Knowledge

Eyewitness memory

Source πŸ“

769:
eyewitness memory before DNA evidence exonerated him in 1995. Despite Jennifer's strong intent to study her rapist's features during the traumatic event for the purpose of identifying him afterward, she fell victim to encoding limitations at the time of the assault. Jennifer undoubtedly experienced a great degree of stress on the night of her assault with a knife pressed to her neck and a feeling of absolute powerlessness. "There in my memory, at the knife-edge of fear, time distorted". She also fell prey to factors after the incident that affected the accuracy of her recall. Even if memories are correctly encoded at the time of the event, interference and decay can alter these memories in negative ways. The simple passage of time entails memory loss, and any new information presented between the time of the crime and testimony can interfere with a witness's recall. When Jennifer was asked to identify her perpetrator from a series of photographs, she was told by officers that she should not feel compelled to make an identification. However, Jennifer's faith in the legal system led her to believe that the police must have had a suspect to warrant her participation in photographic identification. And when Jennifer selected the photo of Ronald, the police told her she did great. The photograph of Jennifer's true rapist, Bobby Poole, was not included in the lineup. The positive feedback Jennifer received allowed her to begin incorporating details from the photograph into her memory of the attack. The fact that Jennifer took five minutes to study the pictures before she selected Ronald Cotton's photo also allowed Jennifer ample opportunity to encode Ronald's face as her assailant and thereby interfere with her original memory.
712:, can aid or impair an individual's recollection of it. There is evidence that faces are better remembered if they display emotion compared to when they appear neutral; in one study healthy control participants remembered more accurately happy faces than they did neutral faces. Likewise, a host of studies have found that memories that are more emotional in nature are more complex and are less likely to be forgotten compared to memories that are more neutral. It therefore seems logical for researchers to explore whether auditory material which is emotional in nature is also remembered better. Research has produced conflicting results. Bradley and Lang (2000) found that there was a memory advantage for auditory material when it was more emotional compared to when it was more neutral. The authors also found that participants' physiological activity when they listened to emotionally arousing sounds was very similar to the physiological arousal produced when they were shown emotional images. However, studies investigating emotion in voices have found no significant differences between recall rates for emotional voices and neutral voices, with some research even demonstrating that emotion can impair memory recall for the voice. For instance, it was found that angry voices were recalled to a lesser extent compared to if they were neutral in tone. This finding has been supported by other studies which have also found that rather than enhancing voice identification, emotion may significantly interfere with it. However, ethical guidelines will confine the levels of emotionality that are appropriate to be induced in participants in a laboratory study environment. 356:
criminal. According to Schuster (2007), the suspect, if he is in the in person lineup or in a picture lineup, should not stand out from the others in the lineup. People's eyes are drawn to what is different. If you make sure that all the men or women in the pictures have a similar appearance, have the same background in their picture, race, age, and are wearing the same or similar clothing, just to name a few, then the risk of getting a false positive will decrease. Thus, this lineup is suggestive. Fillers should be added to the lineup in order to depict a broad spectrum of characteristics, but must match any known description of the offender. If lineup members do not all match the known description of the offender then the lineup is biased toward the suspect. Biased lineups have been shown to increase misidentifications, particularly in target-absent lineups. Increasing the nominal size of a lineup (the actual number of suspects that are compiled) often decreases the potential for a wrong selection. Functional size also plays a role in lineup bias. Functional size is the reciprocal of the fraction of mock witnesses that choose the suspect from a lineup. For example, in a lineup of nominal size 5, if 15 out of 30 mock witnesses (randomly chosen individuals that did not experience the offence) choose the suspect, the functional size of the lineup is the reciprocal of 15/30, which is 30/15, or 2. So although the lineup has 5 members, functionally it only has 2. Effective size is the number of probable suspects. Police use these three numbers to evaluate a lineup.
721:
recognition appears to decline over time; studies have found that participants can recall more correct auditory information immediately after the initial presentation than after a four-day time interval, supporting several other studies finding similar results. Furthermore, the extent to which the time-interval affects memory recall for auditory information depends upon whether the witness just heard the auditory information of whether it was accompanied by visual information too, such as the face of the perpetrator. One study has found that recall is enhanced when both auditory information is heard and visual information is seen, as opposed to just hearing auditory information. Still, when individuals are asked to remember the voice and the speech content, they are only likely to have remembered the gist of what has been said as opposed to remembering verbatim. This clearly has implications for the amount of weight that is placed upon earwitness testimony in court. Earwitnesses are not typically required to give statements or recall a voice or auditory information immediately after an event has occurred, but instead are required to recall information after a time-delay. This could significantly impair the accuracy of their recall. The testimonies of those who have only heard the voice of a suspect compared to a witness who has both seen the face and heard the voice of a suspect should also be treated with extreme caution in court.
347:
lineups produce fewer identifications, since they are more challenging, and require absolute judgement. This means that the decision regarding the matching of the memory to the photo is independently made. On the other hand, a simultaneous lineup requires relative judgement, as the decision is not independent of the other possibilities. An absolute judgment is a judgment that requires the person to be 100 percent certain in their choice where a relative judgment is when someone makes up their mind based on what looks the closest. However, researchers such as Dr. Gary Wells from Iowa State University claim "during simultaneous lineups, witnesses use relative judgment, meaning that they compare lineup photographs or members to each other, rather than to their memory of the offender." Sequential lineups have been preferred historically, seeing as they do not rely on relative judgment. However, recent data suggests the preference for sequential lineups over simultaneous lineups may not be empirically supported. Individuals who participate in sequential lineups are less likely to make a selection at all, regardless if the selection is accurate or not. This suggests the sequential lineup fosters a more conservative shift in criterion to make a selection rather than an increased ability to pick the true perpetrator. Consequently, further research is needed before offering recommendations to police departments.
279:. These effects can be a result of post-event information. It is very important to provide witnesses with helpful response options on memory tests and to be warned of misleading influences that might affect how the memory of the event is recalled at a later time. Many employees, police force workers, and others are trained in post-warning in order to reduce influences on the misinformation effect, which can be predicted before crime. In their studies, many researchers use eyewitnesses to study retrieval-blocking effects, which interfere with a witness' ability to recall information. Misleading information prior to the event can also influence misinformation effects. Other studies also address how the misinformation effect seems to amplify over increasing recall. Discussing events and being questioned multiple times may cause various versions of the testimonies. However, the earliest records prove to be the most accurate due to a minimized misinformation effect. In one study, repeated recall of a traumatic event did not increase resistance to misinformation, nor did it increase susceptibility to information. This result may be due participants being presented both forms of additive and contradictory misinformation. 540:, when compared to an average adult. Poorer memory performance in young kids was shown when youth of different ages were asked to recall a doctor's visit. Children aged 3–5 answered with much less accuracy than individuals aged 6–15, indicating developmental differences in memory capacity. Furthermore, it has been shown that information encoded and stored in memory is dependent on the extent of knowledge regarding the event. That is, children exposed to an event with little knowledge, their memory of the event will not be as accurate when compared to a child who is more knowledgeable on event-related topics. These results of increased sensitivity, suggestibility and memory loss in children lead one to question the competency of a child to serve as an eyewitness. Researchers have determined that children should be considered a competent witness when they have the capacity to observe, communicate, produce sufficient memories, differentiate truth from lies, and understand the obligation to tell the truth. However, the same caution that is taken with all eyewitnesses should be taken with child testimony, as all eyewitness testimonies are prone to inaccuracies. 760:
event. It was predicted that a cognitive interview would improve the likelihood of witnesses making a correct identification and improve recall of speech content, whether immediately after the event of after a time-delay and regardless of age. It was also predicted that adults would recall more content than children, because other studies have indicated that children provide less detail than adults during free recall. However, results revealed poor correct identification rates, regardless of the type of interview earwitnesses had received (19.8%), as well as high false identification rates; 38.7% of participants incorrectly identified an innocent suspect. It did not seem to matter if an interview had been conducted shortly after the event or not. Moreover, there did not seem to be any difference between children and adults in terms of the number of suspects they correctly identified by their voice. Many researchers would suggest that this furthers the case for children (aged 11–13) to be thought of as equally capable of proving potentially helpful earwitness accounts within court settings.
773:
further solidified her choice by telling her "We thought that might be the guy…it's the same person you picked from the photos.". As a result, the authorities viewed Jennifer as the ideal eyewitness, one who was motivated to remember the face of her assailant during the event and subsequently confident in her identification of the target. Unfortunately, the level of confidence in an eyewitness' recall is not associated with accuracy of identification. The eyewitness' confidence in his or her recall is, however, strongly associated with the jury's belief in the accuracy of the eyewitness' testimony, thus increasing the risk of assigning guilty verdicts to innocent individuals. Unconscious transference essentially contaminated Jennifer's memory. Even after Jennifer learned of Ronald's innocence, she still saw his face in her memory of the attack years later. It wasn't until she met with Ronald face-to-face and he gave her his forgiveness did she begin to see Ronald for himself rather than as her assailant, thus beginning a remarkable and unexpected friendship.
553:
group of adults chosen by the Developmental Disabilities Association was compared to a control group of college students, they performed equally well when a target was absent from a lineup. However, the control group were better at recognizing when a target was present in a lineup, leading to the determination that people with intellectual disabilities are more suggestible and likely to confabulate. Children with intellectual disabilities show similar patterns in their eyewitness accounts. After watching a video of a crime, children with these disabilities performed worse than non-disabled kids of the same age on free recall, open-ended questions, and both general and specific misleading questions. These children performed better than the age-matched control group only on leading questions with yes or no answers, suggesting that they are more likely to acquiesce in the interview. These findings indicate that individuals with intellectual disabilities could be considered competent witnesses if interrogated in a non-leading manner.
483:
verbal overshadowing effect typically refers to the negative effect on memory recall as a result of giving a verbal description of a visual object. For example, a witness who gives a verbal description of a face is likely to have subsequent impaired recognition for that face. However, Perfect et al. (2002) predicted that the verbal overshadowing effect would also be seen in voice recognition; that is that verbally describing a voice should also impair subsequent recognition of that voice. They predicted this because they argued that voices were difficult to articulate and so it is likely they would be vulnerable to the verbal overshadowing effect. This was found to be the case. Moreover, a dissociation between accuracy and confidence was observed. Participants' confidence that they had identified the correct voice in the audio-lineup was not influenced by the verbal overshadowing effect; in other words, verbal overshadowing had the effect of decreasing earwitnesses' recognition ability but without their knowledge.
365:
information for the eyewitness, such as limited viewing angles, which restrict the level of detail compared to a computerized virtual lineup where witnesses can see the targets from multiple angles and distances. One might anticipate that examination of the suspects from unlimited viewpoints would allow for better recognition cues, than when compared to limited views. However, unlimited visual information may be disadvantageous and counterproductive if the information offered at the time of retrieval was not actually present at the time of memory encoding. For example, if an eyewitness only saw the face of the perpetrator from one angle, seeing the lineup participants from other viewpoints might be distracting. Other studies have demonstrated that unlimited viewpoints do improve accuracy in police lineups. The eyewitness accuracy improves when the distance between the suspect and witness matches the distance during the initial witnessing of the crime.
288:
Implicit processing takes place during the event, in which the witness encodes the general features of innocent bystanders, creating a sense of familiarity. At retrieval, this familiarity could cause people who were merely present in the crime scene to be confused with the culprit. After viewing a video of a crime involving a thief and two innocent bystanders, participants were asked to identify the perpetrator from a lineup including the three persons present in the video and three other people never before encountered. Most participants falsely identified an innocent person from the lineup. Furthermore, participants were more likely to misidentify one of the two innocent confederates in the video than one of the three unfamiliar people. Unconscious transference occurs in this instance when the witness misattributes his or her sense of familiarity of the perpetrator to a bystander. This confusing effect of familiarity is found in the
236:
the memories of the other details of the scene suffer. The weapon focus effect occurs because additional items require more visual attention, therefore they are frequently not processed. This increased focus of attention on central aspects takes away attentional resources from peripheral details. For example, if a gun was brought into a school, it would attract significant amount of attention, because students are not used to seeing that item. When participants were watching a slideshow, and were seeing an unusual stimulus item, their reaction times were slower (regardless whether the stimulus was dangerous) in comparison to reaction times for more frequent stimulus. When the item was dangerous (i.e. a weapon), participants had a lower accuracy and confidence than the control group's. Another hypothesis is that seeing a weapon might cause an aroused state. In an aroused state, people focus on central details instead of peripheral ones.
461:
perpetrators. Reinstatement is thought to improve recall as it provides memory retrieval cues. Research has demonstrated that pairing faces of suspects or words with contextual cues at the scene of the crime will enhance performance on recognition tasks. Therefore, it seems practical that these results can be applied to eyewitness identification. Methods commonly used to examine context reinstatement include photographs of the environment/scene, mental contextual reinstatement cues, and guided recollection. Studies show that re-exposing participants to the crime scene does enhance performance in facial recognition. There were also notable effects for context reinstatement where improvement on correct identifications while increasing false alarms. Reports also show that the magnitude of improvement via context reinstatement increased in lifelike situations compared to laboratory studies.
470:
Investigators must account for the fact that encountering an acquaintance that we usually see in one context, such as work place, alters memory generalizability when compared to encountering the same acquaintance in another environment that acts like an unassociated context, such as a grocery store. The changes in environment make it difficult to identify this acquaintance. Initially, the individual might seem familiar but because this person is not in the normal context, it might be difficult to place the face and recall the name. Researchers have begun to implement procedures for reinstating the context surrounding a specific event in an attempt to improve identification accuracy. Reinstating the crime scene is often not possible. Sometimes, however it is possible to have eyewitnesses imagine and thus mentally reinstate the surroundings with imagery instructions and other
570:; people who claim to have photographic memories are not immune to flawed eyewitness testimony. Witnesses who believe that they are able to retrieve an accurate mental photograph will also be much more confident in their account of the event and may influence the trial outcome. Accuracy recall of such visual scenes is a controversial issue. In the past, eidetikers were believed to have extremely accurate recall for visual displays, but modern research findings might reveal a different story. Some research demonstrates that eidetic children have greater recall accuracy for visual details compared to non-eidetic children. Other researchers have failed to find any advantage between the two groups. It is also hypothesized that eidetic imagery is not exactly related to memory and improves recall for visual details. As such, photographic memory is not useful in the courtroom. 334:& Yuji showed that using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm has demonstrated that false memory can be produced by the morphological characteristics of a list. Morphological characteristics of the list refer to the structural features of a list of words that are presented to participants for example using the words smile, laughter, and joke, participants were more likely to falsely remember a smiling face, even if no such face was actually presented. This suggests that witnesses may be prone to false identification even without intentional manipulation. Alternative methods of identification, such as photo arrays and sequential lineups, are recommended to reduce the risk of false identifications and improve the accuracy of criminal investigations. 377:. This occurs when new information is processed that obstructs the retrieval of old information. A common source of interference that may occur after the event of a crime is the reporting of the crime. Police investigations include questioning that is often suggestive. The processing of new information may disrupt or entirely replace old information. If a police officer has reason to believe that a suspect is guilty the interrogator's bias can influence the eyewitness' memory. The interrogators can also put pressure on witnesses causing them to want to select a perpetrator from a police lineup. Eyewitnesses are often unsuspecting of the interrogator bias and believe their memories to be uncontaminated. 395:
confidence in having made an accurate identification or accurate rejection. It must be considered that memories are normally vulnerable to multiple influences and prone to distortions and deceptions: "they are never constant and never result in fully accurate representations these changes occur without us being aware of them." As a consequence, the witness' confidence in his/her ability to make a correct identification should not be used to assess the accuracy of identification. Witnesses should be asked to attempt identifications even if their confidence is low. Confidence ratings after identification of a suspect is a better ( but not perfect) predictor.
691:. Wickens' theory suggests that attentional resources are separated into distinct 'pools'. Only visual and auditory tasks have access to visual and auditory attentional resources, respectively. However, when a task arises which requires the use of attentional resources from both modalities, this leads to competition for resources, in turn leading the inability to accomplish one or both tasks or resulting in poorer performance. Therefore, fewer general resources may have been available in order to encode and remember the perpetrator's appearance after witnesses had used attentional resources for the processing of the accented voice and speech content. 734:
performed at above chance levels for voice recognition, compared to the younger-age group of children (aged 7–9) and adults. They suggest that under the age of 10 a child may be overwhelmed by the cognitive demands of the task and so do not perform above chance levels on the task. Meanwhile, adults made the highest percentage (55%) of false identifications. They also found that voice pitch level and speaker rate was highly correlated with children's but not adults' false identification rates. Overall however, the results confirmed other studies which have also shown that in general, earwitness performance for unfamiliar voices is poor.
120:(i.e. the own-race bias, cross-race effect, other-ethnicity effect, same-race advantage) is one factor thought to impact the accuracy of facial recognition. Studies investigating this effect have shown that a person is better able to recognize faces that match their own race but are less reliable at identifying other more unfamiliar races, thus inhibiting encoding. Various explanations for this effect have been proposed. The perceptual expertise account suggests that with an increase of exposure to one's own race, perceptual mechanisms develop which allow people to be more proficient at remembering faces of their own race. The 386:
it very difficult to reconstruct the actual account of an event. To prevent this effect, police should separate witnesses as early as possible before the reporting of the event. Unfortunately this is difficult, especially if the police do not get involved immediately after the event. Police should inform witnesses of the possibility of contamination as soon as possible. Witnesses should be interviewed as soon as possible with police noting if the witnesses have compared accounts. Once the accounts have been recorded, police should make notes of similarities or differences that could point to contaminated details or facts.
500:. For example, the accuracy of the child's explanation, in such situations, coupled with how well the child can identify the setting of the crime and the individuals involved in the crime, influence the credibility of the child's testimony. Whilst research shows that it is possible for children to provide relevant and accurate forensic information, they appear less reliable than adult witnesses and like all witnesses, can create false memories. The experience of testifying can also be harmful and anxiety-inducing to the child, leaving them unable to give a credible testimony. 449:. Misleading information offered by the investigators may attract more attention than the originally encoded information, so the witness' memory of the event is altered to include erroneous details suggested during the interview. In addition, repeating questions could make the witness feel pressured to change his or her answer or elaborate on an already-given response with fabricated details. Open-ended questioning can reduce the level of retrieval-enhanced suggestibility because the witness is not subjected to testing manipulation by the interviewer. 138:. This phenomenon is not limited to race. Stereotypes of any kind (whether they be related to age, gender, etc.) can affect the encoding of information at the time of the event. For example, if one is held at gunpoint by two individuals, one of whom is a man and the other is a woman wearing a hat, the victim may quickly fall back on the belief that men are more likely to be aggressors. Consequently, the victim may encode the situation as involving two male assailants, yielding problematic effects in the process of identifying the assailants later on. 666:
higher-pitched voice in the test phase (audio line-up). Similarly, upon hearing a low-pitched voice, they are likely to remember the voice as being even lower in pitch when voices are presented in an audio line-up. Comparable cognitive functions seem to operate when individuals attempt to remember faces; ambiguity surrounding the ethnicity or gender of faces is likely to result in the individual's recall of faces to be exaggerated with regards to ethnic and gender-related features. Researchers call this the
616:
labelled the sounds again and it was found that re-labelling the sounds subsequently caused individuals to perform much better in the recognition test. Recognition of environmental sounds therefore appears dependent upon labeling both at input and in the test phase, either when labels are created by subjects as they hear the sounds, or when labels are generated by the experimenter and presented to subjects. More recent research has found that it is possible to memorize the
7442: 399:
made with high confidence were, on average, 97 percent accurate. On the other hand, witnesses who report low confidence are highly suggestive of inaccurate identification. University of Virginia law professor Brandon Garrett analyzed trial materials for 161 DNA exonerated individuals and found that in 57 percent of those cases, it was possible to determine that, in the initial (uncontaminated) memory test, the eyewitnesses were, at best,
134:
on categorization more than multiracial eyewitnesses, who develop a more fluid concept of race. Perception may affect the immediate encoding of these unreliable notions due to prejudices, which can influence the speed of processing and classification of racially ambiguous targets. The ambiguity in eyewitness memory facial recognition can be attributed to the divergent strategies that are used when under the influence of
423:. For example, when participants were shown a video and instructed to answer all questions (answerable and unanswerable) about its content, they often fabricated information. When prodded too much to remember something, people often fall upon false memories. This effect is also seen in hypnosis: when people intensely try and are guided to remember something, they may end up mistaking a vivid imagination as a memory. 329:
the witness' selection. When overseeing a lineup, the police can use speed of recognition to determine the validity of the identification. If the witness quickly identifies the perpetrator, then the selection is more likely to be correct. A lineup may be ineffective as the pressure on the witness to identify someone who they believe is the perpetrator can lead to false identifications. To prove this we could use the
751:
compensatory hypothesis is accurate. Nevertheless, many studies have found that there appears to be a high activation of certain visual brain areas in blind individuals when they perform non-visual tasks. This suggests that in blind individuals' brains, a reorganization of what are normally visual areas has occurred in order for them to process non-visual input. This supports a compensatory hypothesis in the blind.
159:; mentally removing themselves from the situation, which may serve as a coping mechanism. Lastly, trauma may induce a flashbulb effect; the witness believes they vividly remember significant details of a salient event, although accuracy must be determined of such memories . In legal settings the mental state of an individual at both witnessing a crime and in testimony can affect the success of their 594:, otherwise known as voice recognition, whilst there is less research which investigates memory for environmental sounds. The majority of the literature on voice and face recognition finds a robust face advantage; compared to voice recognition, face recognition appears to be the stronger pathway, with most individuals finding it much more difficult to recall a voice compared to recalling a face. 7000: 6988: 654:
investigated whether earwitness memory is impaired to the same extent when the face of the one speaking is concealed in some way. Research shows that when a face is covered, with a balaclava for instance, accuracy for voice identification slightly improves; however a face overshadowing effect still exists despite the earwitness being able to see fewer facial features.
603:
clear implications for eyewitness and earwitness memory; what is seen should be more likely to be remembered than what is heard by a witness. This finding can be extended to faces and voices; within the person recognition literature, it has been found that individuals are far better at identifying a person by their face as opposed to their voice.
293:
appeared in previous photo arrays may be identified as quickly as identifying the actual target. Therefore, in cases where a suspect is identified from mug shots following a line-up, it is uncertain whether the line-up identification is a result of the recognition of the perpetrator or of the detection of a person seen previously in mug shots.
108:
Face-specific cognitive and neural processes show contributions to holistic processing and recognition in the episodic memories of eyewitnesses. Unreliability of eyewitness identifications may be a result of mismatching between how faces are holistically processed and how composite systems retrieve features in faces during an event.
533:, as they may influence the child's answer. Additional influences may include individuals surrounding the child prior to, and during the hearing. If children hear new information from such individuals, studies show that children will more than likely agree with what the others saidβ€”regardless of the child's initial opinion. 406:
is brief) witnesses' performance during identification decreases and they are less confident in their decision. The confidence accuracy correlation is thus estimated to be stronger in situations of optimal information processing such as longer exposure time, and weaker under conditions that are not optimal.
683:
because a 'cost' is placed on the listener, with accented voices violating the 'speech schema' the listener is familiar with in their own geographic region. Therefore, listeners may be required to expend more effort in order to recognize and distinguish the non-native speaker's phonetic segments and words.
699:
Whilst many earwitness accounts are attained directly and 'in-the-moment', many will be acquired over a telephone or over other communication devices. Whether the earwitness hears a conversation or other auditory information in person or hears it over a communication device could impact their rate of
133:
races. Most research has shown that white eyewitnesses exhibit the other-race effect, however this effect does extend to other races too. In general, memory is an individual process and that conceptualization of race causes racial ambiguity in facial recognition. Mono-racial eyewitnesses may depend
686:
An accent also has the potential to interfere with the witness's ability to recognize the perpetrator's appearance. It has been found that when witnesses are asked to recall a perpetrator, the perpetrator's physical appearance is remembered less well when they have an accent compared to when they do
636:
Compared to memory recall for faces, voice recall appears to be significantly more vulnerable to interference. These consistent findings suggest that earwitness memory is far more vulnerable to the effects of interference compared to eyewitness memory; although the weight placed on eyewitness memory
565:
are thought to hold to an image in mind for longer and with more accuracy than the average individual. But evidence for eidetic memory is limited, and there is no evidence for photographic memory or a memory being an exact replica of an event. The memories of those who claim to have superior eidetic
552:
are at a higher risk for sexual abuse and exploitation because they are often dependent on others and uneducated or physically incompetent in ways of self-protection. Therefore, much research has been devoted to investigating the accountability of these individuals in eyewitness testimonies. When a
469:
An alteration of context was found to be one of the most important predictors of recognition accuracy. Such changes in experimental context have been shown to have effects similar to transformations in appearance, such as disguises. Criminal identifications can be influenced by a change in context.
405:
The optimality hypothesis states that factors influencing the optimality of information processing also influence the reliability of the confidence estimate. During situations in which information processing conditions are less than optimal (e.g. the perpetrator is disguised or duration of exposure
398:
In many experiments, witnesses are asked to rate their confidence in their decision after making an identification from a lineup. A number of psychologists have investigated factors that might affect the confidence accuracy relationship. In a recent review of 15 experiments, suspect identifications
314:
to identify a perpetrator by viewing a series of photos, or a live group of suspects. One possible outcome of a lineup is that the eyewitness can correctly identify the criminal. Another outcome is that the eyewitness can correctly state that the criminal is not in the lineup. A third option is that
287:
Many mistaken identifications are the result of unconscious transference, or the inability to distinguish between the perpetrator and another person who was encountered in a different context. In many of these cases, the culprit is confused with a different person who was present at the crime scene.
107:
of others involved in a traumatic event. It can only get more challenging for a person to accurately encode a face when they themselves are experiencing a traumatic event. Because courts rely on eyewitness facial recognition, it is important to acknowledge that identification is not always accurate.
385:
The presence of a co-witness can often contaminate memories. When witnesses confer about an event they can end up agreeing on an incorrect narrative. Research has found that 71% of witnesses changed their eyewitness accounts to include false components that their co-witnesses remembered. This makes
333:
which is used in psychology experiments as a technique that explores the relationship between memory, language, and cognition. Participants are presented with a list of words or images that are semantically related to a certain word that is not actually on the list. A study done by Daisuke, Matsui,
323:
There are specific guidelines for police to follow when administering a lineup, to reduce bias in the lineup and increase the accuracy of eyewitness judgements. Police must reduce the pressure that eyewitnesses feel to select a criminal from an array of photos or persons. They should make sure that
292:
procedure as well. The presentation of mug shot arrays alone does not seem to influence identification accuracy. However, this presentation can be influential if the police lineups include individuals who were earlier featured in the mug shot array. Individuals appearing in police lineups that also
235:
effect suggests that the presence of a weapon narrows a person's attention, thus affects eyewitness memory. A person focuses on the central detail (for example, the weapon) and loses focus on the peripheral details thus resulting in worse perpetrator recall. While the weapon is remembered clearly,
214:
Everyday memory can be affected by factors such as stress or mood. The 'mood congruency' effect refers to memory being aided by a matching of mood at the encoding/learning stage to the retrieval stage. If a memory is encoded under stressful conditions it may be more likely that the memory is better
653:
A face overshadowing effect is often found to occur, whereby individuals' voice recognition performance is impaired with the co-presentation of a face. Visual information therefore appears to have the ability to significantly interfere with the recall of auditory information. However, research has
615:
Research has found that recall for environmental sounds can be dependent upon the storage and retrieval of verbalizable interpretations. In one study, individuals heard a selection of ambiguous environmental sounds and attempted to label each sound as they were presented. A week later, individuals
611:
Researchers define environmental sounds as those that are either animate, inanimate, artificial or natural; sounds produced by real events as opposed to machine-generated sounds; sounds that are more complex than laboratory-produced sounds and those that are dynamic and convey a sense of activity.
495:
Children's testimony refers to when children are required to testify in court after witnessing or being involved in a crime. In situations where a child is the main witness of a crime, the result of the hearing is dependent on the child's memory of the event. And there are several important issues
482:
The process of describing a face entails thinking about its features independently, but people process faces configurally (as a whole, encoding the features in relation to one another). So, the process of describing the face often impairs the memory of itβ€”this is the verbal overshadowing effect. A
435:
technique, to elicit the most accurate eyewitness memory. In this preferred protocol for conducting interviews, the interrogator should make the witness feel comfortable, ask open-ended questions, and grant the witness freedom in describing the event. In addition, the interviewer should encourage
328:
procedure that does not allow them to see the lineup. This prevents police from giving the eyewitness any information, intentional or not, about who in the lineup is a police suspect. It also prevents the police from giving any feedback to the eyewitness. Feedback can produce a false confidence in
257:
Memory becomes susceptible to contamination when witnesses discuss the event with others and as time passes. This is because memory traces blend with other stories and events that the witness is exposed to after the stressful or traumatic event Because memory is subject to contamination, the most
244:
The testimony of a witness can lose validity due to too many external stimuli, that may affect what was witnessed during the crime, and therefore obstruct memory. For example, if an individual witnesses a car accident on a very public street, there may be too many cues distracting the witness from
3027:
Using hypnosis in eyewitness memory: Past and current issues. Mazzoni, Giuliana; Lynn, Steven Jay Toglia, Michael P. (Ed); Read, J. Don (Ed); Ross, David F. (Ed); Lindsay, R. C. L. (Ed), (2007). The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol I: Memory for events, pp. 321–338. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence
491:
Most of the research on eyewitness memory has involved adults, despite the fact that it is not uncommon for children to have been involved in a crime or to have been the central witness of a crime. Statistics from the Crown Prosecution Service revealed that 1,116 children under the age of 10 were
460:
is a common technique used to help eyewitnesses remember details about a specific environmentβ€”reviewing the initial environment in which the original information was encoded. Taking a witness back to the scene where the event occurred, for example, will help facilitate the accuracy in identifying
163:. Stress in small amounts is thought to aid memory, whereby stress hormones released by the amygdala promote the consolidation of emotional memories. Nevertheless, stress in high amounts may hinder memory performance. Witnesses of severe crimes or trauma can develop further complications, such as 124:
account predicts that motivational and/or attentional components over focus on the race of a person. Another hypothesis is that each race pays attention to certain facial details to differentiate between faces. However, other races might not encode these same features. A final suggestion is that
5850:
Kujala, Teija; Huotilainen, Minna; Sinkkonen, Janne; Ahonen, Antti I.; Alho, Kimmo; HÀmÀlÀ:inen, Matti S.; Ilmoniemi, Risto J.; Kajola, Matti; Knuutila, Jukka E.T.; Lavikainen, Juha; Salonen, Oili; Simola, Juha; Standertskjâld-Nordenstam, Carl-Gustaf; Tiitinen, Hannu; Tissari, Satu O.; NÀÀtÀnen,
772:
The photographs were presented simultaneously, allowing Jennifer to compare the photographs to each other as opposed to her memory of the event. As a result, when she was later asked to choose her assailant from a physical line-up, Jennifer saw Ronald in her memory and thus chose him. The police
759:
Research has investigated how to improve the accuracy of earwitness performance. One study investigated whether an interview called a Cognitive Interview would improve adult or child (11–13 years) voice recognition performance or speech content recall if it was administered immediately after the
720:
The amount of time between when an individual hears incriminatory information or the voice of their perpetrator, for instance, and the time they are required to recall the auditory information as an earwitness can affect their recall accuracy rate. Memory for auditory information including voice
602:
A substantial proportion of the literature into witness testimony finds a robust recall advantage for visual stimuli compared to auditory stimuli. We seem to have a profound memory advantage for visual objects and scenes whilst being poorer at remembering auditory information. This therefore has
364:
Many studies, as well as police procedures, are dependent on photo lineups or police lineups where the eyewitness views the suspects from a distance. This procedure is done in an attempt to eliminate suspects and identify the perpetrator. These types of lineups allow only small degrees of visual
355:
Lineup members should have diverse characteristics so that lineups are not biased toward or against the suspect. If the appearance of a person stands out amongst the otherwise indistinctive crowd, then an eyewitness is more likely to select that person regardless of their own recollection of the
346:
presents a witness with a series of photos one at a time, requiring the participant to identify if each photo matches his/her memory before moving forward. The witness does not know how many photos are in the group. In a simultaneous lineup, the photos or suspects are viewed together. Sequential
733:
for child victims and witnesses. Compared to adult earwitness memory, the area of child earwitness memory has been largely neglected. In one of few studies comparing adult and child earwitnesses, Γ–hman, Eriksson & Granhag (2011) found that only children in the older age-group of 11–13 years
573:
The frequency of eidetic imagery is low in adults and shows greatest frequency in early child development. In fact, it is almost non-existent past the age of 7. When procedures are used to classify eidetic memory separate from the characteristic of afterimage and memory image, a small number of
524:
Children can be involved in testimony not only when they are witnesses, but also when they are victims. There have been several cases of children recovering false memories of childhood abuse. Children as especially suggestible and in cases of recovered memories, is hard to determine whether the
768:
In 1984, Jennifer Thompson-Cannino selected Ronald Cotton from both a photographic line-up and later a physical line-up as her rapist, leading to his conviction of rape and burglary and a sentence of life in prison plus fifty-four years. Ronald Cotton spent eleven years in prison due to faulty
682:
There is evidence to suggest that witnesses may find it harder to identify a perpetrator's voice if the perpetrator speaks the witness's native language with an accent compared to without one. It is thought that more cognitive effort is required to process a non-native speaker's voice. This is
205:
amnesia) can affect explicit memory for a particular event. Those with psychogenic amnesia present impaired memory functioning in their personal life histories without a discernable neurological cause. Most often cases of psychogenic amnesia occur after witnessing an extremely violent crime or
65:
of innocent individuals. A growing body of research now supports this speculation, indicating that mistaken eyewitness identification is responsible for more convictions of the innocent than all other factors combined. This may be due to the fact that details of unpleasant emotional events are
750:
individuals have an enhanced ability to hear and recall auditory information in order to compensate for a lack of vision. However, whilst blind adults' neural systems demonstrate heightened excitability and activity compared to sighted adults, it is still not exactly clear to what extent this
215:
recalled if stress levels at retrieval are congruent to stress levels at encoding. Mood congruency may affect a witnesses ability to recall a highly stressful crime, if conditions of encoding and retrieval are different. Moderate amounts of stress may be beneficial to memory by the release of
665:
has also been identified as a factor that can affect voice recognition performance. Individuals are likely to exaggerate their memory for pitch; upon hearing a high pitched voice in an initial presentation (such as the perpetrator's voice in a crime), individuals are likely to choose an even
394:
A witness identifying a suspect can make a decision with little or great confidence. Level of confidence varies between different witnesses and situations. There are two types of confidence: confidence in a witness' own ability to make an identification (prior to viewing a police lineup) and
409:
Certain factors affect identification accuracy without influencing confidence whereas other factors influence confidence without having an effect on identification accuracy. Reconstructive processes in memory (i.e. the influence of post-event information on stored memories) can influence
503:
Moreover, children often have a limited vocabulary, a desire to please the officer, or difficulty answering questions because of trauma. Using early childhood memories in eyewitness testimony can also be challenging because for the first 1–2 years of life, brain structures such as the
737:
Other research found that children aged 11 to 13 years old who were tested very shortly after exposure to a voice made more correct identifications compared with children who were tested after a time interval of two weeks. This was found not to be the case for adult witnesses.
687:
not. This appears the case with different accents, speech content and how long a listener is exposed to the speaker. One proposed explanation for why accents can negatively affect the recall of visual information and eyewitness memory draws from Wickens' (2002; 2008)
186:(PTSD); individuals diagnosed with PTSD can struggle to recall explicit events from their memory, usually those which are especially traumatic events. This may be due to the individual preferring not to think about the unpleasant memory, which they may rather forget. 444:
Distortions in a witness's memory can be induced by suggestive questioning procedures. Asking eyewitnesses to repeatedly retrieve information in multiple interviews may enhance memory because the event is being rehearsed many times or, as in many cases, increase
700:
accuracy. However, contrary to this prediction, research has found no significant differences between the accuracy of voice identification when the voice was heard directly or over a mobile phone, despite the sound quality seeming poorer in the latter.
270:
that can alter their account of events. It is of particular interest that the memory of an eyewitness can become compromised by other information, such that an individual's memory becomes biased. This can increase eyewitnesses sensitivity to the
315:
the eyewitness can fail to recognize that the culprit is present. Lastly, the eyewitness can incorrectly select another suspect. The ideal result is to correctly identify the offender, and the worst outcome is to mistakenly identify an innocent.
410:
identification accuracy while not necessarily affecting confidence. Social influence processes (i.e. committing to a decision) might have an effect on confidence judgements while having little to no effect on the accuracy of the identification.
125:
faces of the same race are encoded more deeply, leading a witness to have a more detailed memory for those faces; but there has not been much research to support this hypothesis. Research on the other race effect has mainly focused on the
154:
out of conscious awareness. An inability to access the repressed memory is argued to occur in cases involving child sexual abuse. Another way encoding a memory can be affected is when the person involved in a traumatic event experiences
474:. In some instances, objects from the crime scene such as guns or clothing can be used additionally to help reinstate the context. Such methods have successfully shown to improve reliability and accuracy of eyewitness recall. 612:
Examples include the ring of a doorbell, coughing, rain, a car engine, a railroad crossing signal, and so on. Such environmental sounds are important sources of information and provide us with knowledge of our surroundings.
516:
and is involved in memory storage, are not yet fully developed. Research has demonstrated that children can remember events from before the age of 3–4 years, but that these memories decline as children get older (see
5751:
Cohen, Leonardo G.; Celnik, Pablo; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro; Corwell, Brian; Faiz, Lala; Dambrosia, James; Honda, Manabu; Sadato, Norihiro; Gerloff, Christian; CatalaΒ΄, M. Dolores; Hallett, Mark (11 September 1997).
2063:
Eakin, D. K.; Schreiber, T. A.; Sergent-Marshall, S. (2003). "Misinformation effect in eyewitness memory: The presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility".
637:
in court should also be carefully considered as there is much evidence to suggest its fallibility. For example, some studies have found that eyewitness identification can be impaired by effects such as the
418:
The method of conducting an interview has great implication on the accuracy of the testimony. When the person being interviewed is forced to provide more information, he/she is more likely to engage in
1854:
Kerri L. Pickel (2007). "Remembering and Identifying Menacing Perpetrators: Exposure to Violence and the Weapon Focus Effect". In R.C.L. Lindsay; David F. Ross; J. Don Read; Michael P. Toglia (eds.).
190:, on the other hand, does not seem to be affected in the same way that explicit memory does, rather some individuals with PTSD may score higher on implicit memory tests than non-PTSD individuals. 670:. It is suggested that voice pitch, alongside other 'surface properties' of speech such as speech content, are instantaneously encoded into memory. This contrasts with auditory features such as 1286:
Brigham, J. C., Bennett, L. B., Meissner, C. A., & Mitchell, T. L. (2007). The Influence of Race on Eyewitness Memory. In R.C.L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),
2820:
Paterson, Helen M.; Richard I. Kemp; Jodie R. Ng (January–February 2011). "Combating Co-Witness Contamination: Attempting to Decrease the Negative Effects of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory".
2766:
Christian A. Meissner; Siegfried L. Sporer; Jonathon W. Schooler (2007). "Person Descriptions as Eyewitness Evidence". In R.C.L. Lindsay; David F. Ross; J. Don Read; Michael P. Toglia (eds.).
2320:
Shimane, Daisuke; Matsui, Hiroshi; Itoh, Yuji (2022-06-12). "False memory for faces is produced by the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm based on the morphological characteristics of a list".
525:
recovered memory is accurate or imagined. Due to the sensitivity of these cases, strategic interviewing is implemented for children, which may result in the validity of the memory to suffer.
1788:
Carlson, C; Young, D; Weatherford, D; Carlson, M; Bednarz, J; Jones, A (2016). "The influence of perpetrator exposure time and weapon presence/timing on eyewitness confidence and accuracy".
77:
cases had occurred due to inaccurate eyewitness testimony. It is important to inform the public about the flawed nature of eyewitness memory and the difficulties relating to its use in the
99:
People struggle to identify faces in person or from photos, a difficulty arising from the encoding of faces. When participants were given a basic memory test from an array of photos or a
54:
of the witnessed event which may adversely affect the creation and maintenance of the memory for the event. Experts have found evidence to suggest that eyewitness memory is fallible.
2739:
Smith, Johnathon E.; Robert J. Pleban; David R. Shaffer (February 1982). "Effects of Interrogator Bias and a Police Trait Questionnaire on the Accuracy of Eyewitness Identification".
2569:
Bailenson, J; Davies, A (2008). "The effects of witness viewpoint distance, angle, and choice on eyewitness accuracy in police lineups conducted in immersive virtual environments".
2464:
Roy S. Malpass; Colin G. Tredoux; Dawn McQuiston-Surrett (2007). "Lineup Construction and Lineup Fairness". In R.C.L. Lindsay; David F. Ross; J. Don Read; Michael P. Toglia (eds.).
436:
the witness to exhaust his/her memory by reinstating the context of the event, recalling the events in different orders, and viewing the event scene from different perspectives.
7329: 206:
trauma, such as war. This also goes for experiencing a crime, such as childhood sexual abuse. The dissociation after the event can lead to a higher chance of revictimisation.
42:. It can also refer to an individual's memory for a face, where they are required to remember the face of their perpetrator, for example. However, the accuracy of eyewitness 5317:
Bradley, Margaret M.; Codispoti, Maurizio; Cuthbert, Bruce N.; Lang, Peter J. (2001). "Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing".
66:
recalled poorly compared to neutral events. States of high emotional arousal, which occur during a stressful or traumatic event, lead to less efficient memory processing.
4119: 620:
of an environmental sound. However, a lot of research investigating environmental sound and memory recall is conducted in a laboratory setting and so has limited
5807:
Uhl, F.; Franzen, P.; Lindinger, G.; Lang, W.; Deecke, L. (April 1991). "On the functionality of the visually deprived occipital cortex in early blind persons".
2415: 2405:
Wells, G.L., and E. Seelau, "Eyewitness Identification: Psychological Research and Legal Policy on Lineups," Psychology, Public Policy and Law 1 (1995): 765–791.
1241:
Herzmann, G.; Willenbockel, V.; Tanaka, J. W.; Curran, T. (2011). "The neural correlates of memory encoding and recognition for own-race and other-race faces".
5973:
Thompson-Cannino, Jennifer, Ronald Cotton, and Erin Torneo. Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption. New York: St. Martin's, 2009. Print. pp 48.
5961:
Thompson-Cannino, Jennifer, Ronald Cotton, and Erin Torneo. Picking Cotton: Our Memoir of Injustice and Redemption. New York: St. Martin's, 2009. Print. pp 13.
3445:Γ–hman, Lisa; Eriksson, Anders; Granhag, PΓ€r Anders (16 September 2010). "Overhearing the Planning of A Crime: Do Adults Outperform Children As Earwitnesses?". 1070:
Bruce, V.; Henderson, Z.; Greenwood, K.; Hancock, P. J. B.; Burton, A. M.; Miller, P. (1999). "Verification of face identities from images captured on video".
2873:
Sporer, S; Penrod, S (1995). "Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: a meta-analysis of the confidence–accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies ".
2363:
Steblay, Nancy K.; Hannah L. Dietrich; Shannon L. Ryan; Jeanette L. Raczynski; Kali A. James (August 2011). "Sequential Lineup Laps and Eyewitness Accuracy".
5927:Γ–hman, Lisa; Eriksson, Anders; Granhag, PΓ€r Anders (April 2013). "Enhancing Adults' and Children's Earwitness Memory: Examining Three Types of Interviews". 3864:
Ternes, Marguerite; John C. Yuille (November 2008). "Eyewitness memory and eyewitness identification performance in adults with intellectual disabilities".
5274:
Ridout, Nathan; Astell, Arlene; Reid, Ian; Glen, Tom; O'Carroll, Ronan (January 2003). "Memory bias for emotional facial expressions in major depression".
1914:
Paterson, H; Kemp, R; Ng, J (2011). "Combating co-witness contamination: attempting to decrease the negative effects of discussion on eyewitness memory".
3748:
Goodman, G. S.; Schaaf, J. M. (1997). "Over a decade of research on children's eyewitness testimony: What have we learned? Where do we go from here?".
582:
Research investigating earwitness memory has only recently emerged from the shadow of the extensively investigated phenomena of eyewitness memory and
7267: 7037: 1973: 258:
reliable test of a memory is the initial test. Police procedures can reduce the effects of contamination on memory with proper testing protocols.
6588: 4337:
Yarmey, A. Daniel; Yarmey, A. Linda; Yarmey, Meagan J.; Parliament, Lisa (2001). "Commonsense beliefs and the identification of familiar voices".
103:, they struggled to accurately identify the images and had low recognition. This finding provides a starting point for estimating the accuracy of 1548: 3354:
Schooler, Jonathan W; Engstler-Schooler, Tonya Y (January 1990). "Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid".
7428: 4877:
Stern, Steven E.; Mullennix, John W.; Corneille, Olivier; Huart, Johanne (1 January 2007). "Distortions in the Memory of the Pitch of Speech".
4702:
Woocher, Fredric D. (May 1977). "Did Your Eyes Deceive You? Expert Psychological Testimony on the Unreliability of Eyewitness Identification".
245:
the main focus. Numerous interfering stimulus inputs may suppress the importance of the stimulus of focus, the accident. This can degrade the
2099:
Roediger, III J; Jacoby, D.; McDermott, K. B. (1996). "Misinformation effects in recall: creating false memories through repeated retrieval".
3775:
Ma, L.; Ganea, P. A. (2010). "Dealing with conflicting information: Young children's reliance on what they see versus what they are told".
2267:
Steblay, N; Dysart, J (2003). "Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison".
2935:
Leippe, MR (1980). "Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence".
7282: 6171: 5078:
Munro, MJ; Derwing, TM (1995). "Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech".
3975:
Haber, Lyn; Haber, Ralph Norman (1 January 1998). "Criteria for judging the admissibility of eyewitness testimony of long past events".
590:
for a crime or incriminatory information they have heard. Much of the research which has been conducted on earwitness memory focuses on
5255:
Ohman, Lisa (2010). "Mobile Phone Quality Vs. Direct Quality: How the Presentation Format Affects Earwitness Identification Accuracy".
4863: 3669: 3761: 3484: 1949: 6452: 4913: 4515: 1705:
Joseph, R (1998). "Traumatic amnesia, repression, and hippocampus injury due to emotional stress, corticosteroids, and enkephalins".
574:
children are classified as true eidetikers. These children are still suggestible; their eyewitness testimonies may still have error.
330: 3818:
Gordon, B. N.; Baker-Ward, L.; Ornstein, P. A. (2001). "Children's Testimony: A review on research of memory for past experiences".
4914:"When Memory Shifts Toward More Typical Category Exemplars: Accentuation Effects in the Recollection of Ethnically Ambiguous Faces" 1192: 1032: 832: 3734:
Pipe, M. E., Thierry, K. L., & Lamb, M. E. (2007). The development of event memory: Implications for child witness testimony.
2226: 7416: 5486: 5696:
RΓΆder, Brigitte; Teder-SΓ€lejΓ€rvi, Wolfgang; Sterr, Anette; RΓΆsler, Frank; Hillyard, Steven A.; Neville, Helen J. (8 July 1999).
1869:
Anderson, M. C.; Bjork, R. A.; Bjork, E. L. (1994). "Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory".
7205: 2416:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/everybody-is-stupid-except-you/201406/should-police-lineups-be-sequential-or-simultaneous
5911: 3896:"Individual and developmental differences in eyewitness recall and suggestibility in children with intellectual disabilities" 3049: 1772: 4135: 1620:
Pyszora, N. M.; Barker, A. F.; Kopelman, M. D. (2003). "Amnesia for criminal offenses: A study of life sentence prisoners".
275:. Individuals report what they believe to have witnessed at the time of the crime, even though this may be the result of a 7277: 7272: 7030: 2517:
5Malpass, R.S. & Devine, P.G. (1981). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender"
5519:
Campos, Laura; Alonso-Quecuty, MarΓ­a (January 2006). "Remembering a criminal conversation: Beyond eyewitness testimony".
5124:
Pickel, Kerri L.; Staller, Joshua B. (2011). "A perpetrator's accent impairs witnesses' memory for physical appearance".
4310:
Stevenage, Sarah V; Howland, Amy; Tippelt, Anna (January 2011). "Interference in eyewitness and earwitness recognition".
3119:"Two years later:Effect of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults" 926: 497: 3937: 6662: 5608: 4978: 4525: 4129: 1392: 586:, despite having been in use within the English justice system since the 1660s. Earwitness memory refers to a person's 5984: 5447: 4624:
Stevenage, Sarah V.; Neil, Greg J.; Barlow, Jess; Dyson, Amy; Eaton-Brown, Catherine; Parsons, Beth (29 August 2012).
1657:"Psychogenic amnesia for childhood sexual abuse and risk for sexual revictimisation in both adolescence and adulthood" 1480: 874: 536:
Studies on children show that the average child is at greater risk for memory loss, due to the brain's immaturity and
7354: 7308: 4847: 4157: 3895: 3684: 3398: 3180: 2782: 2195: 1816: 1375: 2531:
Wells, G. L.; Leippe, M. R.; Ostrom, T. M. (1979). "Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup".
793: 6047: 4994:
Goh, WD (January 2005). "Talker variability and recognition memory: instance-specific and voice-specific effects".
4625: 4231: 2696:
Chan, J. C. K.; Thomas, A. K.; Bulevich, J. B. (2009). "Recalling a witness increases eyewitness suggestibility".
875:""Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience" 729:
It is of critical importance that research into children's earwitness memory is also conducted in order to secure
7023: 5658: 5361: 3938:"Logic and Research Versus Intuition and Past Practice as Guides to Gathering and Evaluating Eyewitness Evidence" 3525:"Introduction to this Issue: Children's Eyewitness Memory and Testimony in Context: Children's eyewitness memory" 3118: 674:
and speaking rate, of which there is contrary evidence about whether they are automatically encoded into memory.
4468: 957: 645:. Nevertheless, voice recognition appears to be the pathway most significantly impaired by interfering factors. 7334: 6535: 2974: 2900:
Deffenbacher, K (1980). "Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship?".
2615: 1433:
McGaugh, J (2004). "The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences".
183: 3300: 2480: 2414:
Kornell, N. (2014). Should Police Lineups Be Sequential or Simultaneous? Psychology Today. Retrieved from <
249:
of the event, and diminish the representation of those memories. This is known as the cue-overload principle.
219:. Conversely, too much stress (and therefore an extreme influx of corticosteroids) can affect function of the 4432: 4276:
McAllister, Hunter A.; Dale, Robert H.I.; Bregman, Norman J.; McCabe, Allyssa; Cotton, C. Randy (June 1993).
164: 223:
and therefore hinder memory. Very high levels of corticosteroid release may be very detrimental for memory.
6583: 6484: 6371: 4158:"Criminal identification comparison: aural versus visual identifications resulting from a simulated crime" 2024:"How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics" 5753: 5697: 4542: 6709: 6634: 6467: 5360:
Putman, Peter; van Honk, Jack; Kessels, Roy P.C; Mulder, Martijn; Koppeschaar, Hans P.F (August 2004).
3656:
Fivush, R; Schwarzmueller A (1999). "Children remember childhood: implications for childhood amnesia".
324:
the eyewitness is aware that the perpetrator might not be in the lineup. Also, police should conduct a
7227: 4739:"The admissibility of expert testimony about cognitive science research on eyewitness identification" 4583: 708:
Researchers have also investigated to what extent the distinctiveness of a voice, such as heightened
549: 156: 104: 58: 5181: 3564:
Phelps, E (2004). "Human emotion and memory: Interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex".
2583: 2281: 1883: 1160: 7400: 7200: 7060: 6747: 6692: 6667: 6497: 6474: 6424: 6329: 457: 374: 4770:
Loftus, Elizabeth F.; Loftus, Geoffrey R.; Messo, Jane (1987). "Some facts about "weapon focus"".
1656: 7395: 7359: 7313: 7244: 6434: 6200: 7470: 7160: 7046: 6841: 6801: 6702: 6671: 6309: 6097: 5659:"Auditory memory in congenitally blind adults: a behavioral-electrophysiological investigation" 5176: 3181:"Retrieval-induced forgetting in eyewitness memory: forgetting as a consequence of remembering" 2578: 2276: 2136:"The effects of repeatedly recalling a traumatic event on eyewitness memory and suggestibility" 1878: 1193:"Class, race, and the face: Social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition" 1155: 5851:
Risto (January 1995). "Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination".
4195:
Clifford, Brian (1980). "Voice identification by human listeners: On earwitness reliability".
3721: 1367: 7385: 7239: 7085: 7080: 7075: 6856: 6571: 6457: 6429: 6414: 6409: 6247: 5894:
Ceci, Stephen J.; Toglia, Michael P.; Ross, David F., eds. (1987). "The Memory of Children".
5626:"Angry Voices from the Past and Present: Effects on Adults' and Children's Earwitness Memory" 5362:"Salivary cortisol and short and long-term memory for emotional faces in healthy young women" 4517:
Persistence and change: proceedings of the First International Conference on Event Perception
2362: 1563: 1542: 272: 5031:"Effects of stimulus variability on perception and representation of spoken words in memory" 3685:"Children Remember Early Childhood: Long-term recall across the offset of childhood amnesia" 2765: 2661:
Barnes, J. M.; Underwood, B.J. (1959). "Fate of first-list association in transfer theory".
794:"Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification" 7380: 7339: 7259: 7105: 6740: 6724: 6603: 6361: 6314: 6304: 6092: 6040: 5765: 5709: 4598: 4480: 4385: 4074: 4015: 3499: 3072:"The dark side of testing memory: Repeated retrieval can enhance eyewitness suggestibility" 1996: 1446: 1254: 1033:"Matching faces to photographs: Poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory)" 833:"Matching faces to photographs: Poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory)" 642: 583: 35: 5408: 8: 7475: 7095: 6871: 6771: 6462: 6346: 6294: 6262: 6242: 5167:
Wickens, Christopher D. (January 2002). "Multiple resources and performance prediction".
1355: 667: 621: 591: 432: 325: 198: 168: 62: 5769: 5713: 4602: 4484: 4389: 4078: 4019: 2000: 7422: 7287: 6968: 6953: 6791: 6736: 6729: 6697: 6598: 6593: 6545: 6523: 6492: 6319: 6012: 5944: 5876: 5832: 5789: 5733: 5579: 5544: 5389: 5342: 5299: 5237: 5194: 5149: 5103: 5055: 5030: 4951: 4787: 4719: 4653: 4496: 4408: 4373: 4212: 4100: 4038: 4003: 3957: 3915: 3843: 3800: 3633: 3608: 3589: 3462: 3379: 3336: 3235: 3200: 3099: 3010: 2994: 2952: 2917: 2802: 2721: 2643: 2596: 2548: 2500: 2388: 2345: 2302: 2246: 2171: 2116: 1967: 1836: 1730: 1684: 1637: 1599: 1500: 1458: 1326: 1301: 1266: 1220: 1173: 1123: 1098: 537: 343: 5674: 4672: 4278:"When Eyewitnesses Are Also Earwitnesses: Effects on Visual and Voice Identifications" 4277: 7303: 7232: 7217: 7188: 7150: 7125: 7120: 7070: 7065: 7004: 6992: 6963: 6811: 6682: 6657: 6613: 6540: 6518: 6419: 6356: 6324: 6299: 6267: 6252: 6162: 6070: 6004: 5948: 5907: 5868: 5864: 5824: 5820: 5781: 5725: 5678: 5604: 5583: 5536: 5467: 5428: 5381: 5334: 5291: 5229: 5153: 5141: 5095: 5060: 5011: 4974: 4943: 4894: 4828: 4791: 4645: 4564: 4521: 4500: 4413: 4354: 4253: 4216: 4177: 4125: 4092: 4043: 3961: 3877: 3835: 3792: 3788: 3715: 3638: 3581: 3546: 3466: 3371: 3367: 3328: 3320: 3281: 3239: 3091: 3045: 3002: 2806: 2713: 2709: 2678: 2635: 2504: 2380: 2349: 2337: 2294: 2250: 2193: 2163: 2155: 2081: 2045: 2004: 1896: 1768: 1722: 1688: 1676: 1641: 1603: 1591: 1583: 1534: 1450: 1415: 1371: 1358: 1331: 1317: 1258: 1212: 1191:
Shriver, E. R.; Young, S. G.; Hugenberg, K.; Bernstein, M. J.; Lanter, J. R. (2008).
1169: 1128: 1052: 977: 852: 813: 518: 117: 70: 47: 6016: 5880: 5409:"Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing" 5393: 5303: 5198: 5107: 4657: 4104: 3919: 3847: 3804: 3593: 3340: 3218:
Smith, S; Vela, E (1992). "Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition".
3204: 3014: 2921: 2647: 2552: 2463: 2306: 2175: 2120: 1734: 1504: 1462: 1224: 1177: 7390: 7344: 7195: 7183: 7155: 7090: 6943: 6896: 6866: 6821: 6677: 6608: 6561: 6366: 6341: 6227: 6187: 6075: 5996: 5936: 5899: 5860: 5836: 5816: 5793: 5773: 5737: 5717: 5670: 5637: 5571: 5528: 5498: 5459: 5420: 5377: 5373: 5346: 5326: 5283: 5241: 5221: 5186: 5133: 5087: 5050: 5042: 5003: 4955: 4933: 4925: 4886: 4859: 4818: 4779: 4750: 4711: 4684: 4637: 4606: 4554: 4488: 4447: 4403: 4393: 4346: 4319: 4289: 4243: 4204: 4169: 4082: 4033: 4023: 3984: 3949: 3907: 3873: 3827: 3784: 3757: 3696: 3665: 3628: 3620: 3609:"Accounting for change in declarative memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective" 3573: 3536: 3454: 3410: 3383: 3363: 3312: 3271: 3227: 3192: 3161: 3130: 3103: 3083: 3041:
Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview
2986: 2956: 2944: 2909: 2882: 2829: 2794: 2783:"Memory conformity: can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event?" 2748: 2725: 2705: 2670: 2627: 2588: 2540: 2492: 2441: 2392: 2372: 2329: 2286: 2238: 2207: 2147: 2108: 2073: 2035: 1923: 1888: 1840: 1828: 1797: 1714: 1668: 1629: 1575: 1530: 1492: 1442: 1407: 1321: 1313: 1250: 1204: 1165: 1118: 1110: 1099:"The fusiform face area: A cortical region specialized for the perception of faces" 1079: 1044: 1008: 997:"Perception of line-up suggestiveness: Effects of identification outcome knowledge" 969: 938: 886: 844: 805: 625: 530: 160: 151: 126: 78: 5548: 4688: 2752: 2616:"How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy" 2600: 2430:"Perception of Line-up Suggestiveness: Effects of Identification Oucome Knowledge" 2194:
Davis, Deborah; Elizabeth F. Loftus; Samuel Vanous; Michael Cucciare (July 2008).
2151: 1270: 1146:
Wells, G. L.; Hasel, L. E. (2007). "Facial composite production by eyewitnesses".
7465: 6881: 6861: 6836: 6826: 6781: 6776: 6530: 6502: 6237: 6220: 6215: 6210: 6205: 6080: 6033: 5940: 5903: 3039: 2848: 1672: 1633: 587: 471: 216: 187: 179: 121: 51: 39: 23: 5575: 4293: 2886: 1892: 1302:"Multiracial faces: How categorization affects memory at the boundaries of race" 973: 7212: 7175: 7145: 7140: 7130: 6948: 6912: 6806: 6404: 6351: 6177: 6147: 6127: 6114: 6000: 5463: 5091: 4929: 4890: 3988: 3577: 3134: 3071: 2333: 2077: 1411: 942: 890: 562: 446: 130: 5532: 5424: 5330: 5190: 5137: 5007: 4641: 4087: 4062: 3831: 3458: 2990: 2631: 2376: 2290: 1718: 1496: 1083: 7459: 6927: 6917: 6891: 6886: 6846: 6831: 6796: 6719: 6566: 6394: 6257: 6232: 6195: 6152: 6142: 6137: 6122: 5225: 4912:
Corneille, Olivier; Huart, Johanne; Becquart, Emilie; BrΓ©dart, Serge (2004).
4492: 4358: 3953: 3624: 3397:
Perfect, Timothy J.; Hunt, Laura J.; Harris, Christopher M. (December 2002).
3324: 2341: 2242: 2159: 1680: 1587: 1208: 809: 505: 420: 307: 100: 5502: 4398: 4028: 3316: 2975:"Interviewing Witnesses: The Effect of Forced Confabulation on Event Memory" 1817:"Beyond unusual? Examining the role of attention in the weapon focus effect" 7375: 7115: 6958: 6922: 6876: 6786: 6629: 6444: 6399: 6386: 6376: 6336: 6056: 5729: 5682: 5598: 5540: 5432: 5385: 5338: 5295: 5287: 5233: 5145: 5015: 4947: 4898: 4807:"The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition" 4649: 4568: 4417: 4257: 4096: 4047: 4004:"Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details" 3839: 3796: 3642: 3585: 3550: 3332: 3285: 3231: 3150:"The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory" 3095: 3006: 2717: 2682: 2639: 2384: 2298: 2167: 2135: 2112: 2085: 2049: 1595: 1454: 1335: 1262: 1216: 1132: 1114: 1056: 856: 638: 566:
memories are just as flawed as the memories of individuals who have normal
526: 276: 246: 232: 202: 46:
is sometimes questioned because there are many factors that can act during
5985:"Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification" 5872: 5828: 5785: 5471: 5099: 5064: 5029:
Nygaard, Lynne C.; Sommers, Mitchell S.; Pisoni, David B. (January 1995).
4864:
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199712)11:6<527::AID-ACP483>3.0.CO;2-B
4832: 4755: 4738: 4181: 3670:
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199810)12:5<455::AID-ACP534>3.0.CO;2-H
3375: 3149: 2592: 1900: 1726: 1579: 1419: 1359:"Children's Eyewitness Testimony: Memory development in the legal context" 981: 817: 7165: 7015: 6816: 6687: 6641: 6008: 5562:
HJELMQUIST, ERLAND; GIDLUND, Γ…KE (1985). "Free recall of conversations".
4805:
Dodson, Chad S.; Johnson, Marcia K.; Schooler, Jonathan W. (March 1997).
4671:
McAllister, Hunter A.; Dale, Robert H. I.; Keay, Cynthia E. (June 1993).
3762:
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199712)11:7<S5::AID-ACP545>3.0.CO;2-C
2008: 662: 509: 220: 135: 74: 5212:
Wickens, C. D. (1 June 2008). "Multiple Resources and Mental Workload".
3485:"What the little eye spied: The dos and don'ts of interviewing children" 2481:"Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups" 1356:
Jianjian Qin; Jodi A. Quas; Allison D. Redlich; Gail S. Goodman (1997).
7446: 7135: 7110: 7100: 6851: 6714: 6281: 5046: 4823: 4806: 4783: 4723: 4559: 4248: 4208: 3276: 3259: 2998: 2948: 2913: 2544: 2496: 2040: 2023: 5214:
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
4938: 4610: 4543:"Remembering environmental sounds: The role of verbalization at input" 4374:"Auditory recognition memory is inferior to visual recognition memory" 4173: 1103:
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
6087: 5642: 5625: 4323: 3911: 3700: 3541: 3524: 3165: 3087: 2833: 2738: 2674: 2211: 1927: 1832: 1801: 1048: 848: 747: 529:
must be assessed with sensitivity on an individual bases and without
267: 7441: 5407:
Bradley, MM; Codispoti, M; Cuthbert, BN; Lang, PJ (September 2001).
4715: 4350: 3414: 3260:"Environmental context-dependent memory: a review and meta-analysis" 3196: 2798: 2446: 2429: 1013: 996: 373:
Another phenomenon that may interfere with an eyewitness' memory is
7349: 6576: 5624:Γ–hman, Lisa; Eriksson, Anders; Granhag, PΓ€r Anders (January 2013). 4996:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
2196:"'Unconscious transference' can be an instance of change blindness" 2066:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
1871:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
1765:
Cognitive Psychology: Applying the Science of the Mind, 3rd Edition
688: 671: 617: 567: 513: 289: 147: 43: 5777: 5721: 4452: 2819: 81:
so that eyewitness accounts are not viewed as the absolute truth.
7249: 6289: 5487:"Earwitness identification: Some influences on voice recognition" 4232:"Identifying, rating, and remembering environmental sound events" 730: 709: 311: 31: 5849: 5754:"Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans" 1240: 6025: 5750: 5695: 5657:
RΓΆder, Brigitte; RΓΆsler, Frank; Neville, Helen J (April 2001).
2972: 4973:(Paperback ed., repr. ed.). Edinburgh: University Press. 4230:
Marcell, M; Malatanos, M; Leahy, C; Comeaux, C (August 2007).
3523:
Larson, Rakel P.; Goldfarb, Deborah; Goodman, Gail S. (2015).
2062: 1787: 1190: 1069: 4911: 4372:
Cohen, M. A.; Horowitz, T. S.; Wolfe, J. M. (23 March 2009).
2973:
Pezdek, Kathy; Kathryn Sperry; Shana Owens (1 October 2007).
906: 27: 5406: 5316: 4876: 4336: 4229: 3301:"Do I Know You? Processing Orientation and Face Recognition" 2468:. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 155–178. 2134:
Chan, Elisha; Paterson, Helen M.; van Golde, Celine (2019).
1858:. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 339–360. 1351: 1349: 1347: 1345: 5564:
Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse
5359: 5257:
The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
4275: 958:"Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: a critical review" 5630:
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
4433:"Person Recognition Is Easier from Faces than from Voices" 3606: 2434:
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
1521:
Pujol, M.; Kopelman, M. D. (2003). "Psychogenic Amnesia".
1001:
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
4626:"The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition" 3428: 3353: 2770:. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 3–34. 1950:"Eyewitness Memory Is a Lot More Reliable Than You Think" 1342: 606: 4623: 4584:"Auditory memory and evaluation of environmental sounds" 3974: 3893: 3866:
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
3817: 3440: 3438: 3070:
Chan, Jason C.K.; Jessica A. LaPaglia (22 August 2011).
2768:
The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Memory for People
2466:
The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Memory for People
1856:
The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Memory for People
1767:. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc. pp. 305–322. 1288:
The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Memory for People
5806: 4309: 3717:
Searching for Memory: The Brain, the Mind, and the past
3069: 2098: 1290:(pp. 257–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 741: 150:
of the memory. Traumatic events may cause memory to be
5983:
Wells, G. L.; Lindsay, R. C.; Ferguson, T. J. (1979).
5603:. Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg. 4582:
Kuwano, Sonoko; Namba, Seiichiro; Kato, Tohru (2008).
4514:
Warren Jr., William H.; Shaw, Robert E., eds. (1985).
3859: 3857: 3736:
Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
3655: 3116: 5600:
All Ears: Adults' and Children's Earwitness Testimony
4804: 3522: 3435: 3117:
Poole, Debra A.; Lawrence T. White (September 1993).
2427: 2133: 1619: 597: 543: 492:
witnesses to a crime in England and Wales in 2008/9.
5982: 5926: 5623: 5518: 5273: 5028: 4155: 3863: 3649: 3444: 2021: 1700: 1698: 431:
Researchers have developed a strategy, entitled the
5448:"Long-term auditory memory: speaker identification" 4848:"Earwitness testimony 2. Voices, faces and context" 4673:"Effects of Lineup Modality on Witness Credibility" 4469:"Interpreting the Language of Environmental Sounds" 4156:Hollien, H; Bennett, G; Gelfer, MP (January 1983). 3854: 2224: 1987:Loftus, E. (1979). "Malleability of human memory". 1481:"Implicit memory and posttraumatic stress symptoms" 631: 16:
Imperfect recall of a crime or other dramatic event
5698:"Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans" 5656: 4670: 4371: 3894:Henry, Lucy A.; Gisli H. Gudjonsson (April 2007). 3044:. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. p. 220. 2856:Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 2695: 1868: 1357: 94: 7330:Race in the United States criminal justice system 7268:List of wrongful convictions in the United States 5561: 4769: 4305: 4303: 4061:Inoue, Sana; Matsuzawa, Tetsuro (December 2007). 3935: 3682: 3600: 3396: 3148:Gilbert, Julian A. E.; Fisher, Ronald P. (2006). 2780: 2530: 2319: 1814: 1695: 1562:Brandt, Jason; Gorp, Wilfred G. Van (2006–2007). 1516: 1514: 787: 785: 174: 7457: 4591:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 4124:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 101–124. 3676: 3557: 2968: 2966: 2571:Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1762: 1478: 927:"Experiencing, remembering and reporting events" 426: 146:Stress or trauma during an event can affect the 4581: 4467:Ballas, J. A.; Howard, J. H. (1 January 1987). 4378:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 4008:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 3299:Macrae, C. Neil; Lewis, Helen L. (2002-03-01). 2660: 2568: 1853: 1815:Hope, Lorraine; Daniel Wright (November 2007). 1622:Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 1561: 724: 7429:List of death row inmates in the United States 5893: 5514: 5512: 5119: 5117: 4513: 4300: 4060: 2613: 2428:Ask, Karl; Par Anders Granhag (October 2010). 2262: 2260: 1913: 1511: 1096: 872: 782: 477: 7031: 6041: 5445: 5123: 4271: 4269: 4267: 3747: 3147: 2963: 2266: 2225:Brewer, Neil; Gary L. Wells (February 2011). 2022:Echterhoff, G.; Hirst, W.; Hussy, W. (2005). 1520: 1030: 830: 694: 5077: 4918:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4846:Cook, Susan; Wilding, John (December 1997). 4466: 3607:Richmond, Jenny; Nelson, Charles A. (2007). 3253: 3251: 3249: 2899: 2872: 2564: 2562: 1972:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 1479:Amir, N.; Leiner, A. S.; Bomyea, J. (2010). 1299: 955: 648: 7283:Overturned convictions in the United States 6172:The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two 5898:. New York: Springer US. pp. 178–208. 5509: 5491:Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5114: 4968: 4845: 4063:"Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees" 4001: 3820:Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 3399:"Verbal overshadowing in voice recognition" 3298: 3076:Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3028:Erlbaum Associates Publishers, xii, 703 pp. 2356: 2257: 2231:Current Directions in Psychological Science 1547:: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of May 2024 ( 1236: 1234: 1148:Current Directions in Psychological Science 1072:Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1037:Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 837:Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 831:Megreya, Ahmed M.; Burton, A. Mike (2008). 452: 380: 368: 282: 7045: 7038: 7024: 6048: 6034: 5485:Read, Daniel; Craik, Fergus I. M. (1995). 4264: 3936:Turtle, J.; Want, S. C. (1 October 2008). 3478: 3476: 2846: 2781:Gabbert, F.; Memon, A.; Allan, K. (2003). 2459: 2457: 1615: 1613: 1282: 1280: 1197:Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1145: 994: 924: 907:Scheck, B.; Neufeld, P.; Dwyer, J (2000). 57:It has long been speculated that mistaken 5641: 5484: 5180: 5054: 4937: 4822: 4754: 4558: 4451: 4407: 4397: 4247: 4086: 4037: 4027: 3931: 3929: 3632: 3540: 3447:Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 3275: 3257: 3246: 3217: 3211: 2732: 2582: 2559: 2478: 2445: 2280: 2039: 1882: 1362:. In Nelson Cowan; Charles Hulme (eds.). 1325: 1159: 1122: 1026: 1024: 1012: 209: 182:(used in legal testimony) is affected by 5446:Saslove, H; Yarmey, AD (February 1980). 5169:Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 4540: 4520:. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. 4194: 3889: 3887: 3713: 2813: 2759: 2189: 2187: 2185: 1231: 318: 261: 7417:Capital punishment in the United States 5211: 5166: 4701: 4430: 3774: 3482: 3473: 3178: 3065: 3063: 3061: 2454: 1980: 1758: 1756: 1754: 1752: 1750: 1748: 1746: 1744: 1610: 1474: 1472: 1432: 1277: 464: 331:Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm 7458: 5969: 5967: 4117: 3926: 3811: 3563: 3037: 3031: 2934: 2928: 2866: 2218: 1986: 1847: 1707:Child Psychiatry and Human Development 1704: 1447:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144157 1390: 1364:The Development of Memory in Childhood 1255:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.019 1031:Megreya, A. M.; Burton, A. M. (2008). 1021: 791: 677: 607:Non-verbal memory: environmental sound 193: 7019: 6029: 5596: 5254: 4736: 3995: 3884: 3492:Royal Canadian Mounted Police Gazette 3110: 2479:Luus, C. A. E.; Wells, G. L. (1991). 2182: 1943: 1941: 1939: 1937: 1654: 873:Wells, G.L.; Bradfield, A.L. (1998). 7278:List of miscarriage of justice cases 7273:List of exonerated death row inmates 3058: 1808: 1741: 1564:"Functional ("Psychogenic") Amnesia" 1469: 920: 918: 902: 900: 868: 866: 742:Auditory memory in blind individuals 577: 561:Individuals who are said to possess 141: 111: 5964: 4993: 4282:Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2421: 1393:"The reality of repressed memories" 89: 13: 3977:Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 3720:. New York: Basic Books. pp.  2663:Journal of Experimental Psychology 1947: 1934: 1763:Robinson-Riegler, Bridget (2012). 931:Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 598:Eyewitness vs. earwitness accuracy 544:Intellectual ability and testimony 486: 337: 252: 14: 7487: 7355:Ineffective assistance of counsel 7309:National Registry of Exonerations 6453:Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm 3529:Behavioral Sciences & the Law 3429:"Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)" 3264:Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1366:. UK: Psychology Press. pp.  1097:Kanwisher, N.; Yovel, G. (2006). 915: 897: 863: 657: 556: 439: 350: 7440: 6998: 6986: 6055: 5976: 5955: 5920: 5887: 5843: 5800: 5744: 5689: 5650: 5617: 5590: 5555: 5478: 5439: 5400: 5353: 5310: 5267: 5248: 5205: 5160: 5071: 5022: 4987: 4962: 4905: 4870: 4839: 4798: 4763: 4730: 4695: 4677:The Journal of Social Psychology 4664: 4617: 4575: 4534: 4507: 4460: 4424: 3878:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00425.x 3789:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00878.x 3683:Clevelend, E.; Reese, E (2008). 2741:The Journal of Social Psychology 2710:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02245.x 1535:10.1046/j.1474-7766.2003.05159.x 1318:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01588.x 1170:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00465.x 925:Haber, R. N.; Haber, L. (2000). 632:Verbal memory: voice recognition 4365: 4330: 4223: 4188: 4149: 4111: 4054: 3968: 3768: 3741: 3728: 3707: 3566:Current Opinion in Neurobiology 3516: 3421: 3390: 3347: 3292: 3172: 3141: 3021: 2893: 2840: 2774: 2689: 2654: 2614:Lindsay, R; Semmler, C (2008). 2607: 2524: 2511: 2472: 2408: 2399: 2313: 2127: 2092: 2056: 2015: 1907: 1862: 1781: 1648: 1555: 1426: 1384: 1300:Pauker, K.; Ambady, N. (2009). 1293: 1184: 1139: 1090: 995:Ask, K.; Granhag, P.A. (2010). 239: 226: 95:Challenges of identifying faces 73:determined that 75% of the 239 6663:Atkinson–Shiffrin memory model 6536:Memory and social interactions 5929:Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 5378:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2003.09.001 5035:Perception & Psychophysics 2101:Journal of Memory and Language 1485:Cognitive Therapy and Research 1063: 988: 949: 824: 754: 184:post traumatic stress disorder 175:Post traumatic stress disorder 1: 5989:Journal of Applied Psychology 5675:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00002-7 5452:Journal of Applied Psychology 4971:Elements of general phonetics 4737:Stein, E. (1 December 2003). 4689:10.1080/00224545.1993.9712155 3942:Criminal Justice and Behavior 2849:"Memory formation and belief" 2753:10.1080/00224545.1982.9924392 2519:Journal of Applied Psychology 2152:10.1080/09658211.2018.1533563 1435:Annual Review of Neuroscience 1391:Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1993). 911:. New York, NY: Random House. 879:Journal of Applied Psychology 798:Journal of Applied Psychology 776: 715: 498:eyewitness memory of children 427:Cognitive interview technique 413: 389: 359: 165:posttraumatic stress disorder 6372:Retrieval-induced forgetting 5941:10.1080/13218719.2012.658205 5904:10.1007/978-1-4684-6338-5_10 5896:Children's Eyewitness Memory 5865:10.1016/0304-3940(94)11135-6 5821:10.1016/0304-3940(91)90107-5 4852:Applied Cognitive Psychology 4339:Applied Cognitive Psychology 4312:Applied Cognitive Psychology 4162:Journal of Forensic Sciences 4002:Brady, T; Konkle, T (2008). 3900:Applied Cognitive Psychology 3750:Applied Cognitive Psychology 3689:Applied Cognitive Psychology 3658:Applied Cognitive Psychology 3403:Applied Cognitive Psychology 3368:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90003-M 3220:Applied Cognitive Psychology 3185:Applied Cognitive Psychology 3154:Applied Cognitive Psychology 2822:Applied Cognitive Psychology 2787:Applied Cognitive Psychology 2200:Applied Cognitive Psychology 1948:Mickes, John Wixted, Laura. 1916:Applied Cognitive Psychology 1821:Applied Cognitive Psychology 1790:Applied Cognitive Psychology 1673:10.1080/14681811.2011.615619 1634:10.1080/14789940310001599785 956:Christianson, S.-Γ…. (1992). 725:Children's earwitness memory 296: 266:Witnesses can be subject to 105:eyewitnesses' identification 38:is often relied upon in the 7: 7335:Innocent prisoner's dilemma 5576:10.1515/text.1.1985.5.3.169 4969:Abercrombie, David (1982). 4431:Barsics, Catherine (2014). 4294:10.1207/s15324834basp1402_3 2887:10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.315 2847:Ofengenden, Tzofit (2014). 2227:"Eyewitness identification" 1893:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063 1655:Wager, Nadia (2011-11-04). 974:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.284 746:It has been suggested that 478:Verbal overshadowing effect 84: 10: 7492: 6710:Levels of Processing model 6635:World Memory Championships 6468:Lost in the mall technique 6315:dissociative (psychogenic) 6001:10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.440 5464:10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.111 5092:10.1177/002383099503800305 4930:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.236 4891:10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.148 4541:Bartlett, JC (July 1977). 4121:Adult Eyewitness Testimony 4118:Yarmey, A. Daniel (1994). 3989:10.1037/1076-8971.4.4.1135 3578:10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.015 3498:(1): 20–21. Archived from 3258:Smith, S; Vela, E (2001). 3135:10.1037/0012-1649.29.5.844 2334:10.1007/s12144-020-00830-0 2078:10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.813 1412:10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.518 943:10.1037/1076-8971.6.4.1057 891:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360 763: 703: 695:Direct hearing vs. devices 301: 61:plays a major role in the 7437: 7409: 7368: 7322: 7296: 7258: 7228:Eyewitness identification 7174: 7053: 6981: 6936: 6905: 6764: 6757: 6650: 6622: 6554: 6511: 6483: 6443: 6385: 6280: 6186: 6161: 6113: 6106: 6063: 5533:10.1080/09658210444000476 5425:10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276 5331:10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276 5191:10.1080/14639220210123806 5138:10.1007/s10979-011-9263-7 5008:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.40 4743:Law, Probability and Risk 4642:10.1007/s00426-012-0450-z 4236:Behavior Research Methods 4088:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.027 3714:Schacter, Daniel (1996). 3459:10.1007/s11896-010-9076-5 3038:Fisher, Ronald P (1992). 2991:10.1007/s10979-006-9081-5 2632:10.1007/s10979-008-9128-x 2377:10.1007/s10979-010-9236-2 1497:10.1007/s10608-008-9211-0 1084:10.1037/1076-898x.5.4.339 649:Face overshadowing effect 550:intellectual disabilities 59:eyewitness identification 7401:Innocence Protection Act 7061:Prosecutorial misconduct 6748:The Seven Sins of Memory 6693:Intermediate-term memory 6498:Indirect tests of memory 6475:Recovered-memory therapy 6425:Misattribution of memory 5663:Cognitive Brain Research 5366:Psychoneuroendocrinology 5226:10.1518/001872008X288394 4679:(Submitted manuscript). 4493:10.1177/0013916587191005 4473:Environment and Behavior 4284:(Submitted manuscript). 3954:10.1177/0093854808321879 3625:10.1016/j.dr.2007.04.002 3483:Pozzulo, Joanna (2007). 3123:Developmental Psychology 2243:10.1177/0963721410389169 1306:Journal of Social Issues 1209:10.1177/0146167207310455 810:10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.9 689:multiple resource theory 458:Contextual reinstatement 453:Contextual reinstatement 381:Co-witness contamination 375:retroactive interference 369:Retroactive interference 283:Unconscious transference 7396:Equal Protection Clause 7314:Investigating Innocence 7245:Tampering with evidence 6435:Source-monitoring error 5503:10.1037/1076-898X.1.1.6 4879:Experimental Psychology 4399:10.1073/pnas.0811884106 4029:10.1073/pnas.0803390105 3832:10.1023/A:1011333231621 3317:10.1111/1467-9280.00436 2291:10.1023/a:1012888715007 1719:10.1023/A:1025092117657 79:criminal justice system 7161:Spoliation of evidence 7047:Miscarriage of justice 6842:George Armitage Miller 6802:Patricia Goldman-Rakic 5288:10.1080/02699930302272 5126:Law and Human Behavior 4811:Memory & Cognition 4772:Law and Human Behavior 4630:Psychological Research 4547:Memory & Cognition 4197:Law and Human Behavior 3232:10.1002/acp.2350060204 2979:Law and Human Behavior 2937:Law and Human Behavior 2902:Law and Human Behavior 2875:Psychological Bulletin 2620:Law and Human Behavior 2533:Law and Human Behavior 2485:Law and Human Behavior 2365:Law and Human Behavior 2269:Law and Human Behavior 2140:Memory (Hove, England) 2113:10.1006/jmla.1996.0017 2028:Memory & Cognition 1537:(inactive 2024-05-24). 1115:10.1098/rstb.2006.1934 962:Psychological Bulletin 792:Loftus, E. F. (1980). 527:Strategic interviewing 210:Mood-congruency effect 7386:Right to a fair trial 7240:Misinformation effect 7086:Selective enforcement 7081:Malicious prosecution 7076:Selective prosecution 7005:Philosophy portal 6993:Psychology portal 6857:Henry L. Roediger III 6458:False memory syndrome 6430:Misinformation effect 6410:Imagination inflation 5276:Cognition and Emotion 4345:(3). Wiley: 283–299. 3777:Developmental Science 3305:Psychological Science 2698:Psychological Science 2593:10.1162/pres.17.3.242 1580:10.1055/s-2006-945519 1568:Seminars in Neurology 1400:American Psychologist 319:Police role in lineup 273:misinformation effect 262:Misinformation effect 7381:Exculpatory evidence 7360:Prosecutor's fallacy 7340:Blue wall of silence 7323:Contributing factors 7260:Wrongful convictions 6362:Motivated forgetting 5853:Neuroscience Letters 5809:Neuroscience Letters 5597:Ohman, Lisa (2013). 4440:Psychologica Belgica 3613:Developmental Review 3356:Cognitive Psychology 643:verbal overshadowing 584:eyewitness testimony 465:Experimental context 36:Eyewitness testimony 7106:Abuse of discretion 7096:Attorney misconduct 7054:Types of misconduct 6872:Arthur P. Shimamura 6772:Richard C. Atkinson 6589:Effects of exercise 6463:Memory implantation 6347:Interference theory 6263:Selective retention 6243:Meaningful learning 5770:1997Natur.389..180C 5714:1999Natur.400..162R 5080:Language and Speech 4756:10.1093/lpr/2.4.295 4704:Stanford Law Review 4603:2008ASAJ..123.3159K 4485:1987EnvBe..19...91B 4390:2009PNAS..106.6008C 4079:2007CBio...17R1004I 4073:(23): R1004–R1005. 4020:2008PNAS..10514325B 4014:(38): 14325–14329. 3179:MacLeod, M (2002). 2001:1979AmSci..67..312L 1954:Scientific American 1523:Practical Neurology 1109:(1476): 2109–2128. 678:Other-accent effect 668:accentuation effect 622:ecological validity 592:speaker recognition 433:cognitive interview 310:is a method for an 199:Psychogenic amnesia 194:Psychogenic amnesia 169:psychogenic amnesia 63:wrongful conviction 7423:Batson v. Kentucky 7369:Norms and remedies 7288:Wrongful execution 7206:Child sexual abuse 6969:Andriy Slyusarchuk 6792:Hermann Ebbinghaus 6698:Involuntary memory 6599:Memory improvement 6584:Effects of alcohol 6546:Transactive memory 6524:Politics of memory 6493:Exceptional memory 5047:10.3758/BF03205458 4824:10.3758/BF03201107 4784:10.1007/BF01044839 4560:10.3758/bf03197379 4249:10.3758/bf03193026 4209:10.1007/bf01040628 3277:10.3758/bf03196157 2949:10.1007/bf01040618 2914:10.1007/bf01040617 2545:10.1007/bf01039807 2497:10.1007/bf01044829 2322:Current Psychology 2041:10.3758/BF03193073 1989:American Scientist 568:mnemonic abilities 508:, which holds the 268:memory distortions 7453: 7452: 7304:Innocence Project 7233:Cross-race effect 7223:Eyewitness memory 7218:Mistaken identity 7189:Forced confession 7151:Witness tampering 7126:Legal malpractice 7121:Gaming the system 7071:Police corruption 7066:Police misconduct 7013: 7012: 6977: 6976: 6964:Cosmos Rossellius 6812:Marcia K. Johnson 6683:Exosomatic memory 6668:Context-dependent 6658:Absent-mindedness 6541:Memory conformity 6519:Collective memory 6420:Memory conformity 6357:Memory inhibition 6276: 6275: 6268:Tip of the tongue 5913:978-1-4684-6338-5 5764:(6647): 180–183. 5708:(6740): 162–166. 4611:10.1121/1.2933198 4384:(14): 6008–6010. 4174:10.1520/JFS12253J 3948:(10): 1241–1256. 3051:978-0-398-06121-0 1774:978-0-205-03364-5 1249:(11): 3103–3115. 578:Earwitness memory 548:Individuals with 531:leading questions 519:childhood amnesia 344:sequential lineup 142:Stress and trauma 118:other-race effect 112:Other-race effect 71:Innocence Project 20:Eyewitness memory 7483: 7445: 7444: 7410:Related concepts 7391:Actual innocence 7345:Racial profiling 7196:False accusation 7184:False confession 7156:Brady disclosure 7091:Abuse of process 7040: 7033: 7026: 7017: 7016: 7003: 7002: 7001: 6991: 6990: 6989: 6944:Jonathan Hancock 6897:Robert Stickgold 6867:Richard Shiffrin 6822:Elizabeth Loftus 6762: 6761: 6678:Childhood memory 6485:Research methods 6367:Repressed memory 6342:Forgetting curve 6330:transient global 6201:Autobiographical 6111: 6110: 6050: 6043: 6036: 6027: 6026: 6021: 6020: 5980: 5974: 5971: 5962: 5959: 5953: 5952: 5924: 5918: 5917: 5891: 5885: 5884: 5859:(1–2): 143–146. 5847: 5841: 5840: 5804: 5798: 5797: 5748: 5742: 5741: 5693: 5687: 5686: 5654: 5648: 5647: 5645: 5643:10.1002/jip.1381 5621: 5615: 5614: 5594: 5588: 5587: 5559: 5553: 5552: 5516: 5507: 5506: 5482: 5476: 5475: 5443: 5437: 5436: 5404: 5398: 5397: 5357: 5351: 5350: 5314: 5308: 5307: 5271: 5265: 5264: 5252: 5246: 5245: 5209: 5203: 5202: 5184: 5164: 5158: 5157: 5121: 5112: 5111: 5075: 5069: 5068: 5058: 5026: 5020: 5019: 4991: 4985: 4984: 4966: 4960: 4959: 4941: 4909: 4903: 4902: 4874: 4868: 4867: 4843: 4837: 4836: 4826: 4802: 4796: 4795: 4767: 4761: 4760: 4758: 4734: 4728: 4727: 4699: 4693: 4692: 4668: 4662: 4661: 4621: 4615: 4614: 4588: 4579: 4573: 4572: 4562: 4538: 4532: 4531: 4511: 4505: 4504: 4464: 4458: 4457: 4455: 4437: 4428: 4422: 4421: 4411: 4401: 4369: 4363: 4362: 4334: 4328: 4327: 4324:10.1002/acp.1649 4307: 4298: 4297: 4273: 4262: 4261: 4251: 4227: 4221: 4220: 4192: 4186: 4185: 4153: 4147: 4146: 4144: 4143: 4134:. Archived from 4115: 4109: 4108: 4090: 4058: 4052: 4051: 4041: 4031: 3999: 3993: 3992: 3983:(4): 1135–1159. 3972: 3966: 3965: 3933: 3924: 3923: 3912:10.1002/acp.1280 3891: 3882: 3881: 3861: 3852: 3851: 3815: 3809: 3808: 3772: 3766: 3765: 3745: 3739: 3732: 3726: 3725: 3711: 3705: 3704: 3701:10.1002/acp.1359 3680: 3674: 3673: 3653: 3647: 3646: 3636: 3604: 3598: 3597: 3561: 3555: 3554: 3544: 3542:10.1002/bsl.2196 3520: 3514: 3513: 3511: 3510: 3504: 3489: 3480: 3471: 3470: 3442: 3433: 3432: 3425: 3419: 3418: 3394: 3388: 3387: 3351: 3345: 3344: 3296: 3290: 3289: 3279: 3255: 3244: 3243: 3215: 3209: 3208: 3176: 3170: 3169: 3166:10.1002/acp.1232 3145: 3139: 3138: 3114: 3108: 3107: 3088:10.1037/a0025147 3067: 3056: 3055: 3035: 3029: 3025: 3019: 3018: 2970: 2961: 2960: 2932: 2926: 2925: 2897: 2891: 2890: 2870: 2864: 2863: 2853: 2844: 2838: 2837: 2834:10.1002/acp.1640 2817: 2811: 2810: 2778: 2772: 2771: 2763: 2757: 2756: 2736: 2730: 2729: 2693: 2687: 2686: 2675:10.1037/h0047507 2658: 2652: 2651: 2611: 2605: 2604: 2586: 2566: 2557: 2556: 2528: 2522: 2521:66 (4), 482–489. 2515: 2509: 2508: 2476: 2470: 2469: 2461: 2452: 2451: 2449: 2425: 2419: 2412: 2406: 2403: 2397: 2396: 2360: 2354: 2353: 2328:(5): 3247–3257. 2317: 2311: 2310: 2284: 2264: 2255: 2254: 2222: 2216: 2215: 2212:10.1002/acp.1395 2191: 2180: 2179: 2131: 2125: 2124: 2096: 2090: 2089: 2060: 2054: 2053: 2043: 2019: 2013: 2012: 1984: 1978: 1977: 1971: 1963: 1961: 1960: 1945: 1932: 1931: 1928:10.1002/acp.1640 1911: 1905: 1904: 1886: 1877:(5): 1063–1087. 1866: 1860: 1859: 1851: 1845: 1844: 1833:10.1002/acp.1307 1812: 1806: 1805: 1802:10.1002/acp.3275 1785: 1779: 1778: 1760: 1739: 1738: 1702: 1693: 1692: 1652: 1646: 1645: 1617: 1608: 1607: 1559: 1553: 1552: 1546: 1538: 1518: 1509: 1508: 1476: 1467: 1466: 1430: 1424: 1423: 1397: 1388: 1382: 1381: 1361: 1353: 1340: 1339: 1329: 1297: 1291: 1284: 1275: 1274: 1243:Neuropsychologia 1238: 1229: 1228: 1188: 1182: 1181: 1163: 1143: 1137: 1136: 1126: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1067: 1061: 1060: 1049:10.1037/a0013464 1028: 1019: 1018: 1016: 992: 986: 985: 953: 947: 946: 937:(4): 1057–1097. 922: 913: 912: 909:Actual Innocence 904: 895: 894: 870: 861: 860: 849:10.1037/a0013464 828: 822: 821: 789: 626:generalizability 563:eidetic memories 496:associated with 472:mnemonic devices 161:memory retrieval 127:African American 90:During the event 34:dramatic event. 7491: 7490: 7486: 7485: 7484: 7482: 7481: 7480: 7456: 7455: 7454: 7449: 7439: 7433: 7405: 7364: 7318: 7292: 7254: 7170: 7049: 7044: 7014: 7009: 6999: 6997: 6987: 6985: 6973: 6954:Dominic O'Brien 6932: 6901: 6882:Susumu Tonegawa 6862:Daniel Schacter 6837:Eleanor Maguire 6827:Geoffrey Loftus 6782:Stephen J. Ceci 6777:Robert A. Bjork 6753: 6672:state-dependent 6646: 6618: 6550: 6531:Cultural memory 6507: 6503:Memory disorder 6479: 6439: 6381: 6272: 6182: 6157: 6102: 6059: 6054: 6024: 5981: 5977: 5972: 5965: 5960: 5956: 5925: 5921: 5914: 5892: 5888: 5848: 5844: 5805: 5801: 5749: 5745: 5694: 5690: 5655: 5651: 5622: 5618: 5611: 5595: 5591: 5560: 5556: 5517: 5510: 5483: 5479: 5444: 5440: 5405: 5401: 5358: 5354: 5315: 5311: 5272: 5268: 5253: 5249: 5210: 5206: 5182:10.1.1.602.5010 5165: 5161: 5122: 5115: 5076: 5072: 5041:(7): 989–1001. 5027: 5023: 4992: 4988: 4981: 4967: 4963: 4910: 4906: 4875: 4871: 4844: 4840: 4803: 4799: 4768: 4764: 4735: 4731: 4716:10.2307/1228141 4710:(5): 969–1030. 4700: 4696: 4669: 4665: 4622: 4618: 4586: 4580: 4576: 4539: 4535: 4528: 4512: 4508: 4465: 4461: 4435: 4429: 4425: 4370: 4366: 4351:10.1002/acp.702 4335: 4331: 4308: 4301: 4274: 4265: 4228: 4224: 4193: 4189: 4154: 4150: 4141: 4139: 4132: 4116: 4112: 4067:Current Biology 4059: 4055: 4000: 3996: 3973: 3969: 3934: 3927: 3892: 3885: 3862: 3855: 3816: 3812: 3773: 3769: 3746: 3742: 3733: 3729: 3712: 3708: 3681: 3677: 3654: 3650: 3605: 3601: 3562: 3558: 3521: 3517: 3508: 3506: 3502: 3487: 3481: 3474: 3443: 3436: 3427: 3426: 3422: 3415:10.1002/acp.920 3395: 3391: 3352: 3348: 3297: 3293: 3256: 3247: 3216: 3212: 3197:10.1002/acp.782 3177: 3173: 3146: 3142: 3115: 3111: 3068: 3059: 3052: 3036: 3032: 3026: 3022: 2971: 2964: 2933: 2929: 2898: 2894: 2871: 2867: 2851: 2845: 2841: 2818: 2814: 2799:10.1002/acp.885 2779: 2775: 2764: 2760: 2737: 2733: 2694: 2690: 2659: 2655: 2612: 2608: 2584:10.1.1.363.7583 2567: 2560: 2529: 2525: 2516: 2512: 2477: 2473: 2462: 2455: 2447:10.1002/jip.123 2426: 2422: 2413: 2409: 2404: 2400: 2361: 2357: 2318: 2314: 2282:10.1.1.110.8546 2265: 2258: 2223: 2219: 2192: 2183: 2132: 2128: 2097: 2093: 2061: 2057: 2020: 2016: 1985: 1981: 1965: 1964: 1958: 1956: 1946: 1935: 1912: 1908: 1884:10.1.1.119.3933 1867: 1863: 1852: 1848: 1813: 1809: 1786: 1782: 1775: 1761: 1742: 1703: 1696: 1653: 1649: 1618: 1611: 1560: 1556: 1540: 1539: 1519: 1512: 1477: 1470: 1431: 1427: 1395: 1389: 1385: 1378: 1354: 1343: 1298: 1294: 1285: 1278: 1239: 1232: 1189: 1185: 1161:10.1.1.585.8279 1144: 1140: 1095: 1091: 1068: 1064: 1029: 1022: 1014:10.1002/jip.123 993: 989: 954: 950: 923: 916: 905: 898: 871: 864: 829: 825: 790: 783: 779: 766: 757: 744: 727: 718: 706: 697: 680: 660: 651: 634: 609: 600: 588:auditory memory 580: 559: 546: 489: 487:Child testimony 480: 467: 455: 442: 429: 416: 392: 383: 371: 362: 353: 340: 338:Style of lineup 321: 304: 299: 285: 264: 255: 253:After the event 242: 229: 217:corticosteroids 212: 196: 188:Implicit memory 180:Explicit memory 177: 167:(PTSD) or even 144: 122:socio-cognitive 114: 97: 92: 87: 75:DNA exoneration 40:judicial system 24:episodic memory 17: 12: 11: 5: 7489: 7479: 7478: 7473: 7468: 7451: 7450: 7447:Law portal 7438: 7435: 7434: 7432: 7431: 7426: 7419: 7413: 7411: 7407: 7406: 7404: 7403: 7398: 7393: 7388: 7383: 7378: 7372: 7370: 7366: 7365: 7363: 7362: 7357: 7352: 7347: 7342: 7337: 7332: 7326: 7324: 7320: 7319: 7317: 7316: 7311: 7306: 7300: 7298: 7294: 7293: 7291: 7290: 7285: 7280: 7275: 7270: 7264: 7262: 7256: 7255: 7253: 7252: 7247: 7242: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7225: 7220: 7215: 7213:Police perjury 7210: 7209: 7208: 7203: 7193: 7192: 7191: 7180: 7178: 7176:False evidence 7172: 7171: 7169: 7168: 7163: 7158: 7153: 7148: 7146:Jury tampering 7143: 7141:Sharp practice 7138: 7133: 7131:Kangaroo court 7128: 7123: 7118: 7113: 7108: 7103: 7098: 7093: 7088: 7083: 7078: 7073: 7068: 7063: 7057: 7055: 7051: 7050: 7043: 7042: 7035: 7028: 7020: 7011: 7010: 7008: 7007: 6995: 6982: 6979: 6978: 6975: 6974: 6972: 6971: 6966: 6961: 6956: 6951: 6949:Paul R. McHugh 6946: 6940: 6938: 6934: 6933: 6931: 6930: 6925: 6920: 6915: 6909: 6907: 6903: 6902: 6900: 6899: 6894: 6889: 6884: 6879: 6874: 6869: 6864: 6859: 6854: 6849: 6844: 6839: 6834: 6829: 6824: 6819: 6814: 6809: 6807:Ivan Izquierdo 6804: 6799: 6794: 6789: 6784: 6779: 6774: 6768: 6766: 6759: 6755: 6754: 6752: 6751: 6744: 6734: 6733: 6732: 6722: 6717: 6712: 6707: 6706: 6705: 6695: 6690: 6685: 6680: 6675: 6665: 6660: 6654: 6652: 6648: 6647: 6645: 6644: 6639: 6638: 6637: 6626: 6624: 6620: 6619: 6617: 6616: 6611: 6606: 6601: 6596: 6591: 6586: 6581: 6580: 6579: 6574: 6564: 6558: 6556: 6552: 6551: 6549: 6548: 6543: 6538: 6533: 6528: 6527: 6526: 6515: 6513: 6509: 6508: 6506: 6505: 6500: 6495: 6489: 6487: 6481: 6480: 6478: 6477: 6472: 6471: 6470: 6460: 6455: 6449: 6447: 6441: 6440: 6438: 6437: 6432: 6427: 6422: 6417: 6412: 6407: 6405:Hindsight bias 6402: 6397: 6391: 6389: 6383: 6382: 6380: 6379: 6374: 6369: 6364: 6359: 6354: 6352:Memory erasure 6349: 6344: 6339: 6334: 6333: 6332: 6327: 6322: 6317: 6312: 6310:post-traumatic 6307: 6302: 6297: 6286: 6284: 6278: 6277: 6274: 6273: 6271: 6270: 6265: 6260: 6255: 6250: 6248:Personal-event 6245: 6240: 6235: 6230: 6225: 6224: 6223: 6218: 6213: 6203: 6198: 6192: 6190: 6184: 6183: 6181: 6180: 6178:Working memory 6175: 6167: 6165: 6159: 6158: 6156: 6155: 6150: 6148:Motor learning 6145: 6140: 6135: 6130: 6125: 6119: 6117: 6108: 6104: 6103: 6101: 6100: 6095: 6090: 6084: 6083: 6078: 6073: 6067: 6065: 6064:Basic concepts 6061: 6060: 6053: 6052: 6045: 6038: 6030: 6023: 6022: 5995:(4): 440–448. 5975: 5963: 5954: 5935:(2): 216–229. 5919: 5912: 5886: 5842: 5815:(2): 256–259. 5799: 5743: 5688: 5669:(2): 289–303. 5649: 5616: 5610:978-9162886233 5609: 5589: 5554: 5508: 5477: 5438: 5399: 5372:(7): 953–960. 5352: 5325:(3): 276–298. 5309: 5282:(1): 101–122. 5266: 5247: 5220:(3): 449–455. 5204: 5175:(2): 159–177. 5159: 5132:(2): 140–150. 5113: 5086:(3): 289–306. 5070: 5021: 4986: 4980:978-0852244517 4979: 4961: 4924:(2): 236–250. 4904: 4885:(2): 148–160. 4869: 4858:(6): 527–541. 4838: 4817:(2): 129–139. 4797: 4762: 4749:(4): 295–303. 4729: 4694: 4683:(3): 365–376. 4663: 4636:(2): 167–175. 4616: 4574: 4533: 4527:978-0898593914 4526: 4506: 4459: 4446:(3): 244–254. 4423: 4364: 4329: 4318:(1): 112–118. 4299: 4288:(2): 161–170. 4263: 4222: 4203:(4): 373–394. 4187: 4148: 4131:978-0521432559 4130: 4110: 4053: 3994: 3967: 3925: 3906:(3): 361–381. 3883: 3872:(6): 519–531. 3853: 3810: 3783:(1): 151–160. 3767: 3740: 3727: 3706: 3695:(1): 127–142. 3675: 3664:(5): 455–473. 3648: 3619:(3): 349–373. 3599: 3572:(2): 198–202. 3556: 3535:(4): 367–371. 3515: 3472: 3453:(2): 118–127. 3434: 3420: 3409:(8): 973–980. 3389: 3346: 3311:(2): 194–196. 3291: 3245: 3226:(2): 125–139. 3210: 3191:(2): 135–149. 3171: 3160:(6): 723–739. 3140: 3129:(5): 844–853. 3109: 3082:(4): 418–432. 3057: 3050: 3030: 3020: 2985:(5): 463–478. 2962: 2943:(4): 261–274. 2927: 2908:(4): 243–260. 2892: 2881:(3): 315–327. 2865: 2839: 2812: 2793:(5): 533–543. 2773: 2758: 2731: 2688: 2653: 2626:(6): 526–535. 2606: 2577:(3): 242–255. 2558: 2539:(4): 285–293. 2523: 2510: 2471: 2453: 2440:(3): 213–229. 2420: 2407: 2398: 2371:(4): 262–274. 2355: 2312: 2275:(5): 459–473. 2256: 2217: 2206:(5): 605–623. 2181: 2146:(4): 536–547. 2126: 2107:(2): 300–318. 2091: 2072:(5): 813–825. 2055: 2034:(5): 770–782. 2014: 1995:(3): 312–320. 1979: 1933: 1906: 1861: 1846: 1827:(7): 951–961. 1807: 1796:(6): 898–910. 1780: 1773: 1740: 1713:(2): 169–179. 1694: 1667:(3): 331–349. 1647: 1628:(3): 475–490. 1609: 1574:(3): 331–340. 1554: 1529:(5): 292–299. 1510: 1468: 1425: 1406:(5): 518–537. 1383: 1376: 1341: 1292: 1276: 1230: 1203:(2): 260–274. 1183: 1138: 1089: 1078:(4): 339–360. 1062: 1043:(4): 364–372. 1020: 1007:(3): 214–230. 987: 968:(2): 284–309. 948: 914: 896: 885:(3): 360–376. 862: 843:(4): 364–372. 823: 780: 778: 775: 765: 762: 756: 753: 743: 740: 726: 723: 717: 714: 705: 702: 696: 693: 679: 676: 659: 658:Pitch of voice 656: 650: 647: 633: 630: 608: 605: 599: 596: 579: 576: 558: 557:Eidetic memory 555: 545: 542: 488: 485: 479: 476: 466: 463: 454: 451: 447:suggestibility 441: 440:Suggestibility 438: 428: 425: 415: 412: 391: 388: 382: 379: 370: 367: 361: 358: 352: 351:Size of lineup 349: 339: 336: 320: 317: 303: 300: 298: 295: 284: 281: 263: 260: 254: 251: 241: 238: 228: 225: 211: 208: 195: 192: 176: 173: 143: 140: 113: 110: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 22:is a person's 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7488: 7477: 7474: 7472: 7471:Memory biases 7469: 7467: 7464: 7463: 7461: 7448: 7443: 7436: 7430: 7427: 7425: 7424: 7420: 7418: 7415: 7414: 7412: 7408: 7402: 7399: 7397: 7394: 7392: 7389: 7387: 7384: 7382: 7379: 7377: 7374: 7373: 7371: 7367: 7361: 7358: 7356: 7353: 7351: 7348: 7346: 7343: 7341: 7338: 7336: 7333: 7331: 7328: 7327: 7325: 7321: 7315: 7312: 7310: 7307: 7305: 7302: 7301: 7299: 7295: 7289: 7286: 7284: 7281: 7279: 7276: 7274: 7271: 7269: 7266: 7265: 7263: 7261: 7257: 7251: 7248: 7246: 7243: 7241: 7238: 7234: 7231: 7230: 7229: 7226: 7224: 7221: 7219: 7216: 7214: 7211: 7207: 7204: 7202: 7199: 7198: 7197: 7194: 7190: 7187: 7186: 7185: 7182: 7181: 7179: 7177: 7173: 7167: 7164: 7162: 7159: 7157: 7154: 7152: 7149: 7147: 7144: 7142: 7139: 7137: 7134: 7132: 7129: 7127: 7124: 7122: 7119: 7117: 7114: 7112: 7109: 7107: 7104: 7102: 7099: 7097: 7094: 7092: 7089: 7087: 7084: 7082: 7079: 7077: 7074: 7072: 7069: 7067: 7064: 7062: 7059: 7058: 7056: 7052: 7048: 7041: 7036: 7034: 7029: 7027: 7022: 7021: 7018: 7006: 6996: 6994: 6984: 6983: 6980: 6970: 6967: 6965: 6962: 6960: 6957: 6955: 6952: 6950: 6947: 6945: 6942: 6941: 6939: 6935: 6929: 6928:Clive Wearing 6926: 6924: 6921: 6919: 6916: 6914: 6911: 6910: 6908: 6904: 6898: 6895: 6893: 6892:Endel Tulving 6890: 6888: 6887:Anne Treisman 6885: 6883: 6880: 6878: 6875: 6873: 6870: 6868: 6865: 6863: 6860: 6858: 6855: 6853: 6850: 6848: 6847:Brenda Milner 6845: 6843: 6840: 6838: 6835: 6833: 6832:James McGaugh 6830: 6828: 6825: 6823: 6820: 6818: 6815: 6813: 6810: 6808: 6805: 6803: 6800: 6798: 6797:Sigmund Freud 6795: 6793: 6790: 6788: 6785: 6783: 6780: 6778: 6775: 6773: 6770: 6769: 6767: 6763: 6760: 6756: 6750: 6749: 6745: 6742: 6741:retrospective 6738: 6735: 6731: 6728: 6727: 6726: 6723: 6721: 6720:Muscle memory 6718: 6716: 6713: 6711: 6708: 6704: 6701: 6700: 6699: 6696: 6694: 6691: 6689: 6686: 6684: 6681: 6679: 6676: 6673: 6669: 6666: 6664: 6661: 6659: 6656: 6655: 6653: 6649: 6643: 6640: 6636: 6633: 6632: 6631: 6628: 6627: 6625: 6621: 6615: 6612: 6610: 6607: 6605: 6602: 6600: 6597: 6595: 6592: 6590: 6587: 6585: 6582: 6578: 6575: 6573: 6570: 6569: 6568: 6567:Art of memory 6565: 6563: 6560: 6559: 6557: 6553: 6547: 6544: 6542: 6539: 6537: 6534: 6532: 6529: 6525: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6517: 6516: 6514: 6510: 6504: 6501: 6499: 6496: 6494: 6491: 6490: 6488: 6486: 6482: 6476: 6473: 6469: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6461: 6459: 6456: 6454: 6451: 6450: 6448: 6446: 6442: 6436: 6433: 6431: 6428: 6426: 6423: 6421: 6418: 6416: 6415:Memory biases 6413: 6411: 6408: 6406: 6403: 6401: 6398: 6396: 6395:Confabulation 6393: 6392: 6390: 6388: 6387:Memory errors 6384: 6378: 6375: 6373: 6370: 6368: 6365: 6363: 6360: 6358: 6355: 6353: 6350: 6348: 6345: 6343: 6340: 6338: 6335: 6331: 6328: 6326: 6323: 6321: 6318: 6316: 6313: 6311: 6308: 6306: 6305:post-hypnotic 6303: 6301: 6298: 6296: 6293: 6292: 6291: 6288: 6287: 6285: 6283: 6279: 6269: 6266: 6264: 6261: 6259: 6258:Rote learning 6256: 6254: 6251: 6249: 6246: 6244: 6241: 6239: 6236: 6234: 6233:Hyperthymesia 6231: 6229: 6226: 6222: 6219: 6217: 6214: 6212: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6204: 6202: 6199: 6197: 6196:Active recall 6194: 6193: 6191: 6189: 6185: 6179: 6176: 6173: 6169: 6168: 6166: 6164: 6160: 6154: 6151: 6149: 6146: 6144: 6141: 6139: 6136: 6134: 6131: 6129: 6126: 6124: 6121: 6120: 6118: 6116: 6112: 6109: 6105: 6099: 6096: 6094: 6093:Consolidation 6091: 6089: 6086: 6085: 6082: 6079: 6077: 6074: 6072: 6069: 6068: 6066: 6062: 6058: 6051: 6046: 6044: 6039: 6037: 6032: 6031: 6028: 6018: 6014: 6010: 6006: 6002: 5998: 5994: 5990: 5986: 5979: 5970: 5968: 5958: 5950: 5946: 5942: 5938: 5934: 5930: 5923: 5915: 5909: 5905: 5901: 5897: 5890: 5882: 5878: 5874: 5870: 5866: 5862: 5858: 5854: 5846: 5838: 5834: 5830: 5826: 5822: 5818: 5814: 5810: 5803: 5795: 5791: 5787: 5783: 5779: 5778:10.1038/38278 5775: 5771: 5767: 5763: 5759: 5755: 5747: 5739: 5735: 5731: 5727: 5723: 5722:10.1038/22106 5719: 5715: 5711: 5707: 5703: 5699: 5692: 5684: 5680: 5676: 5672: 5668: 5664: 5660: 5653: 5644: 5639: 5635: 5631: 5627: 5620: 5612: 5606: 5602: 5601: 5593: 5585: 5581: 5577: 5573: 5569: 5565: 5558: 5550: 5546: 5542: 5538: 5534: 5530: 5526: 5522: 5515: 5513: 5504: 5500: 5496: 5492: 5488: 5481: 5473: 5469: 5465: 5461: 5457: 5453: 5449: 5442: 5434: 5430: 5426: 5422: 5419:(3): 276–98. 5418: 5414: 5410: 5403: 5395: 5391: 5387: 5383: 5379: 5375: 5371: 5367: 5363: 5356: 5348: 5344: 5340: 5336: 5332: 5328: 5324: 5320: 5313: 5305: 5301: 5297: 5293: 5289: 5285: 5281: 5277: 5270: 5262: 5258: 5251: 5243: 5239: 5235: 5231: 5227: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5208: 5200: 5196: 5192: 5188: 5183: 5178: 5174: 5170: 5163: 5155: 5151: 5147: 5143: 5139: 5135: 5131: 5127: 5120: 5118: 5109: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5093: 5089: 5085: 5081: 5074: 5066: 5062: 5057: 5052: 5048: 5044: 5040: 5036: 5032: 5025: 5017: 5013: 5009: 5005: 5001: 4997: 4990: 4982: 4976: 4972: 4965: 4957: 4953: 4949: 4945: 4940: 4935: 4931: 4927: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4908: 4900: 4896: 4892: 4888: 4884: 4880: 4873: 4865: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4842: 4834: 4830: 4825: 4820: 4816: 4812: 4808: 4801: 4793: 4789: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4766: 4757: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4740: 4733: 4725: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4698: 4690: 4686: 4682: 4678: 4674: 4667: 4659: 4655: 4651: 4647: 4643: 4639: 4635: 4631: 4627: 4620: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4585: 4578: 4570: 4566: 4561: 4556: 4553:(4): 404–14. 4552: 4548: 4544: 4537: 4529: 4523: 4519: 4518: 4510: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4490: 4486: 4482: 4479:(1): 91–114. 4478: 4474: 4470: 4463: 4454: 4453:10.5334/pb.ap 4449: 4445: 4441: 4434: 4427: 4419: 4415: 4410: 4405: 4400: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4368: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4348: 4344: 4340: 4333: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4306: 4304: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4272: 4270: 4268: 4259: 4255: 4250: 4245: 4241: 4237: 4233: 4226: 4218: 4214: 4210: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4191: 4183: 4179: 4175: 4171: 4168:(1): 208–21. 4167: 4163: 4159: 4152: 4138:on 2016-08-10 4137: 4133: 4127: 4123: 4122: 4114: 4106: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4089: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4057: 4049: 4045: 4040: 4035: 4030: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 3998: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3971: 3963: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3932: 3930: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3890: 3888: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3860: 3858: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3826:(2): 157–81. 3825: 3821: 3814: 3806: 3802: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3771: 3763: 3759: 3756:(7): S6–S20. 3755: 3751: 3744: 3737: 3731: 3723: 3719: 3718: 3710: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3679: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3652: 3644: 3640: 3635: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3603: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3560: 3552: 3548: 3543: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3519: 3505:on 2013-06-27 3501: 3497: 3493: 3486: 3479: 3477: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3441: 3439: 3430: 3424: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3393: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3350: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3295: 3287: 3283: 3278: 3273: 3270:(2): 203–20. 3269: 3265: 3261: 3254: 3252: 3250: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3214: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3175: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3144: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3113: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3066: 3064: 3062: 3053: 3047: 3043: 3042: 3034: 3024: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2969: 2967: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2931: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2896: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2869: 2861: 2857: 2850: 2843: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2816: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2777: 2769: 2762: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2735: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2692: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2669:(2): 97–105. 2668: 2664: 2657: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2610: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2585: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2565: 2563: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2527: 2520: 2514: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2475: 2467: 2460: 2458: 2448: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2424: 2417: 2411: 2402: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2359: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2316: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2283: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2263: 2261: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2221: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2190: 2188: 2186: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2130: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2095: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2059: 2051: 2047: 2042: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2018: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1983: 1975: 1969: 1955: 1951: 1944: 1942: 1940: 1938: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1910: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1885: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1865: 1857: 1850: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1811: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1784: 1776: 1770: 1766: 1759: 1757: 1755: 1753: 1751: 1749: 1747: 1745: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1701: 1699: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1661:Sex Education 1658: 1651: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1616: 1614: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1558: 1550: 1544: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1517: 1515: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1475: 1473: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1429: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1394: 1387: 1379: 1377:9780863774959 1373: 1369: 1365: 1360: 1352: 1350: 1348: 1346: 1337: 1333: 1328: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1296: 1289: 1283: 1281: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1237: 1235: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1187: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1142: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1093: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1066: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1027: 1025: 1015: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 991: 983: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 952: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 921: 919: 910: 903: 901: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 869: 867: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 827: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 788: 786: 781: 774: 770: 761: 752: 749: 739: 735: 732: 722: 713: 711: 701: 692: 690: 684: 675: 673: 669: 664: 655: 646: 644: 640: 629: 627: 623: 619: 613: 604: 595: 593: 589: 585: 575: 571: 569: 564: 554: 551: 541: 539: 534: 532: 528: 522: 520: 515: 511: 507: 506:limbic system 501: 499: 493: 484: 475: 473: 462: 459: 450: 448: 437: 434: 424: 422: 421:confabulation 411: 407: 403: 402: 396: 387: 378: 376: 366: 357: 348: 345: 335: 332: 327: 316: 313: 309: 308:police lineup 294: 291: 280: 278: 274: 269: 259: 250: 248: 247:memory traces 237: 234: 224: 222: 218: 207: 204: 200: 191: 189: 185: 181: 172: 170: 166: 162: 158: 153: 149: 139: 137: 132: 128: 123: 119: 109: 106: 102: 82: 80: 76: 72: 67: 64: 60: 55: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 21: 7421: 7376:Legal ethics 7222: 7116:False arrest 6959:Ben Pridmore 6877:Larry Squire 6787:Susan Clancy 6746: 6630:Memory sport 6555:Other topics 6445:False memory 6400:Cryptomnesia 6377:Weapon focus 6337:Decay theory 6132: 6098:Neuroanatomy 6057:Human memory 5992: 5988: 5978: 5957: 5932: 5928: 5922: 5895: 5889: 5856: 5852: 5845: 5812: 5808: 5802: 5761: 5757: 5746: 5705: 5701: 5691: 5666: 5662: 5652: 5636:(1): 57–70. 5633: 5629: 5619: 5599: 5592: 5567: 5563: 5557: 5527:(1): 27–36. 5524: 5520: 5494: 5490: 5480: 5458:(1): 111–6. 5455: 5451: 5441: 5416: 5412: 5402: 5369: 5365: 5355: 5322: 5318: 5312: 5279: 5275: 5269: 5260: 5256: 5250: 5217: 5213: 5207: 5172: 5168: 5162: 5129: 5125: 5083: 5079: 5073: 5038: 5034: 5024: 5002:(1): 40–53. 4999: 4995: 4989: 4970: 4964: 4921: 4917: 4907: 4882: 4878: 4872: 4855: 4851: 4841: 4814: 4810: 4800: 4778:(1): 55–62. 4775: 4771: 4765: 4746: 4742: 4732: 4707: 4703: 4697: 4680: 4676: 4666: 4633: 4629: 4619: 4594: 4590: 4577: 4550: 4546: 4536: 4516: 4509: 4476: 4472: 4462: 4443: 4439: 4426: 4381: 4377: 4367: 4342: 4338: 4332: 4315: 4311: 4285: 4281: 4242:(3): 561–9. 4239: 4235: 4225: 4200: 4196: 4190: 4165: 4161: 4151: 4140:. Retrieved 4136:the original 4120: 4113: 4070: 4066: 4056: 4011: 4007: 3997: 3980: 3976: 3970: 3945: 3941: 3903: 3899: 3869: 3865: 3823: 3819: 3813: 3780: 3776: 3770: 3753: 3749: 3743: 3735: 3730: 3716: 3709: 3692: 3688: 3678: 3661: 3657: 3651: 3616: 3612: 3602: 3569: 3565: 3559: 3532: 3528: 3518: 3507:. Retrieved 3500:the original 3495: 3491: 3450: 3446: 3423: 3406: 3402: 3392: 3362:(1): 36–71. 3359: 3355: 3349: 3308: 3304: 3294: 3267: 3263: 3223: 3219: 3213: 3188: 3184: 3174: 3157: 3153: 3143: 3126: 3122: 3112: 3079: 3075: 3040: 3033: 3023: 2982: 2978: 2940: 2936: 2930: 2905: 2901: 2895: 2878: 2874: 2868: 2859: 2855: 2842: 2828:(5): 43–52. 2825: 2821: 2815: 2790: 2786: 2776: 2767: 2761: 2744: 2740: 2734: 2704:(1): 66–72. 2701: 2697: 2691: 2666: 2662: 2656: 2623: 2619: 2609: 2574: 2570: 2536: 2532: 2526: 2518: 2513: 2488: 2484: 2474: 2465: 2437: 2433: 2423: 2410: 2401: 2368: 2364: 2358: 2325: 2321: 2315: 2272: 2268: 2237:(1): 24–27. 2234: 2230: 2220: 2203: 2199: 2143: 2139: 2129: 2104: 2100: 2094: 2069: 2065: 2058: 2031: 2027: 2017: 1992: 1988: 1982: 1957:. Retrieved 1953: 1922:(1): 43–52. 1919: 1915: 1909: 1874: 1870: 1864: 1855: 1849: 1824: 1820: 1810: 1793: 1789: 1783: 1764: 1710: 1706: 1664: 1660: 1650: 1625: 1621: 1571: 1567: 1557: 1543:cite journal 1526: 1522: 1488: 1484: 1438: 1434: 1428: 1403: 1399: 1386: 1363: 1312:(1): 69–86. 1309: 1305: 1295: 1287: 1246: 1242: 1200: 1196: 1186: 1151: 1147: 1141: 1106: 1102: 1092: 1075: 1071: 1065: 1040: 1036: 1004: 1000: 990: 965: 961: 951: 934: 930: 908: 882: 878: 840: 836: 826: 801: 797: 771: 767: 758: 745: 736: 728: 719: 707: 698: 685: 681: 661: 652: 639:weapon focus 635: 614: 610: 601: 581: 572: 560: 547: 535: 523: 502: 494: 490: 481: 468: 456: 443: 430: 417: 408: 404: 400: 397: 393: 384: 372: 363: 354: 341: 326:double blind 322: 305: 286: 277:false memory 265: 256: 243: 240:Interference 233:weapon focus 230: 227:Weapon focus 213: 203:dissociative 197: 178: 157:dissociation 145: 115: 98: 68: 56: 19: 18: 7166:Civil wrong 6817:Eric Kandel 6765:Researchers 6737:Prospective 6688:Free recall 6642:Shas Pollak 6295:anterograde 6211:Declarative 5497:(1): 6–18. 4597:(5): 3159. 2862:(2): 34–44. 1154:(1): 6–10. 804:(1): 9–15. 755:Enhancement 663:Voice pitch 510:hippocampus 221:hippocampus 136:racial bias 7476:Eyewitness 7460:Categories 7136:Show trial 7111:Entrapment 7101:Bad apples 6852:Lynn Nadel 6730:intertrial 6715:Metamemory 6703:flashbacks 6623:In society 6320:retrograde 6282:Forgetting 6253:Procedural 6163:Short-term 6133:Eyewitness 4939:2268/65594 4142:2014-11-25 3738:, 453–478. 3509:2012-06-03 1959:2017-09-27 777:References 716:Time-delay 641:effect or 538:plasticity 414:Interviews 401:uncertain. 390:Confidence 360:Viewpoints 312:eyewitness 6604:Nutrition 6512:In groups 6325:selective 6300:childhood 6228:Flashbulb 6188:Long-term 6088:Attention 5949:144400316 5584:144619619 5177:CiteSeerX 5154:144533540 4792:145376954 4501:145163828 4359:0888-4080 4217:146317449 3962:146576923 3467:145642034 3325:0956-7976 3240:145770979 2807:145429260 2747:: 19–26. 2579:CiteSeerX 2505:145351420 2491:: 43–57. 2350:255506950 2342:1046-1310 2277:CiteSeerX 2251:220321932 2160:1464-0686 1968:cite news 1879:CiteSeerX 1689:143440455 1681:1468-1811 1642:146746827 1604:260321435 1588:0271-8235 1491:: 49–58. 1156:CiteSeerX 672:amplitude 297:Retrieval 152:repressed 131:Caucasian 52:retrieval 32:witnessed 30:or other 7350:Loophole 7297:Advocacy 6906:Patients 6577:mnemonic 6572:chunking 6238:Implicit 6221:Semantic 6216:Episodic 6206:Explicit 6071:Encoding 6017:31526434 5881:17924026 5730:10408442 5683:11275490 5541:16423739 5433:12934687 5394:35047476 5386:15177712 5339:12934687 5304:13746665 5296:29715743 5234:18689052 5199:32243134 5146:22471418 5108:25307392 5016:15641903 4948:14769081 4899:17472098 4658:29994359 4650:22926436 4569:24203007 4418:19307569 4258:17958168 4105:17695250 4097:18054758 4048:18787113 3920:52025255 3848:35720611 3840:11771794 3805:33074775 3797:20121871 3643:18769510 3594:13888599 3586:15082325 3551:26294379 3341:32308973 3333:11934008 3286:11495110 3205:37359269 3096:21859229 3015:20593055 3007:17245633 2922:73650509 2718:19037905 2683:13796886 2648:40723977 2640:18253819 2553:19885102 2385:20632113 2307:10906056 2299:11688368 2176:52978895 2168:30319034 2121:27038956 2086:14516215 2050:16383166 1735:27999269 1596:16791779 1505:39762757 1463:17502659 1455:15217324 1441:: 1–28. 1336:24311822 1263:21807008 1225:39633102 1217:18212334 1178:30857180 1133:17118927 1057:19102619 857:19102619 618:loudness 514:amygdala 512:and the 290:mug shot 148:encoding 85:Encoding 48:encoding 44:memories 7250:Frameup 6725:Priming 6651:Related 6594:Emotion 6290:Amnesia 6128:Eidetic 6115:Sensory 6076:Storage 5873:7746476 5837:7803807 5829:2067724 5794:4422418 5786:9296495 5766:Bibcode 5738:4305679 5710:Bibcode 5472:7364704 5413:Emotion 5347:2588423 5319:Emotion 5242:8237955 5100:8816082 5065:8532502 5056:3495320 4956:7386237 4833:9099066 4724:1228141 4599:Bibcode 4481:Bibcode 4409:2667065 4386:Bibcode 4182:6680738 4075:Bibcode 4039:2533687 4016:Bibcode 3634:2094108 3384:6044806 3376:2295225 3104:1451821 2999:4499549 2957:4430830 2726:4833910 2393:9881910 1997:Bibcode 1901:7931095 1841:4134227 1727:9816735 1420:8507050 1368:301–341 1327:3849032 1124:1857737 982:1454896 818:7364708 764:Example 731:justice 710:emotion 704:Emotion 302:Lineups 7466:Memory 6758:People 6743:memory 6674:memory 6614:Trauma 6153:Visual 6143:Iconic 6138:Haptic 6123:Echoic 6081:Recall 6015:  6009:489504 6007:  5947:  5910:  5879:  5871:  5835:  5827:  5792:  5784:  5758:Nature 5736:  5728:  5702:Nature 5681:  5607:  5582:  5549:386308 5547:  5539:  5521:Memory 5470:  5431:  5392:  5384:  5345:  5337:  5302:  5294:  5240:  5232:  5197:  5179:  5152:  5144:  5106:  5098:  5063:  5053:  5014:  4977:  4954:  4946:  4897:  4831:  4790:  4722:  4656:  4648:  4567:  4524:  4499:  4416:  4406:  4357:  4256:  4215:  4180:  4128:  4103:  4095:  4046:  4036:  3960:  3918:  3846:  3838:  3803:  3795:  3641:  3631:  3592:  3584:  3549:  3465:  3382:  3374:  3339:  3331:  3323:  3284:  3238:  3203:  3102:  3094:  3048:  3013:  3005:  2997:  2955:  2920:  2805:  2724:  2716:  2681:  2646:  2638:  2601:768717 2599:  2581:  2551:  2503:  2391:  2383:  2348:  2340:  2305:  2297:  2279:  2249:  2174:  2166:  2158:  2119:  2084:  2048:  2009:475150 2007:  1899:  1881:  1839:  1771:  1733:  1725:  1687:  1679:  1640:  1602:  1594:  1586:  1503:  1461:  1453:  1418:  1374:  1334:  1324:  1271:676546 1269:  1261:  1223:  1215:  1176:  1158:  1131:  1121:  1055:  980:  855:  816:  101:lineup 26:for a 6937:Other 6609:Sleep 6562:Aging 6107:Types 6013:S2CID 5945:S2CID 5877:S2CID 5833:S2CID 5790:S2CID 5734:S2CID 5580:S2CID 5570:(3). 5545:S2CID 5390:S2CID 5343:S2CID 5300:S2CID 5238:S2CID 5195:S2CID 5150:S2CID 5104:S2CID 4952:S2CID 4788:S2CID 4720:JSTOR 4654:S2CID 4587:(PDF) 4497:S2CID 4436:(PDF) 4213:S2CID 4101:S2CID 3958:S2CID 3916:S2CID 3844:S2CID 3801:S2CID 3724:–279. 3590:S2CID 3503:(PDF) 3488:(PDF) 3463:S2CID 3380:S2CID 3337:S2CID 3236:S2CID 3201:S2CID 3100:S2CID 3011:S2CID 2995:JSTOR 2953:S2CID 2918:S2CID 2852:(PDF) 2803:S2CID 2722:S2CID 2644:S2CID 2597:S2CID 2549:S2CID 2501:S2CID 2418:>. 2389:S2CID 2346:S2CID 2303:S2CID 2247:S2CID 2172:S2CID 2117:S2CID 1837:S2CID 1731:S2CID 1685:S2CID 1638:S2CID 1600:S2CID 1501:S2CID 1459:S2CID 1396:(PDF) 1267:S2CID 1221:S2CID 1174:S2CID 748:blind 28:crime 7201:Rape 6739:and 6670:and 6005:PMID 5908:ISBN 5869:PMID 5825:PMID 5782:PMID 5726:PMID 5679:PMID 5605:ISBN 5537:PMID 5468:PMID 5429:PMID 5382:PMID 5335:PMID 5292:PMID 5263:(2). 5230:PMID 5142:PMID 5096:PMID 5061:PMID 5012:PMID 4975:ISBN 4944:PMID 4895:PMID 4829:PMID 4646:PMID 4565:PMID 4522:ISBN 4414:PMID 4355:ISSN 4254:PMID 4178:PMID 4126:ISBN 4093:PMID 4044:PMID 3836:PMID 3793:PMID 3639:PMID 3582:PMID 3547:PMID 3372:PMID 3329:PMID 3321:ISSN 3282:PMID 3092:PMID 3046:ISBN 3003:PMID 2714:PMID 2679:PMID 2636:PMID 2381:PMID 2338:ISSN 2295:PMID 2164:PMID 2156:ISSN 2082:PMID 2046:PMID 2005:PMID 1974:link 1897:PMID 1769:ISBN 1723:PMID 1677:ISSN 1592:PMID 1584:ISSN 1549:link 1451:PMID 1416:PMID 1372:ISBN 1332:PMID 1259:PMID 1213:PMID 1129:PMID 1053:PMID 978:PMID 853:PMID 814:PMID 624:and 231:The 201:(or 129:and 116:The 69:The 50:and 5997:doi 5937:doi 5900:doi 5861:doi 5857:183 5817:doi 5813:124 5774:doi 5762:389 5718:doi 5706:400 5671:doi 5638:doi 5572:doi 5529:doi 5499:doi 5460:doi 5421:doi 5374:doi 5327:doi 5284:doi 5222:doi 5187:doi 5134:doi 5088:doi 5051:PMC 5043:doi 5004:doi 4934:hdl 4926:doi 4887:doi 4860:doi 4819:doi 4780:doi 4751:doi 4712:doi 4685:doi 4681:133 4638:doi 4607:doi 4595:123 4555:doi 4489:doi 4448:doi 4404:PMC 4394:doi 4382:106 4347:doi 4320:doi 4290:doi 4244:doi 4205:doi 4170:doi 4083:doi 4034:PMC 4024:doi 4012:105 3985:doi 3950:doi 3908:doi 3874:doi 3828:doi 3785:doi 3758:doi 3722:248 3697:doi 3666:doi 3629:PMC 3621:doi 3574:doi 3537:doi 3455:doi 3411:doi 3364:doi 3313:doi 3272:doi 3228:doi 3193:doi 3162:doi 3131:doi 3084:doi 2987:doi 2945:doi 2910:doi 2883:doi 2879:118 2830:doi 2795:doi 2749:doi 2745:116 2706:doi 2671:doi 2628:doi 2589:doi 2541:doi 2493:doi 2442:doi 2373:doi 2330:doi 2287:doi 2239:doi 2208:doi 2148:doi 2109:doi 2074:doi 2036:doi 1924:doi 1889:doi 1829:doi 1798:doi 1715:doi 1669:doi 1630:doi 1576:doi 1531:doi 1493:doi 1443:doi 1408:doi 1322:PMC 1314:doi 1251:doi 1205:doi 1166:doi 1119:PMC 1111:doi 1107:361 1080:doi 1045:doi 1009:doi 970:doi 939:doi 887:doi 845:doi 806:doi 521:). 7462:: 6923:NA 6918:KC 6913:HM 6011:. 6003:. 5993:64 5991:. 5987:. 5966:^ 5943:. 5933:20 5931:. 5906:. 5875:. 5867:. 5855:. 5831:. 5823:. 5811:. 5788:. 5780:. 5772:. 5760:. 5756:. 5732:. 5724:. 5716:. 5704:. 5700:. 5677:. 5667:11 5665:. 5661:. 5634:10 5632:. 5628:. 5578:. 5566:. 5543:. 5535:. 5525:14 5523:. 5511:^ 5493:. 5489:. 5466:. 5456:65 5454:. 5450:. 5427:. 5415:. 5411:. 5388:. 5380:. 5370:29 5368:. 5364:. 5341:. 5333:. 5321:. 5298:. 5290:. 5280:17 5278:. 5259:. 5236:. 5228:. 5218:50 5216:. 5193:. 5185:. 5171:. 5148:. 5140:. 5130:36 5128:. 5116:^ 5102:. 5094:. 5084:38 5082:. 5059:. 5049:. 5039:57 5037:. 5033:. 5010:. 5000:31 4998:. 4950:. 4942:. 4932:. 4922:86 4920:. 4916:. 4893:. 4883:54 4881:. 4856:11 4854:. 4850:. 4827:. 4815:25 4813:. 4809:. 4786:. 4776:11 4774:. 4745:. 4741:. 4718:. 4708:29 4706:. 4675:. 4652:. 4644:. 4634:77 4632:. 4628:. 4605:. 4593:. 4589:. 4563:. 4549:. 4545:. 4495:. 4487:. 4477:19 4475:. 4471:. 4444:54 4442:. 4438:. 4412:. 4402:. 4392:. 4380:. 4376:. 4353:. 4343:15 4341:. 4316:25 4314:. 4302:^ 4286:14 4280:. 4266:^ 4252:. 4240:39 4238:. 4234:. 4211:. 4199:. 4176:. 4166:28 4164:. 4160:. 4099:. 4091:. 4081:. 4071:17 4069:. 4065:. 4042:. 4032:. 4022:. 4010:. 4006:. 3979:. 3956:. 3946:35 3944:. 3940:. 3928:^ 3914:. 3904:21 3902:. 3898:. 3886:^ 3870:21 3868:. 3856:^ 3842:. 3834:. 3822:. 3799:. 3791:. 3781:13 3779:. 3754:11 3752:. 3693:22 3691:. 3687:. 3662:12 3660:. 3637:. 3627:. 3617:27 3615:. 3611:. 3588:. 3580:. 3570:14 3568:. 3545:. 3533:33 3531:. 3527:. 3496:69 3494:. 3490:. 3475:^ 3461:. 3451:26 3449:. 3437:^ 3407:16 3405:. 3401:. 3378:. 3370:. 3360:22 3358:. 3335:. 3327:. 3319:. 3309:13 3307:. 3303:. 3280:. 3266:. 3262:. 3248:^ 3234:. 3222:. 3199:. 3189:16 3187:. 3183:. 3158:20 3156:. 3152:. 3127:29 3125:. 3121:. 3098:. 3090:. 3080:17 3078:. 3074:. 3060:^ 3009:. 3001:. 2993:. 2983:31 2981:. 2977:. 2965:^ 2951:. 2939:. 2916:. 2904:. 2877:. 2858:. 2854:. 2826:25 2824:. 2801:. 2791:17 2789:. 2785:. 2743:. 2720:. 2712:. 2702:20 2700:. 2677:. 2667:58 2665:. 2642:. 2634:. 2624:32 2622:. 2618:. 2595:. 2587:. 2575:17 2573:. 2561:^ 2547:. 2535:. 2499:. 2489:15 2487:. 2483:. 2456:^ 2436:. 2432:. 2387:. 2379:. 2369:35 2367:. 2344:. 2336:. 2326:41 2324:. 2301:. 2293:. 2285:. 2273:25 2271:. 2259:^ 2245:. 2235:20 2233:. 2229:. 2204:22 2202:. 2198:. 2184:^ 2170:. 2162:. 2154:. 2144:27 2142:. 2138:. 2115:. 2105:35 2103:. 2080:. 2070:29 2068:. 2044:. 2032:33 2030:. 2026:. 2003:. 1993:67 1991:. 1970:}} 1966:{{ 1952:. 1936:^ 1920:25 1918:. 1895:. 1887:. 1875:20 1873:. 1835:. 1825:21 1823:. 1819:. 1794:30 1792:. 1743:^ 1729:. 1721:. 1711:29 1709:. 1697:^ 1683:. 1675:. 1665:12 1663:. 1659:. 1636:. 1626:14 1624:. 1612:^ 1598:. 1590:. 1582:. 1572:26 1570:. 1566:. 1545:}} 1541:{{ 1525:. 1513:^ 1499:. 1489:34 1487:. 1483:. 1471:^ 1457:. 1449:. 1439:27 1437:. 1414:. 1404:48 1402:. 1398:. 1370:. 1344:^ 1330:. 1320:. 1310:65 1308:. 1304:. 1279:^ 1265:. 1257:. 1247:49 1245:. 1233:^ 1219:. 1211:. 1201:34 1199:. 1195:. 1172:. 1164:. 1152:16 1150:. 1127:. 1117:. 1105:. 1101:. 1074:. 1051:. 1041:14 1039:. 1035:. 1023:^ 1003:. 999:. 976:. 966:11 964:. 960:. 933:. 929:. 917:^ 899:^ 883:83 881:. 877:. 865:^ 851:. 841:14 839:. 835:. 812:. 802:65 800:. 796:. 784:^ 628:. 342:A 306:A 171:. 7039:e 7032:t 7025:v 6174:" 6170:" 6049:e 6042:t 6035:v 6019:. 5999:: 5951:. 5939:: 5916:. 5902:: 5883:. 5863:: 5839:. 5819:: 5796:. 5776:: 5768:: 5740:. 5720:: 5712:: 5685:. 5673:: 5646:. 5640:: 5613:. 5586:. 5574:: 5568:5 5551:. 5531:: 5505:. 5501:: 5495:1 5474:. 5462:: 5435:. 5423:: 5417:1 5396:. 5376:: 5349:. 5329:: 5323:1 5306:. 5286:: 5261:2 5244:. 5224:: 5201:. 5189:: 5173:3 5156:. 5136:: 5110:. 5090:: 5067:. 5045:: 5018:. 5006:: 4983:. 4958:. 4936:: 4928:: 4901:. 4889:: 4866:. 4862:: 4835:. 4821:: 4794:. 4782:: 4759:. 4753:: 4747:2 4726:. 4714:: 4691:. 4687:: 4660:. 4640:: 4613:. 4609:: 4601:: 4571:. 4557:: 4551:5 4530:. 4503:. 4491:: 4483:: 4456:. 4450:: 4420:. 4396:: 4388:: 4361:. 4349:: 4326:. 4322:: 4296:. 4292:: 4260:. 4246:: 4219:. 4207:: 4201:4 4184:. 4172:: 4145:. 4107:. 4085:: 4077:: 4050:. 4026:: 4018:: 3991:. 3987:: 3981:4 3964:. 3952:: 3922:. 3910:: 3880:. 3876:: 3850:. 3830:: 3824:4 3807:. 3787:: 3764:. 3760:: 3703:. 3699:: 3672:. 3668:: 3645:. 3623:: 3596:. 3576:: 3553:. 3539:: 3512:. 3469:. 3457:: 3431:. 3417:. 3413:: 3386:. 3366:: 3343:. 3315:: 3288:. 3274:: 3268:8 3242:. 3230:: 3224:6 3207:. 3195:: 3168:. 3164:: 3137:. 3133:: 3106:. 3086:: 3054:. 3017:. 2989:: 2959:. 2947:: 2941:4 2924:. 2912:: 2906:4 2889:. 2885:: 2860:7 2836:. 2832:: 2809:. 2797:: 2755:. 2751:: 2728:. 2708:: 2685:. 2673:: 2650:. 2630:: 2603:. 2591:: 2555:. 2543:: 2537:3 2507:. 2495:: 2450:. 2444:: 2438:7 2395:. 2375:: 2352:. 2332:: 2309:. 2289:: 2253:. 2241:: 2214:. 2210:: 2178:. 2150:: 2123:. 2111:: 2088:. 2076:: 2052:. 2038:: 2011:. 1999:: 1976:) 1962:. 1930:. 1926:: 1903:. 1891:: 1843:. 1831:: 1804:. 1800:: 1777:. 1737:. 1717:: 1691:. 1671:: 1644:. 1632:: 1606:. 1578:: 1551:) 1533:: 1527:3 1507:. 1495:: 1465:. 1445:: 1422:. 1410:: 1380:. 1338:. 1316:: 1273:. 1253:: 1227:. 1207:: 1180:. 1168:: 1135:. 1113:: 1086:. 1082:: 1076:5 1059:. 1047:: 1017:. 1011:: 1005:7 984:. 972:: 945:. 941:: 935:6 893:. 889:: 859:. 847:: 820:. 808::

Index

episodic memory
crime
witnessed
Eyewitness testimony
judicial system
memories
encoding
retrieval
eyewitness identification
wrongful conviction
Innocence Project
DNA exoneration
criminal justice system
lineup
eyewitnesses' identification
other-race effect
socio-cognitive
African American
Caucasian
racial bias
encoding
repressed
dissociation
memory retrieval
posttraumatic stress disorder
psychogenic amnesia
Explicit memory
post traumatic stress disorder
Implicit memory
Psychogenic amnesia

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑