133:
298:
27:
227:
Harding sold their farm to Coburn. Unfortunately, the parties neglected to get the sale approved by the Court, as required under s25(4) of the Land
Settlement Promotion and Land Acquisition Act . Under this Act, failure to obtain such a consent made the sale "unlawful and shall have no effect".
231:
As a consequence, Coburn sought the relief of validation under section 7 of the
Illegal Contracts Act 1970. Harding's lawyers argued that as the sale was illegal under the Land Settlement Promotion and Land Acquisition Act, there was no legally enforceable sale agreement.
240:
The Court of Appeal ruled that the courts had the power to validate contracts that are deemed illegal unless the other Act expressly prohibits validation under the
Illegal Contracts Act.
339:
363:
219:
had the power to validate (i.e. make legal) despite the fact that another legal enactment "deemed to be unlawful and shall have no effect".
358:
332:
91:
63:
378:
70:
325:
266:
110:
44:
373:
77:
48:
59:
216:
368:
37:
84:
190:
186:
313:
8:
305:
262:
182:
283:
309:
132:
352:
212:
297:
26:
282:
This position was later upheld by the Privy
Council in
215:
case that was one of the first that upheld that the
51:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
350:
261:(4th ed.). LexisNexis. pp. 162–163.
333:
340:
326:
131:
111:Learn how and when to remove this message
259:Butterworths Student Companion Contract
351:
256:
250:
364:Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases
292:
49:adding citations to reliable sources
20:
13:
14:
390:
296:
25:
36:needs additional citations for
143:Court of Appeal of New Zealand
1:
359:New Zealand contract case law
243:
222:
312:. You can help Knowledge by
7:
235:
10:
395:
379:New Zealand case law stubs
291:
217:Illegal Contracts Act 1970
304:This article relating to
257:Walker, Campbell (2004).
201:
196:
178:
173:
165:
157:
147:
139:
130:
125:
374:1976 in New Zealand law
306:case law in New Zealand
183:Sir Clifford RichmondJ
16:New Zealand court case
45:improve this article
152:Harding v Coburn
60:"Harding v Coburn"
321:
320:
211:2 NZLR 577 was a
206:
205:
202:illegal contracts
121:
120:
113:
95:
386:
369:1976 in case law
342:
335:
328:
300:
293:
284:Ross v Henderson
273:
272:
254:
209:Harding v Coburn
174:Court membership
135:
126:Harding v Coburn
123:
122:
116:
109:
105:
102:
96:
94:
53:
29:
21:
394:
393:
389:
388:
387:
385:
384:
383:
349:
348:
347:
346:
289:
277:
276:
269:
255:
251:
246:
238:
225:
117:
106:
100:
97:
54:
52:
42:
30:
17:
12:
11:
5:
392:
382:
381:
376:
371:
366:
361:
345:
344:
337:
330:
322:
319:
318:
301:
275:
274:
267:
248:
247:
245:
242:
237:
234:
224:
221:
204:
203:
199:
198:
194:
193:
180:
179:Judges sitting
176:
175:
171:
170:
167:
163:
162:
159:
155:
154:
149:
148:Full case name
145:
144:
141:
137:
136:
128:
127:
119:
118:
101:September 2015
33:
31:
24:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
391:
380:
377:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
356:
354:
343:
338:
336:
331:
329:
324:
323:
317:
315:
311:
307:
302:
299:
295:
294:
290:
287:
285:
281:
270:
268:0-408-71770-X
264:
260:
253:
249:
241:
233:
229:
220:
218:
214:
210:
200:
195:
192:
188:
184:
181:
177:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
124:
115:
112:
104:
93:
90:
86:
83:
79:
76:
72:
69:
65:
62: –
61:
57:
56:Find sources:
50:
46:
40:
39:
34:This article
32:
28:
23:
22:
19:
314:expanding it
303:
288:
286:2 NZLR 458.
279:
278:
258:
252:
239:
230:
226:
208:
207:
161:22 July 1976
151:
107:
98:
88:
81:
74:
67:
55:
43:Please help
38:verification
35:
18:
213:New Zealand
187:Woodhouse J
353:Categories
244:References
223:Background
169:2 NZLR 577
71:newspapers
280:Footnote:
236:Decision
197:Keywords
166:Citation
191:Cooke J
158:Decided
85:scholar
265:
87:
80:
73:
66:
58:
308:is a
140:Court
92:JSTOR
78:books
310:stub
263:ISBN
64:news
47:by
355::
189:,
185:,
341:e
334:t
327:v
316:.
271:.
114:)
108:(
103:)
99:(
89:·
82:·
75:·
68:·
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
