Litigation involving Apple Inc.

599:$ 0.99 a song and then, after such gift cards were purchased, raised the price on certain songs to $ 1.29 on April 7, 2009. The lawsuit's allegations included that Apple's conduct constituted breach of contract, violated the state consumer fraud statute, and violated consumer protection statutes of other states. The plaintiffs sought a $ .30 refund remedy for each song that class members purchased using a $ .99 iTunes card for which they were charged $ 1.29, plus their attorneys' fees and costs. Apple mounted a vigorous defense and sought to dismiss the suit but lost its motion in December 2009. Individuals are part of the class of plaintiffs if they are U.S. residents who purchased or received an iTunes Gift Card on which the card itself or its packaging contained language to the effect that songs were priced at $ 0.99 and who used the card to purchase one or more $ 1.29 songs from the iTunes Store on or before May 10, 2010. The settlement provides class members with an iTunes Store credit of $ 3.25 if an online claim form was submitted on or before September 24, 2012. 351:'s price discounting as a substantial challenge to their traditional business model. Regarding Apple in particular, the federal complaint alleged that "Apple facilitated the Publisher Defendants' collective effort to end retail price competition by coordinating their transition to an agency model across all retailers. Apple clearly understood that its participation in this scheme would result in higher prices to consumers." In such an agency-model, publishers set prices rather than sellers. Fifteen states and Puerto Rico also filed a companion federal case in Austin, Texas, against Apple, Penguin, Simon & Schuster and Macmillan. In the same month, HarperCollins, Hachette and Simon & Schuster settled with both the DOJ and the state attorneys general, with HarperCollins and Hachette agreeing to pay Texas and Connecticut $ 52 million in consumer restitution, leaving Apple, Penguin, and Macmillan as remaining defendants. As of July 2012, the case was still in the 242:

Litigation", case 11-cv-06714-YGR. The new case is essentially the same but is filed only against Apple, not AT&T Mobility. In late 2013, the various parts of the case were dismissed by the district court. The parts relating to SIM locking were rejected because AT&T was not a party and the plaintiffs were not willing to add AT&T. The remaining claim, in its final version, was that Apple monopolised the market for iPhone applications and that the plaintiffs were damaged by paying Apple's 30% commission for paid applications in the App Store, which the court rejected saying that the commission was "a cost passed-on to consumers by independent software developers", not paid by the consumers directly, and so the plaintiffs did not have standing under the

483:

California action, with the settlement terms designed to end the New York action as well. An appeal followed the California court's approval of the settlement but the appellate court upheld the settlement in December 2005. Eligible members of the class were entitled to extended warranties, store credit, cash compensation, or battery replacement, and some incentive payments, with all unfiled claims expiring after September 2005. Apple agreed to pay all costs of the litigation, including incentive payments to the class members and the plaintiffs' attorney fees, but admitted no fault. In 2006 Apple Canada, Inc., also settled several similar Canadian class action suits alleging misrepresentations by Apple regarding iPod battery life.

1550:(EFF), defensively sued Apple seeking a declaration of non-infringement and non-circumvention. In July 2009, Apple ceased claiming infringement, stating it was "withdrawing takedown notifications" and that "Apple no longer has, nor will it have in the future, any objection to the publication of the itunesDB Pages which are the subject of the OdioWorks complaint". After Apple withdrew its complaint and cited code obsolescence as a contributing factor in its decision to withdraw, BluWiki then republished its discussion of the issue. The EFF noted, "While we are glad that Apple retracted its baseless legal threats, we are disappointed that it only came after 7 months of censorship and a lawsuit". 1072:, a stylised "W", similar in shape to an apple. Apple reportedly took objection to the breadth of Woolworths' application, which would allow it to brand products, including consumer electronics, with the logo. In April 2011, Woolworths amended its trademark application to remove various goods and services, such as "apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images" and Apple withdrew its opposition, allowing the trademark to proceed to registration. In August 2011 Woolworths introduced a shopping app for the iPhone, and, as of January 2019 continues to use the logo, including on the face of its iPhone app. The Woolworths smartphone app is also available on Apple's 1753:. Typhoon acquired two pre-existing patents, (filed in 1993 and 1994 and issued in 1995 and 1997), in mid-2007 for $ 350,000 plus a percentage of collected licensing fees. The patents had languished for some time and were not being policed; shortly after Typhoon acquired the patents, it began enforcement by bringing suit against exploiters of the technology who had not paid licensing fees. Typhoon was successful in its patent infringement suits against some small companies, and then expanded its litigation to go after larger ones. Typhoon alleged that Apple and others used its patented technology inventions without permission. Typhoon originally filed the suit in December 2007 against 928:. Nominet stated that Cohen should appeal the case via the appeal process in the DRS. Cohen refused and, after several months, instead issued proceedings for judicial review. The High Court at first instance rejected Cohen's case in August 2005, noting that Cohen's company, Cyberbritain Group Ltd., should have used the appeal process forming part of Nominet's domain resolution service. Afterward, Cohen's company asked for a rehearing and, as that case progressed, the interim domain name was transferred to Apple in accord with the expert's decision and thereafter pointed to the Apple music site. In November 2005, Cohen dropped all legal action against Apple. 1809:

before finally settling in June 2011. For an undisclosed amount of cash and future ongoing iPhone royalties to be paid by Apple, Nokia agreed to settle, with Apple's royalty payments retroactively back-payable to the iPhone's introduction in 2007, but with no broad cross-licensing agreement made between the companies. Apple only agreed to cross-license some patents to Nokia. "Apple said in a statement today that Nokia will have a license to some technology, "but not the majority of the innovations that make the iPhone unique". Apple gets a license to some of Nokia's patents, including ones that were deemed essential to industry standards on mobile phones.

1052:, claiming the school's logo infringed Apple's trademark rights and that the school's logo falsely suggested Apple had authorized the school's activities. The logo in question featured the outline of an apple and a leaf, although the design incorporated a mountain, had three bumps on top of the apple instead of the two used by Apple, and had no bite out of the apple, unlike Apple's logo. In April 2011, the school reported it had settled its 3-year dispute with Apple, was launching a new logo under a new name, Q College, and was expanding its operations. The settlement's full terms were undisclosed. 504:, and further defendants were added to the action. The complainants petitioned the court for a ban on the "passing of user information without consent and monetary compensation," claimed damages for breach of privacy, and sought redress for other enumerated claims. Press reports stated that in April 2011, Apple agreed to amend its developer agreement to stop this from happening "except for information directly necessary for the functionality of the apps"; however, the suit alleged that Apple took no steps to do this or enforce it "in any meaningful way due to criticism from advertising networks". 1835:(ITC) in Washington, D.C. Apple's suit alleged 20 separate patent infringements relating to the iPhone's user interface, underlying architecture and hardware. Steve Jobs exclaimed "We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it. We've decided to do something about it ... think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours". The ITC rejected all but one of Apple's claims, however, ruling for Apple on a single claim relating to data tapping. HTC motioned the Delaware court for a 670:

lawsuit claimed that Apple favored company-owned stores by providing significant discounts unavailable to independent dealers. The complaint alleged Apple's acts in favoring its own stores constituted breach of contract, false advertising, fraud, trade libel, defamation, and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. As of 2006, Apple reached settlements with all of the plaintiffs, including the bankruptcy trustee for one reseller that failed, while the former principal of that company appealed the bankruptcy court's approval of the settlement.

721:

expertise of a scientist using the undefined phrase 'butt-head'." Sagan then sued for Apple's original use of his name and likeness, but again lost and appealed that ruling. In November 1995, Apple and Sagan reached an out-of-court settlement and Apple's office of trademarks and patents released a conciliatory statement that "Apple has always had great respect for Dr. Sagan. It was never Apple's intention to cause Dr. Sagan or his family any embarrassment or concern". Apple's third and final code name for the project was "LaW", short for "Lawyers are Wimps".

748:

in limited circumstances allows an earlier trademark to be "tacked", or connected, to a later trademark giving the later trademark the priority date of the earlier trademark. It found that Apple Jazz has been in use for "live musical performances" since June 1985, and that Apple Music has been in use since June 2015. The TTAB also found that "the sound recordings identified in Applicant's registrations to be 'the same or similar' for purposes of tacking as the production and distribution of sound recordings identified in Applicant's application."

1849:, also filing a counter-complaint with the ITC, with HTC's general counsel saying "HTC will continue to protect its patented inventions against infringement from Apple until such infringement stops." In May 2012 the Delaware court ordered mediation between the companies. In November 2012, HTC and Apple ended the patent dispute by settling the case, but did not disclose the terms of the settlement. The companies reported the settlement included a 10-year agreement for licensing both companies' current and future patents to each other." 2032:

clarified the purpose of the damage-only retrial and stated the result of the first trial, "This is a case not where we're disputing that the 13 phones contain some elements of Apple's property," but the company has disputed the $ 379.8 million amount that Apple claimed — Samsung presented a figure of $ 52 million. The San Jose jury eventually awarded Apple $ 290 million in damages after jurors completed a one-page assessment form for each infringed patent. The six-woman, two-man jury reached its decision after a three-day period.

1437:

authorization of the copyright owner. Such legal conflicts affected not only Apple, but all other software companies as well, and the conflicts remained unresolved until the creation of an international legal regime embodied in further changes to national copyright laws, which ultimately made object code subject to copyright law. These revisions of law in favor of making object code subject to copyright law are still controversial. The revisions also form the technical underpinnings (via the

2040:

tablet models, while Samsung has responded with a counterclaim, in which it states that two patents for nine phones and tablets have been infringed on by Apple. Jury selection for the trial occurred on March 31, 2014. Samsung stands to gain $ 6 million if the jury rules in its favor, while Apple is seeking $ 2 billion in damages and could proceed with similar lawsuits against other Android handset makers, as the relevant patent issues extend beyond Samsung's software technology.

10080: 425:

issued a ruling in September 2021 that cleared Apple on nine of ten counts related to anti-trust charges Epic had raised, but did find that Apple's anti-steering provision violated California's anti-competition laws. The court issued a permanent injunction against Apple preventing them from blocking developers from including links in App Store apps to third-party payment systems or collecting information within apps to notify users about these systems.

1607: 752:

the TTAB's dismissal of Bertini's Opposition the court stated that "o reasonable person could conclude, based on the record before us, that gramophone records and live musical performances are substantially identical." The result of the court's decision is that Apple Music may not be registered as a trademark in Class 41. Apple requested a rehearing of the appeal, but the request was denied by the court.

2126:(EULA) through the Norwegian Consumer Ombudsman Bjørn Erik Thon, who claimed that Apple was violating contract and copyright laws in their countries. Thon stated that Apple's "being an international company does not entitle to disregard the laws of the countries in which it operates. The company's standard customer contract violates Norwegian law". An official complaint was filed by the 290:(EU). The Commission began an antitrust investigation in 2007 of Apple's business practices after the complaint was made, but ultimately the Commission probe found no agreements between Apple and major record labels on how iTunes is run in Europe, only that Apple had been paying higher wholesale prices to UK music labels and was passing the cost along to UK customers. 1032:

amendment filed in June 2007. The TTAB's Notice of Publication was published in September 2007 and Apple filed an opposition with the TTAB the following January, claiming a likelihood of confusion. In June 2008, NYC filed a motion to amend its application to delete the leaf element from its design, leaving the stem, and the TTAB dismissed Apple's opposition and

88:(BSA), whose principal activity is trying to stop copyright infringement of software produced by BSA members; Apple treats all its intellectual property as a business asset, engaging in litigation as one method among many to police its assets and to respond to claims by others against it. Apple's portfolio of intellectual property is broad enough, for 2028:

the media as a "mixed ruling" and stated that some of Samsung's older devices infringe on two of Apple's patents—one covering touch-screen technology and another regarding headphone jacks; however, no violations were identified in four other patents. The final determination of the ITC was signed by Lisa Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission.

6411:, case 6:07-cv-546, U.S. Dist.Ct., E.D.Tex. (Tyler Division), filed October 23, 2008. Plaintiff's complaint identified the patents as U.S. Patent No. 5,379,057: "Portable Computer with Touch Screen and Computer System Employing Same," and U.S. Patent No. 5,675,362: "Portable Computer with Touch Screen and Computing System Employing Same". 562:, as breaches, per se, sustain no legal damages without a showing of actual and measurable harm such as monetary loss. Under U.S. law as of July 2012, it is only when a data breach results in actual loss as defined by applicable law that compensable damages arise. The case remained on the California court's docket as of July 2012. 912:(the DRS), claiming that Apple had trademark rights in the name "iTunes" and that the use of the domain name by Cohen's company was abusive (these being the two tests under the DRS rules for prevailing in a matter where the complaint related only to the later use of a trademarked name). The dispute was unresolved at the free 4968: 1867:(RIM) in January 2010, filing two lawsuits against Apple and a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission against both Apple and RIM after the companies refused to pay royalties for use of Kodak's patents for digital cameras. Kodak alleged Apple's and RIM's phones infringed on patented Kodak 2039:

A new trial is scheduled for March 2014, in which Apple will seek to prevent Samsung from selling some of its current devices in the U.S. The case will involve further debate over monetary compensation. In the 2014 lawsuit, Samsung is accused of infringing five of Apple Inc.'s patents in 10 phone and

2035:

In the first week of January 2014, a filing with the U.S. District court in San Jose showed that legal executives from both parties agreed to meet prior to February 19, 2014, to engage in settlement discussions. Both Samsung and Apple were responding to a court order that instructed the completion of

1664:

statement for May 1, 2001, eMachines stated that its "net loss for the first quarter of 2001 was $ 31.1 million, or $ 0.21 per share, compared to a loss of $ 11.9 million, or $ 0.13 per share, in the first quarter of 2000", and that these results "reflect the substantial discounts and incentives that

1411:

reversed its earlier decisions and ruled that because object code was a translation of source code and embodied in a silicon chip, it was therefore a translation of an original literary work expressed in a material form and unauthorized reproduction of the object code was therefore an infringement of

1298:

statute, a law designed to dispense with meritless legal claims attempting to silence valid exercises of freedom of speech. In late 2007, Think Secret announced "Apple and Think Secret have settled their lawsuit, reaching an agreement that results in a positive solution for both sides. As part of the

1031:

initiative, by designer Blake E. Marquis. NYC originally filed for its trademark: "a stylized apple design" for "ducation services, namely, providing public service announcements on policies and practices of the City of New York in the field of environmentally sustainable growth" in May 2007, with an

747:

Consequently, Bertini filed an Opposition proceeding at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the USPTO, challenging the right of Apple to register Apple Music over Apple Jazz. In April 2021 the TTAB dismissed Bertini's Opposition. The TTAB based its Decision on the "tacking" doctrine, which

469:

support policy led Apple to rescind the offer, resulting in a consumer class action lawsuit for breach of contract. Apple denied wrongdoing but, in settlement of the claims, Apple ultimately reinstated the telephone support for the duration of original ownership of the otherwise obsolete products and

2221:

into this licensing dispute, with Apple ultimately prevailing and awarded permanent injunctive relief, and the decision affirmed on appeal in 2011. Psystar's appeal asserted copyright misuse as a defense by arguing that Apple's license agreement was an unlawful attempt to extend copyright protection

2018:

A U.S. jury trial was held on July 30, 2012, with Apple prevailing and Samsung ordered to pay more than $ 1 billion in damages, after which Samsung stated: "This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected

1960:

and VPN On Demand technology in the iOS system. The first case, involving four of VirnetX's patents, was found in favor of VirnetX, and while Apple was able to content one of the patents with the Patent Office, the other three stood up to scrutiny. Apple further appealed up to the Supreme Court, but

1808:

In October 2009, Nokia Corporation sued Apple for Apple's infringement of Nokia's patents relating to wireless technology; Apple countersued Nokia in December 2009. The two companies engaged in nearly two-years of litigation and both parties amended their claims multiple times and in multiple courts

1724:

In August 2006, Apple and Creative settled the suit with Apple agreeing to pay Creative $ 100 million USD for the right to implement Creative's method of sorting songs on the iPod. The settlement effectively ended the patent dispute and five other pending lawsuits between the two companies. Creative

1568:

In 2020 the judge ruled in favor of Corellium on the copyright aspect of the case, while leaving open the DMCA aspect. He also determined that Corellium used a vetting process for its customers. In 2021, Apple and Corellium settled the DMCA claim. Apple appealed the copyright ruling in 2021 but lost

787:

music synthesizer chip, Apple Corps alleged the product to be in violation of the terms of their settlement. The parties then reached another settlement agreement and Apple paid Apple Corps around $ 26.5 million, with Apple agreeing it would not package, sell, or distribute physical music materials.

720:

that a reader aware of the context would understand Apple was "clearly attempting to retaliate in a humorous and satirical way", and that "It strains reason to conclude that Defendant was attempting to criticize Plaintiff's reputation or competency as an astronomer. One does not seriously attack the

669:

In 2004, independent Apple resellers filed a lawsuit against Apple alleging the company used misleading advertising practices by using unfair business practices that harmed the resellers' sales while boosting Apple-owned outlets, in effect by favoring its own outlets over those of its resellers. The

616:

In 2011, five parents filed a class action suit against Apple for "in-app" purchases, which are purchases that can be made within applications ("apps"). The parents contended that Apple had not disclosed that the "free" apps that were to be used by children had the potential to rack up fees without

751:

In September 2021 Bertini appealed the TTAB's decision to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. In April 2023 the court issued a precedential decision reversing the decision of the administrative tribunal. The court stated "e do not agree" with Apple's legal position regarding tacking. Referring to

637:

decreases over time. Nevertheless, users were forced to spend extra on battery replacement to restore their phones' former speed. After the issuance of a class-action lawsuit in 2017 and lengthy litigation, in 2020, Apple agreed to pay the compensation of $ 500m (about $ 25 for each affected user).

482:

music players sold prior to May 2004 did not have the battery life represented and/or that the battery's capacity to take and hold a charge substantially diminished over time. Rather than litigate these claims, Apple entered into a settlement agreement in August 2005 after a fairness hearing in the

424:

from their storefronts for violating their policies as apps are not allowed to bypass the App Store payment system; Google also removed the game for similar reasons from the Play Store. Epic subsequently filed the lawsuits against both companies after the game was pulled. The federal district judge

227:

In October 2008, the court denied the defendants' motions to dismiss the case on the federal claims and granted their motions to dismiss the state unfair trade practice claims except in California, New York, and Washington, but gave the plaintiffs leave to amend those claims. In December 2011, the

2027:

On August 9, 2013, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced its decision regarding an Apple-initiated case, whereby Samsung is accused of infringing four Apple patents related to user interfaces and headphone input functionality. The USITC sided with Apple in what was described in

1913:

and Apple started a period of intense patent litigation. The Motorola-Apple patent imbroglio commenced with claims and cross-claims between the companies for patent infringement and encompassed multiple forums in multiple countries as each party sought friendly venues for litigating its respective

1436:

then considered these prior decisions and sided with the Canadian decision in ruling that, although object code is not an original literary work in its own right, it is a reproduction of source code in material form and therefore an infringement of copyright takes place if it is copied without the

1172:

In January 2013, Apple's false advertising claim was rejected by a US District judge, who argued that the company presented no evidence that Amazon had " to mimic Apple's site or advertising", or communicated that its service "possesses the characteristics and qualities that the public has come to

996:

Sector Labs, which sought to register "Video Pod" as a mark identifying goods associated with a video projector product. Apple argued that the proposed mark was merely "descriptive" and should be denied because the registration would cause a likelihood of confusion with Apple's pre-existing "iPod"

2130:

in January 2006, after which German and French consumer groups joined the Nordic-led drive to force Apple to make its iTunes online store compatible with digital music players made by rival companies. A French law allows regulators to force Apple to make its player and store compatible with rival

2002:

By August 2011, Apple and Samsung were engaged in 19 ongoing lawsuits in 12 courts in nine countries on four continents; by October, the fight expanded to 10 countries, and by July 2012, the two companies were embroiled in more than 50 lawsuits around the globe with billions of dollars in damages

1152:

Developer Portal" and Amazon's alleged other similar uses of the phrase. In its complaint, Apple did not refer to "apps" as a common name, but described its applications store as a place consumers license "software programs or products"; Amazon countered in its answer that "app store" is a common

803:

violated the terms of the previous agreement in which Apple agreed not to distribute music. The trial opened on March 29, 2006, in the UK. and ended on May 8, 2006, with the court issuing judgement in favor of Apple Computer. " find no breach of the trademark agreement has been demonstrated," the

355:

stage of litigation. On July 10, 2013, District Court Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan found Apple Inc. guilty of the violation of federal antitrust law, citing "compelling evidence" that Apple played a "central role" in a conspiracy with publishers to eliminate retail competition and the prices of

241:

In December 2011, immediately after class decertification of the previous case, a new group of plaintiffs led by Robert Pepper won the race to the courthouse by filing a complaint in the Northern District, which was combined with some slightly later filers and titled "In re Apple iPhone Antitrust

2300:

involved in the attack. Apple claimed the order "would undermine the very freedoms and liberty our government is meant to protect" and appealed. On March 28, 2016, the DOJ reported that it had retrieved the data from the attacker's iPhone through an alternative method without Apple's assistance,

2031:

In a damage-only retrial court session on November 13, 2013, as ordered by Judge Koh in December 2012, a Samsung Electronics representative stated in a San Jose, U.S. courtroom that Apple's hometown jury found that the company copied some features of both the iPhone and iPad. Samsung's attorney

636:

Apple was claimed to intentionally slow down old iPhone models by adjusting their operating systems in order to encourage users to buy new products. The company confirmed these suspicions but said that the slowdown is exclusively due to the fact that the performance of old lithium-ion batteries

219:

Shortly after this initial filing, other lawsuits were filed, and these were consolidated with the original Holman suit, bringing in additional plaintiffs and complaints: Timothy Smith, et al., v. Apple, Inc. et al., No. C 07-05662 RMW, adding complaints related to ringtones, and Kliegerman v.

1564:

iPhones. The product enabled testing iOS software on computers, enabling some kinds of security research that would be harder to do on actual iPhones. Apple's lawsuit argued that Corellium's product would be dangerous in the wrong hands as it would let hackers learn exploits easier, as well as

807:

On February 5, 2007, Apple Inc. and Apple Corps announced another settlement of their trademark dispute, agreeing that Apple Inc. would own all of the trademarks related to 'Apple' and would license certain of those trademarks back to Apple Corps for its continued use. The settlement ended the

778:

and its association with music. In 1978, Apple Corps filed suit against Apple Computer for trademark infringement and the parties settled in 1981 with Apple Computer paying an undisclosed amount to Apple Corps, later revealed to be $ 80,000. A primary condition of the settlement was that Apple

644:

based on the same software update. The claim states that the lack of an option to disable the slowdown and the absence of a warning about it meant that the phones were "throttled" deliberately. The claim was made for £750 million and would affect an estimated 25 million users in the event of a

1087:

In March 2010, an Australian Trademarks tribunal denied Apple's attempt to prevent a small company from trademarking the name DOPi for use on its laptop bags and cases for Apple products. Apple argued that the DOPi name — which is iPod spelled backwards — is too similar to its own

952:, Cisco filed a lawsuit against Apple in January 2007, alleging Apple's iPhone name infringed on Cisco's iPhone trademark. Cisco alleged that Apple created a front company subsequent to their negotiations to try to acquire the rights another way, while Apple countered that there would be no 164:

technology making its music playable on iPods, Apple changed its software such that the RealNetworks music would no longer play on iPods. The claims of Apple's changes to its encoding and its refusal to license FairPlay technology to other companies were dismissed by the court 2009, but the

2500:, Bloomberg News, bloomberg.com, March 22, 2011. Accessed 2012-4-13. Apple customer Thomas Slattery filed the suit seeking class-action status on behalf of consumers, claiming Apple illegally limited consumer choice by limiting iPod content selection to the company's own iTunes music store. 2065:

infringed four patents owned by them (Corephotonics). Corephotonics said that they approached Apple over a possible partnership, but Apple's lead negotiator apparently declined the idea, with Apple going ahead and launching the iPhone 7 Plus in late 2016, and then the 8 Plus in late 2017.

1424:. It further held that such translation does not include the expression of an idea in another form, but rather only applies to the expression of an idea in another language, and that a translation has a one-to-one correspondence between works that are expressed in two different languages. 1879:

to block Kodak's efforts to use the disputed patents as collateral for loans. In the January complaint Kodak claimed violations of the same image preview technology at issue in the original dispute between Kodak, Apple, and RIM that is, as of 2012, pending before ITC. In March 2012,

919:

Cohen thereafter launched a media offensive claiming the DRS was biased in favor of large businesses and made frequent threats of lawsuits against Nominet. Cohen stated he believed that the DRS system was unfair for a number of reasons and would seek redress against Nominet with the

1536:

case was one of the first high-profile cases illustrating Apple's attempts to employ federal police power in its litigation practices by invoking the anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) as a means of shielding its intellectual property from

824:

advertising campaign that ran from 1997 until 2002. Swatch contended that Apple's campaign wasn't well known enough in Switzerland to warrant protection and the Federal Administrative Court concluded that Apple had failed to produce sufficient documentation to support its claim.

2023:

later decided that the jury had miscalculated $ 450 million in its initial damage assessment and ordered a retrial that commenced in November 2013. Following a week-long trial, also overseen by Judge Koh, Samsung was ordered to pay $ 600 million to Apple for the 2012 lawsuit.

199:

on the iPhone and Apple's (at the time) complete ban on third-party apps, and alleged that the 1.1.1 software update was "expressly designed" to disable unapproved SIM cards and apps. The lawsuit said that this was an unfair, unlawful, and fraudulent business practice (see

739:

Jazz musician Charles Bertini filed an application to register his trademark "Apple Jazz" in Class 41 for entertainment services with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in June 2016. The USPTO refused his application due to Apple Inc.'s June 2015 application to register

653:

In October 2022, Apple was fined $ 19 million in a class action lawsuit, with the Sao Paulo state court ruling that the company must include battery chargers with all iPhones sold in the country after the ruling was issued. Apple stated that it would appeal the decision.

524:'s senior director of technology published an article examining the data collected by his own iPhone, showing examples of the data collected and maps correlating the data. Separately, digital forensics researchers reported they regularly use the data collected from Apple 4965: 5044:, Reuters, reuters.com, July 2, 2012. Accessed July 25, 2012. See also "Guangdong Gaoyuan Chenggong Tiaojie Pingguo yu Weiguan IPAD Quanshu Jiufen An" (Guangdong Higher Court Succeeds in Mediating the Apple Proview Dispute over IPAD Trademarks), gdcourts.gov.cn, the 3038: 2222:

to products that are not copyrightable. The appeals court ruled that Psystar failed to demonstrate "copyright misuse" by Apple because Psystar must show either that the license agreement restricts creativity or that it restricts competition, and that Apple's

1545:

provider, alleging BluWiki infringed Apple's copyrights in publishing a discussion of how to make the latest iPods interoperate with other software and that, by so doing, violated the DMCA. In April 2009, OdioWorks, the operators of BluWiki, backed by the

2898:, Hachette Book Group, Inc., Harpercollins Publishers LLC, Verlagsgruppe Georg Von Holtzbrinck GMBH, Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC d/b/a Macmillan, The Penguin Group, a Division of Pearson PLC, Penguin Group (USA), Inc., and Simon & Schuster, Inc. 1793:. In 2010, Apple settled with Typhoon for an undisclosed sum and was then dismissed from the litigation as of September 2010. The other large companies were able to rebuff Typhoon's claims, and Typhoon ceased doing business in 2008 after the 6205: 1572:

The document prepared by Apple with the goal of using it in the company's copyright lawsuit against Corellium, revealed that the cybersecurity startup offered or sold its tools to controversial government spyware and hacking-tool makers in

4811: 4799: 6162: 1504:

for Windows 1.0. The decision was upheld on appeal in 1994, but legal disputes on this topic were still ongoing until 1997, when the two companies came to a wide-ranging agreement that included Microsoft buying non-voting Apple stocks.

1839:

to the Northern District of California, arguing against Apple's desire to consolidate the case with the similar cases brought by Nokia against Apple, alleging insubstantial overlap between those cases and Apple's complaint, but Judge

2003:

claimed between them. As of August 2013, the ultimate cost of these patent wars to consumers, shareholders, and investors is not known. Named as a third party in the suit, Google claims that this is another tactic by Apple to defeat

3605:

case: the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a trial court decision that employees of Ceridian Corporation's customers did not have standing to sue Ceridian after the payroll processing firm suffered a data breach. See

3490:; (5) Consumer Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA"), Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 against Apple only; (6) Unfair Competition under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200; (7) Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; and (8) Unjust Enrichment. 873:

case where a top-level domain registrar's decision differed from prior decisions by awarding a domain name to a subsequent registrant (Apple), rather than to the prior registrant (Cohen). As the decision recounts, in November 2000,

1885: 120:(USPTO) alone, most in opposition to or taking exception to others' use of the terms "apple", "pod", and "safari"; those cases include sellers of apples (the fruit), as well as many others' less unassuming use of the term "apple". 515:

members stating that commercial storage and usage of location information without a consumer's express consent is illegal under current law, but Apple defended its use of customer tracking in a letter released May 9, 2011, by the

464:

From 1993 to 1996, Apple developed a marketing strategy that promised free and unlimited live-telephone support on certain products for as long as the original purchaser owned those products; by 1997, however, changes in Apple's

607:

Apple settled a U.S. class action in 2011 regarding the older T-shaped MagSafe power adapters. Apple agreed to replace the adapters with newer adapters, and to compensate customers who were forced to buy replacement adapters.

2131:

offerings. The consumer protection regulators of Norway, Sweden, and Finland met with Apple in September 2006 in hopes of resolving the issues without litigation, but the matter was only resolved after Apple discontinued its

2216:

restricted the use of Mac OS X to Apple computers, and specifically prohibited customers from installing the operating system on non-Apple computers.The case brought the anti-circumvention and anti-trafficking facets of the

224:. The combined case title was changed to "In Re Apple & AT&TM Anti-Trust Litigation." The court appointed lead counsel from the various plaintiffs' lawyers, and several versions of a combined complaint were filed. 2070:

Apple's lead negotiator expressed contempt for Corephotonics' patents, telling Dr. Mendlovic and others that even if Apple infringed, it would take years and millions of dollars in litigation before Apple might have to pay

2591:

Order Relating Cases; Consolidating Cases; And Setting Case Management Conference, In Re Apple & AT&TM Anti-Trust Litigation No. C 07-05152 & No. C 07-05662, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2008. Accessed August 25,

4575:', Video Pod matter, Opposition No. 91176027, p. 47. Accessed July 25, 2012. The TTAB sustained Apple's opposition to the registration of the VIDEO POD mark under both Section 2(e)(1) and Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act. 2870: 2085:

Corephotonics also blamed Apple's consumers (who bought the 7 Plus or 8 Plus) to be infringing the patents, as they claim that Apple sells the products with "knowledge of or willful blindness", which the consumers buy.

10194: 2081:

The patents claimed by Corephotonics to be infringed are: two patents on mini telephoto lens assembly, one patent on dual aperture zoom digital cameras, and one on high resolution thin multi-aperture imaging systems.

1892:

ruled that Kodak did not infringe on Apple's patent technology for digital cameras, although a few days earlier Kodak lost its case before the ITC against Apple and RIM; Kodak announced it would appeal that decision.

852:

in an attempt to draw attention to the web-hosting business he ran out of his parents' basement, a note on Traya's site stated that his plan was to "generate traffic to our servers and try to put the domain to sale.

2604:

Stipulation And Order Granting Plaintiff's Administrative Motion To Relate Cases Under L.R. 3-12, In Re Apple & AT&TM Anti-Trust Litigation No. C 07-05152, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2008. Accessed August 25,

594:

complaint alleged that Apple wrongfully marketed, distributed, and sold iTunes gift cards and songs through its online iTunes store, while representing that consumers could use the gift cards to purchase songs for

10199: 1286:'s parent company, the dePlume Organization LLC, and Think Secret's editor in January 2005, alleging misappropriation of trade secrets with regard to Think Secret's stories on a "headless iMac" and new version of 808:

ongoing trademark lawsuit between the companies, with each party bearing its own legal costs, and Apple Inc. continuing to use the Apple name and logos on iTunes. The settlement's full terms were confidential.

382:

Cap.A class-action lawsuit was filed in the California Northern District District Court by iOS app developers, alleging that Apple abuses its control of the iOS App Store to require its 30% revenue cut and its

2296:, obtained a court order that demanded that Apple create a version of its operating system that would allow the FBI to circumvent security controls, so that it could inspect the contents of an iPhone used by 5045: 1427:

In these conflict of laws cases, Apple met with conflicting international judicial opinions: an Australian court decision conflicted with a Canadian court decision on the copyrightability of object code. In

409:

for antitrust violations and anti-competitive behavior. Epic, which had long since challenged the 30% revenue share that Apple, Google, and other digital storefronts took, had introduced a payment option in

5484:

the court looked to 1986 161 CLR 171 (test in Exxon for literary work is "not intended to establish a comprehensive or exhaustive definition of literary work for copyright purposes" per Mason and Wilson JJ

1844:

denied HTC's motion for a venue change, ruling that Apple's choice of forum would prevail. HTC countersued Apple in September 2011 in the same court claiming infringement of four patents HTC obtained from

894:

in October 2000 which was granted in March 2001, and then launched its UK iTunes music store service in 2004. Afterward, Cohen reactivated his registered domain name, redirecting it to iTunes' then-rival,

255:, Apple should be treated as a manufacturer or producer, in which case the class did not have standing to sue, or if they should be considered a distributor, in which case the class could sue for damages. 2641:

Order Granting Apple's Motion To Dismiss Second Amended Complaint With Prejudice, In Re Apple iPhone Anti-Trust Litigation No. C 11-cv-06714-YGR, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2013. Accessed December 18, 2013.

44:

industry and many have captured the attention of the public and media. Apple's litigation generally involves intellectual property disputes, but the company has also been a party in lawsuits that include

495:

users sued Apple, alleging that certain software applications were passing personal user information to third-party advertisers without the users' consent. The individual cases were consolidated in the

7196:, v. 92, pp. 435, 441, 2004, in which the authors noted "Total direct litigation costs for the median patent case with between $ 1 million and $ 25 million at stake were $ 2 million per side in 2003." 7182: 5565:, LMSD Redacted Forensic Analysis, L-3 Services for LMSD's counsel, May 2010, p. 15. Accessed July 23, 2012. The school used its technology to track licensed copyrighted software, among other things. 2154:(OFT) to investigate Apple's EULA, claiming Apple's EULA, and those of multiple other technology companies, misled consumers and infringed legal rights. The NCC's product complaint included Apple's 1124:(intentional misrepresentation, concealment, inducement) and unfair competition. Apple paid $ 60 million to Proview to end the dispute in a court-mediated settlement in the Higher People's Court of 2089:

The lawsuit demands monetary compensation for the lawyers the start-up had to hire, as well as for damages. They are also asking Apple to immediately stop producing dual-lens cameras systems. The

2629:

Order Granting Apple's Motion To Dismiss Amended Consolidated Complaint, In Re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation No. C 11-cv-06714-YGR, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2013. Accessed August 25, 2013.

6479: 1403:

case, the Australian court decided against the then-prevailing opinions in other courts (the U.K., Canada, South Africa, and the U.S.) and ruled object code was not copyrightable, while the

582:

and who were then unable to use the cards to purchase iTunes music at the price advertised on the card because Apple raised the price of the music after it sold the cards to consumers. The

7158:

Analysis Of The Entire Market Value Rule In Complex Technology Litigation: Arduous Royalty Base Determinations, Unjust Damage Rewards, And Empirical Approaches To Measuring Consumer Demand

1161:

was opposing Apple's attempted registration of the phrase as a trademark and that part of the matter was before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). Apple motioned the court for a

470:

customers affected by the change were given a limited reimbursement if they had been refused telephone support, had been charged per incident, or had incurred third party support charges.

1709:

in September 2000, approximately a year prior to Apple's first iPod release in October 2001. Creative, a Singapore-based consumer electronics group, also filed a trade complaint with the

1116:

district court, where Proview claimed $ 1.6 billion USD in damages. Apple paid Proview approximately $ 53,000 – $ 55,000 for the mark in 2009. In February 2012, Proview sued Apple in the

554:

compensable under current law, the plaintiffs had not shown they sustained injury in fact by the defendants' actions. The problem facing the plaintiffs is the current state of electronic

497: 1369:) of a computer program is subject to copyright laws. A third case in which Apple was not a party but that involved the Apple decisions followed in New Zealand. The specific cases were 528:

in working with law enforcement officials investigating crimes and have been doing so since at least mid-2010. In contrast with earlier statements, Apple revealed in a hearing with the

7814: 6891: 5495: 5318:"Defendant The Deplume Organization LLC's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Special Motion to Strike Complaint Pursuant to California Anti-Slapp Statute, CCP§ 425.16" 1365:

that resulted in international litigation. In the 1980s, Apple litigated two copyright cases with central issues that included the question of whether object code (as contrasted with

340: 7828: 7579: 1926:

license to a components manufacturer carries over to an equipment manufacturer incorporating the component into equipment, an issue not addressed in the U.S. Supreme Court's default

6249:, 71 Fed. Reg. 34,390, June 8, 2006 (notice); Apple filed an ITC countersuit for Creative's alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,046,230, 5,341,293, 5,898,434, and 6,282,646: 3456: 1630:("GEM"), almost a direct copy of the Macintosh's graphical user interface (GUI), or "look and feel". Features Digital Research removed from GEM as a result of the lawsuit included 2996: 1240:, which did no original reporting on the case and thus had no sources to reveal. In February 2005, a trial court in California decided that website operators do not have the same 1001:(TTAB) ruled in Apple's favor and denied Sector Labs' registration, finding that the "iPod" mark was "famous" and therefore entitled to broad protection under U.S. trademark law. 2769: 1875:. After Kodak filed an additional suit in January 2012 against Apple and another against HTC claiming infringement of four of its key patents, Apple filed a countersuit with the 112:

of various types as well and, while it states it generally does not license its patent portfolio, it does work with third parties having an interest in product interoperability.

2859: 1634:

icons on the desktop, movable and resizable windows in the file manager, shading in the title bars, and window open/close animations. In addition, visual elements including the

617:

the parent's knowledge. Potentially 23 million customers could make up the class. Apple offered a settlement option for customers who had fees in excess of $ 30. In 2011 The

6461:, case 6:07-cv-00546-LED, E.D.Tex., March 6, 2009. (Asserted, inter alia, that the iPhone infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 5,379,057 and 5,675,362.); and see Seaman, Christopher B., 6362: 4732: 859:]" After a legal dispute lasting for nearly a year, Apple settled out of court, paying Traya's legal fees and giving him a 'token payment' in exchange for the domain name. 1888:, overseeing Kodak's restructuring, denied Apple's request to file a patent complaint with the ITC over some of Kodak's cameras, photo frames, and printers. In July 2012, the 1734: 6300: 5052: 4664: 3452: 4838: 1745:

collection issues in the commercial exploitation of intellectual property rights. Ultimately, Typhoon could not prevail against patent defense arguments of prior art and

1585:, and to a cybersecurity firm with potential ties to the Chinese government. The leaked documents also revealed that in 2019, Corellium offered a trial of its product to 4158: 2182:, and others. The OFT determined the licensing agreements were unfair and Apple agreed to improve its terms and conditions to make them clearer and fairer to consumers. 7107: 5004: 1112:, as of April 2012. Proview Technology sued Apple over the rights to the mark in China in 2011; Apple counter-sued but lost and then appealed, with the case before the 195:

was introduced), Paul Holman and Lucy Rivello filed a class action lawsuit (numbered C07-05152) in the Northern District of California. The lawsuit referenced Apple's

6396: 4239: 2274:, while Microsoft agreed to continue developing Office and other software for the Mac for the next five years and to purchase $ 150 million of non-voting Apple stock. 7647: 6469:, No. 5, p. 1661, 2010; Chicago-Kent Intellectual Property, Science & Technology Research Paper No. 10-030, 2011-2-1, via papers.ssrn.com. Accessed July 27, 2012. 4823: 532:

that a "software bug" caused iPhones to continue to send anonymous location data to the company's servers, even when location services on the device were turned off.

7485: 2679: 1824: 558:, the issue being that there is no national privacy law that provides for compensatory damages for breach of privacy, and this is the same issue faced by victims of 6788: 3427:, case 10-CV-05878-LHK, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2011. Accessed January 28, 2012. Other consolidated actions related to the matter were identified by the court as: 1198:, the suit filed by Apple against unnamed bloggers raised the issue for the first time of whether bloggers hold the same protections against revealing sources that 980:

which sold for around $ 600. In February 2007, Cisco and Apple announced an agreement under which both companies would be allowed to use the iPhone name worldwide.

7010: 6092: 4985: 3786: 5910: 5540:(DRM) for copyrighted works and controls access to copyrighted software. Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Pub. L. 105-304 (1998); 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1) (2006). 2810: 2036:

such a meeting before a new trial begins in March 2014. One of three Samsung chiefs met with Cook, but the filing did not reveal the name of the representative.

439:

On March 21, 2024, the DOJ filed an antimonopoly lawsuit against Apple, stating the company engaged in anticompetitive practices. DOJ cited Apple's work against

268:

in its 2018 term. The Supreme Court upheld the Ninth Circuit's ruling in May 2019, in that the class did have standing to litigate Apple for antitrust concerns.

73: 6910: 6230: 5641: 5124: 1889: 1361:

contributed to the development of contemporary copyright law because the company's object code cases brought different results in different courts, creating a

4889: 3402: 7160: 6019: 3017: 24:

in its normal course of business for a variety of reasons. In particular, Apple is known for and promotes itself as actively and aggressively enforcing its

7918: 7887: 7671: 6344: 6186: 5662: 5388: 4309: 4260: 3322: 6706: 4680: 4130: 2913: 2260:. After a threat to withdraw support for the Macintosh edition of Microsoft Office the suit was settled in 1997, along with all lingering issues from the 478:

In 2004 and 2005, two state-level class action suits were filed against Apple in New York and California alleging the first, second, and third generation

5037: 2394: 1445:) for the legal notions of electronic privacy violation and computer trespass, as well as the further development of anti-hacking law-making such as the 3451:, 11-cv-01828-LHK, removed 2011-4-14. Other related actions with substantially similar allegations against Apple and other Defendants were filed in the 2824: 5060: 3245:, apple.com, April 1, 2012. Accessed April 2, 2012. The deadline to submit claims on the unlimited live-telephone support matter was September 8, 1999. 251:

The plaintiffs appealed to the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the District Court's dismissal. The Ninth Circuit asked the question whether, in light of

5189: 4144: 3141:, filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against Apple for monopolization or attempted monopolization of smartphone markets in violation of Section 2 of the 7716: 4296: 2601: 2588: 2552:, arstechnica.com, May 9, 2012. Accessed July 23, 2012. The case was granted class action status in 2012 and a website was set up for class members: 1352: 1291: 550:, but gave the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint, thereby not shutting out the claims permanently. The court ruled that without a showing of 7073: 5163: 2577: 116:

alone was a named inventor on over 300 design and utility patents. Between January 2008 and May 2010, Apple Inc. filed more than 350 cases with the

6727: 6483: 5691: 3299:, case 7-04-cv-5773, U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D.N.Y. (the "Mosley Action"). The information site Apple created for the California class action posted the 3058: 2638: 2375: 1909:

In the year before Apple and Samsung began suing each other on most continents, and while Apple and HTC were already embroiled in a patent fight,

791:

In September 2003, Apple Corps again sued Apple Computer alleging Apple Computer had breached the settlement once more, this time for introducing

621:(FTC) investigated similar claims. This settled for $ 100 million. The FTC's action lead to a payout of $ 32.5 million payout in February 2014. 7239: 6984:

case cited the 150-year-old doctrine of patent exhaustion which limits patent rights that survive the initial authorized sale of a patented item.

2545: 1315: 540: 7175: 4715: 2704: 2614:

In re Apple & AT & T M Antitrust Litig., No. C 07-05152 JW, 2010 WL 3521965, N.D. Cal., 2010-7-8, pp. 5–8. Accessed July 25, 2012.

2497: 10149: 7435: 3592:, Heinz Col. of Pub. Pol. and Info. Systems, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Beasley School of Law, Temple Univ., February 19, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-23. 2652: 1295: 774:-founded record label and holding company) and Apple Inc. (then Apple Computer) litigated a dispute involving the use of the name "Apple" as a 451:, messaging apps, and smartwatch compatibility. After the announcement shares of the company slid by just over 4 percent to close at $ 171.37. 3536: 7409: 6424: 4857: 3732: 2757: 2462: 1932: 1496:" copyright lawsuits of the 1980s. After several years in court, Apple's claims against Microsoft were dismissed, primarily due to a license 1464: 6888: 5021: 4089: 4076: 1169:, presiding over Apple's case against Amazon, denied Apple's motion. In July 2012, the case was still in the discovery stage of litigation. 7854: 5935: 5212: 4697: 1710: 6759: 5049: 3157: 944:

trademark, but the negotiations stalled when Cisco pushed for the two products to be interoperable. Following the public unveiling of the

5595: 5449: 4278: 1977: 1923: 6976: 6967: 5317: 5150: 2970: 165:

allegation of Apple's monopoly on the iPod's music download capabilities between 2004 and 2009 remained as of July 2012. In March 2011,

20:

has been a participant in various legal proceedings and claims since it began operation and, like its competitors and peers, engages in

10174: 6512: 5140:

Apple Inc v. Amazon.com Inc., Order Denying Motion For Preliminary Injunction, No. C 11-1327 PJH, July 6, 2011. Accessed July 27, 2012.

3638:, 5:11-md-02250-LHK, In Re: iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation, calendared for August 8, 2012. Accessed July 25, 2012. 8019: 7797: 4534: 10189: 10169: 10154: 9138: 7687: 7510: 6932:

In the Matter of Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, Computers and Components Thereof

6604: 6359: 3872: 1991:

was the first of many lawsuits between Apple and Samsung. In the spring of 2011, Apple sued Samsung while already fully engaged in a

117: 7866: 7535: 7208: 6875: 5233: 3500: 10179: 10164: 10159: 9297: 7765: 3966:

Poundstone, William, Carl Sagan: A Life in the Cosmos, Henry Holt & Company, New York, 1999, pp. 363–364, 374–375.

3827: 1733:

In June 2008, Apple was named among others as a defendant in a suit brought by plaintiff Typhoon Touch Technologies in the federal

179:

tracks sold in the United Kingdom and that Steve Jobs had been directed by the court in March 2011 to make himself available to be

7998: 6686: 6480:"Apple Inc. and 9 Others Added to Greatly Expanded Dell, Inc. Patent Infringement Suit Brought by Typhoon Touch Technologies, Inc" 6041: 3287: 3238: 2528: 2252:, alleging that Microsoft and Intel knowingly used the software company to aid them in stealing several thousand lines of Apple's 10134: 9533: 8817: 6805: 5558: 5550: 2340: 2297: 1794: 365: 172: 7604: 6772: 4661: 3766: 10184: 5111:, Bloomberg Finance L.P., Vol. 3, No. 11, 2011, from Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., nmmlaw.com. Accessed July 27, 2012. 4835: 3138: 956:

between the two products, because Apple's iPhone product was the first cell phone with such a name, while Cisco's iPhone was a

517: 387:

developer fee. The developers are being represented by the same law firm that won the previous eBook price-fixing scheme case.

5757: 4492: 1522:(GUI) copyrights. A federal district court dismissed Xerox's claims without addressing whether Apple's GUI infringed Xerox's. 92:

alone, to encompass several pages of the company's web site and, in April 2012, it listed 176 general business trademarks, 79

10144: 7928: 7897: 5579: 5367: 1442: 7383: 7332: 5606:, 249 F. App'x 476 (7th Cir. 2007). Accessed 2012-7-27. (Distributor of counterfeit software violated copyright laws.); and 5341: 5287: 3631: 3301: 1660:. The eOne was taken off the market, resulting in eMachines' losing the ability to sell the eOne as intended. In eMachines' 709:

letter. Apple complied, but its engineers retaliated by changing the internal codename to "BHA" for "Butt-Head Astronomer".

8074: 6535: 6323: 3612:, Ct.App. 3d Cir., No. 11-1738, 2011-12-12, (on appeal from case 2-10-cv-05142, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. N.J. 2010). See also 2579:" Complaint, Paul Holman et al. v. Apple Inc. et al. No. 07-05152, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2007. Accessed August 25, 2013. 1117: 699:" with the sale of the computer. Apple used the name only internally, but after the name was publicized in a 1993 issue of 7630: 6267: 2351: 1721:

in the United States and for money damages for past sales. Apple filed a countersuit against Creative on similar grounds.

276:

In 2008, Apple agreed to cut the price UK consumers pay to download music for their iPods after a formal complaint to the

6559: 5339:, Think Secret (via archive.org), April 12, 2005. Accessed 2012-7-27. Think Secret's archived web page has links to their 4739: 2811:

Antitrust: European Commission welcomes Apple's announcement to equalise prices for music downloads from iTunes in Europe

1832: 406: 316: 7305: 7272: 7055: 6102: 4927: 4781: 4220: 3807: 3790: 10124: 9970: 6862: 6144: 5274: 5104: 1492:. Cited, among other things, was the use of overlapping and resizable windows in Windows 2.0. The case was one of the " 1323:

established the fundamental basis of copyright of computer software, even if it was provided only as object code or in

1109: 916:

stage and so Apple paid for an independent expert to decide the case; the expert decided the dispute in Apple's favor.

259: 5849: 4908: 3352: 3267: 1269: 8939: 7140: 5708: 4764: 4684: 3971: 1965:

verdict against it. Other cases cover redesigns versions of FaceTime that VirnetX claim still violate their patents.

1690: 7460: 7289: 2731: 228:

district court granted Apple and AT&T's motions to compel arbitration, following the Supreme Court decision in

9872: 9572: 9543: 9309: 9130: 9082: 8109: 7104: 6974:, IEEE Micro, ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id, 2012-3/4, mmi2012020003.3d 10/3/012 16:48 p. 3. Accessed 2012-4-13. Stern cites 6703: 6563: 3182: 2283: 1560:

In 2019, Apple sued Corellium for copyright and DMCA violations related to Corellium's software tools for creating

1438: 1016: 1010: 998: 69: 7157: 6009: 2602:

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/5:2007cv05152/196514/86/0.pdf?ts=1376380861

2589:

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/5:2007cv05152/196514/34/0.pdf?ts=1376380861

1871:

technology. Kodak sought an injunction against further imports into the United States of Apple's iPhone and RIM's

10114: 9492: 9435: 9013: 8624: 8421: 8104: 7124: 6445: 5625: 4266: 2289: 1904: 816:

In April 2019, a Swiss court ruled against Apple's claim that the 'Tick Different' slogan employed by watchmaker

529: 5885: 5121: 4175: 3914: 3707: 2639:

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/4:2011cv06714/249697/124/0.pdf?1386062572

10119: 10104: 9611: 6994: 6785: 5741: 5520: 4203: 3112: 1876: 1725:

also secured an agreement to participate in the "Made for iPod" program by producing accessories for the iPod.

1547: 235: 230: 221: 7676:, Norwegian Consumer Council web service forbrukerportalen.no (via archive.org), 2006. Accessed July 22, 2012. 7007: 3749: 9538: 9528: 9482: 5773: 3365: 1048:

In September 2008, Apple sent a cease and desist letter to the Victoria School of Business and Technology in

761: 434: 310: 244: 7028: 5985: 2900:, case 1:12-cv-02826-UA and 11-md-02293, U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D.N.Y., filed April 11, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-12. 1999:: Extensive litigation followed fierce competition in the global market for consumer mobile communications. 1565:

claiming that Corellium was selling their product indiscriminately, even to potential competitors of Apple.

208:

and Apple was to reduce competition and cause a monopoly in violation of California's antitrust law and the

10129: 8944: 8694: 8671: 8412: 8143: 8134: 6907: 6849: 6830: 6309: 4585: 4521: 4447: 4116: 3483: 2249: 2243: 1827:

in the two companies' ongoing battle with each other, and a complaint against HTC under Section 337 of the

1627: 1611: 547: 7726: 2983: 9255: 7978: 7841: 6669: 5499: 4886: 4572: 4559: 4102: 4090:

https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn87060640&docId=OOA20160917155315#docIndex=4&page=1

3399: 2895: 2481: 2007:, citing Apple's asking a judge to force Google to hand over documents containing Android's source code. 1941: 1828: 1245: 875: 641: 161: 5094:, 11-1327, U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D.Ca., filed March 18, 2011, amended November 16, 2011. Accessed 2023-2-21. 3983: 3954: 3085: 3009: 1248:

reversed the trial court's decision, ruling that activities in question were covered by the shield law.

370:

In 2014, Apple settled out of court both an antitrust lawsuit and a related class-action suit regarding

7983: 7778: 6656: 5960: 4949: 2293: 2127: 2123: 2012: 2004: 1343:. The case was decided in Franklin's favor but reversed by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. 85: 7280:, case 11-CV-01846-LHK, 768 F. Supp. 2d 1040, U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D.Cal. 2011-4. Accessed July 25, 2012. 7063:, case 11-CV-01846-LHK, 768 F. Supp. 2d 1040, U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D.Cal. 2011-4. Accessed July 27, 2012. 6435:, columbialawreview.org, Vol. 110, p. 114, 2010, Appendix B.1., November 22, 2009. Accessed 2012-7-27. 5525:

Rewriting History: Counterfactuals and Alternative Stories in Intellectual Property and Cyberspace Law

4645: 2556: 9813: 9450: 8499: 6634: 5737: 5612:, 485 F.3d 199 (3d Cir. 2007). Accessed 2012-7-27. (Software counterfeiters face criminal liability.) 5537: 5073: 4048:, CV 94-2180 LGB (BRx), 874 F.Supp. 1072, U.S. Dist. Ct., C.D.Cal. 1994; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20154. 2380: 2135: 2057:

Corephotonics sued Apple. They claimed that the technology behind the dual-camera systems in Apple's

1433: 1049: 6620: 6123: 5608: 5602:, International Journal of Communications Law and Policy, 2011:14. Accessed July 23, 2012. See also 5034: 4346: 3940: 3608: 3471: 3423: 3221: 2510: 152:

in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the

10139: 10025: 9487: 9477: 9367: 8310: 8067: 6421: 5798: 5677: 4854: 4022: 3666: 3614: 2626: 2437: 2015:

through patent litigation, rather than innovating and competing with better products and services.

1519: 1450: 1148:

and related California state law over Amazon's use of the "App Store" phrase relating to Amazon's "

960:

phone. Bloomberg reported Cisco's iPhone as a product marketed for less than $ 100 and part of the

618: 6624:, C.A. Nos. 10-166-GMS, 10-167-GMS, U.S. Dist. Ct., D. Del., January 14, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-27. 3478:, case 11-MD-02250-LHK, September 20, 2011. The Consolidated Complaint contains eight claims: (1) 3472:

Order Granting Defendants' Motions To Dismiss For Lack Of Article III Standing With Leave To Amend

3295:, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4355, San Mateo Co. Sup. Ct.; and New York action: 9504: 9440: 8114: 7949: 7125:

Apple seeks .5 billion in damages from Samsung, offers half a cent per standard-essential patent

6835: 6560:

Securities registration termination [Section 12(g)] Acc-no: 0001221508-08-000051 (34 Act)

5503: 2791: 1757:

after settling with some smaller companies but, in mid-2008, amended its complaint to add Apple,

1417: 1404: 1328: 1299:

confidential settlement, no sources were revealed and Think Secret will no longer be published".

1069: 684: 536: 336: 7357: 5209: 4478: 1173:

expect from the Apple APP STORE and/or Apple products" In July 2013, Apple dropped the lawsuit.

9577: 9392: 8634: 8460: 8455: 7559: 6566:, SEC records of Typhoon Touch Technologies, SEC, sec.gov, August 21, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6547: 5498:), the 1991 European Economic Council Directive on the Legal Protection of Computer Programs (" 2151: 1996: 1983: 1619: 1370: 1162: 590:

case and was settled on February 10, 2012, with payments to be made to consumers by Apple. The

512: 412: 41: 5592: 5446: 4873: 4632: 4619: 4412: 301:

for abusing its dominant position on the market for the distribution of music streaming apps.

10010: 9721: 9632: 9499: 9206: 8845: 8629: 8564: 8544: 8472: 8440: 8277: 8272: 8099: 8094: 7748: 7183:

Just Because Companies Can Design Around Patents Doesn't Mean There's No Impact For Consumers

6964: 6700:

In The Matter of Certain Personal Data and Mobile Communications Devices and Related Software

5324: 3558: 2204:

pre-installed and that, in so doing, violated Apple's copyright and trademark rights and the

1770: 1166: 989: 949: 921: 696: 209: 141:

in 2005 claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading

25: 7953: 6509: 3897: 1995:

with Motorola. Apple's multinational litigation over technology patents became known as the

10020: 9398: 9213: 9054: 8794: 8768: 8651: 8581: 7794: 7029:"US Supreme Court denies Apple's bid to avoid paying $ 440 million damages in patent fight" 5667:, FindLaw (via archive.org), corporate.findlaw.com, August 5, 1997. Accessed July 22, 2012. 4913: 4429: 3505: 3486:("CFAA"), 18 U.S.C. § 1030; (3) Computer Crime Law, Cal. Penal Code § 502; (4) Trespass on 2209: 1578: 953: 906: 799:. Apple Corps alleged Apple Computer's introduction of the music-playing products with the 716:

in federal court. The court granted Apple's motion to dismiss Sagan's claims and opined in

688: 324: 264: 65: 58: 7691: 6397:

Apple & Creative Announce Broad Settlement Ending Legal Disputes Between the Companies

5802:, case C-09-1818, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal., 2008-9-8, via eff.org. Accessed July 27, 2012. 5521:

What if Object Code Had Been Excluded from Protection as a Literary Work in Copyright Law?

3691: 2484:

Accessed July 26, 2012. (This search is not instant and takes a minute to return results.)

8: 10083: 9548: 9372: 9340: 9171: 9059: 8762: 8450: 8445: 8060: 7804:, U.K. Office of Fair Trading, oft.gov.uk, 136/09, November 27, 2009. Accessed 2012-7-25. 7171:, chtlj.org, vol. 27, 2011-4, pp. 637–671 at 639. Accessed July 27, 2012. See also 4990: 4461: 4384: 4368: 3043: 2429: 2193: 1927: 1919: 1782: 1694: 1682: 1538: 899:; later Cohen forwarded the domain name to his CyberBritain's cash back/rewards website. 396: 343:

and alleges the defendants conspired to restrain retail price competition in the sale of

332: 298: 277: 4546: 4399: 4145:"APPLE JAZZ Mark Owner Vindicated at CAFC with Denial of Apple's Petition for Rehearing" 3679: 2433: 9889: 9685: 9644: 9268: 8984: 8962: 8916: 8661: 8119: 8020:"Apple's San Bernardino fight is officially over as government confirms working attack" 7358:"Jury tells Samsung to pay up, awards Apple $ 290 million in damages [updated]" 7192:

Allison, John, Lemley, Mark, Moore, Kimberly, and Trunkey, R. Derek, Valuable Patents,

7086: 6898:, General Patent Corporation, generalpatent.com, March 9, 2012. Accessed July 27, 2012. 6054: 6014: 5507: 4702: 4269:, hmcourts-service.gov.uk, Case No: HC03C02428, EWHC 996 (Ch). Accessed July 23, 2012. 4225: 4191: 4023:"his Week in Apple History: November 14–20: McIntosh, IIe Killed, Butt-Head Astronomer" 3698:. Class Action Settlement website, johnsonitunessettlement.com. Accessed April 2, 2012. 3284: 3257:, bankrupt.com (Beard Group), Vol. 6, No. 161, August 16, 2004. Accessed April 1, 2012. 3235: 3117: 3090: 2736: 2467: 1915: 1864: 1141: 1076:

where the logo is featured prominently; Apple closely manages its App Store offerings.

1061: 965: 779:

Computer agreed to stay out of the music business. In 1991, after Apple introduced the

213: 50: 5555: 5090: 2337: 1569:

the appeal in May 2023. The two companies reached a full settlement in December 2023.

1541:. In November 2008, Apple sent a cease-and-desist letter to BluWiki, a non-commercial 848:

in July 1998, Apple sued then-teenager Abdul Traya. Having registered the domain name

447:, as well as claiming that Apple suppressed competition in five categories, including 10109: 9823: 9594: 9555: 9155: 9105: 8887: 8569: 8529: 8359: 7912: 7881: 7703:, Norwegian Consumer Council (via archive.org), January 25, 2006. Accessed 2012-7-22. 7665: 7637:, Forbrukerombudet Norway, forbrukerombudet.no, June 7, 2006. Accessed July 22, 2012. 6702:, Notice of the Commission's Final Determination Finding a Violation Of Section 337, 6521: 6338: 6180: 5857: 5656: 5575: 5382: 4590: 4254: 4131:"APPLE JAZZ Trademark Owner Beats Apple in CAFC Reversal of TTAB on Tacking Doctrine" 3967: 3553: 3487: 3316: 2770:

Not the Apple of the EU's Eye: Brussels Accuses iTunes of Violating Competition Rules

2267: 2257: 1910: 1638:

and the window close button were changed to be less similar to those in the Mac GUI.

1590: 1478: 1165:

to bar Amazon from using the "App Store" name but, in July 2011, U.S. District Judge

201: 7560:"Corephotonics Sues Apple Over Dual-Lens Cameras in iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 8 Plus" 4964:, case 1-12-CV-219219, Ca. Superior Ct. (Santa Clara Co.), filed February 17, 2012. 3207: 2417: 2357: 744:", also in Class 41, citing a "likelihood of confusion" between the two trademarks. 183:

on Apple's FairPlay changes as they relate to the plaintiffs' monopolization claim.

10015: 9965: 9828: 9778: 9768: 9739: 9665: 9560: 9472: 9418: 9115: 8862: 8393: 8124: 5817: 5754: 5574:

Lloyd, Ian J., Information Technology Law, 5th ed., Chapters 10, 17, and 18, 2008.

3225:, 110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 145, Cal. Ct. App., 6th App. Dist 2001. Accessed April 2, 2012. 2205: 2159: 2011:

has accused Apple (alongside Oracle, Microsoft, and others) of trying to take down

1841: 1701:

patent claiming Apple infringed Creative's patent for the menuing structures on an

1623: 1413: 1362: 1340: 1336: 1244:

protection as do other journalists. The journalists appealed and, in May 2006, the

1113: 973: 706: 508: 440: 417: 205: 180: 28:

interests. From the 1980s to the present, Apple has been plaintiff or defendant in

7932: 6704:

Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order, Termination of Investigation No. 337-Ta-710

6579: 6575: 6257:, Notice of Investigation, Inv. No. 337-TA-573, U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 2006-6-8. 5830: 5262:

Apple Computer, Inc., v. Nick Deplume, The Deplume Organization LLC, and Does 1-20

3572: 2449: 2347:, General Patent Corporation, generalpatent.com, 2012-2. Accessed April 13, 2012. 705:, Sagan was concerned that it would become a product endorsement and sent Apple a 9838: 9808: 9763: 9670: 9655: 9511: 9445: 9430: 9405: 9039: 8996: 8822: 8559: 8539: 8267: 7801: 7634: 7276: 7218: 7164: 7144: 7111: 7059: 7014: 6971: 6914: 6895: 6792: 6710: 6516: 6428: 6366: 5761: 5599: 5562: 5453: 5345: 5303:, Think Secret (via archive.org), 2005-3-4, January 25, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-27. 5291: 5216: 5041: 4972: 4932: 4893: 4861: 4842: 4668: 4649: 4603: 3832: 3812: 3771: 3635: 3628: 3406: 3291: 3242: 2865: 2560: 2344: 2054: 1868: 1741:

technology. The suit illustrated the vagaries of litigating patent licensing and

1631: 1474: 1207: 1149: 1073: 993: 925: 821: 352: 286:

demonstrated higher prices in UK for the same iTunes songs sold elsewhere in the

46: 6463:

Reconsidering the Georgia-Pacific Standard for Reasonable Royalty Patent Damages

6383: 5812: 5785: 2825:"Apple hit with more than $ 1.95 billion EU antitrust fine over music streaming" 1961:

the Supreme Court refused to hear the case in February 2020, leaving in place a

1956:

related to patent infringement on at least thirteen of their patents in Apple's

1681:

In a dispute illustrating the nature of claims, defenses, and counterclaims for

1331:, alleging that Franklin's ACE 100 personal computer used illegal copies of the 734: 9975: 9833: 9798: 9660: 9220: 9044: 8904: 8802: 8505: 8152: 7627: 7076:, Bloomberg Businessweek, businessweek.com, March 29, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-25. 6995:

Apple and Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility both appeal Judge Posner's ruling

6889:

Apple Denied Permission to File Patent Infringement Suit Against Bankrupt Kodak

6820:, case 6:2010cv06022, U.S. Dist.Ct., WD NY (Rochester), filed January 14, 2010. 6591: 5523:, a paper for presentation at the 4th Annual Intellectual Property Conference: 3847: 3139:

The Justice Department, joined by 16 other state and district attorneys general

2957: 2941: 2774: 2709: 2653:"US appeals court reopens lawsuit against Apple for alleged App Store monopoly" 2171: 2147: 1937: 1706: 1653: 1561: 1489: 941: 890:, and was then inoperative for some time. Apple applied for a UK trademark for 870: 543: 448: 287: 166: 7580:"Israeli start-up says Apple copied its patented smartphone camera technology" 6714: 6457:

Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement at pp. 5–6,

4505: 3339:, bankrupt.com (Beard Group), 8:31, February 13, 2006. Accessed April 2, 2012. 2999:, Bloomberg Businessweek, businessweek.com, July 20, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-26. 1040:

in July 2008. In November 2011, the TTAB issued NYC's trademark registration.

10098: 10050: 9985: 9942: 9901: 9858: 9853: 9848: 9803: 9727: 9695: 9356: 9345: 9279: 9100: 8892: 8750: 8554: 8383: 7818:, 673 F. Supp. 2d 943, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2009. Accessed July 27, 2012. 7269: 7052: 5861: 5494:

The 1994 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (

5190:"Apple drops 'App Store' lawsuit against Amazon, says no need to pursue case" 5128: 5074:

China: Court Announces Apple and Proview Settlement of iPad Trademark Dispute

5056: 4334: 3618:, 604 F.Supp. 2d 605, U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D.N.Y. 2009. Accessed April 17, 2012. 2175: 2167: 1860: 1493: 1265: 1228: 1189: 1020: 957: 937: 902:

In 2005, Apple took the matter to the Dispute Resolution Service operated by

717: 525: 328: 320: 33: 7249: 4367:

decision, including the full history of the use of the domain itunes.co.uk:

3828:"Apple to pay $ 32.5m over practice that let children make in-app purchases" 3767:"Apple faces multimillion US settlement over 'in-app purchases' by children" 3336: 3254: 2548:, The lawsuit has been winding its way through the legal system since 2004, 2248:

In 1995, Apple added Microsoft and Intel to an existing lawsuit against the

1952:

Since 2010, at least three different cases have been filed against Apple by

10055: 10005: 9995: 9980: 9948: 9926: 9921: 9843: 9788: 9773: 9733: 9700: 9675: 9638: 9516: 9460: 9325: 9318: 9241: 8899: 8807: 8775: 8735: 8719: 8477: 8376: 8241: 8220: 7958: 7244: 6762:, Bloomberg News, bloomberg.com, September 7, 2011. Accessed July 27, 2012. 6049: 5850:"Apple drops intellectual property lawsuit against maker of security tools" 3918: 2796: 2564: 2549: 1750: 1738: 1698: 1497: 1283: 1279: 1259: 1237: 1100:

rights to the iPad mark from the Taiwanese company Proview Electronics; in

1033: 977: 817: 800: 371: 157: 138: 93: 10195:

United States District Court for the Northern District of California cases

7768:, Ars Technica, arstechnica.com, February 4, 2009. Accessed July 22, 2012. 7137: 6280: 5536:

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) criminalizes circumvention of

5445:, 44 DLR (4th) 74 Federal Court of Appeal, 1987, Canada, (later affirmed, 2860:"US court rules Apple conspired with five publishers to fix e-book prices" 2680:"9th Circuit Apple antitrust ruling splits with 8th, is boon to consumers" 10000: 9916: 9906: 9818: 9793: 9783: 9705: 9582: 9423: 9192: 9165: 8934: 8911: 8869: 8781: 8756: 8745: 8740: 8398: 8333: 8328: 8184: 8179: 7091: 6462: 6422:

Trolls Or Market-Makers? An Empirical Analysis Of Nonpracticing Entities

6081:, case 99-CV-20839, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal., filed 1999-8-19, (settled). 5419: 5415: 3142: 2395:"Lawsuit against Apple, Google, Tesla, and others (re child labour, DRC)" 2315: 2310: 2020: 1836: 1746: 1657: 1470: 1446: 1421: 1366: 1358: 1278:, a case illustrating one of Apple's methods of protecting its claims in 1037: 841: 771: 767: 741: 559: 555: 319:(DOJ) and 33 U.S. states brought a civil antitrust action against Apple, 10200:

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York cases

6760:

HTC Sues Apple Using Google Patents Bought Last Week as Battle Escalates

6448:, Seeking Alpha, seekingalpha.com. July 9, 2008. Accessed July 27, 2012. 6253:, Inv.No. 337-TA-543, U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, June 21, 2005. See also: 5911:"Apple appeals against security research firm while touting researchers" 5393:, Think Secret (via archive.org), December 20, 2007. Accessed 2012-7-23. 5164:"No app for that: Apple's false ad suit over Amazon Appstore thrown out" 4349:, The Mac Observer, macobserver.com, April 27, 1999. Accessed 2012-1-28. 3710:, Case No. C 09-01911 JW, class action information. Accessed 2015-07-04. 3039:

Apple, Google agree to settle lawsuit alleging hiring, salary conspiracy

1104:

the iPad mark was still owned by the subsidiary of Proview Electronics,

10045: 9960: 9954: 9751: 9745: 9690: 9680: 9465: 9286: 9262: 9199: 9049: 9008: 8949: 8812: 8788: 8709: 8641: 8595: 8364: 8248: 8196: 8083: 7333:"Samsung says $ 52m, not $ 380m, is owed for Apple patent infringement" 6808:, ArsTechnica, arstechnica.com, November 11, 2012. Accessed 2012-12-21. 6689:, Ars Technica, arstechnica.com, March 4, 2010. Accessed July 22, 2012. 6538:, Law360, law360.com, New York, September 15, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6156:

Before the suit was settled, an analysis of the claims appeared in the

5469:

International Business Machines Corporation v. Computer Imports Limited

4950:

Chinese Firm Demands $ 1.6 Billion from Apple in iPad Trademark Dispute

3736: 3733:

Class-Action Lawsuit Forces Apple To Replace Frayed MagSafe Power Cords

3479: 3447:, 11-cv-02317-LHK, filed 2011-5-10; and one case not yet consolidated, 3158:"DOJ calls out Apple for breaking iMessage-on-Android solution, Beeper" 2546:

iPod owners being notified of class-action antitrust suit against Apple

2515: 1992: 1881: 1872: 1778: 1714: 1501: 1482: 1241: 1210:

publicly revealed information about two unreleased Apple products, the

1199: 1145: 1137: 909: 780: 713: 692: 402: 348: 113: 54: 36:

and other countries. Some of these actions have determined significant

21: 17: 6852:, Bloomberg News, bloomberg.com, January 14, 2010. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6775:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, September 7, 2011. Accessed July 27, 2012. 6499:, QuoteMedia.com (via archive.org), June 23, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-27. 5527:, Michigan State Univ. College of Law, 2007:3. Accessed July 27, 2012. 5288:"Think Secret goes on offensive, asks to have Apple lawsuit dismissed" 5024:, ITProPortal, itproportal.com, February 28, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-19. 3519: 3368:, May 1, 2008. Accessed April 2, 2012. The Canadian suits were termed 3059:"Apple is being sued by iOS devs over 'profit-killing' App Store fees" 2986:, The Register, theregister.co.uk, April 12, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-18. 1697:

sued Apple in May 2006 for Apple's alleged infringement of Creative's

1673: 1420:

and the conversion from the source code into object code is a form of

9587: 9412: 9248: 9149: 9095: 8991: 8714: 8646: 8576: 8549: 8349: 8295: 8234: 8227: 7832:, case 10-15113, U.S. Ct.App., 9th Cir. 2011. Accessed July 27, 2012. 7536:"Israeli company sues Apple for dual lens camera patent infringement" 7240:"Google publicly accuses Apple, Microsoft, Oracle of patent bullying" 6878:, ITProPortal, itproportal.com, January 12, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6865:, ITProPortal, itproportal.com, January 24, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6646:

Apple's ITC complaint against HTC, 75 Fed. Reg. 17434, April 6, 2010.

6192: 5764:, Network World, networkworld.com, July 22, 2009. Accessed 2012-7-27. 5236:, Apple Insider, appleinsider.com, June 23, 2009. Accessed 2012-7-27. 4562:, Video Pod matter, Opposition No. 91176027. Accessed April 11, 2012. 4297:

Apple Inc. and The Beatles' Apple Corps Ltd. Enter into New Agreement

4283: 3719: 3063: 2253: 2107: 1922:

involvement. As of April 2012, the controversy centered on whether a

1742: 1718: 1686: 1649: 1635: 1593:

spyware against dissidents, journalists, and human rights defenders.

1586: 1486: 1158: 1125: 1065: 1024: 913: 775: 579: 578:

against Apple on behalf of American individuals who purchased iTunes

466: 220:

Apple, Inc., No. C 08-948, bringing in allegations under the federal

204:) under California's Unfair Competition Law; that the combination of 186: 105: 101: 89: 6952:

Apple, Inc. and Apple Sales International v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.

6510:

Apple, Nokia, others added to Typhoon Touch lawsuit launched vs Dell

5277:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, January 5, 2005. Accessed July 22, 2012. 4445:

High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division, Administrative Court,

3589: 2973:, Bloomberg News, bloomberg.com, April 11, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-13. 1665:

we gave to retailers to enable liquidation of product inventories".

339:, alleging violations of the Sherman Act. The suit was filed in the 9990: 9895: 9757: 9650: 9626: 9565: 9332: 9178: 9026: 8979: 8850: 8840: 8656: 8511: 8494: 8388: 8305: 8300: 8191: 8166: 7486:"Apple, Samsung kick off case by sparring over instructional video" 7186: 7127:, FOSS Patents, fosspatents.com, July 24, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-28. 6997:, FOSS Patents, fosspatents.com, July 21, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-25. 6607:, Bloomberg News, bloomberg.com, June 14, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6386:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, September 23, 2006. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6284: 5936:"Apple loses bid to revive US copyright claims over iOS simulation" 5628:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, August 6, 1997. Accessed July 22, 2012. 5022:

Proview Amends Lawsuit Against Apple, Seeks Global iPad Name Rights

3523: 2529:

Is Apple Playing Fair? Navigating the iPod FairPlay DRM Controversy

2271: 2132: 2093:

is not included in the lawsuit, despite having a dual-lens camera.

2090: 2062: 2058: 1957: 1332: 1324: 1290:. In response, DePlume filed a motion to dismiss the case based on 1223: 1211: 1105: 444: 420:

directly from Epic at a discounted rate. Apple immediately removed

196: 146: 145:

that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary

142: 108:

interests in multiple products and processes and owns and licenses

37: 6730:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, December 19, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-22. 6728:

Apple wins patent victory over HTC, which faces looming import ban

6594:, BBC News, news.bbc.co.uk, December 11, 2009. Accessed 2012-3-26. 6208:, USPTO, uspto.gov, filed January 5, 2001. Accessed July 27, 2012. 6147:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, March 8, 2000. Accessed July 22, 2012. 5986:"A Leak Details Apple's Secret Dirt on a Trusted Security Startup" 5886:"Apple loses copyright battle against security start-up Corellium" 4337:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, February 19, 1999. Accessed 2012-7-23. 3086:"Fortnite Creator Sues Apple and Google After Ban From App Stores" 1705:

player. Creative claimed it began using its menuing method on its

1226:

three sites to force them to identify their confidential sources:

695:" after the popular astronomer in the hope that Apple would make " 9911: 9034: 8955: 8534: 8524: 8489: 8371: 8320: 8201: 8174: 7869:. February 13, 1995. Archived from the original on April 10, 1997 7290:

Apple vs. Samsung Verdict Is In After Epic Patent Trial (UPDATES)

5681:, 734 F. Supp. 1542 (N.D. Cal. 1990). Accessed December 21, 2012. 5210:

News Publishers and Internet Industry Urge Reversal in Apple Case

5035:

UPDATE 4-Apple pays ,0 mln to settle China iPad trademark dispute

4786: 4549:, Cisco press release, February 21, 2007. Accessed April 2, 2012. 4495:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, January 10, 2007. Accessed 2012-7-22. 4207: 3410: 2683: 2223: 2213: 2119: 1953: 1790: 1762: 1758: 1606: 1154: 1028: 961: 896: 784: 701: 551: 294: 282: 29: 7511:"Apple sues Samsung for $ 2bn as tech rivals head back to court" 6676:, bits.blogs.nytimes.com, March 2, 2010. Accessed July 27, 2012. 6637:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, August 16, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-27. 4876:

in the Apple AppStore, itunes.apple.com. Accessed July 27, 2012.

3208:"Why is the US suing Apple? A 'monopoly' vs 'innovation' battle" 2627:

https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/0816AppleSuit.pdf

570:

In June 2009, a group of consumers filed the class action suits

10075:

indicate discontinued products, services, or defunct companies.

9227: 9185: 9160: 9143: 9120: 9110: 9090: 9020: 8614: 8606: 8600: 8435: 8354: 8259: 8047: 7779:

Consumer group slams 'unfair' software licenses, EULAugh, I cry

7688:"iTunes' questionable terms and conditions – Forbrukerportalen" 6659:, Engaget, engadget.com, March 2, 2010. Accessed July 27, 2012. 4887:

Google's Chrome browser to be available on Apple's iPad, iPhone

4802:, ipaustralia.gov.au, April 6, 2011. Accessed January 15, 2013. 4681:

No Apple for Vancouver Island School, Says Computer Corporation

4194:, BBC News, news.bbc.co.uk, March 29, 2006. Accessed 2012-1-28. 2179: 2115: 2111: 2051: 2008: 1968: 1846: 1766: 1582: 1574: 1203: 1097: 945: 940:

and Apple negotiated over allowing Apple rights to use Cisco's

792: 625: 511:

reported a pending congressional inquiry into the matter, with

344: 192: 176: 109: 7410:"Apple wins U.S. ban on older Samsung devices in mixed ruling" 6954:, case 12CV0355 JLS BLM, U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D. Cal., 2012-2-10. 6270:, CNET News, news.cnet.com, June 14, 2006. Accessed 2012-7-22. 6116: 4962:

Proview Electronics Co. Limited, et al. v. Apple, Inc., et al.

4508:, securityfocus.com, January 22, 2007. Accessed April 2, 2012. 4310:"Swiss court backs Swatch in 'Think Different' row with Apple" 3873:"Brazil court fines Apple, orders to sell iPhone with charger" 2914:

Justice Dept. Accuses Apple And Others Of Fixing E-Book Prices

2732:"Supreme Court Allows Antitrust Suit Against Apple to Proceed" 2482:

U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board search for 'Apple Inc.'.

9362: 8856: 8676: 8619: 8589: 8467: 8052: 7987:(via findarticles.com), January 26, 1999. Accessed 2012-7-22. 7114:, Reuters, reuters.com, October 27, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-27. 7017:, Reuters, reuters.com, July 5, 2012. Accessed July 25, 2012. 6936:

Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple Inc. and NeXT Software, Inc.

6713:, usitc.gov, December 19, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-27. See also 6578:, BBC News, news.bbc.co.uk, October 22, 2009; article now at 5433:, 65 ALR 33, 1986; F.S.R. 537, 1986, High Court of Australia. 5264:, case 1-05-CV-033341, Cal. Superior Ct, (Santa Clara), 2005. 3930:

in the reseller actions of 2003-2005. Accessed April 2, 2012.

2705:"Apple Gets U.S. Supreme Court Review on iPhone App Fee Suit" 2657: 2201: 2197: 2163: 2155: 1786: 1661: 1287: 1121: 1101: 1043: 969: 602: 486: 7755:, theregister.co.uk, September 29, 2006. Accessed 2012-7-27. 7178:, PCWorld, pcworld.com, November 6, 2011. Accessed 2012-8-3. 7008:

Judge who shelved Apple trial says patent system out of sync

6944:

In the Matter of Certain Mobile Devices and Related Software

6806:

Apple and HTC reach a sudden patent peace, but at what cost?

5011:, washingtonpost.com, February 28, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-19. 4994:, washingtonpost.com, February 24, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-19. 4524:, Bloomberg News, February 22, 2007. Accessed April 2, 2012. 3588:

Romanosky, Sasha, Hoffman, David, and Acquisti, Alessandro,

3573:

Sen. Al Franken calls for Apple, Google app privacy policies

3302:"Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action" 3236:

Support for Legacy Products FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

3084:

Nicas, Jack; Browning, Kellen; Griffith, Erin (2020-08-13).

1728: 9350: 9273: 9234: 8666: 8484: 8287: 8211: 8160: 7785:, theregister.co.uk, February 19, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-25. 7316:, huffingtonpost.com, August 24, 2012. Accessed 2012-12-21. 7296:, huffingtonpost.com, August 24, 2012. Accessed 2012-12-21. 7213: 7105:

Australian court to fast-track Samsung appeal on tablet ban

6876:

Kodak Files Patent Infringement Lawsuits Against Apple, HTC

6605:

Nokia Wins Apple Patent-License Deal Cash, Settles Lawsuits

6582:, BBC News, news.bbc.co.uk, 2009-12-11. Accessed 2012-3-26. 6324:"Creative Files Suit Against Apple For Patent Infringement" 6097: 5131:, Reuters, reuters.com, March 22, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-22. 5077: 4648:, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, February 23, 2010; and 4522:

Apple Can Sell IPhones This Year After Cisco Deal (Update3)

4179: 4165:, businessweek.com, September 30, 2004. Accessed 2012-7-23. 3753: 3113:"Judge Orders Apple to Ease Restrictions on App Developers" 2553: 2498:

Apple's Jobs Must Answer Questions in ITunes Antitrust Suit

2262: 2218: 1944:

and Apple announced its intention to appeal a month later.

1754: 1542: 1060:

In October 2009, Apple disputed a trademark application by

845: 796: 624:

A similar case was filed by a parent in March 2014 against

498:

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

492: 479: 297:

in 2019, Apple was hit with a 1.8 billion euro fine by the

153: 149: 97: 7605:"Israeli company claims Apple copied its dual-camera tech" 6965:

Standardization Skullduggery Never Ends: Apple v. Motorola

6917:, Reuters, reuters.com, July 23, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-25. 6206:

Automatic hierarchical categorization of music by metadata

5248:, 44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 72, 139 Cal.App. 4th 1423, modified by 5105:

Apple v. Amazon.com – The war for "App" Dominance Advances

4896:, Reuters, reuters.com, June 29, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-25. 4387:, DRS No. 02223, p. 3, March 10, 2005. Accessed 2012-7-23. 2960:, BBC News, bbc.co.uk, April 11, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-12. 2758:

Apple to Standardize iTunes Music Prices Throughout Europe

2440:, FileMaker, Inc., filemaker.com. Accessed April 12, 2012. 2354:, PCWorld, pcworld.com, March 4, 2010. Accessed 2012-4-13. 1412:

359: 128: 9002: 8431: 7999:"Why Apple Is Fighting the FBI--and What It Means to You" 7721: 7147:, IPocracy, ipocracy.org, 2011-9. Accessed July 27, 2012. 7032: 6795:, Reuters, reuters.com, May 20, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-25. 6220:, case 4:06CY3218, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. May 15, 2006. 5821:, informationweek.com, July 22, 2009. Accessed 2012-7-22. 5593:

DRM Misuse: An Emerging Doctrine In Search For Principles

5151:

Apple Wants Amazon To Cough Up Docs In 'App Store' IP Row

4845:, woolworths.com.au, August 11, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-22. 4826:, ipaustralia.gov.au, April 19, 2011. Accessed 2013-1-15. 4814:, ipaustralia.gov.au, April 18, 2011. Accessed 2013-1-15. 4790:, theage.com.au, October 5, 2009. Accessed July 25, 2012. 4430:

Nominet faces judicial review over itunes.co.uk ownership

3787:"Post Tech - FTC to review Apple iPhone in-app purchases" 2997:

Steve Jobs Interviews Sought by Plaintiffs in E-Book Suit

2984:

Publishers fork out ,2m in Apple ebook pricing settlement

2945: 2909: 2518:

107127, N.D. Cal., December 22, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-26.

1820: 1774: 1702: 1456: 1346: 1004: 903: 855: 640:

In June 2022, a class action claim was launched with the

596: 521: 7384:"Movement expected Friday in Apple, Samsung patent wars" 6940:

Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc.

6850:

Apple, RIM Accused of Infringing Kodak Patents (Update4)

5153:, Law360, law360.com, July 23, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-25. 4917:, abc.net.au, December 8, 2011. Accessed April 11, 2012. 4864:, woolworths.com.au, April 12, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-22. 4754:, Woolworths Limited, 2008-8-22, Accessed July 27, 2012. 4210:, ZDNet, zdnet.com, May 8, 2006. Accessed July 22, 2012. 3944:, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2007. Accessed April 2, 2012. 3808:"Google facing US lawsuit over $ 66 of in-app purchases" 3653:, case 1-09-CV-146501, Cal. Sup. Ct., Santa Clara, 2009. 2376:

Apple's future won't be brought to you by the letter 'i'

648: 7176:

Mobile Patent Wars: A Closer Look at How Everyone Loses

6908:

Appeals court says Kodak does not infringe Apple patent

6839:, online.wsj.com, January 14, 2010. Accessed 2010-7-27. 6687:

Apple vs HTC: proxy fight over Android could last years

6255:

In the Matter of Certain Portable Digital Media Players

4952:, Wired.com, February 7, 2012. Accessed April 11, 2012. 3400:

Apple sued over apps privacy issues; Google may be next

3382:

Hamilton v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc.

2971:

U.S. Sues Apple For eBook Pricing as Three Firms Settle

2792:

Apple cuts UK iTunes prices, Heads off EC investigation

2141: 1947: 1589:, whose customers have for years been caught using its 7861:, nytimes.com, February 10, 1995. Accessed 2012-7-22. 7711: 7709: 6204:

Creative Technology LTD Original patent #US006928433:

5776:, EFF, eff.org, November 25, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-27. 5698:, nytimes.com, December 15, 1989. Accessed 2012-12-21. 5223:, infozine.com, April 9, 2005. Accessed July 27, 2012. 4379: 4377: 4347:

Battle For Domain Name Between Apple And Teen Resolved

4299:, Apple Press Info, apple.com. Accessed July 23, 2012. 3278: 3276: 2384:(SMH), smh.com.au, March 12, 2010. Accessed 2012-4-13. 1797:(SEC) suspended its trading in a fraud investigation. 724: 565: 535:

In September 2011, the District Court granted Apple's

6597: 6273: 6237:, businessweek.com, May 17, 2006. Accessed 2012-7-22. 6124:"eMachines, Inc, Form S-3/A, Filing Date May 1, 2001" 5983: 4771:, theage.com.au, August 21, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-27. 4635:, NYC logo matter, July 28, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-27. 4395: 4393: 4004: 4002: 3083: 2813:, europa.eu, January 9, 2008. Accessed April 1, 2012. 2778:

International, April 3, 2007. Accessed July 22, 2012.

2760:, apple.com, January 9, 2008. Accessed April 2, 2012. 2232: 1735:

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

1601: 1140:

alleging trademark infringement, unfair competition,

171:

reported that, after a related 3-year inquiry by the

64:

Additionally, Apple has also been the defendant of a

7766:

Norway: no reason to hound Apple over DRM any longer

7209:"Apple pushes for Android code docs in Samsung case" 7095:, pcmag.com, September 14, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6692: 6163:"Cases suggest iMacs' trade dress merits protection" 5738:

Unintended Consequences: Twelve Years under the DMCA

5642:"Apple-Microsoft Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement" 4716:

Business school drops use of Apple's forbidden fruit

4662:

Apples and Oranges: VSBT vs. Apple Inc. Logo Dispute

3682:, Johnson iTunes Settlement. Accessed April 2, 2012. 3601:

A case illustrating the 'no damages' problem is the

3554:

Investigators use iPhones to track owners' movements

3374:

Wolfe v. Apple Computer, Inc. and Apple Canada, Inc.

2948:

News, bbc.co.uk, April 11, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-12.

2622: 2620: 2185: 1800: 1015:

In January 2008, Apple filed an opposition with the

491:

In December 2010, two separate groups of iPhone and

7923:, pa.msu.edu, February 9, 1995. Accessed 2012-7-27. 7706: 7461:"Samsung, Apple CEOs To Discuss Lawsuit Settlement" 6525:

via moneyam.com, June 24, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-22.

5788:, EFF, eff.org, April 27, 2009. Accessed 2012-7-27. 5715:, nytimes.com, March 24, 1990. Accessed 2012-12-21. 4633:

TTAB dismissal of Apple opposition and counterclaim

4547:

Cisco and Apple Reach Agreement on iPhone Trademark

4535:

Cisco and Apple Reach Agreement on iPhone Trademark

4374: 3467: 3465: 3273: 2471:, nytimes.com, August 25, 2011. Accessed 2012-4-13. 2463:

Apple Patents Show Steve Jobs's Attention to Design

1852: 1270:

Criticism of Apple Inc. § Think Secret lawsuit

735:

Cancellation of "Apple Music" trademark application

293:In March 2024, in response to a complaint filed by 271: 100:products and services, and 2 trademarks related to 7621: 7189:, techdirt.com, 2012-3-20. Accessed 2012-7-27; and 7138:Patents Considered Evil: The Rationale for Patents 7087:Every Place Samsung and Apple Are Suing Each Other 6550:, SEC, sec.gov, July 18, 2008. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6536:Apple Strikes Deal In Typhoon Touch-Screen IP Spat 5833:, EFF, eff.org, July 22, 2009. Accessed 2012-7-27. 5791: 5755:Apple takes legal heel off throat of wiki operator 5692:Xerox Sues Apple Computer Over Macintosh Copyright 5636: 5634: 5005:Proview accuses Apple of fraud, unfair competition 4671:, Q College, January 14, 2011. Accessed 2012-7-27. 4516: 4514: 4422: 4390: 4051: 3999: 3802: 3800: 3394: 3392: 3390: 2858: 2452:, Apple, Inc., apple.com. Accessed April 12, 2012. 2420:, Apple, Inc., apple.com. Accessed April 12, 2012. 2237: 1079: 187:Apple and AT&T Mobility antitrust class action 156:. The suit initially alleged that five days after 6980:, 128 S. Ct. 2109, 2008; accessed 2012-4-13. The 6746:, case 09-1002, both U.S. Dist.Ct., ND Cal. 2011. 6548:SEC temporary suspension of Typhoon Touch Trading 6399:, apple.com, August 23, 2006. Accessed 2012-7-22. 6313:), nytimes.com, May 18, 2006. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6211: 6198: 5961:"Apple, Corellium settle iOS virtualization case" 5786:Wiki Operator Sues Apple Over Bogus Legal Threats 5370:. Archived from the original on December 23, 2007 4709: 4698:Will Apple's suit against B.C. school bear fruit? 4616:Apple, Inc. opposition to NYC & Company, Inc. 4359: 4357: 4355: 3670:, 09-cv-0479-MJR, U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D.Ill., 2009. 3501:Apple Slammed Over iPhone, iPad Location Tracking 2617: 1717:to block the import and sale of Apple's iPod and 1353:Apple Computer, Inc. v. Mackintosh Computers Ltd. 1128:province; the U.S. case was thrown out of court. 473: 459: 212:; and that this disabling was a violation of the 10096: 7996: 7917:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 7886:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 7670:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 7299: 6773:HTC sues Apple using Google patents, report says 6765: 6754: 6752: 6343:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 6185:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 6033: 5727:, case C-09-1818, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2009. 5661:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 5387:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 4405: 4259:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 4020: 3907: 3750:Apple agrees to MagSafe power adapter settlement 3646: 3644: 3537:Sifting Through An iPhone's Geo Data, Row By Row 3462: 3321:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 2256:code in an effort to improve the performance of 1825:U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware 1713:(ITC) against Apple. Creative asked for a court 1626:to alter basic components in Digital Research's 1518:was a 1989 case where Xerox sued Apple over its 678: 611: 8420: 7979:Apple And Microsoft: Jobs Barefoot Under A Tree 7436:"Jury Tells Samsung to Pay Apple $ 290 Million" 7283: 7262: 6938:, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Del., October 8, 2010; 6733: 6349:, iPod Hacks, May 16, 2006. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6326:. Archived from the original on January 7, 2010 6218:Creative Technology Ltd. v. Apple Computer Inc. 5644:. Archived from the original on August 11, 2002 5631: 5620: 5618: 5443:Apple Computer Inc. v Mackintosh Computers Ltd. 5403:Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. 4511: 3848:"Apple settles iPhone slowdown case for $ 500m" 3797: 3493: 3387: 3183:"Apple sued by DOJ over iPhone monopoly claims" 2942:US sues Apple and publishers over e-book prices 2786: 2784: 2352:Apple's Lawsuit Against HTC: Bad for Consumers? 1819:Apple filed a patent infringement suit against 1469:In 1988, after the introduction of Microsoft's 1382:Apple Computer Inc. v Mackintosh Computers Ltd. 1316:Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. 1131: 631: 234:, and decertified the class; in April 2012 the 7821: 7807: 7717:"European drive against iTunes builds support" 7407: 7330: 6863:Apple Counters Kodak's Patent Ownership Claims 6720: 6640: 6018:(National ed.). 1985-10-01. p. D-4. 5730: 5624:Kawamoto, Dawn; Heskett, Ben; Ricciuti, Mike. 5234:Report details Apple's unusual veil of secrecy 5122:Apple sues Amazon.com over APP STORE trademark 4986:Proview files suit against Apple in U.S. court 4928:Apple: Proview's iPad Trademark Demands Unfair 4687:News, October 6, 2008. Accessed July 27, 2012. 4552: 4439: 4352: 4242:. Archived from the original on March 28, 2007 4021:Linzmayer, Owen; Chaffin, Bryan (2004-11-15). 3720:Apple's Power Adapter Replacement Program page 3010:"Apple colluded on e-book prices, judge finds" 2920:, npr.org, April 12, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-12. 2360:, Apple, Inc., apple.com. Accessed 2012-07-22. 2277: 1614:1.1 desktop was a copy of that of the Mac GUI. 1473:, Apple filed a lawsuit against Microsoft and 1372:Computer Edge Pty. Ltd. v. Apple Computer Inc. 175:, Apple agreed in 2008 to lower its prices on 8068: 7749:Apple's talks with Nordic regulators positive 7653:. Archived from the original on June 13, 2006 7433: 6977:Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. 6957: 6942:, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.Dist. Wisc., 2010-10-29; 6798: 6749: 6627: 6360:The Rise of the Information Processing Patent 6168:. Archived from the original on June 15, 2011 6002: 5984:Franceschi-Bicchierai, Lorenzo (2022-11-21). 5510:, and other national copyright law revisions. 5431:Computer Edge Pty. Ltd. v Apple Computer Inc. 5424: 5267: 5156: 5134: 5080:, loc.gov, July 16, 2012. Accessed 2012-7-25. 4733:"Woolworths launches new look after 21 years" 4565: 4493:Cisco sues Apple over use of iPhone trademark 4454: 4204:Apple Computer wins court battle with Beatles 3641: 3110: 2856: 2370: 2368: 2266:"look & feel" suit. Apple agreed to make 2263:Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation 2150:(NCC, now Consumer Focus) called on the UK's 2101: 1896: 1465:Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation 976:, and contrasted it with Apple's iPhone as a 931: 428: 304: 7795:Apple agrees to improve terms and conditions 7738:, CNN, January 23, 2007. Accessed 2012-7-27. 7483: 7458: 6934:, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-745, October 6, 2010; 6615: 6613: 6402: 5615: 5280: 5103:Pinguelo, Fernando M, and Hyman, Stacey A., 4944: 4942: 4920: 4904: 4902: 4604:Trademark application and history, #77179942 4537:, February 21, 2007. Accessed April 2, 2012. 4016: 4014: 3976: 3590:Empirical Analysis of Data Breach Litigation 3111:Nicas, Jack; Browning, Kellen (2021-09-10). 2781: 2535:, 5:2, 2007, p. 332. Accessed July 22, 2012. 2511:In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation 2192:In July 2008, Apple Inc. filed suit against 1711:United States International Trade Commission 1214:and an as yet unreleased product code-named 1068:over the new logo for its supermarket chain 135:In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation 7898:"An Open Letter to the Computing Community" 7381: 7270:Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 7098: 7079: 7053:Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 6585: 6569: 6553: 5774:Apple Confuses Speech with a DMCA Violation 5767: 5488: 4867: 4674: 4638: 4448:Cyberbritain Group Ltd. vs. Nominet UK Ltd. 4117:"USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 91229891" 4103:"USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 91229891" 3355:, February 3, 2006. Accessed April 2, 2012. 3347: 3345: 3270:, February 1, 2005. Accessed April 2, 2012. 2935: 2763: 2411: 2399:Business & Human Rights Resource Centre 2333: 2331: 1989:Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 1978:Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 878:of CyberBritain registered the domain name 443:, an app that allowed Android users to use 8075: 8061: 7900:. Archived from the original on 2001-06-05 7855:Intel and Microsoft Added to Apple Lawsuit 7169:Computer & High Technology Law Journal 6384:Apple settles with Creative for ,0 million 6093:"Apple sues eMachines for iMac look-alike" 5958: 5883: 5847: 5824: 5779: 5744:, eff.org, 2010-2. Accessed July 27, 2012. 5701: 5684: 5436: 4706:, October 6, 2008. Accessed July 22, 2012. 4655: 4650:USPTO TDR Portlet for Serial No. 77179942. 4606:, NYC logo matter. Accessed July 27, 2012. 4092:September 17, 2016, Office Action Outgoing 3960: 3661: 3659: 3416: 3304:. Archived from the original on 2007-07-05 3205: 2889: 2887: 2800:, January 9, 2008. Accessed April 1, 2012. 2480:U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), 2365: 1656:too closely resembled the then-new iMac's 1508: 1091: 1055: 1044:Victoria School of Business and Technology 983: 844:dispute, two months before announcing the 603:Macbook MagSafe power adapter class action 487:iPad and iPhone privacy issue class action 7892:, TidBITS, 1995-2-13. Accessed 2012-7-22. 7355: 7130: 6679: 6610: 6438: 6414: 6376: 6260: 5831:Apple Withdraws Threats Against Wiki Site 5805: 5747: 5718: 5709:Most of Xerox's Suit Against Apple Barred 5464: 5462: 5456:, 2 S.C.R. 209). Accessed July 22, 2012. 5083: 4939: 4899: 4774: 4690: 4402:, Nominet.org.uk., Accessed July 24, 2012 4240:"Apple Corps Ltd. v. Apple Computer, Inc" 4011: 3756:, November 16, 2011. Accessed 2015-07-04. 3739:, November 10, 2011. Accessed 2015-07-04. 3546: 3529: 2492: 2490: 2043: 1737:alleging patent infringement in portable 1729:Typhoon Touch Technologies (touch screen) 1327:. In 1982, Apple filed a lawsuit against 454: 16:The multinational technology corporation 6459:Typhoon Touch Techs., Inc. v. Dell, Inc. 6409:Typhoon Touch Techs., Inc. v. Dell, Inc. 6352: 6090: 5933: 5513: 5063:(中华人民共和国商标法) is a fast developing field. 4722:, April 1, 2011. Accessed July 27, 2012. 4594:, April 4, 2008. Accessed July 27, 2012. 4482:, 07-198, U.S. Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal. 2007. 4182:News, news.cnet.com, September 23, 2004. 3595: 3413:, December 28, 2010. Accessed 2012-7-23. 3358: 3342: 3260: 2951: 2474: 2328: 2292:, as part of its investigation into the 1890:Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 1605: 1251: 1023:'s (NYC) trademark application for the " 968:, enabling internet-based calls through 238:denied plaintiffs permission to appeal. 7326: 7324: 7322: 7306:Samsung: Apple Victory 'Not Final Word' 6946:, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-750, 2010-10-29; 6786:Apple, Samsung CEOs set for court talks 6662: 6603:ben-Aaron, Diana and Pohjanpalo, Kati, 6446:Red Flags at Typhoon Touch Technologies 6268:ITC to investigate Apple, says Creative 6195:, January 31, 2000. Accessed 2012-7-22. 6145:Apple settles suits over iMac knockoffs 5551:Robbins v. Lower Merion School District 5181: 5114: 4451:, CO Ref: CO/8360/2005, August 4, 2005. 4413:Cohen disputes UK registry's legitimacy 4383:Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service, 4327: 4221:Apple Computer Triumphs In Beatles Case 3656: 3565: 3520:Apple Defends IPhone 'Hot Spot'-Logging 3512: 2884: 2822: 2677: 1795:U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 828: 407:lawsuit against Apple as well as Google 366:High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation 360:High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation 191:In October 2007 (four months after the 129:Apple iPod, iTunes antitrust litigation 10097: 7375: 7150: 6649: 6247:Certain Portable Digital Media Players 6039: 5879: 5877: 5843: 5841: 5839: 5670: 5459: 5275:Apple suit foreshadows coming products 5187: 4491:Reardon, Marguerite, and Krazit, Tom, 4335:Teen in dispute with Apple over domain 4159:John, Paul, George, Ringo...and Steve? 3984:"When Carl Sagan sued Apple ... TWICE" 3904:, June 16, 2004. Accessed May 2, 2007. 3443:, 11-cv-02270-LHK, filed May 9, 2011; 3180: 3047:, April 24, 2014. Accessed 2015-07-04. 2729: 2650: 2514:, case C-05-00037-JW, 2008 U.S. Dist. 2487: 1458:Apple v. Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard 1416:silicon chips are protected under the 1347:Object code cases and conflicts of law 1202:have. In November 2004, three popular 1153:phrase meaning a "place to buy apps". 377: 10150:United States administrative case law 8056: 7867:"Apple Sues Intel, Microsoft – Again" 7237: 7026: 6928:Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple Inc. 6592:Nokia and Apple settle patent dispute 6240: 6223: 6079:Apple Computer Inc. v. eMachines Inc. 5813:Apple Drops Complaint Against BluWiki 4936:, March 13, 2012. Accessed 2012-4-11. 4909:Apple loses China iPad trademark case 4597: 4462:Cohen ends legal bid for itunes.co.uk 3890: 3509:, washingtontimes.com, July 22, 2012. 3482:against Apple only; (2) Violation of 3155: 2702: 2533:NW Jour. of Tech. & Intell. Prop. 1641: 1553: 1525: 1443:Electronic Communications Privacy Act 1017:U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board 683:In 1994, engineers at Apple Computer 662: 649:Battery charger class action (Brazil) 500:, San Jose division, under the title 390: 68:for the use of young children in the 49:claims, consumer actions, commercial 7503: 7319: 5908: 5474: 5368:"Apple, Think Secret settle lawsuit" 5109:Bloomberg Law Reports—Technology Law 5046:Guangdong Court's official statement 4885:Oreskovic, Alexei, and Shih, Gerry, 3439:, 11-cv-02110-LHK, filed 2011-4-28; 3435:, 11-cv-00700-LHK, filed 2011-2-15; 3431:, 11-cv-00407-LHK, filed 2011-1-27; 3056: 2847:Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 2142:Office of Fair Trading investigation 1948:VirnetX patent infringement lawsuits 1749:and earned itself a reputation as a 1622:suit in the mid-1980s, Apple forced 1307: 7948: 6818:Eastman Kodak Company v. Apple Inc. 6291:, May 19, 2006. Accessed 2012-7-27. 5874: 5836: 5678:Xerox Corp. v. Apple Computer, Inc. 4571:Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, ' 3476:In Re iPhone Application Litigation 3424:In Re iPhone Application Litigation 2496:MacLean, Pamela, and Gullo, Karen, 1833:U.S. International Trade Commission 1693:, rival digital music player maker 1485:violated Apple's copyrights in the 1194:Ultimately decided under the title 1120:, alleging several permutations of 725:Trademarks, copyrights, and patents 566:iTunes price-switching class action 502:In Re iPhone Application Litigation 416:that day that allowed users to buy 13: 6831:Kodak Sues Apple, RIM Over Patents 6717:at google.com. Accessed 2012-7-27. 6301:Apple sues iPod rival over patents 6231:Creative Technology Takes on Apple 5959:Vigliarolo, Brandon (2023-12-18). 4520:Levy, Ari, and Guglielmo, Connie, 4506:iPhone Trademarks: the Real Issues 3206:Al Jazeera, English (2024-03-22). 2233:Corporate espionage and data theft 1675:Creative Technology v. Apple, Inc. 1144:, and false advertising under the 1136:In 2011, Apple filed suit against 882:. The domain initially pointed to 260:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 10211: 10175:United States defamation case law 8041: 7937:, pa.msu.edu. Accessed 2012-7-27. 7829:Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation 7815:Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation 6758:Milford, Phil and Decker, Susan, 6576:Nokia suing Apple over the iPhone 4436:, Music and Media, June 17, 2005. 4287:, timesonline.co.uk, May 8, 2006. 4176:Apple vs. Apple: Perfect harmony? 3526:, NBC News.msn.com, May 10, 2011. 2461:Helft, Miguel, and Carter, Shan, 2187:Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation 1648:In 1999, Apple successfully sued 1294:grounds under California's state 657: 262:, which agreed to hear the case, 10190:United States trademark case law 10170:United States copyright case law 10155:United States antitrust case law 10079: 10078: 8012: 7990: 7971: 7942: 7847: 7835: 7788: 7771: 7758: 7741: 7679: 7640: 7597: 7572: 7552: 7528: 7477: 7452: 7427: 7401: 7349: 7231: 7201: 7117: 7066: 7045: 7020: 7000: 6987: 6920: 6901: 6881: 6868: 6855: 6842: 6823: 6811: 6778: 6657:Apple vs HTC: a patent breakdown 6580:Apple and Nokia's battle hots up 6541: 6528: 6502: 6472: 6451: 6389: 6373:1, 2008. Accessed July 27, 2012. 6316: 6294: 6150: 6137: 6091:Kanellos, Michael (1999-08-19). 6084: 6072: 6010:"Digital Research To Modify GEM" 5977: 5952: 5927: 5902: 5626:MS to invest ,0 million in Apple 5585: 5568: 5543: 5530: 5408: 5396: 5360: 5306: 5255: 5239: 5226: 5203: 5143: 5097: 5066: 5033:Lee, Melanie, and Shen, Samuel, 5027: 5014: 4997: 4978: 4955: 4879: 4848: 4829: 4817: 4805: 4793: 4782:Apple bites over Woolworths logo 4757: 4725: 4625: 4609: 4578: 4540: 4527: 4498: 4485: 4479:Cisco Systems Inc. v. Apple Inc. 4471: 4340: 4302: 4290: 4272: 4232: 4213: 4197: 4185: 3708:MagSafe Power Adaptor Settlement 2958:Q&A: Apple and e-book prices 2651:Condon, Stephanie (2017-01-12). 2418:Apple Trademarks – Piracy Policy 1936:. In June 2012, appellate Judge 1914:claims; the fight also included 1439:Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1181: 1176: 1036:in accordance with the parties' 1011:Environmental practices of Apple 999:Trademark Trial and Appeal Board 833: 272:European antitrust investigation 118:U.S. Patent and Trademark office 10180:United States Internet case law 10165:United States contract case law 10160:United States computer case law 7997:Joseph Steinberg (2016-02-17). 7929:"Second open letter from Apple" 6744:Nokia Corporation v. Apple Inc. 6740:Nokia Corporation v. Apple Inc. 6160:: Coolley, Brady, and Campagna, 6022:from the original on 2018-09-30 5884:Albergotti, Reed (2020-12-30). 5848:Albergotti, Reed (2021-08-11). 5405:, 714 F.2d 1240, 3d Cir., 1983. 4419:, Financial News, May 27, 2005. 4192:Apple giants do battle in court 4168: 4151: 4137: 4123: 4109: 4095: 4083: 4069: 4060: 4039: 3990: 3947: 3933: 3865: 3840: 3820: 3779: 3759: 3742: 3725: 3713: 3701: 3685: 3673: 3621: 3582: 3330: 3248: 3228: 3222:Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc. 3214: 3199: 3174: 3149: 3131: 3104: 3077: 3050: 3031: 3020:from the original on 2015-10-14 3002: 2989: 2976: 2969:Forden, Sara, and Bliss, Jeff, 2963: 2923: 2903: 2873:from the original on 2022-05-08 2850: 2841: 2816: 2803: 2750: 2723: 2696: 2671: 2644: 2632: 2608: 2595: 2582: 2570: 2538: 2527:Sharpe, N.F., and Arewa, O.B., 2521: 2503: 2374:Moses, Lee, and Asher, Julian, 2358:Apple Legal – Piracy Prevention 2290:Federal Bureau of Investigation 2238:QuickTime code theft litigation 2019:many of Apple's claims." Judge 1905:Motorola Mobility v. Apple Inc. 1812: 997:marks. In March 2012, the U.S. 862: 811: 530:U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee 258:Apple appealed the case to the 231:AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion 10135:Intellectual property case law 8082: 5934:Brittain, Blake (2023-05-08). 5742:Electronic Frontier Foundation 5556:Initial LANrev System Findings 5252:, 140 Cal.App. 4th 675b, 2006. 4385:Decision of Independent Expert 4066:Poundstone, pp. 374–375. 3433:Rodimer v. Apple, Inc., et al. 3297:Mosley v. Apple Computer, Inc. 2678:Frankel, Alison (2017-01-13). 2455: 2443: 2423: 2387: 2301:ending the legal proceedings. 1940:ordered dismissal of the case 1596: 1548:Electronic Frontier Foundation 869:The Apple-Cohen dispute was a 755: 474:iPod battery life class action 460:Technical support class action 374:employees of other companies. 1: 10185:United States patent case law 7628:iTunes violates Norwegian law 7408:Josh Lowensohn (2013-08-09). 7331:Charles Arthur (2013-11-14). 6670:What Apple vs. HTC Could Mean 6371:Jour. Science & Tech. Law 6040:Reimer, Jeremy (2005-05-05). 5091:Apple Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. 4765:Woolies shelves Safeway brand 4586:Apple sues New York over logo 4229:, billboard.com, May 8, 2006. 4046:Sagan v. Apple Computer, Inc. 3898:Apple resellers are revolting 2823:Kharpal, Arjun (2024-03-04). 2321: 1516:Xerox Corp. v. Apple Computer 804:presiding Justice Mann said. 762:Apple Corps v. Apple Computer 679:Libel dispute with Carl Sagan 673: 612:In-app purchases class action 435:United States v. Apple (2024) 341:Southern District of New York 311:United States v. Apple (2012) 79: 10145:United States case law lists 9269:Shazam Entertainment Limited 7434:Brian X. Chen (2013-11-21). 7238:Cheng, Jacqui (2011-08-03). 6715:Apple's patent No. 5,946,647 6310:International Herald Tribune 5188:Bostic, Kevin (2013-07-09). 4369:Nominet Cohen-Apple decision 4279:Transcript of full judgement 4267:Her Majesty's Courts Service 3941:In Re Macadam Computer, Inc. 3629:Case Mgmt Conference Further 3484:Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 3457:Northern District of Alabama 3181:Heater, Brian (2024-03-21). 2857:Jamie Dunkley (2013-07-11). 2284:FBI–Apple encryption dispute 2250:San Francisco Canyon Company 2244:San Francisco Canyon Company 2096: 1972:: Android phones and tablets 1628:Graphics Environment Manager 1390:IBM v. Computer Imports Ltd. 1302: 1005:New York City "GreeNYC" logo 729: 632:iPhone slowdown class action 214:Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 123: 7: 7844:uscourts.gov September 2011 7484:John Ribeiro (2014-01-31). 7459:Youkyung Lee (2014-01-09). 7027:Duffy, Clare (2020-02-24). 6281:Apple counter-sues Creative 5909:Menn, Joseph (2021-08-18). 5604:Microsoft Corp. v. Rechanik 5048:(via Google Translate); in 4824:Trade Mark Details: 1258288 4812:Trade Mark History: 1258288 4800:Trade Mark History: 1258288 3378:Hirst v. Apple Canada, Inc. 3370:Lenzi v. Apple Canada, Inc. 3156:Malik, Aisha (2024-03-21). 2730:Liptak, Adam (2019-05-13). 2563:(this link works only with 2304: 2278:FBI demand to unlock iPhone 2106:In June 2006, the Consumer 1918:rulings as well as ITC and 1823:(HTC) in March 2010 in the 992:a trademark application by 642:Competition Appeal Tribunal 280:from the UK consumer group 10: 10216: 7984:Computergram International 7648:"Norwegian EULA complaint" 7382:Grant Gross (2013-08-08). 7143:February 22, 2012, at the 6365:November 11, 2013, at the 5598:November 11, 2013, at the 3543:, npr.org, April 23, 2011. 3441:Velez-Colon v. Apple, Inc. 3290:November 11, 2013, at the 3057:Kerr, Chris (2019-06-05). 2703:Stohr, Greg (2018-06-18). 2567:turned on in the browser). 2436:, Apple, Inc., apple.com. 2294:2015 San Bernardino attack 2281: 2241: 2128:Norwegian Consumer Council 2124:end user license agreement 2122:challenged Apple's iTunes 2102:Norwegian Consumer Council 1981: 1975: 1902: 1898:Motorola Mobility v. Apple 1462: 1350: 1313: 1263: 1257: 1246:California Court of Appeal 1187: 1118:Santa Clara Superior Court 1088:product's name, the iPod. 1008: 932:Cisco Systems: iPhone mark 759: 712:Sagan then sued Apple for 432: 429:Anticompetitive litigation 394: 363: 308: 305:eBook price-fixing lawsuit 222:Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act 96:, 7 trademarks related to 86:Business Software Alliance 10125:Conflict of laws case law 10068: 10038: 9935: 9882: 9871: 9714: 9619: 9610: 9603: 9534:Non-recruiting agreements 9385: 9308: 9129: 9081: 9074: 8972: 8927: 8878: 8833: 8728: 8702: 8693: 8520: 8411: 8342: 8319: 8286: 8258: 8210: 8151: 8142: 8133: 8090: 7633:February 6, 2012, at the 6950:, 337-TA-750, 2012-3-16; 6709:January 30, 2012, at the 6508:Thompson Financial News, 5538:Digital rights management 5313:Apple Computer v. Deplume 5250:O'Grady v. Superior Court 5246:O'Grady v. Superior Court 4860:February 1, 2010, at the 4836:Woolworths App for iPhone 4622:. Accessed July 27, 2012. 3539:, National Public Radio, 2381:The Sydney Morning Herald 2343:October 20, 2016, at the 2270:the default browser over 2148:National Consumer Council 2136:digital rights management 1668: 1434:High Court of New Zealand 1396:"), (New Zealand, 1989). 1276:Apple Computer v. DePlume 1196:O'Grady v. Superior Court 1050:Saanich, British Columbia 820:had infringed on Apple's 337:Hachette Book Group, Inc. 84:Apple is a member of the 9573:Depictions of Steve Jobs 7492:. IDG Consumer & SMB 7390:. IDG Consumer & SMB 7356:Brad Reed (2013-11-21). 6562:, 15-12G filing of firm 6289:The Financial Times Ltd. 5471:, 2 NZLR 395, 409, 1989. 5076:, Global Legal Monitor, 4077:"USPTO TSDR Case Viewer" 2438:Filemaker trademark list 2226:agreement does neither. 1933:Quanta v. LG Electronics 1821:High Tech Computer Corp. 1602:GEM "look and feel" suit 1520:graphical user interface 1451:Convention on Cybercrime 1357:Apple's litigation over 619:Federal Trade Commission 548:failure to state a claim 518:House of Representatives 6970:April 17, 2012, at the 6836:The Wall Street Journal 6427:April 15, 2012, at the 6251:Notice of Investigation 5504:Copyright Act of Canada 5447:Supreme Court of Canada 5078:Law Library of Congress 4971:April 26, 2012, at the 4948:Bonnington, Christina, 4667:April 26, 2012, at the 4400:iTunes.co.uk Background 3615:Cherny v. Emigrant Bank 3453:District of Puerto Rico 2158:as well as Microsoft's 1618:Prevailing in an early 1510:Xerox v. Apple Computer 1430:IBM v. Computer Imports 1418:Copyright Act of Canada 1405:Supreme Court of Canada 1394:IBM v. Computer Imports 1329:Franklin Computer Corp. 1096:In 2006, Apple secured 1092:Proview: iPad trademark 1070:Woolworths Supermarkets 1056:Woolworths Limited logo 984:Sector Labs: use of Pod 954:likelihood of confusion 317:U.S. Justice Department 61:, among other matters. 10115:United States lawsuits 9544:FBI encryption dispute 7275:July 29, 2012, at the 7163:July 11, 2012, at the 7074:Apple's War on Android 7058:July 29, 2012, at the 6042:"A History of the GUI" 5799:Re: OdioWOrks v. Apple 5561:June 15, 2010, at the 5055:November 29, 2012, at 4841:July 30, 2012, at the 3953:Apple Computer, Inc., 3722:. Accessed 2015-07-04. 3449:Jenkins v. Apple, Inc. 3445:Normand v. Apple, Inc. 3351:Apple Computer, Inc., 2338:Remembering Steve Jobs 2288:In February 2016, the 2196:alleging Psystar sold 2152:Office of Fair Trading 2079: 2045:Corephotonics v. Apple 1997:Smartphone patent wars 1984:Smartphone patent wars 1685:based on arguments of 1620:copyright infringement 1615: 1163:preliminary injunction 513:United States Congress 455:Consumer class actions 413:Fortnite Battle Royale 173:Competition Commission 74:cobalt-mining industry 42:information technology 10120:Class action lawsuits 10105:Apple Inc. litigation 9207:InVisage Technologies 7800:May 24, 2010, at the 7416:. CBS Interactive Inc 6894:May 25, 2012, at the 6635:HTC sues Apple, again 5452:June 9, 2012, at the 5061:Chinese trademark law 4975:. Accessed 2012-4-19. 4333:Lipton Krigel, Beth, 3879:. Reuters. 2022-10-14 3651:Johnson v. Apple Inc. 3577:San Jose Mercury News 3571:Tessler, Joelle, AP, 3559:San Jose Mercury News 3398:Mukherjee and Ahmed, 3337:Class Action Reporter 3266:Apple Computer Inc., 3255:Class Action Reporter 2930:U.S. v. Apple, et al. 2809:European Commission, 2450:Apple Legal – Patents 2298:one of the terrorists 2068: 1877:U.S. Bankruptcy Court 1609: 1264:Further information: 1253:Apple v. Think Secret 988:In March 2007, Apple 697:billions and billions 576:Johnson v. Apple Inc. 522:National Public Radio 210:Sherman Antitrust Act 160:released in 2004 its 51:unfair trade practice 26:intellectual property 10021:Edgar S. Woolard Jr. 9214:The Keyboard Company 8105:Timeline of products 7954:"Maritz on... Apple" 6158:National Law Journal 5221:Kansas City infoZine 4646:NYC Trademark Status 4468:, November 25, 2005. 3696:Johnson v. Apple Inc 3667:Owens v. Apple, Inc. 3506:The Washington Times 3437:Gupta v. Apple, Inc. 2982:Parnell, Brid-Aine, 2430:Apple trademark list 2350:Worthington, David, 2200:-based systems with 2050:On 6 November 2017, 1579:United Arab Emirates 1500:had negotiated with 907:domain name registry 829:Domain name disputes 766:For nearly 30 years 689:Power Macintosh 7100 572:Owens v. Apple, Inc. 401:On August 13, 2020, 347:because they viewed 333:Simon & Schuster 325:Macmillan Publishers 265:Apple Inc. v. Pepper 66:class action lawsuit 10130:Defamation case law 9539:Price-fixing ebooks 9373:Rockstar Consortium 7729:on February 2, 2007 7465:The Huffington Post 7314:The Huffington Post 7294:The Huffington Post 7085:Albanesius, Chloe, 6926:The cases include: 6829:Lloyd, Mary Ellen, 6726:McCullagh, Declan, 6564:000-52130 081032074 6433:Columbia Law Review 5736:Von Lohmann, Fred, 5348:on January 25, 2008 5294:on January 25, 2008 5009:The Washington Post 5003:Tsukayama, Hayley, 4991:The Washington Post 4984:Tsukayama, Hayley, 4926:Kurtenbach, Elaine 4745:on October 13, 2009 4652:Accessed 2012-7-22. 4174:Borland and Fried, 3996:Poundstone, p. 363. 3541:All Tech Considered 3499:Robertson, Jordan, 3429:Chiu v. Apple, Inc. 3044:The Washington Post 2896:U.S. v. Apple, Inc. 2434:NeXT trademark list 2210:shrink wrap license 2194:Psystar Corporation 1928:exhaustion doctrine 1920:European Commission 1695:Creative Technology 1683:patent infringement 1539:reverse engineering 1409:Apple v. Mackintosh 1386:Apple v. Mackintosh 1384:, (Canada, 1987) (" 1236:, and, separately, 397:Epic Games v. Apple 378:iOS fees litigation 315:In April 2012, the 299:European Commission 278:European Commission 59:corporate espionage 9890:Arthur D. Levinson 8985:Sign in with Apple 7977:Chalmers, Rachel, 7859:The New York Times 7440:The New York Times 7136:Hintjens, Pieter, 7123:Mueller, Florian, 7110:2015-09-24 at the 7072:Barrett, Paul M., 7013:2015-10-10 at the 6993:Mueller, Florian, 6913:2015-09-24 at the 6791:2015-09-24 at the 6742:, case 09-791 and 6674:The New York Times 6515:2013-11-11 at the 6369:, 14 Boston Univ. 6305:The New York Times 6229:Hesseldahl, Arik, 6143:Miles, Stephanie, 6015:The New York Times 5811:Clayburn, Thomas, 5760:2014-04-21 at the 5725:OdioWOrks v. Apple 5713:The New York Times 5696:The New York Times 5690:Fisher, Lawrence. 5591:Zingales, Nicolo, 5508:Copyright Act 1994 5506:, the New Zealand 5215:2011-09-30 at the 5192:. Appleinsider.com 5040:2015-10-15 at the 4892:2015-09-24 at the 4703:The Globe and Mail 4464:, Financial News, 4411:McCarthy, Kieren, 4057:Poundstone, p. 374 4008:Poundstone, p. 364 3634:2012-08-14 at the 3609:Reilly vs Ceridian 3405:2015-09-24 at the 3241:2002-08-11 at the 3118:The New York Times 3091:The New York Times 2737:The New York Times 2559:2013-07-22 at the 2468:The New York Times 2206:software licensing 2162:, and products by 2076:Corephotonics LTD. 1916:administrative law 1865:Research In Motion 1829:Tariff Act of 1930 1804:(wireless, iPhone) 1643:Apple v. eMachines 1616: 1610:The design of the 1555:Apple v. Corellium 1527:OdioWorks v. Apple 1132:Amazon "App Store" 1110:Proview Technology 1083:: lower-case i use 1062:Woolworths Limited 801:iTunes Music Store 664:Resellers v. Apple 586:case absorbed the 391:Epic Games lawsuit 10092: 10091: 10064: 10063: 10034: 10033: 9867: 9866: 9824:Peter Oppenheimer 9647:(General Counsel) 9556:iOS app approvals 9381: 9380: 9070: 9069: 8689: 8688: 8685: 8684: 8407: 8406: 6948:Apple v. Motorola 6685:Foresman, Chris, 6522:Thomson Financial 6420:Shrestha, Sannu, 6126:. secdatabase.com 5707:Pollack, Andrew, 5580:978-0-19-929977-5 4620:Opp. No. 91181984 4591:Los Angeles Times 4560:Final Trial Brief 4460:Richardson, Tim, 4428:Richardson, Tim, 4363:Full text of the 3748:Kessler, Topher, 3627:Judge Koh, Lucy, 3562:, April 21, 2011. 3552:Wolverton, Troy, 3282:California case: 2932:, Complaint, p.4. 2268:Internet Explorer 2258:Video for Windows 2208:terms of Apple's 1911:Motorola Mobility 1856:(digital imaging) 1479:Microsoft Windows 1374:(1986, Australia) 1321:Apple v. Franklin 1309:Apple v. Franklin 1027:" logo for NYC's 537:motion to dismiss 418:microtransactions 206:AT&T Mobility 202:False advertising 10207: 10082: 10081: 10016:Michael Spindler 9966:Fred D. Anderson 9880: 9879: 9829:Mark Papermaster 9779:Guerrino De Luca 9769:Fred D. Anderson 9740:Michael Spindler 9666:John Giannandrea 9617: 9616: 9608: 9607: 9116:Braeburn Capital 9079: 9078: 8700: 8699: 8418: 8417: 8149: 8148: 8140: 8139: 8077: 8070: 8063: 8054: 8053: 8035: 8034: 8032: 8031: 8016: 8010: 8009: 8007: 8006: 7994: 7988: 7975: 7969: 7968: 7967: 7966: 7946: 7940: 7936: 7931:. Archived from 7922: 7916: 7908: 7906: 7905: 7891: 7885: 7877: 7875: 7874: 7851: 7845: 7839: 7833: 7825: 7819: 7811: 7805: 7792: 7786: 7775: 7769: 7762: 7756: 7745: 7739: 7737: 7735: 7734: 7725:. Archived from 7713: 7704: 7702: 7700: 7699: 7694:on July 20, 2011 7690:. Archived from 7683: 7677: 7675: 7669: 7661: 7659: 7658: 7652: 7644: 7638: 7625: 7619: 7618: 7616: 7615: 7601: 7595: 7594: 7592: 7591: 7576: 7570: 7569: 7567: 7566: 7556: 7550: 7549: 7547: 7546: 7532: 7526: 7525: 7523: 7522: 7507: 7501: 7500: 7498: 7497: 7481: 7475: 7474: 7472: 7471: 7456: 7450: 7449: 7447: 7446: 7431: 7425: 7424: 7422: 7421: 7405: 7399: 7398: 7396: 7395: 7379: 7373: 7372: 7370: 7369: 7364:. BGR Media, LLC 7353: 7347: 7346: 7344: 7343: 7328: 7317: 7303: 7297: 7287: 7281: 7266: 7260: 7259: 7257: 7256: 7235: 7229: 7228: 7226: 7225: 7205: 7199: 7194:Geo. Law Journal 7154: 7148: 7134: 7128: 7121: 7115: 7102: 7096: 7083: 7077: 7070: 7064: 7049: 7043: 7042: 7040: 7039: 7024: 7018: 7004: 6998: 6991: 6985: 6963:Stern, Richard, 6961: 6955: 6924: 6918: 6905: 6899: 6885: 6879: 6874:Mandalia, Ravi, 6872: 6866: 6861:Mandalia, Ravi, 6859: 6853: 6846: 6840: 6827: 6821: 6815: 6809: 6802: 6796: 6782: 6776: 6769: 6763: 6756: 6747: 6737: 6731: 6724: 6718: 6696: 6690: 6683: 6677: 6666: 6660: 6653: 6647: 6644: 6638: 6631: 6625: 6617: 6608: 6601: 6595: 6589: 6583: 6573: 6567: 6557: 6551: 6545: 6539: 6532: 6526: 6506: 6500: 6494: 6492: 6491: 6482:. Archived from 6476: 6470: 6455: 6449: 6442: 6436: 6418: 6412: 6406: 6400: 6393: 6387: 6380: 6374: 6356: 6350: 6348: 6342: 6334: 6332: 6331: 6320: 6314: 6298: 6292: 6277: 6271: 6266:Kawamoto, Dawn, 6264: 6258: 6244: 6238: 6227: 6221: 6215: 6209: 6202: 6196: 6190: 6184: 6176: 6174: 6173: 6167: 6154: 6148: 6141: 6135: 6134: 6132: 6131: 6120: 6114: 6113: 6111: 6110: 6101:. Archived from 6088: 6082: 6076: 6070: 6068: 6066: 6065: 6059: 6053:. Archived from 6046: 6037: 6031: 6030: 6028: 6027: 6006: 6000: 5999: 5997: 5996: 5981: 5975: 5974: 5972: 5971: 5956: 5950: 5949: 5947: 5946: 5931: 5925: 5924: 5922: 5921: 5906: 5900: 5899: 5897: 5896: 5881: 5872: 5871: 5869: 5868: 5845: 5834: 5828: 5822: 5818:Information Week 5809: 5803: 5795: 5789: 5783: 5777: 5771: 5765: 5753:McNamara, Paul, 5751: 5745: 5734: 5728: 5722: 5716: 5705: 5699: 5688: 5682: 5674: 5668: 5666: 5660: 5652: 5650: 5649: 5638: 5629: 5622: 5613: 5589: 5583: 5572: 5566: 5547: 5541: 5534: 5528: 5519:Corbett, Susan, 5517: 5511: 5492: 5486: 5478: 5472: 5466: 5457: 5440: 5434: 5428: 5422: 5412: 5406: 5400: 5394: 5392: 5386: 5378: 5376: 5375: 5364: 5358: 5356: 5354: 5353: 5344:. Archived from 5338: 5336: 5335: 5330:on March 5, 2007 5329: 5323:. Archived from 5322: 5310: 5304: 5302: 5300: 5299: 5290:. Archived from 5284: 5278: 5271: 5265: 5259: 5253: 5243: 5237: 5230: 5224: 5207: 5201: 5200: 5198: 5197: 5185: 5179: 5178: 5176: 5175: 5160: 5154: 5147: 5141: 5138: 5132: 5118: 5112: 5101: 5095: 5087: 5081: 5070: 5064: 5031: 5025: 5020:Mandalia, Ravi, 5018: 5012: 5001: 4995: 4982: 4976: 4959: 4953: 4946: 4937: 4924: 4918: 4906: 4897: 4883: 4877: 4871: 4865: 4852: 4846: 4833: 4827: 4821: 4815: 4809: 4803: 4797: 4791: 4778: 4772: 4761: 4755: 4753: 4751: 4750: 4744: 4738:. Archived from 4737: 4729: 4723: 4713: 4707: 4694: 4688: 4678: 4672: 4659: 4653: 4642: 4636: 4629: 4623: 4613: 4607: 4601: 4595: 4582: 4576: 4569: 4563: 4556: 4550: 4544: 4538: 4531: 4525: 4518: 4509: 4502: 4496: 4489: 4483: 4475: 4469: 4458: 4452: 4443: 4437: 4426: 4420: 4409: 4403: 4397: 4388: 4381: 4372: 4361: 4350: 4344: 4338: 4331: 4325: 4324: 4322: 4321: 4306: 4300: 4294: 4288: 4276: 4270: 4264: 4258: 4250: 4248: 4247: 4236: 4230: 4217: 4211: 4201: 4195: 4189: 4183: 4172: 4166: 4157:Salkever, Alex, 4155: 4149: 4148: 4141: 4135: 4134: 4127: 4121: 4120: 4113: 4107: 4106: 4099: 4093: 4087: 4081: 4080: 4073: 4067: 4064: 4058: 4055: 4049: 4043: 4037: 4036: 4034: 4033: 4027:The Mac Observer 4018: 4009: 4006: 3997: 3994: 3988: 3987: 3980: 3974: 3964: 3958: 3951: 3945: 3937: 3931: 3929: 3927: 3926: 3917:. Archived from 3911: 3905: 3894: 3888: 3887: 3885: 3884: 3869: 3863: 3862: 3860: 3859: 3844: 3838: 3837: 3824: 3818: 3817: 3804: 3795: 3794: 3789:. Archived from 3783: 3777: 3776: 3763: 3757: 3746: 3740: 3729: 3723: 3717: 3711: 3705: 3699: 3689: 3683: 3677: 3671: 3663: 3654: 3648: 3639: 3625: 3619: 3599: 3593: 3586: 3580: 3569: 3563: 3550: 3544: 3533: 3527: 3516: 3510: 3497: 3491: 3469: 3460: 3420: 3414: 3396: 3385: 3362: 3356: 3349: 3340: 3334: 3328: 3326: 3320: 3312: 3310: 3309: 3285:In re iPod Cases 3280: 3271: 3264: 3258: 3252: 3246: 3232: 3226: 3218: 3212: 3211: 3203: 3197: 3196: 3194: 3193: 3178: 3172: 3171: 3169: 3168: 3153: 3147: 3135: 3129: 3128: 3126: 3125: 3108: 3102: 3101: 3099: 3098: 3081: 3075: 3074: 3072: 3071: 3054: 3048: 3035: 3029: 3028: 3026: 3025: 3006: 3000: 2995:Van Voris, Bob, 2993: 2987: 2980: 2974: 2967: 2961: 2955: 2949: 2939: 2933: 2927: 2921: 2907: 2901: 2891: 2882: 2881: 2879: 2878: 2862: 2854: 2848: 2845: 2839: 2838: 2836: 2835: 2820: 2814: 2807: 2801: 2788: 2779: 2767: 2761: 2754: 2748: 2747: 2745: 2744: 2727: 2721: 2720: 2718: 2717: 2700: 2694: 2693: 2691: 2690: 2675: 2669: 2668: 2666: 2665: 2648: 2642: 2636: 2630: 2624: 2615: 2612: 2606: 2599: 2593: 2586: 2580: 2574: 2568: 2542: 2536: 2525: 2519: 2507: 2501: 2494: 2485: 2478: 2472: 2459: 2453: 2447: 2441: 2427: 2421: 2415: 2409: 2408: 2406: 2405: 2391: 2385: 2372: 2363: 2335: 2146:In 2008, the UK 2077: 1970:Apple v. Samsung 1964: 1842:Gregory M. Sleet 1677:(menu structure) 1636:scrollbar thumbs 1624:Digital Research 1363:conflict of laws 1337:operating system 1218:, also known as 1206:sites featuring 1167:Phyllis Hamilton 974:Yahoo! Messenger 888:cyberbritain.com 707:cease-and-desist 509:Associated Press 386: 10215: 10214: 10210: 10209: 10208: 10206: 10205: 10204: 10140:Patent case law 10095: 10094: 10093: 10088: 10060: 10030: 9931: 9927:Susan L. Wagner 9922:Ronald D. Sugar 9874: 9863: 9839:Bertrand Serlet 9809:Nancy R. Heinen 9764:Angela Ahrendts 9710: 9686:Deirdre O'Brien 9656:Craig Federighi 9645:Katherine Adams 9599: 9446:Right to repair 9406:Think different 9377: 9304: 9256:Power Computing 9125: 9066: 8968: 8923: 8880: 8874: 8829: 8823:MLS Season Pass 8724: 8681: 8545:Developer Tools 8540:Core Foundation 8516: 8423: 8403: 8338: 8315: 8282: 8254: 8206: 8129: 8086: 8081: 8044: 8039: 8038: 8029: 8027: 8018: 8017: 8013: 8004: 8002: 7995: 7991: 7976: 7972: 7964: 7962: 7947: 7943: 7927: 7910: 7909: 7903: 7901: 7896: 7895:Mace, Michael, 7879: 7878: 7872: 7870: 7865: 7853:Markoff, John, 7852: 7848: 7840: 7836: 7826: 7822: 7812: 7808: 7802:Wayback Machine 7793: 7789: 7776: 7772: 7764:Cheng, Jacqui, 7763: 7759: 7746: 7742: 7732: 7730: 7715: 7714: 7707: 7697: 7695: 7686: 7684: 7680: 7663: 7662: 7656: 7654: 7650: 7646: 7645: 7641: 7635:Wayback Machine 7626: 7622: 7613: 7611: 7603: 7602: 7598: 7589: 7587: 7578: 7577: 7573: 7564: 7562: 7558: 7557: 7553: 7544: 7542: 7534: 7533: 7529: 7520: 7518: 7509: 7508: 7504: 7495: 7493: 7482: 7478: 7469: 7467: 7457: 7453: 7444: 7442: 7432: 7428: 7419: 7417: 7406: 7402: 7393: 7391: 7380: 7376: 7367: 7365: 7354: 7350: 7341: 7339: 7329: 7320: 7304: 7300: 7288: 7284: 7277:Wayback Machine 7267: 7263: 7254: 7252: 7236: 7232: 7223: 7221: 7219:CBS Interactive 7207: 7206: 7202: 7181:Masnick, Mike, 7165:Wayback Machine 7155: 7151: 7145:Wayback Machine 7135: 7131: 7122: 7118: 7112:Wayback Machine 7103: 7099: 7084: 7080: 7071: 7067: 7060:Wayback Machine 7050: 7046: 7037: 7035: 7025: 7021: 7015:Wayback Machine 7005: 7001: 6992: 6988: 6972:Wayback Machine 6962: 6958: 6925: 6921: 6915:Wayback Machine 6906: 6902: 6896:Wayback Machine 6886: 6882: 6873: 6869: 6860: 6856: 6848:Decker, Susan, 6847: 6843: 6828: 6824: 6816: 6812: 6803: 6799: 6793:Wayback Machine 6783: 6779: 6770: 6766: 6757: 6750: 6738: 6734: 6725: 6721: 6711:Wayback Machine 6697: 6693: 6684: 6680: 6667: 6663: 6654: 6650: 6645: 6641: 6632: 6628: 6618: 6611: 6602: 6598: 6590: 6586: 6574: 6570: 6558: 6554: 6546: 6542: 6534:Marks, Joseph, 6533: 6529: 6517:Wayback Machine 6507: 6503: 6489: 6487: 6478: 6477: 6473: 6456: 6452: 6444:Harris, Larry, 6443: 6439: 6429:Wayback Machine 6419: 6415: 6407: 6403: 6394: 6390: 6381: 6377: 6367:Wayback Machine 6357: 6353: 6336: 6335: 6329: 6327: 6322: 6321: 6317: 6299: 6295: 6278: 6274: 6265: 6261: 6245: 6241: 6228: 6224: 6216: 6212: 6203: 6199: 6178: 6177: 6171: 6169: 6165: 6161: 6155: 6151: 6142: 6138: 6129: 6127: 6122: 6121: 6117: 6108: 6106: 6089: 6085: 6077: 6073: 6063: 6061: 6057: 6044: 6038: 6034: 6025: 6023: 6008: 6007: 6003: 5994: 5992: 5982: 5978: 5969: 5967: 5957: 5953: 5944: 5942: 5932: 5928: 5919: 5917: 5907: 5903: 5894: 5892: 5890:Washington Post 5882: 5875: 5866: 5864: 5854:Washington Post 5846: 5837: 5829: 5825: 5810: 5806: 5796: 5792: 5784: 5780: 5772: 5768: 5762:Wayback Machine 5752: 5748: 5735: 5731: 5723: 5719: 5706: 5702: 5689: 5685: 5675: 5671: 5654: 5653: 5647: 5645: 5640: 5639: 5632: 5623: 5616: 5609:US v. Kononchuk 5600:Wayback Machine 5590: 5586: 5573: 5569: 5563:Wayback Machine 5548: 5544: 5535: 5531: 5518: 5514: 5493: 5489: 5479: 5475: 5467: 5460: 5454:Wayback Machine 5441: 5437: 5429: 5425: 5413: 5409: 5401: 5397: 5380: 5379: 5373: 5371: 5366: 5365: 5361: 5351: 5349: 5340: 5333: 5331: 5327: 5320: 5316: 5311: 5307: 5297: 5295: 5286: 5285: 5281: 5272: 5268: 5260: 5256: 5244: 5240: 5232:Marsal, Katie, 5231: 5227: 5217:Wayback Machine 5208: 5204: 5195: 5193: 5186: 5182: 5173: 5171: 5162: 5161: 5157: 5148: 5144: 5139: 5135: 5119: 5115: 5102: 5098: 5088: 5084: 5071: 5067: 5042:Wayback Machine 5032: 5028: 5019: 5015: 5002: 4998: 4983: 4979: 4973:Wayback Machine 4960: 4956: 4947: 4940: 4933:Huffington Post 4925: 4921: 4907: 4900: 4894:Wayback Machine 4884: 4880: 4874:Woolworth's App 4872: 4868: 4862:Wayback Machine 4853: 4849: 4843:Wayback Machine 4834: 4830: 4822: 4818: 4810: 4806: 4798: 4794: 4779: 4775: 4762: 4758: 4748: 4746: 4742: 4735: 4731: 4730: 4726: 4714: 4710: 4695: 4691: 4679: 4675: 4669:Wayback Machine 4660: 4656: 4643: 4639: 4630: 4626: 4614: 4610: 4602: 4598: 4583: 4579: 4570: 4566: 4557: 4553: 4545: 4541: 4532: 4528: 4519: 4512: 4503: 4499: 4490: 4486: 4476: 4472: 4459: 4455: 4444: 4440: 4427: 4423: 4410: 4406: 4398: 4391: 4382: 4375: 4362: 4353: 4345: 4341: 4332: 4328: 4319: 4317: 4308: 4307: 4303: 4295: 4291: 4277: 4273: 4252: 4251: 4245: 4243: 4238: 4237: 4233: 4218: 4214: 4202: 4198: 4190: 4186: 4173: 4169: 4156: 4152: 4143: 4142: 4138: 4129: 4128: 4124: 4115: 4114: 4110: 4101: 4100: 4096: 4088: 4084: 4075: 4074: 4070: 4065: 4061: 4056: 4052: 4044: 4040: 4031: 4029: 4019: 4012: 4007: 4000: 3995: 3991: 3982: 3981: 3977: 3965: 3961: 3952: 3948: 3938: 3934: 3924: 3922: 3913: 3912: 3908: 3895: 3891: 3882: 3880: 3871: 3870: 3866: 3857: 3855: 3846: 3845: 3841: 3833:TheGuardian.com 3826: 3825: 3821: 3813:TheGuardian.com 3806: 3805: 3798: 3785: 3784: 3780: 3772:TheGuardian.com 3765: 3764: 3760: 3747: 3743: 3731:Crook, Jordan, 3730: 3726: 3718: 3714: 3706: 3702: 3690: 3686: 3680:Important Dates 3678: 3674: 3664: 3657: 3649: 3642: 3636:Wayback Machine 3626: 3622: 3600: 3596: 3587: 3583: 3579:, May 25, 2011. 3570: 3566: 3551: 3547: 3534: 3530: 3517: 3513: 3498: 3494: 3470: 3463: 3421: 3417: 3407:Wayback Machine 3397: 3388: 3363: 3359: 3350: 3343: 3335: 3331: 3314: 3313: 3307: 3305: 3300: 3292:Wayback Machine 3281: 3274: 3265: 3261: 3253: 3249: 3243:Wayback Machine 3233: 3229: 3219: 3215: 3204: 3200: 3191: 3189: 3179: 3175: 3166: 3164: 3154: 3150: 3136: 3132: 3123: 3121: 3109: 3105: 3096: 3094: 3082: 3078: 3069: 3067: 3055: 3051: 3036: 3032: 3023: 3021: 3008: 3007: 3003: 2994: 2990: 2981: 2977: 2968: 2964: 2956: 2952: 2940: 2936: 2928: 2924: 2908: 2904: 2892: 2885: 2876: 2874: 2866:The Independent 2855: 2851: 2846: 2842: 2833: 2831: 2821: 2817: 2808: 2804: 2789: 2782: 2768: 2764: 2755: 2751: 2742: 2740: 2728: 2724: 2715: 2713: 2701: 2697: 2688: 2686: 2676: 2672: 2663: 2661: 2649: 2645: 2637: 2633: 2625: 2618: 2613: 2609: 2600: 2596: 2587: 2583: 2575: 2571: 2561:Wayback Machine 2554:ipodlawsuit.com 2544:Cheng, Jacqui, 2543: 2539: 2526: 2522: 2508: 2504: 2495: 2488: 2479: 2475: 2460: 2456: 2448: 2444: 2428: 2424: 2416: 2412: 2403: 2401: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2373: 2366: 2345:Wayback Machine 2336: 2329: 2324: 2307: 2286: 2280: 2246: 2240: 2235: 2229: 2190: 2144: 2104: 2099: 2078: 2075: 2048: 1986: 1980: 1974: 1963:US$ 440 million 1962: 1950: 1907: 1901: 1869:digital imaging 1863:sued Apple and 1858: 1837:change of venue 1817: 1806: 1731: 1679: 1671: 1646: 1604: 1599: 1558: 1530: 1513: 1475:Hewlett-Packard 1467: 1461: 1441:(DMCA) and the 1355: 1349: 1318: 1312: 1305: 1292:First Amendment 1272: 1262: 1256: 1192: 1186: 1179: 1150:Amazon Appstore 1134: 1094: 1085: 1058: 1046: 1013: 1007: 986: 934: 926:judicial review 867: 838: 831: 822:Think Different 814: 764: 758: 737: 732: 727: 681: 676: 667: 660: 651: 634: 614: 605: 568: 489: 476: 462: 457: 449:digital wallets 437: 431: 399: 393: 384: 380: 368: 362: 313: 307: 274: 189: 137:was filed as a 131: 126: 104:. Apple claims 82: 12: 11: 5: 10213: 10203: 10202: 10197: 10192: 10187: 10182: 10177: 10172: 10167: 10162: 10157: 10152: 10147: 10142: 10137: 10132: 10127: 10122: 10117: 10112: 10107: 10090: 10089: 10087: 10086: 10076: 10069: 10066: 10065: 10062: 10061: 10059: 10058: 10053: 10048: 10042: 10040: 10036: 10035: 10032: 10031: 10029: 10028: 10023: 10018: 10013: 10008: 10003: 9998: 9993: 9991:Robert A. Iger 9988: 9983: 9978: 9976:Mickey Drexler 9973: 9968: 9963: 9958: 9952: 9946: 9939: 9937: 9933: 9932: 9930: 9929: 9924: 9919: 9914: 9909: 9904: 9899: 9893: 9886: 9884: 9877: 9869: 9868: 9865: 9864: 9862: 9861: 9856: 9851: 9846: 9841: 9836: 9834:Jon Rubinstein 9831: 9826: 9821: 9816: 9811: 9806: 9801: 9799:Scott Forstall 9796: 9791: 9786: 9781: 9776: 9771: 9766: 9761: 9755: 9749: 9743: 9737: 9731: 9725: 9718: 9716: 9712: 9711: 9709: 9708: 9703: 9698: 9693: 9688: 9683: 9678: 9673: 9668: 9663: 9661:Isabel Ge Mahe 9658: 9653: 9648: 9642: 9636: 9630: 9623: 9621: 9614: 9605: 9601: 9600: 9598: 9597: 9592: 9591: 9590: 9585: 9575: 9570: 9569: 9568: 9558: 9553: 9552: 9551: 9546: 9541: 9536: 9531: 9521: 9520: 9519: 9509: 9508: 9507: 9497: 9496: 9495: 9490: 9485: 9475: 9470: 9469: 9468: 9463: 9455: 9454: 9453: 9448: 9438: 9433: 9428: 9427: 9426: 9421: 9416: 9409: 9402: 9389: 9387: 9383: 9382: 9379: 9378: 9376: 9375: 9370: 9365: 9360: 9353: 9348: 9343: 9338: 9337: 9336: 9329: 9314: 9312: 9306: 9305: 9303: 9302: 9301: 9300: 9292: 9291: 9290: 9283: 9276: 9271: 9266: 9259: 9252: 9245: 9238: 9231: 9224: 9217: 9210: 9203: 9196: 9189: 9182: 9175: 9168: 9163: 9158: 9153: 9146: 9135: 9133: 9127: 9126: 9124: 9123: 9118: 9113: 9108: 9103: 9098: 9093: 9087: 9085: 9076: 9072: 9071: 9068: 9067: 9065: 9064: 9063: 9062: 9057: 9047: 9042: 9037: 9032: 9031: 9030: 9018: 9017: 9016: 9011: 9006: 8994: 8989: 8988: 8987: 8976: 8974: 8970: 8969: 8967: 8966: 8959: 8952: 8947: 8945:Certifications 8942: 8937: 8931: 8929: 8925: 8924: 8922: 8921: 8920: 8919: 8909: 8908: 8907: 8897: 8896: 8895: 8884: 8882: 8876: 8875: 8873: 8872: 8867: 8866: 8865: 8860: 8848: 8843: 8837: 8835: 8831: 8830: 8828: 8827: 8826: 8825: 8820: 8815: 8805: 8800: 8799: 8798: 8786: 8785: 8784: 8779: 8772: 8765: 8760: 8753: 8743: 8738: 8732: 8730: 8726: 8725: 8723: 8722: 8717: 8712: 8706: 8704: 8697: 8691: 8690: 8687: 8686: 8683: 8682: 8680: 8679: 8674: 8669: 8664: 8659: 8654: 8649: 8644: 8639: 8638: 8637: 8632: 8627: 8617: 8612: 8611: 8610: 8603: 8598: 8586: 8585: 8584: 8574: 8573: 8572: 8567: 8562: 8552: 8547: 8542: 8537: 8532: 8527: 8521: 8518: 8517: 8515: 8514: 8509: 8506:Classic Mac OS 8502: 8497: 8492: 8487: 8482: 8481: 8480: 8475: 8465: 8464: 8463: 8458: 8456:iPadOS history 8453: 8448: 8443: 8428: 8426: 8415: 8409: 8408: 8405: 8404: 8402: 8401: 8396: 8391: 8386: 8381: 8380: 8379: 8369: 8368: 8367: 8357: 8352: 8346: 8344: 8340: 8339: 8337: 8336: 8331: 8325: 8323: 8317: 8316: 8314: 8313: 8308: 8303: 8298: 8292: 8290: 8284: 8283: 8281: 8280: 8275: 8270: 8264: 8262: 8256: 8255: 8253: 8252: 8245: 8238: 8231: 8224: 8216: 8214: 8208: 8207: 8205: 8204: 8199: 8194: 8189: 8188: 8187: 8182: 8172: 8171: 8170: 8157: 8155: 8146: 8137: 8131: 8130: 8128: 8127: 8122: 8117: 8112: 8107: 8102: 8097: 8091: 8088: 8087: 8080: 8079: 8072: 8065: 8057: 8051: 8050: 8043: 8042:External links 8040: 8037: 8036: 8011: 7989: 7970: 7952:(1999-02-01), 7941: 7939: 7938: 7935:on 2000-10-12. 7926:Mace, Michael, 7924: 7893: 7864:Duncan, Geoff, 7846: 7842:Court document 7834: 7820: 7806: 7787: 7770: 7757: 7740: 7705: 7678: 7639: 7620: 7596: 7571: 7551: 7527: 7502: 7476: 7451: 7426: 7400: 7374: 7348: 7318: 7298: 7282: 7261: 7230: 7200: 7198: 7197: 7190: 7179: 7167:, Santa Clara 7149: 7129: 7116: 7097: 7078: 7065: 7044: 7019: 6999: 6986: 6956: 6919: 6900: 6880: 6867: 6854: 6841: 6822: 6810: 6797: 6777: 6771:Cheng, Roger, 6764: 6748: 6732: 6719: 6691: 6678: 6668:Bilton, Nick, 6661: 6655:Patel, Nilay, 6648: 6639: 6633:Cheng, Roger, 6626: 6609: 6596: 6584: 6568: 6552: 6540: 6527: 6501: 6471: 6467:BYU Law Review 6450: 6437: 6413: 6401: 6388: 6375: 6358:Klemens, Ben, 6351: 6315: 6293: 6279:Burton, John, 6272: 6259: 6239: 6222: 6210: 6197: 6149: 6136: 6115: 6083: 6071: 6032: 6001: 5976: 5951: 5926: 5901: 5873: 5835: 5823: 5804: 5790: 5778: 5766: 5746: 5729: 5717: 5700: 5683: 5669: 5630: 5614: 5584: 5567: 5542: 5529: 5512: 5487: 5473: 5458: 5435: 5423: 5407: 5395: 5359: 5305: 5279: 5266: 5254: 5238: 5225: 5202: 5180: 5155: 5149:Gold, Django, 5142: 5133: 5127:2013-02-02 at 5113: 5096: 5082: 5072:Zhang, Laney, 5065: 5026: 5013: 4996: 4977: 4954: 4938: 4919: 4898: 4878: 4866: 4847: 4828: 4816: 4804: 4792: 4773: 4756: 4724: 4720:Times Colonist 4708: 4689: 4673: 4654: 4637: 4624: 4608: 4596: 4584:Larson, Erik, 4577: 4564: 4551: 4539: 4526: 4510: 4497: 4484: 4470: 4453: 4438: 4421: 4404: 4389: 4373: 4351: 4339: 4326: 4301: 4289: 4271: 4231: 4212: 4196: 4184: 4167: 4150: 4136: 4122: 4108: 4094: 4082: 4068: 4059: 4050: 4038: 4010: 3998: 3989: 3975: 3959: 3957:, 2006, p. 41. 3946: 3932: 3906: 3889: 3864: 3839: 3819: 3796: 3793:on 2011-02-24. 3778: 3758: 3741: 3724: 3712: 3700: 3684: 3672: 3655: 3640: 3620: 3594: 3581: 3564: 3545: 3528: 3511: 3492: 3461: 3415: 3386: 3357: 3341: 3329: 3272: 3259: 3247: 3227: 3213: 3198: 3173: 3148: 3130: 3103: 3076: 3049: 3030: 3016:. 2013-07-10. 3001: 2988: 2975: 2962: 2950: 2934: 2922: 2902: 2883: 2849: 2840: 2815: 2802: 2780: 2775:Spiegel Online 2762: 2749: 2722: 2710:Bloomberg L.P. 2695: 2670: 2643: 2631: 2616: 2607: 2594: 2581: 2569: 2537: 2520: 2502: 2486: 2473: 2454: 2442: 2422: 2410: 2386: 2364: 2362: 2361: 2355: 2326: 2325: 2323: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2313: 2306: 2303: 2282:Main article: 2279: 2276: 2242:Main article: 2239: 2236: 2234: 2231: 2189: 2184: 2160:Office for Mac 2143: 2140: 2138:(DRM) scheme. 2103: 2100: 2098: 2095: 2073: 2047: 2042: 1976:Main article: 1973: 1967: 1949: 1946: 1942:with prejudice 1938:Richard Posner 1903:Main article: 1900: 1895: 1857: 1854:Kodak v. Apple 1851: 1816: 1811: 1805: 1802:Nokia v. Apple 1799: 1730: 1727: 1678: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1645: 1640: 1603: 1600: 1598: 1595: 1557: 1552: 1529: 1524: 1512: 1507: 1490:user interface 1477:alleging that 1463:Main article: 1460: 1455: 1348: 1345: 1314:Main article: 1311: 1306: 1304: 1301: 1258:Main article: 1255: 1250: 1188:Main article: 1185: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1157:reported that 1133: 1130: 1093: 1090: 1084: 1078: 1057: 1054: 1045: 1042: 1006: 1003: 985: 982: 942:Linksys iPhone 933: 930: 886:, and then to 876:Benjamin Cohen 871:cybersquatting 866: 861: 837: 832: 830: 827: 813: 810: 760:Main article: 757: 754: 736: 733: 731: 728: 726: 723: 687:the mid-level 680: 677: 675: 672: 666: 661: 659: 658:Trade practice 656: 650: 647: 633: 630: 613: 610: 604: 601: 567: 564: 526:mobile devices 488: 485: 475: 472: 461: 458: 456: 453: 433:Main article: 430: 427: 395:Main article: 392: 389: 379: 376: 364:Main article: 361: 358: 309:Main article: 306: 303: 288:European Union 273: 270: 253:Illinois Brick 245:Illinois Brick 188: 185: 130: 127: 125: 122: 81: 78: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 10212: 10201: 10198: 10196: 10193: 10191: 10188: 10186: 10183: 10181: 10178: 10176: 10173: 10171: 10168: 10166: 10163: 10161: 10158: 10156: 10153: 10151: 10148: 10146: 10143: 10141: 10138: 10136: 10133: 10131: 10128: 10126: 10123: 10121: 10118: 10116: 10113: 10111: 10108: 10106: 10103: 10102: 10100: 10085: 10077: 10074: 10071: 10070: 10067: 10057: 10054: 10052: 10051:Steve Wozniak 10049: 10047: 10044: 10043: 10041: 10037: 10027: 10024: 10022: 10019: 10017: 10014: 10012: 10011:Michael Scott 10009: 10007: 10004: 10002: 9999: 9997: 9994: 9992: 9989: 9987: 9986:Larry Ellison 9984: 9982: 9979: 9977: 9974: 9972: 9971:Bill Campbell 9969: 9967: 9964: 9962: 9959: 9956: 9953: 9950: 9947: 9944: 9943:Mike Markkula 9941: 9940: 9938: 9934: 9928: 9925: 9923: 9920: 9918: 9915: 9913: 9910: 9908: 9905: 9903: 9902:James A. Bell 9900: 9897: 9894: 9891: 9888: 9887: 9885: 9881: 9878: 9876: 9870: 9860: 9859:Steve Wozniak 9857: 9855: 9854:Avie Tevanian 9852: 9850: 9849:Sina Tamaddon 9847: 9845: 9842: 9840: 9837: 9835: 9832: 9830: 9827: 9825: 9822: 9820: 9817: 9815: 9812: 9810: 9807: 9805: 9804:Ellen Hancock 9802: 9800: 9797: 9795: 9792: 9790: 9787: 9785: 9782: 9780: 9777: 9775: 9772: 9770: 9767: 9765: 9762: 9759: 9756: 9753: 9750: 9747: 9744: 9741: 9738: 9735: 9732: 9729: 9728:Mike Markkula 9726: 9723: 9722:Michael Scott 9720: 9719: 9717: 9713: 9707: 9704: 9702: 9699: 9697: 9696:Phil Schiller 9694: 9692: 9689: 9687: 9684: 9682: 9679: 9677: 9674: 9672: 9669: 9667: 9664: 9662: 9659: 9657: 9654: 9652: 9649: 9646: 9643: 9640: 9637: 9634: 9633:Jeff Williams 9631: 9628: 9625: 9624: 9622: 9618: 9615: 9613: 9609: 9606: 9602: 9596: 9593: 9589: 9586: 9584: 9581: 9580: 9579: 9576: 9574: 9571: 9567: 9564: 9563: 9562: 9559: 9557: 9554: 9550: 9547: 9545: 9542: 9540: 9537: 9535: 9532: 9530: 9527: 9526: 9525: 9522: 9518: 9515: 9514: 9513: 9510: 9506: 9503: 9502: 9501: 9498: 9494: 9491: 9489: 9486: 9484: 9481: 9480: 9479: 9476: 9474: 9471: 9467: 9464: 9462: 9459: 9458: 9457:Headquarters 9456: 9452: 9449: 9447: 9444: 9443: 9442: 9439: 9437: 9434: 9432: 9429: 9425: 9422: 9420: 9417: 9414: 9410: 9407: 9403: 9400: 9396: 9395: 9394: 9391: 9390: 9388: 9384: 9374: 9371: 9369: 9366: 9364: 9361: 9359: 9358: 9357:Digital Ocean 9354: 9352: 9349: 9347: 9344: 9342: 9339: 9335: 9334: 9330: 9328: 9327: 9323: 9322: 9321: 9320: 9316: 9315: 9313: 9311: 9307: 9299: 9296: 9295: 9293: 9289: 9288: 9284: 9282: 9281: 9277: 9275: 9272: 9270: 9267: 9265: 9264: 9260: 9258: 9257: 9253: 9251: 9250: 9246: 9244: 9243: 9239: 9237: 9236: 9232: 9230: 9229: 9225: 9223: 9222: 9218: 9216: 9215: 9211: 9209: 9208: 9204: 9202: 9201: 9197: 9195: 9194: 9190: 9188: 9187: 9183: 9181: 9180: 9176: 9174: 9173: 9169: 9167: 9164: 9162: 9159: 9157: 9154: 9152: 9151: 9147: 9145: 9142: 9141: 9140: 9137: 9136: 9134: 9132: 9128: 9122: 9119: 9117: 9114: 9112: 9109: 9107: 9104: 9102: 9101:Apple Studios 9099: 9097: 9094: 9092: 9089: 9088: 9086: 9084: 9080: 9077: 9073: 9061: 9058: 9056: 9053: 9052: 9051: 9048: 9046: 9043: 9041: 9038: 9036: 9033: 9029: 9028: 9024: 9023: 9022: 9019: 9015: 9012: 9010: 9007: 9005: 9004: 9000: 8999: 8998: 8995: 8993: 8990: 8986: 8983: 8982: 8981: 8978: 8977: 8975: 8971: 8965: 8964: 8960: 8958: 8957: 8953: 8951: 8948: 8946: 8943: 8941: 8938: 8936: 8933: 8932: 8930: 8926: 8918: 8915: 8914: 8913: 8910: 8906: 8903: 8902: 8901: 8898: 8894: 8891: 8890: 8889: 8886: 8885: 8883: 8881:digital sales 8877: 8871: 8868: 8864: 8861: 8859: 8858: 8854: 8853: 8852: 8849: 8847: 8846:Walkie-Talkie 8844: 8842: 8839: 8838: 8836: 8834:Communication 8832: 8824: 8821: 8819: 8816: 8814: 8811: 8810: 8809: 8806: 8804: 8801: 8797: 8796: 8792: 8791: 8790: 8787: 8783: 8780: 8778: 8777: 8773: 8771: 8770: 8766: 8764: 8761: 8759: 8758: 8754: 8752: 8749: 8748: 8747: 8744: 8742: 8739: 8737: 8734: 8733: 8731: 8727: 8721: 8718: 8716: 8713: 8711: 8708: 8707: 8705: 8701: 8698: 8696: 8692: 8678: 8675: 8673: 8670: 8668: 8665: 8663: 8660: 8658: 8655: 8653: 8650: 8648: 8645: 8643: 8640: 8636: 8633: 8631: 8628: 8626: 8623: 8622: 8621: 8618: 8616: 8613: 8609: 8608: 8604: 8602: 8599: 8597: 8594: 8593: 8592: 8591: 8587: 8583: 8580: 8579: 8578: 8575: 8571: 8568: 8566: 8563: 8561: 8558: 8557: 8556: 8555:Final Cut Pro 8553: 8551: 8548: 8546: 8543: 8541: 8538: 8536: 8533: 8531: 8528: 8526: 8523: 8522: 8519: 8513: 8510: 8508: 8507: 8503: 8501: 8498: 8496: 8493: 8491: 8488: 8486: 8483: 8479: 8476: 8474: 8471: 8470: 8469: 8466: 8462: 8459: 8457: 8454: 8452: 8449: 8447: 8444: 8442: 8439: 8438: 8437: 8433: 8430: 8429: 8427: 8425: 8419: 8416: 8414: 8410: 8400: 8397: 8395: 8392: 8390: 8387: 8385: 8382: 8378: 8375: 8374: 8373: 8370: 8366: 8363: 8362: 8361: 8358: 8356: 8353: 8351: 8348: 8347: 8345: 8341: 8335: 8332: 8330: 8327: 8326: 8324: 8322: 8318: 8312: 8309: 8307: 8304: 8302: 8299: 8297: 8294: 8293: 8291: 8289: 8285: 8279: 8278:iPhone models 8276: 8274: 8271: 8269: 8266: 8265: 8263: 8261: 8257: 8251: 8250: 8246: 8244: 8243: 8239: 8237: 8236: 8232: 8230: 8229: 8225: 8223: 8222: 8218: 8217: 8215: 8213: 8209: 8203: 8200: 8198: 8195: 8193: 8190: 8186: 8183: 8181: 8178: 8177: 8176: 8173: 8169: 8168: 8164: 8163: 8162: 8159: 8158: 8156: 8154: 8150: 8147: 8145: 8141: 8138: 8136: 8132: 8126: 8123: 8121: 8118: 8116: 8113: 8111: 8108: 8106: 8103: 8101: 8098: 8096: 8093: 8092: 8089: 8085: 8078: 8073: 8071: 8066: 8064: 8059: 8058: 8055: 8049: 8046: 8045: 8025: 8021: 8015: 8000: 7993: 7986: 7985: 7980: 7974: 7961: 7960: 7955: 7951: 7945: 7934: 7930: 7925: 7920: 7914: 7899: 7894: 7889: 7883: 7868: 7863: 7862: 7860: 7856: 7850: 7843: 7838: 7831: 7830: 7824: 7817: 7816: 7810: 7803: 7799: 7796: 7791: 7784: 7780: 7777:Oates, John, 7774: 7767: 7761: 7754: 7750: 7747:Oates, John, 7744: 7728: 7724: 7723: 7718: 7712: 7710: 7693: 7689: 7685:Singstad, Jo, 7682: 7673: 7667: 7649: 7643: 7636: 7632: 7629: 7624: 7610: 7606: 7600: 7585: 7581: 7575: 7561: 7555: 7541: 7537: 7531: 7516: 7512: 7506: 7491: 7487: 7480: 7466: 7462: 7455: 7441: 7437: 7430: 7415: 7411: 7404: 7389: 7385: 7378: 7363: 7359: 7352: 7338: 7334: 7327: 7325: 7323: 7315: 7311: 7307: 7302: 7295: 7291: 7286: 7279: 7278: 7274: 7271: 7265: 7251: 7247: 7246: 7241: 7234: 7220: 7216: 7215: 7210: 7204: 7195: 7191: 7188: 7184: 7180: 7177: 7173: 7172: 7170: 7166: 7162: 7159: 7156:Mohan, Ravi, 7153: 7146: 7142: 7139: 7133: 7126: 7120: 7113: 7109: 7106: 7101: 7094: 7093: 7088: 7082: 7075: 7069: 7062: 7061: 7057: 7054: 7048: 7034: 7030: 7023: 7016: 7012: 7009: 7003: 6996: 6990: 6983: 6979: 6978: 6973: 6969: 6966: 6960: 6953: 6949: 6945: 6941: 6937: 6933: 6929: 6923: 6916: 6912: 6909: 6904: 6897: 6893: 6890: 6887:patentadmin, 6884: 6877: 6871: 6864: 6858: 6851: 6845: 6838: 6837: 6832: 6826: 6819: 6814: 6807: 6804:Mullin, Joe, 6801: 6794: 6790: 6787: 6784:Levine, Dan, 6781: 6774: 6768: 6761: 6755: 6753: 6745: 6741: 6736: 6729: 6723: 6716: 6712: 6708: 6705: 6701: 6695: 6688: 6682: 6675: 6671: 6665: 6658: 6652: 6643: 6636: 6630: 6623: 6622: 6616: 6614: 6606: 6600: 6593: 6588: 6581: 6577: 6572: 6565: 6561: 6556: 6549: 6544: 6537: 6531: 6524: 6523: 6518: 6514: 6511: 6505: 6498: 6497:Business Wire 6486:on 2008-06-27 6485: 6481: 6475: 6468: 6464: 6460: 6454: 6447: 6441: 6434: 6430: 6426: 6423: 6417: 6410: 6405: 6398: 6395:Apple, Inc., 6392: 6385: 6379: 6372: 6368: 6364: 6361: 6355: 6346: 6340: 6325: 6319: 6312: 6311: 6306: 6302: 6297: 6290: 6286: 6282: 6276: 6269: 6263: 6256: 6252: 6248: 6243: 6236: 6232: 6226: 6219: 6214: 6207: 6201: 6194: 6188: 6182: 6164: 6159: 6153: 6146: 6140: 6125: 6119: 6105:on 2012-10-22 6104: 6100: 6099: 6094: 6087: 6080: 6075: 6060:on 2011-07-19 6056: 6052: 6051: 6043: 6036: 6021: 6017: 6016: 6011: 6005: 5991: 5987: 5980: 5966: 5962: 5955: 5941: 5937: 5930: 5916: 5912: 5905: 5891: 5887: 5880: 5878: 5863: 5859: 5855: 5851: 5844: 5842: 5840: 5832: 5827: 5820: 5819: 5814: 5808: 5801: 5800: 5794: 5787: 5782: 5775: 5770: 5763: 5759: 5756: 5750: 5743: 5739: 5733: 5726: 5721: 5714: 5710: 5704: 5697: 5693: 5687: 5680: 5679: 5673: 5664: 5658: 5643: 5637: 5635: 5627: 5621: 5619: 5611: 5610: 5605: 5601: 5597: 5594: 5588: 5581: 5577: 5571: 5564: 5560: 5557: 5553: 5552: 5546: 5539: 5533: 5526: 5522: 5516: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5497: 5491: 5483: 5482:Computer Edge 5477: 5470: 5465: 5463: 5455: 5451: 5448: 5444: 5439: 5432: 5427: 5421: 5417: 5411: 5404: 5399: 5390: 5384: 5369: 5363: 5347: 5343: 5326: 5319: 5314: 5309: 5293: 5289: 5283: 5276: 5270: 5263: 5258: 5251: 5247: 5242: 5235: 5229: 5222: 5218: 5214: 5211: 5206: 5191: 5184: 5169: 5165: 5159: 5152: 5146: 5137: 5130: 5129:archive.today 5126: 5123: 5120:Levine, Dan, 5117: 5110: 5106: 5100: 5093: 5092: 5086: 5079: 5075: 5069: 5062: 5058: 5057:archive.today 5054: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5039: 5036: 5030: 5023: 5017: 5010: 5006: 5000: 4993: 4992: 4987: 4981: 4974: 4970: 4967: 4963: 4958: 4951: 4945: 4943: 4935: 4934: 4929: 4923: 4916: 4915: 4910: 4905: 4903: 4895: 4891: 4888: 4882: 4875: 4870: 4863: 4859: 4856: 4851: 4844: 4840: 4837: 4832: 4825: 4820: 4813: 4808: 4801: 4796: 4789: 4788: 4783: 4780:Lee, Julian, 4777: 4770: 4766: 4760: 4741: 4734: 4728: 4721: 4717: 4712: 4705: 4704: 4699: 4693: 4686: 4682: 4677: 4670: 4666: 4663: 4658: 4651: 4647: 4641: 4634: 4628: 4621: 4617: 4612: 4605: 4600: 4593: 4592: 4587: 4581: 4574: 4573:TTAB Decision 4568: 4561: 4555: 4548: 4543: 4536: 4530: 4523: 4517: 4515: 4507: 4504:Rasch, Mark, 4501: 4494: 4488: 4481: 4480: 4474: 4467: 4463: 4457: 4450: 4449: 4442: 4435: 4431: 4425: 4418: 4414: 4408: 4401: 4396: 4394: 4386: 4380: 4378: 4370: 4366: 4365:Nominet-Cohen 4360: 4358: 4356: 4348: 4343: 4336: 4330: 4315: 4311: 4305: 4298: 4293: 4286: 4285: 4280: 4275: 4268: 4262: 4256: 4241: 4235: 4228: 4227: 4222: 4216: 4209: 4205: 4200: 4193: 4188: 4181: 4177: 4171: 4164: 4160: 4154: 4147:. 2023-07-06. 4146: 4140: 4133:. 2023-04-04. 4132: 4126: 4118: 4112: 4104: 4098: 4091: 4086: 4078: 4072: 4063: 4054: 4047: 4042: 4028: 4024: 4017: 4015: 4005: 4003: 3993: 3986:. 2014-02-26. 3985: 3979: 3973: 3972:0-8050-5766-8 3969: 3963: 3956: 3950: 3943: 3942: 3936: 3921:on 2007-03-17 3920: 3916: 3910: 3903: 3899: 3896:Oates, John, 3893: 3878: 3874: 3868: 3853: 3849: 3843: 3836:. 2014-01-15. 3835: 3834: 3829: 3823: 3816:. 2014-03-11. 3815: 3814: 3809: 3803: 3801: 3792: 3788: 3782: 3775:. 2013-02-26. 3774: 3773: 3768: 3762: 3755: 3751: 3745: 3738: 3734: 3728: 3721: 3716: 3709: 3704: 3697: 3693: 3688: 3681: 3676: 3669: 3668: 3662: 3660: 3652: 3647: 3645: 3637: 3633: 3630: 3624: 3617: 3616: 3611: 3610: 3604: 3598: 3591: 3585: 3578: 3574: 3568: 3561: 3560: 3555: 3549: 3542: 3538: 3535:Brand, Zach, 3532: 3525: 3521: 3515: 3508: 3507: 3502: 3496: 3489: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3468: 3466: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3425: 3419: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3401: 3395: 3393: 3391: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3366:SEC Form 10-Q 3364:Apple, Inc., 3361: 3354: 3353:SEC Form 10-Q 3348: 3346: 3338: 3333: 3324: 3318: 3303: 3298: 3294: 3293: 3289: 3286: 3279: 3277: 3269: 3268:SEC Form 10-Q 3263: 3256: 3251: 3244: 3240: 3237: 3234:Apple, Inc., 3231: 3224: 3223: 3217: 3209: 3202: 3188: 3184: 3177: 3163: 3159: 3152: 3146: 3144: 3140: 3134: 3120: 3119: 3114: 3107: 3093: 3092: 3087: 3080: 3066: 3065: 3060: 3053: 3046: 3045: 3040: 3037:Levine, Dan, 3034: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3005: 2998: 2992: 2985: 2979: 2972: 2966: 2959: 2954: 2947: 2943: 2938: 2931: 2926: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2906: 2899: 2897: 2890: 2888: 2872: 2868: 2867: 2861: 2853: 2844: 2830: 2826: 2819: 2812: 2806: 2799: 2798: 2793: 2790:Oates, John, 2787: 2785: 2777: 2776: 2771: 2766: 2759: 2756:Apple, Inc., 2753: 2739: 2738: 2733: 2726: 2712: 2711: 2706: 2699: 2685: 2681: 2674: 2660: 2659: 2654: 2647: 2640: 2635: 2628: 2623: 2621: 2611: 2603: 2598: 2590: 2585: 2578: 2573: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2541: 2534: 2530: 2524: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2506: 2499: 2493: 2491: 2483: 2477: 2470: 2469: 2464: 2458: 2451: 2446: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2426: 2419: 2414: 2400: 2396: 2390: 2383: 2382: 2377: 2371: 2369: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2349: 2348: 2346: 2342: 2339: 2334: 2332: 2327: 2317: 2314: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2302: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2285: 2275: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2264: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2245: 2230: 2227: 2225: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2188: 2183: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2139: 2137: 2134: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2094: 2092: 2087: 2083: 2072: 2067: 2064: 2060: 2059:iPhone 7 Plus 2056: 2053: 2046: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2022: 2016: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2000: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1985: 1979: 1971: 1966: 1959: 1955: 1945: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1912: 1906: 1899: 1894: 1891: 1887: 1886:Allen Gropper 1883: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1861:Eastman Kodak 1855: 1850: 1848: 1843: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1815: 1810: 1803: 1798: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1726: 1722: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1707:Nomad players 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1691:first to file 1688: 1684: 1676: 1666: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1644: 1639: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1613: 1608: 1594: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1570: 1566: 1563: 1556: 1551: 1549: 1544: 1540: 1535: 1528: 1523: 1521: 1517: 1511: 1506: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1494:look and feel 1491: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1459: 1454: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1435: 1431: 1425: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1401:Computer Edge 1397: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1378:Computer Edge 1375: 1373: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1354: 1344: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1317: 1310: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1282:, Apple sued 1281: 1280:trade secrets 1277: 1271: 1267: 1266:Apple v. Does 1261: 1254: 1249: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1229:Apple Insider 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1191: 1190:Apple v. Does 1184: 1183:Apple v. Does 1177:Trade secrets 1174: 1170: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1129: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1089: 1082: 1081:Apple v. DOPi 1077: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1053: 1051: 1041: 1039: 1035: 1034:counterclaims 1030: 1026: 1022: 1021:New York City 1018: 1012: 1002: 1000: 995: 991: 981: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 950:Macworld Expo 947: 943: 939: 938:Cisco Systems 929: 927: 923: 917: 915: 911: 908: 905: 900: 898: 893: 889: 885: 884:skipmusic.com 881: 877: 872: 865: 860: 858: 857: 851: 850:appleimac.com 847: 843: 836: 835:appleimac.com 826: 823: 819: 809: 805: 802: 798: 794: 789: 786: 782: 777: 773: 769: 763: 753: 749: 745: 743: 722: 719: 715: 710: 708: 704: 703: 698: 694: 690: 686: 671: 665: 655: 646: 643: 638: 629: 627: 622: 620: 609: 600: 598: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 563: 561: 560:data breaches 557: 553: 552:legal damages 549: 545: 542: 538: 533: 531: 527: 523: 519: 514: 510: 505: 503: 499: 494: 484: 481: 471: 468: 452: 450: 446: 442: 436: 426: 423: 419: 415: 414: 408: 404: 398: 388: 375: 373: 367: 357: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 329:Penguin Books 326: 322: 321:HarperCollins 318: 312: 302: 300: 296: 291: 289: 285: 284: 279: 269: 267: 266: 261: 256: 254: 249: 247: 246: 239: 237: 236:Ninth Circuit 233: 232: 225: 223: 217: 215: 211: 207: 203: 198: 194: 184: 182: 178: 174: 170: 169: 163: 159: 155: 151: 148: 144: 140: 136: 121: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 94:service marks 91: 87: 77: 75: 71: 67: 62: 60: 56: 52: 48: 43: 39: 35: 34:United States 31: 30:civil actions 27: 23: 19: 10072: 10056:Ronald Wayne 10006:Eric Schmidt 9996:Delano Lewis 9981:Al Eisenstat 9949:John Sculley 9844:Bruce Sewell 9789:Al Eisenstat 9774:John Browett 9734:John Sculley 9701:Johny Srouji 9676:Greg Joswiak 9671:Lisa Jackson 9639:Luca Maestri 9523: 9517:AppleMasters 9355: 9331: 9326:Kaleida Labs 9324: 9319:AIM alliance 9317: 9310:Partnerships 9285: 9278: 9261: 9254: 9247: 9242:Nothing Real 9240: 9233: 9226: 9219: 9212: 9205: 9198: 9191: 9184: 9177: 9170: 9148: 9131:Acquisitions 9083:Subsidiaries 9025: 9001: 8961: 8954: 8917:Fifth Avenue 8900:iTunes Store 8855: 8793: 8776:iTunes Radio 8774: 8767: 8755: 8605: 8588: 8504: 8247: 8240: 8233: 8226: 8219: 8165: 8125:Trade unions 8120:Supply chain 8028:. Retrieved 8026:. 2016-03-28 8023: 8014: 8003:. Retrieved 7992: 7982: 7973: 7963:, retrieved 7959:The Register 7957: 7944: 7933:the original 7902:. Retrieved 7871:. Retrieved 7858: 7849: 7837: 7827: 7823: 7813: 7809: 7790: 7783:The Register 7782: 7773: 7760: 7753:The Register 7752: 7743: 7731:. Retrieved 7727:the original 7720: 7696:. Retrieved 7692:the original 7681: 7655:. Retrieved 7642: 7623: 7612:. Retrieved 7608: 7599: 7588:. Retrieved 7586:. 2017-11-07 7583: 7574: 7563:. Retrieved 7554: 7543:. Retrieved 7539: 7530: 7519:. Retrieved 7517:. 2014-03-31 7515:The Guardian 7514: 7505: 7494:. Retrieved 7489: 7479: 7468:. Retrieved 7464: 7454: 7443:. Retrieved 7439: 7429: 7418:. Retrieved 7413: 7403: 7392:. Retrieved 7387: 7377: 7366:. Retrieved 7361: 7351: 7340:. Retrieved 7337:The Guardian 7336: 7313: 7309: 7301: 7293: 7285: 7268: 7264: 7253:. Retrieved 7245:Ars Technica 7243: 7233: 7222:. Retrieved 7212: 7203: 7193: 7174:Mack, Eric, 7168: 7152: 7132: 7119: 7100: 7090: 7081: 7068: 7051: 7047: 7036:. Retrieved 7022: 7006:Levine, Dan 7002: 6989: 6981: 6975: 6959: 6951: 6947: 6943: 6939: 6935: 6931: 6927: 6922: 6903: 6883: 6870: 6857: 6844: 6834: 6825: 6817: 6813: 6800: 6780: 6767: 6743: 6739: 6735: 6722: 6699: 6694: 6681: 6673: 6664: 6651: 6642: 6629: 6621:Apple v. HTC 6619: 6599: 6587: 6571: 6555: 6543: 6530: 6520: 6504: 6496: 6488:. Retrieved 6484:the original 6474: 6466: 6458: 6453: 6440: 6432: 6416: 6408: 6404: 6391: 6382:Krazit, Tom 6378: 6370: 6354: 6328:. Retrieved 6318: 6308: 6304: 6296: 6288: 6283:, Gadgets – 6275: 6262: 6254: 6250: 6246: 6242: 6235:Businessweek 6234: 6225: 6217: 6213: 6200: 6170:. Retrieved 6157: 6152: 6139: 6128:. Retrieved 6118: 6107:. Retrieved 6103:the original 6096: 6086: 6078: 6074: 6062:. Retrieved 6055:the original 6050:Ars Technica 6048: 6035: 6024:. Retrieved 6013: 6004: 5993:. Retrieved 5989: 5979: 5968:. Retrieved 5965:The Register 5964: 5954: 5943:. Retrieved 5939: 5929: 5918:. Retrieved 5914: 5904: 5893:. Retrieved 5889: 5865:. Retrieved 5853: 5826: 5816: 5807: 5797: 5793: 5781: 5769: 5749: 5732: 5724: 5720: 5712: 5703: 5695: 5686: 5676: 5672: 5646:. Retrieved 5607: 5603: 5587: 5570: 5549: 5545: 5532: 5524: 5515: 5500:EC Directive 5490: 5481: 5476: 5468: 5442: 5438: 5430: 5426: 5410: 5402: 5398: 5372:. Retrieved 5362: 5350:. Retrieved 5346:the original 5332:. Retrieved 5325:the original 5312: 5308: 5296:. Retrieved 5292:the original 5282: 5273:Fried, Ina, 5269: 5261: 5257: 5249: 5245: 5241: 5228: 5220: 5205: 5194:. Retrieved 5183: 5172:. Retrieved 5170:. 2013-01-02 5168:Ars Technica 5167: 5158: 5145: 5136: 5116: 5108: 5099: 5089: 5085: 5068: 5029: 5016: 5008: 4999: 4989: 4980: 4961: 4957: 4931: 4922: 4912: 4881: 4869: 4850: 4831: 4819: 4807: 4795: 4785: 4776: 4768: 4763:Sharp, Ari, 4759: 4747:. Retrieved 4740:the original 4727: 4719: 4711: 4701: 4692: 4676: 4657: 4640: 4627: 4615: 4611: 4599: 4589: 4580: 4567: 4558:Apple Inc., 4554: 4542: 4533:Apple, Inc, 4529: 4500: 4487: 4477: 4473: 4466:The Register 4465: 4456: 4446: 4441: 4434:The Register 4433: 4424: 4417:The Register 4416: 4407: 4364: 4342: 4329: 4318:. Retrieved 4316:. 2019-04-02 4313: 4304: 4292: 4282: 4274: 4244:. Retrieved 4234: 4224: 4219:Brandle, L. 4215: 4199: 4187: 4170: 4163:Businessweek 4162: 4153: 4139: 4125: 4111: 4097: 4085: 4071: 4062: 4053: 4045: 4041: 4030:. Retrieved 4026: 3992: 3978: 3962: 3949: 3939: 3935: 3923:. Retrieved 3919:the original 3915:"Complaints" 3909: 3902:The Register 3901: 3892: 3881:. Retrieved 3876: 3867: 3856:. Retrieved 3854:. 2020-03-02 3851: 3842: 3831: 3822: 3811: 3791:the original 3781: 3770: 3761: 3744: 3727: 3715: 3703: 3695: 3692:Class Notice 3687: 3675: 3665: 3650: 3623: 3613: 3607: 3602: 3597: 3584: 3576: 3567: 3557: 3548: 3540: 3531: 3514: 3504: 3495: 3475: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3422: 3418: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3360: 3332: 3306:. Retrieved 3296: 3283: 3262: 3250: 3230: 3220: 3216: 3201: 3190:. Retrieved 3186: 3176: 3165:. Retrieved 3161: 3151: 3137: 3133: 3122:. Retrieved 3116: 3106: 3095:. Retrieved 3089: 3079: 3068:. Retrieved 3062: 3052: 3042: 3033: 3022:. Retrieved 3013: 3004: 2991: 2978: 2965: 2953: 2937: 2929: 2925: 2917: 2905: 2894: 2875:. Retrieved 2864: 2852: 2843: 2832:. Retrieved 2828: 2818: 2805: 2797:The Register 2795: 2773: 2765: 2752: 2741:. Retrieved 2735: 2725: 2708: 2698: 2687:. Retrieved 2673: 2662:. Retrieved 2656: 2646: 2634: 2610: 2597: 2584: 2572: 2550:Ars Technica 2540: 2532: 2523: 2509: 2505: 2476: 2466: 2457: 2445: 2425: 2413: 2402:. Retrieved 2398: 2389: 2379: 2287: 2261: 2247: 2228: 2191: 2186: 2145: 2105: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2069: 2049: 2044: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2017: 2001: 1988: 1987: 1969: 1951: 1931: 1908: 1897: 1884:court judge 1859: 1853: 1818: 1814:Apple v. HTC 1813: 1807: 1801: 1751:patent troll 1739:touch screen 1732: 1723: 1680: 1674: 1647: 1642: 1617: 1571: 1567: 1559: 1554: 1533: 1531: 1526: 1515: 1514: 1509: 1498:John Sculley 1468: 1457: 1429: 1426: 1408: 1400: 1398: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1371: 1356: 1320: 1319: 1308: 1284:Think Secret 1275: 1273: 1260:Think Secret 1252: 1238:Think Secret 1233: 1227: 1219: 1215: 1208:Apple rumors 1195: 1193: 1182: 1171: 1135: 1095: 1086: 1080: 1059: 1047: 1014: 987: 978:mobile phone 948:at the 2007 946:Apple iPhone 935: 918: 901: 891: 887: 883: 880:itunes.co.uk 879: 868: 864:itunes.co.uk 863: 854: 849: 840:In an early 839: 834: 818:Swatch Group 815: 812:Swatch Group 806: 790: 765: 750: 746: 738: 711: 700: 682: 668: 663: 652: 639: 635: 623: 615: 606: 591: 587: 583: 575: 571: 569: 539:for lack of 534: 506: 501: 490: 477: 463: 438: 421: 411: 400: 381: 372:cold calling 369: 314: 292: 281: 275: 263: 257: 252: 250: 243: 240: 229: 226: 218: 190: 167: 158:RealNetworks 139:class action 134: 132: 83: 63: 57:claims, and 15: 10001:Arthur Rock 9917:Andrea Jung 9907:Alex Gorsky 9819:David Nagel 9814:Ron Johnson 9794:Tony Fadell 9784:Paul Deneve 9706:John Ternus 9595:Car project 9583:Asahi Linux 9424:Product Red 9393:Advertising 9368:Imagination 9193:FingerWorks 9166:BIS Records 9060:Look Around 8870:Game Center 8757:Beats Music 8451:iOS history 8311:Accessories 8110:Environment 8048:Apple Legal 7950:Lea, Graham 7092:PC Magazine 6287:story from 5420:object file 5416:object code 4966:Case Docket 4265:version of 3143:Sherman Act 2918:The Two–Way 2893:Complaint, 2316:Batterygate 2311:Antennagate 2021:Lucy H. Koh 1747:obviousness 1658:trade dress 1597:Trade dress 1562:virtualized 1471:Windows 2.0 1447:Patriot Act 1422:translation 1367:source code 1359:object code 1220:Project Q97 1200:journalists 1038:stipulation 842:domain name 772:The Beatles 768:Apple Corps 756:Apple Corps 742:Apple Music 556:privacy law 541:Article III 10099:Categories 10046:Steve Jobs 10026:Jerry York 9961:Gil Amelio 9957:(Chairman) 9955:Steve Jobs 9951:(Chairman) 9945:(Chairman) 9892:(Chairman) 9752:Steve Jobs 9746:Gil Amelio 9691:Dan Riccio 9681:Sabih Khan 9612:Executives 9549:Epic Games 9524:Litigation 9488:Typography 9473:University 9294:Potential 9263:PrimeSense 9200:Intrinsity 9009:TestFlight 8963:One to One 8950:Genius Bar 8935:AppleCare+ 8879:Retail and 8596:GarageBand 8565:Compressor 8394:Vision Pro 8084:Apple Inc. 8030:2016-03-30 8005:2016-02-18 7965:2012-07-27 7904:2001-06-05 7873:2007-02-01 7733:2007-02-14 7698:2013-09-19 7657:2012-04-01 7614:2017-11-08 7590:2017-11-08 7565:2017-11-08 7545:2017-11-08 7521:2014-04-07 7496:2014-04-07 7470:2014-04-07 7445:2014-04-07 7420:2013-11-15 7394:2013-08-09 7368:2014-04-07 7342:2013-11-15 7255:2017-06-14 7250:Condé Nast 7224:2015-02-12 7038:2020-02-24 6490:2016-09-05 6330:2006-05-26 6172:2010-04-27 6130:2018-05-14 6109:2012-07-22 6069:(28 pages) 6064:2012-07-23 6026:2020-01-12 5995:2024-08-12 5970:2024-08-12 5945:2024-08-12 5920:2024-08-12 5895:2020-12-30 5867:2024-08-09 5648:2007-01-26 5374:2012-07-23 5352:2008-01-25 5334:2007-03-05 5298:2008-01-25 5196:2014-01-02 5174:2013-09-04 4855:Woolworths 4749:2008-08-23 4320:2019-04-03 4246:2006-05-09 4032:2020-07-09 3925:2016-09-05 3883:2022-10-14 3858:2020-03-03 3737:TechCrunch 3480:Negligence 3308:2017-02-27 3192:2024-03-21 3187:TechCrunch 3167:2024-03-21 3162:TechCrunch 3124:2021-09-10 3097:2020-08-13 3070:2019-06-05 3024:2017-06-30 2877:2013-07-11 2869:. London. 2834:2024-03-04 2743:2019-05-14 2716:2018-06-18 2714:Retrieved 2689:2018-06-18 2664:2018-06-18 2404:2023-08-12 2322:References 2071:something. 1993:patent war 1982:See also: 1882:bankruptcy 1873:BlackBerry 1715:injunction 1632:disk drive 1502:Bill Gates 1351:See also: 1296:Anti-SLAPP 1242:shield law 1234:Power Page 1224:subpoenaed 1146:Lanham Act 1138:Amazon.com 1009:See also: 922:High Court 910:Nominet UK 853: [ 781:Apple IIGS 693:Carl Sagan 685:code-named 674:Defamation 580:gift cards 403:Epic Games 248:doctrine. 114:Steve Jobs 90:trademarks 80:Background 55:defamation 22:litigation 18:Apple Inc. 9875:directors 9588:iPodLinux 9566:#AppleToo 9529:Antitrust 9512:Community 9505:Codenames 9441:Criticism 9431:Ecosystem 9413:Get a Mac 9249:P.A. Semi 9150:AuthenTec 9139:Completed 9096:Apple IMC 9075:Companies 8997:Developer 8888:App Store 8818:originals 8795:Newsstand 8703:Financial 8647:QuickTime 8582:MainStage 8577:Logic Pro 8550:FileMaker 8530:Classroom 8422:Operating 8350:Apple SIM 8115:Marketing 8024:The Verge 7540:The Verge 6193:Jones Day 5862:0190-8286 5342:"filings" 4284:The Times 4226:Billboard 3955:Apple 10K 3064:Gamasutra 2565:referrers 2254:QuickTime 2176:Kaspersky 2108:Ombudsmen 2097:Licensing 1831:with the 1771:Panasonic 1719:iPod nano 1687:prior art 1650:eMachines 1587:NSO Group 1534:OdioWorks 1487:Macintosh 1481:and HP's 1303:Copyright 1159:Microsoft 1126:Guangdong 1098:Taiwanese 1074:App Store 1066:Australia 1025:Big Apple 936:In 2006, 914:mediation 776:trademark 730:Trademark 467:AppleCare 356:e-books. 353:discovery 168:Bloomberg 133:The case 124:Antitrust 106:copyright 102:FileMaker 47:antitrust 10110:Lawsuits 10084:Category 10039:Founders 9896:Tim Cook 9873:Board of 9758:Jony Ive 9651:Eddy Cue 9627:Tim Cook 9333:Taligent 9179:EditGrid 9027:MobileMe 8851:iMessage 8841:FaceTime 8803:Podcasts 8769:Festival 8695:Services 8657:SceneKit 8512:visionOS 8495:bridgeOS 8413:Software 8268:Hardware 8144:Hardware 8135:Products 7913:cite web 7882:cite web 7798:Archived 7666:cite web 7631:Archived 7609:Engadget 7490:Macworld 7388:MacWorld 7273:Archived 7187:Techdirt 7161:Archived 7141:Archived 7108:Archived 7056:Archived 7011:Archived 6968:Archived 6911:Archived 6892:Archived 6789:Archived 6707:Archived 6672:, Bits, 6513:Archived 6425:Archived 6363:Archived 6339:cite web 6285:NBC News 6181:cite web 6020:Archived 5758:Archived 5657:cite web 5596:Archived 5559:Archived 5502:"), the 5485:(Aus.)). 5450:Archived 5414:Compare 5383:cite web 5213:Archived 5125:Archived 5053:Archived 5038:Archived 4969:Archived 4914:ABC News 4890:Archived 4858:Archived 4839:Archived 4665:Archived 4255:cite web 3852:BBC News 3632:Archived 3603:Ceridian 3524:NBC News 3455:and the 3403:Archived 3317:cite web 3288:Archived 3239:Archived 3018:Archived 2871:Archived 2557:Archived 2341:Archived 2305:See also 2272:Netscape 2202:Mac OS X 2172:Symantec 2133:FairPlay 2091:iPhone X 2074:— 2055:start-up 1958:FaceTime 1652:, whose 1449:and the 1388:"), and 1333:Apple II 1325:firmware 1222:. Apple 1216:Asteroid 1212:Mac mini 1142:dilution 1108:company 1106:Shenzhen 1019:against 795:and the 783:with an 645:payout. 544:standing 445:iMessage 422:Fortnite 405:filed a 197:SIM lock 150:encoding 147:FairPlay 143:monopoly 70:DR Congo 40:for the 38:case law 10073:Italics 9912:Al Gore 9883:Current 9620:Current 9500:History 9386:Related 9280:Texture 9055:Flyover 9040:Fitness 9035:Find My 8956:ProCare 8928:Support 8905:Connect 8763:Up Next 8630:Numbers 8625:Keynote 8535:HomeKit 8525:CarPlay 8490:watchOS 8473:History 8441:iPhones 8424:systems 8384:Silicon 8372:HomePod 8321:AirPods 8273:History 8242:Shuffle 8221:Classic 8175:MacBook 8100:Outline 8095:History 7584:Reuters 7310:Reuters 5940:Reuters 5915:Reuters 5050:Chinese 4787:The Age 4769:The Age 4644:USPTO, 4631:USPTO, 4314:Reuters 4208:Reuters 3877:Reuters 3488:Chattel 3411:Reuters 3014:Reuters 2684:Reuters 2224:license 2214:license 2212:. That 2120:Denmark 2052:Israeli 2013:Android 2005:Android 1954:VirnetX 1783:Samsung 1763:Toshiba 1759:Fujitsu 1743:royalty 1591:Pegasus 1483:NewWave 1399:In the 1155:Reuters 1114:Xicheng 1029:GreeNYC 994:startup 990:opposed 966:routers 962:Linksys 897:Napster 785:Ensoniq 702:MacWeek 584:Johnson 345:e-books 295:Spotify 181:deposed 162:Harmony 110:patents 53:suits, 32:in the 9936:Former 9715:Former 9604:People 9561:Unions 9478:Design 9461:Campus 9436:Events 9341:Akamai 9298:Disney 9228:Metaio 9186:Emagic 9161:Beddit 9144:Anobit 9121:Claris 9111:Beddit 9091:Anobit 9045:Photos 9021:iCloud 8736:Arcade 8720:Wallet 8662:Shazam 8652:Safari 8615:iTunes 8607:iPhoto 8601:iMovie 8570:Motion 8500:Darwin 8478:Server 8436:iPadOS 8355:AirTag 8260:iPhone 8197:Studio 6982:Quanta 5860: 5578: 5059:. The 4930:, the 3970: 2432:, and 2180:McAfee 2116:Sweden 2112:Norway 2063:8 Plus 2009:Google 1847:Google 1789:, and 1767:Lenovo 1669:Patent 1583:Russia 1581:, and 1577:, the 1575:Israel 1432:, the 1204:weblog 892:iTunes 793:iTunes 626:Google 441:Beeper 385:US$ 99 349:Amazon 335:, and 283:Which? 193:iPhone 177:iTunes 9898:(CEO) 9760:(CDO) 9754:(CEO) 9748:(CEO) 9742:(CEO) 9736:(CEO) 9730:(CEO) 9724:(CEO) 9641:(CFO) 9635:(COO) 9629:(CEO) 9578:Linux 9363:iFund 9287:Topsy 9156:Beats 9106:Beats 8973:Other 8912:Store 8893:macOS 8857:iChat 8746:Music 8741:Books 8729:Media 8677:Xcode 8672:Swift 8635:Pages 8620:iWork 8590:iLife 8468:macOS 8446:iPads 8399:Watch 8360:Beats 8343:Other 8249:Touch 8001:. Inc 7651:(PDF) 6698:ITC, 6166:(PDF) 6058:(PDF) 6045:(PDF) 5990:Wired 5496:TRIPs 5418:with 5328:(PDF) 5321:(PDF) 4743:(PDF) 4736:(PDF) 4696:CTV, 4281:from 2658:ZDNet 2605:2013. 2592:2013. 2516:LEXIS 2198:Intel 2168:Adobe 2164:Corel 2156:iLife 1924:FRAND 1787:Nokia 1662:EDGAR 1288:iWork 1122:fraud 1102:China 970:Skype 964:home 718:dicta 714:libel 592:Owens 588:Owens 9493:Book 9466:Park 9419:iPod 9399:1984 9351:DiDi 9274:Siri 9235:NeXT 9221:Lala 9050:Maps 9014:WWDC 8940:AASP 8789:News 8710:Card 8667:Siri 8642:Mail 8485:tvOS 8461:Apps 8377:Mini 8365:Pill 8296:Mini 8288:iPad 8235:Nano 8228:Mini 8212:iPod 8192:Mini 8161:iMac 7919:link 7888:link 7672:link 7414:Cnet 7312:via 7214:CNET 6345:link 6187:link 6098:CNET 5858:ISSN 5663:link 5576:ISBN 5389:link 4261:link 4180:CNET 3968:ISBN 3754:CNET 3518:AP, 3323:link 2829:CNBC 2219:DMCA 2118:and 2061:and 1779:Palm 1755:Dell 1689:and 1654:eOne 1543:wiki 1532:The 1380:"), 1339:and 1268:and 972:and 958:VoIP 924:via 846:iMac 797:iPod 574:and 546:and 507:The 493:iPad 480:iPod 154:iPod 98:NeXT 9483:IDg 9451:Tax 9346:Arm 9172:Cue 9003:iAd 8992:One 8863:App 8782:App 8715:Pay 8432:iOS 8334:Max 8329:Pro 8306:Pro 8301:Air 8202:Pro 8185:Pro 8180:Air 8167:Pro 8153:Mac 7722:CNN 7362:BGR 7033:CNN 5480:In 4685:CBC 2946:BBC 2910:NPR 2110:in 1930:in 1775:HTC 1703:MP3 1699:Zen 1612:GEM 1414:ROM 1407:in 1341:ROM 1335:'s 1274:In 1064:in 904:.uk 856:sic 520:. 72:'s 10101:: 8980:ID 8808:TV 8434:/ 8389:TV 8022:. 7981:, 7956:, 7915:}} 7911:{{ 7884:}} 7880:{{ 7857:, 7781:, 7751:, 7719:. 7708:^ 7668:}} 7664:{{ 7607:. 7582:. 7538:. 7513:. 7488:. 7463:. 7438:. 7412:. 7386:. 7360:. 7335:. 7321:^ 7308:, 7292:, 7248:. 7242:. 7217:. 7211:. 7185:, 7089:, 7031:. 6930:, 6833:, 6751:^ 6612:^ 6519:, 6495:, 6465:, 6431:, 6341:}} 6337:{{ 6303:, 6233:, 6191:, 6183:}} 6179:{{ 6095:. 6047:. 6012:. 5988:. 5963:. 5938:. 5913:. 5888:. 5876:^ 5856:. 5852:. 5838:^ 5815:, 5740:, 5711:, 5694:, 5659:}} 5655:{{ 5633:^ 5617:^ 5554:, 5461:^ 5385:}} 5381:{{ 5219:, 5166:. 5107:, 5007:, 4988:, 4941:^ 4911:, 4901:^ 4784:, 4767:, 4718:, 4700:, 4683:, 4618:, 4588:, 4513:^ 4432:, 4415:, 4392:^ 4376:^ 4354:^ 4312:. 4257:}} 4253:{{ 4223:, 4206:, 4178:, 4161:, 4025:. 4013:^ 4001:^ 3900:, 3875:. 3850:. 3830:. 3810:. 3799:^ 3769:. 3752:, 3735:, 3694:, 3658:^ 3643:^ 3575:, 3556:, 3522:, 3503:, 3474:, 3464:^ 3409:, 3389:^ 3380:; 3376:; 3372:; 3344:^ 3319:}} 3315:{{ 3275:^ 3185:. 3160:. 3115:. 3088:. 3061:. 3041:, 3012:. 2944:, 2916:, 2912:, 2886:^ 2863:. 2827:. 2794:, 2783:^ 2772:, 2734:. 2707:. 2682:. 2655:. 2619:^ 2531:, 2489:^ 2465:, 2397:. 2378:, 2367:^ 2330:^ 2178:, 2174:, 2170:, 2166:, 2114:, 1791:LG 1785:, 1781:, 1777:, 1773:, 1769:, 1765:, 1761:, 1453:. 1392:(" 1376:(" 1232:, 628:. 597:US 331:, 327:, 323:, 216:. 76:. 9415:" 9411:" 9408:" 9404:" 9401:" 9397:" 8813:+ 8751:1 8560:X 8076:e 8069:t 8062:v 8033:. 8008:. 7921:) 7907:. 7890:) 7876:. 7736:. 7701:. 7674:) 7660:. 7617:. 7593:. 7568:. 7548:. 7524:. 7499:. 7473:. 7448:. 7423:. 7397:. 7371:. 7345:. 7258:. 7227:. 7041:. 6493:. 6347:) 6333:. 6307:( 6189:) 6175:. 6133:. 6112:. 6067:. 6029:. 5998:. 5973:. 5948:. 5923:. 5898:. 5870:. 5665:) 5651:. 5582:. 5391:) 5377:. 5357:. 5355:. 5337:. 5315:, 5301:. 5199:. 5177:. 4752:. 4371:. 4323:. 4263:) 4249:. 4119:. 4105:. 4079:. 4035:. 3928:. 3886:. 3861:. 3459:. 3384:. 3327:. 3325:) 3311:. 3210:. 3195:. 3170:. 3145:. 3127:. 3100:. 3073:. 3027:. 2880:. 2837:. 2746:. 2719:. 2692:. 2667:. 2576:" 2407:. 770:( 740:" 691:"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.