Knowledge

Lum v. Rice

Source šŸ“

34: 910: 576:; all the members of the school district's board of trustees, and other state education officials, were named as defendants, with the head of the board of trustees, Greek Rice, as the lead. Among the state officials was the state superintendent of education, Willard Faroe Bond, whom Brewer believed to have betrayed him politically while he was governor; Brewer thus drew some satisfaction from the knowledge that Bond would be personally served with the legal papers. 896: 843:
of the beautiful stone and brick structure attended by whites. You see, the three months you are allowed to attend this institution, between the sowing, chopping and picking of cotton, are equal to the nine months white children go to school. Your teachers, barely out of the primary school themselves, possessing no special training for teachers, are the equals of white teachers all especially trained and prepared for the work they undertake.
1581: 469:, who are entitled, by law, to participate in the political control of the State and nation, who are not excluded, by law or by reason of their race, from public stations of any kind, and who have all the legal rights that belong to white citizens, are yet declared to be criminals, liable to imprisonment, if they ride in a public coach occupied by citizens of the white race. 673:
brought to justice. Brewer handed the Lum case to a younger associate, James Flowers, who had prior to his employment with Brewer worked primarily as corporate counsel for several railroads in Mississippi. Flowers was aware that he was ignorant in the areas of law related to the case, especially the Fourteenth Amendment.
765:
Most of the cases cited arose, it is true, over the establishment of separate schools as between white pupils and black pupils; but we cannot think that the question is any different, or that any different result can be reached, assuming the cases above cited to be rightly decided, where the issue is
743:
We must assume, then, that there are school districts for colored children in Bolivar county, but that no colored school is within the limits of the Rosedale consolidated high school district. This is not inconsistent with there being at a place outside of that district and in a different district, a
648:
The state had also, since 1892, prohibited marriages between whites and Asians, for whom it used the term "Mongolians", the latter being defined as anyone with more than one-eighth Asian ancestry. Asians and coloreds, also barred from marrying whites, were free to marry each other, Ethridge noted. He
531:
The couple had two daughters, Berda and Martha, and later a son, Hamilton. Both Gong Jeu and Katherine especially sought to make sure their children lived a better life than they had. While Berda resisted her parents' efforts to educate her, desiring to leave the Delta region when she grew up, Martha
748:
Taft further stated that given the accessibility of segregated schools, the question then was whether a person of Chinese ancestry, born in and a citizen of the United States, was denied equal protection of the law by being given the opportunity to attend a school that received "only children of the
842:
It is the opinion of Chief Justice William Howard Taft that these opportunities are equal ... The little shacks you attend, in which a large coal stove in the center of the room furnishes both heat and smokeā€”the ramshackle, tumble-down contraption, situated far down among the cotton stalksā€”is equal
672:
After the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in 1927, Brewer was preoccupied with representing the relatives of a Black man in Bolivar County who had been murdered immediately following his acquittal on murder charges in the death of a local white farmer's son, as they sought to have the killers
644:
schools after it was learned that they had a Black great-grandmother. While that case had not gone beyond the instant issue in deciding that those whose racial heritage was colored above a certain threshold were themselves legally colored, Ethridge wrote, "a careful reading of the opinion ... shows
559:
There was no school in the district maintained for Chinese students, and the Lum daughters were required to attend school. That left the district's school for colored children as the only public school available. It was underfunded and poorly equipped; the Lums did not want their daughters educated
464:
There is a race so different from our own that we do not permit those belonging to it to become citizens of the United States. Persons belonging to it are, with few exceptions, absolutely excluded from our country. I allude to the Chinese race. But by the statute in question, a Chinaman can ride in
289:
that their reason for choosing to avoid black schools was motivated by racism. In fact, Katherine Lum later told a reporter, ā€œI did not want my children to attend the ā€˜coloredā€™ schools the community would have classified us as Negroes.ā€ They filed suit in local court to force the district to allow
786:
Other Chinese in Mississippi likewise began leaving the Delta, some even returning to China; save for those who found a few school districts still willing to accept their children in their white schools. Other Chinese families established private schools; in the late 1930s the state of Mississippi
619:
The court reversed the lower court's decision and allowed the board of trustees to exclude Martha Lum from the school for white children. Justice George Ethridge, a former teacher to whom his colleagues generally deferred in matters related to education, wrote for a unanimous court that considered
113:
Chinese children do not meet the statutory definition of "White" and thus may lawfully be denied admission to schools reserved for children of that race only; attendance at school for Black students is constitutional as long as facilities are equal to those provided Whites. Classifying students by
680:
for the Supreme Court justices was inconsistent, alternating between defending segregation but attacking it inasmuch as he argued the Constitution protected Lum from being forced to attend a colored school, yet ending with a suggestion that segregated schools were inherently unequal. Justice
714:
The short time available to travel to Washington, and the possibility that the case would be forfeited to the state if no one argued for the Lums, was the least of Flowers' concerns. He had never argued a case before any court, considering himself a poor public speaker. First he sought a
412:, limiting further Chinese immigration to narrowly defined categories of people, including a bar on family members of Chinese citizens already in the U.S., the only time the law has mandated immigrants be denied admission explicitly on the grounds of racial identity or national origin. 823:
The Supreme Court's opinion points the way toward making still more effective. So far segregation depends largely upon private agreement, and private agreements sometimes break down when they are submitted to severe strain. It will be better all around when they can be given legal
3101: 861:, which outlawed segregation in public schools. An important part of the decision still standsā€”the power of the state to make racial distinctions in its school system, and to determine the race of its students. It has not been overturned because it was not an issue in 652:
Lum's right to an education was not affected by the decision, Ethridge concluded. She could attend the colored school, but did not have to, as she could also be educated privately, as long as she was educated. Lum and Brewer petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for
624:
and statutes were clearer in defining white people as those not "colored". "e think," he wrote, "that the constitutional convention used the word 'colored' in the broad sense rather than the restricted sense; its purpose being to provide schools for the white or
755:, Taft concluded that the "right and power of the state to regulate the method of providing for the education of its youth at public expense is clear." Additionally, Taft pointed to a number of federal and state court decisions, most prominently 739:, it affirmed the Mississippi Supreme Court's ruling and thus the position of the board of trustees. Taft held that the petitioner had not shown that there were no segregated schools accessible for the education of Martha Lum in Mississippi: 620:
the case as a question of whether the Lum children were within the statutory definition of white. While some other states' courts and statutes had extended the definition of "white" to include members of other races who were not Black,
800:
were inadmissible as evidence, reversing the convictions of several of his clients. Brewer died in 1942, before he could live to see schools desegregated, but that had happened by the time Jeu Gong died in 1965 and Katherine in 1988.
783:, where they opened another grocery and Katherine was able to find a high school that would accept her daughters. It was not as prosperous a market as the one in Rosedale, and in later years the family left the Delta region entirely. 1161:"An Act to amend section one thousand six hundred and sixty-two of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, entitled "An Act to establish a Political Code," approved March 12, 1872, relating to public schools" 706:
The Lums themselves, realizing that the case had implications for all Chinese Americans, had similar concerns, and had arranged for a longtime friend of theirs, not a lawyer, to travel to Washington and be present at
527:
laws. Operating a store made Lum a merchant and thus exempt from the Exclusion Act. Black patrons preferred shopping at Chinese-owned stores since the Chinese were less insistent on being addressed with honorifics.
2091: 607:, with all six justices participating. Assistant attorney general Elmer Clinton Sharp argued the case for the school district, reiterating the history of segregation in the state and saying that Asians and 3937: 611:
were not considered white. Brewer argued in response that while the state constitution had indeed not put whites and Asians on equal footing, it had also distinguished Asians and Blacks, and therefore the
3037: 3029: 3740: 766:
as between white pupils and the pupils of the yellow races. The decision is within the discretion of the state in regulating its public schools, and does not conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment.
377:
and later to work on railroad construction and mining. Both came to be seen as a threat to an existing social hierarchy dominated by whites: Blacks for their newly free status, and the Chinese as
3181: 685:, who believed the Fourteenth Amendment allowed too much federal interference with state authority yet was open to arguments that discrimination against members of minority groups violated their 1512: 3149: 3005: 1478: 3828: 3644: 583:
to force the members of the board of trustees to admit the Lums. Their case was not that racial discrimination as such was illegal but that his daughter, had incorrectly been classified as
3304: 649:
added that a pair of U.S. Supreme Court decisions had both held that Asians were not white or Caucasian in the historical sense of how that word had been understood in the United States.
719:
but learned that was unlikely, so then he and Brewer asked if the case could be decided purely on the basis of the briefs. The Court allowed that, and there would be no oral argument of
2067: 880:
has called it an "ugly and unfortunate" decision. "The Court's ruling had established a precedent more powerful than the Lum family could have imagined", observed Adrienne Berard, in
466: 511:. There he married Katherine Wong, a Chinese American woman who had been adopted as an orphan in China and raised mostly in the U.S. by a Chinese father who grew wealthy operating a 3478: 3013: 2273: 3141: 2327: 855:
continued to be cited in briefs supporting racial segregation, and court decisions upholding it, until it was effectively overruled 27 years later by the Court's decision in
408:, which allowed unrestricted entry and a path to citizenship for any immigrants of African descent, denied it to anyone of Chinese descent. In 1882 Congress passed the first 629:, to which schools no other race could be admitted, carrying out the broad dominant purpose of preserving the purity and integrity of the white race and its social policy." 4104: 1865: 933: 711:. That would be unnecessary. Within a week of filing the brief, the Court informed Flowers by telegram that it had scheduled the case for argument within the next week. 3961: 645:
that the court did not intend to restrict the term 'colored' to persons having negro blood in their veins or who were descendants of negroes or of the negro race."
277:, Chinese immigrants with two American-born children who had attended local public schools for white children without incident until, in the wake of an increase in 4084: 3860: 2758: 556:, which effectively ended all immigration from Asia, told the Lum girls they could no longer attend its schools for whites because they were not considered white. 2734: 2171: 452:, which went further and upheld the constitutionality of laws that mandated segregation in private facilities open to the public such as rail transport, Justice 2973: 2853: 1675: 613: 443: 439: 297: 260: 213: 318:
that Mississippi's constitution and laws clearly distinguished Asians ("Mongolians", it called them) from whites, so the Lums could not attend white schools.
4114: 3804: 3454: 2941: 2917: 2115: 2059: 1598: 928: 473:
Harlan's belief that the Chinese were culturally incapable of assimilating into American society and thus properly barred from naturalizing was personal; in
75: 446:
Amendments to the Constitution, both passed in the years after the war, only barred racial discrimination by the government, not private parties. In 1896's
4089: 4059: 3748: 2813: 2139: 2107: 3780: 3692: 3636: 3550: 3542: 3438: 3336: 3921: 3296: 3165: 3085: 2019: 4079: 3518: 3117: 2933: 2909: 2610: 690: 4069: 3820: 3812: 3430: 3232: 3021: 779:, which did not restrict Chinese attendance at its schools as strictly, in case the decision went down against them. When it did, they settled in 3470: 2893: 2187: 1974: 999: 285:, they were told by administrators that their children could only attend the district's school for black children. Adrienne Berard points out in 2418: 640:, a 1917 case where, in an opinion he had also authored, a unanimous court upheld the dismissal of several children of a white couple from the 4109: 3969: 3320: 3077: 2925: 2718: 751: 365:, the United States began to deal with the place in society of two racial minorities: Blacks, especially those newly freed from slavery, and 761:, all of which had upheld segregation in the public sphere and particularly in the realm of public education. Accordingly, Taft concluded: 1160: 3772: 3684: 2311: 278: 4064: 2570: 938: 348:
a quarter-century later, it gave greater legal foundation to educational segregation in the short term and set back efforts to end it.
342:'s unanimous opinion ended with a pronouncement that all racial segregation in schools was constitutional; while it was overturned by 3796: 3328: 2343: 1666: 296:, a former governor of the state, represented the Lums, arguing that forcing the girls to attend the inferior school violated their 500: 378: 4074: 3609: 2474: 2075: 1942: 524: 386: 252: 2981: 2155: 1966: 4099: 2335: 971: 608: 549: 300:, and that since they were not Black they should be allowed to attend the schools for whites. He was able to win the writ of 3486: 3173: 3157: 3061: 1097:
Water Tossing Boulders: How a Family of Chinese Immigrants Led the First Fight to Desegregate Schools in the Jim Crow South
621: 3069: 2179: 1031: 838:" provisions supposedly governing segregation in light of the conditions found in many schools for Black children only: 787:
formally established some schools for Chinese students. They were never well-attended, and the last one closed in 1947.
731:
Late in November 1927 the Court announced its decision. In a nine-page unanimous opinion, with no footnotes, written by
3885: 3601: 3526: 2790: 336: 248: 38: 3945: 1885: 1618: 1262: 1109: 545: 3764: 2634: 552:
for two semesters. The following September, that ended when the school district, in response to the passage of the
465:
the same passenger coach with white citizens of the United States, while citizens of the black race in Louisiana,
2514: 2359: 1873: 370: 4094: 3344: 2202: 1095: 507:, where immigration laws were less enforced as employers sought to replace Black workers who had left for the 1986: 1725: 1659: 1226: 703:(himself later appointed to the Court), if it might be possible to find more competent counsel for the Lums. 475: 429:
public school was unconstitutional; the state responded by allowing the establishment of segregated schools.
4119: 2742: 2594: 2546: 2287: 1902: 1636: 1330: 598: 103:
Trial court ordered writ of mandamus. Reversed by Supreme Court of Mississippi, 139 Miss. 760, 104 So. 105.
3628: 2798: 2099: 1950: 1492: 857: 834:, a prominent Black newspaper, also ran a front-page editorial, condemning the decision as ignoring the " 516: 390: 344: 228: 2750: 1254: 641: 405: 523:
that primarily served the area's Black population, barred from many business establishments by strict
3953: 3360: 3352: 2965: 2386: 2319: 1290: 923: 305: 139: 1424: 1212: 699:, another case involving Chinese petitioners) was deeply disturbed by the brief; he asked a friend, 3985: 3929: 3093: 2650: 2618: 2249: 2043: 2027: 1652: 1516: 1474: 1456: 1232: 1147: 974:
with dark skin who was considered Black since she socialized with Black people and worshipped at a
868:
It is remembered today for increasing the scope of permissible segregation. Historian and educator
422: 1585: 3993: 3558: 3414: 2675: 2602: 1995: 1910: 790:
Earl Brewer continued to pursue civil rights cases in the courts. In 1936 he successfully argued
565: 553: 282: 171: 1609: 819:
put its response, praising the Court and advocating for further segregation, on the front page:
572:, to represent them in legal action against the district. The Lums and their daughters were the 3224: 1356: 508: 151: 1644: 1246: 3913: 3756: 3724: 3312: 2861: 1809: 1701: 1602: 958: 541: 480: 409: 274: 244: 67: 3905: 3652: 3502: 3395: 3200: 3133: 2642: 2578: 2458: 2295: 2123: 2083: 2035: 1450: 792: 693:, to the point that he had written several majority opinions to that effect (most recently 453: 374: 356: 175: 404:
Legal discrimination against Chinese immigrants began in California during the 1870s. The
8: 3836: 3788: 3732: 3668: 3660: 3593: 3510: 3446: 3109: 3053: 2997: 2989: 2626: 2506: 2490: 2367: 2147: 2131: 1825: 1709: 1567: 1400: 1368: 736: 695: 520: 339: 147: 131: 3897: 3716: 3708: 3534: 3494: 3462: 3379: 3248: 3240: 3208: 3125: 2949: 2901: 2877: 2845: 2766: 2710: 2702: 2554: 2450: 2265: 1934: 1849: 1778: 1689: 1551: 1498: 1406: 1206: 1186: 915: 835: 757: 686: 448: 434: 362: 4032: 4024: 3977: 3700: 3574: 3288: 3045: 2885: 2869: 2820: 2806: 2782: 2538: 2522: 2482: 2410: 2351: 2051: 1958: 1894: 1841: 1733: 1258: 1192: 1115: 1105: 815: 797: 700: 504: 366: 335:
to ask around if some other lawyer could be found on short notice to argue the case.
163: 3280: 3256: 2837: 2586: 2562: 2426: 1833: 1801: 1749: 1543: 830: 810: 780: 580: 256: 1513:"How a Chinese American Family Challenged School Segregation in 1920s Mississippi" 1362: 3102:
Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors of America v. Jacksonville
2694: 2434: 2303: 1857: 1817: 1741: 1534:
Payne, Charles (1984). "Multicultural Education and Racism in American Schools".
876:"the most racist Supreme Court decision in the twentieth century". Legal scholar 484: 398: 394: 393:
that made specific acts crimes when committed by Blacks, and vaguely worded anti-
183: 70: 1627: 3844: 3676: 3422: 3387: 3264: 2774: 2530: 2442: 2211: 1717: 1374: 1141: 884:, a history of the case. "By fighting, they had only made the enemy stronger." 682: 626: 561: 496: 417: 332: 331:; instead just decided on its briefs, and the Lums were so poor it led Justice 267: 159: 114:
race and segregating them is within state authority under Fourteenth Amendment.
1547: 1025: 4053: 3938:
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
3566: 2957: 2829: 2498: 2466: 2394: 2257: 2163: 2011: 1926: 1119: 732: 708: 512: 426: 328: 315: 1286: 3852: 3216: 2402: 1757: 1101: 975: 877: 869: 467:
many of whom, perhaps, risked their lives for the preservation of the Union
460:, noted the dissonance between the legal treatment of Blacks and Chinese: 397:
laws that allowed many Black men to be taken into custody for purposes of
2003: 1918: 1790: 716: 677: 569: 381:. States that had formerly allowed slavery dealt with the former through 293: 3182:
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
357:
Legal discrimination against Blacks and Chinese in the late 19th century
3272: 1555: 901: 655: 323: 86: 3150:
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
3006:
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
1326: 744:
colored school which the plaintiff Martha Lum may conveniently attend.
633: 573: 895: 2068:
Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists
776: 382: 301: 1580: 603: 585: 310: 2274:
Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York
1674: 389:
in public accommodations such as transport and public schools,
82: 33: 2328:
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community
1027:
The Story of California From the Earliest Days to the Present
813:
account of the decision. Some responded with editorials. The
1000:"BROWN V. BOARD: Timeline of School Integration in the U.S." 961:
severely limited which Chinese could lawfully enter the U.S.
934:
List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Taft Court
1562:
White, G. Edward. "The lost episode of Gong Lum v. Rice."
304:
they sought, but then the school district appealed to the
3962:
Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
1866:
O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
1089: 1087: 1085: 1083: 1081: 1079: 1077: 1075: 1073: 1071: 1069: 2759:
Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
1251:
Asian American Children: A Historical Handbook and Guide
1067: 1065: 1063: 1061: 1059: 1057: 1055: 1053: 1051: 1049: 616:
required that the Lum children be schooled with whites.
290:
their daughters to continue attending the white school.
2172:
Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.
2854:
Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
261:
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
2918:
United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education
2060:
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health
1316: 1314: 1046: 929:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 275
775:
The Lums had pre-emptively moved across the river to
532:
consistently earned good grades in the local school.
263:. The decision effectively approved the exclusion of 3749:
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
2814:
Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
2140:
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
1030:. Chicago: A.C. McClurg & Co. pp. 283ā€“296. 891: 568:
who had just overwhelmingly lost an election to the
4105:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court
3637:
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.
579:A lower court granted the plaintiff's request of a 3297:Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney 3166:Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action 2020:Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth 1311: 2934:Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education 2611:Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 1276: 1274: 798:confessions obtained through beatings and torture 4051: 3813:City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc. 3022:Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 515:. Lum, too, opened a general store in the small 373:in large numbers first to try their luck in the 327:petition to review the case. The case was never 4085:Overruled United States Supreme Court decisions 2894:Green v. County School Board of New Kent County 2419:Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. 749:brown, yellow or black races." In reference to 425:held that a Chinese student's exclusion from a 1271: 3970:Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs 3321:Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County 3078:Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell 2926:Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education 2719:Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education 1660: 752:Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education 503:from Canada in 1904 and settled in the lower 4115:United States racial discrimination case law 2188:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 2092:Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health 1975:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 1244: 592: 4090:Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States 4060:United States school desegregation case law 3773:Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia 3685:Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections 2674: 2312:Will v. Michigan Department of State Police 1301: 1299: 479:two years later, where the Court held that 456:, the sole dissenter as he had been in the 270:children from schools reserved for whites. 3038:Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education 2571:Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill 1667: 1653: 1510: 939:Chinese Americans in the Mississippi Delta 809:Newspapers around the country carried the 796:before the Supreme Court, which held that 314:and unanimously reversed the lower court, 273:The case was brought by the Lum family of 3797:New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer 3329:Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan 2344:Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee 259:from a public school did not violate the 16:1927 U.S. Supreme Court civil rights case 4080:Education in Bolivar County, Mississippi 3030:Washington v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1 1296: 487:in dissenting in part on those grounds. 361:In the late 19th century, following the 321:The U.S. Supreme Court granted Brewer's 4070:United States equal protection case law 3741:Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. 3610:Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward 2475:Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur 2076:Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 1943:Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 726: 483:were citizens, he joined Chief Justice 4052: 3884: 2982:Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver 1777: 1688: 1093: 1023: 251:case in which the Court held that the 4012: 3883: 2673: 2336:City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams 1776: 1687: 1648: 1533: 662: 550:Rosedale Consolidated School District 535: 21:1927 United States Supreme Court case 4110:Education segregation in Mississippi 3062:Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education 2203:Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes 1542:(2). Taylor & Francis: 124ā€“131. 544:and moved there. The girls attended 540:In 1923, the Lums bought a house in 3829:Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public Schools 3645:Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth 3070:City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. 2180:June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo 2156:Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt 1967:Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt 970:The record suggests that she was a 667: 116:Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed. 13: 3602:Arlington County Board v. Richards 3527:Examining Board v. Flores de Otero 3305:Wengler v. Druggists Mut. Ins. Co. 2791:McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents 1676:United States Fourteenth Amendment 1527: 560:there. They retained local lawyer 369:, who had begun emigrating to the 39:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 4131: 4065:United States Supreme Court cases 3946:Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents 3487:Takahashi v. Fish and Game Comm'n 1573: 804: 632:Ethridge found the most relevant 601:, which decided to hear the case 546:Rosedale Consolidated High School 490: 279:anti-Chinese sentiment nationwide 3765:Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas 3174:Fisher v. University of Texas II 2635:Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. 1605:78 (1927) is available from: 1579: 1034:from the original on May 9, 2008 908: 894: 501:illegally immigrated to the U.S. 32: 3479:Ohio ex rel. Clark v. Deckebach 3158:Fisher v. University of Texas I 2515:Moore v. City of East Cleveland 2360:Los Angeles County v. Humphries 1874:West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish 1504: 1484: 1462: 1442: 1430: 1412: 1392: 1380: 1348: 1336: 1238: 1146:, 66 Cal. 473 ( 964: 57:Gong Lum, et al. v. Rice et al. 4075:1927 in United States case law 3345:J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. 1218: 1198: 1178: 1153: 1133: 1017: 992: 951: 438:, the Court had held that the 1: 3014:Dayton Bd. of Ed. v. Brinkman 2219:McNeese v. Board of Education 1726:United States v. Wong Kim Ark 1227:United States v. Wong Kim Ark 985: 597:The trustees appealed to the 476:United States v. Wong Kim Ark 351: 4100:Legal history of Mississippi 2743:Hirabayashi v. United States 2595:DeShaney v. Winnebago County 2547:Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. 2288:Owen v. City of Independence 1903:Pierce v. Society of Sisters 770: 599:Supreme Court of Mississippi 253:exclusion on account of race 7: 3629:United States v. Cruikshank 2799:Brown v. Board of Education 2100:Planned Parenthood v. Casey 1951:Planned Parenthood v. Casey 1511:Lee Rawles (May 17, 2017). 1493:Brown v. Board of Education 887: 858:Brown v. Board of Education 345:Brown v. Board of Education 249:United States Supreme Court 229:Brown v. Board of Education 10: 4136: 2751:Korematsu v. United States 1255:Greenwood Publishing Group 1245:Tong, Benson, ed. (2004). 735:and former U.S. President 622:Mississippi's constitution 495:Jeu Gong Lum, a native of 432:Two years earlier, in the 423:California's Supreme Court 406:Naturalization Act of 1870 46:Submitted October 12, 1927 4019: 4013: 4008: 3954:United States v. Morrison 3892: 3879: 3620: 3585: 3406: 3371: 3361:United States v. Skrmetti 3353:United States v. Virginia 3192: 2966:Guey Heung Lee v. Johnson 2686: 2682: 2669: 2387:Jacobson v. Massachusetts 2378: 2320:Gonzaga University v. Doe 2198: 1985: 1884: 1789: 1785: 1772: 1696: 1683: 1548:10.1080/00405848409543102 1094:Berard, Adrienne (2016). 1024:Norton, Henry K. (1924). 924:1927 in the United States 847: 593:Mississippi Supreme Court 306:Mississippi Supreme Court 226: 219: 212: 207: 196: 191: 125: 120: 112: 107: 99: 94: 62: 52: 48:Decided November 21, 1927 45: 31: 26: 3986:United States v. Georgia 3930:City of Boerne v. Flores 3094:United States v. Fordice 2651:Williams v. Pennsylvania 2619:Washington v. Glucksberg 1517:American Bar Association 944: 3994:Shelby County v. Holder 3559:Cabell v. Chavez-Salido 3415:Patsone v. Pennsylvania 2676:Equal Protection Clause 2603:Michael H. v. Gerald D. 1996:United States v. Vuitch 1911:Griswold v. Connecticut 554:Immigration Act of 1924 308:, which heard the case 283:Immigration Act of 1924 3861:Armour v. Indianapolis 3225:Moritz v. Commissioner 2281:Procunier v. Navarette 2199:Civil rights liability 1987:Abortion jurisprudence 1566:18.2 (2015): 191ā€“205. 1475:93 F.Supp. 327 1357:Ozawa v. United States 882:Water Tossing Boulders 845: 826: 768: 746: 471: 287:Water Tossing Boulders 214:U.S. Const. amend. XIV 4095:Asian-American issues 3914:Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer 3757:Richardson v. Ramirez 3725:Boddie v. Connecticut 3313:Kirchberg v. Feenstra 3142:Johnson v. California 2862:McLaughlin v. Florida 2250:O'Connor v. Donaldson 1810:Allgeyer v. Louisiana 1702:Slaughter-House Cases 1327:114 Miss. 560 1287:139 Miss. 760 959:Chinese Exclusion Act 840: 821: 763: 741: 481:American-born Chinese 462: 410:Chinese Exclusion Act 281:after passage of the 275:Rosedale, Mississippi 3906:Katzenbach v. Morgan 3653:Breedlove v. Suttles 3503:Graham v. Richardson 3396:Obergefell v. Hodges 3201:Breedlove v. Suttles 3134:Grutter v. Bollinger 2974:Jefferson v. Hackney 2643:Obergefell v. Hodges 2579:Edwards v. Aguillard 2459:Epperson v. Arkansas 2296:Harlow v. Fitzgerald 2231:Jenkins v. McKeithen 2124:Mazurek v. Armstrong 2084:Hodgson v. Minnesota 2044:Bellotti v. Baird II 2036:Colautti v. Franklin 1791:Economic substantive 1536:Theory into Practice 1499:347 U.S. 483 1457:297 U.S. 278 1451:Brown v. Mississippi 1407:259 U.S. 276 1375:260 U.S. 199 1363:260 U.S. 178 1233:169 U.S. 649 1213:163 U.S. 537 1003:Learning for Justice 793:Brown v. Mississippi 727:Opinion of the Court 614:Fourteenth Amendment 589:by the authorities. 454:John Marshall Harlan 375:California Gold Rush 298:Fourteenth Amendment 140:Oliver W. Holmes Jr. 4120:1927 in Mississippi 3837:Gregory v. Ashcroft 3805:Mills v. Habluetzel 3789:Zablocki v. Redhail 3733:Eisenstadt v. Baird 3669:Oyama v. California 3661:Skinner v. Oklahoma 3594:Shapiro v. Thompson 3511:Sugarman v. Dougall 3455:Porterfield v. Webb 3447:Terrace v. Thompson 3110:Missouri v. Jenkins 3054:Hunter v. Underwood 2998:Milliken v. Bradley 2990:Norwood v. Harrison 2942:McDaniel v. Barresi 2627:Troxel v. Granville 2507:Mathews v. Eldridge 2491:Taylor v. Louisiana 2368:Connick v. Thompson 2148:Gonzales v. Carhart 2132:Stenberg v. Carhart 2116:Lambert v. Wicklund 2028:Bellotti v. Baird I 1826:Lochner v. New York 1710:Minor v. Happersett 1637:Library of Congress 1425:275 U.S. 78 1401:Ng Fung Ho v. White 1369:Yamashita v. Hinkle 737:William Howard Taft 696:Ng Fung Ho v. White 340:William Howard Taft 152:James C. McReynolds 148:Willis Van Devanter 3898:Civil Rights Cases 3886:Enforcement Clause 3717:Oregon v. Mitchell 3709:Williams v. Rhodes 3535:Nyquist v. Mauclet 3495:Hernandez v. Texas 3380:Bowers v. Hardwick 3372:Sexual orientation 3249:Stanton v. Stanton 3241:Geduldig v. Aiello 3209:Goesaert v. Cleary 3126:Gratz v. Bollinger 2950:Palmer v. Thompson 2902:Hunter v. Erickson 2878:Loving v. Virginia 2846:Anderson v. Martin 2767:Shelley v. Kraemer 2711:Plessy v. Ferguson 2703:Yick Wo v. Hopkins 2555:Kolender v. Lawson 2451:Loving v. Virginia 2266:Imbler v. Pachtman 2243:Wood v. Strickland 2108:Leavitt v. Jane L. 1935:Bowers v. Hardwick 1850:Buchanan v. Warley 1779:Due Process Clause 1690:Citizenship Clause 1470:Epps v. Carmichael 1322:Moreau v. Grandich 1207:Plessy v. Ferguson 1193:109 U.S. 3 1187:Civil Rights Cases 1166:. 1885. p. 99 916:Mississippi portal 836:separate but equal 758:Plessy v. Ferguson 687:due process rights 663:U.S. Supreme Court 638:Moreau v. Grandich 536:Underlying dispute 525:racial segregation 458:Civil Rights Cases 449:Plessy v. Ferguson 435:Civil Rights Cases 387:racial segregation 136:Associate Justices 4047: 4046: 4043: 4042: 4033:Trump v. Anderson 4025:Gold Clause Cases 4004: 4003: 3978:Tennessee v. Lane 3875: 3874: 3871: 3870: 3781:Trimble v. Gordon 3701:Levy v. Louisiana 3693:Rinaldi v. Yeager 3575:Bernal v. Fainter 3551:Ambach v. Norwick 3543:Foley v. Connelie 3439:Crane v. New York 3337:Lehr v. Robertson 3289:Caban v. Mohammed 3046:Palmore v. Sidoti 2886:Lee v. Washington 2870:Reitman v. Mulkey 2821:Gebhart v. Belton 2807:Briggs v. Elliott 2783:Sweatt v. Painter 2665: 2664: 2661: 2660: 2539:Parratt v. Taylor 2523:Duren v. Missouri 2483:Arnett v. Kennedy 2411:Powell v. Alabama 2352:Ashcroft v. Iqbal 2237:Scheuer v. Rhodes 2052:H. L. v. Matheson 1959:Lawrence v. Texas 1895:Meyer v. Nebraska 1842:Coppage v. Kansas 1768: 1767: 1734:Perez v. Brownell 1584:Works related to 1365: (1922). and 1235:, 731 (1898). 1215:, 561 (1896). 957:At the time, the 816:Los Angeles Times 701:Felix Frankfurter 505:Mississippi Delta 415:In the 1885 case 236: 235: 176:Edward T. Sanford 164:George Sutherland 81:48 S. Ct. 91; 72 4127: 4010: 4009: 3922:Dellmuth v. Muth 3881: 3880: 3281:Parham v. Hughes 3257:Edwards v. Healy 3086:Freeman v. Pitts 2841:(M.D. Ala. 1956) 2838:Browder v. Gayle 2684: 2683: 2671: 2670: 2587:Turner v. Safley 2563:Hudson v. Palmer 2427:NAACP v. Alabama 1886:Right to privacy 1834:Muller v. Oregon 1802:Mugler v. Kansas 1787: 1786: 1774: 1773: 1750:Rogers v. Bellei 1685: 1684: 1669: 1662: 1655: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1635: 1632: 1626: 1623: 1617: 1614: 1608: 1587:Gong Lum v. Rice 1583: 1559: 1521: 1520: 1508: 1502: 1496: 1488: 1482: 1472: 1466: 1460: 1454: 1446: 1440: 1434: 1428: 1427:, 84 (1927). 1422: 1416: 1410: 1404: 1396: 1390: 1384: 1378: 1372: 1360: 1352: 1346: 1340: 1334: 1324: 1318: 1309: 1303: 1294: 1284: 1282:Rice v. Gong Lum 1278: 1269: 1268: 1242: 1236: 1230: 1222: 1216: 1210: 1202: 1196: 1190: 1182: 1176: 1175: 1173: 1171: 1165: 1157: 1151: 1145: 1137: 1131: 1130: 1128: 1126: 1091: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1039: 1021: 1015: 1014: 1012: 1010: 996: 979: 968: 962: 955: 918: 913: 912: 911: 904: 899: 898: 831:Chicago Defender 811:Associated Press 668:Before the Court 609:Native Americans 581:writ of mandamus 257:Chinese ancestry 247:78 (1927), is a 200:Taft, joined by 121:Court membership 36: 35: 24: 23: 4135: 4134: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4039: 4015: 4000: 3888: 3867: 3616: 3581: 3519:In re Griffiths 3463:Webb v. O'Brien 3402: 3367: 3188: 3118:Texas v. Lesage 2910:Hadnott v. Amos 2695:Pace v. Alabama 2678: 2657: 2435:Hoyt v. Florida 2374: 2304:Felder v. Casey 2200: 2194: 1981: 1880: 1858:Adams v. Tanner 1818:Holden v. Hardy 1792: 1781: 1764: 1742:Afroyim v. Rusk 1692: 1679: 1673: 1639: 1633: 1630: 1624: 1621: 1615: 1612: 1606: 1576: 1530: 1528:Further reading 1525: 1524: 1509: 1505: 1490: 1489: 1485: 1477:, 330ā€“331 ( 1468: 1467: 1463: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1435: 1431: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1385: 1381: 1366: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1341: 1337: 1320: 1319: 1312: 1304: 1297: 1280: 1279: 1272: 1265: 1243: 1239: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1169: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1139: 1138: 1134: 1124: 1122: 1112: 1092: 1047: 1037: 1035: 1022: 1018: 1008: 1006: 1005:. April 1, 2004 998: 997: 993: 988: 983: 982: 972:Native American 969: 965: 956: 952: 947: 914: 909: 907: 900: 893: 890: 850: 807: 773: 729: 691:Fifth Amendment 670: 665: 595: 538: 493: 485:Melville Fuller 399:convict leasing 385:laws mandating 359: 354: 232:(1954, in part) 222: 184:Harlan F. Stone 174: 162: 150: 132:William H. Taft 115: 90: 47: 41: 22: 17: 12: 11: 5: 4133: 4123: 4122: 4117: 4112: 4107: 4102: 4097: 4092: 4087: 4082: 4077: 4072: 4067: 4062: 4045: 4044: 4041: 4040: 4038: 4037: 4029: 4020: 4017: 4016: 4006: 4005: 4002: 4001: 3999: 3998: 3990: 3982: 3974: 3966: 3958: 3950: 3942: 3934: 3926: 3918: 3910: 3902: 3893: 3890: 3889: 3877: 3876: 3873: 3872: 3869: 3868: 3866: 3865: 3857: 3849: 3845:Vacco v. Quill 3841: 3833: 3825: 3821:Clark v. Jeter 3817: 3809: 3801: 3793: 3785: 3777: 3769: 3761: 3753: 3745: 3737: 3729: 3721: 3713: 3705: 3697: 3689: 3681: 3677:Oyler v. Boles 3673: 3665: 3657: 3649: 3641: 3633: 3624: 3622: 3618: 3617: 3615: 3614: 3606: 3598: 3589: 3587: 3583: 3582: 3580: 3579: 3571: 3563: 3555: 3547: 3539: 3531: 3523: 3515: 3507: 3499: 3491: 3483: 3475: 3467: 3459: 3451: 3443: 3435: 3431:Heim v. McCall 3427: 3423:Truax v. Raich 3419: 3410: 3408: 3404: 3403: 3401: 3400: 3392: 3388:Romer v. Evans 3384: 3375: 3373: 3369: 3368: 3366: 3365: 3357: 3349: 3341: 3333: 3325: 3317: 3309: 3301: 3293: 3285: 3277: 3269: 3265:Craig v. Boren 3261: 3253: 3245: 3237: 3233:Kahn v. Shevin 3229: 3221: 3213: 3205: 3196: 3194: 3190: 3189: 3187: 3186: 3178: 3170: 3162: 3154: 3146: 3138: 3130: 3122: 3114: 3106: 3098: 3090: 3082: 3074: 3066: 3058: 3050: 3042: 3034: 3026: 3018: 3010: 3002: 2994: 2986: 2978: 2970: 2962: 2954: 2946: 2938: 2930: 2922: 2914: 2906: 2898: 2890: 2882: 2874: 2866: 2858: 2850: 2842: 2834: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2817: 2810: 2795: 2787: 2779: 2775:Perez v. Sharp 2771: 2763: 2755: 2747: 2739: 2735:Smith v. Texas 2731: 2723: 2715: 2707: 2699: 2690: 2688: 2680: 2679: 2667: 2666: 2663: 2662: 2659: 2658: 2656: 2655: 2647: 2639: 2631: 2623: 2615: 2607: 2599: 2591: 2583: 2575: 2567: 2559: 2551: 2543: 2535: 2531:Parham v. J.R. 2527: 2519: 2511: 2503: 2495: 2487: 2479: 2471: 2463: 2455: 2447: 2443:Oyler v. Boles 2439: 2431: 2423: 2415: 2407: 2399: 2391: 2382: 2380: 2376: 2375: 2373: 2372: 2364: 2356: 2348: 2340: 2332: 2324: 2316: 2308: 2300: 2292: 2284: 2278: 2270: 2262: 2254: 2246: 2240: 2234: 2228: 2225:Pierson v. Ray 2222: 2216: 2212:Monroe v. Pape 2207: 2205: 2196: 2195: 2193: 2192: 2184: 2176: 2168: 2160: 2152: 2144: 2136: 2128: 2120: 2112: 2104: 2096: 2088: 2080: 2072: 2064: 2056: 2048: 2040: 2032: 2024: 2016: 2008: 2000: 1991: 1989: 1983: 1982: 1980: 1979: 1971: 1963: 1955: 1947: 1939: 1931: 1923: 1915: 1907: 1899: 1890: 1888: 1882: 1881: 1879: 1878: 1870: 1862: 1854: 1846: 1838: 1830: 1822: 1814: 1806: 1797: 1795: 1783: 1782: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1763: 1762: 1754: 1746: 1738: 1730: 1722: 1718:Elk v. Wilkins 1714: 1706: 1697: 1694: 1693: 1681: 1680: 1672: 1671: 1664: 1657: 1649: 1643: 1642: 1591: 1575: 1574:External links 1572: 1571: 1570: 1560: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1522: 1503: 1483: 1461: 1441: 1429: 1411: 1391: 1379: 1347: 1335: 1310: 1295: 1270: 1263: 1237: 1217: 1197: 1177: 1152: 1142:Tape v. Hurley 1132: 1110: 1045: 1016: 990: 989: 987: 984: 981: 980: 963: 949: 948: 946: 943: 942: 941: 936: 931: 926: 920: 919: 905: 889: 886: 849: 846: 806: 805:Press reaction 803: 772: 769: 728: 725: 683:Louis Brandeis 669: 666: 664: 661: 627:Caucasian race 594: 591: 562:Earl L. Brewer 537: 534: 517:Bolivar County 497:southern China 492: 491:The Lum family 489: 418:Tape v. Hurley 358: 355: 353: 350: 333:Louis Brandeis 288: 255:of a child of 234: 233: 224: 223: 220: 217: 216: 210: 209: 205: 204: 198: 194: 193: 189: 188: 187: 186: 160:Louis Brandeis 137: 134: 129: 123: 122: 118: 117: 110: 109: 105: 104: 101: 97: 96: 92: 91: 80: 64: 60: 59: 54: 53:Full case name 50: 49: 43: 42: 37: 29: 28: 20: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4132: 4121: 4118: 4116: 4113: 4111: 4108: 4106: 4103: 4101: 4098: 4096: 4093: 4091: 4088: 4086: 4083: 4081: 4078: 4076: 4073: 4071: 4068: 4066: 4063: 4061: 4058: 4057: 4055: 4035: 4034: 4030: 4027: 4026: 4022: 4021: 4018: 4011: 4007: 3996: 3995: 3991: 3988: 3987: 3983: 3980: 3979: 3975: 3972: 3971: 3967: 3964: 3963: 3959: 3956: 3955: 3951: 3948: 3947: 3943: 3940: 3939: 3935: 3932: 3931: 3927: 3924: 3923: 3919: 3916: 3915: 3911: 3908: 3907: 3903: 3900: 3899: 3895: 3894: 3891: 3887: 3882: 3878: 3863: 3862: 3858: 3855: 3854: 3850: 3847: 3846: 3842: 3839: 3838: 3834: 3831: 3830: 3826: 3823: 3822: 3818: 3815: 3814: 3810: 3807: 3806: 3802: 3799: 3798: 3794: 3791: 3790: 3786: 3783: 3782: 3778: 3775: 3774: 3770: 3767: 3766: 3762: 3759: 3758: 3754: 3751: 3750: 3746: 3743: 3742: 3738: 3735: 3734: 3730: 3727: 3726: 3722: 3719: 3718: 3714: 3711: 3710: 3706: 3703: 3702: 3698: 3695: 3694: 3690: 3687: 3686: 3682: 3679: 3678: 3674: 3671: 3670: 3666: 3663: 3662: 3658: 3655: 3654: 3650: 3647: 3646: 3642: 3639: 3638: 3634: 3631: 3630: 3626: 3625: 3623: 3619: 3612: 3611: 3607: 3604: 3603: 3599: 3596: 3595: 3591: 3590: 3588: 3584: 3577: 3576: 3572: 3569: 3568: 3567:Plyler v. Doe 3564: 3561: 3560: 3556: 3553: 3552: 3548: 3545: 3544: 3540: 3537: 3536: 3532: 3529: 3528: 3524: 3521: 3520: 3516: 3513: 3512: 3508: 3505: 3504: 3500: 3497: 3496: 3492: 3489: 3488: 3484: 3481: 3480: 3476: 3473: 3472: 3471:Frick v. Webb 3468: 3465: 3464: 3460: 3457: 3456: 3452: 3449: 3448: 3444: 3441: 3440: 3436: 3433: 3432: 3428: 3425: 3424: 3420: 3417: 3416: 3412: 3411: 3409: 3405: 3398: 3397: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3382: 3381: 3377: 3376: 3374: 3370: 3363: 3362: 3358: 3355: 3354: 3350: 3347: 3346: 3342: 3339: 3338: 3334: 3331: 3330: 3326: 3323: 3322: 3318: 3315: 3314: 3310: 3307: 3306: 3302: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3291: 3290: 3286: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3275: 3274: 3270: 3267: 3266: 3262: 3259: 3258: 3254: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3243: 3242: 3238: 3235: 3234: 3230: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3219: 3218: 3214: 3211: 3210: 3206: 3203: 3202: 3198: 3197: 3195: 3191: 3184: 3183: 3179: 3176: 3175: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3160: 3159: 3155: 3152: 3151: 3147: 3144: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3135: 3131: 3128: 3127: 3123: 3120: 3119: 3115: 3112: 3111: 3107: 3104: 3103: 3099: 3096: 3095: 3091: 3088: 3087: 3083: 3080: 3079: 3075: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3064: 3063: 3059: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3048: 3047: 3043: 3040: 3039: 3035: 3032: 3031: 3027: 3024: 3023: 3019: 3016: 3015: 3011: 3008: 3007: 3003: 3000: 2999: 2995: 2992: 2991: 2987: 2984: 2983: 2979: 2976: 2975: 2971: 2968: 2967: 2963: 2960: 2959: 2958:Coit v. Green 2955: 2952: 2951: 2947: 2944: 2943: 2939: 2936: 2935: 2931: 2928: 2927: 2923: 2920: 2919: 2915: 2912: 2911: 2907: 2904: 2903: 2899: 2896: 2895: 2891: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2880: 2879: 2875: 2872: 2871: 2867: 2864: 2863: 2859: 2856: 2855: 2851: 2848: 2847: 2843: 2840: 2839: 2835: 2832: 2831: 2830:Lucy v. Adams 2827: 2823: 2822: 2818: 2816: 2815: 2811: 2809: 2808: 2804: 2803: 2801: 2800: 2796: 2793: 2792: 2788: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2769: 2768: 2764: 2761: 2760: 2756: 2753: 2752: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2737: 2736: 2732: 2729: 2728: 2724: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2713: 2712: 2708: 2705: 2704: 2700: 2697: 2696: 2692: 2691: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2672: 2668: 2653: 2652: 2648: 2645: 2644: 2640: 2637: 2636: 2632: 2629: 2628: 2624: 2621: 2620: 2616: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2605: 2604: 2600: 2597: 2596: 2592: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2581: 2580: 2576: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2565: 2564: 2560: 2557: 2556: 2552: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2541: 2540: 2536: 2533: 2532: 2528: 2525: 2524: 2520: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2509: 2508: 2504: 2501: 2500: 2499:Goss v. Lopez 2496: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2485: 2484: 2480: 2477: 2476: 2472: 2469: 2468: 2467:In re Winship 2464: 2461: 2460: 2456: 2453: 2452: 2448: 2445: 2444: 2440: 2437: 2436: 2432: 2429: 2428: 2424: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2413: 2412: 2408: 2405: 2404: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2395:Zucht v. King 2392: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2381: 2377: 2370: 2369: 2365: 2362: 2361: 2357: 2354: 2353: 2349: 2346: 2345: 2341: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2330: 2329: 2325: 2322: 2321: 2317: 2314: 2313: 2309: 2306: 2305: 2301: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2290: 2289: 2285: 2282: 2279: 2276: 2275: 2271: 2268: 2267: 2263: 2260: 2259: 2258:Paul v. Davis 2255: 2252: 2251: 2247: 2244: 2241: 2238: 2235: 2232: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2220: 2217: 2214: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2206: 2204: 2197: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2182: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2166: 2165: 2164:Azar v. Garza 2161: 2158: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2145: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2134: 2133: 2129: 2126: 2125: 2121: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2102: 2101: 2097: 2094: 2093: 2089: 2086: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2077: 2073: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2062: 2061: 2057: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2030: 2029: 2025: 2022: 2021: 2017: 2014: 2013: 2012:Doe v. Bolton 2009: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1998: 1997: 1993: 1992: 1990: 1988: 1984: 1977: 1976: 1972: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1961: 1960: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1929: 1928: 1927:Doe v. Bolton 1924: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1892: 1891: 1889: 1887: 1883: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1868: 1867: 1863: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1836: 1835: 1831: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1820: 1819: 1815: 1812: 1811: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1798: 1796: 1794: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1775: 1771: 1760: 1759: 1755: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1686: 1682: 1677: 1670: 1665: 1663: 1658: 1656: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1638: 1629: 1620: 1611: 1610:CourtListener 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1590:at Wikisource 1589: 1588: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1532: 1531: 1518: 1514: 1507: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1487: 1480: 1476: 1471: 1465: 1458: 1453: 1452: 1445: 1438: 1433: 1426: 1421: 1415: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1395: 1388: 1383: 1376: 1371: 1370: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1351: 1344: 1339: 1332: 1328: 1323: 1317: 1315: 1307: 1302: 1300: 1292: 1288: 1283: 1277: 1275: 1266: 1264:9780313330421 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1241: 1234: 1229: 1228: 1221: 1214: 1209: 1208: 1201: 1194: 1189: 1188: 1181: 1162: 1156: 1149: 1144: 1143: 1136: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1111:9780807033531 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1090: 1088: 1086: 1084: 1082: 1080: 1078: 1076: 1074: 1072: 1070: 1068: 1066: 1064: 1062: 1060: 1058: 1056: 1054: 1052: 1050: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1020: 1004: 1001: 995: 991: 977: 973: 967: 960: 954: 950: 940: 937: 935: 932: 930: 927: 925: 922: 921: 917: 906: 903: 897: 892: 885: 883: 879: 875: 871: 866: 864: 860: 859: 854: 844: 839: 837: 833: 832: 825: 820: 818: 817: 812: 802: 799: 795: 794: 788: 784: 782: 778: 767: 762: 760: 759: 754: 753: 745: 740: 738: 734: 733:Chief Justice 724: 722: 718: 712: 710: 709:oral argument 704: 702: 698: 697: 692: 688: 684: 679: 674: 660: 658: 657: 650: 646: 643: 642:Bay St. Louis 639: 635: 630: 628: 623: 617: 615: 610: 606: 605: 600: 590: 588: 587: 582: 577: 575: 571: 567: 563: 557: 555: 551: 547: 543: 533: 529: 526: 522: 518: 514: 513:general store 510: 506: 502: 498: 488: 486: 482: 478: 477: 470: 468: 461: 459: 455: 451: 450: 445: 441: 437: 436: 430: 428: 427:San Francisco 424: 420: 419: 413: 411: 407: 402: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 349: 347: 346: 341: 338: 337:Chief Justice 334: 330: 326: 325: 319: 317: 313: 312: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 286: 284: 280: 276: 271: 269: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 241: 231: 230: 225: 218: 215: 211: 206: 203: 199: 195: 190: 185: 181: 177: 173: 172:Pierce Butler 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 138: 135: 133: 130: 128:Chief Justice 127: 126: 124: 119: 111: 106: 102: 98: 93: 88: 84: 78: 77: 72: 69: 65: 61: 58: 55: 51: 44: 40: 30: 25: 19: 4031: 4023: 3992: 3984: 3976: 3968: 3960: 3952: 3944: 3936: 3928: 3920: 3912: 3904: 3896: 3859: 3853:Bush v. Gore 3851: 3843: 3835: 3827: 3819: 3811: 3803: 3795: 3787: 3779: 3771: 3763: 3755: 3747: 3739: 3731: 3723: 3715: 3707: 3699: 3691: 3683: 3675: 3667: 3659: 3651: 3643: 3635: 3627: 3608: 3600: 3592: 3573: 3565: 3557: 3549: 3541: 3533: 3525: 3517: 3509: 3501: 3493: 3485: 3477: 3469: 3461: 3453: 3445: 3437: 3429: 3421: 3413: 3394: 3386: 3378: 3359: 3351: 3343: 3335: 3327: 3319: 3311: 3303: 3295: 3287: 3279: 3271: 3263: 3255: 3247: 3239: 3231: 3223: 3217:Reed v. Reed 3215: 3207: 3199: 3180: 3172: 3164: 3156: 3148: 3140: 3132: 3124: 3116: 3108: 3100: 3092: 3084: 3076: 3068: 3060: 3052: 3044: 3036: 3028: 3020: 3012: 3004: 2996: 2988: 2980: 2972: 2964: 2956: 2948: 2940: 2932: 2924: 2916: 2908: 2900: 2892: 2884: 2876: 2868: 2860: 2852: 2844: 2836: 2828: 2819: 2812: 2805: 2797: 2789: 2781: 2773: 2765: 2757: 2749: 2741: 2733: 2726: 2725: 2717: 2709: 2701: 2693: 2649: 2641: 2633: 2625: 2617: 2609: 2601: 2593: 2585: 2577: 2569: 2561: 2553: 2545: 2537: 2529: 2521: 2513: 2505: 2497: 2489: 2481: 2473: 2465: 2457: 2449: 2441: 2433: 2425: 2417: 2409: 2403:Buck v. Bell 2401: 2393: 2385: 2366: 2358: 2350: 2342: 2334: 2326: 2318: 2310: 2302: 2294: 2286: 2280: 2272: 2264: 2256: 2248: 2242: 2236: 2230: 2224: 2218: 2210: 2186: 2178: 2170: 2162: 2154: 2146: 2138: 2130: 2122: 2114: 2106: 2098: 2090: 2082: 2074: 2066: 2058: 2050: 2042: 2034: 2026: 2018: 2010: 2002: 1994: 1973: 1965: 1957: 1949: 1941: 1933: 1925: 1917: 1909: 1901: 1893: 1872: 1864: 1856: 1848: 1840: 1832: 1824: 1816: 1808: 1800: 1758:Saenz v. Roe 1756: 1748: 1740: 1732: 1724: 1716: 1708: 1700: 1594: 1586: 1563: 1539: 1535: 1506: 1501: (1954). 1491: 1486: 1469: 1464: 1459: (1936). 1449: 1444: 1436: 1432: 1419: 1414: 1409: (1922). 1399: 1394: 1386: 1382: 1377: (1922). 1367: 1355: 1350: 1342: 1338: 1321: 1305: 1281: 1250: 1240: 1225: 1220: 1205: 1200: 1195: (1883). 1185: 1180: 1168:. Retrieved 1155: 1140: 1135: 1123:. Retrieved 1102:Beacon Press 1096: 1036:. Retrieved 1026: 1019: 1007:. Retrieved 1002: 994: 976:black church 966: 953: 881: 878:Jamal Greene 873: 870:James Loewen 867: 862: 856: 852: 851: 841: 829: 827: 822: 814: 808: 791: 789: 785: 774: 764: 756: 750: 747: 742: 730: 720: 713: 705: 694: 675: 671: 654: 651: 647: 637: 631: 618: 602: 596: 584: 578: 558: 539: 530: 494: 474: 472: 463: 457: 447: 433: 431: 416: 414: 403: 360: 343: 322: 320: 309: 292: 272: 264: 239: 238: 237: 227: 221:Overruled by 208:Laws applied 201: 192:Case opinion 179: 167: 155: 143: 95:Case history 74: 56: 18: 2778:(Cal. 1948) 2727:Lum v. Rice 2004:Roe v. Wade 1919:Roe v. Wade 1793:due process 1595:Lum v. Rice 1515:(Podcast). 1481: 1950). 1420:Lum v. Rice 1333: 1917). 1293: 1925). 1170:October 10, 1150: 1885). 1038:October 10, 723:before it. 721:Lum v. Rice 717:continuance 570:U.S. Senate 564:, a former 391:Black Codes 379:cheap labor 294:Earl Brewer 240:Lum v. Rice 27:Lum v. Rice 4054:Categories 3273:Orr v. Orr 1439:, at 86ā€“87 1125:October 8, 1100:. Boston: 986:References 902:Law portal 689:under the 656:certiorari 574:plaintiffs 444:Fourteenth 440:Thirteenth 371:West Coast 352:Background 324:certiorari 87:U.S. LEXIS 85:172; 1927 3586:Residency 1564:Green Bag 1389:, 781ā€“784 1120:939994405 1009:March 18, 771:Aftermath 676:Flowers' 634:precedent 363:Civil War 202:unanimous 63:Citations 3407:Alienage 1678:case law 1593:Text of 1479:M.D.N.C. 1345:, at 779 1308:, at 788 1032:Archived 888:See also 824:backing. 777:Arkansas 566:governor 542:Rosedale 519:town of 395:vagrancy 383:Jim Crow 302:mandamus 268:minority 197:Majority 2802:(1954) 1619:Findlaw 1556:1476441 872:called 604:en banc 586:colored 548:of the 367:Chinese 316:holding 311:en banc 108:Holding 4036:(2024) 4028:(1935) 3997:(2013) 3989:(2006) 3981:(2004) 3973:(2003) 3965:(2001) 3957:(2000) 3949:(2000) 3941:(1999) 3933:(1997) 3925:(1989) 3917:(1976) 3909:(1966) 3901:(1883) 3864:(2012) 3856:(2000) 3848:(1997) 3840:(1991) 3832:(1988) 3824:(1988) 3816:(1985) 3808:(1982) 3800:(1979) 3792:(1978) 3784:(1977) 3776:(1976) 3768:(1974) 3760:(1974) 3752:(1973) 3744:(1973) 3736:(1972) 3728:(1971) 3720:(1970) 3712:(1968) 3704:(1968) 3696:(1966) 3688:(1966) 3680:(1962) 3672:(1948) 3664:(1942) 3656:(1937) 3648:(1928) 3640:(1886) 3632:(1876) 3613:(1985) 3605:(1977) 3597:(1969) 3578:(1984) 3570:(1982) 3562:(1982) 3554:(1979) 3546:(1978) 3538:(1977) 3530:(1976) 3522:(1973) 3514:(1973) 3506:(1971) 3498:(1954) 3490:(1948) 3482:(1927) 3474:(1923) 3466:(1923) 3458:(1923) 3450:(1923) 3442:(1915) 3434:(1915) 3426:(1915) 3418:(1914) 3399:(2015) 3391:(1996) 3383:(1986) 3364:(2024) 3356:(1996) 3348:(1994) 3340:(1983) 3332:(1982) 3324:(1981) 3316:(1981) 3308:(1980) 3300:(1979) 3292:(1979) 3284:(1979) 3276:(1979) 3268:(1976) 3260:(1975) 3252:(1975) 3244:(1974) 3236:(1974) 3228:(1972) 3220:(1971) 3212:(1948) 3204:(1937) 3185:(2023) 3177:(2016) 3169:(2014) 3161:(2013) 3153:(2007) 3145:(2005) 3137:(2003) 3129:(2003) 3121:(1999) 3113:(1995) 3105:(1993) 3097:(1992) 3089:(1992) 3081:(1991) 3073:(1989) 3065:(1986) 3057:(1985) 3049:(1984) 3041:(1982) 3033:(1982) 3025:(1978) 3017:(1977) 3009:(1977) 3001:(1974) 2993:(1973) 2985:(1973) 2977:(1972) 2969:(1971) 2961:(1971) 2953:(1971) 2945:(1971) 2937:(1971) 2929:(1969) 2921:(1969) 2913:(1969) 2905:(1969) 2897:(1968) 2889:(1968) 2881:(1967) 2873:(1967) 2865:(1964) 2857:(1964) 2849:(1964) 2833:(1955) 2794:(1950) 2786:(1950) 2770:(1948) 2762:(1948) 2754:(1944) 2746:(1943) 2738:(1940) 2730:(1927) 2722:(1899) 2714:(1896) 2706:(1886) 2698:(1883) 2654:(2016) 2646:(2015) 2638:(2009) 2630:(2000) 2622:(1997) 2614:(1990) 2606:(1989) 2598:(1989) 2590:(1987) 2582:(1987) 2574:(1985) 2566:(1984) 2558:(1983) 2550:(1982) 2542:(1981) 2534:(1979) 2526:(1979) 2518:(1977) 2510:(1976) 2502:(1975) 2494:(1975) 2486:(1974) 2478:(1974) 2470:(1971) 2462:(1968) 2454:(1967) 2446:(1962) 2438:(1961) 2430:(1958) 2422:(1950) 2414:(1932) 2406:(1927) 2398:(1922) 2390:(1905) 2371:(2011) 2363:(2010) 2355:(2009) 2347:(2009) 2339:(2005) 2331:(2003) 2323:(2002) 2315:(1989) 2307:(1988) 2299:(1982) 2291:(1980) 2283:(1978) 2277:(1978) 2269:(1976) 2261:(1976) 2253:(1975) 2245:(1975) 2239:(1974) 2233:(1969) 2227:(1967) 2221:(1963) 2215:(1961) 2201:under 2191:(2022) 2183:(2020) 2175:(2019) 2167:(2018) 2159:(2016) 2151:(2007) 2143:(2006) 2135:(2000) 2127:(1997) 2119:(1997) 2111:(1996) 2103:(1992) 2095:(1990) 2087:(1990) 2079:(1989) 2071:(1986) 2063:(1983) 2055:(1981) 2047:(1979) 2039:(1979) 2031:(1976) 2023:(1976) 2015:(1973) 2007:(1973) 1999:(1971) 1978:(2022) 1970:(2016) 1962:(2003) 1954:(1992) 1946:(1989) 1938:(1986) 1930:(1973) 1922:(1973) 1914:(1965) 1906:(1925) 1898:(1923) 1877:(1937) 1869:(1931) 1861:(1917) 1853:(1917) 1845:(1915) 1837:(1908) 1829:(1905) 1821:(1898) 1813:(1897) 1805:(1887) 1761:(1999) 1753:(1971) 1745:(1967) 1737:(1958) 1729:(1898) 1721:(1884) 1713:(1875) 1705:(1873) 1640:  1634:  1631:  1628:Justia 1625:  1622:  1616:  1613:  1607:  1568:online 1554:  1497:, 1473:, 1455:, 1423:, 1405:, 1373:, 1361:, 1329: ( 1325:, 1289: ( 1285:, 1261:  1231:, 1211:, 1191:, 1118:  1108:  848:Legacy 781:Elaine 636:to be 521:Benoit 329:argued 243:, 275 182: 180:· 178:  170: 168:· 166:  158: 156:· 154:  146: 144:· 142:  83:L. Ed. 4014:Other 3621:Other 2379:Other 1601: 1552:JSTOR 1331:Miss. 1291:Miss. 1164:(PDF) 945:Notes 863:Brown 678:brief 509:North 100:Prior 2687:Race 1603:U.S. 1387:Rice 1343:Rice 1306:Rice 1259:ISBN 1247:"10" 1172:2021 1148:Cal. 1127:2021 1116:OCLC 1106:ISBN 1040:2021 1011:2021 828:The 442:and 245:U.S. 76:more 68:U.S. 66:275 3193:Sex 1599:275 1544:doi 1437:Lum 874:Lum 853:Lum 265:any 89:256 4056:: 1597:, 1550:. 1540:23 1538:. 1313:^ 1298:^ 1273:^ 1257:. 1253:. 1249:. 1114:. 1104:. 1048:^ 865:. 659:. 499:, 421:, 401:. 71:78 1668:e 1661:t 1654:v 1558:. 1546:: 1519:. 1267:. 1174:. 1129:. 1042:. 1013:. 978:. 79:) 73:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
78
more
L. Ed.
U.S. LEXIS
William H. Taft
Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
Willis Van Devanter
James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis
George Sutherland
Pierce Butler
Edward T. Sanford
Harlan F. Stone
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
Brown v. Board of Education
U.S.
United States Supreme Court
exclusion on account of race
Chinese ancestry
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
minority
Rosedale, Mississippi
anti-Chinese sentiment nationwide
Immigration Act of 1924
Earl Brewer
Fourteenth Amendment
mandamus
Mississippi Supreme Court

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘