the certification section, so that the certifier would not have to sign off on tons of evidence. Keeping it simple. Please assist.

1428:

Also, keep in mind, that the RfC is not about the fact that he protected the page. That was a judgement call, a poor and unnecessary one in my opinion. It is about the fact that he commited the violation of reverting before he protected.

1029:"In 1987 the position of Prime Minister was abolished, and Mugabe assumed the new office of executive President of Zimbabwe gaining additional powers in the process. He was re-elected in 1990 and 1996, and, controversially, in 2002." 1613:

If you wanted to say anything it might be best to contact user:Woohookitty first by e-mail for examples of what ArbComm is looking for. Thanks for letting us quote you on the article forking - Woohookitty (an admin) found the

535:, and that's where ye olde Energy directory has ended up, and since the VfD for the latter expanded to such bloated length and the whole VfD page is apparently choking on a lot of people... You might consider pulling it from 512: 306:; you should know about it. If you have any other ideas, let me know. I just do not want to have to spend the next year taking turns with you in reverting changes RJII insists on, despite the fact that no one agrees. 1178:

Well, it feels like I lack the commitment needed to carefully respond on on those pages, it is clearly better if I just go away, just being anti-communist (I am one, but not an extremist of any sort) is not enough to

1784:

disputed material from an old revision - from one article to another. Resolve the POV and accuracy disputes in the original article first, then write a summary of the material in question into the second article. --

1182:

I've been rereading the talk page and those other guys look so convinced that any claims can be countered by small bona-fide policies of Lenin or compatively slight injustice happening elsewhere that I stand amazed.

926:

version of these three paragraphs (and associated footnotes) floating around. (Or do you think the Pioneer fund section should be part of the History section instead? It wasn't before. It used to be section 2.3, and

1026:"A peace accord was negotiated in 1987, resulting in ZAPU's merger (1988) into the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF). Mugabe brought Nkomo into the government once again as a vice-president. 729:

Power by Ben) but we're going to mediate the whole article. Would you take a look? Go to the bottom of the Discussion for Price-Anderson and use the link in the box down there. Thanks for considering this.

1457: 1441:

You don't have to sign on to my whole reform program. I just needed someone to certify that we actually tried to correct the violation. That is the limit of your participation in this one. Best of luck. --

1524: 1493:

Also this situation looked like a matter of history repeating himself. I started at c2 more as a wiki on wiki discussion and currently as a software effort a thing that might be of interest to you

1344:"its dedication to the proposition that the present constitutional Government of the United States ultimately must be brought to ruin by any available means, including resort to force and violence" 861: 460:

Anyway, I am very confused by the four style proposals I've looked in at. I don't understand what exactly is meant by "automatic numbering" since every time I do footnotes in stories like

834: 820: 675:, or just wasn't useful article content; I wasn't attempting to "censor" anything and I ask you not to characterize it as such in your edit summaries, if you would be so kind. Thanks! 1404:

I don't need the help on the arbcom case, maybe later, thanx. Right now I need you to certify your attempt to resolve the dispute at the protect page at the above link. thanx, --

255:

I think that even a Communist state might use new technology so I do not see it as falling under the market solution, even though it is an important part of the market solution.

1543: 1154:

guessing, I've sealed the fate of any productive discussion. I'm out to regain control of my POV issue, I've never knew that my anti-Communism can get me to act so blatantly. –

1553:

You moved one of Roylee's his contributions from Utilitarianizm to Jeremy Bentham. I have removed it pending confirmation. Can you confirm it with a reputable source? Thanks.

693:

Hi Ultramarine, I'm sorry that you think my actions on this page are an abuse of power. You can always ask another administrator to review my desicision, or file an RFC. --

1850: 1371: 400: 1843: 1601: 1597: 1825: 1872: 1299: 1288: 1228: 1115: 847: 601: 1302: 489:

as fuel." Can you give us a reference? Seems pretty absurd on the fact of it, to me, since compressing air is a notoriously energy-intensive process. --

1446: 1408: 1377: 1894: 1789: 1877: 1775: 1364: 1082: 983:

Unfortunately I do not have time at the moment to investigate requests for page protection, but I note there is a large backlog. I shall mention this at

850: 1570: 1502:

causes that WCP is trying to address. So this seems paradoxical for somebody with pro free-market views to get stucked in a tragedy of the commons :)

1482:. I'm a fellow wikizen in the world wide wiki, and funnily enough I stumbled upon your troubles at Knowledge while trying to document a pattern called 1704: 1586: 1593: 1356: 1505:

I would very much value some comments/observations on this meta-wiki subject given your experience and perspective as a contributor of wikipedia.

1891: 1433: 1419: 1396: 1387: 970: 585: 576: 1688: 1664: 1044: 567: 1608: 280:

can also be blocked for this edit war. I'm not doing this because I dissagree with you and if I have made a mistake I will gladly reverse this.

1676: 1224: 106: 819: 1620: 878: 384: 1748: 1565: 1291: 536: 1650: 1246:

is the correct way to proceed in such cases? I'm fairly new to wikipedia, and not well versed in the control methods, if there are any.

767:

and have been temporarily blocked from editing. If you feel this is unfair, you're welcome to e-mail me using the link on my user page.

782: 1192: 1143: 991: 654: 623: 1235: 1770: 1089: 543: 360:

be the case for such fundamental articles. I don't have the energy to fight a losing battle over this POV eventuality. Watch this

1832: 838: 334:, but some might argue that what s/he is doing is not technically vandalism. Well, whatever you want to do, I will back you up. 608: 221:

I would prefer to continue the discussion on the discussion page of Hubberts peak so others can follow what we are discussing.

1043:

Your continued deletion of the Mugabe material from the democracy article leads me to believe you wish sources other than the

749:. Any further violations of this rule may result in your being blocked from editing for a short period of time. Thank you, 1014: 814: 1683: 1264: 1214: 649: 1009: 457:

in-line author-date parenthetical style ends up busier than footnotes for readability in the case of my particular work.

1887: 1764:

new article needs some work and some new blood, and I'll just suggest that similar contributions go over there. Thanks.

1548: 973: 502:

to produce compromise estimates between the optimistic and pessimistic camps? Or are we stuck with extremes? Thx again.

157: 1473: 1332:"proof of a serious attack on American security by the Soviet Union, with considerable assistance from an enemy within;" 1636: 955: 936: 154:

are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

1723: 1641: 915: 560: 96: 914:

Hi Ultramarine. Please don't put the pioneer fund subsection back in the main article. It belongs to the subarticle

476: 1148: 868: 638: 1814: 904: 1132: 978: 753: 188:

I also just realized we should perhaps add another paragraph to the implications of a peak section that mentions

173: 91: 1468: 672: 660: 419: 303: 211:

I have tried to move the critique. I will add that those critical are not denying that fossil fuels will end.

86: 793: 1883: 1753: 1219: 1076: 27: 1019:

My statements on this subject are perfectly consistent with the account given in the wikipedia article on

1269: 742: 116: 66: 1458:

Knowledge:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 November 7#Category:Soviet spies to Category:Aed Soviet spies

681: 613: 121: 1840: 1829: 1709: 628: 595: 482: 425: 111: 922:

versions already. Keeping the notes and footnotes in order is a hell already, I really don't need a

897:

article was recently blocked. What you may not know is that he attacked you and me in his defense.

527: 1736: 274:

I see that you posted on the 3RR board that there is no rule against being involved in an edit war.

56: 1064: 1856: 1657: 1133: 1102: 1095: 642: 131: 126: 71: 688: 1670: 798: 393: 339: 311: 151: 1139:

You may be interested in the edits I amde to the above page and my comments in its talk page.

604:, have indicated my comments there. I would appreciate your support by voting delete. Thanks, 1284: 947: 664: 532: 287: 136: 101: 17: 1048: 1023:, an article (as you can see from the page history) that I had nothing to do with creating. 841:. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. 552: 496: 399: 51: 1350:"its existence a clear present and continuing danger to the security of the United States". 1335:

or the Findings and Declarations of Fact in the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950,

909: 771: 506: 444: 433: 411: 239: 204: 76: 548: 531:

Since I can probably assume you don't, and I doubt anybody would, object to an article at

26: 8: 1558: 1240: 620: 193: 167: 147: 61: 46: 1094: 1315:"it has never been a significant internal threat to the liberal democracies themselves" 1188: 1172: 1159: 1119: 996: 960: 811: 718: 600:

Whoever wrote that article is off with the fairies. i concur with your vfd listing for

81: 41: 1700:

Anyway, I won't past them here, but they'll be in the history of main your user space

361: 229: 1839:

Actually, case 2 is now closed, but I see no-one has updated it. I'd better do that!

1811: 1320: 1207: 1198: 1126: 1052: 1037: 898: 389: 335: 307: 317:

They will likely turn down a request for arbitration until you have first exhausted

1605: 1521:

in an economy (wiki as economy) that is essentially built on communist principles.

1232: 1107: 1070: 1047:

article Itself. What about the external refs that article provides? Like this one?

573: 490: 281: 256: 247: 222: 1392:

I just restored it, I wanted to know I had a certifier before I did. -- thanx, --

1337: 1819: 1767: 1633: 1626: 1540: 1443: 1430: 1416: 1405: 1393: 1384: 1374: 1261: 1111: 1006: 952: 941: 855: 768: 764: 503: 441: 430: 408: 236: 201: 143: 1869: 1786: 1701: 1661: 1647: 1554: 1461: 1276: 1140: 1086: 1002: 988: 901: 668: 582: 564: 540: 486: 388:

Then go to the "Evidence page" and follow their guidelines to put in evidence!

163: 1065:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Agiantman

717: 1800: 1794: 1715: 1255: 1184: 1168: 1155: 1063:

You comments about the Rfc page created to harrass me would be appreciated.

1020: 808: 804: 790: 750: 725: 706: 634: 605: 465: 461: 269: 197: 1494: 1058: 263: 1808: 1680: 984: 470: 825: 327: 318: 1760: 1690: 1617: 1583: 1465: 1451: 1353: 884: 875: 865: 776: 736: 730: 331: 1483: 1535: 1479: 966: 933: 862:

Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Conspiracy allegations about Harry Magdoff

350: 142:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have.

1804: 1525:

Race and intelligence (Culture-only or partially-genetic explanation)

1383:

Ultramarine, are you available and willing to certify at this time?--

1199: 711: 676: 646: 372: 277: 189: 31: 1656:

OK, I've made the application now, you can follow the link from the

1311:

Please allow me to indulge an answer to Mihnea Tudoreanu's question,

1101:

I've been asked to investigate whether the ongoing dispute over the

700: 1744: 1069:

Also, you may want to vote on the the proposed wikistalking policy

890: 786: 694: 563:

and remove {{Knowledge:Votes for deletion/List of energy topics}}.

1732: 581:...I removed the vfd tag, so this long chapter should be over. :) 179: 1697:

account like that; if I were you I'd take it up with Knowledge.

1280: 513: 1799:(posted to 172 and Ultramarine). Please be very careful of the 1575:

Hi, I'm one of the principals in the ArbComm case against Ben.

894: 485:

you've put in " Several companies are proposing vehicles using

1675:

The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the

296: 216:

A peak soon would indeed cause a depression and energy crises.

451: 321:. However, understand that this mechanism is for conflicts 1256:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Theo_Pardilla

987:

and hopefully other admins will have time to deal with it.

1602:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Benjamin Gatti/Workshop

1598:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Benjamin Gatti/Evidence

1826:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Climate_change_dispute

1049:

http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=2192&l=1

746: 520: 346:

What do you mean by "No censorship of Rothbard"? -- Anon.

1250: 1229:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Ultramarine/Evidence

1321:

Moynihan Commssion on Government Secrecy, Appendix A,

378: 1001:

Yes, I see no workable alternative. I am filing an

874:

Thanks for looking. Let me know if I can be of help.

559:

Oh! It was under May 5, sorry! I meant going back to

522:

_List_of_energy_topics-2005-05-06T15:40:00.000Z": -->

515:

_List_of_energy_topics-2005-05-06T15:40:00.000Z": -->

1851:

Will you please do me the favor of READING my edits?

1083:

Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/User:Robert_McClenon

1855:I did not delete any of the material you added to 1730:and let your edits have a chance to be discussed. 1592:I received the following message late last night: 1594:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Benjamin Gatti 763:Hi, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at 758: 637:. If you wish to appeal please contact another 246:You have some good points. Will try to change. 1807:. I'd hate to have to block either of you. -- 1714:I have restored the images you deleted in the 1677:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Ultramarine 1225:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Ultramarine 107:Knowledge:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense 1460:. This is a direct attack on the sourcing of 705:I just want you to know that your efforts on 633:You have been blocked for 24 hours under the 356:socio-economic system called capitalism), as 1596:has been accepted. Please place evidence on 1878:Have you read IQ and the Wealth of Nations? 1776:Moving material from one article to another 1456:If you got a minute can you take a look at 1365:Could you assist in certifying the dispute? 1863:my edits, commenting upon them, and, yes, 1600:. Proposals and comments may be placed on 1571:Arbitration Hearing Against Benjamin Gatti 860:If you have a moment could you look in at 783:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Ultramarine 1495:http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiChangeProposal 1015:Robert Mugabe and tyranny of the majority 1529:This article is clearly POV, terms like 1005:You are still welcome to suggest one. 1474:Untitled Contribution By Anonymous User 839:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion 803:Try to click at any "ISBN" link in the 14: 1338:50 U.S.Code, Chap. 23 Sub. IV Sec. 841 900:Thanks for keeping Knowledge honest -- 807:reference section to see what I mean. 37:Here are some links I thought useful: 1484:http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WoodenLanguage 1251:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Negawatt 1227:has been accepted. Place evidence at 477:Compressed air for vehicle propulsion 268:I have blocked you for 24 hours on a 1480:http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CostinCozianu 667:that I thought was not in line with 659:Hi! I've removed some material from 655:Characterizing edits as "censorship" 553:_Master_List_of_Energy_Topics_-: --> 549:_Master_List_of_Energy_Topics_-: --> 544:_Master_List_of_Energy_Topics_-: --> 528:_Master_List_of_Energy_Topics_-: --> 521:_Master_List_of_Energy_Topics_-: --> 514:_Master_List_of_Energy_Topics_-: --> 1828:& thats just the first one :-) 946:Thanks for all your recent work on 518:Master List of Energy Topics -: --> 424:I noticed an edit you made over on 23: 835:Image:Victim of Lenin's Famine.jpg 821:Image:Victim of Lenin's Famine.jpg 572:I have removed it from the queue. 420:geothermal as renewable/depletable 24: 1905: 1824:I challenge your arbcomm claims: 1275:communism. But, as Matthew White 916:Race and intelligence controversy 97:Knowledge:Pages needing attention 1743: 1731: 1317:; See the published findings of 1175:) 03:29, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 1162:) 00:59, August 29, 2005 (UTC) 1055:19:29, September 5, 2005 (UTC) 918:, where it currently exists in 92:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 1780:Please do not copy material - 1582:Thanks for your help, . . . . 1236:20:39, 21 September 2005 (UTC) 1215:18:24, 16 September 2005 (UTC) 1193:20:07, 17 September 2005 (UTC) 661:Religiousness and intelligence 383:Go here and make a statement: 13: 1: 1890:. Have you read that book? -- 1749:16:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 1705:20:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 1684:17:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC) 1665:11:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1651:10:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 1621:10:33, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 1609:03:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 1544:02:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 1469:20:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC) 1129:17:37, August 22, 2005 (UTC) 1040:18:55, August 19, 2005 (UTC) 781:You are subject to an RfC at 407:re-add the transwiki notice? 364:for further generic details. 304:Knowledge:Request for comment 87:Knowledge:Conflict resolution 1895:02:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 1884:IQ and the Wealth of Nations 1873:17:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 1844:13:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 1833:11:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 1815:07:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 1790:05:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 1771:11:21, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 1689:Edits to your user space of 1637:18:36, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 1587:21:47, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 1566:20:49, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 1447:15:32, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 1434:15:07, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 1420:15:03, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 1409:14:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 1397:14:13, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 1388:13:48, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 1378:08:21, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 1357:16:53, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 1303:21:52, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 1292:20:54, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 1265:01:06, 29 October 2005 (UTC) 554:_List_of_energy_topics": --> 550:_List_of_energy_topics": --> 545:_List_of_energy_topics": --> 529:_List_of_energy_topics": --> 7: 1549:Roylee pernicious vandalism 1144:11:06, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 1090:19:01, 21 August 2005 (UTC) 1010:17:31, 18 August 2005 (UTC) 992:09:49, 18 August 2005 (UTC) 974:12:04, 10 August 2005 (UTC) 951:involved in more than one! 773:01:38, July 20, 2005 (UTC) 743:Knowledge:three revert rule 561:edit the VfDs for that page 176:) 12:52, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) 117:Knowledge:Featured pictures 67:Knowledge:Cite your sources 10: 1910: 1882:You have been editing the 1646:I don't see why not, yeah 1326:(1997) for this statement, 956:20:29, 7 August 2005 (UTC) 937:11:12, 3 August 2005 (UTC) 879:20:22, 3 August 2005 (UTC) 122:Knowledge:Boilerplate text 1870:Nikodemos (f.k.a. Mihnea) 1787:Nikodemos (f.k.a. Mihnea) 1642:DPT As A Featured Article 905:03:55, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 869:14:57, 27 July 2005 (UTC) 851:08:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC) 815:01:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC) 794:00:23, 21 July 2005 (UTC) 754:21:44, 11 July 2005 (UTC) 697:23:35, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) 689:Definitions of capitalism 685:05:17, 2005 May 29 (UTC) 509:04:53, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) 497:thx for adding the images 493:15:14, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) 483:Future energy development 473:02:25, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC) 436:20:31, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) 426:Future energy development 401:Definitions of capitalism 396:19:42, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) 375:02:49, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC) 342:19:35, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) 314:17:49, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) 242:14:01, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) 207:05:57, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC) 112:Knowledge:Brilliant prose 1149:Sorry for Vladimir Lenin 733:7 July 2005 13:28 (UTC) 714:3 July 2005 18:37 (UTC) 650:21:20, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 624:03:25, 21 May 2005 (UTC) 447:20:57, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) 416:03:52, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 328:look here for the policy 293:20:27, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) 259:14:55, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) 250:14:12, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) 225:06:06, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC) 57:Knowledge:Policy Library 1857:Criticisms of communism 1658:Democratic Peace Theory 1134:Democratic Peace Theory 1103:Criticisms of communism 1096:Criticisms of communism 979:Page protection request 609:12:40, 8 May 2005 (UTC) 586:17:16, 6 May 2005 (UTC) 577:17:07, 6 May 2005 (UTC) 568:16:51, 6 May 2005 (UTC) 546:15:40, 6 May 2005 (UTC) 517:Energy directory -: --> 319:the mediation mechanism 132:Knowledge:Mailing lists 127:Knowledge:Current polls 72:Knowledge:Verifiability 1888:09:05, 23 January 2005 1722:Also, looking at your 1285:military dictatorships 830:Image deletion warning 741:You have violated the 230:Hubbert new technology 152:Knowledge:Village pump 948:race and intelligence 665:Intelligence quotient 602:Magic wheel generator 533:List of energy topics 519:List of energy topics 137:Knowledge:IRC channel 102:Knowledge:Peer review 18:User talk:Ultramarine 1841:William M. Connolley 1830:William M. Connolley 1754:Move to Forex scams? 1373:for certification.-- 1220:Arbitration accepted 1077:Request for Comments 1003:arbitration request. 673:no original research 77:Knowledge:Wikiquette 1270:A personal question 837:has been listed at 332:see this for action 194:economic depression 148:Knowledge:Help desk 62:Knowledge:Utilities 52:M:Foundation issues 47:Knowledge:Help desk 1210:Stevie is the man! 969:, not Cybil Burt. 719:Price-Anderson Act 614:Ad Hominem Attacks 82:Knowledge:Civility 42:Knowledge:Tutorial 1710:Excessive editing 1562: 1206:make over his. — 1167:from going nuts.– 1059:Items of interest 889:As you may know, 845: 844: 635:three revert rule 629:Three revert rule 596:Magic fairy wheel 414: 270:three revert rule 264:3RR on Capatalism 1901: 1747: 1741: 1735: 1560: 1300:Mihnea Tudoreanu 1289:Mihnea Tudoreanu 1212: 1116:Mihnea Tudoreanu 848:Mihnea Tudoreanu 826: 555: 551: 530: 523: 516: 412: 1909: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1880: 1853: 1822: 1797: 1778: 1756: 1737: 1712: 1694: 1673: 1644: 1629: 1573: 1551: 1527: 1476: 1464:. Thank you. 1454: 1367: 1272: 1243: 1222: 1208: 1203: 1151: 1137: 1112:Septentrionalis 1099: 1079: 1061: 1041: 1017: 1007:Septentrionalis 999: 981: 963: 944: 912: 887: 858: 824: 801: 779: 765:Communist State 761: 745:on the article 739: 722: 703: 691: 684: 657: 631: 616: 598: 525: 499: 479: 454: 422: 404: 381: 353: 299: 266: 232: 182: 144:Knowledge:About 35: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1907: 1886:article since 1879: 1876: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1821: 1818: 1796: 1793: 1777: 1774: 1755: 1752: 1711: 1708: 1693: 1687: 1672: 1671:Final decision 1669: 1668: 1667: 1643: 1640: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1615: 1611: 1572: 1569: 1550: 1547: 1526: 1523: 1478:Hi there from 1475: 1472: 1462:Venona project 1453: 1450: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1423: 1422: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1347: 1341: 1340:, which reads, 1336: 1334: 1328: 1327: 1318: 1312: 1306: 1305: 1271: 1268: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1242: 1239: 1221: 1218: 1202: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1180: 1176: 1150: 1147: 1136: 1131: 1098: 1093: 1078: 1075: 1060: 1057: 1035: 1016: 1013: 998: 995: 980: 977: 962: 959: 943: 940: 911: 908: 886: 883: 882: 881: 864:. Thank you. 857: 854: 843: 842: 832: 823: 818: 800: 799:Bibliographies 797: 778: 775: 760: 757: 738: 735: 724:The battle on 721: 716: 702: 699: 690: 687: 680: 656: 653: 630: 627: 621:Benjamin Gatti 615: 612: 597: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 524: 511: 498: 495: 487:compressed air 478: 475: 453: 450: 449: 448: 421: 418: 403: 398: 380: 377: 368: 352: 351:Capita...cake! 349: 348: 347: 298: 295: 265: 262: 261: 260: 252: 251: 231: 228: 227: 226: 218: 217: 213: 212: 181: 178: 140: 139: 134: 129: 124: 119: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 79: 74: 69: 64: 59: 54: 49: 44: 34: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1906: 1897: 1896: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1875: 1874: 1871: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1845: 1842: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1834: 1831: 1827: 1817: 1816: 1813: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1792: 1791: 1788: 1783: 1773: 1772: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1740: 1734: 1729: 1725: 1724:contributions 1720: 1717: 1716:Joseph Stalin 1707: 1706: 1703: 1698: 1692: 1686: 1685: 1682: 1678: 1666: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1649: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1622: 1619: 1616: 1612: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1585: 1580: 1576: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1556: 1546: 1545: 1542: 1539: 1538: 1532: 1522: 1520: 1516: 1510: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1487: 1485: 1481: 1471: 1470: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1449: 1448: 1445: 1435: 1432: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1407: 1398: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1358: 1355: 1351: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1316: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1257: 1254: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1238: 1237: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1217: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1201: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1181: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1161: 1157: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1135: 1130: 1128: 1123: 1121: 1120:Robert A West 1117: 1113: 1109: 1104: 1097: 1092: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1074: 1072: 1067: 1066: 1056: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1045:Robert Migabe 1039: 1034: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1021:Robert Mugabe 1012: 1011: 1008: 1004: 994: 993: 990: 986: 976: 975: 972: 968: 958: 957: 954: 949: 939: 938: 935: 930: 925: 921: 917: 907: 906: 903: 899: 896: 892: 880: 877: 873: 872: 871: 870: 867: 863: 853: 852: 849: 840: 836: 833: 831: 828: 827: 822: 817: 816: 813: 810: 806: 805:Joseph Stalin 796: 795: 792: 788: 784: 774: 772: 770: 766: 756: 755: 752: 748: 744: 734: 732: 727: 726:nuclear power 720: 715: 713: 708: 707:Nuclear power 701:Nuclear power 698: 696: 686: 683: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 652: 651: 648: 644: 640: 639:administrator 636: 626: 625: 622: 611: 610: 607: 603: 587: 584: 580: 579: 578: 575: 571: 570: 569: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 547: 542: 538: 534: 510: 508: 505: 494: 492: 488: 484: 474: 472: 467: 466:Tanya Donelly 463: 462:Kristin Hersh 458: 446: 443: 439: 438: 437: 435: 432: 427: 417: 415: 410: 402: 397: 395: 391: 386: 385: 376: 374: 367: 366: 363: 359: 345: 344: 343: 341: 337: 333: 329: 324: 320: 315: 313: 309: 305: 294: 292: 290: 286: 284: 279: 275: 271: 258: 254: 253: 249: 245: 244: 243: 241: 238: 224: 220: 219: 215: 214: 210: 209: 208: 206: 203: 199: 198:Energy crisis 195: 191: 186: 177: 175: 172: 169: 165: 161: 159: 155: 153: 149: 145: 138: 135: 133: 130: 128: 125: 123: 120: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 63: 60: 58: 55: 53: 50: 48: 45: 43: 40: 39: 38: 33: 29: 19: 1881: 1864: 1860: 1854: 1823: 1798: 1782:particularly 1781: 1779: 1766: 1757: 1738: 1727: 1721: 1713: 1699: 1695: 1674: 1645: 1630: 1581: 1577: 1574: 1552: 1536: 1531:discredited, 1530: 1528: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1507: 1504: 1499: 1492: 1488: 1477: 1455: 1440: 1403: 1368: 1352:Thank you. 1349: 1343: 1331: 1323:The Cold War 1322: 1314: 1273: 1260: 1244: 1223: 1209: 1204: 1152: 1138: 1127:Kelly Martin 1124: 1100: 1080: 1068: 1062: 1053:Christofurio 1042: 1038:Christofurio 1031: 1028: 1025: 1018: 1000: 982: 965:His name is 964: 945: 928: 923: 919: 913: 910:Pioneer fund 888: 859: 846: 829: 802: 780: 762: 740: 723: 704: 692: 658: 643:mailing list 632: 617: 599: 526: 504:zen master 500: 480: 459: 455: 442:zen master 431:zen master 423: 405: 390:Slrubenstein 387: 382: 369: 365: 357: 354: 336:Slrubenstein 322: 316: 308:Slrubenstein 300: 288: 282: 273: 267: 237:zen master 233: 202:zen master 187: 183: 180:Hubbert peak 170: 162: 156: 141: 36: 1761:Forex scams 1691:December 27 1606:Fred Bauder 1579:page then? 1519:unavoidable 1241:I need help 1233:Fred Bauder 1179:contribute. 1108:Ultramarine 1081:Please see 574:Ultramarine 491:Wtshymanski 362:flash video 272:violation. 257:Ultramarine 248:Ultramarine 223:Ultramarine 1768:Smallbones 1634:Silverback 1500:economical 1444:Silverback 1431:Silverback 1417:Silverback 1406:Silverback 1394:Silverback 1385:Silverback 1375:Silverback 1262:Sillybilly 997:Acts 25:12 967:Cyril Burt 961:Cyril Burt 953:Jokestress 769:SlimVirgin 710:lifted. -- 297:Capitalism 1892:hitssquad 1805:Holodomor 1728:slow down 1702:Robdurbar 1662:Robdurbar 1648:Robdurbar 1555:Hipocrite 1200:Democracy 1141:Robdurbar 1125:Regards, 1087:Agiantman 989:Thryduulf 971:hitssquad 902:Agiantman 583:Samaritan 565:Samaritan 541:Samaritan 537:the queue 452:Footnotes 413:speak up! 278:User:RJII 190:recession 164:Sam_Spade 32:Knowledge 1739:Camillus 1614:history. 1515:inherent 1513:this is 751:Gentgeen 606:THE KING 174:contribs 1865:editing 1861:reading 1820:Arbcomm 1681:Raul654 1627:limited 1442:thanx-- 1281:Fascism 942:Thanks! 893:of the 856:Magdoff 641:or the 471:Emerman 323:between 158:Be Bold 30:to the 28:Welcome 1679:case. 1618:Simesa 1584:Simesa 895:Stalin 731:Simesa 379:URGENT 196:, and 150:, and 1660:page 1346:, and 1185:Gnomz 1169:Gnomz 1156:Gnomz 985:WP:AN 934:Arbor 924:third 809:mikka 440:thx. 394:Talk 340:Talk 312:Talk 285:roken 16:< 1812:aran 1561:Talk 1541:(ix) 1466:nobs 1354:nobs 1319:the 1283:and 1118:and 1071:here 876:nobs 866:nobs 791:Talk 712:Yath 677:Demi 671:and 669:NPOV 663:and 647:Geni 409:Slac 373:El_C 358:must 291:egue 168:talk 1809:Pak 1803:on 1801:3RR 1795:3RR 1537:Fad 1452:CfD 1085:.-- 929:all 920:two 891:172 885:172 812:(t) 787:172 777:RfC 759:3RR 747:DDT 737:DDT 695:Duk 481:In 464:or 392:| 338:| 310:| 1835:. 1632:-- 1604:. 1557:- 1429:-- 1415:-- 1231:. 1191:) 1114:, 1110:, 1073:. 1051:-- 1036:-- 789:| 785:. 539:? 507:T 445:T 434:T 330:, 240:T 205:T 200:. 192:, 160:! 146:, 1846:. 1563:» 1559:« 1517:/ 1189:? 1187:( 1183:– 1173:? 1171:( 1160:? 1158:( 682:C 679:/ 645:. 326:( 289:S 283:B 171:· 166:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index