User talk:Cryptic/archive-9

2702:

uses were the result of a compromise several years ago whereby we agreed to remove all uses of the Gator head logo from season, rivalry, bowl game, and championship articles (literally, more than 100 others) where they were in use at the time. We use secondary text logos for all Florida Gators articles other than the main team articles, and I've done my best to patrol and enforce that compromise ever since, which usually requires giving a brief explanation to any newbie editor who thinks we should use the Gator head logo everywhere. Most newbies and drive-bys accept that, and move on; they're usually a little bit intimidated by the non-free use rationales on the logo file page, as well the logo talk page explanations and warnings regarding its proper use. Which is exactly what we wanted. : )

3819:? Or the widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in the subject's specific field? But shrug, never mind, recreate it, it'll only join all the other non-notable bios. I'm pretty disillusioned about them, and it's hardly worth my trouble to take it to AfD. Low-profile articles of this type don't usually get sufficient, or much of any, attention there, which is not surprising. We seem to expect our users to do a lot of cumbersome busywork, such as to read and opine on all sorts of boring AfD's and similar, but most won't; they want to do things that interest them. Such is the nature of a volunteer-created project, and I don't blame them. I want to do interesting stuff too. 3161:, and subsequently deleted it on expiration. No quibbles with the procedural move, but there are numerous sources which establish Ranger as the largest manufacturer of bass boats in the world. Was their independent support of this in the article? Maybe not -- can't see for sure since that article is gone -- but to not have an article about the largest manufacturer of a significant genre of boat seems to be just plain wrong. I know it's the author's job (and I can't remember if I was the original author or not -- I'm guessing I was) to establish sources, but a Google search turned up plenty of evidence that would establish notability. 2759:. I discovered that he hadn’t yet had a Wiki article, did what limited research I could and wrote the article to which a few others later made minor edits and additions. The article largely remained mine alone. Thus, my regret at seeing it deleted, my one and only article! I also liked the idea that the subject was so young. Should he eventually become a major entertainment figure, then I could have had the future satisfaction of having created his article “way back when” as if I had anachronistically "discovered" say, John Travolta in his salad days, and that the article would have endured long after I leave the scene. 649:

company Riedel Communications in this situation to see what their opinion is about that. This article descripes the company Riedel. As with many other wiki sites already... The articles describes the company, the products and milestones. Is it prohibited to name events in which the company was involved in the past? I do not think so! Normally articles do not get deleted asap, you work together so that you have a nice article in the end. If thou you do not feel in a position to help us with that and instantly delete our article again and again, I would like to talk to another person about that.--

4076: 1501: 2045: 361: 5317: 4445: 766:

clean block log, and some all round experiece in meta areas with not too many mistakes. It usually takes a year and 4,000 edits to achieve all that. Some admins might have far exceeded those norms when they ran, but simply because they never really considered being admins until it was suggested to them. Old-age pensioners like me for example, who had already been around on Wiki for about 6 years and 30,000 edits, and certainly not looking for recognition for work on a web site. --

4936:, where it matters most, if it were resized to exactly 200x150.As for the book cover, I'm surprised I didn't notice it; I usually try to catch pd-text images and untag instead of revdelete them. (Except for company logos, which I'll cheerfully reduce.) I got a database error when I tried to undelete it just now, and I'm going to continue to be unavailable for the near future, so feel free to get another admin to restore it. 1939:: Redirect to a deleted or nonexistent page" and "It was previously been deleted by a discussion" I agree with you. It was deleted for lack of reliable references but this new page was created with new contents & references based on recent development. Can you please check again the contents of the article & reliable references. It's okay , you can remove the re-direction , please don't delete the whole page! 2384:

revert it, but I figured that it would be best suited under its final name, because I have almost never (ever, possibly) seen the common name used in ANG articles other than this instance. Considering that now all the unit histories have been moved to their respective locations and some outright lies have been corrected, it is easier having things be more cohesive at this point than disjointed and all over the place.

3081:

true (if it ever was; I haven't checked); there's no mention of the photo in the article text. The latter is, of course, nonsense - the article is about the person, not the photograph. I also note that the uploader did not object to the deletion, which he was well aware of (as shown by the formatting edits he made to the image description page during its 7-day grace period).

2334:"the subject is clearly more commonly known by one of the previous names." Check out the page history, where a reason was given for the reverse move. The 52d saw combat under the "from" name and was a partially manned unit under the final name. I'd revert your move, but for some reason I get a message saying that it was already reverted, although it hasn't. -- 1161:

are inappropriate, and will delete them. You suggest that 'nearly every paragraph' was G11, yet the bulk of the article past the introduction and history seem very innocuous to me. Am I missing something? Please bear in mind that the majority of traffic for this article will be high school students looking to familiarise themselves with THIMUN rules and procedures.

3675:

permissions-en@wikimedia.org, nevertheless later you have deleted the image. Could you please explain why? If the email was not received I can forward it to you once again and would kindly ask you to restore the image in the article. Otherwise please let me know what went wrong. This is my first experience at Knowledge, so i'm kind of lost a bit. Thank you.

3845:, I was watching it, in the sense that it was one of almost 9,000 articles on my watchlist. But how can we discuss the notability, or otherwise, of an article that no longer exists? You may, despite your tiredness, remember all the details of its sourcing, but I'm afraid I don't, not at this remove (I see from my records that I created it in May 2009). 4787:(the company founded by Michael Featherstone) has been created I thought you may be able cast a watchful eye over it. The subject appears notable, and there are many reliable sources documenting issues around the company and Mr Featherstone. There was a lot of copy and paste material in the article and it certainly did not appear to be written with 1974:. I've taken another look, and I stand by my re-deletion. The re-created page uses different references than the one deleted at AFD, but most are from the same publications, and the remainder appear similar in character to me and I don't think they would have made a difference to the AFD outcome if they had been in the article at the time. 2478:. As best I can tell your reversing the blanking does nothing significant because there was never a discussion on the page (just the redirect to the group AfD) and the new discussion page has 2nd Nomination on it. Maybe it is different for Admins but this is the only way I found that works properly for us little people with no powers. 2143:, concern was: why is this here?") showing up in my logs would have been embarrassing. (Even more so than the double A7 I ended up with. I was trying to ensure the prod part didn't get truncated, so wrote a shortened version of the generic drop-down A7... and then forgot to disable the generic one, making truncation even 165:. I think it's very clear looking at the history of the article that the 2012 version was started from scratch, both from the gap in revision dates and from your edit summary, before even looking at its text. (Plus, deleting large numbers of revisions is annoying—each one needs to be individually clicked.) — 2994:. Nowhere in the text of the article was there any indication of any sort of lasting importance or significance, and the provided references were all either interviews or had the character of unedited press releases. If your company is truly notable, someone else will eventually write an article about it. — 3982:

Articles deleted via the proposed deletion process are normally restored upon request, so let me know if you want that. I advise against that in this case unless you have in-depth, independent sources to add to the article - as it stands, any administrator could immediately delete it again; and even

3080:

The yearbook image was uploaded with a copyright tag that permits use where the image itself is the subject of sourced commentary in the article, and with a fair-use rationale that stated in part "The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work." The former is no longer

2770:

To be fair, however, I’m uncertain if his seeming dearth of recent professional accomplishments is more a function of a lack of offers or his personal desire (or that of his parents') to concentrate on his professional and academic education with the intention and hope of resuming an active career as

2545:

Exactly the issue - I add Caroline Scott - manually or with TW and the old AfD is transcluded on to the page. Further testing shows that the redirect needs to be removed, the new AfD done, then the redirect restored so that the old AfD is correctly linked. This is caused by the BUNDLE process. I will

1704:

Hi, I would like to understand with you how should I re-create the article about Better Decisions Forum. It's not a promotional page about company, product or persons. I wanted to create an encyclopedic page about a series of conferences related to business, academic and technology topics (just like

1350:

The policy seems to allow for names that imply that the user works at a particular place. I'll agree that this user was using Knowledge to promote himself (and possibly his company), and that his article was rightfully deleted, but I don't necessarily agree with the username block. It's a moot point

889:

If you had half a brain you'd see that A) I was the one who identified them as likely - but by no means certain - copyvios, and B) I was the one who blocked him, and C) if you can see his name in the article's history, he obviously didn't create them in violation of his block. They're not speedies.

610:

Actually it would be nice to talk with you about problems with my site. I can not understand why you keep deleting my article about Riedel Communications. I tried to fix it but instead of opening a discussion the site was deleted immediatly...We have no problem with the copyright here as I am working

255: 219: 5688:

2. I disagree that the page foes not indicate why the subject matter is important. It is important because Screen NSW is the NSW governments funding body for the TV and Film industry in NSW. There are many similar government bodies listed for Australia and this is one of the largest. Below are three

4582:

and put an "OTRS pending" on. Do you know if that OTRS ticket actually has substance to it? I'm asking because this editor has reuploaded this same image about half a dozen times despite multiple deletions since mid-February, always claiming he had what sounded like a "for-Knowledge-only" permission

4223:

I agree that the edit was quite deceptive. The editor admits that it was deceptive and they assert that it won't occur again. I'm prepared to unblock the account with the stipulation that if they upload any additional copyvio material, they will be subject to an immediate indef block. I'm leaning

4186:

requesting reconsideration of the indef block you placed on their account. The editor admitted that they made a mistake in not replying to the copyright notifications and is requesting an unblock with the promise that it will not occur again. Since you were the blocking admin, I'd like to get your

3019:

I noticed you deleted the image of author Thomas Pynchon on the grounds that it violated Knowledge's non-free content criteria, since Mr. Pynchon is still living and therefore a free photograph could be taken of him. However, this fails to take into account the fact that Mr. Pynchon is a recluse who

2733:

I see you recently were instrumental in removing the article on Ryan Collinson on notability grounds. To that effect, you apparently used the PROD procedure. I must have missed seeing the article during the indicated time period. If I had, I can’t honestly say if I would have opposed the deletion

2701:

That's probably because WikiProject University of Florida did a better job at creating individual articles for its notable sports teams, including its women's teams, unlike most other families of sports program articles, which drop off pretty quickly after football and men's basketball. The current

2286:

You wrote one sentence describing the software and five saying how great it is. That one sentence ("SEMCAD is a commercial 3-D FDTD-based full-wave electro-magnetic & thermal simulation software.") isn't sufficient for an article; the others have no place in an encyclopedia, especially one like

1780:

for further work, and this is what I recommend; let me know if you want that. Alternately, you can just create it again as you did before, so long as you say in your article why the organization is significant - preferably, including independent reliable sources, so that other volunteers don't have

1384:

states that this only applies "where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving. ... For equivocal cases which do not meet speedy deletion criteria (such as ... where free-content edits overlie the infringement, or where there is only partial infringement or close paraphrasing), the

1245:

Yeah, I've blocked him for his username (which won't matter, since he hasn't edited in almost a year), and no, the article's never going to make it into mainspace like that, but at least it's neutrally written. No harm letting it sit around unindexed for six months, and I'd never be able to justify

732:

been getting a sudden short sharp wave of inappropriate nominations over the last four weeks or so. That said, I don't think our criteria are absurdley high. In the absence of any easy way to defrock sysops who go astray, in this post 2007 era I believe them to be about right. All the best for 2015.

3332:

I understand that this is a new term, which is correct, but in the same way the Option Pool Shuffle was "new" a few years ago. And is now commonplace. Codifying this term will raise the mechanic to startups and small companies, and assist them when negotiating with VCs. We don't stand to make any

2740:

It is said that the classic definition of ambivalence is watching one's mother-in-law driving off a cliff in one’s brand new Cadillac! That’s sort of the way I felt when I discovered the article was deleted. I've always felt somewhat embarrassed at having written it. My one and only interest in the

2119:(Deletion log); 04:35 . . Cryptic (talk | contribs) deleted page Dave Huddart ‎(A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events): A7: Bio with no explanation of significance. Also an expired WP:PROD with (not-so-great) rational "why is this here?") 923:

is always going to be a controversial tagging, and essentially never correct in the absence of sockpuppetry. If your script can figure out the original user's talk page to put a notice on, then the article was pretty much by definition created before the banning or blocking. Besides, the blocking

481:

Saw both of those, yes; but it'll be less disruption in the long run if he can be talked down instead of just blocking a sock army (if P004ME2 really is SummerFunMan, and not just someone else stirring the pot). He's clearly frustrated, and understandably so; and the current version of the article

206:

the info there (it's an Israeli films database), like other sites that need the information about that Director and films that contribute to the Israeli culture. more than that, the article at wikipedia was translated from the Hebrew-wiki-page, so it is just translation. i have changed as much as i

5812:

Hello. I noticed that you were doing some categorization work with my Sandbox and test deletion tags. If the page was categorized by those tags, would it still be deleted despite the warnings on my Sandbox itself, the Sandbox Talk Page, AND my User Talk page? Why does categorization even matter to

5796:

nominationed it for deletion with the rationale that eventually made it into my deletion comment, and nobody objected to deletion in more than a week. Apparently the article had survived for years based on unreferenced claims that the company had worked on many specific games, but our articles on

3942:

Please be aware that "notability" as used here is Knowledge jargon: it's a reference to our inclusion criteria, and is closer in meaning to "noted" than "notable". The guideline that the article will eventually have to pass for inclusion at Knowledge is listed (in verbose, excruciating detail) at

2852:

Thank you for your prompt, most courteous and helpful reply. It’s most appreciated. Upon reviewing the Wiki editor’s user/talk pages that you referenced, I find his or her motivation suspect. Nevertheless, the embarrassment portion of my ambivalence—admitting that I actually wrote an article on

2162:

Hi Cryptic, I got notif, that You thanked me :-) thank You for the thanks. I just try to confirm that it was for my PROD (hardly anything else, yet as not being admin, I do not see who prceded it and deleted it). Frankly, I wasn't quite sure by what measures, what procedure I should choose on this

1160:

Hi Cryptic, many thanks for the comments. I do agree that there was too much puff in the article I submitted. The external links were actually there largely as citations. Being new to creating articles, I was unsure how to insert them as such. I assume that the links connected to THIMUN affiliates

780:

Yes, he was a couple standard deviations above the norm, and in retrospect my reply here was a bit flippant. I hope you'll agree, though, that some exaggeration was appropriate in the context of my original comment on RegistryKey's talk page (which is what I've been assuming you were referring to

289:

and took care in referencing it as far as I could (over 90 links to trustful sources). I am an experienced editor of Knowledge. For my surprise, the article was reverted by user CIRT to a preceding stub version mainly consisting of a very narrow list of films. Many important contents were removed.

5221:

are the most common; in the latter case, you'll also need to add a statement that you're the copyright holder.) Do be aware, though, that just because you own the physical photo and that it's of your deceased relative, that doesn't necessarily make you the copyright holder; those rights lie with

2792:

Still, and again, although I am uncertain if I would have objected, I would respectfully suggest that should you use the PROD method of deleting an article in the future, that you might drop a note on the talk pages of the article’s creator and major contributors (if any) simply as a courtesy for

2762:

On the other hand, I understand your point and, I must confess, I am somewhat disappointed in the subject from a personal perspective. In an effort to update his article with hopefully further professional credits, I followed his Twitter tweets for awhile and was bemused finding myself instead

2166:

The think is the article became an issue on Czech Twiter, til one moment one my colleague at work notified me and we both studied it.It seemed fishy right away, but being written in such a manner, it wasnt easy to disprove. Fortunatelly other Wikipedians took part in it actively and disproved the

648:

At first It´s not your encyclopedia, it´s a encyclopedia for ALL. If I look through all the other articles about companys our article compared to that is not advertising at all...And all materials and informations in these articles are legal and free content. Maybe it is a solution to contact the

156:

I don't think it's necessary. Copyvios don't get restored, even for temporary review at DRV; my doing so was an error that needed correction. The other revisions are comparatively harmless, and potentially useful in that they illustrated the troubled history of the article, especially since the

3519:

I don't see any mention of the co-op in your first link, and only trivial coverage of it in your second, so I don't think they justify an article in mainspace. I can restore the deleted version as a draft for you, if you like; but it's probably going to need much more substantial coverage to be

2383:

As Cryptic said above, don't shoot the messenger as this is my doing and they innocently walked in to help out. I requested the move because I have almost never seen UNITNAME used before, and was trying to update all ANG unit pages so that they made sense and were easily accessible. Feel free to

2239:

The article looks like an advertisement of a product from a company. However, I was looking for information about the article I wrote months ago, and I never found it. That is why I wrote the article, Semcad is a tool that scientist uses for simulating magnetic fields and the lack of information

2208:

Yes, it was for that article, if the thanks notification got broken (I seem to recall that they used to if the article got deleted afterwards, but thought that got fixed?). The prod process was fine, given your thorough explanation; if you'd just said something like "hoax" I'd have kicked it to

765:

You just happened to choose a comment from an editor, a very young one, whose own 3rd RfA tanked monumentally just 48 hours ago. All that candidates are required to do is demonstrate an acceptable level of maturity, civility, helpfulness, a good knowledge of policies, some solid content work, a

5685:

1. The pagee is not advertising anything or any of the above. Screen NSW is the state government funding body for film and television production in the state of NSW, Australia. I used the copy from its website which states its mission statement and government function. It is not a company so it

2402:

As before, Cryptic may have some permission that I don't (a technical reason?). There is some reason I can't move it back. When I do so "The edit appears to have already been undone." appears above the editing box, and the usual description of the edit to be undone does not appear in the edit

4910:, did you take a look at the article in which the image is used? The user who put the image in the article arranged so that only 200×150 pixels are used, but the full-size image currently has 365×273. It seems that the image can be reduced further, as the extra pixels aren't in use anywhere. -- 140:

I saw you changed the visibility of previously-deleted copyvio versions. Would it not be better to just remove all versions dated before 12 March 2012‎? They had all been deleted, and then a fresh version of the article was started on 12 March 2012. I don't know how difficult that would be, or

2173:

I would be most interested who did write it and why. It looked like some attempt of University professor of history to showcase how such a thing can survice on wiki. But at the same time he would benefit mostly if he would new our procedures, so he choose the best sources and topic to make it

838:

The twitter link on the original author's userpage contains his full name (matching the username, but the confirmation is nice). Linkedin profile lists it as a former occupation. He's made legitimate edits since posting that article, so I wasn't about to identify him there at DRV. Might be

4507:

At a glance, it still looks fairly promotional (though probably not at a speedyable level), and seems to match what I remember of the brochure. The problematic claim of winning Emmy Awards is still there, too; it's somewhere between false and deliberately misleading. (The company won minor

1183:

I see you've already re-created it at your user page, so you clearly have a copy of it offline. You're probably better off working on it there instead of on Knowledge until you're at the point where you need active feedback. There's no need to worry about getting the formatting or such

2828:

I do know where you're coming from with respect to not being able to find articles to create. By the time I first discovered Knowledge in... probably late 2003?... my areas of expertise, and my primary areas of interest as a reader (which have zero overlap with the first), were already

4688:

You deleted a file called LEAP Africa Logo.jpg and I am wondering why. This image has been removed several times but I have asked the organization that owns it to send an email to wikipedia permitting my use, which they have done several times. I don't understand what I should do now.

4011:

Is it possible for normal users to move a page without leaving a redirect? Or is that only something an admin can do? It's mainly the reason I didn't just move it back instead and decided to tag it for speedy, I wasn't exactly sure what to do in that situation. Thanks for your reply.

3020:

has never made a public appearance and hasn't been clearly photographed in nearly 60 years. I understand the rationale behind deleting non-free images of living people, but in this case it seems exceedingly unlikely a free image could ever be taken of the subject to to his secrecy.

2767:, a typical kid seemingly more bent on impressing his juvenile tribe than contributing to the world of “art” or even concentrating on learning the niceties of the English language, one might add. Alas, I discerned no glimmer of Mozart in him, though I wish him well in the future. 2502:

I believe Knowledge is doing the transluding. I even did some testing and deleting the redirect was the only thing that worked. Anyway, if you can't explain what I am doing wrong, please don't change my actions that result in everything working correctly instead of being messed up.

3996:. That would protect it from most forms of immediate deletion; however, it would need to be approved by an experienced editor before being republished - and, again, that's unlikely unless much better sourcing is provided. Still, that's what I advise in this case. Let me know. — 1771:") deletion process I used on your article only allows us to delete when an article doesn't even imply that it might meet those guidelines. Any statement that plausibly indicates that additional research would have a reasonable chance of demonstrating notability would suffice. 3046:, to the detriment of the encyclopedia - and this puts me in kind of a weird position, in that I'm forced to defend a position I don't actually hold. However, I'm confident that this deletion meets both the letter and spirit of policy, as well as precedent in its application. 1080:

Where and when was the request for the move made? For some reason I can not find it. The whole move is a bit strange as people in Co. Clare refer not only to the village but also to the dam as Ardnacrusha. To be true: with the dam being the better known one outside Co. Clare.

3674:

Dear Cryptic. I'm writing to you concerning the deletion of the file Tigran_Tsitoghdyan_with_his_painting_from_Mirror_series.png on 10 Feb, 2015 15:55 I have forwarded the permission of the author of the photo (who is actually the person to whiom the article is dedicated) to

3551:

Hey, I'm so sorry. I thought about emailing you yesterday but I saw the actions were a few days old so thought it best not to bug you. Can't see a link to it here, but suffice to say, absolutely nothing to do with you or your decision. I promise that makes sense somewhere.

848:

Yeah. I guess you could remove that comment if you can to ensure it's not problematic. To be precise, the original author has self identified himself on the web. So even if you do not remove the comment, it's alright. Your call is as good as mine on this. See you around.

263: 5297:. And, as she also mentions, we wouldn't do so anyway, as the draft was far too promotional; it would have to be so thoroughly rewritten before it even began to look like an encyclopedia article and not an advertisement that the external copyright wouldn't apply. — 5252: 1344:

Usernames that unambiguously represent the name of a company, group, institution or product (e.g. TownvilleWidgets, MyWidgetsUSA.com, TrammelMuseumofArt). However usernames that contain such names are sometimes permissible; see under Usernames implying shared use

986:

It wasn't a redirect when I deleted it, and I'm embarrassed to say that, while I read the entire AFD to be sure it still applied to the re-created article, I entirely missed the closer's statement that a redirect was OK. I've restored and protected it as such.

5654:

instead, and add "{{submit}}" (with the curly braces) to it. It'll take a while before someone gets to it (the backlog is around 3 weeks), but the article will be protected from most forms of deletion until it's published; this is what I usually recommend.

4642:

Someone brought it to my attention that a page discussing my work as an artist and writer has been removed. Why? This page has been maintained by people I do not now and it has existed on wikipedia by many years. Thank you, Don Ritter (not the politician)

2123:

See you have a sense of humor. And great reading comprehension. I was trying to be different and hopefully amusing. why is this here? Is another way of saying he was not wiki worthy aka not notable. But I guess those are lousy reasons to delete an article.

2834:

In any case, at least your brand new Cadillac was fully insured. PRODs are lightweight; all you have to do to get back articles deleted by them is ask. If you decide that way, either I can do it, or (and this way will usually be quicker) you can ask at

1213: 5704:

It would be fantastic if you could let me know what would make this page better rather than deleting it as it is a page that many Australians in the screen industry will find a useful reference point. It would be great to have this on Knowledge shortly

4994:

I just saw that my page has been deleted on the terms of "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Please let me know the content that looked like advertising so that i can modify it. My aim was to create a Wiki page with no intent of advertising.

4031:

have moved it back if you had done so immediately rather than tag the redirect for speedy deletion. A redirect pointing at the source of a page move, with only one revision, won't prevent a move. Best practice would have been to move back to

259: 223: 2403:

summary box. A preview shows no change to the page. Since Cryptic made the move I can't undo, I presume Cryptic can undo it, so that's why I posted here. Had I been able to revert the move, I would have and discussed it on the talk page. --

2814:

I'm afraid my interest in the article was merely clerical - while I did end up being the one to push the delete button, my role was only to make sure the rationale for deletion was reasonable and that nobody had objected to deletion. It was

2240:

about it is a shame in this area. I'm not related to the company who produce this tool at all. I just want to give a reference for future scientist who want to use this tool (Semcad) in order to show the that it exist. Similar pages are:

5258:

Will you restore my pages: 15:29, 31 May 2015 Cryptic (talk | contribs) deleted page Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Bear on the Square Mountain Festival (G13: Abandoned AfC submission; copyvio pasted together from various sources)

4845: 2417:

It sounds like you're pushing "undo" from the history page or diff or your watchlist. That's not going to work; you have to use the move-this-page feature. In any case, I'll move it back and let you two hash it out on the talk page.

310:

I have no interest in the article, and generally make a point of not responding to massively-crossposted messages; but at a cursory glance, Cirt's reversion was at least defensible. Once you get back from your block, try a listing at

3243:, and you're invited to participate. Some editors commenting in the recent AFD have already been invited by another editor, and i am just making a point to contact the others, including you, to avoid any appearance of selectivity. -- 1979:

It didn't help matters that the prose was substantially the same between the two versions, nor that it re-created at a different title. Both always make it look like the intent was avoid scrutiny, whether or not that's actually the

4931:

What Stefan2 said, pretty much. The deleted versions of the Drakenguard ranged between 20% and 45% over the normal size guidelines, and there wasn't any justification stated for the larger size. We'd get the clearest image in the

3968:

Your article didn't provide any such sources; it linked only to the organization's own websites about itself and about its journal. To my reading, it didn't even say anything that implied the organization might have been noted, so

3634:

If it's already been published somewhere else, that's another situation where we need an email sent to the permissions address, mostly so that we know you are who you say you are. This is to protect you as much as it is to protect

4350:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

1633: 290:

Self promotional vandalism seems to be the reason of such intervention, sustained by acute threats. I do not intend to respond with helpless and inconsequent arguments and the time I have to dedicate to Knowledge is quite limited.

4586:

not to re-upload it another time, which he ignored with this latest upload on 17 March, so I'm rather tempted to go ahead and block him now, unless somebody can confirm he actually got a new and improved license for it this time.

3203:"Serious lack of independent sourcing to establish notability. What notability there is would seem to depend on being the innovative developer of the bass boat. However that article credits a different inventor, 20 years earlier." 1417:

Please can you therefore restore the content. I suggest that you userfy it for me because, as explained at the RfA, I have identified further sources and so can readily improve the content while removing any copyright concerns.

3396:

Articles deleted via the prod process are normally restored on request. I am explicitly declining to do so in this case, both because you confirm the basis of deletion as a neologism yourself above, and because the article met

5262:

I write the website, which is used for the event schedules and changes for each year. The intention of the Knowledge pages is to record the structure of the festival and some history of events over the past 19 years. thanks

4817:

doesn't look at all promotional, if that's your concern; if anything, it reads towards the negative side. I haven't looked at its sources at all, so can't speak as to whether the third and fourth paragraphs are undue weight.

210:

it's a bio about this person - movies he made, prizes he won and where he grew up - there is no much "play" with the info way of writing. you will also find plus-minus similar info at IMDb site, where i updated his info too.

4163:), to which I'll add that the article gives no reason whatsoever to think such sources might exist (which is why I deleted it the first time).Sorry this reply took so long; my network connectivity has been plain awful. — 3608:

Cryptic, Very quick reply!!! The photo is in the book “Home is Where the Bus Is” for which I have full copyright, publishing & subsidiary rights. That includes the photos in the book taken by family members. No?

3164:

I intend to re-establish the article, as I have time, and this time I will include more independent sources. Please do not interfere with the creation process -- I don't have the time to devote to WP that I once did. -

2853:

such a subject while my primary interests are physics, metaphysics and history just to have an article creation credit within my Wiki editorship history—has prevailed. Therefore, let us stand on the legal principle of

3532: 1736:

tagged the article for deletion because he thought it unambiguously promotional, that's not why I deleted it. Rather, your article had almost the opposite problem: it didn't say why the organization is important or

4827:

Thanks for your reply. There's been a lot of revisions on the article since I sent you the above note, and some helpful admin oversight. How it reads now compared to then is far better. Thanks for looking it over.

5251: 2530:

Further testing shows that the redirect needs to be removed, the new AfD done, then the redirect restored so that the old AfD is correctly linked. This is caused by the BUNDLE process. I will proceed accordingly.

2866:

I wish young Mr. Collinson all the best with his entertainment career and in life in general, and should he prosper mightily one day within his field, I shall leave it to one of his youthful fans to restart his

1811:

thank you for your explanation. I would like to do as you recommend and start working on a Draft version in order to properly modify the page before publish it again. Can you please restore it as you suggested?

1552:

I already have a copy of the page as it was. Using cut/paste copying to recreate this text is not good practice on Knowledge because it fails to re-establish the history which we require for attribution — see

1164:

It seems that creating rough drafts for my personal use (practice) in the sandbox is wrong. Would that page have been deleted from my user space? If not, could I create a draft there and then request feedback?

3101:

A better bet would be to scan the navy photo from one of its print sources and upload that, this time with all the i's dotted and t's crossed so the folks at Commons don't delete it over a technicality again.

2492:

Being an administrator has absolutely nothing to do with it. You're responsible for your contributions, whether you make them manually or with a tool. Nobody retranscluded the redirected old afd except you.

5231:

I'm restoring the photo based on your statement above, but you still need to be the one to put the license tag and statement of sourcing on the image page within seven days. I can't take that action on your

2007:

Cryptic, It's okay. Thanks for your help & support. I will use your instruction. Honestly , Misee harris deserved a wiki article! Give me some suggestions then or so it is possible to restore it again?

3482:

Sorry about the late reply. My internet's been spotty for most of the day, and while I saw your message shortly after you left it, I only got connectivity back about two hours ago, and had forgotten it by

1868:

It's one IP, and his changes aren't derogatory (regardless of whether they're sourced or correct). Let's see if he stops after your warning; otherwise, the correct action would be to block, not protect.

1230:), so I thought there was a clear COI and probably a User name violation but I see you've added the AfC template now, so I have no issue letting it go through the process. Thanks for all your mop work :) 5143:

Hi Cryptic, Why did you delete the picture I uploaded of Farid Simaika? This is a picture owned by myself of a deceased relative. There is no copyright involved (as this is my picture). Youssef Simaika

3669: 3596:

from the copyright holder - apparently the Vernon Oliver and Anne Beckwith Johnson estate? - emailed to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Site policy doesn't let us simply take a third party's word for it.

2435:

I can't understand why you are reverting the removal of a redirect that is preventing the posting an AfD. With the redirect in place it reposts the ol group AfD to the AfD log. I'm I doing this wrong?

2103:

I kind of expected it, and so had his contributions open in another tab with the intent to check again in an hour or so. I've blocked him; with any luck, that'll gets us at least a day of autoblocking.

4579: 728:

Hi. Thank you for taking the initiative to remove that RfA. It was a totally unprecedented way of closing one and I'm not sure that simply eradicating it from the records is the best way to go, but we

4864:

where you revdeleted the previous versions? The images were already at a sufficiently low resolution before being resized, and all the bot did was introduce unnecessary resizing artifacts. Thanks. --

4544: 3211:

if it's entirely self-sourced, as this was. The claims have also been made that they invented the bass boat and (here, unsourced) that they're the world's largest manufacturer of bass boats. However

2981:

Furthermore, while it is abundantly obvious to a Knowledge editor that you work for this company, either directly or as some sort of advertising consultant, you did not disclose that, as required by

1328:), not because it implied shared use. I'll readily admit that the block template I used wasn't a perfect fit, but I couldn't find a better one and wasn't up to devising a custom one on the spot. — 102: 5766: 3657:

I actually don't have the authority to restore the image in these circumstances. If you send an email with that license release to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, they'll be able to sort you out. —

3886: 1713:

process. All the event connected to the Forum are free and there are different independent articles about the events. Maybe the structure of the article wasn't right, can you give me any advice?

5110:

that needed to be added to the file description page to let patrolling admins know that an email was sent; otherwise, we have no way to know. I've restored the image and placed the template. —

2906: 2330:

No discussion on the talk page of this move and you move because another editor requested it? Read the history of the article. This is not an uncontroversial move and pretty clearly violates

4209:

what he was doing was wrong, and tried to hide it. Uploading copyvio images because you don't know any better is one thing; active deception is another. I presume he has a good explanation?

3440: 4625:

No; as Stefan2 says, I was only using the template to document what was already written on the file description page. I don't have OTRS access so can't confirm whether it's actually true. —

5681:

2. It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant.

874:

Reviewing new articles by banned users I came across a bunch that are marked with copyright notices. The creator is indef banned for copyvio. I tagged for delete, but maybe that is wrong?

2915:". The information I provided about this company was fully supported by pro. websites of the FX Industry (Leverate's industry). When you answer, please give a private answer. Regards, N 2796:

By the way, just out of curiosity, what made you take an interest in this article one way or another? Reading your user page, you seem as unlikely to be reading it as I was to write it!

1605: 5737:. What you wrote was much, much closer to the former than the latter. Whether the organization is for-profit or not is irrelevant; otherwise, they wouldn't need to pay a PR department. 3411:--All I was trying to do, was help other startups by sharing this term and related findings. I will wait for others to write a similar article later, once it's considered main stream. 3375:

You repeatedly say "our" and "we" above. I take it, then, that you are financially connected with the reportally website that the article promoted? If so, I draw your attention to the

2677:, and I understand that it's about maintenance and deleting unused versions of non-free images. Was all of the rest of the paperwork for existing uses of the current version in order? 5012:

In a word, all of it. What you wrote read like a cross between a marketing brochure and a press release, and did not bear even a passing resemblance to an encyclopedia article. (Like

5679:

1. It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

4879: 3077:(deleted images from that era of Knowledge can't be viewed even by admins, so I can't be certain), which was deleted primarily because the uploader didn't explicitly detail his source. 5272: 1397: 2781:), he did have the lead/title role in a major theatrical West End production of a musical encompassing a score by Sir Elton John, which makes him more notable in my estimation than 5558: 3815:? Anyway, thanks for the ping and the vote of confidence, Cryptic. The subject isn't notable IMO, and I'm surprised Jack, an experienced editor, would think it is. Where is the 3215:

challenges the invention claim and there's no indication that they have been or still are the largest manufacturer. There needs to be sourcing, and really independent sourcing.

2618:

You try doing the noms manually over and over and then get back to me on that. The redirects you added are not in the directions for bundling. Do you know if they are correct?

1463: 1217: 1601: 3914: 3446:

Please give me some feedback why you deleted the website of my housing cooperative. We are one of the first co-ops in New York and the first one in Ithaca. We are a member of

1827: 4490:

copyvio article that you deleted on November 28, 2014. I was asked on OTRS to move it in place of the prior article, and I did. If you think it's not OK, please let me know.

3566:

Regarding your removal of a photograph . That was a family photograph taken by family and included as part of history. What was your justification? Thank you for answering

3695: 2755:

I had never even heard of the kid until someone, knowing my (rather causal) interest in theater, sent me a You Tube link in which the boy performed one of his numbers from

334:. I didn't even think to check whether it had. I assumed that someone doing so would close the DRV... but of course if they didn't know about it. Nicely done. Thanks mate. 1000: 968: 967:, it says that "Anyone who wants to create a redirect at this title is free to do so". Why was the article for "Sabina Altynbekova" deleted AFTER I created a redirect to 2935: 4202: 4037: 5529:

Hi, can you please help me figure out how to modify and edit my page you took down. The last thing I want is to break any rules or not follow Wiki guidelines. Thanks.

937:

and the tool provided. See 10,000 pages to review so I focused on the blocked and banned users figuring alot of them would be deletes. I'll use other tags then. Thanks

3326: 3012: 2355:

From the history, it looked like the article had been recently moved away from the title chosen by the article's creator and author of 100% of its substantial content.

2085: 467:

I understand you want to assume good faith but the comments on the edit boaards, you and the user name Poo for me too ie P004me2 makes it pretty difficult to do that.

3117:

That was wonderfully amusing snark on the silly, thankfully-now-deleted TUN faux article page! I am the Oink that nominated it for deletion. Also interesting to me:

1583:'s RFA. Attribution via edit summary is perfectly sufficient, as you would know if you had read the all-caps shortcuts you patronizingly posted here before doing so 1542:

The claim of involvement doesn't pass the laugh test, and if anything, it paints the candidate in a poor light and directly contradicts my own statement of support. —

3906: 3031: 1190: 4594: 4583:

from the owners, and apparently entirely unwilling to react in any way to the information that that was not enough. I gave him an explicit block warning on 5 March

4384:

Please don't be offended by the word "notability". It's Knowledge jargon, and doesn't have its usual meaning; instead, it's a reference to our inclusion criteria (

4125:

Hi everyone, I created a page and I need you to delete so i could start another or if you could help me in resposting. The name of the page is Rev Ismaila H.Awudu.

5016: 4561:

I've restored them. Not sure how that happened; I check both the file page and whatlinkshere for F5s, and can't imagine how I missed it on both for both images. —

1697: 5137: 1051: 3780:

Hi. Where would I find any discussion about the proposed deletion of this page? It completely escaped my radar, which, as the author, rather concerns me. --

5847: 5651: 5174: 5152: 4654: 3052: 241: 3802:

didn't notify you; I did less checking of the formalities than usual because I trust her judgment. Prods are restored upon request; I assume you want that? —

5493: 5485: 5290: 4708: 4692: 5044:], I uploaded a reduced image but have screwed it up a bit and need your assistance. The new image that I submitted to replace the previous image is here: 3073:

There's an official navy portrait that could be used instead, which is in the public domain. My understanding is that this is the image that used to be at

1995:{{subst:drv2|page=Misee Harris (actress)|xfd_page=Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Misee Harris|reason=(replace this with your reasons for undeletion)}} ~~~~ 5607:, I've re-drafted the page and added various references from national news outlets. How should I go about submitting the updated page for review? Thanks. 5352: 4629: 4620: 3745: 2890: 2800: 2468:

Aww, I am not blanking the discussion. I am blanking a redirect to a group AfD on the page where the individual discussion goes. Without that step you get

282:

I have searched in vain for the good path to get administrator’s help for the following issue and so I decided to send this request to some including you.

3096:; discussions at the latter tend to be poorly-attended and one-sided in favor of the NFCC-hardliners. But I don't think its chances even at DRV are good. 2304:

to see why that isn't a very persuasive argument. If you're looking for articles that are legitimately worth emulating, try looking through the lists at

5280: 5264: 4717:, which policy only lets us use if it's in an article, not a draft. Mere permission for use isn't sufficient; it has to be under a fully-free license. — 4297: 2266: 1282: 5659: 790:

Under the cicumstances I think your exaggeration was as legitimate (in a different way) as my rather harsh outburst as the first opposer on that RfA. --

476: 4998: 3944: 3644:

As to whether that means you have the rights to relicense the image - I don't know, and couldn't know without seeing the agreement that they made with

3074: 2060: 1743: 1695: 1540:(I'm pinging him as a courtesy, though he's currently inactive, and there's no reason to expect him to come out of retirement just to comment on this.) 964: 4360: 382:, which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the 5523: 4573: 1800: 1791:

Both reasons have validity. I encourage you to read the guidelines and resubmit with appropriate adjustments. Good luck and thanks for contributing.

1722: 1169: 650: 616: 126: 5822: 5081: 3303:

I may be able to find some. I can't stay online right now, so I will add some tomorrow. Please leave a note on my talkpage as a reminder. Thank you.

2167:

literary sources at library. (and I just hoped there would not be needed any scans of the journals, for it would take even more troubles and times)

5600: 4893: 4857: 4846: 4814: 4784: 4183: 4152: 4081:

Thanks for deleting that accidentally created redirection page for me. It is very very frustrating not being able to fix simple problems myself.

2944: 2923: 1813: 1729: 1714: 1427: 817: 5843:

has to look at it, determine that it's not a real request, and move on. I was saving them (and, more to the point, me) the trouble of doing so. —

5742:

If the article was indeed copied from the website - it was so egregiously inappropriate for Knowledge that I didn't even bother to check - that's

1008: 486: 445: 429: 5245: 4330: 4308: 4160: 3731: 3280: 3224: 2819:

who proposed it for deletion with the rationale that eventually ended up my deletion log; I was just the poor guy working through the backlog at

2412: 1990: 1617: 1595: 1574: 1153: 1040: 669: 78: 5801: 5480: 4721: 4262:

and to my user sandbox page you kindly deleted. If I had wanted to retain the page history, I could have simply moved it into mainspace myself.

2675: 2151: 5514: 4748: 4131: 4114: 4000: 3769: 3705: 3683: 3264: 3106: 2898: 2843: 2640: 2587:

That edit became possible only after removing the redirect. I suppose it is possible to do the entire nom manually, but that's a ton of work.

1227: 462: 331: 5778: 5425: 5411: 5301: 5128: 5114: 4136:

About the only way you're going to be able to convince folks that it should be kept is to find compelling evidence that this person meets our

4058: 4044: 3405: 2316: 1464:

http://npgportraits.si.edu/eMuseumNPG/code/emuseum.asp?rawsearch=ObjectID/,/is/,/108707/,/false/,/false&newprofile=CAP&newstyle=single

717: 5750: 5031: 3051:

It's true that we've used non-free images fair-use imagery for living people before. The canonical example is J. D. Salinger, where we used

2720: 2696: 2555: 2422: 2376: 1821: 1529: 1069: 749: 5378: 4677: 3194: 3059:

makes for interesting reading.) Those cases only have a superficial resemblance to Pynchon's, however, and don't apply. Most importantly:

1201: 1134: 1116: 1112:. (I'd normally offer to undelete myself, but my network connection is starting to act up again, so that would probably be a lot slower.) — 680: 642: 5859: 5623: 5565: 4988: 4285: 3873: 3860: 3312: 3298: 2998: 2808: 2655: 2627: 2611: 2596: 2540: 2525: 2512: 2497: 2487: 2459: 1834: 1785: 1546: 1375:

At 14:53 on 15 January 2015 it seems that you deleted this page as G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement. This seems incorrect because:

1362: 1332: 1004: 946: 928: 908: 894: 267: 227: 4979: 4429: 4320: 4103: 3827: 3806: 3336:

Separately, if you felt the article was overly partisan - which we disagree with - then please suggest appropriate edits. Not a deletion.

2028: 1962: 1029: 1020: 991: 187: 169: 150: 5188: 5065: 4944: 4837: 4822: 4565: 4556: 4167: 4021: 3887: 3724: 3661: 3618: 3601: 3524: 2445: 861: 843: 799: 785: 775: 760: 658: 624: 587: 555: 178:

O.k. no problem. It just looked a bit odd. I will keep it on my watchlist this time. I suspect there will be more efforts to puff it up.

4919: 3259: 2393: 2343: 2217: 2108: 2001: 1918: 1887: 1873: 1862: 1687: 1673: 1264: 1250: 4635: 4538: 4241: 4232: 4218: 3056: 2581: 1930: 1905: 1370: 5627: 5164: 4473: 3431: 3348: 2692:

I must admit I was a bit alarmed at the number of uses, but they all seem to have rationales. I don't see anything obviously wrong. —

1742:

The guideline that the article will eventually have to pass for inclusion at Knowledge is listed (in verbose, excruciating detail) at

1579:

I'm not going to do that, since your subsequent edits have made it clear that your primary intention is to make some sort of point at

5453: 4783:

Hello, I noticed you deleted an article concerning Michael Featherstone for copyright violations in January, and as a new article on

4516: 3035: 1404: 1177: 4700: 3973:(who proposed the article for deletion) could have immediately deleted the article himself under the expedited ("speedy") criterion 4969: 4291: 3575: 3476: 2227: 1844: 883: 507:

It seems that I'm not getting a reply, so I thought I would check here. Nope, not SummerFunMan. But I did ask you on my talk page,

141:

whether it is important, but that would make the history look the same as if the article had not been speedied in the first place.

133: 1239: 237:

changed. Given the copyright notice at its bottom, there really wasn't any other option open to me. I've restored the article. —

5818: 5476:

moved it out of articlespace. I have no opinion at all on the draft itself; it's not the sort of article I normally work with. —

5338: 3230: 5119:

Sorry about my mistake and thanks for correcting it. Now that the photo is back, I submitted the complete article for review. --

5006: 4457:

This is for all of the hard work you do, especially deleting files! I'm sure it gets tiring, but your work is much appreciated!

3176: 2686: 1893: 5756: 4611:. This implies that something has been sent to OTRS (unless the uploader forgot to include an @ sign in the e-mail address). -- 4522: 4408:

Much of the article was sourced to the Center itself (either to press releases or directly to its website); those sources that

3447: 3265: 3144: 2430: 5769:

about whether the page should be deleted. Could you direct me towards where I might find a record of the deletion discussion?

2455:

is not to blank the previous discussion. I don't use Twinkle, but I can't imagine that it gets it wrong when used properly. —

5160: 4658: 605: 5093: 4584: 4364: 4090: 3757: 3458: 2133: 1104:

disambiguation page itself; my role here was merely clerical. If you truly dispute the move, then move the article back to

980: 202:

Hi my page was automatically deleted because some of the article was similar to an external site. i don't own the site, but

5445: 5184: 5055: 4343:

for a full week, and nobody objected to deletion in that time. His full rationale didn't fit into my deletion log; it was:

4195: 2728: 419: 115: 5862:

in hopes of being able to provide a backup to Hazard-Bot (if it does return) or a replacement (if it is gone for good). --

5549: 5401: 3648:. They may have only granted you the right to publish, but not the rights to allow others to publish or modify the image. 1299:

states that, while account names implying ownership by an organization are not allowed, account names indicating a person

1055: 924:

admin could have, and just about always will already have, deleted the articles in question at the same time he blocked. —

4907: 4861: 4850: 4732:

Hi, I don't know how I could change the username. Can I ask for your assistance? Knowledge 22:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

4591: 4271: 4122: 4006: 3910: 3788: 3753: 3027: 2820: 2322: 1318: 1278: 634:, and B) your marketing and legal departments will probably have a problem with you releasing your marketing material as 2177:

Well the article was mess, yet a bit fun in a awkward way too, so I archived it in one of my subpages to look upon :-).

707: 5830: 5814: 5725: 4800: 4744: 3561: 3463: 3438: 3427: 2274: 1292: 1221: 1207: 1094: 695: 5368: 2352:

There's still no discussion on the talk page, because you're complaining in the wrong place (and to the wrong person).

346: 319: 5721: 5677:

You recently deleted Screen NSW page. I believe I can answer your concerns with the page. The reasons were listed as:

5392:? A n00b incorrectly replaced it with an image they uploaded to commons that was deleted as a copyvio (it's a logo). 4952: 2068: 1145: 1047: 400: 293:

I’d be happy if you could pay some attention to this occurrence and let you decide whatever you think is reasonable.

4772: 3794:

There wasn't any discussion, just a tag on the article which had gone unobjected-to for a week (as is the nature of

2278: 5871: 5619: 4650: 3320: 3063: 2361:

had been unable to move it back himself solely because of technical reasons, namely categorization of the redirect.

1850: 869: 383: 134: 5024: 3380: 5545: 5082:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/14845022/Email%20requesting%20release%20of%20Peter%20Landrock%27s%20image.pdf

4665:

If you were able to figure out that it was me who deleted it, you were able to see the reason I did it, to wit: "

4417: 4354: 4049:

That makes sense, I'll try in keep that in mind if I ever come across a similar situation, thanks for the help. -

2931: 2236:

02:34, 30 January 2015 Cryptic (talk | contribs) deleted page Semcad (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

2202: 1645: 1358: 1314: 111: 98: 5589: 3894:

Hi I would like to know why my page on the Operations Research Society of South Africa was deleted. Thank you.

1935:

Cryptic, My humble request to you restore the wiki page of Misee Harris (actress). You said on editors summery "

1475: 4588: 4523: 4316: 3948: 3186:, I've restored the article per your request. Your rancor is (at least partially) misplaced, however - it was 3004: 2785:

subjects of Wiki articles that I have encountered. This seeming lack of consistency is one of the downsides to

2364:

There should be no such technical reason preventing you from moving it back, since there have been no edits to

2097: 1747: 162: 4671:, concern was: limited use of third party sources and does not seem to meet notability criteria for academics. 4425:

Articles deleted via the proposed deletion process get restored on request; so let me know if you want that. —

5807: 5433: 5307: 5136: 4759: 4740: 4137: 3956: 3691: 3254: 2469: 1755: 5839:

wasn't paying attention. It still shows up as a speedy deletion request, though, so every admin patrolling

4392:). Most articles that aren't overly promotional or just plain nonsense get deleted because they don't have 3556: 2473: 832: 742: 5650:), just create the article again.If you want someone else to doublecheck it first, create it as a draft at 4791:. I've had a go at cleaning it up, but would appreciate your thoughts on it and the revisions made so far. 4683: 4501: 4173: 3149: 3132:

I shall try to create to compose a barn star of Delightful Snark Giggles. You will be the first recipient!

3112: 3093: 2024: 1958: 522:

got attracted to that part of the 3RR/EW board from what looks like nowhere. So yeah, Hell, what attracted

72: 69: 66: 63: 60: 57: 4214:

But if you think he deserves another chance, and want to unblock and keep an eye on him, I won't oppose. —

5789: 5637: 5615: 5080:). I sent a request for permission on Sat, 16 May 2015 09:55:58 +0200. Here is a pdf version of my mail: 4986: 4765: 4467: 4435: 4373:

Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. Please see the

3492: 2669: 2476: 2309: 2305: 1444: 360: 158: 51: 48: 45: 42: 39: 36: 33: 30: 1443:

He was a member of (or at least seen in a photograph in the Smithsonian collection sitting amongst) the

5733:

Knowledge isn't here to mirror organizations' web pages nor reprint their press releases; it publishes

5037: 4714: 4066: 3952: 3157:

I just logged back onto WP after an absence of several weeks, and found that you had applied a PROD to

1751: 958: 472: 441: 415: 4609:

A copy of the permission email from Mr. Gold was emailed to "permissions-enwikimedia.org" on 3/17/2015

3505:

and on the fact that its address is 211 Stewart Avenue. While not owned or associated officially with

696:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ronald_Duncan_(martial_arts)_(2nd_nomination)

5156: 3092:

if you want. It'll probably get a fairer hearing there than if I undeleted it myself and sent it to

3089: 1986: 1613: 1570: 1423: 674:{{subst:drv2|page=Riedel Communications|reason=(replace this with your reasons for undeletion)}} ~~~~ 665: 1500: 1121:

Hmmm, as far as I remember I have objected against the move but the discussion has now disappeared.

5853: 5774: 5449: 5355:

is continuously removing speedy deletion tag over a copied article. He has copied the article from

4696: 4109: 4054: 4017: 3367: 2965: 2129: 713:

How about no? You've had enough bites at the apple already, and it doesn't belong at afd anyway. —

4529:

You deleted this as F5 but the file seems to be in use, so maybe the deletion should be undone. --

2752:

as opposed to merely editing articles. He seemed to meet the notability guidelines at the time.

2300:

The two articles you link, particularly the second, aren't paragons of neutrality either, but see

2178: 5797:

those games contradicted the claims, and nobody was able to find any external evidence of them. —

5793: 5785: 5522: 5505: 5180: 5077: 4958: 3775: 3749: 3514:

which doesn't assert any kind of significance and doesn't include any third-party sources at all.

2894: 2804: 1655: 5858:

FYI, I saw you manually created yesterday's permissions dated category. I have filed a BRFA at

2365: 97:

or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a

5594: 5421: 5397: 5268: 5124: 5089: 5071: 4778: 4459: 4251: 3423: 3344: 3271:

It's a shame I did not know this was getting deleted. I would've explained why it is notable...

3220: 2969: 2574: 2521:. If you are incapable of using your script correctly then renominate the articles manually. — 2518: 2323: 2270: 1989:. The instructions there are more complex than they need to be; the short version is to go to 1584: 1286: 1272: 703: 668:. The instructions there are more complex than they need to be; the short version is to go to 451: 4368: 5788:(which I presume is how you found out that it was me who deleted it), it was deleted via the 5717: 5215: 5107: 5002: 4487: 3730: 3714: 3358:

on your talk page when he nominated it, the article's subject violated Knowledge's policy on

2716: 2682: 2408: 2339: 2064: 1351:

now as the user has apparently picked a new name, but it's a point for future consideration.

1325: 1105: 1039: 515: 468: 437: 411: 274: 91: 2331: 1513: 163:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log&page=Gold+Mercury+International+Award

5709: 5611: 5533: 5461: 5441: 5384: 5374:

Blocking's not necessary here (or at least, not yet). I'll keep an eye on him for a bit. —

5364: 5334: 5238: 5148: 4736: 4646: 4304: 4259: 4075: 3898: 3871: 3858: 3786: 3741: 3679: 3538: 3415: 3294:

such request I've seen.) Don't suppose you have secondary sources to add to the article? —

3290:'s get restored on request, so I'll do that in a moment. (I must say, two minutes was the 3171: 3023: 2919: 2262: 2114: 2012: 1946: 1609: 1566: 1558: 1419: 1173: 1128: 1088: 694:

so that it would make it easier for individuals to see when going through the AFD process.

654: 620: 369: 286: 251: 195: 5051: 3376: 2982: 2255:

I want to improve the page later on, and add categories like history and more references.

913:

That was intemperate, and I apologize. (By way of excuse, it's fairly late here.) But a

8: 5770: 5541: 5046:]; and then I managed to submit another orphaned image that needs to be deleted. Thanks 4727: 4267: 3308: 3276: 3140: 2927: 2829:

well-represented. By the time I actually started editing, there was no hope left at all.

2623: 2592: 2551: 2536: 2508: 2483: 2441: 2249: 2125: 1985:

I don't think that you're going to be able to convince me, so your route of appeal is at

1817: 1796: 1718: 1608:. Because you speedily deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 1075: 942: 904: 879: 396: 303: 5183:, the image page didn't say who owned the picture or what its licensing status is. See 2651:, as you did with the the overwhelming majority of articles in both of your mass afds. — 511:, how you got attracted to my talk page. However, I see now how that happened (by Hell). 5762: 5665: 5500: 5473: 5346: 5195: 4965: 4512:.) I'll have time to look at it more closely on Monday. Thanks for letting me know. — 4416:. I honestly don't know whether the article would survive a formal deletion debate at 4312: 4086: 4033: 3924: 3902: 3824: 3506: 1664: 1554: 1408: 1016: 976: 686: 455: 351: 183: 146: 5438:

Hi, I would like to know why you deleted the entry I made on Amos A. Phelps. Thanks.

4099:

Pish. Thanks in turn for the article. Deleting redirects is trivial in comparison. —

692: 159:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log&page=Gold+Mercury+International

5571: 5417: 5393: 5120: 5101: 5085: 4915: 4833: 4796: 4616: 4552: 4534: 4509: 4159:

already summed up the article's prospects fairly accurately the last time you asked (

4118: 4050: 4013: 3766: 3721: 3687: 3658: 3614: 3598: 3593: 3571: 3521: 3472: 3419: 3402: 3340: 3295: 3249: 3216: 3191: 3187: 3103: 2995: 2957: 2840: 2693: 2652: 2608: 2603: 2578: 2522: 2494: 2456: 2452: 2419: 2373: 2313: 2214: 2157: 2148: 2105: 1998: 1915: 1870: 1831: 1782: 1670: 1627: 1592: 1543: 1535: 1329: 1247: 1198: 1113: 1066: 1026: 988: 925: 891: 857: 840: 828: 795: 782: 771: 757: 738: 714: 699: 677: 639: 584: 551: 483: 426: 405: 325: 316: 238: 166: 121: 17: 4957:

Please restore the following file for which I plan to provide a fair use rationale:

2960:

like "turn-key solutions provider"; no paragraph would have survived unchanged in a

5713: 5286: 5205: 4937: 4900: 4869: 4393: 4278: 4141: 3993: 3363: 2836: 2816: 2712: 2678: 2404: 2389: 2335: 2199: 2093: 2044: 2035: 2020: 1954: 1901: 1883: 1858: 1777: 1683: 1641: 1386: 1260: 1235: 1109: 336: 2741:

subject himself was that he appeared to be a rare target of opportunity for me to

5583: 5360: 5330: 5020: 4413: 3816: 3398: 3166: 2964:-written encyclopedia article. In short, you have mistaken Knowledge for either 2292: 2076: 1710: 1480: 1307:). Clearly, this account name indicates user JMC (J. Michael Cobb) at IDC World. 1123: 1083: 5390: 5047: 3974: 3947:. The short, short version is that the organization will need to have received 3535:. Would be nice if you could check in in a few days and give me some feedback. 1936: 1746:. The short, short version is that the organization will need to have received 5643: 5537: 5469: 5316: 4668: 4481: 4444: 4396: 4336: 4263: 4252: 4179: 4145: 3977:. Instead, he gave the article a week to give you a chance to supply sourcing. 3934: 3930: 3795: 3388: 3355: 3304: 3287: 3272: 3240: 3183: 3136: 3043: 2973: 2961: 2911:

Dear Crpytic, I would like to know why did you delete the value I wrote about "

2711:

Suffice it to say, we continue to diligently enforce the compromise. Cheers.

2644: 2619: 2588: 2547: 2532: 2504: 2479: 2437: 2288: 2226: 2140: 1792: 1733: 1706: 1493: 1352: 1308: 1062: 938: 917: 900: 899:

Well I'm learning how to deal with new article review, so thanks for the help.

875: 635: 631: 392: 299: 105:. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing! 3765:

BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT OLD ENOUGH TO HAVE BEEN PLAYING FOR THE CELTICS IN 1980. —

1853:

as an IP keeps reverting me to add unsourced info to the BLP article. Thanks,

5294: 5023:; in particular, our terms of use, which you agreed to by editing Knowledge, 4961: 4497: 4340: 4082: 3984: 3970: 3960: 3866: 3853: 3842: 3820: 3812: 3799: 3781: 3546: 3502: 3384: 3359: 2639:

afds already in progress with other editors' comments on them, as you did at

2301: 2210: 1911: 1768: 1759: 1588: 1580: 1562: 1381: 1304: 1012: 972: 580:

The magic checkuser 8 ball confirmed the farm. 18:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

312: 214:

please help me get that page back online. check the details and information.

179: 142: 3042:

I personally agree - I think we're far too strict in our application of the

2472:

and no new discussion page because of the redirect instead of this listing

2163:

type of issue (AfD? PROD? just hoax or what?) and what description to give.

5844: 5798: 5747: 5671: 5656: 5647: 5576:

Just stopping by to say thanks for the delete of the requested page! Best,

5562: 5489: 5477: 5408: 5375: 5298: 5242: 5111: 5062: 5028: 5013: 4976: 4941: 4911: 4829: 4819: 4808: 4792: 4769: 4718: 4674: 4626: 4612: 4562: 4548: 4530: 4513: 4426: 4400: 4385: 4374: 4282: 4238: 4215: 4164: 4156: 4148: 4100: 4041: 3997: 3849: 3803: 3720:

template on the image page. Entirely my fault. I've restored the image. —

3629: 3610: 3589: 3583: 3567: 3468: 3244: 3158: 3151: 2953: 2573:

All you have to do is transclude the current afd on the daily page, as you

2081: 1942:

Dr.Misee Harris is a notable subject.Can you please re-check? Thanks Man.

1808: 1338: 1296: 1001:

Kazakhstan_women's_national_volleyball_team#2014_Junior_Asian_Championships

969:

Kazakhstan_women's_national_volleyball_team#2014_Junior_Asian_Championships

850: 821: 791: 767: 734: 547: 508: 377: 196: 3499:. It was founded in the 1950s and is usually home to 14 people<ref: --> 1407:. You were an earlier supporter of the candidate and so are acting while 454:

against you. Just figured I'd let you know in case you haven't seen it. --

5867: 5743: 5465: 5356: 5253:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Bear on the Square Mountain Festival

4926: 4865: 4389: 3987:, and a deletion there would be substantially more difficult to overcome. 3509:

the majority of its residents have always been and are graduate students.

3208: 2991: 2385: 2358: 2188: 2089: 2016: 1971: 1950: 1897: 1879: 1854: 1679: 1637: 1256: 1231: 1101: 820:

conclusion? Any diffs that I missed? Thanks for keeping a watch on this.

811: 723: 4187:

opinion before taking further action on their unblock request. Thanks,

2947:, I won't give you a "private answer". Knowledge doesn't work that way. 2577:. There's absolutely no need to touch the previous nomination's page. — 5578: 4225: 4188: 3553: 3496: 4856:

Would you consider reverting the changes made by Theo's Little Bot to

3983:

if none did, it seems likely that the article would be brought to our

3325:

Please can you explain precisely why you deleted our contribution on "

3190:, not me, who nominated it for deletion, as shown on your talk page. — 25: 3236: 3212: 3066:, is not a recluse in the usual sense of the word; he actively shuns 2952:

I deleted this article because, as you put it, it had no value to an

2369: 1561:. Please userfy the article or follow the instructions specified in 1525: 1194: 207:

could the text at the external site, but the update takes 4-10 days.

3670:

Romoving Tigran_Tsitoghdyan_with_his_painting_from_Mirror_series.png

3467:

Many other coops have pages on Knowledge that haven't been deleted.

3387:. Either way, you should also be aware that we prohibit the use of 611:

at Riedel, the english Version is a translation of our german page (

5187:. If you're the copyright holder, then putting one of the tags at 5084:. Here is the ticket: Ticket#: 2015051610007766 What went wrong? -- 4492: 4224:

towards a final-warning unblock but wanted to run it by you first.

2912: 2233:

Hello, I would like to support the article I just wrote yesterday.

1528:.) The remainder of the article was the entire prose contained on 1393:}}, and the page should be listed at Knowledge:Copyright problems." 3235:

Hi, there's some active editing and discussion going on about the

612: 5840: 3451: 2990:

Lastly, I have severe doubts as to whether the company meets our

2244: 1632:

Hello Cryptic, could you please add the AfC creation template to

482:

doesn't have the edits everyone else was objecting to in place. —

5076:

Hi Cryptic, question on the deletion of Peter Landrock's image (

4764:

If you're still around, you'll need to follow the directions at

2084:

is evading your salting of their band page by creating another,

1767:

For now, however, you don't need to show that - the expedited ("

1046:

This has been re uploaded again. Perhaps more needs to be done?

216:

what to i need to do next to have that page in English wiki too?

5863: 5293:, none of us has the authority to restore this content without 4281:

had edited it enough that attribution needed to be preserved. —

1154:

User talk:Kikichugirl/Archive 2#THIMUN Foundation G11 complaint

5792:("PROD") process. There wasn't a formal deletion discussion; 934: 2871:

profile either by resurrecting this article or starting anew.

2291:. Further, you provided no evidence that the software meets 2170:

Would You have recommended me different approach? Procedure?

3817:

significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources

1385:

article or the appropriate section should be blanked with {{

5239:

we generally prohibit the use of more than one user account

4788: 5691: 2734:

nomination or not. My interest in this issue is simple:

1914:

if it happens again; you'll get a faster response there. —

1538:'s AFD close is that the copyright issue was overlooked. 1189:

As an aside, the draft was actually less objectionable at

1514:

http://www.flickriver.com/photos/39907211@N03/9576230512/

816:

Hi there again. Just wanted to enquire how did you reach

410:

Can you stop the madness, please check the edit history.

157:

deletion logs are now disconnected from it and hiding at

3121:

better than even odds it was written by an attorney, and

1476:"A New York Girl Who Was in Favor with Duke of Clarence" 5699: 4975:(Already handled elsewhere, if anyone's idly curious. — 5605:

A7: No credible indication of importance (web content)

4578:

Hi, just a question: you removed an F11 from the file

4300:

was deleted, can you help me understand why? Thanks.

3379:

that you agreed to by editing Knowledge, specifically

3064:

in the "Photographing Pynchon" section of this article

2647:, or to leave articles on afd with no afd tag on them 1108:

and ask for an undelete of the disambiguation page at

4258:

I really don't see the point of these edits you made

4027:

Only admins can suppress the redirect. However, you

2976:

before making any attempt to bring this article back.

2907:

Why did you delete the value I wrote about "leverate"

5695: 5642:

If you're certain it passes our inclusion criteria (

4636: 3937:", and nobody objected to its deletion in that time. 3128:

WP Admins were involved in creating/ fluffing it up!

2635:

I know they're correct. What wasn't correct was to

1341:

page, this time from the Promotional names section:

999:- Thank you. I recommend however, that the path be 4813:I don't remember the Featherstone article at all. 3457:You can find some references about the co-op here: 3385:

local policy on editing with a conflict on interest

839:

problematic if the article gets restored, though. —

374:was updated with an item that involved the article 5767:I am not able to find any record of any discussion 5689:other such government bodies listed for Australia: 3945:Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies) 2793:them to weigh in before any action is affected. 1892:I have just been reverted by the same IP again... 1744:Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies) 1009:Kazakhstan_women's_national_volleyball_team#Junior 965:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sabina Altynbekova 103:implementation of previously deprecated parameters 5389:Hi, would you restore this deleted non-free logo 5359:and replaced his name with his own. Help. Thanks 5241:. Please pick an account name and stick to it. — 5226:the photo, unless he explicitly gave them to you. 5042:Hi Cryptic, per your request to reduce an image: 4607:On the file information page, the uploader wrote 3531:I will gather some more sources and build a draf 3207:I don't believe a boat maker article can support 2771:an adult if such an opportunity presents itself. 1636:as I am not entirely sure how it's done. Thanks, 1396:The issue of copyright was raised at the earlier 615:) and this page is not marked as advertising...-- 4894:File:All Men Are Mortal, 1946 French edition.jpg 4858:File:All Men Are Mortal, 1946 French edition.jpg 4847:File:All Men Are Mortal, 1946 French edition.jpg 3362:, and its content violated Knowledge's policies 3354:As stated in my deletion summary, as well as by 3333:direct benefit from it become an accepted term. 2643:, point articles at blank afds, as you did with 4547:also seems to be in use in the same article. -- 3933:for a full week with rationale "no evidence of 2607:. Nobody has a problem with this except you. — 1991:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2024 September 30 1403:The matter has arisen afresh as evidence at an 670:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2024 September 30 27:This page is an archive. Please do not edit it. 5744:another reason why we can't host this material 5329:Thanks for helping cleanup and patrolling. :) 5185:Knowledge:Image use policy#User-created images 3992:Alternately, I could restore the article as a 3399:the criteria for expedited ("speedy") deletion 2956:. It was irredeemably promotional, rife with 2641:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Agron 613:https://de.wikipedia.org/Riedel_Communications 4205:is deeply troubling; it seemed to me like he 4178:Howdy, the UTRS team has received an unblock 935:https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:NewPagesFeed 5860:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/B-bot 5 2088:. They seem intent on promoting their band. 1324:I blocked because the name was promotional ( 1061:Thanks for keeping an eye on this, .5; I've 5189:Knowledge:File copyright tags/Free licenses 4896:was mistagged as 'non-free'; it is in fact 4237:Go for it. You don't need my permission. — 3888:Operations Research Society of South Africa 3381:§4.7, Paid contributions without disclosure 2763:following the youthful ramblings of, well, 1910:Bumped up to a final warning. Take him to 1303:an organization are OK (third bullet under 1005:Kazakhstan_women's_national_volleyball_team 632:Our encyclopedia is not your free billboard 4486:A new articles was written to replace the 3057:Special:WhatLinksHere/File:JD Salinger.jpg 2475:and proper listing with this page created 1669:is the incantation you were looking for. — 583:Ah well. I tried. Too little too late. — 5692:https://en.wikipedia.org/Screen_Australia 4940:routinely handles this sort of request. — 4580:File:Engineers CC - Roslyn Harbor, NY.jpg 4574:File:Engineers CC - Roslyn Harbor, NY.jpg 4390:full version here, in mind-numbing detail 1531:. Is that sufficient for your purposes? 1521:{{DEFAULTSORT:Allen, William}} ] ] ] ] ] 285:I have considerably expanded the article 4545:File:TNBT on roof of Capitol Records.jpg 3055:for years before the subject's death. ( 2880:Thanks again. I sense a kindred spirit! 2777:(I’m beginning to sound like Tevye from 4036:and then tag the resulting redirect at 3541:comment added 19:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC) 1776:I'm willing to restore your article as 87:As one of the previous contributors to 14: 5835:It wouldn't be deleted unless someone 5700:https://en.wikipedia.org/Film_Victoria 5025:forbid paid editing without disclosure 3500:http://stewartlittle.org/</ref: --> 3448:North American Students of Cooperation 3266:Foundation for Excellence in Education 2139:The autogenerated rationale ("Expired 5599:Hi Cryptic, you recently deleted the 5492:, My apologies, I'd thought I'd left 5061:Duplicate taken care of, thank you. — 3929:As the deletion summary says, it was 3488:The article at time of deletion was: 3389:user accounts by more than one person 1849:Hello, could you please semi-protect 1433:Noninfringing content was de minimis: 1400:and there was no consensus to delete. 5179:Because, as the bot informed you at 2674:Hey, Cryptic. I just saw this edit 691:Can you please restore this article 355: 5696:https://en.wikipedia.org/ScreenWest 4908:File:Drakengard2ground gameplay.jpg 4862:File:Drakengard2ground gameplay.jpg 4851:File:Drakengard2ground gameplay.jpg 3710:I've very sorry - I overlooked the 2821:Category:Expired proposed deletions 23: 5191:on the image page will suffice. ( 4637:http://en.wikipedia.org/Don_Ritter 4138:inclusion criteria for biographies 3811:Weren't you watching the article, 3592:posted on your talk page, we need 2958:impenetrable marketing doublespeak 1931:Deletion of Misee Harris (actress) 1606:William Sullivant Vanderbilt Allen 1438:William Sullivant Vanderbilt Allen 1371:William Sullivant Vanderbilt Allen 1100:The move request was a tag on the 24: 5882: 3865:Thanks for the restoration. -- 3737:WHY DID YOU DELETE MY PAGE????? 3501:. Its name is a play on the book 2972:, and should thoroughly read our 2059:For covering a new editors ( Y ) 5686:doesn't make money or advertise. 5315: 4443: 4292:Question about CDH Proton Center 4074: 3798:). I'm actually surprised that 3070:, but that's not the same thing. 2519:Nobody made this edit except you 2258:Thanks for your understanding. 2043: 1896:. This is getting annoying now. 1851:Adam Morgan (English footballer) 1845:Adam Morgan (English footballer) 1651:Done. There's documentation at 1499: 514:I guess I should be asking you, 359: 306:) 05,02, 15 November 2014 (UTC) 135:Gold Mercury International Award 4418:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 3462:And about the house (page 62): 3231:discussion on Sageworks article 2470:this closed discussion reposted 2453:renominating an article for afd 1214:Pickled Pepper Productions Ltd. 101:started on the talk page as to 5813:begin with? It's just a test. 5757:Deletion of Threewave Software 5644:full guideline for web content 5496:a message regarding the move. 4524:File:LOTR TNBT Cover 713px.jpg 2431:Reverting removal of redirects 2349:What it looks like from here: 1507: 1468: 1457: 13: 1: 5831:Wiki you now, Wiki you later! 5815:Wiki you now, Wiki you later! 4377:of our notability guidelines. 4153:article's deletion discussion 3796:the proposed deletion process 3789:23:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC) 3770:03:25, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 3758:03:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 3725:01:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 3696:23:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 3662:01:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 3619:22:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 3602:22:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 3576:21:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 3557:14:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 3525:03:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 3477:19:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC) 3450:and an important part of the 3432:15:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 3406:18:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 3349:15:59, 19 February 2015 (UTC) 3313:01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC) 3299:00:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC) 3281:00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC) 3260:22:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 3225:16:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 3195:16:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 3177:16:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 3145:15:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 3107:16:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC) 3036:04:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC) 2999:14:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC) 2936:16:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC) 2899:19:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC) 752:as counterargument. (4 or 5 718:10:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC) 708:14:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC) 681:13:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC) 659:12:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC) 643:11:56, 28 November 2014 (UTC) 625:11:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC) 606:Riedel Communications Article 588:01:17, 24 November 2014 (UTC) 556:10:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC) 487:10:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC) 477:10:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC) 463:10:26, 23 November 2014 (UTC) 446:09:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC) 434:Sorry thought it was obvious 430:09:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC) 420:09:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC) 401:16:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC) 347:22:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC) 320:07:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC) 256:חנה ושרי - ייצוג יוצרים ותוכן 220:חנה ושרי - ייצוג יוצרים ותוכן 5557:Same answer you already got 3961:general notability guideline 3094:Knowledge:Files for deletion 2844:17:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 2809:17:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 2729:Ryan Collinson – Ambivalence 2721:15:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2697:14:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2687:14:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2656:16:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2628:15:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2612:15:50, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2597:15:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2582:15:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2556:15:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2541:15:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2526:15:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2513:15:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2498:14:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2488:14:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2460:14:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2446:14:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2423:01:13, 5 February 2015 (UTC) 2413:22:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2394:06:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2377:06:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2344:00:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC) 2317:06:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC) 2287:Knowledge that adheres to a 2279:17:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC) 2218:11:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC) 2203:11:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC) 2152:16:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC) 2134:16:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC) 2109:16:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC) 2098:16:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC) 2069:01:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC) 2029:05:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC) 2002:05:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC) 1963:04:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC) 1919:05:37, 25 January 2015 (UTC) 1906:20:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC) 1888:21:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 1874:21:01, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 1863:20:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC) 1835:11:32, 20 January 2015 (UTC) 1828:Draft:Better Decisions Forum 1822:11:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC) 1801:19:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 1786:18:29, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 1760:general notability guideline 1723:17:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 1688:00:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 1674:00:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 1646:23:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1618:19:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 1596:18:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 1575:01:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 1547:18:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1428:17:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1363:14:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1333:14:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1319:13:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1265:02:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 1251:02:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 1240:02:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 1202:22:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1178:20:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1135:23:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 1117:23:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 1095:20:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 1070:01:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 1056:01:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 268:05:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC) 242:18:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC) 228:06:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC) 7: 5648:simplified general criteria 4766:Knowledge:Changing username 4151:and presenting them at the 4007:Question about moving pages 3852:, I accept your offer. -- 3184:contested proposed deletion 3062:Pynchon, as discussed e.g. 2857:and take no further action. 2310:Knowledge:Good articles/all 2306:Knowledge:Featured articles 1445:Society of American Artists 1030:17:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 1021:17:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 992:17:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 981:14:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 947:06:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 929:06:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 909:06:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 895:06:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 884:06:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 862:18:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 844:18:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 833:18:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 800:03:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC) 786:19:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 776:18:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 761:18:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 743:17:29, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 664:OK. The place to do so is 452:making baseless accusations 233:Aha - I see that that site 188:16:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 170:15:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 151:12:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 10: 5887: 5683:to address them in order: 5237:You should also know that 5021:conflict of interest guide 4980:22:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC) 4970:15:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC) 4945:22:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC) 4920:17:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC) 4880:17:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC) 4838:23:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC) 4823:22:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC) 4801:05:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC) 4773:22:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC) 4722:22:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC) 4678:22:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC) 4630:19:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC) 4621:14:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC) 4595:14:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC) 4566:20:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC) 4557:15:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC) 4539:15:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC) 4517:20:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC) 4502:05:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC) 4474:02:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC) 4430:22:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4321:20:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4286:17:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4272:17:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4242:03:52, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4233:03:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4219:02:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4196:01:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 4168:22:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC) 3562:Removing family photograph 2985:. This is non-negotiable. 2293:our criteria for inclusion 2053:The Helping Hand Barnstar 1587:. If you insist on this, 1212:Hello Cryptic.. regarding 1208:Pickled Pepper Productions 750:this post-delisting oppose 112:MediaWiki message delivery 5872:18:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC) 5848:19:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC) 5823:18:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC) 5802:14:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC) 5779:14:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC) 5751:09:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC) 5726:03:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC) 5660:03:07, 22 June 2015 (UTC) 5628:20:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC) 5590:05:18, 20 June 2015 (UTC) 5566:01:54, 19 June 2015 (UTC) 5550:01:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC) 5515:22:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC) 5481:13:11, 18 June 2015 (UTC) 5454:12:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC) 5426:18:56, 10 June 2015 (UTC) 5412:18:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC) 5402:14:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC) 5314: 4953:Please restore this image 4888:Non-administrator comment 4701:12:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 4659:17:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC) 4603:Non-administrator comment 4442: 4277:I history merged because 4203:File:Mt. Namcha Barwa.jpg 4123:14:59, 9 March 2015 (UTC) 4104:11:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 4091:09:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 4059:06:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC) 4045:06:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC) 4038:Knowledge talk:Madangarli 4022:06:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC) 4001:01:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC) 3915:16:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC) 3874:03:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC) 3861:01:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 3828:00:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 3807:00:02, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 3520:approved. Let me know. — 3090:Knowledge:Deletion review 3044:non-free content criteria 2757:Billy Elliot, the Musical 2049: 2042: 1987:Knowledge:Deletion review 1255:I agree. Thanks again... 1216:, it was created by User 1146:THIMUN Foundation article 666:Knowledge:Deletion review 425:...Which madness where? — 127:18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 110:This message was sent by 5464:; I only cleaned up the 5379:09:37, 9 June 2015 (UTC) 5369:09:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC) 5339:08:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC) 5302:16:35, 4 June 2015 (UTC) 5273:15:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC) 5246:21:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC) 5165:17:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC) 5129:07:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC) 5115:14:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 5094:05:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC) 5066:02:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC) 5056:22:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC) 5032:10:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC) 5019:.) You should read our 5007:04:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC) 4760:Iranian Cinematographers 4741:Iranian Cinematographers 3401:even without the prod. — 3327:Convertible debt shuffle 3321:Convertible Debt Shuffle 3013:File:PynchonYearbook.jpg 2086:Recent (Bangldeshi Band) 1732:. While it's true that 1484:. 17 January 1892. p. 12 1453:An evening by the lake 1218:PickledPepperProductions 870:Copyright issue articles 5794:User:DissidentAggressor 5295:a valid license release 5181:User talk:Sherifbichara 5078:File:Peter Landrock.png 4959:File:Pocket PC 2000.png 3985:formal deletion process 3088:You can appeal this at 2368:. Instructions are at 2147:likely. Nice going.) — 1878:Fair enough. Thanks... 1781:to find them for you. — 1326:WP:UN#Promotional names 1191:User:Moseley101/sandbox 1025:I've done the former. — 204:i was the one who wrote 5638:Furious Mythical Beast 5616:Furious Mythical Beast 5603:page I created due to 5468:that was left over at 4375:plain-language summary 4040:for speedy deletion. — 3005:Pynchon Image Deletion 2366:52d Troop Carrier Wing 2324:52d Troop Carrier Wing 1698:Better Decisions Forum 1337:Again, I'll quote the 5808:Test Deletion Notices 5761:You recently deleted 5735:encyclopedia articles 5434:Draft: Amos A. Phelps 5138:File:Faridsimaika.jpg 4713:It was labelled as a 4508:subcategories of the 4488:Riedel Communications 4412:independent were all 4337:proposed for deletion 4140:—which means finding 3931:proposed for deletion 2546:proceed accordingly. 2289:neutral point of view 2179:User:Reo On/To do/Haď 1667:|creator's username}} 1106:Ardnacrusha (village) 366:On 20 November 2014, 247:T H A N K Y O U!!! 5652:Draft:FullTimeDevils 5462:Draft:Amos A. Phelps 5460:It's still there at 5323:The Admin's Barnstar 4684:LEAP Africa Logo.jpg 4451:The Admin's Barnstar 4174:UTRS Unblock request 4142:significant coverage 3959:of it (which is our 3949:significant coverage 3890:(ORSSA) page deleted 3491:Stewart Little is a 3201:Read the PROD text, 3113:I enjoyed the snark! 3053:File:JD Salinger.jpg 2970:a business directory 2789:that I have noted. 2736:I wrote the article! 1758:of it (which is our 1748:significant coverage 1678:Very useful. Thanks 1524:(All prose added by 1295:) is inappropriate. 1193:, and I suggest you 287:Guerrilla filmmaking 5308:A barnstar for you! 4436:A barnstar for you! 2779:Fiddler on the Roof 2670:Florida Gators logo 2575:eventually did here 2250:COMSOL Multiphysics 1993:and edit it to add 1634:Nuur dugle, Somalia 1600:I have asked for a 1277:I would argue that 1063:protected the title 672:and edit it to add 450:It looks like he's 304:User talk:Tertulius 83:be interested in... 5763:Threewave Software 5474:User:Non-dropframe 5353:User:Sonusn07itsme 5038:Indian Larry image 4386:brief summary here 4067:A cupcake for you! 4034:User talk:Manojmkn 3507:Cornell University 2992:inclusion criteria 2889:Very best regards. 2451:The first step in 2332:WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME 2174:difficult for us. 1195:move it back there 959:Sabina Altynbekova 5790:proposed deletion 5784:As stated in the 5729: 5712:comment added by 5631: 5614:comment added by 5553: 5536:comment added by 5456: 5444:comment added by 5344: 5343: 5289:already told you 5168: 5151:comment added by 4891: 4753: 4739:comment added by 4661: 4649:comment added by 4606: 4510:Sports Emmy Award 4479: 4478: 4355:CDH Proton Center 4324: 4307:comment added by 4298:CDH Proton Center 4161:now archived here 4096: 4095: 3918: 3901:comment added by 3761: 3744:comment added by 3699: 3682:comment added by 3594:a license release 3454:college culture. 3435: 3418:comment added by 3188:User:Andy Dingley 3175: 3038: 3026:comment added by 2974:FAQ for companies 2939: 2922:comment added by 2775:On the other hand 2282: 2265:comment added by 2183:Have a good time 2074: 2073: 2032: 2015:comment added by 1966: 1949:comment added by 1661:; in particular, 1585:rather than after 1541: 1536:User:Dennis Brown 781:re: rfa norms). — 390: 389: 271: 254:comment added by 129: 18:User talk:Cryptic 5878: 5854:Dated categories 5834: 5728: 5706: 5641: 5630: 5608: 5586: 5581: 5552: 5530: 5512: 5503: 5499: 5439: 5319: 5312: 5311: 5284: 5220: 5214: 5210: 5204: 5200: 5194: 5178: 5167: 5145: 5105: 5017:already told you 4930: 4905: 4899: 4889: 4885: 4876: 4812: 4763: 4752: 4733: 4712: 4644: 4604: 4600: 4470: 4462: 4447: 4440: 4439: 4401:reliable sources 4371: 4357: 4334: 4323: 4301: 4279:User:Philafrenzy 4230: 4193: 4135: 4110:Deletion of page 4078: 4071: 4070: 3953:reliable sources 3928: 3917: 3895: 3869: 3856: 3784: 3760: 3738: 3719: 3713: 3709: 3698: 3676: 3633: 3587: 3542: 3434: 3412: 3257: 3252: 3247: 3169: 3075:File:Pynchon.jpg 3021: 2983:our Terms of Use 2966:a free billboard 2938: 2916: 2386:Kevin Rutherford 2281: 2259: 2194: 2047: 2040: 2039: 2031: 2009: 1997:at the bottom. — 1965: 1943: 1752:reliable sources 1668: 1660: 1654: 1539: 1516: 1511: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1497: 1491: 1489: 1472: 1466: 1461: 1447:, Jury of 1890. 1355: 1311: 1133: 1126: 1093: 1086: 922: 916: 854: 825: 676:at the bottom. — 469:Hell in a Bucket 460: 438:Hell in a Bucket 412:Hell in a Bucket 363: 356: 343: 341: 270: 248: 125: 109: 96: 90: 79:An RfC that you 5886: 5885: 5881: 5880: 5879: 5877: 5876: 5875: 5856: 5828: 5810: 5759: 5707: 5668: 5635: 5609: 5597: 5584: 5579: 5574: 5531: 5527: 5524:Draft:Vegenaise 5510: 5506: 5501: 5497: 5436: 5387: 5349: 5310: 5278: 5256: 5218: 5212: 5208: 5202: 5198: 5192: 5175:Youssef simaika 5172: 5153:Youssef simaika 5146: 5141: 5099: 5074: 5040: 4992: 4955: 4924: 4903: 4897: 4887: 4870: 4854: 4806: 4781: 4757: 4734: 4730: 4706: 4686: 4640: 4602: 4576: 4527: 4484: 4468: 4460: 4438: 4414:local in nature 4359: 4353: 4328: 4302: 4294: 4256: 4226: 4189: 4176: 4149:reliable source 4129: 4112: 4069: 4009: 3922: 3896: 3892: 3867: 3854: 3782: 3778: 3776:George Savvides 3739: 3735: 3717: 3711: 3703: 3677: 3672: 3627: 3581: 3564: 3549: 3536: 3444: 3413: 3323: 3269: 3255: 3250: 3245: 3233: 3155: 3115: 3007: 2917: 2909: 2731: 2672: 2433: 2328: 2260: 2231: 2192: 2160: 2117: 2079: 2038: 2010: 1944: 1933: 1847: 1826:Done. It's at 1711:Decision Making 1702: 1665:subst:AFC draft 1662: 1658: 1652: 1630: 1602:deletion review 1519: 1512: 1508: 1498: 1487: 1485: 1481:Chicago Tribune 1474: 1473: 1469: 1462: 1458: 1440:(1860 - 1931) 1391:insert URL here 1373: 1361: 1353: 1317: 1309: 1275: 1210: 1148: 1124: 1122: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1044: 961: 933:I'm just using 920: 914: 872: 852: 823: 814: 792:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 768:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 735:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 726: 689: 608: 456: 408: 384:candidates page 354: 339: 337: 328: 277: 249: 200: 138: 119: 118:) on behalf of 94: 88: 85: 76: 75: 28: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5884: 5855: 5852: 5851: 5850: 5809: 5806: 5805: 5804: 5771:BananaLanguage 5758: 5755: 5754: 5753: 5739: 5738: 5698: 5694: 5690: 5687: 5684: 5682: 5680: 5678: 5667: 5664: 5663: 5662: 5601:FullTimeDevils 5596: 5595:FullTimeDevils 5593: 5573: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5526: 5521: 5520: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5508: 5494:65.120.112.150 5486:65.120.112.150 5470:Amos A. Phelps 5446:65.120.112.150 5435: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5386: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5348: 5345: 5342: 5341: 5326: 5325: 5320: 5309: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5255: 5250: 5249: 5248: 5234: 5233: 5228: 5227: 5140: 5135: 5134: 5133: 5132: 5131: 5073: 5072:Peter Landrock 5070: 5069: 5068: 5039: 5036: 5035: 5034: 4991: 4985: 4984: 4983: 4954: 4951: 4950: 4949: 4948: 4947: 4873: 4853: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4815:Phoenix Global 4785:Phoenix Global 4780: 4779:Phoenix Global 4777: 4776: 4775: 4729: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4715:non-free image 4709:Leapsandbounds 4693:Leapsandbounds 4685: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4639: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4623: 4575: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4526: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4483: 4480: 4477: 4476: 4454: 4453: 4448: 4437: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4422: 4421: 4405: 4404: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4372: 4352: 4345: 4344: 4293: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4255: 4253:Kanai Hiroyuki 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4211: 4210: 4184:User:Tinchojos 4175: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4111: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4094: 4093: 4079: 4068: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4008: 4005: 4004: 4003: 3989: 3988: 3979: 3978: 3965: 3964: 3939: 3938: 3891: 3885: 3883: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3863: 3846: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3777: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3734: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3671: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3622: 3621: 3605: 3604: 3563: 3560: 3548: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3528: 3527: 3516: 3515: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3485: 3484: 3443: 3441:Stewart Little 3437: 3409: 3408: 3393: 3392: 3372: 3371: 3356:User:Wikidemon 3322: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3268: 3263: 3241:Talk:Sageworks 3232: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3205: 3198: 3197: 3154: 3148: 3130: 3129: 3122: 3114: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3098: 3097: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3078: 3071: 3048: 3047: 3017: 3016: 3006: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2987: 2986: 2978: 2977: 2949: 2948: 2908: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2847: 2846: 2831: 2830: 2825: 2824: 2748:an article on 2730: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2671: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2645:Bridget Wilmes 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2463: 2462: 2432: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2380: 2379: 2362: 2356: 2353: 2327: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2297: 2296: 2253: 2252: 2247: 2230: 2225: 2223: 2221: 2220: 2159: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2126:Postcard Cathy 2122: 2116: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2078: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2056: 2055: 2050: 2048: 2037: 2034: 2005: 2004: 1982: 1981: 1976: 1975: 1932: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1789: 1788: 1773: 1772: 1764: 1763: 1739: 1738: 1707:TED Conference 1701: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1656:AFC submission 1629: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1591:is thataway. — 1534:My reading of 1518: 1517: 1506: 1494:Newspapers.com 1467: 1455: 1435: 1434: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1401: 1394: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1357: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1313: 1274: 1273:Username block 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1186: 1185: 1158: 1157: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 960: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 871: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 813: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 748:I'll offer up 725: 722: 721: 720: 688: 685: 684: 683: 646: 645: 607: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 512: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 448: 407: 404: 388: 387: 364: 353: 350: 327: 324: 323: 322: 276: 273: 245: 244: 199: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 173: 172: 137: 132: 131: 130: 84: 77: 29: 26: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5883: 5874: 5873: 5869: 5865: 5861: 5849: 5846: 5842: 5838: 5832: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5820: 5816: 5803: 5800: 5795: 5791: 5787: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5776: 5772: 5768: 5764: 5752: 5749: 5745: 5741: 5740: 5736: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5727: 5723: 5719: 5715: 5711: 5702: 5701: 5697: 5693: 5675: 5673: 5661: 5658: 5653: 5649: 5645: 5639: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5629: 5625: 5621: 5617: 5613: 5606: 5602: 5592: 5591: 5588: 5587: 5582: 5567: 5564: 5560: 5556: 5555: 5554: 5551: 5547: 5543: 5539: 5535: 5525: 5516: 5513: 5511: 5504: 5502:Non-Dropframe 5495: 5491: 5487: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5479: 5475: 5471: 5467: 5463: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5455: 5451: 5447: 5443: 5427: 5423: 5419: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5410: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5403: 5399: 5395: 5391: 5380: 5377: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5370: 5366: 5362: 5358: 5354: 5340: 5336: 5332: 5328: 5327: 5324: 5321: 5318: 5313: 5303: 5300: 5296: 5292: 5288: 5282: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5270: 5266: 5260: 5254: 5247: 5244: 5240: 5236: 5235: 5230: 5229: 5225: 5217: 5207: 5197: 5190: 5186: 5182: 5176: 5171: 5170: 5169: 5166: 5162: 5158: 5154: 5150: 5139: 5130: 5126: 5122: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5113: 5109: 5103: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5091: 5087: 5083: 5079: 5067: 5064: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5053: 5049: 5045: 5043: 5033: 5030: 5026: 5022: 5018: 5015: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5008: 5004: 5000: 4996: 4990: 4981: 4978: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4967: 4963: 4960: 4946: 4943: 4939: 4935: 4928: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4917: 4913: 4909: 4906:. Concerning 4902: 4895: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4877: 4875: 4867: 4863: 4859: 4852: 4848: 4839: 4835: 4831: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4821: 4816: 4810: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4790: 4786: 4774: 4771: 4767: 4761: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4750: 4746: 4742: 4738: 4723: 4720: 4716: 4710: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4698: 4694: 4690: 4679: 4676: 4672: 4670: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4660: 4656: 4652: 4648: 4638: 4631: 4628: 4624: 4622: 4618: 4614: 4610: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4593: 4590: 4585: 4581: 4567: 4564: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4536: 4532: 4525: 4518: 4515: 4511: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4499: 4495: 4494: 4489: 4475: 4472: 4471: 4464: 4463: 4456: 4455: 4452: 4449: 4446: 4441: 4431: 4428: 4424: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4407: 4406: 4402: 4398: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4382: 4376: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4356: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4342: 4341:User:Speciate 4338: 4332: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4310: 4306: 4299: 4287: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4261: 4254: 4243: 4240: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4231: 4229: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4217: 4213: 4212: 4208: 4204: 4201:I'm dubious. 4200: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4194: 4192: 4185: 4181: 4169: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4133: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4124: 4120: 4116: 4105: 4102: 4098: 4097: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4077: 4073: 4072: 4060: 4056: 4052: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4030: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4019: 4015: 4002: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3990: 3986: 3981: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3971:User:RHaworth 3967: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3941: 3940: 3936: 3932: 3926: 3925:Berndtlindner 3921: 3920: 3919: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3903:Berndtlindner 3900: 3889: 3884: 3875: 3872: 3870: 3864: 3862: 3859: 3857: 3851: 3847: 3844: 3843:User:Bishonen 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3829: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3805: 3801: 3800:User:Bishonen 3797: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3787: 3785: 3771: 3768: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3746:Tehkingofsweg 3743: 3733: 3732:Isaac Mattern 3726: 3723: 3716: 3707: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3663: 3660: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3647: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3631: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3607: 3606: 3603: 3600: 3595: 3591: 3585: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3559: 3558: 3555: 3540: 3534: 3530: 3529: 3526: 3523: 3518: 3517: 3513: 3508: 3504: 3503:Stuart Little 3498: 3494: 3490: 3489: 3487: 3486: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3465: 3464: 3460: 3459: 3455: 3453: 3449: 3442: 3436: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3407: 3404: 3400: 3395: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3383:; and to our 3382: 3378: 3374: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3360:on neologisms 3357: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3337: 3334: 3330: 3328: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3267: 3262: 3261: 3258: 3253: 3248: 3242: 3238: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3204: 3200: 3199: 3196: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3173: 3168: 3162: 3160: 3153: 3147: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3133: 3127: 3124:not one, but 3123: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3108: 3105: 3100: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3086: 3079: 3076: 3072: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3060: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3028:50.28.135.149 3025: 3015: 3014: 3009: 3008: 3000: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2914: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2891:HistoryBuff14 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2870: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2856: 2855:stare decisis 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2845: 2842: 2838: 2833: 2832: 2827: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2801:HistoryBuff14 2799:Best regards. 2797: 2794: 2790: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2766: 2760: 2758: 2753: 2751: 2747: 2744: 2738: 2737: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2695: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2657: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2606: 2605: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2580: 2576: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2496: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2474: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2424: 2421: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2401: 2400: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2382: 2381: 2378: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2360: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2350: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2325: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2256: 2251: 2248: 2246: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2237: 2234: 2229: 2224: 2219: 2216: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2197: 2196: 2191: 2184: 2181: 2180: 2175: 2171: 2168: 2164: 2153: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2120: 2110: 2107: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2057: 2054: 2051: 2046: 2041: 2033: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2003: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1983: 1978: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1940: 1938: 1920: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1872: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1836: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1810: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1787: 1784: 1779: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1740: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1709:) related to 1708: 1699: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1672: 1666: 1657: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559:WP:COPYWITHIN 1556: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1545: 1537: 1532: 1530: 1527: 1522: 1515: 1510: 1502: 1495: 1483: 1482: 1477: 1471: 1465: 1460: 1456: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1446: 1441: 1439: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1395: 1392: 1388: 1387:subst:Copyvio 1383: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1349: 1343: 1342: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1249: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1226: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1168:Many thanks, 1166: 1162: 1156: 1155: 1150: 1149: 1143: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1071: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1042: 1041:Winmel Garcia 1031: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1007:) instead of 1006: 1002: 998: 995: 994: 993: 990: 985: 984: 983: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 931: 930: 927: 919: 912: 911: 910: 906: 902: 898: 897: 896: 893: 888: 887: 886: 885: 881: 877: 863: 860: 859: 856: 855: 847: 846: 845: 842: 837: 836: 835: 834: 831: 830: 827: 826: 819: 801: 797: 793: 789: 788: 787: 784: 779: 778: 777: 773: 769: 764: 763: 762: 759: 755: 751: 747: 746: 745: 744: 740: 736: 731: 719: 716: 712: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 682: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 662: 661: 660: 656: 652: 644: 641: 637: 633: 629: 628: 627: 626: 622: 618: 614: 589: 586: 582: 581: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 557: 553: 549: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 525: 521: 517: 513: 510: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 488: 485: 480: 479: 478: 474: 470: 466: 465: 464: 461: 459: 458:Seahorseruler 453: 449: 447: 443: 439: 435: 433: 432: 431: 428: 424: 423: 422: 421: 417: 413: 403: 402: 398: 394: 385: 381: 380: 379: 373: 372: 371: 365: 362: 358: 357: 349: 348: 345: 344: 333: 321: 318: 314: 309: 308: 307: 305: 301: 297: 294: 291: 288: 283: 280: 275:Page reverted 272: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 243: 240: 236: 232: 231: 230: 229: 225: 221: 217: 212: 208: 205: 198: 189: 185: 181: 177: 176: 175: 174: 171: 168: 164: 160: 155: 154: 153: 152: 148: 144: 136: 128: 123: 117: 113: 108: 107: 106: 104: 100: 93: 82: 74: 71: 68: 65: 62: 59: 56: 53: 50: 47: 44: 41: 38: 35: 32: 19: 5857: 5836: 5811: 5786:deletion log 5760: 5734: 5708:— Preceding 5703: 5676: 5669: 5610:— Preceding 5604: 5598: 5577: 5575: 5532:— Preceding 5528: 5507: 5440:— Preceding 5437: 5418:Kindzmarauli 5394:Kindzmarauli 5388: 5385:Deleted logo 5350: 5322: 5281:Davemoser123 5265:Davemoser123 5261: 5257: 5223: 5216:cc-by-sa-3.0 5147:— Preceding 5142: 5121:ScienceGuard 5102:ScienceGuard 5086:ScienceGuard 5075: 5041: 4997: 4993: 4987:Deletion of 4956: 4933: 4871: 4855: 4782: 4735:— Preceding 4731: 4691: 4687: 4666: 4645:— Preceding 4641: 4608: 4577: 4528: 4491: 4485: 4466: 4458: 4450: 4409: 4399:coverage in 4303:— Preceding 4296:Hi, my page 4295: 4257: 4227: 4206: 4190: 4177: 4144:in multiple 4113: 4051:War wizard90 4028: 4014:War wizard90 4010: 3897:— Preceding 3893: 3882: 3850:User:Cryptic 3779: 3740:— Preceding 3736: 3715:OTRS pending 3678:— Preceding 3673: 3645: 3565: 3550: 3537:— Preceding 3466: 3461: 3456: 3445: 3439:Deletion of 3420:Swfindlay101 3414:— Preceding 3410: 3377:Terms of Use 3368:on promotion 3341:Swfindlay101 3338: 3335: 3331: 3324: 3291: 3270: 3234: 3217:Andy Dingley 3202: 3163: 3159:Ranger Boats 3156: 3152:Ranger Boats 3134: 3131: 3125: 3116: 3067: 3022:— Preceding 3018: 3010: 2954:encyclopedia 2918:— Preceding 2910: 2868: 2854: 2798: 2795: 2791: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2773: 2769: 2764: 2761: 2756: 2754: 2749: 2745: 2742: 2739: 2735: 2732: 2673: 2648: 2636: 2632: 2602: 2572: 2434: 2329: 2267:Marloncitopr 2261:— Preceding 2257: 2254: 2238: 2235: 2232: 2222: 2198: 2189: 2187: 2185: 2182: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2144: 2121: 2118: 2115:Dave Huddart 2080: 2052: 2011:— Preceding 2006: 1994: 1945:— Preceding 1941: 1934: 1848: 1790: 1737:significant. 1703: 1696:Deletion of 1631: 1533: 1523: 1520: 1509: 1486:. Retrieved 1479: 1470: 1459: 1452: 1450:== Works == 1449: 1442: 1437: 1436: 1416: 1390: 1374: 1300: 1289: 1283:Idcworld-jmc 1276: 1246:G11ing it. — 1224: 1211: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1151: 1141: 1129: 1089: 1079: 1065:this time. — 1045: 996: 962: 873: 858: 851: 829: 822: 815: 753: 729: 727: 700:CrazyAces489 698:Thank you. 690: 673: 647: 636:free content 609: 523: 519: 457: 409: 391: 378:Ken Takakura 376: 375: 368: 367: 335: 329: 298: 295: 292: 284: 281: 278: 250:— Preceding 246: 234: 215: 213: 209: 203: 201: 197:Savi Gabizon 139: 122:Technical 13 92:Infobox film 86: 80: 54: 5714:Shellyprawn 5357:Ankit Fadia 5287:Tokyogirl79 4999:Abhinav0712 4728:Hi Cryptic! 4397:independent 4394:significant 4146:independent 3957:independent 3495:located in 3493:cooperative 3364:on sourcing 3239:article at 3068:journalists 2817:Kartoffel07 2713:Dirtlawyer1 2679:Dirtlawyer1 2604:three edits 2405:Lineagegeek 2336:Lineagegeek 2061:Deunanknute 1756:independent 1555:WP:CUTPASTE 1102:Ardnacrusha 1076:Ardnacrusha 1048:49.197.25.5 370:In the news 161:instead of 5666:Screen NSW 5361:PawanAhuja 5351:This user 5347:Block User 5331:PawanAhuja 5108:a template 4892:Note that 4651:42.2.50.18 3935:notability 3868:Jack of Oz 3855:Jack of Oz 3783:Jack of Oz 3497:Ithaca, NY 3172:Talk to me 3167:Realkyhick 1488:October 9, 1279:this block 1170:Moseley101 1125:The Banner 1085:The Banner 687:Ron Duncan 651:BeyondTime 617:BeyondTime 352:ITN credit 218:thank you 5572:Thank you 5538:FYH Oscar 5196:GFDL-self 4938:WP:REFUND 4589:Fut.Perf. 4264:ww2censor 3955:that are 3305:Zigzig20s 3273:Zigzig20s 3237:Sageworks 3213:bass boat 3137:FeralOink 3011:Context: 2962:neutrally 2945:Naadvavni 2924:Nadavavni 2869:Knowledge 2837:WP:REFUND 2787:Knowledge 2750:Knowledge 2633:Of course 2620:Legacypac 2589:Legacypac 2548:Legacypac 2533:Legacypac 2505:Legacypac 2480:Legacypac 2438:Legacypac 2370:Help:Move 2186:Petr aka 2158:Haď Čarem 1814:EddyWilly 1793:Legacypac 1754:that are 1734:Legacypac 1730:EddyWilly 1715:EddyWilly 1628:G13 clock 1610:Andrew D. 1567:Andrew D. 1526:User:Gaff 1420:Andrew D. 1354:WikiDan61 1310:WikiDan61 1152:Context: 1110:WP:REFUND 939:Legacypac 901:Legacypac 890:Sheesh. — 876:Legacypac 406:3rr board 393:ThaddeusB 326:Hilarious 300:Tertulius 296:My best, 5722:contribs 5710:unsigned 5624:contribs 5612:unsigned 5546:contribs 5534:unsigned 5466:redirect 5442:unsigned 5416:Thanks! 5222:whoever 5161:contribs 5149:unsigned 5106:There's 4962:Mdrnpndr 4749:contribs 4737:unsigned 4667:Expired 4647:unsigned 4331:IChevako 4317:contribs 4309:IChevako 4305:unsigned 4083:Hawkeye7 3911:contribs 3899:unsigned 3821:Bishonen 3754:contribs 3742:unsigned 3692:contribs 3680:unsigned 3428:contribs 3416:unsigned 3150:PROD of 3024:unsigned 2932:contribs 2920:unsigned 2913:leverate 2275:contribs 2263:unsigned 2036:Barnstar 2025:contribs 2013:unsigned 1959:contribs 1947:unsigned 1581:MelanieN 1409:involved 1359:ReadMe!! 1315:ReadMe!! 1293:contribs 1228:contribs 1013:Jax 0677 973:Jax 0677 264:contribs 252:unsigned 180:Aymatth2 143:Aymatth2 5845:Cryptic 5841:CAT:CSD 5799:Cryptic 5748:Cryptic 5672:Cryptic 5657:Cryptic 5563:Cryptic 5490:Cryptic 5478:Cryptic 5409:Cryptic 5407:Done. — 5376:Cryptic 5299:Cryptic 5243:Cryptic 5232:behalf. 5206:PD-self 5112:Cryptic 5063:Cryptic 5048:Evenrød 5029:Cryptic 5014:Yunshui 4989:my page 4977:Cryptic 4942:Cryptic 4934:article 4912:Stefan2 4901:PD-text 4830:79616gr 4820:Cryptic 4809:79616gr 4793:79616gr 4770:Cryptic 4719:Cryptic 4675:Cryptic 4669:WP:PROD 4627:Cryptic 4613:Stefan2 4563:Cryptic 4549:Stefan2 4531:Stefan2 4514:Cryptic 4427:Cryptic 4420:or not. 4369:scholar 4335:It was 4283:Cryptic 4239:Cryptic 4216:Cryptic 4180:request 4165:Cryptic 4157:Yunshui 4132:Ebartey 4115:Ebartey 4101:Cryptic 4042:Cryptic 3998:Cryptic 3804:Cryptic 3767:Cryptic 3722:Cryptic 3706:Hamik.m 3684:Hamik.m 3659:Cryptic 3630:JendaAJ 3611:JendaAJ 3599:Cryptic 3590:Diannaa 3584:JendaAJ 3568:JendaAJ 3539:undated 3522:Cryptic 3469:Kaimast 3452:Cornell 3403:Cryptic 3296:Cryptic 3292:fastest 3192:Cryptic 3104:Cryptic 2996:Cryptic 2841:Cryptic 2743:finally 2694:Cryptic 2653:Cryptic 2609:Cryptic 2579:Cryptic 2523:Cryptic 2495:Cryptic 2457:Cryptic 2420:Cryptic 2374:Cryptic 2314:Cryptic 2245:AutoCAD 2215:Cryptic 2149:Cryptic 2106:Cryptic 2082:Rocksbd 2077:Rocksbd 1999:Cryptic 1916:Cryptic 1871:Cryptic 1832:Cryptic 1809:Cryptic 1783:Cryptic 1778:a draft 1700:Article 1671:Cryptic 1593:Cryptic 1544:Cryptic 1330:Cryptic 1248:Cryptic 1199:Cryptic 1114:Cryptic 1067:Cryptic 1027:Cryptic 989:Cryptic 926:Cryptic 892:Cryptic 853:Wifione 841:Cryptic 824:Wifione 783:Cryptic 758:Cryptic 715:Cryptic 678:Cryptic 640:Cryptic 585:Cryptic 548:P004ME2 509:Cryptic 484:Cryptic 427:Cryptic 317:Cryptic 279:Hello, 239:Cryptic 167:Cryptic 5837:really 5585:Verbum 5211:, and 4927:Ahecht 4866:Ahecht 4482:Riedel 3286:Well, 2746:create 2649:at all 2359:Ktr101 2302:WP:OSE 2228:Semcad 2211:WP:AFD 2090:331dot 2017:Khocon 1972:Khocon 1951:Khocon 1912:WP:AIV 1898:JMHamo 1880:JMHamo 1855:JMHamo 1769:speedy 1680:JMHamo 1638:JMHamo 1589:WP:DRV 1563:WP:G12 1492:– via 1382:WP:G12 1345:below. 1305:WP:ISU 1257:JMHamo 1232:JMHamo 1184:right. 997:Reply 526:there? 518:, how 313:WP:RSN 5472:when 4498:talk 4469:Chat? 4461:Corky 4365:books 4228:Nakon 4191:Nakon 4029:could 3994:draft 3848:Yes, 3841:Yes, 3554:Panyd 3547:Email 3483:then. 3182:As a 2765:a kid 2637:blank 2601:It's 2517:No. 1980:case. 1389:|url= 1339:WP:UN 1297:WP:UN 918:db-g5 754:years 342:lwart 16:< 5868:talk 5819:talk 5775:talk 5765:but 5718:talk 5620:talk 5559:here 5542:talk 5509:talk 5450:talk 5422:talk 5398:talk 5365:talk 5335:talk 5291:here 5269:talk 5224:took 5157:talk 5125:talk 5090:talk 5052:talk 5003:talk 4966:talk 4916:talk 4874:PAGE 4872:TALK 4860:and 4849:and 4834:talk 4797:talk 4789:NPOV 4745:talk 4697:talk 4673:". — 4655:talk 4617:talk 4553:talk 4535:talk 4410:were 4361:news 4313:talk 4268:talk 4260:here 4207:knew 4182:for 4119:talk 4087:talk 4055:talk 4018:talk 3907:talk 3825:talk 3813:Jack 3750:talk 3688:talk 3615:talk 3572:talk 3533:here 3473:talk 3424:talk 3366:and 3345:talk 3309:talk 3288:prod 3277:talk 3221:talk 3209:WP:N 3141:talk 3032:talk 2943:No, 2928:talk 2895:talk 2805:talk 2783:many 2717:talk 2683:talk 2624:talk 2593:talk 2552:talk 2537:talk 2509:talk 2484:talk 2442:talk 2409:talk 2390:talk 2340:talk 2326:move 2271:talk 2145:more 2141:PROD 2130:talk 2094:talk 2065:talk 2021:talk 1970:Hi, 1955:talk 1902:talk 1894:diff 1884:talk 1859:talk 1818:talk 1797:talk 1719:talk 1684:talk 1642:talk 1614:talk 1571:talk 1557:and 1490:2014 1424:talk 1287:talk 1261:talk 1236:talk 1222:talk 1174:talk 1130:talk 1090:talk 1052:talk 1017:talk 1011:. -- 1003:(or 977:talk 971:? -- 943:talk 905:talk 880:talk 818:this 796:talk 772:talk 756:?) — 739:talk 730:have 704:talk 655:talk 621:talk 552:talk 516:HiaB 473:talk 442:talk 416:talk 397:talk 332:this 330:... 260:talk 224:talk 184:talk 147:talk 120:{{U| 116:talk 5746:. — 5670:Hi 5580:Pax 5561:. — 5285:As 5027:. — 4768:. — 4493:DGG 4339:by 4155:. 3951:in 3646:you 3635:us. 3588:As 3329:"? 3251:ncr 3126:two 2968:or 2839:. — 2372:. — 2312:. — 2308:or 2213:. — 1830:. — 1750:in 1728:Hi 1604:of 1565:. 1405:RfA 1398:AFD 1281:on 1197:. — 963:At 812:Hey 724:RfA 638:. — 630:A) 524:you 520:you 315:. — 235:has 99:RfC 81:may 5870:) 5821:) 5777:) 5724:) 5720:• 5674:, 5646:; 5626:) 5622:• 5548:) 5544:• 5498:-- 5488:, 5452:) 5424:) 5400:) 5367:) 5337:) 5271:) 5219:}} 5213:{{ 5209:}} 5203:{{ 5201:, 5199:}} 5193:{{ 5163:) 5159:• 5127:) 5092:) 5054:) 5005:) 4968:) 4918:) 4904:}} 4898:{{ 4878:) 4836:) 4799:) 4751:) 4747:• 4699:) 4657:) 4619:) 4555:) 4537:) 4500:) 4465:| 4388:; 4367:, 4363:, 4358:– 4319:) 4315:• 4270:) 4121:) 4089:) 4057:) 4020:) 3975:A7 3963:). 3913:) 3909:• 3823:| 3756:) 3752:• 3718:}} 3712:{{ 3694:) 3690:• 3617:) 3574:) 3475:) 3430:) 3426:• 3347:) 3339:-- 3311:) 3279:) 3256:am 3246:do 3223:) 3143:) 3135:-- 3034:) 2934:) 2930:• 2897:) 2807:) 2719:) 2685:) 2626:) 2595:) 2554:) 2539:) 2511:) 2486:) 2444:) 2411:) 2392:) 2342:) 2277:) 2273:• 2132:) 2096:) 2067:) 2027:) 2023:• 1961:) 1957:• 1937:G8 1904:) 1886:) 1861:) 1820:) 1799:) 1762:). 1721:) 1686:) 1663:{{ 1659:}} 1653:{{ 1644:) 1616:) 1573:) 1478:. 1426:) 1301:at 1263:) 1238:) 1176:) 1054:) 1019:) 979:) 945:) 921:}} 915:{{ 907:) 882:) 798:) 774:) 741:) 733:-- 706:) 657:) 623:) 554:) 475:) 444:) 436:] 418:) 399:) 338:St 266:) 262:• 226:) 186:) 149:) 124:}} 95:}} 89:{{ 73:15 70:14 67:13 64:12 61:11 58:10 5866:( 5864:B 5833:: 5829:@ 5817:( 5773:( 5716:( 5655:— 5640:: 5636:@ 5618:( 5540:( 5448:( 5420:( 5396:( 5363:( 5333:( 5283:: 5279:@ 5267:( 5177:: 5173:@ 5155:( 5123:( 5104:: 5100:@ 5088:( 5050:( 5001:( 4982:) 4964:( 4929:: 4925:@ 4914:( 4890:) 4886:( 4868:( 4832:( 4818:— 4811:: 4807:@ 4795:( 4762:: 4758:@ 4743:( 4711:: 4707:@ 4695:( 4653:( 4615:( 4605:) 4601:( 4592:☼ 4551:( 4533:( 4496:( 4403:. 4333:: 4329:@ 4311:( 4266:( 4134:: 4130:@ 4117:( 4085:( 4053:( 4016:( 4012:- 3927:: 3923:@ 3905:( 3830:. 3748:( 3708:: 3704:@ 3686:( 3632:: 3628:@ 3613:( 3597:— 3586:: 3582:@ 3570:( 3471:( 3422:( 3391:. 3370:. 3343:( 3307:( 3275:( 3219:( 3174:) 3170:( 3139:( 3102:— 3030:( 2926:( 2893:( 2823:. 2803:( 2715:( 2681:( 2622:( 2591:( 2550:( 2535:( 2507:( 2493:— 2482:( 2440:( 2418:— 2407:( 2388:( 2338:( 2295:. 2269:( 2195:o 2193:e 2190:R 2128:( 2104:— 2092:( 2063:( 2019:( 1953:( 1900:( 1882:( 1869:— 1857:( 1816:( 1795:( 1717:( 1682:( 1640:( 1612:( 1569:( 1496:. 1422:( 1411:. 1290:· 1285:( 1259:( 1234:( 1225:· 1220:( 1172:( 1050:( 1015:( 987:— 975:( 941:( 903:( 878:( 794:( 770:( 737:( 702:( 653:( 619:( 550:( 471:( 440:( 414:( 395:( 386:. 340:★ 302:( 258:( 222:( 182:( 145:( 114:( 55:9 52:8 49:7 46:6 43:5 40:4 37:3 34:2 31:1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index