Buckley v. Valeo - Knowledge

691:

First, assuming, arguendo, that large independent expenditures pose the same dangers of actual or apparent quid pro quo arrangements as do large contributions, Sec. 608(e)(1) does not provide an answer that sufficiently relates to the elimination of those dangers. Unlike the contribution limitations' total ban on the giving of large amounts of money to candidates, Sec. 608(e)(1) prevents only some large expenditures. So long as persons and groups eschew expenditures that in express terms advocate the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, they are free to spend as much as they want to promote the candidate and his views. The exacting interpretation of the statutory language necessary to avoid unconstitutional vagueness thus undermines the limitation's effectiveness as a loophole-closing provision by facilitating circumvention by those seeking to exert improper influence upon a candidate or office-holder."

694:"Second, quite apart from the shortcomings ... in preventing any abuses generated by large independent expenditures, the independent advocacy restricted by the provision does not presently appear to pose dangers of real or apparent corruption comparable to those identified with large campaign contributions ... The absence of prearrangement and coordination of an expenditure with the candidate or his agent not only undermines the value of the expenditure to the candidate but also alleviates the danger that expenditures will be given as a quid pro quo for improper commitments from the candidate. Rather than preventing circumvention of the contribution limitations, Sec. 608(e)(1) severely restricts all independent advocacy despite its substantially diminished potential for abuse." 826:

candidate can potentially overcome the disparity in resources through contributions from others. But ability to generate contributions may itself depend upon a showing of a financial base for the campaign or some demonstration of preexisting support, which, in turn, is facilitated by expenditures of substantial personal sums. Thus, the wealthy candidate's immediate access to a substantial personal fortune may give him an initial advantage that his less wealthy opponent can never overcome. And even if the advantage can be overcome, the perception that personal wealth wins elections may not only discourage potential candidates without significant personal wealth from entering the political arena, but also undermine public confidence in the integrity of the electoral process.

687:

explicit the range of expenditures covered by the limitation. The section prohibits 'any expenditure ... relative to a clearly identified candidate during a calendar year which, when added to all other expenditures ... advocating the election or defeat of such candidate, exceeds, $ 1,000.' (Emphasis added.) This context clearly permits, if indeed it does not require, the phrase "relative to" a candidate to be read to mean 'advocating the election or defeat of' a candidate." The Court elaborated in a footnote that "his construction would restrict the application of to communications containing express words of advocacy of election or defeat, such as 'vote for,' 'elect,' 'support,' 'cast your ballot for,' 'Smith for Congress,' 'vote against,' 'defeat,' 'reject.'"

716:"voters to place each candidate in the political spectrum more precisely than is often possible solely on the basis of party labels and campaign speeches." These interests are a result of the fact that "the sources of a candidate's financial support also alert the voter to the interests to which a candidate is most likely to be responsive and thus facilitate predictions of future performance in office." Further, "disclosure requirements deter actual corruption and avoid the appearance of corruption by exposing large contributions and expenditures to the light of publicity." Finally, "recordkeeping, reporting, and disclosure requirements are an essential means of gathering the data necessary to detect violations of the contribution limitations described above." 34: 810:

provision does, nevertheless, serve salutary purposes related to the integrity of federal campaigns. By limiting the importance of personal wealth, § 608(a) helps to assure that only individuals with a modicum of support from others will be viable candidates. This in turn would tend to discourage any notion that the outcome of elections is primarily a function of money. Similarly, § 608(a) tends to equalize access to the political arena, encouraging the less wealthy, unable to bankroll their own campaigns, to run for political office.

683:

press facilities, and all groups, except political parties and campaign organizations, from voicing their views 'relative to a clearly identified candidate' through means that entail aggregate expenditures of more than $ 1,000 during a calendar year. The provision, for example, would make it a federal criminal offense for a person or association to place a single one-quarter page advertisement 'relative to a clearly identified candidate' in a major metropolitan newspaper."

698:... he concept that government may restrict the speech of some elements of our society in order to enhance the relative voice of others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment, which was designed 'to secure "the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources,"' and '"to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people."'" 617:

operation of the system of government established by our Constitution. The First Amendment affords the broadest protection to such political expression in order 'to assure (the) unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people.'" The Court stated that these issues include "political association as well as political expression."

639:

discussed, the depth of their exploration, and the size of the audience reached." Further, the law's "$ 1,000 ceiling on spending 'relative to a clearly identified candidate,' would appear to exclude all citizens and groups except candidates, political parties, and the institutional press from any significant use of the most effective modes of communication." (citations omitted).

769: 720:

contributions earmarked for political purposes or authorized or requested by a candidate or his agent, to some person other than a candidate or political committee, and (2) when they make expenditures for communications that expressly advocate the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate."

682:

The Court first reiterated that "he Act's expenditure ceilings impose direct and substantial restraints on the quantity of political speech." It reviewed the sweeping scope of the law, noting, "The plain effect of is to prohibit all individuals, who are neither candidates nor owners of institutional

825:

One of the points on which all Members of the Court agree is that money is essential for effective communication in a political campaign. It would appear to follow that the candidate with a substantial personal fortune at his disposal is off to a significant "headstart." Of course, the less wealthy

697:

The Court rejected the notion that a "governmental interest in equalizing the relative ability of individuals and groups to influence the outcome of elections serves to justify the limitation on express advocacy of the election or defeat of candidates imposed by Sec. 608(e)(1)'s expenditure ceiling

690:

Even after narrowing the scope of the provision, however, the Court found that limits on expenditures are unconstitutional. "We find that the governmental interest in preventing corruption and the appearance of corruption is inadequate to justify s 608(e)(1)'s ceiling on independent expenditures...

664:

spawned by the real or imagined coercive influence of large financial contributions on candidates' positions and on their actions if elected to office." The Court further defined "corruption" to mean "large contributions ... given to secure a political quid pro quo from current and potential office

620:

The Court rejected the idea that limits on campaign contributions and spending merely limited conduct: "his Court has never suggested that the dependence of a communication on the expenditure of money operates itself to ... reduce the exacting scrutiny required by the First Amendment." The opinion

649:

Finally, the Court concluded this section by stating, "In sum, although the Act's contribution and expenditure limitations both implicate fundamental First Amendment interests, its expenditure ceilings impose significantly more severe restrictions on protected freedoms of political expression and

638:

The Court affirmed a First Amendment interest in spending money to facilitate campaign speech, writing, "A restriction on the amount of money a person or group can spend on political communication during a campaign necessarily reduces the quantity of expression by restricting the number of issues

715:

However, the Court held that the government has a vital interest in "provid the electorate with information 'as to where political campaign money comes from and how it is spent by the candidate' in order to aid the voters in evaluating those who seek federal office", a vital interest in allowing

686:

The Court held that the "key operative language of the provision ... "any expenditure ... relative to a clearly identified candidate"—was unconstitutionally vague, for it "fails to clearly mark the boundary between permissible and impermissible speech, unless other portions of make sufficiently

642:

However, "limitation upon the amount that any one person or group may contribute to a candidate or political committee entails only a marginal restriction upon the contributor's ability to engage in free communication", because such persons or groups are free to communicate directly with voters.

462:

of the Senate upon recommendations of the majority and minority leaders of the Senate; two would be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives upon recommendations of the majority and minority leaders of the House, and two would be appointed by the President. The six voting members

799:

significance not because they are themselves communicative with respect to the qualifications of the candidate, but because money may be used to defray the expenses of speaking or otherwise communicating about the merits or demerits of federal candidates for election. The act of giving money to

783:

took part in oral arguments, his resignation intervened and he cast no official vote in the case. Thus, eight justices decided the case. The opinion was a per curiam opinion, that is, not authored by a single justice, but an opinion for the Court. Several justices dissented from portions of the

616:

First, the Court cited the importance of the First Amendment issues at stake: "The Act's contribution and expenditure limitations operate in an area of the most fundamental First Amendment activities. Discussion of public issues and debate on the qualifications of candidates are integral to the

813:

Since the contribution and expenditure limitations are neutral as to the content of speech and are not motivated by fear of the consequences of the political speech of particular candidates or of political speech in general, this case depends on whether the nonspeech interests of the Federal

809:

I also disagree with the Court's judgment that § 608(a), which limits the amount of money that a candidate or his family may spend on his campaign, violates the Constitution. Although it is true that this provision does not promote any interest in preventing the corruption of candidates, the

643:

Nevertheless, "iven the important role of contributions in financing political campaigns, contribution restrictions could have a severe impact on political dialogue if the limitations prevented candidates and political committees from amassing the resources necessary for effective advocacy."

719:

However, the Court again found the statute's reach, as written, to be unconstitutionally overbroad. It thus ruled that the Act's disclosure requirements apply to "individuals and groups that are not candidates or political committees only in the following circumstances: (1) when they make

5210: 634:

The restrictions were not justified under the "times, places, and manner" clause giving the government the authority to regulate elections: The restrictions were "direct quantity restrictions on political communication and association by persons, groups, candidates, and political

1942: 794:

Concededly, neither the limitations on contributions nor those on expenditures directly or indirectly purport to control the content of political speech by candidates or by their supporters or detractors. What the Act regulates is giving and spending money, acts that have

630:

Further, even if considered "conduct", the Court found that "it is beyond dispute that the interest in regulating the alleged 'conduct' of giving or spending money 'arises in some measure because the communication allegedly integral to the conduct is itself thought to be

5178: 5266: 4933: 2332: 711:

The Court recognized that reporting and disclosure requirements infringe on First Amendment rights. "e have repeatedly found that compelled disclosure, in itself, can seriously infringe on privacy of association and belief guaranteed by the First

668:

The Court rejected the plaintiffs' claim that all "contribution limitations must be invalidated because bribery laws and narrowly drawn disclosure requirements constitute a less restrictive means of dealing with 'proven and suspected quid pro quo

2534: 1531: 5258: 1611: 6699: 3982: 463:

would then need to be confirmed by the majority of both Houses of Congress. In addition, there was a requirement that each of the three appointing authorities was forbidden to choose both of their appointees from the same political party.

127:

1. Some federal limitations on campaign contributions are justified to counteract corruption, but limitations on campaign expenditures are not justified to counteract corruption. On the matter of limiting expenditures, section 608 of the

6832: 1966: 7191: 6285: 5330: 5322: 836:

Chief Justice Burger would have held that contribution limits are unconstitutional, that the government financing provisions are unconstitutional, and that disclosure of small contributions to campaigns is unconstitutional.

3990: 2388: 2009: 1619: 1432: 1499: 814:

Government in regulating the use of money in political campaigns are sufficiently urgent to justify the incidental effects that the limitations visit upon the First Amendment interests of candidates and their supporters.

6992: 2052: 1926: 840:

Justice Stevens arrived on the Court after argument so he did not participate in the decision. However, he said later that he 'always thought that Byron got it right'. Stevens would go on to write the dissent in

5250: 4188: 4728: 4824: 4680: 2396: 2135: 1571: 1587: 646:"The Act's contribution and expenditure limitations also impinge on protected associational freedoms. Making a contribution, like joining a political party, serves to affiliate a person with a candidate." 6592: 3820: 2420: 6800: 5290: 4236: 6584: 5146: 6117: 5433: 5162: 4949: 3189: 759:

at 137. Burger and Rehnquist agreed that limits on expenditure are unconstitutional, but dissented otherwise, stating that they would have held much larger parts of the Act to be unconstitutional.

5457: 5202: 4156: 3213: 6667: 5417: 5066: 3974: 1635: 574:

opinion, the Supreme Court held that several key provisions of the Campaign Finance Act, § 608(a), which limited expenditure by political campaigns, are unconstitutional and contrary to the

5170: 5154: 3460: 2594: 1408: 821:

dissented on the point of limiting personal contributions and expenditures by a candidate to his or her own campaign – he would have upheld that provision, which was stricken by the Court.

350:

dissented in part and wrote that Congress had legitimately recognized unlimited election spending "as a mortal danger against which effective preventive and curative steps must be taken".

5274: 4925: 4204: 4196: 3966: 454:(FEC) (formerly 2 U.S.C. §437c(a) (1)(A–C)). Eight members of the commission were to be chosen as follows: the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives were 7474: 6752: 6608: 5122: 5090: 5026: 4909: 4287: 4071: 2143: 1950: 1667: 540: 2340: 730:

The Court ruled that the government can directly subsidize political campaigns, but that it cannot require candidates to forego private fundraising if they choose the subsidy instead.

7427: 7419: 7349: 3309: 4994: 4124: 7027: 6651: 5138: 2570: 1603: 1475: 7546: 6659: 6568: 5314: 4752: 4736: 4589: 4581: 4079: 1859: 804:

if the candidate is elected. Both Congress and this Court's cases have recognized this as a mortal danger against which effective preventive and curative steps must be taken.

6277: 5569: 2284: 752: 299: 5226: 5130: 4664: 4063: 3656: 1982: 800:

political candidates, however, may have illegal or other undesirable consequences: it may be used to secure the express or tacit understanding that the giver will enjoy

6170: 4521: 4087: 1651: 7274: 6944: 5831: 4244: 4148: 472: 3828: 3285: 2947: 2428: 7266: 5850: 4360: 4352: 5114: 4941: 4391: 3616: 2782: 1523: 342:

because a restriction on spending for political communication necessarily reduces the quantity of expression. It limited disclosure provisions and limited the

7357: 7035: 6202: 5882: 5489: 5473: 5370: 3648: 2025: 1699: 1331: 1159: 931: 907: 888: 854: 830:

Justice Rehnquist dissented on the application of the public funding provisions to minor parties, believing that it was unconstitutional as applied to them.

600:

The Court upheld a system of voluntary government funding of campaigns, including limits on spending by candidates who choose to accept government subsidies.

313: 75: 7551: 6792: 6683: 6194: 5756: 5652: 5082: 2614: 1867: 1563: 672:

Thus the Court upheld the limits on contributions to candidates and their campaign committees, and to parties and political action committees, in the Act.

6744: 6643: 6419: 5997: 5194: 5034: 4672: 4320: 2623: 2119: 1579: 733:

The Court held that the government can condition receipt of the campaign subsidy on a candidate's voluntary agreement to limit his or her total spending.

966: 790:

would have upheld all the restrictions on both contributions and expenditures, striking down only the FEC's appointment process. He said the following:

7541: 7506: 4853: 4720: 4513: 4031: 3253: 2489: 2412: 1707: 1595: 7443: 6824: 6691: 5505: 5425: 4496: 3958: 3876: 1347: 1272: 551: 547: 295: 133: 7511: 7175: 6887: 4565: 4295: 3624: 1808: 1555: 1539: 1379: 594:

The Court struck down limits on independent expenditures (i.e., expenditures by other groups or individuals than candidates and political parties).

660:

The Court held that restrictions on "large campaign contributions" are justified by the state's interest in "the prevention of corruption and the

7501: 6471: 6226: 5577: 2542: 1974: 7526: 5804: 5106: 3732: 1400: 368: 6021: 4986: 4260: 3221: 1659: 6511: 6427: 6109: 5676: 4452: 3836: 3523: 3333: 7094: 6320: 5858: 5711: 5218: 3341: 2436: 1832: 1824: 7521: 5306: 5042: 4415: 4220: 4212: 3277: 3269: 3261: 1323: 755:

of the Constitution) but held that the Commissioners could not exercise this significant authority because they were not "appointed".

7531: 6013: 5915: 5409: 4336: 4164: 3812: 3173: 3141: 2497: 1715: 1547: 951: 374: 362: 240:, joined by Brennan, Stewart, Powell; Marshall (in part); Blackmun (in part); Rehnquist (in part); Burger (in part); White (in part). 3868: 3037: 2017: 1883: 1263: 487: 7536: 7325: 6293: 5561: 5481: 5346: 5186: 4039: 3237: 524: 588:

The Court upheld the aggregate limit on an individual's total contributions to all candidates and committees in a calendar year.

6724: 5772: 5497: 5465: 5449: 4957: 4557: 4505: 4484: 4023: 3245: 2668: 2212: 751:. The Court opined that these powers could properly be exercised by an "Officer of the United States" (validly appointed under 607:

The Court's opinion begins by stating certain "General Principles", and then dealing with individual parts of the law in turn.

398: 597:

The Court upheld mandatory disclosure and reporting provisions, but it narrowed the types of speech to which they could apply.

7516: 6328: 5660: 5390: 4704: 4573: 3921: 3205: 2356: 1875: 1416: 514: 325: 321: 129: 992: 6880: 6675: 5537: 5521: 4784: 4613: 4541: 2687: 2460: 1899: 1840: 603:

The Court struck down the system by which members of Congress directly appointed Federal Election Commission commissioners.

483: 6452: 6624: 6373: 5989: 5242: 4140: 4055: 3998: 3468: 2578: 1768: 6242: 5739: 4180: 3419: 2526: 2068: 1958: 1424: 976: 38: 412:

of 1971 (FECA), creating the most comprehensive effort by the federal government to date to regulate federal campaign

6776: 6005: 4816: 4344: 4172: 3685: 3386: 3197: 2872: 2561: 1103: 506: 137: 6576: 6261: 5441: 5234: 4549: 3796: 3301: 2111: 7435: 6873: 6234: 5823: 5282: 4632: 4460: 3349: 3165: 3077: 2718: 7102: 6848: 6162: 6154: 6085: 6056: 5010: 4885: 4760: 3563: 2915: 2848: 2452: 2380: 1744: 1440: 623: 494: 372:

in 2010. The latter held that corporations may spend from their general treasuries during elections. In 2014,

6968: 6952: 6616: 5593: 5098: 5050: 4893: 4776: 4476: 4383: 3600: 3427: 1483: 1355: 409: 151: 6960: 6495: 5981: 5636: 3804: 3701: 3592: 3555: 2834: 2404: 1256: 1206: 1047: 7258: 6736: 6382: 6218: 6178: 4423: 3852: 3748: 3499: 3093: 3020: 2907: 2856: 2348: 1891: 744: 498: 451: 343: 143: 7282: 7167: 6269: 5609: 5338: 4095: 3632: 2955: 2931: 1371: 7250: 7062: 7011: 6928: 6768: 6125: 5973: 5957: 3764: 3317: 3101: 2188: 627:, and it noted that sending a telegram to a public official—a clearly protected activity—costs money. 1188: 7309: 7301: 6976: 6936: 6479: 6064: 5002: 4978: 4605: 3950: 3929: 3547: 3325: 3109: 3069: 2864: 2839: 2795: 2726: 2673: 2236: 1934: 1691: 1448: 661: 458:

members of the Commission without a right to vote; two members would be appointed by the President

701:

Thus, the Court struck down limits on both candidate and independent spending as unconstitutional.

7333: 7086: 7078: 7043: 6186: 6146: 4869: 4103: 3693: 3677: 3640: 3491: 3394: 3000: 2899: 2815: 2774: 2742: 2711: 2228: 2204: 1249: 860: 502: 1179: 7317: 7242: 7199: 7140: 7019: 6984: 6101: 5553: 4526: 3724: 3029: 3008: 2984: 2790: 2268: 1095: 405: 176: 1140: 1034: 1022: 845:

and called for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Court's campaign finance decisions.

6865: 5941: 5703: 4832: 3045: 2758: 2734: 2517: 2372: 1233: 1163: 935: 911: 892: 435: 67: 1087: 420:

signed the bill into law on October 15. The key parts of the amended law did the following:

7121: 4917: 4861: 4744: 4132: 3756: 3740: 3515: 3439: 3157: 3125: 2252: 2176: 1800: 1776: 1515: 1286: 868: 748: 532: 476: 57:

James L. Buckley, et al. v. Francis R. Valeo, Secretary of the United States Senate, et al.

927: 8: 6896: 6390: 6361: 6301: 5796: 5298: 5018: 4712: 4696: 4640: 3892: 3788: 3507: 3061: 3053: 2939: 2810: 2044: 1456: 1241: 571: 394: 208: 147: 82: 6920: 6600: 6530: 6411: 6336: 6093: 6048: 5780: 5727: 5601: 5529: 5074: 4597: 4468: 3780: 3531: 3443: 3370: 3181: 3133: 3117: 3085: 2923: 2750: 2639: 2316: 2300: 2292: 2276: 2087: 2060: 2010:

Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State

1792: 1675: 1620:

Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State

1339: 938: 914: 780: 425: 357: 329: 1170: 378:

held that aggregate limits on political giving by an individual are unconstitutional.

7365: 7341: 6808: 6210: 5949: 5585: 5362: 4969: 4796: 4648: 4407: 4372: 4047: 3913: 3860: 3844: 3571: 3293: 3229: 3149: 2992: 2890: 2127: 1752: 1683: 1643: 1507: 1315: 1307: 1197: 1136: 1099: 1088: 1010: 972: 895: 818: 555: 339: 220: 212: 196: 1090:

Free Speech on Trial: Communication Perspectives on Landmark Supreme Court Decisions

7384: 7070: 6784: 6487: 5866: 5748: 5695: 5628: 5513: 5211:

Ibanez v. Florida Dept. of Business and Professional Regulation, Bd. of Accountancy

4877: 4688: 4328: 4014: 3884: 3772: 3539: 2963: 2602: 2586: 2444: 2324: 2260: 2220: 2095: 1627: 1363: 1126: 510: 479: 317: 168: 1065: 7234: 6760: 6503: 6029: 5965: 5927: 5788: 5719: 5378: 4901: 4808: 4431: 4268: 4252: 4228: 3480: 3452: 3410: 3378: 2822: 2766: 2505: 2244: 2196: 2151: 2103: 1918: 1784: 1760: 1723: 1066:"Bowman v. The United Kingdom – 24839/94 [1998] ECHR 4 (19 February 1998" 796: 575: 490: 335: 833:

Justice Blackmun would have held that contribution limits are unconstitutional.

393:

Congress had made previous attempts to regulate campaign finance. It passed the

70: 6816: 5890: 5874: 4768: 4656: 4533: 2884: 2481: 2001: 1816: 1491: 200: 184: 447:

limited candidate expenditures from personal funds (formerly 18 U.S.C. §608a),

7495: 3608: 2802: 2631: 1009:

nb Associate Justice Harry Blackmun's papers indicate that Associate Justice

775:(above) would have upheld the law's limits on expenditures and contributions. 90: 1131: 1114: 7148: 6549: 5764: 5545: 5354: 5058: 4443: 4399: 3715: 2364: 2308: 334:(by the Court) opinion, they ruled that expenditure limits contravene the 6840: 5668: 2975: 1224: 1086:

Smith, Craig R. (2003). "Buckley v. Valeo". In Parker, Richard A. (ed.).

787: 772: 768: 559: 417: 413: 188: 102: 509:, and numerous other plaintiffs. The named defendant in the caption was 6137: 5932: 5131:

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Comm'n of California

4064:

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Comm'n of California

2698: 801: 536: 519: 444:

limited independent expenditures to $ 1,000 (formerly 18 U.S.C. §608e),

86: 324:. A majority of justices held that, as provided by section 608 of the 5179:

Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois

2595:

Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania

528: 5091:

Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission

6753:

Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.

6609:

Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston

4072:

Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston

2703: 1013:

drafted the separation-of-powers portion of the per curiam opinion.

5147:

San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. U.S. Olympic Committee

1215: 285:

Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

5123:

Zauderer v. Off. of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio

5027:

Virginia State Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council

3967:

Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association

3310:

American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland

468: 347: 5267:

Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Co.

4934:

Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.

2333:

Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.

650:

association than do its limitations on financial contributions."

585:

The Court upheld limitations on volunteers' incidental expenses.

431:

required the disclosure of political contributions (2 USC §434),

4197:

Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin System v. Southworth

4080:

Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc.

1115:"Fascism-Lite in America (or the Social Ideal of Donald Trump)" 33: 6895: 5315:

Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy

4825:

U.S. Civil Service Comm'n v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers

4753:

Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy

4737:

Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.

4590:

Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy

4582:

Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.

1532:

Levitt v. Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty

5259:

Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Assn., Inc. v. United States

2285:

Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc.

1612:

Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Regan

1094:. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press. pp. 441:

limited expenditures by candidates and associated committees,

328:, limits on election expenditures are unconstitutional. In a 6700:

Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party

4995:

Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Comm'n on Human Relations

3983:

International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee

3657:

City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC

360:

in further cases, including in the five to four decision of

6833:

BE and K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

5331:

Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA

5139:

Posadas de Puerto Rico Assoc. v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico

1983:

Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Acevedo Feliciano

993:"ACLU Amicus Brief in Federal Election Commission v. Akins" 965:

Dimino, Michael; Smith, Bradley; Solimine, Michael (2010).

591:

The Court struck down limits on expenditures by candidates.

6286:

Denver Area Ed. Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. FCC

5570:

Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett

4088:

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra

2571:

Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal

2144:

Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. Grumet

1668:

Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. Grumet

1652:

Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind

1271: 450:

created and fixed the method of appointing members to the

424:

limited contributions to candidates for federal office (2

16:

1976 United States Supreme Court case on campaign finance

385:

is the longest opinion ever issued by the Supreme Court.

2429:

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

1860:

Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School Dist.

705: 546:

The plaintiffs argued that the legislation violated the

6171:

Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Ass'n, Inc. v. Bresler

4279: 743:

The Court held that the method for appointments to the

582:

The Court upheld limits on contributions to candidates.

6203:

Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.

5323:

Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States

5115:

Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.

4942:

Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.

7547:

United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court

5490:

FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee

5474:

Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC

5371:

Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants

3649:

Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants

1868:

Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette

1332:

County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union

855:

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 424

6793:

California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited

6195:

Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.

3991:

Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes

2783:

Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.

2389:

Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security

4665:

Mt. Healthy City School Dist. Board of Ed. v. Doyle

4361:

USAID v. Alliance for Open Society International II

4321:

Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington

1500:

Board of Ed. of Central School Dist. No. 1 v. Allen

964: 4721:United States v. National Treasury Employees Union 4514:West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette 4392:Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans 4353:USAID v. Alliance for Open Society International I 3254:United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. 2413:Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah 2053:Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley 7444:Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission 6825:Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation 6692:New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres 5653:Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee 5426:Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley 3877:Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York 3625:Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board 1348:McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union 7493: 7176:Springer v. Government of the Philippine Islands 4522:Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Community School Dist. 4296:Minnesota Board for Community Colleges v. Knight 3461:Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus 1967:Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich 1380:American Legion v. American Humanist Association 6472:Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath 6227:Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton 5578:American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock 5251:Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliot, Inc. 5035:Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro 4189:Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliot, Inc. 2543:Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru 1927:Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila 5805:National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo 4854:Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Comm'n of Ohio 2667: 724: 369:Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 6881: 4261:Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association 1660:Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District 1257: 6512:Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta 6428:Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta 6110:Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Commissioner 5677:Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta 4681:Smith v. Arkansas State Hwy. Employees Local 4032:West Virginia State Board of Ed. v. Barnette 3837:Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence 3524:Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence 2397:Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization 2136:Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization 1572:Public Funds for Public Schools v. Marburger 138:Constitution of the United States of America 132:is unconstitutional because it violates the 7552:United States separation of powers case law 6909: 6321:Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. 5712:Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck 5219:Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. 4673:Givhan v. Western Line Consol. School Dist. 2437:Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo 2026:Arizona Christian Sch. Tuition Org. v. Winn 1700:Arizona Christian Sch. Tuition Org. v. Winn 1588:Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Maryland 473:District Court for the District of Columbia 7408: 6888: 6874: 6451: 5043:Carey v. Population Services International 4729:Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. Umbehr 4566:Westside Community Board of Ed. v. Mergens 4416:Houston Community College System v. Wilson 3821:USPS v. Council of Greenburgh Civic Assns. 3262:City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. 3222:American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc. v. Hudnut 2948:Nat'l Socialist Party v. Village of Skokie 1809:Westside Community Board of Ed. v. Mergens 1401:Walz v. Tax Comm'n of the City of New York 1324:Board of Trustees of Scarsdale v. McCreary 1264: 1250: 7542:American Civil Liberties Union litigation 7507:United States Free Speech Clause case law 6801:Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees 6014:Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia 5410:First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti 5291:Thompson v. Western States Medical Center 5083:Consol. Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n 4337:National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley 4237:Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association 4165:Communications Workers of America v. Beck 3174:United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film 3142:United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs 2498:Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue 2421:Watchtower Society v. Village of Stratton 1716:Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue 1548:Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist 1130: 1119:British Journal of American Legal Studies 1112: 952:McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission 375:McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission 363:First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti 5914: 5859:Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Union 3038:United States v. One Book Called Ulysses 2175: 2018:Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation 1884:Good News Club v. Milford Central School 1285: 767: 539:relief. Plaintiffs then appealed to the 7512:United States equal protection case law 7223: 6723: 6593:New York Club Ass'n v. City of New York 6360: 6294:Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC 5562:Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan 5482:Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC 5434:FEC v. National Right to Work Committee 5347:Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman 5187:City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network 4221:Davenport v. Washington Education Ass'n 4040:Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo 3278:United States v. American Library Ass'n 3238:United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. 3190:Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad 7502:Federal Election Commission litigation 7494: 6329:Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises 5498:Republican Party of Minnesota v. White 5466:Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce 5458:Eu v. S.F. Cty. Democratic Cent. Comm. 5450:FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life 5203:United States v. Edge Broadcasting Co. 4958:Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement 4558:Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier 4506:Minersville School District v. Gobitis 4485:Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb 4453:American Communications Ass'n v. Douds 4157:Chicago Local Teachers Union v. Hudson 4024:Minersville School District v. Gobitis 3334:Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n 3214:Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., Inc. 2213:Minersville School District v. Gobitis 1833:Elk Grove Unif. School Dist. v. Newdow 654: 578:. The major holdings were as follows: 523:member of the FEC who represented the 7527:United States administrative case law 7462: 7407: 7222: 6908: 6869: 6722: 6668:Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party 6585:Rotary Int'l v. Rotary Club of Duarte 6450: 6359: 5913: 5418:California Medical Association v. FEC 5067:Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association 4705:Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois 3975:Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense Fund 3869:Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc. 3206:Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. 2666: 2357:Bob Jones University v. United States 2174: 1417:Bob Jones University v. United States 1284: 1245: 1085: 747:was an unconstitutional violation of 706:Reporting and disclosure requirements 676: 610: 434:provided for the public financing of 408:passed significant amendments to the 326:Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 142:2. The appointment of members of the 130:Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 21:1976 United States Supreme Court case 7326:Humphrey's Executor v. United States 6676:California Democratic Party v. Jones 6118:Arkansas Writers' Project v. Ragland 5538:FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. 5522:Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. FEC 5307:Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass'n 4614:Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. 4542:Island Trees School District v. Pico 4213:Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass'n 3342:FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. 1636:School Dist. of Grand Rapids v. Ball 484:Conservative Party of New York State 6625:Christian Legal Society v. Martinez 5990:New York Times Co. v. United States 5243:44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island 5171:State University of New York v. Fox 5155:Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association 4141:Abood v. Detroit Board of Education 4056:Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins 3999:Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky 3469:Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky 2579:Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. 1769:Abington School District v. Schempp 1409:California v. Grace Brethren Church 13: 6993:FOMBPR v. Aurelius Investment, LLC 6243:Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox 5275:United States v. United Foods Inc. 4926:Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Assn. 4288:Steele v. Louisville & N.R. Co 4205:United States v. United Foods Inc. 3420:Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project 2527:NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago 2069:Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc. 1959:Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church 1425:Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc. 543:and finally to the Supreme Court. 39:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 7563: 7522:United States Supreme Court cases 7475:FEC v. NRA Political Victory Fund 6897:United States Appointments Clause 6777:United Mine Workers v. Pennington 5661:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n 5163:Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind 4950:Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind 4910:Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Bar 4817:United Public Workers v. Mitchell 4785:Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. 4345:Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez 4173:Keller v. State Bar of California 3813:Org. for a Better Austin v. Keefe 3686:Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. 3387:Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 3198:Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville 2873:Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus 2461:Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. 1951:Kreshik v. St. Nicholas Cathedral 1943:Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral 1900:Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. 1841:Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. 1825:Santa Fe Ind. School Dist. v. Doe 1433:Corp. of Presiding Bishop v. Amos 1234:World Legal Information Institute 1148: 737: 493:(a Democrat from Minnesota), the 7532:United States elections case law 7463: 6577:Roberts v. United States Jaycees 6262:Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC 5442:FEC v. National Conservative PAC 5235:Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc. 4574:Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia 4550:Bethel School District v. Fraser 3922:Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia 3797:Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne 2490:Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer 1876:Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia 1708:Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer 32: 7436:Elgin v. Department of Treasury 7420:Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich 6235:Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. 5824:NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. 5773:Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach 5283:Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly 4987:Rowan v. U.S. Post Office Dept. 4633:Pickering v. Board of Education 4461:Garner v. Board of Public Works 4181:Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Ass'n 3350:Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton 3166:Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton 3078:MANual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day 2719:Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten 1166:1 (1976) is available from: 1058: 1040: 753:Article II, Section 2, clause 2 7537:1976 in United States case law 7103:United States v. Arthrex, Inc. 6849:Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri 6163:Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts 6155:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan 6086:Grosjean v. American Press Co. 6057:Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn 6006:Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart 5011:Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar 4886:Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson 4761:Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri 4125:Ry. Emps. Department v. Hanson 2916:Terminiello v. City of Chicago 2849:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan 2554:Statutory religious exemptions 2453:Fulton v. City of Philadelphia 1745:McCollum v. Board of Education 1441:Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock 1028: 1016: 1003: 985: 968:Voting Rights and Election Law 958: 944: 920: 901: 882: 624:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan 495:New York Civil Liberties Union 1: 7428:Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB 7350:Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB 6652:Democratic Party v. Wisconsin 6617:Boy Scouts of America v. Dale 6569:Hishon v. King & Spalding 5594:Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar 5099:Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego 5051:Bates v. State Bar of Arizona 4894:Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown 4777:Heffernan v. City of Paterson 4477:Keyishian v. Board of Regents 4384:Pleasant Grove City v. Summum 3601:Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego 3428:Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar 2112:Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc. 1604:New York v. Cathedral Academy 1484:Everson v. Board of Education 1476:Cochran v. Board of Education 1356:Pleasant Grove City v. Summum 1273:United States First Amendment 1079: 1048:"Campaign Finance Disclosure" 410:Federal Election Campaign Act 401:. Neither was well enforced. 152:officers of the United States 7517:Appointments Clause case law 6961:Quackenbush v. United States 6660:Tashjian v. Republican Party 6496:Bates v. City of Little Rock 6402:Protection from prosecution 5982:Lamont v. Postmaster General 5637:Bates v. City of Little Rock 3805:Coates v. City of Cincinnati 3702:Packingham v. North Carolina 3593:Lamont v. Postmaster General 2405:Employment Division v. Smith 150:as Congress may not appoint 7: 7259:McAllister v. United States 6737:United States v. Cruikshank 6383:United States v. Cruikshank 6278:FCC v. WNCN Listeners Guild 6219:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 6179:Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. 4424:Shurtleff v. City of Boston 3853:Ward v. Rock Against Racism 3749:Martin v. City of Struthers 3564:City of Erie v. Pap's A. M. 3094:Quantity of Books v. Kansas 2908:Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire 2857:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 2381:O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz 1892:Shurtleff v. City of Boston 848: 763: 745:Federal Election Commission 725:Public funding of campaigns 565: 499:American Conservative Union 488:1968 presidential candidate 486:), former U.S. Senator and 452:Federal Election Commission 344:Federal Election Commission 312:, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), was a 144:Federal Election Commission 10: 7568: 7283:Shurtleff v. United States 7168:Shoemaker v. United States 7133:Challenges to Appointments 6270:FCC v. Pacifica Foundation 5610:FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate 5339:Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. 5227:Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co. 4096:303 Creative LLC v. Elenis 3633:R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul 2956:R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul 2932:Gregory v. City of Chicago 1372:Town of Greece v. Galloway 1225:Oyez (oral argument audio) 7469: 7458: 7414: 7403: 7376: 7293: 7251:Crenshaw v. United States 7229: 7218: 7159: 7132: 7113: 7063:United States v. Germaine 7054: 7012:United States v. Hartwell 7003: 6929:United States v. Le Baron 6915: 6904: 6769:Edwards v. South Carolina 6731: 6718: 6635: 6560: 6541: 6522: 6463: 6459: 6446: 6401: 6372: 6368: 6355: 6312: 6253: 6136: 6126:Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. 6075: 6040: 5974:Hannegan v. Esquire, Inc. 5958:Lovell v. City of Griffin 5926: 5922: 5909: 5842: 5815: 5738: 5687: 5620: 5389: 4968: 4843: 4795: 4624: 4495: 4442: 4371: 4310: 4114: 4013: 3940: 3903: 3765:Edwards v. South Carolina 3712: 3667: 3582: 3479: 3438: 3409: 3360: 3318:United States v. Kilbride 3302:United States v. Williams 3102:Ginzburg v. United States 3019: 2974: 2883: 2833: 2697: 2686: 2682: 2662: 2613: 2560: 2553: 2516: 2471: 2189:Reynolds v. United States 2183: 2170: 2079: 2036: 1993: 1910: 1851: 1734: 1467: 1390: 1297: 1293: 1280: 527:. The trial court denied 503:Peace & Freedom Party 475:, on January 2, 1975, by 300:Article II, Sec. 2, cl. 2 294: 289: 284: 276: 268: 260: 252: 244: 233: 228: 162: 157: 146:by Congress violates the 126: 121: 113: 108: 98: 62: 52: 45: 31: 26: 7310:Parsons v. United States 7302:United States v. Perkins 7160:Appointments by Congress 6977:NLRB v. SW General, Inc. 6937:Mimmack v. United States 6480:Watkins v. United States 6065:Florida Star v. B. J. F. 5003:Lehman v. Shaker Heights 4979:Valentine v. Chrestensen 4606:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski 4280:Compelled representation 4245:Knox v. SEIU, Local 1000 3951:Lehman v. Shaker Heights 3930:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski 3548:United States v. Eichman 3500:United States v. O'Brien 3326:United States v. Stevens 3110:Memoirs v. Massachusetts 3070:Marcus v. Search Warrant 2865:United States v. Alvarez 2796:clear and present danger 2727:Schenck v. United States 2237:United States v. Ballard 1935:United States v. Ballard 1852:Private religious speech 1692:Zelman v. Simmons-Harris 1449:City of Boerne v. Flores 876: 864:ECHR 4, (1998) 26 EHRR 1 662:appearance of corruption 416:and spending. President 399:Taft–Hartley Act in 1947 388: 89:16; 76-1 U.S. Tax Cas. ( 48:Decided January 29, 1976 46:Argued November 10, 1975 7334:Wiener v. United States 7294:Limits on Removal Power 7275:Reagan v. United States 7087:Edmond v. United States 7079:Freytag v. Commissioner 7044:Burnap v. United States 6945:United States v. Corson 6910:Appointment of Officers 6636:Primaries and elections 6187:Time, Inc. v. Firestone 6147:Beauharnais v. Illinois 5832:FTC v. Superior Ct. TLA 4870:Murdock v. Pennsylvania 4149:Ellis v. Railway Clerks 4104:Moody v. NetChoice, LLC 3694:City of Ladue v. Gilleo 3678:Schneider v. New Jersey 3641:Reed v. Town of Gilbert 3492:Stromberg v. California 3395:United States v. Hansen 3001:Elonis v. United States 2900:Cantwell v. Connecticut 2816:imminent lawless action 2775:Dennis v. United States 2743:Abrams v. United States 2712:Alien and Sedition Acts 2229:Murdock v. Pennsylvania 2205:Cantwell v. Connecticut 1911:Internal church affairs 1132:10.2478/bjals-2018-0012 861:Bowman v United Kingdom 525:U.S. federal government 515:Secretary of the Senate 7409:Jurisdiction stripping 7318:Myers v. United States 7243:Blake v. United States 7200:Weiss v. United States 7141:Ryder v. United States 7028:United States v. Smith 7020:United States v. Mouat 7004:Officers vs. Employees 6985:Ortiz v. United States 6969:United States v. Smith 6953:United States v. Eaton 6561:Membership restriction 6453:Freedom of association 6404:and state restrictions 6102:Houchins v. KQED, Inc. 5554:Citizens United v. FEC 4527:substantial disruption 3829:United States v. Grace 3725:Davis v. Massachusetts 3556:Barnes v. Glen Theatre 3030:Rosen v. United States 3009:Counterman v. Colorado 2985:Watts v. United States 2791:Yates v. United States 2341:Thomas v. Review Board 2269:Fowler v. Rhode Island 1113:McGaughey, E. (2018). 828: 816: 776: 436:presidential elections 177:William J. Brennan Jr. 7267:Keim v. United States 6313:Copyrighted materials 5942:Patterson v. Colorado 5851:Procunier v. Martinez 5704:Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner 4846:restriction of speech 4833:Broadrick v. Oklahoma 3046:Roth v. United States 2759:Whitney v. California 2735:Debs v. United States 2535:Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC 2518:Ministerial exception 2472:Exclusion of religion 2373:Goldman v. Weinberger 955:, 572 U.S. 185 (2014) 823: 792: 771: 556:freedom of expression 7122:NLRB v. Noel Canning 5916:Freedom of the press 5740:Official retaliation 5394:and political speech 4918:Freedman v. Maryland 4862:Cox v. New Hampshire 4745:Garcetti v. Ceballos 4133:Machinists v. Street 3757:Niemotko v. Maryland 3741:Thornhill v. Alabama 3617:Butterworth v. Smith 3516:Spence v. Washington 3158:Miller v. California 3126:Ginsberg v. New York 2474:from public benefits 2349:United States v. Lee 2253:Niemotko v. Maryland 2177:Free Exercise Clause 1801:Edwards v. Aguillard 1777:Epperson v. Arkansas 1524:Lemon v. Kurtzman II 1516:Tilton v. Richardson 1287:Establishment Clause 869:Harper v Canada (AG) 749:separation of powers 356:was extended by the 296:U.S. Const. amend. I 7377:Removal by Congress 7224:Removal of Officers 7114:Recess Appointments 7036:Auffmordt v. Hedden 6725:Freedom to petition 6391:Presser v. Illinois 6362:Freedom of assembly 6302:Bartnicki v. Vopper 5883:Overton v. Bazzetta 5797:Gonzalez v. Trevino 5299:Nike, Inc. v. Kasky 5019:Bigelow v. Virginia 4713:Waters v. Churchill 4697:Rankin v. McPherson 4641:Perry v. Sindermann 3893:McCullen v. Coakley 3789:Adderley v. Florida 3508:Cohen v. California 3363:to criminal conduct 3286:Ashcroft v. ACLU II 3062:Smith v. California 3054:One, Inc. v. Olesen 2940:Cohen v. California 2811:Brandenburg v. Ohio 2045:McGowan v. Maryland 1457:Cutter v. Wilkinson 1391:Statutory religious 1207:Library of Congress 655:Contribution limits 395:Tillman Act of 1907 348:Justice Byron White 209:Lewis F. Powell Jr. 148:Appointments Clause 6921:Marbury v. Madison 6684:Clingman v. Beaver 6601:Dallas v. Stanglin 6531:Baggett v. Bullitt 6412:De Jonge v. Oregon 6337:Eldred v. Ashcroft 6094:Branzburg v. Hayes 6049:Time, Inc. v. Hill 5781:Nieves v. Bartlett 5757:Reichle v. Howards 5728:Murthy v. Missouri 5602:Thompson v. Hebdon 5530:Randall v. Sorrell 5075:Friedman v. Rogers 4598:Morse v. Frederick 4469:Speiser v. Randall 3781:Brown v. Louisiana 3532:Dallas v. Stanglin 3371:New York v. Ferber 3270:Ashcroft v. ACLU I 3182:Jenkins v. Georgia 3134:Stanley v. Georgia 3118:Redrup v. New York 3086:Jacobellis v. Ohio 2924:Feiner v. New York 2751:Gitlow v. New York 2640:Ramirez v. Collier 2317:Wisconsin v. Yoder 2301:Sherbert v. Verner 2293:Torcaso v. Watkins 2277:Braunfeld v. Brown 2088:Torcaso v. Watkins 2061:Braunfeld v. Brown 1793:Wallace v. Jaffree 1676:Agostini v. Felton 1564:Wheeler v. Barrera 1340:Van Orden v. Perry 777: 677:Expenditure limits 611:General principles 381:By some measures, 358:U.S. Supreme Court 173:Associate Justices 81:96 S. Ct. 612; 46 7489: 7488: 7485: 7484: 7454: 7453: 7399: 7398: 7395: 7394: 7366:Collins v. Yellen 7358:Selia Law v. CFPB 7342:Morrison v. Olson 7214: 7213: 7210: 7209: 7055:Inferior Officers 6863: 6862: 6859: 6858: 6809:McDonald v. Smith 6745:Thomas v. Collins 6714: 6713: 6710: 6709: 6644:Cousins v. Wigoda 6442: 6441: 6438: 6437: 6420:Thomas v. Collins 6351: 6350: 6347: 6346: 6211:McDonald v. Smith 5998:Pell v. Procunier 5950:Near v. Minnesota 5905: 5904: 5901: 5900: 5586:McCutcheon v. FEC 5363:Iancu v. Brunetti 5195:Edenfield v. Fane 4970:Commercial speech 4649:Arnett v. Kennedy 4408:Iancu v. Brunetti 4311:Government grants 4306: 4305: 4117:of others' speech 4115:Compelled subsidy 4048:Wooley v. Maynard 4009: 4008: 3914:Widmar v. Vincent 3861:Burson v. Freeman 3845:Frisby v. Schultz 3572:Virginia v. Black 3405: 3404: 3294:Nitke v. Gonzales 3230:People v. Freeman 3150:Kois v. Wisconsin 2993:Virginia v. Black 2669:Freedom of speech 2658: 2657: 2654: 2653: 2650: 2649: 2624:Sossamon v. Texas 2166: 2165: 2162: 2161: 2128:Bowen v. Kendrick 2120:Larson v. Valente 1994:Taxpayer standing 1753:Zorach v. Clauson 1684:Mitchell v. Helms 1644:Aguilar v. Felton 1580:Meek v. Pittenger 1508:Lemon v. Kurtzman 1316:Lynch v. Donnelly 1308:Marsh v. Chambers 1011:William Rehnquist 507:Libertarian Party 482:(a member of the 471:was filed in the 438:(IRC Subtitle H), 340:freedom of speech 314:landmark decision 305: 304: 213:William Rehnquist 197:Thurgood Marshall 7559: 7460: 7459: 7405: 7404: 7385:Bowsher v. Synar 7291: 7290: 7220: 7219: 7184:Buckley v. Valeo 7071:Ex parte Siebold 7001: 7000: 6906: 6905: 6890: 6883: 6876: 6867: 6866: 6785:Cox v. Louisiana 6720: 6719: 6488:NAACP v. Alabama 6461: 6460: 6448: 6447: 6370: 6369: 6357: 6356: 5928:Prior restraints 5924: 5923: 5911: 5910: 5867:Turner v. Safley 5749:Hartman v. Moore 5696:Marsh v. Alabama 5645:Buckley v. Valeo 5629:NAACP v. Alabama 5621:Anonymous speech 5514:McConnell v. FEC 5402:Buckley v. Valeo 5391:Campaign finance 4878:Kunz v. New York 4689:Connick v. Myers 4625:Public employees 4329:Rust v. Sullivan 4277: 4276: 4015:Compelled speech 3885:Hill v. Colorado 3773:Cox v. Louisiana 3710: 3709: 3540:Texas v. Johnson 2964:Snyder v. Phelps 2695: 2694: 2684: 2683: 2677: 2664: 2663: 2603:Tanzin v. Tanvir 2587:Zubik v. Burwell 2558: 2557: 2469: 2468: 2445:Tandon v. Newsom 2325:McDaniel v. Paty 2261:Kunz v. New York 2221:Jamison v. Texas 2172: 2171: 2096:McDaniel v. Paty 1628:Mueller v. Allen 1596:Wolman v. Walter 1364:Salazar v. Buono 1295: 1294: 1282: 1281: 1266: 1259: 1252: 1243: 1242: 1238: 1232: 1229: 1223: 1220: 1214: 1211: 1205: 1202: 1196: 1193: 1187: 1184: 1178: 1175: 1169: 1156:Buckley v. Valeo 1144: 1134: 1109: 1093: 1074: 1073: 1062: 1056: 1055: 1044: 1038: 1032: 1026: 1025:, 260–265 (1976) 1020: 1014: 1007: 1001: 1000: 989: 983: 982: 962: 956: 948: 942: 924: 918: 905: 899: 886: 819:Justice Marshall 562:, respectively. 541:Court of Appeals 511:Francis R. Valeo 480:James L. Buckley 354:Buckley v. Valeo 322:campaign finance 318:US Supreme Court 309:Buckley v. Valeo 169:Warren E. Burger 158:Court membership 36: 35: 27:Buckley v. Valeo 24: 23: 7567: 7566: 7562: 7561: 7560: 7558: 7557: 7556: 7492: 7491: 7490: 7481: 7465: 7450: 7410: 7391: 7372: 7289: 7235:Ex parte Hennen 7225: 7206: 7155: 7128: 7109: 7050: 6999: 6911: 6900: 6894: 6864: 6855: 6761:NAACP v. Button 6727: 6706: 6631: 6556: 6537: 6518: 6504:NAACP v. Button 6455: 6434: 6403: 6397: 6364: 6343: 6308: 6254:Broadcast media 6249: 6246:(9th Cir. 2014) 6132: 6077: 6071: 6036: 6030:Tory v. Cochran 5966:Tucker v. Texas 5930: 5918: 5897: 5838: 5811: 5789:Egbert v. Boule 5734: 5720:Lindke v. Freed 5683: 5616: 5506:FEC v. Beaumont 5393: 5385: 5379:Vidal v. Elster 4964: 4902:NAACP v. Button 4845: 4839: 4809:Ex parte Curtis 4800: 4791: 4620: 4491: 4438: 4432:Vidal v. Elster 4374: 4367: 4312: 4302: 4275: 4269:Janus v. AFSCME 4253:Harris v. Quinn 4229:Locke v. Karass 4116: 4110: 4005: 3959:Brown v. Glines 3942: 3936: 3905: 3899: 3714: 3708: 3669: 3668:Content-neutral 3663: 3584: 3578: 3483: 3481:Symbolic speech 3475: 3453:Smith v. Goguen 3442: 3434: 3411:Strict scrutiny 3401: 3379:Osborne v. Ohio 3362: 3361:Speech integral 3356: 3321:(9th Cir. 2009) 3313:(6th Cir. 2009) 3297:(S.D.N.Y. 2005) 3225:(7th Cir. 1985) 3041:(S.D.N.Y. 1933) 3015: 2970: 2888: 2879: 2838: 2829: 2823:Hess v. Indiana 2767:Fiske v. Kansas 2722:(S.D.N.Y. 1917) 2701: 2689: 2678: 2671: 2646: 2609: 2549: 2512: 2506:Carson v. Makin 2473: 2467: 2245:Tucker v. Texas 2197:Davis v. Beason 2179: 2158: 2152:Trump v. Hawaii 2104:Harris v. McRae 2075: 2032: 1989: 1919:Watson v. Jones 1906: 1847: 1785:Stone v. Graham 1761:Engel v. Vitale 1736: 1730: 1724:Carson v. Makin 1463: 1392: 1386: 1299: 1298:Public displays 1289: 1276: 1270: 1236: 1230: 1227: 1221: 1218: 1212: 1209: 1203: 1200: 1194: 1191: 1185: 1182: 1176: 1173: 1167: 1151: 1106: 1082: 1077: 1070:www.bailii.org/ 1064: 1063: 1059: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1033: 1029: 1021: 1017: 1008: 1004: 991: 990: 986: 979: 963: 959: 949: 945: 925: 921: 906: 902: 887: 883: 879: 851: 843:Citizens United 802:political favor 797:First Amendment 781:Justice Douglas 766: 740: 727: 708: 679: 669:arrangements.'" 657: 613: 576:First Amendment 568: 491:Eugene McCarthy 404:Then, in 1974, 397:, and then the 391: 336:First Amendment 221:John P. Stevens 211: 199: 187: 141: 134:First Amendment 94: 47: 41: 22: 17: 12: 11: 5: 7565: 7555: 7554: 7549: 7544: 7539: 7534: 7529: 7524: 7519: 7514: 7509: 7504: 7487: 7486: 7483: 7482: 7480: 7479: 7470: 7467: 7466: 7456: 7455: 7452: 7451: 7449: 7448: 7440: 7432: 7424: 7415: 7412: 7411: 7401: 7400: 7397: 7396: 7393: 7392: 7390: 7389: 7380: 7378: 7374: 7373: 7371: 7370: 7362: 7354: 7346: 7338: 7330: 7322: 7314: 7306: 7297: 7295: 7288: 7287: 7279: 7271: 7263: 7255: 7247: 7239: 7230: 7227: 7226: 7216: 7215: 7212: 7211: 7208: 7207: 7205: 7204: 7196: 7188: 7180: 7172: 7163: 7161: 7157: 7156: 7154: 7153: 7145: 7136: 7134: 7130: 7129: 7127: 7126: 7117: 7115: 7111: 7110: 7108: 7107: 7099: 7091: 7083: 7075: 7067: 7058: 7056: 7052: 7051: 7049: 7048: 7040: 7032: 7024: 7016: 7007: 7005: 6998: 6997: 6989: 6981: 6973: 6965: 6957: 6949: 6941: 6933: 6925: 6916: 6913: 6912: 6902: 6901: 6893: 6892: 6885: 6878: 6870: 6861: 6860: 6857: 6856: 6854: 6853: 6845: 6837: 6829: 6821: 6817:Meyer v. Grant 6813: 6805: 6797: 6789: 6781: 6773: 6765: 6757: 6749: 6741: 6732: 6729: 6728: 6716: 6715: 6712: 6711: 6708: 6707: 6705: 6704: 6696: 6688: 6680: 6672: 6664: 6656: 6648: 6639: 6637: 6633: 6632: 6630: 6629: 6621: 6613: 6605: 6597: 6589: 6581: 6573: 6564: 6562: 6558: 6557: 6555: 6554: 6545: 6543: 6539: 6538: 6536: 6535: 6526: 6524: 6523:Future Conduct 6520: 6519: 6517: 6516: 6508: 6500: 6492: 6484: 6476: 6467: 6465: 6457: 6456: 6444: 6443: 6440: 6439: 6436: 6435: 6433: 6432: 6424: 6416: 6407: 6405: 6399: 6398: 6396: 6395: 6387: 6378: 6376: 6366: 6365: 6353: 6352: 6349: 6348: 6345: 6344: 6342: 6341: 6333: 6325: 6316: 6314: 6310: 6309: 6307: 6306: 6298: 6290: 6282: 6274: 6266: 6257: 6255: 6251: 6250: 6248: 6247: 6239: 6231: 6223: 6215: 6207: 6199: 6191: 6183: 6175: 6167: 6159: 6151: 6142: 6140: 6134: 6133: 6131: 6130: 6122: 6114: 6106: 6098: 6090: 6081: 6079: 6073: 6072: 6070: 6069: 6061: 6053: 6044: 6042: 6038: 6037: 6035: 6034: 6026: 6018: 6010: 6002: 5994: 5986: 5978: 5970: 5962: 5954: 5946: 5937: 5935: 5920: 5919: 5907: 5906: 5903: 5902: 5899: 5898: 5896: 5895: 5891:Beard v. Banks 5887: 5879: 5875:Shaw v. Murphy 5871: 5863: 5855: 5846: 5844: 5840: 5839: 5837: 5836: 5828: 5819: 5817: 5813: 5812: 5810: 5809: 5801: 5793: 5785: 5777: 5769: 5761: 5753: 5744: 5742: 5736: 5735: 5733: 5732: 5724: 5716: 5708: 5700: 5691: 5689: 5685: 5684: 5682: 5681: 5673: 5665: 5657: 5649: 5641: 5633: 5624: 5622: 5618: 5617: 5615: 5614: 5606: 5598: 5590: 5582: 5574: 5566: 5558: 5550: 5542: 5534: 5526: 5518: 5510: 5502: 5494: 5486: 5478: 5470: 5462: 5454: 5446: 5438: 5430: 5422: 5414: 5406: 5397: 5395: 5387: 5386: 5384: 5383: 5375: 5367: 5359: 5351: 5343: 5335: 5327: 5319: 5311: 5303: 5295: 5287: 5279: 5271: 5263: 5255: 5247: 5239: 5231: 5223: 5215: 5207: 5199: 5191: 5183: 5175: 5167: 5159: 5151: 5143: 5135: 5127: 5119: 5111: 5103: 5095: 5087: 5079: 5071: 5063: 5055: 5047: 5039: 5031: 5023: 5015: 5007: 4999: 4991: 4983: 4974: 4972: 4966: 4965: 4963: 4962: 4954: 4946: 4938: 4930: 4922: 4914: 4906: 4898: 4890: 4882: 4874: 4866: 4858: 4849: 4847: 4841: 4840: 4838: 4837: 4829: 4821: 4813: 4804: 4802: 4793: 4792: 4790: 4789: 4781: 4773: 4769:Lane v. Franks 4765: 4757: 4749: 4741: 4733: 4725: 4717: 4709: 4701: 4693: 4685: 4677: 4669: 4661: 4657:Elrod v. Burns 4653: 4645: 4637: 4628: 4626: 4622: 4621: 4619: 4618: 4610: 4602: 4594: 4586: 4578: 4570: 4562: 4554: 4546: 4538: 4534:Healy v. James 4530: 4518: 4510: 4501: 4499: 4493: 4492: 4490: 4489: 4481: 4473: 4465: 4457: 4448: 4446: 4440: 4439: 4437: 4436: 4428: 4420: 4412: 4404: 4396: 4388: 4379: 4377: 4369: 4368: 4366: 4365: 4357: 4349: 4341: 4333: 4325: 4316: 4314: 4308: 4307: 4304: 4303: 4301: 4300: 4292: 4283: 4281: 4274: 4273: 4265: 4257: 4249: 4241: 4233: 4225: 4217: 4209: 4201: 4193: 4185: 4177: 4169: 4161: 4153: 4145: 4137: 4129: 4120: 4118: 4112: 4111: 4109: 4108: 4100: 4092: 4084: 4076: 4068: 4060: 4052: 4044: 4036: 4028: 4019: 4017: 4011: 4010: 4007: 4006: 4004: 4003: 3995: 3987: 3979: 3971: 3963: 3955: 3946: 3944: 3938: 3937: 3935: 3934: 3926: 3918: 3909: 3907: 3901: 3900: 3898: 3897: 3889: 3881: 3873: 3865: 3857: 3849: 3841: 3833: 3825: 3817: 3809: 3801: 3793: 3785: 3777: 3769: 3761: 3753: 3745: 3737: 3729: 3720: 3718: 3707: 3706: 3698: 3690: 3682: 3673: 3671: 3665: 3664: 3662: 3661: 3653: 3645: 3637: 3629: 3621: 3613: 3605: 3597: 3588: 3586: 3580: 3579: 3577: 3576: 3568: 3560: 3552: 3544: 3536: 3528: 3520: 3512: 3504: 3496: 3487: 3485: 3484:versus conduct 3477: 3476: 3474: 3473: 3465: 3457: 3448: 3446: 3436: 3435: 3433: 3432: 3424: 3415: 3413: 3407: 3406: 3403: 3402: 3400: 3399: 3391: 3383: 3375: 3366: 3364: 3358: 3357: 3355: 3354: 3346: 3338: 3330: 3322: 3314: 3306: 3298: 3290: 3282: 3274: 3266: 3258: 3250: 3242: 3234: 3226: 3218: 3210: 3202: 3194: 3186: 3178: 3170: 3162: 3154: 3146: 3138: 3130: 3122: 3114: 3106: 3098: 3090: 3082: 3074: 3066: 3058: 3050: 3042: 3034: 3025: 3023: 3017: 3016: 3014: 3013: 3005: 2997: 2989: 2980: 2978: 2972: 2971: 2969: 2968: 2960: 2952: 2944: 2936: 2928: 2920: 2912: 2904: 2895: 2893: 2891:heckler's veto 2885:Fighting words 2881: 2880: 2878: 2877: 2869: 2861: 2853: 2844: 2842: 2831: 2830: 2828: 2827: 2819: 2807: 2799: 2787: 2779: 2771: 2763: 2755: 2747: 2739: 2731: 2723: 2715: 2708: 2706: 2692: 2680: 2679: 2660: 2659: 2656: 2655: 2652: 2651: 2648: 2647: 2645: 2644: 2636: 2628: 2619: 2617: 2611: 2610: 2608: 2607: 2599: 2591: 2583: 2575: 2566: 2564: 2555: 2551: 2550: 2548: 2547: 2539: 2531: 2522: 2520: 2514: 2513: 2511: 2510: 2502: 2494: 2486: 2482:Locke v. Davey 2477: 2475: 2466: 2465: 2457: 2449: 2441: 2433: 2425: 2417: 2409: 2401: 2393: 2385: 2377: 2369: 2361: 2353: 2345: 2337: 2329: 2321: 2313: 2305: 2297: 2289: 2281: 2273: 2265: 2257: 2249: 2241: 2233: 2225: 2217: 2209: 2201: 2193: 2184: 2181: 2180: 2168: 2167: 2164: 2163: 2160: 2159: 2157: 2156: 2148: 2140: 2132: 2124: 2116: 2108: 2100: 2092: 2083: 2081: 2077: 2076: 2074: 2073: 2065: 2057: 2049: 2040: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2031: 2030: 2022: 2014: 2006: 2002:Flast v. Cohen 1997: 1995: 1991: 1990: 1988: 1987: 1979: 1971: 1963: 1955: 1947: 1939: 1931: 1923: 1914: 1912: 1908: 1907: 1905: 1904: 1896: 1888: 1880: 1872: 1864: 1855: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1846: 1845: 1837: 1829: 1821: 1817:Lee v. Weisman 1813: 1805: 1797: 1789: 1781: 1773: 1765: 1757: 1749: 1740: 1738: 1737:public schools 1732: 1731: 1729: 1728: 1720: 1712: 1704: 1696: 1688: 1680: 1672: 1664: 1656: 1648: 1640: 1632: 1624: 1616: 1608: 1600: 1592: 1584: 1576: 1568: 1560: 1556:Sloan v. Lemon 1552: 1544: 1540:Hunt v. McNair 1536: 1528: 1520: 1512: 1504: 1496: 1492:Flast v. Cohen 1488: 1480: 1471: 1469: 1468:Public funding 1465: 1464: 1462: 1461: 1453: 1445: 1437: 1429: 1421: 1413: 1405: 1396: 1394: 1388: 1387: 1385: 1384: 1376: 1368: 1360: 1352: 1344: 1336: 1328: 1320: 1312: 1303: 1301: 1300:and ceremonies 1291: 1290: 1278: 1277: 1269: 1268: 1261: 1254: 1246: 1240: 1239: 1189:Google Scholar 1150: 1149:External links 1147: 1146: 1145: 1110: 1104: 1081: 1078: 1076: 1075: 1057: 1052:www.c-span.org 1039: 1027: 1015: 1002: 984: 978:978-0327174172 977: 971:. LexisNexis. 957: 943: 919: 900: 880: 878: 875: 874: 873: 865: 857: 850: 847: 844: 765: 762: 761: 760: 739: 738:Make-up of FEC 736: 735: 734: 731: 726: 723: 722: 721: 717: 713: 707: 704: 703: 702: 699: 695: 692: 688: 684: 678: 675: 674: 673: 670: 666: 656: 653: 652: 651: 647: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 618: 612: 609: 605: 604: 601: 598: 595: 592: 589: 586: 583: 567: 564: 531:' request for 465: 464: 448: 445: 442: 439: 432: 429: 390: 387: 303: 302: 292: 291: 287: 286: 282: 281: 278: 277:Concur/dissent 274: 273: 270: 269:Concur/dissent 266: 265: 262: 261:Concur/dissent 258: 257: 254: 253:Concur/dissent 250: 249: 246: 245:Concur/dissent 242: 241: 235: 231: 230: 226: 225: 224: 223: 201:Harry Blackmun 185:Potter Stewart 174: 171: 166: 160: 159: 155: 154: 124: 123: 119: 118: 115: 111: 110: 106: 105: 100: 96: 95: 80: 64: 60: 59: 54: 53:Full case name 50: 49: 43: 42: 37: 29: 28: 20: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7564: 7553: 7550: 7548: 7545: 7543: 7540: 7538: 7535: 7533: 7530: 7528: 7525: 7523: 7520: 7518: 7515: 7513: 7510: 7508: 7505: 7503: 7500: 7499: 7497: 7477: 7476: 7472: 7471: 7468: 7461: 7457: 7446: 7445: 7441: 7438: 7437: 7433: 7430: 7429: 7425: 7422: 7421: 7417: 7416: 7413: 7406: 7402: 7387: 7386: 7382: 7381: 7379: 7375: 7368: 7367: 7363: 7360: 7359: 7355: 7352: 7351: 7347: 7344: 7343: 7339: 7336: 7335: 7331: 7328: 7327: 7323: 7320: 7319: 7315: 7312: 7311: 7307: 7304: 7303: 7299: 7298: 7296: 7292: 7285: 7284: 7280: 7277: 7276: 7272: 7269: 7268: 7264: 7261: 7260: 7256: 7253: 7252: 7248: 7245: 7244: 7240: 7237: 7236: 7232: 7231: 7228: 7221: 7217: 7202: 7201: 7197: 7194: 7193: 7189: 7186: 7185: 7181: 7178: 7177: 7173: 7170: 7169: 7165: 7164: 7162: 7158: 7151: 7150: 7146: 7143: 7142: 7138: 7137: 7135: 7131: 7124: 7123: 7119: 7118: 7116: 7112: 7105: 7104: 7100: 7097: 7096: 7092: 7089: 7088: 7084: 7081: 7080: 7076: 7073: 7072: 7068: 7065: 7064: 7060: 7059: 7057: 7053: 7046: 7045: 7041: 7038: 7037: 7033: 7030: 7029: 7025: 7022: 7021: 7017: 7014: 7013: 7009: 7008: 7006: 7002: 6995: 6994: 6990: 6987: 6986: 6982: 6979: 6978: 6974: 6971: 6970: 6966: 6963: 6962: 6958: 6955: 6954: 6950: 6947: 6946: 6942: 6939: 6938: 6934: 6931: 6930: 6926: 6923: 6922: 6918: 6917: 6914: 6907: 6903: 6898: 6891: 6886: 6884: 6879: 6877: 6872: 6871: 6868: 6851: 6850: 6846: 6843: 6842: 6838: 6835: 6834: 6830: 6827: 6826: 6822: 6819: 6818: 6814: 6811: 6810: 6806: 6803: 6802: 6798: 6795: 6794: 6790: 6787: 6786: 6782: 6779: 6778: 6774: 6771: 6770: 6766: 6763: 6762: 6758: 6755: 6754: 6750: 6747: 6746: 6742: 6739: 6738: 6734: 6733: 6730: 6726: 6721: 6717: 6702: 6701: 6697: 6694: 6693: 6689: 6686: 6685: 6681: 6678: 6677: 6673: 6670: 6669: 6665: 6662: 6661: 6657: 6654: 6653: 6649: 6646: 6645: 6641: 6640: 6638: 6634: 6627: 6626: 6622: 6619: 6618: 6614: 6611: 6610: 6606: 6603: 6602: 6598: 6595: 6594: 6590: 6587: 6586: 6582: 6579: 6578: 6574: 6571: 6570: 6566: 6565: 6563: 6559: 6552: 6551: 6547: 6546: 6544: 6540: 6533: 6532: 6528: 6527: 6525: 6521: 6514: 6513: 6509: 6506: 6505: 6501: 6498: 6497: 6493: 6490: 6489: 6485: 6482: 6481: 6477: 6474: 6473: 6469: 6468: 6466: 6464:Organizations 6462: 6458: 6454: 6449: 6445: 6430: 6429: 6425: 6422: 6421: 6417: 6414: 6413: 6409: 6408: 6406: 6400: 6393: 6392: 6388: 6385: 6384: 6380: 6379: 6377: 6375: 6374:Incorporation 6371: 6367: 6363: 6358: 6354: 6339: 6338: 6334: 6331: 6330: 6326: 6323: 6322: 6318: 6317: 6315: 6311: 6304: 6303: 6299: 6296: 6295: 6291: 6288: 6287: 6283: 6280: 6279: 6275: 6272: 6271: 6267: 6264: 6263: 6259: 6258: 6256: 6252: 6245: 6244: 6240: 6237: 6236: 6232: 6229: 6228: 6224: 6221: 6220: 6216: 6213: 6212: 6208: 6205: 6204: 6200: 6197: 6196: 6192: 6189: 6188: 6184: 6181: 6180: 6176: 6173: 6172: 6168: 6165: 6164: 6160: 6157: 6156: 6152: 6149: 6148: 6144: 6143: 6141: 6139: 6135: 6128: 6127: 6123: 6120: 6119: 6115: 6112: 6111: 6107: 6104: 6103: 6099: 6096: 6095: 6091: 6088: 6087: 6083: 6082: 6080: 6074: 6067: 6066: 6062: 6059: 6058: 6054: 6051: 6050: 6046: 6045: 6043: 6039: 6032: 6031: 6027: 6024: 6023: 6019: 6016: 6015: 6011: 6008: 6007: 6003: 6000: 5999: 5995: 5992: 5991: 5987: 5984: 5983: 5979: 5976: 5975: 5971: 5968: 5967: 5963: 5960: 5959: 5955: 5952: 5951: 5947: 5944: 5943: 5939: 5938: 5936: 5934: 5929: 5925: 5921: 5917: 5912: 5908: 5893: 5892: 5888: 5885: 5884: 5880: 5877: 5876: 5872: 5869: 5868: 5864: 5861: 5860: 5856: 5853: 5852: 5848: 5847: 5845: 5841: 5834: 5833: 5829: 5826: 5825: 5821: 5820: 5818: 5814: 5807: 5806: 5802: 5799: 5798: 5794: 5791: 5790: 5786: 5783: 5782: 5778: 5775: 5774: 5770: 5767: 5766: 5762: 5759: 5758: 5754: 5751: 5750: 5746: 5745: 5743: 5741: 5737: 5730: 5729: 5725: 5722: 5721: 5717: 5714: 5713: 5709: 5706: 5705: 5701: 5698: 5697: 5693: 5692: 5690: 5686: 5679: 5678: 5674: 5671: 5670: 5666: 5663: 5662: 5658: 5655: 5654: 5650: 5647: 5646: 5642: 5639: 5638: 5634: 5631: 5630: 5626: 5625: 5623: 5619: 5612: 5611: 5607: 5604: 5603: 5599: 5596: 5595: 5591: 5588: 5587: 5583: 5580: 5579: 5575: 5572: 5571: 5567: 5564: 5563: 5559: 5556: 5555: 5551: 5548: 5547: 5543: 5540: 5539: 5535: 5532: 5531: 5527: 5524: 5523: 5519: 5516: 5515: 5511: 5508: 5507: 5503: 5500: 5499: 5495: 5492: 5491: 5487: 5484: 5483: 5479: 5476: 5475: 5471: 5468: 5467: 5463: 5460: 5459: 5455: 5452: 5451: 5447: 5444: 5443: 5439: 5436: 5435: 5431: 5428: 5427: 5423: 5420: 5419: 5415: 5412: 5411: 5407: 5404: 5403: 5399: 5398: 5396: 5392: 5388: 5381: 5380: 5376: 5373: 5372: 5368: 5365: 5364: 5360: 5357: 5356: 5352: 5349: 5348: 5344: 5341: 5340: 5336: 5333: 5332: 5328: 5325: 5324: 5320: 5317: 5316: 5312: 5309: 5308: 5304: 5301: 5300: 5296: 5293: 5292: 5288: 5285: 5284: 5280: 5277: 5276: 5272: 5269: 5268: 5264: 5261: 5260: 5256: 5253: 5252: 5248: 5245: 5244: 5240: 5237: 5236: 5232: 5229: 5228: 5224: 5221: 5220: 5216: 5213: 5212: 5208: 5205: 5204: 5200: 5197: 5196: 5192: 5189: 5188: 5184: 5181: 5180: 5176: 5173: 5172: 5168: 5165: 5164: 5160: 5157: 5156: 5152: 5149: 5148: 5144: 5141: 5140: 5136: 5133: 5132: 5128: 5125: 5124: 5120: 5117: 5116: 5112: 5109: 5108: 5104: 5101: 5100: 5096: 5093: 5092: 5088: 5085: 5084: 5080: 5077: 5076: 5072: 5069: 5068: 5064: 5061: 5060: 5056: 5053: 5052: 5048: 5045: 5044: 5040: 5037: 5036: 5032: 5029: 5028: 5024: 5021: 5020: 5016: 5013: 5012: 5008: 5005: 5004: 5000: 4997: 4996: 4992: 4989: 4988: 4984: 4981: 4980: 4976: 4975: 4973: 4971: 4967: 4960: 4959: 4955: 4952: 4951: 4947: 4944: 4943: 4939: 4936: 4935: 4931: 4928: 4927: 4923: 4920: 4919: 4915: 4912: 4911: 4907: 4904: 4903: 4899: 4896: 4895: 4891: 4888: 4887: 4883: 4880: 4879: 4875: 4872: 4871: 4867: 4864: 4863: 4859: 4856: 4855: 4851: 4850: 4848: 4844:Licensing and 4842: 4835: 4834: 4830: 4827: 4826: 4822: 4819: 4818: 4814: 4811: 4810: 4806: 4805: 4803: 4798: 4794: 4787: 4786: 4782: 4779: 4778: 4774: 4771: 4770: 4766: 4763: 4762: 4758: 4755: 4754: 4750: 4747: 4746: 4742: 4739: 4738: 4734: 4731: 4730: 4726: 4723: 4722: 4718: 4715: 4714: 4710: 4707: 4706: 4702: 4699: 4698: 4694: 4691: 4690: 4686: 4683: 4682: 4678: 4675: 4674: 4670: 4667: 4666: 4662: 4659: 4658: 4654: 4651: 4650: 4646: 4643: 4642: 4638: 4635: 4634: 4630: 4629: 4627: 4623: 4616: 4615: 4611: 4608: 4607: 4603: 4600: 4599: 4595: 4592: 4591: 4587: 4584: 4583: 4579: 4576: 4575: 4571: 4568: 4567: 4563: 4560: 4559: 4555: 4552: 4551: 4547: 4544: 4543: 4539: 4536: 4535: 4531: 4528: 4524: 4523: 4519: 4516: 4515: 4511: 4508: 4507: 4503: 4502: 4500: 4498: 4497:School speech 4494: 4487: 4486: 4482: 4479: 4478: 4474: 4471: 4470: 4466: 4463: 4462: 4458: 4455: 4454: 4450: 4449: 4447: 4445: 4444:Loyalty oaths 4441: 4434: 4433: 4429: 4426: 4425: 4421: 4418: 4417: 4413: 4410: 4409: 4405: 4402: 4401: 4397: 4394: 4393: 4389: 4386: 4385: 4381: 4380: 4378: 4376: 4370: 4363: 4362: 4358: 4355: 4354: 4350: 4347: 4346: 4342: 4339: 4338: 4334: 4331: 4330: 4326: 4323: 4322: 4318: 4317: 4315: 4313:and subsidies 4309: 4298: 4297: 4293: 4290: 4289: 4285: 4284: 4282: 4278: 4271: 4270: 4266: 4263: 4262: 4258: 4255: 4254: 4250: 4247: 4246: 4242: 4239: 4238: 4234: 4231: 4230: 4226: 4223: 4222: 4218: 4215: 4214: 4210: 4207: 4206: 4202: 4199: 4198: 4194: 4191: 4190: 4186: 4183: 4182: 4178: 4175: 4174: 4170: 4167: 4166: 4162: 4159: 4158: 4154: 4151: 4150: 4146: 4143: 4142: 4138: 4135: 4134: 4130: 4127: 4126: 4122: 4121: 4119: 4113: 4106: 4105: 4101: 4098: 4097: 4093: 4090: 4089: 4085: 4082: 4081: 4077: 4074: 4073: 4069: 4066: 4065: 4061: 4058: 4057: 4053: 4050: 4049: 4045: 4042: 4041: 4037: 4034: 4033: 4029: 4026: 4025: 4021: 4020: 4018: 4016: 4012: 4001: 4000: 3996: 3993: 3992: 3988: 3985: 3984: 3980: 3977: 3976: 3972: 3969: 3968: 3964: 3961: 3960: 3956: 3953: 3952: 3948: 3947: 3945: 3939: 3932: 3931: 3927: 3924: 3923: 3919: 3916: 3915: 3911: 3910: 3908: 3902: 3895: 3894: 3890: 3887: 3886: 3882: 3879: 3878: 3874: 3871: 3870: 3866: 3863: 3862: 3858: 3855: 3854: 3850: 3847: 3846: 3842: 3839: 3838: 3834: 3831: 3830: 3826: 3823: 3822: 3818: 3815: 3814: 3810: 3807: 3806: 3802: 3799: 3798: 3794: 3791: 3790: 3786: 3783: 3782: 3778: 3775: 3774: 3770: 3767: 3766: 3762: 3759: 3758: 3754: 3751: 3750: 3746: 3743: 3742: 3738: 3735: 3734: 3730: 3727: 3726: 3722: 3721: 3719: 3717: 3711: 3704: 3703: 3699: 3696: 3695: 3691: 3688: 3687: 3683: 3680: 3679: 3675: 3674: 3672: 3666: 3659: 3658: 3654: 3651: 3650: 3646: 3643: 3642: 3638: 3635: 3634: 3630: 3627: 3626: 3622: 3619: 3618: 3614: 3611: 3610: 3609:Boos v. Barry 3606: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3595: 3594: 3590: 3589: 3587: 3583:Content-based 3581: 3574: 3573: 3569: 3566: 3565: 3561: 3558: 3557: 3553: 3550: 3549: 3545: 3542: 3541: 3537: 3534: 3533: 3529: 3526: 3525: 3521: 3518: 3517: 3513: 3510: 3509: 3505: 3502: 3501: 3497: 3494: 3493: 3489: 3488: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3471: 3470: 3466: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3449: 3447: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3430: 3429: 3425: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3416: 3414: 3412: 3408: 3397: 3396: 3392: 3389: 3388: 3384: 3381: 3380: 3376: 3373: 3372: 3368: 3367: 3365: 3359: 3352: 3351: 3347: 3344: 3343: 3339: 3336: 3335: 3331: 3328: 3327: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3315: 3312: 3311: 3307: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3296: 3295: 3291: 3288: 3287: 3283: 3280: 3279: 3275: 3272: 3271: 3267: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3256: 3255: 3251: 3248: 3247: 3243: 3240: 3239: 3235: 3232: 3231: 3227: 3224: 3223: 3219: 3216: 3215: 3211: 3208: 3207: 3203: 3200: 3199: 3195: 3192: 3191: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3179: 3176: 3175: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3160: 3159: 3155: 3152: 3151: 3147: 3144: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3135: 3131: 3128: 3127: 3123: 3120: 3119: 3115: 3112: 3111: 3107: 3104: 3103: 3099: 3096: 3095: 3091: 3088: 3087: 3083: 3080: 3079: 3075: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3064: 3063: 3059: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3048: 3047: 3043: 3040: 3039: 3035: 3032: 3031: 3027: 3026: 3024: 3022: 3018: 3011: 3010: 3006: 3003: 3002: 2998: 2995: 2994: 2990: 2987: 2986: 2982: 2981: 2979: 2977: 2973: 2966: 2965: 2961: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2950: 2949: 2945: 2942: 2941: 2937: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2918: 2917: 2913: 2910: 2909: 2905: 2902: 2901: 2897: 2896: 2894: 2892: 2886: 2882: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2859: 2858: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2846: 2845: 2843: 2841: 2836: 2832: 2825: 2824: 2820: 2817: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2805: 2804: 2803:Bond v. Floyd 2800: 2797: 2793: 2792: 2788: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2769: 2768: 2764: 2761: 2760: 2756: 2753: 2752: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2737: 2736: 2732: 2729: 2728: 2724: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2709: 2707: 2705: 2700: 2696: 2693: 2691: 2685: 2681: 2675: 2670: 2665: 2661: 2642: 2641: 2637: 2634: 2633: 2632:Holt v. Hobbs 2629: 2626: 2625: 2621: 2620: 2618: 2616: 2612: 2605: 2604: 2600: 2597: 2596: 2592: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2581: 2580: 2576: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2565: 2563: 2559: 2556: 2552: 2545: 2544: 2540: 2537: 2536: 2532: 2529: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2521: 2519: 2515: 2508: 2507: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2495: 2492: 2491: 2487: 2484: 2483: 2479: 2478: 2476: 2470: 2463: 2462: 2458: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2447: 2446: 2442: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2431: 2430: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2407: 2406: 2402: 2399: 2398: 2394: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2362: 2359: 2358: 2354: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2334: 2330: 2327: 2326: 2322: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2311: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2295: 2294: 2290: 2287: 2286: 2282: 2279: 2278: 2274: 2271: 2270: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2258: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2247: 2246: 2242: 2239: 2238: 2234: 2231: 2230: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2218: 2215: 2214: 2210: 2207: 2206: 2202: 2199: 2198: 2194: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2185: 2182: 2178: 2173: 2169: 2154: 2153: 2149: 2146: 2145: 2141: 2138: 2137: 2133: 2130: 2129: 2125: 2122: 2121: 2117: 2114: 2113: 2109: 2106: 2105: 2101: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2090: 2089: 2085: 2084: 2082: 2078: 2071: 2070: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2047: 2046: 2042: 2041: 2039: 2035: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2015: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1985: 1984: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1975:Jones v. Wolf 1972: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1913: 1909: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1886: 1885: 1881: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1870: 1869: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1854: 1850: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1787: 1786: 1782: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1755: 1754: 1750: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1741: 1739: 1733: 1726: 1725: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1694: 1693: 1689: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1670: 1669: 1665: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1625: 1622: 1621: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1601: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1581: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1470: 1466: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1397: 1395: 1389: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1366: 1365: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1302: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1283: 1279: 1274: 1267: 1262: 1260: 1255: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1235: 1226: 1217: 1208: 1199: 1190: 1181: 1180:CourtListener 1172: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1142: 1138: 1133: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1107: 1105:0-8173-1301-X 1101: 1097: 1092: 1091: 1084: 1083: 1071: 1067: 1061: 1053: 1049: 1043: 1036: 1031: 1024: 1019: 1012: 1006: 998: 994: 988: 980: 974: 970: 969: 961: 954: 953: 947: 940: 937: 933: 929: 923: 916: 913: 909: 904: 897: 894: 890: 885: 881: 871: 870: 866: 863: 862: 858: 856: 853: 852: 846: 842: 838: 834: 831: 827: 822: 820: 815: 811: 807: 805: 803: 798: 791: 789: 788:Justice White 785: 782: 774: 773:Justice White 770: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 741: 732: 729: 728: 718: 714: 710: 709: 700: 696: 693: 689: 685: 681: 680: 671: 667: 663: 659: 658: 648: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 626: 625: 619: 615: 614: 608: 602: 599: 596: 593: 590: 587: 584: 581: 580: 579: 577: 573: 563: 561: 557: 553: 552:5th Amendment 549: 544: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 521: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 489: 485: 481: 478: 474: 470: 461: 457: 453: 449: 446: 443: 440: 437: 433: 430: 427: 423: 422: 421: 419: 415: 414:contributions 411: 407: 402: 400: 396: 386: 384: 379: 377: 376: 371: 370: 365: 364: 359: 355: 351: 349: 345: 341: 338:provision on 337: 333: 332: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 310: 301: 297: 293: 288: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 236: 232: 229:Case opinions 227: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 175: 172: 170: 167: 165:Chief Justice 164: 163: 161: 156: 153: 149: 145: 139: 135: 131: 125: 120: 116: 112: 107: 104: 103:Oral argument 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 78: 77: 72: 69: 65: 61: 58: 55: 51: 44: 40: 30: 25: 19: 7473: 7464:Ratification 7442: 7434: 7426: 7418: 7383: 7364: 7356: 7348: 7340: 7332: 7324: 7316: 7308: 7300: 7281: 7273: 7265: 7257: 7249: 7241: 7233: 7198: 7192:MWAA v. CAAN 7190: 7183: 7182: 7174: 7166: 7149:Carr v. Saul 7147: 7139: 7120: 7101: 7095:Lucia v. SEC 7093: 7085: 7077: 7069: 7061: 7042: 7034: 7026: 7018: 7010: 6991: 6983: 6975: 6967: 6959: 6951: 6943: 6935: 6927: 6919: 6847: 6839: 6831: 6823: 6815: 6807: 6799: 6791: 6783: 6775: 6767: 6759: 6751: 6743: 6735: 6698: 6690: 6682: 6674: 6666: 6658: 6650: 6642: 6623: 6615: 6607: 6599: 6591: 6583: 6575: 6567: 6550:In re Primus 6548: 6542:Solicitation 6529: 6510: 6502: 6494: 6486: 6478: 6470: 6426: 6418: 6410: 6389: 6381: 6335: 6327: 6319: 6300: 6292: 6284: 6276: 6268: 6260: 6241: 6233: 6225: 6217: 6209: 6201: 6193: 6185: 6177: 6169: 6161: 6153: 6145: 6124: 6116: 6108: 6100: 6092: 6084: 6076:Taxation and 6063: 6055: 6047: 6028: 6020: 6012: 6004: 5996: 5988: 5980: 5972: 5964: 5956: 5948: 5940: 5889: 5881: 5873: 5865: 5857: 5849: 5830: 5822: 5803: 5795: 5787: 5779: 5771: 5765:Wood v. Moss 5763: 5755: 5747: 5726: 5718: 5710: 5702: 5694: 5688:State action 5675: 5667: 5659: 5651: 5644: 5643: 5635: 5627: 5608: 5600: 5592: 5584: 5576: 5568: 5560: 5552: 5546:Davis v. FEC 5544: 5536: 5528: 5520: 5512: 5504: 5496: 5488: 5480: 5472: 5464: 5456: 5448: 5440: 5432: 5424: 5416: 5408: 5401: 5400: 5377: 5369: 5361: 5355:Matal v. Tam 5353: 5345: 5337: 5329: 5321: 5313: 5305: 5297: 5289: 5281: 5273: 5265: 5257: 5249: 5241: 5233: 5225: 5217: 5209: 5201: 5193: 5185: 5177: 5169: 5161: 5153: 5145: 5137: 5129: 5121: 5113: 5107:In re R.M.J. 5105: 5097: 5089: 5081: 5073: 5065: 5059:In re Primus 5057: 5049: 5041: 5033: 5025: 5017: 5009: 5001: 4993: 4985: 4977: 4956: 4948: 4940: 4932: 4924: 4916: 4908: 4900: 4892: 4884: 4876: 4868: 4860: 4852: 4831: 4823: 4815: 4807: 4801:similar laws 4783: 4775: 4767: 4759: 4751: 4743: 4735: 4727: 4719: 4711: 4703: 4695: 4687: 4679: 4671: 4663: 4655: 4647: 4639: 4631: 4612: 4604: 4596: 4588: 4580: 4572: 4564: 4556: 4548: 4540: 4532: 4520: 4512: 4504: 4483: 4475: 4467: 4459: 4451: 4430: 4422: 4414: 4406: 4400:Matal v. Tam 4398: 4390: 4382: 4359: 4351: 4343: 4335: 4327: 4319: 4294: 4286: 4267: 4259: 4251: 4243: 4235: 4227: 4219: 4211: 4203: 4195: 4187: 4179: 4171: 4163: 4155: 4147: 4139: 4131: 4123: 4102: 4094: 4086: 4078: 4070: 4062: 4054: 4046: 4038: 4030: 4022: 3997: 3989: 3981: 3973: 3965: 3957: 3949: 3928: 3920: 3912: 3906:public forum 3891: 3883: 3875: 3867: 3859: 3851: 3843: 3835: 3827: 3819: 3811: 3803: 3795: 3787: 3779: 3771: 3763: 3755: 3747: 3739: 3733:Hague v. CIO 3731: 3723: 3716:public forum 3700: 3692: 3684: 3676: 3670:restrictions 3655: 3647: 3639: 3631: 3623: 3615: 3607: 3599: 3591: 3585:restrictions 3570: 3562: 3554: 3546: 3538: 3530: 3522: 3514: 3506: 3498: 3490: 3467: 3459: 3451: 3426: 3418: 3393: 3385: 3377: 3369: 3348: 3340: 3332: 3324: 3316: 3308: 3300: 3292: 3284: 3276: 3268: 3260: 3252: 3246:Reno v. ACLU 3244: 3236: 3228: 3220: 3212: 3204: 3196: 3188: 3180: 3172: 3164: 3156: 3148: 3140: 3132: 3124: 3116: 3108: 3100: 3092: 3084: 3076: 3068: 3060: 3052: 3044: 3036: 3028: 3007: 2999: 2991: 2983: 2976:True threats 2962: 2954: 2946: 2938: 2930: 2922: 2914: 2906: 2898: 2871: 2863: 2855: 2847: 2840:false speech 2821: 2809: 2801: 2789: 2786:(1955; 1961) 2781: 2773: 2765: 2757: 2749: 2741: 2733: 2725: 2717: 2638: 2630: 2622: 2601: 2593: 2585: 2577: 2569: 2541: 2533: 2525: 2504: 2496: 2488: 2480: 2459: 2451: 2443: 2435: 2427: 2419: 2411: 2403: 2395: 2387: 2379: 2371: 2365:Bowen v. Roy 2363: 2355: 2347: 2339: 2331: 2323: 2315: 2309:Cruz v. Beto 2307: 2299: 2291: 2283: 2275: 2267: 2259: 2251: 2243: 2235: 2227: 2219: 2211: 2203: 2195: 2187: 2150: 2142: 2134: 2126: 2118: 2110: 2102: 2094: 2086: 2067: 2059: 2051: 2043: 2024: 2016: 2008: 2000: 1981: 1973: 1965: 1957: 1949: 1941: 1933: 1925: 1917: 1898: 1890: 1882: 1874: 1866: 1858: 1839: 1831: 1823: 1815: 1807: 1799: 1791: 1783: 1775: 1767: 1759: 1751: 1743: 1722: 1714: 1706: 1698: 1690: 1682: 1674: 1666: 1658: 1650: 1642: 1634: 1626: 1618: 1610: 1602: 1594: 1586: 1578: 1570: 1562: 1554: 1546: 1538: 1530: 1522: 1514: 1506: 1498: 1490: 1482: 1474: 1455: 1447: 1439: 1431: 1423: 1415: 1407: 1399: 1378: 1370: 1362: 1354: 1346: 1338: 1330: 1322: 1314: 1306: 1155: 1122: 1118: 1089: 1069: 1060: 1051: 1042: 1037:, 288 (1976) 1030: 1018: 1005: 997:www.aclu.org 996: 987: 967: 960: 950: 946: 922: 917: (1978). 903: 884: 867: 859: 839: 835: 832: 829: 824: 817: 812: 808: 806: 793: 786: 778: 756: 622: 606: 569: 545: 518: 477:U.S. Senator 466: 459: 455: 403: 392: 382: 380: 373: 367: 366:in 1978 and 361: 353: 352: 330: 308: 307: 306: 290:Laws applied 237: 216: 204: 192: 180: 109:Case history 74: 56: 18: 6841:Doe v. Reed 6022:Lowe v. SEC 5669:Doe v. Reed 3440:Overbreadth 3233:(Cal. 1988) 2688:Unprotected 1735:Religion in 941: (2010) 898: (1976) 712:Amendment." 560:due process 533:declaratory 460:pro tempore 418:Gerald Ford 189:Byron White 117:As amended. 7496:Categories 6138:Defamation 6078:privileges 5933:censorship 4375:as speaker 4373:Government 3904:Designated 2835:Defamation 2699:Incitement 1393:exemptions 1216:OpenJurist 1125:(2): 291. 1080:References 631:harmful.'" 572:per curiam 554:rights to 537:injunctive 529:plaintiffs 520:ex officio 456:ex officio 346:'s power. 331:per curiam 238:Per curiam 114:Subsequent 87:U.S. LEXIS 85:659; 1976 4797:Hatch Act 3941:Nonpublic 3444:Vagueness 3021:Obscenity 2037:Blue laws 784:opinion. 779:Although 665:holders." 635:parties." 280:Rehnquist 83:L. Ed. 2d 63:Citations 6899:case law 5816:Boycotts 2704:sedition 1275:case law 1154:Text of 1035:424 US 1 1023:424 US 1 849:See also 764:Dissents 566:Judgment 406:Congress 272:Blackmun 264:Marshall 234:Majority 99:Argument 93:) ¶ 9189 6041:Privacy 5843:Prisons 4525:(1969, 2814:(1969, 2794:(1957, 1171:Cornell 1141:3024584 872:SCR 827 469:lawsuit 383:Buckley 316:of the 136:to the 122:Holding 7478:(1994) 7447:(2023) 7439:(2012) 7431:(2010) 7423:(1994) 7388:(1986) 7369:(2021) 7361:(2020) 7353:(2010) 7345:(1988) 7337:(1958) 7329:(1936) 7321:(1926) 7313:(1897) 7305:(1886) 7286:(1903) 7278:(1901) 7270:(1900) 7262:(1891) 7254:(1890) 7246:(1880) 7238:(1839) 7203:(1994) 7195:(1991) 7187:(1976) 7179:(1928) 7171:(1893) 7152:(2021) 7144:(1995) 7125:(2014) 7106:(2021) 7098:(2018) 7090:(1997) 7082:(1991) 7074:(1879) 7066:(1878) 7047:(1920) 7039:(1890) 7031:(1888) 7023:(1888) 7015:(1867) 6996:(2020) 6988:(2018) 6980:(2017) 6972:(1932) 6964:(1900) 6956:(1898) 6948:(1885) 6940:(1878) 6932:(1856) 6924:(1803) 6852:(2011) 6844:(2010) 6836:(2002) 6828:(1999) 6820:(1988) 6812:(1985) 6804:(1979) 6796:(1972) 6788:(1965) 6780:(1965) 6772:(1963) 6764:(1963) 6756:(1961) 6748:(1945) 6740:(1876) 6703:(2008) 6695:(2008) 6687:(2005) 6679:(2000) 6671:(1997) 6663:(1986) 6655:(1981) 6647:(1975) 6628:(2010) 6620:(2000) 6612:(1995) 6604:(1989) 6596:(1988) 6588:(1987) 6580:(1984) 6572:(1984) 6553:(1978) 6534:(1964) 6515:(2021) 6507:(1963) 6499:(1960) 6491:(1958) 6483:(1957) 6475:(1951) 6431:(2021) 6423:(1945) 6415:(1937) 6394:(1886) 6386:(1876) 6340:(2003) 6332:(1985) 6324:(1977) 6305:(2001) 6297:(1997) 6289:(1996) 6281:(1981) 6273:(1978) 6265:(1969) 6238:(1990) 6230:(1989) 6222:(1988) 6214:(1985) 6206:(1985) 6198:(1984) 6190:(1976) 6182:(1974) 6174:(1970) 6166:(1967) 6158:(1964) 6150:(1952) 6129:(1991) 6121:(1987) 6113:(1983) 6105:(1978) 6097:(1972) 6089:(1936) 6068:(1989) 6060:(1975) 6052:(1967) 6033:(2005) 6025:(1985) 6017:(1978) 6009:(1976) 6001:(1974) 5993:(1971) 5985:(1965) 5977:(1946) 5969:(1946) 5961:(1938) 5953:(1931) 5945:(1907) 5894:(2006) 5886:(2003) 5878:(2001) 5870:(1987) 5862:(1977) 5854:(1974) 5835:(1990) 5827:(1982) 5808:(2024) 5800:(2024) 5792:(2022) 5784:(2019) 5776:(2018) 5768:(2014) 5760:(2012) 5752:(2006) 5731:(2024) 5723:(2024) 5715:(2019) 5707:(1972) 5699:(1946) 5680:(2021) 5672:(2010) 5664:(1995) 5656:(1982) 5648:(1976) 5640:(1960) 5632:(1958) 5613:(2022) 5605:(2019) 5597:(2015) 5589:(2014) 5581:(2012) 5573:(2011) 5565:(2011) 5557:(2010) 5549:(2008) 5541:(2007) 5533:(2006) 5525:(2006) 5517:(2003) 5509:(2003) 5501:(2002) 5493:(2001) 5485:(2000) 5477:(1996) 5469:(1990) 5461:(1989) 5453:(1986) 5445:(1985) 5437:(1982) 5429:(1981) 5421:(1981) 5413:(1978) 5405:(1976) 5382:(2024) 5374:(2020) 5366:(2019) 5358:(2017) 5350:(2017) 5342:(2011) 5334:(2010) 5326:(2010) 5318:(2007) 5310:(2005) 5302:(2003) 5294:(2002) 5286:(2001) 5278:(2001) 5270:(1999) 5262:(1999) 5254:(1997) 5246:(1996) 5238:(1995) 5230:(1995) 5222:(1995) 5214:(1994) 5206:(1993) 5198:(1993) 5190:(1993) 5182:(1990) 5174:(1989) 5166:(1988) 5158:(1988) 5150:(1987) 5142:(1986) 5134:(1986) 5126:(1985) 5118:(1982) 5110:(1982) 5102:(1981) 5094:(1980) 5086:(1980) 5078:(1979) 5070:(1978) 5062:(1978) 5054:(1977) 5046:(1977) 5038:(1977) 5030:(1976) 5022:(1975) 5014:(1975) 5006:(1974) 4998:(1973) 4990:(1970) 4982:(1942) 4961:(1992) 4953:(1988) 4945:(1982) 4937:(1981) 4929:(1967) 4921:(1965) 4913:(1964) 4905:(1963) 4897:(1957) 4889:(1952) 4881:(1951) 4873:(1943) 4865:(1941) 4857:(1915) 4836:(1973) 4828:(1973) 4820:(1947) 4812:(1882) 4788:(2022) 4780:(2016) 4772:(2014) 4764:(2011) 4756:(2007) 4748:(2006) 4740:(2001) 4732:(1996) 4724:(1995) 4716:(1994) 4708:(1990) 4700:(1987) 4692:(1983) 4684:(1979) 4676:(1979) 4668:(1977) 4660:(1976) 4652:(1974) 4644:(1972) 4636:(1968) 4617:(2021) 4609:(2021) 4601:(2007) 4593:(2007) 4585:(2001) 4577:(1995) 4569:(1990) 4561:(1988) 4553:(1986) 4545:(1982) 4537:(1972) 4517:(1943) 4509:(1940) 4488:(1974) 4480:(1967) 4472:(1958) 4464:(1951) 4456:(1950) 4435:(2024) 4427:(2022) 4419:(2022) 4411:(2019) 4403:(2017) 4395:(2015) 4387:(2009) 4364:(2020) 4356:(2013) 4348:(2001) 4340:(1998) 4332:(1991) 4324:(1983) 4299:(1984) 4291:(1944) 4272:(2018) 4264:(2016) 4256:(2014) 4248:(2012) 4240:(2009) 4232:(2008) 4224:(2007) 4216:(2005) 4208:(2001) 4200:(2000) 4192:(1997) 4184:(1991) 4176:(1990) 4168:(1988) 4160:(1986) 4152:(1984) 4144:(1977) 4136:(1961) 4128:(1956) 4107:(2024) 4099:(2023) 4091:(2018) 4083:(2006) 4075:(1995) 4067:(1986) 4059:(1980) 4051:(1977) 4043:(1974) 4035:(1943) 4027:(1940) 4002:(2018) 3994:(1997) 3986:(1992) 3978:(1985) 3970:(1983) 3962:(1980) 3954:(1974) 3933:(2021) 3925:(1995) 3917:(1981) 3896:(2014) 3888:(2000) 3880:(1997) 3872:(1994) 3864:(1992) 3856:(1989) 3848:(1988) 3840:(1984) 3832:(1983) 3824:(1981) 3816:(1971) 3808:(1971) 3800:(1968) 3792:(1966) 3784:(1966) 3776:(1965) 3768:(1963) 3760:(1951) 3752:(1943) 3744:(1940) 3736:(1939) 3728:(1897) 3713:In the 3705:(2017) 3697:(1994) 3689:(1986) 3681:(1939) 3660:(2022) 3652:(2020) 3644:(2015) 3636:(1992) 3628:(1991) 3620:(1990) 3612:(1988) 3604:(1981) 3596:(1965) 3575:(2003) 3567:(2000) 3559:(1991) 3551:(1990) 3543:(1989) 3535:(1989) 3527:(1984) 3519:(1974) 3511:(1971) 3503:(1968) 3495:(1931) 3472:(2018) 3464:(1987) 3456:(1974) 3431:(2015) 3423:(2010) 3398:(2023) 3390:(2002) 3382:(1990) 3374:(1982) 3353:(2025) 3345:(2012) 3337:(2011) 3329:(2010) 3305:(2008) 3289:(2004) 3281:(2003) 3273:(2002) 3265:(2002) 3257:(2000) 3249:(1997) 3241:(1994) 3217:(1980) 3209:(1976) 3201:(1975) 3193:(1975) 3185:(1974) 3177:(1973) 3169:(1973) 3161:(1973) 3153:(1972) 3145:(1971) 3137:(1969) 3129:(1968) 3121:(1967) 3113:(1966) 3105:(1966) 3097:(1964) 3089:(1964) 3081:(1962) 3073:(1961) 3065:(1959) 3057:(1958) 3049:(1957) 3033:(1896) 3012:(2023) 3004:(2015) 2996:(2003) 2988:(1969) 2967:(2011) 2959:(1992) 2951:(1977) 2943:(1971) 2935:(1969) 2927:(1951) 2919:(1949) 2911:(1942) 2903:(1940) 2876:(2014) 2868:(2012) 2860:(1988) 2852:(1964) 2826:(1973) 2806:(1966) 2778:(1951) 2770:(1927) 2762:(1927) 2754:(1925) 2746:(1919) 2738:(1919) 2730:(1919) 2714:(1798) 2690:speech 2674:portal 2643:(2022) 2635:(2015) 2627:(2011) 2615:RLUIPA 2606:(2020) 2598:(2020) 2590:(2016) 2582:(2014) 2574:(2006) 2546:(2020) 2538:(2012) 2530:(1979) 2509:(2022) 2501:(2020) 2493:(2017) 2485:(2004) 2464:(2022) 2456:(2021) 2448:(2021) 2440:(2020) 2432:(2018) 2424:(2002) 2416:(1993) 2408:(1990) 2400:(1989) 2392:(1989) 2384:(1987) 2376:(1986) 2368:(1986) 2360:(1983) 2352:(1982) 2344:(1981) 2336:(1981) 2328:(1978) 2320:(1972) 2312:(1972) 2304:(1963) 2296:(1961) 2288:(1961) 2280:(1961) 2272:(1953) 2264:(1951) 2256:(1951) 2248:(1946) 2240:(1944) 2232:(1943) 2224:(1943) 2216:(1940) 2208:(1940) 2200:(1890) 2192:(1879) 2155:(2018) 2147:(1994) 2139:(1989) 2131:(1988) 2123:(1982) 2115:(1982) 2107:(1980) 2099:(1978) 2091:(1961) 2072:(1985) 2064:(1961) 2056:(1961) 2048:(1961) 2029:(2011) 2021:(2007) 2013:(1982) 2005:(1968) 1986:(2020) 1978:(1979) 1970:(1976) 1962:(1969) 1954:(1960) 1946:(1952) 1938:(1944) 1930:(1929) 1922:(1872) 1903:(2022) 1895:(2022) 1887:(2001) 1879:(1995) 1871:(1995) 1863:(1993) 1844:(2022) 1836:(2004) 1828:(2000) 1820:(1992) 1812:(1990) 1804:(1987) 1796:(1985) 1788:(1980) 1780:(1968) 1772:(1963) 1764:(1962) 1756:(1952) 1748:(1948) 1727:(2022) 1719:(2020) 1711:(2017) 1703:(2011) 1695:(2002) 1687:(2000) 1679:(1997) 1671:(1994) 1663:(1993) 1655:(1986) 1647:(1985) 1639:(1985) 1631:(1983) 1623:(1982) 1615:(1980) 1607:(1977) 1599:(1977) 1591:(1976) 1583:(1975) 1575:(1974) 1567:(1974) 1559:(1973) 1551:(1973) 1543:(1973) 1535:(1973) 1527:(1973) 1519:(1971) 1511:(1971) 1503:(1968) 1495:(1968) 1487:(1947) 1479:(1930) 1460:(2005) 1452:(1997) 1444:(1989) 1436:(1987) 1428:(1985) 1420:(1983) 1412:(1982) 1404:(1970) 1383:(2019) 1375:(2014) 1367:(2010) 1359:(2009) 1351:(2005) 1343:(2005) 1335:(1989) 1327:(1985) 1319:(1984) 1311:(1983) 1237: 1231: 1228: 1222: 1219: 1213: 1210: 1204: 1201: 1198:Justia 1195: 1192: 1186: 1183: 1177: 1174: 1168: 1139: 1102: 1098:–217. 975: 930:, 928:08-205 621:cited 513:, the 505:, the 501:, the 497:, the 428:§441a) 248:Burger 219: 217:· 215: 207: 205:· 203: 195: 193:· 191: 183: 181:· 179: 3943:forum 2080:Other 1162: 934: 910: 891: 877:Notes 570:In a 517:, an 389:Facts 256:White 5931:and 2889:the 2702:and 2562:RFRA 1164:U.S. 1137:SSRN 1100:ISBN 973:ISBN 936:U.S. 926:No. 912:U.S. 893:U.S. 558:and 550:and 535:and 467:The 76:more 68:U.S. 66:424 4799:and 2887:and 2837:and 1160:424 1127:doi 1096:203 939:310 932:558 915:765 908:435 889:424 757:Id. 548:1st 426:USC 320:on 91:CCH 7498:: 1158:, 1135:. 1121:. 1117:. 1068:. 1050:. 995:. 298:, 140:. 6889:e 6882:t 6875:v 4529:) 2818:) 2798:) 2676:) 2672:( 1265:e 1258:t 1251:v 1143:. 1129:: 1123:7 1108:. 1072:. 1054:. 999:. 981:. 896:1 79:) 73:( 71:1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index