Template talk:Wines

2205:

because it is more commonly sold as a Chianti, Brunello, Rosso di Montalcino, etc? Petite Sirah is largely grown in California and the Pacific Northwest and this is the primary region of its popularity. It is a clone created in the 1920's. Wines made from Nebbiolo have been highly prized since at least the 14th century. As for the template being a navigational tool I understand that. The Barolo article would interest someone seeking information about the wine. I think it likely that someone interested in the wine would also have an interest in finding out more information about the grape just as someone reading the article about Bordeaux would have an interest in reading about Cab Sauv, Cab Franc, etc. Additionally there are increasing numbers of winemakers working to grow Nebbiolo in areas outside Piedmont, California being one of the major regions where this is being done. I think that is another reason a Wiki user would have an interest in information about the grape seperately from Barolo, etc.

2032:

popularity in the US, it seems to still be a fairly obscure varietal in a broader sense. Particularly when it is referred to as Durif. Dolcetto is a much more extensivly planted grape in Italy and the US among other places, so I could see an argument being made for including it in this list. Like Barbera it is widely grown in Italy, however Barbera is little used outside of Italy. Nebbiolo on the other hand, while grown in smaller quantities in Italy and other wine regions of the world, is a grape that should be included. Barolo and Baberesco are important and broadly recognized wines. Nebbiolo is also used to make wines in the Gattinara and Ghemme DOC regions of Piedmont. These wines may not be as widely recognized outside of Italy and parts of Europe but their quality argues for the inclusion of this varietal in any overview of notable wine grapes. It really should be in the template. So I have removed Durif, added Nebbiolo and left any decision about the other two for someone else to make.

2977:

the difference could be quantified by some combination of # of acres globally, and # continents where there are significant plantings. CabSav or Chardonnay have a major presence on 6 continents, and account for a huge volume of varietal wine. Chenin blanc has significant acreage on 3 continents, but I doubt the volume of production globally is even close to Chardonnay or Pinot Grigio. Replacing the term "International" with "Global" might be more accurate, but I think International/Regional is more common parlance. Inclusion in the Regional list seems the most arbitrary to me, Bobal? Mencia? I love learning about new varietals, but these are pretty minor to put next to Zinfandel and Chenin Blanc. Perhaps the regional list could include a link to an expanded sub-template of national varietals?

713:

that are important to regional styles, that are not typically sold as single varietals gives the same problem. I love Cinsault, but it's essentially unheard of outside of blends, Lambrusco may also be the name of the grape, but it's not often used outside the named region/style, Nero d'Avola is (in my mind at least) not really notable outside of its blends. I think that having grapes like this do little more than make the template more confusing to a "typical reader" The grapes deserve mentions (and prominent ones) in the styles that they make, but they're not ones that are going to be entry points for a reader. And those are the ones that I think the grape types should be limited to. ---

1467:. However, unfortunately those customers are few and far between the type of drinkers that walk into a typical wine shop. Those customers are the novice and very casual wine drinkers who tend to buy a fair amount of their wines also from the supermarkets. In fact, supermarkets and Costco are BY FAR my biggest competition for what is arguably the largest chunk of business in this market. For these customers, the template is of little use to them if it is jam packed with too much information. It loses its approachability and overwhelms them with unfamilar grapes and regions that they'll never see. For most wine drinkers, the extent of their wine reading is the label of the bottle. 798:

wines/regions section is partly to ensure that links that would be expected by any user to appear in a wines navigational template (e.g. Bordeaux and Burgundy) will appear. However, I feel the regions are most sensibly organised and navigated by country and that way we can also achieve something near completeness of coverage. In my view, calling 'Egri Bikaver' 'Bulls Blood' instead would enhance the argument for including it. This is a discussion we should have so that we can ensure the titles in the table match the intended inclusions and that the purpose of the table is understood and in line with what we think most users needs would be.

3086: 1146:

The language limit is because this is the English version of Knowledge and it limits the number of wines with limited distribution. I disagree with the first point for the reason that I agree with the second point: wine name found on front of the label. Some labels say "Rioja" others say "Tempranillo" some say "Chianti" others say "Merlot". The novice does not know that Rioja and Chianti are regions or that Tempranillo and Merlot are varietals. The novice should be presented with a single template that includes all the names the novice might encounter. --

2071:) and is also quickly emerging as the premier grape in the growing Mexican wine industry, I just can not see how one could argue for its exclusion when its "notability" is arguable on par with the grape you are adding. Now, as I said before, if we want to do a wholesale condensing of the template (which I have supported before), I can see removing it along with Nebbiolo and others to leave just 10-12 truly "major" grapes in place. But if we are not doing that wholesale condensing then I don't see a justification for its exclusion. 2146:. Since both wines are 100% Nebbiolo it seems to me a stonger case can be made for including Nebbiolo than Petite Sirah, using your own method to determine the importance of a grape. I think Nebbiolo and Sangiovese are without doubt two major red grapes from Italy that would need to be included if this list were cut down to 10-12 major wines. Don't get me wrong, there are many wines made from Petite Sirah that are superb. I just thought the entire idea here was to keep the template from getting cluttered. 22: 235: 445: 1308:

alter the article. I'm a huge advocate of growth and evolution in article and I think editors benefit in the experience of taking part in the discussion and crafting of a quality article. It is more mutually beneficial to all involved when particular issues that need to be tweaked, clean up or re-worded within an article is brought up to the editors already working on the article versus doing a major delete and expecting the editors to just deal with the pieces left behind.

601:

detailed template like it is now encourages exploration and learning. Many users will not bother to follow the link to the category page from a page on a particular varietal or region, but they are much more likely to notice this template at the bottom of the page. Seeing unfamiliar terms in the list can prompt some people (eg, me) to click on those terms. I've learned quite a lot in the last few days based on the links in the template. --

159: 1030:. A wine novice is going to pick up a bottle of wine (that most likely they got at a supermarket) and type that name into the search engine. Most likely, (at least in the beginning) they are going to want to read about other wines that they are going to find listed on the front of a bottle at their favorite store. Somehow, someway we need to limit the template to 15-20 grapes instead of the 30 or so it had now (with more to come, I'm sure) 3042: 2855:

those countries. I think we may have too many regions listed for Spain. Are Bizkaiko Txakolina, Toro, Campo de Borja, Navarra and Reuda really on par with Rioja, Penedes, Priorat and Ribera del Duero? Also, I would trim Portugal down to remove the more minor region of Estremadura and Swartland from South Africa. While they makes significant bulk wines, they are not regions that people are likely to see on many wine labels.

1452:

extremely obscure grapes (though Nero d'Avola is a favorite and I was sorry to see it go). I disagree that this template be tailored primarily for the "entry level" wine drinker. If they learn about a new grape with an unfamiliar name such as Gewurztraminer, Viogner, or Malbec, however, all the better; they'll know something they didn't before and perhaps they'll try that one out and be pleasantly surprised.

87: 2164:

information on Petite Sirah are going to be looking for Petite Sirah. Keep in mind that a template is meant to be a navigational tool and to compare the two grapes (for purpose of this template) you need to compare them as the grape articles rather then the separate wine. In that vein, the two are on quite the same level. Barolo and Barbaresco would be more on par to compare with a Bordeaux or Rhone.

815:

been removed (yet). I feel that the template can allow some of these lesser known grapes to stand with the bigger names and bring them to wider knowledge, but some editors seem quite afraid of scaring off "entry level" wine consumers with too many choices. I don't share that worry, as even when presented with a wide variety of wines people quickly discover which wines fit their palate.

77: 53: 2056: 679:(like in wine shops or grocery stores) and then curios enough to come to Knowledge to read about. That is where the template is the most useful as a navigational tool. But it's usefulness goes only as far as it remains focus. If you overwhelm the reader it becomes uninviting (or worse turns them off from reading more). That is the major problem with the current template. 2052: 1898:. That is confusing, since that list is already linked at the bottom of the template. So what is it? It sounds like we're talking about a blend of two different lists, which is confusing. My suggestion was obviously about "regions". Is there even an article or list for "regionals"? If not, maybe it should be started, instead of just using a template. -- 1478:

that the customer might like even more. That is definitely true of beers. I always listen to the recommendations of my wine store workers regarding both, and appreciate their expertise very much. I reiterate my support for preserving the list as we have it (with the exception of the few obscure ones that were added over the past week or so).

2954:(Chardonnay, Merlot, ...) are found almost all over. But "regional" isn't a the obvious only term for "important grapes not found everywhere". While Nebbiolo could probably be called regional, Tempranillo is found all over Spain, Pinot Blanc are found in several European countries, Grenache probably is international, and on it goes. Sigh. 703:

or category but not a template. The current template overwhelms the reader and needs to be re-tighten in focus. Again, our readership is aimed towards the novice and the casual drinker. Their curiosity is guided by what they see and are familiar with. A template deals with the familiar. A list and category introduces the new.

1163:(i.e. no varietal grape or style label). Though I still worry about future (and maybe present) debates over what can go through. Ideally, I would love to see the regions shaved down to 7-10. My gut still tells me that a separate wine region template is most ideal but I can see a workable solution either way. 2976:

I like the layout of this template, it is a little cluttered, but there's a lot to know about wine and I appreciate the information density, I think it achieves a middle ground between the exhaustive 'list of varietals' and the top 5. The regional/international distinction is a bit fuzzy, but I think

2919:

If we feel the need to separate varieties into two tiers, and can't rely on an external consensus to do so, then it seems we should simply look at worldwide production and see if there's a natural place to draw a line, and then classify the varieties as "major" and "minor". Otherwise we have to come

2915:

On what basis is the division of grape varieties made? Chenin Blanc, for example, is listed as a regional variety, despite accounting for a fifth of all South African plantings, and also having a major presence in California. Does there exist a consensus among wine authorities what the criteria for

2010:

as a more prominent of an Italian grape and will gladly support a swap of the two. Carmenere is is one of the most prominent South American grape so it should be given fair consideration. Petite Sirah is fairly popular here in the US (with one of the most cheeky advocacy groups :p ) but if we wanted

1477:

Yes, personally I prefer the more unusual grapes though I of course haven't tried them all. But there's no evidence as to the drinking preferences or habits of our users. Further, as you know, a wine store owner can evaluate the flavor characteristics a customer likes and often suggest a rarer wine

1360:

No "cleaning" is necessary other than the removal of the three or four obscure grapes that were added in the past week or so. Much productive work is needed elsewhere in our subject without "reductive" work that limits our users to seeing only wines that are extremely well known. I don't agree with

1307:

Major delete edits without discussion talk pages. I understand the wiki motto of Be bold but I think that benefits Knowledge more when it applies to additions to articles rather then encouraging major deletions. A better motto for deletions is to Be Discerning--especially when the edits fundamentally

1145:

I agree with Agne27 on points 2, 3 and 4. Fourth point is easy and logical: use red instead of black. Third point is a good way to include the more obscure varieties. Second point sounds very reasonable: limit to wine names found on front of bottle is favorite store in an English speaking country.

493:

It seems like there have been a lot of information that has added recently that makes the template unwieldily. It's at the point where even as an interested user, my eyes glaze over. I think more than 10-12 items in any category is overkill. Just looking at the list of varieties, I'd personally

2163:

are two separate articles with Barolo already noted in the template in the Regions area. The average wikipedia reader interested in information on Barolo will most likely search for that article rather then the Nebbiolo one (and would then thusly be wiki-linked to the grape article). One looking for

1558:

I agree that Carmenere (and one I'd added earlier, Tannat) are rarely encountered as single-grape wines thought one does see such from time to time. Similarly, I'm not sure Albariño needs to be there as we already have Vinho Verde listed. These would be near the bottom end of a continuum from "most

1517:

That is a very worthwhile point to be mindful of but also the fact that this is the English language version and so our scope doesn't need to be quite so broad. I'm sure those grapes are very amply covered in the Spanish, Hungarian, Portuguese, etc wikipedias. I also appreciate the need to introduce

1440:

We have to think of the use and benefit of the template. This template is of no benefit to "veteran" wine drinkers who already have a strong grasp of what grapes are out there. A "veteran" is going to be more interested in the link to the lists of grape varieties and wine producing regions. A novice

881:

For what my vote is worth, I think that with the pruning by Portnadler the template currently strikes a good balance between inclusiveness and conciseness. I do not see a need to add or remove more than one or two more items from any one category. I think that the template benefits from having the

768:

As well as being a navigational tool, the template is a useful way to ensure people's understanding of wine categorisation and nomenclature. I think it would be confusing to mix countries with regions, although we do already have non-regional wines (e.g. Liebfraumilch) mixed in with the regions. I

734:

I think Bethling has it spot on. We should keep the grape varieties that are used to make wines that are principally marketed as the varietals, and remove those that are used principally to make one style of wine. On this basis, I have done some pruning and removed Furmint, Palamino, Lambrusco, etc.

702:

Of course they deserve coverage--as an article, as a wiki-link, as a part of a list of grape varieties and as a category. The fact that they are notable components in their nation or region doesn't discount the fact that they are beyond the scope and usefulness of a template--amply useful for a list

712:

I think that if a grape is tied to a region/style of wine, and really isn't used on its own it doesn't belong listed on the grape variety list. The problem that at least some of us had was that the old template intermingled "styles" and "varietals" in the same list. Placing a large number of grapes

1580:

I have tidied up list of grape varieties, and changed grouping names to "Top 20 by acreage" and "Top 21-50 by acreage", reducing varieties listed to 50 per colour. Also added a "See full list" link for each colour. Top 50 varieties based on Anderson, K. and N. Aryal, Database of Regional, National

1332:

As per the discussion above, I don't agree that only "supermarket wines" be included in the template, or that it must be tailored only, or primarily for "entry-level" wine drinkers. The selection of grapes we worked out seems a good one. Some of the former blending grapes are now used to produce

1254:

I added the country (Georgia) that seemed to be missing from the wines by country template, and as far as I can tell, it now has all the countries that had been listed here. In the cases where it makes sense to have a list of countries I think both templates could be included. To have a large

586:

Funny, recent films have brought out some biases among various populations, either "for" or "against" the predominant varieties, or those that are considered to be "legitimate" or not. Whatever the case, I don't think any of the wines or grapes listed in the template are particularly obscure, and

2204:

and you will see reference to Nebbiolo as possibly the most important red grape in Italy. As I already stated, Nebbiolo and Sangiovese are the two major red grapes in Italy in terms of the notariety of the wines they are used to produce. Would you exclude Sangiovese being listed in the template

2096:

I'm actually thinking of creating a separate Petite Sirah article since there are actually three grapes that are made as wines as Petite Sirah and some of the California's vines are actually not Durif. I think a full article could be written on both Durif and Petite Sirah. But until I (or someone

2031:

After further research, and keeping in mind many of the comments made previously I must acknowledge that the case for the inclusion of Carménère is one I understand and respect. It apparently is a varietal that is important in South America, particularly Chile. While Petite Sirah is enjoying some

1976:

I know the template issue has been discussed thouroughly, but I do find it odd that grapes such as Durif (Petite Sirah), Dolcetto and Carménère are deemed appropriate for listing but Nebbiolo is not. It really is the most highly regarded red grape in Piedmont. Shouldn't it be included and these

1429:

I think we had a good selection, worked out by consensus here (extensive discussion above), until about 1-2 weeks ago when a few more obscure blending grapes were added (I believe Négrette and Petit verdot were among them). Otherwise, I think the list in the template as it stands is a good one.

1158:

Well if someone searches for Rioja they should be lead to that article with a wine region template on the bottom and mention of the grapes within the article. But you do make a good point about #1. There are regions that are the primary label on a bottle. I could live with a pared down section on

814:

Good points. I agree that there are an astronomical number of obscure grapes that are used primarily as blending grapes, but, as has been emerging in recent years, some of these "obscure" grapes such as Malbec and Viognier can operate as excellent varietals on their own. Thankfully those haven't

787:

Is this a joke? These are major styles in their nations of origin, as are some of those that have been removed. The comment above about Nero d'Avola is similarly ignorant, as a varietal wine made from this grape is probably the most prominent red from Sicily. I had assumed the people here were

2854:

Nice first draft. Excellent idea grouping all the sub regions of France & Italy into the main regions. As for other improvements, I think you could group Chile & Argentina into one South America heading and just list the countries--not too many people are familiar with the sub-regions of

2370:

Amarone • Asti • Barbaresco • Barbera d'Asti • Barolo • Barossa • Beaujolais • Bordeaux • Burgundy • Chablis • Champagne • Chianti • Commandaria • Dão • Egri Bikavér • Madeira • Marsala • Mosel • Muscadet • Port • Retsina • Rheingau • Rheinhessen • Rhône • Rioja • Sancerre • Sauternes • Sherry •

764:

I agree that this was getting quite cluttered, especially the grapes section. The grape varieties section has no criteria within its title to exclude the clutter, so how about restricting it to those grapes that are used to denote a varietal wine and changing the title to make that clear - e.g.

623:

first and then later go into detail of the more obscure. You don't want to overwhelm the novice with too much info in the beginning--which is what this template it currently doing. The average reader is going to look at a wine bottle and come here searching for the variety that is listed on that

600:

While I agree that the template should not be exhaustive, I think that it is not too large or comprehensive at its current size. A template that includes only terms with with I am familiar is of limited value to me since I could easily type those terms into the search box to get to the page. A

1918:

It is confusing and mostly because many people over many months have made small changes that were not all coordinated. I have de-linked the "regionals" term from the "regions" page because, as you point out, the link is already at the bottom of the page in a clear manner. That wasn't the only

1489:

Keep in mind also that we have readers everywhere in the world, including nations with grapes that are famous in those countries. Hence the inclusion of one or other of the most prominent Spanish, Hungarian, South American, etc. grapes. It's a very good idea, one which I don't think is at all

1451:

Speaking from my own experience, I drink many of these and refer to the template often, following its links to find out more about each grape/style. Thus, the template is far from being of "no benefit" to me. In fact, I'm quite happy with it and was fine with the compromise of leaving out the

674:

Just like my sister's boyfriend's garage band is notable to the folks in my home town but not notable enough to warrant a Knowledge entry. Part of the problem is the ill-advised removal of the word "Major" from the template. It was an open invitation for the template to lose its focus. The term

2870:

Thanks. Yes I agree with the line drawn for 'major regions', and though Mendoza, Central Valley, Maipo and such aren't obscure, we should keep it as tight as possible. In the case of South Africa I'm in doubt since Stellenbosch, Paarl (+Franschhoek) in another context would be in the same Cape

2471:

The articles dropped by that user were probably ones she’d not heard of and as such perhaps a result of systemic bias (note not one French wine was dropped). Something we from smaller countries come up against quite often. But had I mentioned this at the very beginning, people might have taken

1837:

Per previous discussions, a region such as Napa would not be listed because Napa is not a wine's *primary* designation. That is, a wine is not known as a Napa in the sense that a wine would be known as a Chianti or a Chablis. The primary designation for a wine from Napa will be its varietal:

797:

I think you've may have missed my point on the well-known wines/regions comment. They may be important examples for their region, but those regions will be covered by the countries selection. I think the regions/wines should be well known globally so that no regional bias is introduced. The

1347:

and the continued discussion that have been going on for nearly a week. It clear that a majority of users that have been on this talk page think the template needs some clean up. There are still two more sections that need some cleaning, now let's get down to work and hammer out some details.

2953:

I've never liked this template - it's too big, and it uses some vaguely defined terms with unclear inclusion criteria. As to Chenin Blanc, I wouldn't call it a true international variety, because it plays an important role "only" in Loire and South Africa, while the truly international ones

1987:

If Nebbiolo is very prominent you should add it. I just got a bottle of Dolcetto and it's not the best known, but I don't think it's extremely obscure. I don't know who added Durif or when; do you regard it as extremely obscure. Carmenere is a blending grape but does show up these days as a

1180:

To keep the list from again springing out of control, it would probably be helpful to use a listing of wines by production volume. We could then find a logical top grouping and make a cutoff. I was not able to find such a list with a quick Google search. Anyone else know of such a list?

906:

I agree on the Viognier and Malbec grapes. My views on this are that these are currently fashionable grapes and since Knowledge is a living encyclopedia it can take account of fashion. The only concern is if they are only fashionable to a small group, but I do not think that applies for

2938:

IMO, the "regional varieties" should just be cut as well as a substantial trimming of the wine region section as part of a general overhaul of this horrendous template. This template just has major issues all around with the foremost being the desire to cram entirely too much info in.

516:

Some templates are large, but their focus isn't necessarily only to provide a few of the best known aspects of a subject. Our project is to bring knowledge to people, and this template allows them to explore styles they may not have heard about before. I wouldn't advocate limiting

1025:

Second, we need to limit the number of grapes. My personal scale would be grapes that are normally made into varietal wines. My reasoning is simple. Templates benefit more the novice wine drinker then they would an expert and the majority of our readership on these articles will be

613:

Oooooh no, no, no. A template is not meant to replace a list or a category. It is a navigational tool and needs to be focused in its scope. This one has sprung out of control. As a wine shop owner, I think of what the value the template would be to my average customer. Sure they

572:

To avoid edit wars, I think that we should discuss and choose the varieties in this page, and when we have a nearly "definitive" lists, we should modify the template. On OIV I don't see statistic about varieties, so how to find the most important grapes in an objective manner?

1518:

drinkers to new wines and new experiences but there is a limit to the useful and extent that a template can do. A template is a navigational tool and the usefulness of that tool is intimately tied into how focused and clear it is. Too much info is distracting and discouraging.

675:"major" should be on as large of a scale of notability as possible and shouldn't have obscure varieties tucked under the umbrella when they are served well in as part of a list page and categories. We are aiming towards the novice, piquing their curiosity with wines that they 2453:

Again I would have to agree with you. Either an article subject (and in this case a wine, grape blah blah blah) is notable (and as such deserves its own article) or it is not notable and consequently should not feature on wikipedia altogether. There are no articles that are

1255:

list of countries on the page of most grapes seems like overkill. If I'm interested in reading about a grape type, the fact that China produces wine isn't likely going to interest me. On the other hand, if I'm reading about French wines, I can see that being useful. ---

2871:

winelands region, more distinguished as belonging to different "pockets". Swartland (mind, home to Sadie, Lammerschoek, Allesverloren etc.) would have some merit to stand apart, but I'm more inclined to squeeze SA in with "other". Any other ideas, cuts or inclusions?

1190:

I don't know how easy it would be to find that list but I know that nearly ever wine book has an "expert's list" of what the major grape varieties are. Why don't we review those list and see what common grapes overlaps and maybe discuss some of the borderline ones?

2345:

from the See Also section to its own areas. In my opinion those two links more then cover the subject matter and can direct the "curious reader" to any notable region they would like to see. That is my first choice. Second choice would be modifying the list below.

2332:

Well the problem that I find with the template (and looking at the history is easy confirmation) is that everyone has an opinion on what constitute a "notable" wine region and attempts to stay more mainstream can always be countered (and somewhat correctly) as

2060: 2831:

Here is a draft. Some chopping and more clinincal on the regions, rather than "list of famous wine styles", right now with some omissions where region article don't exist and some links where there is no regional article :^/ Please suggest where to go next.

1462:

Badagnani, judging from yoru contributions I would consider you a "wine veteran" will a strong base of knowledge about wines. You are the type of customer that I absolutely love walking into my shop because they are the ones that are going to ask for my nice

2064: 1244:

The wine by country template is useful to our readers. Before blanking that segment of this template (which I do not agree with), content must be merged into the original "Wines by country" template. Not to do so robs our users of important information.

618:

Cabernet, Merlot and Chardonnay but the typical wine drinker (and Wiki reader) won't know all the details that a good article about these major varietals would have. I think of a template like part of a good wine book. The first chapters always covers the

1541:. I think having these links will help tighten the template and still provide a service for the curious reader and to help introduce novices to new grapes and regions. I think that covers a lot of bases and a lot of the concerns that have been addressed. 587:

many are the primary styles in their nations of origin. Again, most people already know something about chardonnay, merlot, cabernet so it's the slightly lesser known varieties that could really benefit from being here, by exposing more people to them.

2481:

On a more constructive note, I would suggest that if the template is considered too cluttered, it gets split into smaller ones. Say one for grapes and one for regions. Another consideration would be to rename/redefine what is included (say swap the word

2223:

I agree with this. The template exists to get users to the right place, whether it be a discrete grape or wine. The two are not always mutually exclusive and that's fine. That's why we have the "notable wines" and "notable grapes" in separate areas.

1702:

It might deserve a spot in the template since it produces soooo much wine, and wikipedia isn't supposed to focus on prestige alone. We might want to include this infamously voluminous wine in the template once the articles get spiffed up a bit.

2790:

I can hack at it, but some editorial decisions need to be made since ATM, "Major wine regions" is a confusing soup of wine styles, major wine regions and subregions. My opinion is that such a template shouldn't try too much, ie suffice to let

2051:(a much more common name then Durif) and Nebbiolo, I would say the two are darn close to the same in terms of prominence and familarity with the average wine drinker (and presumably the average wikipedia reader). Look at Wine Spectator's hits 826:

I had also suggested splitting the template into one for countries and one for grapes and styles. These templates could be used for specific purposes, and would cut down on the size while allowing some of the lesser known grapes to remain.

1752:

Agreed, I also believe there are other regions in the template with similar issues. It may be time for a cleanup of the "notable" regions section. I suggest that this template only links to "wine-region specific" articles similar to how the

772:

There are a number of wines/regions in the well known list that I would argue are not well-known (primarily because I haven't heard of them). I feel that as a minimum Dao, Egri Bikaver should go, but four or five others are only marginal.

651:

should be left out in order to keep the template more focused. The varietal list shouldn't exceed (between red & white) 10-12 of the major varieties. The wine producing Regions and Countries should be merged to the top 5-10 major

1012:

I've been doing a lot of work on the grape articles in terms of setting up redirects for alternative names and I have to say this template is a huge eye sore and utterly defeats any practical purpose and use. Something needs to be

2121:

take issue with the idea that if it is dropped then Nebbiolo should be as well. While you found roughly equivilant numbers in the Wine Specator wine rating search function and article search for the two grapes, if you had run

1741:

On another subject, the template is looking better and better. To the editor who figured out how to split the middle part into two columns, that's great--I never would have figured out how to do that, and it looks wonderful.

494:

eliminate anything that isn't commonly sold as a single varietal wine, along with the non-vinifera varieties (I like them, and occasionally even make a Concord and a sparkling Niagra, but they're not major varietals).

3103:

Additionally, please don't copy the entire contents of the template page onto the talk page; this interferes with the header system and may confuse bots that are archiving talk pages. I've removed the sections for you.

2194:

Again, I will respectfully disagree with you. Bordeaux and Rhone wines are not an apt comparison because they are made from a blend of several grapes while both Barolo and Barbaresco are 100% Nebbiolo. Go to Wine

497:

I'd also limit the number of countries listed to the top 7-9 wine producing countries, and drop a lot of the "wine styles". I think the information overload has just made this template less friendly to readers.

2435:. That would put us at about 20 entries. But then you look at the "under-representation" of wines the US, South America, Australia/New Zealand, South Africa etc and you have a whole new mess of things to add. :p 2503:

Those are some very reasonable ideas. Though we do get into some trouble marks with the using the highest sales because that it is naturally more bias towards the more international varieties sold in the larger

769:

think it's useful to have all the countries as no full list exists elsewhere (that I know of), they don't take up too much space, and the the Knowledge regional pages are organised by region as the top category.

501:

The only change I'm making right now is to remove Spatlese from the list of styles. It's not style, just a designation regarding the ripeness/condition of the grapes (much like Kabinett,Auslese, BA and TBA) --

1048:

of wine that those grapes produce and we should keep it in that simple frame of references. For the purpose of a template, we do not need to get technical and scientific. We can leave that to the actual wine

945:

Maybe the whole list is wrong. It will be incomplete and there is not way to choose what should be in and what should be out. So I propose to re-think the list, and i.e. to transform in a more generic list:

1054:

Let's see what kind of teamwork and compromise we can get. Out of the 4 items listed above, discuss which ones you may want to work with and what ones that would need to be ironed out and discussed more.

692:

This doesn't address the fact that many of the varieties purported to be "non-notable" are in fact the most notable exponents of winemaking in their nations or regions, and deserving of coverage here.

1674:. I don't know if it's worth making a separate category for them. A wine drinker can find it pretty easily with typing the name into the search engine and it is wiki-linked from several wine pages. 1317:

Honestly, to me it looks like he was discussing this delete before doing it. There have been a couple of editors (myself included) who really thought that the template needed to be cleaned. ---

1784:

I removed Kakheti. Per extensive previous discussions, the point of the regions section (which used to be named regionals) is for wines whose primarly descriptor on the label is the region name.--

1221:

template is useful for those articles but not for the grape articles. I was amazed at how well that simple action already improved the article. Still needs a little more trimming but it's a start.

384:

project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,

2086:

Why not just rename the article, then (is "Durif" not the original name?), and re-add it to the template. The template looks very fine and well-balanced since the reorganization a few weeks back.

1622:(key word) seeing on wine bottles that a novice wine drinker would likely find. I think a key frame of reference would be what is available at a grocery store more so then a specialize wine shop. 2757:

Portugal, with three regions listed (Madeira, Port, and Vinho Verde), gets relegated to the "Other" section, while New Zealand, with a single region, gets it own section. What is that about? --

2067:. This doesn't even count the additional hits on the alternative name "Durif" and the misspelling "Petite Syrah". Considering that the grape is one of the oldest in California (second only to 2117:

I have no real interest in debating this, leave Petite Sirah/Durif in if you want. I was simply trying to avoid cluttering up the template due to the discussion that took place above. I

1649:

I agree with your list of regionaly named wines. It covers all that I had though of (with one exception) and only a few I had not thought of. The groceries in my area consistently carry

665:

As I said before, some of them might not be major to *you*, but many of them are the most prominent representative styles for nations or regions that don't sell as well in your store.

924:

I also agree on Malbec and Viognier, which is why I left them in. On another note, I think we have now got to a point where we have too many in the Styles/Regionals section. This is

2309:

Well I support any attempts to clean up the template and make it more manageable. A listing of 33 region is a bit overbearing. Ideally it would be nice to get that down to 15-20.

1880:

I would support Napa's listing as well. Overly strict adherence to such a rule (which leaves out extremely major wine-growing regions) is something only a few editors support.

1763:

template only links to "country specific" wine articles. If the wine region article does not exist it is not included. Thanks for the feedback regarding my template update too.

928:

the place to display ones erudition and knowledge of the world's wines. It's meant to be a handy template to guide the interested layman around. At the risk of repeating myself

1633:

2424: 2573: 2273: 545:

I would get rid of some of the more obscure grape varieties that have been added recently. I have always taken the view that a template such as this should not be an

844:. The template is already cluttered and will only become more so. I see no reason to include so much information within the one template. Invidual templates such as 2982: 1231:

I agree that this version is much better. With the Wine by country template, having all the countries that produce wine is just redundant and unnecessary. ---

398: 1533:

Now in trying to steer towards a compromise, I've added a "See Also" section and made more clear and direct the links to the very valuable information in the

363: 222: 167: 63: 172: 1581:

and Global Winegrape Bearing Areas by Variety, 2000 and 2010, Wine Economics Research Centre, University of Adelaide, December 2013, revised July 2014.

3100:

are more elaborate collections that serve as "main pages" for topics, including many more related articles and also trivia, images, and project pages.

3032: 2772:

As I've said many times before, this template needs a significant overhaul. Unfortunately I'm not "code savvy" enough to figure out how to do this.

2725: 3128: 911: 805: 777: 3133: 3070: 1022:. Obviously on the grape article you would use the grape template and on articles about AOC or wine regions you would use the region template. 2267: 785:

There are a number of wines/regions in the well known list that I would argue are not well-known (primarily because I haven't heard of them).

1386:

3138: 1065:

I've mentioned it before, and I still agree. There's just too much information in the template to make it useful to the typical user. --

999: 385: 1894:

To make our discussion easier, I have placed the template at the bottom. The text says "regionals" (which I hadn't noticed), but links to

903:

page as I felt adding the wines template might be overkill as there is a beverages one there already. It also appears above on this page.

2552: 2523: 392: 995:

that sets out grapes in this way, but I don't think there is a place for table grapes, hybrids, etc. in a wine navigational template. --

202: 1838:

Merlot, Chardonnay, etc. The current list is in need of a cleanup as some regions (not regionals) have made their way into the list.--

2986: 936: 561: 557:

button. Saving every individual edit clutters up the page history and also imposes more load on the hard-pressed Knowledge servers. --

212: 207: 3078: 2567: 2285: 1884: 1441:

will be interested in wines and names that they will actually find on a label in a store. I see this all the time with my customers.

886: 739: 628:

with. Then they will go to a category or a list to get a more exhaustive knowledge. We need to get this template back under control.

605: 197: 113: 1545: 1392:

1325: 1280: 1263: 1249: 721: 591: 536: 525: 2948: 2558:

Ugh....looks like more "link creep" has occurred. This templates needs to be paired back down to the essentials. I'll take a look.

1992: 1919:

confusing link as "wine styles" linked to an article on winemaking (which I moved to a separate link at the bottom of the page). --

1788: 1779: 1707: 1040:

Finally, we need to change the black/white designation to red wine grapes/white wine grapes. Again, this is for the benefit of the

870: 3096:

are simple collections of related articles that are placed at the bottom of relevant pages to aid in navigation between articles.

2261: 2106: 1942: 1923: 1871: 1862: 1842: 1678: 1657: 1593: 1563: 1522: 1508: 1494: 1482: 1456: 1434: 1365: 1343:(edit conflict) Um....yeah. That's why we've been talking about it on this talk page. Not counting the discussion that started in 1337: 1312: 1195: 1185: 1167: 831: 819: 792: 754: 707: 697: 683: 669: 656: 642: 2781: 1239: 1073: 2963: 2746: 2513: 2498: 2355: 2327: 2318: 2209: 2173: 2150: 2080: 2036: 2020: 577: 3026: 2824: 1832: 2932: 2882: 2843: 2810: 2295:

I have re-inserted the (notable regionals) links removed recently from this template. I would suggest a discussion of what is

2902: 982: 638:

I think it's clear that the lists and categories are much longer than the template, and that a lot of things were left out.

1044:

wine drinkers that we are trying to guide with this template. When you think of wine grapes, it is natural to think of the

245: 100: 58: 2238:

Someone just removed lots of things from the template, and from the edit summary I assume s/he found the template on the

1079: 532:

A possibility is to have separate templates 1) for wine-growing countries, and 2) for wine styles and grape varieties.

2978: 2910: 2543:

Action required: Please develop the region page by that name, and fix this template to point to that page. Thanks. --

1059: 1643: 1626: 1123: 518: 510: 3002:

The list is not neutral (why Alsace, Oregon but not China, Russia etc.). The entries there should strictly reflect

2342: 1966: 1415:

The "iffies" are ones that very rarely made into single bottle varietals and would be best served as a link to the

112:

related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1912: 1817: 632: 2228: 2090: 1958:(instead of the other way around). This has brought the article title in conformance with the other articles on 1631:

My thoughts and experiences at what I can easily find at a Safeway, Publix, Albertson, Dierbergs, Schnucks, etc.

1007: 1117: 3006:

or be deleted. I think the latter option makes more sense since there is already a {{Wine by country}} navbox.

3003: 2444: 2338: 2155:

I thought about that when I was doing the search but then I realized that wouldn't be a valid comparison since

1981: 1895: 1636: 1605: 1538: 1501: 1471: 1445: 1423: 1718:

The recent edits to the design and colors of the template are very nice, and elegant, befitting the subject.

1635:

Again for the more "specialized" wines that you would have to look for at a wine shop we could have a link to

854:

etc kept things much more simple and relevant to the article content. My vote would be to split the template.

3113: 3013: 2741: 1276:

The compromise is acceptable to me. However, that repair should have been taken care of before the delete.

1135: 1037:

or other lists for those who want to read about the more obscure grapes/hybrids/rootsocks or blending grapes.

461: 2242:

page and assumed the template was just for Beaujolais wines--and removed non-Beaujolais things accordingly.

1722: 1404:

2943: 2859: 2776: 2720: 2578:

Could someone more code savvy merge the two grape sections into a title called "Major grapes" and include:

2562: 2508: 2439: 2350: 2313: 2303: 2280: 2256: 2246: 2168: 2101: 2075: 2015: 1857: 1827: 33: 2766: 1746: 3069:

The "Template" for "Wine" is not the same as the "Portal" for "Wine". Why not homogenize the knowledge?

2864: 1150: 3023: 3010: 1959: 1796: 488: 2716:

We already have a link to all grape varieties so we need to try and keep this as focused as possible.

932:, it should not be an exhaustive list of everything we can think of. There are list pages for that. -- 1352: 1225: 1140: 996: 908: 802: 774: 374: 2891:

If no objections then I'll insert this code for the old one and further modifications bemade to it.

2427:

article. The second groups are wines that I'm sure are widely considered a "notable region" such as

1666:

is a common grocery store wine but it is not really a style or a region. It's a branding name like

801:

I agree that Nero d'Avola should be included in the grapes as it is marketed widely as a varietal.--

2923:

20% of plantings in at least three regions not all in the same country", or something like that. --

2202: 1757: 1215: 1088: 848: 3048: 2600: 2365: 1534: 1416: 1373: 1034: 992: 550: 1867:

Okay, good point. Then Napa Valley would seem to fit the criteria for the regionals section. --

2548: 1971: 416: 2199: 2097:

else) get time to write those articles I think the template should include Durif/Petite Sirah

1582: 3020: 3007: 2379:

First I would remove the "redundant" links that essentially overlap each other. would remove

1618:

and not realizing those aren't grapes. So let's talk about some of the wine regions that are

39: 2928: 1694: 2274:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Wine#Vegan_wine.2C_Organic_wine.2C_Natural_wine_and_Kosher_wine

8: 2416: 2762: 2646: 2290: 1951: 1849:

Actually Mike, for wines that are blends and not 75% of more of a single varietal, you

1323: 1261: 1237: 1129: 1071: 719: 508: 765:

Varietal grapes, but link grapes to the full list. I agree with Portnadler's pruning.

3109: 3074: 2959: 2820: 2737: 2544: 2337:. My personal preference would be to do away with the section in favor of moving the 1774: 1764: 1713: 1686: 1112: 1102: 865: 855: 268: 2594: 1853:

see the regional designation of "Napa Valley Red Wine" or "Napa Valley White Wine".

2997: 2946: 2862: 2779: 2752: 2723: 2565: 2511: 2442: 2353: 2316: 2283: 2259: 2233: 2171: 2104: 2078: 2018: 1937: 1907: 1860: 1830: 1823:

I would support its listing. You certainly see the region printed on wine bottles.

1812: 1589: 370: 2924: 2900: 2880: 2841: 2808: 2624: 2388: 2239: 1955: 1797: 1727: 1704: 933: 736: 558: 2467:

Which brings me back to my original reason for reverting the adjustment made by

1018:

First and foremost there should be a split between the grape/wines and the wine

2640: 2334: 2243: 2225: 2087: 1989: 1920: 1881: 1868: 1839: 1785: 1743: 1719: 1690: 1654: 1560: 1505: 1491: 1479: 1453: 1431: 1362: 1334: 1309: 1277: 1246: 1182: 1147: 883: 841: 828: 816: 789: 751: 694: 666: 639: 602: 588: 533: 522: 327: 473: 234: 3122: 3093: 2758: 2468: 2404: 2396: 1738:

a very notable wine region, when the WP article doesn't mention wine at all?

1663: 1650: 1318: 1256: 1232: 1066: 714: 503: 444: 3105: 2955: 2816: 2732: 2588: 2495: 2324: 2300: 2206: 2147: 2048: 2033: 1978: 1963: 1769: 1333:

excellent single-grape wines and we have included some of the major ones.

1107: 860: 293: 2011:

to do a wholesole condensing of the template, I would support its removal.

477: 3097: 2940: 2856: 2773: 2717: 2706: 2606: 2559: 2505: 2436: 2347: 2310: 2277: 2253: 2165: 2098: 2072: 2012: 1930: 1900: 1854: 1824: 1805: 1675: 1640: 1623: 1585: 1542: 1519: 1468: 1442: 1420: 1349: 1292: 1222: 1207:

Well I was bold and trimmed the countries producing wine section. Nearly

1192: 1164: 1132: 1056: 704: 680: 653: 629: 353: 92: 3092:

Navigation templates and Portals serve different purposes on Knowledge.

2630: 479: 2892: 2872: 2833: 2800: 2694: 2682: 2612: 2582: 2160: 2138:

hits respectively for wine ratings. For the article search Barolo had

2127: 1667: 2815:

Definitely agree, and ditto for several other project-wide templates.

1653:, though it is not especially important to me that it be included. -- 2712: 2068: 1094:

template was merged into this one, and feel it should be split back.

979: 574: 297: 2920:

up with an yet more arbitrary criterion such as "accounts for : -->

2799:

be Loire, etc.. I can pluck at a version of how I would prefer it.

2688: 2670: 2658: 2634: 2618: 2007: 2003: 1671: 475: 369:

Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review

2196: 1735: 1728: 1615: 978:. And provide a template for such types with lists all varieties 1159:

regions with the disclaimer that only regions who listed as the

158: 2676: 2664: 2276:

to share your views on the wine styles listed in the template.

2156: 2123: 553:

page. On another note, please could Badagnani learn to use the

305: 1361:

the reasoning that only "supermarket" varieties be included.

480: 2700: 2652: 1611: 1504:

is the recent edit in which some obscure grapes were added.

349: 331: 301: 285: 281: 277: 109: 2916:

designating a variety as regional versus international are?

882:

countries listed and vote against spliting the template. --

86: 1610:

I can see Mike's point about a novice seeing a bottle with

1583:

https://www.adelaide.edu.au/wine-econ/databases/winegrapes/

900: 357: 323: 289: 273: 105: 3036: 2391:

article that can direct the reader to all these articles.

2371:

Tokaji • Valpolicella • Vermouth • Vinho Verde • Vouvray

2323:

I support that too. Shall I remove a few of my picking?!

899:

A template for countries does exist and is still on the

76: 52: 2423:

into. We can combine many of the German regions into a

1378:

How about starting with the most "obvious" major grapes

1689:" doesn't have an article although it could point to " 2921:

5% of plantings in at least three countries or : -->

438: 104:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 82: 521:, for example, only to the "major" ethnic groups. 2574:Since I can't fix this without messing up the code 966:. But we need the relevant articles! Or with with 624:bottle and then want to read about terms they are 2922:5% of plantings in at least five regions or : --> 2494:). That way the issue of notability is bypassed. 3120: 170:, a project which is currently considered to be 3033:Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2023 3019:Replaced the list with old vs new world wine. 2532:and it wikilinks to the word. Problem ... 1662:Well that one is a tricky one. I agree that 393:Category:Knowledge requested images of food 2851:Old draft of {{User:Murgh/Templatebox3}} 2797:Muscadet, Pouilly-Fumé, Vouvray, Sancerre 2528:In this template you refer to the region 2299:and what is not before readjusting this. 32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 1559:prevalent" to "least commonly found." 3129:Template-Class Food and drink articles 3121: 2539:Your region is not defined on the page 2492:highest annual sales by monetary value 3134:NA-importance Food and drink articles 2268:Discussion on wine styles in template 2252:Yeah, it looks like that. Good call. 2057:303 Nebbiolo ratings-including blends 166:This template is within the scope of 98:This template is within the scope of 21: 19: 2061:569 article mentions of Petite Sirah 1033:For compromise we can add a link to 122:Knowledge:WikiProject Food and drink 15: 3139:WikiProject Food and drink articles 2524:Fetească -- disambiguation required 391:Provide photographs and images for 242:Here are some tasks you can do for 125:Template:WikiProject Food and drink 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 157: 14: 3150: 519:Template:Ethnic groups in Myanmar 3084: 3040: 2381:Asti, Barbaresco, Barbera d'Asti 2343:List of wine-producing countries 2065:504 article mentions of Nebbiolo 443: 397:Consider joining this project's 233: 85: 75: 51: 20: 419:from the project's tasks pages. 362:Participate in project-related 3004:List of wine-producing regions 2488:highest annual sales by volume 2421:Muscadet, Sancerre and Vouvray 2339:List of wine-producing regions 2286:19:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1977:three dropped? Just a thought. 1896:List of wine producing regions 1637:List of wine-producing regions 1539:List of wine-producing regions 1211:country produces wine and the 549:list. That job belongs to the 382:{{WikiProject Food and drink}} 1: 3027:11:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC) 3014:18:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC) 2903:10:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 2536:This is a disambiguation page 2514:19:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2499:19:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2445:18:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2356:18:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2328:17:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2319:17:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2304:17:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1708:11:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1196:20:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC) 1186:18:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 1168:07:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 1151:02:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 1136:06:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 1118:07:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 1074:08:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 1060:07:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 116:and see a list of open tasks. 3114:15:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC) 3079:10:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) 2964:22:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 2949:21:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 2933:20:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 2883:22:25, 27 October 2009 (UTC) 2865:20:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC) 2844:12:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC) 2825:12:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC) 2811:10:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC) 2793:Amarone, Soave, Valpolicella 2782:20:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2767:16:45, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 2731:I will work on it tonite. -- 2568:02:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2553:02:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2419:article that we can combine 2407:article. We don't need both 2142:mentions and Barbaresco had 1967:18:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 1928:Definitely improvements. -- 1679:22:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1658:18:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1644:09:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1627:09:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1594:16:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC) 1564:11:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1546:10:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1523:10:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1509:10:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1495:10:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1483:10:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1472:10:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1457:10:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1446:09:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1435:09:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1424:09:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1366:09:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1353:09:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1338:09:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1326:09:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1313:09:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1281:09:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1264:09:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1250:09:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1240:09:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1226:09:09, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1000:15:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 983:15:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 937:14:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 912:12:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 887:12:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 871:08:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 832:12:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 820:12:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 806:12:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 793:11:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 778:11:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 755:09:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 740:09:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 722:22:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 708:21:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 698:21:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 684:21:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 670:21:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 657:20:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 643:20:39, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 633:20:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 606:17:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 592:12:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 578:12:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 562:09:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 537:07:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 526:07:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 511:06:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 7: 3063:to reactivate your request. 3051:has been answered. Set the 2987:02:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC) 2425:Rhineland-Palatinate (wine) 2262:02:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2247:00:10, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 1960:American Viticultural Areas 1291:Text from the User page of 10: 3155: 2911:International vs. Regional 2395:are already covered under 2002:I see a stronger case for 1747:01:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 1723:17:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 1693:" or the wine section of " 750:It's spelled "Palomino." 246:WikiProject Food and drink 220:To edit this page, select 101:WikiProject Food and drink 2747:02:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC) 2726:02:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC) 1943:07:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 1924:01:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 1913:19:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1885:16:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1872:01:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 1863:19:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1843:11:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1833:08:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1818:08:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1789:01:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 1780:13:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 1639:and cover all the bases. 189:Food and Drink task list: 184: 165: 140: 136: 70: 46: 2393:Chablis & Beaujolais 2229:17:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 2210:16:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 2174:05:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 2151:23:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 2107:07:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 2091:07:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 2081:07:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 2053:359 Petite Sirah ratings 2037:07:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 2021:06:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1993:03:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1982:03:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1803:Why isn't it listed? -- 377:to learn how to do this. 1535:List of grape varieties 1417:List_of_grape_varieties 1035:List_of_grape_varieties 1008:Template out of control 551:List of grape varieties 128:Food and drink articles 2130:you would have gotten 1606:Potential Wine Regions 647:But the point is that 415:Note: These lists are 340:articles currently at 314:articles currently at 262:Status or below up to 162: 1954:is now a redirect to 399:Assessment task force 161: 3094:Navigation templates 1695:Languedoc-Roussillon 1397:Now the "iffy" ones 1084:I am unsure why the 997:The Sage of Brouhaha 909:The Sage of Brouhaha 803:The Sage of Brouhaha 775:The Sage of Brouhaha 364:deletion discussions 2417:Loire Valley (wine) 1988:single-grape wine. 258:articles currently 141:Related taskforces: 2647:Cabernet Sauvignon 2415:. We can create a 1952:Napa Valley (wine) 1798:Napa Valley (wine) 1130:Chancellor (grape) 1128:Re: "clutter" See 964:others (rootstock) 489:Template cluttered 375:WP:Handling trivia 269:Agaricus bisporus 163: 34:content assessment 3067: 3066: 2745: 2403:is linked in the 486: 485: 467: 466: 437: 436: 433: 432: 429: 428: 425: 424: 412: 411: 272:(i.e. mushroom), 254:Help bring these 180: 179: 3146: 3088: 3087: 3058: 3054: 3044: 3043: 3037: 2898: 2895: 2878: 2875: 2839: 2836: 2806: 2803: 2735: 2387:in favor of the 1777: 1767: 1762: 1756: 1687:Vin de Pays d'Oc 1419:. Any thoughts? 1321: 1259: 1235: 1220: 1214: 1115: 1110: 1105: 1093: 1087: 1069: 868: 863: 858: 853: 847: 717: 506: 481: 458: 457: 447: 439: 420: 237: 229: 228: 186: 185: 168:Wines task force 148: 138: 137: 130: 129: 126: 123: 120: 95: 90: 89: 79: 72: 71: 66: 55: 48: 47: 25: 24: 23: 16: 3154: 3153: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3119: 3118: 3085: 3056: 3052: 3041: 3035: 3000: 2913: 2896: 2893: 2876: 2873: 2837: 2834: 2804: 2801: 2795:be Veneto, let 2755: 2625:Sauvignon blanc 2576: 2526: 2389:Piemonte (wine) 2377:Items to remove 2368: 2366:Current listing 2335:systematic bias 2293: 2270: 2240:Beaujolais wine 2236: 1974: 1956:Napa Valley AVA 1801: 1775: 1765: 1760: 1758:Wine by country 1754: 1732: 1716: 1608: 1376: 1374:Varietal Grapes 1319: 1303:Wiki Pet Peeves 1257: 1233: 1218: 1216:Wine by country 1212: 1143: 1126: 1113: 1108: 1103: 1091: 1089:Wine by country 1085: 1082: 1080:Wine by country 1067: 1010: 866: 861: 856: 851: 849:Wine by country 845: 715: 621:Major varieties 504: 491: 482: 476: 452: 421: 414: 408: 405:in this section 338:High Importance 238: 217: 146: 127: 124: 121: 118: 117: 91: 84: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3152: 3142: 3141: 3136: 3131: 3117: 3116: 3101: 3065: 3064: 3045: 3034: 3031: 3030: 3029: 2999: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2912: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2886: 2885: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2785: 2784: 2754: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2715: 2641:Cabernet Franc 2595:Gewürztraminer 2575: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2541: 2540: 2537: 2525: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2456:“more notable” 2448: 2447: 2372: 2367: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2292: 2289: 2269: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2235: 2232: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2110: 2109: 2084: 2083: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2024: 2023: 1996: 1995: 1973: 1972:Template Issue 1970: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1800: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1731: 1726: 1715: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1699: 1698: 1691:Languedoc wine 1683: 1682: 1681: 1634: 1632: 1607: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1512: 1511: 1498: 1497: 1486: 1485: 1460: 1459: 1438: 1437: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1405: 1396: 1394: 1393: 1387: 1379: 1375: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1341: 1340: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1305: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1142: 1139: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1101:as per above. 1081: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1053: 1051: 1050: 1038: 1031: 1023: 1014: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 986: 985: 942: 941: 940: 939: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 904: 892: 891: 890: 889: 876: 875: 874: 873: 835: 834: 823: 822: 811: 810: 809: 808: 799: 782: 781: 780: 770: 766: 759: 758: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 727: 726: 725: 724: 710: 689: 688: 687: 686: 662: 661: 660: 659: 611: 610: 609: 608: 595: 594: 583: 582: 581: 580: 567: 566: 565: 564: 540: 539: 529: 528: 490: 487: 484: 483: 478: 474: 472: 469: 468: 465: 464: 454: 453: 448: 442: 435: 434: 431: 430: 427: 426: 423: 422: 413: 410: 409: 407: 406: 395: 389: 378: 367: 360: 334: 328:French cuisine 312:Top Importance 308: 256:Top Importance 251: 240: 239: 232: 227: 226: 216: 215: 210: 205: 200: 194: 191: 190: 182: 181: 178: 177: 164: 154: 153: 151: 149: 143: 142: 134: 133: 131: 119:Food and drink 114:the discussion 97: 96: 80: 68: 67: 59:Food and drink 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3151: 3140: 3137: 3135: 3132: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3124: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3102: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3062: 3059:parameter to 3050: 3046: 3039: 3038: 3028: 3025: 3022: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3012: 3009: 3005: 2998:Major regions 2988: 2984: 2980: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2947: 2944: 2942: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2917: 2904: 2901: 2899: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2884: 2881: 2879: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2863: 2860: 2858: 2852: 2845: 2842: 2840: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2809: 2807: 2798: 2794: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2783: 2780: 2777: 2775: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2748: 2743: 2739: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2721: 2719: 2714: 2711: 2708: 2705: 2702: 2699: 2696: 2693: 2690: 2687: 2684: 2681: 2678: 2675: 2672: 2669: 2666: 2663: 2660: 2657: 2654: 2651: 2648: 2645: 2642: 2639: 2636: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2623: 2620: 2617: 2614: 2611: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2587: 2584: 2581: 2569: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2538: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2531: 2515: 2512: 2509: 2507: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2470: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2457: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2440: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2405:Bordeaux wine 2402: 2398: 2397:Burgundy wine 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2349: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2326: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2317: 2314: 2312: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2302: 2298: 2288: 2287: 2284: 2281: 2279: 2275: 2263: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2245: 2241: 2231: 2230: 2227: 2211: 2208: 2203: 2201:or Epicurious 2200: 2197: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2175: 2172: 2169: 2167: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2120: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2100: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2089: 2082: 2079: 2076: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2038: 2035: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2022: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1998: 1997: 1994: 1991: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1980: 1969: 1968: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1944: 1941: 1940: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1922: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1911: 1910: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1897: 1886: 1883: 1879: 1873: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1861: 1858: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1841: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1831: 1828: 1826: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1816: 1815: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1799: 1790: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1778: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1759: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1745: 1739: 1737: 1730: 1725: 1724: 1721: 1709: 1706: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1664:Liebfraumilch 1661: 1660: 1659: 1656: 1652: 1651:Liebfraumilch 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1642: 1638: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1565: 1562: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1524: 1521: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1510: 1507: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1493: 1488: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1466: 1458: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1436: 1433: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1409: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1391: 1388: 1385: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1367: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1351: 1346: 1339: 1336: 1331: 1327: 1324: 1322: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1311: 1306: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1282: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1217: 1210: 1197: 1194: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1161:primary label 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1149: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1131: 1124:Case in Point 1119: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1100: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1090: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1058: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1029: 1024: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1001: 998: 994: 990: 989: 988: 987: 984: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 944: 943: 938: 935: 931: 927: 923: 922: 921: 920: 913: 910: 905: 902: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 888: 885: 880: 879: 878: 877: 872: 869: 864: 859: 850: 843: 840:I agree with 839: 838: 837: 836: 833: 830: 825: 824: 821: 818: 813: 812: 807: 804: 800: 796: 795: 794: 791: 786: 783: 779: 776: 771: 767: 763: 762: 761: 760: 756: 753: 749: 748: 741: 738: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 723: 720: 718: 711: 709: 706: 701: 700: 699: 696: 691: 690: 685: 682: 678: 673: 672: 671: 668: 664: 663: 658: 655: 650: 646: 645: 644: 641: 637: 636: 635: 634: 631: 627: 622: 617: 607: 604: 599: 598: 597: 596: 593: 590: 585: 584: 579: 576: 571: 570: 569: 568: 563: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 543: 542: 541: 538: 535: 531: 530: 527: 524: 520: 515: 514: 513: 512: 509: 507: 499: 495: 471: 470: 463: 460: 459: 456: 455: 451: 446: 441: 440: 418: 404: 403:project ideas 400: 396: 394: 390: 387: 383: 379: 376: 372: 368: 365: 361: 359: 355: 351: 347: 344:status up to 343: 339: 335: 333: 329: 325: 321: 318:status up to 317: 313: 309: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 270: 265: 261: 257: 253: 252: 249: 248: 247: 241: 236: 231: 230: 225: 224: 219: 218: 214: 211: 209: 206: 204: 201: 199: 196: 195: 193: 192: 188: 187: 183: 175: 174: 169: 160: 156: 155: 152: 150: 145: 144: 139: 135: 132: 115: 111: 107: 103: 102: 94: 88: 83: 81: 78: 74: 73: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 18: 17: 3089: 3068: 3060: 3049:edit request 3001: 2979:76.92.230.40 2918: 2914: 2853: 2850: 2796: 2792: 2756: 2709: 2703: 2701:Syrah/Shiraz 2697: 2691: 2685: 2679: 2673: 2667: 2661: 2655: 2649: 2643: 2637: 2627: 2621: 2615: 2609: 2603: 2597: 2591: 2589:Chenin blanc 2585: 2579: 2577: 2545:billinghurst 2542: 2529: 2527: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2458:than others. 2455: 2432: 2428: 2420: 2413:Valpolicella 2412: 2408: 2400: 2392: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2369: 2296: 2294: 2271: 2237: 2222: 2198:, Wine Pros 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2118: 2085: 2049:Petite Sirah 1999: 1975: 1949: 1938: 1931: 1929: 1908: 1901: 1899: 1893: 1850: 1813: 1806: 1804: 1802: 1770: 1740: 1733: 1717: 1630: 1619: 1609: 1490:excessive. 1464: 1461: 1439: 1414: 1410:Pinot Blanc 1407: 1401: 1395: 1389: 1383: 1377: 1344: 1342: 1320:The Bethling 1302: 1258:The Bethling 1234:The Bethling 1208: 1206: 1160: 1144: 1127: 1098: 1083: 1068:The Bethling 1052: 1045: 1041: 1027: 1019: 1011: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 956:table grapes 955: 952:White grapes 951: 947: 929: 925: 784: 716:The Bethling 676: 648: 625: 620: 615: 612: 555:Show preview 554: 546: 505:The Bethling 500: 496: 492: 449: 402: 381: 345: 341: 337: 336:Bring these 319: 315: 311: 310:Bring these 294:Ham and eggs 267: 263: 259: 255: 244: 243: 221: 171: 99: 40:WikiProjects 29: 2707:Tempranillo 2607:Pinot blanc 2272:Please see 1465:Duca Enrico 1408:Iffy Whites 1293:User:Agne27 1028:wine novice 991:There is a 649:more things 417:transcluded 401:. List any 386:select here 354:Burger King 93:Food portal 3123:Categories 3053:|answered= 2989:Starcastle 2925:Atemperman 2695:Sangiovese 2683:Pinot noir 2613:Pinot gris 2583:Chardonnay 2161:Barbaresco 2128:Barbaresco 1950:Just FYI: 1705:mroconnell 1668:Fume Blanc 948:Red grapes 934:Portnadler 930:ad nauseam 788:experts. 737:Portnadler 677:see around 652:producers. 559:Portnadler 547:exhaustive 3090:Not done: 2742:I did it! 2738:blah blah 2713:Zinfandel 2401:Sauternes 2244:Badagnani 2226:Badagnani 2088:Badagnani 2069:Zinfindel 1990:Badagnani 1921:Mikebrand 1882:Badagnani 1869:Mikebrand 1840:Mikebrand 1786:Mikebrand 1744:Badagnani 1720:Badagnani 1714:Very nice 1655:Mikebrand 1561:Badagnani 1506:Badagnani 1492:Badagnani 1480:Badagnani 1454:Badagnani 1432:Badagnani 1402:Iffy Reds 1363:Badagnani 1335:Badagnani 1310:Badagnani 1278:Badagnani 1247:Badagnani 1183:Mikebrand 1148:Mikebrand 1049:articles. 968:classical 884:Mikebrand 842:Badagnani 829:Badagnani 817:Badagnani 790:Badagnani 752:Badagnani 695:Badagnani 667:Badagnani 640:Badagnani 603:Mikebrand 589:Badagnani 534:Badagnani 523:Badagnani 462:Archive 1 371:WP:Trivia 298:Soy sauce 266:status: 2759:Nricardo 2753:Portugal 2689:Pinotage 2671:Nebbiolo 2659:Grenache 2635:Viognier 2631:Sémillon 2619:Riesling 2530:Fetească 2504:markets. 2472:offence… 2469:Winetype 2433:Vermouth 2291:Removals 2234:Removals 2047:Between 2008:Dolcetto 2004:Nebbiolo 1672:Meritage 1620:commonly 907:these.-- 626:familiar 450:Archives 380:Add the 348:status: 322:status: 173:inactive 30:template 3106:Liu1126 3098:Portals 3071:Mahurel 2956:Tomas e 2817:Tomas e 2496:Georgeg 2484:notable 2429:Retsina 2409:Amarone 2325:Georgeg 2301:Georgeg 2297:notable 2207:Ee60640 2148:Ee60640 2034:Ee60640 2000:Comment 1979:Ee60640 1964:Kharker 1771:scharks 1736:Kakheti 1729:Kakheti 1616:Chianti 1345:October 1109:§ĉҺɑʀκs 1099:Support 1020:regions 960:hybrids 862:§ĉҺɑʀκs 616:know of 203:history 3024:(Talk) 3011:(Talk) 2733:Jeremy 2677:Merlot 2665:Malbec 2633:({·}} 2601:Muscat 2580:Whites 2385:Barolo 2157:Barolo 2124:Barolo 1932:Fyslee 1902:Fyslee 1807:Fyslee 1586:Fpr155 1042:novice 306:Yogurt 36:scale. 3057:|ans= 3047:This 2653:Gamay 2490:, or 2195:Geeks 2006:then 1612:Rioja 1390:White 1209:every 1141:Votes 1046:types 1013:done. 972:minor 350:Apple 332:Sugar 302:Sushi 286:Drink 282:Curry 278:Bread 213:purge 208:watch 110:drink 28:This 3110:talk 3075:talk 3021:Zach 3008:Zach 2983:talk 2960:talk 2941:Agne 2929:talk 2897:URGH 2877:URGH 2857:Agne 2838:URGH 2821:talk 2805:URGH 2774:Agne 2763:talk 2718:Agne 2638:Reds 2560:Agne 2549:talk 2506:Agne 2437:Agne 2431:and 2411:and 2383:and 2348:Agne 2341:and 2311:Agne 2278:Agne 2254:Agne 2166:Agne 2159:and 2140:1430 2134:and 2132:2172 2119:will 2099:Agne 2073:Agne 2059:and 2013:Agne 1939:talk 1909:talk 1855:Agne 1851:will 1825:Agne 1814:talk 1676:Agne 1670:and 1641:Agne 1624:Agne 1590:talk 1543:Agne 1537:and 1520:Agne 1502:This 1469:Agne 1443:Agne 1421:Agne 1350:Agne 1223:Agne 1193:Agne 1165:Agne 1133:Agne 1057:Agne 993:list 980:Cate 976:rare 974:and 901:Wine 705:Agne 681:Agne 654:Agne 630:Agne 575:Cate 373:and 358:Fish 324:Beer 290:Food 274:Beef 223:here 198:edit 108:and 106:food 64:Wine 3055:or 2486:to 2144:780 2136:970 2126:or 2063:to 2055:to 1962:.-- 1734:Is 1614:or 1384:Red 926:not 3125:: 3112:) 3077:) 3061:no 2985:) 2962:) 2931:) 2823:) 2765:) 2740:• 2551:) 2399:. 1761:}} 1755:{{ 1592:) 1219:}} 1213:{{ 1181:-- 1092:}} 1086:{{ 970:, 962:, 958:, 954:, 950:, 852:}} 846:{{ 773:-- 735:-- 356:, 352:, 346:FA 342:GA 330:, 326:, 320:FA 316:GA 304:, 300:, 296:, 292:, 288:, 284:, 280:, 276:, 264:GA 250:: 147:/ 62:: 3108:( 3073:( 2981:( 2958:( 2945:/ 2927:( 2894:M 2874:M 2861:/ 2835:M 2819:( 2802:M 2778:/ 2761:( 2744:) 2736:( 2722:/ 2710:· 2704:· 2698:· 2692:· 2686:· 2680:· 2674:· 2668:· 2662:· 2656:· 2650:· 2644:· 2628:· 2622:· 2616:· 2610:· 2604:· 2598:· 2592:· 2586:· 2564:/ 2547:( 2510:/ 2441:/ 2352:/ 2315:/ 2282:/ 2258:/ 2170:/ 2103:/ 2077:/ 2017:/ 1936:/ 1906:/ 1859:/ 1829:/ 1811:/ 1776:► 1766:◄ 1697:" 1685:" 1588:( 1295:: 1114:► 1104:◄ 867:► 857:◄ 757:# 388:. 366:. 260:B 176:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index