User talk:Cryptic/archive-10

2339:

deletion there was ample coverage from reliable sources, and I'm concerned that due diligence was lacking at the time of deletion. Numerous other services, companies, and open source projects related to both email and encryption have entries that have evolved and been added to by users over time. Your decision to delete the entry prevented additional and substantive edits from being made to the original article. I do not believe that the original article's lack of content or citations is a rationale for deletion. It should have been flagged for additional sources. Per the policy you referenced: "...if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Knowledge article will not decrease the subject's notability." Again, I respectfully request that you restore the entry and note the need for further edits (which I'm happy to work on). Thank you.

514: 3424: 2142:"Cryptic". My Chief Marketing Officer submitted a Wiki page after taking HOURS of his time and our resources to create it back on June 16. His name is Jeff Cutler and the name of the company is Good Life Advisors Mutual RIA. Who are you and why do you have the capability to delete our page? This was meaningful content about our organization, how it was started, and where we are today. I request you restore it. You can personally email me at conor.delaney@lpl.com as I don't know how to correspond back and forth with this. Thanks! Conor Delaney, Chief Executive Officer, Good Life Advisors, LLC. 3380: 3373: 3366: 785:

admins know that I'm doing the research on a page like this? I usually assume that if a page is created here somebody thinks the subject is noteworthy and I like digging into sources to see if I can figure out why. The speedy deletion process however means that even while I'm doing that work the page could disappear while I'm working. I'm not challenging the process but rather asking if there is a way to flag a page so admins know somebody is working on it. Any recommendations? Thanks! --

2765:. It appears that this editor has created two accounts: one for poverty related articles and one for food related articles. They're not really trying to hide anything, but it seems a little unorthodox to create separate accounts for specific types of articles. I guess they want to be able to make some kind of statement with their user name, but still it seems inappropriate and a bit disingenuos. If you check accounts against each other using the editor interaction tool, you'll see that 3460: 3388: 3148: 1290: 3453: 1405: 1179:

to the image, that's simply not credible without some sort of evidence.What's more likely is that the uploader just picked "own work" and "CC-by-sa-4.0" because they're the defaults when uploading to Commons, or possibly that he actually created the images he uploaded but isn't accounting for fact that they're derivative works of the original. —

2191: 1554:. For some time now, some editors (possibly the same person though not sure) have been making large numbers of smallish edits which seem, at least in my opinion, to be an attempt to mask reverts of improvements made to the article and re-add a non-free image which should not be used. It started with an editor 2215:

I'm some random anonymous person on the Internet who's volunteered tens of thousands of hours of his life to make Knowledge a better educational resource. I have the capability to delete this page because the Knowledge community entrusted me as an administrator nearly ten years ago, in no small part

1391:

mislabeled as cc-zero should have gotten him a copyvio warning all by itself, though at least he hasn't tried that again. He hasn't done anything else since the last time I removed the images, though, so the message may have finally gotten through, and we may not have to do anything else. Thank you

1188:

I know you're not supposed to out editors ... but the uploader appears to be an intern with the city. He may very well have permission, at least for the image (he doesn't seem to understand that cutting and pasting text is a copyright violation, even when it contains a citation), but he hasn't proven

1178:

The city website claims copyright pretty unambiguously, and they'd have had to been crazy not to require copyright assignment as part of the terms of their design contest. The onus is on the uploader to prove otherwise; if the uploader's claiming to be the high school student and still has copyright

1821:

Ok cool - trust me I understand - I read what was there before and it was too promotional. I am trying to just get a factual page up about the firm. If I need to disclose that I edited the page, disclose it one my user page, etc. I will do that. I am also going to fix the links and remove any direct

1752:

raised - is that the article doesn't show any evidence that your firm meets our notability guideline. The word "notability" here is a term of art, and doesn't have its usual English meaning; it instead refers to our inclusion criteria. Succintly, Knowledge article subjects need to have significant

1608:

I can only take a very cursory look tonight (and, wow, at first glance, I see what you mean - I don't think I've ever seen a history page for a live article completely filled by just one user's edits); as I said one section up, I'm going to be traveling this weekend, and need to pack and prep. I'll

623:

in the future? (you'll see he left two messages - the first is where he said "hi glg glg" the second is where he started a new section on "link is not a copy right". I responded to his first message by leaving a message on his own talk page under the heading "darshwan education foundation" and then

2718:

This is a bit late (as above - I checked in briefly last week but the talk-page-edited notice didn't show up), and now irrelevant since he's been blocked for sockpuppetry; but, unless he'd been trying to create an article about himself in mainspace (which I don't see at a glance), I don't think the

2580:

I am contacting you as an OTRS volunteer. You deleted the image of Jason Hogg a couple of months ago-- I have finally processed the OTRS ticket (Ticket#2015062210014753) containing the copyright release to the file under a suitable license. Can the image be undeleted? If so, please ping me and I

2338:

A quick Google News search reveals significant coverage from independent press, including interviews from product developers, and discussion about the relevance of the service as privacy debates are ongoing globally. This coverage has been produced by national (US) and global press. At the time of

141:

in the orphaning templates, saying that they'd been orphaned variously since June 20 or 21 when they hadn't been orphaned until yesterday and hadn't even been uploaded until June 25. This isn't something that's normally checked for when deleting orphaned nonfree images; there's no easy way to tell

83:

Three files I uploaded were deleted by you giving a reason - (F5: Unused non-free media file for more than 7 days), which actually is not true. The images were used in articles from few days. They were orphaned without any reason by a member known as 'Project FMF' and were speedy deleted with wrong

3201:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

808:

Whoops - I hadn't noticed that the page creator and the person who said they were working on it on talk were different. Usually what happens in this situation is that the second person (you, in this case) either removes the speedy-deletion template from the article, or just re-creates the article

199:

Would you be willing to take a minute and teach me how better to use Tineye? I use it in Commons work a fair amount but in all cases the image is there and I can click on the link that runs the Tineye search. I was worried that providing the Knowledge URL would not be sufficient and it wasn't. Can

161:

Thankyou very much. And, for your information, this isn't the first time Project FMF orphaned these images. I have uploaded official cover arts that contain publisher logo and ESRB rating; since they are non-free, they have been resized as per rationale and are used in the relevant articles. These

1203:

Your edits look to be correct here in every regard; I don't think I'd have done anything substantially different. I'm going to be busy for at least another two or three days, but I'll watchlist the article and intervene if he persists after that time. If he continues to insert the text or image

784:

This page was deleted while I was editing it in order to resolve the missing content. I left a message on the talk page to indicate that I was working on it but that was deleted too without response or notification. I'm still relatively new here so just wondering - Is there a better way I can let

1382:

Something about this editor - the complete failure to respond to communication, the obvious coi, the immediate reverts of the removals of nonfree images from his draft, and probably in no small part spillover from offwiki stress I'm dealing with - rubbed me completely the wrong way, to the point

624:

responded to his second message on my own page by responding to it. I was wondering is that's how i'm supposed to handle that sort of stuff. Usually when people don't like my CSD they just do it on the article's own talk page. I was just wondering what to do in the future. thanks in advance.

1650:

My firm's wikipedia page was deleted in Feb. 2015, and my CMO just recently discovered it. Is there a way to reinstate the page, or for me to fix the issues with the page to get it compliant? The page was created by a previous employee in our marketing dept., hence the time lag in noticing the

657:

a free license to copy and modify it. (Even if that website doesn't have a prominent copyright notice at the bottom of the page. And, as in this case, it almost always does.) Hardly any organizations of any size are willing to do this, especially once their legal departments get wind of the

2781:, etc., because it seems like two completely separate editors are making the edits from article histories. Not sure where to discuss this type of thing, so I figured I'd try you first. Would this kind of thing be considered a subtle form of meat puppetry or sock puppetry? Thanks in advance. - 2263:

Cryptic - an article related to the Tutanota encrypted webmail service was deleted on January 15, 2015. The reason given was lack of importance. This service is frequently referred to in a variety of privacy-related forums and discussions. I'm requesting restoration due to ongoing and global

618:

for speedy deletion (and you ended up deleting it - it looks like the article was also deleted once before) - since you're an admin (which I assume b/c you deleted the article) could you give me some feedback and assistance on how to handle the comments the author of the article left on my

1708:

Ok thanks for that - but i still don't understand why you still think it should be deleted. Other law firms have wiki pages (See the other Steptoe & Johnson LLP). What items need corrected to bring it within guidelines? We simply want a firm page with firm history. Thanks again.

1654:

22:50, 28 February 2015 Cryptic (talk | contribs) deleted page Steptoe & Johnson PLLC (Expired PROD, concern was: The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Knowledge:General notability guideline and the more detailed

1577:

and leaving edit sums to explain my reasoning, but there's been no interaction at all. I did ask another administrator about this, but there was no response which might mean this is just another example of me rubbing Knowledge wrong. Anyway, It seems like this might be a case of

1773:.) The surest way for you to get the article kept is to provide links to such coverage - all the sources currently linked in the article are either provided by the firm itself (whether on its own web site, or as a reprinted press release; either way, they're not 661:

There's essentially never any reason to go to the trouble of relicensing text from a web page; it's invariably suitable for an organization's own web page, not an encyclopedia article. Knowledge isn't in the business of telling the world how wonderful they are.

2732:

No worries. After I saw the user had been blocked, I figured an admin would've also done something about the page if it was really problematic. I should've updated you here, but completely forgot to do so so sorry about that. Thanks anyway for taking a look. -

818:

OK thanks! In this case there's no sense in recreating the article as per above. In the future though, if there's no issue with me (as a non-admin) removing the speedy deletion template then I'll be sure to do that if I think I can fix the issues. Thanks!

2092:

The problem wasn't that the page included a link to his CV (it, in fact, didn't). The problem was that the article consisted almost entirely of a copy of it. Without a proper license release of the material according to the detailed requirements described

1822:

links to promotion if they are in there. I will check on the guidelines and will do my best to come into compliance with this. Bear with me as this is the first time I have ever used wikipedia. Thanks again. If there is anything else I can do let me know.

2195: 290:

Then the image will be restored when the permissions grant is processed. I'm not restoring it in the meantime, given the history here; the article has a perfectly usable image in the meantime whose copyright status has never been in question.

2168:" despite you going out of your way to make it difficult (not linking to it, not naming it, not logging in to the account that made it). Its entire content was "This established the page for GLA '''Bold text'''". In no particular order: 146:. Lying about the date in order to manipulate an admin into deleting the images early—almost immediately, in fact—and apparently in order to gain advantage in a content dispute is beyond the pale, and I've blocked him for a week for it. — 174:

previously had the art work only, which could not be called as a cover art or a box art. I had uploaded these images and replaced the existed images which Project FMF had reverted to, in the articles. He is after my uploads from then on.

3348:

It doesn't seem like it would be effective. The problematic IP tends to edit far enough apart that protection of any reasonable duration would likely have expired by the time he's back. Best I can do is watch the article myself.

2987:

First of all, I want to say sorry to Cryptic if I brought drama to their user talk. It was unintentional. Also, want to thank 220 of Borg for their input. Finally, I'll post my reposnse to Eating Nicely on their user talk. -

572:. The file had gone unused due to a new user replacing all the First Edition covers (preferred) with new revised artwork covers. We are in the process of reverting this, but in the meantime this file has been deleted. Thanks, 2223:

I won't be restoring this page. If you or your employees create a page similar to it again, I'll delete it again. If you want to be told exactly the same things again, more verbosely and politely, your avenues of appeal is

696:. It may or may not be productive to say that they're going to need to change their username, depending on how many of the other points you have to bring up, and how egregious their article was. This one doesn't apply here. 3094: 2171:

Whatever your CMO was doing in those hours of work time and with your resources, it clearly wasn't working on this page. A pointed conversation about what he actually spent his time and your money on would probably be in

1069:

It's going to be basically impossible to use non-free images of that nature, since there's numerous freely-licensed ones available depicting the same subject matter; a non-free one would thus fail point 1 of Knowledge's

1087:

might have some redeeming value, if it were the full-size image and not the scaled-down 725x199 barely-better-than-a-thumbnail quality image you uploaded before, and if the file description page identified the location

307: 406:

Hi Cryptic, Now that you know that there are no copyright issues related to the picture of Farid Simaika, can you please restore the pic? I tried to upload it again and followed your advice. The upload failed! Thanks

2673:

All three done. Please confirm the licenses are correct; I left them as they were when they were deleted. Sorry this took so long; dunno why I didn't get the talk-page-edited notice when I checked in last weekend.

248:

And thought you somehow created "ee5ad52343b3608876de2d84ea107de42dc6b6f3" which you fed to the search engine. I tried your steps and they worked I guess I'll have to try to re-create what I tried to see what I did

3090: 3080: 2459: 1101:, and are likely getting at least some benefit from the glorified advertisement you've imposed on our encyclopedia, donating at least one high-quality image of general utility would seem the decent thing to do. — 3241:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2381:

I spent a lot of time corresponding with the folks at Omsk T.V. to get their permission to use this photo. It's not right that Theo's Little Bot gets credit for the upload. Can you help me fix this? Thanks,

1329: 3071: 1570:) appeared and started making similar edits in both style and content: No edit sum, removing content and then immediately re-adding it, changes in background colors or dimmensions mixed together, etc. 2796:

This isn't something I deal with frequently (for a variety of reasons), and I don't have time for more than a snap judgment, which wouldn't be fair. So either ask him directly about it, or take it to

3280:

Cryptic (talk | contribs) deleted page FD Productions (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion; A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events))

1160:

article, stating that he has "permission" to do so, but I didn't see anything on the file page that showed that he did. I was also confused by the assertion that the image was his own work, when the

673:

If they have a conflict of interest - and if they're pasting copyvio promotional material, that's a safe assumption - and haven't explicitly declared it, be certain to remind them they agreed to the

849:

speedily not knowing I gave my very effort on it. I'm a newbie here, I really need guidance on creating good articles, instead deleting directly contents, please do kindly give us tips. God bless.

2477: 2469: 1522: 1501: 1467: 1445: 1121: 1117: 998: 2404:

There's nothing to fix. You're still shown as the uploader, for what that's worth (exactly nothing). It's Omsk T.V. that gets the credit. Absolutely no reason at all to block the bot. —

2208:

either now or in the future, someone else will eventually write an encyclopedia article about it. Attempting to do so yourself before then will be an excercise in frustration; it will be

3136: 2849:

are linked. Before Fighting Poverty was autoconfirmed I had to use Eating Nicely for a few general poverty related edits. Where I can I try to keep the accounts for different articles.

2109:; we don't host raw CVs or resumés.Furthermore, since you have a financial connection to Professor De Moor, you shouldn't be the person creating the page. See the Wikimedia Foundation's 1052:, while they were nothing of the sort - one was a photograph of a location, while the other was a montage of four such photographs. That license tag is only for screenshots of a website 965: 1881:

I see you have deleted the CableFree logo Please can you re-instate this. It has been used on WikiPedia since 2009. Let us know if we need to add any explanatory text etc. Many thanks

730:). Unless they've been exceptionally rude, I like to point out that the word "notability" is Knowledge jargon for our inclusion guidelines, and doesn't have its usual English meaning. — 340:- but that discussion appears to have been initiated when an older version of the page (which looked more like an article) was on the userpage rather than in a user sandbox (from before 1639: 1622:

No worries. It's a bit annoying, but it's not something life-threatening. Anyway, it's also possible that I am also in the wrong in which case I would like to know. Safe travels. -

3198: 3155: 3141: 1322: 1189:

that he has permission for either the image or the text. I've tried to explain that he must jump through Knowledge's hoops to prove he has permission, but he just doesn't get it.

1084: 989: 359:", which is no longer applicable now that the page is in a sandbox. I wasn't sure if you wanted to create a nom for the sandbox now, or if the MfD should just be removed now? --- 3084: 2465: 2165: 2136: 956: 2493: 1731:

The main problem with the article is that it reads much closer to an informational brochure than an encyclopedia article. Knowledge isn't like Facebook; our aim is to provide

933: 615: 608: 2464:

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at

3122: 2871:

see the messages. I would suggest making them more prominent though, by moving them to the top of the page in large letters for example. I'm not sure if they comply with

2769:, which seems contrary to their reason for using multiple accounts. I think this is potentially misleading, especially when they are used to make consecutive edits like in 692:

If their username doesn't make it clear that they're an individual - like, if it was something like "User:Darshan Education" instead of "User:President DEF" - list them at

3215: 3093:. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the 2723:

test for being mistaken as a fake article; it doesn't seem excessive; and he'd been editing mainspace (rather than doing nothing on Knowledge except edit his user page). —

1567: 2449: 1360:

and I kinda of expect they will probably try to reupload the image again. At what point, based upon your experience, does "being fairly new to Knowledge" start becoming

1651:

deletion. I have been tasked with either rebuilding the page or getting it back online. Here is the message below that I recieved when I started to re-build the page:

1842: 1718: 1673: 1388: 1164:

describes the flag as the work of a local high school student, which would seem to make it her work of art (although she may have assigned the copyright to the city).

2517: 1691: 1431: 269: 115: 111: 107: 1535: 1513: 1488: 221:, pasted that address in the form on the front page of tineye.com, and then pasted the link for the search results (which tineye says will expire in three days) on 2766: 2537: 846: 1509: 1453: 427: 2553: 3030:. Apparently re-created by a 'new' editor, who appears to have had the original text, as when re-created they also added a Refimprove template dated May 2015. 1437:

From THE WIND THE RAIN AND THE PHOENIX Mate, the Sam Wilson page was not finished Google him, he does play for NZ Under 17. I just need the citations Thanks,

469: 408: 349: 333: 1023:

Hello, I thought I followed all the non-free image use requirements to upload the 2 images, could you please let me know what was wrong? Thanks. The article:

2858: 2563: 1900:

does not allow use of non-free images outside of published articles. You've been adamant in claiming copyright for the logo; you can't have it both ways. —

3270: 2750: 2509: 2504: 1457: 2614:

Same deal, different file. We now have the copyright holder's permission under OTRS ticket #2015062910019656. Can you undelete for him/ her? Thanks!

2340: 2284: 2268: 2790: 1356:

I see that the Common image has already been deleted. I believe this editor is still fairly new to Knowledge so they probably are not too familiar with

3302: 3289: 2982: 2968: 2930: 2182:

By creating this page without disclosing his financial relationship to your company, Mr. Cutler was editing in violation of the Wikimedia Foundation's

1830: 1799: 1766: 1726: 1710: 1681: 1665: 1043: 1027: 904:, if you want; it would then need another editor to review the article before republishing. But there's basically no way it could survive as it was. — 124: 2997: 2087: 2065: 1484:

would probably be faster, especially if you get them this weekend; I'm going to be traveling until Monday, and probably won't have internet access. —

1251:

Cryptic, I asked for deletion of a page before I moved it to meta (which was my plan, and I just changed my mind). Anyways, could you please restore

225:. The link you gave seems to be an interface to search within a webpage and then do a search on the image there; it's not one I was aware existed. — 2896: 2264:

conversations about private communications and increasing consumer interest in services, techniques, and products that maintain or enhance privacy.

1609:

investigate more thoroughly on Monday. It might be worth trying to recruit an editor who speaks Bulgarian, to at least get their attention, though

1586:, but before I'd like to hear what others think before taking it to ANI, etc. Any advice you have on this would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. 2692:. The lede and the stuff about Knowledge seems fine, but the filmography info and some of the infobox stuff seem to be a contrary to the spirit of 2359: 1221:

route - no one ever listens to an IP. Based on my past experience, the results would be a resounding silence. Thanks for paying attention to this.

606: 495: 1944: 1904: 633: 434: 3353: 1230: 1212: 1198: 1183: 1173: 1151: 927: 879: 869: 857: 770: 1743:

that allows administrators to delete irreparably promotional articles on sight; that's the "G11" code I mentioned at the formal deletion debate.

2605: 2366: 2324: 2249: 2022: 833: 600: 590: 345: 337: 276: 3320: 2833: 1870: 1815: 1702: 1401:

No worries. I completely understand being "rubbed the wrong" and I'm sure I've done some wrong way Knowledge rubbing of other editors myself.

1105: 1035: 184: 150: 3342: 2129: 1274: 789: 260: 229: 2804: 2742: 2727: 2157: 1931: 1890: 1631: 1617: 1418: 1396: 1377: 1351: 803: 468:

Hello, and good morning! I am a bit rusty about appealing from deletion decisions. How to I go about appealing from your decision regarding

142:

for sure what article an image had been in (if any) or when it was removed, and the overwhelming majority are tagged not by a human, but by

2678: 2661: 2631: 2598: 2531: 1602: 940: 908: 823: 813: 1341: 734: 295: 2439: 2426: 2408: 1505: 1449: 1141: 760: 2638: 395: 3098: 3017: 2481: 2012: 1989: 1531:(click on that link). In this case, the most likely source would be a news article. Blogs, Facebook, Youtube, and so on won't work. — 1264: 835: 776: 481: 3418: 3310: 2812:, Nosy parker just passing through comment. I would think that they would have to place a message on each page, linking to the other. 3286: 2569: 93: 3297: 2391: 2003: 2815: 2348: 2276: 1850:

Thanks for the ping. The article is still an unreferenced mess that does not seem to belong in an encyclopedia, per reasons cited (

1080: 948: 563: 3066: 1590: 1545: 284: 1387:, I don't trust myself even to issue warnings to him. Otherwise I think I'd have given him a final one already. The upload of 426:

is still there. (Note the capitalization and extra space in the filename compared to the image I deleted and later restored at

3220: 3137: 2955:

then go below the userbox, not next to it. Strongly suggest sticking to one account during this discussion, it gets confusing!

1321: 416: 118:, for any interested onlookers.) They'll still need to be put back into articles, or they'll be deleted again in another week. 3498: 2077: 711:; how the specific article failed ("Press releases, announcements, and your own website don't qualify." is a sentence that is 2135: 649:

We can't use material that already exists on another website without a full license verification via all the requirements at

646:

There's, hm, six different points I usually make when this comes up. They are, depressingly, almost always all applicable.

375: 3334: 3326: 3266: 3130: 2489: 1574: 1563: 1559: 1222: 1190: 1165: 1147:

The latter two aren't ok either, and I've flagged them for speedy deletion on Commons. I hadn't been aware they existed. —

1133: 2417:

states "Uploaded by Theo's Little Bot". That is incorrect. I've tried to fix it and failed, now I'm asking for your help.

2549: 2372: 1964: 211: 2705: 2042:

Please put the page back online. If this page causes problems, I will not use the link. Or you can delete the link.

1313: 551: 513: 322: 3283:

regarding fd productions page please let me know why a redirect page can't be created? here is the referenced article:

3253:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2149: 1876: 1246: 715:

often applicable); and that trying to write one anyway will just be a frustrating waste of time for everyone concerned.

584: 3043: 3512: 3036: 2961: 2889: 2878: 2826: 1922:

Can you please re-instate the logo, with appropriate or similar level of notification on copyright etc. Many thanks

1838: 134: 2526: 2301:

do so. It would thus be immediately deleted again by any administrator who saw it.If you think you can provide the

3446: 3048: 2073: 1132:. Can you explain the difference between them (i.e., why the latter two are OK, but the first two aren't)? Thanks. 1111: 1049: 742: 699:

If their article was unsourced or poorly sourced, explain that it's impossible to write Knowledge articles without

275:

Why did you delete this? The copyright owner sent permission and license information to permissions@wikimedia.org.

2114: 1795: 1098: 1014: 678: 458: 3262: 3126: 2485: 2229: 1551: 1430: 981: 922:

Hello, please do so and I'll try my best to support the necessary information to meet the criteria. Thanks <3

268: 78: 2761:

Hi again Cryptic. I've come across something that I haven't really seen before and I'm not sure if it is OK per

2289:

I'm not going to restore it outright. The article not only didn't show that it meets our inclusion guidelines (

3275: 2545: 865: 747:

You recently blocked this editor, and as soon the block was lifted he returned to the making the same edits at

3359: 1573:

I've tried posting on each editors page to at least understand why they are making the edits and posting at

3436: 3398: 3327: 2255: 1002: 795:

I guess I should add that in this case, the page probably should be deleted anyway but for failing to meet

569: 463: 327: 72: 69: 66: 63: 60: 969: 3258: 3179: 3163: 2872: 1010: 369: 54: 51: 48: 45: 42: 39: 36: 33: 30: 3423: 994: 977: 3203: 3112: 2978: 2926: 1950: 961: 477: 218: 3379: 1472:

When you have the citations, then the page can be restored. We can't leave a completely unreferenced

1304:

For performing the due diligence that I should have performed before making an RfA !vote. Thank you.

1060:

image on that appears anywhere on the Internet, which is plainly ridiculous. So I deleted them under

2020: 1927: 1886: 1640: 1555: 545: 412: 237: 1661:

Thanks for your attention in this matter, Scott Snider, PR Team Leader, Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

1079:

The images might be usable if you freely relicense them and verify that, as per the requirements at

681:. Just picking a username like "President DEF" isn't sufficient. They also need to be directed to 3338: 3021: 2918: 1527:

At the most basic - you just have to find another webpage that discusses this person and meets our

1252: 1226: 1194: 1169: 1137: 756: 663: 3287:

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-hollywood-drones-20140925-story.html

3316:

Redirect to what? The article I deleted wasn't a redirect; it was a straight-up advertisement. —

2854: 2468:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 2037: 748: 2914: 3211: 2770: 2344: 2272: 2153: 1937: 1006: 579: 423: 1083:. There's little use for the montage, but a version of the marina image that you uploaded as 973: 3414: 3306: 3293: 2974: 2944: 2922: 2910: 2846: 2751: 2571: 2414: 2378: 2106: 1834: 1714: 1669: 1280: 1157: 1031: 473: 401: 385: 180: 128: 89: 3249:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2683: 2145: 2069: 2061: 1923: 1882: 1826: 1762: 1497: 1441: 1260: 853: 704: 542: 316: 255: 206: 194: 2183: 2110: 2036:

I (secretary of Prof. B. De Moor) made a wikipedia page "Bart De Moor" and used the link "

674: 8: 3254: 3167: 2993: 2786: 2738: 2701: 2101:

a license to reproduce and modify the material - Knowledge cannot host a copy of it.Even

1627: 1598: 1414: 1373: 1337: 752: 452: 3053:

For your condescending attitude and unwillingness to help, I hereby designate you as a

2906: 2864: 2850: 2842: 2762: 2755: 2474:

Please add your evidence by September 8, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes.

2228:. If you prefer email, you can contact our volunteer email response team as described 1309: 861: 1125: 3230: 3221: 3207: 3187: 3116: 2658: 2628: 2595: 2312:- and being referred to in fora and discussions does not qualify - I'd be willing to 1864: 1161: 667: 629: 620: 574: 280: 17: 1955:

Why was this deleted after I got the photographer to sign off on it to commons OTRS?

3250: 3234: 3108: 3062: 3031: 3011: 2956: 2937: 2884: 2821: 2720: 2422: 2387: 2313: 1778: 1736: 1610: 1481: 1477: 1056:; if it were broad enough to apply to these images, it could be used for literally 897: 176: 101: 85: 1129: 3404: 2774: 2460:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Notification list

2122: 1798:. I appreciate that you said who you are, but that declaration should really be 1791: 1256: 1094: 682: 365: 250: 201: 3202:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

3159: 3158:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

2355: 1777:), or are mere listings of the company and its number of employees (which isn't 445:

Sorry, didn't see the AFD with all the other notices. Thanks for catching that.

3246: 3238: 3175: 2989: 2809: 2782: 2767:

both accounts have been used to edit the same article on more than one occasion

2734: 2713: 2697: 2693: 2581:

will make sure it gets marked as having passed OTRS verification. Thank you!

2302: 2205: 1999: 1960: 1897: 1732: 1687: 1623: 1594: 1579: 1410: 1369: 1365: 1333: 1071: 700: 504: 447: 440: 301: 222: 3372: 3365: 2316:; let me know if that's the case. Trying to write an article on this website 1981:- it was the local duplicate that didn't have documentation, and was actually 3242: 3171: 2797: 2541: 2309: 2237: 2236:

verbose and polite; but they'll ultimately direct you either back here or to

2225: 2209: 2187: 2118: 2094: 1978: 1808: 1787: 1740: 1593:, but that seems to have stopped for now since the article was redirected. - 1528: 1473: 1384: 1361: 1357: 1305: 1218: 1205: 1093:

Since it's obvious that you're affiliated with Roomer, did not disclose your

901: 885: 820: 800: 786: 727: 693: 686: 650: 531: 488: 391:

template (mainly because it noindexes). I hadn't been aware it was on mfd. —

341: 2220:

of my interest in ridding it of pages similar to the one your CMO submitted.

1994:

Thanks for the quick reply. I take it I may reinsert it on my personal page.

1811:

for why referring to other articles is almost never a persuasive argument. —

1550:

Since I've got you on the phone, I am wondering if you could take a look at

3350: 3317: 2801: 2724: 2689: 2675: 2668: 2646: 2616: 2583: 2560: 2498: 2436: 2405: 2363: 2333: 2321: 2305: 2294: 2246: 2126: 2009: 1986: 1941: 1901: 1860: 1812: 1774: 1770: 1758: 1754: 1749: 1699: 1695: 1614: 1583: 1532: 1485: 1480:

once you have your references, and we'll undelete it, no questions asked.

1393: 1348: 1271: 1209: 1180: 1148: 1102: 1061: 937: 917: 905: 893: 889: 842: 810: 767: 731: 723: 708: 641: 625: 597: 492: 431: 392: 292: 226: 147: 2117:. Also see our local guidelines for editing with a conflict of interest ( 491:, just like you did the last time you wasted volunteers' time with this. — 3058: 2418: 2399: 2383: 2290: 2212:

by any administrator who notices it, or whose attention it is brought to.

1855: 1851: 796: 719: 2478:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Workshop

2470:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Evidence

2204:

In the statistically unlikely event that your company meets Knowledge's

1332:

which you deleted per F7, but I can't see both files to compare them. -

422:

There's no need to upload it again; the copy you uploaded to commons at

3452: 2778: 360: 143: 3387: 3193:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

2544:

page and thus the it was deleted through the image deletion process.--

1156:

Thanks. The uploader has been repeatedly inserting the image into the

25: 3409: 3183: 3103: 2413:

I apologize for not being more specific. The photo in the infobox of

1995: 1972: 1956: 778: 3459: 200:

you explain how you identified what information to feed to Tineye?--

3488: 3484: 3469: 2257: 2179:

notable subjects. It does not host run-of-the-mill advertisements.

1916: 726:, and whichever notability sub-guideline applies (here it would be 171: 167: 163: 2540:

please? What happened was that vandals removed the image from the

238:

http://tineye.com/search/ee5ad52343b3608876de2d84ea107de42dc6b6f3/

3237:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

1064:, "Non-free images or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag". 1786:

You should also be aware of our conflict-of-interest guideline (

1476:

hanging around before that, however.You can either ask me or at

1289: 1099:§4.7 of our Terms of use (Paid contributions without disclosure) 1048:

The problem with both of the images is that they were tagged as

2466:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3

2186:, Knowledge's local content policies (most egregiously against 718:

If their article's subject doesn't seem notable, point them at

3333:

Can you protect the page due to poorly and unsourced content?

2458:

You may opt-out of future notification regarding this case at

2038:

http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~bdmdotbe/bdm2013/index.php?p=cv

1919: 892:

for the simplified version; your article didn't even meet the

381:

My involvement with the page began and ended with adding the

2719:

user page was problematic in itself. I think it passes the

2320:

such sources, though, will be an excercise in frustration. —

1915:

I am looking at comparable vendors in the wireless industry

3408:, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand 2800:, depending on how deliberate you think the deception is. — 2175:

It wasn't "our page". Knowledge has encyclopedia articles

1690:

requires me to do so upon request; but I've also started a

894:

lower standard of indicating any importance or significance

2105:

a license release, Knowledge wouldn't host a copy of it.

538:

so you get a whopping three cookies, fresh from the oven!

2913:. When I put the templates on the tops of the pages it 2688:

Hi Cryptic. I was wondering if you could take a look at

1347:

Yup. It's also been speedied at Commons before, too. —

1328:

Hi Cryptic. I believe this file is exactly the same as

799:

criteria based on my research. So no need to rescue. --

217:

I just clicked on the image on the image page, getting

2476:

You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,

2113:(which you agreed to by using the site), specifically 845:, I'm really upset of your action deleting my article 1589:

For reference, similar things were also happening on

900:

if you think you can show it meets the higher bar of

336:

points to a redirect that leads to the discussion at

2297:), it didn't even say anything that implied that it 2040:" from his personal website, which causes problems. 3487:, and thanks for your contributions to Knowledge. 234:Okay, that was easy. I saw the URL for the result: 3229:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2644:Please undelete. OTRS ticket #2015062910019889 1735:, dispassionate articles about notable subjects, 472:? Hoping you can help, I am, respectfully yours, 306:Thank you very much, Cryptic, for your help with 1024: 1917:https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Motorola.svg 1062:the first point of speedy deletion criterion F7 766:Drmies saw it first, as you probably noticed. — 27:This page is an archive. Please do not edit it. 3160:section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion 3097:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 2480:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 338:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sukuk51 1920:https://en.wikipedia.org/File:RADWIN-logo.png 3483:Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable 1655:Knowledge:Notability (companies) requir...) 1330:File:AM North Carolina Office; Knowledge.JPG 1116:I noticed that you deleted these two files: 2115:§4.7, Paid contributions without disclosure 1985:the documentation on the commons version. — 1796:§4.7, Paid contributions without disclosure 1769:for the version specific to companies, and 1767:WP:Notability (organizations and companies) 679:§4.7, Paid contributions without disclosure 3099:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 2482:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 2358:in your belief. In any case, it's now at 1558:and then rather suddenly three IPs (first 3075:arbitration case proposed decision posted 2606:File:A view of the main bay - Krøttøy.jpg 568:Hello. I'd like to request undeletion of 2192:FTC regulations on deceptive advertising 1771:this simplified version of the guideline 1081:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials 2431:I'm not seeing that anywhere, and it's 2201:Why on earth would I want to email you? 1591:Bulgaria national football team results 14: 1568:2601:403:4000:6df0:d4ac:5f78:b7de:81f2 357:Userpage is masquerading as an article 355:The NOM reason on that discussion is " 1861:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1794:) and our terms of use, specifically 1686:I've restored the article, since the 3162:, because it is a redirect from the 2532:Undeletion of File:SK Telecom T1.jpg 2097:- which, among other things, grants 2053:Signaalverwerking en Gegevensanalyse 1658:Please let me know how to proceed. 1575:Talk:Bulgaria national football team 1493:I don't really understand citations 1402: 1204:before then, I advise taking him to 1126:File:The City of Janesville Flag.png 1122:File:The City of Janesville Flag.pdf 1118:File:The City of Janesville Flag.jpg 896:. I'm willing to restore this as a 888:for our full inclusion criteria, or 677:by using the site, and specifically 487:Follow the directions at the top of 106:Short answer: I've restored them. ( 3204:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3016:Hi Cryptic. You previously deleted 2951:right after the template. The text 2639:File:Krøttøy_-_seen_from_Grytøy.jpg 2377:Hi Cryptic, During my research for 1898:non-free image use policy (point 9) 1748:A secondary problem - the one that 23: 3458: 3451: 3422: 3378: 3371: 3364: 3146: 2194:; and additionally exposed you to 2055:Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - bus 2446 1737:not an all-inclusive business list 24: 3528: 3255:review the candidates' statements 3101:. For the Arbitration Committee, 2484:. For the Arbitration Committee, 2051:Centrum voor Dynamische Systemen, 1694:since I substantially agree with 1523:THE WIND THE RAIN AND THE PHOENIX 1502:THE WIND THE RAIN AND THE PHOENIX 1468:THE WIND THE RAIN AND THE PHOENIX 1446:THE WIND THE RAIN AND THE PHOENIX 3511:Send New Year cheer by adding {{ 3386: 3091:you are on the notification list 2875:requirements at the moment. The 1403: 1288: 1130:File:City of Janesville Flag.tif 1072:non-free content criteria policy 949:Question of deletion of 2 images 564:Requesting un-deletion of a file 512: 2816:User alternative account banner 2507:; OTRS ticket 2015071310012538. 2196:substantial reputational damage 1552:Bulgaria national football team 1546:Bulgaria national football team 1025:https://en.wikipedia.org/Roomer 670:are good links to include here. 530:Thank for !voting at my recent 84:reason. I need an explanation. 3513:subst:Happy New Year fireworks 3261:. For the Election committee, 3231:Arbitration Committee election 3222:ArbCom elections are now open! 3156:Draft:Wonder Woman (2017 film) 3142:Draft:Wonder Woman (2017 film) 3067:04:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC) 3044:13:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2998:22:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2983:16:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2969:14:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2931:14:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2897:13:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2859:13:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2834:13:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2805:12:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2791:12:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 2743:21:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC) 2728:14:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC) 2679:14:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC) 2645: 2615: 2582: 2440:14:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC) 2314:restore the article as a draft 1643:page deleted - need reinstated 1323:File:North Carolina Office.JPG 1124:, but these two files remain: 1085:File:Roomertravel service2.png 990:File:Roomertravel service2.png 834:Reaction on Deletion of pages 653:, which, in particular, grant 13: 1: 3419:23:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 3354:00:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 3343:08:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC) 3321:03:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC) 3271:13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 3216:18:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 3026:. Just letting you know it's 2706:21:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 2662:21:35, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 2632:21:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 2599:20:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 2564:05:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC) 2554:08:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 2427:17:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 2409:05:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC) 2137:Good Life Advisors Mutual RIA 1698:rationale in nominating it. — 1474:article about a living person 957:File:Roomertravel service.png 3328:Closer (Tegan and Sara song) 3311:04:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC) 3298:04:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC) 3123:20:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC) 3089:arbitration case, for which 1688:lightweight deletion process 934:Draft:Sitio Bisaya sa Ateneo 616:Darshan Education foundation 609:Darshan Education foundation 570:File:LongShadowsWarriors.jpg 7: 3499:21:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC) 3257:and submit your choices on 3095:proposed decision talk page 3086:Palestine-Israel articles 3 3073:Palestine-Israel articles 3 2841:If you check the userpages 2527:21:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 2494:15:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC) 2451:Palestine-Israel articles 3 2392:01:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC) 2373:File:Antonov 70 crash 2.jpg 2367:05:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC) 2349:04:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC) 2325:04:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC) 2277:01:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC) 2164:Against all odds, I found " 2078:12:11, 6 August 2015‎ (UTC) 1514:22:03, 3 August 2015‎ (UTC) 10: 3533: 3263:MediaWiki message delivery 3127:MediaWiki message delivery 3081:decision has been proposed 2936:(indents added above, see 2486:MediaWiki message delivery 2250:18:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 2158:14:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC) 2130:18:15, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 2013:16:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC) 2004:16:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC) 1990:16:26, 5 August 2015 (UTC) 1965:15:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC) 1945:14:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC) 1932:14:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC) 1905:14:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC) 1891:14:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC) 1877:Deletion of CableFree logo 1871:05:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC) 1843:18:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 1816:18:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 1719:18:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 1703:17:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 1674:14:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 1641:Steptoe & Johnson PLLC 1632:00:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC) 1536:17:15, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 1247:I screwed up - please help 809:after it's been deleted. — 3154:A tag has been placed on 2546:Prisencolinensinainciusol 2107:Knowledge is not LinkedIn 1618:23:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 1603:23:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 1556:User talk:BulgariaSources 1489:22:44, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 1458:22:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 1419:22:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 1397:14:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 1378:08:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 1352:04:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC) 1342:22:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC) 1314:01:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC) 1294: 1287: 1275:15:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 1265:13:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 1231:02:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1213:01:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1199:00:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1184:00:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1174:00:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC) 1152:23:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC) 1142:15:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC) 1106:22:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC) 1036:21:07, 19 July 2015 (UTC) 941:18:57, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 909:18:45, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 870:18:28, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 824:19:42, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 814:18:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 804:18:22, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 790:18:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 777:Question on deleted page 771:17:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 761:11:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 735:09:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC) 722:, its simplified version 634:07:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC) 601:01:09, 17 July 2015 (UTC) 591:01:06, 17 July 2015 (UTC) 552:19:09, 16 July 2015 (UTC) 496:18:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC) 482:17:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC) 459:01:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC) 435:19:49, 10 July 2015 (UTC) 417:19:00, 10 July 2015 (UTC) 396:18:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC) 376:16:43, 10 July 2015 (UTC) 323:06:19, 10 July 2015 (UTC) 185:10:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 151:08:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 94:05:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 3447:Happy New Year, Cryptic! 3437:subst:Season's Greetings 3049:A Special Award for you! 2883:user-box may be useful. 2879:User alternative account 1765:for the full guideline, 1389:File:Anthony Brocco.jpeg 1253:User:Oiyarbepsy/barnstar 1112:Question about deletions 1050:non-free web screenshots 743:User:Peace is contagious 296:22:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC) 285:05:28, 5 July 2015 (UTC) 261:21:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC) 230:20:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC) 212:20:09, 2 July 2015 (UTC) 3439:}} to send this message 2696:. Thanks in advance. - 2453:arbitration case opened 2049:KU Leuven, ESAT/STADIUS 1911:Thanks for the message, 1529:Reliable Sources policy 1432:Sam Wilson (footballer) 1217:I'm unlikely to go the 749:Avengers: Age of Ultron 270:JudgeThomasHardiman.pdf 116:File:WWE 2K14 Cover.jpg 79:Deletion of my uploads. 3515:}} to user talk pages. 3463: 3456: 3427: 3383: 3376: 3369: 3276:Undeletion Requestion: 3195:contest the nomination 3151: 2538:File:SK Telecom T1.jpg 2232:, and they'll be even 2099:everybody in the world 1761:of the subject. (See 1692:formal deletion debate 1298:The Detective Barnstar 847:Sitio Bisaya sa Ateneo 424:File:Farid Simaika.jpg 112:File:WWE '13 Cover.jpg 108:File:WWE '12 Cover.jpg 3462: 3455: 3426: 3382: 3375: 3368: 3235:Arbitration Committee 3150: 2911:User:Fighting Poverty 2905:I put templates onto 2847:User:Fighting Poverty 2771:Jobseeker's Allowance 2752:User:Fighting Poverty 2572:File:Jason Hogg 2.jpg 2415:2001 Omsk An-70 crash 2379:2001 Omsk An-70 crash 2308:required to meet the 1158:Janesville, Wisconsin 655:everyone in the world 428:File:Faridsimaika.jpg 2873:wp:Alternate account 2536:Hi can you undelete 1779:significant coverage 1739:. We actually have 1383:where, as I said at 1095:conflict of interest 470:Fletchers Solicitors 464:Appeal from deletion 350:User:Sukuk51/sandbox 344:moved the page from 334:User:Sukuk51/sandbox 328:User:Sukuk51/sandbox 3360:Season's Greetings! 3239:arbitration process 2503:Hi Cryptic, please 523:Pavlov's RfA reward 139:falsified the dates 3464: 3457: 3428: 3384: 3377: 3370: 3251:arbitration policy 3152: 2907:User:Eating Nicely 2843:User:Eating Nicely 2756:User:Eating Nicely 2295:simplified summary 2206:inclusion criteria 2123:simplified summary 1951:File talk:Jzsj.JPG 1792:simplified summary 1392:for stepping in. — 527: 3199:visiting the page 3164:article namespace 3119: 3040: 2965: 2941: 2893: 2830: 2160: 2148:comment added by 2081: 2064:comment added by 2008:Yes, of course. — 1846: 1829:comment added by 1800:on your user page 1733:neutrally-written 1613:is fairly thin. — 1517: 1500:comment added by 1461: 1444:comment added by 1319: 1318: 873: 856:comment added by 664:WP:NOTADVERTISING 614:Hi - I nominated 561: 560: 555: 519: 373: 18:User talk:Cryptic 3524: 3516: 3496: 3475: 3440: 3417: 3390: 3149: 3117: 3038: 2975:Fighting Poverty 2963: 2945:Fighting Poverty 2935: 2923:Fighting Poverty 2891: 2882: 2828: 2819: 2721:moron in a hurry 2717: 2672: 2660: 2656: 2651: 2630: 2626: 2621: 2597: 2593: 2588: 2523: 2520: 2515: 2512: 2403: 2337: 2306:reliable sources 2288: 2210:deleted on sight 2143: 2091: 2080: 2058: 2045:With many thanks 1979:still at Commons 1976: 1867: 1845: 1823: 1755:reliable sources 1730: 1685: 1611:Category:User bg 1526: 1516: 1494: 1471: 1460: 1438: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1292: 1285: 1284: 1255:for me? Thanks, 1047: 1019: 1018: 986: 985: 931: 921: 883: 872: 850: 841:Hello Sir/Ma'am 709:reliable sources 645: 587: 582: 577: 550: 516: 509: 508: 474:BeenAroundAWhile 457: 455: 450: 390: 384: 363: 258: 253: 209: 204: 105: 3532: 3531: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3518: 3510: 3505: 3489: 3476: 3466: 3449: 3442: 3434: 3429: 3413: 3405:winter solstice 3391: 3362: 3331: 3278: 3259:the voting page 3225: 3166:to a different 3147: 3145: 3138:Speedy deletion 3077: 3051: 3014: 2876: 2813: 2775:Universities UK 2759: 2711: 2686: 2666: 2652: 2647: 2622: 2617: 2589: 2584: 2575: 2534: 2521: 2518: 2513: 2510: 2501: 2455: 2397: 2375: 2331: 2282: 2261: 2140: 2085: 2059: 2028:August 6, 2015 2026: 1970: 1953: 1924:Stephenjpatrick 1883:Stephenjpatrick 1879: 1869: 1865: 1824: 1724: 1679: 1645: 1548: 1520: 1495: 1465: 1439: 1435: 1404: 1326: 1283: 1249: 1114: 1097:as required by 1041: 992: 988: 959: 955: 951: 925: 915: 877: 851: 839: 782: 745: 689:COI guidelines. 639: 612: 585: 580: 575: 566: 525: 507: 466: 453: 448: 446: 443: 409:Youssef simaika 404: 388: 382: 332:The MfD tag on 330: 304: 273: 256: 251: 207: 202: 197: 162:articles about 99: 81: 76: 75: 28: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3530: 3520: 3519: 3508: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3482: 3470:Happy New Year 3465: 3450: 3448: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3432: 3399:holiday season 3394:Hello Cryptic: 3385: 3363: 3361: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3335:123.136.106.70 3330: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3277: 3274: 3228: 3224: 3219: 3144: 3140:nomination of 3135: 3079:Hi Cryptic. A 3076: 3070: 3055:Wiki Jack-Load 3050: 3047: 3013: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2947:, try putting 2942: 2900: 2899: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2758: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2685: 2682: 2642: 2641: 2609: 2608: 2574: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2533: 2530: 2500: 2497: 2454: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2374: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2360:Draft:Tutanota 2328: 2327: 2260: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2221: 2213: 2202: 2199: 2180: 2173: 2139: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2119:full guideline 2057:B-3001 Leuven 2056: 2054: 2052: 2050: 2048: 2046: 2041: 2032: 2025: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 1992: 1952: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1907: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1859: 1819: 1818: 1804: 1803: 1783: 1782: 1745: 1744: 1706: 1705: 1644: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1564:141.215.16.153 1560:141.215.16.150 1547: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1434: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1325: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1301: 1300: 1295: 1293: 1282: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1223:32.218.152.177 1191:32.218.152.177 1166:32.218.152.177 1162:city's website 1134:32.218.152.177 1113: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1090: 1089: 1076: 1075: 1066: 1065: 1021: 1020: 950: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 932:Done; it's at 912: 911: 838: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 781: 775: 774: 773: 753:TriiipleThreat 744: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 716: 697: 690: 683:the simplified 671: 659: 611: 605: 604: 603: 565: 562: 559: 558: 556: 540:All the best: 539: 528: 521: 517: 506: 503: 501: 499: 498: 465: 462: 442: 439: 438: 437: 403: 400: 399: 398: 329: 326: 303: 300: 299: 298: 272: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 243: 242: 241: 240: 235: 196: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 154: 153: 120: 119: 80: 77: 29: 26: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3529: 3517: 3514: 3507: 3506: 3504: 3500: 3497: 3494: 3493: 3486: 3480: 3474: 3473: 3471: 3461: 3454: 3441: 3438: 3431: 3430: 3425: 3421: 3420: 3416: 3415:North America 3411: 3407: 3406: 3402:and upcoming 3401: 3400: 3395: 3389: 3381: 3374: 3367: 3355: 3352: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3329: 3322: 3319: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3288: 3284: 3281: 3273: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3223: 3218: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3200: 3196: 3191: 3190:namespaces. 3189: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3143: 3139: 3134: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3118:ping in reply 3114: 3110: 3106: 3105: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3082: 3074: 3069: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3046: 3045: 3042: 3041: 3035: 3034: 3029: 3025: 3024: 3019: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2967: 2966: 2960: 2959: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2943: 2939: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2898: 2895: 2894: 2888: 2887: 2880: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2865:Eating Nicely 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2851:Eating Nicely 2848: 2844: 2835: 2832: 2831: 2825: 2824: 2817: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2757: 2753: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2726: 2722: 2715: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2681: 2680: 2677: 2670: 2664: 2663: 2659: 2657: 2655: 2650: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2629: 2627: 2625: 2620: 2612: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2596: 2594: 2592: 2587: 2578: 2577:Hi, Cryptic! 2573: 2565: 2562: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2542:SK Telecom T1 2539: 2529: 2528: 2525: 2524: 2516: 2506: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2461: 2452: 2441: 2438: 2435:irrelevant. — 2434: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2407: 2401: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2380: 2368: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2356:very mistaken 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2335: 2326: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2286: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2265: 2259: 2251: 2248: 2244: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2222: 2219: 2216:specifically 2214: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2167: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2138: 2131: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2089: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2043: 2039: 2034: 2029: 2024: 2014: 2011: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1991: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1974: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1946: 1943: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1918: 1910: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1872: 1868: 1862: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1763:WP:Notability 1760: 1756: 1751: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1728: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1704: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1683: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1662: 1659: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1642: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1612: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1587: 1585: 1581: 1576: 1571: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1537: 1534: 1530: 1524: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1469: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1433: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1390: 1386: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1324: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1299: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1281:Due diligence 1276: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1211: 1207: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1182: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1107: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1045: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 991: 983: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 958: 953: 952: 942: 939: 935: 929: 924: 923: 919: 914: 913: 910: 907: 903: 899: 898:draft article 895: 891: 887: 881: 876: 875: 874: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 848: 844: 837: 825: 822: 817: 816: 815: 812: 807: 806: 805: 802: 798: 794: 793: 792: 791: 788: 780: 772: 769: 765: 764: 763: 762: 758: 754: 750: 736: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 695: 691: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 669: 665: 660: 656: 652: 648: 647: 643: 638: 637: 636: 635: 631: 627: 622: 617: 610: 602: 599: 595: 594: 593: 592: 589: 588: 583: 578: 571: 557: 553: 548: 547: 544: 537: 534:. You voted 533: 526: 524: 518: 515: 511: 510: 502: 497: 494: 490: 486: 485: 484: 483: 479: 475: 471: 461: 460: 456: 451: 436: 433: 429: 425: 421: 420: 419: 418: 414: 410: 402:Farid Simaika 397: 394: 387: 380: 379: 378: 377: 371: 367: 362: 358: 353: 351: 347: 343: 342:user:RHaworth 339: 335: 325: 324: 321: 320: 319: 313: 309: 297: 294: 289: 288: 287: 286: 282: 278: 271: 262: 259: 254: 247: 246: 245: 244: 239: 236: 233: 232: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215: 214: 213: 210: 205: 186: 182: 178: 173: 169: 165: 160: 159: 158: 157: 156: 155: 152: 149: 145: 140: 136: 133: 130: 126: 123:Long answer: 122: 121: 117: 113: 109: 103: 98: 97: 96: 95: 91: 87: 74: 71: 68: 65: 62: 59: 56: 53: 50: 47: 44: 41: 38: 35: 32: 19: 3509: 3491: 3490: 3478: 3477: 3468: 3467: 3433: 3403: 3397: 3393: 3392: 3332: 3301: 3285: 3282: 3279: 3226: 3208:Kailash29792 3194: 3192: 3153: 3102: 3085: 3078: 3072: 3054: 3052: 3037: 3032: 3027: 3022: 3015: 2962: 2957: 2952: 2948: 2890: 2885: 2868: 2840: 2827: 2822: 2760: 2690:User:K.belev 2687: 2684:User:K.belev 2665: 2653: 2648: 2643: 2623: 2618: 2613: 2610: 2604:Deletion of 2590: 2585: 2579: 2576: 2570:Deletion of 2535: 2508: 2502: 2473: 2457: 2456: 2450: 2432: 2376: 2341:Lakeshoreatx 2329: 2317: 2298: 2291:full version 2285:Lakeshoreatx 2269:Lakeshoreatx 2266: 2262: 2256:Deletion of 2233: 2217: 2184:Terms of Use 2176: 2150:74.75.168.75 2144:— Preceding 2141: 2111:Terms of Use 2102: 2098: 2060:— Preceding 2044: 2035: 2030: 2027: 2023:Bart De Moor 1982: 1977:The file is 1954: 1914: 1880: 1825:— Preceding 1820: 1807:Lastly, see 1788:full version 1753:coverage in 1707: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1588: 1572: 1566:and finally 1549: 1496:— Preceding 1440:— Preceding 1436: 1327: 1297: 1250: 1115: 1057: 1053: 1022: 852:— Preceding 843:user:cryptic 840: 783: 746: 712: 675:Terms of Use 654: 613: 607:Deletion of 573: 567: 541: 535: 529: 522: 520: 500: 467: 444: 405: 386:user sandbox 356: 354: 346:User:Sukuk51 331: 317: 315: 311: 305: 274: 198: 195:Tineye usage 138: 131: 82: 57: 3303:Filmdynasty 3290:Filmdynasty 3170:except the 2763:WP:VALIDALT 2611:Hi, again, 2303:independent 2245:Good day. — 2047:Ida Tassens 2033:Dear Madam 1831:Steptoe1913 1775:independent 1759:independent 1727:Steptoe1913 1711:Steptoe1913 1682:Steptoe1913 1666:Steptoe1913 1647:Cryptic - 1044:Indepentten 1028:Indepentten 884:Please see 705:third-party 701:independent 252:S Philbrick 203:S Philbrick 177:AkshayAnand 125:Project FMF 102:AkshayAnand 86:AkshayAnand 3412:. Cheers, 3396:Enjoy the 3247:topic bans 2779:Tax credit 2267:Thank you 2088:IdaTassens 2066:IdaTassens 1866:reply here 1257:Oiyarbepsy 1054:as a whole 797:notability 713:alarmingly 668:WP:PEACOCK 666:and often 546:Farmbrough 144:User:B-bot 3410:Knowledge 3243:site bans 3180:Knowledge 3168:namespace 2990:Marchjuly 2938:WP:INDENT 2820:perhaps. 2810:Marchjuly 2783:Marchjuly 2735:Marchjuly 2714:Marchjuly 2698:Marchjuly 2694:WP:UP#NOT 2166:your page 1896:No. Our 1757:that are 1696:Piotrus's 1624:Marchjuly 1595:Marchjuly 1482:WP:REFUND 1478:WP:REFUND 1411:Marchjuly 1370:Marchjuly 1334:Marchjuly 1088:depicted. 954:context: 779:Domchanch 621:talk page 449:GregJackP 3485:New Year 3176:Template 3172:Category 3020:in June 3018:ShikKube 3012:ShikKube 2505:undelete 2354:You are 2258:Tutanota 2146:unsigned 2074:contribs 2062:unsigned 2031:Dear Sir 1839:contribs 1827:unsigned 1741:a policy 1510:contribs 1498:unsigned 1454:contribs 1442:unsigned 1306:Inks.LWC 928:Neweditz 880:Neweditz 866:contribs 858:Neweditz 854:unsigned 836:neweditz 370:contribs 249:wrong.-- 172:WWE 2K14 135:contribs 3479:Cryptic 3351:Cryptic 3318:Cryptic 3083:in the 2802:Cryptic 2725:Cryptic 2676:Cryptic 2669:KDS4444 2561:Cryptic 2559:Done. — 2437:Cryptic 2406:Cryptic 2364:Cryptic 2334:Cryptic 2322:Cryptic 2318:without 2247:Cryptic 2218:because 2190:), and 2127:Cryptic 2010:Cryptic 1987:Cryptic 1942:Cryptic 1902:Cryptic 1813:Cryptic 1750:Piotrus 1700:Cryptic 1615:Cryptic 1580:WP:DUCK 1562:, then 1533:Cryptic 1486:Cryptic 1394:Cryptic 1366:WP:IDHT 1349:Cryptic 1272:Cryptic 1270:Done. — 1210:Cryptic 1181:Cryptic 1149:Cryptic 1103:Cryptic 1003:history 970:history 938:Cryptic 918:Cryptic 906:Cryptic 811:Cryptic 768:Cryptic 732:Cryptic 642:GLG GLG 626:GLG GLG 598:Cryptic 596:Done. — 576:Bramble 536:Support 493:Cryptic 454:Boomer! 432:Cryptic 393:Cryptic 310:page! 293:Cryptic 277:Visitas 227:Cryptic 223:WP:NFCR 168:WWE '13 164:WWE '12 148:Cryptic 3435:Use {{ 3233:. The 3188:Portal 3059:Samf4u 2973:Done. 2953:should 2867:yes I 2798:WP:ANI 2419:Samf4u 2400:Samf4u 2384:Samf4u 2310:WP:GNG 2238:WP:DRV 2226:WP:DRV 2188:WP:COI 2172:order. 1983:hiding 1809:WP:OSE 1385:WP:NFR 1362:WP:CIR 1358:WP:IUP 1219:WP:ANI 1206:WP:ANI 902:WP:ORG 886:WP:ORG 728:WP:ORG 694:WP:UAA 651:WP:DCM 505:My RfA 489:WP:DRV 441:Thanks 302:Redcat 257:(Talk) 208:(Talk) 114:, and 3186:, or 3125:(via 2949:{{-}} 2919:badly 2433:still 2299:might 2177:about 2021:Page 1858:). -- 1584:WP:DE 1011:watch 1007:links 978:watch 974:links 890:WP:42 724:WP:42 658:idea. 361:Barek 318:Paine 312:Joys! 16:< 3339:talk 3307:talk 3294:talk 3267:talk 3212:talk 3206:. 3184:Help 3131:talk 3104:L235 3063:talk 3028:back 3023:here 2994:talk 2979:talk 2927:talk 2917:out 2915:came 2909:and 2855:talk 2845:and 2787:talk 2754:and 2739:talk 2702:talk 2654:4444 2637:And 2624:4444 2591:4444 2550:talk 2522:zley 2499:OTRS 2490:talk 2423:talk 2388:talk 2345:talk 2273:talk 2234:more 2230:here 2154:talk 2125:). — 2103:with 2095:here 2070:talk 2000:talk 1996:jzsj 1973:Jzsj 1961:talk 1957:jzsj 1938:Done 1928:talk 1887:talk 1856:WP:V 1852:WP:N 1835:talk 1715:talk 1670:talk 1628:talk 1599:talk 1582:and 1506:talk 1450:talk 1415:talk 1374:talk 1368:? - 1338:talk 1310:talk 1261:talk 1227:talk 1195:talk 1170:talk 1138:talk 1032:talk 1015:logs 999:talk 995:edit 987:and 982:logs 966:talk 962:edit 862:talk 757:talk 720:WP:N 687:full 685:and 630:talk 581:claw 543:Rich 478:talk 430:.) — 413:talk 366:talk 352:). 308:this 281:talk 219:this 181:talk 170:and 129:talk 90:talk 3227:Hi, 3197:by 3133:)) 3065:) 3033:220 2958:220 2886:220 2869:can 2823:220 2649:KDS 2619:KDS 2586:KDS 2519:Wea 2511:Wil 2425:) 2390:) 2362:. — 2330:Hi 1940:. — 1364:or 1208:. — 1058:any 936:. — 751:.-- 532:RfA 348:to 3495:iz 3341:) 3309:) 3296:) 3269:) 3245:, 3214:) 3182:, 3178:, 3174:, 3121:) 3115:/ 3111:/ 3039:of 2996:) 2981:) 2964:of 2929:) 2921:. 2892:of 2881:}} 2877:{{ 2857:) 2829:of 2818:}} 2814:{{ 2789:) 2777:, 2773:, 2741:) 2704:) 2552:) 2514:ly 2492:) 2472:. 2347:) 2293:; 2275:) 2156:) 2121:; 2076:) 2072:• 2002:) 1963:) 1930:) 1889:) 1854:, 1841:) 1837:• 1790:; 1781:). 1717:) 1709:-- 1672:) 1664:-- 1630:) 1601:) 1512:) 1508:• 1456:) 1452:• 1417:) 1409:- 1376:) 1340:) 1312:) 1263:) 1229:) 1197:) 1172:) 1140:) 1128:, 1120:, 1034:) 1013:| 1009:| 1005:| 1001:| 997:| 980:| 976:| 972:| 968:| 964:| 868:) 864:• 821:N8 819:-- 801:N8 787:N8 759:) 707:, 703:, 632:) 480:) 415:) 389:}} 383:{{ 374:- 368:• 314:– 283:) 183:) 166:, 137:) 110:, 92:) 73:15 70:14 67:13 64:12 61:11 58:10 3492:L 3481:, 3472:! 3349:— 3337:( 3305:( 3292:( 3265:( 3210:( 3129:( 3113:c 3109:t 3107:( 3061:( 3057:. 2992:( 2977:( 2940:) 2925:( 2853:( 2785:( 2737:( 2716:: 2712:@ 2700:( 2674:— 2671:: 2667:@ 2548:( 2488:( 2462:. 2421:( 2402:: 2398:@ 2386:( 2343:( 2336:: 2332:@ 2287:: 2283:@ 2271:( 2240:. 2198:. 2152:( 2090:: 2086:@ 2068:( 1998:( 1975:: 1971:@ 1959:( 1926:( 1885:( 1863:| 1833:( 1802:. 1729:: 1725:@ 1713:( 1684:: 1680:@ 1668:( 1626:( 1597:( 1525:: 1521:@ 1504:( 1470:: 1466:@ 1448:( 1413:( 1372:( 1336:( 1308:( 1259:( 1225:( 1193:( 1168:( 1136:( 1074:. 1046:: 1042:@ 1030:( 1017:) 993:( 984:) 960:( 930:: 926:@ 920:: 916:@ 882:: 878:@ 860:( 755:( 644:: 640:@ 628:( 586:x 554:. 549:, 476:( 411:( 372:) 364:( 291:— 279:( 179:( 132:· 127:( 104:: 100:@ 88:( 55:9 52:8 49:7 46:6 43:5 40:4 37:3 34:2 31:1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index