256:
rich countries, domestic producers of "simple" manufactured goods, such as textiles, leather goods, ceramics, glass and steel, have long claimed that they could not compete with large quantities of imports. Thus, such products have been categorically excluded from GSP coverage under the U.S. and many other GSP programs. Critics assert that these excluded products are precisely the kinds of manufactures that most developing countries are able to export, the argument being that developing countries may not be able to efficiently produce things like locomotives or telecommunications satellites, but they can make shirts.
159:
22:
235:. This exemption allowed contracting parties to the GATT (the equivalent of today's WTO members) to establish systems of trade preferences for other countries, with the caveat that these systems had to be "generalized, non-discriminatory and non-reciprocal' with respect to the countries they benefited (so-called "beneficiary" countries). Countries were not supposed to set up GSP programs that benefited just a few of their "friends.'
134:" (MFN). MFN status provides equal treatment in the case of tariff being imposed by a nation but in case of GSP differential tariff could be imposed by a nation on various countries depending upon factors such as whether it is a developed country or a developing country. Both the rules comes under the purview of
259:
Supporters note that even in the face of its limitations, it would not be accurate to conclude that GSP has failed to benefit developing countries, though some concede GSP has benefited developing countries unevenly. Some assert that, for most of its history, GSP has benefited "richer developing"
255:
Criticism has been leveled noting that most GSP programs are not completely generalized with respect to products, and this is by design. That is, they don't cover products of greatest export interest to low-income developing countries lacking natural resources. In the United States and many other
243:
From the perspective of developing countries as a group, GSP programs have been a mixed success. On one hand, most rich countries have complied with the obligation to generalize their programs by offering benefits to a large swath of beneficiaries, generally including nearly every non-OECD member
230:
followed the lead of UNCTAD and enacted two waivers to the MFN that permitted tariff preferences to be granted to developing country goods. Both these waivers were limited in time to ten years. In 1979, the GATT established a permanent exemption to the MFN obligation by way of the
223:(UNCTAD) in the 1960s. Among other concerns, developing countries claimed that MFN was creating a disincentive for richer countries to reduce and eliminate tariffs and other trade restrictions with enough speed to benefit developing countries.
244:
state. Certainly, every GSP program imposes some restrictions. The United States, for instance, has excluded countries from GSP coverage for reasons such as being communist (
305:
374:
367:
354:
220:
180:
39:
326:
388:
86:
58:
65:
72:
276:, more recently Brazil and India - while providing virtually no assistance to the world's least developed countries, such as
54:
422:
395:
289:
130:
system which provides tariff reduction on various products. The concept of GSP is very different from the concept of "
443:
206:
105:
378:
188:
438:
184:
79:
43:
348:
219:
The idea of tariff preferences for developing countries was the subject of considerable discussion within the
330:
288:. The U.S., however, has closed some of these gaps through supplemental preference programs like the
327:"2006 Wikileaks leaked cable from US Ambassador Sobel in Brasilia to WHA Assistant Secretary Shannon"
142:
169:
173:
32:
8:
401:
293:
248:), being placed on the U.S. State Department's list of countries that support terrorism (
131:
285:
232:
405:
432:
384:
412:
362:"UNCTAD Database on Generalized System of Trade Preferences Utilization"
269:
265:
158:
21:
273:
245:
292:
and a newer program for Haiti and Europe has done the same with
261:
127:
361:
418:
306:
Global System of Trade
Preferences among Developing Countries
281:
277:
249:
370:
on trends and utilization rates across reporting countries.
252:), and failing to respect U.S. intellectual property laws.
227:
349:"UNCTAD Introduction to Generalized System of Preferences"
145:
but MFN is only for not discriminating among WTO members.
135:
46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
221:United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
430:
187:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
413:"Japan Generalized System of Preferences"
207:Learn how and when to remove this message
106:Learn how and when to remove this message
431:
423:Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs
185:adding citations to reliable sources
152:
44:adding citations to reliable sources
15:
396:"Generalised Scheme of Preferences"
260:countries - in early years Mexico,
55:"Generalized System of Preferences"
13:
290:African Growth and Opportunity Act
141:GSP provides tariff reduction for
14:
455:
341:
120:Generalized System of Preferences
157:
20:
31:needs additional citations for
357:about GSP programs in general.
319:
1:
312:
7:
299:
10:
460:
238:
148:
389:U.S. Trade Representative
143:least developed countries
444:World Trade Organization
284:, and most countries in
439:United States trade law
421:'s GSP program by the
400:Information from the
383:Introduction to the
181:improve this section
126:, is a preferential
40:improve this article
402:European Commission
387:GSP program by the
294:Everything But Arms
132:most favored nation
286:sub-Saharan Africa
408:GSP arrangements.
366:Information from
353:Information from
217:
216:
209:
116:
115:
108:
90:
451:
417:Introduction to
416:
399:
382:
365:
352:
335:
334:
329:. Archived from
323:
212:
205:
201:
198:
192:
161:
153:
111:
104:
100:
97:
91:
89:
48:
24:
16:
459:
458:
454:
453:
452:
450:
449:
448:
429:
428:
411:
394:
373:
360:
347:
344:
339:
338:
325:
324:
320:
315:
302:
241:
233:enabling clause
213:
202:
196:
193:
178:
162:
151:
112:
101:
95:
92:
49:
47:
37:
25:
12:
11:
5:
457:
447:
446:
441:
427:
426:
409:
392:
381:on 2005-04-14.
377:Archived from
371:
358:
343:
342:External links
340:
337:
336:
333:on 2011-07-18.
317:
316:
314:
311:
310:
309:
301:
298:
240:
237:
215:
214:
197:September 2013
165:
163:
156:
150:
147:
114:
113:
28:
26:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
456:
445:
442:
440:
437:
436:
434:
424:
420:
414:
410:
407:
403:
397:
393:
390:
386:
380:
376:
372:
369:
363:
359:
356:
350:
346:
345:
332:
328:
322:
318:
307:
304:
303:
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
257:
253:
251:
247:
236:
234:
229:
226:In 1971, the
224:
222:
211:
208:
200:
190:
186:
182:
176:
175:
171:
166:This section
164:
160:
155:
154:
146:
144:
139:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
110:
107:
99:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57: –
56:
52:
51:Find sources:
45:
41:
35:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
379:the original
331:the original
321:
258:
254:
242:
225:
218:
203:
194:
179:Please help
167:
140:
123:
119:
117:
102:
93:
83:
76:
69:
62:
50:
38:Please help
33:verification
30:
433:Categories
313:References
66:newspapers
270:Singapore
266:Hong Kong
168:does not
96:June 2017
300:See also
274:Malaysia
404:on the
246:Vietnam
239:Effects
189:removed
174:sources
149:History
80:scholar
375:"U.S."
368:UNCTAD
355:UNCTAD
308:(GSTP)
272:, and
262:Taiwan
128:tariff
82:
75:
68:
61:
53:
419:Japan
282:Nepal
278:Haiti
250:Libya
122:, or
87:JSTOR
73:books
385:U.S.
228:GATT
172:any
170:cite
118:The
59:news
183:by
136:WTO
124:GSP
42:by
435::
406:EU
296:.
280:,
268:,
264:,
138:.
425:.
415:.
398:.
391:.
364:.
351:.
210:)
204:(
199:)
195:(
191:.
177:.
109:)
103:(
98:)
94:(
84:·
77:·
70:·
63:·
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
