31:
22:
85:
64:
197:
The term "extraordinary" has no real meaning. Years ago it was given only to nonresident ambassadors on temporary missions and was used to distinguish them from regular resident ambassadors. The latter resented others having this appellation, as it seemed to imply a lesser position for themselves.
217:
Is there any reason that the modern explanation of rank should not be at the top, with the historical ones relegated below? I know many references are to the historical versions, but the article should be about the most current explanation of the term.
275:
The Holy See appoints
Nuncios where the British Commonwealth countries appoint High Commissioners and everybody else appoints Ambassadors. Shouldn't this fact be mentioned in the article? I don't find the word nuncio anywhere in it.
35:
369:
mandated" by the
Secretary-General of the United Nations) -- has changed, and is now called the "Special Envoy of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees" ... which sounds like it means that the title is NOT for a
506:
157:
A Chargé d'Affairs should be differentiated from a Chargé d'Affaires, ad interim. 'Ad interim' would of course denote in the absence of a regular ambassador or other permanent chief of mission.
256:
They (and I do mean they) did until sometime after their civil war. Prior to that, they were spoken of as plural by their own citizens; they are a federation of separate states, after all.
198:
Eventually therefore, it was accorded to them as well. "Plenipotentiary" also comes down through the years. Today it simply means possessed of full power to do an ambassador’s normal job.
511:
183:
135:
496:
246:
416:
261:
203:
521:
125:
207:
526:
516:
192:
396:
But, if "2." is true, then that last sub-bullet is wrong (/slash "misleading"), because being mandated "by" or "via" some other person is different -- (
445:
101:
166:
463:
Just added two of these for
Australia. The new Prime Minister has created two "special envoys" positions. Ive added links to media reporting this.
175:
92:
69:
501:
491:
434:
334:
However, now I am wondering if that (that last sub-bullet entry) is old (obsolete) information. I have recently seen the phrase
371:
242:
250:
412:
265:
486:
290:
277:
257:
222:
199:
188:
How did it appear? Is it used now? What does it mean? Can an ambassador be either extraordinary or plenipotentiary only?
453:
285:
169:
178:
472:
212:
44:
230:
100:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
430:
281:
97:
21:
350:
the "Special Envoy of the UN High
Commissioner for Refugees" -- which only makes sense if one's
307:
449:
408:
50:
238:
8:
439:
378:
mandated by the
Secretary-General") ... but instead, is for a position that is mandated
426:
468:
458:
160:
361:
the position called the "United
Nations Special Envoy for Refugees" -- (and which
219:
152:
270:
387:
326:
bullets under that, listing various UN positions, and the last one of those is
174:
In the Roman Empire; it was administrative, not diplomatic. See the article.
480:
189:
392:
someone else ("someone else" being the "UN High
Commissioner for Refugees").
380:
464:
444:
Blymey. This article starts and continues to confuse dopes like me. HELP!
411:
specific version (the "15:01, 9 August 2016‎" version) (last edited by
401:
375:
366:
315:
354:
were to make it pointlessly difficult to figure out this stuff;
507:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in
Society and social sciences
318:
mandates special envoys for a particular field, including:
512:
Start-Class vital articles in
Society and social sciences
338:"Special Envoy of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees"
84:
63:
497:
Knowledge vital articles in Society and social sciences
165:
What about pussy? I heard this was a rank somewhere. --
235:
The United States does. The United States do not do.
96:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
346:The "United Nations Special Envoy for Refugees" is
478:
522:Mid-importance International relations articles
184:Meaning of "Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary"?
110:Knowledge:WikiProject International relations
527:WikiProject International relations articles
517:Start-Class International relations articles
314:The Secretary-General of the United Nations
113:Template:WikiProject International relations
19:
330:United Nations Special Envoy for Refugees
479:
372:Special Envoy of the Secretary-General
90:This article is within the scope of
15:
93:WikiProject International relations
49:It is of interest to the following
13:
502:Start-Class level-5 vital articles
14:
538:
492:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
342:...which suggests that, either
306:The third-to-last bullet under "
116:International relations articles
83:
62:
29:
20:
130:This article has been rated as
435:21:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
308:Diplomatic_rank#Special_envoys
1:
404:" by the Secretary-General.
251:18:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
104:and see a list of open tasks.
193:03:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
170:21:00, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
7:
473:05:54, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
291:Has this changed? or what?
10:
543:
487:Start-Class vital articles
454:13:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
400:) -- from being mandated "
136:project's importance scale
286:01:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
223:12:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
129:
78:
57:
266:01:35, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
208:09:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
419:)) of the article .))
356:or else, (more likely),
310:" starts out by saying
295:changed? or what?": -->
179:01:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
107:International relations
98:International relations
70:International relations
340:
332:
320:
336:
328:
322:and then there are 5
312:
36:level-5 vital article
213:Ordering of Sections
231:Grammar Convention
45:content assessment
253:
241:comment added by
153:Chargé d'Affaires
150:
149:
146:
145:
142:
141:
534:
422:Any comments?
303:
302:
298:
236:
118:
117:
114:
111:
108:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
58:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
542:
541:
537:
536:
535:
533:
532:
531:
477:
476:
461:
442:
304:
300:
296:
294:
293:
273:
243:136.167.130.245
233:
215:
186:
163:
155:
115:
112:
109:
106:
105:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
540:
530:
529:
524:
519:
514:
509:
504:
499:
494:
489:
460:
457:
441:
438:
413:49.224.239.186
394:
393:
359:
348:different from
292:
289:
272:
269:
232:
229:
227:
214:
211:
185:
182:
162:
159:
154:
151:
148:
147:
144:
143:
140:
139:
132:Mid-importance
128:
122:
121:
119:
102:the discussion
88:
76:
75:
73:Mid‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
539:
528:
525:
523:
520:
518:
515:
513:
510:
508:
505:
503:
500:
498:
495:
493:
490:
488:
485:
484:
482:
475:
474:
470:
466:
456:
455:
451:
447:
437:
436:
432:
428:
427:Mike Schwartz
423:
420:
418:
414:
410:
405:
403:
399:
391:
389:
383:
382:
377:
373:
368:
364:
360:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
325:
319:
317:
311:
309:
299:
288:
287:
283:
279:
278:129.93.17.195
268:
267:
263:
259:
258:64.60.100.162
254:
252:
248:
244:
240:
228:
225:
224:
221:
210:
209:
205:
201:
200:195.218.15.27
195:
194:
191:
181:
180:
177:
172:
171:
168:
158:
137:
133:
127:
124:
123:
120:
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
60:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
462:
443:
424:
421:
406:
397:
395:
385:
379:
362:
355:
351:
347:
341:
337:
333:
329:
323:
321:
313:
305:
274:
255:
234:
226:
216:
196:
187:
173:
164:
156:
131:
91:
51:WikiProjects
34:
446:Longinus876
440:Accredited?
237:—Preceding
41:Start-class
481:Categories
407:((Source:
402:personally
376:personally
367:personally
363:used to be
316:personally
220:Sarcasmboy
167:Sobolewski
459:Australia
398:isn't it?
161:Proconsul
39:is rated
239:unsigned
190:Samnikal
176:J S Ayer
465:Timeoin
134:on the
271:Nuncio
47:scale.
28:This
469:talk
450:talk
431:talk
417:talk
409:this
374:" ("
358:that
352:goal
324:sub-
297:edit
282:talk
262:talk
247:talk
204:talk
388:via
384:or
276:Tom
126:Mid
483::
471:)
452:)
433:)
425:--
381:by
284:)
264:)
249:)
206:)
467:(
448:(
429:(
415:(
390:"
386:"
370:"
365:"
301:]
280:(
260:(
245:(
202:(
138:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
