User talk:Dodger67/Archive 8

1129:

subject. I made some contributions to improve the references to updraft and downdraft engine concepts, but much more is needed, especially the Vortex engine page. These technologies are poorly understood because they are not correctly represented by their proponents. The material offered is more promotional than analytical. Pluvinergy was written with the specific objective of not falling in love with, and being rigidly dedicated to any idea. This is what happens when people patent an idea. They become emotionally unable to accept criticism. A book is different, in that it is an argument open to counter-arguments. That is valuable for a new technology. The content on those subjects in Knowledge seems to be directly or indirectly from such sources and needs a lot of correction. That is why it would be good to look at Pluvinergy, it shows the weaknesses of each concept. Downdraft engines create a terrible amount of humidity, and a large river of brine. The updraft is too expensive, and too much of a target for malevolent attack, or natural catastrophe. The Vortex concept is incomplete, incorrect, and way under-scale, for what it claims to be able to do. As I have time I will make the case for each of these arguments on those pages, it will add credibility to the claims the technologies make, even though it seems to degrade them. In the meantime perhaps there is a way to get someone to understand and post something on Pluvinergy.

795:-Adding BMI Repertoire search results (citation listed in above paragraph) (one of the recommended citations per "Music") -Adding third party news citations (archival)(fact checking would require clicking my link; Satisfies #1 main heading, #5 "Other" heading) -Adding citation for radio airplay (I will be contacting the radio station to inquire regarding the availability of archival set lists for citation) -Adding ReverbNation Charting citations (will correct once it updates my city back to Lincoln) (satisfies #7 main heading) -Deleting some content on my submission (Self inflation) -Adding Singles section to discography and website citation. ( I'm not trying to make your life more difficult, it is just new and I fully plan on keeping this page up to date once it has been approved either by myself or a via a representative.) 1579:- The article still needs quite a bit of work, much of the content is unsourced, it needs many more references. Basically any statement or claim that can be disputed must be backed up by a reference. You can use the organization's own website or publications for "routine" information such as names of people involved, dates, etc. but anything controversial such as claims of recognition should be referenced to independent sources - use the actual content of the news articles you mention near the end to improve the article. Telling the world that a news article about the organization exists is not that interesting - you should tell us what the news article actually said about the organization. If the article discusses the organization's activities then you should use that article as a source for writing about those activities. 3747:- I do understand the confusion here... There are people who do not know that the Maritz rebellion was a rebellion against Britain, more specifically the Union of SA, and not "bitter-enders" who only wanted to re-establish the ZAR. So from their POV it makes sense to them. Then there is a lot of disinformation, mainly because of the lack of academic interest in this event, but it was not even a real rebellion as it has more to do with WW1 and anti-British etc. than it has to do with anything specifically as some of these "rebels" were commisioned officers of armies and had sworn allegiances. Therefore: was this a rebellion or an uprising or actually just treason? Either way, could you both please just scan my spelling, etc here: 1273:- No Knowledge is not a reliable source for anything, because people just like you and me wrote it. Also excluded are: Facebook; Twitter and similar social media; personal emails; "I was there"; "my dad/boss/cousin/roommate/guy-on-the-street-corner told me", most blogs (the exception is if the author is a well known expert on the subject - "Einstein blogging about relativity - acceptable", "Einstein writing about tax law - not acceptable", "Some guy writing about relativity - not acceptable"); any other wiki; readers comments on otherwise reliable websites such as news media; any website where content can be added or edited by random readers without first being approved by editors; most self-published books. See 3367: 5225:. I went through the article language and structure intensively with a WIKI moderator 'Revent' before re-submitting it. Seems like more needs to be done...Could you pleae help me with an example of where the article appears biased and non-neutral? I can edit that bit accordingly. Moreover, I went through several articles written for other Chefs before putting this one together to get the tone right as much as possible. Is the problem in the Early life and Career sections? Also, wherever I have mentioned an achievement or aard, etc, I have given valid citations and other references. Looking forward to your reply so I can edit the article as soon as possible. 799:

I state above, the third party publication proves that I meet criteria number five under the "Other" criteria, the ReverbNation charting provides proof I meet criteria number seven for the main heading, and the first criteria by way of third party publication (due to the frequency of my inclusion which is more than three times per month, generally.). I have been number one in my specific genre (Dubstep, which is one of the categories I have categorized my listing under) for a considerable amount of time. I also continue to hold the charting spot in spite of having moved (i.e. I am number one in dubstep not only in my CITY but in my STATE).

678:

managed to get most of her books and have them in my possession. I know of several people that read her books and it's come to my attention that her books are still in demand in several countries. Concerning your remarks in your message of 17 July, thanks for offering to help me to get this article off the ground. I am open to any suggestions that you may have. I will continue to prompt the "powers that be" at the AFM for more news material and photographs which I can always add at a later stage, if necessary. So, as for your offer, I am ready. Pray tell what more I need to do. Brgds

277: 1393:

case reputable art critics. We as Knowledge writers should try not to introduce our opinions because to readers they end up looking like Knowledge's opinions. As a matter of policy, Knowledge itself never has an opinion at all about anything. BTW, I will not be doing the next review - we try to avoid having the same reviewer repeatedly dealing with a draft - because that may result in the reviewer's own biases being introduced into the article. Having different reviewers helps to even out such biases. I hope you find all this useful.

1080:) requires that after the initial introduction when the full name is stated, subsequent mentions should use the surname only. It's the formal style that an encyclopedia requires. The references you've added look good except for one noticeable error. You have one newspaper reference that doesn't mention the article title, it also has a URL with a "note" that the article is not available on the website - in that case the URL is pointless, take it out and also the accessdate which is only relevant for website references (use the 2179: 2131: 2106: 3007:..my article was declined by you sometime ago. Unfortunately I was not able to return to this issue, but now I would like to do it and try to publish my article in wikipedia. Thanks for the suggestions, but unfortunately we (consortium) still don't have independent sources concerning this project, since this is recent and so far there are no publishable results or events, and thus no references in news, magazines or even scientific literature....Additionally, I noticed that are two similar projects ( 473: 31: 3221:. But when you phrase a question as you just did, it doesn't come off as a request for information, it comes off as a polemic statement that merely has a question mark at the end of it. "Look at all these stupid American Christians" is what your question comes off as saying. You don't want to be saying that, I know. Instead, you want to understand more about the nature of American Christianity. So ask a question that doesn't insult people. It will go much better. -- 4741:- The article is tagged by WPAFC simply because it was created through the AFC process, tagging it is part of the acceptance procedure. Please don't remove the tag, it help us to keep track of trends over long periods. Adding other relevant Wikiprojects is indeed a good idea, please do so. There's probably a music project that wil also fit, but I don't have any particular expertise in either education or music so I'm really not the right person to advise on this. 1009:

I have never been a notable one (until lately. About April of this year actually.) I fully expect many many edits to this article. I hope there are edits to maintain accuracy. I hope that someone takes the time to do the research, cite their sources, and correct my mistakes. I created this draft because I am a big fan of informational availability and I figure maybe someone has seen an article or something that I haven't that could be cited and added to this.

4655: 5351: 4100:

people do not even know they are biased, never mind even considering it... and i know that you are not one of those people as i have seen you change your pov, i think you have seen me change my pov also? kinda cool that, the fact that one can learn and grow as a person, i think it was helenonline that said: that life outside wikipedia should be run on wikipedia culture, did not have a clue what she meant, way back then, all of two weeks ago :)

2259: 1551: 578:- Thanks, but you've misunderstood my request. I'm no newbie, I have logged over 40,000 edits and started about 30 articles on a wide variety of topics over the last seven years. I can write proper citations, add categories, wikilinks, infoboxes, etc, in my sleep. What I need help with is someone who has some understanding of the technicalities of tactical data links and can thus parse and paraphrase the sources in a meaningful way. 4458: 2834:

and put the code in an article for creation. Subsequently, apparently, the sandbox article was reviewed by Linuxxx25 and because there was not any Dyson code there the submission was declined. Is there anyway for me to rescue this situation, or should I just wait for someone to review the draft, if it still exists? Sorry for the confusion. This has been a learning curve for me in more ways than one. Many thanks for your time.

3696:

for the removal of the edits, but also insulted me as well. My response, though not exactly the best (you'll have to forgive my lack of social skills, as my sole companions are usually books on history and science and various forms of literature), were courteous and not intended for insult. I try to avoid conflict, and I learned my lesson the first two times I was blocked. Please don't block me over such a ridiculous issue.

211:

person who cites the book, website or journal? What if the name of the writer of the news item in the website, journal or news item is not mentioned? I've now replaced the the name Francois van Oudtshoorn in all the cites and references, but am not sure whether I did the right thing or not. I left those spaces blank where I did not have the name of the journalist or writer who created the news items and journals, etc.

1866:. The page format looks a little strange, so I have asked for help to make sure it's the way it should be. You can start answering the questions; if there is any problem with the format I will fix it before transclusion. It's a good thing you asked for a delay; on the 17th I might have found the total lack of internet access at the Bluegrass festival somewhat of a problem. Let me know when you are ready to go. — 792:

under my legal name, as I am transgender (which was NOT relevant to the page, due to the Knowledge guidelines regarding gender identity). These sources include radio setlists, rights management organizations, and publications on twitter are ones that I do not own and have little access to (with the exception of BMI). I have worked to alleviate this lack of citation and have changed my citations as follows:

4361: 4335: 4285: 4163: 4140: 3832: 3555: 1920:. For consistency's sake, one of us should change (2) I was going to say something about your statement about adding POV, which is a loaded acronym, but I see that you have changed it to 'voices'. Other neutral yet descriptive words might be 'aspects', 'dimensions', 'elements'. (3) I think you should be more specific about how admin tools could help with Wikignome activities; after reading the 291: 1925:

refund. One last thing - you mention "observing" how to do administrative tasks - you may or may not want to add something about asking for advice from experienced admins. That's all I see; feel free to ignore if my suggestions don't 'fit'. I was going to take issue with your spelling of 'nett', but it seems it's in the dictionary even though I've never seen it spelled that way before. —

3169:

Methodist/Presbyterian/Baptist/Lutheran minister? Do you seriously think closed armed cult compounds could exist in Sweden or Italy? Do you believe that polygamist churches could be established in England or Germany? Are you claiming it is possible for the Westboro Baptist Church to exist in France? Yet all those do currently or have existed in the US - there simply must be a reason why.

1508:, I don't think this person is notable enough for a wikipedia article, I think it's puff piece advertising. I appreciate you pinging WP:EQUINE and hope my input was helpful (full disclosure: I know the Arabian breed rather well, there are a couple dozen people more well-known in the industry than this person and none of them have WP articles, though a couple might qualify.) 3295:

idea where (or if) non-western groups such as the LRA, Moonies, Aum, etc fit into the pattern - if there is one. AFAIK the Amish and Mennonites are basically "relics" of a broader European Anabaptist movement that became increasingly "uncomfortable" with the Enlightenment and rise of Modernism in Europe, so they left to find a space for themselves outside of such pressures.

195:- I see you've made a few changes to some of the citations, but you have not touched the really big problem yet - "Francois van Oudtshoorn" is not the author of those books and news articles - you did correct a few but then somehow you reversed the correction. ISBN only became common in the late 1970s, older books will not have them, so just leave it out of the reference. 4042:, it seems you're under the impression that Knowledge is just another social media site, but it's actually an encyclopedia that requires all article subjects to be objectively notable. A site such as Facebook may be more suitable for your needs at this stage. When there are published reviews about yourself and your work we can look at the possibility of an article again. 5603:- I have looked at the German article and see that its references are the same as your English draft. The references are all from the company's own website - except where the competitors are mentioned you reference their websites. The problem is that anything published by or on behalf of the subject itself does not help prove that the company is 4066:- You do not have to get involved if you do not want to, please just tell me if in your opinion, I am being neutral or not (obviously I think that i am :) but I do know that you will tell me if you think that I am not...- hence, me asking you, I think we have now a track record of honesty with each other and I have high regard your opinion...) 1943:- responding to your points: (1) I used the list I maintain on my user page - "about 40" created articles seems to be ok - the xtools list credits me with two more than my own list. (2) changed (3) thanks for this, I don't actually know what's in the admin toolbox so your experience is helpful. (The "net/nett" difference is simply ENGVAR.) 3977:- A mere mention is not sufficient - you need to cite substantial articles that discuss you in considerable depth - articles that are directly about you and your work. Articles about shows you performed in are not adequate if they only mention your name in passing or in a cast list. The source articles must also be published by/in 5244:- It's looking very much better now. Just one style issue that I notice; never use the subject's first name or title after the initial introduction. Don't use the title "chef" throughout the text - once his full name is given and said that he is a chef in the lead, you use only his surname/family name in the rest of the article. 1442:(with an external reference). The German relevance rules also say that there may be other reasons that make a company significant. I found it relevant and quite unique that the company's history goes back to 1796 and that it is family-owned since then. I don't think that there are many companies to which that applies. 451:- you need to sprinkle many more references throughout the text, there are entire paragraphs without any cites. I presume most of the text was sourced from the autobiography, you should cite it at least at the end of each paragraph where it is the only source, while also citing other sources everywhere you used them. 673:

with her family. I did manage to trace the grand daughter and grandson who promised to provide photographs, but they haven't come to the party as yet. The only sources from which I was able to extract information are the author's books, the websites, the news articles, the University of Johannesburg and the

5611:

such as newspaper or magazine articles about the company (but not press releases as they are not independent). Look for business news articles in mainstream newspapers or in industry publications such as engineering or agriculture magazines. The company must be a major topic of the articles, not just

4242:

Sorry Roger, I haven't read the whole article (probably, maybe, ever) and don't want to get sucked into it. I am writing a new article as an antidote to try help pick me up a bit then I will go back to catching up on WLM for which I have missed the deadline partly due to ridiculous protracted editing

3294:

Yes I suspect the fact that the US never had an "establishment" church and has had absolute religious freedom for far longer than most of Europe may be a significant factor, but it seems insufficient to explain the really "extreme fringe" elements such as the likes of Koresh, Westboro, etc. I have no

2813:

It's already discussed within the article body. That section I deleted is just completely redundant. Seeing the intro and then a section right after the intro which says everything the intro says. Which, incidentally, is still discussed twice later on in the article. For example, the policy about war

1924:

article, I can't think of anything. However, as a new admin, there are a couple of things that come to mind, and if you think you would do these you may want to include them: it's handy to be able to see deleted versions of articles and to restore deleted pages when participating at AfC, AfD and G13

1373:

The initial problem with my article for submission was formatting regarding the citation section and the tone of neutrality throughout the article. The aforementioned issues have since been resolved, and the article has been submitted for review. Review of my article and (hopeful) subsequent approval

1004:

Thanks for those! I know there is a CoI involved here. I actually requested feedback before I really started writing the article. Unfortunately, none was forthcoming. Considering you brought up CoI and Autobiographical Knowledge entries, might you have a POV or feedback about my article? I really did

1441:

Concerning relevance: I have not found clear relevance rules and regulations for articles about companies in the English Knowledge. For the original article, I had checked the German Knowledge rules for relevance which I had followed, stating that the company is the world market leader in its sector

1008:

My point with the article was to allow other people (without a firm background in music composition) to have a reference as to the elements of my music as well as insight into my on going career from a unbiased point of view. I have been a musician since I was 15 (I'm nearly 30 now) and in that time

798:

Also I did review the criteria for music notability. Again. I would like to point out that I did, of course, review the criteria, made absolutely sure I met said criteria, and debated long and hard on whether a Knowledge page was right for me before I even began the process of creating one. Also, as

247:

Don't let the fact that your article is about an author confuse you - if you were writing about dog food you would never have a reference that calls "dog food" the author. The "history of dog food" book would have a named author but the government regulations and standards document for manufacturing

3981:

sources - press releases, your own publicity or the publicity of productions you were involved in are not independent. Review articles by professional journalists in mainstream press are the best sources for actors. I'm afraid it's rather difficult to write an acceptable article about yourself here

3212:

Just a little word of advice for the future, Roger. Tone is everything. If you are curious about the nature and character of Christianity in America, you need only ask a question like "How are Christians in America different with regard to issues X, Y, and Z" or "What studies have been done which

2833:

Hi. My first new submission was for American architect Arthur Dyson. Previously I have only edited existing articles. I think I know now what happened. I made a mistake by misunderstanding the article creation process. I copied the code out of my sandbox so I could start working on another article,

2471:

Myself, I think 3 months would probably do, but there's been some opposition to doing that in the past, so suggest 6, and I probably will be willing to co-sponsor. I do hope to work with you successfully--there's at least 2 people I've strongly opposed in the past who are now close WP colleagues.

1801:

That's fine - it will give me time to figure out how to do it. While I'm no longer involved in formal education, I remember how hectic it could be at times. I had a period like that last year when I offered to be the editor of a 250 page syllabus for a three day conference for 600 people, and then

672:

Hi Dodger67, thanks for spending so much time on my draft article on JC de Ferrieres. I only read your message of 17 July now (don't know why I haven't before), hence, just a brief reassurance that I don't know the De Ferrieres from a bar of soap, nor anyone else who may be related to or acquainted

592:

Yes I did misunderstand you (and I was puzzled your request because I could see you had a long history of edits). Because of the complications with edit history and copyright, I think you are better to put it into article space and then get others to edit it to add in more details. I think that the

5636:

Many thanks for the additions Roger. I've amended the nee, because in fact it is a former married name. I've made the Mulligan element clearer by adding "formerly" in the intro. I hoe that clarifies things. I'm finding the whole wikipedia thing a little daunting so I'm pleased to have not made too

5594:

I thought a translation in other languages would be good because it is the first company which invented an electrical manure mixer. All references are given in the german article. i wanted to link them together after the review. Is it therefore necessary to get more references and so on? If it is

3695:

I'm not the one engaged in an edit war. Zarpboer is the one who is the instigator of this conflict. Read the talk page of the article. I listed my reasons for the edits there, and then attempted to discuss the issue with the user. In his responses, not only did he fail to provide sufficient reason

1437:

As for the references used, I'd like to tell you that the two references of Krüss family members are not marketing material. Gerhard and Hugo Krüss were scientists, the reference is to a book they published 120 years ago. An article about Gerhard Krüss was already on the English Knowledge before I

711:

I think it's basically ready, so let's see what happens at the next AFC review. Because I've become so involved with it I can no longer do any formal reviews as my neutrality is compromised. In any case multiple opinions are preferred, rather than having just one reviewer, as their personal biases

166:

Thank you Dodger67 for directing me on how to properly process the reference templates. I hope that they are now correct. I would appreciate any further assistance from you with regard to my article. I would also like to point out that most of the facts contained in my article are sourced from the

3565:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to

1429:

Hi Dodger67 Thank you very much for your great contribution to Knowledge and for reviewing my article about Krüss GmbH, which you have declined, unfortunately. The submitted article was a translation of the German article which was accepted in April 2014, so I saw no problems in translating them.

1392:

See how I have stripped out everything that looks like the writer's (your) opinion. All opinions in Knowledge articles must be explicitly cited to the person who expressed it, and preferably written as a direct quote. Only the published opinions of qualified commentators actually matter - in this

1128:

I am the author of Pluvinergy and so am not allowed to post the article. Thanks for looking at it though. It would be good if someone posted something to the effect of the article. People like the simplicity, and quality control of Knowledge. It is a better source than a web page dedicated to the

677:

journals, and a few senior citizens who attended her Sunday school classes and read her books. No doubt, she was a highly respected person and, personally, judging from the admiration I picked up, I do believe that JC de Ferrieres is/was a notable personality that deserves a space in Knowledge. I

210:

Hi Doger67. This is why I mentioned the confusion locked in the cite and reference templates. Really, they're not user friendly. I'm sure I'm not the only one grappling with working out what goes where. When is it the name of the author (the subject in the article) and when is it the name of the

4509:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

3765:

Checked my own spelling :) - Now the Maritz Rebellion page looks okay, ready for further refinement! I have added citations all over the place and from multiple sources, please let me know if it still needs anything anywhere? But I think that it is now a good neutral reflection of the rebellion?

2734:

You bowed out of your RfA very gracefully and the community will respect you even more for that. So don't worry - even the highly respected admin who did the actual close did not succeed on their first run. I look forward to seeing you run again but preferably not before 6

1766:

Roger, are you still thinking of applying to be an admin? I wasn't sure from your reply last time I asked whether you wanted me to put your name forward or not; you mention asking someone else. I haven't had much experience at RfA, but I will be glad to do it if you don't have someone else in

1433:

I see your point that it may appear like a commercial article, so, after your critique, I have changed and basically shortened the article. Since I had no public external sources for the current range of products and for further activities of the company as education programs etc., I deleted the

791:

I listed the reasons why I am notable. Firstly, the amount of music I have released warrants a wikipedia entry which is verifiable and by a third party (BMI) . Unfortunately, the sources that would allow me the citations required are either private or are updated frequently. My BMI is registered

4099:

thank you! what are you studying? I am also thinking of studying something else, i have a b com, but no interest in using it... wikipedia is very cool! i am learning a lot and i am learning that i am quite a biased person, and i have to be careful whom i ask to balance my bias, cause many other

2492:

Six months strikes me as about right. Don't nominate anything for deletion, just participate at AfD and be sure to examine the way things close and why. Many people think that blocking buttons are the most sensitive administrative tool, but it's actually the article deletion button, in my view.

917:- The changes you've made look good. Let's wait and see what the next reviewer thinks. It won't be me, at AFC multiple opinions are preferred. If a single reviewer keeps coming back to the same draft the reviewer's personal biases may end up affecting the content of the draft. BTW have you read 540:

You are assuming that the reader will fill in the dots and that the "Link-ZA" is the system developed without explicitly stating so. Also I would start the sentence with "South Africa developed the Link-ZA, because ..." rather than starting the sentence with "Because". But that is a very minor

4799:

Hi Dodger67, As one of the most active Wikipedians in South Africa I would like to invite you to Wikimedia ZA's annual general meeting on the 1st November 2014. It will be held in Cape Town but you can also join us digitally over Google Hangout if you like. Please let me know if you have any

3871: 1438:

started writing; I translated that one to German. The also quoted Andres Krüss wrote a chronicle of the history of the company and the Krüss family which is closely linked to the history of Hamburg. It is not more marketing material than Henry Ford's memoirs would be when writing about Ford.

1786:

I'm definitely still interested, just not this week. I'm hideously busy with university work - no time for the RFA inquisition! There's some space in my schedule later this month. If you could prepare a nomination for 17 August that would fit perfectly. I'm not going to bother with a second

251:

Of course when you are citing something that Sannie herself wrote (e.g. her autobiography) you would cite her as the author of the reference - but that's because she wrote the book you are referencing, it has nothing as such to do with the fact that the article is about her. Hope this helps

410:

Hi Dodger67, my gut feel tells me my draft article is now hunky dory, but then I could be wrong. I replaced the two newspaper article cites, as well as two book cites. Please check if it is now correct. I'd hate my proposed article to be rejected in the end. I appreciate you guidance.

818: 3080:

Please dont delete my page it was mistake to move it in an article it was suppose to be a User page but now I cant revert my User page please revert it as User: Engr. Joelar V. Larion. The system cant revert it maybe an error or only you can do the changes thank you administrator.

1015:

I was and am fully intending to update it should I ever get into trouble legally or if an album goes gold (if someone doesn't do it first ) regardless of how it makes me look. (Facts are facts. I value Knowledge greatly and read articles nearly every week for pure entertainment.)

1556:

I would like to thank you for reviewing and editing the page I submitted for Lion's Heart. I have been editing pages and trying to learn how Knowledge works in more detail- hands on guidance through seeing a page edited has made that much easier. I appreciate the time and effort!

244:- as you are the writer of the Knowledge page. You as the Knowledge writer are never mentioned in the article's references - you are "cited" by the page history - just click on the "View history" tab of any page and you will see all the edits credited to whichever users did them. 171:. The book is not yet listed in the OCLC records, however, I am in contact with their London office whose staff is currently in the process of including the book in their listings. Strangely, the book does not bear an ISBN number as it was written prior to ISBN numbering. 2689:

Remember, these aren't "votes," they're "opinions" — and the main thing isn't whether a person is right or wrong, it's rather the rationale behind the decision. I'll offer my perspective on the above by chiming in on the debates and I'd encourage others to do likewise.

2054:

Hi Roger. Just in case the information is useful in the future, an "h-index" can be found on an academic's Google Scholar report. A person with an h-index of 10 has at least ten articles which have been cited ten times. Here's one for a young fellow just starting out:

3168:

In what universe is it "offensive" to state the simple objective fact that such cults are crackpot? Are you seriously proposing that David Koresh and his followers were perfectly rational and sane? What makes you think Jim Jones was no different from any mainstream

1696:

As main source I use kremlin.ru - it's official site of President of Russia. Doesn't it reliable source? I understand worry about my username, but I can sure you it's not what you think. :) Also this article almost translate of the article in russian wiki.

3883: 2433:

Thanks, I think I'll sit this one out and just watch from the sidelines. I don't have a dog in that fight and the arguments, excluding the emotional appeals and bruised egos of course (see my comment on ego in the next topic below), seem quite close.

522:) is fine. Well done! Rather than developing it further just copy it across main space and then others can add any additional information or rebalance it etc once it is live. Instead you could "Submit your draft for review!" but I have never done so. 5079: 819:

http://repertoire.bmi.com/writer.asp?fromrow=1&torow=25&keyname=CALADRIUS%20JACE%20ANDREW&querytype=WriterID&keyid=550284837&page=1&blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&affiliation=BMI&cae=703138283

5656:

If you can find her birth name and whether she was actually born in Barnstaple it would be a very useful addition. The history of her marriages (who and when) and whether she has children, would be perfect for starting a "Personal life" section.

4681:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

541:

point. The second one is why not write out the dates in the citations DAY MONTH YEAR or MONTH DAY, YEAR rather than using the ISO format? The third is that if you place all your "More promising sources" temporarily into ref tag pairs and run

4490:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 2857:

is perfectly fine where it is - waiting for review. If you want to use your sandbox page for something new, just delete the now irrelevant review message before you begin - or I can delete it for you if you're unsure of doing it yourself.

4209:

were/are a mixed (Coloured) group with Khoi and white (Trekboer) ancestry. The section heading should be changed to "Khoisan" and the material about the Griqua should be split out and moved to later in the timeline - mid-1700's onwards.

240:- If the news article or website page has no named author then just leave it out - as long as the article title, newspaper name, date and page number, is in the cite a reader can find it. The person who cites the book or news article is 1385:

Here's an example from your draft: "Encouraged by his success, Smith fully committed himself to his artistic work, and uniquely traveled the country for several years in a camper-van, selling his bronzes while establishing a name for

1090:

template). Fixing these minor issues will "polish up" the draft quite nicely. It looks to me like the draft should have a fairly good chance of being accepted at the next review - but don't hold me to it, I'm tired and off to bed.

2004:

Well, as you can see, I finally got it going - sorry for the messy start - would you believe I at one time wrote software professionally? Do you want a {{RfX-notice|a}} on your user page? You seem to be off to a good start.

1726:. The draft is about a senior government official and all your sources are from the government - you need to find sources that have no connection at all to the government, such as newspaper or other independent media articles. 3867: 3333:

is an interesting one, where, while always illegal in the US, sometimes those laws are not enforced. Wearing a face covering and carrying a knife for religious reasons may not be tolerated, ether, in certain circumstances.

1986:, yes I'm ready. It's early evening here so I'll be able to stay on top of further questions for the next 5 or 6 hours before I go to bed. AIUI the initial flurry of activity after "launch" is quite critical for success. 1049: 1639: 1055:

You declined this one - I tweaked it a bit and found some more refs to add - is there anything in particular that you don't like? I don't want to just keeping guessing, tweaking, and submitting. Thanks for your time.

1670: 4685:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4514:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 2565: 4819:- Thanks. I'll definitely not be able to attend in person, I'll investigate Google Hangout and see if I can manage something. Unfortunately I have very limited bandwidth - I'm on a 3G connection, no ADSL (yet). 555:

I would place them under "Further Reading", these resource may be of use to others who follow and want to develop the article further, although they will probably get culled down to fewer than you have listed.

2794:" are redirects to titles with the second word in lower case. As the phrases are the actual names of academic disciplines should the article titles not be as I wrote them - both words with capital initials? 1296: 5088: 5081: 2757:) so "switching off the life support" was clearly the best thing to do. I'm going to be far too busy over the next six months anyway to run another RfA. I'm in the thick of the final semester of my BA in 2668:

I deleted the existing signature and replaced it with a fresh "four tildes" - the timestamp now is later than your first reply above. That should have worked, but even if it didn't it's not a big deal.

3940: 3469: 2454:

Hi, I was in the "oppose" column this time, but just wanted to let you know that I certainly hope to see you back in 6-12 months and am rather confident I'll be in the other column then! Good luck! --

545:

over them it will auto format them for you (use the interactive option). Once formatted you can then add them to "Further Reading" or "External links" section -- as they would be formatted inside

5112: 4085:, I think you're doing fine, moenie so baie worrie nie! I'll be less active here for a while as I have university exams in October. You can always ask for help or opinions at the wikiproject too. 2712:- I suppose you probably missed the "!" prepended to the word "vote" - it's a "negating" symbol that apparently comes from some or other programming language - "!vote" (read as "not vote" because 515: 1615: 3146:- not only is it a clear request for opinion (do you really think there could be a factual answer?) but it is grossly offensive. If you want to engage in such debates, find a forum somewhere. 2941: 2550: 1368: 3015:) in wikipedia that don't have independent sources! I would appreciate any further assistance that you could give me regarding to this issue, in order to resubmit my article. Thanks again 2555: 761: 5513: 5265:

Hey thanks Roger, OK noted. I'll try edit where possible. Would using the first name be a no-no again? Or will Chef Brar be ok? As using just Ranveer or Brar doesnt sound appropriate..

940: 727: 610: 1916:, I've been sleeping... I have a couple of suggestions, and you can do what you want with them. (1) We are disagreeing about the number of article that you have created. I was using 5475: 3676: 348: 102: 3544: 2493:

Thanks for all your efforts at WP and keep at it — you're an outstanding administrative candidate, but there's that one issue to resolve first: really grasping AfD. best, —Tim ////

248:

dog food, or the supermarket group's website page that contains dog food sales statistics, will probably not have a named author so none will be included when citing such a source.

3549: 3503: 4339:

you taught me not to take things so seriously, just relax, take a deep breath and hang in there, am now trying to figure out what a WLM is, seems to be the inverse of a massage?

1402: 1205: 752: 519: 4030: 3965: 3213:

show differences in attitude by Christians in America versus Christians in other parts of the world" Certainly, sources exist which explore such topics, for example, consider

2753:

When I saw that my replies to the last few questions had no effect on the !voting trend I realized that holding on until the scheduled end would be pointless (and perhaps even

644: 382: 136: 4530: 2975: 1171: 311:

in June 2014! Thank you for you contributions to Knowledge at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the

5216: 4713:

Why is the article part of WikiProject Articles for Creation to start with? The article was written mainly in January 2014 and most of the contributors are registered users.

1389:

I would rewrite it like this: "Smith took up art fulltime and traveled the country for several years in a camper-van, selling his bronzes while establishing his reputation."

5547: 5385: 3024: 907: 5437: 4446: 4243:

disputes here. I need to avoid all disputes for a while or I will end up quitting WP altogether. I can only take so much time wasting. Not your fault, sorry for ranting.

2316:

Roger, is your current email address r****c*****@g****.com? If not, you need to update your preferences -- I got a bounce-back message from the Wikimedia email server.

4568: 4267:, maybe you should post a general request at WikiProject South Africa, it would in any case also be good to have someone other than we "usual suspects" review the page. 3582: 3494: 1043: 1030: 894: 698: 3272:

sects originated outside the US, too. As for why they migrated to the US, that probably had to do with more religious freedom in the US, at the time, than in Europe.

2334:- Yes that address is correct and active, the last movement on it was just over 30 minutes ago, so it's working. Now that you have my address you can mail me directly. 441: 230: 182: 4495: 4263:, I too did not read the whole page, I stopped at the first problem I found. My time for Wikiediting is very limited this month due to the abovementioned exams. Sorry 1076:- I took a quick look before going off to bed... I noticed a few relatively minor issues: You refer to the subject by his first name. The style guide for biographies ( 1048: 437: 5625: 5585: 3577: 635: 373: 127: 3662: 1631: 5508: 2201:

If you don't recognize the pseudo Latin meaning, Google it. This too will pass, and one day soon you will find yourself laughing about these seven days. Cheers.

4606: 4525: 1005:

intend it to be impartial and as the articles you shared say, feedback is golden. I don't want the article and all that citing being wasted due to impartiality.

5538: 4958: 2769:, it turned out to be a positive experience for me (so you can toss that mail in the trash). I try to leave my ego on the coatrack at the door when entering WP. 2540: 1505: 1263: 4563: 5234: 4920: 4401: 3536: 3475: 2873: 1243: 1066: 4695: 4644: 4585: 3799: 3787: 3617: 3029: 5607:. (The German Knowledge's standard for notability is quite a bit lower than what the English Knowledge requires). What is really needed are references from 5126:, why did you leave the inappropriately plural title intact? This sort of thing seems almost universally neglected when people approve articles like this. 3685: 5470: 5161:

I fixed this one before commenting here. I've fixed dozens of these new articles whose titles got no attention when they were moved to the article space.

5003: 3725:

When (at least) three editors have disagreed with you an yet you persist in reverting to the version only you support, you are by definition edit warring.

1917: 1576: 1558: 5408:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

4639: 1659: 4998: 3900: 3672: 2560: 2415: 1745: 1719: 1703: 4953: 4441: 2936: 4678: 3070: 2814:

communism is explained in the History section, whereas the "higher phase" of communism is explained in the "Marxist communism" section, etc etc etc...

1035: 1022: 965: 946: 914: 899: 886: 733: 706: 690: 682: 616: 526: 448: 425: 417: 354: 237: 222: 214: 190: 174: 108: 5036: 2360:

Let me know if I can ever be of any help to you in your future AfD work -- I'm mired pretty deeply in AfD, and know the basics pretty well. Cheers.

529:

quieter if once it is live you put a link to it into a couple of other articles and also add a couple of categories at the bottom of the new article.

4756: 4039: 4018: 3974: 3953: 3935: 3016: 2947: 2850: 2835: 1632: 3190:

I'm not interested in engaging in a debate over this. Your question was offensively worded, and had no business being posted on the reference desk.

5395: 4789: 3155: 2443: 1978: 1889: 1875: 5653: 5638: 5600: 5577: 5519: 5170: 5156: 3115: 3094: 1603: 5432: 5074: 4750: 4062:

I know you are busy and I am sorry to have to ask, but as I know that you have researched the history, please can you check my POV on Talk page

3236: 3199: 3181: 2655: 2620: 1753: 1735: 5484: 5477: 5321: 5292: 5266: 5241: 5226: 5041: 4375: 4348: 4299: 4276: 4254: 4180: 4154: 3895: 3820: 3464: 2391: 2369: 2343: 2325: 2249: 2229: 2092: 2014: 1995: 1952: 1934: 1907: 1851: 1837: 1811: 1796: 1382:- I see you've got the reference formatting right, but I'm afraid the tone is still far from neutral - you need to kill most of the adjectives. 1145: 1130: 934: 721: 460: 261: 204: 4051: 4003: 3281: 2867: 2678: 1711: 5211: 3785: 3429: 2744: 2699: 2502: 1535: 1270: 1255: 1235: 1177: 1115: 1100: 486: 5666: 4237: 4219: 4131: 4109: 4094: 3918:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 3803:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 3775: 3760: 3640:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 3600:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 3447:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 3131: 2594:

is correct again that you should try for adminship after 3 months - 6 months. You know you are a valuable member of en.wiki. Best of luck !

1493: 1468: 1416: 5692:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 5495:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 5457:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 5274: 5253: 5198:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 5099:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 5061:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 5023:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 4940:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 4915: 4902:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 4872: 4846: 4828: 4776:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 4731: 4716:

It seems natural that the school should be part of WikiProject Education and/or WikiProject Schools. Why not? How are these things decided?

4626:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 4600: 4550:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 3856: 3848: 3657: 2778: 2725: 2581: 1312: 1165: 1148:, but I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Maybe your comment should be posted on a relevant article talk page, or perhaps 5705: 5689: 5492: 5454: 5329: 5300: 5195: 5096: 5058: 5020: 4937: 4899: 4773: 4623: 4547: 3919: 3804: 3734: 3641: 3601: 3448: 3343: 3304: 1682: 1290: 5178: 3424: 3137: 2483: 4709:

has been upgraded to B-class under WikiProject Articles for Creation. However, I have a few questions that you might be able to answer:

4491: 3106: 2210: 5341: 4539: 4532: 3720: 602: 587: 4978: 4882: 4667: 4421: 3622: 3012: 2889: 2427: 2382:- Thanks! I hope your being "mired" doesn't become "sunk"! Well it's bedtime for me, tomorrow I have to do some actual work... Yuck! 2311: 1863: 1626: 1424: 5672: 5135: 4615: 4608: 4569: 3825: 3562: 3008: 4487: 1248:

This is my first article and I am very confused about references and citations and I am not even sure how to use this talk page.

3596: 3584: 3165:- Yes I do really believe there is a rational explanation for why these types of cults exist in the US but are unknown elsewhere. 2878:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

1688: 1566: 4700: 1776: 1445:

I hope I could improve the article and make clear why I find the subject relevant; and I hope you do too when having read this.

5446: 5439: 4447: 3668: 2545: 1516: 1278: 1274: 4719:

Is the article far from being rated A-class? Do you have any suggestions as to what I could perhaps do to improve the article?

339: 4974: 4971:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4417: 4414:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4075: 3485: 3075: 2885: 2882:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2044: 3675:

election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the

712:

may unduly influence the article content, this can particularly be a problem with articles on politics, religion and sport.

2419: 433: 4809: 2166: 1669:- I'm afraid I made a rather horrible mess of the last time I tried to do such a merge so I have asked for a volunteer at 5646: 3705: 3143: 2843: 1609: 1480:- I took just a quick look, the improvements you've made look good. By the way the notability rules for companies are at 559:

Let me know if I can be of any assistance with this page or with anything else by placing a message on my talk page. --

5693: 5496: 5458: 5357: 5199: 5100: 5062: 5024: 4964: 4941: 4929: 4922: 4903: 4777: 4627: 4551: 3923: 3808: 3645: 3605: 3452: 2196: 2191: 2143: 5405: 5320:

Hey there, sorry to bother..could you take a peek at the article again when you can and possibly re-review it? TIA ..

4122:

is a formidably competent editor. I'm busy with a BA in Communication Science at Unisa - not easy at my age, I'm 46.

2761:- if all goes well I graduate at the end of the year and thereafter I want to start on a post-grad diploma course in 2118: 1149: 956: 743: 626: 364: 118: 3218: 1138: 5595:

accepted in the german wiki? the only references i could find are in german and only texts out of some magazines.

5012: 5005: 4205:

One big problem immediately hit me in the face! The section headed "Griquas" is mostly about the Khoi and San, the

4026: 3961: 3403:}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. 2957: 2646: 2611: 1364: 1330: 1306: 536:"Because South Africa was not able to acquire the NATO standard Link-16 system an indigenous system was developed" 4354: 3084:

Hi Admin, so is there by any means my User page can be back again? I cant revert it back to make it a user page.

2073: 504: 5123: 2823: 2463: 777: 5529: 3990:

for some guidance and if you still believe you do qualify for an article you can get further assistance at the

3914: 3902: 3353: 3102: 1464: 332: 5688:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 5491:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 5453:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 5194:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 5095:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 5057:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 5019:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 4936:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 4898:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 4772:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 4622:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 4546:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 3533:

Hello, I am requesting a review to ask what specifically needs to be changed on the Jean_Claude_Jitrois page.

2803: 568: 4963:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4765: 4758: 4706: 4406:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3909: 3794: 3631: 3591: 3438: 2897: 1153: 532:

I will mention three point all of them trivial. If you publish it as is I would want to change the sentence:

94: 86: 1346: 4467: 4010:

Sure. Sounds like red tape to me. Just delete the page. Less admin for everyone. More points for you.

2405: 1898:, please take a look at my first draft answers and critique them before we "go live" with the inquisition. 1187: 660: 398: 152: 81: 69: 64: 59: 3519: 2991: 765: 5117: 4837:

Sure, do you have a gmail or google + account that I can add you to for the Google Hangout on the day? --

3261: 2786:

BTW - seeing as I have the attention of a few highly experienced Wikipedians here - I noticed that both "

1499: 1379: 1360: 1321: 1302: 1221: 267: 5563: 3214: 1334: 874: 839: 773: 5409: 5391: 5378: 5369: 5050: 5043: 4511: 4057: 3417: 3379: 3366: 1761: 757: 648: 386: 140: 38: 4308:

okay, did not know that about Griquas, i thought they were a San tribe, thank you so much Dude! - and

4136:

Thanks, BTW pinging only works if you sign in the same post (I had to use my psychic powers instead).

3507: 2269: 1342: 516:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Military history#I need help with a draft about a Tactical Data Link system

4671: 3945:

I do not understand your message. I have 4 citations, 2 in which I am mentioned by name. Explain.

3540: 3479: 3443: 3431: 3326: 3172:

My question is no different than asking for reasons for the rise of anti-western Islamic radicalism.

2302:- I have not received the mail yet - I've checked my spam folder too, perhaps you should resend it. 2277: 1541: 1326: 1209: 656: 394: 148: 4727: 3515: 2979: 640: 378: 132: 4794: 4522: 4474: 3690: 3499: 2879: 2713: 2423: 2267:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1217: 1196: 5551: 2987: 1201: 5187: 5180: 5166: 5131: 4691: 4168: 3983: 3264:

are a couple wacky Christian cults from outside the US. Although not exactly cults, the unusual

2971: 2966: 2062: 2059: 2056: 1562: 990: 922: 5559: 4510:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2148: 1012:[A funny little anecdote about the article regarding COI and Autobiographical content actually: 5631: 5543: 4063: 3891: 3195: 3151: 2650: 2642: 2615: 2607: 1749: 1707: 5350: 5427: 5362: 4891: 4884: 4370: 4326: 4294: 4249: 4149: 3739:

I have improved the Maritz rebellion page, with citations, etc. Could you please have a look

3636: 3624: 3572: 3411: 3373: 2787: 2758: 2365: 2321: 2245: 2206: 2171: 2162: 2123: 2069: 2010: 1974: 1930: 1885: 1871: 1847: 1807: 1772: 1723: 1277:

for further guidance and if you are unsure about a specific source you can get advice at the

1039: 1026: 978: 974: 950: 903: 890: 769: 737: 694: 686: 620: 429: 421: 358: 226: 218: 178: 112: 5399: 3118:, I'm just the person who proposed the deletion, the admin who actually did the deletion is 5681: 5674: 5662: 5621: 5604: 5249: 5152: 4868: 4824: 4746: 4596: 4506: 4483: 4451: 4407: 4272: 4233: 4215: 4127: 4090: 4047: 4022: 4014: 3999: 3957: 3949: 3843:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

3730: 3400: 3300: 3219:

this one, which shows the UK and raises some interesting problems with your initial premise

3177: 3127: 3090: 3020: 2951: 2863: 2839: 2828: 2799: 2774: 2721: 2674: 2577: 2459: 2439: 2387: 2339: 2307: 2225: 2154: 2088: 2040: 1991: 1948: 1903: 1833: 1792: 1731: 1678: 1599: 1531: 1489: 1452: 1412: 1398: 1338: 1286: 1161: 1096: 986: 930: 717: 583: 456: 257: 200: 4738: 4723: 3908:

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

3793:

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

3630:

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

3590:

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

3437:

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

2178: 2130: 2105: 970: 652: 390: 144: 8: 4519: 3511: 3038: 3031: 2411: 2098: 2035:- I was just about to ask you if it is acceptable to mention it on my user page. Thanks. 1921: 1671:

WT:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewer help#A draft sent to MFD needs to be merged

1514: 1213: 542: 5642: 5581: 5523: 5162: 5142: 5127: 4687: 4662: 4646: 4344: 4176: 4105: 4071: 3991: 3771: 3756: 3396: 3229: 3098: 2983: 2854: 2791: 2762: 2716:) is a widely used "shorthand" way to refer to an opinion posted to a poll here on WP. 1460: 1123: 1084: 318: 312: 276: 47: 17: 5388:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2629:

Letting you know, ping only works when you have signed your message at the same time.

5701: 5555: 5504: 5466: 5325: 5296: 5270: 5230: 5207: 5145: 5108: 5070: 5032: 4994: 4985:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

4949: 4911: 4842: 4805: 4785: 4635: 4581: 4559: 4437: 4428:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3931: 3922:. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from 3887: 3836: 3816: 3807:. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from 3653: 3644:. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from 3613: 3604:. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from 3460: 3451:. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from 3191: 3162: 3147: 3066: 2932: 2923:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2808: 2740: 2695: 2498: 2185: 2137: 2112: 2083:, one of the truly great things about WP is that one learns something new every day. 1802:

somehow ended up being the conference chair and then in charge of the food as well! —

1622: 1591: 1134: 861: 826: 549: 5419: 5291:

Have further edited repeat reference to his name with pronouns. hope it is OK now.

4365: 4321: 4289: 4260: 4244: 4225: 4144: 4119: 3861: 3748: 3701: 3567: 3339: 3277: 3052: 2532: 2512: 2379: 2361: 2331: 2317: 2299: 2241: 2217: 2202: 2158: 2080: 2065: 2032: 2006: 1983: 1970: 1940: 1926: 1895: 1881: 1867: 1843: 1825: 1803: 1783: 1768: 1655: 1640:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nelly Kaplan

1259: 1239: 1181: 1077: 509: 497: 466: 308: 3037:

Hello Dodger67. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

3987: 3716: 3318: 2754: 2630: 2595: 2566:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/2013 Irkutsk Antonov An-12 crash (2nd nomination)

2524: 2455: 1583: 918: 4486:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

982: 414:

Oh, and by the way, congratulations with the AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar award.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5613: 4515: 3879: 2819: 1587: 1523: 1509: 1481: 1106: 1073: 1057: 3878:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

3245:

for the advice. (Note to self - don't compile difficult questions when tired!)

5658: 5617: 5608: 5317: 5288: 5262: 5245: 5148: 4864: 4820: 4742: 4592: 4411: 4340: 4268: 4264: 4229: 4211: 4206: 4172: 4123: 4115: 4101: 4086: 4082: 4067: 4043: 3995: 3978: 3767: 3752: 3744: 3726: 3682: 3322: 3296: 3242: 3222: 3173: 3123: 3119: 3056: 3004: 2859: 2795: 2770: 2717: 2670: 2573: 2479: 2435: 2383: 2335: 2303: 2221: 2084: 2036: 1987: 1966: 1944: 1913: 1899: 1859: 1829: 1788: 1727: 1674: 1595: 1527: 1485: 1477: 1456: 1408: 1394: 1282: 1157: 1092: 926: 713: 598: 579: 564: 452: 324: 253: 196: 1407:

BTW, in your second reference the title of the magazine article is missing.

5697: 5500: 5462: 5203: 5104: 5066: 5028: 4990: 4986: 4945: 4907: 4860: 4838: 4816: 4801: 4781: 4631: 4577: 4576:

Hi. I have tagged this for deletion. Could you weigh in on the discussion?

4555: 4433: 4429: 4167:

hey, old (46) Dude, can you pls give me your 2c on the new structure here:

3927: 3812: 3649: 3609: 3456: 3062: 3048: 3041:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 2928: 2924: 2766: 2736: 2709: 2691: 2528: 2516: 2494: 2287: 1647: 1618: 501: 479: 472: 3671:! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual 4466:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

3697: 3387: 3355: 3335: 3291: 3273: 2911: 2449: 2049: 1787:

nominator, unless you think it's essential. Thanks for remembering this.

1666: 1651: 802:

Thank you for re-reviewing my article submission. Have a pleasant day.

493: 3740: 3712: 3329:, for example (although the latter are more cultural than religious). 2915: 2903: 4501:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

2551:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Environmental Injustice in East Boston

2058:(non-notable at present) and for an established, well cited professor: 1744:

Hi Roger! I addes 3 more sources from newspapers, hope this can help.

1297:

16:13:34, 8 August 2014 review of submission by GeoffreySmithGalleries

5374:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 3269: 2815: 2220:- Is it really pseudo-Latin? I thought it's actually "proper" Latin. 1828:, can we postpone to the 20th - I'll be away from home 17-19 August. 593:

article as is is muppet proof as so it can be launched as a stub. --

5590:

Hi Dodger 67 My wiki article is a translation of the german article

3941:

Deletion of Jaco van Rensburg. Invalid reasons for deletion stated.

2556:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Big Three (University of California)

2537:- I've !voted on a few AFDs since yesterday, how am I doing so far? 1550: 925:

yet? They contain some good advice for an editor in your situation.

4494:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 3470:

13:19:48, 15 September 2014 review of submission by Jitroisofficial

3330: 2591: 2520: 2474: 1254:

Are links to other Knowledge Articles considered to be references?

594: 575: 560: 5591: 3852: 3561:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the

1722:- the problem with the sources you have used is that they are not 5376:... that South Africa has a hotline to report illegal parking in 3257: 3047:

listing credibly indicates some significance to at least to pass

2907: 5093:

Talk:Prehistoric Bajada "hanging" canals of southeastern Arizona

5082:

Talk:Prehistoric Bajada "hanging" canals of southeastern Arizona

3044: 3751:

i did copy & paste where i can, but I am only a people :)

2942:

17:18:32, 02 September 2014 review of submission by CFamal2014

2410:

Just a heads up. On June 19th, you accepted the submission of

3265: 5680: