User talk:Slatersteven/Archive 1

1519:

for you. It is as easy, as you've demonstrated above, to go source hunting, which is far more productive, than it is to add a silly tag. An edit is an edit. So let me get this right, you see some unsourced info on a WP article. Does the curiosity not get the better of you by you clicking off to somewhere else to see if what you've read is correct? The fact it's a "rule" that they can be used to tag and nothing else, is not a reason to do it. No one will complain if you go and add a source, but to add a tag and do nothing else will still force others to go away and find the source themselves. By that time, they've lost interest and may not return, hence why these bloody eyesores end up remaining for several years. Is it not best to add a source from the off? Or, if the text remains, find the source and add to the article yourself? Please don't forget why you signed up to this website all those years ago, to collaborate with others to build a great encyclopaedia. Adding tags and doing nothing else is neither of those things.

3118:

cause they define what that term means in USA, so should not that section focus on world understanding ? Quote from article - In The Concealment of the State, Professor Jason Royce Lindsey argues that even without a conspiratorial agenda, the term deep state is useful for understanding aspects of the national security establishment in developed countries, with emphasis on the United States. Lindsey writes that the deep state draws power from the national security and intelligence communities, a realm where secrecy is a source of power. Alfred W. McCoy states that the increase in the power of the U.S. intelligence community since the September 11 attacks "has built a fourth branch of the U.S. government" that is "in many ways autonomous from the executive, and increasingly so."

1592:

The fact it's a "rule" that they can be used to tag and nothing else, is not a reason to do it. WP is full of unintelligible rules that make no sense whatsoever. They can be broken if it is justifiable to do so. No one will complain if you go and add a source, but to add a tag and do nothing else will still force others to go away and find the source themselves. By that time, they've lost interest and may not return, hence why these bloody eyesores end up remaining for several years. Is it not best to add a source from the off? Or, if the text remains, find the source and add it to the article yourself? This can be done, by you, and is a whole lot better for the project, as an encyclopaedia.

1439:

avoid the tag, as that suggests you're too lazy to go looking for references yourself, and simply go reference hunting? I personally will not go looking for references on behalf of someone else. It is not for us to spend valuable time looking for references on behalf of someone who thinks it's ok to simply come along and add what the hell they like, without a source. The idea is to add information with a source, at the time of adding it. It should've been deleted on sight when it was first added, but it wasn't. The fact it's been deleted several months down the line is irrelevant. Finally, you may want to take a read of

3526:

is because of that issue, in part a result of the caste area being so complex anyway, that it is important to note that such figures are positively dangerous to use in the caste context. People were generalising about scenarios in that thread prior to my arrival and have done since my simple, brief comment - it was appropriate for reasons that I doubt you will be willing to accept, and it could have stood alone without writing the hundreds of subsequent words that have been made necessary by your pointless officiousness.

1227: 31: 2206: 2173: 94: 662: 1330: 1200: 447: 1637:. Generally, a source is needed at the end of every piece of information. If it's not in the source given, it is unverifiable and should be removed, particularly if there are BLP issues. That's the rule of thumb. A cite is to be included if a reliable one exists, not a fan site, blog, or other third hand website (like the Rayleigh museum). A cite should always close a paragraph. Lead sections should also not carry citations, see 2458: 1077: 3530:

same length of time and, since he has done that, I will point out that I have a massively greater number of edits and, which is still more significant, a massively greater proportion of edits to article space. That experience doesn't make me always right, of course, but it does make me a bit pissed off when someone with little clue regarding a issue (and too much time spent chattering) pokes me without real cause. -

772:

only involved in (what two or three) disputes mutually? In fact I dount we have had more then half a dozen mutual disputes this year, in fact I can say that I dounbt that we have many poages we edit together (or come to that me and MjolnirPants) As for the Dyslexic stuff, yes I posted it after it became clear people were not taking it in to account when commenting on my edit spelling (rather then ion actual content).

850:

issue you'd harassed him over in the past, and at the time you first posted his username (or the variant "MPants") appeared 11 times on the page; you could not reasonably pretend to be unaware the discussion was about him, nor explain how you happened across it having never edited that page before (you clearly did not see the publicizing in a vacuum, given your response to my ANI thread about the canvassing).

3152:

courts, the Democrats and the media. In short, it's a cabal of unelected leftist officials lodged deep in the government who are conspiring to thwart the administration's policies, discredit its supporters and ultimately even overturn Trump's election. He is given as source on Deep State in United Stateshttps://www.npr.org/2018/08/09/633019635/opinion-why-the-term-deep-state-speaks-to-conspiracy-theorists.

3451:? Yes, I know how RSN works and, yes, I know how it is used. The two are not the same, the discussion is already dealing with generalities and the situation with caste-related organisations is so severe that it formed one of the reasons for the special sanctions regime in that topic area. Someone will see that discussion and try to use it for their benefit. 776:

repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention from me (but as I said that is because of a series if linked incidents, not unrelated pages, and annoying only in the sense I have disagreed with him). As to my interactions with you, again these are linked incidents and cannot be used as evidence I am harassing him.

872:

actions of one of the eds, but as MPants was not the only uses who posted (and no I had not seen his names mentioned, I did not read all the posts, just the proposal) it might not have been him. And NO I do not agree the discussion was about him, he is not the only user (as ewas clear from the RFC) who says fuck off.

3707:, seemingly trying to teach a long-term contributor to suck eggs, is bloody irritating. It is to be expected with relatively new contributors, who are learning the ropes etc, but you have been here for years and, since you do in fact spend so much time at the various centralised boards, really should know better. - 3658:

We're working on your suggestions. Sorry on behalf of whoever did that. It is a reasonable question to ask. If you want to post questions, use the heading "Prose review" and maybe indicate that I invited you for this specific purpose. You asked a very good question, by the way, because "it hasn't

3525:

What you want is your business; what you get is not necessarily the same thing. If you ever actually do support the idea of quoting/attributing a membership claim by a caste-affiliated association, you're going to be shot down in flames because you clearly haven't got a clue about the subject. And it

3071:

You have provide no sources that say there are actual deep states that are proven, what you have a sources that say that if you take deep state to mean something other then a "a government-wide conspiracy" then there may indeed be such things. The Conmsproicy article is talking about "government wide

2993:

Rolling Stone - "Is there actually a deep state? If you mean entrenched bureaucracy, then of course there is" - Also definition you give at best only refers to current meaning of term in USA in limited circles of conservatives (not consensus among all conservatives, let alone USA), not in the world

2835:

Point is we cant use loose definition(for which there is no consensus as shown in sources, sources notably point to definition I am using)of single country for entire term. Term Deep State cant and wont only refer to USA situation, especially since it does not even originate from that country. If you

1423:

You have not bothered too look for sources as it has taken me upwards to 1 minute to find them. The only reason it is talking so long to undo your deletions is the amount you have deleted. This is why I am asking you to tag, your mass deletion just makes the task of looking for sources harder because

144:

I said another ed had accused of of it. As to the rest, ~ True Jews can be immigrants, but most of those killed by the Nazis were not they were Germans (or the citizens of other nations stolen form their homes, which is still not immigration, and not to Germany anyway). I have told you how to fix the

3469:

The point is you do not get to make a general point about what is or is not an RS in a largely unrelated thread. That RSN post is not and does not say "we cannot use caste based sources" and my response to your point would have been the same as my response to what was being discussed we can use them

3285:

Also Steven your leftwing bias is disgusting and should be ashamed of your self, but you wont cause 80 percent of editors here have it, which is just sad for this site. Its obvious you want to keep section and not correct it case you hate Trump. I will leave you old fart too it, you can keep pushing

3151:

It is still wrong tho, even in conspiratorial sense Geoff Nunberg described it lot better what it means in conservative circles (I still hold definition you give wrong). It's an elastic label — depending on the occasion, it can encompass the Justice Department, the intelligence communities, the FISA

3117:

I still have massive problems with entire section. Its not occasionally, it is generally used in that way. On topic of you using US definitions from magazines, I looked up Deep State in United States article which is lot better than deep state section in conspiracy theories and kinda seems redundant

3027:

Article needs to make it clear that it only applies to limited conservative circles without consensus among USA conservatives, let alone entire USA. It also needs clearly to differentiate it from actual deep states that are proven, like military coup in Turkey 2016 cause sources given do. Meaning in

2978:

I asked you to provide a source that directly said it, you did not. None of the sources you provided say that the definition of deep state we say is in use is wrong. What they do (at best) is provide an alternative definition (anbd some do not even do that, they actually talk about Donnies belief in

2387:

Then report it. Any user can leave warnings if they think a users is about to breach policy (in fact you were told in the edit war report against me that is what you should have done before reporting, inform an ed they might be about to breach revert restrictions). It was a courtesy to tell you that

2123:

Actually, on second thought and after reviewing Loxton and Prothero, here's a quote: "the quest for Mokele Mbembe ... is part of the effort by creationists to overthrow the theory of evolution and teaching of science by any means possible". The entity stems from regional folklore, but is, as we know

1878:

When I was dealing with that section there were no other sources supporting the material I removed. Dsprc inserted a second instance of the same source as if it were a second source but that hardly counts. Two URLs - the same content. Which is why I was challenging inclusion; you'll note I have made

1863:

Except there are other sources in that section as well. Nor have you shown the information is false or misleading, just that you do not like the source. It is a fact that most totalitarian (not just communist) countries tend to be allegedly "atheist" (they are in fact only anti theist) and actively

1518:

We have them for articles that are being worked on by persons intending on adding the sources during their construction in order to allow them a reminder that a source is needed. They are not for people like you to add to dubious claims in the hope that someone, someday, will pop along and answer it

927:

What I said, that I cannot recall what brought me to that RFC (it was after all an RFC, and may well have been mentioned in many places), but it was mentioned at ANI whilst I was keeping an eye on ANI (thus is one notice board I may have seen it on), so maybe it was the mention at ANI that attracted

871:

I cannot recall how I cam across it, maybe the same way I come across many pages I have never edited before, I stumbled across it. Or maybe (as an RFC) it showed up somewhere that I was watching (this is the one I suspect as this was raised whilst I still had an eye on ANI). Maybe I was watching the

145:

POV issues, find sources that make explicit links and then repeat what they say. "according to professor X the current attitude towards immigrants represented a continuation of the attitudes expressed by the Nazi regime" or some such (sourced to professor X of course). That is how you make the point.

124:

you talking about? And where is your evidence of forum shopping? You wrote "search in goggle for "links between the immigration crisis and Germans racist past"... How on earth do you think I found the references in the first place? (apart from the fact that I used Google, not "goggle") The fact that

3488:

Steven, you could be insulting him. You're 'splaining to an editor who has at least as much as experience as you do. He arrived on the project exactly 19 days before you. Consider the possibility that Sitush is right, and maybe you haven't understood his explanation. Ask questions before concluding

2281:

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't

975:

were tiny (both containing 300-500 troops) and both were failures, to manipulate this fact and say "Poles served in Schutzmannschaft: 202 or 107" as to suggest this was some wide phenomena is VERY INACCURATE. Instead of blindly reverting, please look at the facts, and recall the original discussion

829:

25 times, I was being communicated (most of those were replies to other users, not even just you and MjolnirPants) with. Moreover not one of my replies was a response or reply to MjolnirPants, not one. I do not in fact even refer to him except in my last post, as a response to you raising his name.

3529:

As I said above, I do know how RSN is supposed to work and I also know how it works in practice. You're being far too binary in your thought processes, as I have noticed in the past when you have ventured your opinion on caste issues. Jehochman mentions the fact that we've both been around for the

3102:

I was referencing the rolling stone source, As I said it does not contradict anything we say (and I note the first line of the paragraph "Occasionally used as a neutral term to denote a nation's bureaucracy", so yes we do point out is is sometimes used in the way you describe). We make it clear we

1591:

OK, So let me get this right, you see some unsourced info on a WP article, with or without a tag. Does the curiosity not get the better of you by you clicking off to somewhere else to see if what you've read is correct? Why would we allow people to do this? We want to keep people, not lose them.

849:

about MPants going after you for your dyslexia), but that doesn't really matter. And the number 25 is not significant to my above point, as the point was that you clearly do not have WT:CIVIL on your watchlist, but instead showed up there because the discussion involved MPants, and specifically an

844:

You want to harass MPants, to the point of changing policy specifically to get him, and my opening that thread on DT's canvassing got between you and that goal; you may have also known that I have a historical good working relationship with MPants (maybe you even remembered the fact that I was the

3722:

Forgive me, but I had posted in that thread before you, you replied to me. With an answer that seemed to be saying "Ahhh but". I just pointed out "no there is not an "ahh but", I said why we could use it, and your response did not contradict any of that (in fact it agreed) whilst at the same time

3619:

We need a layperson to read the article and make a list of suggested copy edits, as well as proofreading and gnomish fixes. It's a technical subject so not everything will make sense entirely, but we should try to make it reasonably accessible. Any feedback would be quite useful. If you want to

1807:

as a starting point for specific skepticism of the US's neutrality as an information source then... My point is simply that, for these claims, I want to see an independent source. I'm not being a Hoxaist apologist here. But I am tired of Knowledge sourcing information about Communist nations only

1769:

recent historical examples of the US government apparatus spreading disinformation about rival states (Iraq, Venezuela, Cuba, etc.) that questioning their accuracy should be seen as healthy skepticism, not revisionism. If other sources exist from independent entities, I'm happy to entertain them.

1438:

Firstly, the unsourced information has been on there for months, if not years, so that's why it was removed. As for your term "mass deletion", how about the mass addition of unsourced info? Secondly, if, like you say, the references have taken "upwards to 1 minute to find", why use a tag? Why not

771:

I am not Hounding of MjolnirPants, I have not (as far as I know) posted on his talk page, not about an ANI about him in months (and the ANI you linked too last was not about him, or even launched by him. It seems to be more about me disagreeing with you). Nor have I come after you, in fact we are

3741:

before long. Have you ever been asked formally to back away from the drama boards and centralised discussions, aside from the informal hint Jehochman gave you above? You're disingenuous, tendentious, irritating and wasting a lot of people's time at RSN at the moment. Meanwhile, I've got a lot of

3562:

don't get to decide what constitutes de-railing, and certainly not on the basis of a single comment. I think taking up Jehochman's idea below might be A Good Thing; then perhaps keep doing similar stuff until your article edits hit, say, 65%. You'd learn a lot from doing so. And article space is

253:

It has been stated on the AR Talk page that none of this is relevant to the article. "Where does he say "ar-125" or "assault rifle " (a-or any thing approximate to those). This page is about AR-15 style rifles, not mass shootings. So if a source does not explicitly talk about (at the very least)

3593:

promoted to featured article status. Variety is the spice of life. Would you like to help me with this endeavor? It may be something completely new and may give you a totally different view of Knowledge. Sometimes it's healthy to take a break from Knowledge space and dive into a strange, new

1483:

I am, but I'll stick to this, thanks. This isn't a top trumps on WP policy, it's a common sense scenario that if unsourced information is added and not backed up, then it is either sourced pronto or it is deleted. As you have now sourced it (although I'm connvinced the sources you've used are

702:

Adding a claim to being dyslexic to your user page after someone pokes fun at a misspelling you made, then opening an ANI thread about how they are insulting people with a particular disability, and not mentioning anywhere in that thread that you only disclosed your dyslexia after the fact, is

775:

Nor have my interactions been repeated (except over a very short and specific time period all involving linked incidents), nor would I argue it is offensive, at least no more then telling a user to fuck off). You might argue that in the recent series of linked threads (yes linked) he has got

2140:

That does not say they are the only ones who believe in it, only that they use it. Also arte you sure that is accuatre, the closets I can find is "the quest for Mokele Mbembe ... but part of the effort by creationists to overthrow the theory of evolution and teaching of science by any means

2222:

You have recently shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

1407:

and other sourcing guidelines. And no, contrary to what you've put on my talk page, tagging is not "perhaps best". This is for someone who can't be bothered to find the references themselves and would rather leave it to someone else to find. That is not collaborative behaviour. Thanks.

2307:'What function does this serve?' Well... i don't now, it maybe the function of providing the information, that he is also a YouTube personality whith over 250K subscribers at the moment... For you personally it can be dysfunctional, not for thousands that visit hir article everdyday. 1342:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

415:

Hey Slatersteven. Two things. First, even though we don't often agree on the firearms edits, thank you for helping out with the compromise proposal this morning. Second, your last edit, was it incomplete? It appears to be referring to something I said but I don't know what.

3470:

as long as we attribute it. This would have been a de-rail, as you would not doubt be aware. Thus I pointed out is was not really about what was being discussed. I would also remind you to be polite and respectful towards other edds, I have not insulted you do not insult me.

2644:

Given examples of what? Of the fact that some members of Donnies own staff are working against him, that is not the deep state. The fact that Uscinski has claimed there is (possibly) some kickback against the White House from bureaucrats is not proof of a deep state, read

3251:

He is not my colleague and this kind of attitude is going to go down badly. I would advise you to message the only user who so far has shown you any sympathy and ask him (or ask him to suggest someone) who can mentor you. At the rate you are going you are going to get a

3498:

I am explaining why I said what I said. I did not want to see that thread de-railed into a discussion about caste based sources. Now is it in fact true that caste based or affiliated sources cannot be used as sources for their own claims? Can I see where this was

2388:

you might be about the breach 1RR, would you rather I reported you again next time without warning (you know I am willing to)? Also I did not restore any comments you removed, so HUSH is not even relevant (do learn to actually read a policy before invoking it).

1255: 1239: 514:

are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to

378:

Civility restriction: Users are required to follow proper decorum during discussions and edits. Users may be sanctioned (including blocks) if they make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad

233:

2372:(and by the way just common courtesy). As stated before you lack the ability to judge what is a actual violation, you are not a authoritative figure, so stop trying to act like one. Please do not post on my page doing so just looks like harassment. - 1864:

persecute all religions (as the only allowed god is either the party or the leader). Thus I have no difficulty accepting the source as accurate in its appraisal of the situation, and need rather more then your dislike of the USA to undermine that.

3042:

A dictator claiming a coup was part of some deep state conspiracy is not proof there was in fact a deep state conspiracy. You need RS saying that there was (in fact) a deep state conspiracy (note saying it was one, not saying it has been called

2823:

When we are talking about a situation in one country we cannot use what happened in another as proof of the situation in the first country. Not all Coups are the same, and what happens in a coup is not evidence of what happens when there is not

3702:

Perhaps it is just me, although I doubt it because I think this has been raised before. One of the reasons why you have such a high volume of non-article contributions is because you seem unable to resist sticking your oar into discussions.

1789:

It was your choice of words, that implies you are not viewing this neurally. Yes they can spread disinformation, they also (often) get things right. So it needs to be a bit more then "evil capitalist lackeys" for me to decide its not an

1608:

Generally not if it is not controversial and I have no reason to doubt it no. I do not go around looking for unsoruced material to remove. And again not everything needs to be sourced, and I fail, to get why this is such a bugbear with

976:

on this section, which concluded that only major facts should be included in this high level article. Also, Poles did not serve in the SS, only members of the German minority in occupied Poland, so that statement is also incorrect. --

1641:. I see that Rayleigh does. That information should be echoed in the body of the main text, with the cite, and the lead should be cite free. Finally, why am I not allowed to have this as my "bugbear"? I would ask you to memain civil. 1288: 655: 2994:

and not through history. No where it states that in article but sources are clear, its just blanked used in article and can be assumed that it applies to entire world.Again reading carefully and with understanding is critical.

522:

to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the

2731:

No it means that you do not have a source saying is. It means that not all Coups are Deep state operations (and no all accusations of Claims of Coups are real). It means you need an RS actually saying "there was a deep state

1844:

that there is just cause to suspect that the United States, which has a history of attempting to destabilize socialist countries in general and which had poor relations with Albania in specific during its socialist period is

3012:

That does not say the other definitions are wrong, it says that in on e context it is valid. In fact this does not even say this is a deep state, only that if you mean it in this context it is real (if you mean it in this

888:] (not him). Again it is odd that the only place I "harass" him is at a policy forum in a discussion not in fact directly about him. Despite the fact there were other places more directly about him I could have done so. 1956:

As Knowledge is built on a consensus model, I intend to continue arguing that it is not. Others are free to agree or disagree - but that doesn't change that I'm not POV pushing, just arguing that my interpretation of

2749:

A military coup may not always be from an entrenched bureaucracy, the Qaddafi and Greek ones were not. And also there has been no coup in the USA, so talking about coups tells us nothing about the USA. Please read

125:

you don't agree that Jews can be immigrants does not make you correct, and your own efforts to improve the article have been just as quickly attacked as mine have. It would be more useful if you could explain how

1274:

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Knowledge that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other

3136:

No because the article (and thus the section) is about conspiracy theories. As such it should really concentrate on that part of the deep state concept, not a wider discussion as to deep state as a political

1716:

Another reason why just deleting is a bad idea, it increases the amount of work needed by not only meaning you have to create correct cites, but also re-add the text (and maybe re-write it as well). It makes

1124: 3643:

And my first few questions have just been undone as breaching notafourm (such questions as "Has it been indirectly observed?" ), so forgive me if I decide that being a layman means I have no place in that

3340: 2513: 1909:

Periodically I do bring up the "Knowledge's sourcing of statements about socialist countries is bullshit" issue on the RS noticeboard. Mostly in the frame of my ongoing complaint that Knowledge maintains

669:

another editor. Knowledge aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be

2964:

Ok its not your direct fault but still. RS use definiton I use and you ask me to provide sources(they are already given). That i think falls into competency issue, being able to read with understanding.

745: 3419: 3345:

I am adding encyclopedic content including cast premiete dates synopsis and others, have already added some along with references so please undo the tag for speedy deletion kindly. From Ericranium.

3266:

They why is he on your page hurling threats ? Me and you are having discussion and unless he wants to be constructive mind his own business.You is not obliged to respond to me if I am bothering you.

2768:

We are talking about specific coup, not Greek or Qaddafi. Also term deep state is not from USA and does not only apply to them, nor do they get to define it since it was well known and used before.

1354:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 680: 1915: 1108: 1092: 749: 738: 581:

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon was the person convicted of multiple crimes not Tommy Robinson. If you tried to check court records under Tommy Robinson you could not discover the cases against him.

2692:, it does not matter what some leader does, what matters is what RS say. Just because Hitler, Stalin or Teresa May arrest, sack or kill a lot of people does not prove there is a deep state. 2489: 2473: 3233:

I suggest you and your college to read Deep State in United States and then read deep state in conspiracy theory and review and correct obvious contradictions cause I wont be intimidated.

794:

25 times in the last week or so; you had not edited it at any time previously, apparently because the inciting incident in this latest controversy involved your houndee, and you've been

2497: 2284: 1370: 1100: 3364: 2807:? We obviously cant talk about such important and relevant term through lenses of single country at single point in time, for which there is hardly consensus even within the country. 2574: 2481: 1465:). It was doubtful anyone would challenge the existence of a park (for example). Why use a tag, because it makes it easy to see what needs sourcing (we have them for a reason), see 2036: 1433: 825:

What has me "going for you" got to do with MjolnirPants, you seem to be conflating two separate users as one in order to claim harassment against one of them. Of course I edited

2918:

You are firmly left wing Labour supporter with obvious disdain of Donald Trump and are willing to hijack term Deep State so you can attack him.I thought that was clear already.

1697: 1650: 1618: 1601: 1546: 1528: 1513: 1497: 1478: 1456: 1116: 170:

I am going to leave it to you, I think you need to learn how to edit and this is a good start. Fell free to come here with any suggested edits and sources and run them past me.

2505: 224: 1417: 3295: 2932:

That is not what a COI is on Knowledge, And I did not hijack the term, I neither added it to the article, not am I any of the RS that use in in the context we are disusing.

2912: 2598: 1409: 1269:

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

3415: 3227: 2649:. A suspicion that there is a deep state held by Donnie or his supporters is not proof there is a deep state. You have to have a source that say "there is a deep state". 1689: 1642: 1593: 1520: 1489: 1448: 404: 3723:

saying "ahhh but". So who was trying to tell who how to suck eggs, yes it is irritating to have someone tell you the blindingly obvious, and then agree with you anyway.

715:) well over a year later is simply unacceptable. I cannot believe an editor who engages in this kind of disruption somehow has only one short EW block on their record. 339: 286: 1388: 1316: 244:

At 30:21 he states they don't use assalt weapons all the time only a quarter of the time and if they did not have those there are other weapons as equally deadly.

565: 497: 489: 519: 1281: 3086:

Nope, it only says coordinated effort, does not mention a single thing of how narrow or wide. It could be 2 bureaucrats as far as I know according to article.

649: 3704: 3395:. (Nothing that should concern you, but I always prefer to notify if I name someone who isn't an existing participant or otherwise aware of the discussion.) 3392: 2751: 2166: 2193: 1301: 552: 2424:

are free to remove those comments and they shouldn't put them back. But that doesn't prohibit them from warning you about some different incident later.

2177: 263:

I would like to hear what uninvolved editors views are on any inclusion for the section in the AR-15 article for the "Use in crime and mass shootings". -

3653: 3275: 3261: 3161: 3146: 3127: 3112: 3095: 3081: 3066: 3052: 3037: 3022: 3003: 2988: 2973: 2959: 2941: 2927: 2861: 2845: 2816: 2802: 2787: 2763: 2741: 2725: 2701: 2682: 2658: 2638: 2614: 2347: 1726: 1711: 2746:

Hahaha dear god, then what was military coup ? All sources define it as entrenched bureaucracy, most commonly in military and intelligence community.

1484:

dubious and fail several guidelines) I'll leave it alone. I would challenge anything not sourced on WP. WP is not a reliable,e source, remember that.

610: 3380: 3679: 3663: 3638: 3624: 3508: 3493: 3328: 3242: 2433: 2150: 2133: 2118: 2104: 2090: 2048: 1998: 1970: 1951: 1935: 1904: 1888: 1873: 1858: 1835: 1821: 1799: 368: 2397: 937: 922: 897: 881: 864: 839: 820: 785: 305: 1413: 98: 3765: 3751: 3732: 3614: 3572: 3553: 3539: 3479: 1984: 354: 2251: 1693: 1646: 1597: 1524: 1493: 1452: 1260:, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is 1028: 1014: 1000: 3028:

that way is consensus Steven even in sources, then they go on to give it different meaning used by some. Clear differentiation needs to be made.

1179: 766: 3598: 2538: 2297: 1149: 193: 179: 2568: 2254:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 590:

The article, as it was edited, made it perfectly clear in the first paragraph that he is known as multiple aliases including Tommy Robinson.

2030: 1185: 704: 3544:

As I said this is why I did not want that thread de-railed, and I take it form the above that no it has never been decided by the community.

584:

No legal change of name or registered stage name has been accepted in UK law for Stephen Yaxley-Lennon to be recognised as Tommy Robinson.

634: 432: 2457: 1076: 1060: 3659:

been directly observed" suggest that maybe it has been indirectly observed. I would say, yes it has, because of the gravity signature.

2605:

Saying "some one may think there is something" is not the same as saying "there is something". And I have asked you to stop making PA's.

1961:

differs from the main consensus currently. You can tell by how I don't do much edit warring on it and regularly engage at article talk.

1926:

were anti-communist). To date it's been something of a quixotic pursuit. Perhaps in a few years the scale will have tipped a bit there.

2836:

want to argue that Donald Trump is peddling conspiracies thats on you, but you cant use term that is well known and defined beforehand.

2663:

We cant have discussion when you did not read. Erdogan coup and subsequent firings of thousands of military, education,etc personnel.

2381: 2066:

would really help you out here. This is in fact a topic of particular historical interest to Young Earth creationist cryptozoologists.

1403:

needs to stop. If you don't have the sources to evidence what you're saying, then don't say it. It is OR and is discouraged on WP. See

1322: 985: 383:

Clearly states his abuse is a violation. My actions are within policy, the comment as well as being grossly inaccurate are off topic. -

2317:

Then we can put this (if we have to, I ma not sure that 250K is that many nowadays) as prose in the article, not as some odd "button".

1849:

a reliable source for an encyclopedia to use as a sole-source for statements of fact about the expressed goals of a communist leader.

165: 2441: 1395: 798:

arguing for it, even going me for opening a thread about how an editor on your "side" was canvassing. Yeah, maybe the latter is more

219: 2075: 1295:

which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

622: 3448: 1488:

Did you not read my last post about tagging something to make others look for it? That is lazy, unproductive and uncollaborative.

1055: 2326: 2534: 1145: 597:

You should sign your posts. Nor did I insist on anything, check what I refer to him as. But we go with what sources say, (read

138: 3437: 1783: 2542: 1153: 3404: 2059: 427: 2293: 1911: 1384: 752:

that someone on your side was not canvassing when they clearly were. So these are both serious, ongoing problems with you.

3463: 575:

You insist that Tommy Robinson is the common term to use when relating factual information about Stephen Yaxley-Lennon.

492:

for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.

959: 2579:

Please dont be incompetent and require from users to spell out sources that are already given, and read them yourself.

1879:

no attempt to challenge any independent sources for this information. My dispute is with the source, not the statement.

110: 3716: 2783: 2721: 2678: 2634: 2594: 1804: 1280:

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also

3360: 2359: 79: 71: 66: 2289: 2271: 2124:

it, something of a construct by Young Earth creationist cryptozoologists. They have a chapter dedicated to this.

1380: 1043: 2793:

I though we were talking about Donnie and the USA, that is what was being talked about on the article talk page.

1486:"And I did not ask you to look for sources, I asked you to tag unsourced material in order to make others look". 1469:. And I did not ask you to look for sources, I asked you to tag unsourced material in order to make others look. 1400: 972: 968: 917: 859: 815: 761: 733: 326:. You moved your comments when you hatted mine. I will revise my comment to make it clear I was not addressing 2706:

Right so coup may or may have not happened? Lmao, like there are not countless headlines about that coup. Sad

533: 115: 1633:

for everything else. It is important to cite all information, not just some of it. Otherwise, that becomes

1919: 1466: 1363: 630: 2979:

a deep state). You need sources that explicitly (not implicitly) say that the definition we list is wrong.

1661:

That is not talking about a need for cites, but a need for cites (if you have them) to be correctly placed

3409: 2053: 1504:

No its not, its policy, you tag unsourced material. Otherwise why do we even have them, to take up space?

1375: 1310: 559: 293: 3433: 1461:

Generally not everything has to be sourced, it only needs to be sourced if likely to be challenged (see

2232: 1989:

I said it should be attributed from the off. This was caused by simons apparent rejection of that idea.

1285:

Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers'

616: 479:

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

38: 2243: 2176:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

1051: 672: 1210: 457: 238:

The comments are completely off topic and are of a uncivil nature, they are also completely false.

210:

Thanks for your comment, I look forward with working with you to improve the White Privilege page.

3761: 3728: 3675: 3649: 3634: 3610: 3549: 3504: 3475: 3376: 3257: 3142: 3108: 3077: 3048: 3018: 2984: 2955: 2937: 2908: 2857: 2829: 2798: 2779: 2759: 2737: 2717: 2697: 2674: 2654: 2630: 2610: 2590: 2393: 2343: 2322: 2236: 2146: 2114: 2086: 1994: 1947: 1900: 1869: 1831: 1795: 1722: 1707: 1685: 1614: 1542: 1509: 1474: 1429: 1024: 996: 933: 893: 877: 835: 781: 645: 606: 400: 364: 301: 215: 175: 150: 1975:

For the record I do agree with Simon's position here. Attribute at least, preferably don't use. --

626: 540: 205: 3356: 3291: 3271: 3238: 3157: 3123: 3091: 3062: 3033: 2999: 2969: 2923: 2841: 2812: 2548: 2302: 2276: 2181: 1752: 1159: 799: 47: 17: 1044:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Fred_Bauder&diff=prev&oldid=868347488

3442: 1351: 410: 2212:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

3386: 3348: 2771: 2709: 2666: 2622: 2582: 2228: 1362:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1047: 1038: 826: 791: 666: 2420:

threads is that users are free to put a warning on your page once for any given incident.

991:

They were rather more successful then the BFC, and we have a whole seperate section on it.

830:

Nor is MjolnirPants mentions in the OP of the RFC, so why would I assume it was about him?

8: 3400: 3324: 3223: 2429: 2129: 2100: 2071: 2044: 1980: 1966: 1931: 1884: 1854: 1817: 1808:

from their explicit enemies. I see it as a constant and irritating systemic violation of

1779: 1626: 1462: 692: 350: 335: 211: 3697: 2556: 2377: 2338:

NO, this is not the correct use of a play button, and it is also an irrelevant factoid.

2189: 1638: 1167: 914: 856: 812: 758: 730: 423: 388: 282: 268: 87: 625:. Did you mean "if" rather than "is"? I didn't want to correct it if I misunderstood. 254:

semi-auto rifles it is irrelevant to this article.Slatersteven (talk), 7 October 2018"

3757: 3724: 3671: 3645: 3630: 3606: 3545: 3500: 3471: 3372: 3316: 3287: 3267: 3253: 3234: 3206: 3153: 3138: 3119: 3104: 3087: 3073: 3058: 3044: 3029: 3014: 2995: 2980: 2965: 2951: 2933: 2919: 2904: 2853: 2837: 2825: 2808: 2794: 2775: 2755: 2733: 2713: 2693: 2670: 2650: 2626: 2606: 2586: 2547:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2389: 2339: 2318: 2142: 2110: 2082: 1990: 1943: 1896: 1865: 1827: 1791: 1718: 1703: 1681: 1677: 1610: 1538: 1505: 1470: 1444: 1425: 1338: 1158:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

1020: 992: 964: 929: 889: 873: 831: 777: 703:

seriously bad form. That you are still coming after MjolnirPants (and, by extension,

641: 621:

Hi, you said "But certainly only is RS have mentioned the incident." in a comment at

602: 396: 360: 327: 297: 171: 146: 106: 3747: 3712: 3568: 3535: 3459: 2564: 2247: 1347: 1287:, and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an 1175: 803: 712: 696: 229:

Please note the article is under these restrictions. I also made no edit warning.

2095:

You are of course correct about that, and I agree that your edit is better there.

1206: 744:

BTW: While searching for the above bogus ANI filing I noticed you actually opened

453: 3352: 3216: 3212: 2619:

There are given examples, you would know that if you actually read the sources.

2369: 2269: 2224: 1010: 981: 684: 656:

Hounding of MjolnirPants (and retaliative harassment of those who take his side)

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3660: 3621: 3595: 3490: 3429: 3396: 3320: 3312: 3219: 2425: 2417: 2365: 2125: 2096: 2067: 2040: 1976: 1962: 1958: 1927: 1923: 1880: 1850: 1813: 1809: 1775: 1359: 688: 346: 331: 277:

It appears he is referring to your comments on denying mass shooting content. -

1840:

I am not using it as an RS in this context. I'm just trying to demonstrate to

1226: 3738: 3308: 2947: 2900: 2552: 2407: 2373: 2198: 2185: 1355: 1163: 909: 905:

this is the one I suspect as this was raised whilst I still had an eye on ANI

851: 807: 753: 725: 419: 384: 313: 278: 264: 189: 161: 134: 3454:

Other people thanked me for making the note, so please wind your neck in. -

718:

Consider this a warning. If I see any more hounding/harassment from you, of

318:

the log on the page clearly shows I threaded my statement immediately under

2689: 2646: 2332: 2308: 1634: 1630: 1447:. The formatting and reliability of the sources you've used is below par. 1440: 1404: 102: 3420:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/KC International Airlines (2nd nomination)

2037:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 11#Knowledge:DAILYMAIL

101:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. (it wasn't me)

3743: 3708: 3590: 3564: 3531: 3455: 2560: 2081:

Its also of interest to many other types of people including folklorists.

1171: 598: 3670:

Well I think the consensus seems to be that something has been observed.

2205: 1366:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

967:, this is a statement which was added recently, and has no sources. The 707:, with a comment that, if take as a sincere, good-faith remark, shows a 587:

Knowledge is not here to placate or mimic the press but deliver facts.

2259: 1424:

I have to check each of your edits to know what it is you have removed.

1006: 977: 665:

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully

359:

So then (72bikers) you were edit warring, and my warning was justified.

1759:

trusting the US government to be accurate in matters of foreign policy

1205:

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on

593:

I will not be coerced into changing facts by threats of being banned.

452:

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on

3423: 3341:

Consent for removal of deletion tag for the article ami sirajer begum

2490:

Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies

2416:

times and I think we all know that the response to all those various

1329: 1264:

as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.

3629:

Sadly I will be away till Sunday evening. But I can give it a start.

601:) not what we think. Sources seem to refer to him as Tommy Robinson. 3418:. Just wanted to know I had nominated the article for deletion at 3215:

and then put yours down before you face a consequence worse than a

185: 157: 130: 511: 471:

Hello Slatersteven, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

555:

to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —

156:

I look forward to seeing how you get on with these improvements.

3103:

are talking about "the conspiratorial notion of a "deep state"".

2506:

TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the close of World War I

2412:

the issue of you banning people from your talk page has come up

2218:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

1676:

You may also want to fix your exposed URLs as they will suffer

1369:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

1304:

to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

1895:

And I see nothing wrong with the source, maybe take it to RSN.

1219:

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

465:

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

3447:

Do you realise how ridiculously officious and, well, crazy

3558:

I haven't got much idea what you are referring to now but

2575:

Deep state section that you are editing is case of WP:CIR

1625:

Wrong. Again, you need to brush up on your sourcing. See

345:

Nevermind, the comment chronology has already been fixed.

184:

You've really brightened my day with your humour. :-)))))

3393:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Keith-264

3391:

Just to let you know, I made a minor mention of you here

3311:- because buddy, you're heading fast from "don't want to 2180:

regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on

501:

as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!

1350:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

488:

There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the

395:

Are you an admin? Do you not read what admins tell you?

1005:

United Kingdom wasn't occupied , Poland was occupied.

225:

Uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith

2474:

From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

1093:

From the editors; awards and honours; contest results

3414:

Hiya, you were previously involved with the article

3057:

Fine dont put Erdogan, everything else still stands.

748:a few weeks later, and a few months after that you 2178:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 2946:Note I pointed to the wrong policy, it should be 1238:Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote 1019:So, the point made was about numbers and failure. 2062:, picking up that copy of Loxton and Prothero's 271:) 9 October 2018, Tuesday (8 days ago) (UTC−4) 99:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2482:Last month's new featured and A-class content 2167:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 1257:Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements 1101:Last month's new featured and A-class content 3286:your agenda, like i give a fuck if I get ban 928:my attention. What else could it have meant? 722:editor, I will request that you be blocked. 2288:before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, 2242:For additional information, please see the 2227:is in effect: any administrator may impose 572:–Stephen Yaxley-Lennon AKA Tommy Robinson— 536:— A new script created for quickly placing 3211:as you're new here I'd suggest you review 2537:. To receive it on your talk page, please 2498:On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!) 2239:, when making edits related to the topic. 2141:possible". A minor difference but even so. 1148:. To receive it on your talk page, please 886:Here is the edit posted just before I did 292:And involved ed cannot hat a comment (see 1922:is the same thing (as if events like the 490:drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal 3756:Fair enough, then that is where it goes. 2035:There is another redirect discussion at 623:Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party 3422:. Please voice your opinions there. -- 2462: 1757:What I'd ask is why is it assumed that 1081: 806:, but it's still highly inappropriate. 14: 2231:on editors who do not strictly follow 1410:2A02:C7F:76E4:4400:E1BB:DAFE:CF66:1377 1289:article in this month's upcoming issue 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2031:2nd RfD announce: Knowledge:DAILYMAIL 1916:Mass killings in capitalist countries 1690:2A02:C7F:76E4:4400:CCE0:9846:4FC6:EDC 1643:2A02:C7F:76E4:4400:CCE0:9846:4FC6:EDC 1594:2A02:C7F:76E4:4400:CCE0:9846:4FC6:EDC 1521:2A02:C7F:76E4:4400:CCE0:9846:4FC6:EDC 1490:2A02:C7F:76E4:4400:CCE0:9846:4FC6:EDC 1449:2A02:C7F:76E4:4400:CCE0:9846:4FC6:EDC 1186:NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018 1109:Peacemaker67 looks at the Sydney Wars 1912:Mass killings in Communist countries 1339:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 1194: 845:one who caught you out in the above 441: 433:NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018 25: 3563:where I am heading to right now. - 2244:guidance on discretionary sanctions 1336:Hello, Slatersteven. Voting in the 1117:TomStar81 on the end of World War I 97:There is currently a discussion at 23: 3742:"proper" stuff done here today. - 1323:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 1225: 24: 3781: 2903:and then justify your accusation. 1396:Introducing unsourced information 2852:We are not we are saying he has. 2465:Your Military History Newsletter 2456: 2335:16:20, 27 september 2018 (EEST) 2311:14:12, 26 september 2018 (EEST) 2204: 2171: 1702:Or you could, nothing stops you. 1328: 1198: 1084:Your Military History Newsletter 1075: 660: 445: 92: 29: 3620:help, that would be wonderful. 2364:You are violating two policies 1373:and submit your choices on the 129:propose to fix the POV issues. 2434:14:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC) 2398:14:30, 27 September 2018 (UTC) 2382:14:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC) 2348:13:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC) 2327:11:13, 26 September 2018 (UTC) 2298:03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC) 2272:00:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC) 2194:23:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC) 1918:- going so far as to say that 1774:that I have a grievance with. 973:Schutzmannschaft Battalion 107 969:Schutzmannschaft Battalion 202 695:and had an edit conflict with 13: 1: 3381:16:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC) 3365:16:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC) 1688:) 18:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1389:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1352:Knowledge arbitration process 1317:18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC) 1180:09:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 1056:16:38, 11 November 2018 (UTC) 534:User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js 3766:12:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 3752:20:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 3733:09:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 3717:06:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC) 3680:15:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC) 3664:19:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3654:17:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3639:17:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3625:17:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3615:17:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3605:I am not sure what I can do. 3599:16:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3573:17:06, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3554:16:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3540:16:50, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3509:16:07, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3494:16:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3480:15:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3464:15:44, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 3438:16:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC) 3405:11:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC) 2535:Military history WikiProject 2151:10:32, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 2134:17:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC) 2119:17:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC) 2105:17:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC) 2091:17:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC) 2076:17:16, 11 January 2019 (UTC) 2049:14:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC) 1999:16:19, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1985:16:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1971:14:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1952:14:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1936:14:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1920:Anti-communist mass killings 1905:14:03, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1889:14:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1874:13:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1859:13:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1836:13:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1822:13:47, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1800:13:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1784:13:39, 10 January 2019 (UTC) 1537:I did not add those entries. 1146:Military history WikiProject 1029:12:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC) 1015:07:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC) 1001:11:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC) 986:14:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC) 938:10:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC) 923:12:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC) 898:10:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC) 882:10:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC) 865:23:11, 4 November 2018 (UTC) 840:22:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC) 821:22:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC) 786:19:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC) 767:23:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC) 739:23:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC) 650:08:23, 26 October 2018 (UTC) 635:21:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC) 611:09:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC) 566:20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC) 428:17:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC) 405:08:19, 18 October 2018 (UTC) 369:16:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 355:16:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 340:16:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 306:16:06, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 287:16:02, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 220:13:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC) 194:10:26, 12 October 2018 (UTC) 180:10:24, 12 October 2018 (UTC) 166:10:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC) 139:10:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC) 7: 3737:This is going to end up at 3589:Steven, I am trying to get 3329:16:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3296:16:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3276:16:11, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3262:16:07, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3243:16:01, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3228:15:57, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3162:15:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3147:15:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3128:15:38, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3113:14:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3096:12:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3082:12:34, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3067:12:30, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3053:12:28, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3038:12:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3023:12:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 3004:12:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2989:11:56, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2974:11:44, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2960:11:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2942:11:39, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2928:11:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2913:11:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2862:11:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2846:11:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2817:10:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2803:10:47, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2788:10:44, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2764:10:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2742:10:28, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2726:10:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2702:10:22, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2683:10:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2659:10:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2639:09:56, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2615:09:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2599:09:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 2569:07:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC) 1727:18:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1712:18:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1698:17:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1651:17:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1619:17:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1602:17:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1547:17:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1529:17:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1514:17:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1498:17:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1479:17:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1457:16:53, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1434:10:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 1418:10:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC) 960:Schutzmannschaft Battalions 483:Community Wishlist Proposal 294:Template:Hidden archive top 111:10:56, 9 October 2018 (UTC) 10: 3786: 3307:I'd suggest you also read 2451: 2331:LoL, are we playing goy?! 2290:MediaWiki message delivery 2237:page-specific restrictions 1381:MediaWiki message delivery 1070: 1064:: Issue CLI, November 2018 3416:KC International Airlines 2899:Ohh and by the way, read 2514:This month in World War I 2109:So why did you revert it? 1125:This month in World War I 2445:: Issue CL, October 2018 2360:You are violating policy 2282:and would like to, vote 2248:Arbitration Committee's 2225:discretionary sanctions 1826:Knowledge is not an RS. 1443:and more specifically, 322:as I was responding to 1311:Insertcleverphrasehere 1230: 560:Insertcleverphrasehere 18:User talk:Slatersteven 3432:) — If (reply) then ( 1914:but refuses to allow 1467:WP:FAILEDVERIFICATION 1348:Arbitration Committee 1233:Hello Slatersteven, 1229: 498:join the conversation 116:Immigration and crime 42:of past discussions. 3705:This type of comment 2533:is published by the 2233:Knowledge's policies 1765:is a POV? There are 1144:is published by the 902:What do you mean by 711:misunderstanding of 673:blocked from editing 518:There are now tools 3449:this comment sounds 3410:Notification of AFD 2054:Loxton and Prothero 1250:Voting takes place 689:five hours too late 374:You are incorrect. 2064:Abominable Science 1942:So its an RS then. 1364:arbitration policy 1248:Community Wishlist 1231: 683:to get off with a 627:Absolutelypuremilk 617:Typo in talk page? 3489:that he's wrong. 3367: 3351:comment added by 3203: 3202:talk page watcher 2790: 2774:comment added by 2728: 2712:comment added by 2685: 2669:comment added by 2641: 2625:comment added by 2601: 2585:comment added by 2527: 2526: 2523: 2522: 2404: 2184:. Thank you. - 1763:not trusting them 1313: 1305: 1252:16 to 30 November 1224: 1223: 1217: 1216: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1133: 965:User:Slatersteven 920: 862: 818: 764: 736: 568: 562: 469: 468: 464: 463: 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3777: 3346: 3319:" at this rate. 3315:" to "block for 3210: 3201: 2769: 2707: 2664: 2620: 2580: 2551:. Your editors, 2539:join the project 2460: 2453: 2452: 2449: 2448: 2411: 2402: 2267: 2264: 2208: 2175: 2174: 1487: 1332: 1309: 1299: 1202: 1201: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1162:. Your editors, 1150:join the project 1079: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1067: 913: 855: 811: 757: 729: 697:User:Writ Keeper 664: 663: 558: 550: 545: 539: 512:ORES predictions 449: 448: 442: 438: 437: 317: 96: 95: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3785: 3784: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3700: 3445: 3412: 3389: 3343: 3204: 2577: 2572: 2519: 2467: 2447: 2405: 2362: 2305: 2279: 2262: 2260: 2257: 2256: 2209: 2201: 2172: 2169: 2056: 2033: 1772:specific source 1761:is neutral and 1755: 1485: 1398: 1393: 1392: 1333: 1325: 1320: 1242: 1199: 1188: 1183: 1130: 1086: 1066: 1048:Govindaharihari 1041: 962: 800:WP:BATTLEGROUND 679:You were lucky 661: 658: 640:Yes I meant if. 619: 570: 543: 537: 506:Project updates 446: 435: 413: 311: 227: 208: 206:White privilege 118: 93: 90: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3783: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3699: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3602: 3601: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3527: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3483: 3482: 3444: 3441: 3411: 3408: 3388: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3342: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3246: 3245: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3149: 3115: 3072:conspiracies". 2944: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2576: 2573: 2546: 2528: 2525: 2524: 2521: 2520: 2518: 2517: 2509: 2501: 2493: 2485: 2477: 2471:Project news: 2468: 2463: 2461: 2446: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2403:(Page watcher) 2361: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2304: 2303:Tommy Robinson 2301: 2278: 2277:Have your say! 2275: 2210: 2203: 2202: 2200: 2197: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2058:Responding to 2055: 2052: 2032: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1924:Trail of Tears 1805:how about this 1754: 1753:POV and the US 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1714: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1397: 1394: 1371:the candidates 1334: 1327: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1297: 1296: 1277: 1276: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1262:very important 1244: 1243: 1237: 1222: 1221: 1215: 1214: 1203: 1189: 1187: 1184: 1157: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1129: 1128: 1120: 1112: 1104: 1096: 1090:Project news: 1087: 1082: 1080: 1065: 1059: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 961: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 884: 790:You've edited 773: 691:to call for a 687:because I was 657: 654: 653: 652: 618: 615: 614: 613: 548: 547: 541:copyvio-revdel 530: 529: 525: 524: 516: 508: 507: 503: 502: 493: 485: 484: 477: 476: 467: 466: 462: 461: 450: 436: 434: 431: 412: 409: 408: 407: 381: 380: 372: 371: 357: 309: 308: 275: 274: 273: 272: 258: 257: 256: 255: 248: 247: 246: 245: 236: 235: 226: 223: 212:Keith Johnston 207: 204: 203: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 117: 114: 89: 86: 83: 82: 77: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3782: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3740: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3662: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3623: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3603: 3600: 3597: 3592: 3588: 3587: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3561: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3537: 3533: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3492: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3461: 3457: 3452: 3450: 3443:Officiousness 3440: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3426: 3421: 3417: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3218: 3214: 3208: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3150: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3116: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2834: 2833: 2831: 2827: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2791: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2748: 2747: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2730: 2729: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2686: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2643: 2642: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2571: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2516: 2515: 2510: 2508: 2507: 2502: 2500: 2499: 2494: 2492: 2491: 2487:Book review: 2486: 2484: 2483: 2478: 2476: 2475: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2459: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2444: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2409: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2336: 2334: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2310: 2300: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2286: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2268: 2266: 2255: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2240: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2220: 2219: 2217: 2207: 2196: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1843: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1406: 1402: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1372: 1367: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1331: 1319: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1312: 1303: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1284: 1279: 1278: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1228: 1220: 1212: 1211:MediaWiki.org 1208: 1204: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1119: 1118: 1113: 1111: 1110: 1106:Book review: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1097: 1095: 1094: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1063: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 989: 988: 987: 983: 979: 974: 970: 966: 939: 935: 931: 926: 925: 924: 919: 916: 911: 907: 906: 901: 900: 899: 895: 891: 887: 885: 883: 879: 875: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 861: 858: 853: 848: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 828: 824: 823: 822: 817: 814: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 788: 787: 783: 779: 774: 770: 769: 768: 763: 760: 755: 751: 747: 743: 742: 741: 740: 735: 732: 727: 723: 721: 716: 714: 710: 706: 700: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 681:18 months ago 677: 675: 674: 668: 651: 647: 643: 639: 638: 637: 636: 632: 628: 624: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 595: 594: 591: 588: 585: 582: 579: 578:Four points 576: 573: 569: 567: 564: 563: 561: 554: 542: 535: 532: 531: 527: 526: 521: 517: 513: 510: 509: 505: 504: 500: 499: 494: 491: 487: 486: 482: 481: 480: 474: 473: 472: 459: 458:MediaWiki.org 455: 451: 444: 443: 440: 439: 430: 429: 425: 421: 417: 411:Unclear edit? 406: 402: 398: 394: 393: 392: 390: 386: 377: 376: 375: 370: 366: 362: 358: 356: 352: 348: 344: 343: 342: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 315: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290: 289: 288: 284: 280: 270: 266: 262: 261: 260: 259: 252: 251: 250: 249: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 232: 231: 230: 222: 221: 217: 213: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182: 181: 177: 173: 169: 168: 167: 163: 159: 155: 154: 152: 148: 143: 142: 141: 140: 136: 132: 128: 123: 113: 112: 108: 104: 100: 81: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3758:Slatersteven 3725:Slatersteven 3701: 3672:Slatersteven 3646:Slatersteven 3631:Slatersteven 3607:Slatersteven 3559: 3546:Slatersteven 3501:Slatersteven 3472:Slatersteven 3453: 3446: 3424: 3413: 3390: 3373:Slatersteven 3347:— Preceding 3344: 3288:MrStefanWolf 3284: 3268:MrStefanWolf 3254:Slatersteven 3235:MrStefanWolf 3207:MrStefanWolf 3200: 3154:MrStefanWolf 3139:Slatersteven 3120:MrStefanWolf 3105:Slatersteven 3088:MrStefanWolf 3074:Slatersteven 3059:MrStefanWolf 3045:Slatersteven 3030:MrStefanWolf 3015:Slatersteven 2996:MrStefanWolf 2981:Slatersteven 2966:MrStefanWolf 2952:Slatersteven 2934:Slatersteven 2920:MrStefanWolf 2905:Slatersteven 2898: 2854:Slatersteven 2838:MrStefanWolf 2826:Slatersteven 2809:MrStefanWolf 2795:Slatersteven 2776:MrStefanWolf 2770:— Preceding 2756:Slatersteven 2752:wp:Synthasis 2734:Slatersteven 2732:conspiracy". 2714:MrStefanWolf 2708:— Preceding 2694:Slatersteven 2671:MrStefanWolf 2665:— Preceding 2651:Slatersteven 2627:MrStefanWolf 2621:— Preceding 2607:Slatersteven 2587:MrStefanWolf 2581:— Preceding 2578: 2530: 2529: 2512: 2504: 2496: 2488: 2480: 2472: 2464: 2442: 2421: 2413: 2390:Slatersteven 2363: 2340:Slatersteven 2319:Slatersteven 2306: 2283: 2280: 2261: 2258: 2241: 2221: 2215: 2213: 2211: 2182:edit warring 2170: 2143:Slatersteven 2111:Slatersteven 2083:Slatersteven 2063: 2057: 2034: 1991:Slatersteven 1944:Slatersteven 1897:Slatersteven 1866:Slatersteven 1846: 1841: 1828:Slatersteven 1792:Slatersteven 1771: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1756: 1719:Slatersteven 1704:Slatersteven 1682:Slatersteven 1629:for one and 1627:WP:INTEGRITY 1611:Slatersteven 1539:Slatersteven 1506:Slatersteven 1471:Slatersteven 1463:WP:CHALLENGE 1426:Slatersteven 1399: 1374: 1368: 1345: 1337: 1335: 1308: 1307: 1298: 1293:The Signpost 1292: 1283:The Signpost 1282: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1247: 1232: 1218: 1141: 1140: 1123: 1115: 1107: 1099: 1091: 1083: 1061: 1042: 1039:as an am din 1021:Slatersteven 993:Slatersteven 963: 930:Slatersteven 904: 903: 890:Slatersteven 874:Slatersteven 846: 832:Slatersteven 795: 778:Slatersteven 724: 719: 717: 708: 701: 693:WP:BOOMERANG 678: 671: 659: 642:Slatersteven 620: 603:Slatersteven 592: 589: 586: 583: 580: 577: 574: 571: 557: 556: 549: 520:being tested 496: 478: 470: 414: 397:Slatersteven 382: 373: 361:Slatersteven 328:Slatersteven 323: 319: 310: 298:Slatersteven 276: 237: 228: 209: 172:Slatersteven 147:Slatersteven 126: 121: 119: 91: 60: 43: 37: 3591:Planet Nine 2688:Again read 2541:or sign up 2495:Interview: 2126::bloodofox: 2097::bloodofox: 2068::bloodofox: 1639:WP:LEADCITE 1376:voting page 1207:Phabricator 1152:or sign up 528:New scripts 454:Phabricator 36:This is an 3698:Irritating 3387:ANI notice 3353:Ericranium 3317:WP:NOTHERE 2511:Timeline: 2479:Articles: 1770:It's this 1678:WP:LINKROT 1445:WP:CITEVAR 1360:topic bans 1275:pollution. 1122:Timeline: 1098:Articles: 699:'s close. 546:on a page. 88:ANI notice 3661:Jehochman 3622:Jehochman 3596:Jehochman 3594:article. 3499:discuseed 3491:Jehochman 3397:Nil Einne 3321:Simonm223 3220:Simonm223 2549:this page 2531:The Bugle 2443:The Bugle 2426:Simonm223 2250:decision 2235:, or any 2229:sanctions 2060:this diff 2041:Guy Macon 1977:Calthinus 1963:Simonm223 1928:Simonm223 1881:Simonm223 1851:Simonm223 1814:Simonm223 1776:Simonm223 1356:site bans 1160:this page 1142:The Bugle 1062:The Bugle 910:Hijiri 88 852:Hijiri 88 808:Hijiri 88 804:WP:HARASS 796:viciously 754:Hijiri 88 726:Hijiri 88 713:WP:CANVAS 667:harassing 347:Simonm223 332:Simonm223 80:Archive 5 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 3644:article. 3430:🗣️ Talk 3361:contribs 3349:unsigned 3217:WP:TROUT 3213:WP:STICK 2784:contribs 2772:unsigned 2722:contribs 2710:unsigned 2679:contribs 2667:unsigned 2635:contribs 2623:unsigned 2595:contribs 2583:unsigned 2553:Ian Rose 2408:72bikers 2374:72bikers 2370:WP:NOBAN 2265:𝔴𝔞𝔯𝔪 2246:and the 2214:It does 2186:72bikers 1254:for the 1164:Ian Rose 827:WT:CIVIL 792:WT:CIVIL 685:WP:TROUT 523:backlog. 420:Springee 385:72bikers 314:72bikers 279:72bikers 265:72bikers 3434:ping me 3313:WP:BITE 2503:Op-ed: 2418:WP:AN/I 2366:WP:HUSH 2333:Tolea93 2309:Tolea93 1959:WP:NPOV 1810:WP:NPOV 1767:so many 1209:and on 1114:Op-ed: 746:another 709:serious 515:review. 495:Please 475:Backlog 456:and on 103:Kleuske 39:archive 3744:Sitush 3739:WP:ANI 3709:Sitush 3565:Sitush 3532:Sitush 3456:Sitush 3371:I have 3309:WP:NPA 3252:block. 2948:wp:COI 2901:wp:CIR 2561:Nick-D 2559:) and 1172:Nick-D 1170:) and 750:argued 379:faith. 234:faith. 3137:term. 3043:one). 3013:way). 2690:wp:or 2647:wp:or 2199:Alert 1717:work. 1635:WP:OR 1631:WP:CS 1441:WP:CS 1405:WP:RS 1007:Xx236 978:E-960 802:than 320:yours 120:What 16:< 3762:talk 3748:talk 3729:talk 3713:talk 3676:talk 3650:talk 3635:talk 3611:talk 3569:talk 3550:talk 3536:talk 3505:talk 3476:talk 3460:talk 3425:Tyw7 3401:talk 3377:talk 3357:talk 3325:talk 3292:talk 3272:talk 3258:talk 3239:talk 3224:talk 3158:talk 3143:talk 3124:talk 3109:talk 3092:talk 3078:talk 3063:talk 3049:talk 3034:talk 3019:talk 3000:talk 2985:talk 2970:talk 2956:talk 2938:talk 2924:talk 2909:talk 2858:talk 2842:talk 2830:talk 2824:one. 2813:talk 2799:talk 2780:talk 2760:talk 2738:talk 2718:talk 2698:talk 2675:talk 2655:talk 2631:talk 2611:talk 2591:talk 2565:talk 2557:talk 2543:here 2430:talk 2414:many 2394:talk 2378:talk 2368:and 2344:talk 2323:talk 2294:talk 2285:here 2252:here 2190:talk 2147:talk 2130:talk 2115:talk 2101:talk 2087:talk 2072:talk 2045:talk 2039:. -- 1995:talk 1981:talk 1967:talk 1948:talk 1932:talk 1901:talk 1885:talk 1870:talk 1855:talk 1832:talk 1818:talk 1796:talk 1780:talk 1723:talk 1708:talk 1694:talk 1686:talk 1647:talk 1615:talk 1609:you. 1598:talk 1543:talk 1525:talk 1510:talk 1494:talk 1475:talk 1453:talk 1430:talk 1414:talk 1401:This 1385:talk 1346:The 1302:here 1291:of 1176:talk 1168:talk 1154:here 1052:talk 1046:lol 1025:talk 1011:talk 997:talk 982:talk 971:and 934:talk 894:talk 878:talk 836:talk 782:talk 676:. 646:talk 631:talk 607:talk 599:wp:v 553:here 424:talk 418:]. 401:talk 389:talk 365:talk 351:talk 336:talk 302:talk 283:talk 269:talk 216:talk 190:talk 176:talk 162:talk 151:talk 135:talk 107:talk 3560:you 2422:You 2216:not 1847:not 1842:you 1790:RS. 1300:Go 1240:NOW 847:lie 720:any 551:Go 324:you 186:Deb 158:Deb 131:Deb 127:you 122:are 3764:) 3750:) 3731:) 3715:) 3678:) 3652:) 3637:) 3613:) 3571:) 3552:) 3538:) 3507:) 3478:) 3462:) 3436:) 3403:) 3379:) 3363:) 3359:• 3327:) 3294:) 3274:) 3260:) 3241:) 3226:) 3160:) 3145:) 3126:) 3111:) 3094:) 3080:) 3065:) 3051:) 3036:) 3021:) 3002:) 2987:) 2972:) 2958:) 2940:) 2926:) 2911:) 2860:) 2844:) 2832:) 2815:) 2801:) 2786:) 2782:• 2762:) 2740:) 2724:) 2720:• 2700:) 2681:) 2677:• 2657:) 2637:) 2633:• 2613:) 2597:) 2593:• 2567:) 2432:) 2396:) 2380:) 2346:) 2325:) 2296:) 2263:𝖘 2192:) 2149:) 2132:) 2117:) 2103:) 2089:) 2074:) 2047:) 1997:) 1983:) 1969:) 1950:) 1934:) 1903:) 1887:) 1872:) 1857:) 1834:) 1820:) 1812:. 1798:) 1782:) 1725:) 1710:) 1696:) 1649:) 1617:) 1600:) 1545:) 1527:) 1512:) 1496:) 1477:) 1455:) 1432:) 1416:) 1387:) 1379:. 1358:, 1306:— 1178:) 1054:) 1027:) 1013:) 999:) 984:) 936:) 921:) 918:やや 908:? 896:) 880:) 863:) 860:やや 838:) 819:) 816:やや 784:) 765:) 762:やや 737:) 734:やや 705:me 648:) 633:) 609:) 544:}} 538:{{ 426:) 403:) 391:) 367:) 353:) 338:) 330:. 304:) 296:). 285:) 218:) 192:) 178:) 164:) 153:) 137:) 109:) 76:→ 3760:( 3746:( 3727:( 3711:( 3674:( 3648:( 3633:( 3609:( 3567:( 3548:( 3534:( 3503:( 3474:( 3458:( 3428:( 3399:( 3375:( 3355:( 3323:( 3290:( 3270:( 3256:( 3237:( 3222:( 3209:: 3205:@ 3156:( 3141:( 3122:( 3107:( 3090:( 3076:( 3061:( 3047:( 3032:( 3017:( 2998:( 2983:( 2968:( 2954:( 2950:. 2936:( 2922:( 2907:( 2856:( 2840:( 2828:( 2811:( 2797:( 2778:( 2758:( 2754:. 2736:( 2716:( 2696:( 2673:( 2653:( 2629:( 2609:( 2589:( 2563:( 2555:( 2545:. 2428:( 2410:: 2406:@ 2392:( 2376:( 2342:( 2321:( 2292:( 2188:( 2145:( 2128:( 2113:( 2099:( 2085:( 2070:( 2043:( 1993:( 1979:( 1965:( 1946:( 1930:( 1899:( 1883:( 1868:( 1853:( 1830:( 1816:( 1794:( 1778:( 1721:( 1706:( 1692:( 1684:( 1680:. 1645:( 1613:( 1596:( 1541:( 1523:( 1508:( 1492:( 1473:( 1451:( 1428:( 1412:( 1383:( 1213:. 1174:( 1166:( 1156:. 1050:( 1023:( 1009:( 995:( 980:( 932:( 915:聖 912:( 892:( 876:( 857:聖 854:( 834:( 813:聖 810:( 780:( 759:聖 756:( 731:聖 728:( 644:( 629:( 605:( 460:. 422:( 399:( 387:( 363:( 349:( 334:( 316:: 312:@ 300:( 281:( 267:( 214:( 188:( 174:( 160:( 149:( 133:( 105:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index