Knowledge

Bishop's borough

Source πŸ“

231:, bishop of Ossory, made for personal compensation at the Union contains a statement which is of value in the representative history of Ireland. It puts beyond question the reasons which induced the bishops to trouble themselves with borough management. After advancing five statements in support of his case that the borough of Irishtown had long been under the individual control of successive bishops of Ossory, Hamilton affirmed that the control so exercised by himself and his predecessors had "given the bishops of Ossory so much additional consequence, and obtained for them so much attention from Government, that the bishops of that see, with the exception of only two bishops, who died soon after their appointment, for above a century past have been all translated to much more eligible bishoprics." Hamilton further urged that by the Union he was to be deprived of "that influence and consequence which his predecessors always enjoyed, and from which they derived great advantage"; and therefore he considered himself entitled to claim any allowance which might be awarded for the extinction of Irishtown as a Parliamentary borough. 481:." The local clergymen at Cashel were active among the resident freemen, lending them money and rendering them other services in the interest of the archbishop, who bestowed preferment on clergymen who aided him in his management and control of the borough. But although, in the early decades of the eighteenth century, Palliser was in full control of Cashel, it did not become, like Irishtown, Clogher, Old Leighlin, or Armagh, permanently a bishop's borough; and for seventy years before the 131:, "as a person very well qualified for that trust, on account of his conformity to the Church, and consequently his loyalty to the King." "And indeed," added the archbishop, "I must needs say, with much comfort, for the few English Protestants there incorporated, that they seem to be very well principled, all very uniform in their public devotions, and manageable on any occasion readily for his Majesty's service." 327:, then bishop of Ossory, claimed as his individual property the fifteen thousand pounds which were to be paid as compensation for the disfranchisement of the borough, and in his statement of claim laid stress on the fact "that for a long series of years all elections of members of Parliament have been held in the bishop's palace-yard, and the other corporate meetings in his hall." 334:
of Irishtown was to be true to the interests of the bishop of Ossory; that the burgesses were always elected on the recommendation of the bishop; that neither property, residence, nor service in the borough was required of any freeman; that hardly one inhabitant of the borough in 1800 was a freeman;
211:
At the Union fifteen thousand pounds were allowed as compensation in respect of each of the three bishop boroughs, Irishtown, Clogher, and Old Leighlin. The compensation, however, did not go to the bishops, each of whom had put in an individual claim. The sum of forty-five thousand pounds was handed
183:
increased the independence of the Irish Parliament, and at the general election of 1783, on the usual application being made to the bishops for the nominations for their boroughs, three of them answered the Lord Lieutenant that their seats were already disposed of. Northington wrote for instructions
282:
were clergymen, "who seem to have held on an express or implied stipulation to resign on quitting the diocese, or in case of their becoming unwilling to act under the archbishop's direction." As these clergymen naturally looked to the archbishop for preferment, it is improbable that there were many
147:
at Old Leighlin, that the Irish bishops were able to maintain an easy hold on their boroughs, and, with the boroughs thus in their possession, to use the power of nomination to the House of Commons to their own advantage in the Church. The influence enjoyed by the bishops probably accounts for the
476:
to make the newly ordained clergymen freemen of the borough. Dr Burgess, a clergyman, was mayor; and, to quote from the evidence in the election case of 1737, "the archbishop had an ordination at Cashel in Dr Burgess' mayoralty, when there were about eighteen or twenty young men ordained, and they
286:
At Armagh, in the closing years of the old representative system, the archbishop although he was not a member of the corporation, and had no constitutional connection with it commanded twelve of the thirteen votes by which the members of Parliament for the city were elected; and "so completely was
386:
of 1747. From the Journals little can be learned of its history; for election petitions were infrequent from any of the boroughs created by James I. These were never easy of attack; and Old Leighlin was doubtless managed, as was the borough of Armagh, with the corporation largely composed of the
138:
the bishops continued their interest in municipal politics with a view to Parliamentary influence; and in the eighteenth century bishops were frequently of the great borough-owning families, and were often borough managers on their own account. The method of securing borough control through
425:
in the cathedral, and the exercise of that right." For some time the corporation apparently existed in this loose form, and the occupants of the stalls in the cathedral were the sole electors of the members from Clogher; but in the middle of the eighteenth century the freeholders of the
421:. "We are unable," wrote the Municipal Commissioners who visited the borough in 1833, "to discover any trace of the existence of a corporation, beyond what may arise from the right to vote for members of Parliament having been attached by the bishops of Clogher to the grant of each 456:, and in the early part of the eighteenth century it was as much a bishop's borough as Armagh. Evidence of the archbishop's political control of Cashel is to be found in the Journals for 1737. The methods of borough management there were then very similar to those at Armagh. 283:
resignations under the last clause of the agreement; and a corporation so managed must have been as easy to control as through tenants who had taken an oath, and against whom, moreover, the agent had the additional lever of the "hanging gale" (rent arrears).
155:
A. P. W. Malcomson suggests that the appointment of cathedral clergy as burgesses of the corporations of Irishtown, Clogher, and Old Leighlin was a consequence of the scarcity of other resident members of the Church of Ireland; although the
335:
and that the influence of the bishop had always been so powerful that all members of Parliament and burgesses had been uniformly elected on his recommendation, without one instance to the contrary. In 1779, the Lord Lieutenant the
343:
for the see of Ossory, and reminded North that there was a borough with the see, "which requires a great deal of management," adding that for this work Hotham "appears to me particularly well qualified."
71:, and their bishops at the time applied for the standard Β£15,000 compensation due to patrons of disenfranchised boroughs; however, the Commissioners rejected these claims, and awarded the money to the 430:
tendered their votes at an election. They were refused; and they petitioned Parliament against the return. The House of Commons admitted their right to vote; and Clogher thus became a
200:
controlled the borough of Old Leighlin, was the only bishop who at this general election gave his two seats to the Government. Cope was rewarded by the promotion of his brother-in-law
489:
family, who held it, not as Palliser had done by making many freemen, but by restricting the number and electing none but members of the Pennefather family into the corporation.
765: 320:
to gentlemen, thereby making them free; and as often as the bishop desired it, the same was done." Cockets were the titles by which freemen established their right to vote.
330:
Among the grounds proffered for the bishop's claim to the compensation to be awarded at the Union was that, by immemorial custom, part of the oath of office taken by the
287:
the election of the members considered to be in the primate, that he regularly paid the expenses of the admission of the free burgesses, amounting to five pounds each."
217: 245: 76: 417:, and by its constitution the corporation was to consist of a portreeve and twelve burgesses, and the first members were to be nominated by the then 353: 56: 431: 296: 64: 312:
but forming a separate borough, called Irishtown or St Canice. The 1707 election was held indoors because of bad weather, in the hall of the
669: 396: 60: 443: 175:. The idea that these boroughs were the property of the bishops, to be used as other borough proprietors used their boroughs, dated from 92: 139:
dependents was one which was sometimes acted upon by the bishops who were in control of boroughs. It was chiefly through the clergy, as
498: 96: 374:. The elective franchise was in the portreeve and twelve free burgesses. When the Irish Municipal Commissioners made their visit to 336: 84: 184:
from London in this emergency. "Was he," he asked, " to signify to these prelates his Majesty's disapprobation of their conduct?"
201: 176: 323:
The connection thus early existing between the bishops and the borough of Irishtown continued to the last; for at the Union
167:
Until 1783, the four boroughs belonging to the bishops, Irishtown, Clogher, Old Leighlin, and Armagh, had been regarded as
780: 434:. The bishops, however, never lost their control, and at the Union Clogher was dealt with as one of the bishop boroughs. 733: 710: 216:, subject to the condition that the interest accruing from it should be expended in such a way as would best promote 120: 378:
there were only twenty houses and not more than one hundred inhabitants. It must have been an easy borough for the
107:
Even before seats in the House of Commons were greatly valued, the Irish bishops had interested themselves in the
596: 524: 473: 148:
abortive motion in the House of Commons in 1710, "that leave be given to bring in the heads of a bill to prevent
192:] is unwilling to interfere, but he agrees with your excellency, that it is extremely improper conduct." 520: 379: 340: 197: 172: 775: 516: 457: 135: 39:
where the patron who controlled the borough was the bishop for the time being of the diocese of the
770: 464:
from 1696 until 1726. He was a freeman of the borough; and was active in the election of mayor and
449: 171:
property, and as providing opportunities for bringing into the House of Commons men connected with
17: 551: 316:. For many years prior to 1734, it was the custom of the bishop to order the portreeve "to give 588:
Further Proceedings of Commissioners under Union Compensation Act of Ireland (Boroughs &c.)
324: 259: 228: 221: 161: 36: 700: 586: 482: 213: 108: 99:
were originally archbishops' boroughs, they passed to lay patrons in the eighteenth century.
88: 72: 461: 414: 263: 193: 180: 80: 52: 630:
Malcomson, A. P. W. (March 1973). "The Newtown Act of 1748: Revision and Reconstruction".
8: 550:. Vol. 2: Scotland and Ireland. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp.  545: 367: 301: 140: 468:, because by these officers the making of freemen was controlled. It was usual after an 647: 578:
Proceedings of Commissioners under Union Compensation Act of Ireland (Boroughs &c.)
512: 486: 371: 309: 116: 68: 706: 576: 418: 143:
in Irishtown and Cashel, as members of the corporation in Clogher and Armagh, and as
40: 639: 313: 205: 702:
Their Fathers' Daughters: Hannah More, Maria Edgeworth, and Patriarchal Complicity
16:
This article is about the Irish boroughs. For the Bishop of Durham's borough, see
453: 279: 128: 410: 144: 32: 643: 759: 508: 406: 363: 255: 581:. Sessional Papers. Vol. 1803–04 HC VIII (159) 675. HMSO. 7 July 1804. 375: 359: 547:
The unreformed House of Commons; parliamentary representation before 1832
478: 427: 422: 383: 275: 157: 651: 591:. Sessional Papers. Vol. 1805 HC VII (89) 597. HMSO. 26 April 1805. 469: 267: 189: 185: 112: 220:
of the Established Church; a decision Porritt describes as "certainly
331: 271: 168: 44: 465: 305: 124: 402: 317: 251: 160:
of 1748 allowed non-resident burgesses, this did not apply to "
149: 409:
was originally a corporation borough. It was enfranchised by
87:
at Westminster and under the archbishop's control until the
504: 339:
was writing to the prime minister Lord North to recommend
266:. The sovereign of Armagh corporation was the primate's 164:", a class which arguably included all cathedral towns. 543: 515:
from its enfranchisement in 1614, but it passed to the
766:
Constituencies of the Parliament of Ireland (pre-1801)
188:, the British prime minister, replied: "The King [ 638:(71): 313–344, esp. p.319, fn.18 & p.328, fn.41. 692: 670:"Peer pressure: the Irish House of Lords, 1780–1801" 47:
was within the borough. All bishops were themselves
246:
Armagh Borough (Parliament of Ireland constituency)
698: 354:Old Leighlin (Parliament of Ireland constituency) 757: 536:Text mostly adapted from this public-domain book 150:the promotion of any spiritual person for reward 699:Kowaleski-Wallace, Elizabeth (3 October 1991). 511:, was a corporation borough controlled by the 297:St Canice (Parliament of Ireland constituency) 663: 661: 397:Clogher (Parliament of Ireland constituency) 444:Cashel (Parliament of Ireland constituency) 544:Porritt, Edward; Annie G. Porritt (1903). 658: 629: 499:Tuam (Parliament of Ireland constituency) 705:. Oxford University Press. p. 149. 758: 667: 485:, Cashel was in the possession of the 382:to manage: easier than ever after the 234: 127:Thomas Cartwright, the newly elected 668:Murphy, Charlotte (May–June 2010). 111:and in municipal politics. In 1680 13: 14: 792: 477:were all admitted freemen of the 258:, was the episcopal seat of the 738:History of the Irish Parliament 601:History of the Irish Parliament 347: 740:. Ulster Historical Foundation 726: 623: 603:. Ulster Historical Foundation 67:) were disenfranchised by the 1: 616: 214:Commissioners of First-Fruits 380:bishop of Ferns and Leighlin 304:was a suburb of the city of 290: 198:bishop of Ferns and Leighlin 55:. Three bishop's boroughs ( 7: 10: 797: 781:Protestantism and politics 530: 527:'s daughter Anne in 1714. 496: 441: 394: 390: 387:clergymen of the diocese. 370:, one of the creations of 351: 294: 243: 102: 15: 644:10.1017/S0021121400025840 437: 239: 632:Irish Historical Studies 450:Cashel, County Tipperary 18:Crossgate, County Durham 492: 337:Earl of Buckinghamshire 218:residence of the clergy 179:'s administration. The 260:primate of All Ireland 136:the 1688–91 Revolution 109:municipal corporations 65:St Canice or Irishtown 37:Irish House of Commons 483:Irish Reform Act 1832 413:in the fifth year of 89:Irish Reform Act 1832 85:remained enfranchised 73:Board of First Fruits 474:St. John's Cathedral 462:archbishop of Cashel 264:Archbishop of Armagh 181:Constitution of 1782 81:Archbishop of Armagh 53:Irish House of Lords 523:married archbishop 368:corporation borough 235:Particular boroughs 513:Archbishop of Tuam 310:county of the city 117:archbishop of Tuam 69:Acts of Union 1800 776:Church of Ireland 419:bishop of Clogher 202:Archibald Acheson 41:Church of Ireland 788: 750: 749: 747: 745: 730: 724: 723: 721: 719: 696: 690: 689: 687: 685: 665: 656: 655: 627: 612: 610: 608: 597:"Constituencies" 592: 582: 563: 561: 559: 458:William Palliser 314:bishop of Ossory 227:The claim which 206:Viscount Gosford 177:Lord Northington 25:bishop's borough 796: 795: 791: 790: 789: 787: 786: 785: 771:Rotten boroughs 756: 755: 754: 753: 743: 741: 732: 731: 727: 717: 715: 713: 697: 693: 683: 681: 674:History Ireland 666: 659: 628: 624: 619: 606: 604: 595: 585: 575: 557: 555: 533: 501: 495: 454:freeman borough 446: 440: 401:The village of 399: 393: 356: 350: 299: 293: 248: 242: 237: 129:mayor of Galway 105: 51:members of the 21: 12: 11: 5: 794: 784: 783: 778: 773: 768: 752: 751: 725: 711: 691: 657: 621: 620: 618: 615: 614: 613: 593: 583: 572: 571: 569: 565: 564: 540: 539: 537: 532: 529: 497:Main article: 494: 491: 442:Main article: 439: 436: 411:letters patent 395:Main article: 392: 389: 358:The hamlet of 352:Main article: 349: 346: 295:Main article: 292: 289: 244:Main article: 241: 238: 236: 233: 204:from Baron to 173:the Government 104: 101: 33:pocket borough 29:bishop borough 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 793: 782: 779: 777: 774: 772: 769: 767: 764: 763: 761: 739: 735: 729: 714: 712:9780195345025 708: 704: 703: 695: 679: 675: 671: 664: 662: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 626: 622: 602: 598: 594: 590: 589: 584: 580: 579: 574: 573: 570: 568:Other sources 567: 566: 553: 549: 548: 542: 541: 538: 535: 534: 528: 526: 522: 521:Henry Bingham 519:family after 518: 514: 510: 509:County Galway 506: 500: 490: 488: 484: 480: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 445: 435: 433: 432:manor borough 429: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407:County Tyrone 404: 398: 388: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 364:County Carlow 361: 355: 345: 342: 338: 333: 328: 326: 325:Hugh Hamilton 321: 319: 315: 311: 308:, within the 307: 303: 298: 288: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 256:County Armagh 253: 247: 232: 230: 229:Hugh Hamilton 225: 223: 219: 215: 209: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 182: 178: 174: 170: 165: 163: 159: 153: 151: 146: 142: 137: 132: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 100: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 19: 742:. Retrieved 737: 728: 716:. Retrieved 701: 694: 682:. Retrieved 677: 673: 635: 631: 625: 605:. Retrieved 600: 587: 577: 556:. Retrieved 546: 503:The town of 502: 448:The city of 447: 400: 376:Old Leighlin 360:Old Leighlin 357: 348:Old Leighlin 329: 322: 300: 285: 278:. The other 250:The city of 249: 226: 212:over to the 210: 166: 154: 133: 106: 83:'s borough, 57:Old Leighlin 48: 28: 24: 22: 607:25 February 487:Pennefather 479:corporation 384:Newtown Act 341:John Hotham 194:Walter Cope 158:Newtown Act 145:freeholders 123:to present 119:, wrote to 91:. Although 77:Armagh City 760:Categories 684:22 January 617:References 525:John Vesey 470:ordination 268:land agent 190:George III 186:Lord North 113:John Vesey 49:ex officio 554:–315, 333 415:Charles I 332:portreeve 302:Irishtown 291:Irishtown 280:burgesses 272:seneschal 270:, or the 222:equitable 196:, who as 45:cathedral 652:30005420 466:aldermen 306:Kilkenny 125:Alderman 744:2 March 718:10 July 558:1 March 531:Sources 517:Bingham 472:at the 403:Clogher 391:Clogher 372:James I 318:cockets 274:of the 141:freemen 121:Ormonde 103:History 63:, and 61:Clogher 35:in the 734:"Tuam" 709:  650:  452:was a 438:Cashel 366:was a 262:, the 252:Armagh 240:Armagh 162:cities 134:After 93:Cashel 79:, the 43:whose 31:was a 648:JSTOR 428:manor 423:stall 276:manor 169:Crown 746:2014 720:2017 707:ISBN 686:2015 609:2014 560:2014 505:Tuam 493:Tuam 460:was 97:Tuam 95:and 680:(3) 640:doi 552:307 224:". 152:." 27:or 762:: 736:. 678:18 676:. 672:. 660:^ 646:. 636:18 634:. 599:. 507:, 405:, 362:, 254:, 208:. 115:, 75:. 59:, 23:A 748:. 722:. 688:. 654:. 642:: 611:. 562:. 20:.

Index

Crossgate, County Durham
pocket borough
Irish House of Commons
Church of Ireland
cathedral
Irish House of Lords
Old Leighlin
Clogher
St Canice or Irishtown
Acts of Union 1800
Board of First Fruits
Armagh City
Archbishop of Armagh
remained enfranchised
Irish Reform Act 1832
Cashel
Tuam
municipal corporations
John Vesey
archbishop of Tuam
Ormonde
Alderman
mayor of Galway
the 1688–91 Revolution
freemen
freeholders
the promotion of any spiritual person for reward
Newtown Act
cities
Crown

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑