Knowledge

Atomicity (database systems)

Source 📝

36: 256:
occur. A guarantee of atomicity prevents partial database updates from occurring, because they can cause greater problems than rejecting the whole series outright. As a consequence, the transaction cannot be observed to be in progress by another database client. At one moment in time, it has not yet
260:
An example of an atomic transaction is a monetary transfer from bank account A to account B. It consists of two operations, withdrawing the money from account A and saving it to account B. Performing these operations in an atomic transaction ensures that the database remains in a
324:) as necessary after changes have successfully taken place. Afterwards, crash recovery ignores incomplete entries. Although implementations vary depending on factors such as concurrency issues, the principle of atomicity – i.e. complete success or complete failure – remain. 272:
in database systems, where it instead refers to the concept that the values for fields may not consist of multiple smaller values to be decomposed, such as a string into which multiple names, numbers, dates, or other types may be packed.
442:
An operation during which a processor can simultaneously read a location and write it in the same bus operation. This prevents any other processor or I/O device from writing or reading memory until the operation is
312:
Typically, systems implement Atomicity by providing some mechanism to indicate which transactions have started and which finished; or by keeping a copy of the data before any changes occurred (
378:. Portable operating systems cannot simply block interrupts to implement synchronization, since hardware that lacks concurrent execution such as 53: 456: 304:
As a result of this, a failure to detect a violation and roll back the enclosing transaction may cause an isolation or consistency failure.
100: 320:). Databases usually implement this using some form of logging/journaling to track changes. The system synchronizes the logs (often the 72: 301:
also relies on atomicity to roll back the enclosing transaction in the event of a consistency violation by an illegal transaction.
79: 257:
happened, and at the next it has already occurred in whole (or nothing happened if the transaction was cancelled in progress).
316:). Several filesystems have developed methods for avoiding the need to keep multiple copies of data, using journaling (see 86: 68: 17: 119: 496: 298: 218: 57: 226: 194: 293:
relies on atomicity to roll back the enclosing transaction in the event of an isolation violation such as a
290: 222: 371: 294: 93: 491: 405: 464: 46: 400: 317: 282: 269: 185: 231: 8: 206: 430: 265:, that is, money is neither lost nor created if either of those two operations fails. 410: 395: 383: 367: 328: 313: 262: 143: 379: 355: 347:
that allow applications to atomically open or lock a file. At the process level,
133: 375: 244: 485: 363: 348: 359: 336: 35: 321: 332: 327:
Ultimately, any application-level implementation relies on
286: 212: 199: 176: 170: 155: 164: 149: 167: 146: 173: 152: 161: 158: 60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 483: 268:The same term is also used in the definition of 248:series of database operations such that either 351:provide adequate synchronization primitives. 331:functionality. At the file-system level, 289:properties of transactions. For example, 120:Learn how and when to remove this message 14: 484: 454: 281:Atomicity does not behave completely 211:'undividable') is one of the 58:adding citations to reliable sources 29: 27:Property of the ACID database system 24: 457:"Atomic File Transactions, Part 1" 25: 508: 307: 69:"Atomicity" database systems 276: 142: 34: 45:needs additional citations for 448: 423: 13: 1: 433:. Webopedia. 25 November 2003 416: 354:The hardware level requires 200: 7: 389: 372:Load-Link/Store-Conditional 335:-compliant systems provide 10: 513: 189: 285:with regard to the other 406:Long-running transaction 386:is now extremely rare. 497:Transaction processing 401:Transaction processing 318:journaling file system 455:Amsterdam, Jonathan. 54:improve this article 431:"atomic operation" 236:atomic transaction 18:Atomic transaction 356:atomic operations 270:First normal form 210: 198: 130: 129: 122: 104: 16:(Redirected from 504: 476: 475: 473: 472: 463:. Archived from 452: 446: 445: 439: 438: 427: 411:Read-copy-update 396:Atomic operation 384:multi-processing 374:, together with 368:Compare-and-swap 346: 342: 329:operating-system 314:read-copy-update 263:consistent state 205: 203: 193: 191: 183: 182: 179: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 134:database systems 125: 118: 114: 111: 105: 103: 62: 38: 30: 21: 512: 511: 507: 506: 505: 503: 502: 501: 492:Data management 482: 481: 480: 479: 470: 468: 453: 449: 436: 434: 429: 428: 424: 419: 392: 380:hyper-threading 376:memory barriers 344: 340: 310: 279: 234:properties. An 145: 141: 126: 115: 109: 106: 63: 61: 51: 39: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 510: 500: 499: 494: 478: 477: 447: 421: 420: 418: 415: 414: 413: 408: 403: 398: 391: 388: 309: 308:Implementation 306: 278: 275: 128: 127: 42: 40: 33: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 509: 498: 495: 493: 490: 489: 487: 467:on 2016-03-03 466: 462: 458: 451: 444: 432: 426: 422: 412: 409: 407: 404: 402: 399: 397: 394: 393: 387: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 364:Fetch-and-add 361: 357: 352: 350: 349:POSIX Threads 338: 334: 330: 325: 323: 319: 315: 305: 302: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 277:Orthogonality 274: 271: 266: 264: 258: 255: 251: 247: 246: 241: 237: 233: 229: 228: 224: 220: 214: 208: 202: 196: 187: 186:Ancient Greek 181: 139: 135: 124: 121: 113: 102: 99: 95: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: –  70: 66: 65:Find sources: 59: 55: 49: 48: 43:This article 41: 37: 32: 31: 19: 469:. Retrieved 465:the original 460: 450: 441: 435:. Retrieved 425: 360:Test-and-set 353: 337:system calls 326: 311: 303: 283:orthogonally 280: 267: 259: 253: 249: 243: 239: 235: 216: 137: 131: 116: 107: 97: 90: 83: 76: 64: 52:Please help 47:verification 44: 299:consistency 245:irreducible 240:indivisible 232:transaction 219:Consistency 217:Atomicity, 486:Categories 471:2016-02-28 437:2011-03-23 417:References 252:occur, or 227:Durability 110:April 2020 80:newspapers 443:complete. 291:isolation 223:Isolation 195:romanized 138:atomicity 461:O'Reilly 390:See also 358:such as 345:flock(2) 339:such as 322:metadata 295:deadlock 341:open(2) 209:  197::  184:; from 94:scholar 238:is an 201:átomos 190:ἄτομος 96:  89:  82:  75:  67:  370:, or 333:POSIX 101:JSTOR 87:books 343:and 287:ACID 254:none 242:and 213:ACID 207:lit. 73:news 382:or 250:all 132:In 56:by 488:: 459:. 440:. 366:, 362:, 297:; 230:) 225:, 221:, 204:, 192:, 188:: 136:, 474:. 215:( 180:/ 177:i 174:t 171:ə 168:s 165:ɪ 162:m 159:ˈ 156:ə 153:t 150:æ 147:ˌ 144:/ 140:( 123:) 117:( 112:) 108:( 98:· 91:· 84:· 77:· 50:. 20:)

Index

Atomic transaction

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Atomicity" database systems
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
database systems
/ˌætəˈmɪsəti/
Ancient Greek
romanized
lit.
ACID
Consistency
Isolation
Durability
transaction
irreducible
consistent state
First normal form
orthogonally
ACID
isolation
deadlock
consistency

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.