74:
53:
84:
22:
190:
discern the relevance or otherwise of practice in different jurisdictions (which gives them clues as to where to search for relevant legislation or judicial cases). Finally, there are many articles regarding a single subject that are then subdivided by country, most of them much longer than this article.
189:
Most readers will be interested to see the differences between the two planning practices and the article is so short that it does not disadvantage someone who is only interested in one of the two jurisdictions. Also, this is part of
Wikilegal, and legal researchers greatly benefit from being able to
205:
The issue for me is that there is virtually no similarity between "structure plans" in the UK and those in
Australia - as someone who used to work on UK structure plans, the Australian ones seem to be quite different, more akin to what we would call
158:
It's fairly obvious that SPs as they used to exist in the UK, and SPs in
Australia, are different beasts that happen to share the same title. So, I propose that the article be split into
163:
159:
191:
136:
227:
247:
126:
252:
242:
214:. It is not a "single subject" - the only common factor is the name "structure plan". So, we should be guided by
199:
101:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
33:
179:
184:
97:
58:
211:
21:
39:
8:
167:
223:
215:
195:
175:
153:
236:
219:
171:
207:
89:
73:
52:
83:
102:
218:- split the article and provide a disambiguation page.
79:
234:
19:
235:
95:This article is within the scope of
15:
105:and the subjects encompassed by it.
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
264:
82:
72:
51:
20:
131:This article has been rated as
1:
228:10:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
200:10:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
166:, with this page becoming a
7:
248:Low-importance law articles
180:13:33, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
10:
269:
164:Structure plan (Australia)
137:project's importance scale
130:
111:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
67:
46:
253:WikiProject Law articles
114:Template:WikiProject Law
243:Stub-Class law articles
212:local development plans
28:This article is rated
168:disambiguation page
160:Structure plan (UK)
170:. Any thoughts?
34:content assessment
151:
150:
147:
146:
143:
142:
260:
119:
118:
115:
112:
109:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
268:
267:
263:
262:
261:
259:
258:
257:
233:
232:
187:
156:
116:
113:
110:
107:
106:
98:WikiProject Law
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
266:
256:
255:
250:
245:
231:
230:
186:
183:
155:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
141:
140:
133:Low-importance
129:
123:
122:
120:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
265:
254:
251:
249:
246:
244:
241:
240:
238:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
182:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
138:
134:
128:
125:
124:
121:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
188:
157:
132:
117:law articles
96:
40:WikiProjects
216:WP:CONSPLIT
208:local plans
185:Don't Split
103:legal field
237:Categories
90:Law portal
30:Stub-class
220:Ghmyrtle
192:Steveau2
172:Ghmyrtle
135:on the
154:Split?
36:scale.
224:talk
196:talk
176:talk
162:and
210:or
127:Low
108:Law
59:Law
239::
226:)
198:)
178:)
222:(
194:(
174:(
139:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
