116:
55:
82:
174:
annual applications for leave to appeal of which an average of 170 were granted. Of that 170, conviction was quashed in 20 percent of cases and sentence varied in another 22 per cent. Rulings of the court included limitation of the lower courts' ability simultaneously to try multiple defendants, multiple
173:
Though the court was staffed with the judges who had shown such hostility (consisting of the Lord Chief
Justice and eight judges of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court), it had a restraining effect on the excesses of prosecutors. During the period 1909–1912, there was an average of 450
178:
and disparate counts within an indictment. The ability of the prosecution to introduce further evidence after the close of the prosecution case was curtailed as were several prejudicial practices with a defendant's previous
115:
259:
332:
150:
to which referral had been solely discretionary and which could only consider points of law. Throughout the nineteenth century, there had been opposition from
352:
362:
347:
357:
337:
31:
17:
67:
301:
107:
199:
342:
59:
187:
came under scrutiny, as did the practice of insisting that the defence proceed even in the case of an inadequate
147:
162:
against such an appeal court with collateral right of appeal. However, disquiet over the convictions of
327:
170:
led to the concession of a new court that could hear matters of law, fact or mixed law and fact.
198:
On 1 October 1966, the Court of
Criminal Appeal was superseded by the Criminal Division of the
81:
8:
102:
magazine cartoon from 1890, noting then current discussion as to the need to relieve the
93:"Why, indeed? But I don't see any Help for it till we get a Court of Criminal Appeal."
297:
98:
192:
180:
131:
191:
case by the prosecution. The Court also did much to refine and systematise the
103:
321:
184:
167:
135:
159:
175:
163:
143:
72:
151:
128:
183:. Further, trial judges' ability to invade the jury's role as
110:, of the responsibility for determining criminal case appeals.
155:
296:. London: Sweet & Maxwell. pp. 619–623.
119:Law book with the rules of court and forms (1908)
333:Former courts and tribunals in England and Wales
319:
312:Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law
353:1966 disestablishments in the United Kingdom
363:Courts and tribunals disestablished in 1966
348:1907 establishments in the United Kingdom
88:"Oh, dear! Oh, dear! Why leave it to Me!"
32:Court of Criminal Appeal (disambiguation)
358:Courts and tribunals established in 1907
114:
80:
14:
320:
274:, 4th ed. Vol.10 (Reissue), "Courts",
270:Lord Mackay of Clashfern (ed.) (2002)
294:Law and Society in England 1750-1950
200:Court of Appeal of England and Wales
24:
338:Criminal law of the United Kingdom
291:
278:'Divisions of the Court of Appeal'
234:
218:
25:
374:
27:Former court of England and Wales
292:Cornish, W.; Clarke, G. (1989).
60:Parliament of the United Kingdom
53:
285:
264:
253:
244:
228:
212:
148:Court for Crown Cases Reserved
13:
1:
205:
7:
146:. c. 23) It superseded the
10:
379:
272:Halsbury's Laws of England
39:United Kingdom legislation
29:
91:Mr. P. (sympathetically).
66:
52:
47:
343:Legal history of England
260:Criminal Appeal Act 1966
140:Criminal Appeal Act 1907
125:Court of Criminal Appeal
43:Criminal Appeal Act 1907
18:Criminal Appeal Act 1907
120:
112:
118:
84:
235:Cornish & Clarke
219:Cornish & Clarke
30:For other uses, see
138:established by the
44:
310:Davies, S. (1949)
121:
113:
42:
303:978-0-421-31150-3
111:
79:
78:
48:Act of Parliament
16:(Redirected from
370:
328:Appellate courts
314:(new series) 425
307:
279:
268:
262:
257:
251:
248:
242:
232:
226:
216:
96:
57:
56:
45:
41:
21:
378:
377:
373:
372:
371:
369:
368:
367:
318:
317:
304:
288:
283:
282:
269:
265:
258:
254:
249:
245:
233:
229:
217:
213:
208:
193:law of evidence
181:criminal record
132:appellate court
95:
94:
89:
62:
54:
40:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
376:
366:
365:
360:
355:
350:
345:
340:
335:
330:
316:
315:
308:
302:
287:
284:
281:
280:
263:
252:
243:
227:
210:
209:
207:
204:
136:criminal cases
108:Henry Matthews
104:Home Secretary
77:
76:
70:
64:
63:
58:
50:
49:
38:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
375:
364:
361:
359:
356:
354:
351:
349:
346:
344:
341:
339:
336:
334:
331:
329:
326:
325:
323:
313:
309:
305:
299:
295:
290:
289:
277:
273:
267:
261:
256:
250:Davies (1949)
247:
240:
236:
231:
224:
220:
215:
211:
203:
201:
196:
194:
190:
186:
185:trier of fact
182:
177:
171:
169:
168:George Edalji
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
130:
126:
117:
109:
105:
101:
100:
92:
87:
83:
74:
71:
69:
65:
61:
51:
46:
37:
33:
19:
311:
293:
286:Bibliography
275:
271:
266:
255:
246:
238:
230:
222:
214:
197:
188:
172:
139:
124:
122:
97:
90:
85:
36:
189:prima facie
176:indictments
160:Home Office
322:Categories
206:References
164:Adolf Beck
86:Home Sec.
158:and the
144:7 Edw. 7
73:7 Edw. 7
68:Citation
237:(1989)
221:(1989)
152:lawyers
129:English
127:was an
75:. c. 23
300:
156:judges
99:Punch
298:ISBN
166:and
134:for
123:The
276:634
241:620
225:619
324::
239:p.
223:p.
202:.
195:.
154:,
106:,
306:.
142:(
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
