137:, it was responsible for promoting high ethical standards in local government. It oversaw the nationally imposed Code of Conduct (also now abandoned), which covered elected and co-opted members across a range of local authorities. The board maintained an independent national overview of local investigations into allegations that members' conduct might have fallen short of the required standards. In certain cases the board itself investigated allegations. It could not impose sanctions on members, but if it considered that further action might be necessary, it referred cases to the
265:, and with effect from 2012, the statutory Model Code was abolished, although all local authorities in England were still required to adopt a code of conduct which was consistent with the seven Nolan Principles of public life; they were not prevented from adopting the former code, after its abolition, on a voluntary basis. Since 2012 authorities have not been required to appoint standards committees, but they retain the power to do so.
25:
292:“Instead of welcoming transparency and remedial action, there have been persistent attempts to silence such dissent by claiming that their activities brought the council into disrepute. If a council, in whatever way, is disreputable, it deserves to be given that description. It is not the council that is being brought into disrepute by the dissident member but the behaviour of the council itself in whatever way.”
258:. Where members had a prejudicial interest in a matter, they were given the same rights as members of the public to speak at meetings where that matter was being discussed, but were not allowed to vote. A member was deemed to have a personal interest in a matter only if it affected them to a greater extent than it affected the majority of the inhabitants of the locality.
253:
The 2001 Model Code of
Conduct was made compulsory for all relevant authorities. It was later revised, after an extensive consultation process, and a new Model Code came into force on 3 May 2007. Revisions included a relaxing of the definition of "personal interest" and an extension of the right of
141:
or to the relevant authority's own standards committee for determination. Standards committees (no longer compulsory since 2012) could suspend members for up to six months. The
Adjudication Panel could disqualify members for up to five years. The Standards Board for England also provided advice, and
240:
Under the system abolished in 2012 each local authority subject to the Code of
Conduct had to appoint a monitoring officer and a local standards committee. The standards committee (which had to be chaired by an independent member) was responsible for receiving allegations and deciding whether any
244:
Standards for
England had the power to direct that a standards committee's assessment and review functions be suspended, and instead undertaken either by Standards for England or by another relevant authority. This generally happened only after a series of attempts to improve performance, either
236:
Primary responsibility for ensuring ethical standards has rested with the local authorities themselves since before the board was created, and remains with them since it was abolished. The chief executive and legal officers of the authority have a duty to advise members on ethical matters.
287:“I have seen that happen time and again with large and small authorities – when apparently disreputable actions of a few leading members or officers of a council have been exposed by a whistleblower, but their reaction has been to seek to silence him or her.
451:
456:
279:
for allegedly exceeding its powers, investigating preposterous cases and deterring whistleblowers. The
Liberal Democrat peer Lord Tyler raised similar concerns in the
334:
195:
431:
436:
130:
363:
205:
42:
411:
89:
406:
61:
210:
68:
75:
375:
441:
339:
57:
344:
108:
396:
329:
190:
157:
The
Standards Board for England investigated complaints against members of the following types of authority in
138:
46:
446:
391:
126:
82:
416:
181:
165:
134:
222:
35:
149:, the board ceased to function on 31 January 2012 and was formally abolished on 31 March 2012.
146:
308:
and explained the reasoning for abolishing it and seeking a "light touch" approach instead.
255:
170:
8:
273:
The
Standards Board for England was the subject of repeated criticism by the magazine
262:
186:
305:
216:
200:
401:
280:
175:
425:
317:
304:, his successor, were critical of the former standards regime in a debate in
301:
254:
members of authorities to speak in relation to matters in which they had a
142:
produced formal guidance, to members and officers on the Code of
Conduct.
275:
296:
In 2013, in the aftermath of the abolition of the
Standards Board, both
452:
Defunct non-departmental public bodies of the United
Kingdom government
297:
245:
before or after notification from Standards for England, had failed.
24:
158:
417:
Guardian news article - How to set the highest standards locally
335:
Ethical Standards in Public Life etc. (Scotland) Act 2000
364:
Tyler welcomes end to ludicrously trivial investigations
231:
457:
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
49:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
300:, the local government minister at the time, and
228:It also worked with police authorities in Wales.
423:
131:Department for Communities and Local Government
397:Standards Board for England - Official website
432:2012 disestablishments in the United Kingdom
437:Government agencies disestablished in 2012
316:The last Chief Executive of the board was
376:Westminster Hall debates, 16 January 2013
109:Learn how and when to remove this message
152:
424:
392:House of Commons Library Briefing Note
378:, at Parliament.uk (from column 289WH)
232:Responsibility for ethical standards
47:adding citations to reliable sources
18:
407:Public Services Ombudsman for Wales
340:Public Services Ombudsman for Wales
320:. Its chair was Dr Robert Chilton.
13:
248:
171:district, city or borough councils
14:
468:
402:Standards Commission for Scotland
385:
345:Standards Commission for Scotland
311:
23:
206:passenger transport authorities
34:needs additional citations for
369:
357:
330:Adjudication Panel for England
191:Council of the Isles of Scilly
139:Adjudication Panel for England
1:
350:
58:"Standards Board for England"
16:British Political Association
268:
127:non-departmental public body
7:
442:Local government in England
323:
241:action needed to be taken.
196:fire and rescue authorities
123:Standards Board for England
10:
473:
182:City of London Corporation
412:Coverage on a UK law wiki
211:national park authorities
135:Local Government Act 2000
223:Greater London Authority
133:. Established under the
147:2010 UK quango reforms
447:Ombudsmen in England
256:prejudicial interest
153:Relevant authorities
43:improve this article
187:unitary authorities
201:police authorities
263:Localism Act 2011
129:sponsored by the
119:
118:
111:
93:
464:
379:
373:
367:
361:
306:Westminster Hall
217:Broads Authority
189:, including the
114:
107:
103:
100:
94:
92:
51:
27:
19:
472:
471:
467:
466:
465:
463:
462:
461:
422:
421:
388:
383:
382:
374:
370:
362:
358:
353:
326:
314:
271:
251:
249:Code of conduct
234:
176:county councils
166:parish councils
155:
145:As part of the
115:
104:
98:
95:
52:
50:
40:
28:
17:
12:
11:
5:
470:
460:
459:
454:
449:
444:
439:
434:
420:
419:
414:
409:
404:
399:
394:
387:
386:External links
384:
381:
380:
368:
366:at libdems.org
355:
354:
352:
349:
348:
347:
342:
337:
332:
325:
322:
313:
312:Office holders
310:
294:
293:
289:
288:
281:House of Lords
270:
267:
250:
247:
233:
230:
226:
225:
219:
213:
208:
203:
198:
193:
184:
178:
173:
168:
154:
151:
117:
116:
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
469:
458:
455:
453:
450:
448:
445:
443:
440:
438:
435:
433:
430:
429:
427:
418:
415:
413:
410:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
395:
393:
390:
389:
377:
372:
365:
360:
356:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
327:
321:
319:
318:Glenys Stacey
309:
307:
303:
302:Brandon Lewis
299:
291:
290:
286:
285:
284:
282:
278:
277:
266:
264:
259:
257:
246:
242:
238:
229:
224:
220:
218:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
188:
185:
183:
179:
177:
174:
172:
169:
167:
164:
163:
162:
160:
150:
148:
143:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
113:
110:
102:
99:February 2023
91:
88:
84:
81:
77:
74:
70:
67:
63:
60: –
59:
55:
54:Find sources:
48:
44:
38:
37:
32:This article
30:
26:
21:
20:
371:
359:
315:
295:
274:
272:
260:
252:
243:
239:
235:
227:
156:
144:
122:
120:
105:
96:
86:
79:
72:
65:
53:
41:Please help
36:verification
33:
276:Private Eye
426:Categories
351:References
283:, saying:
69:newspapers
298:Bob Neill
269:Criticism
324:See also
261:By the
159:England
83:scholar
125:was a
85:
78:
71:
64:
56:
90:JSTOR
76:books
221:the
215:the
180:the
121:The
62:news
45:by
428::
161:.
112:)
106:(
101:)
97:(
87:·
80:·
73:·
66:·
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
