25:
130:, the government must show that the government's action is necessary to achieve a compelling government interest. The protection of public health and safety, including the regulation of violent crime, the requirements of national security and military necessity are considered compelling government interests. Restricting access to unapproved
196:
which contains various human rights that the states party to the convention are bound by. Most of these rights contain "limitations" which means that the right is not absolute and can be limited by a state if it follows certain criteria set out by the convention. For example, all limitations must be
304:
117:
decisions, the courts weigh the government's interest in a particular subject matter against the impact of restrictions being imposed on the individuals' rights and interests. A compelling governmental interest may override
197:"prescribed by law" (i.e. not arbitrary and not by a vague law), they must follow a legitimate aim and be necessary in a democratic society. Only the prohibition of torture cannot be limited in any circumstances.
97:
to regulate a given matter. The concept may apply differently in different countries, and the limitations of what should and should not be of government interest vary, and have varied over time.
200:
The approach in Europe is very different to the United States where the courts have not been willing to recognize a broad government interest in relation to the 1st or 2nd amendments.
126:
test. A government interest is compelling if it is essential or necessary rather than a matter of choice, preference, or discretion. When government action infringes an individual's
166:
jurisprudence, when the government classifies a restriction based on gender, for example, it must show that its actions further an important government interest, under the
158:
If the subject matter is a legitimate government interest, but does not place a restriction on a fundamental right, the courts will test its validity by applying the
35:
342:
174:
263:
109:, the concept of government interest arises especially when certain constitutional issues are before a court of law. Under
337:
193:
114:
69:
110:
184:
falls on the state in cases that require strict scrutiny or intermediate scrutiny, but not the rational basis.
51:
47:
223:
163:
173:
Protecting residential privacy has been recognized as a significant government interest by the
181:
167:
159:
43:
319:
144:
8:
152:
229:
139:
127:
119:
219:
131:
214:
209:
123:
94:
331:
106:
265:
Restricting Access to
Unapproved Drugs: A Compelling Government Interest
134:
148:
34:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
16:
Legal concept allowing the state to regulate a given matter
90:
320:
https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG
306:
Political E-Mail: Protected Speech or
Unwelcome Spam?
261:
151:
children, based on the parents' fundamental right to
147:beyond 8th grade was not compelling in the case of
192:In Europe, 47 out of 49 countries are part of the
279:Railway Express Agency v. People of State of N.Y.
329:
268:, vol. 20, J.L. & Health, p. 309
137:is also a compelling government interest. In
32:The examples and perspective in this article
175:U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit
143:, on the other hand, the requirement for
70:Learn how and when to remove this message
302:
330:
18:
194:European Convention on Human Rights
13:
14:
354:
120:fundamental constitutional rights
343:United States constitutional law
100:
23:
313:
296:
284:
272:
262:Currie, Peter M. (2006–2007),
255:
243:
1:
236:
162:. Under the Supreme Court's
113:jurisprudence, arising from
7:
281:, 336 U.S. 106, 112 (1949).
203:
46:, discuss the issue on the
10:
359:
338:American legal terminology
309:, Duke L. & Tech. Rev.
293:, 518 U.S. 515, 520 (1996)
252:, 466 U.S. 429, 432 (1984)
291:United States v. Virginia
187:
224:international relations
222:, a related concept in
164:Equal Protection Clause
122:, if it satisfies the
168:intermediate scrutiny
145:compulsory education
52:create a new article
44:improve this article
160:rational basis test
153:freedom of religion
230:Wisconsin v. Yoder
140:Wisconsin v. Yoder
128:fundamental rights
250:Palmore v. Sidoti
220:National interest
111:US constitutional
80:
79:
72:
54:, as appropriate.
350:
322:
317:
311:
310:
303:M Sweet (2003),
300:
294:
288:
282:
276:
270:
269:
259:
253:
247:
115:US Supreme Court
93:that allows the
89:is a concept in
75:
68:
64:
61:
55:
27:
26:
19:
358:
357:
353:
352:
351:
349:
348:
347:
328:
327:
326:
325:
318:
314:
301:
297:
289:
285:
277:
273:
260:
256:
248:
244:
239:
215:Public morality
210:Public interest
206:
190:
182:burden of proof
124:strict scrutiny
103:
76:
65:
59:
56:
41:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
356:
346:
345:
340:
324:
323:
312:
295:
283:
271:
254:
241:
240:
238:
235:
234:
233:
226:
217:
212:
205:
202:
189:
186:
102:
99:
87:state interest
78:
77:
38:of the subject
36:worldwide view
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
355:
344:
341:
339:
336:
335:
333:
321:
316:
308:
307:
299:
292:
287:
280:
275:
267:
266:
258:
251:
246:
242:
232:
231:
227:
225:
221:
218:
216:
213:
211:
208:
207:
201:
198:
195:
185:
183:
178:
176:
171:
169:
165:
161:
156:
154:
150:
146:
142:
141:
136:
133:
129:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
107:United States
101:United States
98:
96:
92:
88:
84:
74:
71:
63:
53:
49:
45:
39:
37:
30:
21:
20:
315:
305:
298:
290:
286:
278:
274:
264:
257:
249:
245:
228:
199:
191:
179:
172:
157:
138:
132:prescription
104:
86:
82:
81:
66:
57:
33:
60:August 2017
332:Categories
237:References
170:standard.
83:Government
48:talk page
204:See also
42:You may
105:In the
188:Europe
149:Amish
135:drugs
95:state
50:, or
180:The
91:law
85:or
334::
177:.
155:.
73:)
67:(
62:)
58:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.