151:
133:
22:
71:
53:
81:
273:
bridge between homicide (in the technical sense) and the offence of procuring a miscarriage, and so on. I tried to put them in order of decreasing seriousness.) If you cannot see correlation, a better solution might be further subdivision of the template or the creation of new, more specific templates. Alphabetical order is going to be meaningless to a person who is familiar with the subject. I didn't realise that it was alphabetical.
326:
This template wrecks the view of pages that have it open, effectively adding a "third column" to the view (first column being the left-side wikipedia info, second column being the article itself, which has been width-limited due to the addition of the "third column" created by the unnatural width of
236:
In my view, there are so many offences, and so many related concepts, that we will need additional templates with a narrower focus. There are already a substantial number of offences, that already have articles that are not included, not to mention the ones for which articles have yet to be created.
375:
I have noticed there are 5 broken links in the template 1. Assault with intent to rape 2. Harboring a fugitive 3. Escape from lawful custody 4. Breach of prison / breaking prison 5. Rescuing a prisoner. I am not confident about trying to modify the template so thought to bring it to attention here.
272:
The correlation is that the classes, defences and offences are related to each other and are grouped together by books on the subject. (So, for example, murder, manslaughter and infanticide are grouped together because they are forms of homicide, and I put child destruction next because it is a
252:
I have fixed several links, so that they will work or "black-out" on their respective transcluded pages. I don't know why you had reverted them. Also, I tend to like the links to be alphabetized, because, in the order that they are now, as a layperson, I don't see a correlation.
268:
The reversion of those particular links was an accident that was due to the fact I started with an earlier revision of the template because I felt it wouldn't be practical to start with the latest revision in order to make the extensive changes that I had in mind.
216:
I will create a new group for "forgery, personation and cheating" as forgery does not fit into any of the existing groups, and is not necessarily an offence against property either. This follows the layout of
Archbold Criminal Pleading, Evidence and
205:
The following offences, currently listed, do not, in express terms, require "dishonesty": taking without consent, forgery, blackmail. Neither do offences under the
Computer Misuse Act 1990 (presumably what "computer crime" refers to).
212:
I am going to replace the group "crimes of dishonesty" with a group called "offences against property" as I think this is more typical and straightforward approach. I will put criminal damage into this group.
345:
Well, removing the image improves the situation on several pages, including this one. So I'm leaving the change. However, the margin problem still exists on the stupid page where I started,
443:
448:
330:
I have no idea what to really do about this. I am going to try removing the image in case that solves the problem. But I expect I'll be putting it back when it doesn't.
167:
355:. It seems more likely that the page itself has some coding flaw, but it's not immediately apparent. I hope someone smarter than me figures this out. Thanks.
288:
Yes, I agree, sorting by correlation is probably the best. Although, like I said above, that may not be immediately evident to a layperson, such as myself. --
339:
158:
138:
226:
364:
356:
331:
321:
297:
262:
200:
316:
282:
246:
413:
385:
304:
231:
428:
433:
438:
370:
150:
132:
163:
98:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
33:
94:
58:
166:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
39:
360:
347:
335:
293:
258:
8:
351:. The issue may or may not be related to its' mismatched name in the template, which is
312:
278:
242:
222:
209:
I do not understand the logic of grouping criminal damage with public order offences.
409:
381:
289:
254:
422:
308:
274:
238:
218:
405:
377:
86:
70:
52:
80:
393:"Harboring a fugitive" now redirects to Accessory (legal term).
404:
I don't know whether they should be corrected or removed.
99:
444:
Template-Class
Politics of the United Kingdom articles
449:
NA-importance
Politics of the United Kingdom articles
176:
Knowledge:WikiProject
Politics of the United Kingdom
162:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
76:
179:
Template:WikiProject
Politics of the United Kingdom
396:Obstruction of a police officer is now a redlink.
420:
159:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
322:width of box creates page margin problems
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
353:Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm
305:Template:History of English criminal law
182:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
421:
156:This template is within the scope of
92:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
15:
102:and the subjects encompassed by it.
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
460:
406:The Crab Who Played With The Sea
149:
131:
79:
69:
51:
20:
232:Additional templates are needed
201:"Crimes of dishonesty" and etc
173:Politics of the United Kingdom
164:Politics of the United Kingdom
139:Politics of the United Kingdom
1:
170:and see a list of open tasks.
365:12:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
340:12:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
317:04:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
298:19:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
283:18:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
263:18:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
247:16:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
7:
429:Template-Class law articles
399:Other 2 are still redlinks.
10:
465:
434:NA-importance law articles
227:13:17, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
144:
108:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
64:
46:
439:WikiProject Law articles
414:09:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
386:03:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
371:Broken Links in Template
111:Template:WikiProject Law
348:Grievous bodily harm
34:content assessment
198:
197:
194:
193:
190:
189:
126:
125:
122:
121:
456:
327:this template.
303:I have effected
184:
183:
180:
177:
174:
153:
146:
145:
135:
128:
127:
116:
115:
112:
109:
106:
89:
84:
83:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
464:
463:
459:
458:
457:
455:
454:
453:
419:
418:
373:
324:
234:
203:
181:
178:
175:
172:
171:
113:
110:
107:
104:
103:
95:WikiProject Law
85:
78:
12:
11:
5:
462:
452:
451:
446:
441:
436:
431:
417:
416:
402:
401:
400:
397:
394:
372:
369:
368:
367:
323:
320:
301:
300:
266:
265:
233:
230:
202:
199:
196:
195:
192:
191:
188:
187:
185:
168:the discussion
154:
142:
141:
136:
124:
123:
120:
119:
117:
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
461:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
427:
426:
424:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
395:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
383:
379:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:
344:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
328:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
270:
264:
260:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
229:
228:
224:
220:
214:
210:
207:
186:
169:
165:
161:
160:
155:
152:
148:
147:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
129:
118:
101:
97:
96:
88:
82:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
374:
352:
346:
329:
325:
302:
271:
267:
235:
215:
211:
208:
204:
157:
114:law articles
93:
40:WikiProjects
29:
100:legal field
423:Categories
357:Ukrpickaxe
332:Ukrpickaxe
290:Funandtrvl
255:Funandtrvl
87:Law portal
217:Practice.
309:James500
275:James500
239:James500
219:James500
30:template
378:Nestek
36:scale.
28:This
410:talk
382:talk
361:talk
336:talk
313:talk
294:talk
279:talk
259:talk
243:talk
223:talk
105:Law
59:Law
425::
412:)
384:)
363:)
338:)
315:)
307:.
296:)
281:)
261:)
253:--
245:)
225:)
408:(
380:(
359:(
334:(
311:(
292:(
277:(
257:(
241:(
221:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.svg){kind=small}