Knowledge

Critical mass (sociodynamics)

Source đź“ť

337:—a "common good", using Oliver et al.'s terminology. One proposition states that such media's existence is all or nothing, wherein if universal access is not achieved, then, eventually, use will discontinue. Another proposition suggests that a media's ease of use and inexpensiveness, as well as its utilization of an "active notification capability" will help it achieve universal access. The third proposition states that the heterogeneity, as discussed by Oliver et al., is beneficial, especially if users are dispersed over a larger area, thus necessitating interactivity via media. Fourth, it is very helpful to have highly sought-after individuals to act as early adopters, as their use acts as incentive for later users. Finally, Markus posits that interventions, both monetarily and otherwise, by governments, businesses, or groups of individuals will help a media reach its critical mass and achieve universal access. 288:". "Collective Action" is beneficial to all, regardless of individual contribution. By their definition, then, "critical mass" is the small segment of a societal system that does the work or action required to achieve the common good. The "Production Function" is the correlation between resources, or what individuals give in an effort to achieve public good, and the achievement of that good. Such function can be decelerating, where there is less utility per unit of resource, and in such a case, resource can taper off. On the other hand, the function can be accelerating, where the more resources that are used the bigger the payback. "Heterogeneity" is also important to the achievement of a common good. Variations (heterogeneity) in the value individuals put on a common good or the effort and resources people give is beneficial, because if certain people stand to gain more, they are willing to give or pay more. 147:" is borrowed from nuclear physics, where it refers to the amount of a substance needed to sustain a chain reaction. Within social sciences, critical mass has its roots in sociology and is often used to explain the conditions under which reciprocal behavior is started within collective groups, and how reciprocal behavior becomes self-sustaining. Recent technology research in platform ecosystems shows that apart from the quantitative notion of a “sufficient number”, critical mass is also influenced by qualitative properties such as reputation, interests, commitments, capabilities, goals, consensuses, and decisions, all of which are crucial in determining whether reciprocal behavior can be started to achieve sustainability to a commitment such as an idea, new technology, or innovation. 316:, wherein the value and utility of a good or service increases the more users it has. Thus, the increase of adopters and quickness to reach critical mass can therefore be faster and more intense with interactive media, as can the rate at which previous users discontinue their use. The more people that use it, the more beneficial it will be, thus creating a type of snowball effect, and conversely, if users begin to stop using the innovation, the innovation loses utility, thus pushing more users to discontinue their use. 303:
politics. However, other research suggests lower numbers of women working together in legislature can also affect political change. Kathleen Bratton goes so far as to say that women, in legislatures where they make up less than 15% of the membership, may actually be encouraged to develop legislative agendas that are distinct from those of their male colleagues. Others argue that we should look more closely at parliamentary and electoral systems instead of critical mass.
389:
signed up, continuing to when Facebook opened the platform to high-school and university students worldwide in 2005, before eventually launching to the public in 2006. By obtaining critical mass in each relative population before advancing to the next audience, Facebook developed enough saturation to become self-sustaining. Being self-sustained helps to grow and maintain network size, whilst also enhancing the perceived critical mass of those yet to adopt.
361:, which had been around for almost 150 years before it became popular and widely used. It had existed in various forms and for various uses, but with more advancements in the technology of faxes, including the use of existing phone lines to transmit information, coupled with falling prices in both machines and cost per fax, the fax machine reached a critical mass in 1987, when "Americans began to assume that 'everybody else' had a fax machine". 27: 187:
to explain the actions and behaviors of a wide range of people and phenomenon. The concept was first established (although not explicitly named) in Schelling's essay about racial segregation in neighborhoods, "Dynamic models of segregation", published in 1971 in the Journal of Mathematical Sociology,
311:
While critical mass can be applied to many different aspects of sociodynamics, it becomes increasingly applicable to innovations in interactive media such as the telephone, fax, or email. With other non-interactive innovations, the dependence on other users was generally sequential, meaning that the
302:
Critical mass theory in gender politics and collective political action is defined as the critical number of personnel needed to affect policy and make a change not as the token but as an influential body. This number has been placed at 30%, before women are able to make a substantial difference in
388:
Facebook promoted the innovation to groups that were likely to adopt en masse. Between 2003–2004 Facebook was exclusive to universities such as Harvard, Yale and 34 other schools. Perceived critical mass grew amongst the student population, and by the end of 2004 more than a million students had
380:
provides a good illustration of critical mass. In its initial stages, Facebook had limited value to users due to the lack of network effects and critical mass. The principle behind the strategy is that at each time Facebook enlarged the size of the community, the saturation never drops below the
150:
Other social factors that are important include the size of; and inter-dependencies and level of communication in a society or one of its subcultures. Another is social stigma, or the possibility of public advocacy due to such a factor. Critical mass is a concept used in a variety of contexts,
266:, work to help us understand why humans do or adopt certain things which are beneficial to them, or, more importantly, why they do not. Much of this reasoning has to do with individual interests trumping that which is best for the collective whole, which may not be obvious at the time. 131:
is a sufficient number of adopters of a new idea, technology or innovation in a social system so that the rate of adoption becomes self-sustaining and creates further growth. The point at which critical mass is achieved is sometimes referred to as a threshold within the
346: 369:
Critical mass is fundamental for social media sites to maintain a significant userbase. Reaching a sustainable population is dependent on the collective rather than individual use of the technology. The adoption of the platform creates the effects of
312:
early adopters influenced the later adopters to use the innovation. However, with interactive media, the interdependence was reciprocal, meaning both users influenced each other. This is due to the fact that interactive media have high
192:, published in 1978. Schelling did use the term "critical density" with regard to pollution in his "On the Ecology of Micromotives". Granovetter, in his essay "Threshold models of collective behavior", published in the 463:
David, R., Aubert, B.A., Bernard, J-G., & Luczak-Roesch, M. (2020). Critical Mass in Inter-Organizational Platforms. Americas Conference of Information Systems (AMCIS), Salt Lake City, UT. 10-12 August, 2020.
332:
entitled "Toward a 'Critical Mass' Theory of Interactive Media", several propositions are made that attempt to predict under what circumstances interactive media is most likely to achieve critical mass and reach
250:
Critical mass and the theories behind it help us to understand aspects of humans as they act and interact in a larger social setting. Certain theories, such as
961:
Tremblay, Manon (December 2006). "The substantive representation of women and PR: some reflections on the role of surrogate representation and critical mass".
674:
Oliver, P.; Marwell, G.; Teixeira, R. (1985). "A Theory of Critical Mass: I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action".
755: 454:
Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2010). “Failure to launch: Critical mass in platform businesses.” Review of Network Economics, 9(4), 1-33.
1144:
Van Slyke, Craig; Ilie, Virginia; Lou, Hao; Stafford, Thomas (2007). "Perceived critical mass and the adoption of a communication technology".
44: 91: 63: 924:
Bratton, Kathleen A. (March 2005). "Critical mass theory revisited: the behavior and success of token women in state legislatures".
70: 1047:
Markus, M. Lynne (1987). "Toward a "Critical Mass" Theory of Interactive Media: Universal Access, Interdependence and Diffusion".
621:
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1971. Print.
77: 59: 1265: 110: 1106: 465: 219:
It had also been a present, if not solidified, idea in the study of consumer habits and economics, especially in
208:
The concept of critical mass had existed before it entered a sociology context. It was an established concept in
776: 48: 884:
Childs, Sarah; Krook, Mona Lena (October 2008). "Critical mass theory and women's political representation".
714: 281: 238:'s essay, "Bandwagon and underdog effects and the possibility of election predictions", published in 1954 in 193: 712:(March 1977). "Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses to token women". 886: 752: 723: 374:
whereby each additional user provides additional perceived benefits to previous and potential adopters.
84: 998:
Grey, Sandra (December 2006). "Numbers and beyond: the relevance of critical mass in gender research".
255: 220: 577:
Akerlof, George A. The Market for "lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. 2003. Print.
1290: 425: 1305: 383: 239: 1300: 1295: 1179: 37: 1180:"DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS. By Everett M. Rogers. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1962. 367" 564:
Krauth, Brian. "Notes for a History of the Critical Mass Model." SFU.ca. Web. 29 November 2011.
297: 371: 263: 520:
Schelling, Thomas C. "On the Ecology of Micromotives," The Public Interest, No. 25, Fall 1971.
403: 224: 1000: 963: 926: 849: 808: 709: 640: 415: 137: 1107:"Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: an empirical study on Facebook" 8: 1034:
Rogers, Everett M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2003. Print.
644: 196:
in 1978 worked to solidify the theory. Everett Rogers later cites them both in his work
1207: 1161: 1072: 1017: 980: 943: 903: 866: 825: 789: 743: 735: 691: 604: 547: 280:
tackle this subject in relation to critical theory in a 1985 article published in the
1261: 1199: 1126: 1064: 1021: 984: 947: 907: 899: 870: 829: 774:(December 1988). "From a small to a large minority: women in Scandinavian politics". 747: 656: 608: 494: 435: 420: 285: 1165: 1076: 695: 551: 1191: 1153: 1118: 1056: 1009: 972: 935: 895: 858: 817: 785: 727: 683: 648: 596: 539: 511:
Schelling, Thomas C. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.
486: 430: 398: 334: 269: 235: 228: 184: 180: 1157: 652: 565: 490: 844: 759: 325: 133: 124: 847:(December 2006). "Should feminists give up on critical mass? A contingent yes". 1060: 912: 803: 771: 466:
https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1055&context=amcis2020
410: 313: 273: 259: 242:, has been cited as a predecessor to the concept we now know as critical mass. 164: 156: 1122: 1013: 976: 939: 862: 821: 1284: 1203: 1130: 1068: 498: 152: 144: 1225: 1270: 277: 251: 213: 660: 381:
critical mass, reaching the desired diffusion effect discussed in Rogers'
284:. In their essay, they define that action in service of a public good as " 227:
paper written in 1970 by George Akerlof. Similarly, Granovetter cited the
1253: 1105:
Rauniar, Rupak; Rawski, Greg; Yang, Jei; Johnson, Ben (4 February 2014).
753:
Pdf from Norges Handelshøyskole (NHH), the Norwegian School of Economics.
1211: 739: 600: 168: 1089: 530:
Granovetter, Mark (1978). "Threshold Models of Collective Behavior".
225:"The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism" 179:
The concept of critical mass was originally created by game theorist
1195: 216:, since the 1920s, as it helped to explain the spread of illnesses. 26: 731: 687: 543: 377: 209: 160: 477:
Schelling, Thomas C. (1971). "Dynamic models of segregation".
806:(December 2006). "The story of the theory of critical mass". 245: 587:
Kuran, Timur (1987). "Chameleon Voters and Public Choice".
358: 345: 1143: 1104: 1028: 673: 51:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 200:, in which critical mass plays an important role. 1042: 1040: 223:. In his papers, Schelling quotes the well-known 1282: 631:Hardin, G (1968). "The Tragedy of the Commons". 1090:Holmlov, Kramer and Karl-Eric Warneryd (1990). 566:https://www.sfu.ca/~bkrauth/papers/critmass.htm 1037: 1258:Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another 1111:Journal of Enterprise Information Management 1226:"Facebook | Overview, History, & Facts" 883: 842: 529: 246:Logic of collective action and common good 16:Self-sustaining action that creates growth 476: 111:Learn how and when to remove this message 960: 802: 770: 344: 1146:European Journal of Information Systems 923: 364: 1283: 1046: 708: 630: 340: 586: 479:The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 997: 306: 49:adding citations to reliable sources 20: 13: 1247: 790:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00372.x 485:(2). Informa UK Limited: 143–186. 353:An example put forth by Rogers in 291: 60:"Critical mass" sociodynamics 14: 1317: 1092:Adoption and Use of Fax in Sweden 1055:(5). SAGE Publications: 491–511. 1277:, Harvard University Press, 1971 900:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00712.x 25: 1218: 1172: 1137: 1098: 1083: 991: 954: 917: 877: 836: 796: 764: 702: 667: 624: 615: 319: 203: 188:and later refined in his book, 36:needs additional citations for 1275:The Logic of Collective Action 777:Scandinavian Political Studies 580: 571: 558: 523: 514: 505: 470: 457: 448: 190:Micromotives and Macrobehavior 1: 1260:, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1158:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000680 715:American Journal of Sociology 676:American Journal of Sociology 653:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 532:American Journal of Sociology 491:10.1080/0022250x.1971.9989794 441: 282:American Journal of Sociology 194:American Journal of Sociology 298:Women in government (quotas) 7: 724:University of Chicago Press 392: 10: 1322: 1190:(4): 415–416. 1 May 1963. 1061:10.1177/009365087014005003 295: 256:Logic of Collective Action 221:General Equilibrium Theory 174: 1123:10.1108/JEIM-04-2012-0011 1014:10.1017/S1743923X06221147 977:10.1017/S1743923X06231143 940:10.1017/S1743923X0505004X 863:10.1017/S1743923X06251146 822:10.1017/S1743923X0624114X 426:Tipping point (sociology) 384:Diffusion of innovations 355:Diffusion of Innovations 240:Public Opinion Quarterly 198:Diffusion of Innovations 1230:Encyclopedia Britannica 758:28 January 2016 at the 1049:Communication Research 372:positive externalities 350: 330:Communication Research 264:Tragedy of the Commons 1094:. Elmservier Science. 1001:Politics & Gender 964:Politics & Gender 927:Politics & Gender 850:Politics & Gender 809:Politics & Gender 722:(5): 965–990 for the 710:Kanter, Rosabeth Moss 404:Economics of networks 348: 416:One-third hypothesis 365:Social media example 231:game in his papers. 138:statistical modeling 45:improve this article 645:1968Sci...162.1243H 341:Fax machine example 639:(3859): 1243–248. 601:10.1007/bf00115654 351: 887:Political Studies 421:Positive feedback 307:Interactive media 286:collective action 121: 120: 113: 95: 1313: 1291:Motion (physics) 1241: 1240: 1238: 1236: 1222: 1216: 1215: 1176: 1170: 1169: 1141: 1135: 1134: 1102: 1096: 1095: 1087: 1081: 1080: 1044: 1035: 1032: 1026: 1025: 995: 989: 988: 958: 952: 951: 921: 915: 911: 881: 875: 874: 845:Krook, Mona Lena 840: 834: 833: 800: 794: 793: 768: 762: 751: 706: 700: 699: 671: 665: 664: 628: 622: 619: 613: 612: 584: 578: 575: 569: 562: 556: 555: 527: 521: 518: 512: 509: 503: 502: 474: 468: 461: 455: 452: 431:Viral phenomenon 399:Bandwagon effect 357:was that of the 335:universal access 236:Herbert A. Simon 229:Nash Equilibrium 185:Mark Granovetter 183:and sociologist 181:Thomas Schelling 116: 109: 105: 102: 96: 94: 53: 29: 21: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1306:Social dynamics 1281: 1280: 1250: 1248:Further reading 1245: 1244: 1234: 1232: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1196:10.2307/2573300 1178: 1177: 1173: 1142: 1138: 1103: 1099: 1088: 1084: 1045: 1038: 1033: 1029: 996: 992: 959: 955: 922: 918: 882: 878: 843:Childs, Sarah; 841: 837: 804:Dahlerup, Drude 801: 797: 772:Dahlerup, Drude 769: 765: 760:Wayback Machine 707: 703: 672: 668: 629: 625: 620: 616: 585: 581: 576: 572: 563: 559: 528: 524: 519: 515: 510: 506: 475: 471: 462: 458: 453: 449: 444: 395: 367: 343: 326:M. Lynne Markus 322: 309: 300: 294: 292:Gender politics 248: 212:, specifically 206: 177: 134:threshold model 125:social dynamics 117: 106: 100: 97: 54: 52: 42: 30: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1319: 1309: 1308: 1303: 1301:Systems theory 1298: 1296:Social systems 1293: 1279: 1278: 1268: 1249: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1217: 1171: 1152:(3): 270-283. 1136: 1097: 1082: 1036: 1027: 1008:(4): 492–502. 990: 971:(4): 502–511. 953: 916: 894:(3): 725–736. 876: 857:(4): 522–530. 835: 816:(4): 511–522. 795: 784:(4): 275–297. 763: 732:10.1086/226425 701: 688:10.1086/228313 666: 623: 614: 579: 570: 557: 544:10.1086/226707 522: 513: 504: 469: 456: 446: 445: 443: 440: 439: 438: 436:Metcalfe's law 433: 428: 423: 418: 413: 411:Network effect 408: 407: 406: 394: 391: 366: 363: 342: 339: 321: 318: 314:network effect 308: 305: 293: 290: 260:Garrett Hardin 247: 244: 205: 202: 176: 173: 165:public opinion 157:group dynamics 119: 118: 33: 31: 24: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1318: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1288: 1286: 1276: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1266:0-374-53041-6 1263: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1251: 1231: 1227: 1221: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1184:Social Forces 1181: 1175: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1140: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1101: 1093: 1086: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1043: 1041: 1031: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 994: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 965: 957: 949: 945: 941: 937: 934:(1): 97–125. 933: 929: 928: 920: 914: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 888: 880: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 851: 846: 839: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 810: 805: 799: 791: 787: 783: 779: 778: 773: 767: 761: 757: 754: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 716: 711: 705: 697: 693: 689: 685: 682:(3): 522–56. 681: 677: 670: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 627: 618: 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 589:Public Choice 583: 574: 567: 561: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 526: 517: 508: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 473: 467: 460: 451: 447: 437: 434: 432: 429: 427: 424: 422: 419: 417: 414: 412: 409: 405: 402: 401: 400: 397: 396: 390: 387: 385: 379: 375: 373: 362: 360: 356: 349:A fax machine 347: 338: 336: 331: 327: 317: 315: 304: 299: 289: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 265: 261: 257: 253: 243: 241: 237: 232: 230: 226: 222: 217: 215: 211: 201: 199: 195: 191: 186: 182: 172: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 148: 146: 145:critical mass 141: 139: 135: 130: 129:critical mass 126: 115: 112: 104: 93: 90: 86: 83: 79: 76: 72: 69: 65: 62: â€“  61: 57: 56:Find sources: 50: 46: 40: 39: 34:This article 32: 28: 23: 22: 19: 1274: 1271:Mancur Olson 1257: 1233:. Retrieved 1229: 1220: 1187: 1183: 1174: 1149: 1145: 1139: 1114: 1110: 1100: 1091: 1085: 1052: 1048: 1030: 1005: 999: 993: 968: 962: 956: 931: 925: 919: 891: 885: 879: 854: 848: 838: 813: 807: 798: 781: 775: 766: 719: 713: 704: 679: 675: 669: 636: 632: 626: 617: 595:(1): 53–78. 592: 588: 582: 573: 560: 535: 531: 525: 516: 507: 482: 478: 472: 459: 450: 382: 376: 368: 354: 352: 329: 323: 320:Markus essay 310: 301: 268: 252:Mancur Olson 249: 233: 218: 214:epidemiology 207: 204:Predecessors 197: 189: 178: 149: 142: 128: 122: 107: 98: 88: 81: 74: 67: 55: 43:Please help 38:verification 35: 18: 1254:Philip Ball 1117:(1): 6–30. 538:(6): 1420. 359:fax machine 328:' essay in 1285:Categories 1235:31 October 442:References 296:See also: 169:technology 151:including 143:The term " 101:March 2023 71:newspapers 1204:0037-7732 1131:1741-0398 1069:0093-6502 1022:146299602 985:143563459 948:144411873 908:220339143 871:145732410 830:146526801 748:144140263 609:154483266 499:0022-250X 234:Finally, 1166:12566191 1077:57147797 756:Archived 696:16390125 552:49314397 393:See also 378:Facebook 278:Teixeira 210:medicine 161:politics 1212:2573300 740:2777808 661:5699198 641:Bibcode 633:Science 274:Marwell 175:History 153:physics 85:scholar 1264:  1210:  1202:  1164:  1129:  1075:  1067:  1020:  983:  946:  906:  869:  828:  746:  738:  694:  659:  607:  550:  497:  276:, and 270:Oliver 167:, and 87:  80:  73:  66:  58:  1208:JSTOR 1162:S2CID 1073:S2CID 1018:S2CID 981:S2CID 944:S2CID 904:S2CID 867:S2CID 826:S2CID 744:S2CID 736:JSTOR 692:S2CID 605:S2CID 548:S2CID 92:JSTOR 78:books 1262:ISBN 1237:2020 1200:ISSN 1127:ISSN 1065:ISSN 913:Pdf. 657:PMID 495:ISSN 64:news 1192:doi 1154:doi 1119:doi 1057:doi 1010:doi 973:doi 936:doi 896:doi 859:doi 818:doi 786:doi 728:doi 684:doi 649:doi 637:162 597:doi 540:doi 487:doi 324:In 262:'s 258:or 254:'s 140:. 136:of 123:In 47:by 1287:: 1273:: 1256:: 1228:. 1206:. 1198:. 1188:41 1186:. 1182:. 1160:. 1150:16 1148:. 1125:. 1115:27 1113:. 1109:. 1071:. 1063:. 1053:14 1051:. 1039:^ 1016:. 1004:. 979:. 967:. 942:. 930:. 902:. 892:56 890:. 865:. 853:. 824:. 812:. 782:11 780:. 742:. 734:. 726:. 720:82 718:. 690:. 680:91 678:. 655:. 647:. 635:. 603:. 593:53 591:. 546:. 536:83 534:. 493:. 481:. 272:, 171:. 163:, 159:, 155:, 127:, 1239:. 1214:. 1194:: 1168:. 1156:: 1133:. 1121:: 1079:. 1059:: 1024:. 1012:: 1006:2 987:. 975:: 969:2 950:. 938:: 932:1 910:. 898:: 873:. 861:: 855:2 832:. 820:: 814:2 792:. 788:: 750:. 730:: 698:. 686:: 663:. 651:: 643:: 611:. 599:: 568:. 554:. 542:: 501:. 489:: 483:1 386:. 114:) 108:( 103:) 99:( 89:· 82:· 75:· 68:· 41:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Critical mass" sociodynamics
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
social dynamics
threshold model
statistical modeling
critical mass
physics
group dynamics
politics
public opinion
technology
Thomas Schelling
Mark Granovetter
American Journal of Sociology
medicine
epidemiology
General Equilibrium Theory
"The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism"
Nash Equilibrium
Herbert A. Simon
Public Opinion Quarterly

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑