Knowledge

Bid rigging

Source đź“ť

312: 972:, in the real estate industry, may occur when the bank "tentatively" auctions a foreclosed home and gives bidders an option to give "preliminary bids" for homes that are not yet authorized for auction. If the reserve bids are not met, the home is updated as "never was available for auction" even though bids were received. Some houses are auctioned at fire-sale prices, and the auctions are closed before the auction was formally announced. Investors rush to get in their preliminary bids before the house is technically up for auction. Bidders fear losing options so it results in more bids, and naturally, higher prices. If bidders fail to reach the target bids, the item was never available for auction. Banks do that because if they unloaded all of their 990:
behaviors, such as bid rigging, create market inefficiencies as contracts are fulfilled at elevated values. Furthermore, bid prices increase with more repeated collusion. Ultimately, the cost is typically borne by the taxpayer as government-sponsored contracts are artificially above market value. Additionally, it can be thought of as raising prices for the taxpayer (or consumer) as firms rent seek. One study found that bid rigging significantly raised prices over market value in the seafood industry in Philadelphia in a bidding scheme involving Defense Personnel Support Center, a purchaser for the Department of Defense. The high price of entry and fewer entrants in many industries results in lessened incentives for firms to behave competitively.
814:, for example in the case of government construction contracts. The typical objective of bid rigging is to enable the "winning" party to obtain contracts at uncompetitive prices (i.e., at higher prices if they are sellers, or lower prices if they are buyers). The other parties are compensated in various ways, for example, by cash payments, or by being designated to be the "winning" bidder on other contracts, or by an arrangement where some parts of the successful bidder's contract will be subcontracted to them. In this way, they "share the spoils" among themselves. Bid rigging almost always results in economic harm to the agency which is seeking the bids, and to the public, who ultimately bear the costs as taxpayers or consumers. 1178:
unit quotes. The fines from this bid rigging scheme amounted to €45 million following an initial court decision, an over-ruling, and a reinstatement of the initial verdict. In 2007, a Slovakian government ministry participated in bidder exclusion by posting a request for proposals regarding consulting on a bulletin board in an official building, though not open to the public. This resulted in a consulting firm winning a €120 million contract. The word for receiving kickbacks after participating in bid rigging is known as "tunelovanie" in Slovak.
1051:, or if there is reason to believe that officials and bidders are in contact, an open auction is preferred to sidestep potential bribery. When officials are engaged in more competitive procurement processes with regard to price but are suspected of kickbacks, a potential solution is the open auction to prevent clandestine arrangements such as change order abuse. If a closed or sealed auction process is preferred, the use of electronic bidding and investment in tamper-resistant systems is suggested. 38: 920:, occurs when some of the bidders agree to submit bids that are intended to be unsuccessful so that another conspirator can win the contract. For example, the cover bids might contain prices that are uncompetitive in relation to the prices submitted by the conspirator, who is designated to win the contract, or the cover bids might contain conditions that the conspirators know to be unacceptable to the agency calling for the bids. 1217:"Indeed, the OFT uncovered evidence of cover pricing in over 4000 tenders involving over 1000 companies but had to focus its investigation on a limited number of companies and instances where the available evidence was strongest, in order to make best use of its resources and conclude its investigation within a reasonable timeframe. The OFT could not, therefore, pursue every firm suspected of involvement in cover pricing." 1165:(TFEU). The annual cost to the EU in economic waste as a direct result of bid rigging among cartels was estimated to be between €13 billion and €37 billion in 2008. Bid rigging seems to be on the rise across Europe, raising concerns particularly over excessive expenditures and single-bid tenders. These single-bid tenders represented 17% of tenders in 2006, but 30% nine years later. 1294:
meaning that they were more likely to continue to win additional contracts in areas they were already developing. This was discovered to be a result of complementary bidding. Some legal action has been undertaken against these bid rigging schemes with nine contracting companies and several officials being charged and fined $ 5 billion in 1999.
1077:. Petrobras is suspected of having overcharged bids as much as 3% of the total cost on contracts with an alleged $ 2.1 billion being misappropriated in kickbacks. Operation Car Wash is part of a larger investigation into Brazil's government as well and has contributed to the conviction and imprisonment of former president 884:
simultaneously skimming profits from the artificially high bid price. Additionally, bidders may give low quotes for non-necessary items (knowledge gained through collusion or experience) to disadvantage other firms as their bid amount is more competitive. This also serves to increase the cost of entry for new firms.
1177:
Bid rigging is illegal in Slovakia under the Act on the Protection of Competition and by EU membership, also Article 101 of TFEU. The first charges to be brought to court in Slovakia in 2006 by the Antimonopoly Office involved six construction companies who submitted bids with suspiciously consistent
980:
Those forms of bid rigging can occur together, and two or more of the practices could occur at the same time. For example, if one member of the bidding ring is designated to win a particular contract, that bidder's conspirators could avoid winning by not bidding ("bid suppression") or by submitting a
1017:
At a very basic level, there would likely be more competitive bidding if there were more firms present in a market, outside of a cartel, as evidence shows that bids lessen in value as the number of firms rises. Furthermore, collusion becomes less frequent with better market competitiveness, a result
989:
Many of the issues presented by bid rigging are the result of cartel involvement. Inefficient firms are not pushed out, as they would have been in a competitive market, and firms experience more profit, despite an inefficient allocation of resources. Cartels behave more like monopolies and so their
883:
involves high bid prices for commencing phases of development and low prices for later stages. That effectively increases the flow of funds for the bidding firm. This occurs when bidders cite high prices for items, intending to raise the number of units and purchase them at a competitive rate while
1293:
In a three-and-a-half-year period from 1995 to 1998 there was an estimated $ 4.13 billion surcharge attributed to bid rigging in Korea's construction industry, representing 15.5% of the total spent. It was also found that firms already present in an area enjoyed a significant degree of incumbency,
1265:
is often supported though as allowing small firms to continue to compete, though detractors are quick to point to the economic inefficiencies presented by a non-competitive market. The US Government, specifically the United States Trade Representative Office and Department of Commerce, made fierce
1249:
Although both a violation of Japanese criminal law and the Japan Anti-Monopoly Law, bid rigging is still a habitual practice of the Japanese construction industry. It has been shown by a number of academic studies both in Japan and in the US to be a system which considerably inflates the cost of
950:
are false bids to trick a legitimate bidder into bidding more than would have otherwise been the case. The seller or auctioneer hires confederates to call out the phantom bids. If the phantom bid is the winner, the lot is hidden and comes back around for a second auction, or the second-highest
926:
occurs when bidders take turns being the designated successful bidder. For example, each conspirator is designated to be the successful bidder on a certain contract, with conspirators designated to win other contracts. That is a form of market allocation in which the conspirators allocate or
1270:
as a de facto non-tariff barrier to foreign firms in the Japanese construction market. Despite years of negotiations, including promises by the Japanese government in the Structural Impediment Initiative (SII) trade talks, the practice was never fully stamped out and continued to flourish.
1115:
From 2002 until 2013, the Colombian government opened 121 investigations into bid rigging, which lead to sixty-nine entities paying fines amounting to nearly $ 23.5 million, with an additional nine entities receiving sanctions. Colombia was found to generally comply with the
857:
to reduce the minimum bid amount. That functions as contracts are split up to reduce the actual procurement amount and keep it under a threshold value. That reduces competitive bidding and enables less oversight at the project level as bid prices drop and kickbacks can be
1097:. This would not be the first instance of bid rigging by construction firms in recent Brazilian history as Andrade Gutierrez Engenharia SA, the nation's second largest construction firm, admitted to bid rigging during contract procurement for stadiums to host the 1260:
can be understood as a mutually beneficial system of bureaucracy and government and the private construction industry wherein bid rigging is incredibly common, benefiting colluding firms and officials alike in the form of kickbacks. The system of
870:
is another method for officials to choose the bidder of their choice but occurs after receipt of bids. The methods for this would include either changing bid parameters, evaluation processes, or other activity to effectively select the bidder of
927:
apportion markets, products, customers or geographic territories among themselves. This is then divided up such that each will get a "fair share" of the total business, without truly having to compete with the others for that business.
1224:
Many of the businesses involved cooperated fully with the OFT investigation and it was acknowledged that they had changed their bidding practices and provided staff training on competition law once the OFT had raised the issue.
1213:(OFT) on 103 construction companies found to have engaged in illegal bid-rigging schemes. The OFT commented that cover pricing, the form of bid rigging involved in these cases, was widespread in the UK construction industry. 1186:
Bid rigging occurs frequently in the construction industry in Switzerland. In 2007, seventeen different firms were involved in a bid rigging scheme but there was no prosecution as the ring had disbanded before
1092:
The Petrobras scandal extends beyond bid rigging in the oil sector as the investigation has also implicated Brazilian construction firms as bid rigging was discovered to be rampant in the preparations for the
831:
occurs when a contractor colludes with project officials, wins a low bid, and asks to change the contract afterwards. That is approved by officials, resulting in a much higher bid being retroactively approved.
1046:
Suggestions for ameliorating procurement auctions have also been put forth. Lengstein and Wolfstetter suggest that when a particular bidder is preferred, disregarding cost, possible reforms include a sealed
961:
is the strategy in which the auctioneer or seller bids on a lot and buys it back to protect it from being sold to the highest bidder for an insufficient price. That is fraud if the auction is advertised as
1870: 2282:
in the cases of Quarmby Construction Company Limited and St James Securities Holdings Limited v Office of Fair Trading, unofficial summary published 15 April 2011, accessed 19 January 2024
840:
Instituting unreasonable qualification parameters, excluding non-preferred firms, or effectuating the same by shortening the time of acceptance periods for new bids following a request.
2004: 1162: 1014:
Bid rigging is an illegal practice under the criminal or competition laws of most developed countries. Depending on the jurisdiction, it is punishable by fines, imprisonment or both.
933:
can be a factor fostering the presence of bid rigging; for instance, it is the case of marketing agencies that bid for the same ad space on behalf of different and competing agents.).
1236:
figures for the wrong year when calculating fines, and treated the bid-rigging as more serious than it should have done, although in some other respects the OFT's ruling was upheld.
1194:, in 2011, a bid rigging scheme was discovered wherein seventeen firms were fined eight million Swiss francs though the appeals are ongoing. Multiple other cases are still ongoing. 951:
legitimate bidder is informed that the first bidder was unable to make payment. In online auctions, the latter ruse is pulled via a (secretly illegitimate) "second-chance offer."
2266: 1979: 100: 2097: 877:
allow more bidder exclusion by officials by either tailoring requests to individual bidders or creating a vague criterion to reasonably choose a preferred bidder.
771: 1022: 1221:
Cover pricing involves high price bidding, intended "to give the appearance of genuine competition", by businesses who, "in reality, ... are not competing".
2122: 1832: 2241:
Information note to procuring entities in the public and private sectors regarding the OFT’s decision on bid rigging in the construction industry
1188: 864:, which requires a relationship of some degree between the project and a bidder as the bidder is handed information to gain an unfair advantage. 1042:
Reducing potential for communication between bidders and procurement officials and adhering to a strict criterion and process of evaluation.
798:
action which enables companies to submit non-competitive bids. It can be performed by corrupt officials, by firms in an orchestrated act of
1250:
construction projects, and in the Japanese public sector, considerably wasteful of annual tax money amounting to billions of Japanese yen.
890:
are bids chosen on criteria unrelated to their competitiveness. That can be performed blatantly, by falsifying bids, or by price splitting.
1103: 1285:
As of 2008, thirteen lawsuits were still pending over 1990s' bid rigging for local government contracts to supply incinerator plants.
278: 2027: 1006:
in 2016 aiming to promote good practice among procurement and supply staff, and detailing indications they should watch out for.
2240: 1874: 526: 2253: 1346:
Choi, Jin-Wook (2007). "Governance Structure and Administrative Corruption in Japan: An Organizational Network Approach".
1190:
In 2009, a ring of seven electricity firms from Bern were charged with bid rigging and fined two million Swiss francs. In
2453: 1887: 837:
allows project officials to essentially choose their bid. There are multiple methods to achieve that like the following:
2404:
Lee, In Kwon; Hahn, Kyungdong (2002). "Bid-Rigging in Auctions for Korean Public-Works Contracts and Potential Damage".
1137:. Even so, bid rigging is still rampant in the construction industry, auto sale auctions, and foreclosed home auctions. 1853: 311: 2463: 2338: 1797:
Froeb, Luke M.; Koyak, Robert A.; Werden, Gregory J. (January 1993). "What is the effect of bid-rigging on prices?".
999: 778: 516: 247: 849:
Coercion and intimidation can also be used, as well as the simple rejection of individual bids over trivial matters.
976:
at once, the housing market would collapse, which causes foreclosed homes to be dribbled out with phantom auctions.
441: 802:, or by officials and firms acting together. This form of collusion is illegal in most countries. It is a form of 1256:
refers to collusion in Japanese, or more precisely, "conference", and is an extremely prevalent system in Japan.
436: 2157: 1282:, resigned over a series of bid rigging allegations and was subsequently sentenced to over three years in jail. 906:
occurs when some of the conspirators agree not to submit bids to allow another conspirator to win the contract.
491: 486: 85: 2458: 2313: 386: 271: 190: 2279: 2269:
in the cases of G F Tomlinson Building and others, CAT 7, published 24 March 2011, accessed 16 January 2024
1754:
Gupta, Srabana (2001). "The Effect of Bid Rigging on Prices: A Study of the Highway Construction Industry".
711: 406: 1078: 1229: 843:
Advertising projects to select bidders or bidding markets, thereby reducing publicity of bid procurement.
566: 401: 1081:. In early January 2018, Petrobras settled a United States class action case for $ 2.95 billion, though 955:
is a legitimate bidder's best chance to foil a shill bidder who aims to drive up the price artificially.
1500: 119: 54: 1548: 2468: 1425:
Woodall, Brian (1993). "The Logic of Collusive Action: The Political Roots of Japan's Dango System".
746: 1101:. This revelation implicates an additional five domestic construction firms and was revealed by the 661: 264: 2178: 1708:
Black, William K. (October 2004). "The Dango Tango: Why Corruption Blocks Real Reform in Japan".
1596: 1036:
Maximizing the number of bids and potential contractors for enhanced competition among proposals.
646: 456: 2292: 1210: 164: 2051:
Maci, Marsela (April 2012). "Private Enforcement in Bid-Rigging Cases in the European Union".
1620: 1476: 1169:
estimated that the overall annual cost posed to the EU by bid cost increases was $ 5 billion.
1133:
In the United States, bid rigging is a federal felony criminal offense under Section 1 of the
1404:
Porter, Robert; Zona, J. Douglas (1992). "Detection of Bid Rigging in Procurement Auctions".
706: 651: 611: 506: 501: 391: 366: 252: 1572: 2383: 2362: 1524: 1094: 496: 396: 207: 202: 90: 8: 1644: 1279: 1203: 1098: 716: 641: 356: 339: 2429: 2149: 2076: 1936: 1779: 1733: 1687: 1450: 1392: 1323: 1070: 963: 671: 511: 466: 226: 148: 1033:
Developing expertise and awareness of the market for which a tender is being designed.
2433: 2421: 2219: 2153: 2141: 2080: 2068: 1954: 1940: 1928: 1814: 1810: 1783: 1771: 1737: 1725: 1442: 1384: 1363: 1359: 721: 676: 531: 461: 371: 351: 295: 212: 197: 80: 68: 17: 1691: 1266:
efforts in the late 1980s and early 1990s to urge the Japanese government to reform
2413: 2211: 2133: 2060: 1920: 1806: 1763: 1717: 1677: 1434: 1413: 1355: 1191: 1166: 764: 751: 666: 561: 481: 451: 446: 376: 221: 175: 171: 73: 1375:
LaCasse, Chantale (1995). "Bid Rigging and the Threat of Government Prosecution".
1328: 1146: 1145:
In Canada, bid rigging is an indictable criminal offence under Section 47 of the
1048: 952: 626: 591: 586: 581: 521: 476: 426: 421: 334: 329: 180: 159: 105: 29: 2064: 1233: 1158: 1082: 731: 696: 636: 536: 431: 411: 381: 344: 128: 110: 2417: 1767: 361: 2447: 2425: 2384:"Builders settle damages suit over bid-rigging | The Japan Times Online" 2223: 2145: 2072: 1932: 1818: 1775: 1729: 1446: 1388: 1367: 1275: 811: 631: 416: 217: 185: 2215: 1232:
revised the values of the fines. The tribunal decided that the OFT had used
1333: 973: 803: 686: 681: 656: 616: 571: 471: 231: 144: 95: 2202:
Huschelrath, K. (2012-12-17). "Economic Approaches to Fight Bid Rigging".
1202:
In the United Kingdom, individuals can be prosecuted criminally under the
601: 2137: 2123:"The First Bid Rigging Case in Slovakia after Years of Judicial Disputes" 1912: 1721: 1134: 1086: 1073:
is an ongoing investigation into the Brazilian semi-public multinational
1003: 795: 621: 556: 1924: 1396: 1318: 1026: 319: 2028:"Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement in Colombia - 2014 - OECD" 1454: 1669: 1313: 1074: 799: 133: 63: 37: 1955:"Petrobras scandal | Summary, Explanation, & Operation Car Wash" 2005:"Brazil builder admits to World Cup stadium cartel in deal with..." 1980:"Petrobras to pay $ 2.95 billion to settle U.S. corruption lawsuit" 1682: 1438: 807: 741: 59: 1888:"Guidelines for Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement - OECD" 1417: 1163:
Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
1303: 546: 303: 1670:"Marketing agencies and collusive bidding in online ad auctions" 1412:. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research: 518–538. 1668:
Decarolis, Francesco; Goldmanis, Maris; Penta, Antonio (2017).
1308: 896: 139: 1228:
The fines were subsequently deemed to be "excessive" and the
1117: 964:
an absolute auction, meaning that there are no reserve bids
1833:"Checklist to design tender methods to reduce bid rigging" 1027:
its work on bid-rigging and cartels in public procurement
1089:
had expected a settlement between $ 5 and $ 10 billion.
1667: 1120:'s recommendations regarding competitive procurement. 1029:, makes the following suggestions for better tenders: 1023:
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
937: 1749: 1747: 1910: 2243:, published 22 September 2009, accessed 27 May 2024 2204:Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 1744: 1645:"Potential Scheme: Unjustified Sole Source Awards" 1854:CMA publishes guidance to help detect bid-rigging 1039:Striving for clarity in requirements and details. 2445: 1796: 1674:National Bureau of Economic Research, No. W23962 1911:Lengwiler, Yvan; Wolfstetter, Elmar G. (2006). 1501:"Potential Scheme: Excluding Qualified Bidders" 2120: 1549:"Potential Scheme: Leaking of Bid Information" 2278:Registry of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, 1054: 806:and market allocation, often practiced where 772: 272: 2256:, published March 2024, accessed 27 May 2024 2201: 1104:Conselho Administrativo de Defesa EconĂ´mica 1403: 779: 765: 279: 265: 2121:Blaao, Ondrej; Sramelova, Silvia (2015). 1877:on 24 June 2016, accessed 18 January 2024 1681: 1597:"Potential Scheme: Rigged Specifications" 846:Bundling of contracts to exclude bidders. 240:Enforcement authorities and organizations 1573:"Potential Scheme: Manipulation of Bids" 822: 2403: 1424: 1374: 2446: 2235: 2233: 2176: 1873:, published 20 June 2016, archived by 1621:"Potential Scheme: Unbalanced Bidding" 1477:"Potential Scheme: Change Order Abuse" 16:For the New Jersey investigation, see 2386:. Search.japantimes.co.jp. 2009-04-04 2365:. Search.japantimes.co.jp. 2009-03-28 2172: 2170: 2092: 2090: 1753: 1707: 1703: 1701: 2050: 1913:"Corruption in Procurement Auctions" 1345: 2280:Judgment (Non-confidential version) 2230: 2179:"E.U. Cash Tunnel Ends in Slovakia" 2177:Castle, Stephen (9 November 2010). 1977: 1871:Detecting and deterring bid-rigging 1869:Competition and Markets Authority, 1525:"Potential Scheme: Split Purchases" 938:As a seller, auctioneer or official 13: 2167: 2087: 1698: 1339: 1209:In 2011, fines were levied by the 1018:of reduced ability to compromise. 894: 36: 14: 2480: 2406:Review of Industrial Organization 2314:"New York Times report from 1995" 2293:"US Department of Justice report" 1756:Review of Industrial Organization 1197: 1000:Competition and Markets Authority 984: 248:International Competition Network 2002: 1360:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00779.x 1128: 1123: 1059: 310: 2397: 2376: 2355: 2331: 2306: 2285: 2272: 2259: 2246: 2195: 2114: 2044: 2020: 1996: 1971: 1947: 1904: 1880: 1863: 1846: 1825: 1790: 1661: 1637: 1613: 1589: 1565: 1541: 1517: 1493: 1469: 1181: 1157:Bid rigging is illegal in the 1009: 888:Unjustified sole source awards 253:List of competition regulators 1: 2265:Competition Appeal Tribunal, 1462: 1377:The RAND Journal of Economics 2053:European Competition Journal 1811:10.1016/0165-1765(93)90095-t 1406:Journal of Political Economy 1348:Public Administration Review 993: 981:high bid ("cover bidding"). 794:is a fraudulent scheme in a 7: 1297: 1230:Competition Appeal Tribunal 1172: 1110: 10: 2485: 2454:Anti-competitive practices 2065:10.5235/174410512800369973 1860:, accessed 18 January 2024 1055:Notable examples by region 862:Leaking of bid information 120:Anti-competitive practices 86:Herfindahl–Hirschman index 55:History of competition law 15: 2254:Cartels and Cover Pricing 2130:SSRN Working Paper Series 1917:SSRN Working Paper Series 1710:Business Ethics Quarterly 1152: 1140: 1079:Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva 1064: 904:Bid suppression collusion 747:Private electronic market 23:Form of procurement fraud 2464:Organized crime activity 2239:Office of Fair Trading, 1676:. Working Paper Series. 1288: 1244: 817: 442:Generalized second-price 2418:10.1023/a:1016018505021 2295:. Usdoj.gov. 1994-09-16 1959:Encyclopedia Britannica 1768:10.1023/a:1012568509136 1278:, the then governor of 1239: 437:Generalized first-price 1219: 1211:Office of Fair Trading 492:Simultaneous ascending 165:Occupational licensing 41: 2216:10.1093/jeclap/lps071 1875:The National Archives 1433:(3). JSTOR: 297–312. 1383:(3). Wiley: 398–417. 1354:(5). Wiley: 930–942. 1215: 910:Complementary bidding 875:Rigged Specifications 823:As acts of corruption 527:Vickrey–Clarke–Groves 40: 2459:Conflict of interest 2363:"Japan Times report" 2138:10.2139/ssrn.2741673 1722:10.5840/beq200414442 1427:Comparative Politics 1095:2016 Summer Olympics 810:are determined by a 407:Discriminatory price 208:Occupational closure 203:Dividing territories 191:Essential facilities 91:Market concentration 2339:"Britanica Article" 1925:10.2139/ssrn.874705 1280:Miyazaki Prefecture 1204:Enterprise Act 2002 1099:2014 FIFA World Cup 717:Revenue equivalence 402:Deferred-acceptance 2318:The New York Times 2183:The New York Times 2098:"Rigging the bids" 1978:Pierson, Brendan. 1324:Operation Car Wash 1071:Operation Car Wash 881:Unbalanced bidding 855:Purchase splitting 829:Change order abuse 487:Sealed first-price 227:Regulatory capture 42: 1799:Economics Letters 789: 788: 567:Cancellation hunt 517:Value of revenues 387:Click-box bidding 289: 288: 218:Misuse of patents 213:Predatory pricing 198:Exclusive dealing 81:Barriers to entry 69:Coercive monopoly 18:Operation Bid Rig 2476: 2469:Bidding strategy 2438: 2437: 2401: 2395: 2394: 2392: 2391: 2380: 2374: 2373: 2371: 2370: 2359: 2353: 2352: 2350: 2349: 2335: 2329: 2328: 2326: 2325: 2310: 2304: 2303: 2301: 2300: 2289: 2283: 2276: 2270: 2263: 2257: 2250: 2244: 2237: 2228: 2227: 2199: 2193: 2192: 2190: 2189: 2174: 2165: 2164: 2162: 2156:. Archived from 2127: 2118: 2112: 2111: 2109: 2108: 2094: 2085: 2084: 2048: 2042: 2041: 2039: 2038: 2024: 2018: 2017: 2015: 2014: 2000: 1994: 1993: 1991: 1990: 1975: 1969: 1968: 1966: 1965: 1951: 1945: 1944: 1908: 1902: 1901: 1899: 1898: 1884: 1878: 1867: 1861: 1850: 1844: 1843: 1837: 1829: 1823: 1822: 1794: 1788: 1787: 1751: 1742: 1741: 1705: 1696: 1695: 1685: 1665: 1659: 1658: 1656: 1655: 1641: 1635: 1634: 1632: 1631: 1617: 1611: 1610: 1608: 1607: 1593: 1587: 1586: 1584: 1583: 1569: 1563: 1562: 1560: 1559: 1545: 1539: 1538: 1536: 1535: 1521: 1515: 1514: 1512: 1511: 1497: 1491: 1490: 1488: 1487: 1473: 1458: 1421: 1400: 1371: 970:Phantom auctions 918:courtesy bidding 912:, also known as 868:Bid manipulation 835:Bidder exclusion 781: 774: 767: 712:Price of anarchy 562:Calor licitantis 314: 291: 290: 281: 274: 267: 172:Product bundling 74:Natural monopoly 26: 25: 2484: 2483: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2402: 2398: 2389: 2387: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2368: 2366: 2361: 2360: 2356: 2347: 2345: 2337: 2336: 2332: 2323: 2321: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2298: 2296: 2291: 2290: 2286: 2277: 2273: 2264: 2260: 2251: 2247: 2238: 2231: 2200: 2196: 2187: 2185: 2175: 2168: 2160: 2125: 2119: 2115: 2106: 2104: 2096: 2095: 2088: 2049: 2045: 2036: 2034: 2026: 2025: 2021: 2012: 2010: 2001: 1997: 1988: 1986: 1976: 1972: 1963: 1961: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1909: 1905: 1896: 1894: 1886: 1885: 1881: 1868: 1864: 1851: 1847: 1835: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1795: 1791: 1752: 1745: 1706: 1699: 1666: 1662: 1653: 1651: 1649:guide.iacrc.org 1643: 1642: 1638: 1629: 1627: 1625:guide.iacrc.org 1619: 1618: 1614: 1605: 1603: 1601:guide.iacrc.org 1595: 1594: 1590: 1581: 1579: 1577:guide.iacrc.org 1571: 1570: 1566: 1557: 1555: 1553:guide.iacrc.org 1547: 1546: 1542: 1533: 1531: 1529:guide.iacrc.org 1523: 1522: 1518: 1509: 1507: 1505:guide.iacrc.org 1499: 1498: 1494: 1485: 1483: 1481:guide.iacrc.org 1475: 1474: 1470: 1465: 1342: 1340:Further reading 1329:Organized crime 1300: 1291: 1247: 1242: 1200: 1184: 1175: 1155: 1147:Competition Act 1143: 1131: 1126: 1113: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1049:Vickrey auction 1012: 998:In the UK, the 996: 987: 940: 900: 825: 820: 785: 756: 726: 691: 596: 592:Tacit collusion 541: 457:Multi-attribute 285: 181:Refusal to deal 160:Tacit collusion 106:Relevant market 30:Competition law 24: 21: 12: 11: 5: 2482: 2472: 2471: 2466: 2461: 2456: 2440: 2439: 2396: 2375: 2354: 2343:Britannica.com 2330: 2305: 2284: 2271: 2258: 2252:Wedlake Bell, 2245: 2229: 2210:(2): 185–191. 2194: 2166: 2163:on 2020-01-01. 2113: 2086: 2059:(1): 211–227. 2043: 2019: 1995: 1970: 1946: 1903: 1879: 1862: 1845: 1824: 1805:(4): 419–423. 1789: 1762:(4): 451–465. 1743: 1716:(4): 603–623. 1697: 1683:10.3386/w23962 1660: 1636: 1612: 1588: 1564: 1540: 1516: 1492: 1467: 1466: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1439:10.2307/422247 1422: 1401: 1372: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1331: 1326: 1321: 1316: 1311: 1306: 1299: 1296: 1290: 1287: 1246: 1243: 1241: 1238: 1199: 1198:United Kingdom 1196: 1183: 1180: 1174: 1171: 1159:European Union 1154: 1151: 1142: 1139: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1122: 1112: 1109: 1066: 1063: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1034: 1011: 1008: 995: 992: 986: 985:Economic costs 983: 978: 977: 967: 956: 939: 936: 935: 934: 931:Bid delegation 928: 921: 907: 899: 893: 892: 891: 885: 878: 872: 865: 859: 852: 851: 850: 847: 844: 841: 832: 824: 821: 819: 816: 787: 786: 784: 783: 776: 769: 761: 758: 757: 755: 754: 749: 744: 738: 735: 734: 728: 727: 725: 724: 722:Winner's curse 719: 714: 709: 703: 700: 699: 693: 692: 690: 689: 684: 679: 674: 669: 664: 659: 654: 649: 644: 639: 634: 629: 624: 619: 614: 608: 605: 604: 598: 597: 595: 594: 589: 584: 579: 574: 569: 564: 559: 553: 550: 549: 543: 542: 540: 539: 534: 529: 524: 519: 514: 509: 504: 499: 494: 489: 484: 479: 474: 469: 464: 459: 454: 449: 444: 439: 434: 429: 424: 419: 414: 409: 404: 399: 394: 389: 384: 379: 374: 369: 364: 359: 354: 349: 348: 347: 342: 337: 326: 323: 322: 316: 315: 307: 306: 300: 299: 287: 286: 284: 283: 276: 269: 261: 258: 257: 256: 255: 250: 242: 241: 237: 236: 235: 234: 229: 224: 215: 210: 205: 200: 195: 194: 193: 188: 178: 169: 168: 167: 162: 157: 152: 142: 131: 129:Monopolization 123: 122: 116: 115: 114: 113: 111:Merger control 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 77: 76: 71: 57: 49: 48: 47:Basic concepts 44: 43: 33: 32: 22: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2481: 2470: 2467: 2465: 2462: 2460: 2457: 2455: 2452: 2451: 2449: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2400: 2385: 2379: 2364: 2358: 2344: 2340: 2334: 2319: 2315: 2309: 2294: 2288: 2281: 2275: 2268: 2262: 2255: 2249: 2242: 2236: 2234: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2198: 2184: 2180: 2173: 2171: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2124: 2117: 2103: 2102:The Economist 2099: 2093: 2091: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2047: 2033: 2029: 2023: 2009: 2006: 1999: 1985: 1981: 1974: 1960: 1956: 1950: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1907: 1893: 1889: 1883: 1876: 1872: 1866: 1859: 1855: 1849: 1841: 1834: 1828: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1793: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1750: 1748: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1704: 1702: 1693: 1689: 1684: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1664: 1650: 1646: 1640: 1626: 1622: 1616: 1602: 1598: 1592: 1578: 1574: 1568: 1554: 1550: 1544: 1530: 1526: 1520: 1506: 1502: 1496: 1482: 1478: 1472: 1468: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1423: 1419: 1418:10.3386/w4013 1415: 1411: 1407: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1344: 1343: 1335: 1332: 1330: 1327: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1317: 1315: 1312: 1310: 1307: 1305: 1302: 1301: 1295: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1277: 1276:Tadahiro Ando 1272: 1269: 1264: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1237: 1235: 1231: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1212: 1207: 1205: 1195: 1193: 1189: 1179: 1170: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1150: 1148: 1138: 1136: 1129:United States 1124:North America 1121: 1119: 1108: 1107: 1105: 1100: 1096: 1090: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1060:South America 1052: 1050: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1015: 1007: 1005: 1002:published an 1001: 991: 982: 975: 971: 968: 965: 960: 957: 954: 949: 945: 942: 941: 932: 929: 925: 922: 919: 915: 914:cover bidding 911: 908: 905: 902: 901: 898: 889: 886: 882: 879: 876: 873: 869: 866: 863: 860: 856: 853: 848: 845: 842: 839: 838: 836: 833: 830: 827: 826: 815: 813: 812:call for bids 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 782: 777: 775: 770: 768: 763: 762: 760: 759: 753: 750: 748: 745: 743: 740: 739: 737: 736: 733: 730: 729: 723: 720: 718: 715: 713: 710: 708: 707:Digital goods 705: 704: 702: 701: 698: 695: 694: 688: 685: 683: 680: 678: 675: 673: 670: 668: 665: 663: 660: 658: 655: 653: 650: 648: 645: 643: 640: 638: 635: 633: 630: 628: 625: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 609: 607: 606: 603: 600: 599: 593: 590: 588: 585: 583: 580: 578: 575: 573: 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 554: 552: 551: 548: 545: 544: 538: 535: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 507:Uniform price 505: 503: 502:Traffic light 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 478: 475: 473: 470: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 445: 443: 440: 438: 435: 433: 430: 428: 425: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 410: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 392:Combinatorial 390: 388: 385: 383: 380: 378: 375: 373: 370: 368: 367:Best/not best 365: 363: 362:Barter double 360: 358: 355: 353: 350: 346: 343: 341: 338: 336: 333: 332: 331: 328: 327: 325: 324: 321: 318: 317: 313: 309: 308: 305: 302: 301: 297: 293: 292: 282: 277: 275: 270: 268: 263: 262: 260: 259: 254: 251: 249: 246: 245: 244: 243: 239: 238: 233: 230: 228: 225: 223: 219: 216: 214: 211: 209: 206: 204: 201: 199: 196: 192: 189: 187: 186:Group boycott 184: 183: 182: 179: 177: 173: 170: 166: 163: 161: 158: 156: 153: 150: 146: 143: 141: 138:Formation of 137: 136: 135: 132: 130: 127: 126: 125: 124: 121: 118: 117: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 79: 75: 72: 70: 67: 66: 65: 61: 58: 56: 53: 52: 51: 50: 46: 45: 39: 35: 34: 31: 28: 27: 19: 2412:(1): 73–88. 2409: 2405: 2399: 2388:. Retrieved 2378: 2367:. Retrieved 2357: 2346:. Retrieved 2342: 2333: 2322:. Retrieved 2320:. 1995-03-09 2317: 2308: 2297:. Retrieved 2287: 2274: 2261: 2248: 2207: 2203: 2197: 2186:. Retrieved 2182: 2158:the original 2129: 2116: 2105:. Retrieved 2101: 2056: 2052: 2046: 2035:. Retrieved 2032:www.oecd.org 2031: 2022: 2011:. Retrieved 2007: 1998: 1987:. Retrieved 1983: 1973: 1962:. Retrieved 1958: 1949: 1916: 1906: 1895:. Retrieved 1892:www.oecd.org 1891: 1882: 1865: 1857: 1848: 1839: 1827: 1802: 1798: 1792: 1759: 1755: 1713: 1709: 1673: 1663: 1652:. Retrieved 1648: 1639: 1628:. Retrieved 1624: 1615: 1604:. Retrieved 1600: 1591: 1580:. Retrieved 1576: 1567: 1556:. Retrieved 1552: 1543: 1532:. Retrieved 1528: 1519: 1508:. Retrieved 1504: 1495: 1484:. Retrieved 1480: 1471: 1430: 1426: 1409: 1405: 1380: 1376: 1351: 1347: 1334:Price fixing 1292: 1284: 1273: 1267: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1227: 1223: 1220: 1216: 1208: 1201: 1185: 1176: 1156: 1144: 1132: 1114: 1102: 1091: 1068: 1045: 1020: 1016: 1013: 997: 988: 979: 974:toxic assets 969: 958: 947: 944:Phantom bids 943: 930: 924:Bid rotation 923: 917: 913: 909: 903: 887: 880: 874: 867: 861: 854: 834: 828: 804:price fixing 791: 790: 642:Domain names 576: 497:Single-price 397:Common value 232:Rent-seeking 154: 145:Price fixing 96:Market power 2003:Mano, Ana. 1182:Switzerland 1161:(EU) under 1135:Sherman Act 1087:BTG Pactual 1025:(OECD), in 1010:Remediation 1004:open letter 796:procurement 792:Bid rigging 357:Anglo-Dutch 340:Bidding fee 155:Bid rigging 2448:Categories 2390:2011-12-17 2369:2011-12-17 2348:2011-12-17 2324:2011-12-17 2299:2011-12-17 2188:2018-09-11 2107:2018-09-11 2037:2018-09-11 2013:2018-09-11 1989:2018-09-11 1964:2018-09-11 1897:2018-09-11 1852:Cave, B., 1654:2018-09-11 1630:2018-09-11 1606:2018-09-11 1582:2018-09-11 1558:2018-09-11 1534:2018-09-11 1510:2018-09-11 1486:2018-09-11 1463:References 1319:Corruption 1187:colluding. 948:shill bids 612:Algorithms 512:Unique bid 467:No-reserve 222:copyrights 101:SSNIP test 2434:153429133 2426:0889-938X 2224:2041-7764 2154:159767037 2146:1556-5068 2081:154382209 2073:1744-1056 1941:167452901 1933:1556-5068 1819:0165-1765 1784:153988096 1776:0889-938X 1738:146369439 1730:1052-150X 1447:0010-4159 1389:0741-6261 1368:0033-3352 1314:Collusion 1274:In 2006, 1083:JP Morgan 1075:Petrobras 1069:Brazil's 994:Detection 895:Within a 858:allotted. 808:contracts 800:collusion 677:Virginity 532:Walrasian 462:Multiunit 372:Brazilian 352:Amsterdam 134:Collusion 64:oligopoly 2267:Judgment 1858:Lexology 1692:44056837 1298:See also 1234:turnover 1173:Slovakia 1111:Colombia 959:Buy-back 752:Software 742:Ebidding 667:Spectrum 632:Children 602:Contexts 482:Scottish 452:Knapsack 447:Japanese 377:Calcutta 304:Auctions 296:a series 294:Part of 60:Monopoly 1842:. 2009. 1397:2555995 1304:Bribery 1106:(CADE). 953:Sniping 871:choice. 647:Flowers 637:Players 627:Charity 587:Suicide 582:Sniping 577:Rigging 557:Shading 547:Bidding 522:Vickrey 477:Reverse 427:Forward 422:English 335:Chinese 330:All-pay 140:cartels 2432:  2424:  2222:  2152:  2144:  2079:  2071:  1939:  1931:  1817:  1782:  1774:  1736:  1728:  1690:  1455:422247 1453:  1445:  1395:  1387:  1366:  1309:Cartel 1192:Aargau 1153:Europe 1141:Canada 1065:Brazil 897:cartel 732:Online 697:Theory 672:Stamps 662:Slaves 537:Yankee 432:French 412:Double 382:Candle 345:Dollar 2430:S2CID 2161:(PDF) 2150:S2CID 2126:(PDF) 2077:S2CID 1937:S2CID 1836:(PDF) 1780:S2CID 1734:S2CID 1688:S2CID 1451:JSTOR 1393:JSTOR 1289:Korea 1268:dango 1263:dango 1258:Dango 1254:Dango 1245:Japan 818:Forms 687:Wives 652:Loans 617:Autos 417:Dutch 320:Types 176:tying 149:cases 2422:ISSN 2220:ISSN 2142:ISSN 2069:ISSN 1929:ISSN 1840:OECD 1815:ISSN 1772:ISSN 1726:ISSN 1443:ISSN 1385:ISSN 1364:ISSN 1240:Asia 1167:RAND 1118:OECD 1085:and 1021:The 682:Wine 657:Scam 572:Jump 472:Rank 220:and 174:and 62:and 2414:doi 2212:doi 2134:doi 2061:doi 2008:U.S 1984:U.S 1921:doi 1807:doi 1764:doi 1718:doi 1678:doi 1435:doi 1414:doi 1410:101 1356:doi 946:or 916:or 622:Art 2450:: 2428:. 2420:. 2410:21 2408:. 2341:. 2316:. 2232:^ 2218:. 2206:. 2181:. 2169:^ 2148:. 2140:. 2132:. 2128:. 2100:. 2089:^ 2075:. 2067:. 2055:. 2030:. 1982:. 1957:. 1935:. 1927:. 1919:. 1915:. 1890:. 1856:, 1838:. 1813:. 1803:42 1801:. 1778:. 1770:. 1760:19 1758:. 1746:^ 1732:. 1724:. 1714:14 1712:. 1700:^ 1686:. 1672:. 1647:. 1623:. 1599:. 1575:. 1551:. 1527:. 1503:. 1479:. 1449:. 1441:. 1431:25 1429:. 1408:. 1391:. 1381:26 1379:. 1362:. 1352:67 1350:. 1206:. 1149:. 298:on 2436:. 2416:: 2393:. 2372:. 2351:. 2327:. 2302:. 2226:. 2214:: 2208:4 2191:. 2136:: 2110:. 2083:. 2063:: 2057:8 2040:. 2016:. 1992:. 1967:. 1943:. 1923:: 1900:. 1821:. 1809:: 1786:. 1766:: 1740:. 1720:: 1694:. 1680:: 1657:. 1633:. 1609:. 1585:. 1561:. 1537:. 1513:. 1489:. 1457:. 1437:: 1420:. 1416:: 1399:. 1370:. 1358:: 966:. 780:e 773:t 766:v 280:e 273:t 266:v 151:) 147:( 20:.

Index

Operation Bid Rig
Competition law

History of competition law
Monopoly
oligopoly
Coercive monopoly
Natural monopoly
Barriers to entry
Herfindahl–Hirschman index
Market concentration
Market power
SSNIP test
Relevant market
Merger control
Anti-competitive practices
Monopolization
Collusion
cartels
Price fixing
cases
Bid rigging
Tacit collusion
Occupational licensing
Product bundling
tying
Refusal to deal
Group boycott
Essential facilities
Exclusive dealing

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑