Knowledge

Nonprobability sampling

Source 📝

86:
or purposive sampling, where the researcher chooses the sample based on who they think would be appropriate for the study. This is used primarily when there is a limited number of people that have expertise in the area being researched, or when the interest of the research is on a specific field or a
49:
While probabilistic methods are suitable for large-scale studies concerned with representativeness, nonprobability approaches may be more suitable for in-depth qualitative research in which the focus is often to understand complex social phenomena. The in-depth analysis of a small purposive sample or
40:
Nonprobability samples are not intended to be used to infer from the sample to the general population in statistical terms. In cases where external validity is not of critical importance to the study's goals or purpose, researchers might prefer to use nonprobability sampling. Researchers may seek to
68:, where members of the population are chosen based on their relative ease of access. Such samples are biased because researchers may unconsciously approach some kinds of respondents and avoid others, and respondents who volunteer for a study may differ in important ways from others. 108:, in which the researcher identifies subsets of the population of interest and then sets a target number for each category in the sample. Next, the researcher samples from the population of interest nonrandomly until the quotas are filled. 50:
case study enables the discovery and identification of patterns and causal mechanisms that do not draw time and context-free assumptions. Another advantage of nonprobability sampling is its lower cost compared to probability sampling.
112:
Studies intended to use probability sampling sometimes unintentionally end up using nonprobability samples because of characteristics of the sampling method. The statistical model used can also render the data a nonprobability sample.
80:, involving the first respondent referring an acquaintance, and so on. Such samples are biased because they give people with more social connections an unknown but higher chance of selection, but lead to higher response rates. 90:
Deviant case: The researcher obtains cases that substantially differ from the dominant pattern. The case is selected in order to obtain information on unusual cases that can be specially problematic or specially
74:, also known as total enumerative sampling, is a sampling technique in which every subject meeting the criteria of inclusion is selected until the required sample size is achieved. 41:
use iterative nonprobability sampling for theoretical purposes, where analytical generalization is considered over statistical generalization.
421: 17: 216: 250: 37:
that does not utilise random sampling techniques where the probability of getting any particular sample may be calculated.
399:
Small, Mario L. (2009). "‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research."
284: 350:"Beyond the Existence Proof: Ontological Conditions, Epistemological Implications, and In-Depth Interview Research." 345:, edited by Samuel Kotz, Campbell Read, N. Balakrishnan, and Brani Vidakovic. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 294: 260: 226: 61:
Nonprobability sampling is widely used in qualitative research. Examples of nonprobability sampling include:
459: 427:
Wiederman, Michael W. (1999). "Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants."
368: 94:
Case study: The research is limited to one group, often with a similar characteristic or of small size.
122: 34: 137: 71: 65: 8: 142: 132: 105: 53:
Nonprobability sampling is often not appropriate in statistical quantitative research.
290: 256: 222: 77: 369:"An Inconvenient Dataset: Bias and Inappropriate Inference in the Multilevel Model." 432: 404: 390: 376: 357: 127: 83: 101: 436: 394: 380: 361: 349: 453: 408: 341:
Berg, Sven. (2006). "Snowball Sampling–I," pp. 7817–7821 in
385:
Marshall, Martin N. (1996). "Sampling for Qualitative Research."
413:
Steinke, I. (2004). "Quality criteria in qualitative research".
249:
Schuster, Daniel P.; Powers (MD.), William J. (2005).
283:
Bowers, David; House, Allan; Owens, David H. (2011).
248: 87:small group. Types of purposive sampling include: 255:. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 46. 451: 282: 252:Translational and Experimental Clinical Research 44: 242: 276: 221:. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 224. 208: 444:Case study research: Design and methods 14: 452: 214: 417:, 184–190. London: Sage Publications 343:Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 446:. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications. 420:Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). 415:A companion to qualitative research 24: 286:Getting Started in Health Research 25: 471: 422:"Basics of Qualitative Research" 328: 319: 310: 218:Nursing Research and Statistics 199: 190: 181: 172: 163: 154: 13: 1: 148: 424:. London: Sage Publications. 45:Advantages and disadvantages 7: 367:Lucas, Samuel R. (2014b). 348:Lucas, Samuel R. (2014a). 178:(Marshall 1996; Small 2009) 116: 56: 10: 476: 160:(Strauss and Corbin, 1990) 106:stratified random sampling 437:10.1080/00224499909551968 381:10.1007/s11135-013-9865-x 362:10.1007/s11135-012-9775-3 289:. John Wiley & Sons. 409:10.1177/1466138108099586 18:Non-probability sampling 442:Yin, Robert K. (2014). 429:Journal of Sex Research 395:10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 215:Suresh, Sharma (2014). 31:Nonprobability sampling 373:Quality & Quantity 354:Quality & Quantity 123:Sampling (statistics) 104:. This is similar to 138:Simple random sample 72:Consecutive sampling 66:Convenience sampling 460:Sampling techniques 143:Systematic sampling 133:Multistage sampling 375:, 48: 1619–1649. 84:Judgment sampling 78:Snowball sampling 16:(Redirected from 467: 335: 332: 326: 323: 317: 314: 308: 307: 305: 303: 280: 274: 273: 271: 269: 246: 240: 239: 237: 235: 212: 206: 205:(Wiederman 1999) 203: 197: 194: 188: 185: 179: 176: 170: 167: 161: 158: 128:Cluster sampling 21: 475: 474: 470: 469: 468: 466: 465: 464: 450: 449: 387:Family Practice 356:, 48: 387–408. 338: 333: 329: 325:(Steinke, 2004) 324: 320: 315: 311: 301: 299: 297: 281: 277: 267: 265: 263: 247: 243: 233: 231: 229: 213: 209: 204: 200: 195: 191: 186: 182: 177: 173: 168: 164: 159: 155: 151: 119: 59: 47: 28: 27:Sampling method 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 473: 463: 462: 448: 447: 440: 425: 418: 411: 397: 383: 365: 346: 337: 336: 334:(Lucas, 2014b) 327: 318: 309: 295: 275: 261: 241: 227: 207: 198: 189: 180: 171: 162: 152: 150: 147: 146: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 118: 115: 110: 109: 102:Quota sampling 98: 97: 96: 95: 92: 81: 75: 69: 58: 55: 46: 43: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 472: 461: 458: 457: 455: 445: 441: 438: 434: 431:, 36: 59–66, 430: 426: 423: 419: 416: 412: 410: 406: 402: 398: 396: 392: 389:13: 522–526. 388: 384: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 344: 340: 339: 331: 322: 313: 298: 296:9781118292969 292: 288: 287: 279: 264: 262:9780781755658 258: 254: 253: 245: 230: 228:9788131237861 224: 220: 219: 211: 202: 196:(Lucas 2014a) 193: 187:(Lucas 2014a) 184: 175: 166: 157: 153: 144: 141: 139: 136: 134: 131: 129: 126: 124: 121: 120: 114: 107: 103: 100: 99: 93: 89: 88: 85: 82: 79: 76: 73: 70: 67: 64: 63: 62: 54: 51: 42: 38: 36: 33:is a form of 32: 19: 443: 428: 414: 400: 386: 372: 353: 342: 330: 321: 312: 302:29 September 300:. Retrieved 285: 278: 268:29 September 266:. Retrieved 251: 244: 234:29 September 232:. Retrieved 217: 210: 201: 192: 183: 174: 165: 156: 111: 60: 52: 48: 39: 30: 29: 401:Ethnography 316:(Berg 2006) 169:(Yin, 2014) 403:10: 5–38. 149:References 454:Category 117:See also 57:Examples 35:sampling 293:  259:  225:  91:good. 304:2017 291:ISBN 270:2017 257:ISBN 236:2017 223:ISBN 433:doi 405:doi 391:doi 377:doi 371:, 358:doi 352:, 456:: 439:. 435:: 407:: 393:: 379:: 364:. 360:: 306:. 272:. 238:. 20:)

Index

Non-probability sampling
sampling
Convenience sampling
Consecutive sampling
Snowball sampling
Judgment sampling
Quota sampling
stratified random sampling
Sampling (statistics)
Cluster sampling
Multistage sampling
Simple random sample
Systematic sampling
Nursing Research and Statistics
ISBN
9788131237861
Translational and Experimental Clinical Research
ISBN
9780781755658
Getting Started in Health Research
ISBN
9781118292969
"Beyond the Existence Proof: Ontological Conditions, Epistemological Implications, and In-Depth Interview Research."
doi
10.1007/s11135-012-9775-3
"An Inconvenient Dataset: Bias and Inappropriate Inference in the Multilevel Model."
doi
10.1007/s11135-013-9865-x
doi
10.1093/fampra/13.6.522

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.