Knowledge talk:Templates for discussion/Archive 9

3094:: Remember that viewing old revisions can invoke old templates that appear in the old display. Yes, an extensive analysis could reveal which templates have fallen 100 revisions out of sight in their parent articles, but why bother? Just keep it simple: upon the 1-year anniversary, plan to delete most deprecated templates, unless they are obviously integral to a historical view of template development. When you find a historically-notable template, mark it as such to avoid deletion. I wish deleted images could first be auto-blurred as deprecation to avoid copyright- 2446:

a very experienced and willing editor would discover and 2) it enables the mover a potential advantage for their side of the discussion; as the mover has the power to inform who he/she pleases that the page has been moved, while hoping other select users don't notice the new page. Not saying either of these would happen, but the potential is there. That aside, it's highly irregular for a page history - esp. on something important like a vote - should be split in two like that. grubber is totally correct. There's no reason why

2500:, per se... not one that would need history merging, at least. My objective was to get content on a subpage, to emphasize the idea of a central discussion, and also to make the TFD page a bit shorter. I couldn't move the log page, because that had other votes on it. So I put it on a subpage of the log page, and all page history is kept on the log page itself. Nothing is lost, all is GFDL-compliant, and the people rejoice. Sort of. Anyway, I provided a link to the discussion on the main TFD page... this was 31: 1996:{{Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/{{#time:Y F j}}}} {{Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/{{#time:Y F j|-1 day}}}} {{Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/{{#time:Y F j|-2 days}}}} {{Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/{{#time:Y F j|-3 days}}}} {{Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/{{#time:Y F j|-4 days}}}} {{Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/{{#time:Y F j|-5 days}}}} {{Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/{{#time:Y F j|-6 days}}}}  459:), and I just tested it. However, I must apologize in advance: since I can not be in front of my terminal at 0:00 GMT, when the change is supposed to happen, I will run it manually a little bit earlier for the next few days, in order to make sure everything is going smoothly. This may produce some duplications of sections for a few hours, sorry about this. When everything is shown to work well, I will schedule it to run automatically at 0:00 GMT. 1516:, tag it with a {{db|reason}} and ask an admin to delete it − these do not require consensus. Otherwise, proposal of a template for deletion may be appropriate whenever: 1. The template is not helpful or noteworthy (encyclopaedic); 2. The template is redundant to another better-designed template; 3. The template is not used (note that this cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks, it may be used with "subst:"); 4. The template isn't a 2406:

a move-and-move back from the per-day TfD page (to add it to people's watchlists) are both unacceptable, and I don't think informing everyone who's participated is usual, so what you've described would seem to be a reasonable state of affairs. How do you think it's contrary to the spirit of Knowledge (after all, the discussion is linked from the main TfD page)? --

1549:), caused by disruptive editors/trolls. The easy way to avoid problems is to use speedy closures when a Wikilawyering nomination taking advantage of those error takes place. However, on the overhand, I don't think that and TfDs have beeen remvoed for not complying directly with the criteria, and many which have been deleted don't comply with the "rules" there. 3057:

could also be on a user subpage. The author could be alerted that the template will be nominated for speedy deletion as housekeeping in several days, and then G7 might apply. On the other hand, that sounds like an approved Knowledge process: the point is not to bureaucratically eliminate the templates; it's to do so informally.

3047:, what you can do similarly is build a list of such templates (perhaps here, on a user subpage, or in a personal file), then start a huge group nomination at the end of each month/week at TfD. Doesn't someone routinely do this already? If you alert the author and they agree, then it's easier to speedy than G6. – 3027:

would work, so long as the only criterion for inclusion is that it could be speedily deleted under G6; any possibly controversy could go to to TFD. Once again, it's just an informal list, but much better than tagging each one individually for a couple of reasons. I could start populating it, I guess.

2445:

for articles on mainspace, I don't think it's hard to work out what spirit I'm referring to. In the case of the move I referred to, it was carried out by a user who had participated one way in the vote. There are two points of potential irregularity: 1) text and votes can be interfered with, and only

1883:

When will anything happen with the 9/11 templates? They are in constant flux as far as their actual content -- therefore can hardly be considered 'templates' - and are being used a tool for everyone's battles on the 9/11 pages. They've been up for deletion for awhile now -- when is a decision going

547:

Totally agree. Infoboxes have become a major feature and many of them serve a very good purpose, but they, like all aspects of Knowledge, should be presented consistently. I think that's really important - everything should carry the Knowledge "brand" and in style and appearance should be part of a

356:

The template uses {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} and {{CURRENTDAY}}, doesn't it mean that the dates in the headers will change every day ? Shouldn't we use a template with an argument, such as {{tfd log|September 6}} ? For now, the bot can just write the full header with the correct date, I'll try to have this

2405:

explains the process for AfD, and the practice seems to have spilled over into TfD; however, unlike AfD and MfD, TfD doesn't have per-discussion subpages, so cut-and-paste has to be used (unfortunately for the effect on watchlists). The two possible alternatives, a history split from the TfD page or

1728:, despite that it's shorter, since at least tl takes argument and Round_corners is only a static copy of stylesheet attributes, and in fact it can be shortened to "-moz-border-radius: 1em". Also, it can be parameterized to take the degree of "Roundness" too. This aside, I DO agree on the benefits of 3241:

first to see what kind of reaction you get. If the project participants generally agree, then you can do a mass nomination here. BTW - the templates seem to be used only in the articles about the corresponding team's season, so I think you're in effect suggesting the roster information be deleted

3056:

The point that should be most explicitly made is that such a subpage is not a deletion process, but a means of organizing deprecated templates, especially infoboxes. The mass nominations seem to be the thing we're trying to avoid, since a speedy deletion criterion (G6) would apply anyway. The list

2779:

The question to ask yourself is 'if this were kept, should it be removed from the articles it's used in'? Normally, the answer is 'no', so you should wait until the TfD finishes to remove the template. On occasion though, the answer is 'yes' (for instance, if a template designed to be substed has

2229:

One problem I see is with a template which is always subst'd. Nobody would notice the prod and the person nominating deletion would not know the template was unused. Also, I think a prod would need to have the notice be placed to be visible in all transclusions, just like is sometimes done in a

2217:

checking everything; while I personally trust your judgement with templates, I think it would be best to use the same "any administrator can delete after five days" rule as with prods. This would definitely make it easier to clear out all the old, unused, forgotten templates that are lying around

2032:

I am curious why the format of TfD is different from AfD. I like how AfD uses subpages, so that you can watch only those threads you are participating in. As it is now, watching the whole day in TfD makes it hard to see when something relevant to your previous comments has been posted. This issue

1452:

Proposal of a template for deletion may be appropriate whenever: 1. The template is not helpful or noteworthy (encyclopaedic); 2. The template is redundant to another better-designed template; 3. The template is not used (note that this cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks, it may be

3151:

a deletion process; OTOH, deciding these are deprecated should involve more judgement than just doing a sweep through the page of orphans. (I've pointed out elsewhere that there's a number of reasons why stub templates would be unused at any given, and that in my opinion it'd be better to list

2972:

Maybe we could institute an informal deprecated template deletion system: list the templates on a page, and if there are no transclusions/substitutions (a judgment that is hard to explain but easy to make), if the template is of no historical or technical value, and if there are no objections by

561:

Thanks for your feedback! I agree that consensus on a more standardiz/sed appearance may be impossible and perhaps not necessarily desirable, but introducing the Infobox: namespace as a means to produce greater consistency (and less "Template:Infobox" redundancy) seems an obvious improvement...

3146:

How did we get from the above discussion of an 'informal list'/G6-able templates/'not a deletion process' to a, well, process for "prodding" templates, on apparently no basis other than their being unused? The basic problem here is the presumptive equation of "orphaned" with "deprecated".

2559:. Now editors do not need to click "edit this page" at the top of the page which was, at least for me, regularly truncating the bottom-most discussion. Instead, click the edit section link on the H4 header titled "NEW NOMINATIONS". Commented out instructions are just below that header. 2427:

more difficult than monitoring an AfD because you can't watch only the relevant discussions. Every change to any TfD for that day triggers a reset in your watchlist. I suggested that we make the process uniform over all XfD, but I didn't get much response to the idea. I can't see any real

2071:

I'm surprised that this thread is so idle. As a person just getting into AfD and TfD, it is frustrating to do TfD because you can't easily tell if the ones you have voted on have changed or not without reading through the entire list. Anyone have any objection to changing the process? -

1826:(currently under TfD discussion)? The TfD warning will be left as permanent feature in the substed code, each time where the template is used. I understand the TfD warning should be visible (at least in transcluded templates), so simply suggesting to encase it in <noinclude: --> 3098:, and deleted when no-one would wonder just-kinda how did that image appear and how did the article format/wrap around that image (during the previous year). Yes, those auto-blurred images would be a truly valuable improvement to Knowledge, as opposed to "converting images to 3113:

Would someone care to explain how they think the housekeeping speedy deletion criterion applies to such templates? Housekeeping is for cleaning up after other deletions, or for enabling maintenance tasks like page moves and history merges, not for deletion in its own right.

2195:, or an alternate version for templates) on redundant infoboxes? Then someone (such as me) would check to make sure that there are no problems with the nomination. This does sound somewhat drastic, but I think it would help focus attention on more controversial areas. 1932:, only the high schools are likely to viewed as being notable enough to merit articles. So the presence of this template would appear to lead editors who are not aware of the notability requirements for schools into creating an article that will likely be deleted. 1860:

Suggest someone with better thumb-fingered template skills than I possess adjust which ever templates necessary to reconcile the two experiences. Think I've seen the same kind of navigation error on CFD's too... which may implicate other Xfd links. Regards //

1211:

Good idea. For that matter, why don't we have a generalized XfD system, with minor modifications depending on purpose? Right now, our deletion processes look like a piecing together of things depending on the time they got split off from Votes for deletion.

1350:- RFD, MFD and CFD are all "for discussion", IFD, AFD and STFD are all "for deletion". There doesn't seem to be any determining factor for what debates should be called, and I think we need a more central discussion on this, if it's even important. 2129:

is designed to help with template deprecation and orphaning. Would anyone mind my putting a note in the "needs to be orphaned" section mentioning that any template that has a significant number of replacements can be done automatically by my bot?

526:...Infoboxes seem to've become part of the Knowledge furniture, at least in the English Knowledge. Hence, rather than the many "Template:Infobox..." pages (with inconsistent capitaliz/sation etc), suggest an "Infobox:..." namespace created. 3226:

and noticed a handful of single season roster templates. While I think a teams single season template is very useful for major league baseball, I do not for college football. What's the best way to discuss all of these at once?

3007: 2700:

For those caught unawares (including me) we now appear to have a "table" namespace. Since tables are essentially templates, I would suggest that the (inevitable) deletion discussions about tables take place on this process.

1634:

with code that is effectively only a one-liner after shrinking, no computation, no summary or formatting, functionally self-contained, used by around 100 pages, mostly user pages. The only usefulness of this template is a

3262:

Okay, I'll definitely mention this there. I see why you'd think i was suggesting that the rosters be removed. Rather, I would simply just recommend that the rosters are moved directly to that page. Thanks for the tip!

2254:

I was thinking more of other templates, such as redundant infoboxes or navigational templates, that are meant to be transcluded. This would not refer to functional templates, which are often meant to be substituted.

1608:

Usually that is done on the talk page of the template. If no one responds, you can either just go ahead, or look for input in other places. A lot of people do watch templates though, so people will usually respond. -

800:

Can we consolidate the votes for Earth, Mars, Wikipedian, etc, etc, etc onto one piece of discussion? They all do the same thing, excpet it's a lot more trouble when the argument is spread across many discussions.

548:

set, rather than a one-off. I think though, that it's difficult enough to reach consensus in discussing one infobox - I imagine discussing them as a group is going to be even more difficult, but worth aiming for.

2377: 1664:

It is quite a small template, and I think it takes up hardly any resources. It is a much simpler way for technically inexperienced users to put round corners into their user pages, instead of having to type the

2230:

regular TfD or otherwise interested parties would not notice. Perhaps there should also be a guideline that you shouldn't prod something transcluded over X times since that means it implicitly has supporters.

374:

The template doesn't work, and because it uses some additionally complex templates inside of it.. there's no direct way to make that work. It would just reset itself every day. But they do need to include the

1096:

The "old" section if for thiose that need closing, hence the bot moved them there after their time on the page was up - in your revert, you also removed today's page! I've rollbacked you - if there is no

1427: 3156:.) I therefore strongly suggest changing to specifically one, or the other. (I'd prefer the "non-process" approach; IMO we need yet another deletion process like we need a hole in the head.) 260: 3212: 3334:; RfD's better equipped to handle this sort of situation, because tfd-tagging a redirect sometimes misleads people into thinking that the template it redirects to is going to be deleted. 692: 264: 734:

about how to delete a number of outdated, old, unused templates s/he came across. The original editor is no longer involved with the articles, and is only sporadically active on Wiki.

208:, is no longer needed as it would have grown in size to the point where it would function best as a single-use template. It would have fit on the bottom of all state route pages listed 2395: 2034: 3134: 3024: 737:. I don't know how to delete a template, and the instructions on this page make it sound like a lot of work to clear out something that's not in use. Here are the unused templates: 3182: 2369: 3165: 786:

As a first time user of the TfD nominating process, I have to complement the editors of the page. The explanations, instructions, and process were very easy to follow. Good job.--

3003: 2368:

Just a question. Is it common to create subpages for deletion votes by cut and paste, without informing anyone who has participated that the page has been moved? This happened to

1691:

is even simpler, and yet it's one of the most highly used templates on Knowledge. Generally speaking, even simple templates are useful if they help people to read the wikicode. --

2563:

is also an H4 header, so when the next user clicks the edit section link for "NEW NOMINATIONS", he or she will only be editing a new blank (with commented out stuff) section. --

1894:

The decision has been made to keep both for the moment. Unfortunately, due to your (and two other editors) repeated edits against concensus, the templates are not stable. —

1172:

Can we get some kind of link, head or index to be able to find past Tfd's at the head end of this page please? Expand that request to encompass all xFD pages where necessary.

3315: 2567: 2524: 1942:

Navboxes with that many redlinks are normally good TfD candidates unless there is some other reason why they might be worth keeping, and I can't think of one in this case. --

2899: 1658: 2465: 2432: 3338: 2773: 2619:|Hairstyles|text=Your reason(s) for nominating the template. ~~~~}} to the top of the page, right under the section titled "April 25" (or whatever the current day is). -- 541: 2928: 2668: 1502:

No competent editor would delete such a template, but a vandal may abuse this clause, create a huge backlog in the TfD, and feign legitimacy by pointing to that clause.

830:

wasn't working, but I've fixed it using the relatively new {{#time}} parser function, so for whoever creates the new day's log pages, it's now available for you to use.

766: 761: 2689: 1765: 3167: 3011: 2943: 2047:

I'm not quite sure why it failed before. The issue seemed to be the templates not working well, but if you only have to link to a specific page, you can just copy the

1936: 1872: 805: 673: 633: 601: 1157: 1138: 1121: 497: 2780:

been transcluded and then TfDd, substing it and removing the TfD notice that results in the article is a sensible course of action even while the TfD is running). --

2546: 1615: 1223: 751: 719: 3038: 3018: 2998: 1538: 3275: 3253: 3123: 2739: 2097: 1741: 1677: 573: 552: 1560: 1434: 3231: 3106: 2923: 2894: 2641: 2632: 2623: 1506: 1446: 756: 361: 351: 175: 147: 3076: 3067: 3051: 2331: 2287: 2267: 2245: 1911: 1902: 473: 445: 428: 411: 383: 317: 2764: 2076: 2066: 2021: 1805: 1782: 1772: 1420: 746: 741: 205: 198: 2966: 2222: 2171: 2156: 776: 188:

Could we delete this template as it involves metadata or maybe request that they remove this metadata stuff as it really looks dumm in the top of the screen.

2962:

would apply to these templates, so I may use that. Some of the templates in that category have been deprecated for months, some even longer. Any thoughts? --

2832: 2578: 1177: 1602: 3283: 2862: 2805: 2363: 2115: 2041: 1925: 274: 192: 376: 3209: 2373: 1621: 1372: 1325: 802: 709: 2530:

Speaking of GFDL compliance, I used "move to subpage" as an edit summary, which definitely means that history can be found on the parent page. However,

2207: 1907:

That's right, because Arthur Rubin's edits are supported by all (except three other editors), and the views of all others are only "against consensus."

1976: 824: 811: 485: 341: 97: 89: 84: 1361: 1342: 2813: 702: 72: 67: 59: 2006: 1792: 1047: 2358: 2037:, and seemed like there were quite a few on both sides of the discussion. I thought I would bring it up again and see what people think. Thanks. - 1071: 3208:. This is really sad--delete the article to the point that it has no content, then put it up for deletion for the reason that it has no content. 2108: 1573:

forbids exploiting it). If a TfD is filed which doesn't satisfy any of the deletion reasons, that's a reason to close as 'keep', not to delist. --

1271: 235: 113:

User box pillage was deleted. There was no notice that I was aware of. Can I get the User Box code for it so I can put it back on my user page?

2651: 2589: 2140: 1840: 479: 859: 463: 401: 331: 307: 3141: 2313: 2301: 1255: 1205: 502: 159: 1835: 130: 1816:

The instructions say to include {{tfd|TemplateName}}. What about templates that are supposed to be substed at the time of their use, such as

1090: 2732: 2343: 3223: 1969: 1919: 1669:-moz-border-radius-topleft: 1em; -moz-border-radius-topright: 1em; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 1em; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 1em; 1440: 787: 3160: 2801:

Actually, it's someone else who does that, and considering his temper I just wanted to be sure about things before requesting him to stop

2769:

Should a template nominated for deletion be removed from all articles it's used in, or should it removed after it's decided to delete it?

2725: 3238: 2402: 1888: 795: 162: 3217: 2974: 2958:

Would anyone object to me cleaning this category out? I'm asking here because I can't think of a better place to ask. I imagine that

2297: 249: 1849: 1750:

Do other browsers (besides those related to Mozilla), such as IE7, have similar code that can help them to round corners, too? —

790: 394: 324: 1989: 47: 17: 1525:

Note: I'm not sure vandals even do this sort of thing. If so, I acknowledge that this won't stop vandalism of this type, but it

158:

August 11 and august 13 are there. No august 12. It's not on the project page for some reason but it exists on the sub page.--

2664:

accordingly. Any suggestions and improvements regarding the clarity of and edits to the text would be greatly appreciated. --

2272:

I know, but if we are going to have template prod be a formal policy we need to define exactly when it can and cannot be used.

1627: 1402: 1081:

Why is Dec 12 moved to old discussions when those nominations haven't been closed ? Why was the admin backlog tag removed ?

3129: 2951: 619: 2027: 181: 3192: 3189: 2684: 2660:

that allows us to create mass nominations while not breaking the existing functionality of the template. I modified the

1760: 1023:

I always do the second one, as it keeps the closing wikitext in the same section as the debate, whereas using the first,

1855: 3300: 2915: 2886: 2309: 2090: 1396:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1320: 1264: 1243:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

1218: 725: 1408: 254: 3206: 3203: 3201: 3199: 3196: 3194: 1305: 3304: 2919: 2890: 2582: 2447: 2381: 2305: 2012:

A bot adds the new day, and we only move the discussions after everything's been closed, so that won't work well. -

1593: 1260: 659: 587: 1995: 1850:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_January_15#.5B.5BTemplate:Interwikitmp-grp.5D.5D

1831:

wouldn't work as a standard solution. Could someone please work this out and expand the instructions accordingly?

1411:, for duplicate or unused templates. If you have any thoughts on the subject, please add your feedback there. -- 940: 2610: 295:

It was mentioned somewhere above that it would be nice to have a bot to do some daily housekeeping on this page.

2977:

was suggested before, but maybe an informal centralized version of it would work, since most of those templates

2553: 995:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a

954:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a

927:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a

881:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a

2460: 2390: 2180: 1960: 213: 209: 2952: 1981: 590:, a proposal to standardize the look and feel of a large class of templates by using a common CSS style. -- 171:

That's because the pages all have to be manually updated each day. We really should get a bot to do this. --

1295:

on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

2791: 2755: 2485: 2474:-like format before (using subpages but not as heavyweight as AfD), but I don't think they got anywhere. -- 2417: 1953: 1771: 1702: 1584: 1016: 978: 905: 421: 300: 230: 197: 182: 2572: 2326: 2282: 2240: 2185:

Would anyone have an objection to creating or using a process involving proposed deletions (such as with

2120: 687: 2871: 2423:

It would be nice, IMO, if the process was always a subpage. Monitoring TfD entries that you vote in is

290: 38: 1856:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_January_15#Template:Interwikitmp-grp

2744:

The namespace was removed again, by the way (in the meantime, it's a pseudonamespace like WP: is). --

2455: 2385: 2337: 2147:

Seems fine, but make sure to note the things that the bot can't do, so people don't try to make it. -

1811: 996: 955: 928: 882: 484:

This was crossposted and has little to do with the specific workings of this page. Please discuss at

1999:

I think this works, and means that manual updates of the backlog dates will no-longer be necessary.

3330:(by copying the template's code into the redirect with the rfd-t template above it) and take it to 3102:" or other similar bizarre girations. Anyway, keep deprecated templates 1 year as a simple plan. - 1148: 1112: 1038: 810: 488:. The comments have already been moved. Please do not spam such complaints across multiple pages. 2384:, but I ask because it seems contrary to the spirit of wikipedia as I know it elsewhere. Regards, 1167: 1143:

Nah - it wasn't any extra work :) Just one click. I've managed to clear the backlog fully now.

3289: 3178:

The template is not helpful or encyclopedic and serves no benefit. Only used in two articles. —

1569:

for a reason. Still, may as well correct the rules when we find a loophole in them (even though

2911: 2882: 1899: 1878: 1722: 1631: 1229: 1134: 1086: 948:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.

875:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.

628: 568: 536: 108: 2470:

I see the problem you're referring to. I think there've been proposals to change TfD to use a

1276: 3335: 1520:(editors must demonstrate that the template cannot be modified to satisfy this requirement); 1457:(editors must demonstrate that the template cannot be modified to satisfy this requirement); 1300: 1101: 285: 3248: 2736: 2665: 2638: 2620: 2564: 2543: 2521: 2355: 2264: 2204: 1820: 716: 699: 668: 596: 271: 2534:

should probably have "relisting from TFD log for Frumpruary 41, 2017" as an edit summary.

1005:

There's both in the TfD logs at the moment, and it would be nice if it were consistent. --

303:, so it would be relatively easy for me to adapt it to work here. Would that be welcome ? 8: 3119: 1736:

outweighing the resources that it might have consumed, and especially in this case tiny.

1554: 1484: 1480: 1416: 1355: 1338: 1153: 1117: 1043: 838: 731: 3270: 2852: 2702: 2695: 2680: 2346:. I would appreciate if others reviewed them to make that they reflect consensus, etc. 1867: 1756: 1513: 1497: 1460: 1200: 1065: 853: 265:

Knowledge:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_June_30#Template:Serbia_and_Montenegro_topics

153: 144: 137: 284:

August 24 and 26 have been closed out, but no action has yet been taken for August 25:

2906: 2877: 2842: 2438: 2152: 2062: 2017: 1895: 1599: 1369: 1268: 1130: 1082: 1076: 911: 773: 693:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 August 16#Template:Saban American Tokusatsu

623: 563: 531: 493: 240: 1333:- No need to move general discussion here, when it can be done on the talk page. -- 3294: 2822: 2788: 2752: 2661: 2482: 2442: 2414: 2126: 2094: 1950: 1933: 1699: 1581: 1027: 1013: 975: 902: 864: 267:. (Yes, I see it's under closing in progress, but it's almost two months old now.) 226: 3293:

which was created July 29, 2007, apparently as an alternate spelling redirect to

869:

TfD's getting quite inconsistent about this now: should TfDs be closed like this:

3312: 3243: 3073: 3058: 3048: 3044: 3029: 2989: 2934: 2933:

Oops, I missed this. I probably would have just been bold and moved all of them.

2535: 2513: 2378:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 18/Template:Infobox England place

2370:

Knowledge:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_March_18#Template:Infobox_England_place

2347: 2256: 2196: 1737: 1654: 1649:

If deleted, how to substitute/expand existing template references on other pages?

1570: 1546: 735: 713: 696: 663: 591: 469:

It seems to be working great! Good job, this will make things a lot easier :D --

348: 268: 2982: 2959: 1479:

the last one applies, then speedy delete should be chosen". However, it is also

407:

Awesome. Can it also adjust the links on the main page when the dates shift? --

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3324: 3138: 3115: 3015: 2963: 1973: 1961: 1551: 1517: 1454: 1412: 1352: 1334: 1252: 1187: 1145: 1109: 1035: 817: 470: 442: 408: 380: 314: 172: 730:

The instructions on this page are unbearable. Another editor has inquired at

3331: 3266: 3228: 3153: 2675: 2616: 2505: 2471: 2451: 2213:

Yes, I think that would be fine – though I'm not sure people will agree with

2189: 1929: 1863: 1789: 1751: 1674: 1611: 1566: 1535: 1431: 1378: 1196: 1056: 845: 833: 781: 510: 456: 296: 141: 125: 2988:

TFD does not strike me as the best venue for deleting deprecated templates.

2802: 2770: 1129:

Thanks, Martin - sorry for creating extra work - I wasn't sure what to do.

586:

I'd encourage anyone interested in infobox consistency to please comment at

3103: 2657: 2599: 2429: 2428:

disadvantage, and it would clear up the issue that Deacon is mentioning. -

2165: 2148: 2134: 2112: 2073: 2058: 2051: 2038: 2013: 2002: 1598:

Is there any page for the discussion of templates e.g. moves, renames etc?

1315: 1213: 1183: 489: 286:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_25

212:, but would have consumed a lot of space. A more approperiate link back to 189: 3147:

Mass-populating this with all orphaned templates only makes sense if this

2785: 2781: 2749: 2745: 2629: 2586: 2479: 2475: 2411: 2407: 1947: 1943: 1799: 1712: 1696: 1692: 1685: 1578: 1574: 1010: 1006: 972: 968: 899: 895: 772:

If anyone can make this easy, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

549: 460: 425: 398: 358: 328: 304: 217: 2107:

Thanks for the suggestion, Chick Bowen. This suggestion has been posted

662:(although adding a link to this discussion certainly doesn't hurt). -- 3179: 2581:

for deletion, but can't find instcructions on how. Do I just add it on

2318: 2274: 2232: 1832: 519: 1194:) would also be a nice (and sensible and useful) thing too. Thanks // 486:

Knowledge talk:Deletion policy#Informing the creators is being ignored

3157: 3095: 1368:

However, AFD is there because it is too big for RM or similar pages.

323:

So here is the first step: creating a new daily page; the result is

246: 2219: 1908: 1885: 1426:

Right now, those two criteria are #2 and #3, respectively, for the

3137:. Feel free to make changes and revise the methodology. Cheers. -- 3135:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Deprecated and orphaned templates

3025:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Deprecated and orphaned templates

1788:. Should this be moved to a user space, or put for discussion? -- 2905:

Given no response, I nominated all of the above on project page.

1852:

doesn't seem to be able to find the section, as one would expect.

1390:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

1237:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal.

1033:

appears in the previous section, overly confusing the process.

989:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

921:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

2876:

earlier and now found it after spending some time with pages.

2496:

Hey Deacon, I don't think that what I did was a cut-and-paste

1192:

All archives really, to skate one to the next chronologically.

1314:. Um... did template talk pages disappear while I was gone? - 1267:— There seems to be no places to discuss renaming, moves etc 1125:

PS - I'll have some time to clear the backlog in a few hours

1505:

For the above stated reasons, I have changed the wording to

279: 2628:

Ahh. Now i see the instructions. Thanks for helping out! --

2552:

In response to Firefox repeatedly truncating text areas, I

3099: 1639:

that ease coding a bit, otherwise it's quite pointless.

379:(most of the recent ones are missing this, actually). -- 1970:

Wikipedia_talk:Proposed_deletion#Prod_for_templates_idea

2733:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)#Tables for deletion

3188:

Nominator MONGO deleted the entries for this template

3008:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Deprecated templates

2512:

in the debate, when I saw that it would grow larger.

1992:

be borrowed here for the backlog? Consider the code:

1858:, but this form built when clicking on the TOC, does. 2973:

people reviewing the list, delete it after a while.

2450:

cannot follow the same process which, for instance,

1926:

Template:South San Francisco Unified School District

1492:

in a strictly legal sense, any template that is not

2868:. Where do I propose such? I had been looking for 2401:It can be done if a vote is overwhelming the page. 958:). No further edits should be made to this page. 885:). No further edits should be made to this page. 710:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 August 25

1708:Thanks for the responses. Hmm... I don't consider 1545:Well the problem probably has potential to occur ( 2504:. If I didn't, then you would have reason to not 1182:template connection between all such (And in the 2508:. I also tried to perform the moving of content 999:). No further edits should be made to this page. 931:). No further edits should be made to this page. 424:, but I have not had time to get around it yet. 2342:Note: I've made some changed to the TFD header 2218:(four of which I submitted to TfD yesterday) – 2765:Removing templates while debate still going on 2314:Knowledge talk:Proposed deletion/Template prod 2302:Knowledge talk:Proposed deletion/Template prod 2093:. Not very many people watch this talk page. 1924:What is the opinion here about templates like 1845:Hi! This (I think from the Template notice): 1453:used with "subst:"); 4. The template isn't a 3284:Redirect apparently unused in template space 3224:Category:American college football templates 2380:. I don't know much about the processes for 2364:Question: cut and paste creation of subpages 3239:Knowledge talk:WikiProject College football 2403:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Maintenance 2161:Gotcha, I'll go ahead and put it up there. 1673:I would recommend keeping this template. − 1622:Is this *generally* qualified for deletion? 1459:5. The template does not clearly satisfy a 2814:Converting templates to infobox templates 2298:Knowledge:Proposed deletion/Template prod 1053:The second one is how it's always been. — 1500:) is fair game for tagging for deletion! 2652:Template documentation for Template:Tfd 1990:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion 1841:Are pagenames urls navigating correctly 1467:I know that this implicitly means, "if 480:Informing the creators is being ignored 18:Knowledge talk:Templates for discussion 14: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2924:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 2895:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 2312:. Please continue any discussion at 1646:If kept, will it cost much resources? 622:; thanks for your suggestion, Rick! 620:Knowledge talk:Geographical infoboxes 393:Ok, improved version for tomorrow is 261:Template:Serbia and Montenegro topics 1920:School district navigation templates 1643:Is this good candidate for deletion? 1512:If the template clearly satisfies a 1441:Changed wording to deletion criteria 25: 1529:get rid of any plead of legitimacy. 796:Useless But Funny Userbox Templates 313:It would definitely be welcome. -- 23: 3301:Knowledge:Redirects for discussion 2310:Knowledge:Village pump (proposals) 2091:Knowledge:Village pump (proposals) 2089:I would recommend posting this at 1928:? Based on the current trends in 1483:for the template to be nominated, 1265:Knowledge:Templates for discussion 357:in place for tomorrow's new page. 24: 3350: 3218:American college football rosters 3028:(By the way, sorry for the wait) 2300:. Discussion has been copied to 1473:of the first four criteria apply 654:To clarify, the suggestion is to 420:It will, as it currently does on 3305:Knowledge:Templates for deletion 3092:Keep deprecated templates 1 year 2735:. I suggest the same thing. -- 2583:Knowledge:Templates for deletion 2448:Knowledge:Templates for deletion 2382:Knowledge:Templates for deletion 2306:Knowledge talk:Proposed deletion 1261:Knowledge:Templates for deletion 660:Knowledge:Geographical infoboxes 588:Knowledge:Geographical infoboxes 530:What do folk think...? Thanks, 121:that was the Transclude for it. 29: 1481:only one criterion must be true 397:; again, all comments welcome. 299:is doing something similar for 3237:I'd suggest bringing it up at 3004:Knowledge:Deprecated templates 2296:I have made a draft policy at 1403:New CSD for Templates proposed 963:The result of the debate was 890:The result of the debate was 720:03:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 703:03:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 674:18:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 634:16:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 602:16:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 574:13:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 553:10:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 542:12:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 498:19:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 474:04:29, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 455:I have the bot working (under 214:List of State Highways in Ohio 13: 1: 3014:? Which one do you prefer? -- 2953:Category:Deprecated templates 2818:I would like to move/convert 2304:and I will advertise that at 2116:17:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 2098:22:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 2077:16:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 2067:18:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 2042:17:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 2035:has come up before (Jan 2006) 1514:criterion for speedy deletion 1461:criterion for speedy deletion 1421:00:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC) 1373:01:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC) 1362:00:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC) 1343:00:42, 31 December 2006 (UTC) 1326:16:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 1272:13:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 1248:The result of the debate was 1224:00:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 1206:00:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 1158:19:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 1139:14:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 1122:14:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 1091:13:16, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 464:21:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 446:07:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 429:06:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 412:23:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 402:22:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 384:09:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 362:09:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 352:07:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 332:20:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 318:03:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 308:22:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 3043:In case someone labels this 2028:TfD using subpages like AfD? 2022:03:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 2007:01:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1977:17:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1937:08:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 1912:23:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 1903:18:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 1889:19:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 1873:17:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 1836:19:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 1806:01:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 1793:01:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 1742:16:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1734:code-abstraction-&-reuse 1678:06:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1659:01:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1518:Neutral Point of View (NPOV) 1455:Neutral Point of View (NPOV) 1385:Add any additional comments: 1072:17:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 1048:12:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 860:03:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 503:Create "Infobox:" namespace? 422:Knowledge:Copyright problems 301:Knowledge:Copyright problems 183:Template:Big Brother project 7: 3124:00:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 2437:When you've got pages like 2376:, with the new location at 1626:Please take a look at this 1616:17:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1603:14:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1561:13:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1539:13:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1435:13:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1256:18:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 806:01:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 791:17:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 777:00:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 520:a proposal made at Bugzilla 275:20:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 250:08:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 236:16:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 193:23:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 176:09:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 163:09:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 10: 3355: 3161:20:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 2674:Looks great, thanks! — 2669:18:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 2633:00:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 2624:19:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 2590:16:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 2547:22:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 2525:17:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2466:15:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 2433:14:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 2396:01:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 2359:17:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2332:17:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2288:17:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2268:17:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2246:19:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 2223:18:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 2208:04:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 2172:18:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2157:18:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2141:17:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2111:for further discussion. - 1107:, feel free to re-add it. 726:Unused, outdated templates 148:08:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 131:20:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 3339:16:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 3316:03:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 3276:19:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 3254:15:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 3232:10:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 3142:21:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 3077:04:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 3068:04:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 3052:03:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 3039:03:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 3019:00:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 2999:19:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 2944:19:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 2577:I would like to nominate 2568:21:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC) 1766:04:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1494:divisive and inflammatory 1009:09:42, 23 November 2006 ( 971:09:42, 23 November 2006 ( 898:09:42, 23 November 2006 ( 767:Template:ChavezReferences 762:Template:ChavezCategories 255:Old discussion not closed 3332:redirects for discussion 3242:from these articles. -- 3213:23:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 3183:07:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 3168:Template:State terrorism 3107:21:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 3012:Knowledge:something else 2967:00:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 2929:21:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC) 2900:01:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 2806:03:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 2774:18:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 2109:Village pump (proposals) 1946:09:07, 1 February 2007 ( 1695:09:15, 11 January 2007 ( 1594:Templates for discussion 1577:09:18, 11 January 2007 ( 1393:Please do not modify it. 1240:Please do not modify it. 992:Please do not modify it. 951:Please do not modify it. 924:Please do not modify it. 878:Please do not modify it. 3191:Along with ultramarine 3174:Nominator MONGO wrote: 2740:18:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2726:08:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2690:20:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 2656:I requested an edit to 2642:01:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 752:Template:ChavezArticles 327:, any comment welcome. 3290:Template:Current Event 2662:template documentation 2637:Glad I could help. -- 2478:16:59, 20 March 2007 ( 2410:14:12, 20 March 2007 ( 2181:Temporary prod process 1301:Survey - Support votes 528: 263:should be deleted per 3170:be closed speedy keep 1982:Automatic log display 1778:Someone just created 1653:Thanks for advising, 1409:new CSD for templates 1306:Survey - Oppose votes 757:Template:ChavezHonors 658:in the discussion at 524: 42:of past discussions. 3299:Do I take it to the 2784:16:47, 23 May 2007 ( 2748:10:00, 10 May 2007 ( 2456:Deacon of Pndapetzim 2386:Deacon of Pndapetzim 2057:code that does so. - 1773:Template:User_racism 1507:the criteria for TfD 747:Template:ChavezNotes 742:Template:ChavezLinks 518:Copying and pasting 347:on the top as well. 245:Where is August 21? 216:works just as well. 206:Template:OH Highways 199:Template:OH Highways 3288:I wish to discuss 3205:, and Tom Harrison 2607:Template:Hairstyles 2579:Template:Hairstyles 2573:Template:Hairstyles 2121:Orpahning Templates 712:was closed either. 688:Unclosed discussion 2454:follows. Regards, 1988:Would the idea at 1559: 1360: 1156: 1120: 1046: 291:Housekeeping tasks 3274: 3252: 3222:I was looking at 2975:template prodding 2927: 2898: 2872:Infobox Sculpture 2506:assume good faith 2463: 2439:Template:Pagemove 2393: 2338:Changes to header 2155: 2065: 2020: 1812:Substed templates 1550: 1498:CSD for templates 1351: 1324: 1222: 1144: 1126: 1108: 1069: 1060: 1034: 941:Template:Whatever 912:Template:Whatever 857: 672: 618:Pointer added to 600: 496: 441:Very awesome. -- 234: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3346: 3329: 3323: 3295:Template:current 3273: 3264: 3246: 3064: 3061: 3035: 3032: 2995: 2992: 2940: 2937: 2909: 2880: 2875: 2867: 2861: 2857: 2851: 2847: 2841: 2837: 2831: 2827: 2821: 2722: 2720: 2718: 2716: 2714: 2688: 2604: 2598: 2557:Template:Tfd log 2541: 2538: 2519: 2516: 2459: 2389: 2353: 2350: 2330: 2323: 2286: 2279: 2262: 2259: 2244: 2237: 2202: 2199: 2194: 2188: 2168: 2164: 2151: 2137: 2133: 2061: 2056: 2050: 2016: 2005: 1870: 1825: 1819: 1803: 1787: 1781: 1764: 1727: 1721: 1718:is simpler than 1717: 1711: 1690: 1684: 1557: 1447:criteria for TfD 1395: 1358: 1318: 1242: 1216: 1203: 1181: 1151: 1124: 1115: 1106: 1100: 1070: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1041: 1032: 1026: 994: 953: 926: 880: 858: 851: 848: 843: 836: 829: 823: 812:Template:Tfd log 732:Talk:Hugo Chávez 666: 632: 594: 572: 540: 514: 509:(also posted to 492: 346: 340: 224: 221: 128: 120: 119: 118:{{User Pillage}} 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3354: 3353: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3327: 3321: 3286: 3265: 3220: 3172: 3132: 3062: 3059: 3033: 3030: 2993: 2990: 2956: 2938: 2935: 2869: 2865: 2859: 2855: 2849: 2845: 2839: 2835: 2829: 2825: 2819: 2816: 2767: 2712: 2710: 2708: 2706: 2704: 2698: 2678: 2654: 2602: 2596: 2575: 2539: 2536: 2517: 2514: 2366: 2351: 2348: 2340: 2329: 2319: 2317: 2285: 2275: 2273: 2260: 2257: 2243: 2233: 2231: 2200: 2197: 2192: 2186: 2183: 2166: 2162: 2135: 2131: 2123: 2054: 2048: 2030: 2000: 1997: 1984: 1966: 1922: 1881: 1868: 1843: 1823: 1817: 1814: 1801: 1785: 1779: 1776: 1754: 1725: 1719: 1715: 1709: 1688: 1682: 1630:, a stylesheet 1624: 1596: 1555: 1521: 1485:not all of them 1465: 1445:Currently, the 1443: 1405: 1400: 1391: 1381: 1356: 1323: 1308: 1303: 1293: 1287: 1286:# '''Support''' 1279: 1238: 1232: 1221: 1201: 1175: 1170: 1168:Give us a break 1149: 1113: 1104: 1098: 1079: 1055: 1054: 1039: 1030: 1024: 1003: 997:deletion review 990: 956:deletion review 949: 943: 935: 929:deletion review 922: 914: 883:deletion review 876: 867: 846: 839: 834: 831: 827: 821: 815: 798: 784: 728: 690: 626: 566: 534: 508: 505: 482: 344: 338: 337:Please add the 293: 282: 257: 243: 219: 202: 186: 156: 126: 117: 116: 111: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3352: 3342: 3341: 3318: 3298: 3292: 3285: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3257: 3256: 3219: 3216: 3186: 3185: 3171: 3164: 3131: 3130:How about this 3128: 3127: 3126: 3110: 3109: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 2986: 2955: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2815: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2796: 2795: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2697: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2653: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2615: 2605:to the top of 2574: 2571: 2550: 2549: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2435: 2365: 2362: 2339: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2325: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2281: 2249: 2248: 2239: 2226: 2225: 2182: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2143: 2122: 2119: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2029: 2026: 2025: 2024: 1994: 1987: 1983: 1980: 1965: 1964:for templates? 1959: 1958: 1957: 1921: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1880: 1879:9/11 Templates 1877: 1876: 1875: 1859: 1853: 1842: 1839: 1827:like I did at 1813: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1798:Delete as T1? 1775: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1671: 1666: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1644: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1595: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1532: 1531: 1511: 1451: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1398: 1387: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1365: 1364: 1345: 1328: 1319: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1294: 1292:# '''Oppose''' 1291: 1288: 1285: 1278: 1275: 1246: 1245: 1233: 1231: 1230:Requested move 1228: 1227: 1226: 1217: 1173: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1078: 1075: 1051: 1050: 1002: 1001: 961: 960: 944: 942: 939: 937:or like this: 934: 933: 913: 910: 888: 887: 871: 866: 863: 818:User:Ned Scott 814: 809: 797: 794: 783: 780: 770: 769: 764: 759: 754: 749: 744: 727: 724: 723: 722: 689: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 579: 578: 577: 576: 556: 555: 516: 515: 504: 501: 481: 478: 477: 476: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 434: 433: 432: 431: 415: 414: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 367: 366: 365: 364: 321: 320: 292: 289: 281: 278: 259:It looks like 256: 253: 242: 239: 204:The template, 201: 196: 185: 180: 179: 178: 167: 155: 152: 151: 150: 110: 109:Quick Question 107: 105: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3351: 3340: 3337: 3333: 3326: 3319: 3317: 3314: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3306: 3303:, or here at 3302: 3296: 3291: 3277: 3272: 3268: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3255: 3250: 3245: 3240: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3230: 3225: 3215: 3214: 3211: 3207: 3204: 3202: 3200: 3197: 3195: 3193: 3190: 3184: 3181: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3169: 3163: 3162: 3159: 3155: 3150: 3144: 3143: 3140: 3136: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3112: 3111: 3108: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3090: 3078: 3075: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3065: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3036: 3026: 3023:I think that 3022: 3021: 3020: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2996: 2987: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2965: 2961: 2954: 2945: 2941: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2908: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2879: 2873: 2864: 2854: 2844: 2834: 2824: 2807: 2804: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2793: 2790: 2787: 2783: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2772: 2757: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2723: 2691: 2686: 2682: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2643: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2631: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2622: 2618: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2601: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2570: 2569: 2566: 2562: 2561:Template:Tfd2 2558: 2555: 2548: 2544: 2542: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2522: 2520: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2487: 2484: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2462: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2434: 2431: 2426: 2422: 2421: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2409: 2404: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2392: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2361: 2360: 2356: 2354: 2345: 2333: 2328: 2324: 2322: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2289: 2284: 2280: 2278: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2263: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2247: 2242: 2238: 2236: 2228: 2227: 2224: 2221: 2216: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2205: 2203: 2191: 2173: 2170: 2169: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2142: 2139: 2138: 2128: 2118: 2117: 2114: 2110: 2099: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2078: 2075: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2053: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2040: 2036: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2004: 1993: 1991: 1979: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1963: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1913: 1910: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1887: 1874: 1871: 1866: 1865: 1857: 1854: 1851: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1830: 1822: 1807: 1804: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1791: 1784: 1774: 1767: 1762: 1758: 1753: 1749: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1724: 1723:Round_corners 1714: 1707: 1706: 1704: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1687: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1638: 1637:readable-name 1633: 1629: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1601: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1537: 1530: 1528: 1523: 1522: 1519: 1515: 1510: 1508: 1503: 1501: 1499: 1495: 1488: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1464: 1462: 1456: 1450: 1448: 1436: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1407:I proposed a 1397: 1394: 1388: 1386: 1383: 1382: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1354: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1329: 1327: 1322: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1309: 1296: 1290: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1274: 1273: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1244: 1241: 1235: 1234: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1204: 1199: 1198: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1179: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1116: 1111: 1103: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1074: 1073: 1067: 1061: 1049: 1045: 1042: 1037: 1029: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1000: 998: 993: 987: 986: 985: 982: 980: 977: 974: 970: 966: 959: 957: 952: 946: 945: 938: 932: 930: 925: 919: 918: 917: 909: 907: 904: 901: 897: 893: 886: 884: 879: 873: 872: 870: 862: 861: 855: 850: 849: 844: 842: 837: 826: 819: 813: 808: 807: 804: 793: 792: 789: 779: 778: 775: 768: 765: 763: 760: 758: 755: 753: 750: 748: 745: 743: 740: 739: 738: 736: 733: 721: 718: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 704: 701: 698: 694: 675: 670: 665: 661: 657: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 635: 630: 625: 621: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 603: 598: 593: 589: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 575: 570: 565: 560: 559: 558: 557: 554: 551: 546: 545: 544: 543: 538: 533: 527: 523: 521: 512: 507: 506: 500: 499: 495: 491: 487: 475: 472: 468: 467: 466: 465: 462: 458: 457:User:Zorglbot 447: 444: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 430: 427: 423: 419: 418: 417: 416: 413: 410: 406: 405: 404: 403: 400: 396: 385: 382: 378: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 363: 360: 355: 354: 353: 350: 343: 336: 335: 334: 333: 330: 326: 319: 316: 312: 311: 310: 309: 306: 302: 298: 288: 287: 277: 276: 273: 270: 266: 262: 252: 251: 248: 238: 237: 232: 228: 223: 222: 215: 211: 207: 200: 195: 194: 191: 184: 177: 174: 170: 169: 168: 165: 164: 161: 149: 146: 143: 139: 135: 134: 133: 132: 129: 122: 114: 106: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3320:Tag it with 3287: 3221: 3210:216.60.70.61 3187: 3173: 3148: 3145: 3133: 3091: 2978: 2957: 2907:TonyTheTiger 2878:TonyTheTiger 2817: 2768: 2703: 2699: 2658:Template:Tfd 2655: 2606: 2576: 2560: 2556: 2551: 2531: 2509: 2501: 2497: 2495: 2425:considerably 2424: 2367: 2341: 2320: 2276: 2234: 2214: 2184: 2124: 2106: 2031: 1998: 1985: 1967: 1923: 1896:Arthur Rubin 1882: 1862: 1844: 1828: 1815: 1777: 1733: 1729: 1668: 1652: 1636: 1625: 1610: 1600:Simply south 1597: 1534: 1533: 1526: 1524: 1504: 1493: 1491: 1489: 1475: 1474: 1469: 1468: 1466: 1458: 1444: 1406: 1392: 1389: 1384: 1370:Simply south 1347: 1330: 1311: 1282: 1269:Simply south 1259: 1249: 1247: 1239: 1236: 1195: 1191: 1171: 1102:adminbacklog 1080: 1066:push to talk 1052: 1004: 991: 988: 983: 964: 962: 950: 947: 936: 923: 920: 915: 891: 889: 877: 874: 868: 840: 832: 816: 803:75.33.140.40 799: 785: 771: 729: 691: 655: 532:David Kernow 529: 525: 517: 483: 454: 392: 322: 294: 283: 258: 244: 218: 203: 187: 166: 157: 123: 115: 112: 104: 78: 43: 37: 3166:Requesting 2095:Chick Bowen 1934:Vegaswikian 1829:NoMoreLinks 1821:NoMoreLinks 1783:User racism 1730:readability 1628:simple case 820:noted that 708:Nothing at 656:participate 36:This is an 3313:Yellowdesk 3244:Rick Block 2833:ArtCutline 2737:Iamunknown 2696:Tablespace 2666:Iamunknown 2639:Iamunknown 2621:Iamunknown 2609:and add {{ 2565:Iamunknown 2127:^demonBot2 1884:to made? 1496:(the only 1379:Discussion 1178:succession 714:TimBentley 697:TimBentley 664:Rick Block 592:Rick Block 349:Hbdragon88 269:TimBentley 154:August 12? 136:Posted to 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 11 85:Archive 10 3152:those at 3139:MZMcBride 3072:Agreed. – 3016:MZMcBride 2983:WP:CSD#G6 2964:MZMcBride 2960:WP:CSD#G6 2863:Infobox x 2853:Sculpture 2731:See also 2532:relisting 2443:WP:SPLICE 1974:Mike Peel 1253:Patstuart 1190:etc too! 1077:Archiving 471:Ned Scott 443:Ned Scott 409:Ned Scott 381:Ned Scott 377:nav links 315:Ned Scott 280:August 25 241:August 21 173:Ned Scott 138:user talk 79:Archive 9 73:Archive 8 68:Archive 7 60:Archive 5 3267:Jmfangio 3229:Jmfangio 3198:Tbeatty 2843:Painting 2685:contribs 2125:My bot, 1790:ReyBrujo 1761:contribs 1675:Twas Now 1632:template 1612:cohesion 1571:WP:POINT 1565:We have 1547:WP:BEANS 1536:Twas Now 1432:Twas Now 865:Closebox 297:Zorglbot 231:contribs 142:sjorford 3104:Wikid77 2858:all to 2823:Artwork 2676:Jeff G. 2510:earlier 2502:crucial 2430:grubber 2149:Amarkov 2113:grubber 2074:grubber 2059:Amarkov 2039:grubber 2003:mwtoews 1962:WP:PROD 1752:Jeff G. 1413:Renesis 1348:Neutral 1335:Renesis 1316:Amarkov 1214:Amarkov 1188:WP:AN/I 1154:rtinp23 1118:rtinp23 1059:ilotguy 1044:rtinp23 1028:tfd top 965:example 892:example 825:tfd log 562:Yours, 490:Rossami 342:tfd log 190:Lincher 160:Tbeatty 124:Thanks 39:archive 3336:ais523 3154:WP:SFD 3116:bainer 3045:creepy 2782:ais523 2746:ais523 2630:Bensin 2587:Bensin 2554:edited 2476:ais523 2452:WP:FAC 2408:ais523 2321:—dgies 2277:—dgies 2235:—dgies 1944:ais523 1930:WP:AFD 1900:(talk) 1738:Godric 1693:ais523 1655:Godric 1575:ais523 1567:WP:IAR 1490:Thus, 1331:Oppose 1312:Oppose 1277:Survey 1250:oppose 1007:ais523 969:ais523 896:ais523 717:(talk) 700:(talk) 550:Rossrs 511:WP:VPR 494:(talk) 461:Schutz 426:Schutz 399:Schutz 359:Schutz 329:Schutz 305:Schutz 272:(talk) 220:Seicer 3325:rfd-t 3271:Talk 3180:MONGO 3149:isn't 3074:Pomte 3063:notes 3060:Grace 3049:Pomte 3034:notes 3031:Grace 2994:notes 2991:Grace 2981:meet 2979:would 2939:notes 2936:Grace 2803:Perón 2771:Perón 2705:: --> 2611:subst 2540:notes 2537:Grace 2518:notes 2515:Grace 2352:notes 2349:Grace 2261:notes 2258:Grace 2201:notes 2198:Grace 2167:demon 2136:demon 2014:Amark 1833:Femto 1665:code: 1556:inp23 1357:inp23 1321:edits 1283:Add 1219:edits 1184:WP:AN 1131:Sandy 1083:Sandy 835:howch 788:G1076 782:Kudos 774:Sandy 624:David 564:David 16:< 3249:talk 3158:Alai 3120:talk 2916:cont 2912:talk 2887:cont 2883:talk 2848:and 2721:< 2681:talk 2617:tfd2 2595:Add 2585:? -- 2498:move 2461:Talk 2441:and 2391:Talk 2374:here 2344:here 2308:and 2190:prod 2153:moo! 2063:moo! 2018:moo! 1968:See 1800:Tito 1757:talk 1732:and 1552:Mart 1527:will 1449:are 1417:talk 1353:Mart 1339:talk 1289:or 1135:Talk 1087:Talk 984:... 967:. -- 916:... 894:. -- 854:chat 669:talk 629:talk 597:talk 569:talk 537:talk 395:here 325:here 247:Eixo 227:talk 210:here 140:. — 3311:-- 3100:PNG 3096:vio 2920:bio 2891:bio 2600:tfd 2472:MfD 2372:, 2220:Qxz 2215:you 2052:afd 1986:Hi, 1909:bov 1898:| 1886:bov 1869:nkB 1864:Fra 1476:and 1470:any 1428:TfD 1202:nkB 1197:Fra 229:) ( 127:Æon 3328:}} 3322:{{ 3307:? 3269:► 3122:) 3114:-- 3066:§ 3037:§ 3010:? 3006:? 2997:§ 2942:§ 2874:}} 2870:{{ 2866:}} 2860:{{ 2856:}} 2850:{{ 2846:}} 2840:{{ 2838:, 2836:}} 2830:{{ 2828:, 2826:}} 2820:{{ 2603:}} 2597:{{ 2545:§ 2523:§ 2464:) 2420:) 2394:) 2357:§ 2316:. 2266:§ 2206:§ 2193:}} 2187:{{ 2055:}} 2049:{{ 1972:. 1824:}} 1818:{{ 1802:xd 1786:}} 1780:{{ 1740:/ 1726:}} 1720:{{ 1716:}} 1713:tl 1710:{{ 1705:) 1689:}} 1686:tl 1683:{{ 1657:/ 1509:: 1487:. 1430:− 1419:) 1341:) 1263:→ 1186:, 1180:}} 1176:{{ 1174:A 1137:) 1105:}} 1099:{{ 1089:) 1031:}} 1025:{{ 1019:) 981:) 908:) 847:ng 828:}} 822:{{ 695:. 522:: 345:}} 339:{{ 145:++ 94:→ 64:← 3297:. 3251:) 3247:( 3118:( 2985:. 2926:) 2922:/ 2918:/ 2914:/ 2910:( 2897:) 2893:/ 2889:/ 2885:/ 2881:( 2794:) 2792:C 2789:T 2786:U 2758:) 2756:C 2753:T 2750:U 2719:t 2717:n 2715:a 2713:i 2711:d 2709:a 2707:R 2687:) 2683:| 2679:( 2614:: 2488:) 2486:C 2483:T 2480:U 2458:( 2418:C 2415:T 2412:U 2388:( 2327:c 2283:c 2241:c 2163:^ 2132:^ 2001:+ 1956:) 1954:C 1951:T 1948:U 1763:) 1759:| 1755:( 1703:C 1700:T 1697:U 1587:) 1585:C 1582:T 1579:U 1463:. 1415:( 1337:( 1212:- 1150:a 1146:M 1133:( 1114:a 1110:M 1085:( 1068:) 1064:( 1057:P 1040:a 1036:M 1017:C 1014:T 1011:U 979:C 976:T 973:U 906:C 903:T 900:U 856:} 852:{ 841:e 671:) 667:( 631:) 627:( 599:) 595:( 571:) 567:( 539:) 535:( 513:) 233:) 225:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:Templates for discussion/Archive 9 - Knowledge

Index