25:
93:
383:. The Privy Council held that the question of whether laws were inconsistent involved the application of section 109 of the Constitution and did not involve a question in relation to the constitutional powers of the Commonwealth and the States. The Privy Council approved the decision of the statutory majority, particularly the judgment of Fullagar J and dismissed the appeal.
363:
Fullagar J noted that it was possible to obey both sets of laws simultaneously, by acquiring both State and
Commonwealth licenses. However, it was his opinion that the regulations expressed an intention to "completely and exhaustively" cover the field with regards to the regulation of such premises;
325:
The
Commonwealth has the power to make laws with respect to "trade and commerce with other countries, and among the States", as per s 51(i) of the Constitution. This power authorises the prohibition of the export of certain commodities, and by extension the prohibition of commodities with certain
354:
In general regulation of production may occur where there is an objectively different method of production between meat destined for home and foreign consumption, but
Fullagar J was clear in restricting the application of the principle to the specific factual circumstances at hand.
351:. This includes provisions to control the quality of meat being exported, which may involve regulation of such stages as packaging and handling. In fact, it may be necessary to "enter the factory or the field or the mine" to secure Australia's export industry.
364:
he found the detailed regulations compelling in this regard. Furthermore, the State law would have acted to deny the rights granted by a certificate obtained under the
Commonwealth regulations.
581:
305:(Cth). Regulation 4B prohibited the exportation of meat unless an export permit had been granted, and regulation 5 required that all premises used for the slaughter of meat to be registered.
347:
concurred, stated that the
Commonwealth may control any steps leading to the export itself (generally labelled as "production") that may affect "beneficially or adversely" Australia's
379:
gave special leave to appeal except in relation to the constitutional powers of the
Commonwealth and the States. The High Court subsequently refused to issue a certificate under
367:
The court was split 3-3. As this was a stated case and not an appeal, the decision of the Chief
Justice prevailed, in what is sometimes described as a statutory majority.
586:
301:
in a chilled or frozen condition" were required to obtain a licence from the State
Agriculture Minister. However, the defendant company was registered under the
308:
The defendant company argued that the State act was invalid by virtue of inconsistency with the
Commonwealth regulations, which is dealt with in
329:
Regulation 5 does not fall under the direct head of power. Instead, it falls within the implied incidental power, which was best expressed in
596:
392:
270:
262:
380:
397:
309:
491:
170:
535:
376:
141:
576:
566:
449:
290:
68:
46:
39:
571:
218:
402:
297:. All premises outside the metropolitan area "for the purpose of slaughtering stock for export as fresh
243:
Section 51(i) of the
Constitution permits the Commonwealth to regulate the slaughter of meat for export
478:
198:
591:
266:
531:
523:
500:
471:
429:
179:
158:
149:
125:
33:
504:
433:
258:
103:
601:
50:
527:
154:
425:
348:
206:
121:
496:
467:
175:
8:
519:
331:
145:
546:
475:
336:
245:(per Dixon CJ, Fullagar & Kitto JJ; McTiernan, Webb & Taylor JJ dissenting)
238:(per Dixon CJ, Fullagar & Kitto JJ; McTiernan, Webb & Taylor JJ dissenting)
236:
The Commonwealth licensing system was inconsistent with the state licensing system
210:
202:
286:
294:
560:
92:
344:
214:
340:
195:
221:
551:
Australian federal constitutional law: commentary and materials
269:, and inconsistency between Commonwealth and State laws, under
582:
Trade and commerce power in the Australian Constitution cases
326:
restrictions. Regulation 4B is therefore within its power.
298:
261:
regarding the scope of the trade and commerce power, under
281:
Noarlunga Meat Ltd was charged with contravening the
587:Inconsistency in the Australian Constitution cases
415:
558:
509:
393:Section 51(i) of the Australian Constitution
320:
398:Section 109 of the Australian Constitution
91:
553:, 1999. LBC Information Services, Sydney.
69:Learn how and when to remove this message
464:Milne v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
32:This article includes a list of general
16:Judgement of the High Court of Australia
559:
492:O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd (No 2)
171:O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd (No 2)
283:Metropolitan and Export Abattoirs Act
289:), s 52a, because it did not hold a
18:
597:History of agriculture in Australia
484:
13:
303:Commerce (Meat Export) Regulations
38:it lacks sufficient corresponding
14:
613:
358:
23:
538:(on appeal from Australia).
516:O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd
422:O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd
271:section 109 of the Constitution
254:O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd
86:O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd
457:
439:
381:section 74 of the Constitution
1:
577:Australian constitutional law
567:High Court of Australia cases
408:
403:Australian constitutional law
276:
432:565 (17 December 1954),
257:, was a case decided in the
7:
386:
315:
10:
618:
335:(1904) 1 CLR 91 at p 110.
370:
310:s 109 of the Constitution
232:
227:
191:
186:
165:
137:
132:
117:
109:
99:
90:
85:
528:[1956] UKPCHCA 4
503:367 (2 March 1956),
321:Trade and commerce power
155:[1956] UKPCHCA 4
534:177 (4 July 1956),
448:s23 as amended by the
267:Australian Constitution
259:High Court of Australia
104:High Court of Australia
53:more precise citations.
572:1954 in Australian law
520:[1956] UKPC 24
178:, (1956) 94
157:, (1956) 95
146:[1956] UKPC 24
124:, (1954) 92
468:[1976] HCA 2
426:[1954] HCA 29
122:[1954] HCA 29
497:[1956] HCA 9
176:[1956] HCA 9
474:526 at p. 533 per
451:Judiciary Act 1912
446:Judiciary Act 1903
295:slaughtering stock
166:Subsequent actions
375:In June 1955 the
250:
249:
246:
239:
79:
78:
71:
609:
592:1954 in case law
539:
513:
507:
488:
482:
461:
455:
443:
437:
419:
332:D'Emden v Pedder
244:
237:
187:Court membership
95:
83:
82:
74:
67:
63:
60:
54:
49:this article by
40:inline citations
27:
26:
19:
617:
616:
612:
611:
610:
608:
607:
606:
557:
556:
543:
542:
514:
510:
489:
485:
462:
458:
444:
440:
420:
416:
411:
389:
373:
361:
323:
318:
279:
153:
144:
75:
64:
58:
55:
45:Please help to
44:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
615:
605:
604:
599:
594:
589:
584:
579:
574:
569:
555:
554:
541:
540:
508:
483:
456:
438:
413:
412:
410:
407:
406:
405:
400:
395:
388:
385:
372:
369:
360:
357:
322:
319:
317:
314:
278:
275:
248:
247:
230:
229:
225:
224:
193:
192:Judges sitting
189:
188:
184:
183:
167:
163:
162:
139:
135:
134:
130:
129:
119:
115:
114:
111:
107:
106:
101:
97:
96:
88:
87:
77:
76:
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
614:
603:
602:Meat industry
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
565:
564:
562:
552:
548:
547:Winterton, G.
545:
544:
537:
536:Privy Council
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
512:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
487:
480:
477:
473:
470:, (1976) 133
469:
465:
460:
453:
452:
447:
442:
435:
431:
427:
423:
418:
414:
404:
401:
399:
396:
394:
391:
390:
384:
382:
378:
377:Privy Council
368:
365:
359:Inconsistency
356:
352:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
327:
313:
311:
306:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
274:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
255:
242:
235:
231:
228:Case opinions
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
190:
185:
181:
177:
173:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
151:
147:
143:
142:Privy Council
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
120:
116:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
94:
89:
84:
81:
73:
70:
62:
52:
48:
42:
41:
35:
30:
21:
20:
550:
530:, (1956) 95
515:
511:
499:, (1956) 94
490:
486:
463:
459:
450:
445:
441:
428:, (1954) 92
421:
417:
374:
366:
362:
353:
349:export trade
339:, with whom
330:
328:
324:
307:
302:
293:licence for
282:
280:
253:
252:
251:
240:
233:
169:
133:Case history
113:16 June 1954
80:
65:
59:January 2018
56:
37:
138:Appealed to
51:introducing
561:Categories
505:High Court
434:High Court
409:References
337:Fullagar J
277:Background
34:references
203:McTiernan
182: 367
161: 177
128: 565
118:Citations
387:See also
341:Dixon CJ
316:Decision
211:Fullagar
152: 1;
148:,
549:et al.
476:Barwick
345:Kitto J
265:of the
263:s 51(i)
110:Decided
47:improve
371:Appeal
285:1936 (
219:Taylor
36:, but
518:
495:
466:
424:
291:State
241:(3:3)
234:(3:3)
215:Kitto
196:Dixon
174:
100:Court
343:and
299:meat
217:and
207:Webb
532:CLR
526:1;
522:,
501:CLR
472:CLR
430:CLR
180:CLR
159:CLR
126:CLR
563::
524:AC
479:CJ
312:.
287:SA
273:.
222:JJ
213:,
209:,
205:,
201:,
199:CJ
150:AC
481:.
454:.
436:.
72:)
66:(
61:)
57:(
43:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
