Knowledge

Homo reciprocans

Source đź“ť

98:. Evidence indicates that "married individuals are more positively reciprocal, but are not different from the unmarried in terms of negative reciprocity". Among employees, negative reciprocity appear to be correlated with a higher number of sick days. Positive reciprocity correlates with low unemployment, and negative reciprocity strongly correlates with unemployment. High levels of positive reciprocity correlate with higher income, but no correlation appears to exist between negative reciprocity and income. 150:
expected return of favor is given during an act of kindness. However, she also notes that perceived kindness is only a factor in positive reciprocity because the intentions of a person who commits harmful acts are apparent, but those of a person who performs beneficial acts are ambiguous, unsure of intentions behind.
127:
Dohmen’s study on the Big 5 personality types as determinants of trust and reciprocity concluded that all personality types impact one’s propensity to reciprocate positively. On the other hand, in regards to negative reciprocity, they found that extraversion and openness have little to no effect, but
149:
Yesim Orhun, a professor of marketing at the University of Michigan Ross School Business, emphasizes the significance of people’s perceived dispositions in reciprocal situations in her research on perceived motives and reciprocity. She asserts that generosity becomes polluted if the impression of an
89:
Reciprocal players are willing to reward behaviour that is just or fair, and to punish unjust or unfair behaviour. Empirical evidence suggests that positive and negative reciprocity are fundamentally different behavioral dispositions in the sense that the values for positive and negative reciprocity
111:
A study conducted by Thomas Dohmen and his team of behavioral economists investigated the determinants of trust and reciprocity, in which their results indicated that women hold a higher propensity to trust and, thus reciprocate, than men. This finding is echoed by Warneken and Tomasello’s study on
140:
In a similar study conducted by Miller and seven other psychologists, they found that Indians base their reciprocal acts on communal norms while Americans’ are contingent on reciprocal exchanges. An example of such difference is that Indians act upon their peers’ requests for assistance repeatedly
76:
A common example of this interaction is the haggler and shopkeeper. If the haggler wants a deal and the shopkeeper wants a sale, the haggler must carefully choose a price for the shopkeeper to consider. The shopkeeper will consider a lower price (or a price in between) based on the benefit of
136:
Cultural psychologists Joan Miller and David Bersoff, in an experimental study in 1994, found that Americans receive greater utility in providing help under a reciprocity condition than without one; on the other hand, Indians displayed virtually no difference in utility with or without a prior
115:
Thomas Dohmen and his team of behavioral economists also found a positive correlation between both age and height and one’s trust, meaning that the taller a person is, the more willing they are to trust, and the same idea applies to age—the older one gets, the more trusting they are.
29:
of humans as cooperative actors who are motivated by improving their environment through positive reciprocity (rewarding other individuals) or negative reciprocity (punishing other individuals), even in situations without foreseeable benefit for themselves.
90:
in individuals are only weakly correlated and that these values correlate differently with factors such as gender or age. A possible explanation is "that negative and positive reciprocity are different because they tap into different emotional responses".
72:
players, however, also are motivated by justification. If a second player is perceived as having done something wrong or insulting, the first player is willing to "take a hit", even with no foreseeable benefits, in order for the second player to suffer.
67:
concept states that human being players interact with a propensity to cooperate. They will compromise in order to achieve a balance between what is best for them and what is best for the environment they are a part of.
93:
Positive reciprocity correlates with height, with increasing age, with female gender, with higher income as well as higher number of hours of work, with a higher number of friends and with higher overall
119:
Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter, professors of behavioral economics at the University of Zurich, discovered through their study that women and the elderly are more apt to perform reciprocal behaviors.
311: 39:, which states the opposite theory that human beings are exclusively motivated by self-interest. However, the two ideas can be reconciled if we assume that utility functions of the 128:
people who land on the higher end of the neuroticism spectrum tend to be more negatively reciprocal, while those who are more conscientious and agreeable tend to be less so.
81:, which may be offensive to the shopkeeper, the shopkeeper may refuse simply on the grounds that he is offended, and will knowingly and purposely lose the sale. 601:
Miller, Joan G.; Bland, Chloe; Källberg-Shroff, Malin; Tseng, Chiung-Yi; Montes-George, Jazmin; Ryan, Katelin; Das, Rekha; Chakravarthy, Sharmista (July 2014).
695: 216: 686: 141:
throughout their lifetimes, whereas Americans show reciprocal behaviors shortly, and only, after altruistic acts were performed towards them.
764: 43:
can have parameters that are dependent to the perceived utility of other agents (such as one's spouse or children).
774: 759: 736: 769: 499:"Cultural Influences on the Moral Status of Reciprocity and the Discounting of Endogenous Motivation" 256: 723: 719: 712: 705: 236: 221: 246: 696:
Self-Interest, Homo Islamicus and Some Behavioral Assumptions in Islamic Economics and Finance
709: 180: 165: 112:
reciprocity in children, through which they found that girls are more prosocial than boys.
8: 727: 665: 583: 526: 479: 377: 261: 175: 349: 716: 690: 657: 622: 575: 567: 530: 518: 471: 463: 424: 416: 369: 365: 328: 160: 95: 26: 669: 381: 649: 614: 587: 557: 510: 483: 455: 408: 361: 323: 251: 226: 701: 210: 196: 52: 35: 602: 396: 618: 412: 241: 190: 55:
wrote about the concept of "mutual aid" in the early part of the 20th century.
498: 753: 731: 661: 626: 571: 562: 545: 522: 514: 467: 420: 373: 170: 739:
Edward J. O'Boyle, Mayo Research Institute, a refutation of reductionism in
101: 579: 475: 428: 641: 744: 653: 231: 203: 546:"A Cultural Psychology of Agency: Morality, Motivation, and Reciprocity" 348:
DOHMEN, THOMAS; FALK, ARMIN; HUFFMAN, DAVID; SUNDE, UWE (January 2008).
297:
Homo reciprocans: survey evidence on prevalence, behaviour and success
740: 443: 185: 459: 603:"Culture and the role of exchange vs. communal norms in friendship" 350:"Representative Trust and Reciprocity: Prevalence and Determinants" 78: 544:
Miller, Joan G.; Goyal, Namrata; Wice, Matthew (September 2017).
295: 600: 397:"The emergence of contingent reciprocity in young children" 312:"Homo Reciprocans: Survey Evidence on Behavioural Outcomes" 102:
Determining Propensity to Reciprocate of Homo Reciprocans
347: 309: 294:
Thomas Dohmen, Armin Falk, David Huffmann, Uwe Sunde,
310:
Dohmen, T.; Falk, A.; Huffman, D.; Sunde, U. (2009).
395:
Warneken, Felix; Tomasello, Michael (October 2013).
84: 497:Miller, Joan G.; Bersoff, David M. (October 1994). 394: 751: 77:selling a product. If the haggler's offer is a 704:a blog by current economics PhD student at the 543: 217:List of alternative names for the human species 33:This concept stands in contrast to the idea of 290: 288: 286: 284: 282: 280: 278: 496: 442:Fehr, Ernst; Gächter, Simon (January 2002). 441: 275: 503:Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 300:, IZA Discussion Paper no. 2205, July 2006 607:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 561: 327: 401:Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 106: 752: 639: 550:Perspectives on Psychological Science 343: 341: 339: 144: 642:"Perceived Motives and Reciprocity" 13: 14: 786: 680: 444:"Altruistic punishment in humans" 336: 85:Positive and negative reciprocity 366:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00082.x 329:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02242.x 633: 594: 537: 490: 435: 388: 303: 122: 1: 726:with the patronage of former 698:(DOC) by Mohammad Omar Farooq 268: 46: 7: 765:Latin philosophical phrases 737:Requiem for Homo Economicus 153: 58: 10: 791: 619:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.006 413:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.002 131: 25:, is the concept in some 724:University of Queensland 640:Orhun, A. Yesim (2017). 563:10.1177/1745691617706099 515:10.1177/0146167294205015 722:and Tasman Bain of the 706:University of Cambridge 646:SSRN Electronic Journal 237:Post-autistic economics 222:Modern portfolio theory 775:Rational choice theory 687:Rational self interest 247:Rational choice theory 137:reciprocal occasion. 760:Economic methodology 654:10.2139/ssrn.2982333 316:The Economic Journal 181:Economic rationalism 166:Behavioral economics 107:Sex, Age, and Height 728:Stanford University 689:, Roger A. McCain, 23:reciprocating human 262:Strong reciprocity 176:Gift-exchange game 691:Drexel University 454:(6868): 137–140. 161:Agent (economics) 145:Perceived Motives 96:life satisfaction 51:Russian theorist 27:economic theories 782: 770:Moral psychology 743:using tenets of 674: 673: 637: 631: 630: 598: 592: 591: 565: 541: 535: 534: 494: 488: 487: 439: 433: 432: 392: 386: 385: 354:Economic Inquiry 345: 334: 333: 331: 307: 301: 292: 252:Rational pricing 227:Moral psychology 70:Homo reciprocans 65:Homo reciprocans 18:Homo reciprocans 790: 789: 785: 784: 783: 781: 780: 779: 750: 749: 683: 678: 677: 638: 634: 599: 595: 542: 538: 495: 491: 460:10.1038/415137a 440: 436: 393: 389: 346: 337: 308: 304: 293: 276: 271: 266: 211:Homo economicus 197:Homo biologicus 156: 147: 134: 125: 109: 104: 87: 61: 53:Peter Kropotkin 49: 41:homo economicus 36:homo economicus 12: 11: 5: 788: 778: 777: 772: 767: 762: 748: 747: 734: 699: 693: 682: 681:External links 679: 676: 675: 632: 593: 556:(5): 867–875. 536: 509:(5): 592–602. 489: 434: 407:(2): 338–350. 387: 335: 302: 273: 272: 270: 267: 265: 264: 259: 254: 249: 244: 242:Rational agent 239: 234: 229: 224: 219: 214: 207: 200: 193: 191:Herbert Gintis 188: 183: 178: 173: 168: 163: 157: 155: 152: 146: 143: 133: 130: 124: 121: 108: 105: 103: 100: 86: 83: 60: 57: 48: 45: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 787: 776: 773: 771: 768: 766: 763: 761: 758: 757: 755: 746: 742: 738: 735: 733: 732:Peter Corning 729: 725: 721: 718: 714: 711: 707: 703: 700: 697: 694: 692: 688: 685: 684: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 636: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 597: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 564: 559: 555: 551: 547: 540: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 493: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 438: 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 391: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 344: 342: 340: 330: 325: 321: 317: 313: 306: 299: 298: 291: 289: 287: 285: 283: 281: 279: 274: 263: 260: 258: 257:Samuel Bowles 255: 253: 250: 248: 245: 243: 240: 238: 235: 233: 230: 228: 225: 223: 220: 218: 215: 213: 212: 208: 206: 205: 201: 199: 198: 194: 192: 189: 187: 184: 182: 179: 177: 174: 172: 171:Dictator game 169: 167: 164: 162: 159: 158: 151: 142: 138: 129: 120: 117: 113: 99: 97: 91: 82: 80: 74: 71: 66: 56: 54: 44: 42: 38: 37: 31: 28: 24: 20: 19: 720:(Queensland) 708:Dan Gibbons 645: 635: 610: 606: 596: 553: 549: 539: 506: 502: 492: 451: 447: 437: 404: 400: 390: 360:(1): 84–90. 357: 353: 322:(536): 592. 319: 315: 305: 296: 209: 202: 195: 148: 139: 135: 126: 118: 114: 110: 92: 88: 75: 69: 64: 62: 50: 40: 34: 32: 22: 17: 16: 15: 745:natural law 713:(Melbourne) 702:Reciprocans 232:Pirate game 204:Homo duplex 123:Personality 754:Categories 730:Professor 269:References 741:free will 662:1556-5068 627:0022-1031 613:: 79–93. 572:1745-6916 531:145136058 523:0146-1672 468:0028-0836 421:0022-0965 374:0095-2583 186:Gratitude 47:Kropotkin 670:49680026 580:28972843 476:11805825 429:23917162 382:39441604 154:See also 79:low-ball 59:Examples 588:3429467 484:4310962 132:Culture 668:  660:  625:  586:  578:  570:  529:  521:  482:  474:  466:  448:Nature 427:  419:  380:  372:  666:S2CID 584:S2CID 527:S2CID 480:S2CID 378:S2CID 21:, or 710:BCom 658:ISSN 623:ISSN 576:PMID 568:ISSN 519:ISSN 472:PMID 464:ISSN 425:PMID 417:ISSN 370:ISSN 63:The 717:MSc 650:doi 615:doi 558:doi 511:doi 456:doi 452:415 409:doi 405:116 362:doi 324:doi 320:119 756:: 715:, 664:. 656:. 648:. 644:. 621:. 611:53 609:. 605:. 582:. 574:. 566:. 554:12 552:. 548:. 525:. 517:. 507:20 505:. 501:. 478:. 470:. 462:. 450:. 446:. 423:. 415:. 403:. 399:. 376:. 368:. 358:46 356:. 352:. 338:^ 318:. 314:. 277:^ 672:. 652:: 629:. 617:: 590:. 560:: 533:. 513:: 486:. 458:: 431:. 411:: 384:. 364:: 332:. 326::

Index

economic theories
homo economicus
Peter Kropotkin
low-ball
life satisfaction
Agent (economics)
Behavioral economics
Dictator game
Gift-exchange game
Economic rationalism
Gratitude
Herbert Gintis
Homo biologicus
Homo duplex
Homo economicus
List of alternative names for the human species
Modern portfolio theory
Moral psychology
Pirate game
Post-autistic economics
Rational agent
Rational choice theory
Rational pricing
Samuel Bowles
Strong reciprocity




Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑