1694:
144:
1708:
364:
no legally valid decision (that is, the purported decision is legally a nullity) there is no "decision" to which an ouster clause can apply. The Lords found the purported decision to be invalid (a nullity), because the tribunal had misconstrued the term "successor in title". Since the tribunal's determination that
Anisminic did not qualify for compensation was null, Anisminic were entitled to a share of the compensation paid by the Egyptian government.
36:
378:
325:. c. 12) to distribute compensation paid by the Egyptian government to the UK government with respect to British properties it had nationalised. Anisminic claimed that they were eligible for compensation under the Orders, and the claim was determined by a tribunal (the respondents in this case) set up under the Foreign Compensation Act.
434:
The decision illustrates the courts' reluctance to give effect to any legislative provision that attempts to exclude their jurisdiction in judicial review. Even when such an exclusion is relatively clearly worded, the courts will hold that it does not preclude them from scrutinising the decision on
363:
By a 3–2 majority, the House of Lords decided that section 4(4) of the
Foreign Compensation Act did not preclude a court from reviewing the tribunal's decision. It said that a court is always able to inquire whether there has actually been a "decision", meaning a legally valid decision. If there is
350:
There were two important issues. The first was whether the tribunal had made an error of law when construing the term "successor in title". The second issue, which had important implications for the law on judicial review, was whether a court's jurisdiction to review a tribunal's decision could be
355:" in the relevant legislation even if the tribunal had made an error of law. Such a clause was section 4(4) of the Foreign Compensation Act: "The determination by the commission of any application made to them under this Act shall not be called into question in any court of law."
53:
318:
328:
The tribunal decided that
Anisminic were not eligible for compensation, because TEDO, their "successors in title", did not have British nationality, as required by the Orders.
17:
310:
government before
November 1956. Anisminic then sold the mining properties to The Economic Development Organisation (TEDO), owned by the Egyptian government, in 1957.
100:
72:
79:
1768:
1758:
86:
68:
1753:
1675:
93:
395:
1101:
659:
558:
462:
421:
119:
403:
1215:
1084:
1670:
1017:
918:
1177:
811:
388:
272:
230:
57:
1763:
530:
1337:
816:
218:
267:
made by a public body will make its decision a nullity and that a statutory exclusion clause (known as an
1332:
206:
1307:
806:
256:
1390:
1748:
1185:
1167:
260:
1519:
1560:
1347:
836:
821:
399:
302:
some mining properties of the appellant
Anisminic (renamed from Sinai Mining Co.) located in the
46:
1615:
1600:
340:
202:
1719:
1312:
990:
801:
438:
It also establishes that any error of law by a public body will result in its decision being
336:
252:
1440:
786:
8:
1595:
735:
652:
1410:
1069:
923:
908:
886:
630:
610:
563:
553:
1395:
1317:
1155:
898:
893:
846:
771:
765:
605:
523:
482:
1400:
1367:
866:
730:
725:
690:
474:
314:
214:
503:
187:
1649:
1622:
1610:
1590:
1524:
1502:
1482:
1477:
1457:
1322:
1302:
1297:
1200:
1160:
871:
796:
720:
705:
625:
344:
332:
303:
1726:
1534:
1452:
1041:
1007:
958:
943:
715:
620:
600:
590:
154:
286:, foreclose the ability judicial review, and is mirrored in numerous cases in
1742:
1580:
1539:
1425:
1405:
1377:
1327:
1292:
1266:
1261:
1254:
1205:
1145:
985:
975:
933:
856:
851:
781:
740:
664:
486:
352:
268:
234:
1712:
1462:
1430:
1385:
1123:
1118:
1089:
1002:
980:
948:
881:
861:
755:
695:
685:
637:
595:
573:
516:
478:
264:
238:
1634:
1575:
1565:
1362:
1357:
1195:
1096:
1012:
971:
938:
903:
826:
750:
700:
615:
440:
299:
210:
143:
1698:
1627:
1507:
1445:
1190:
1111:
1106:
1064:
1046:
1034:
995:
841:
831:
791:
776:
760:
710:
647:
642:
504:
Anisminic v
Foreign Compensation Commission – full text of the decision
287:
1605:
1570:
1512:
1487:
1352:
1249:
1237:
1222:
1210:
1138:
1056:
1029:
913:
322:
1693:
406:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
35:
1654:
1639:
1342:
1227:
1024:
568:
279:
1544:
1492:
1472:
1420:
1232:
1150:
966:
928:
876:
1644:
1497:
1242:
1133:
1128:
1074:
745:
1585:
1529:
1435:
1276:
1079:
578:
335:
of the tribunal's decision. Anisminic were successful in the
307:
1467:
1415:
1271:
669:
585:
435:
an error of law and quashing it when such an error occurs.
278:
The case is seen as emblematic for and has fostered a wide
539:
271:) does not deprive the courts of their jurisdiction in
508:
467:
Cambridge
Journal of International and Comparative Law
463:"The Supreme Court and the New Judicial Independence"
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
282:on the possibility of a government to ultimately,
347:; Anisminic then appealed to the House of Lords.
69:"Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission"
1740:
248:Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
137:Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
524:
275:unless it expressly states this intention.
18:Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission
531:
517:
142:
422:Learn how and when to remove this message
343:), but this decision was reversed by the
120:Learn how and when to remove this message
1676:History of the American legal profession
460:
14:
1769:United Kingdom constitutional case law
1759:United Kingdom administrative case law
1741:
512:
371:
58:adding citations to reliable sources
29:
24:
25:
1780:
660:Restitution and unjust enrichment
497:
1707:
1706:
1692:
376:
255:case from the House of Lords in
34:
1754:1968 in United Kingdom case law
1671:History of the legal profession
367:
45:needs additional citations for
454:
13:
1:
447:
319:Foreign Compensation Act 1950
306:peninsula were seized by the
7:
402:the claims made and adding
358:
207:Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest
10:
1785:
1338:International legal theory
817:International slavery laws
812:International human rights
807:International criminal law
257:English administrative law
164:17 December 1968
27:UK constitutional law case
1686:
1663:
1553:
1391:Administration of justice
1376:
1285:
1176:
1055:
957:
678:
546:
263:", which states that any
229:
224:
198:
193:
183:
175:
160:
150:
141:
136:
1168:Basic structure doctrine
1018:Natural and legal rights
899:Public international law
293:
261:collateral fact doctrine
1348:Principle of typicality
822:International trade law
538:
461:Neudorf, Lorne (2012).
479:10.7574/cjicl.01.02.39
259:. It established the "
1343:Principle of legality
1102:Delegated legislation
802:Intellectual property
253:UK constitutional law
1764:House of Lords cases
1561:Barristers' chambers
1503:Legal representation
1441:Justice of the peace
787:Financial regulation
317:were made under the
179:2 AC 147, 2 WLR 163
54:improve this article
1596:Election commission
1308:Expressive function
837:Landlord–tenant law
736:Consumer protection
298:As a result of the
1554:Legal institutions
1421:Lawsuit/Litigation
1411:Dispute resolution
1216:Catholic canon law
924:State of emergency
887:Will and testament
611:Law of obligations
564:Constitutional law
554:Administrative law
387:possibly contains
313:In 1959 and 1962,
1736:
1735:
1396:Constitutionalism
1318:Law and economics
1156:Act of parliament
894:Product liability
847:Legal archaeology
772:Environmental law
766:Entertainment law
606:International law
432:
431:
424:
389:original research
331:Anisminic sought
315:Orders in Council
244:
243:
188:BAILII Transcript
130:
129:
122:
104:
16:(Redirected from
1776:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1697:
1696:
1520:Question of fact
1401:Criminal justice
731:Construction law
726:Conflict of laws
691:Agricultural law
533:
526:
519:
510:
509:
491:
490:
458:
427:
420:
416:
413:
407:
404:inline citations
380:
379:
372:
351:excluded by an "
215:Lord Wilberforce
194:Court membership
171:
169:
146:
134:
133:
125:
118:
114:
111:
105:
103:
62:
38:
30:
21:
1784:
1783:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1749:1968 in England
1739:
1738:
1737:
1732:
1705:
1691:
1682:
1659:
1650:Political party
1623:Legal education
1611:Law enforcement
1591:Court of equity
1549:
1525:Question of law
1478:Practice of law
1458:Judicial review
1372:
1323:Legal formalism
1303:Comparative law
1298:Contract theory
1281:
1201:Legal pluralism
1172:
1161:Act of Congress
1085:Executive order
1051:
953:
872:Nationality law
797:Immigration law
721:Competition law
674:
542:
537:
500:
495:
494:
459:
455:
450:
428:
417:
411:
408:
393:
381:
377:
370:
361:
345:Court of Appeal
333:judicial review
296:
273:judicial review
231:Judicial review
167:
165:
126:
115:
109:
106:
63:
61:
51:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1782:
1772:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1734:
1733:
1731:
1730:
1723:
1716:
1702:
1699:Law portal
1687:
1684:
1683:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1667:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1658:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1608:
1603:
1598:
1593:
1588:
1583:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1563:
1557:
1555:
1551:
1550:
1548:
1547:
1542:
1537:
1535:Trial advocacy
1532:
1527:
1522:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1510:
1505:
1500:
1495:
1490:
1485:
1475:
1470:
1465:
1460:
1455:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1443:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1382:
1380:
1374:
1373:
1371:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1295:
1289:
1287:
1283:
1282:
1280:
1279:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1225:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1182:
1180:
1174:
1173:
1171:
1170:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1087:
1082:
1072:
1067:
1065:Ballot measure
1061:
1059:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1049:
1044:
1042:Legal treatise
1039:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1010:
1008:Letters patent
1005:
1000:
999:
998:
988:
983:
978:
969:
963:
961:
959:Sources of law
955:
954:
952:
951:
946:
944:Unenforced law
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
916:
911:
906:
901:
896:
891:
890:
889:
884:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
849:
844:
839:
834:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
774:
769:
763:
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
716:Commercial law
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
682:
680:
676:
675:
673:
672:
667:
662:
657:
656:
655:
645:
640:
635:
634:
633:
628:
618:
613:
608:
603:
598:
593:
588:
583:
582:
581:
571:
566:
561:
556:
550:
548:
544:
543:
536:
535:
528:
521:
513:
507:
506:
499:
498:External links
496:
493:
492:
452:
451:
449:
446:
430:
429:
384:
382:
375:
369:
366:
360:
357:
295:
292:
251:2 AC 147 is a
242:
241:
227:
226:
222:
221:
200:
199:Judges sitting
196:
195:
191:
190:
185:
181:
180:
177:
173:
172:
162:
158:
157:
155:House of Lords
152:
148:
147:
139:
138:
128:
127:
42:
40:
33:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1781:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1750:
1747:
1746:
1744:
1729:
1728:
1724:
1722:
1721:
1717:
1715:
1714:
1703:
1701:
1700:
1695:
1689:
1688:
1685:
1677:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1669:
1668:
1666:
1662:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1629:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1621:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1609:
1607:
1604:
1602:
1599:
1597:
1594:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1581:Civil society
1579:
1577:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1567:
1564:
1562:
1559:
1558:
1556:
1552:
1546:
1543:
1541:
1540:Trier of fact
1538:
1536:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1526:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1506:
1504:
1501:
1499:
1496:
1494:
1491:
1489:
1486:
1484:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1476:
1474:
1471:
1469:
1466:
1464:
1461:
1459:
1456:
1454:
1451:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1426:Legal opinion
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1406:Court-martial
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1383:
1381:
1379:
1378:Jurisprudence
1375:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1290:
1288:
1284:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1267:Statutory law
1265:
1263:
1262:Socialist law
1260:
1256:
1255:Byzantine law
1253:
1252:
1251:
1248:
1244:
1241:
1239:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1226:
1224:
1221:
1217:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:Religious law
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1179:
1178:Legal systems
1175:
1169:
1166:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:Statutory law
1144:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1113:
1110:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1095:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1058:
1054:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
997:
994:
993:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
976:Statutory law
973:
970:
968:
965:
964:
962:
960:
956:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
934:Transport law
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
888:
885:
883:
880:
879:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
852:Legal fiction
850:
848:
845:
843:
840:
838:
835:
833:
830:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
782:Financial law
780:
778:
775:
773:
770:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
741:Corporate law
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
683:
681:
677:
671:
668:
666:
665:Statutory law
663:
661:
658:
654:
651:
650:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
632:
629:
627:
624:
623:
622:
619:
617:
614:
612:
609:
607:
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
580:
577:
576:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
560:
557:
555:
552:
551:
549:
547:Core subjects
545:
541:
534:
529:
527:
522:
520:
515:
514:
511:
505:
502:
501:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
457:
453:
445:
443:
442:
436:
426:
423:
415:
405:
401:
397:
391:
390:
385:This section
383:
374:
373:
365:
356:
354:
353:ouster clause
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
311:
309:
305:
301:
291:
289:
285:
281:
276:
274:
270:
269:ouster clause
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
240:
236:
235:Ouster clause
232:
228:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
197:
192:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
163:
159:
156:
153:
149:
145:
140:
135:
132:
124:
121:
113:
102:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71: –
70:
66:
65:Find sources:
59:
55:
49:
48:
43:This article
41:
37:
32:
31:
19:
1725:
1718:
1704:
1690:
1463:Jurisdiction
1431:Legal remedy
1386:Adjudication
1286:Legal theory
1124:Ratification
1119:Promulgation
1090:Proclamation
1070:Codification
1003:Human rights
991:Divine right
981:Constitution
949:Women in law
867:Military law
862:Marriage law
857:Maritime law
756:Election law
696:Aviation law
686:Abortion law
638:Property law
574:Criminal law
473:(2): 25–43.
470:
466:
456:
439:
437:
433:
418:
409:
386:
368:Significance
362:
349:
330:
327:
312:
297:
290:countries.
283:
277:
265:error of law
247:
246:
245:
239:Error of law
219:Lord Pearson
131:
116:
107:
97:
90:
83:
76:
64:
52:Please help
47:verification
44:
1635:Legislature
1566:Bureaucracy
1363:Rule of man
1358:Rule of law
1333:Libertarian
1196:Chinese law
1097:Legislation
1047:Regulations
1035:Law reports
1013:Natural law
909:Reparations
904:Refugee law
827:Jurimetrics
768:(Media law)
706:Banking law
701:Amnesty law
679:Disciplines
616:Private law
441:ultra vires
300:Suez Crisis
284:in any case
211:Lord Pearce
1743:Categories
1628:Law school
1508:Prosecutor
1446:Magistrate
1233:Jewish law
1191:Common law
1112:Rulemaking
1107:Regulation
1057:Law making
996:Divine law
972:Legal code
919:Sports law
842:Law of war
792:Health law
777:Family law
761:Energy law
711:Bankruptcy
648:Punishment
643:Public law
448:References
396:improve it
337:High Court
288:common law
184:Transcript
168:1968-12-17
80:newspapers
1606:Judiciary
1601:Executive
1576:The bench
1513:Solicitor
1488:Barrister
1368:Sociology
1353:Pseudolaw
1293:Anarchist
1250:Roman law
1238:Parsi law
1223:Hindu law
1211:Canon law
1186:Civil law
1139:Concordat
1030:Precedent
939:Trust law
914:Space law
751:Drugs law
621:Procedure
559:Civil law
487:2050-1706
400:verifying
323:14 Geo. 6
203:Lord Reid
1713:Category
1655:Tribunal
1640:Military
1483:Attorney
1453:Judgment
1313:Feminist
1228:Jain law
1025:Case law
746:Cyberlaw
653:Corporal
631:Criminal
601:Evidence
591:Doctrine
569:Contract
412:May 2022
359:Judgment
341:Browne J
308:Egyptian
280:case law
225:Keywords
176:Citation
110:May 2022
1727:Outline
1664:History
1571:The bar
1545:Verdict
1493:Counsel
1473:Justice
1328:History
1151:Statute
967:Charter
929:Tax law
877:Probate
394:Please
166: (
161:Decided
94:scholar
1645:Police
1616:Agency
1498:Lawyer
1243:Sharia
1134:Treaty
1129:Repeal
1075:Decree
986:Custom
882:Estate
832:Labour
596:Equity
485:
96:
89:
82:
75:
67:
1720:Index
1586:Court
1530:Trial
1436:Judge
1277:Yassa
1080:Edict
626:Civil
579:Crime
304:Sinai
294:Facts
151:Court
101:JSTOR
87:books
1468:Jury
1416:Fiqh
1272:Xeer
670:Tort
586:Deed
483:ISSN
73:news
540:Law
475:doi
398:by
56:by
1745::
974:/
481:.
469:.
465:.
444:.
237:,
233:,
217:,
213:,
209:,
205:,
532:e
525:t
518:v
489:.
477::
471:1
425:)
419:(
414:)
410:(
392:.
339:(
321:(
170:)
123:)
117:(
112:)
108:(
98:·
91:·
84:·
77:·
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
