Knowledge

Lytton Report

Source 📝

20: 737:, which had already been proclaimed by the time the Commission reached Manchuria. It also covered the question of the economic interests of Japan both in Manchuria and China as a whole, and the nature and effects of the Chinese anti-Japanese boycott. Soviet Union interests in the region were also mentioned. Finally, the Commission submitted a study of the conditions to which, in its judgment, any satisfactory solution should conform, and made various proposals and suggestions as to how an agreement embodying these principles might be brought about. 655: 757:. Regarding Manchukuo, the Report concluded that the new State could not have been formed without the presence of Japanese troops; that it had no general support locally or from China; and that it was not part of a genuine and spontaneous independent movement. Still, the report held that both China and Japan had legitimate grievances. Japan, it states, took advantage of questionable rights, and China obstructed by the exercise of her undoubted rights. The Geneva correspondent of 687: 732:
took place as the Japanese army (without authorization from the Japanese government) seized the large Chinese province of Manchuria. The Report described the unsatisfactory features of the Chinese administration and giving weight to the various claims and complaints of Japan. It then proceeded with a
799:
In the end, the Lytton Report showcased the weaknesses of the League of Nations and its inability to enforce its decisions. The situation was complicated by the length of time it took for the Lytton Commission to prepare its report, during which time Japan was able to firmly secure its control over
740:
However, the report did not directly address one of its chief goals: the cause of the Mukden Incident. Instead, it simply stated the Japanese position (that the Chinese had been responsible),  with no comment as to the truth or falsity of the Japanese claims. Although there was no doubt as to
770:
French correspondent says: "The report insists on the withdrawal of Japanese troops within the South Manchuria railway zone, and recommends the establishment of an organisation under the sovereignty of China to deal with conditions in Manchuria, taking due account of the rights and interests of
787:
of Manchukuo. When the findings of the Report were announced before the General Assembly of the League of Nations, recognizing Chinese sovereignty over Manchuria and refusing to recognize Manchukuo, the Japanese delegation led by ambassador
748:
between the conflicting views of China and Japan, the effect of the Report was regarded as a substantial vindication of the Chinese case on most fundamental issues. In particular, the Commission stated that the operations of the
763:
says: "The report, which was approved unanimously, proposes that China and Japan shall be given three months in which to accept or reject the recommendations. It is hoped that the parties will agree to direct negotiations."
733:
narrative of the events in Manchuria subsequent to September 18, 1931, based on the evidence of many participants and on that of eyewitnesses. It devoted particular attention to the origins and development of the State of
638:, announced its conclusions in October 1932. It stated that the Empire of Japan must withdraw from Manchuria, recognized Chinese sovereignty of Manchuria, and refused to recognize the Japanese puppet state of 717:, representative of the Lytton Commission during their voyage back to Europe. They planned to kidnap them and then demand ransom. Airplanes were used during their journey as a safety measure to prevent it. 1060:
Chang, David Wen-wei. “The Western Powers and Japan’s Aggression in China: The League of Nations and ‘The Lytton Report.’” American Journal of Chinese Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, 2003, pp. 43–63. JSTOR,
848:
Hudson, Manley O. “The Report of the Assembly of the League of Nations on the Sino-Japanese Dispute.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 27, no. 2, 1933, pp. 300–05. JSTOR,
934: 706: 48: 984: 779:
In September 1932, even before the official announcement of the findings of the Lytton Report on October 2, 1932, was made public, the Japanese government extended official
694:
The group spent six weeks in Manchuria in spring 1932 (despite having been sent in December 1931) on a fact-finding mission after they had met government leaders in the
709:, also many with sabotaging the railway with explosions. The bandits were also planning an attack on the express train transporting the German governor 573: 41: 835:“League of Nations Assembly Report on the Sino-Japanese Dispute.” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 27, no. 3, 1933, pp. 119–53. JSTOR, 910: 725:
It was hoped that the report would defuse the hostilities between Japan and China and thus help maintain peace and stability in the Far East.
34: 815:, the great powers were reluctant to further damage their own economies by sanctioning another great power, and the policy used was largely 1178: 1168: 1153: 1143: 642:. The League of Nations General Assembly adopted the report, and Japan quit the League. The recommendations went into effect after Japan 501: 741:
Japan's guilt among the five commission members, Claudel (the French delegate) insisted that Japan not be portrayed as the aggressor.
792:
walked out. Japan gave formal notice of its withdrawal from the League of Nations on March 27, 1933. The United States announced the
128: 1222: 635: 1232: 861: 481: 392: 1077:
Chang, David Wen-wei. "The Western Powers and Japan's Aggression in China: The League of Nations and 'The Lytton Report.'"
554: 248: 189: 447: 194: 441: 808: 695: 1122:. London: Oxford University Press, 1960. pp. 491–492. Available on the site of the United Nations Office in Geneva 771:
Japan, and the formation of a committee of negotiation for the application of these and other recommendations."
662:
The Lytton Commission, headed by Lord Lytton, included four other members, one each from the US (Major General
624: 351: 79: 1202: 377: 316: 162: 101: 546: 1043: 671: 385: 179: 1217: 996: 157: 929: 728:
The Lytton Report contained an account of the situation in Manchuria before September 1931, when the
535: 475: 434: 330: 133: 123: 19: 905: 402: 59: 1227: 566: 414: 397: 337: 301: 271: 1123: 1212: 1207: 780: 750: 427: 357: 208: 1175: 1165: 1150: 1140: 467: 408: 343: 241: 968: 880:"The Faithful Hounds of Imperialism? Heinrich Schnee on the League's Manchurian Commission" 560: 512: 494: 284: 265: 8: 892: 759: 118: 879: 1103:
Japan's Struggle with Internationalism: Japan, China, and the League of Nations, 1931–3
643: 580: 540: 507: 420: 309: 289: 173: 96: 819:. Without Article 16, it was impossible for the League to enforce the Lytton Report. 784: 658:
Lytton Commission members in Shanghai (Lord Lytton wearing a coat in center of photo)
612: 528: 520: 462: 452: 253: 221: 202: 111: 106: 811:, to mark the Empire of Japan as an aggressor and levy economic sanctions. Amid the 800:
Manchuria and was thus able to reject the condemnation of the League with impunity.
16:
1932 League of Nations report on the illegitimacy of Japan's occupation of Manchuria
888: 812: 793: 663: 457: 362: 322: 296: 235: 227: 213: 167: 143: 1182: 1172: 1157: 1147: 789: 729: 710: 667: 620: 616: 278: 84: 1135: 654: 985:
Memo from the US Ambassador in Japan to the US Secretary of State, 16 July 1932
686: 260: 138: 1187: 1196: 1009: 714: 675: 796:, which warned Japan that areas gained by conquest would not be recognized. 754: 745: 26: 1141:
Observations of Japan to the report (from p. 88, or 8 by file's numbering)
987:, Foreign Relations of the United States, Japan 1931–1941 (see pp. 93–94), 701:
There were also members of the commission in September 1932. At the time,
611:
refers to the findings of the Lytton Commission, entrusted in 1931 by the
816: 804: 1151:
end of Japan's observations and comments by China to those observations
1113: 1096: 1061: 1031: 957: 803:
Despite insistence by the small powers of the League of Nations, the
753:
following on the Mukden incident could not be regarded as legitimate
734: 702: 639: 628: 1164:
Discussion on the report in the Assembly of the League of Nations.
1110:
The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
849: 836: 952:
Robert H. Ferrell, "The Mukden Incident: September 18–19, 1931."
939: 915: 690:
Lytton Commission, investigating the blast point of the railway.
1108:
Saito, Hirosi. "A Japanese view of the Manchurian situation."
1091:
Kuhn, Arthur K. "The Lytton Report on the Manchurian Crisis."
1086:
China and the League of nations: the Sino-Japanese controversy
1026:
Frederick V. Field, "American Far Eastern Policy, 1931–1937."
634:
The five-member commission, headed by British politician
906:"Planning tot ontvoering van leden der commissie-Lytton" 878: 1194: 930:"De Lyttoncommissie. | Plannen tot ontvoering?" 604: 598: 887:, Oxford University Press, pp. 194–215, 42: 1044:"League of Nations - Third period (1931–36)" 1014:Sydney Morning Herald (NSW : 1842–1954) 56: 1036: 49: 35: 938:(in Dutch). 9 September 1932 – via 914:(in Dutch). 9 September 1932 – via 685: 681: 653: 18: 1195: 1093:American Journal of International Law 969:The Mukden Incident by Thomas Ferrell 876: 30: 1088:(St. John's University Press, 1965). 1062:http://www.jstor.org/stable/44288722 1079:American Journal of Chinese Studies 997:Myopic Grandeur by John E. Dreifort 13: 1120:A History of The League of Nations 1071: 893:10.1093/oso/9780190907211.003.0007 14: 1244: 1129: 649: 935:Westfriesch dagblad onze courant 807:never invoked Article 16 of the 720: 619:, which was used to justify the 1223:1931 in international relations 1054: 1020: 1002: 990: 850:https://doi.org/10.2307/2189554 837:https://doi.org/10.2307/2213489 774: 1233:Foreign relations of Manchukuo 1084:Jin, Wensi, and WĂȘn-ssĆ­ Chin. 1016:. 16 February 1933. p. 9. 978: 962: 946: 922: 898: 885:Revenants of the German Empire 870: 855: 842: 829: 615:in an attempt to evaluate the 74:1931–1937 (pre-war skirmishes) 1: 822: 744:In spite of care to preserve 7: 877:Wempe, Sean Andrew (2019), 672:Luigi Aldrovandi Marescotti 605: 502:North Burma and West Yunnan 10: 1249: 23:Cover of the Lytton Report 973:Journal of Modern History 954:Journal of modern history 599: 124:Pacification of Manchukuo 70: 1064:. Accessed 28 July 2024. 852:. Accessed 28 July 2024. 839:. Accessed 28 July 2024. 707:series of trains attacks 61:Second Sino-Japanese War 1136:Full text of the report 1118:Walters, Francis Paul. 975:March 1955 (see p. 67), 705:was plagued by a large 674:), and France (General 1030:10.4 (1937): 377–392. 781:diplomatic recognition 751:Imperial Japanese Army 691: 659: 555:West Henan–North Hubei 24: 1112:165 (1933): 159–166. 1095:27.1 (1933): 96–100. 1081:(2003) 19#1 pp 43–63. 956:27.1 (1955): 66–72. 689: 682:1932 Manchuria visits 657: 22: 1203:History of Manchuria 862:Five Wise Westerners 636:Victor Bulwer-Lytton 1188:US History.com site 768:The Daily Telegraph 760:The Daily Telegraph 713:and French general 666:), Germany (Doctor 482:Sichuan (cancelled) 1181:2016-04-27 at the 1171:2016-04-27 at the 1156:2016-04-27 at the 1146:2016-04-27 at the 1105:(Routledge, 1993). 692: 660: 272:Yellow River flood 186:Railway Operation 25: 1218:League of Nations 785:puppet government 696:Republic of China 613:League of Nations 589: 588: 448:Yunnan-Burma Road 386:Hundred Regiments 158:Marco Polo Bridge 1240: 1101:Nish, Ian Hill. 1065: 1058: 1052: 1051: 1040: 1034: 1024: 1018: 1017: 1006: 1000: 994: 988: 982: 976: 966: 960: 950: 944: 943: 926: 920: 919: 902: 896: 895: 882: 874: 868: 859: 853: 846: 840: 833: 813:Great Depression 794:Stimson Doctrine 670:), Italy (Count 664:Frank Ross McCoy 610: 608: 606:Ritton Hƍkokusho 602: 601: 476:Zhejiang–Jiangxi 352:Winter Offensive 249:North-East Henan 180:Sihang Warehouse 65: 64: 62: 51: 44: 37: 28: 27: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1193: 1192: 1183:Wayback Machine 1173:Wayback Machine 1158:Wayback Machine 1148:Wayback Machine 1132: 1074: 1072:Further reading 1069: 1068: 1059: 1055: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1028:Pacific Affairs 1025: 1021: 1010:"Lytton Report" 1008: 1007: 1003: 999:(see pp. 80–83) 995: 991: 983: 979: 967: 963: 951: 947: 928: 927: 923: 904: 903: 899: 875: 871: 860: 856: 847: 843: 834: 830: 825: 790:Yosuke Matsuoka 777: 730:Mukden Incident 723: 711:Heinrich Schnee 684: 668:Heinrich Schnee 652: 621:Empire of Japan 617:Mukden Incident 596: 590: 585: 378:Zaoyang–Yichang 317:Suixian–Zaoyang 163:Beiping–Tianjin 102:Nenjiang Bridge 66: 60: 58: 57: 55: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1246: 1236: 1235: 1230: 1228:1931 documents 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1191: 1190: 1185: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1131: 1130:External links 1128: 1127: 1126: 1116: 1106: 1099: 1089: 1082: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1053: 1035: 1019: 1001: 989: 977: 961: 945: 921: 911:De Nederlander 897: 869: 854: 841: 827: 826: 824: 821: 776: 773: 722: 719: 698:and in Japan. 683: 680: 651: 650:The Commission 648: 587: 586: 584: 583: 577: 576: 570: 569: 564: 557: 552: 551: 550: 547:Guilin–Liuzhou 543: 538: 524: 517: 516: 515: 510: 498: 490: 489: 485: 484: 479: 472: 471: 470: 465: 460: 455: 445: 438: 431: 424: 417: 412: 405: 400: 395: 390: 381: 373: 372: 368: 367: 366: 365: 360: 348: 347: 346: 334: 327: 326: 325: 313: 306: 305: 304: 294: 293: 292: 287: 275: 268: 263: 258: 257: 256: 246: 245: 244: 232: 231: 230: 218: 217: 216: 211: 199: 198: 197: 192: 190:Beiping–Hankou 184: 183: 182: 170: 165: 160: 154: 153: 149: 148: 147: 146: 141: 136: 129:Inner Mongolia 126: 121: 116: 115: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 93: 92: 76: 75: 71: 68: 67: 54: 53: 46: 39: 31: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1245: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1213:1931 in China 1211: 1209: 1208:1931 in Japan 1206: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1198: 1189: 1186: 1184: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1104: 1100: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1080: 1076: 1075: 1063: 1057: 1049: 1045: 1039: 1033: 1029: 1023: 1015: 1011: 1005: 998: 993: 986: 981: 974: 970: 965: 959: 955: 949: 941: 937: 936: 931: 925: 917: 913: 912: 907: 901: 894: 890: 886: 881: 873: 866: 865:Time Magazine 863: 858: 851: 845: 838: 832: 828: 820: 818: 814: 810: 806: 801: 797: 795: 791: 786: 782: 772: 769: 765: 762: 761: 756: 752: 747: 742: 738: 736: 731: 726: 721:Lytton Report 718: 716: 715:Henri Claudel 712: 708: 704: 699: 697: 688: 679: 677: 676:Henri Claudel 673: 669: 665: 656: 647: 645: 641: 637: 632: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 607: 595: 594:Lytton Report 582: 579: 578: 575: 572: 571: 568: 565: 563: 562: 558: 556: 553: 549: 548: 544: 542: 539: 537: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 525: 523: 522: 518: 514: 511: 509: 506: 505: 504: 503: 499: 497: 496: 492: 491: 487: 486: 483: 480: 478: 477: 473: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 456: 454: 451: 450: 449: 446: 444: 443: 439: 437: 436: 432: 430: 429: 425: 423: 422: 418: 416: 413: 411: 410: 406: 404: 401: 399: 398:Central Hubei 396: 394: 393:North Vietnam 391: 389: 388: 387: 382: 380: 379: 375: 374: 370: 369: 364: 361: 359: 356: 355: 354: 353: 349: 345: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338:South Guangxi 335: 333: 332: 328: 324: 321: 320: 319: 318: 314: 312: 311: 307: 303: 300: 299: 298: 295: 291: 288: 286: 283: 282: 281: 280: 276: 274: 273: 269: 267: 264: 262: 259: 255: 252: 251: 250: 247: 243: 240: 239: 238: 237: 233: 229: 226: 225: 224: 223: 219: 215: 212: 210: 207: 206: 205: 204: 200: 196: 195:Tianjin–Pukou 193: 191: 188: 187: 185: 181: 178: 177: 176: 175: 171: 169: 166: 164: 161: 159: 156: 155: 151: 150: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 131: 130: 127: 125: 122: 120: 117: 113: 110: 108: 105: 103: 100: 98: 95: 91: 90:Lytton Report 88: 87: 86: 83: 82: 81: 78: 77: 73: 72: 69: 63: 52: 47: 45: 40: 38: 33: 32: 29: 21: 1119: 1109: 1102: 1092: 1085: 1078: 1056: 1047: 1038: 1027: 1022: 1013: 1004: 992: 980: 972: 964: 953: 948: 933: 924: 909: 900: 884: 872: 864: 857: 844: 831: 805:great powers 802: 798: 778: 775:Consequences 767: 766: 758: 755:self-defence 746:impartiality 743: 739: 727: 724: 700: 693: 661: 633: 593: 591: 559: 545: 536:4th Changsha 527: 526: 519: 500: 493: 474: 442:3rd Changsha 440: 435:2nd Changsha 433: 428:South Shanxi 426: 419: 407: 384: 383: 376: 358:West Suiyuan 350: 336: 331:1st Changsha 329: 315: 308: 277: 270: 234: 220: 209:Pingxingguan 201: 174:2nd Shanghai 172: 119:1st Shanghai 89: 867:10 Oct 1932 817:appeasement 644:surrendered 468:Yenangyaung 409:South Henan 403:South Anhui 344:Kunlun Pass 242:Taierzhuang 1197:Categories 1048:Britannica 823:References 561:West Hunan 513:Mount Song 495:West Hubei 415:West Hubei 290:Wenxi fire 285:Wanjialing 134:Great Wall 735:Manchukuo 703:Manchuria 646:in 1945. 640:Manchukuo 629:Manchuria 508:Myitkyina 488:1943–1945 371:1940–1942 266:Chongqing 152:1937–1939 97:Jiangqiao 80:Manchuria 1179:Archived 1169:Archived 1154:Archived 1144:Archived 1114:in JSTOR 1097:in JSTOR 1032:in JSTOR 958:in JSTOR 809:Covenant 541:Hengyang 421:Shanggao 310:Nanchang 228:Massacre 940:Delpher 916:Delpher 783:to the 625:seizure 600:ăƒȘăƒƒăƒˆăƒłć ±ć‘Šæ›ž 581:Taihoku 574:Air War 567:Guangxi 529:Ichi-Go 521:Changde 463:Toungoo 453:Tachiao 254:Lanfeng 222:Nanking 203:Taiyuan 144:Suiyuan 107:Jinzhou 1176:Part 2 1166:Part 1 1124:online 458:Oktwin 363:Wuyuan 323:Swatow 302:Hainan 297:Canton 236:Xuzhou 214:Xinkou 168:Chahar 112:Harbin 85:Mukden 279:Wuhan 678:). 592:The 261:Amoy 139:Rehe 889:doi 627:of 623:'s 1199:: 1046:. 1012:. 971:, 932:. 908:. 883:, 631:. 603:, 1050:. 942:. 918:. 891:: 609:) 597:( 50:e 43:t 36:v

Index


v
t
e
Second Sino-Japanese War
Manchuria
Mukden
Lytton Report
Jiangqiao
Nenjiang Bridge
Jinzhou
Harbin
1st Shanghai
Pacification of Manchukuo
Inner Mongolia
Great Wall
Rehe
Suiyuan
Marco Polo Bridge
Beiping–Tianjin
Chahar
2nd Shanghai
Sihang Warehouse
Beiping–Hankou
Tianjin–Pukou
Taiyuan
Pingxingguan
Xinkou
Nanking
Massacre

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑