27:
197:
There are two exceptions to the rule. The first one is specific animals as seen in the case of Re Dean (1889) 41 Ch. D 552. The second exception is when the trust is created to build or maintain a tomb or a monument as in the case of Re Hooper 1 Ch 38. The problem is that these are very limited
193:
Ch 534 re-affirm the court's disinclination to enforce trusts that are not specific and detailed. The common law exceptions to the general prohibition on purposes trusts tend to relate to specific and detailed matters, such as maintenance of a specific tomb, or caring for a particular animal.
157:
it was said "every trust must have a definite object. There must be someone in whose favour the court can decree performance." With a charitable trust, this power of enforcement is usually vested in the
206:
In various jurisdictions in the United States, the beneficiary principle has been abolished, so that a trust can be for a purpose, even if it is not charitable, and the courts will enforce it.
183:
Where the objects of a trust are a purpose rather than an individual or individuals, there is much greater risk that a trust would not be enforceable due to lack of certainty. Cases such as
189:
143:
sections 2 and 3, and also do not make the trust property available for the benefit of defined people (i.e. beneficiaries), are void.
91:
163:
63:
173:
44:
70:
180:
on the basis that there would be difficulty ascertaining beneficiaries for the court to enforce the trust in favour of.
77:
110:
59:
48:
257:
153:
84:
136:
132:
37:
8:
177:
215:
140:
128:
168:
159:
162:. However, such conceptual objections seem less strong since the decision of the
251:
26:
176:
rode roughshod over objections to widening the class of valid
51:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
249:
135:jurisdictions, that trusts which do not have
111:Learn how and when to remove this message
250:
49:adding citations to reliable sources
20:
13:
14:
269:
201:
25:
36:needs additional citations for
227:
1:
239:
16:Policy of English trusts law
7:
209:
10:
274:
185:Morice v Bishop of Durham
154:Morice v Bishop of Durham
139:objects, as under the UK
221:
187:(1805) 9 Ves Jr 399 and
60:"Beneficiary principle"
146:
125:beneficiary principle
178:discretionary trusts
45:improve this article
233:(1804) 9 Ves Jr 399
258:English trusts law
216:English trusts law
141:Charities Act 2006
129:English trusts law
169:McPhail v Doulton
121:
120:
113:
95:
265:
234:
231:
174:Lord Wilberforce
160:Attorney General
131:, and trusts in
116:
109:
105:
102:
96:
94:
53:
29:
21:
273:
272:
268:
267:
266:
264:
263:
262:
248:
247:
242:
237:
232:
228:
224:
212:
204:
198:circumstances.
149:
127:is a policy of
117:
106:
100:
97:
54:
52:
42:
30:
17:
12:
11:
5:
271:
261:
260:
246:
245:
241:
238:
236:
235:
225:
223:
220:
219:
218:
211:
208:
203:
200:
164:House of Lords
148:
145:
119:
118:
33:
31:
24:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
270:
259:
256:
255:
253:
244:
243:
230:
226:
217:
214:
213:
207:
202:United States
199:
195:
192:
191:
186:
181:
179:
175:
172:AC 424 where
171:
170:
165:
161:
156:
155:
144:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
115:
112:
104:
93:
90:
86:
83:
79:
76:
72:
69:
65:
62: –
61:
57:
56:Find sources:
50:
46:
40:
39:
34:This article
32:
28:
23:
22:
19:
229:
205:
196:
188:
184:
182:
167:
152:
150:
133:Commonwealth
124:
122:
107:
98:
88:
81:
74:
67:
55:
43:Please help
38:verification
35:
18:
101:August 2021
240:References
137:charitable
71:newspapers
252:Category
210:See also
190:Re Astor
85:scholar
87:
80:
73:
66:
58:
222:Notes
92:JSTOR
78:books
123:The
64:news
166:in
151:In
147:Law
47:by
254::
114:)
108:(
103:)
99:(
89:·
82:·
75:·
68:·
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.