1027:, but it is typical for them to wait until after you all are ready for a new look and as long as you keep this page informed and that work is steadily progressing in the right direction. (I am quite concerned that I haven't seen much progress yet, particularly in terms of re-organizing the content towards a trimmer version.) Where you coordinate the work doesn't matter; it can be on the article talk page, or on the talk page of this FAR, but to avoid clogging this page, the nitty gritty need not be conducted here, unless you need broader feedback beyond the day-to-day improvements. This page is for others to eventually declare Close or Move to FARC in the FAR phase, and Keep or Delist if it moves to the FARC phase. Considering there is a very large amount of work to do, my suggestion is that work proceeds on article talk, and that you let this page know bi-weekly how things are going. If progress stalls, editors are likely to suggest Move to FARC to keep the process moving forward. Perhaps an understanding of FAR functioning can be had by reading through
1923:
corrections should be discussed on nomination pages such as FAR. If the article is so far away from the criteria that it cannot be fixed in a couple of weeks, my opinion is to delist it and work on it without the time pressures of FAR, and it can be renominated at FAC when it is ready. Since this has been open for 8 months, and citation problems still exist (even after the above sections were removed) my opinion is that the article probably needs a lot of work to get it back to FA status, which should happen on the article's talk page.
2222:
2211:
1185:. I still want to do more source work (last paragraph of languages needs verification; waiting for a new book on slavery which may improve the narrative) but I thought now is as good a time than ever to ask if I am rewriting this article to the standard that is expected. (I'm finding it a challenge to balance summary prose with comprehensiveness and neutrality...I've never brought an article to FA standard so I apologise for what may seem obvious to others.)
2301:
2288:
2275:
2261:
2248:
2235:
2327:
2314:
771:
before 1453 and even 1204 occurred. That is to say, this era of 800-1204 is very sensitive how we edit it. Howard-Johnston, Treadgold and
Kaldellis are the leading experts on this 'middle' period so I hope you understand my reluctance to have an opinion on this section until I get further with Kadellis.
1899:
As for the reverting of some of my edits, this has not been a problem for me, as it keeps me to a higher standard when done respectfully. And of the litany of other editors where this occurs, it's been appropriate as we've had talk page consensus on these issues. But I can understand it does not look
929:
If we exclude the Lead and
Nomenclature, there are 9 history subheadings, 7 culture subeadings and 4 other major sections. By announcing periodic drives on a section and putting eyes on it, even with just 1-3 of us, we'll rip through and make Temüjin-like progress. If we want to do this right, and on
854:
With three "Move to FARC' declarations, I'm unclear which way this FAR is headed. If you all are intending to save the star, it will be a very long effort, with work best conducted on talk with bi-weekly updates here, while a discussion of how you intend to tackle the size issue will be helpful. How
563:
The act of doing this will give us plenty of inspiration to start editing and improving the article on what substantively it needs. As it’s a large topic, I suggest this is done in sections to make this less over-whelming. If there is a way to set this up as a project, other people can contribute. By
517:
Use this an opportunity to identify historians who might have written more research that updates our knowledge. Bruno
Rochette on language is a good example of that, as he wrote a more recent paper (2018) that, I think, responded to misinterpretations of what he wrote in 2012 (and that Knowledge used
501:
If you have time, and like to read sources, then I have a project that will prepare us for productive editing. It's the approach I would take and if we set this up right, I'll happily involve myself as well when I find a minute as this is the fun bit for me but also the most time consuming. This can
1922:
The concern is not about specific sections: it's that FAR is about evaluating whether the article should still be considered an FA. Having extended comments on a review makes the FAR page difficult to load, and discussions on article improvements should happen on the article's talk page, while small
906:
I'm willing to work on the article within FAR, but not outside it. To be honest, the size issue is at the moment secondary to more immediate problems (OR, CLOP, etc.) History section first, then others, when we're all hopefully soaked through with knowledge. As we should be going section-to-section,
191:
I generally agree that FAR is an unlikely solution for this, unless someone seriously commits themselves to this daunting task. This has been one of the big impending FARs for many years... I think the biggest length issues are in the history section, which should be 3/4, maybe even half as long. On
859:
be employed? Alternately, if the thought is that the article will be better served by having it delisted, and re-appearing at FAC once reworked, we need to know that, too, so we can move to FARC. I understand people are still reading the necessary new sources, but over a month in, we've seen very
230:
I agree with SandyGeorgia. Even if it were thought that a very long article would be needed even to summarize this topic well, this is not in any shape to be considered featured article class. As Sandy points out, there are too many deficiencies for a featured article. It will be a big task to make
1941:
I do want to say that the articles talk page has been inhibiting progress on this article these last few years. Since this FAR started, I've become along with others one of the top authors in the articles history. The work I do is not superficial and will take months. For example, the previous FAR
1536:
added that copy editing tag because I wanted feedback on my writing and actually I've been waiting for this and is partly why I paused my contributions. I would appreciate your continued involvement in copy-editing as we re-write sections. Personally, I'm trying hard to write a balanced and modern
2066:
I'd prefer to wait until the whole article is ready: there have been times when editors asked me to review parts, only to disappear later. However, the following listed sources are not used as inline citations, and should either be included or removed: Dennis, George T. (1985), Chrysos, Evangelos
612:
One suggestion on approach is we understand this is a big project and do drives every so often on sections. It will make this a sustained effort then (and action will breed other action). If a regular group of editors have experience working together, they can just jive off each other’s edits. If
608:
I agree. That said, I do think
Kaldellis’s book — the first new academic narrative since the 1990s — should be a standard for us to measure the current article beyond the maintenance tasks. Despite some issues, it’s remarkable well written. If we have a group of people commit to reading it before
1877:
After 8 and a half months, this article is still not close to meeting the FA criteria. There are still uncited sections, including the entire "Military", "Clothing", and "Relationship with
Western Christendom" sections. Progress also seems to have stalled, with information added recently getting
770:
It's worth introducing the historian
Roderick Beaton (with his very excellent, The Greeks: A Global History) who's book tries to make a case that every generation of Greek-speaking regime collapsed when central government was no longer useful. So in the case of the Byzantine Empire, he said long
933:
I'll put my hand up on the slowest part of this process which is validating existing sources, evaluating other sources people suggest or from other articles, and otherwise assessing current scholarship. This will result in addressing article issues like CLOP and OR, and by extension assist with
688:
Lead can be done last (and where Talk wastes the most time so let's stay away from it). Nomenclature has undergone a major review recently so no need to focus on that now. The
Language section in Culture is 519 words, a good 1/7th of that section and larger than the two sections after it -- the
245:
Agree with all of the above. If there's a collective push to save this article I would chip in but it's way too modern for my usual area and I'm in no position to lead it. Aside from all of the valid criticisms already made, I am surprised to see not a single mention of slaves/slavery in the
170:
barely scratch the surface; the article is riddled with maintenance tags and there are concerns about image licensing, uncited text, prose, MOS compliance, and a good chunk of the very large article has never been vetted in a review process, as it was added after the last review. I believe the
1974:
rabbit hole, reaching out to academics as it's a multi-disciplinary issue across history, jurisprudence and philosophy. As for why, I've come to realise it's important for this topic, as it underpins narrative bias historians have (ie, Prinzipat und
Dominat, Bleicken 1978, 22–24 uses it for
1975:
periodisation of the Roman Empire that others refer to; Kaldellis all together rejects it; and it separately has had a huge impact on medieval and modern law but that's beyond the scope of this article though it does link to the section about law as it was in
Justinian's code). If
474:
Conversely, I do have time, but I am intimidated in the task and would feel most comfortable as the "junior partner" in an article cleanup where I'm possibly doing tasks specifically requested by others with more intuitive expertise, like I am presently doing at the other FAC
2029:
Feel free to ping me when this article is ready to be reviewed. I could consider the article ready when there is no uncited text, the prose size is reduced (currently at over 13,000 words), and the article has been copyedited (anyone can do that, or even split the work).
386:
I'm working on. I think there are some easy improvements that could be made. I prefer to collaborate with people and take a section by section approach as I go deep into the sources and more interested in factual accuracy as it supports a narrative than word smithing.
1895:
If there is a list of specific issues you want done by a certain time period, I'm happy to prioritise this over the line by line by section review that is currently occurring (albeit at a leisurely pace as I did not think there was a rush and it requires readings and
1946:) and now that I've read half of it says something completely different to what people think it says (ie, terms like principate/dominate need to be dropped, it was the same legal system since Augustus, there was no hellenistic autocracy change in the emperor which
1384:
Life got in the way for me that I needed to depriortitise this. But I'm still committed. My current focus is on the government and military. Working on how to find a balance of what I can do with more consistent contributions so I don't disappear again.
2095:
Those are all references that were previously in the diplomacy section, a review completed after
Matarisvan's review. I reviewed diplomacy in late July and agree that they can be removed (except the Chrysos that in now listed as a chapter in Shepherd).
1283:
I'm drafting a new section on socioeconomic and legal rights, that will incorporate sources from the women section I'm reading and that will reduce that section but also make the content stronger I hope (ie, combined with other sources, broader
1942:
editors added citations but when I checked one, it was to the contents pages (as I read all the sources); and this Bleicken book I've hunted down that is referenced in modern scholarship I've come across is referenced in other articles (ie,
934:
condensing the narrative which will address the big billboard problem of size. Happy to document notes and note down direct quotes as I read sources which may assist in making this work more accessible so other people can leverage it.
2008:, I've worked on the bibliography formatting, namely the links to authors and editors, locations of publication and consistent use of ISBN13. Could you review this? Once this is OK'd then I can start work on the reference formatting.
1622:
and related the impact of Justinian's code, which probably won't belong on this article but reflecting on its relevance still, and plan to focus on military, diplomacy, law after that which has some overlap on the work I've already
1937:
Understood. I defer to yours and others judgement. Personally, I like the idea of keeping this as the oldest FA on Knowledge so would prefer a process where I have time to improve it which is how I understand FARC with extensions
1693:, does it seem too long? I was going for as concise as possible, but don't know if I've overstepped. I'll paste it in after I copy edit and go through the sources once more. Should get started on the art section in a few days. –
1618:'s driving the history rewrite and also worked on Nomenclature which I also previously worked on, I've completed my work on Society and recently finished Governance. I've gone into a rabbit hole understanding one statement about
996:
I think the idea is that everything happens on this page or its talk, and that the improving of each section is part of the FAR. At the end, some other editors will take a look at the article and see whether they think it meets
2395:, except length, addressed. Flags and insignia, Daily life (Cuisine, Recreation, Clothing) as well as a new dedicated section for Education in Society have entered into different stages of review right now, with many thanks to
593:
Thus, we don't currently have a holistic overview of how the article should change. It would be good to have that. If FA review could give us that, it would be worth doing. If there is another, better venue, we should do that.
2268:
Previous sections that are now finalised: Society. They include Transition into an Eastern Christian empire (previously in history), Slavery (new section), Socio-economic (new section partially from women before), Women, and
2228:
Religion was rewritten by an editor with expertise in the topic (Jenhawk777), Economy similarly for the first paragraph by another editor (Graearms) but needs more work, and both will need to be reviewed by different editor
2338:
Overall: We may not be done but the work we've done has now made all of us in the before mentioned 5 of the top 10 authors of the current article which reflects how extensive this content review has been. We also have a
1412:)—a total of ±22½ years. Given its tenure and current longstanding rescue mission, it'll already be too soon if the star gets taken down. (Having typed this out, I now feel really old.) Details and backstory at
926:
I support working within FAR though these frameworks for review is not something I have useful experience in. Will need to defer to someone else's lead on that. In terms of process, I'm amenable to suggestions.
880:
Per above, it seems like we are going to keep it simple, starting with the history section and go over it chronologically. I've already earmarked several graphics that I plan on replacing or possibly removing.
2321:
Other than the before mentioned, what remains is a review of the more straightforward topics of Flags and insignia, Daily Life (Cuisine, Recreation, and we might add Clothing), Science/medicine, and legacy.
2044:
Hi, I was looking for a review of just the formatting of the bibliography. I believe it would be much better to do piecemeal reviews since, as you said, the article size is large. Wdyt? Please let me know,
555:
In my view, this article should read with what Treadgold and Kaldellis have written in their books as the primary sources as they are the most recent academic historians to write about the topic at length.
481:
If anyone else wants to help and knows exactly what to do, but doesn't have the time to do it—I have that time at present. I hope that's useful. I've been grabbing the sources cited so I have them on hand.
1287:
I'm still evaluating if there needs to be something on "gender" (as part of women or separate) which is something that is coming up in modern scholarship. Can only resolve this by reading a book by Leora
911:
took me 413 days on my lonesome). At the moment, I'm mildly optimistic—we have three competent and active editors, pretty much a blank sheet in front of us, and if it fails then. well, at least we tried?
613:
people revert and becomes a problem, we take it to talk. What’s key is we set the expectation that we are blowing up a section and ask for people’s collaboration in edits rather than hash it out on talk.
2334:
Airship will be proposing a new article layout, which we may implement once we complete the review to restructure the content and address lingering word count issues, as well as to make the content more
161:
This 2001 FA which dates to Refreshing Brilliant Prose days was last reviewed at FAR more than 10 years ago, and its most significant contributors are no longer active. The talk page notifications from
502:
be a parallel process to any editing that occurs. It will align people and can be used to settle Talk disputes. If more people want to involve themselves, it gives a common reference point for editing.
689:
languages section in Roman Empire has undergone a recent deep review by me so we can lean on this to re-evaluate this section. Oh, and history, let's look at that as clearly this needs work:
590:
I have a lot of respect for Biz's work and especially for their careful section by section approach, but that does mean that the talk page tends to focus on points of detail and nomenclature.
558:
Specialist historians on sections should be used of course to delve into issues but as we are looking for consensus what Kaldellis and Treadgold have said should be the test for consensus.
1265:
Transition into an eastern Christian empire: need to validate two sources still and final proof read to make sure I'm happy with the copy. This section was completely rewritten by me.
2128:
Yes, though I think since this was discussed it has been removed. We would love it if you could continue to join us in the review, the more eyes the better. Let's discuss the work
2129:
1816:
1054:
721:
Was hoping to finish Kaldellis before editing again -- with my travel and other commitments, optimistically it won't be before January -- but hey, throw a dart and we can start.
767:
Ah, the most interesting section! Crisis and fragmentation, or rather that time period, is something Kaldellis will be key for as there is a lot of new research since Treadgold.
401:
I am also reading this book, and I would like to contribute to improving this article the best I can. If I can help you in an adequately directed way, I would be happy to.
171:
problems here are too deep and wide to be addressed at FAR, and the article should be delisted and re-submitted to FAC if it improves, but maybe someone is up to the task.
1375:
907:
and just move the comments on each to talk after it's satisfactorily completed. This will be a long job but I wouldn't expect anything else for such an important article (
299:
281:
290:. Between Christmas and other real-life stuff I probably can't commit to much but I'll watchlist the page and poke my nose in if I have anything useful to contribute.
107:
102:
97:
1214:: Biz has been working on the language section, while my grand reduction of the history section has gotten slightly distracted; I will be back there shortly, however.
1134:
1120:
259:
2179:
1223:
1045:
921:
225:
2382:
1452:
1361:
1326:
1028:
1499:
817:
240:
373:
1878:
reverted several times. While I appreciate the work done to try to save this, it might be better if it goes to FARC so that it can be evaluated for delisting.
948:
Sounds good. Sandy is probably right that we should do all the nitty grity on this FAR's talk, so we don't clog up the main FAR page with all our scribblings.
331:
84:
2184:
Quick update: we now have two subject-matter experts updating/rewriting the sections on both economy and religion. I expect to get to the art section soon. –
1784:
1589:
Hi all, came across this a few days ago and thought I'd offer my help if there are any particular sections that could do with editing/sourcing improvements? @
1148:
2368:
1868:
1430:
1344:
1237:
443:
2408:
1760:
1584:
1567:
1485:
1106:
1080:
1014:
991:
957:
798:
730:
654:
448:
Not sure. I don't have time to commit due to life circumstances, have not finished Kaldellis yet because I'm 4 deep in other books, but throw me a bone... @
2017:
894:
2343:
which if we stick to will put it in the strongest state its ever been while also reflecting the latest scholarship, breathing in a new life for this FA.
645:
I can work with Kaldellis as a foundation, I also have access to the relevant Cambridge history; I can get going in around a week, if that's acceptable.
603:
495:
2199:
1810:
1708:
567:
Further, by doing this, copy editing I think will be more informed and it will allow us to make the article more concise with the content that matters.
348:
211:
1413:
396:
92:
21:
2352:
2090:
2076:
2054:
2039:
1887:
1626:
Economy, architecture, Daily life, Science and medicine, Religion would be next after that so that would be a great place you could pick up on. Arts @
1194:
1066:
943:
356:
it seems like even basic maintenance tags are unaddressed. Apropos of nothing, I am surprised that this article manages to be even longer than my own
216:
I am reluctant to commit, given other constraints, but with a day in the library I could seriously improve the bloated history section. We shall see.
1527:
196:
article), the emphasis on instruments is hugely undue and much more discussion of composers, genres and music rituals should be instead substituted.
2149:
2123:
1995:
1394:
1308:
874:
552:
If you want to take this article to an even higher level, chase down Treadgold’s 1990s work and see where he and Kaldellis agree or differ in views.
469:
185:
1513:
1558:—none of the three sentences make grammatical sense, and I additionally don't see what relevance it has to a section titled "Central government".
832:
780:
762:
640:
576:
414:
1277:
I've asked for feedback on the above because I'm not confident in my ability to meet FA standard, and before I embark on the rest of the article.
1639:
1609:
1490:
Halted, and probably will be for the next three weeks due to RL responsibilities. Working on adjacent topics, however, and intending to return.
622:
2105:
1959:
1932:
1909:
1848:
1828:
1746:
1726:
1659:
1546:
1162:
167:
154:
1575:
I'll review the two new sentences on nomos empsychos and re-evaluate which seems to be the only thing you cut from the revision I made.
1554:
please try to iron out your additions in drafts, before adding them to the rewritten article. Take for example the second paragraph of
587:
I think we all agree that this shouldn't be an FA. It would be good to get a clear summary of why it's not and of what needs to change.
739:, it may be easiest to identify the article's broader shortcomings with a short cut from the middle. I can also take a closer look at
1268:
when I thought I had finished this, someone added a paragraph on slavery, and as I validated the sources, I ended up reading a book
383:
627:
I am currently already reading it as I've said above, and I agree with your praise. Also with your methodology, I am fully onboard.
250:
which seems to suggest that there were major changes to the institution of slavery from how it had been in classical antiquity...
1795:
My new literature section has been added. Thanks again Biz for your feedback! I'll look towards doing Art next sometime soon –
1178:
1504:
Same with me. IRL challenges, but have every intention to continue. Appreciate the follow up. Time has flown this past month…
1986:
Military is a complex topic I'm reading about now and plan to draft new copy hopefully this month when I get some free time.
2340:
1272:
which helped rewrite it and which is also helping with a lot of other content (like marriage which sits in women right now)
192:
the other side, the Literature section seems embarrassingly brief. From my understanding of Byzantine music (I created the
55:
50:
2392:
1262:
Languages: need to validate last paragraph sources and final review of copy. This section was completely rewritten by me.
129:
59:
549:. See if anything he introduces supports the sources, the narrative or challenges them (the Iconaclasm is an example).
1537:
narrative supported by stronger sources but it's easy to get caught in detail that another editor can easily correct.
163:
151:
2217:
History and Arts are progressing but I defer to Airship and Aza given they are updating here. I'm working on Law next
1409:
295:
255:
42:
17:
2308:
Matarisvan has improved the bibliography and converted the remaining references into SFN on the unreviewed sections.
1280:
I'm currently reviewing the "women" section and have more literature to read as it's a topic I have no expertise in
2114:, could you confirm whether it would be alright if these 5 unused sources were removed? If so, I will remove them.
1425:
1405:
247:
449:
505:
1. Read all the sources referenced to statements and document with quotes and/or bullet points what they say.
64:
1766:
1555:
786:
378:
I've been taking a break due to life, but before I touch this topic again I want to read Anthony Kaldellis's
482:
2378:
2175:
1756:
1563:
1495:
1448:
1371:
1357:
1322:
1219:
1130:
1102:
1076:
1010:
953:
917:
794:
749:
seems fairly...not for this decade. It needs to be replaced or likely removed, I'll see what I can source.
650:
512:
291:
264:
251:
221:
147:
124:
193:
76:
746:
930:
balance of all the things needed, I'd say this a 20-80 week project (budgeting 1-4 weeks per section).
1023:, but there is no time pressure. Other editors will evaluate on this page whether the article meets
1731:
Thank you! I've made some adjustments (moved your comments to the bottom of the page with replies).
2067:(1992), Bury, John Bagnell; Philotheus (1911), Antonucci, Michael (1993), Seeck, Otto, ed. (1876).
1977:
someone can help me obtain access to Bleicken which I've had trouble with, I would appreciate that.
1436:
2170:
I am free once again, and expect progress to be made swiftly and efficiently over the next month.
540:
When these articles talk about each other as different empires, we should probably understand why.
2374:
2171:
1752:
1714:
1683:
1615:
1590:
1559:
1533:
1491:
1463:
1444:
1367:
1353:
1318:
1256:
1215:
1126:
1116:
1098:
1072:
1006:
949:
913:
790:
646:
369:
217:
1041:
870:
327:
277:
181:
72:
2133:
1139:
I still see lots of uncited sections. I am happy to cn tag the article if this is requested.
609:
editing we will be all on the same page and the article will be all the better because of it.
46:
1182:
2364:
2119:
2086:
2050:
2013:
1864:
1422:
1340:
1252:
1233:
476:
439:
357:
68:
982:
Anything else? Who will perform the FAR? And we officially start sometime-ish this month?
785:
Let's start at the beginning? (I should note that when this FAR was opened a month ago, I
8:
2081:
I will look through these sources and see if anything in there can be added here. Cheers
1819:. Let's use that page to coordinate on the work, and keep this page for general updates.
1481:
30:
1097:
as the two remaining !votes, is there anything in particular you want to see addressed?
1679:
1112:
1092:
1019:
I don't understand Biz's question: the FAR is open, the instructions are at the top of
901:
889:
812:
757:
635:
490:
434:
What is your timeline like - are you hoping to work on this within the context of FAR?
409:
365:
236:
231:
the needed improvements and, I think, few if any reviewers available to undertake it.
2388:
1980:
1032:
1002:
861:
318:
287:
268:
172:
1604:
599:
38:
31:
2396:
2360:
2192:
2115:
2082:
2072:
2061:
2046:
2035:
2024:
2009:
2001:
1928:
1883:
1860:
1841:
1803:
1777:
1739:
1701:
1652:
1523:
1440:
1417:
1336:
1229:
1144:
1024:
435:
344:
204:
2255:
Also reviewed, but new since the FAR started: Geography, Military (Army, Navy).
1644:
Starting work on literature in my sandbox. Should get to Art and Music after –
1477:
998:
2404:
2348:
2145:
2101:
1991:
1955:
1905:
1824:
1722:
1635:
1580:
1542:
1509:
1471:
1390:
1304:
1190:
1158:
1062:
1020:
987:
971:
Issues from the above two processes will get posted on the articles Talk page
968:
this FAR talk is where we put notes evaluating scholarship and/or other notes
939:
882:
828:
805:
776:
750:
726:
628:
618:
572:
483:
465:
429:
402:
392:
232:
2373:
Still going, no intention of stopping; article is being gradually improved.
908:
856:
531:
457:
1053:
I've started the review with some structure on how we approach it in this
1598:
1071:
Discussion of approaches may also take place on the article's talk page.
1057:. Open to feedback to do this differently (in the Talk page, of course).
595:
525:
Documenting this means you can have other people help with the evaluation
453:
2221:
2210:
564:
reading the sources, the edit prioritization will just naturally emerge.
2187:
2068:
2031:
2005:
1943:
1924:
1879:
1836:
1798:
1772:
1734:
1696:
1647:
1627:
1519:
1295:
Due to life commitments, I expect to be slow moving until February 5th.
1140:
1088:
340:
199:
1815:
Thank you for your work. I've updated the status of the article here:
1111:
There is at least one section without a source at the last sentence.
1892:
I've removed the three sections until more work can be done on them.
1518:
I copy-edited the "Society" section, does that section look better.
1404:
This is undisputedly the longest-lived FA on the English Knowledge,
977:
After (or in parallel?) of the FAR, we do section by section drives?
2400:
2344:
2141:
2111:
2097:
1987:
1983:
that all the scholars reference; now I just need to learn German...
1951:
1901:
1820:
1718:
1688:
1631:
1594:
1576:
1551:
1538:
1505:
1467:
1386:
1300:
1186:
1154:
1058:
983:
935:
824:
772:
722:
614:
568:
461:
425:
388:
361:
1630:
has previously said they would work on, but otherwise open field!
1177:
I would appreciate feedback on two sections I've been focused on:
1817:
Knowledge talk:Featured article review/Byzantine Empire/archive3
1572:
By second paragraph, you mean the sentence starting with Phocas?
479:. This is a big topic of my interest, but it's not my specialty.
1751:
Sorry, don't have much time to take a look at this at present.
1248:
which was my precondition before I start work on this article.
965:
this FAR page (or its talk?) is where we document a FAR review
1031:(which I I believe is the biggest rewrite at FAR to date).
1244:
I've completed my read (40+ hours) of Anthony Kaldellis's
1678:
I've completed a draft for a new literature section, see
1352:
progress. should be able to crack on next week, however.
134:
1765:
No worries! The Byzantine Empire will be waiting, since
1029:
Knowledge:Featured article review/J. K. Rowling/archive1
860:
little actual article progress, so direction is needed.
787:
trimmed the original six paragraphs into the current two
2295:
Infobox has now more tightly regulated and simplified.
1979:
UPDATE: it only took a few hours and two months but I
1259:
is taking point on History and it's not an easy task.
1085:
I'm continuing the rewrite, aided by the others here;
2242:
Governance and Diplomacy have been recently reviewed.
317:, it looks unlikely anyone can or will take this on.
2387:Law has been rewritten and the review is complete.
1366:Update: I hope to make some progress this weekend.
701:
Macedonian dynasty and resurgence (867–1025): 2170
1270:Slaveries of the First Millennium by Youval Rotman
460:what do you think is best to improve the article?
1614:Great! We are working our way down the article, @
108:Featured article review/Byzantine Empire/archive3
103:Featured article review/Byzantine Empire/archive2
98:Featured article review/Byzantine Empire/archive1
2204:Comprehensive status update as of August 20 2024
537:There should be synergies between these articles
534:and see if there is anything there we can use.
267:it looks like work is progressing; are you in?
855:will the article/work be divided, where will
962:Makes sense. So if I understand this right:
85:Featured article candidates/Byzantine Empire
1414:WP:Knowledge Signpost/2008-07-21/Dispatches
1179:Transition into an eastern Christian empire
804:I would also fully support this approach.
698:Arab invasions and shrinking borders: 1312
360:. I caveat though that I see though that
1153:Yes please, that would be a great help!
974:We announce updates here every two weeks
735:For some reason, my non-binding pick is
707:Komnenian dynasty and the Crusades: 1694
508:Check they actually say what was written
93:Featured article review/Byzantine Empire
2399:this past month for moving us forward.
2359:Could we get an update on status here?
1859:Could we get an update on status here?
1335:Could we get an update on status here?
1228:Could we get an update on status here?
364:is doing a bit of work on the article?
14:
2341:battle tested standard on source usage
1833:Understood! Nice system you got there
1406:going as far back as mid-November 2001
518:as the basis of its narrative in the
1767:you can't go back to Constantinople
530:2. Read the article and sources in
27:
1950:has been used to represent, etc).
28:
2424:
18:Knowledge:Featured article review
2325:
2312:
2299:
2286:
2273:
2259:
2246:
2233:
2220:
2209:
710:Decline and disintegration: 1282
1713:I've responded with feedback. @
671:Government and bureaucracy: 924
545:3. Finish reading Kaldellis's
248:Slavery in the Byzantine Empire
148:Mass Message Send notifications
2409:17:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2383:20:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
2369:17:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
382:and complete my research on a
13:
1:
1313:History rewrite is ongoing...
1224:20:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
1163:16:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
1149:16:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
1135:13:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
1121:12:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
1107:12:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
1081:03:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
1067:19:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
1046:12:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
704:Crisis and fragmentation: 491
692:Early Byzantine history: 1026
659:Word counts by major section
415:13:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
397:20:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
374:10:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
300:14:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
282:12:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
2136:and keep this page just for
1981:found this out-of-print book
1327:21:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
1309:20:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
1238:19:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
1195:00:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
1015:23:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
992:20:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
958:19:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
944:19:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
922:14:35, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
895:14:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
875:14:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
833:15:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
818:14:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
799:14:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
781:04:47, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
763:04:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
731:04:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
655:22:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
641:05:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
623:05:39, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
604:07:41, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
577:18:09, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
496:15:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
470:07:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
444:05:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
349:14:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
332:12:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
260:10:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
241:06:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
226:23:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
212:22:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
186:22:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
7:
2353:22:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
1255:". It's two-thirds done. @
1050:Thank you for the pointers.
194:List of Byzantine composers
10:
2429:
2200:05:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2150:16:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
2124:08:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
2106:17:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
2091:16:35, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
2077:15:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
2055:07:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
2040:06:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
2018:06:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1395:22:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
1376:12:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
1251:I'm currently focused on "
747:File:Bizansist touchup.jpg
745:Oh, also, the presence of
2180:23:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
1996:20:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
1960:19:39, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
1933:17:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
1910:20:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
1888:21:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
1869:01:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
1849:16:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
1829:03:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
1811:02:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
1785:21:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
1761:10:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
1747:04:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1727:03:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1717:should also take a look.
1709:21:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1660:19:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
1453:15:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
1431:05:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
1362:05:50, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
1345:05:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
890:
813:
758:
674:Science and medicine: 528
636:
491:
450:Future Perfect at Sunrise
410:
2282:Nomenclature from before
1640:23:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
1610:21:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
1585:01:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
1568:00:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
1547:20:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
1528:21:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
1439:, 26 May 2001, 08:00:45
1437:Knowledge:BrilliantProse
823:Logical. Ready to roll.
737:Crisis and fragmentation
716:Political aftermath: 725
1514:04:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
1500:19:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
1486:19:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
1410:August 2001 per Wayback
695:Justinian dynasty: 1081
292:Caeciliusinhorto-public
265:Caeciliusinhorto-public
252:Caeciliusinhorto-public
1426:egg-throwing coleslaw?
2375:~~ AirshipJungleman29
2172:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1753:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1560:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1492:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1445:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1368:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1354:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1319:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1216:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1127:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1099:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1073:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1007:~~ AirshipJungleman29
950:~~ AirshipJungleman29
914:~~ AirshipJungleman29
791:~~ AirshipJungleman29
647:~~ AirshipJungleman29
218:~~ AirshipJungleman29
2393:long standing issues
1246:The New Roman Empire
1212:Christmas Day update
547:The New Roman Empire
477:Battle of Red Cliffs
380:The new Roman Empire
358:African humid period
286:Thanks for the ping
150:, talk page notices
1402:Wikitrivia comment:
1125:We'll get to that.
1055:article's talk page
1715:AirshipJungleman29
1680:User:Aza24/sandbox
1616:AirshipJungleman29
1591:AirshipJungleman29
1534:AirshipJungleman29
1464:AirshipJungleman29
1257:AirshipJungleman29
2140:general updates.
1532:Yes, thank you! @
1476:How is it going?
1429:
905:
665:Nomenclature: 307
522:article section).
246:article. We have
158:
142:
141:
2420:
2333:
2329:
2328:
2320:
2316:
2315:
2307:
2303:
2302:
2294:
2290:
2289:
2281:
2277:
2276:
2267:
2263:
2262:
2254:
2250:
2249:
2241:
2237:
2236:
2224:
2213:
2197:
2195:
2190:
2065:
2028:
1972:nomos empsychos
1846:
1844:
1839:
1808:
1806:
1801:
1782:
1780:
1775:
1744:
1742:
1737:
1706:
1704:
1699:
1692:
1657:
1655:
1650:
1607:
1601:
1475:
1420:
1096:
1038:
1001:. Is that right
899:
892:
887:
867:
820:
815:
810:
760:
755:
638:
633:
498:
493:
488:
433:
412:
407:
324:
274:
209:
207:
202:
178:
144:
114:
113:
80:
62:
39:Byzantine Empire
32:Byzantine Empire
22:Byzantine Empire
2428:
2427:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2326:
2324:
2313:
2311:
2300:
2298:
2287:
2285:
2274:
2272:
2260:
2258:
2247:
2245:
2234:
2232:
2193:
2188:
2186:
2134:articles's talk
2059:
2022:
1948:nomos empsychos
1842:
1837:
1835:
1804:
1799:
1797:
1778:
1773:
1771:
1740:
1735:
1733:
1702:
1697:
1695:
1686:
1653:
1648:
1646:
1620:nomos empsychos
1605:
1599:
1461:
1086:
1036:
883:
865:
806:
803:
751:
668:History: 10,090
629:
484:
423:
403:
339:per the above.
322:
272:
205:
200:
198:
176:
112:
53:
37:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2426:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2356:
2355:
2336:
2322:
2309:
2296:
2283:
2270:
2256:
2243:
2230:
2218:
2206:
2205:
2202:
2182:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2093:
1998:
1984:
1970:I went down a
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1939:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1897:
1893:
1872:
1871:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1749:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1624:
1573:
1516:
1502:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1311:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1278:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1263:
1249:
1226:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1083:
1051:
980:
979:
978:
975:
972:
969:
966:
931:
927:
924:
897:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
768:
744:
719:
718:
717:
714:
711:
708:
705:
702:
699:
696:
693:
686:
685:
684:
681:
678:
675:
672:
669:
666:
663:
643:
610:
591:
588:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
565:
561:
560:
559:
556:
553:
543:
542:
541:
538:
528:
527:
526:
523:
515:
509:
503:
480:
472:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
351:
334:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
214:
140:
139:
138:
137:
135:External links
132:
127:
119:
118:
111:
110:
105:
100:
95:
89:
88:
87:
34:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2425:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2358:
2357:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2337:
2332:
2323:
2319:
2310:
2306:
2297:
2293:
2284:
2280:
2271:
2266:
2257:
2253:
2244:
2240:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2207:
2203:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2191:
2183:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2168:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2094:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2063:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2026:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1982:
1978:
1973:
1969:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1940:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1898:
1894:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1857:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1840:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1802:
1794:
1786:
1783:
1781:
1776:
1768:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1748:
1745:
1743:
1738:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1700:
1690:
1684:
1682:(perma link:
1681:
1677:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1651:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1608:
1602:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1460:
1459:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1435:According to
1434:
1433:
1432:
1427:
1424:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1383:
1382:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1333:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1299:
1294:
1286:
1284:perspective).
1282:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1271:
1267:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1247:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1113:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1110:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1094:
1093:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1090:
1084:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
995:
994:
993:
989:
985:
981:
976:
973:
970:
967:
964:
963:
961:
960:
959:
955:
951:
947:
946:
945:
941:
937:
932:
928:
925:
923:
919:
915:
910:
903:
902:edit conflict
898:
896:
893:
888:
886:
879:
878:
877:
876:
872:
868:
864:
858:
857:summary style
834:
830:
826:
822:
821:
819:
816:
811:
809:
802:
801:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
783:
782:
778:
774:
769:
766:
765:
764:
761:
756:
754:
748:
742:
738:
734:
733:
732:
728:
724:
720:
715:
712:
709:
706:
703:
700:
697:
694:
691:
690:
687:
682:
679:
677:Culture: 3536
676:
673:
670:
667:
664:
661:
660:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
642:
639:
634:
632:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
611:
607:
606:
605:
601:
597:
592:
589:
586:
585:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
557:
554:
551:
550:
548:
544:
539:
536:
535:
533:
529:
524:
521:
516:
514:
513:patch-writing
510:
507:
506:
504:
500:
499:
497:
494:
489:
487:
478:
473:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
431:
427:
422:
416:
413:
408:
406:
400:
399:
398:
394:
390:
385:
381:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
366:Jo-Jo Eumerus
363:
359:
355:
352:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
316:
313:
312:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
249:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
229:
228:
227:
223:
219:
215:
213:
210:
208:
203:
195:
190:
189:
188:
187:
183:
179:
175:
169:
165:
159:
157:
156:
153:
149:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:
123:
122:
121:
120:
116:
115:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
90:
86:
83:
82:
81:
78:
74:
70:
66:
61:
57:
52:
48:
44:
40:
33:
23:
19:
2389:SandyGeorgia
2330:
2317:
2304:
2291:
2278:
2264:
2251:
2238:
2225:
2214:
2185:
2137:
2130:on this talk
1976:
1971:
1947:
1834:
1796:
1770:
1732:
1694:
1645:
1619:
1408:(or rather,
1401:
1349:
1314:
1269:
1245:
1211:
1033:
1003:SandyGeorgia
909:Genghis Khan
884:
862:
853:
807:
752:
740:
736:
680:Economy: 418
630:
546:
532:Roman Empire
520:Roman Empire
519:
485:
404:
379:
354:Move to FARC
353:
337:Move to FARC
336:
319:
315:Move to FARC
314:
288:SandyGeorgia
269:
197:
173:
160:
145:
143:
130:Citation bot
36:
1896:reflection)
1597:& co.?
1315:slooowwwwly
683:Legacy: 416
2397:Matarisvan
2361:Nikkimaria
2335:accessible
2116:Matarisvan
2083:Matarisvan
2062:Matarisvan
2047:Matarisvan
2025:Matarisvan
2010:Matarisvan
2002:Nikkimaria
1944:Principate
1861:Nikkimaria
1441:Slgrandson
1418:Slgrandson
1337:Nikkimaria
1230:Nikkimaria
511:Check for
436:Nikkimaria
168:2022-12-10
164:2020-11-21
155:2022-12-10
152:2020-11-21
146:Notified:
2269:Language.
1769:anyways.
1556:this edit
1478:QuicoleJR
1350:sloooooow
713:Fall: 309
662:Lead: 571
2331:Not done
2318:Not done
2226:Doing...
2215:Doing...
1472:Remsense
1423:How's my
1183:Language
1025:WP:WIAFA
885:Remsense
808:Remsense
753:Remsense
741:Language
631:Remsense
486:Remsense
430:Remsense
405:Remsense
233:Donner60
125:Analysis
20: |
2132:or the
1470:, and
1288:Neville
1253:society
1037:Georgia
999:WP:FACR
866:Georgia
458:DeCausa
323:Georgia
273:Georgia
177:Georgia
117:Toolbox
56:protect
51:history
2229:later.
2194:(talk)
1900:good.
1843:(talk)
1805:(talk)
1779:(talk)
1741:(talk)
1703:(talk)
1654:(talk)
1600:Jr8825
1021:WP:FAR
596:Furius
454:Furius
206:(talk)
60:delete
2189:Aza24
2138:pulse
2069:Z1720
2032:Z1720
2006:Z1720
2004:and @
1925:Z1720
1880:Z1720
1838:Aza24
1800:Aza24
1774:Aza24
1736:Aza24
1698:Aza24
1649:Aza24
1628:Aza24
1623:done.
1520:CosXZ
1141:Z1720
1089:Z1720
1034:Sandy
863:Sandy
384:draft
341:Z1720
320:Sandy
270:Sandy
201:Aza24
174:Sandy
77:views
69:watch
65:links
16:<
2405:talk
2379:talk
2365:talk
2349:talk
2305:Done
2292:Done
2279:Done
2265:Done
2252:Done
2239:Done
2176:talk
2146:talk
2120:talk
2102:talk
2087:talk
2073:talk
2051:talk
2036:talk
2014:talk
2000:Hi @
1992:talk
1956:talk
1929:talk
1906:talk
1884:talk
1865:talk
1825:talk
1757:talk
1723:talk
1636:talk
1606:Talk
1581:talk
1564:talk
1543:talk
1524:talk
1510:talk
1496:talk
1482:talk
1449:talk
1416:. --
1391:talk
1372:talk
1358:talk
1341:talk
1323:talk
1305:talk
1234:talk
1220:talk
1191:talk
1181:and
1159:talk
1145:talk
1131:talk
1117:talk
1103:talk
1091:and
1077:talk
1063:talk
1042:Talk
1011:talk
988:talk
954:talk
940:talk
918:talk
871:Talk
829:talk
795:talk
777:talk
727:talk
651:talk
619:talk
600:talk
573:talk
466:talk
440:talk
428:and
393:talk
370:talk
345:talk
328:Talk
296:talk
278:Talk
256:talk
237:talk
222:talk
182:Talk
166:and
73:logs
47:talk
43:edit
2401:Biz
2391:'s
2345:Biz
2142:Biz
2112:Biz
2098:Biz
1988:Biz
1952:Biz
1938:is.
1902:Biz
1821:Biz
1719:Biz
1689:Biz
1685:).
1632:Biz
1595:Biz
1577:Biz
1552:Biz
1539:Biz
1506:Biz
1468:Biz
1387:Biz
1301:Biz
1187:Biz
1155:Biz
1059:Biz
1044:)
984:Biz
936:Biz
873:)
825:Biz
789:).
773:Biz
723:Biz
615:Biz
569:Biz
462:Biz
426:Biz
389:Biz
362:Biz
330:)
280:)
184:)
2407:)
2381:)
2367:)
2351:)
2178:)
2148:)
2122:)
2104:)
2089:)
2075:)
2053:)
2038:)
2016:)
1994:)
1958:)
1931:)
1908:)
1886:)
1867:)
1827:)
1759:)
1725:)
1638:)
1603:•
1583:)
1566:)
1545:)
1526:)
1512:)
1498:)
1484:)
1466:,
1451:)
1443:.
1393:)
1374:)
1360:)
1343:)
1325:)
1317:.
1307:)
1236:)
1222:)
1193:)
1161:)
1147:)
1133:)
1119:)
1105:)
1079:)
1065:)
1013:)
1005:?
990:)
956:)
942:)
920:)
831:)
797:)
779:)
729:)
653:)
621:)
602:)
575:)
468:)
442:)
395:)
372:)
347:)
298:)
258:)
239:)
224:)
75:|
71:|
67:|
63:|
58:|
54:|
49:|
45:|
2403:(
2377:(
2363:(
2347:(
2174:(
2144:(
2118:(
2110:@
2100:(
2085:(
2071:(
2064::
2060:@
2049:(
2034:(
2027::
2023:@
2012:(
1990:(
1954:(
1927:(
1904:(
1882:(
1863:(
1823:(
1755:(
1721:(
1691::
1687:@
1634:(
1593:@
1579:(
1562:(
1541:(
1522:(
1508:(
1494:(
1480:(
1474::
1462:@
1447:(
1428:)
1421:(
1389:(
1370:(
1356:(
1339:(
1321:(
1303:(
1232:(
1218:(
1189:(
1157:(
1143:(
1129:(
1115:(
1101:(
1095::
1087:@
1075:(
1061:(
1040:(
1009:(
986:(
952:(
938:(
916:(
904:)
900:(
891:留
869:(
827:(
814:留
793:(
775:(
759:留
743:.
725:(
649:(
637:留
617:(
598:(
571:(
492:留
464:(
456:@
452:@
438:(
432::
424:@
411:聊
391:(
368:(
343:(
326:(
294:(
276:(
254:(
235:(
220:(
180:(
79:)
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.