Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK Waterways/Archive 4

4517:

years ago, the first edition 1:10,560 Ordnance Survey map clearly shows the remains of the canal crossing French Weir with a lock at the junction with the river and a second lock halfway across French Weir. The cut carried on parallel with the Tone through the first field of roughmoor before turing north along the edge of the second field in roughmoor. The join with the main line would have been at approximately 51º01'21.6"N 3º07'03.6"W. Pages 77-78 of The Grand Western Canal by Helen Harris confirms that there was a cut, made in 1834, although it may have been little used. I have now created a Knowledge account so I will try to draft suitable additional paragraph for the article over the coming period.

5118:

think that to be consistent, umKRZuswq ought to be mKRXusw, and umKRZuxswq ought to be xmKRZusw. Thus they become railway icons crossing canals, rather than canal icons crossing railways (the lack of the initial "u"), and the modifiers for use always go at the beginning. This allows em variants (live railway over unnavigable waterway), exm variants (dead railway over unnavigable waterway) and gm variants (live railway over unwatered canal) to be created, and displayed on the legend page without having to invent new line objects to display a set of icons which use a different naming scheme.

4936:) from scratch, which I think look significantly better. Here: (i) the water meets the parapet without a gap, as with most other canal bridges; (ii) diagonals (abutments excepted) are parallel (the deck is shown rotated 60° from "open"); (iii) the parapets are of approximately normal thickness, and the abutments are of approximately normal length; (iv) the parapets are spaced further apart, allowing for a narrow gap between these and the red line, as with other railway bridges (although the gap varies, it's almost always present); (v) the black "pivot" circle is of the larger variety. 472:, and seen some of last summer's discussion on AfDs for society articles, I think it is perhaps time for us to create some guidelines for what is and what is not notable for articles within this project. Taking the three locks on the Hertford Union as an example, I see nothing noteworthy about them. They are unreferenced, and the content serves only to locate the lock geographically, give the rise of the lock and show a picture. One has a story about something that happened in a pub nearby, which while it is interesting is dubious content in this article ( 5619:, to try to reduce their number. I have removed a few from UKW, as they were for minor streams, which were unnavigable, and added content to quite a few, particularly those for individual canals, tunnels, waterway trusts and engineers. The total left is now 203, and there are a few other articles I might be able to improve, but that leaves over 180 about individual locks or junctions. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how articles about subjects with such limited scope can be improved, and where there are reliable sources? I know on the 4443:

Bridgwater and Taunton Canal. The article on the Bridgwater and Taunton Canal suggests that the link with the Grand Western was made by going up the Tone and building a short stretch of canal at French Weir. Both plans however show the link being made with the Bridgwater and Taunton Canal. In addition the Map reference given for the Taunton Boat Lift appears odd. It resolves to 81 St Augustine Street which is on the right bank of the Tone whereas all the other canal works are on the left bank of the Tone.

2028:

discussions may roll on a bit. I've now used it on quite a few pages, but as I said initially - I set it to 365days and 10 threads - so nothing under a year old gets archived, and if that would leave less than 10 threads then it's not done. I'll have a go and we'll see what it does - I'll set the counter to "3", so the 2 archives present are left intact as they are and we'll start Miszabot with Archive 3. If we don't like it, we can either tweak it or just revert it - after all nothing is ever lost.

31: 4925: 630: 4910: 5496:. Some articles are in both categories, some in only one. Is there an argument for everything in the former category to also be included in the latter category, and keeping the categories completely separate? Or would it be better if the former category were made a subcategory of the latter? Or something else? (I asked this question at the Knowledge help desk a few days ago, but nobody responded.) What makes an article "historical" anyways?-- 5534:

is all the information available about him. The sentence is confirmed by Hadfield (Canals of the West Midlands p.194). Much the same sentence appears in Skempton's Biographical Dictionary of Civil Engineers (p.362), in an article on Josias Jessop, but he does not get his own entry. I have found no other refs to him. I have beefed up some pretty unlikely-looking stubs, but this one is beyond me. Can anyone think of a reason for keeping it?

5136: 5029: 5014: 4969: 4954: 4891: 4845: 1621: 5059: 4999: 4984: 4876: 4860: 5044: 4826: 1635: 4811: 2237:

the bottom of the four on the south of the river. The line is quite straight, and the top lock was approximately at the end of the present wharf. On the north of the river, the cut came out at that wide pond by the lock on the main line. The river was diverted somewhat when the aquduct was built, and although it is not clear in the satellite image, Get-a-map still shows some the original course in water. --

3110:

companies you mention having their own articles if there is sufficient information available to warrant it. The GUC is very long, and it would not be unreasonable for the current article to become a parent to many descendant articles. It's one of those jobs that's not for the faint-hearted. The bigger the article topic, the harder it is to determine its scope and the subsections it should contain.

4501:. Using the 1889 OS map, which was printed before the railway goods yard obliterated the remains, I have located the Taunton boat lift and altered its coordinates. Thanks for pointing out the problem. I don't believe there was ever a link to French Weir, since the canal would be a well over 20 ft too high, as there was a lock near the junction, and Taunton lift had a rise of 23.5 ft. 514:} - and this was reflected in the two articles that existed before. I have now referenced the articles to their Canalplan gazetteer entries - they also appear to be listed structures, so where I have found the entry in IoE, I have added that. I'm inclined to the view that listed structures are inherently notable - but they're only at Grade II - so, wouldn't press the point. 3308:(both on the K&A) used to contradict each other on a) how many working turf-sided locks there are in the country, and b) how many of these are on the K&A. Now, I've updated both articles to say that there's two on that canal (with source), but is there any truth in the original statement that there aren't any elsewhere in the country? 582:. Multiple examples of Old Ford Locks came up - and it seemed that this was the simplest way to deal with it, without confusion. I'm not wedded to the idea of keeping them, if there's a better and unambiguous way of recording the difference. I can see merger may be the way to go, rather than my somewhat 'completest' solution. After all, 1667:, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators. 5784:(currently a red link). Is this yet another name for a roving bridge (along with turnover bridge, changeover bridge, and side bridge!) or a more general term? Incidentally, a nice photo of a split bridge would be useful. The only one near me is literally underneath the M5 motorway so it's difficult to get a decent shot.-- 3158: 4516:

I have only just managed to get back to this. First, thanks for updating the lift coordinates. There was without doubt a cut from the River Tone at French Weir to the main line of the Grand Western Canal the other side of Frieze Hill. Apart from the fact that I used to collect frog spawn in it many

4477:

Many thanks. I have since managed to dig out an older OS map which clearly shows a route for the GWC running parallel with the railway and joining up with the B&TC. So it appears it is not one or the other but both routes existed. A direct link with B&TC at the beginning of the B&TC and

4442:

I am trying to make sense of the route of the Taunton end of the Grand Western Canal. Old Ordnance Survey maps suggest it came into the town across Roughmoor and met the Tone in French Weir. The Knowledge article on the Grand Western Canal suggests that the Grand Western actually linked direct to the

3109:

In terms of article names, you should follow the normal naming guidelines, which recommend using the name by which the article's subject is best known. In the case of canal companies, the official name might be better, with a redirect from other names, as needed. There is scope for any and all of the

2923:

Is there a need to trawl the UK Waterways articles, so see whether the assessments are still right? Having just scanned through 172 articles, the ratings are extremely variable, from B-class with not a lot of information to Stub class with considerable amounts of well-organised information. If I knew

2727:

Nick has been doing a lot of work on Canalplan AC and we've noticed that a lot of the links buried in Wiki are to the unaliased mihalis url. So I'm going to start updating them - so any pointers to pages where they might be lurking would be a great help. It would be great too if people, when they are

2286:

it was necessary to set crossing type. As before Culverts as type crossing in wikipedia were not used for a categorisation, it was necessary to enter it. I have estimated reasonable to include in it such water objects which are Culverts on the big extent. Let's discuss two questions: whether there

1556:

I fully agree with EdJogg except for one point, some WP's won't accept C-class, it has to be Start-class or B-class for them. WikiProject Military history is one, so you can get an article that other WPs rate as C-class article, whereas MILHIS downgrade to Start-class; but there are other WPs as well

1539:

Class and importance assessments are two jobs I leave to others who know the appropriate metrics and get fulfilment from doing so, although I have elevated a few stubs in my time. By the same token, if I find an un-tagged railway- or canal-based article I will add the appropriate banner template, but

589:

The main problem with most of these particular waterways is the control system. The lower part of the Lee was semi-tidal; the Regent, not. I still haven't worked out how this affected the Hertford Union - and its locks. Thanks for inserting the additional 'factoid'; can you check the displayed format

3689:

I'm surprised this article hasn't been deleted or had any attention to it. If you can call it an article. It's a mess. Is it a disambiguation page? Should it be moved as a sub-page of this project? Is anyone willing to change it into a general article about waterways in the United Kingdom? Should it

3004:

I was thinking of including branch canals: this is not to be used for route-planning purposes after all. Railways are somewhat different in that the focus of interest might be "Great Western Main Line" which wouldn't include branches. But if we went for "Grand Union Main Line" then we'd need all the

2236:

That is where the canal locked down to the Ouse and back up on the other side while the aqueduct was being built. (The text in the article says 9?) There is a map in Alan Faulner's 'The Grand Junction Canal' showing four locks on each side of the river. I would guess that the one visible on Gmaps is

2080:

The bot is very useful once you get to grips with it. It has created an Archive 3 - which is already about half full (I've set it to 100kb), sometime it will start No.4. I'm also trying to make an index of the whole lot in one page (and including a link in the archive box) - still playing with that

5533:

I am thinking of nominating this stub for deletion. It was created in 2007, and nominated for deletion at the time. Two authors requested a Hangon. I have posted both of them to see if they still think it is worth keeping, but have not yet got a response. It is just one sentence, and I suspect that

4575:

Somerset does have some digited (out of copyright) OS maps available from the Somerset.gov.uk site, but possibly not these two (sods law). If you are prepared a wait a few weeks (possibly a month), I could go there in person (I've been twice, and it is worthwhile visiting if there is a reason to do

4405:

Thinking about it, my concern is mainly to define "Inland Waterways" a bit more clearly so that one get at a more or less complete list. To do that one needs an "authority": I've traditionally used Cumberlidge which has slightly different criteria than Paget-Tomlinson. I was hoping the latter might

2987:

As for editing the template, any editor can change it, although for a controversial change it may be advisable to seek consensus first. Be careful though, some of the templates use insanely complicated parser code to produce the desired functionality, and in these cases it's usually best to contact

1780:

There may be circumstances where it is hard to find current information about the state of restoration (some obscure little project that isn't well documented online, such as some of the foreign canals), or where things happen very rapidly, as is planned for Droitwich. But I agree, in most UK cases

1498:

As a fully-signed up member of Waterways project you can change that assessment if you think that it is wrong (and remove the stub template); if you are a member of WPgeo you could change their assessment as well, or you could just be kind hearted and update theirs at the same time as you do it for

781:

OK...having investigated a little of how the OpenStreetMap Wiki works before answering I can see why this might be an issue! It also means that, as there is probably "no deadline", waiting for completion could be a lengthy business. However, it IS possible to use out-of-copyright maps to trace such

5509:

Many articles are in more than one category, in that it enables people to find articles about particular subject areas more easily. Personally, I would not think of looking at History of Birmingham for articles on the BCN, but then I am part of UK Waterways Project, whereas I can see that if I was

4806:

Recently I needed to add a swing bridge icon to a railway route diagram. Since the article primarily concerns a railway, the red and pink lines for the railway routes run up and down, with bridges as appropriate over secondary features such as roads and canals, these being drawn at right-angles to

3932:

I've just compared the entries in that category with Cumberlidge: Inland Waterways of Great Britain and there are 44 that aren't there, including the Severn. Paget-Tomlinson adds another 11. I've been up 14 of them. The problem is partly in the name. "Navigation" isn't quite the same as "navigable

2967:

attribute in this template. It is one of the basic ways of distinguishing canals and occurs in most similar templates, e.g. rivers, even though there it is often contentious. Clearly it needs to be distinguished from boat length. Is it ok to add an attribute or is there any consensus required? Can

1616:

Also had a go at this one - while not too distant a memory (moored for 15 years on Stort - it did help with all the weir streams...). I did find I needed two extra icons - it was to messy to make without them, so I made them up by editing existing icons, and kept to the same naming protocol. They

1520:

can change a rating from stub to start/C class, as this assessment is mainly based on article size; the higher ratings (for quality and coverage) being awarded by editors outside the projects. The article importance rating would normally be set by a project member with understanding of the subject

685:

Actually, January is already done. If you follow the link that Derek gave, take a look at January 2009, for an example of what has been done there. Basically, it means reducing the article to a single paragraph and one picture. Click on the link to February 2009, and add the paragraph and picture,

5117:

They look good to me. Personally, I quite like the use of "q" at the end, but see discussion above, where user:Apxde objects where both lines are railways/canals. I am also in favour of consistency, so would support redrawing the icons (although I suspect I created some of them!) As for naming, I

3086:

The Regent's has its own page even though it is as much part of the GU as all the others (indeed it was the buyer) and the Hertford Union and Erewash should also be included. The names of those in the 1st paragraph are almost forgotten these days whereas those in this one are still used, but that

2027:

I didn't see them there! But usefully they are called Archive 1 and Archive 2 which is very compliant with archive box templates. I do use Miszabot - it's not overkill if you format it correctly - I think the default is 2or3 threads and 7or14 days which is way no use for this sort of page, where

535:

The dismabiguation page should be sufficient to avoid the confusion. The Canalplan reference is good for proving the data used in the infobox, but I'm not sure it does much for notability. Somewhere there is probably a database of the location of every telegraph pole in the country, but does that

3115:

For the GUC it may be clearer if the article deals with each canal section in turn, each linking to an article on the constructing company (and its descendants) and detailing the history of that section while a separate entity -- the main article can then summarise all the other sub-articles and

1702:

I have been adding "RDT" to applicable templates to help distinguish them from other templates and now more as a norm to show they are RDTs (or Route Diagram Templates). Although i did not propose this, i carried it out being bold and thinking it was uncontroversial. Similar suffixes to the same

1314:

Looking into this further we could get someone for existing canals from the open streetmap people or try working from Nichols, Priestley and Walkers Map of the Inland Navigation, Canals and Rail Roads, with the Situations of the various Mineral Productions, throughout Great Britian from 1830 but

4902:

by 90° clockwise, but neither was entirely satisfactory. My main concerns were: (i) there was a white gap between the water and the bridge; (ii) the diagonal lines were not parallel; (iii) the parapets are rather thin, and the abutments are very short; (iv) the parapets are spaced quite closely

3936:

In general I'm happy with using a category rather than a list as long as there's a prominent pointer to it. There are many readers who don't understand the existence of categories in Knowledge. Maybe a link in the lead of List of canals of the United Kingdom would be one. I can also fill in the

2983:

It may be a simple omission. If we have reliable source available, then it's probably worth including, however... What about branches and arms? Would the length equate to the total number of route-miles or the physical distance of the main line? How do railway and road infoboxes handle the same

2053:

Fair enough -- should be OK for us. Didn't realise that the bot was as configurable -- the instances I see most often obviously use the default parameters. If anyone thinks that any of the above topics should remain locally visible, long-term, please consider how they can be incorporated on the

3078:

most of which should probably be in "River Soar Navigation" according to the guidelines (though the original names were Leicester Navigation and Loughborough Navigation). On the main line there is an article on the Grand Junction, which starts at Braunston, but the Warwick & Birmingham and

3787:

A little archaeology helps here. The article, as created by the original author, was essentially a list of canals, etc. I think this was later split off into a separate article. Looking at these earlier versions may give a clue as to what it's original function was, and what it should be now.

4438:

I initially posted this question on the help desk for guidance on where best to post it. The help desk suggested I might get a better answer either at the reference desk or at the UK Waterways project, so I am posting this again at both (hopefully I am not breaching any cross-posting rules)

1055:

In particular, the beam of narrow canals is problematic. They are built to 7ft beam for boats 6ft 10in wide. Unfortunately, convert those to metric at the same level of precision, and you get 2.1m for both figures. Converting so as to show the difference implies a greater precision than is

2333:

may incorporate one or more culverts in their construction, but they themselves are not a culvert. Furthermore, the culverts may not be notable in their own right. Also by extending your logic, Lancaster Canal, should also be placed in categories such as Brick, Bridge, Aqueduct etc.

4666:

article, which is tagged as being of interest to this project, has been a Good Article since 2006. A few editors have recently been expanding and improving this article in an attempt to get it up to Featured Article standard. Could you take a look and help to improve the article?—

3326:

certainly claims that and I think all the others have been converted. Certainly the Exeter Turf Lock is solid brick and so is Mildenhall. I had a feeling there was at least one up in the north-east which was still partially turf-sided but I can't find any mention of it on the web.

423:

I would contest that a basin can be just a wide bit of canal. I suggest that this is a lay-by - a usage that predates its use for roads - and that a basin is a purpose built area either on an arm off the canal (eg numerous examples on BCN) or at a terminus (eg Paddington Basin).

3178:

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as

1293:

Inland navigation might be worth a try. Otherwise the Walker Nichols and Priestly canal map of Great Britain or george bradshaw canal maps both produced in about 1830. At 1/2 to the mile george bradshaw's stuff might be scanable. None of these would be easy to get hold of

1751:

I created that a few weeks ago when I discovered the Temporal Templates, and thought it would be a good idea, then had similar doubts myself. It can be applied to a section, so it may be more appropriate just to add it to the restoration section of an article as I did for

4540:

a little above that, after which it is very flaky. I think it would still have needed at least one more lock, and possibly two, to overcome the height difference. Harris mentions a tithe map and John Wood's town map of 1840, but I don't know how to get hold of them, yet.

3005:

branches to have separate articles. Apart from the GUC, the Birmingham Canal Network has the most odd branches and there is a tendency there for separate articles describing a simple half-mile branch of canal without locks, sometimes derelict, which seems rather ott.

4180:

Well its not clear precisely what your proposal is: I suggest that you state it clearly. So far you've only asked two questions. Change "River navigations" to "Navigable rivers" is undoubtly part / perhaps most of the proposal, but what about the rest of your first

2110:

I've managed to get the Indexer bot to index all three Archive pages as well as this one, and combine into a sortable table with clickable links. The link to the index can be found as the first entry in the Archive Box near the top of the page or for quickness use

5594:

I have had a look at this, but there is no clear explanation of how the kml file gets generated. It is no good having a missing kml tag unless there is a reasonable expectation that editors might be able to fix it. A tag which only boffins can resolve is bad news.

1670:

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. —

1736:

which puts a banner-warning in an article and adds to an appropriate category. This may be useful in articles on disused canals where there is much work to be done. I have reservations about its use more generally in articles on established canals which may need

5797:

An accommodation bridge was to allow passage to the riparian landowners after the cut had sliced up their property. It was use for railroads and trunk roads as well, so doesn't really have a place alongside the more specialised turnover (etc.) bridge, which was

3802:

Basicaly it appears to have started life as what would now be a rather odd article with a list attached. The article has never really grown and the lists have been moved about a fair bit. An article could be written or we could convert it to a disambiguation

3342:

There is one on the River Wey (Walsham, I think) but it is a flood lock, so normally all the gates are open. Re K&A, while Garston Lock is more or less as built (apart from "health and safety" additions) Monkey Marsh was heavily "modernised" during the

3968:" article. That would be much more useful as the basis of a "Navigable rivers" page. Length of rivers is rather arbitrary (does anyone remember the edit wars over the length of the Shannon?). We could include a column for the distance that is navigable. 1482:

was a Stub, but is now Start in the Lincolnshire project, but still Stub in the Waterways project. Can I upgrade it to Start and remove the stub template, or can an article be both Stub and Start at the same time? (It is also a Geography project stub)

483:

So, I propose that we come up with guidelines for what is and is not an acceptable, a rationale for our decision, and suggestions for dealing with unacceptable articles when they arise. Otherwise I can see that we could be swamped with an awful lot of

5359:

to enable mapping on googlemaps etc. I have been told that a bot could be tasked to do this, however this would be quite a significant change and would not want to do it without consensus. If anyone has any comments could they join the discussion at

573:

Rather than have me bang on about these specific examples, can we consider general principles first - and then fit these examples to that template. I only got into this because I was spending an idle day trying to sort out the waterways around the

2112: 3161:. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at 1094:

Rather than the feet and inches (i'm the proud owner of a 25 feet sailing boat), it's the « date_act = DATE OF ACT OF PARLIAMENT » that makes me react, it's useless for french canals. Something like « date of the king's will » would be more

2532:

Aren't the junctions with Hatherton (which is on your right as you head toward Gailey), the Caldon (on your right as you come out of the locks) and Hardingswood ( on the left once you've left the tunnel). Or have I just mis-read the map

4100:

which is why they are called navigations. Like most navigations they have stretches of canal to get round troublesome parts, many of which were part of an original course of the river in the case of the Lea/Lee. The distinction is often

3997:

That we should change the category "River navigations" to "Navigable rivers". The former is an historical term which relates to the parliamentary history of "improvements" and has very little relevance today. Several rivers such as the

4765: 4359: 245:

Perhaps it might be a start to create a page listing common features on the canal network. Users would then be free to create their own articles on each feature, creating dablinks to each separate article? There are plenty of such

4627: 4871:

which is the right orientation but does not have a railway line across the deck. Accordingly I decided to create icons which fit in with my needs. Initially I tried doing this in two different ways: (a) by adding a red line to

3963:

We should remember the name "Waterways" - it does imply navigability though that can include canoes and rowing boats of course. At present all the lists of rivers go right down to the stream. There's also the rather pointless

2939:

I have never tried to rate any article, it's always far too subjective. Ideally one needs some sort of points system - but then editors start to write the articles in a way that gets most points - or is that not a bad thing?

2313:

Hi Audrey. I think you may be going in the wrong direction adding all these waterways to the category culvert, and would ask that you stop until it can be discussed in a wider forum and consensus is agreed. More to follow...

297:

article has a section called 'terminology'. All the different variations listed above could be redirected to that page. Also, a search for canal terminology finds many results that have terminology used in canal articles.

1703:

types of templates have been added (not by me and even some with the suffix RDT not by me either) such as "map", "route map" and "route diagram". As recently this has been questioned, could i ask for people's opinions at

3528:

I've added a few things I can, but it needs major work on inland shipping I've seen coal, aggregate, and refined petrol being shipped but can't find any reliable references apart from the DofT - and that lacks detail.

4029:"Navigable Rivers" is useful today and isn't contentious though there are marginal cases, mainly where the navigable length is small or tidal. We should continue to use "England", "Wales" and "Scotland", not counties. 4622: 5193:

Does anyone know when the Yorksire Ouse was taken over by British Waterways? It obviously wasn't in 1986 (Inland Waterways of Great Britain (6th Ed)), but was by 1998 (IWoGB (7th Ed)), but I cannot find any sources.

4396: 5298:

It's actually part of the Grand Union Canal Leicester line, though the line of the Soar below Leicester is not usually referred to by that name. The biggest section of canal is the Loughborough cut. Currently the

4205: 3023:- made changes for you. The easiest way to make changes, is to pick a parameter that has a similar action, copy that section and change the text - I used the lock section. Here's the new section you need to add. 4409:

But we do need to be a bit more consistent if we want to distinguish river and canal navigations. e.g. many navigations are included in canal categories and lists as well as/instead of navigation categories. Yet

554:

You can also add redirects that point to the headings in the main article that contains any merged material. The redirects can retain any appropriate categories so that the locks would be categorized correctly.

2813: 2394:

has been adding all articles mentioning Culverts to a category of that name. I have asked her to stop and left an explanation on her talk page. This is ridiculous isn't it? Please add comments to her talk page.

5708:

I have found a way to do junctions, so the total of stub class articles is currently 185, with 15 more junctions to go. But I still have no clues as to how to make an article about a lock more than stub class.

5574: 4286: 1798:

I suspect we will have a number of wikipedains involved in the Droitwich work so keeping up should not be a problem. Certianly we have had pics taken on two different WRG camps uploaded this year by different

5850:

could do with some canal bridge types too. (I put a roving bridge there, if that is the correct term.) There are some creative commons photos better illustrative of the "split" available on Geograph.org.uk.--

4136:

They might be called the Lee Navigation and the Stort Navigation, but any boater on there (like I was for 11 years), refers to the River Lee or River Stort. BW allows a "River Only License", and gives a list

1865:

I'm pretty sure that the Humber Estuary (Northern England) is not a river (as many topics state) but an Estuary (it is formed from rivers and not from a spring, and it also ends in a 'Saline tidal mouth' ).

1530:

The class rating should be the same for all projects, but the importance is likely to be different. Hence whoever decided it was no longer a stub should have changed all banners and removed the stub template.

340:

Adding a terminology section to the Canal article would seem a good start. There is no reason why it should replace the existing 'Features' section, although that might be renamed 'Construction' as a result.

3133: 649: 4371: 2006:

Manual archive is not difficult, also allows you to retain important topics if appropriate. Alternately there is 'Miszabot' (sp.??) which will do everything automatically, but is probably overkill for this

1457:

I have trawled through the articles and managed to fill in g01, g02 and g03, and have made a start on g04, but need an easier way to find articles, as most of my facts came from articles with maps on them.

728:

where an editor insists on removing valid referenced text, which has been supported separately by members of Thames, Rivers and Waterways projects. Can I ask those interested t keep an eye on this. Regards

4632: 4294: 3563:

has much significant shipping any more. There's still some sand and gravel that makes it down the Trent but I'm not sure of the company. Incidentally, you can see there's 10 tonnes of fish on sale in the

964:

You can use it on any that you want! Of course, if you want to use it in a foreign language wiki that doesn't already have a suitable template, you will need to create a local copy of the template to use

117: 1730: 1265:

canal, primarily for use in Google Earth. I took the imagery from old-maps.co.uk, it took me absolutely ages to do and I only did it to help trace the original route through the bits where it's buried!

469: 3198: 2425:. It says that categories "should be based on essential, "defining" features of article subjects." So, an article should not be put in a Category:Culverts just because it contains the word "culvert." - 1325:

There's no law against using copyrighted maps as references. It should be perfectly legal to draw your own map using an existing one as reference. As long as you don't use a copyrighted map directly.

4760: 2924:

how to be objective, I might have a go myself, but I think I am likely to rate most of them too highly, without some more obvious guidelines as to what constitutes Start, C or B class. Any thoughts?

2479:

Just finished a Route Map - have a look. It just a joining of the 4 main sections taken from other maps (and reversed as necessary to join up) with a bit of shrinking with some of the lock flights.

5578: 3066:

Is there a policy on the names of canals which have been taken over by other canal companies? I'm trying to sort out the Leicester line of the Grand Union, and it's a bit chaotic at the moment. The

4740:

for some time but has not received many comments. I am worried that it will be archived soon unless more comments are received, therefore can I ask anyone interested to participate in the review.—

3737: 2561:

one of the reviewers has noticed that several books are lacking page numbers. If you have any of the books below would you be willing to check the page numbers for the claims made in the article?

5361: 4231: 3273:

Cavalcade - been there, done that, and got the T shirt many years ago - I was the telescopic "Canary Wharf" on a londonwrg entry (telescopic to get under the bridges) - lucky it wasn't windy...

5588: 5510:

part of a Birmingham Project, or interested in Birmingham, History of Birmingham would be entirely appropriate. I think they are sufficiently different that they should be left as is. Regards.

4235: 4211: 4113: 3915: 3467: 1433: 5568: 4215: 4282: 4221: 4737: 4678: 4225: 5342: 5315:. Under the policy of having a different article for navigations it could well be called the "River Soar Navigation" which had acts of parliament in 1776 and 1791 (not mentioned in the 5723:

If data on the number of boats using the lock in one year is available for several different years, it might be interesting to describe how usage of the lock has changed over time. --

5627:

is a rather different list, since we seem to have a number of articles with a UKW stub tag, which are not part of UKW on the talk page and vice versa.) All ideas gratefully received!

5368: 4462:, not that they actually did it. Everything was governed by the Act of Parliament and I would imagine it was not uncommon to allow for several possible routes in case problems arose. 3390: 2003:

Careful -- there are already two archive pages linked near the top of the page. Next archive should sort out placing links to all of them in a clearly defined box at top of page (eg).

4637: 4197:

The rest of the comment is simply the justification. Sorry if I don't know the exact wiki way of presenting a proposal. However if you want me to be more precise, the proposal is:

3422: 665: 1248:

they do but your problem would be finding a whole UK map that shows the canals then getting the thing through a scanner (they tend to be around a meter square in size things like

622: 439:

I think this is the problem. Those familiar with canals 'know what it is', but it still needs defining for the non-canal-literate. Finding a ready-made definition is hard, as the

4718:

will be on the front page of wikipedia on 7 July. Any help beforehand with ensuring it shows off our best work and then watching it on the day for vandalism etc would be great.—

2883:

meaning flow, which in this case would relate to the four flows or streams: the Tone, Yeo, Isle and Parrett. This is the last item needed (I think) in getting the article on the

4487: 4452: 4369:, which is under the purview of this WikiProject, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 266: 5780:

article and created a redirect, though there seems to be some disagreement over the use of the term "roving bridge" itself. Now I find a lot of our canal articles use the term

3388:

article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,

5227: 2891: 4406:

be usable but even that has odd omissions: for example the river Dee which was subject to acts in 1734, 1744 and 1791 and is still part of the inland waterways above Chester.

2837: 5262:

It's not marked on my inland waterways map. However, the route as described seems to correspond to sections of the Loughborough Navigation, the Leicester Navigation and the

3622: 3538: 3523: 2717: 1234:

Doesn't copyright expire on OS maps older than 50 years? Could be wrong about that, but I'm sure I've seen an image or two on Wiki with just such a legend in the licence.

132: 5835: 4617: 4612: 4510: 4478:

a spur across roughmoor joining up with the Tone at French Weir. I am still puzzled by the Boat Lift coordinates as the mapped routes go nowhere near St Augustine Street.

2906: 2558: 2343: 4569: 4526: 1824: 1540:

with no parameters, as I feel that the ratings will be more consistent if a minimum number of people apply the standards -- I don't want to apply an inappropriate rating.

680: 5562: 5469: 3716: 3481: 3457: 1184:

Don't want to be criticised for being negative, but I can't see the existing map style being usable for this. Only one step on from one of the ELs on that page, I found

642: 564: 168:

I throw this idea at the project in case anyone feels like running with it, as I don't reckon to have enough knowledge (nor any reference material) to tackle it myself.

5857: 5817: 5604: 5543: 5217:

and wondered if someone would take a look and see if it now meets B class - any suggestions for what else is needed to get it to GA quality would also be appreciated.—

3577: 2434: 1944: 599: 549: 526: 5527: 5519: 5441:

I would be quite happy to produce the templates, based on the Canals of Britain template, if people think it would be useful, and we could decide what goes into each.

4483: 4448: 4427: 3892:, for instance, do not get listed on the canals page, and the rivers page makes no distinction between navigable and un-navigable. They are both as much canals as the 2263: 2246: 1664: 1605: 111: 5753: 5735: 5718: 5173: 5164:

I drew the uxSWINGq, and it rotates the other way because I had not spotted uHSWING. There is no significance to the way it opens. I would rename uHSWING to uSWINGq.

5159: 5127: 5086: 4471: 3840: 3770: 3752: 3251: 2952: 2523: 2506: 3094:

I've started including them all with a footnote saying they're part of the GU. Is this going to cause any problems? In canal terms it was quite a recent takeover...

2414: 2374: 2356: 1968: 1243: 1199: 396: 378: 307: 258: 5663: 4903:

together, meaning that either they lose their impact or that the red line is narrowed; (v) on one of them, the black circle representing the pivot is rather small.

4550: 4063: 3980: 3927: 3674: 3660: 2542: 1760: 1741:

restoration. It is a warning about speculative or changeable information, and could spoil the overall confidence in an article if over-used. To be used sparingly?

1508: 1492: 1467: 1178: 709: 695: 517:

I don't know how it works in the rest of the country, but propinquity to local public houses tends to be relevant to London articles! Thanks for raising the issue.

234: 201: 5550: 5203: 5108: 4089: 3797: 3701: 3336: 2548: 1340:

That would be regarded as a derivative work. Technicaly you might have a point if you worked from the original raw data rather than the map but we don't have that.

1275: 1256: 319: 1812: 1803: 1785: 799: 5703: 4602: 4323: 4309: 4167: 4153: 3909: 3879: 3823: 3436: 3051: 2787: 2769: 1833: 605: 2169: 2144: 2093: 2063: 2040: 2018: 4795: 4607: 4585: 4345: 4276: 4250: 4190: 4129: 3946: 3370: 3143: 1745: 974: 885: 5450: 5291: 5278: 4722: 3285: 3268: 3127: 3014: 2999: 1566: 1551: 1078: 989: 957: 936: 457: 2933: 1854: 1229: 1150: 862: 772:

Probably because the Wilts & Berks Canal doesn't even have a clear route and more and cycleing the full length of the Wey and Arun Canal would be tricky.

755: 653: 285: 5336: 3403: 5237:

this - someone who knows about canals and can write reasonable English might like to tidy it up (and probably Move to a new title) before it gets deleted!

3807: 1892: 1771: 1653: 1415: 1188:(~2MB) which gives an indication of the scale of what you're proposing. A map, or maps, would be good though -- but might need to be regionalised sections. 1123: 1089: 848: 836: 810: 793: 413: 350: 262: 1692: 1344: 1331: 1319: 1298: 4689: 4565: 4522: 4433: 1308: 932: 776: 290: 5256: 4704: 3645: 3605: 1052:

But of course! British canals need to be described in feet and inches, because attempting to use metric measurements causes all sort of inconsistencies.

5636: 2977: 2198: 1808:

Both photos on the Droitwich article are thirty years old:) It took six months for the news about the planning application to appear in the article. --

116: 3079:

Warwick & Napton (as well as the Birmingham and Warwick Junction) are missing. So a third of the main line isn't well covered. It seems to me the

2467: 1581:

I had a go at a map, hope you like the result. I made it so the three sections collapse/expand, otherwise it got rather long or needed multiple maps.

500: 5457: 5221: 2779: 2738: 2534: 2230: 1394: 387:

I would concur, although I'm a tad busy at present! There is an outstanding merge proposal that will need addressing before you an proceed very far.

99: 81: 69: 64: 59: 2746: 1953:, which defines the boundaries between "coast" and "river". If that's the case, then I'd definitely oppose making any search-and-replace changes. – 1044: 913:

The canal location appears to make no difference as long as the English template is used here, though I could be wrong. The template actually links

907: 4365: 4290: 4201: 3317: 2491: 254: 3103: 2832: 2126: 506:

Consensus would be much appreciated. I created these three articles because there was confusion between the five locks named 'Old Ford Lock' (see

5410:

Also, following the discussion above on navigations, do we need a similar template for them, and maybe one for dead canals? Navigations like the

5263: 4780: 4671: 3071: 2817: 2801: 1590: 4744: 3560: 2913: 2323: 738: 4652: 4561: 4518: 3394:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Have a great day. - 3352: 3344: 2404: 2291: 1211:

Trace every Ordnance Survey map over 50 years old containing a canal (from 6 inch maps as one inch maps of that age do not show canals clearly)

425: 5642:

Good work, Bob. But can someone explain to me why we have two "Stub" categories which appear to largely overlap and have other oddities? e.g.

3506: 5493: 4801: 1919:, all of whom ought to know, refer to it as "the River Humber", as does the definitive (well, more accurately only) film on Humber shipping, 1217:

Memorise and amalgamate several paper maps from different sources such that none could have been said to be individually copied (inaccurate).

433: 5503: 2419:

I reviewed a few article that have been added to this category by AndreyA. I agree that the category has been added incorrectly to articles.

179: 5525: 5385: 4076:

is a term very much still in use, particularly by the National Trust (who own it) although the navigable parts are covered by the article

89: 4807:

the railway, i.e. left-right. One bridge that I needed to add is over a navigable canal, i.e. dark blue. For a fixed bridge this is easy:

3221: 5791: 2816:

will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the

1997: 1817:

Do you think that a similar template should be created, but instead on a future canal or some waterway or related structure? For example

1451: 821:

Is there a railway equivalent? There's a lot of railway detail shown (you can even see the loop for Didcot power station!) I'm sure that

5378:

I changed the title of the requested article "Soho Branch Loop Line" to the simpler "Soho Loop", as given on my British Waterways map.--

4950:

Is the form of the bridge acceptable? Would the project like me to redraw any of the other swing bridges (the ones that I know of being

4556:

A quick search of the national archives suggests that both the Wood's Town Map and the St James Tithe Map for 1840 are available at the

3933:

river" - or is it? Paget-Tomlinson calls some of them navigations. But what about the navigable rivers that have never been 'improved'?

5348: 4709: 4038: 1849: 1716: 1704: 5680: 5616: 2422: 1721: 743: 1473: 4116:. Why they should be distinct articles I don't know; I wasn't trying to claim the term was never used. (Ok, I've deleted the term 2214:- if you want a peek). My question is that on Google Earth there appears to be a disused cut connecting the canal to the Ouse at 5185: 3682: 3636:

I am thinking of submitting this article for Good Article status. Any comments, help, or additions would be appreciated. Thanks.

2362: 802:

where I make a few suggestions about what might be PD. individual canals tend not to be too bad (for example we have maps of the

273: 47: 17: 1916: 5654:

appears on canal stubs but it's not on a canal. Do we need both, or is it just a historical anomaly which we can't get rid of?

4138: 1249: 1160: 225:

I've attempted a slight expansion, although my understanding (that a basin is basically a wide bit of canal!) may be flawed...

5623:, each lock article covers the reach up to the next lock, but that would not help much on many canal locks. (I also note that 3497:

Now, what about the Humber? (grin). River or estuary, it is certainly inland, navigable, and used for commercial trade... --

3083:

is complicated enough by itself with all its branch canals (some of which aren't covered) without throwing in all the others.

1658: 5489: 4391: 3408: 2283: 143: 3209: 897:

Hi all. Can I use this template in french (german, dutch...) canals articles ? Or is it specific to UK ? Thanks in advance.

5403:

is listed, despite being closed since 1787. Several of the Irish canals are dubious in this category, and I am not sure if

5226: 4695: 4479: 4444: 3965: 3376: 3139: 3091: 95: 161:

as a redirect somewhere, and possibly to a new page, if it is thought that its description is sufficiently different from

5668: 5624: 5147:, which has its deck "opposite" to the others, i.e. it rotates anticlockwise to open for canal traffic, not clockwise. -- 4402:

Well, do any of you want to speak up? Currently there are 2 "keep" messages and none in support so the proposal will die.

4376: 2887:

ready for another FA nomination (last time it was closed with no opposes , but also no supports). Any help appreciated.—

2195: 1884: 1208:

It's hard to see how such a map could be produced without breaching copyright. There seem to be only four possibilities:

536:

mean they should all have an article? The listed building status is much more relevant, (you missed a notable feature on

198: 5577:. Now there's a proposal to tag suitable articles to add a hidden KML missing category where a KML map link is missing. 3417:

as there are so many articles but it is hard to tell which to put in that category and which to put in the sub-category

1981:

Should we archive some of this page - it's getting rather long. I've a nice bit of code I keep handy for auto archive (

5481: 5390: 2574: 2511:

So I have! That was one of the sections that I had to reverse all the locks - I forgot about the tunnel. All done now.

1611: 944: 477: 5686: 5423: 5208: 3893: 2918: 2703: 2689: 1920: 1262: 3812:

I do think that a good overview page is needed anyway. So should someone convert it? And what are others' opinions?

5287:( I used to live very close & drink in the canal side pubs) & could possibly be merged with that article.— 2958: 1385: 5355:, as I think this offers advantages for users worldwide (who may be unfamiliar with the OS system) and the use of 3683: 3323: 3087:

doesn't seem quite enough to treat them differently. They mostly had a century or more of independent existence.

2795: 507: 1104:

For the while, the template is enough for me, it avoids me to make complicated sentences in my awfull english ;D

369:

seems like a pretty comprehensive article - I think it should be peer-reviewed and perhaps pushed to GA status?

3261: 3031:|length = LENGTH OF CANAL |o_length = ORIGINAL LENGTH OF CANAL |length_note = NOTE TO CANAL LENGTH 2652: 2613: 2348:

This discussion does not approach for User talk page. Where you suggest to discuss a category? Perhaps on page

2287:

is a necessity to allocate them in separate classification from tunnels and what to include in this category.--

1950: 1860: 1379: 890: 4657: 4077: 2442: 2349: 476:). My feeling is that they should be merged in to the canal article, or a list of locks on the canal (as per 4259:

Thanks. I don't have any objections to those four changes. Note: these are only changes of category-name so

2277: 4749: 4727: 4498: 3733: 3628: 2896: 2203: 1169:, in the same style as the map templates for individual canals. Obviously not with all features included! 803: 5319:

article), but only as far as Leicester although Cumberlidge also marks the section above Leicester as the

4458:

I don't know the GWC or the B&TC so I'll defer to anyone who does. However the article only says they

1214:

Walk or navigate every canal and former canal with a GPS track recorder thereby making a map from a survey

5610: 5093: 4314:

Yes, but I never got round to creating and populating them/it. The four above I did as long ago as 2007.

3061: 2153:

Thank you. I agree, it's very useful - bit of a learning curve to get the desired result (not unusual in

613:

I am thinking of nominating this article for GA status. Any comments or suggestions gratefully received.

4532:

I take back what I said above. I have now found a section of Grand Western on the 1889 OS map, with two

3707:

I agree it is not obvious what it is, but have yet to formulate ideas as to what could be done with it.

2757: 446:

May be the answer is to collect examples of canal basins and identify common or characteristic features?

5419: 5396: 4591: 3918:(plus ones for Scotland & Wales, but not yet one for N.I.) which I beleive is reasonably accurate. 3601: 3534: 3502: 3188: 3172: 3163: 2871:

and would be willing to look up a page number for the derivation of the name of the River Parrett from

2722: 2472: 2430: 2177: 1982: 1904: 719: 38: 2812:

will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's

2306: 873: 123:

You may wish to comment at the above category for discussion; it is currently proposed for deletion.

5823: 5772:

I'm wondering if we can make canal bridge terminology clearer and more consistent. We had nothing on

5485: 5356: 5324: 5214: 4387: 4105: 3889: 3494:

I've taken the liberty of adding the Witham to your project, the lower half being navigable and all.

3257: 2675: 2636: 2597: 2105: 1059:

If re-using elsewhere, it may be appropriate to rewrite without all the conversions (particularly if

463: 146:, which I have now identified as a project page. This page, and several others, list ] as ]], where ' 1439:

Of particular priority is filling the g01 and g02 sections to ensure that we have no ugly redlinks.

3587: 3443: 3418: 3295: 2866: 1756:. If you feel that the text could be rewritten to make it more appropriate, please give it a try.-- 1576: 1271: 1239: 1174: 374: 303: 5347:

I have started a discussion about converting the OSGB36 (OS grid refs) on various lists including

5132:

To the above suggestion "would the project like me to redraw any of the other swing bridges", add

3150:(revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the 2298: 5831: 5813: 5431: 3067: 2729: 2448: 2400: 2370: 2339: 2319: 2242: 2211: 2191: 1888: 1753: 1601: 1430:

The portal is looking quite well, but we need more snippets of information for the DYK sections.

1166: 1085:

Well it's posible to add some extra varables into the template to better suit non british canals.

661: 545: 496: 194: 4052:, for example? They are man-made water channels which diversions off the original river routes. 3544: 2385: 1818: 488:, on the basis that if it is ok for Lock X to have an article, then Lock Y should have one too. 5749: 5714: 5674: 5632: 5600: 5558: 5539: 5515: 5465: 5446: 5427: 5199: 5186: 5169: 5123: 4546: 4506: 4060: 4056: 3905: 3897: 3820: 3816: 3767: 3763: 3712: 3698: 3694: 3670: 3641: 3619: 3615: 3520: 3516: 3478: 3474: 3454: 3450: 3433: 3429: 3236: 3217: 2929: 2502: 2218:. Is that real? The phot there of the lock looks a bit modern. I've put it on the map for now. 1712: 1488: 1463: 891: 762: 705: 676: 638: 618: 606: 366: 137: 4010:

are technically navigations but are rarely referred to as such these days. Others such as the

3552: 3264:. More ontopic dressed up canal boats are a common feature of the Cavalcade at little venice.© 3175:. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th. 782:

routes...(just needs someone with the inclination and the time!)...so it'll get there one day.

5585: 5460:, and have added it to lots of articles. I have not yet produced ones for river navigations. 5362:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Automagically converting OSGB36 to coord?

4733: 4681:. A reviewer has questioned whether the descriptions of the "Seven Wonders of the Waterways" 4663: 3597: 3530: 3498: 3313: 2426: 2182:

Could somebody with the requisite knowledge add something about BCN's Birchills Junction, to

560: 107: 4766:

File:Remains of guillotine gate, Wappenshall Lock, Shropshire - geograph.org.uk - 251635.jpg

2733: 1949:

In fact, it looks like the official name may in fact be "River Humber" – see item 10 in the

1304:

Charles Copley published something in 1850 that looks hopeful but again hard to get hold of.

5855: 5847: 5789: 5781: 5741: 5740:

Stub articles are now down to 130, but I am running out of ideas. I would love to sort the

5501: 5435: 5383: 4750: 4380: 3759:

I not sure that would work, unless we merged in the lists on canals, estuaries and rivers.

3228: 3180: 3080: 2783: 2742: 2538: 2204: 1961: 1938: 1880: 595: 583: 579: 522: 128: 590:- it appears damaged, but UK IPs to wiki are being processed thru a cache, at the moment. 102:

for other editors to comment before I continue. Your contributions would be welcome. :o)

8: 5731: 5699: 5274: 5155: 5104: 5082: 4791: 4628:

File:Below Little Bedwyn Lock No 67, Kennet and Avon Canal - geograph.org.uk - 857382.jpg

4494: 2365:

which is the project I am involved with. Please feel free to seek guidance at Bridges. --

1649: 1586: 1361: 1267: 1235: 1170: 575: 537: 370: 299: 4682: 4360:

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:River navigations in the United Kingdom

1899:

Complicated; you're absolutely right that it's technically not a river, but as with the

5827: 5809: 5475: 5399:

on many pages. It says at the top "Navigable Canals", but am not sure what this means.

4592: 3723: 3468:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 February 2#Category:Weirs of the River Lee

3414: 3399: 3171:

and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at

2853: 2753: 2662: 2623: 2584: 2473: 2396: 2366: 2335: 2315: 2238: 2187: 1809: 1782: 1757: 1597: 1425: 1375: 766: 761:

Interesting idea. Has some teething problems, but I guess it's early days. Most of the

725: 657: 541: 492: 473: 190: 4141:, and leaves the word River out completely in the list of rivers! There is no answer. 3690:

be a redirect to the canals UK article? In other words, what should be done about it?

3565: 3556: 1907:, "River Humber" is a commonly used name for it even if not technically accurate. The 1900: 5745: 5710: 5659: 5628: 5596: 5554: 5535: 5511: 5461: 5442: 5373: 5332: 5304: 5195: 5165: 5119: 4581: 4542: 4502: 4467: 4423: 4341: 4319: 4272: 4246: 4186: 4163: 4125: 4053: 4034: 3976: 3942: 3923: 3901: 3813: 3760: 3729: 3708: 3691: 3666: 3656: 3637: 3612: 3573: 3513: 3471: 3447: 3426: 3366: 3348: 3332: 3305: 3213: 3195: 3099: 3010: 2973: 2925: 2700: 2686: 2649: 2610: 2571: 2498: 2452: 2391: 1821: 1708: 1683: 1562: 1504: 1484: 1459: 1447: 1074: 970: 841: 701: 691: 672: 656:

in January and our latest GA would do just fine. Would you do the honors please Bob?

634: 614: 429: 4685:

were written by Robert Aickman or Jim Shead. Can anyone help to answer that query?—

3971:

I'd also propose renaming the "river navigations" categories as "navigable rivers".

3359: 2497:

It looks good, but I think you have the Harecastle tunnel ends the wrong way round.

2410:

It is not necessary to make comments there. It is necessary to make comments here.--

253:

That sounds like a good idea, and I'm sure has been mooted before. What to call it?

5582: 5415: 4623:

File:Little Bedwyn Lock No 67, Kennet and Avon Canal - geograph.org.uk - 409455.jpg

4260: 4085: 4045: 4011: 3992: 3793: 3593: 3309: 3123: 2995: 2765: 2682: 2271: 2140: 2059: 2014: 1976: 1908: 1547: 1411: 1195: 1147: 1120: 1063: 1041: 986: 954: 904: 881: 858: 832: 822: 789: 748: 734: 556: 453: 392: 346: 281: 230: 175: 103: 4104:

As for the Wey, that's an interesting case. That article has only been put in the

3168: 1631:

water and vertical track crossing (there was only uxHKRZun available in that row)

5851: 5785: 5767: 5497: 5400: 5379: 4776: 4648: 2809: 2330: 1956: 1933: 1108: 591: 518: 162: 151: 124: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5724: 5692: 5352: 5267: 5247: 5148: 5097: 5075: 4787: 4299: 4264: 4143: 4073: 4049: 3999: 3830: 3742: 3489: 3275: 3241: 3203: 3041: 3020: 2942: 2513: 2481: 2457: 2253: 2220: 2159: 2116: 2083: 2030: 1987: 1874: 1645: 1582: 1220:

Purchasing a copyright licence to display such a map commercially in Knowledge.

485: 4924: 3548: 5777: 5404: 5234: 4909: 4715: 4633:

File:Potters Lock No 66, Kennet and Avon Canal - geograph.org.uk - 409569.jpg

3395: 2902: 2884: 2827: 2554: 1479: 1398: 1397:

for some of their in-house maps (the current editor is heavily involved with

1366: 1261:

Hmm, not a small task then. Oddly enough I did create a map overlay for the

511: 5135: 5028: 5013: 4968: 4953: 4890: 4844: 2905:

has been nominated for Featured Article status and discussion is ongoing at

1767:

The changes are normaly on the scale of years so I don't think it is needed.

5773: 5655: 5620: 5328: 5058: 4998: 4983: 4875: 4859: 4577: 4463: 4419: 4337: 4315: 4268: 4242: 4182: 4159: 4121: 4030: 4019: 3972: 3938: 3919: 3885: 3652: 3629: 3569: 3384:"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject UK Waterways for a 3362: 3328: 3301: 3095: 3006: 2969: 2756:. Enter the URL and it will show you all the articles that need changing. ( 2411: 2353: 2288: 1985:) I can insert if agreed - it leaves minimum of 10 threads and 1 year old. 1928: 1870: 1674: 1558: 1500: 1443: 1070: 966: 928: 687: 5043: 4825: 4761:

File:Wappenshall Junction, Shrewsbury Canal - geograph.org.uk - 335323.jpg

3421:

and so I am requesting help in populating these two categories. Also, the

1829:

No because I don't think we have a serious issues with keeping up to date.

1478:

How does rating work when an article is in more than one project, please?

1384:

from scratch. And experiment with maps draw from the Canalplanner dataset

540:

BTW) but I still feel that a better article could be created from a merge.

5651: 4810: 4497:

article mentions that the route was changed to connect directly with the

4460:

had powers to construct a lock and a short length of canal at French Weir

4120:

above:) But it does demonstrate the confusion that exists at the moment.

4081: 4023: 4003: 3900:, which is entirely artificial, is listed as a river but not as a canal. 3789: 3446:

for rthe main move request. The previuos discussion was never concluded.

3119: 2991: 2761: 2136: 2055: 2010: 1851: 1742: 1697: 1543: 1407: 1226: 1191: 1141: 1114: 1035: 980: 948: 898: 877: 854: 828: 785: 730: 449: 440: 388: 342: 277: 226: 214:, but it's currently little more than a dicdef, and needs to be expanded. 211: 171: 158: 4557: 3039:

Like most of the fields, if there is nothing added then nothing appears

2800:

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the

1641:

uddSTR - For a double sided marina (there was only uddSTRl and uddSTRd)

5411: 5300: 5284: 4772: 4644: 4015: 3232: 3075: 1326: 165:(which currently does not really describe a canal basin very well...). 5646:

appears in both lists but I can only find the canal stub category. Is

3134:

UK Waterways articles have been selected for the Knowledge 0.8 release

914: 312: 5826:, pending the outcome of deliberations here. Many more on Commons. -- 5643: 5365: 5288: 5238: 5218: 4741: 4719: 4701: 4686: 4668: 4109: 4007: 3876: 3804: 3265: 3151: 3142:

for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were

2910: 2888: 2714: 2183: 1912: 1830: 1800: 1768: 1341: 1316: 1305: 1295: 1253: 1086: 925: 845: 807: 773: 752: 410: 316: 4738:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Kennet and Avon Canal/archive2

1185: 1165:

I wonder if its worth doing a map of the canal network on this page

922: 5430:

a navigable canal, and should I add it to the list? What about the

4700:

2823: 1620: 4947:, but are my chosen names acceptable or wildly against convention? 3187:

to extend the reach of Knowledge worldwide. Please help us, with

3138:

Version 0.8 is a collection of Knowledge articles selected by the

5581:. Please join in and/or acquaint yourself with the KML method. -- 4638:

File:Canal lock, Railway and road - geograph.org.uk - 1283064.jpg

1634: 5575:

method for creating map links for linear features & outlines

3184: 94:

I have been doing quite a lot of editing on the article for the

5803:

A split bridge image is available—just tell me where to put it!

5480:

Trying to find appropriate categories for my nascent articles (

3884:

Do we also need a list of river navigations? I notice that the

3871:

Overview articles are worth having but not easy to write. Even

1924: 5569:

The KML map link method, and tagging articles with KML missing

4026:

have never been navigations (afaik) but are in the category.

3167:

with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's

2730:

http://www2.mihalis.net/canal/cgi-bin/gazette.cgi?where=$ 0ooo

1225:

It seems a shame, but in the UK maps are not freely copyable.

853:

Thanks (unfortunately, same issues apply as for canals above)

3872: 1390:. The Inkscape SVG files/scripts are in the same directory. 186: 147: 4943:

Are these named suitably? I am sure that they are not named

4618:

File:Little Bedwyn - Lock 67 - geograph.org.uk - 1279892.jpg

4613:

File:Little Bedwyn - Lock 67 - geograph.org.uk - 1279894.jpg

2907:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/River Parrett/archive2

2728:

editing pages, could replace the old URLS which looked like

1691:

on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at

918: 5343:

Converting OSGB36 (OS grid refs) to coords on various lists

1442:

So, if you have any interesting facts, start adding them!!

1357:

There are two almost suitable data-sources that I know of;

1290: 1107:

In the template, I don't find a place to put, for example,

294: 872:

FYI (the parent of the above maps) There is an equivalent

2734:

http://www.canalplan.org.uk/cgi-bin/gazetteer.cgi?id=0ooo

825:

would be interested, if they are not already aware of it.

5551:

Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/John_Williams_(engineer)

4414:

are regarded by many people as essentially different to

4297:

if we leave the Ireland canals and rivers on their own?

3229:

http://www.itv.com/granada/u-boat-spotted-on-canal62257/

3144:

selected based on their assessed importance and quality

4603:

File:Little Bedwyn Lock - geograph.org.uk - 1302179.jpg

4108:

so I didn't see it when writing the above, whereas the

2154: 876:

at OpenStreetMap, for coordinating mapping activities.

5573:

I'm not sure how up to speed this project is on a KML

4608:

File:Little Bedwyn Lock - geograph.org.uk - 755287.jpg

4336:

at this point, though I have visited most of them.:-)

3070:

has a reasonable page and I've just added one for the

2251:

Thanks for that Derek, I'll have a look at Get-a-map.

98:

recently and have added a discussion to the talk page

4841:

bridge, and there wasn't a suitable icon. There were

4560:. I very much doubt that they are digitised however. 686:

and it will appear in the portal page for the month.

468:

Having looked at the CfD above, read the articles in

5650:

simply the intersection of 2 other categories? Also

3592:

I've just added another one to the project! Sorry.

3159:

UK Waterways articles and revisionIDs we have chosen

2838:

Pages nos in Ekwall's 1928 book English River Names

1869:

Would it be possible to script this change? (mostly

150:' is a dab page that indicates the closest match is 3231:). I guess it could be added as a small section on 2423:

WP:Categorization#What categories should be created

1931:links unless they're actively causing a problem. – 269:? (none of these would seem to be all-encompassing) 4289:- since we lump England, Scotland, and Wales into 2329:Here is my thinking on the subject. Articles like 2132:That is (to coin a modern idiom) 'wick-ed, man'... 1369:, not complete, but we're getting there (CC-BY-SA) 5458:Template:Unnavigable Canals of the United Kingdom 4856:, which is at right angles to what I needed, and 4158:Do I take that as an agreement with my proposal? 2909:. It would be great if anyone had any comments.— 2778:Thanks for that - will make my life a lot easier 1098:I agree with Mayalld about the tech explanations. 4756:These photos from 1964 may be of some interest: 4366:Category:River navigations in the United Kingdom 4332:. I won't get into the complexities of adding a 4291:Category:River navigations in the United Kingdom 4202:Category:River navigations in the United Kingdom 3256:There is a photo around of an actual submarine ( 2549:Page numbers for books used in River Parrett FAC 1663:Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new 671:I'm not sure I know what this means. Any clues? 5264:Leicestershire and Northamptonshire Union Canal 4206:Category:Navigable rivers in the United Kingdom 3896:, say, which is essentially a river. Also, the 3072:Leicestershire and Northamptonshire Union Canal 2685:, Volume 7, (2006), Harper Collins Publishers, 2557:is currently a featured article candidate. On 1705:Knowledge talk:Route diagram template#Suffices 806:) but country wide is a bit more of a problem. 5494:Category:History of Birmingham, West Midlands 4287:Category:Navigable rivers in Northern Ireland 1111:. This kind of standard doesn't exist in UK ? 5213:I've recently been doing some expansion on 4434:Grand Western Canal - route through Taunton 4295:Category:River navigations in Great Britian 3665:I have made a few tweaks and nominated it. 2694: 1252:are created by scanning a very small area). 1013:o_len = ORIGINAL GAUGE LENGTH IN FEET 751:could use it in it's current state or wait. 749:open street maps here is a reasonable start 5418:do not seem to be much different from the 5349:List of locks on the Kennet and Avon Canal 4281:OK by me, and while we at it - do we need 3732:as one of the 2 UK links (the other being 2988:the template's authors or regular editors. 2699:(7th ed.). Imray Laurie Norie and Wilson. 1016:o_len_in = ORIGINAL GAUGE LENGTH INCHES 409:Low number of refs would count against it. 118:Category:Locks on the Hertford Union Canal 5744:one, but have not found any sources yet. 5681:Category:Stub-Class UK Waterways articles 5617:Category:Stub-Class UK Waterways articles 3466:That's not the end of the Lea moves. See 1028:o_beam = ORIGINAL GAUGE BEAM IN FEET 3391:here are the questions for the interview 2604: 2565: 1101:and with Geni about the extra variablas. 1031:o_beam_in = ORIGINAL GAUGE BEAM INCHES 4677:This article has now been nominated at 4536:entries on it, near French Weir, and a 3738:List of waterways in the United Kingdom 3157:We would like to ask you to review the 2363:Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK Waterways 2157:), but I'm happy it worked in the end. 1665:WikiProject coordinators' working group 1374:In addition, I year so I did draw some 1315:getting hold of a copy could be tricky. 1250:Image:Stroudwater Navigationmap1933.jpg 1004:date_act = DATE OF ACT OF PARLIAMENT 274:Category:Water transport infrastructure 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK Waterways 14: 5549:This is now nominated for deletion at 4232:Category:River navigations in Scotland 4112:article I referred to has been put in 3423:name of the first category is disputed 3227:It was shown on Granada News tonight ( 3194:For the Knowledge 1.0 editorial team, 2843: 1913:Hull & Goole Port Health Authority 1644:I'll add them to the template legend. 1289:Okey posible attack lines john cary's 1140:? It would be very France specific ;D 586:isn't exactly an 'overloaded' article. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5776:so I briefly explained it within the 5490:Category:Birmingham Canal Navigations 5407:can really be counted as navigable. 4906:Therefore I created my own versions ( 4802:Route diagram icons for swing bridges 4736:article has now been under review at 4236:Category:Navigable rivers in Scotland 4212:Category:River navigations in England 4114:Category:River navigations in England 3916:Category:River navigations in England 2643: 2284:Subfluvial tunnel ESPO and Lena River 1848:Template has now been deleted anyway. 1434:Portal:UK Waterways/Did you know/List 144:List of canal basins in Great Britain 4837:if disused. However, my bridge is a 4330:Navigable rivers in Northern Ireland 4216:Category:Navigable rivers in England 3966:Longest rivers of the United Kingdom 3888:(just passed GA nomination) and the 3092:List of canals in the United Kingdom 2135:Every talk page should have one! -- 1726:I have just discovered the template 96:London, Midland and Scottish Railway 90:London, Midland and Scottish Railway 25: 5669:Category:United Kingdom canal stubs 5625:Category:United Kingdom canal stubs 5094:commons:Talk:BSicon#Icon name query 4283:Category:Navigable rivers in Ulster 4222:Category:River navigations in Wales 2451:to be more waterway friendly - see 1019:len_note = NOTES TO GAUGE LENGTH 23: 5679:and is for article pages, whereas 4710:River Parrett on front page 7 July 4598:Take your pick from these photos: 4576:so - I had reasons at that time). 4226:Category:Navigable rivers in Wales 3237:Narrowboat#Modern_narrowboat_types 3235:- perhaps as an "Unusual type" in 2732:with the new ones which look like 2670:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 2631:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 2592:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 2307:User Talk:AndreyA#Culvert category 1633: 1619: 1007:len = GAUGE LENGTH IN FEET 478:Locks on the Kennet and Avon Canal 24: 5871: 5426:in concept, only in name. Is the 5424:Chelmer and Blackwater Navigation 4328:Ok, I'll do the change and add a 4267:would keep their existing names. 3894:Chelmer and Blackwater Navigation 2697:Inland Waterways of Great Britain 1731:Inland waterway under restoration 1722:Inland waterway under restoration 1393:3 another option might be to ask 1010:len_in = GAUGE LENGTH INCHES 999:This template is so... british ;D 943:(conflit d'édition) : Ok, but... 769:routes are missing, for example. 744:might actually have some maps now 724:There is an ongoing problem with 157:At the very least we should have 5648:Stub-Class UK Waterways articles 5134: 5057: 5042: 5027: 5012: 4997: 4982: 4967: 4952: 4923: 4908: 4889: 4874: 4858: 4843: 4824: 4809: 4786:I've added them to the article. 4096:The Lee and Stort are basically 3212:have any place in any articles? 3116:cover the common history itself. 2568:The Canals of South West England 2455:for example. Hope you like it. 1474:Rating of multi-Project acticles 1022:beam = GAUGE BEAM IN FEET 628: 29: 3736:). Maybe it should be renamed 3684:Waterways in the United Kingdom 3543:The obvious places to look are 3300:Our articles on the turf-sided 2305:Discussion is transferred with 1025:beam_in = GAUGE BEAM INCHES 947:the template to fr: and nl: ;D 3875:has issues (sourcing mostly).© 3651:I'll gladly review it at GAN. 3262:Gloucester and Sharpness Canal 3199:23:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 2199:13:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 1923:. I'd say keep the article as 1161:Canals of Great Britain - map? 508:Old Ford Lock (Regent's Canal) 13: 1: 5704:16:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 5664:16:47, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 5637:14:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 5605:11:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 5589:00:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 5563:14:41, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 5369:16:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 5337:11:55, 29 November 2011 (UTC) 5292:20:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC) 5279:20:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC) 5257:18:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC) 4453:17:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC) 4078:Wey and Godalming Navigations 3606:00:05, 19 February 2011 (UTC) 3578:13:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC) 3539:09:57, 11 February 2011 (UTC) 3524:17:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC) 3507:14:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC) 3409:River Lea and Lee Valley Park 2892:11:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC) 2468:23:43, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 2435:13:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 2415:11:44, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 2405:11:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 2375:11:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 2357:11:25, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 2350:Knowledge:WikiProject Bridges 2344:11:19, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 2324:11:15, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 2292:15:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC) 1693:06:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 1606:20:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1360:Canalplanner AC XML datafiles 1299:12:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC) 1276:22:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 1257:02:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 1244:01:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 1230:08:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1200:00:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1179:23:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 696:09:37, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 681:23:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 666:19:44, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 643:09:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC) 623:11:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 565:23:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC) 458:18:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 434:14:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 267:Fings wot you find on a canal 5736:16:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 5719:17:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 5615:I have been working through 5544:10:11, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 5520:10:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 5504:14:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 5470:11:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 5386:09:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 5228:Grand union canal river soar 4696:Template:Droitwich Canal map 4499:Bridgwater and Taunton Canal 3734:List of estuaries of England 3482:23:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC) 3458:16:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC) 3437:16:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC) 3371:14:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC) 3353:17:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 3337:14:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 3318:08:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 3286:21:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 2963:I'm surprised there isn't a 2833:04:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 2264:22:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 2247:21:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 2231:13:55, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 1834:22:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 1825:21:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 1819:Grand Union Canal#New branch 1813:18:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 1804:04:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 1786:23:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 1772:23:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 1761:23:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 1746:19:53, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 1654:00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 1591:22:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1567:22:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1552:20:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1509:17:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1493:16:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1468:16:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 1452:16:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC) 1416:16:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 1151:23:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 1124:23:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 1090:19:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 1079:16:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 1045:15:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 990:15:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 975:15:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 958:15:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 937:15:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 908:14:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 886:15:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 863:15:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 849:13:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 837:09:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 811:15:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 804:Portsmouth and Arundel Canal 794:15:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 777:13:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 756:04:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 629: 600:18:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 550:17:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 527:16:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 501:14:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 414:12:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 397:17:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 379:14:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 351:14:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 320:13:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 308:13:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 286:17:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 235:17:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 202:13:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 180:12:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 133:12:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 112:11:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 7: 5303:article is linked from the 5222:16:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 4939:I have two main questions: 4334:Navigable rivers in Ireland 3404:01:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC) 3269:19:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 3252:19:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 3222:13:07, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 3189:your WikiProject's feedback 2842:Does anyone have a copy of 2788:12:43, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 2770:01:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 2747:17:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC) 2718:21:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC) 2543:17:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC) 2170:19:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 2145:11:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 2127:23:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 2094:18:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 2064:00:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 2041:19:33, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 2019:16:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 1659:Coordinators' working group 1345:04:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 1332:19:06, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 1320:18:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 739:00:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 710:22:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 10: 5876: 5858:21:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 5824:Stratford-upon-Avon Canal 5754:19:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 5451:12:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 5420:Aire and Calder Navigation 5397:Template:Canals of Britain 5391:Template:Canals of Britain 5204:13:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 5174:15:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 5160:14:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 5128:13:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 4822:if the railway is in use, 4551:19:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 4527:11:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 4428:10:56, 25 March 2011 (UTC) 4397:15:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 4346:10:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC) 4324:23:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 4310:22:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 4277:15:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 4251:15:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 4191:09:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 4168:09:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 4154:22:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 4130:18:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 4090:13:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 4064:13:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 4039:12:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC) 3981:22:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 3947:22:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 3937:missing category entries. 3928:09:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 3910:09:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 3728:It's actually linked from 3566:Grimsby electronic auction 3173:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 3169:articles with cleanup tags 3164:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 2968:anyone change a template? 2806:Saturday, January 23, 2010 2695:Cumberlidge, Jane (1998). 2605:Robinson, Stephen (1992). 2566:Hadfield, Charles (1967). 2524:21:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 2507:22:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 2492:19:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1998:19:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1983:User:Ronhjones/ArchiveData 1855:15:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 1717:20:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1612:Stort Navigation Route Map 1436:shows where we have gaps. 1309:20:50, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 5836:11:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 5818:10:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 5792:08:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 5691:and is for talk pages. -- 5357:Template:GeoGroupTemplate 5325:Melton Mowbray Navigation 5215:Claverton Pumping Station 5209:Claverton Pumping Station 5109:16:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC) 4796:09:48, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 4745:19:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 4714:I've just found out that 4511:18:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 4488:10:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 4472:01:05, 1 March 2011 (UTC) 4377:Categories for discussion 4106:Category:Canals in Surrey 4072:I would suggest that the 3890:River Avon (Warwickshire) 3880:23:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 3841:21:42, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 3824:19:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 3808:17:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 3798:13:27, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 3771:18:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 3753:18:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 3717:18:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 3702:22:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 3675:16:07, 7 March 2011 (UTC) 3661:19:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 3646:18:41, 5 March 2011 (UTC) 3623:22:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 3074:. There is a page called 2953:23:32, 11 June 2010 (UTC) 2934:21:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC) 2919:Re-assessment of articles 2848:. Oxford Clarendon Press. 2683:Nicholson Waterways Guide 2646:Portrait of the Quantocks 1969:22:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC) 1945:22:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC) 1921:Ships on the River Humber 1893:22:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC) 1557:that do the same as well. 700:Thanks. Article created. 648:Well done Bob. We need a 5687:WikiProject UK Waterways 5528:John Williams (engineer) 5395:I have recently noticed 5087:14:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC) 4781:13:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 4723:16:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 4705:23:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 4690:13:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 4672:13:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 4653:13:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 4586:12:21, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 4570:10:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 3444:Talk:River Lee (England) 3419:Category:Lee Valley Park 3128:13:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 3104:17:54, 4 July 2010 (UTC) 3052:20:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 3015:15:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 3000:12:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 2978:17:54, 4 July 2010 (UTC) 2914:19:50, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 2802:WP 1.0 assessment system 2553:As you may have noticed 2216:52 4'1.48"N 0 49'55.34"W 1627:uHKRZun - For horizonal 874:UK Waterways WikiProject 609:nomination for GA status 5432:Witham Navigable Drains 5313:Loughborough Navigation 3828:DAB page is fine by me 3551:as well as, of course, 2844:Ekwall, Eilert (1928). 2818:WP 1.0 project homepage 2796:WP 1.0 bot announcement 2713:Any help appreciated.— 2648:. London: Robert Hale. 2644:Waite, Vincent (1964). 2449:Template:Infobox tunnel 2212:User:Ronhjones/Sandbox2 2210:I started a route map ( 1917:Humber Estuary Services 1754:Thames and Severn Canal 1167:Canals_of_Great_Britain 823:WikiProject UK Railways 763:Wilts & Berks Canal 293:would work for me, the 259:Canal civil engineering 5428:South Forty-Foot Drain 5323:. It also has the old 5187:River Ouse (Yorkshire) 4558:Somerset Record Office 3898:South Forty-Foot Drain 3611:No need to apologise! 2959:Template:Infobox canal 2190:(User:Pigsonthewing); 1861:Humber is not a river. 1638: 1624: 1596:Looks good, thanks. -- 892:Template:Infobox Canal 607:South Forty-Foot Drain 367:Lock (water transport) 193:(User:Pigsonthewing); 5321:River Soar Navigation 4734:Kennet and Avon Canal 4664:Kennet and Avon Canal 4658:Kennet and Avon Canal 3185:Knowledge for Schools 2901:Just to let you know 2570:. David and Charles. 2443:Infoboxes for Tunnels 2421:AndreyA, please read 1781:it won't be needed.-- 1637: 1623: 42:of past discussions. 5848:List of bridge types 5782:accommodation bridge 5742:Maidenhead Waterways 5488:), I find we have a 5436:Cambridgeshire Lodes 5309:Leicester Navigation 4751:Wappenshall Junction 4728:K&A Canal at FAC 4372:the category's entry 4293:- or should that be 3914:There is a category 3377:UK Waterways in the 3358:See this picture of 3181:One Laptop per Child 2897:River Parrett at FAC 2607:Somerset Place Names 2205:Grand Junction Canal 1951:Coast Protection Act 584:Hertford Union Canal 580:River Lee Navigation 5611:Stub class articles 5283:It's basically the 4495:Grand Western Canal 4379:page. Thank you. -- 4044:But what about the 3062:Names of old canals 2846:English River Names 2361:I have added it to 2186:, Walsall, please? 1927:, but don't change 576:London Olympic Park 538:Old Ford Upper Lock 5070:) in similar form? 4887:; (b) by rotating 4593:Little Bedwyn Lock 3415:Category:River Lea 3140:Knowledge 1.0 team 2754:Special:LinkSearch 2723:Canalplan AC Links 2609:. Dovecote Press. 2474:Four Counties Ring 2178:Birchills Junction 1639: 1625: 1376:London Underground 767:Wey and Arun Canal 726:Environment Agency 720:Environment Agency 263:Canal architecture 210:I made a start at 5305:Grand Union Canal 4534:Lock (remains of) 4395: 3730:List of waterways 3727: 3559:. I don't think 3545:the port of Goole 3306:Monkey Marsh Lock 3260:) navigating the 2879:meaning four and 2831: 2453:Harecastle Tunnel 2392:User talk:AndreyA 2106:Index of Articles 2054:project page. -- 1883:comment added by 1690: 1389: 1383: 1145: 1118: 1069:isn't available) 1039: 984: 952: 902: 491:Comments please. 464:Notability issues 291:Canal terminology 142:Just bumped into 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5867: 5727: 5695: 5690: 5683:is generated by 5678: 5671:is generated by 5416:River Great Ouse 5270: 5254: 5245: 5151: 5146: 5144: 5138: 5100: 5078: 5069: 5067: 5061: 5054: 5052: 5046: 5039: 5037: 5031: 5024: 5022: 5016: 5009: 5007: 5001: 4994: 4992: 4986: 4979: 4977: 4971: 4964: 4962: 4956: 4935: 4933: 4927: 4920: 4918: 4912: 4901: 4899: 4893: 4886: 4884: 4878: 4870: 4868: 4862: 4855: 4853: 4847: 4836: 4834: 4828: 4821: 4819: 4813: 4386: 4383: 4306: 4304: 4261:Stort Navigation 4150: 4148: 4046:Stort Navigation 3837: 3835: 3749: 3747: 3721: 3598:Robert EA Harvey 3594:Louth Navigation 3588:Louth Navigation 3531:Robert EA Harvey 3499:Robert EA Harvey 3296:Turf-sided locks 3282: 3280: 3248: 3246: 3048: 3046: 2949: 2947: 2870: 2864: 2859: 2857: 2849: 2821: 2760:= 18 pages) -- 2709: 2679: 2673: 2668: 2666: 2658: 2640: 2634: 2629: 2627: 2619: 2601: 2595: 2590: 2588: 2580: 2520: 2518: 2488: 2486: 2464: 2462: 2278:Previous history 2260: 2258: 2227: 2225: 2166: 2164: 2123: 2121: 2090: 2088: 2037: 2035: 1994: 1992: 1964: 1959: 1941: 1936: 1895: 1735: 1729: 1686: 1679: 1672: 1577:Oxford Canal Map 1387: 1381: 1329: 1143: 1116: 1068: 1062: 1037: 982: 950: 900: 650:Selected Article 632: 631: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5875: 5874: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5866: 5865: 5864: 5822:Image added to 5770: 5725: 5693: 5684: 5672: 5613: 5579:Discussion here 5571: 5531: 5478: 5393: 5376: 5345: 5268: 5248: 5239: 5231: 5211: 5191: 5149: 5140: 5133: 5098: 5076: 5063: 5056: 5048: 5041: 5033: 5026: 5018: 5011: 5003: 4996: 4988: 4981: 4973: 4966: 4958: 4951: 4929: 4922: 4914: 4907: 4895: 4888: 4880: 4873: 4864: 4857: 4849: 4842: 4830: 4823: 4815: 4808: 4804: 4754: 4730: 4712: 4698: 4660: 4596: 4436: 4381: 4362: 4302: 4300: 4146: 4144: 3995: 3833: 3831: 3745: 3743: 3687: 3634: 3590: 3492: 3411: 3382: 3298: 3278: 3276: 3244: 3242: 3206: 3146:, then article 3136: 3068:old Grand Union 3064: 3044: 3042: 3032: 2961: 2945: 2943: 2921: 2899: 2862: 2860: 2851: 2850: 2840: 2798: 2725: 2706: 2671: 2669: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2632: 2630: 2621: 2620: 2616: 2593: 2591: 2582: 2581: 2577: 2551: 2516: 2514: 2484: 2482: 2477: 2460: 2458: 2445: 2388: 2383: 2331:Lancaster Canal 2301: 2295: 2280: 2274: 2256: 2254: 2223: 2221: 2208: 2180: 2162: 2160: 2119: 2117: 2108: 2086: 2084: 2033: 2031: 1990: 1988: 1979: 1962: 1957: 1939: 1934: 1905:Elizabeth River 1878: 1863: 1733: 1727: 1724: 1700: 1684: 1675: 1661: 1614: 1579: 1476: 1428: 1395:Waterways World 1327: 1163: 1130:freycinet gauge 1109:Freycinet gauge 1066: 1060: 927:among others .— 919:Canal_de_Briare 895: 746: 722: 611: 466: 163:dock (maritime) 152:dock (maritime) 140: 121: 92: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5873: 5863: 5862: 5861: 5860: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5838: 5805: 5804: 5800: 5799: 5769: 5766: 5765: 5764: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5760: 5759: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5612: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5570: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5530: 5524: 5523: 5522: 5477: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5401:Dukart's Canal 5392: 5389: 5375: 5372: 5353:Template:Coord 5344: 5341: 5340: 5339: 5296: 5295: 5294: 5230: 5225: 5210: 5207: 5190: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5112: 5111: 5092:Have asked at 5072: 5071: 4948: 4803: 4800: 4799: 4798: 4769: 4768: 4763: 4753: 4748: 4729: 4726: 4711: 4708: 4697: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4659: 4656: 4641: 4640: 4635: 4630: 4625: 4620: 4615: 4610: 4605: 4595: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4554: 4553: 4514: 4513: 4480:88.108.222.192 4475: 4474: 4445:88.108.222.192 4435: 4432: 4431: 4430: 4407: 4403: 4361: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4265:Lee Navigation 4254: 4253: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4228: 4218: 4208: 4194: 4193: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4102: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4074:Wey Navigation 4067: 4066: 4050:Lee Navigation 3994: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3969: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3934: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3719: 3686: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3633: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3589: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3491: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3461: 3460: 3410: 3407: 3381: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3340: 3339: 3297: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3205: 3202: 3135: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3117: 3112: 3111: 3081:Grand Junction 3063: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 2989: 2985: 2960: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2920: 2917: 2903:River Parrett 2898: 2895: 2839: 2836: 2797: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2773: 2772: 2724: 2721: 2711: 2710: 2704: 2692: 2680: 2653: 2641: 2614: 2602: 2576:978-0715341766 2575: 2550: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2476: 2471: 2447:I've modified 2444: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2420: 2387: 2384: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2279: 2276: 2275: 2273: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2207: 2202: 2179: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2148: 2147: 2133: 2113:/Archive index 2107: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2022: 2021: 2008: 2004: 1978: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1875:Humber Estuary 1862: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1775: 1774: 1764: 1763: 1723: 1720: 1699: 1696: 1673:Delievered by 1660: 1657: 1613: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1541: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1512: 1511: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1427: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1364: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1335: 1334: 1312: 1311: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1268:Parrot of Doom 1236:Parrot of Doom 1223: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1203: 1202: 1189: 1171:Parrot of Doom 1162: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1132:variable with 1128:Or just add a 1112: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1057: 1053: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1000: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 962: 961: 960: 894: 889: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 826: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 783: 745: 742: 721: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 646: 645: 610: 604: 603: 602: 587: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 530: 529: 515: 465: 462: 461: 460: 447: 444: 443:article shows. 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 402: 401: 400: 399: 382: 381: 371:Parrot of Doom 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 313:Canal#Features 300:Parrot of Doom 270: 255:Canal features 248: 247: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 218: 217: 216: 215: 205: 204: 139: 138:Canal basin... 136: 120: 115: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5872: 5859: 5856: 5853: 5849: 5845: 5844: 5843: 5842: 5837: 5833: 5829: 5828:Old Moonraker 5825: 5821: 5820: 5819: 5815: 5811: 5810:Old Moonraker 5807: 5806: 5802: 5801: 5796: 5795: 5794: 5793: 5790: 5787: 5783: 5779: 5778:roving bridge 5775: 5755: 5751: 5747: 5743: 5739: 5738: 5737: 5733: 5729: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5716: 5712: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5701: 5697: 5689:|class=stub}} 5688: 5682: 5676: 5675:UK-canal-stub 5670: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5661: 5657: 5653: 5649: 5645: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5634: 5630: 5626: 5622: 5618: 5606: 5602: 5598: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5587: 5584: 5580: 5576: 5564: 5560: 5556: 5552: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5541: 5537: 5529: 5521: 5517: 5513: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5505: 5502: 5499: 5495: 5491: 5487: 5483: 5471: 5467: 5463: 5459: 5456:I produced a 5455: 5454: 5453: 5452: 5448: 5444: 5439: 5437: 5433: 5429: 5425: 5421: 5417: 5413: 5408: 5406: 5405:Swansea Canal 5402: 5398: 5388: 5387: 5384: 5381: 5371: 5370: 5367: 5363: 5358: 5354: 5350: 5338: 5334: 5330: 5327:as a branch. 5326: 5322: 5318: 5314: 5310: 5306: 5302: 5297: 5293: 5290: 5286: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5276: 5272: 5265: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5255: 5253: 5252: 5246: 5244: 5243: 5236: 5229: 5224: 5223: 5220: 5216: 5206: 5205: 5201: 5197: 5188: 5175: 5171: 5167: 5163: 5162: 5161: 5157: 5153: 5143: 5137: 5131: 5130: 5129: 5125: 5121: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5110: 5106: 5102: 5095: 5091: 5090: 5089: 5088: 5084: 5080: 5066: 5060: 5051: 5045: 5036: 5030: 5021: 5015: 5006: 5000: 4991: 4985: 4976: 4970: 4961: 4955: 4949: 4946: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4937: 4932: 4926: 4917: 4911: 4904: 4898: 4892: 4883: 4877: 4867: 4861: 4852: 4846: 4840: 4833: 4827: 4818: 4812: 4797: 4793: 4789: 4785: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4778: 4774: 4767: 4764: 4762: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4752: 4747: 4746: 4743: 4739: 4735: 4725: 4724: 4721: 4717: 4716:River Parrett 4707: 4706: 4703: 4691: 4688: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4670: 4665: 4655: 4654: 4650: 4646: 4639: 4636: 4634: 4631: 4629: 4626: 4624: 4621: 4619: 4616: 4614: 4611: 4609: 4606: 4604: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4594: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4567: 4563: 4559: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4524: 4520: 4512: 4508: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4492: 4491: 4490: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4473: 4469: 4465: 4461: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4440: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4417: 4413: 4408: 4404: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4378: 4374: 4373: 4368: 4367: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4308: 4307: 4296: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4241: 4237: 4233: 4229: 4227: 4223: 4219: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4198: 4196: 4195: 4192: 4188: 4184: 4179: 4178: 4169: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4152: 4151: 4140: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4127: 4123: 4119: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4095: 4091: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4065: 4062: 4058: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4027: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4001: 3982: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3967: 3962: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3935: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3842: 3839: 3838: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3822: 3818: 3815: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3806: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3772: 3769: 3765: 3762: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3751: 3750: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3725: 3724:edit conflict 3720: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3700: 3696: 3693: 3685: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3631: 3624: 3621: 3617: 3614: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3522: 3518: 3515: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3495: 3483: 3480: 3476: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3459: 3456: 3452: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3435: 3431: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3406: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3392: 3387: 3380: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3325: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3287: 3284: 3283: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3250: 3249: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3201: 3200: 3197: 3192: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3176: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3160: 3155: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3118: 3114: 3113: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3088: 3084: 3082: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3053: 3050: 3049: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3022: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2966: 2954: 2951: 2950: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2916: 2915: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2894: 2893: 2890: 2886: 2885:River Parrett 2882: 2878: 2874: 2868: 2855: 2847: 2835: 2834: 2829: 2825: 2819: 2815: 2814:summary table 2811: 2807: 2803: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2735: 2731: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2707: 2705:0-85288-355-2 2702: 2698: 2693: 2691: 2690:0-00-721115-5 2688: 2684: 2681: 2677: 2664: 2656: 2651: 2647: 2642: 2638: 2625: 2617: 2612: 2608: 2603: 2599: 2586: 2578: 2573: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2560: 2556: 2555:River Parrett 2544: 2540: 2536: 2531: 2530: 2525: 2522: 2521: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2490: 2489: 2475: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2465: 2454: 2450: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2413: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2397:Derek Andrews 2393: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2367:Derek Andrews 2364: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2336:Derek Andrews 2332: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316:Derek Andrews 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2294: 2293: 2290: 2285: 2265: 2262: 2261: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2239:Derek Andrews 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2229: 2228: 2217: 2213: 2206: 2201: 2200: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2171: 2168: 2167: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2114: 2095: 2092: 2091: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2042: 2039: 2038: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2009: 2005: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1996: 1995: 1984: 1970: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1960: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1943: 1942: 1937: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1885:87.102.39.137 1882: 1876: 1872: 1867: 1856: 1853: 1850: 1847: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1823: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1810:Derek Andrews 1807: 1806: 1805: 1802: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1787: 1784: 1783:Derek Andrews 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1773: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1758:Derek Andrews 1755: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1740: 1732: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1695: 1694: 1689: 1687: 1680: 1678: 1668: 1666: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1642: 1636: 1632: 1630: 1622: 1618: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598:Derek Andrews 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1519: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1481: 1480:Caistor Canal 1469: 1465: 1461: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1431: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1400: 1399:OpenStreetMap 1396: 1392: 1391: 1386: 1380: 1377: 1373: 1368: 1367:OpenStreetMap 1365: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1346: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1333: 1330: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1318: 1310: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1297: 1292: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1152: 1149: 1146: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1113: 1110: 1106: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1065: 1058: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1040: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 991: 988: 985: 978: 977: 976: 972: 968: 963: 959: 956: 953: 946: 945:I just linked 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 934: 930: 926: 924: 920: 916: 912: 911: 910: 909: 906: 903: 893: 888: 887: 883: 879: 875: 864: 860: 856: 852: 851: 850: 847: 843: 840: 839: 838: 834: 830: 827: 824: 820: 812: 809: 805: 801: 797: 796: 795: 791: 787: 784: 780: 779: 778: 775: 771: 770: 768: 764: 760: 759: 758: 757: 754: 750: 741: 740: 736: 732: 727: 711: 707: 703: 699: 698: 697: 693: 689: 684: 683: 682: 678: 674: 670: 669: 668: 667: 663: 659: 658:Derek Andrews 655: 651: 644: 640: 636: 627: 626: 625: 624: 620: 616: 608: 601: 597: 593: 588: 585: 581: 577: 572: 566: 562: 558: 553: 552: 551: 547: 543: 542:Derek Andrews 539: 534: 533: 532: 531: 528: 524: 520: 516: 513: 512:Old Ford Lock 509: 505: 504: 503: 502: 498: 494: 493:Derek Andrews 489: 487: 481: 479: 475: 471: 470:that category 459: 455: 451: 448: 445: 442: 438: 437: 436: 435: 431: 427: 415: 412: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 383: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 363: 352: 348: 344: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 321: 318: 314: 311: 310: 309: 305: 301: 296: 292: 289: 288: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 251: 250: 249: 244: 243: 236: 232: 228: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 213: 209: 208: 207: 206: 203: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 183: 182: 181: 177: 173: 169: 166: 164: 160: 155: 153: 149: 145: 135: 134: 130: 126: 119: 114: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5846:Thanks. Our 5774:split bridge 5771: 5746:Bob1960evens 5711:Bob1960evens 5647: 5629:Bob1960evens 5621:River Thames 5614: 5597:Bob1960evens 5572: 5555:Bob1960evens 5536:Bob1960evens 5532: 5526:Deletion of 5512:Bob1960evens 5479: 5462:Bob1960evens 5443:Bob1960evens 5440: 5409: 5394: 5377: 5346: 5320: 5316: 5312: 5308: 5250: 5249: 5241: 5240: 5232: 5212: 5196:Bob1960evens 5192: 5166:Bob1960evens 5141: 5120:Bob1960evens 5073: 5064: 5049: 5034: 5019: 5004: 4989: 4974: 4959: 4944: 4938: 4930: 4915: 4905: 4896: 4881: 4865: 4850: 4838: 4831: 4816: 4805: 4770: 4755: 4731: 4713: 4699: 4661: 4642: 4597: 4555: 4543:Bob1960evens 4537: 4533: 4515: 4503:Bob1960evens 4476: 4459: 4441: 4437: 4415: 4411: 4370: 4364: 4363: 4333: 4329: 4298: 4142: 4117: 4097: 4028: 3996: 3902:Bob1960evens 3886:River Weaver 3829: 3741: 3709:Bob1960evens 3688: 3667:Bob1960evens 3638:Bob1960evens 3635: 3630:River Weaver 3591: 3561:Gainsborough 3496: 3493: 3412: 3389: 3385: 3383: 3378: 3360:Walsham lock 3343:restoration. 3341: 3302:Garston Lock 3299: 3274: 3240: 3214:Simply south 3207: 3196:SelectionBot 3193: 3177: 3162: 3156: 3147: 3137: 3089: 3085: 3065: 3040: 2964: 2962: 2941: 2926:Bob1960evens 2922: 2900: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2845: 2841: 2805: 2799: 2737: 2726: 2712: 2696: 2645: 2606: 2567: 2552: 2512: 2499:Bob1960evens 2480: 2478: 2456: 2446: 2427:¢Spender1983 2389: 2312: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2282:For article 2281: 2252: 2219: 2215: 2209: 2196:Andy's edits 2188:Andy Mabbett 2181: 2158: 2115: 2109: 2082: 2029: 1986: 1980: 1955: 1954: 1932: 1929:River Humber 1909:Port of Hull 1871:River Humber 1868: 1864: 1822:Simply south 1738: 1725: 1709:Simply south 1701: 1681: 1676: 1669: 1662: 1643: 1640: 1628: 1626: 1615: 1580: 1517: 1485:Bob1960evens 1477: 1460:Bob1960evens 1441: 1438: 1432: 1429: 1313: 1288: 1164: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1095:appropriate. 1056:appropriate. 1034: 998: 979:Ok, thanks. 896: 871: 747: 723: 702:Bob1960evens 673:Bob1960evens 647: 635:Bob1960evens 615:Bob1960evens 612: 490: 482: 467: 422: 365:By the way, 199:Andy's edits 191:Andy Mabbett 170: 167: 156: 141: 122: 93: 75: 43: 37: 5798:canal-only. 5652:Benson Lock 5583:Tagishsimon 5307:under both 5235:stub-sorted 4416:navigations 3442:Oh and see 3154:algorithm. 2672:|coauthors= 2633:|coauthors= 2594:|coauthors= 2299:In addition 2192:Andy's talk 1901:River Plate 1879:—Preceding 1388:(22 kB PDF) 633:It passed. 557:Vegaswikian 474:WP:COATRACK 441:canal basin 212:Canal basin 195:Andy's talk 159:canal basin 104:ColourSarge 36:This is an 5852:Shantavira 5786:Shantavira 5498:Shantavira 5476:Categories 5412:River Nene 5380:Shantavira 5317:River Soar 5301:River Soar 5285:River Soar 4931:uxmKRZqusw 4538:Weir Field 4384:HairedGirl 4012:Great Ouse 3413:I created 3233:Narrowboat 3076:River Soar 2810:WP 1.0 bot 2780:Steve Atty 2739:Steve Atty 2654:0709111584 2615:1874336032 2559:the review 2535:Steve Atty 2386:Discussion 1499:Waterways. 1426:Portal DYK 1382:(4 kB PDF) 1378:style maps 923:Nederlands 592:Kbthompson 519:Kbthompson 185:Note also 125:Kbthompson 5644:Bow Creek 5374:Soho Loop 4945:correctly 4916:umKRZqusw 4110:River Wey 4101:marginal. 3553:Immingham 3152:WikiTrust 3019:Time for 2863:|ref=harv 2854:cite book 2820:. — Carl 2663:cite book 2624:cite book 2585:cite book 2184:Birchills 1646:Ronhjones 1629:navigable 1583:Ronhjones 578:, on the 272:Also see 82:Archive 5 76:Archive 4 70:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 5434:and the 5189:takeover 5142:uxSWINGq 5035:umKRZusw 5020:uKRZuysw 4975:uASWINGu 4960:uAKRZusw 4897:umKRZusw 4851:umKRZusw 4392:contribs 4181:comment. 4000:Ancholme 3993:Proposal 3396:Mabeenot 3386:Signpost 3379:Signpost 3148:versions 2984:problem? 2861:Invalid 2758:see here 2272:Culverts 2081:bot!... 2007:project. 1977:Archive? 1881:unsigned 1186:this map 765:and the 652:for the 5768:Bridges 5656:Chris55 5422:or the 5351:to use 5329:Chris55 5233:I just 5065:uxSWING 5005:uHSWING 4990:ugSWING 4882:uHSWING 4866:uHSWING 4578:Pyrotec 4562:Yertizz 4519:Yertizz 4464:Chris55 4420:Chris55 4375:on the 4338:Chris55 4316:Pyrotec 4269:Pyrotec 4243:Chris55 4230:Change 4220:Change 4210:Change 4200:Change 4183:Pyrotec 4160:Chris55 4122:Chris55 4031:Chris55 3973:Chris55 3939:Chris55 3920:Pyrotec 3653:Pyrotec 3632:article 3570:Chris55 3568:today. 3557:Grimsby 3363:Chris55 3345:Hymers2 3329:Chris55 3258:H class 3096:Chris55 3090:In the 3007:Chris55 2970:Chris55 2412:Andrey! 2354:Andrey! 2289:Andrey! 1903:or the 1799:people. 1685:Disable 1677:§hepBot 1559:Pyrotec 1521:matter. 1501:Pyrotec 1444:Mayalld 1071:Mayalld 1064:convert 967:Mayalld 929:Sandahl 688:Mayalld 426:Hymers2 246:around. 39:archive 5728:rose64 5696:rose64 5586:(talk) 5492:and a 5271:rose64 5152:rose64 5101:rose64 5079:rose64 5050:uSWING 4832:xmKRZo 4412:canals 4388:(talk) 4305:jones 4149:jones 4098:rivers 4082:EdJogg 4054:Simply 4020:Thames 3836:jones 3814:Simply 3803:page.© 3790:EdJogg 3761:Simply 3748:jones 3692:Simply 3613:Simply 3549:Keadby 3514:Simply 3512:Done. 3490:Humber 3472:Simply 3448:Simply 3427:Simply 3281:jones 3247:jones 3204:U-Boat 3120:EdJogg 3047:jones 2992:EdJogg 2965:length 2948:jones 2873:Pedair 2808:, the 2762:EdJogg 2519:jones 2487:jones 2463:jones 2259:jones 2226:jones 2165:jones 2137:EdJogg 2122:jones 2089:jones 2056:EdJogg 2036:jones 2011:EdJogg 1993:jones 1925:Humber 1915:, and 1911:, the 1852:Oosoom 1743:Oosoom 1544:EdJogg 1518:Anyone 1408:Sladen 1227:Oosoom 1192:EdJogg 965:there. 915:French 878:EdJogg 855:EdJogg 829:EdJogg 786:EdJogg 731:Motmit 654:Portal 450:EdJogg 389:EdJogg 343:EdJogg 278:EdJogg 227:EdJogg 172:EdJogg 4839:swing 4817:mKRZo 4788:David 4773:Trevj 4645:Trevj 4382:Brown 4118:never 4080:. -- 4057:south 4024:Trent 4004:Colne 3873:canal 3817:south 3764:south 3695:south 3616:south 3517:south 3475:south 3451:south 3430:south 3208:Does 2875:from 2804:. On 2390:User 1963:scent 1958:iride 1940:scent 1935:iride 1363:(GPL) 1328:G-Man 1294:mind. 1142:Alvar 1115:Alvar 1036:Alvar 981:Alvar 949:Alvar 899:Alvar 800:above 486:stubs 187:wharf 148:basin 16:< 5832:talk 5814:talk 5750:talk 5732:talk 5715:talk 5700:talk 5660:talk 5633:talk 5601:talk 5559:talk 5540:talk 5516:talk 5486:here 5484:and 5482:here 5466:talk 5447:talk 5414:and 5333:talk 5311:and 5275:talk 5266:. -- 5200:talk 5170:talk 5156:talk 5124:talk 5105:talk 5096:. -- 5083:talk 4921:and 4792:talk 4777:talk 4732:The 4702:Geni 4683:here 4662:The 4649:talk 4582:talk 4566:talk 4547:talk 4523:talk 4507:talk 4493:The 4484:talk 4468:talk 4449:talk 4424:talk 4342:talk 4320:talk 4273:talk 4263:and 4247:talk 4187:talk 4164:talk 4139:here 4126:talk 4086:talk 4059:.... 4048:and 4035:talk 4022:and 4016:Hull 4006:and 3977:talk 3943:talk 3924:talk 3906:talk 3877:Geni 3819:.... 3805:Geni 3794:talk 3766:.... 3713:talk 3697:.... 3671:talk 3657:talk 3642:talk 3618:.... 3602:talk 3574:talk 3555:and 3547:and 3535:talk 3519:.... 3503:talk 3477:.... 3453:.... 3432:.... 3400:talk 3367:talk 3349:talk 3333:talk 3314:talk 3310:matt 3304:and 3266:Geni 3218:talk 3210:this 3183:and 3124:talk 3100:talk 3021:bold 3011:talk 2996:talk 2974:talk 2930:talk 2877:pedr 2867:help 2828:talk 2784:talk 2766:talk 2752:Try 2743:talk 2701:ISBN 2687:ISBN 2676:help 2650:ISBN 2637:help 2611:ISBN 2598:help 2572:ISBN 2539:talk 2503:talk 2431:talk 2401:talk 2371:talk 2340:talk 2320:talk 2243:talk 2141:talk 2060:talk 2015:talk 1889:talk 1831:Geni 1801:Geni 1769:Geni 1739:some 1713:talk 1650:talk 1617:are 1602:talk 1587:talk 1563:talk 1548:talk 1505:talk 1489:talk 1464:talk 1448:talk 1412:talk 1342:Geni 1317:Geni 1306:Geni 1296:Geni 1291:1795 1272:talk 1254:Geni 1240:talk 1196:talk 1175:talk 1087:Geni 1075:talk 971:talk 933:talk 882:talk 859:talk 846:Geni 833:talk 808:Geni 798:see 790:talk 774:Geni 753:Geni 735:talk 706:talk 692:talk 677:talk 662:talk 639:talk 619:talk 596:talk 561:talk 546:talk 523:talk 510:and 497:talk 454:talk 430:talk 411:Geni 393:talk 375:talk 347:talk 317:Geni 304:talk 295:Road 282:talk 231:talk 176:talk 129:talk 108:talk 100:here 5726:Red 5694:Red 5366:Rod 5364:.— 5289:Rod 5269:Red 5242:Pam 5219:Rod 5150:Red 5099:Red 5077:Red 4742:Rod 4720:Rod 4687:Rod 4679:FAC 4669:Rod 4390:• ( 4301:Ron 4285:or 4234:to 4224:to 4214:to 4204:to 4145:Ron 4008:Wey 3832:Ron 3744:Ron 3277:Ron 3243:Ron 3191:! 3043:Ron 2944:Ron 2911:Rod 2889:Rod 2881:Rit 2824:CBM 2715:Rod 2515:Ron 2483:Ron 2459:Ron 2352:.-- 2255:Ron 2222:Ron 2161:Ron 2118:Ron 2085:Ron 2032:Ron 1989:Ron 1877:) 1873:to 1698:RDT 1263:MBB 1136:or 1134:yes 917:, 842:yes 276:-- 5834:) 5816:) 5808:-- 5752:) 5734:) 5717:) 5702:) 5685:{{ 5677:}} 5673:{{ 5662:) 5635:) 5603:) 5561:) 5553:. 5542:) 5518:) 5468:) 5449:) 5438:? 5335:) 5277:) 5202:) 5172:) 5158:) 5126:) 5107:) 5085:) 5074:-- 5055:, 5040:, 5025:, 5010:, 4995:, 4980:, 4965:, 4794:) 4779:) 4771:-- 4651:) 4643:-- 4584:) 4568:) 4549:) 4525:) 4509:) 4486:) 4470:) 4451:) 4426:) 4418:. 4344:) 4322:) 4275:) 4249:) 4189:) 4166:) 4128:) 4088:) 4061:.. 4037:) 4018:, 4014:, 4002:, 3979:) 3945:) 3926:) 3908:) 3821:.. 3796:) 3768:.. 3740:? 3715:) 3699:.. 3673:) 3659:) 3644:) 3620:.. 3604:) 3596:-- 3576:) 3537:) 3529:-- 3521:.. 3505:) 3479:.. 3470:. 3455:.. 3434:.. 3425:. 3402:) 3369:) 3351:) 3335:) 3324:BW 3316:) 3239:. 3220:) 3126:) 3102:) 3013:) 2998:) 2976:) 2932:) 2858:: 2856:}} 2852:{{ 2826:· 2786:) 2768:) 2745:) 2667:: 2665:}} 2661:{{ 2628:: 2626:}} 2622:{{ 2589:: 2587:}} 2583:{{ 2541:) 2505:) 2433:) 2403:) 2395:-- 2373:) 2342:) 2334:-- 2322:) 2314:-- 2245:) 2194:; 2155:WP 2143:) 2062:) 2017:) 1891:) 1734:}} 1728:{{ 1715:) 1707:. 1652:) 1604:) 1589:) 1565:) 1550:) 1507:) 1491:) 1466:) 1450:) 1414:) 1401:). 1274:) 1242:) 1198:) 1177:) 1138:no 1077:) 1067:}} 1061:{{ 973:) 935:) 921:, 884:) 861:) 835:) 792:) 737:) 708:) 694:) 679:) 664:) 641:) 621:) 598:) 563:) 548:) 525:) 499:) 480:. 456:) 432:) 395:) 377:) 349:) 306:) 284:) 265:? 261:? 257:? 233:) 197:; 189:. 178:) 154:. 131:) 110:) 5854:| 5830:( 5812:( 5788:| 5748:( 5730:( 5713:( 5698:( 5658:( 5631:( 5599:( 5557:( 5538:( 5514:( 5500:| 5464:( 5445:( 5382:| 5331:( 5273:( 5251:D 5198:( 5168:( 5154:( 5145:) 5139:( 5122:( 5103:( 5081:( 5068:) 5062:( 5053:) 5047:( 5038:) 5032:( 5023:) 5017:( 5008:) 5002:( 4993:) 4987:( 4978:) 4972:( 4963:) 4957:( 4934:) 4928:( 4919:) 4913:( 4900:) 4894:( 4885:) 4879:( 4869:) 4863:( 4854:) 4848:( 4835:) 4829:( 4820:) 4814:( 4790:( 4775:( 4647:( 4580:( 4564:( 4545:( 4521:( 4505:( 4482:( 4466:( 4447:( 4422:( 4394:) 4340:( 4318:( 4303:h 4271:( 4245:( 4185:( 4162:( 4147:h 4124:( 4084:( 4033:( 3975:( 3964:" 3941:( 3922:( 3904:( 3834:h 3792:( 3746:h 3726:) 3722:( 3711:( 3669:( 3655:( 3640:( 3600:( 3572:( 3533:( 3501:( 3398:( 3365:( 3347:( 3331:( 3312:( 3279:h 3245:h 3216:( 3122:( 3098:( 3045:h 3009:( 2994:( 2972:( 2946:h 2928:( 2869:) 2865:( 2830:) 2822:( 2782:( 2764:( 2741:( 2708:. 2678:) 2674:( 2657:. 2639:) 2635:( 2618:. 2600:) 2596:( 2579:. 2537:( 2517:h 2501:( 2485:h 2461:h 2429:( 2399:( 2369:( 2338:( 2318:( 2257:h 2241:( 2224:h 2163:h 2139:( 2120:h 2087:h 2058:( 2034:h 2013:( 1991:h 1887:( 1711:( 1688:) 1682:( 1648:( 1600:( 1585:( 1561:( 1546:( 1503:( 1487:( 1462:( 1446:( 1410:( 1406:— 1270:( 1238:( 1194:( 1173:( 1148:☎ 1144:☮ 1121:☎ 1117:☮ 1073:( 1042:☎ 1038:☮ 987:☎ 983:☮ 969:( 955:☎ 951:☮ 931:( 905:☎ 901:☮ 880:( 857:( 844:. 831:( 788:( 733:( 704:( 690:( 675:( 660:( 637:( 617:( 594:( 559:( 544:( 521:( 495:( 452:( 428:( 391:( 373:( 345:( 315:? 302:( 280:( 229:( 174:( 127:( 106:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.