183:
162:
74:
53:
84:
22:
425:
Auckland does not have official designation for suburbs or localities which could be relied on to determine page notability. Golflands has enough recognition through council planning and general references throughout news coverage. As
Prosperosity points out, lots of news sources in this area also not neccesarily accessible online.
358:
The news reports are trivial routine coverage. The first
Council document just states 'Golflands/Botany neighbourhood' which shows it isn't that distinct from Botany and also is not an officially recognised suburb (which is why they use the term neighbourhood). Not sure what the 70 page document is
294:
I believe there is enough coverage to pass GNG, and if it were to be merged, Pakuranga would be a poor article for it to be merged into (it's quite a distance away from
Pakuranga - two suburbs in between Golflands and Pakuranga). I don't know if there is a logical article for Golflands to be merged
267:
by not being an official suburb (it's a housing subdivision of
Pakuranga) and fails GNG based on a search of Google News, Google Books, and Google Scholar, with only trivial passing mentions that just establish it is an area. Of the sources in the article very few even mention Golflands and those
424:
Golflands is further east to
Pakuranga than Burswood, which is classified as its own suburb. In any case, the proposed merge would be an extremely poor match. The closest feasible page you could merge it with would be Northpark or Botany Downs. But in totality, would agree with others here that
362:
The LINZ link confuses me, I believe it's based off openstreetmap? It doesn't say where the data is from and shows places such as 'Vauxhall' and 'Cardinal West', I don't see why
Auckland Council wouldn't have it included in their official map that they point ratepayers to nor would it be in the
386:
per
Prosperosity. Golflands is recognised by Statistics New Zealand as an SA3 (more significant than the SA2 it also is) and by the Post Office (it doesn't share the postcode with Pakuranga). Auckland doesn't have official suburbs - see Prosperosity's post at
334:
309:
What sources do you think establish GNG? I tried searching for it and I get results for a
Golflands in Australia before anything in New Zealand. I didn't find a single source that was more than a trivial mention of it.
439:
Burswood isn't an actual suburb either. Mentions in planning documents is not the kind of coverage that can be used in
Knowledge nor trivial mentions in newspapers.
332:
485:
227:
144:
237:
324:
There's extensive sources in the
Eastern Courier and the East and Bays Courier (not available in an easily searchable form online), The Times (e.g.
480:
470:
134:
475:
330:
325:
110:
465:
203:
97:
58:
372:
353:
319:
304:
448:
434:
199:
190:
167:
414:
400:
327:
33:
288:
109:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
359:
meant to show. The single page document listing places is based on how FENZ classify localities.
444:
410:
368:
349:
315:
300:
284:
254:
39:
430:
106:
337:
8:
21:
182:
161:
198:, New Zealand, on Knowledge. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
89:
440:
406:
396:
364:
345:
311:
296:
280:
276:
264:
426:
459:
392:
388:
272:
102:
73:
52:
260:
195:
279:
given you two both contributed the most to the article.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
79:
363:Gazetter if it were an official locality/suburb.
457:
268:that do call it a subdivision and not a suburb.
486:Low-importance WikiProject Auckland articles
405:Census tracts cannot establish notability.
194:, which aims to improve the coverage of
19:
458:
481:C-Class WikiProject Auckland articles
188:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
15:
471:Low-importance New Zealand articles
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
342:Auckland's Remarkable Urban Forest
14:
497:
119:Knowledge:WikiProject New Zealand
476:WikiProject New Zealand articles
181:
160:
122:Template:WikiProject New Zealand
82:
72:
51:
20:
232:This article has been rated as
139:This article has been rated as
329:) and council documents (e.g.
263:into this article as it fails
212:Knowledge:WikiProject Auckland
1:
218:WikiProject Auckland articles
215:Template:WikiProject Auckland
113:and see a list of open tasks.
466:C-Class New Zealand articles
7:
449:19:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
435:12:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
10:
502:
238:project's importance scale
145:project's importance scale
107:New Zealand-related topics
340:, it's also discussed in
338:LINZ suburb locality data
231:
176:
138:
67:
46:
415:02:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
401:01:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
373:05:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
354:00:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
320:05:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
305:21:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
289:19:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
202:and/or leave a query at
204:the project's talk page
98:WikiProject New Zealand
28:This article is rated
191:WikiProject Auckland
125:New Zealand articles
259:I propose to merge
255:Merge of Golflands
90:New Zealand portal
34:content assessment
252:
251:
248:
247:
244:
243:
155:
154:
151:
150:
493:
220:
219:
216:
213:
210:
200:the project page
185:
178:
177:
172:
164:
157:
156:
127:
126:
123:
120:
117:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
501:
500:
496:
495:
494:
492:
491:
490:
456:
455:
257:
217:
214:
211:
208:
207:
170:
124:
121:
118:
115:
114:
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
499:
489:
488:
483:
478:
473:
468:
454:
453:
452:
451:
419:
418:
417:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
360:
256:
253:
250:
249:
246:
245:
242:
241:
234:Low-importance
230:
224:
223:
221:
186:
174:
173:
171:Low‑importance
165:
153:
152:
149:
148:
141:Low-importance
137:
131:
130:
128:
111:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
498:
487:
484:
482:
479:
477:
474:
472:
469:
467:
464:
463:
461:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
432:
428:
423:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
385:
382:
374:
370:
366:
361:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
333:
331:
328:
326:
323:
322:
321:
317:
313:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
295:into either.
293:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
266:
262:
239:
235:
229:
226:
225:
222:
205:
201:
197:
193:
192:
187:
184:
180:
179:
175:
169:
166:
163:
159:
158:
146:
142:
136:
133:
132:
129:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
441:Traumnovelle
421:
407:Traumnovelle
389:Talk:Manukau
383:
365:Traumnovelle
346:Prosperosity
341:
312:Traumnovelle
297:Prosperosity
281:Traumnovelle
277:Prosperosity
270:
258:
233:
189:
140:
96:
40:WikiProjects
116:New Zealand
103:New Zealand
59:New Zealand
460:Categories
427:Donkeypeep
344:(2012). --
265:WP:NPLACE
261:Golflands
209:Auckland
196:Auckland
168:Auckland
393:Gadfium
273:Gadfium
236:on the
143:on the
30:C-class
422:Oppose
384:Oppose
36:scale.
445:talk
431:talk
411:talk
397:talk
369:talk
350:talk
316:talk
301:talk
285:talk
105:and
336:),
228:Low
135:Low
462::
447:)
433:)
413:)
399:)
391:.-
371:)
352:)
318:)
303:)
287:)
443:(
429:(
409:(
395:(
367:(
348:(
314:(
299:(
283:(
275:@
271:@
240:.
206:.
147:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
