Knowledge

User talk:Grutness/archive25

Source 📝

572:. I have compiled all the flags in question as well as all but one of the countrydata templates. This template is not complete, as it currently doesnt work for places without flags, but I was going to add that functionality. I can guarantee that there is no issue with the flags being used or countrydata being used in the stub template, as the only territory in dispute actually uses the same flag that the government uses for the resistance movement :). I will support a rename of this template, as it might not be obviously named, but something to this effect is needed for stub sorting the numerous articles related to provincial PNG. Would you support the backend being renamed from Country_flagstub to mabye PNG-provstub2 and the frontend being renamed to PNG-provstub? 607:) with the {{stub}} tag, which, as you know, states "You can help Knowledge by expanding ". While I understand that it's a good thing if bots tag uncategorized pages, I am concerned about the wholesale creation of pages that say "You can help Knowledge by expanding it" - without any human ever having looked at it to see if it would really help Knowledge. I don't know why the bot can't just say it as it is: "This case was uncategorized and may be a stub.". I can imagine that it would be much easier for stub sorting if you didn't have to deal with an indiscriminate mixture of deliberately marked stubs and stubs that merely fit some slightly related criteria. I may be wrong; I leave it up to you if you feel something should be done about it. — 952:
one in general, and works very well with articles. It works far less well in other namespaces, however, and that is why the "Be bold" page has evolved over the years to reflect that fact. As someone who spends a lot of time clearing up damage caused by people being bold at TFD, SFD, and CFD, I can tell you clearly that being bold has little if any place in category or template space. It causes nothing but considerable amounts of cleanup work for others.that is the reason why the "Be bold" page has evolved over the years to specifically call attention to the fact that they need special care. Suddenly undoing the gradual changes which have taken this page from a rough guideline to something actually workable is a
66:
several articles on ancient Thracian persons (the latter having Antarctic geographical features named for them, which had been my original starting point) using the 'Ancient-Greece-bio-stub' template which did not seem correct as those people definitely were not Greeks, ancient Thrace being a distinct civilization even if neighbouring. (It's like an Irish biographical article using the 'England-bio-stub' template on account of having an insufficient number of Irish stubs ...) So how would you suggest to avoid such misleading labelling, just revert them or what?
1049:
independence when there's a National government than a Labour one - Dunedin and Christchurch are the two staunchest labour strongholds in NZ, and because they usually both end up with several cabinet ministers during Labour governments they have a little more say in the running of the country. Certainly here in Dunedin the city tends to go through a major revival whenever there's a Labour government.
1155:, now on the request list at WikiProject African diaspora? I have a scholarly source for this topic and would like to start an article (eventually), but first want to know the issues that led to its prior deletion. Was it a speedy? The deletion log has your name on it but no further info (e.g. no link to an AfD discussion). No hurry on this, but I'm most grateful for any help you can give. -- 685:
go straight to a category of Ancient Egypt stubs). In every case, though, the template tells the editor something of the problem with the article - whether it needs an image, whether the grammar needs tidying up, whether it's biased, whether it needs to be linked to other articles, etc etc etc. All these templates help the editor to know what skills are needed to tidy the article up.
1186: 1501:'s sanctuary). Only problem with this explanation is that the noun "vi" hasn't been in regular use for God knows how many centuries. But the mix-up is possible if an English-speaker had worked solely using a dictionary and his hearing, as few non-Danes would expect that "G" can be a silent letter. :) Not too sure about how notable the bay is either. 991:
user pages is also exercising common sense. I've no objection to people being bold in correcting and adding to articles - that is what this page has been about all along. I'm just trying to reduce the work on clean-up, which is largely caused by people who don't find consensus before editing items that clearly need a consen.
283:
wasn't a stub and in one case it was one of seven stub templates on the article. Perhaps if it can be given strict parameters that don't mess with other stubs, like the roma-stub, then it would be worthwhile, and I'm open to any proposal that does suggest such a scheme - but unfortunately, that isn't how it was being used.
684:
There are loads of cleanup templates of different sorts used on Knowledge. They are all for the benefit of later editors to know exactly what is wrong with an article and (in the case of stub templates) what topic the article is on (that way, an editor with expert knowledge in, say Ancient Egypt, can
154:
After the fuzz about Western Sahara, I took a peek at the similar templates and realized that the Somaliland one used a flag of a secessionist administration. I've removed the flag, and if the creator of the template objects, I'll take the matter up on WP:WSS. Just wanted to keep you posted. Regards.
54:
by Alexander Fol and Valeria Fol, ISBN: 978-9549717181 has fifty-odd persons mentioned, not just kings and other nobles but also priests, poets, singers, artists etc. that could possibly need such a bio stub. In any case, if this template were deleted I trust there would be no objection to inserting
1396:
I got your message about the speedy deletion of my stub ORSYP - which I didn't intend to submit, I was trying to edit it to make it into a final, well referenced article, and I accidentally submitted it. Of course, I don't have admin privileges so I had to wait for someone else to delete it. Thank
1098:
Thanks for the copy-edit. I looked over it and cannot see any major problems. I have only one query, in other articles we have used Test not test. It was bought up at another FAC, and I think we decided it wasn't too important as long as it was the same throughout the article. I'll convert to Euro's
244:
I think you jumped the gun there a bit by speedy deleting it. I'd managed to have a confab with Bohater on his talk page about it, and when I had last checked he was applying the stub in a reasonable fashion rather than on everything remotely related to Kurdishness. Assuming that it can be applied
951:
Hi - Though I can understand the reasons you downgraded the comments on templates and categories on be bold, I feel that it is still necessary to highlight the fact that be bold should rarely if ever apply to them, and have altered the article back accordingly. The principle of being bold is a good
699:
doesn't do any of those things. All it does is tell an editor why the article was created in the first place - something the editor doesn't need to know. And if an article was written as a placeholder, it will almost always be a stub, since it's very unlikely that a placeholder article will be long
668:
Okay... sorry I sounded grumpy about this - I had assumed you were an experienced editor due to your talk page archives (most people don't archive their pages until they have at least 30-40 messages, and certainly wouldn't have three archives until they'd been around quite a long while). The reason
405:
I'm a bit confused as to what's happened here: it looks like you intended to "speedy and salt", but AFAICS you neither deleted nor protected it. Since then there's been a minor db/hangon skirmish there, and a somewhat confused talk page conversation. Can you clarify what you did/intended to do?
311:
My reply to Caerwine above applies here, too. Iff a properly delineated stub could be created that doesn't cause problems re Iran, Iraq and Turkey's stubs, then I've no objection. The question is whether such a scheme can be implemented and maintained without being bent out of shape by editors with
1009:
Edits to talk pages are a red herring since that is covered in other policies and guidelines, so the issue is templates and other such pages. In that respect, I think you're still conflating boldness with recklessness. Yes, reckless actions are easier to make there, but your paragraph is moving in
990:
Discouraging people from being bold in making changes to templates and categories before finding some form of consensus for the changes is not discouraging editing, it is exercising common sense. Discouraging people from editing other people's comments on talk pages and from editing other people's
79:
That would be a satisfactory solution I believe. Just one suggestion: Could we please illustrate the new Ancient-Euro-bio-stub with the picture used in Ancient-Thrace-bio-stub? It's the golden mask of a Thracian king, and arguably the Thracians upheld the reputedly earliest cultural tradition in
974:
People who break things are typically not being bold, but being reckless. Sure, we should make it clear that editing certain types of pages can have more significant consequences, and thus it's important to take extra care not to be reckless, but discouraging people from editing is too excessive.
832:
I bow to your greater knowledge - but note the source book which called her SS repeatedly, (though not some named contemporaries) and was written in part by people with shipping - albeit modern shipping - it couldn't be "SS" due to the fact she had a steam engine on board? (doubt it myself as the
343:
for - respectively - the Kurds and Assyrians, it would make sense to write something very clear in the template's text and lock it down afterwards. E.g. "this article relating to the history and culture of the Kurdic people ..." or "this article relating to the Kurdic people ..." but I'm not sure
282:
He may have been applying it reasonably, but others weren't. Of the 25 or so articles marked with it, several were Iran or Iraq geo-stubs, Iranian politicians of Kurdish descent, and the like. Only about 10-12 of of the articles marked with it were actually directly Kurdish-specific, of which one
65:
I see your points. Apparently there is a rule on stubs requiring 60 stubs, there are possibly less than that Thrace-related stubs at present, hence no Thrace-stub template. My topics of contribution to Knowledge are not so much in the stub field, or Thracian history for that matter. I just saw
1406:
I guess it wasn't evident by the erroneous stub tag, but the submission to which you refer really was a mistake. I would ask you to please reduce the level of my warning - I think it's clear that I've not joined the wikipedia community in bad faith, it just took me a minute to figure out how to
1048:
they advocated some sort of partial return to the old provincial governments, like in the 19th century, making NZ into a federation a bit like Australia. As for support for independence, I don't think so. This is entirely a personal opinion, but I'd say you tend to find more calls for southern
1238:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually
1433:
Replied. As to biting the newbies, given that there were already a couple of warnings in place for essentially identical articles, the next level of warning was appropriate. However, your explanation makes it clear that the edits were in good faith, so I've rescinded that warning.
567:
Thankyou for your concise reply. I did not intend this template to be a solve all fix for every country with country data, but I must admit I did design the backend so it might one day be used for more than it was being currently used for. These stub types are designed for the
1492:
Hi G. I think a simple deletion would be most appropriate. Come to think of it, I do have one theory about how the mix-up could have happened: The Danish noun "vig" (bay or possibly better: cove) is pronounced identically to the old noun "vi" which indeed means a sanctuary
549:
Bleh, calmed down a bit now, but man! would have been nice to get a bit of a dialogue happening with you before you nominated this template for deletion, and when you did notify me, your boilerplate talk message didn't really help to shed light on what your real issue was.
928:- I'd like us to have a vote to write into the conventions of the Māori Knowledge a protocol for using the two official spoken languages of NZ in geographical infoboxes, similar to and complimentary with the convention recently agreed on the English language Knowledge at 475:
Leave it for someone else, I think. If I re-speedied it might look like I had a bit of a vendetta against it. Also conversation on the topic moved on considerably after the first speedying. It's all a bit of a mess, really, which I didn't exactly help to clean up much :/
1474:
but I've not heard it referred to as named after Lauge Koch. The most recent Danish atlas I have simply names the entire region "Nationalparken i Nord- og Østgrønland" (the national park in North and East Greenland). Could you've been thinking about
858:
Hi Grutness, say, you created all those maps gracing the various NZ articles, didn't you? Like the backgrounds of North Island, South Island etc... do you keep them somewhere where others editors can use them? I'd need a blank South Island map for
1036:
I'm originally from Nelson, but living in Oz at the moment. Tell me more about the NZ South Island Party. What were their policies? Do you think that public support for South Island Independence has increased over the last few years?
919: 514:, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at 741:, and means it won't be sorted into a topic-specific stub type to help editors search for specific articles (there are several hundred thousand stubs on Knowledge, so it's really important that they get sorted by topic!). 1079:
comments at the France national rugby union team's FAC even though it's been an FAC for over a week. So i'm asking for some comments from some people that have commented on Rugby union FAC's before. Please comment
436:
I am also very confused... or at least, I was until I checked the edit history. Seems that when I deleted and salted what I actually ended up doing was unprotecting a page that had already been protected. So the
936:
and it would be nice to reciprocate and to confirm and regularise a practice we have already been following, if a little inconsistently. Feel free to ask me on my talk page if you have any questions - Cheers
192:
There are many articles about schools in Malaysia which are stubs. Not much proper information are provided in these articles. So I figure a new stub category would be really helpful to improve these articles.
136:
was created earlier (it has reached 60 and i took the liberty of creating it) but it hasn't been populated yet. Please take a look and see if I did something wrong or if it is just the server being strange.--
1401:
I finally did write a sourced article according to wikipedia guidelines with the aide of your constructive and cheerful fellow editors, who guided me to the creation of a proper article. For that I thank
746:
So basically that's the reason I nominated it for deletion. It is a template that would only be used on stubs, and doesn't help editors if it's used either as a complement or as a replacement for a stub
1199:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
132:
Ok, that is a good reason to get frustrated. I apologize. I think I moved it when I was categorizing politician templates. Anyway, I have another issue that you might be able to help out with.
1081: 203: 1220: 1452:
Thanks so much for your very informative reply on my page, and I know that you are just doing your best to protect Knowledge! You can be sure I'll put the info you gave me to good use!
211: 941: 1279:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
1335:
attached, which it should. I am James Dignan, the creator of that image and the designer of that flag. Please be more careful in reading image files before tagging them!
1242:
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
497: 465:
Many a slip 'tween brain and click. So, are you going to do-over/re-speedy (in spirit, if not actual velocity), or do you want to leave it for someone else to close?
724:
stub as a second template on an article, it's not telling an editor anything at all - it just adds a bit more "clutter" to the bottom of the article. And if it's used
655:
tag was not meant to be a stub type. Sorry for any confusion, I have no intention to vandalise wikipedia in any way. If you have any questions message me. Thanks,
1315: 559:
Okay - yes, it is a boilerplate template, that is true, and that is the reason why little specific information was included. Firstly, the two templates (this and {
55:
in the relevant present articles a footnote to the same effect with no template used? I have no problems with having the template renamed 'Ancient-Thrace-stub'.
874: 777: 704: 693: 673: 649: 140: 301:
Hi Grutness. Would you mind taking a look at the related thred on my talk page? It is just a thought, but it would make a bit more sense permcat-wise.
1239:
sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
1067: 183: 847: 641:
The article in which i placed a random stub tag was a mistake. I couldn't find where I put it. (Thanks for reverting it) Taking the stub tag off of
1126: 1113: 1100: 1085: 1013:
And how does one define "items that clearly need a consen"? Surely that can apply as much to articles too. What's so sacrosanct about templates? --
929: 764: 1505: 1387: 231: 1092: 218: 196: 843:
Cheers - having noted the 'SS' tag was widespread in several sources and not me making it up out of nowhere, I'll leave it to the experts :-).
789: 348: 324: 177: 1457: 1427: 1288: 1133: 1120: 1107: 913: 611: 590: 1446: 1379: 1360: 1347: 1210:
No it is not:) My first name is James, my second name is Paul, and I added Sir to the front to make it sound a little more formal:) Cheers!--
1022: 984: 630: 816: 798: 295: 511: 589:
I recently blanked a nonsense page in the (obsolete) assumption that that would lead to its eventual deletion. To my surprise, it now got
576: 544: 584: 165:
OK thanks for that - Somaliland-stub probably needs dealing with one way or the other, but removing the flag is definitely a good start.
1173: 469: 333:
I don't have any problem with such templates provided that we can avoid a wildfire of editwarring over them. Iff we make something like
1486: 933: 88: 70: 126: 1372: 133: 115: 1292: 1462: 1159: 837: 534: 59: 1480: 159: 932:, where it was agreed to include the Māori language name of towns in infoboxes. This has now been provisionally included in 245:
in a responsible fashion, I see no reason why Kurdish-stub should be speedy deleted when we have other ethnic stubs such as
1125:
Hi, it's been quite a while. Is there anything else that needs to be changed to get your support? Please do let me know. -
227:
Using the adjectival forms would be my first choice as well. In any case, we need to do something about the Japanese mess.
45: 1143: 305: 1308: 207: 1269: 662: 488: 459: 276: 1214: 1003: 968: 867: 1471: 507: 493: 416:
I am also confused. I thought it was deleted as Grutness said it was. I did not check page history when applying the
1068: 901:
Thanks. BTW, nice idea of calling your cats (well, those cats that own you) Nut and Bolt. I am aiming to call mine
410: 1099:(it there a standard way to do this, the ref I red quoted the values in pounds, hence why i used that). Thanks. - 1230: 1222: 617: 96: 616:(I may not be watching this page anymore. If you would like to continue the conversation, please do so here and 1418: 1273: 827: 1263: 604: 569: 185: 146: 108: 1280: 1234:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 860: 373: 659: 540:
Do you have a specific issue with this stub type, or do you just enjoy deleting other people's work?
363: 259: 239: 946: 804:
Yes, my apologies. Somehow I confused two different editors names - I've no idea how that happened.
882: 878: 1356:
Ok, sorry about that. So would you mind me uploading it to Commons, or will you do it yourself? --
853: 773:
It's ok, I like a clean talk page and I'm sorry the archives confused you. I have no problem with
506:
Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at
1470:
Would you mind taking a look at this article again? It looks to me like you're referring to the
344:
such a system can be implemented. And names like "Assyria-" and "Kurdistan-" should be avoided.
1028: 1112:
Hey, I think I have addressed all of your concerns. Please comment at the FAC page. Thanks. -
925: 137: 123: 80:
Europe; as you possibly know the world's oldest gold (dated 46th century BC) was found near
656: 441: 1010:
the direction of suggesting that it's not possible to make bold improvements to templates.
8: 1211: 1192: 1018: 980: 522:
regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first!
1179: 1440: 1341: 1329: 1296: 1257: 1246: 1196: 1055: 997: 962: 891: 822: 810: 758: 636: 608: 528: 482: 453: 396: 337: 318: 289: 271: 249: 171: 33: 17: 1311:. Thank you. (P.S. I really want to know, as I intend to upload it to Commons. D.S.) 844: 834: 598: 428: 381: 40: 390:
Any particular reason why you are telling me this rather than simply nominating it?
1502: 1483: 345: 302: 228: 215: 156: 81: 1285:
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
119: 1302: 794:
Will you kindly withdraw your unwarranted accusation that I have voted twice? --
1454: 1424: 1376: 1357: 1312: 1202: 1166: 1014: 976: 910: 864: 738: 515: 202:
Hi G. It looks like this material differs between proper nouns and adjectives (
193: 1435: 1336: 1084:. A support or oppose (with reasons) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. - 1050: 992: 957: 886: 805: 795: 753: 752:
I hope that expains things a bit more clearly. Sorry for any offence caused.
731: 714: 642: 523: 519: 477: 448: 391: 313: 284: 267: 166: 114:
should be included in Southern Africa grouping? It is not listed anywhere on
920:
Inclusion of English language placenames in infoboxes on the Knowledge Māori
938: 594: 1170: 1156: 956:, and one which is likely to cause far more harm than good to Knowledge. 573: 551: 541: 420: 1152: 1145: 85: 67: 56: 1235: 953: 627: 466: 407: 1412:
At any rate, I'd appreciate a response for the sake of dialogue.
1494: 783:'s deletion. If you have any questions feel free to message me. 833:
steam engine was used to drive the compressor, not the ship).
1044:
To be honest, I don't know that much about their policies. I
1498: 1253: 909:! Bold is obviously going to be the more timid of the two. 1165:
Thanks! There is a good history of the topic in a book by
1185: 1169:
that I'll consult. I appreciate the quick response. --
32:- please do not add new discussion here - add it to my 1276:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
1479:(= Lauge Koch Bay) which is located within the park 1371:Image has been successfully uploaded to Commons at 1307:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1151:Can you fill me in on the deletion of the article 1256:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at 1205:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 930:Knowledge:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board 512:Knowledge:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals 518:. Please feel free to make any comments at 510:. The stub type, which was not proposed at 934:Knowledge:Naming conventions (New Zealand) 406:Does this still need "ordinary" closure? 645:was bad Judgement on my part, sorry. The 118:and is only "reckoned" to be included in 1373:commons:Image:NZflag proposal-dignan.gif 1252:tag can be used to release it under the 134:Category:Sierra Leonean politician stubs 116:Category:Southern Africa geography stubs 1270:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair use 14: 1291:. If the image is copyrighted under a 1075:As of time of posting there have been 885:for anyone who needs them. Have fun! 679:... hm - long explanation coming up: 50:The first book at hand I consulted, 1268:or one of the other tags listed at 208:Category:South African school stubs 204:Category:United States school stubs 23: 1388:Warning Level - article ORSYP S.A. 1195:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 1184: 24: 1517: 1472:Northeast Greenland National Park 790:Knowledge:Stub types for deletion 508:Knowledge:Stub types for deletion 212:Category:Japanese education stubs 1231:Image:NZflag proposal-dignan.gif 1223:Image:NZflag proposal-dignan.gif 1069:France national rugby union team 214:. Would you mind taking a look? 1419:Please don't bite the newcomers 1305:after 02:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 710:simply becomes another form of 700:and detailed. because of that, 626:Thanks for the note, replied. 1309:Media copyright questions page 1274:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 585:Excessive stub creation by bot 13: 1: 570:Provinces of Papua New Guinea 186:Template:Malaysia-school-stub 1289:criteria for speedy deletion 1201:Smile at others by adding {{ 737:it removes the article from 7: 10: 1522: 1301:the image will be deleted 861:Transport in Milford Sound 1506:15:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 1487:19:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1463:Lauge Koch Nature Reserve 1458:11:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1447:10:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1428:07:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1380:09:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1361:09:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 1348:10:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1316:02:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1215:09:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1174:02:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 1160:02:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 1121:04:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1108:04:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC) 1093:00:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 883:Image:NZ-SI plain map.png 879:Image:NZ-NI plain map.png 817:10:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 799:06:13, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 765:00:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 663:13:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 631:15:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 612:07:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 577:04:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 545:02:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 535:02:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 489:02:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 470:02:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 460:00:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 432:15:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC) 411:14:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC) 385:15:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 349:15:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 325:05:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 306:15:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 296:05:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 277:03:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 232:11:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 219:11:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 197:10:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 1134:06:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC) 1023:05:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 1004:04:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 985:02:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 969:00:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 942:08:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 914:01:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 868:00:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 848:01:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 838:00:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 720:. As such, if it's used 178:06:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 160:19:19, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 141:02:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 127:01:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 89:11:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 71:10:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 60:08:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 1221:Unspecified source for 46:Ancient-Thrace-bio-stub 1189: 1040:Cheers New Munsterian 875:Image:NZ plain map.png 669:for the problems with 447:didn't stay in place. 426:template initially. -- 1407:write a good article. 1375:. Have a nice day! -- 1228:Thanks for uploading 1188: 1029:NZ South Island Party 369:should be renamed to 210:) and we even have a 1264:non-free fair use in 1260:, use a tag such as 926:mi:Knowledge:Kōrero 924:Hello - please see 101:Hi there Grutness, 1392:Hi there Grutness, 1297:Knowledge:Fair use 1287:, as described on 1258:Knowledge:Fair use 1190: 657:Thedjatclubrock :) 109:Mauritius-geo-stub 97:Mauritius-geo-stub 18:User talk:Grutness 1443: 1344: 1058: 1000: 965: 894: 813: 761: 622: 531: 485: 456: 431: 399: 384: 374:Judaism-hist-stub 321: 292: 274: 174: 1513: 1441: 1342: 1334: 1328: 1293:non-free license 1267: 1251: 1245: 1212:†Sir James Paul† 1193:†Sir James Paul† 1131: 1118: 1105: 1090: 1056: 998: 963: 892: 828:Dunedin (+/- SS) 811: 782: 776: 759: 736: 730: 719: 713: 709: 703: 698: 692: 678: 672: 654: 648: 614: 561: 560: 529: 502: 498:Country flagstub 496: 483: 454: 446: 440: 427: 425: 419: 397: 380: 378: 372: 368: 364:Jewish-hist-stub 362: 342: 336: 319: 290: 272: 270: 264: 260:Jewish-hist-stub 258: 254: 248: 172: 138:Thomas.macmillan 124:Thomas.macmillan 113: 107: 28:This file is an 1521: 1520: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1465: 1390: 1332: 1326: 1266:|article name}} 1261: 1249: 1243: 1226: 1207: 1182: 1149: 1127: 1114: 1101: 1086: 1073: 1031: 949: 922: 856: 830: 825: 792: 780: 774: 734: 728: 717: 711: 707: 701: 696: 690: 676: 670: 652: 646: 639: 587: 504: 500: 494: 444: 438: 423: 417: 376: 370: 366: 360: 340: 334: 266: 262: 256: 252: 246: 242: 190: 149: 147:Somaliland-stub 120:Southern Africa 111: 105: 99: 48: 43: 37: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1519: 1509: 1508: 1477:Lauge Koch Vig 1464: 1461: 1453: 1450: 1449: 1423: 1416: 1413: 1408: 1403: 1398: 1393: 1389: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1351: 1350: 1225: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1200: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1171:Rob C (Alarob) 1167:Sylviane Diouf 1157:Rob C (Alarob) 1148: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1072: 1066: 1064: 1062: 1061: 1030: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1011: 988: 987: 948: 945: 921: 918: 917: 916: 898: 897: 873:I've uploaded 855: 852: 851: 850: 829: 826: 824: 821: 820: 819: 791: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 768: 767: 749: 748: 743: 742: 739:Category:Stubs 687: 686: 681: 680: 638: 635: 634: 633: 586: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 557: 556: 555: 554: 516:Knowledge:Stub 503: 492: 473: 472: 434: 433: 403: 402: 388: 387: 386: 354: 353: 352: 351: 328: 327: 312:other agenda. 299: 298: 241: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 222: 221: 189: 182: 181: 180: 148: 145: 144: 143: 98: 95: 94: 93: 92: 91: 74: 73: 47: 44: 42: 39: 26: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1518: 1507: 1504: 1500: 1497:= Odins Vi = 1496: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1485: 1481: 1478: 1473: 1468: 1460: 1459: 1456: 1448: 1445: 1444: 1437: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1426: 1421: 1420: 1414: 1410: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1381: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1362: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1338: 1331: 1324: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1304: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1275: 1271: 1265: 1259: 1255: 1248: 1240: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1224: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1206: 1204: 1198: 1194: 1187: 1175: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1147: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1091: 1089: 1083: 1078: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1059: 1052: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1038: 1034: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1002: 1001: 994: 986: 982: 978: 973: 972: 971: 970: 967: 966: 959: 955: 944: 943: 940: 935: 931: 927: 915: 912: 908: 904: 900: 899: 896: 895: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 871: 870: 869: 866: 862: 849: 846: 842: 841: 840: 839: 836: 818: 815: 814: 807: 803: 802: 801: 800: 797: 779: 772: 771: 770: 769: 766: 763: 762: 755: 751: 750: 745: 744: 740: 733: 727: 723: 716: 706: 695: 689: 688: 683: 682: 675: 667: 666: 665: 664: 661: 658: 651: 644: 643:middle finger 632: 629: 625: 624: 623: 621: 619: 613: 610: 606: 603: 600: 596: 592: 578: 575: 571: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 553: 548: 547: 546: 543: 539: 538: 537: 536: 533: 532: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 499: 491: 490: 487: 486: 479: 471: 468: 464: 463: 462: 461: 458: 457: 450: 443: 430: 422: 415: 414: 413: 412: 409: 401: 400: 393: 389: 383: 375: 365: 358: 357: 356: 355: 350: 347: 339: 332: 331: 330: 329: 326: 323: 322: 315: 310: 309: 308: 307: 304: 297: 294: 293: 286: 281: 280: 279: 278: 275: 273:Caer’s whines 269: 261: 251: 233: 230: 226: 225: 224: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 200: 199: 198: 195: 187: 179: 176: 175: 168: 164: 163: 162: 161: 158: 152: 142: 139: 135: 131: 130: 129: 128: 125: 121: 117: 110: 102: 90: 87: 83: 78: 77: 76: 75: 72: 69: 64: 63: 62: 61: 58: 53: 38: 36: 35: 31: 19: 1476: 1469: 1467:Hi Grutness 1466: 1451: 1439: 1417: 1415: 1411: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1391: 1340: 1322: 1300: 1284: 1278: 1241: 1229: 1227: 1191: 1150: 1144:Deletion of 1128: 1115: 1102: 1087: 1076: 1074: 1063: 1054: 1045: 1039: 1035: 1032: 996: 989: 961: 950: 923: 906: 902: 890: 857: 845:Winstonwolfe 835:Winstonwolfe 831: 809: 793: 757: 725: 721: 640: 615: 601: 588: 558: 527: 505: 481: 474: 452: 435: 404: 395: 317: 300: 288: 243: 240:Kurdish-stub 191: 170: 153: 151:Hi Grutness 150: 103: 100: 51: 49: 29: 27: 25: 1503:Valentinian 1484:Valentinian 1203:subst:Smile 947:Re: Be bold 778:placeholder 726:in place of 705:placeholder 694:Placeholder 674:placeholder 650:placeholder 618:let me know 442:deletedpage 346:Valentinian 303:Valentinian 229:Valentinian 216:Valentinian 157:Valentinian 1321:The image 1153:Ring shout 1146:Ring shout 1033:Grutness, 863:. Cheers, 854:Blank maps 823:Otherstuff 1455:Carimarie 1425:Carimarie 1377:Himasaram 1358:Himasaram 1330:GFDL-self 1313:Himasaram 1281:this link 1247:GFDL-self 1236:copyright 954:Bad Thing 911:MadMaxDog 865:MadMaxDog 747:template. 722:alongside 609:Sebastian 338:Roma-stub 250:Roma-stub 194:Horacenew 104:How come 52:Thracians 41:Stubstuff 34:Talk page 1482:? Best. 1436:Grutness 1337:Grutness 1303:48 hours 1197:WikiLove 1051:Grutness 993:Grutness 958:Grutness 887:Grutness 806:Grutness 796:Redaktor 754:Grutness 605:contribs 524:Grutness 478:Grutness 449:Grutness 392:Grutness 359:I think 314:Grutness 285:Grutness 268:Caerwine 167:Grutness 1299:) then 939:Kahuroa 903:Italics 595:Alaibot 30:archive 1495:Odense 1272:. See 1129:Shudda 1116:Shudda 1103:Shudda 1088:Shudda 1015:bainer 977:bainer 881:, and 660:(talk) 591:tagged 574:Aliasd 552:Aliasd 542:Aliasd 520:WP:SFD 1402:them. 1325:have 1295:(per 1180:Smile 1046:think 637:Stubs 184:Re:{{ 86:Apcbg 82:Varna 68:Apcbg 57:Apcbg 16:< 1499:Odin 1442:wha? 1397:you. 1343:wha? 1323:does 1254:GFDL 1082:here 1057:wha? 1019:talk 999:wha? 981:talk 964:wha? 907:Bold 905:and 893:wha? 812:wha? 760:wha? 732:stub 715:stub 628:Alai 599:talk 530:wha? 484:wha? 467:Alai 455:wha? 408:Alai 398:wha? 320:wha? 291:wha? 255:and 206:vs. 173:wha? 1438:... 1339:... 1071:FAC 1053:... 995:... 960:... 889:... 808:... 756:... 593:by 526:... 480:... 451:... 429:Cat 394:... 382:Cat 316:... 287:... 169:... 122:.-- 1409:~ 1333:}} 1327:{{ 1283:. 1262:{{ 1250:}} 1244:{{ 1077:no 1021:) 983:) 975:-- 877:, 781:}} 775:{{ 735:}} 729:{{ 718:}} 712:{{ 708:}} 702:{{ 697:}} 691:{{ 677:}} 671:{{ 653:}} 647:{{ 620:.) 501:}} 495:{{ 445:}} 439:{{ 424:}} 421:db 418:{{ 379:-- 377:}} 371:{{ 367:}} 361:{{ 341:}} 335:{{ 265:. 263:}} 257:{{ 253:}} 247:{{ 188:}} 112:}} 106:{{ 84:. 1493:( 1422:. 1017:( 979:( 602:· 597:(

Index

User talk:Grutness
Talk page
Apcbg
08:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Apcbg
10:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Varna
Apcbg
11:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Mauritius-geo-stub
Category:Southern Africa geography stubs
Southern Africa
Thomas.macmillan
01:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Category:Sierra Leonean politician stubs
Thomas.macmillan
02:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Valentinian
19:19, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Grutness
wha?
06:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Template:Malaysia-school-stub
Horacenew
10:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Category:United States school stubs
Category:South African school stubs
Category:Japanese education stubs
Valentinian
11:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.