Knowledge

Access to information in South Africa

Source šŸ“

130:
held in confidence." Chapter 4 of the PAIA lists a number of grounds on which access to requested information must or may be refused unless a public interest "override" applies. Some of the mandatory grounds protect the privacy of natural persons, records held by the South African Revenue Service, records privileged from production in legal proceedings and commercial information held by a third party. The latter covers trade secrets and other financial, commercial, scientific or technical information. Under section 23 of the interim Constitution, organs of state could be and were required to disclose tender documents to allow a competitor to determine whether its rights to just administrative action had been violated. Under PAIA, however, the state would be entitled to refuse a request for these records if they contained confidential commercial information.
134:
protecting the public. Access may be refused to information that will reveal methods of investigating or prosecuting crime, or might otherwise prejudice a criminal investigation or prosecution. Information relating to the defence, security and international relations of the Republic need not be disclosed. Requests for information may be refused if disclosure is likely "materially" to jeopardise the financial welfare of the Republic or the ability of the government to manage the economy. A request may be refused where the record contains an opinion or report whose disclosure "could reasonably be expected to frustrate the deliberative process in a public body or between public bodies." Requests that are "manifestly frivolous or vexatious" may also be refused.
90:(PAIA) was enacted in response to the constitutional mandate, and came into force in large part in March 2001. Its preamble acknowledges the "secretive and unresponsive culture" of the pre-democratic era, and asserts that one object of PAIA is to "foster a culture of transparency and accountability in public and private bodies." In accordance with section 32, the Act provides for access to information held both by public and private entities. Though privacy features in the Act as a ground on which access may be refused, PAIA is "not a typical privacy or data protection statute such as may be found in many other jurisdictions." Its emphasis falls on facilitating access to information rather than protecting privacy. 94:
rely directly on section 32 only in exceptional cases, most obviously when the validity of the provisions of PAIA itself is being challenged. For example, it could be argued that the controversial blanket exemption of Cabinet records from the ambit of PAIAā€”"This Act does not apply to a record of the Cabinet and its committees"ā€”is "an unconstitutional restriction of the scope of the right of access to 'information held by the state.'" Since the Cabinet is clearly part of "the state," the exemption is a limitation of the right. Its validity would have to be decided by reference to the limitation clause in the Constitution.
74:
medical or banking records, or the information in the personnel files of the person's employer. This aspect is closely related to the right to privacy. As Klaaren and Penfold indicate, having access to information about oneself can considerably enhance one's ability to protect rights such as privacy and equality. In addition, the ability to acquire knowledge about oneself is an aspect of "self-actualization." Section 32(1)(b) is also significant as "a guarantee that records passing into private hands as a result of privatisation processes will not be immune from access."
231:
identified and developed by the Constitutional Court in a series of cases." Amongst other things, the Bill confers on organs of state very wide powers to classify and withhold information on security grounds and creates broadly-defined criminal offences that carry heavy penalties. "There is widespread agreement amongst commentators that while new legislation is certainly needed to deal with sensitive information relating to national security, in its current incarnationever trust thisn the Bill is hopelessly flawed and unlikely to pass constitutional scrutiny."
175:"Significantly," a "requester" is defined to include "a public body or an official thereof," meaning that the state is entitled to access information in private hands. This innovation, "rather controversial," was "clearly not required" by the terms of section 32 of the Constitution, but the objects of the Act listed in section 9 "offer a justification for it." Section 9(c) indicates that the purpose of the mechanism is "to give effect to the constitutional obligations of the State of promoting a human rights culture and social justice." 56:
information. The inclusion of a right of access to information in state hands was therefore "an innovation of great significance" in the interim Constitution. Section 23 conferred on every person "the right of access to all information held by the state or any of its organs at any level of government in so far as such information is required for the exercise or protection of any of his or her rights." In one of the earliest cases to deal with the right Jones J acknowledged its importance in these terms:
98:
language "seems not to serve the function of demarcation but actually to grant the legislature additional scope to limit the right of access to information." However, this scope is granted only to the extent that particular provisions of PAIA are designed to "alleviate the administrative and financial burden on the state." The provision relating to fees "would surely qualify," but the Cabinet exemption "arguably would not," and would thus not be justified by the special limitation.
166:
sector, in other words, is entitled to keep its information to itself, unless that information is needed to protect rights." However, the private nature of a body is not the decisive factor. Section 8(1) of PAIA recognises that a body may be "public" or "private" for the purposes of the Act depending on whether the record in question "relates to the exercise of a power or the performance of a function as a public body or as a private body." For instance, in
126:
have been met, and "if access is not refused in terms of any ground for refusal." Unlike the position under the interim Constitution, there is no need for the requester to show that the information is in any way necessary for the exercise or protection of rights. For the most part, the public body will have to release the information if it relates to the requester. Limited provision is also made for the voluntary disclosure of information.
37:. Offering citizens access to state-held information is "one of the most effective ways of upholding the constitutional values of transparency, openness, participation and accountability." Currie and De Waal suggest that accountability is unattainable if the government has a monopoly on the information that informs its actions and decisions. Access to information is not only fundamental to a properly-functioning 143:, which concerned a report by two senior judges who were asked by the President to visit Zimbabwe shortly before its presidential election in 2002. "Surprisingly," instead of confirming an order to release the report, a majority of the Constitutional Court resorted to section 80 of the Act and remitted the matter to the High Court for it to examine the report in secret and make a determination. 205:, the court surveyed the case law before holding that "reasonably required," and not "necessity," was the proper meaning, "provided that it is understood to connote a substantial advantage or an element of need." While the test has been easily satisfied in some cases, the courts have applied it fairly rigorously in others. For instance, the test was not satisfied in 211:, where the first respondent sought a report on nursing conditions in the hospital in order to build a case of negligence against it. Brand JA characterised the request as one for pre-action discovery and held that the use of section 50 of PAIA for this purpose "must remain the exception rather than the rule." The difficulty in the 125:
Requests for information are directed to the information officer of a public body. The information officer considers the request and notifies third parties where necessary. Section 11 states that a requester "must" be given access to a record of a public body if the procedural requirements of the Act
101:
PAIA is applicable to a "record" any recorded information, regardless of form or medium, of a public body or private body, regardless of when the record came into existence. However, to keep the rules of discovery intact, the Act does not apply to records requested for the purpose of litigation where
60:
The purpose of s 23 is to exclude the perpetuation of the old system of administration, a system in which it was possible for government to escape accountability by refusing to disclose information even if it had bearing upon the exercise or protection ofrights of the individual. This is the mischief
217:
case, on the other hand, was that the applicants were unable to show how the records of donations of certain political parties would assist them in exercising or protecting any of the rights on which they relied. As Griesel J saw it, they were really contending for a general principle of disclosure.
129:
The claim that free access to official information is a prerequisite for public accountability and an essential feature of participatory democracy "must be balanced against the legitimate need for secrecy in matters relating to defence, international relations and where information is personal or is
97:
Apart from general limitation of this kind, there is also a special limitation clause to consider. Section 32(2) permits the national legislation that gives effect to the constitutional right to "provide for reasonable measures to alleviate the administrative and financial burden on the state." This
73:
Section 32(1)(b) represents yet more innovation, as there was nothing to mirror it in section 23. The focus in this part of the right is not on governmental accountability but on a person's need for access to and control over information concerning himself. Such information will typically consist of
178:
A private body is defined in section 1 of the Act to cover business entities, juristic persons and natural persons in their business or professional capacities. Typical examples of private bodies contemplated by the Act are banks and credit bureaux, which keep personal information about the income,
230:
The Protection of State Information Bill "recalls apartheid-era legislation," the Protection of Information Act 84 of 1982, which is "perhaps not inappropriate, for the Bill poses a serious challenge to the right of access to information as well as to the ā€˜principle of open justiceā€™ that has been
182:
There has been considerable debate in the cases as to what sort of "rights" are intended and in what sense the information must be "required" for their protection. Under the interim Constitution, at a time when the qualification applied to information held by the state and referred specifically to
93:
PAIA does not replace the constitutional right. Because, however, it purports to "give effect to" it, parties must generally assert the right via the Act. Thus the constitutional right is for the most part confined to the indirect role of informing the interpretation of the Act. It is possible to
165:
The requirement relating to the protection of rights applied generally under the interim Constitution but is now confined to information held in private hands. "Appropriately enough," private bodies are thus subjected to a less stringent standard of transparency than public bodies: "The private
69:
Today section 32(1) of the Constitution confers on "everyone" a right of access to "(a) any information held by the state; and (b) any information that is held by another person and that is required for the exercise or protection of any rights." Significantly, the first part of the right is far
45:
many other benefits to be had. For instance, access to information discourages corruption, arbitrariness and other improper governmental conduct. It facilitates the protection of rights, something that is easily demonstrated in the area of administrative justice. Like reasons for administrative
133:
In terms of PAIA, access to information must be refused if its disclosure "could reasonably be expected to endanger" the safety of an individual, and may be refused if its disclosure would be likely to impair the security of a building, a computer system, a means of transport or any system for
55:
Before the enactment of the interim Constitution there was no general right of access to information in South Africa. Considerable resources were directed instead towards maintaining secrecy in government. Many statutes contained provisions making it a criminal offence for officials to release
110:
Access to records of public bodies is governed by Part 2 of the Act. A public body is defined in section 1 to include all departments of state or administration at the national, provincial and local levels, as well as any other functionary or institution acting in terms of a constitution or
77:
Section 32(2) required the enactment of national legislation to give effect to the right in section 32(1), and expressly allowed for "reasonable measures to alleviate the administrative and financial burden on the state." The operation of s 32(1) was suspended pending the enactment of the
78:
legislation. In the interim, as with the rights to administrative justice, section 32(1) was to be read as if it were section 23 of the interim Constitution. During this period, then, it was not possible to assert the right to information held by "another person."
192: 61:
it is designed to prevent Demonstrable fairness and openness promotes public confidence in the administration of public affairs generally. This confidence is one of the characteristics of the democratically governed society for which the Constitution strives.
65:
The right was soon being relied upon in various contexts, and a body of case law on section 23 developed rapidly. In particular, a number of cases were brought by accused persons who sought access to information contained in police dockets.
111:"exercising a public power or performing a public function in terms of any legislation." However, in terms of section 12, the Act does not apply to a record of the Cabinet and its committees. Other exempted records are those relating to 189:
Cameron J suggested that the term should be interpreted to include not only rights in the Bill of Rights but also contractual and delictual rights against the stateā€”an approach supported by the Supreme Court of Appeal in
46:
action, access to state-held information can be of enormous assistance to a person who suspects that her rights to administrative justice have been infringed and is in the process of building a case.
139: 185: 179:
banking history and credit rating of individualsā€”the sort of records that easily qualify as "required for the exercise or protection of any rights" in terms of section 50(1)(a) of the Act.
151:
Part 3 of PAIA gives effect to the right in section 32(1)(b) of the Constitution by providing in section 50 that a requester "must be given access to any record of a private body" if
248: 17: 201: 207: 172:, where the applicants sought access to the donation records of certain political parties, the latter were judged to be private bodies in relation to those records. 579: 1016: 241: 809: 70:
broader than was section 23 of the interim Constitution: The information no longer has to be required for the exercise or protection of rights.
255: 464: 1149: 102:
the request was made after the commencement of criminal or civil proceedings and access to the record "is provided for in any other law."
925: 594: 799: 1056: 703: 137:
Under section 81(3) of PAIA, the refusing party has to justify any refusal of access. This evidential burden was not discharged in
895: 688: 1154: 87: 199:"Required" can mean several things, ranging all the way from "essential" to merely "relevant" to the protection of rights. In 41:, it also increases public confidence in government and enhances its legitimacy. There are also, according to Cora Hoexter, 816: 789: 693: 663: 222:, that this is desirable in any democracy and that it will be beneficial to openness, transparency and accountability." 857: 930: 877: 852: 764: 668: 457: 1134: 944: 862: 615: 610: 574: 1353: 1139: 1036: 996: 882: 784: 698: 678: 673: 1041: 713: 651: 1174: 1051: 1001: 872: 683: 509: 502: 1348: 1166: 1114: 1084: 915: 774: 744: 641: 450: 33: 1011: 991: 842: 268: 1253: 1066: 986: 966: 794: 769: 754: 183:"his or her rights," there was a natural concern to construe "rights" as broadly as possible. Thus in 1006: 971: 920: 804: 759: 708: 658: 629: 1119: 1109: 1031: 976: 956: 905: 732: 718: 589: 497: 1313: 1306: 1076: 1046: 1021: 910: 847: 830: 646: 485: 477: 38: 1094: 1026: 981: 867: 749: 121:
decisions of the Judicial Service Commission relating to nomination, selection or appointment.
1322: 1287: 1282: 1144: 1129: 1124: 1099: 1061: 961: 514: 27: 1179: 534: 8: 1327: 1243: 779: 161:
access to the record is not refused on any of the grounds listed in Chapter 4 of Part 3.
1103: 887: 559: 1089: 554: 529: 519: 569: 118:
individual members of Parliament or provincial legislatures in that capacity; and
1265: 564: 1342: 1275: 1204: 1199: 158:
the procedural requirements laid down in the Act have been complied with; and
1214: 1209: 1194: 1189: 549: 473: 140:
President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v M & G Media Ltd
1270: 1219: 1184: 900: 544: 524: 280:
Holt, DH 1997, Management principles and practices, Prentice Hall, Sydney
168: 442: 1248: 1236: 193:
Cape Metropolitan Council v Metro Inspection Services (Western Cape) CC
1260: 584: 155:
the record is required for the exercise or protection of any rights;
1231: 539: 1226: 213: 115:
the judicial functions of courts and certain other tribunals;
146: 81: 225: 105: 1340: 256:Arena Holdings v South African Revenue Service 18:Section 32 of the Constitution of South Africa 458: 465: 451: 472: 50: 14: 1341: 234: 147:Access to information in private hands 88:Promotion of Access to Information Act 82:Promotion of Access to Information Act 446: 1175:South African Bantu-speaking peoples 406: 404: 402: 400: 398: 396: 373: 371: 369: 367: 335: 333: 249:My Vote Counts v Minister of Justice 226:Protection of State Information Bill 186:Van Niekerk v Pretoria City Council 24: 25: 1365: 393: 364: 330: 106:Access to state-held information 426: 417: 384: 355: 346: 317: 304: 291: 13: 1: 274: 34:Constitution of South Africa 7: 269:Open access in South Africa 262: 10: 1370: 202:Clutchco (Pty) Ltd v Davis 1300: 1165: 1075: 952: 943: 838: 829: 740: 731: 637: 628: 603: 493: 484: 423:Currie & De Waal 695. 218:They were "pointing out, 208:Unitas Hospital v Van Wyk 284: 242:My Vote Counts v Speaker 896:State-owned enterprises 595:Democratic South Africa 39:participatory democracy 1354:Freedom of information 63: 48: 515:Kingdom of Mapungubwe 58: 43: 28:Access to information 1150:World Heritage Sites 926:Water and sanitation 535:Mthethwa Paramountcy 390:2011 (2) SA 1 (SCA). 51:Constitutional right 1349:Law of South Africa 235:Notable court cases 560:Transvaal Republic 434:Administrative Law 412:Administrative Law 379:Administrative Law 341:Administrative Law 325:Administrative Law 312:Administrative Law 299:Administrative Law 32:section 32 of the 1336: 1335: 1296: 1295: 939: 938: 931:Wealth inequality 878:Income inequality 825: 824: 800:Political parties 765:Foreign relations 727: 726: 624: 623: 555:Orange Free State 530:Dutch Cape Colony 520:Kingdom of Mutapa 30:is guaranteed in 16:(Redirected from 1361: 1316: 1309: 1135:National symbols 1057:Social movements 950: 949: 891: 863:Economic history 836: 835: 738: 737: 704:Populated places 635: 634: 575:Great Depression 491: 490: 467: 460: 453: 444: 443: 437: 430: 424: 421: 415: 408: 391: 388: 382: 375: 362: 359: 353: 350: 344: 337: 328: 321: 315: 308: 302: 295: 21: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1332: 1319: 1312: 1305: 1292: 1161: 1140:Public holidays 1071: 1037:Sexual violence 1017:Life expectancy 935: 889: 883:Mining industry 821: 785:Law enforcement 723: 689:Mountain ranges 620: 599: 570:Second Boer War 480: 471: 441: 440: 431: 427: 422: 418: 409: 394: 389: 385: 376: 365: 360: 356: 351: 347: 338: 331: 322: 318: 309: 305: 296: 292: 287: 277: 265: 237: 228: 149: 108: 84: 53: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1367: 1357: 1356: 1351: 1334: 1333: 1331: 1330: 1325: 1318: 1317: 1310: 1302: 1301: 1298: 1297: 1294: 1293: 1291: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1273: 1268: 1266:Cape Coloureds 1258: 1257: 1256: 1251: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1234: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1171: 1169: 1163: 1162: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1155:heritage sites 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1081: 1079: 1073: 1072: 1070: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1042:Slum clearance 1039: 1034: 1029: 1024: 1019: 1014: 1009: 1004: 999: 994: 989: 984: 979: 974: 969: 964: 959: 953: 947: 941: 940: 937: 936: 934: 933: 928: 923: 918: 913: 908: 903: 901:Stock exchange 898: 893: 885: 880: 875: 870: 865: 860: 858:Communications 855: 850: 845: 839: 833: 827: 826: 823: 822: 820: 819: 817:State security 814: 813: 812: 802: 797: 792: 787: 782: 777: 772: 767: 762: 757: 752: 747: 741: 735: 729: 728: 725: 724: 722: 721: 716: 711: 706: 701: 699:National parks 696: 694:Municipalities 691: 686: 681: 676: 671: 666: 661: 656: 655: 654: 652:Climate change 644: 638: 632: 626: 625: 622: 621: 619: 618: 613: 607: 605: 601: 600: 598: 597: 592: 587: 582: 577: 572: 567: 565:First Boer War 562: 557: 552: 547: 542: 537: 532: 527: 522: 517: 512: 507: 506: 505: 494: 488: 482: 481: 470: 469: 462: 455: 447: 439: 438: 425: 416: 392: 383: 363: 354: 352:Act 2 of 2000. 345: 329: 316: 303: 289: 288: 286: 283: 282: 281: 276: 273: 272: 271: 264: 261: 260: 259: 252: 245: 236: 233: 227: 224: 163: 162: 159: 156: 148: 145: 123: 122: 119: 116: 107: 104: 83: 80: 52: 49: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1366: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1344: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1315: 1311: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1277: 1274: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1170: 1168: 1164: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1080: 1078: 1074: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1052:Social issues 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1002:Land invasion 1000: 998: 995: 993: 990: 988: 985: 983: 980: 978: 975: 973: 970: 968: 965: 963: 960: 958: 955: 954: 951: 948: 946: 942: 932: 929: 927: 924: 922: 919: 917: 914: 912: 909: 907: 904: 902: 899: 897: 894: 892: 886: 884: 881: 879: 876: 874: 873:Foreign trade 871: 869: 866: 864: 861: 859: 856: 854: 851: 849: 846: 844: 841: 840: 837: 834: 832: 828: 818: 815: 811: 808: 807: 806: 803: 801: 798: 796: 793: 791: 788: 786: 783: 781: 778: 776: 773: 771: 768: 766: 763: 761: 758: 756: 753: 751: 748: 746: 743: 742: 739: 736: 734: 730: 720: 717: 715: 712: 710: 707: 705: 702: 700: 697: 695: 692: 690: 687: 685: 682: 680: 677: 675: 672: 670: 667: 665: 662: 660: 657: 653: 650: 649: 648: 645: 643: 640: 639: 636: 633: 631: 627: 617: 614: 612: 609: 608: 606: 602: 596: 593: 591: 588: 586: 583: 581: 578: 576: 573: 571: 568: 566: 563: 561: 558: 556: 553: 551: 548: 546: 543: 541: 538: 536: 533: 531: 528: 526: 523: 521: 518: 516: 513: 511: 510:Early history 508: 504: 501: 500: 499: 496: 495: 492: 489: 487: 483: 479: 475: 468: 463: 461: 456: 454: 449: 448: 445: 435: 429: 420: 413: 407: 405: 403: 401: 399: 397: 387: 380: 374: 372: 370: 368: 358: 349: 342: 336: 334: 326: 320: 313: 307: 300: 294: 290: 279: 278: 270: 267: 266: 258: 257: 253: 251: 250: 246: 244: 243: 239: 238: 232: 223: 221: 216: 215: 210: 209: 204: 203: 197: 195: 194: 188: 187: 180: 176: 173: 171: 170: 160: 157: 154: 153: 152: 144: 142: 141: 135: 131: 127: 120: 117: 114: 113: 112: 103: 99: 95: 91: 89: 79: 75: 71: 67: 62: 57: 47: 42: 40: 36: 35: 29: 19: 1167:Demographics 1115:Homelessness 1085:Architecture 916:Trade unions 775:Human rights 745:Constitution 642:Biodiversity 580:World War II 550:Zulu Kingdom 474:South Africa 433: 428: 419: 411: 386: 378: 357: 348: 340: 324: 319: 311: 306: 298: 293: 254: 247: 240: 229: 219: 212: 206: 200: 198: 191: 184: 181: 177: 174: 167: 164: 150: 138: 136: 132: 128: 124: 109: 100: 96: 92: 85: 76: 72: 68: 64: 59: 54: 44: 31: 26: 1271:Cape Malays 992:Immigration 843:Agriculture 664:Earthquakes 545:Cape Colony 525:Kaditshwene 169:IDASA v ANC 1343:Categories 1249:Afrikaners 1237:San people 1120:Literature 1067:Xenophobia 987:Healthcare 967:Disability 890:(currency) 795:Parliament 770:Government 755:Corruption 590:Border War 275:References 220:in general 1261:Coloureds 1007:Languages 972:Education 921:Transport 853:Companies 805:President 760:Elections 709:Provinces 669:Estuaries 659:Districts 630:Geography 585:Apartheid 1323:Category 1232:Khoekhoe 1110:HIV/AIDS 1032:Religion 997:Intersex 977:Feminism 957:Cannabis 906:Taxation 810:timeline 790:Military 733:Politics 719:Wildlife 616:Military 604:By topic 540:Ndwandwe 498:Timeline 478:articles 432:Hoexter 410:Hoexter 377:Hoexter 361:s 12(a). 339:Hoexter 323:Hoexter 310:Hoexter 297:Hoexter 263:See also 1307:Outline 1288:Chinese 1283:Indians 1276:Griquas 1254:British 1227:Khoisan 1180:Ndebele 1100:Cuisine 1077:Culture 1047:Smoking 1022:Poverty 945:Society 911:Tourism 848:Banking 831:Economy 679:Islands 674:Forests 647:Climate 611:Economy 486:History 1328:Portal 1244:Whites 1205:Tswana 1200:Tsonga 1145:Sports 1095:Cinema 1027:Racism 982:Health 868:Energy 750:Courts 714:Rivers 476:  314:94-95. 1314:Index 1215:Xhosa 1210:Venda 1195:Swazi 1190:Sotho 1130:Music 1125:Media 1062:Women 962:Crime 888:Rand 684:Lakes 503:Years 285:Notes 214:IDASA 1220:Zulu 1185:Pedi 1104:wine 1012:LGBT 436:102. 414:100. 86:The 1090:Art 780:Law 381:97. 343:96. 327:95. 301:94. 1345:: 395:^ 366:^ 332:^ 196:. 1106:) 1102:( 466:e 459:t 452:v 20:)

Index

Section 32 of the Constitution of South Africa
Access to information
Constitution of South Africa
participatory democracy
Promotion of Access to Information Act
President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v M & G Media Ltd
IDASA v ANC
Van Niekerk v Pretoria City Council
Cape Metropolitan Council v Metro Inspection Services (Western Cape) CC
Clutchco (Pty) Ltd v Davis
Unitas Hospital v Van Wyk
IDASA
My Vote Counts v Speaker
My Vote Counts v Minister of Justice
Arena Holdings v South African Revenue Service
Open access in South Africa












v
t

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘