Knowledge

Electoral Finance Act 2007

Source 📝

31: 304:"let's just take a deep breath and examine the rules that govern election spending in Britain and Canada (countries which, the last time I looked, were still counted among the world's leading democracies). In Britain, "third party" expenditure is capped at 5 per cent of the expenditure authorised for political parties in the 12 months prior to polling day. 309:
In Canada the figure is 1 per cent, but applies only to the period of official campaigning. (Mr Burton is proposing a cap of 2.5 per cent or $ 60,000 for 10 months.) In both Britain and Canada, third parties are required to register with the official electoral regulators; both countries also restrict
202:
The Act made it illegal for anyone to spend more than NZ$ 12,000 criticising or supporting a political party or taking a position on any political matter, or more than NZ$ 1,000 criticising or supporting an individual member of parliament, without first registering with a state agency, the Electoral
420:
did not vote. The legislation was sent to the Justice and Electoral Committee for consideration, with agreement from MPs to extend the membership of the committee for consideration of the Bill to include members from almost all Parliamentary parties. The committee's report on the Bill was due by 25
529:
signed the Act into law on 19 December 2007. The Electoral Finance Act was repealed on 17 February 2009 by a vote in Parliament of 112 to 9. The Green Party was the only Party opposing the repeal, saying it should stay in force until a replacement Bill was prepared. National Party Justice Minister
499:
The Bill was put to a second reading vote on 22 November 2007. It passed by 65 votes to 54, with Labour, New Zealand First, the Greens, United Future, and the Progressive Party supporting it. National, ACT, the Māori Party, and independents Gordon Copeland and Taito Phillip Field voted against it,
221:
The Act extends the "regulated period" for election campaigning from the previous 90-day period to the period starting on 1 January of election year – from three months to around ten, depending on the timing of the election. During this period electoral advertising by candidates, political parties
433:
reported on 31 August that the Government had indicated it might write to the Committee indicating that it intended to make unspecified changes to the parts of the legislation dealing with third parties. This would have prevented the committee from hearing criticism of the existing provisions and
516:
The Bill passed its third reading on 18 December 2007 by 63 votes to 57, with the National Party, the Maori Party, ACT, United Future and independent MP Taito Phillip Field voting against and Labour, the Greens, New Zealand First and Progressive voting for. Independent MP Gordon Copeland did not
234:, a group that advocates the reform of election finance law in New Zealand, opposed parts of the Bill, particularly the failure of the Bill to ban secret donations to political parties, given the strong financial disclosure requirements placed on third parties. 177:
The proponents of the bill generally held that such a law was required to prevent wealthy private parties from "buying elections" anonymously via advertising campaigns or other financially costly lobbying, while opponents considered it a serious restriction of
212:
The regulation of third parties also extends to their finances. The Act requires that third parties disclose all donations they receive over $ 5000. Anonymous donations that third parties receive over this level must be given to the State.
348:, who said at its introduction "The package of reforms introduced to Parliament will help promote participation in parliamentary democracy, and aims to clean up New Zealand's electoral system and protect it from abuse." 245:, and the Royal New Zealand Forest and Bird Society argued the definition will catch not just electoral speech, but almost all political speech – including things like placards at protest marches. 273: 287:
Criticism has also been made over the process that led to the Bill's introduction, which involved discussions only with the Labour Government's supporting parties and not the Opposition.
1063: 194:
The Act amended numerous areas of New Zealand electoral law, but was repealed on 17 February 2009. Principally and most controversially it regulated "third party" election campaigns
434:
allow the Government to introduce changes during the Committee of the Whole House without the public being able to make submissions on the new provisions. Then Prime Minister
310:
the contributions of foreign donors to third parties; and both require the identity of third party donors to be made public. That is how modern democracies conduct themselves.
209:
The Bill originally limited the spending of registered third parties on political advertising to $ 60,000, but this was later increased to $ 120,000 by the Select Committee.
1179: 917: 328:, drew over 2,000 protestors. A second Auckland protest, on 1 December 2007, drew a crowd of around 5,000. Smaller protests were held in Wellington and Christchurch. 947: 541:. The new law set the regulated period for election advertising as beginning two years and nine months after the previous election, banned the use of 1209: 534:
said during debate on the repeal bill that all parties in Parliament had agreed to take part in consultations to draft replacement electoral law.
1093: 1071: 1035: 554: 171: 372:
described Crown Law's opinion as "...one of the worst, most politically expedient calls on New Zealand human rights legislation in memory."
1264: 559: 658: 581: 1153: 688: 206:
The Bill as introduced required that unregistered third parties file statutory declarations before publishing election advertisements.
1309: 315:
But, in New Zealand, it is still acceptable (at least to the National Party) for those with the most money to have the most say."
1187: 474:, who became Minister of Justice following a Cabinet reshuffle on 31 October 2007, announced a number of changes to the Bill. 364:
must advise Parliament at the introduction of a bill if that bill is inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. The
167: 977: 925: 617: 281: 820: 465: 48: 794: 454: 385: 357: 761: 955: 636: 542: 538: 461: 342: 256:
was a "danger to democracy". On 6 October 2007 the Free Speech Coalition was formed by prominent right-wing bloggers
253: 252:, also opposed the Bill. Political commentator Matthew Hooton argued that the Bill should not proceed, and that the 1299: 1294: 1239: 484:
Increasing the cap on election advertising before they have to register under the new law from $ 5,000 to $ 12,000;
1122: 866: 569: 537:
Parliament eventually passed the Electoral (Finance Reform and Advance Voting) Amendment Bill 116–5 ahead of the
526: 365: 361: 296: 991: 1304: 839: 719: 397: 231: 779: 596: 115: 125: 105: 237:
The broad definition of "election advertisement" came in for particular criticism. Critics, including the
1217: 564: 401: 257: 249: 1097: 393: 586: 951: 531: 381: 369: 345: 90: 368:, which undertook the review, concluded that the Bill was consistent with the Bill of Rights. The 450: 238: 591: 1213: 1127: 1067: 871: 844: 724: 662: 38: 1157: 692: 627: 446: 696: 8: 413: 140: 1183: 632: 613: 430: 389: 277: 242: 921: 895: 918:"Electoral Finance Bill: Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990" 1036:"Submission to the Justice and Electoral Committee on the Electoral Finance Bill" 417: 409: 265: 179: 449:, submitted in favour of the need for changes to New Zealand electoral law. The 587:
Knowledge Basket – Clause by clause analysis of the Bill; Full text of the Bill
261: 405: 294:
had harsh criticism of the detractors of the Act in several opinion pieces in
30: 1288: 325: 291: 798: 481:
Increasing the cap on total third party spending from $ 60,000 to $ 120,000;
182:, and further regarded spending private money on political campaigning as a 1009: 471: 269: 55: 545:
funding for electoral purposes, and increased spending and donation caps.
622: 442: 435: 380:
The Bill passed its first reading on 27 July by 65 votes to 54, with the
324:
On 17 November 2007 a protest in Auckland against the Bill, organised by
222:
and third parties must follow election rules, and spending limits apply.
163: 183: 508:
The Committee of the whole House stage began on 3 December 2007.
170:
introduced the Electoral Finance Bill partly in response to the
150: 592:
Coalition for Open Government- supports Electoral Finance Bill
992:"Government open to suggestions for electoral finance reform" 468:
on 18 November 2007, and recommended that the Bill proceed.
1013: 582:
New Zealand Parliament – Text of the Electoral Finance Bill
429:
Public submissions on the Bill closed on 7 September 2007.
1123:"Revamp of finance bill removes 'unintended consequences'" 720:"Electoral law review lacks credibility thanks to process" 1096:. New Zealand Government. 31 October 2007. Archived from 500:
the Māori party voting two of its four votes in favour.
1094:"Ministerial List for Announcement on 31 October 2007" 597:
Kill the Bill Campaign- opposes Electoral Finance Bill
490:
Increasing the corruption penalties to $ 100,000 fine.
792: 756: 754: 752: 750: 748: 746: 744: 742: 628:
The Hollow Men: A Study in the Politics of Deception
520: 887: 795:"Kill the Bill: Kill The Bill Campaign Launched!!" 780:"Lobby Groups Unhappy With Electoral Finance Bill" 1148: 1146: 1064:"Reported by the Justice and Electoral Committee" 1010:"MPs told bill would not stop Brethren campaigns" 978:"Strong Reservations Over Electoral Finance Bill" 739: 610:Electoral Law in New Zealand: Practice and Policy 1286: 1265:"Government backtracks on electoral finance law" 893: 682: 680: 487:Changing the definition of election advertising; 1172: 503: 1240:"Parliament passes new electoral finance laws" 1143: 1086: 821:"Electoral bill 'backward step' – Law Society" 686: 1180:"Controversial Electoral Finance Bill passed" 970: 837: 813: 677: 555:2005 New Zealand election funding controversy 172:2005 New Zealand election funding controversy 1058: 1056: 717: 174:, in particular to "third-party" campaigns. 1154:"Electoral Finance Bill passes 2nd reading" 1115: 1041:. New Zealand Law Society. 4 September 2007 984: 910: 772: 689:"Justice minister is a danger to democracy" 341:The Bill was introduced on 23 July 2007 by 940: 653: 651: 29: 1053: 786: 840:"Protest against Electoral Finance Bill" 793:Free Speech Coalition (6 October 2007). 711: 331: 197: 648: 1287: 1002: 896:"Electoral finance changes announced" 282:Direct Democracy Party of New Zealand 1028: 980:. Radio New Zealand. 31 August 2007. 274:New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Society 455:New Zealand Human Rights Commission 424: 358:New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 216: 13: 1216:. 17 February 2009. Archived from 1186:. 18 December 2007. Archived from 1156:. 22 November 2007. Archived from 1070:. 19 November 2007. Archived from 867:"Protestors send a strong message" 838:Rebecca Lewis (18 November 2007). 248:The parliamentary opposition, the 14: 1321: 894:Hon. Mark Burton (23 July 2007). 687:Matthew Hooton (12 August 2007). 575: 494: 351: 1310:Repealed New Zealand legislation 1210:"Electoral Finance Act repealed" 954:. 4 October 2007. Archived from 521:Royal Assent and eventual repeal 511: 375: 16:Act of Parliament in New Zealand 1257: 1232: 1202: 948:"Crony Watch special: the Sims" 602: 570:Electoral system of New Zealand 336: 272:Party, to oppose the Bill. The 924:. 26 June 2007. Archived from 859: 831: 718:Audrey Young (14 April 2007). 225: 1: 762:"Electoral bill no one wants" 642: 232:Coalition for Open Government 504:Committee of the whole House 457:submitted against the Bill. 7: 612:. Wellington: Lexis-Nexis. 565:Constitution of New Zealand 548: 319: 162:was a controversial act in 10: 1326: 400:voting in favour, and the 160:Electoral Finance Act 2007 24:Electoral Finance Act 2007 782:. Newswire. 24 July 2007. 464:reported the Bill to the 441:Investigative journalist 300:. On 17 August he wrote 189: 146: 139: 134: 124: 114: 104: 96: 85: 80: 72: 64: 54: 44: 37: 28: 23: 952:National Business Review 898:. New Zealand Government 659:"Electoral Finance Bill" 631:. Nelson: Craig Potton. 477:These changes included: 466:House of Representatives 370:National Business Review 284:also opposed the Bill. 49:House of Representatives 1300:2007 in New Zealand law 1295:Statutes of New Zealand 608:Geddis, Andrew (2007). 560:Campaign finance reform 451:New Zealand Law Society 356:Under section 7 of the 239:New Zealand Law Society 168:Fifth Labour Government 1214:Television New Zealand 1128:The New Zealand Herald 1068:New Zealand Parliament 996:The New Zealand Herald 872:The New Zealand Herald 845:The New Zealand Herald 825:The New Zealand Herald 766:The New Zealand Herald 725:The New Zealand Herald 663:New Zealand Parliament 290:Political commentator 39:New Zealand Parliament 693:The Sunday Star-Times 543:Parliamentary Service 539:2011 general election 332:Parliamentary process 198:Third party campaigns 1305:Election legislation 827:. 28 September 2007. 699:on 30 September 2007 1160:on 31 December 2007 1074:on 23 November 2007 1016:. 20 September 2007 998:. 4 September 2007. 801:on 31 December 2007 414:Taito Phillip Field 343:Minister of Justice 254:Minister of Justice 241:, Catholic charity 135:Related legislation 81:Legislative history 1131:. 19 November 2007 958:on 11 October 2007 928:on 12 October 2007 665:. 19 December 2007 141:Electoral Act 1993 1190:on 2 January 2008 1184:Radio New Zealand 1103:on 1 October 2008 875:. 3 December 2007 768:. 11 August 2007. 618:978-0-408-71836-3 431:Radio New Zealand 408:and independents 297:The Dominion Post 278:NORML New Zealand 156: 155: 1317: 1280: 1279: 1277: 1275: 1261: 1255: 1254: 1252: 1250: 1236: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1225: 1206: 1200: 1199: 1197: 1195: 1176: 1170: 1169: 1167: 1165: 1150: 1141: 1140: 1138: 1136: 1119: 1113: 1112: 1110: 1108: 1102: 1090: 1084: 1083: 1081: 1079: 1060: 1051: 1050: 1048: 1046: 1040: 1032: 1026: 1025: 1023: 1021: 1006: 1000: 999: 988: 982: 981: 974: 968: 967: 965: 963: 944: 938: 937: 935: 933: 922:Crown Law Office 914: 908: 907: 905: 903: 891: 885: 884: 882: 880: 863: 857: 856: 854: 852: 835: 829: 828: 817: 811: 810: 808: 806: 797:. Archived from 790: 784: 783: 776: 770: 769: 758: 737: 736: 734: 732: 715: 709: 708: 706: 704: 695:. Archived from 684: 675: 674: 672: 670: 655: 527:Governor-General 462:Select committee 425:Select Committee 416:voting against. 366:Crown Law Office 362:Attorney-General 268:, leader of the 217:Regulated period 130:18 December 2007 120:22 November 2007 76:17 February 2009 68:20 December 2007 60:19 December 2007 33: 21: 20: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1273: 1271: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1248: 1246: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1223: 1221: 1220:on 17 June 2011 1208: 1207: 1203: 1193: 1191: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1163: 1161: 1152: 1151: 1144: 1134: 1132: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1106: 1104: 1100: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1077: 1075: 1062: 1061: 1054: 1044: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1019: 1017: 1008: 1007: 1003: 990: 989: 985: 976: 975: 971: 961: 959: 946: 945: 941: 931: 929: 916: 915: 911: 901: 899: 892: 888: 878: 876: 865: 864: 860: 850: 848: 836: 832: 819: 818: 814: 804: 802: 791: 787: 778: 777: 773: 760: 759: 740: 730: 728: 716: 712: 702: 700: 685: 678: 668: 666: 657: 656: 649: 645: 605: 578: 551: 523: 514: 506: 497: 427: 410:Gordon Copeland 378: 354: 339: 334: 322: 266:Bernard Darnton 228: 219: 200: 192: 180:civil liberties 45:Enacted by 17: 12: 11: 5: 1323: 1313: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1297: 1282: 1281: 1256: 1231: 1201: 1171: 1142: 1114: 1085: 1052: 1027: 1001: 983: 969: 939: 909: 886: 858: 830: 812: 785: 771: 738: 710: 676: 646: 644: 641: 640: 639: 620: 604: 601: 600: 599: 594: 589: 584: 577: 576:External links 574: 573: 572: 567: 562: 557: 550: 547: 522: 519: 513: 510: 505: 502: 496: 495:Second reading 493: 492: 491: 488: 485: 482: 447:The Hollow Men 426: 423: 421:January 2008. 402:National Party 377: 374: 353: 352:Bill of Rights 350: 338: 335: 333: 330: 321: 318: 317: 316: 312: 311: 306: 305: 262:Cameron Slater 250:National Party 227: 224: 218: 215: 199: 196: 191: 188: 154: 153: 144: 143: 137: 136: 132: 131: 128: 122: 121: 118: 116:Second reading 112: 111: 108: 102: 101: 98: 94: 93: 87: 83: 82: 78: 77: 74: 70: 69: 66: 62: 61: 58: 52: 51: 46: 42: 41: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1322: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1292: 1290: 1270: 1266: 1260: 1245: 1241: 1235: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1205: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1175: 1159: 1155: 1149: 1147: 1130: 1129: 1124: 1118: 1099: 1095: 1089: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1059: 1057: 1037: 1031: 1015: 1011: 1005: 997: 993: 987: 979: 973: 957: 953: 949: 943: 927: 923: 919: 913: 897: 890: 874: 873: 868: 862: 847: 846: 841: 834: 826: 822: 816: 800: 796: 789: 781: 775: 767: 763: 757: 755: 753: 751: 749: 747: 745: 743: 727: 726: 721: 714: 698: 694: 690: 683: 681: 664: 660: 654: 652: 647: 638: 637:1-877333-62-X 634: 630: 629: 624: 621: 619: 615: 611: 607: 606: 598: 595: 593: 590: 588: 585: 583: 580: 579: 571: 568: 566: 563: 561: 558: 556: 553: 552: 546: 544: 540: 535: 533: 528: 518: 512:Third reading 509: 501: 489: 486: 483: 480: 479: 478: 475: 473: 469: 467: 463: 458: 456: 452: 448: 444: 439: 438:denied this. 437: 432: 422: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 394:United Future 391: 387: 383: 376:First reading 373: 371: 367: 363: 359: 349: 347: 344: 329: 327: 326:John Boscawen 314: 313: 308: 307: 303: 302: 301: 299: 298: 293: 292:Chris Trotter 288: 285: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 246: 244: 240: 235: 233: 223: 214: 210: 207: 204: 195: 187: 185: 181: 175: 173: 169: 165: 161: 152: 149: 145: 142: 138: 133: 129: 127: 126:Third reading 123: 119: 117: 113: 109: 107: 106:First reading 103: 99: 95: 92: 88: 86:Introduced by 84: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 57: 53: 50: 47: 43: 40: 36: 32: 27: 22: 19: 1272:. Retrieved 1268: 1259: 1247:. Retrieved 1243: 1234: 1222:. Retrieved 1218:the original 1204: 1192:. Retrieved 1188:the original 1174: 1162:. Retrieved 1158:the original 1133:. Retrieved 1126: 1117: 1105:. Retrieved 1098:the original 1088: 1076:. Retrieved 1072:the original 1043:. Retrieved 1030: 1018:. Retrieved 1004: 995: 986: 972: 960:. Retrieved 956:the original 942: 930:. Retrieved 926:the original 912: 900:. Retrieved 889: 877:. Retrieved 870: 861: 849:. Retrieved 843: 833: 824: 815: 803:. Retrieved 799:the original 788: 774: 765: 729:. Retrieved 723: 713: 701:. Retrieved 697:the original 667:. Retrieved 626: 623:Hager, Nicky 609: 603:Bibliography 536: 524: 515: 507: 498: 476: 472:Annette King 470: 459: 445:, author of 440: 428: 379: 355: 340: 337:Introduction 323: 295: 289: 286: 270:Libertarianz 258:David Farrar 247: 236: 229: 220: 211: 208: 205: 203:Commission. 201: 193: 176: 159: 157: 147: 110:27 July 2007 100:26 July 2007 56:Royal assent 18: 1244:The Beehive 1194:18 December 851:18 November 669:19 December 532:Simon Power 443:Nicky Hager 436:Helen Clark 406:Māori Party 398:Progressive 346:Mark Burton 226:Controversy 164:New Zealand 91:Mark Burton 1289:Categories 1274:4 November 1249:4 November 1164:4 December 1135:4 December 1107:4 December 1078:4 December 879:4 December 643:References 453:, and the 280:, and the 184:democratic 97:Introduced 1269:NZ Herald 902:13 August 805:7 October 731:13 August 65:Commenced 625:(2006). 549:See also 390:NZ First 320:Protests 151:Repealed 73:Repealed 1045:10 July 1020:10 July 962:10 June 932:10 June 703:12 July 243:Caritas 186:right. 148:Status: 635:  616:  517:vote. 386:Greens 382:Labour 360:, the 264:, and 190:Effect 166:. The 1224:7 May 1101:(DOC) 1039:(PDF) 89:Hon. 1276:2020 1251:2020 1226:2009 1196:2007 1166:2007 1137:2007 1109:2007 1080:2007 1047:2007 1022:2007 1014:NZPA 964:2007 934:2007 904:2007 881:2007 853:2007 807:2007 733:2007 705:2007 671:2007 633:ISBN 614:ISBN 525:The 460:The 412:and 396:and 276:and 260:and 230:The 158:The 418:ACT 1291:: 1267:. 1242:. 1212:. 1182:. 1145:^ 1125:. 1066:. 1055:^ 1012:. 994:. 950:. 920:. 869:. 842:. 823:. 764:. 741:^ 722:. 691:. 679:^ 661:. 650:^ 404:, 392:, 388:, 384:, 1278:. 1253:. 1228:. 1198:. 1168:. 1139:. 1111:. 1082:. 1049:. 1024:. 966:. 936:. 906:. 883:. 855:. 809:. 735:. 707:. 673:.

Index


New Zealand Parliament
House of Representatives
Royal assent
Mark Burton
First reading
Second reading
Third reading
Electoral Act 1993
Repealed
New Zealand
Fifth Labour Government
2005 New Zealand election funding controversy
civil liberties
democratic
Coalition for Open Government
New Zealand Law Society
Caritas
National Party
Minister of Justice
David Farrar
Cameron Slater
Bernard Darnton
Libertarianz
New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Society
NORML New Zealand
Direct Democracy Party of New Zealand
Chris Trotter
The Dominion Post
John Boscawen

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.