1167:- Am I right in my understanding that, because the bull is feral, no one can claim without seeing the results of genetic testing that it is really a Charolais bull? Have we required the same strict standard for all images of wild animals in Knowledge articles? Also, couldn't we contact a zoologist or cattle breeder, preferably one in the area where the photo was taken, to see if the type of bull can be confirmed? It may even be the case that there are no other kinds of cattle except Charolais in that area. I know that contacting someone may take a little time, but perhaps the nomination could be placed on hold for a few days. The photo is a nice one, the bull is distinctive, there is some support here for the image, and I wouldn't dismiss it lightly. I think it's worth a little investigation.
641:
rest, at that time, I was fast asleep. I do not remember what the situation was, however, woke up by a sound of falling rocks. And there was this huge animal staring at me, I really have no way to explain it, but when I was looking at him, the animal felt one with me. His body was so great that covered an entire area around a ledge. The animal looked at me in disbelief and curiosity and was quickly disappearing into the mist. I returned a few years later, however, I found no animal in that area. I recently talked to a few climbers who told me that these animals had to descend into radical foraging due to climate change has been that area. Many have been killed for human consumption and many others for breeding. --
51:
922:
539:
597:
767:
533:
527:
1122:
851:
833:
traits absent in modern breeds and novel or rare adaptations; the presence of these variants may be suggested directly by morphological markers, quantitative traits, fitness characters, or rare or unique alleles, and indirectly by the extent and duration of isolation, founder number, ancestry, or environmental conditions. Both direct and indirect evidence indicated potentially valuable traits in a population of feral population.
934:
615:
domestic cattle are not even capable of it any more. And bulls are slightly difficult to handle sometimes, exactly like bears, can be uncomfortable to deal with. Dominant males keep a vigilant eye on the surroundings and bulls can be rather difficult if they are in that mood, I have been chased twice by (domestic cattle) bulls and there is not much you can do against an angry bull if you are not a professional
1044:
954:, I see you changed the name to "Feral bull". Couldn't you make it "Feral Charolais bull"? I think this bull looks very different from cattle we see in the U.S. The color and long hair are distinctive. If it looks anything like a Charolais bull, it probably is one, and adding "feral" might satisfy those who feel there should be genetic testing before it's called a Charolais. Just a thought. -
902:
1140:
supposed to be fun !! I when I took that picture because I thought it might be useful to someone and I'm not particularly interested in this photograph is selected. However, some people take a huge effort in search for dramas of what supposedly was sought, this nomination is starting to become a
Mexican novel. --
903:
https://books.google.se/books?id=7YC3cYhGMOcC&pg=PA469&lpg=PA469&dq=Sierra+Nevada+wild+cattle&source=bl&ots=Clh93OV2Sw&sig=ZLwISC0Q2TBPm0YMaxcEaX8BEHA&hl=sv&sa=X&ei=G9TTVJCENYj5ywOa0YLACg&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Sierra%20Nevada%20wild%20cattle&f=false
640:
Thank you very much for this nominating regardless of the final result. I would comment that this photograph was performed after 8 days away from any kind of civilization. On the eighth day, the day of the descent, I was extremely tired to think due to lack of oxygen. At that time, I lay on a rock to
973:
I'm not sure that what you propose gets the ship out of the ice, as "feral" does not imply admixture. If it's not
Charolais, it might be a hybrid, but we can't confirm that either, so what Hafspajen did is probably best in this case. FWIW, I created an article about the plant, but I don't have time
832:
the breed - but the feral one, and thus has EV too. It has plenty of EV either way, because it illustrates the different articles. Please. Feral livestock may have some genetic variation with potential commercial, scientific historical, or aesthetic value. Important variants may include primitive
602:
no hotels, retaurants, easy access and stuff, that's EV already. Because cattle need tremendous areas to grazing and are prodigious eaters; need large quantities of grasses and are in need of right kind of habitat. Most cattle that exist in the world is domestic and it is billion dollar industry
573:
Well, I can't agree about the EV. I do think it has EV, and really plenty of EV, rather. When I found this picture my first reaction was wow, a wild cattle! Wild cattle or feral cattle are not especially common. In Europe there are very few places where still exist some feral cattle, I think only
730:
Hi
Samsara. I agree with you, I'm not sure we can assert that it is a Charolais and this premise may be applicable for any wild bull. Blood tests and the presence of an expert to ensure that this really is a purebred needed. BTW "In Sierra Nevada de Mérida, Venezuela, following the rural flight of
614:
brought sheep, goats, cattle and horses. There were none until then in these areas. This above has long fur and is adapted to the mountain climate, during the years in the wild. Also an interesting trait. It climbs in the mountain on rocks and stuff, the way domestic cattle don't do any more, some
1125:
which I think from the perspective of illustrating the breed is actually more valuable. In over two years now, there has been no response to the citation needed tag. I think it's getting close to the time where we have to concede that a citation is not forthcoming and the sentence will have to be
1139:
This nomination seems to be more about who is right instead of selecting high quality photos objectively. It's amazing the time taken to especultar and bring up circumstantial elements, seemingly innocuous comments. It's my bad perception or there are people here who need a therapist ?. This is
1001:
Strictly speaking, he has a point in terms of the stability criterion. As it stands, the image's use in the charolais article has a citation needed tag hanging over its head. I'm mulling what should be done with it. A source would be really great at this point. Using it as an example of a feral
1002:
animal is probably fine. Ultimately, we have to trust the photographer's account or we'd probably have to remove quite a few images from
Knowledge. So I suggest that after all the sweat and tears, we IAR, declare the nom valid and hope for the best.
318:- I mean the photo is unusual and nice. It has EV because it is taken in a natural environment, in an place away from any civilization. It is rather its strength that is climbing on cliffs, looking down on us, instead of the usual
868:. It is one of the a feral cattle and it has plenty of EV as far of the feral cattle living in those areas. And this is my very last nomination of any photo. And I really don't understand sometimes the reactions on FP. We had
270:
I think it's rare to find a photo of a large animal this close up without it being in a small pen in a cattle yard, and one that is so attractive with the vegetation and the unusual perspective of looking up at the animal.
1040:– this is a quality image (an FP on Commons); the additional requirement we have for EV is, I think, also met. It may well be a hybrid - feral animals don't bother about the niceties of ensuring pedigrees remain pure
668:
650:
1149:
786:
756:
743:
1064:
686:
390:
628:
551:
507:
1130:
1098:
1077:
709:
1198:
1176:
1026:
992:
963:
917:
460:- Well, the monkey shelfie was half of an animal too... And actually it has more EV one could think, when investigating the matter, several articles more. And aesthetic value generates EV... of course.
362:
331:
305:
280:
241:
154:
842:
815:
258:
207:
1006:
978:
721:
564:
469:
448:
406:
436:
220:
195:
423:
897:: Feral cattle in South America still exist in Sierra Nevada and are the the descends of the cattle brought by the Spanish conquistadors. Most live in the National park. This is such an
560:
Two of those were promoted because they show a specific behaviour. They were not promoted to identify and represent the animal. Both species also have FPs that show the full animal.
889:
134:
1213:
752:
That's from a
Knowledge mirror. The live version has a "citation needed" tag, so in the absence of other sources we should not treat the above statement as true. Thanks.
872:, but everybody was just silent and polite. When I knew very well it was the sock comming back to vote, the very one I politely asked to stay away from me - -
249:
Once again, a nice enough picture, but this section is for pictures that also have full EV, and as the full subject is not visable I cannot
Support sorry...
603:
worldwide, while under the hands of humans, they have been bread and messed with, until they don't really look like anything or their ancestors ( take
1237:
873:
677:
Thank you to both parties, and I especially liked hearing about the situation and circumstance that brought about the taking of the photograph.
1108:
1227:
107:
731:
farmers, many
Charolais cattle were abandoned; they have survived in the wild feeding on Espeletia schultzii, a high altitude shrub"
659:
Thank you, Hafspajen, for the information, and thank you The
Photographer for sharing your experience in such an interesting way.
83:
880:
and the bad guy, all of the sudden. I never disrupted this project, never socked on this project and still I am the bad one?
1232:
493:
17:
700:- Considering how rare such images are (at least with free licenses), I don't mind not having the whole animal in view. —
144:
Hafs, this is the last type of photo that I would think you would nominate. I never knew you had an interest in cattle.
717:
Given the account of how this picture was taken, I'm not sure we can assert that it shows a purebred
Charolais.
1086:
Sorry, I was referring to the image not being removed from the article, rather than the sentence being tagged.
732:
1116:
1112:
1049:
519:
It is by now added to 8 articles. That's quite an EV. I think there is nothing wrong with this pic, really.
1185:
Decline puting nomination on hold. Any issues of this may be continued at resp. article talk page, like at
869:
498:. Sorry for "my trolling". It's absolutely doesn't matter for me if the image get the FP status or not. --
587:
1145:
782:
739:
646:
619:, except run fast to fence and jump, because of their sheer size. (luckily there was one both times).--
594:... I believe if you want to take a picture like this, these are the requirements to get to the place,
95:
58:
229:
381:
Great picture. I love that the animal is in a more natural environment. I like the angle shot.
1093:
1059:
682:
386:
503:
487:
1141:
983:
Yeah, and then somebody will ask that the nomination should be closed or chucked, see above.
803:
778:
735:
705:
642:
115:
50:
921:
591:
583:
8:
1194:
1172:
1022:
988:
959:
913:
885:
838:
664:
624:
547:
465:
358:
327:
301:
276:
237:
150:
130:
538:
432:
216:
1087:
1053:
678:
575:
382:
26:
798:
If the breed of this cattle cannot be confirmed (as discussed directly above between
499:
483:
402:
91:
901:. Maybe or maybe not not a Charolais, but certainly belongs to these feral cattle.
99:
1186:
701:
444:
per Editør and gazhiley. Seems to be mostly supported for aesthetic value, not EV.
75:
596:
193:
906:
1190:
1168:
1018:
984:
955:
951:
909:
881:
834:
773:
In this picture you can also see the main and only food to sustain this animal
660:
620:
543:
461:
419:
354:
323:
297:
272:
233:
146:
126:
87:
1221:
1210:
1073:
To the contrary, it was challenged with a "citation needed" tag immediately.
807:
350:
250:
204:
1017:
Some kind of
Espeletia is. Espeletia has quite a lot of subspecies, though.
532:
1127:
1074:
1003:
975:
799:
766:
753:
718:
604:
561:
445:
398:
215:– Great photo, but for EV, I would rather see the entire animal. – Editør (
183:
1121:
526:
415:
1048:- but it appears to have been in the Charolais cattle article since
79:
850:
616:
611:
268:
Hafs, did you mean "appalling" (awful) or "appealing" (attractive)?
1119:. The following more canonical image was replaced in the process:
933:
579:
974:
to make much progress with it. Extra hands make light work. ;)
898:
574:
in some wild areas in Spain or France might have some and the
232:. I think personally that it is rather an attractive posture.
1207:
Promoted File:Charolais cattle, Sierra Nevada, Venezuela.jpg
578:, about 90 animals in Chillingham, that inhabit a park. The
495:
the author is unable to accept criticism or another opinions
1189:. There are five articles where the photo is valid anyway.
1126:
moved to the talk page for interested parties to work on.
607:
for example). On his second voyage to the New World in
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
228:- it's more like a portrait, looking down from an
1219:
907:https://books.google.se/books?isbn=0643099166
524:And these are FPs too, and were accepted:
108:Knowledge:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
1238:Featured picture nominations/January 2015
582:were living once here wild, but they are
932:
920:
849:
806:), can we proceed with this Nom or not?
595:
69:Big enough, looks clear and crisp. Used.
49:
84:Sierra Nevada National Park (Venezuela)
14:
1220:
296:So "appealing", and I agree with you.
18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
1041:
72:Articles in which this image appears
23:
1228:Ended featured picture nominations
431:per my earlier comment. – Editør (
24:
1249:
1109:The Photographer placed the image
1120:
1042:
874:I was the one who got reproached
864:Changed the nomination title to
765:
537:
531:
525:
490:) 23:33, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
57:– a wild bull portrait in the
13:
1:
876:for not showing AGF. And now
1233:Featured picture nominations
1214:19:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1199:19:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1177:18:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1150:15:05, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1131:14:25, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1099:13:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1078:13:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1065:10:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1027:02:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
1007:01:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
993:23:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
979:01:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
964:23:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
918:20:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
890:18:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
843:18:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
816:13:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
787:13:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
757:14:32, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
744:11:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
734:. Thanks for your comment --
722:09:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
710:02:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
687:22:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
669:02:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
651:21:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
629:06:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
565:14:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
552:23:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
508:21:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
470:20:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
449:17:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
437:12:58, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
424:18:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
407:15:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
391:03:17, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
363:00:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
332:00:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
306:00:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
281:22:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
259:18:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
242:16:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
221:11:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
208:05:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
196:02:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
155:20:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
135:19:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
7:
10:
1254:
1117:challenged on the same day
1052:without being challenged.
492:I strike my vote, because
104:FP category for this image
96:Ploughing in the Nivernais
590:. India has quite a few,
586:There have been attempts
1107:What happened was that
482:missing the real EV. --
938:
926:
855:
600:
320:cow in the green field
62:
39:Voting period ends on
936:
924:
853:
599:
353:mountains after all.
345:this photo. Also, it
203:. Nice composition. —
53:
1111:, then a week later
870:loads of disruptions
123:Support as nominator
775:Espeletia schultzii
939:
927:
856:
601:
576:Chillingham cattle
63:
966:
638:Support as author
588:to re-create them
365:
341:Again I agree. I
308:
269:
145:
92:Maverick (animal)
47:
1245:
1187:Charolais cattle
1142:The_Photographer
1124:
1090:
1056:
1047:
1046:
1045:
946:
895:Cattle reference
813:
810:
804:The_Photographer
779:The_Photographer
769:
736:The_Photographer
643:The_Photographer
541:
535:
529:
340:
295:
267:
256:
253:
192:
189:
186:
143:
116:The Photographer
76:Charolais cattle
38:
36:
1253:
1252:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1218:
1217:
1088:
1054:
1043:
811:
808:
254:
251:
190:
184:
181:
142:- Great photo!
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1251:
1241:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1180:
1179:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1134:
1133:
1113:added the text
1102:
1101:
1081:
1080:
1068:
1067:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
996:
995:
981:
968:
967:
931:
930:
929:
928:
892:
848:
847:
846:
845:
819:
818:
792:
791:
790:
789:
762:
761:
760:
759:
747:
746:
725:
724:
712:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
672:
671:
654:
653:
634:
633:
632:
631:
570:
569:
568:
567:
555:
554:
542:; great pics.
520:
511:
510:
475:
474:
473:
472:
452:
451:
439:
426:
409:
393:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
335:
334:
310:
309:
290:
289:
284:
283:
261:
244:
223:
210:
198:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
164:
163:
158:
157:
137:
119:
118:
113:
110:
105:
102:
100:Mérida (state)
88:Feral organism
73:
70:
67:
45:19:49:22 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1250:
1239:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1229:
1226:
1225:
1223:
1216:
1215:
1212:
1208:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1163:
1162:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1132:
1129:
1123:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1091:
1089:SagaciousPhil
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1057:
1055:SagaciousPhil
1051:
1050:December 2012
1039:
1036:
1035:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1008:
1005:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
994:
990:
986:
982:
980:
977:
972:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
935:
923:
919:
915:
911:
908:
904:
900:
896:
893:
891:
887:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
860:
859:
858:
857:
852:
844:
840:
836:
831:
827:
823:
822:
821:
820:
817:
814:
805:
801:
797:
794:
793:
788:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
763:
758:
755:
751:
750:
749:
748:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
728:
727:
726:
723:
720:
716:
713:
711:
707:
703:
699:
696:
695:
688:
684:
680:
679:WordSeventeen
676:
675:
674:
673:
670:
666:
662:
658:
657:
656:
655:
652:
648:
644:
639:
636:
635:
630:
626:
622:
618:
613:
610:
606:
598:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
572:
571:
566:
563:
559:
558:
557:
556:
553:
549:
545:
540:
534:
528:
523:
518:
515:
514:
513:
512:
509:
505:
501:
497:
496:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
476:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
455:
454:
453:
450:
447:
443:
440:
438:
434:
430:
427:
425:
421:
417:
413:
410:
408:
404:
400:
397:
394:
392:
388:
384:
383:WordSeventeen
380:
377:
376:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:Sierra Nevada
348:
344:
339:
338:
337:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
294:
293:
292:
291:
288:
287:
286:
285:
282:
278:
274:
265:
262:
260:
257:
248:
245:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
222:
218:
214:
211:
209:
206:
202:
199:
197:
194:
188:
187:
179:
176:
175:
168:
167:
166:
165:
162:
161:
160:
159:
156:
152:
148:
141:
138:
136:
132:
128:
124:
121:
120:
117:
114:
111:
109:
106:
103:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
74:
71:
68:
65:
64:
60:
59:Sierra Nevada
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
19:
1206:
1205:
1164:
1094:
1060:
1037:
947:
894:
877:
865:
861:
829:
825:
795:
774:
770:
714:
697:
637:
608:
605:Belgian Blue
584:extinct now.
521:
516:
500:Alchemist-hp
494:
484:Alchemist-hp
479:
478:
457:
441:
428:
411:
395:
378:
346:
342:
319:
315:
263:
246:
225:
212:
200:
182:
177:
139:
122:
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
702:Crisco 1492
414:as others.
61:, Venezuela
41:6 Feb 2015
1222:Categories
1115:which was
866:Feral bull
28:Feral bull
1191:Hafspajen
1169:CorinneSD
1019:Hafspajen
985:Hafspajen
956:CorinneSD
952:Hafspajen
937:Espeletia
925:Espeletia
910:Hafspajen
882:Hafspajen
854:Espeletia
835:Hafspajen
661:CorinneSD
621:Hafspajen
592:Australia
544:Hafspajen
462:Hafspajen
355:CorinneSD
324:Hafspajen
322:- style.
298:CorinneSD
273:CorinneSD
234:Hafspajen
147:CorinneSD
127:Hafspajen
1211:Armbrust
796:Question
771:Comment:
617:toreador
612:Columbus
205:Bruce1ee
55:Original
1165:Comment
1128:Samsara
1075:Samsara
1038:Support
1004:Samsara
976:Samsara
948:Comment
862:Comment
826:Comment
800:Samsara
754:Samsara
719:Samsara
715:Comment
698:Support
580:Aurochs
562:Samsara
522:Comment
517:Comment
458:Comment
446:Samsara
412:Support
399:Tomer T
396:Support
379:Support
349:in the
316:Comment
264:Comment
226:Comment
213:Comment
201:Support
178:Support
140:Support
112:Creator
899:animal
480:Oppose
442:Oppose
429:Oppose
247:Oppose
80:Páramo
66:Reason
828:- It
812:hiley
255:hiley
185:Atsme
16:<
1195:talk
1173:talk
1146:talk
1095:Chat
1061:Chat
1023:talk
989:talk
960:talk
914:talk
886:talk
839:talk
802:and
783:talk
740:talk
706:talk
683:talk
665:talk
647:talk
625:talk
609:1493
548:talk
536:, +
504:talk
488:talk
466:talk
433:talk
420:talk
416:Yann
403:talk
387:talk
359:talk
343:love
328:talk
302:talk
277:talk
238:talk
230:edge
217:talk
151:talk
131:talk
905:or
809:gaz
252:gaz
98:,
82:,
78:,
43:at
1224::
1209:--
1197:)
1175:)
1148:)
1092:-
1058:-
1025:)
991:)
962:)
950:-
916:)
888:)
878:I
841:)
830:is
785:)
777:--
742:)
708:)
685:)
667:)
649:)
627:)
550:)
530:;
506:)
468:)
435:)
422:)
405:)
389:)
361:)
347:is
330:)
304:)
279:)
266:-
240:)
219:)
180:--
153:)
133:)
125:–
94:,
90:,
86:,
1193:(
1171:(
1144:(
1021:(
987:(
958:(
912:(
884:(
837:(
824:'
781:(
738:(
704:(
681:(
663:(
645:(
623:(
546:(
502:(
486:(
464:(
418:(
401:(
385:(
357:(
326:(
300:(
275:(
236:(
191:☯
149:(
129:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
