Knowledge

User talk:Cryptic/archive-6

Source 📝

342:
not care about the site he just took nightscream's side to try and avoid conflict as Luigi would be the one throwing the snit fit if he didn't get his way. I tried to reasonably talk to him about this but he pretends that I do not exist which is just continuing the insult and degredation that I received from him and the administrators of nitcentral. I have tried to be polite and civil about but that didn't work and I have gotten mad and been uncivil with him yes, but it is all a direct result of his provocation of me. I am sorry that his arrogance and jerky behavior has caused an issue here and will not pursue it further here unless he attacks or otherwise attempts the same behavior against me here that he did on nitcentral.
929:
Cleanup-date|August 2006 - cleanup-cliche|topic - confusing, without cleaning up. And to top that - she's added the article to other languages because she herself added fr:Lonie Walker + de:Lonie Walker to the article, adding it to other languages, although those have since been deleted from those Wikis. And you're right, I'm not willing to clean it up. I would just as soon prod it with 943 ghits - but with magazine reviews not sure that's possible, although you're right, they are not verifiable since they are on her own site. In your opinion, would it qualify for prod? If not, mind if I cut and paste some of your suggestions into its talk page?
580:
article would make Knowledge a better encyclopedia, especially because of how big social networks have become in contemporary living. As previously noted, the number of decayenne members is not that great (currently ca. 4,000), but that is a poor indicator of importance as decayenne has a strict invite-only policy that no other such site has. Niche social networks are the future of social networking, and even in elite aSmallWorld there is a lot of buzz about decayenne. Please undelete the article.
965:(the named magazines are reliable sources, even if the "reprints" on her web site are not); as such, I wouldn't even consider prodding this article. At most, if I was convinced that the reviews weren't in fact published by third parties and that none of the albums were published by major labels or independent indie labels, I'd take it to AFD to get more eyeballs. There doesn't seem to be much reason to dispute those, though, only to re-source them if possible, or add a disclaimer template like {{ 3193:'s edits to the RFC page. If you see his user history, I have warned him twice against just posting his soapbox complaint as he did, and asked him to read instructions. He either does not know how, or is unwilling, and I am asking you if you would help me deal with this editor. A lot of editors thought he meant well with his edits, but I'm starting to get wary of the situation. Very wary. Please help me! 3467:
Label of his own. I did read that it was deleted do to promotional data on the topic, but no matter what you put on Wiki it will be thought of as promotional, of the topic, and I would like to be able to use wiki as a resource on all of my favorite artists. I am new to wiki so if i went to the wrong place to ask about this I am sorry and please direct me to the correct path to get this topic re-posted.
1591:
2006-07 Preseason Player of the Year, and projected as a 2007 NBA Draft Pick. Since the page was deleted, he's been named to the Preseason Wooden Award watch list of arguably the Top 50 players in college basketball. In reading the guidelines on notability, I assumed that these distinctions would qualify. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks much.
3086:
template without coming to consensus on what it is going to say first. When you edit the template you are editing a post that I have made on and that still lives on multiple pages. If you want to change it, that’s fine, it’s the wiki way. Please bring it to the talk page and work out what and why it should say before you change it.
1919: 1009:. I am trying to mark newly created articles more clearly and am not up to speed on all the delete templates, and if in doubt - I mark with notability. I was unaware of the recent change to the proposed guidelines on music notability that if the band is notable their albums are - so thanks for helping me uncover that. 1687:
from the Google results to the proper page. Also, I added the company logo and a pic of buses to The BusBank's page. Call it first timers stupidity or whatever, but I would like to have the page restored minus any edits that you feel was against Knowledge's guidelines. Thank you and look forward to hearing from you.
3338:, reads like a brochure, and at the time I deleted it, I was reasonably sure it had been copied out of one. It cited no reliable published sources, was almost completely unwikified, and was highly promotional in nature - in short, indistinguishable from the deluge of spam we are constantly inundated with. — 3803:
I take it you deleted this article on the grounds that a prior discussion, held over two years ago, resulted in the consensus that the Carrion Fields article was to be deleted. Yet, as I think I've already stated, the article that I have written since featured a completely different content than the
3775:
again ask the question on what grounds you have deleted the Carrion Fields article? The result of a debate held two years ago was to delete, yet this article I have written since had a completely different content. As it stands, you may deleted it wrongfully, and I would like you to investigate that
3466:
If you could please take a second look at the deletion of the page for Crooked I. I went onto Wiki to get some information on the artist, and it said the page was deleted and protect from being re-created. He is a legitiment Rap artist who was signed to Death Row, and left teh label to start a Record
341:
My apologies. However I believe Nightscream has lied and misrepresented the situation with me. He unfairly and unjustly attacked and provoked me due to differences in our POV over many things. He misused and abused his power and authority as a moderator to ban me and since the site administrator does
303:
and read up there; the various editors who hang out there all have different (rather stringent) requirements that you must pass if you want their support; basically, you just need to prove to them that you deserve to be an administrator. After a cursory glance, I think you might get shot down (that's
3446:
The company does x, y and z. Some people don't like the fact the company does z. So there, that's how I see the article. If there's other things, illegal things, that the company is doing, state that. But the simple truth should be the stating of facts. That's what I THOUGHT Knowledge was all about.
3369:
I just had an article that I worked hours on deleted. The article was referring to one of the top luxury hotels in London. The hotel is part of a chain. There are other hotel's from the chain listed and there are numerous other luxury hotel's from London also listing articles. I worked on making
720:
You are suppressing a page that has references from media. There are about 243 references to the Pronoia Tour on Google alone. In fact I have archive video footage of this event, including Peter Rosen's Kidcast for Peace. Are you not going with the consensus, and leaving this to a "majority" opinion
530:
I'm afraid I've stumbled into the midst of this issue-- when I deleted the inline ext links from the list, I accidentally removed the RussArt entry. I have now restored it to the list. I have no issue with this either way; my only concern was that inline external links were inappropriate. Cheers!
3085:
is looking like an edit war. I post the tag on a page and it says one thing by the time I post it on another page it says something else. I am sure that the template needs work and that all of you making changes have the best interest of Knowledge in mind, but it is unseemly to keep changing the
1686:
Hey, just wondering how 2 pages got deleted. In the past someone created a page called "BusBank" for the charter bus service company. The correct spelling of the company is "The BusBank." While I am new to Knowledge page creation, I understood that a redirect had to be made in order to bring people
1838:
Thanks for your help Cryptic, I have attached a link that explains that The BusBank recieved the United Motorcoach Association's Vision Award and a link explaining that it is given to the "best and brightest companies" in the industry. The BusBank is the first non-operator to recieve this award. I
1590:
I had not logged on for a few weeks, and got a message that a page I'd created for Blake Schilb was to be deleted because of notability. When I looked up who deleted it, I got this page. Schilb is a men's basketball player for Loyola University, 2006 Honorable Mention All-America, Horizon League
3823:
1) If you did indeed delete the Carrion Fields article based on the consensus reached in 2005 (two years ago), could it be possible you thus deleted it without first examining whether or not that reached consensus actually still applied to an article which has since been re-written to a radically
1012:
However, I do think that Robert Bateman High School should at least be marked notable (or deleted under A7) as there is no assertion in the article of why it is notable. It was founded in 2004, and while the website is nice - and it looks like there is alot of promotion of the school - I couldn't
579:
today on www.easybourse.com (a french financial online magazine) with one of the founders of decayenne. They also had interviews with the founders of other social networks that have articles on wikipedia, notably aSmallWorld. decayenne is important enough to have on Knowledge and undeleting the
3813:
You appear to be a person of limited patience. Yet, considering that you have arbitarily, without any prior notification and possibly under an invalid reason to boot have deleted an article I have spend many hours in total on, I would dare to say that I am conducting this discussion in a rather
3323:
I thought that the concept of having an uber-rich community with its own race track was very interesting...not unlike the Jumboair luxury community that resides in Florida. How can I modify the information so it won't violate any terms and get deleted again - I think quite a few people would be
3288:
Hi! I just spent two hours yesterday creating an article for Victory Lanes community and you deleted it for 'blatent advertising'. I am not anyway associated with the community, nor did I leave any contact information on how to purchase land or exactly where it is. Knowledge is supposed to be
928:
Thank you. I knew you could articulate all that far better than I. I could tell it was a clear vanity article as, among other things, she didn't catch a few "I"s in the body - and in BRIEFLY delving into the history she changes "I" and "my" to the correct person. She's already removed tags:
1712:
I'm sorry, I guess I do not know the fine line between notability and promotion. The BusBank has the largest Charter Bus network in North America (larger than Greyhound's fleet) also was highly applauded by newspapers for its evacuation relief efforts in hurricane's Katrina and Rita, the story
1038:
that first put it into place when the new messages banner lit up my screen.) Articles about real people, small groups of real people (i.e. bands and clubs), companies, or web content can be speedied via this criterion if they don't assert any notability. Articles about books, albums, places,
3442:
Sure I'm pro-Primerica, as are people against who add to the article. From what I've read as long as the subject matter added to the article pertains to the article and can be sourced it can be allowed. Am I wrong? Are the people who want to flame the company have more say about article. They
3574:, do you think yourself and other admins would like all the CSD user page warning templates to have a deletion equivalent (i.e. no info about hang-on and in past tense). I have done a few - empty, spam and nn but have not got round to doing them all. Anyway your quick opinion please. Cheers 1274:
Hey, can you take a moment and delete this nonsense article? The creator keeps removing the speedy tags, and I am tired of playing around with him. There is no question as to its nonsensical and farcical nature. The guy is just a vandal and needs a serious warning. Thanks for your time.
3120:
Hiya. When you note that editors don't have suffrage to vote in the ArbCom elections (e.g. Cleo123 on the "Can't Sleep, Clown Will Eat Me" vote page), you're using gender-specific terms that aren't necessary and surely contribute to the perception of WP as a boys' club. In the case of
1157:
I had also created pages for his mixtapes, which I see have been deleted because they included links to buy them, and were not notable releases. If it is possible to bring these pages back without the links to purchase, would you do that? Also, I feel that there are alot of unnotable
952:), who has substantial contributions going back to late July. The first-person language seems to stem from using quotations as narration, and the cleanup tags were both added and removed by him. The interwiki links are puzzling - the articles weren't deleted, they never even existed! 421:
I thought fair use images were only to be used in the Article space and only if alternatives are not available for whatever reason (the trademark/copyright protections of logos being one of them). Therefore I would think that this should be deleted since it is only used on a userpage.
3827:
2) If the answer to the above is yes, and provided you did examine the new content and found it to still be worthy of deletion under the same rational as that which was reached two years ago, then could you explain why the numerous other multi-user dungeon articles have never had a
1747:
Cryptic- Yes it was a press release, but it was previously on Knowledge, under "BusBank" so obviously it was deemed appropriate content since that page was active for almost a year. The page only got deleted when I redirected it to "The BusBank" Please let me know your thoughts
1066:-like game of "guess which speedy criterion I can shoehorn this article into". We only speedy-delete very specific kinds of articles, and those kinds are determined by long experience of the kinds of articles that deleted every time when brought to a larger audience like afd. — 3438:
How does having the history of the company and a small criticism section, all of which are sourced, account for tagging the article with a NPOV dispute? What should be removed? I apologize for removing the NPOV tag, which I did without signing in, but I don't see the issue.
574:
I recently made an article (called decayenne) that was deleted because it sounded like an advertisement and because there were no sources other than decayenne.com. However, I tried to clean up the advertising "feel" of the article before it was deleted. I came across an
838:
The sourcing is, well, yes, atrocious. All the sources listed are from a website the subject is associated with. At the very least, if the press reviews and magazine articles reproduced on her web site are legitimate, they should be sourced directly, not through her
279:
Oh, btw, I spoke to an administrator back in January about how to become an administrator, and he said you need 2,000 edits. How can an editor check how many edits they have? And if they have enough, what should they do to lobby for an admin position? Thanks.
1048:
or most any other high school would get a consensus for deletion if listed on afd would be if it turned out to be a hoax. (And no, hoaxes are specifically not subject to speedy deletion, either - they need more than one or two pairs of eyes to be certain.
1254:. There's quite a bit of explanatory fluff there that I think explains my thinking on the matter. Right now, I'm soliciting input from people before deciding how to go about implementing it. Any thoughts on the talk page would be greatly appreciated. :-) 386:. I object to the move not because the guy who made the move was wrong, but because he gave no notice, gave no chnace for input, and simply created a redirect. I would like to see the Rosemead page restored to the original name (keeping the history). If 3659:
Are you aware that a Knowledge administator actually considered this article to be valid, as can be seen in the article's history pages? Also, exactly on what grounds have you deleted this article, on which I have spend quite a bit of my free time?
3351:
Understandable - there is limited information on the community except for the links I provided above as well as the actual website - in the future how do you suggest that I post info for commercial locations without sounding like I am a sales person?
1631:) since he was heavily involved but before I get accused of canvassing can you tell me whether or not it is ok to similarly notify all the users which I have listed as editors who have tried and failed to resolve the dispute with Rrfayette? Thanks. 2648:
The art gallery and museum Studio L2 is not commercial. I wrote a very small note about the existence of this institution and art installation (please delete if anything within the page sounds wrong, but I AM working with it, under construction)
1376:. I also didn't use the right deletion tag. (There was an edit conflict -- thanks for deleting my user page. I could put in a redirect for the talk, but I would prefer deletion as per RightToVanish and as per examples of others I have seen.) -- 1506:"such as a link to a shock site" should not have been there, it is because I edited from a previous version so ignore that part, and tell me why "Inappropriate, objectable web content..." is irrelevant. That is an important aspect to consider. — 794:
Hi Cryptic. I'm a pretty new Wikipedian with only minor edits to my name, mostly in music. I've come across this article that is frankly atrocious, seems to violate everything in the book and I have no clue how and what to tag. Can you help?
1180:
you had with one of my co-workers. I'm wondering what was the offensive material? I'm in the process editing the article about my company that Edward was attempting to post. So, if you can tell me what was offensive, that would be appreciated.
697:
Hi Cryptic, thank you for undeleting revisions from the article. I should have taken a closer look at the history to determine which revisions were in violation of copyright, and I apologize for the inconvenience this may have caused. Cheers,
1138:
Myself and alot of others worked hard to write this article, and we feel it was deleted and protected without merit. Here are some points we are trying to convey against the Deletion reasons: (Pardon the swearing and bashing, we were angry)
2908:
Hi Cryptic. I'm in the process of answering the questions on my page, and hope to wrap things up this morning over the next few hours as time permits. I just wanted to let you know that I have every intention of answering them. Thanks,
1502:
The "such as a link to a shock site" is not related to the "Inappropriate, objectable web content which are irrelevant to the article will also be". Was that your interpretation? Because I can see how that could lead to miscommunication.
769:, the article consisted only of the words "Dave Reilly is a comedian in the United States." Merely having a job does not qualify a person for an article on Knowledge, and the article didn't say anything else about him. For more, see 2722:
Yes, this does show that they have a funding connection. This in itself isn't particularly noteworthy. The point of the paragraph I removed was that "there have been increasing calls for Rep. Buyer to return the 2500 dollars"; it's
619:. Since it was such a long block, I was thinking I should double-check with you before converting to anon-only? I'm mainly looking at the user's creation log, which suggests the account existed about two weeks ago, or so. Thoughts? 1879:
Searching "busbank chicago-tribune" or "busbank houston-chronicle" seems to generate some possible third-party sources that could be considered, although I can't find any article *about* them, they always seem to be the sideline.
1547:
Ok, I'm done reading what Pascal.Tesson said. He made many false accusations, "disregarding other editors' opinions". If you look at the talk, you will see I started a list of what people wanted changed, and I did changed them.
3701:
is considered suitable and a page like the one I've attempted to build out isn't? Because this seems neither rational nor fair to me. Or do you intend to delete every article on Knowledge descriping a multi-user dungeon?
1571:
Cryptic, I'm attempting to post my article about my company, however, apparently it's violating a policy in Knowledge, G11, if you can email me, can you help me out to identify what is paragraphs are offensive? Email me at
877:...but that's not really what you asked. If you're not willing to put the time into cleaning up the article yourself (no shame in that; I'm not either), there are specific cleanup tags for all of the problems above ({{ 1075:
Thanks for the advice - I wasn't trying to shoehorn any particular article in - the day I did those I reviewed about 100 new pages, marked some with db-?? if I was unsure, speedied clear violations, marked some with
3604:. Most other speedies either won't merit an extra user-talk notification, aren't deleteable on sight (particularly the image criteria), or come up infrequently enough that specific templates won't be remembered. — 1736:
If the article had actually said that, it wouldn't have been deleted. Can you provide a independent reference to back this up? (The external link in the article was to one of the company's own press releases.)
828:
The trivia section should be removed. If the information isn't important enough to be incorporated into the article's prose, it shouldn't be in the encyclopedia entry. Trivial is the opposite of encyclopedic.
1397:
I have not protected the talk page against recreation, but have done so with the main page. It however requires to have a place holder, so I have added that. The account is now indef protected per request. --
368:
Hrm. Looked ok to me. In any case, I've deleted the revisions except for the initial redirect; you can move pages over them if there's only one revision and it's a redirect to the title you're moving from.
3335: 985:
I appreciate your time and effort on this, and your opinion well-respected. Everything makes total sense and it helped me to clarify things. I will try and coax some cleanup on it. Thanks much again.
3268: 629:
I've reblocked anon-only myself; I've never seen one of these /index.php spambots edit with a username. (Should've blocked anon-only in the first place, but I'm still not used to having the option.) —
115: 3799:
Ironically it raises more questions regarding your recent deletion of the Carrion Fields article than it answers. I will explain what I mean by this. Quoted directly from the Deletion review;
3103:
Please keep in mind it is my signature on a whole bunch of pages that that template is living on. The people that are seeing the template are seeing my post keep changing with no idea why.
1644:
has all you ever wanted to know and more. For an RFC, where the aim is to resolve disputes, it's not problematic unless you're copying the message to all 173 members of a wikiproject or such. —
3639: 3631: 3515:
Why have all references to the Duke of Ballenwsorth been removed from this website? Is this a political point against nobles in general, or directed towards the specific house of Ballensworth?
1057:
would be deleted at afd, either; the overwhelming majority of our articles about albums contain nothing more than this article than an infobox, and the band that released it is clearly notable.
83:
I'm glad to see that you've returned in some capacity. You were always the admin I respected the most, and it was disheartening to discover you'd left after I returned from my brief vacation.
662:
page? I don't speak Wikipedian so "speedied unfree image" doesn't mean much to me, but I have express permission from Chistopher Possanza to use the image, so copyright shouldn't be an issue.
358:
You didn't actually revert the speedy to the redirect. Which is okay, because I was going to move the page back to where it was before it was moved without any consultation or prior notice. --
3225: 676:
explains, mere permission to display an image on Knowledge is not sufficient; they must also be freely redistributable and modifiable. When such images are uploaded, they immediately become
2539:
has a Knowledge page that is fact-filled, enlightening and verifiable. Would it be possible to remove this post or move it to my profile's talk page in case i have further questions. Thanks
1499:
Huh? I'm trying to "hijack it midsentence"? What are you talking about? Have you not read the above? Wow, you are confusing me. That is not about external links, as I stated multiple times.
865: 2862: 1145:
Myself: I read Wiki alot, but fuck that shit. It wasn't promoting, it was straight up info. And if you look at any other artists wiki, you could say it is promotion for any of them.
3408: 1670:
Thanks for the unref tag - they are a problem - i dont think much has been written about them - it'll probably be web based info - will get around to it - thanks anyways! Needs work
3205: 1148:
Tony: Quote from: Kingwell on October 28, 2006, 04:27:24 PM Thats exactly what I thinking. Isn't everything on Wiki regarding entertainment or entertainers promotion, technically?
3895:
article in 2005. Could you please look into this a bit more? And my apologies for losing my temper a bit in my previous posts. It's just that, a lot of work has gone into the
3282: 1617:. Since I have listed you as one of the users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute, I was hoping you could take a look at it. But I also have a question: I have alerted 756:
Hi. I'm building a list of all the David Reilly's of the world, and noticed you'd deleted one of mine. I'm fairly new, and not sure of everything, but what was wrong with it?
1963:.) This clearly states that BusBank owns no vehicles, but is instead a travel broker, in comparison to both your misleading assertion above that you have a larger fleet than 3233: 3229: 3210: 3206: 2980: 2360: 849: 1828:, not me) without third-party verification. I'll have time later today to look through the search results more carefully if you can't or won't provide it before then. — 702: 1454:
It has not been explained multiple times for your information. The explanation was irrelevant as I had stated in the talk. They keep talking about censorship, which is
3896: 3888: 3884: 3652: 3482: 1713:
regarding that effort was linked on the page also. I would only like to have "BusBank" old page restored to read "The BusBank" Please let me know if this is possible.
3891:
article however was originally written by me starting in late 2006, with the specific intention to remove all the reasons which originally led to the deletion of the
3240: 2758:
Neither you nor Gamaliel have responded to my concerns. Am I wrong to take a lack of responce as the go ahead to place to newly sorced facts back into the article?
2683:
article. It seems that the refrences to Mark Foley's money to steve buyer have been removed. I have included links below, if you could please place the item back.
819:
Quotations should never, ever be used to narrate an article. This is an encyclopedia entry, not an interview. Where they remain, each one needs an inline citation.
1333:
Actually what I would like to do is delete both the userpage and the talk page and protect against recreation. I have seen this done before when people leave. --
750: 499: 1906:
On the other hand, here's what I found on my own, buried amongst a great many verbatim reprinted company press releases, advertisements, and directory listings.
909:}}, and while I don't know one for the categories, I'm sure it exists), but rather than bombard the article with two pages' worth of boxes, a straightforward {{ 1865: 1808: 1759: 1724: 721:
amongst a few wiki users? The Pronoia Tour resulted in a lot of offshoots, including a Cybersafari to Africa. There is also mention on the Wired Magazine page
3887:. The first article has not existed since 2005, as it was deleted under the same reached consensus on which you apparently have deleted the second one. The 3900: 3856: 3777: 3727: 3703: 3661: 3478: 3159: 3043: 239:
Why did you delete the article StarGateWars? I was creating it and accidently clicked save instead of preview. How was it advertising? I only play the game.
3539: 2706: 157:
dont call my shit a garage band, you sit on wikipedia all day and edit peoples nonsense come on how much room do you have to talk about anybodys anything.
3522: 2501:
article as being primarily about this company instead of mentioning it as a handy example. It's a borderline case, and I'd vote to delete it if it were
1120: 495: 471: 3664: 2125: 1551:
His accusations are one-sided and now I see why you had biases from the start, because that person had persuaded you. I need a neutral talk, please. —
3422: 3381: 3153: 1861: 1839:
hope this gives enough 3rd party evidence and I would like to link these sites once/if The BusBank page becomes available once again. Thanks again.
1804: 1775:
is a core, non-negotiable content policy; I don't see anything in a casual google except reprints of company press releases, which do not constitute
1755: 1720: 1688: 1399: 1215:
Sorry about that; I wasn't aware that material was posted. I originally thought he was posting a 2 page essay that I wrote. Thanks for the heads up.
467: 3125:, you described a self-described woman as "he" on the Starblind & Golbez vote pages. Could you not use a more gender-neutral wording? Cheers, 101: 3892: 3880: 2785:
Thanks for advices - I just wonder if my articles still are under discussion? Are all changes made? Kindest Nike NGL 11:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
2021:
But this doesn't seem to be what your company is primarily known for. I've found a great deal of information about a certain bus accident, which,
1342:
Just to be clear, one step in my long goodbye was to change my username, which I did a few weeks ago. I'm just looking to finish the process. --
118:
cut-and-paste page move was one of my earilest mistakes when I was a relatively new user here. Thanks for fixing it. (You don't need to reply.)
3804:
one the consensus was reach on in 2005, and I would dare submit that the article you have deleted thus was no longer relevant to that discussion.
3651: 3353: 3325: 1035: 3859: 3794: 3780: 3762: 3730: 3721: 3706: 3692: 3678:'s declination to speedy-delete it on the grounds that it was "not about a person, group of people, band or club" - the article had been tagged 2525: 2025:, killed 23 nursing home patients; curiously, no mention is made of this in the deleted article at all. A bare handful of the stories I found: 488:
In last revision, there is no link to RussArt. Please give me a reason, why you delete RussArt entry and not TigerCinema? Both are not notable.
3671: 1657: 1648: 1535:
I see Pascal.Tesson contacted you. No wonder why you're not neutral. I could already see this from your first reply. I knew something was up. —
810: 788: 415: 240: 204: 164: 2947: 2605: 2490: 1680: 1389: 1377: 1343: 1334: 1311: 990: 933: 633: 3924:
If you feel it would be more appropriate to develop this material in another manner (e.g. on a Talk subpage) I am happy to discuss this. —
3617: 3608: 3448: 3418: 3377: 2636: 2444: 2400: 2364: 2297: 2253: 2209: 2165: 2121: 2077: 2030: 1972: 1915: 1493: 1468: 1442: 1402: 977: 921: 743: 732: 312: 3356: 3342: 3054: 2913: 2016:
evacuation. It's a passing mention in an article about the amount of waste inherent in the contractor-subcontractor-subcontractor system.
822:
The section on her bar should either be split into a separate article or drastically cut down. The article's about her, not her business.
3801:
This includes appeals to restore pages that have been deleted as well as to delete pages which were not deleted after a prior discussion.
3275: 3190: 3065:
I saw your note against my user name ( it's she, incidentally). I'm sorry; I did not realise that there was a qualification for entry.
3017: 2987: 2642: 1019: 564: 539: 404: 78: 3451: 3324:
interested in reading about it (just like people read the Robb Report - most can't afford the items, yet it is fun to dream!). Thanks
2895: 2301: 1392: 1380: 1363: 1337: 1328: 1092: 1070: 684: 453: 442: 3328: 2878: 2797: 2789: 1346: 1268: 648: 602: 373: 329: 254: 3028:
The script appears to hide the whole rest of the article, instead of just everything up to and including the endspoiler tag. See e.g.
1356: 1307:. What is the best way to go about this procedure? I would like to protect the account pages afterwards from recreation or editing. 3635: 3433: 2959: 1628: 1025:
Neither of these articles were marked with "notability notice" templates, just db-a7 variants. I wasn't aware of a recent change to
996: 766: 673: 3305: 3179: 1314: 623: 362: 3145: 1614: 3578: 3518: 3474: 3414: 3373: 2803: 2702: 2652: 2627: 1857: 1800: 1751: 1716: 379: 3110: 2632:... on the Savannah cat article. Next time I get that message for speedy deletion, I'll remember to check my citation syntax! -- 1191:
The posted "article" consisted entirely of a logo and an external link, and was thoroughly objectionable. Please stop and read
1128: 2923:
I just wanted to thank you for helping me to avoid what I think would probably, in the end, have been a mistake at this time.
781: 562: 3069: 2505:. I'm thus not going to take any action with regards to the article. If you still want it undeleted, you can try asking the 1123: 229: 3281: 1478: 1386: 710: 351: 256:
Okay, thanks. I wasn't entirely sure if it qualified under the existing CSD criteria (heh, guess I found out). Thanks again.
666: 3486: 3397:
or several other permutations of the title, nor do I see anything similar in my deletion logs. Can you be more specific? —
3370:
it very 'non commercial'. Could you tell me why this was deleted but the others are ok? Thanks...I really appreciate it.
2910: 1884: 1293: 1176:
Forgive me if posted in the wrong spot, but I'm still learning making pages in Knowledge. I have a question regarding this
1262: 2835: 2714: 2595: 1288: 1279: 557: 521: 3401: 3036: 2616:
Why the Protected notice? Not really explained in the history...You could've just done a redirect to the Harlem shake.
957: 955: 953: 938:
I think it's very unlikely that this article was written by the subject - the only significant editor of the article is
294:
for checking your edits, as it does a good job of presenting everything (not just your edits, but your actual activity).
193: 3530: 3002: 2578: 2169: 1674: 1525: 1513: 1424: 1302: 1240: 799: 725: 645: 503: 3903: 3258: 3047: 2775: 2591:
RE: "Are they bored yet?" I reckon we'll find out. It depends on whether that one guy is lurking "around the corner".
1825: 478: 2664: 1602: 1109: 576: 428: 284: 274: 3735:
I have to repeat one related question which you haven't answered yet -- is every article which describes a specific
3200: 2749: 2735: 1832: 1787: 1741: 1706: 1558: 1542: 3928: 3879:) has explained to me what the source of this confusion might be. The original article nominated for deletion was 3560: 3546: 3166: 2557: 1869: 1812: 1763: 1728: 1142:
dobbies: yea apparently they didnt know who crooked i was....sumthin about that it was shameless self-promotion...
1044:
Schools in particular are rancorous; abominable informationless single-sentence substub though it be, the only way
300: 3646: 3501: 2973: 2574:
page? I've added more info/citations so that the significance of the band is brought to light. Thanks in advance {
1635: 1230:
Hi Cryptic, thanks a lot for your advice... Please do let me know if you see any further areas for improvement --
122: 3077: 2941: 1898: 1431: 949: 917:}}, with your specific concerns listed on the talk page, is both the best approach and the easiest to remember. — 608: 210: 2619: 2356: 1430:
Mostly because you seem to be lost. As has been explained multiple times by several editors on the guideline's
616: 3698: 3594:
is already general enough that it isn't really out of place for an article that's already been deleted, unlike
3565: 2815: 1192: 861: 806: 749: 260: 3129: 2855: 2513:
page. If restored, however, I can assure you that the final article will bear very little resemblence to the
1034:
A7 is very specific about what it makes speedy-deleteable. (By a weird coincidence, I was paging through the
816:
The diction is quite hypish and promotional, and hardly NPOV. The whole article reads like a magazine review.
3443:
shouldn't. Should people be allowed to add advertising shill to the article, no. Where do we draw the line?
3134: 2936: 2727:
statement that needs a source, and I was unable to find one except for a few mentions on blogs, which aren't
1622: 1013:
find evidence of independent publication about the school, any guidance you can give would be appreciated. --
383: 352: 243: 172: 3224:
is not the topic of these talk archives. The article that these talk archives are related to was deleted at
3165:
In a way, that image is redundant because there is already an image of the same character being used on the
2694: 1451:
Then why don't you explain? "Inappropriate, objectable web content" has nothing to do with "External links".
1305: 3293:, and things...yet when I post about all the features that this unique community offers, it gets deleted!? 3158: 2348: 2034: 1203: 961:
If the magazine reviews are legitimate or the named albums aren't self-published, then she certainly meets
853: 653: 72: 69: 66: 63: 60: 57: 346: 3426: 3385: 1417:
Hi! You just reverted and I was wondering if you could explain your reasoning. I'll reply here. Thanks! —
1321: 857: 54: 51: 48: 42: 39: 36: 33: 30: 1461:
Who are you? You weren't even part of the discussion and come in and the first thing you do is revert. —
1161:
This artist is signed to a major label, I don't see how it was argued that he isn't a notable artist.
396:
OK; I've moved it back (and I didn't get the administrator-only "delete that page first?" prompt, so it
2828: 2404: 2081: 1482: 1251: 1053:
used to maintain a list of apparent hoaxes that ended up being kept on his user page.) There's no way
1045: 1006: 390:, let him notify us first ... or maybe actually do something with the page like creating a DAB page. -- 1847: 1372:
I think your the wrong person to talk to. I am following for a few weeks the procedure outlined here:
553:
User Helgrot is kind of new and I do not think it is fair practice to block him without any warning.--
3787: 3726:
I see. I'll fix that momentarily. Please tell me if I'm missing any of the nuances in this matter.
3571: 3494: 2874: 2510: 1894: 848:
Lots of redundant categories. Articles should not be in both a category and one of its descendants;
690: 461: 3814:
civilized and constructive manner. I would like a few clear responses in return, more specifically;
299:
As for making a request to be an administrator, a 2k post count is hardly the only requirement. See
3197: 2788: 1618: 1435: 1245: 1114: 483: 321:
I'm really not the best person to ask; I've recently returned from a six-month-long wikibreak, and
3584:
It probably wouldn't hurt, though this is clearly going to be the most-used one. The phrasing on
2611: 1530: 3364: 3306:
http://www.digg.com/motorsport/Ultimate_Luxury_Home_Community_for_People_with_Fast_Expensive_Toys
3082: 3060: 2824: 2710: 2536: 2305: 2257: 2085: 1772: 1238: 1196: 973:|www.loniewalker.com}}. This really looks more like a cleanup candidate than one for deletion. — 970: 966: 906: 869: 842: 809:. (Search for "(transclusion)".) That said, a couple problems jump out at me, glancing through 609: 308:
to get more in-depth feedback about what you may need to do to secure an administrator position.
291: 270:
It is much appreciated. I'll let you know if he continues his antics. And enjoy your trip. :-)
222: 211: 3526: 3023: 2955: 2584: 2217: 1980: 1967:
and the image caption "One of the 60,000+ buses in The BusBank's fleet" in the deleted article.
898: 894: 2800:
article, but I don't think that there ARE any third party publications yet. What should I do?
2687: 2535:
of the Charter Bus Industry is not important enough and gets deleted hours after an edit, but
3316: 3245: 3122: 2993: 2771: 2660: 2563: 2544: 1665: 882: 414: 2766:
Wow. You're back. Only just twigged. Welcome back. Sorry to take this long to realise.
2448: 3588: 3250:
Can you restore Kitchen Craft of Canada Ltd. please. It is one of the largest companies in
2548: 1583: 1412: 1285: 1276: 1250:
I'm floating around this proposal I've written for a new CSD regarding unsourced articles:
890: 787: 715: 707: 644:
Good job on the formatting on JW's page. I figured there must be SOME way to do it. Kudos.
584: 548: 491: 181: 160: 88: 3032:. If this is difficult to fix, please say so, then I'll have a go at it. Yours sincerely, 2479: 2435: 2391: 2332: 2288: 2244: 2200: 2156: 2112: 2068: 2007: 1954: 1641: 1086:, but left the majority in place. I was unsure about these and appreciate your comments -- 8: 3614: 3575: 3194: 3176: 2674: 2173: 2129: 1881: 1679: 1592: 1177: 1080: 943: 387: 168: 3236:, so it doesn't seem to me that there should be any reason to keep archives 3 and 4. -- 3175:. It looks like it has been edited (hint, the whiskers on the right and the red shoes). 3046:
lost both class="endspoiler" and id="spoiler" at some point. I've replaced the former;
2552: 1087: 1014: 448: 423: 3736: 3643: 3510: 3251: 3066: 2903: 2811: 2466: 2452: 2319: 2275: 2231: 2187: 2143: 2099: 2055: 1994: 1941: 1671: 1654: 1632: 1577: 1259: 1231: 1216: 1184: 910: 902: 886: 878: 290:
While I may not be Cryptic, I do know the answers to which you seek. I would recommend
2012:
This contains the only material I could find in regards to your company's role in the
3908: 3791: 3759: 3718: 3689: 3605: 3543: 3498: 3459: 3398: 3339: 3272: 3051: 3029: 2984: 2964: 2951: 2892: 2832: 2761: 2746: 2732: 2522: 2506: 2422: 2378: 2022: 2013: 1829: 1784: 1738: 1703: 1645: 1599: 1490: 1439: 1360: 1325: 1200: 1067: 974: 918: 778: 740: 691: 681: 659: 630: 599: 536: 518: 439: 401: 370: 326: 143: 17: 2213: 1976: 3598: 3552: 3468: 3237: 3013: 2918: 2870: 2851: 2767: 2742: 2656: 1893:(via edit conflict) The only mention of your company that I can find on uma.org is 1267: 1225: 1106: 1100: 914: 639: 620: 554: 517:), and hadn't yet had a chance to go through the entries that were already there. — 281: 271: 265: 248: 3921:, with the redirect being maintained for convenience before the page goes "live". 3855:
tags on every multi-user dungeon article I come across from here on? Thank you.
3845:
3) Finally, would you recommend to me, as a fellow Knowledge editor, that I place
3313:
LA Business Journal "Plan for Housing, Track and Runway Is Gaining Speed" 11/22/06
1355:
I've deleted your user page, but we normally do not delete user talk pages. (See
304:
not a personal statement about you; I'm just saying). I'd recommend you submit an
3918: 3849: 3832: 3755: 3743: 3713:
Because nobody's nominated that article to be considered for deletion. See also
3682: 3411:. I used other hotels that are already listed in London as a template. Thanks. 3394: 3140: 2633: 2498: 1964: 1926: 1780: 1026: 962: 699: 152: 119: 2969:
Apologize for the ignorance. But how many edits do I need for Sufferage? Thanks
2861:
To respond to myself, you don't need to bother- another user is running a bot:
2518: 1695: 770: 677: 435: 3870: 3557: 3115: 2841: 2602: 2592: 2585: 2494: 1901:'s yearly company newsletter, and has a brief mention of you buried on page 16. 1699: 1552: 1536: 1519: 1507: 1485:
talks about whether entire articles should exist. You're trying to hijack it
1462: 1418: 987: 939: 930: 796: 722: 109: 3913:
Please don't delete the material being added to the (currently redirect) page
1151:
TRD: Any free information is free promotion if its relates to an entertainer.
3925: 3876: 3714: 3675: 3149: 3033: 2999: 2931: 2925: 2888: 2807: 2575: 2571: 2564: 2502: 1255: 774: 736: 595: 343: 322: 218: 138:
page to the last version by Wikiman. Unfortunately, he also is a vandal...
3300: 2823:
If there isn't any third-party verification, we can't have an article. See
1598:... ... ... I don't know what I was on, sorry. I've restored the article. — 1566: 3264: 3255: 3184: 3107: 3094: 2970: 2728: 1821: 1776: 1584: 1054: 1050: 1002: 759: 532: 305: 234: 139: 128: 1852: 116:
Peacemakers: The Paris Peace Conference of 1919 and Its Attempt to End War
3625: 3221: 3217: 3126: 3098: 3009: 2866: 2847: 2695:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.asp?strID=C00325969&Cycle=2002
2680: 2514: 1608: 663: 592: 1960: 3917:. This material is being developed in accordance with a discussion on 3171: 3090: 1171: 391: 359: 309: 257: 226: 201: 3688:,which at that time did not apply to web content - is a red herring. — 3226:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sean Howard (American webcomic artist)
831:
Similarly, the quotes section could stand to be removed; if she's not
25: 3914: 3460: 2699:
Hope this is sufficent to get the sorced fact back into the article.
2041: 1794: 3216:
You've removed the speedy delete tags from these. Yes, an aricle on
3754:
I already said that the fact that the article was briefly tagged {{
2408: 2261: 1848:
http://www.trailways.com/download.asp?fl=%2Fpdf%2FTraveler_2003.pdf
1001:
Hi - you removed notability (and inappropriate db-) templates from
475: 337: 2601:
Apparently he was lurking, although it took him a couple of days.
127: 2532: 3169:
article. Besides, the image doesn't look like a screenshot from
1489:
into talking about external links. Articles ≠ external links. —
1357:
Knowledge:User page#How do I delete my user and user talk pages?
731:
The place to complain about a properly closed, nearly unanimous
3670:
It was previously determined to be unsuitable for Knowledge at
3310:
Road & Track - "People, Places, & Things" section 12/06
3296:
The community has been featured in several articles including:
2570:
Hi. I was wondering if you could re-assess your opinion on the
1373: 1119:
We have a new response on our talk page, concerning your edit
1029:, but it's not really relevant, since A7 doesn't reference it. 3254:
and part of a project to list all top employers in the city.
1783:, it should be trivial to provide third-party verification. — 1301:
I'm looking to delete and close my account completely -- see
1063: 674:
large block of text that appeared when you uploaded the image
3234:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Sean Howard/Archive 2
2981:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote
2641: 3334:
Your article, which I've just moved into your userspace at
2979:
150 by the start of the election, as it says at the top of
2688:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.asp?strID=C00325969
2509:; if he refuses also, you can make a formal listing on our 1158:
albums/mixtapes on Knowledge, why should his get the boot?
3317:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=117673
1820:
I won't overrule another administrator's deletion (it was
825:
The album sections should be split into separate articles.
2891:
who did it last year, and my bot's blocked in any case. —
845:
should be removed unless she's actually a published poet.
135: 2846:
Will you be updating your bot to tally ArbCom results?
2531:
Thanks Cryptic, I'm glad that Knowledge thinks that the
959:
Maybe he thought interwikis could be used like redlinks.
615:
Looks like this user's gotten hit by a block you set on
134:
G'day Cryptic. You recently rv'd some vandalism to the
3883:. The article I am referring to, however, is actually 2780: 2449:"Bus Operator Is Convicted of Conspiracy in Explosion" 1842: 2258:"Rita bus fire victims reach $ 11 million settlement" 1388:. Hopefully this is a way to handle it properly. -- 835:
for being quotable, they belong in Wikiquote at best.
805:
If you think that's atrocious, check out some of the
225:
can be moved into its place. Thanks for your help. --
217:
I think it is getting sorted out. Now if I could get
3267:
has restored it and moved it into your userspace at
1518:
Issue is resolved. It will be left by all as it is.—
591:
Done. I'm still pretty dubious that this meets our
2302:"Officials: Fatal bus fire points out lack of data" 1771:All that shows is that no one noticed it earlier. 1359:.) Is there some reason not to just redirect it? — 1133: 856:, for example, so the latter should go. So should 3008:And thanks as well for notifying me on FloNight. 3143:account since you've made recent edits. Regards, 468:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Waiting to Inhale 2551:- it makes it easier to find stuff like this. -- 2035:"Ill-fated Charter Bus Had Expired Registration" 1793:Can the page be reinstated as a stub? Much like 27:This page is an archive. Please do not edit it. 3842:to the Carrion Fields article you have deleted? 3838:tag placed on them, even though they all share 3697:Can you then explain to me why a page such as 3672:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Carrion Fields 1165:Can you please message me back on my MyTalk, 598:, but I'll give you a chance to clean it up. — 2796:Thanks for placing the citation thing on the 2214:"Interviews tell of desperate, chaotic scene" 1105:For reverting the vandalism on my page. :) -- 1039:fictitious things, or anything else can't be. 470:. Would you mind taking care of the redirect 2865:. Thanks again for handling it last year. 2442: 2398: 2251: 434:They need to be unused for seven days. See 325:'s standards are notoriously inflationary. — 3336:User:Wrzfreak/Victory Lane Luxury Community 2679:Thanks for taking the time to clean up the 2023:as documented in our Hurricane Rita article 1129:Inquiry About Deleted and Protected article 3758:}} had nothing to do with its deletion. — 3301:http://www.autoblog.com/search/?q=victory 3269:User:Jdobbin/Kitchen Craft of Canada Ltd. 2170:"Numerous Violations Alleged in Bus Fire" 1959:(A reprint of the full text is available 1779:. If your company is indeed larger than 1284:Thanks for your quick action on this! --- 2946:Your input would be appreciated at this 1615:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Rrfayette 378:hmmm, this isn't working for me yet ... 1853:http://www.busbank.com/visionAward.aspx 380:Don Bosco Technical Institute, Rosemead 14: 3393:I can't find any deleted revisions at 2405:"Split Verdict In Hurricane Rita Case" 1977:"System makes storm cleanup cost more" 1434:, you're trying to clarify a facet of 658:Why did you remove this image off the 3640:The Search For The Next Fashion Model 3632:The Search For The Next Fashion Model 2357:"Government Faulted for Unsafe Buses" 400:have worked fine for normal users). — 2207: 2163: 807:articles that transclude {{db-band}} 3788:Deletion review is right over there 3739:to be nominated for deletion under 3613:Thanks for the reply - :):) Cheers 2620:Dont delete the Akron wiki article! 2295: 2028: 1970: 1920:"Angels scarce, but still hovering" 866:Category:African American musicians 513:Because I saw RussArt being added ( 79:In the unlikely event that you care 23: 2863:User:Gurch/Reports/ArbComElections 2745:; any followups should go there. — 2686:Florida Republican Leadership PAC 2119: 2075: 1913: 24: 3939: 3638:. The page is (or was) a copy of 3434:Primerica Financial Services NPOV 2998:Sorry about that - I'll fix it.-- 2690:Look who the affliated person is 2126:"Pharr firm caught in legal mess" 1438:on a completely unrelated page. — 1134:http://en.wikipedia.org/Crooked_I 997:recent notability notice removals 3489:) 21:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3409:The Mandarin Oriental, Hyde Park 3388:) 13:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3167:List of characters in Camp Lazlo 2717:) 23:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2667:) 11:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC) 2547:- please consider registering a 1872:) 19:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1815:) 18:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1766:) 17:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1731:) 17:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 301:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 3533:) 11:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2818:) 13:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 2628:Thanks for fixing my references 2503:formally nominated for deletion 2493:, barely, would appear to meet 2082:"Suit filed in deadly bus fire" 1899:Trailways Transportation System 1324:. Accounts can't be deleted. — 1320:The closest you can come is to 3699:Achaea, Dreams of Divine Lands 3429:) 21:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 2911:Can't sleep, clown will eat me 1385:Talking to administrator here 1193:Knowledge:Conflict of interest 862:Category:American entertainers 678:candidates for speedy deletion 13: 1: 3502:20:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 3452:17:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3402:20:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 3343:19:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 3329:19:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3289:about the sharing of people, 3283:Victory Lane Luxury Community 3276:02:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3259:01:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3241:00:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 3201:01:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 3180:22:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 3154:18:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 3130:15:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 3111:15:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 3070:01:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 3055:03:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 3037:02:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 3018:14:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 2776:13:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 2755:Please see talk page. Thanks 2750:09:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 2736:23:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 2637:09:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC) 2606:06:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC) 2596:23:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 2579:21:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 2558:19:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 2526:04:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 1885:04:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 1833:18:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1788:17:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1742:17:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1707:17:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1675:03:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1658:06:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1649:00:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1636:15:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 1603:00:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1559:03:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 1543:03:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 1526:03:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 1514:03:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 1494:02:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 1469:02:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 1443:02:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 1425:02:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 1403:18:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1393:17:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1381:17:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1364:17:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1347:17:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1338:17:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1329:17:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1315:17:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1289:16:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 1280:16:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 1263:05:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC) 1241:03:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 1204:08:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC) 384:Don Bosco Technical Institute 353:Don Bosco Technical Institute 146:, 19 October 2006 @12:17 UTC 3929:16:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 3904:14:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3860:13:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3795:13:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3781:13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3763:13:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3731:13:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3722:13:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3707:13:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3693:13:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3665:12:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3647:23:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 3630:When you closed the AFD for 3618:01:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 3609:20:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 3579:19:53, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 3561:07:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 3547:11:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 3189:I saw you recently reverted 3003:21:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 2988:19:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 2974:19:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 2960:17:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 2937:16:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 2914:09:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 2896:06:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 2879:03:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 2856:00:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 2836:14:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 2612:Chicken Noodle Soup dance... 1294:Looking to delete my account 1124:21:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 1110:17:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 1093:22:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 1071:17:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 1020:16:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 991:14:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 978:13:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 934:13:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 922:11:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 872:, and probably several more. 854:Category:People from Chicago 800:23:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 782:12:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 744:12:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 726:12:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 711:07:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 685:23:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 667:23:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC) 649:20:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 634:11:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 624:10:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 603:17:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 558:04:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 540:03:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 522:08:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 479:19:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 454:20:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 443:20:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 429:19:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 405:08:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 374:11:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 363:11:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 347:17:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 330:04:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 313:03:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 285:03:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 275:03:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 261:02:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 244:14:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 230:09:09, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 205:09:09, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 194:01:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 123:00:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC) 102:22:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 7: 3495:Deletion review is thataway 3407:Sorry about that....it was 3357:21:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 1797:without the press release? 858:Category:American musicians 447:Thx for info and link :) -- 10: 3944: 3776:possibility. Thank you. 3230:Talk:Sean Howard/Archive 2 3211:Talk:Sean Howard/Archive 4 3207:Talk:Sean Howard/Archive 3 2829:Knowledge:Notability (web) 2497:, if you can construe the 2361:National Safety Commission 1895:this directory-style entry 1483:Knowledge:Notability (web) 1252:User:Dmcdevit/CSD addition 1046:Robert Bateman High School 1007:Robert Bateman High School 850:Category:Chicago musicians 3840:identical characteristics 3572:Template:Nn-warn-deletion 3198:I did "That's hot" first! 3089:Posted to talk pages for 2495:our notability guidelines 1897:. The pdf appears to be 3897:The Carrion Fields (MUD) 3889:The Carrion Fields (MUD) 3885:The Carrion Fields (MUD) 3232:was recently deleted at 1613:Hi. I have just filed a 1479:what you're reverting to 1436:Knowledge:External links 3875:Another administrator ( 3083:Template:Primarysources 3078:Template:Primarysources 2942:Your input is requested 2825:Knowledge:Verifiability 2624:Why did you delete it? 2306:The Dallas Morning News 2218:The News & Observer 2086:Dallas Business Journal 1981:The News & Observer 1773:Knowledge:Verifiability 1197:Knowledge:Autobiography 870:Category:Jazz musicians 843:Category:American poets 610:User talk:Garyrmortimer 223:York-Adams Area Council 212:York-Adams Area Council 3899:article from my part. 3634:, you missed deleting 3570:I saw your comment on 3566:CSD deletion templates 2693:Donations from FRLPAC 2537:Harold's Chicken Shack 2507:deleting administrator 2474:Check date values in: 2430:Check date values in: 2386:Check date values in: 2327:Check date values in: 2283:Check date values in: 2239:Check date values in: 2195:Check date values in: 2151:Check date values in: 2107:Check date values in: 2063:Check date values in: 2002:Check date values in: 1949:Check date values in: 751:Dave Reilly (comedian) 3521:comment was added by 3477:comment was added by 3417:comment was added by 3376:comment was added by 3220:does exist, but that 3135:In case it matters... 2806:comment was added by 2741:(I've copied this to 2705:comment was added by 2655:comment was added by 1860:comment was added by 1803:comment was added by 1754:comment was added by 1719:comment was added by 765:As can be seen in my 3655:article its deletion 3160:Image:ToodieFull.jpg 3139:I've unblocked your 2948:Request for Comments 1580:2006.11.14.1854 UTC 1322:change your username 1199:before proceeding. — 1187:2006.11.11.0048 UTC 852:is a subcategory of 654:Image: tbm-teeth.jpg 3050:fixes the latter. — 3044:Template:Endspoiler 2174:The Washington Post 1843:http://www.uma.org/ 1826:deleted the article 1619:Milo H Minderbinder 1219:2006.11.11.2322 UTC 913:}} and a generic {{ 388:User:Scorpion prinz 292:Wannabe Kate's Tool 3824:different content? 3737:multi-user dungeon 3653:The Carrion Fields 3252:Winnipeg, Manitoba 2453:The New York Times 2443:Associated Press ( 2399:Associated Press ( 2339:Unknown parameter 2296:Grabell, Michael ( 2252:Associated Press ( 2076:Jordan, Jaime S. ( 1642:WP:SPAM#Canvassing 1168:Regards, Kingwell 3534: 3490: 3471:29 December 2006 3447:May I was wrong. 3430: 3389: 3030:A Modest Proposal 2935: 2819: 2774: 2718: 2668: 2120:Geller, Marc B. ( 2014:Hurricane Katrina 1873: 1816: 1767: 1732: 1696:made no assertion 1567:Need your opinion 1400:Kim van der Linde 692:Bernard E. Witkin 660:This Busy Monster 507: 494:comment added by 472:Waiting to inhale 466:I saw you closed 462:Waiting to Inhale 176: 163:comment added by 18:User talk:Cryptic 3935: 3854: 3848: 3837: 3831: 3748: 3742: 3687: 3681: 3603: 3597: 3593: 3587: 3516: 3472: 3412: 3371: 3152: 3123:ContivityGoddess 2929: 2801: 2770: 2743:Talk:Steve Buyer 2729:reliable sources 2700: 2650: 2555: 2521:earlier today. — 2483: 2477: 2472: 2470: 2462: 2460: 2459: 2439: 2433: 2428: 2426: 2418: 2416: 2415: 2395: 2389: 2384: 2382: 2374: 2372: 2371: 2352: 2346: 2342: 2336: 2330: 2325: 2323: 2315: 2313: 2312: 2292: 2286: 2281: 2279: 2271: 2269: 2268: 2248: 2242: 2237: 2235: 2227: 2225: 2224: 2208:Brubaker, Bill ( 2204: 2198: 2193: 2191: 2183: 2181: 2180: 2164:Brubaker, Bill ( 2160: 2154: 2149: 2147: 2139: 2137: 2136: 2116: 2110: 2105: 2103: 2095: 2093: 2092: 2072: 2066: 2061: 2059: 2051: 2049: 2048: 2039: 2029:Johnson, Kevin ( 2011: 2005: 2000: 1998: 1990: 1988: 1987: 1958: 1952: 1947: 1945: 1937: 1935: 1934: 1924: 1855: 1798: 1777:reliable sources 1749: 1714: 1555: 1539: 1522: 1510: 1465: 1421: 1246:Possible new CSD 1236: 1115:Baron & Budd 1090: 1085: 1079: 1017: 767:deletion summary 705: 489: 484:RussArt linkspam 474:, too? Cheers! - 451: 426: 221:deleted so that 200:tsk, tsk. ;-) -- 191: 188: 158: 98: 95: 3943: 3942: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3919:Talk:Pink noise 3911: 3873: 3852: 3846: 3835: 3829: 3746: 3740: 3685: 3679: 3657: 3628: 3601: 3595: 3591: 3585: 3568: 3555: 3517:—The preceding 3513: 3473:—The preceding 3464: 3436: 3413:—The preceding 3395:Hyde Park Hotel 3372:—The preceding 3367: 3365:Hyde Park Hotel 3297: 3286: 3248: 3214: 3187: 3163: 3144: 3137: 3118: 3080: 3063: 3061:Disenfranchised 3026: 2996: 2967: 2944: 2921: 2906: 2844: 2802:—The preceding 2794: 2783: 2764: 2701:—The preceding 2677: 2651:—The preceding 2646: 2630: 2622: 2614: 2589: 2568: 2553: 2511:deletion review 2499:Chicago Tribune 2475: 2473: 2464: 2463: 2457: 2455: 2431: 2429: 2420: 2419: 2413: 2411: 2387: 2385: 2376: 2375: 2369: 2367: 2355: 2344: 2340: 2338: 2328: 2326: 2317: 2316: 2310: 2308: 2284: 2282: 2273: 2272: 2266: 2264: 2240: 2238: 2229: 2228: 2222: 2220: 2196: 2194: 2185: 2184: 2178: 2176: 2152: 2150: 2141: 2140: 2134: 2132: 2108: 2106: 2097: 2096: 2090: 2088: 2064: 2062: 2053: 2052: 2046: 2044: 2037: 2003: 2001: 1992: 1991: 1985: 1983: 1971:Warrick, Joby ( 1950: 1948: 1939: 1938: 1932: 1930: 1927:Chicago Tribune 1922: 1856:—The preceding 1799:—The preceding 1781:Greyhound Lines 1750:—The preceding 1715:—The preceding 1689:User:Thebusbank 1684: 1668: 1611: 1588: 1569: 1553: 1537: 1533: 1520: 1508: 1463: 1419: 1415: 1374:Right to Vanish 1296: 1272: 1248: 1232: 1228: 1174: 1131: 1117: 1103: 1088: 1083: 1077: 1015: 999: 792: 754: 718: 703: 695: 656: 642: 613: 585:RedBLACKandBURN 569: 551: 486: 464: 449: 424: 419: 356: 339: 268: 251: 237: 215: 189: 182: 155: 132: 112: 96: 89: 81: 76: 75: 28: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3941: 3910: 3907: 3901:84.192.125.204 3893:Carrion Fields 3881:Carrion Fields 3872: 3869: 3867: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3857:84.192.125.204 3843: 3825: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3778:84.192.125.204 3766: 3765: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3733: 3728:84.192.125.204 3711: 3710: 3709: 3704:84.192.125.204 3662:84.192.125.204 3656: 3650: 3627: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3567: 3564: 3554: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3512: 3509: 3507: 3505: 3504: 3479:24.106.129.123 3463: 3458: 3456: 3435: 3432: 3405: 3404: 3366: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3346: 3345: 3322: 3320: 3319: 3314: 3311: 3308: 3303: 3295: 3285: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3247: 3244: 3213: 3204: 3186: 3183: 3177:Squirepants101 3162: 3157: 3136: 3133: 3117: 3114: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3062: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3025: 3024:Spoiler script 3022: 3021: 3020: 2995: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2966: 2963: 2943: 2940: 2920: 2917: 2905: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2882: 2881: 2843: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2793: 2787: 2782: 2779: 2763: 2760: 2739: 2738: 2676: 2673: 2671: 2645: 2640: 2629: 2626: 2621: 2618: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2588: 2586:Square (slang) 2583: 2567: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2529: 2528: 2519:speedy-deleted 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2440: 2396: 2353: 2293: 2249: 2205: 2161: 2117: 2073: 2019: 2018: 2017: 1968: 1923:(Fee required) 1908: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1882:Orderinchaos78 1836: 1835: 1791: 1790: 1745: 1744: 1710: 1709: 1683: 1678: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1587: 1582: 1568: 1565: 1563: 1532: 1529: 1497: 1496: 1477:Stop and read 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1459: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1383: 1367: 1366: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1295: 1292: 1271: 1266: 1247: 1244: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1209: 1207: 1206: 1173: 1170: 1164: 1154: 1130: 1127: 1116: 1113: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1059: 1058: 1041: 1040: 1031: 1030: 998: 995: 994: 993: 983: 982: 981: 971:self-published 967:primarysources 925: 924: 907:primarysources 875: 874: 873: 846: 840: 836: 829: 826: 823: 820: 817: 791: 786: 785: 784: 753: 748: 747: 746: 717: 714: 694: 689: 688: 687: 655: 652: 641: 638: 637: 636: 612: 607: 606: 605: 568: 561: 550: 547: 545: 543: 542: 527: 526: 525: 524: 485: 482: 463: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 418: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 355: 350: 338: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 316: 315: 296: 295: 267: 264: 250: 247: 236: 233: 214: 209: 208: 207: 197: 196: 154: 151: 149: 131: 126: 111: 108: 106: 100: 87: 80: 77: 29: 26: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3940: 3931: 3930: 3927: 3922: 3920: 3916: 3906: 3905: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3877:user:Steel359 3868: 3861: 3858: 3851: 3844: 3841: 3834: 3826: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3802: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3793: 3789: 3786: 3782: 3779: 3774: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3764: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3745: 3738: 3734: 3732: 3729: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3705: 3700: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3691: 3684: 3677: 3676:User:Mushroom 3673: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3663: 3654: 3649: 3648: 3645: 3644:DCEdwards1966 3641: 3637: 3633: 3619: 3616: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3607: 3600: 3590: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3577: 3573: 3563: 3562: 3559: 3548: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3508: 3503: 3500: 3496: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3470: 3462: 3457: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3444: 3440: 3431: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3410: 3403: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3358: 3355: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3344: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3327: 3318: 3315: 3312: 3309: 3307: 3304: 3302: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3292: 3284: 3277: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3257: 3253: 3246:Kitchen Craft 3243: 3242: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3212: 3208: 3203: 3202: 3199: 3196: 3192: 3182: 3181: 3178: 3174: 3173: 3168: 3161: 3156: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3142: 3132: 3131: 3128: 3124: 3113: 3112: 3109: 3104: 3101: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3087: 3084: 3075: 3072: 3071: 3068: 3067:Clio the Muse 3056: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3042:It's because 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3035: 3031: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3001: 2994:Daniel Bryant 2989: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2972: 2962: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2939: 2938: 2933: 2928: 2927: 2916: 2915: 2912: 2897: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2837: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2799: 2791: 2786: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2759: 2756: 2753: 2751: 2748: 2744: 2737: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2707:199.8.170.203 2704: 2697: 2696: 2691: 2689: 2684: 2682: 2672: 2669: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2644: 2639: 2638: 2635: 2625: 2617: 2607: 2604: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2594: 2587: 2582: 2580: 2577: 2573: 2572:Sputniks Down 2566: 2565:Sputniks Down 2559: 2556: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2538: 2534: 2527: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2489: 2488: 2481: 2468: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2441: 2437: 2424: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2397: 2393: 2380: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2334: 2321: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2294: 2290: 2277: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2250: 2246: 2233: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2206: 2202: 2189: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2162: 2158: 2145: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2118: 2114: 2101: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2074: 2070: 2057: 2043: 2036: 2032: 2027: 2026: 2024: 2020: 2015: 2009: 1996: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1969: 1966: 1962: 1956: 1943: 1928: 1921: 1917: 1914:Kaiser, Rob ( 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1891: 1886: 1883: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1854: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1834: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1796: 1789: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1743: 1740: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1708: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1682: 1677: 1676: 1673: 1666:Federal Group 1659: 1656: 1655:Pascal.Tesson 1652: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1643: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1634: 1633:Pascal.Tesson 1630: 1627: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1604: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1586: 1581: 1579: 1575: 1564: 1561: 1560: 1557: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1541: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1516: 1515: 1512: 1504: 1500: 1495: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1470: 1467: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1423: 1404: 1401: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1365: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1348: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1270: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1237: 1235: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1205: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1186: 1182: 1179: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1149: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1126: 1125: 1122: 1112: 1111: 1108: 1094: 1091: 1082: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1062:This isn't a 1061: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1010: 1008: 1004: 992: 989: 984: 980: 979: 976: 972: 968: 964: 958: 956: 954: 951: 948: 945: 941: 937: 936: 935: 932: 927: 926: 923: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 899:toomuchtrivia 896: 895:splitsections 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 844: 841: 837: 834: 830: 827: 824: 821: 818: 815: 814: 812: 808: 804: 803: 802: 801: 798: 790: 783: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 763: 762: 761: 757: 752: 745: 742: 739:, not here. — 738: 734: 730: 729: 728: 727: 724: 713: 712: 709: 706: 701: 693: 686: 683: 679: 675: 671: 670: 669: 668: 665: 661: 651: 650: 647: 635: 632: 628: 627: 626: 625: 622: 618: 611: 604: 601: 597: 594: 590: 589: 588: 586: 581: 578: 572: 566: 560: 559: 556: 546: 541: 538: 534: 529: 528: 523: 520: 516: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 505: 501: 497: 493: 481: 480: 477: 473: 469: 455: 452: 446: 445: 444: 441: 437: 433: 432: 431: 430: 427: 417: 416:Image:EIT.gif 406: 403: 399: 395: 394: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 376: 375: 372: 367: 366: 365: 364: 361: 354: 349: 348: 345: 331: 328: 324: 320: 319: 318: 317: 314: 311: 307: 306:Editor Review 302: 298: 297: 293: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 277: 276: 273: 263: 262: 259: 255: 246: 245: 242: 232: 231: 228: 224: 220: 219:Camp Tuckahoe 213: 206: 203: 199: 198: 195: 192: 187: 186: 179: 178: 177: 174: 170: 166: 162: 150: 147: 145: 141: 137: 130: 125: 124: 121: 117: 107: 104: 103: 99: 94: 93: 86:All the best, 84: 74: 71: 68: 65: 62: 59: 56: 53: 50: 47: 44: 41: 38: 35: 32: 19: 3923: 3912: 3874: 3866: 3839: 3800: 3772: 3658: 3629: 3569: 3556: 3523:131.111.1.66 3514: 3506: 3465: 3455: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3406: 3368: 3321: 3290: 3287: 3249: 3228:. Note that 3215: 3188: 3170: 3164: 3138: 3119: 3105: 3102: 3095:User:Cryptic 3088: 3081: 3073: 3064: 3027: 2997: 2968: 2952:Kelly Martin 2945: 2924: 2922: 2907: 2845: 2795: 2784: 2765: 2757: 2754: 2740: 2724: 2698: 2692: 2685: 2678: 2670: 2647: 2631: 2623: 2615: 2590: 2569: 2543:I copied it 2530: 2456:. Retrieved 2412:. Retrieved 2368:. Retrieved 2347:suggested) ( 2309:. Retrieved 2265:. Retrieved 2221:. Retrieved 2177:. Retrieved 2133:. Retrieved 2089:. Retrieved 2045:. Retrieved 1984:. Retrieved 1931:. Retrieved 1851: 1846: 1841: 1837: 1792: 1746: 1711: 1694:The article 1685: 1669: 1625: 1612: 1589: 1585:Blake Schilb 1573: 1570: 1562: 1550: 1546: 1534: 1517: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1486: 1455: 1416: 1413:Who are you? 1309: 1300: 1298:Hi Cryptic, 1297: 1283: 1273: 1249: 1233: 1229: 1208: 1183: 1175: 1167: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1141: 1137: 1132: 1121:Baronandbudd 1118: 1104: 1055:Witch Hunter 1011: 1003:Witch Hunter 1000: 960: 946: 883:cleanup-tone 832: 811:Lonie Walker 793: 789:Lonie Walker 760:David Reilly 758: 755: 719: 716:Pronoia Tour 696: 657: 643: 614: 587:31 Oct 2006 582: 573: 570: 552: 549:User:Helgrot 544: 514: 496:66.189.88.27 490:— Preceding 487: 465: 420: 397: 357: 340: 278: 269: 252: 238: 216: 184: 183: 159:— Preceding 156: 148: 133: 129:User:Wikiman 113: 105: 91: 90: 85: 82: 45: 3771:Then can I 3589:nothanks-sd 3469:adarkfigure 3238:Dragonfiend 3222:Sean Howard 3218:Sean Howard 3099:User:Centrx 2768:Steve block 2681:Steve Buyer 2675:Thanks, but 2657:Nike George 2515:hagiography 2491:The BusBank 2341:|coauthors= 2130:The Monitor 1681:The BusBank 1487:midsentence 1107:Doc Tropics 891:split-apart 621:Luna Santin 555:Bakhteiarov 282:Nightscream 272:Nightscream 3511:Incredible 3172:Camp Lazlo 3141:Crypticbot 3106:Thank you 3091:User:Jossi 2904:My answers 2634:Finiteyoda 2458:2006-11-16 2445:2006-10-03 2414:2006-11-16 2401:2006-10-03 2370:2006-11-16 2365:2006-08-18 2311:2006-11-16 2298:2006-08-09 2267:2006-11-16 2254:2006-05-12 2223:2006-11-16 2210:2006-02-17 2179:2006-11-16 2166:2005-10-18 2135:2006-11-16 2122:2005-10-05 2091:2006-11-16 2078:2005-10-03 2047:2006-11-16 2031:2005-09-25 1986:2006-11-16 1973:2006-03-21 1933:2006-11-16 1916:2002-11-11 1862:Thebusbank 1805:Thebusbank 1756:Thebusbank 1721:Thebusbank 1700:notability 1081:notability 1036:discussion 596:guidelines 563:undelete " 120:Hbdragon88 3915:1/f noise 3909:1/f noise 3615:Lethaniol 3576:Lethaniol 3558:Pete.Hurd 3538:Just the 3461:Crooked I 3191:User:Yrgh 2965:Sufferage 2762:Holy crap 2643:STUDIO L2 2603:Wahkeenah 2593:Wahkeenah 2517:that was 2467:cite news 2343:ignored ( 2320:cite news 2276:cite news 2232:cite news 2188:cite news 2144:cite news 2100:cite news 2056:cite news 2042:USA Today 2038:(Reprint) 1995:cite news 1965:Greyhound 1942:cite news 1795:coach USA 1593:East-West 1531:Oh, I see 1458:my focus. 1432:talk page 988:Cricket02 940:Supershow 931:Cricket02 911:POV-check 903:quotefarm 887:quotefarm 879:POV-check 797:Cricket02 771:WP:CSD#A7 723:Ethnopunk 646:F.A.A.F.A 577:interview 565:decayenne 515:yet again 436:WP:CSD#I5 3926:WebDrake 3531:contribs 3519:unsigned 3487:contribs 3475:unsigned 3427:contribs 3415:unsigned 3386:contribs 3374:unsigned 3354:Wrzfreak 3326:Wrzfreak 3000:Brownlee 2889:Interiot 2875:my votes 2816:contribs 2808:WiiVolve 2804:unsigned 2798:WiiVolve 2790:WiiVolve 2715:contribs 2703:unsigned 2665:contribs 2653:unsigned 2576:Dianogah 2549:username 2423:cite web 2409:CBS News 2379:cite web 2345:|author= 2262:ABC News 1870:contribs 1858:unsigned 1813:contribs 1801:unsigned 1764:contribs 1752:unsigned 1729:contribs 1717:unsigned 1672:SatuSuro 1653:Thanks. 1629:contribs 1578:Franklin 1576:Thanks! 1269:UBUBKZUG 1256:Dmcdevit 1217:Franklin 1185:Franklin 1027:WP:MUSIC 969:}} or {{ 963:WP:MUSIC 950:contribs 893:}} or {{ 640:Good job 583:Thanks, 504:contribs 492:unsigned 344:Rwetruck 249:Alrighty 173:contribs 161:unsigned 3792:Cryptic 3773:perhaps 3760:Cryptic 3719:Cryptic 3690:Cryptic 3636:TSFTNFM 3606:Cryptic 3599:nn-warn 3544:Cryptic 3499:Cryptic 3399:Cryptic 3340:Cryptic 3273:Cryptic 3265:Bearcat 3256:jdobbin 3195:Mike H. 3108:Jeepday 3052:Cryptic 3034:Shinobu 2985:Cryptic 2971:Abu ali 2893:Cryptic 2887:It was 2833:Cryptic 2792:article 2747:Cryptic 2733:Cryptic 2533:Expedia 2523:Cryptic 1830:Cryptic 1822:Brookie 1785:Cryptic 1739:Cryptic 1704:Cryptic 1646:Cryptic 1600:Cryptic 1491:Cryptic 1440:Cryptic 1361:Cryptic 1326:Cryptic 1286:Charles 1277:Charles 1201:Cryptic 1068:Cryptic 1051:Rossami 975:Cryptic 919:Cryptic 915:cleanup 779:Cryptic 741:Cryptic 682:Cryptic 672:As the 631:Cryptic 617:this IP 600:Cryptic 593:content 571:Hello. 533:Mwanner 519:Cryptic 440:Cryptic 402:Cryptic 371:Cryptic 327:Cryptic 241:Tyscorp 190:Unction 185:Ξxtreme 165:Dpeper7 153:dumbass 97:Unction 92:Ξxtreme 3871:Update 3850:db-bio 3833:db-bio 3756:db-bio 3744:db-bio 3715:WP:INN 3683:db-bio 3553:thanks 3540:hoaxes 3291:places 3146:Kimchi 3127:Vizjim 3116:Gender 3010:Ral315 2919:Thanks 2867:Ral315 2848:Ral315 2842:ArbCom 2781:Hello! 2554:Trödel 2476:|date= 2432:|date= 2388:|date= 2329:|date= 2285:|date= 2241:|date= 2197:|date= 2153:|date= 2109:|date= 2065:|date= 2004:|date= 1951:|date= 1929:. p. 3 1554:Solely 1538:Solely 1521:Solely 1509:Solely 1464:Solely 1420:Solely 1390:Deodar 1378:Deodar 1344:Deodar 1335:Deodar 1312:Deodar 1226:Thanks 1101:Thanks 1089:Trödel 1016:Trödel 905:}}, {{ 901:}}, {{ 897:}}, {{ 889:}}, {{ 885:}}, {{ 881:}}, {{ 775:WP:BIO 737:WP:DRV 735:is on 700:Tangot 664:Waqcku 450:Trödel 425:Trödel 398:should 323:WP:RFA 266:Thanks 180:Tsk. 140:Gordon 110:Thanks 3449:A1794 3419:Abe66 3378:Abe66 2932:Help! 1556:Facts 1540:Facts 1523:Facts 1511:Facts 1466:Facts 1422:Facts 1064:nomic 839:site. 833:known 392:evrik 360:evrik 310:EVula 258:EVula 227:evrik 202:evrik 16:< 3527:talk 3483:talk 3423:talk 3382:talk 3209:and 3185:Yrgh 3048:this 3014:talk 2956:talk 2871:talk 2852:talk 2827:and 2812:talk 2772:Talk 2725:this 2711:talk 2661:talk 2545:here 2480:help 2436:help 2392:help 2349:help 2333:help 2289:help 2245:help 2201:help 2157:help 2113:help 2069:help 2008:help 1961:here 1955:help 1866:talk 1824:who 1809:talk 1760:talk 1725:talk 1623:talk 1304:and 1234:Lost 1195:and 1178:chat 1005:and 944:talk 773:and 537:Talk 500:talk 382:was 253:Re: 235:Why? 169:talk 144:Talk 114:The 3790:. — 3717:. — 3674:. 3626:AFD 3542:. — 3497:. — 3271:. — 2983:. — 2950:. 2926:Guy 2873:) ( 2831:. — 2731:. — 2447:). 2403:). 2300:). 2256:). 2212:). 2168:). 2124:). 2080:). 2033:). 1975:). 1918:). 1702:. — 1698:of 1609:Rfc 1481:. 1456:not 1275:--- 777:. — 733:afd 708:ngo 680:. — 531:-- 476:AED 438:. — 136:Dog 3853:}} 3847:{{ 3836:}} 3830:{{ 3747:}} 3741:{{ 3686:}} 3680:{{ 3642:. 3602:}} 3596:{{ 3592:}} 3586:{{ 3529:• 3485:• 3425:• 3384:• 3150:sg 3097:, 3093:, 3016:) 2958:) 2877:) 2854:) 2814:• 2752:) 2713:• 2663:• 2581:} 2471:: 2469:}} 2465:{{ 2451:. 2427:: 2425:}} 2421:{{ 2407:. 2383:: 2381:}} 2377:{{ 2363:. 2359:. 2337:; 2324:: 2322:}} 2318:{{ 2304:. 2280:: 2278:}} 2274:{{ 2260:. 2236:: 2234:}} 2230:{{ 2216:. 2192:: 2190:}} 2186:{{ 2172:. 2148:: 2146:}} 2142:{{ 2128:. 2104:: 2102:}} 2098:{{ 2084:. 2060:: 2058:}} 2054:{{ 2040:. 1999:: 1997:}} 1993:{{ 1979:. 1946:: 1944:}} 1940:{{ 1925:. 1868:• 1811:• 1762:• 1727:• 1310:-- 1172:Hi 1084:}} 1078:{{ 868:, 864:, 860:, 813:: 535:| 506:) 502:• 422:-- 175:) 171:• 142:| 73:15 70:14 67:13 64:12 61:11 58:10 3749:? 3525:( 3481:( 3421:( 3380:( 3148:. 3012:( 2954:( 2934:) 2930:( 2869:( 2850:( 2810:( 2709:( 2659:( 2482:) 2478:( 2461:. 2438:) 2434:( 2417:. 2394:) 2390:( 2373:. 2351:) 2335:) 2331:( 2314:. 2291:) 2287:( 2270:. 2247:) 2243:( 2226:. 2203:) 2199:( 2182:. 2159:) 2155:( 2138:. 2115:) 2111:( 2094:. 2071:) 2067:( 2050:. 2010:) 2006:( 1989:. 1957:) 1953:( 1936:. 1864:( 1807:( 1758:( 1737:— 1723:( 1626:· 1621:( 1574:] 1260:t 1258:· 947:· 942:( 704:a 567:" 498:( 369:— 167:( 55:9 52:8 49:7 46:6 43:5 40:4 37:3 34:2 31:1

Index

User talk:Cryptic
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Ξxtreme Unction
22:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Peacemakers: The Paris Peace Conference of 1919 and Its Attempt to End War
Hbdragon88
00:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
User:Wikiman
Dog
Gordon
Talk
unsigned
Dpeper7
talk
contribs
Ξxtreme Unction

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.