568:, in which the lawfulness of the Parliament Act 1949 was questioned. The challenge asserted that the Parliament Act 1911 had delegated power from Parliament as a whole to the Commons, and that the Parliament Act 1949 was therefore delegated rather than primary legislation. If this were the case, then the House of Commons could not further increase its own powers through the Parliament Act 1949 without direct permission from the House of Lords. Since it was passed under the 1911 act, the 1949 act had never received the required consent of the Lords. However, the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords found that the 1911 act was not primarily about empowering the Commons, but rather had the purpose of restricting the ability of the Lords to reject legislation, i.e. altering the process by which Parliament as a whole enacts legislation. The 1949 act had therefore been lawfully enacted. This ruling also appears to mean that efforts to abolish the House of Lords (a major constitutional change) by using the act could be successful, although the issue was not directly addressed in the ruling.
483:; instead, they could be delayed for up to two years. This two-year period meant that legislation introduced in the fourth or fifth years of a parliament could be delayed until after the next election, which could prove an effective measure to prevent it being passed. Specifically, two years had to elapse between the second reading in the House of Commons in the first session and the passing of the bill in the House of Commons in the third session. The Speaker also has to certify that the conditions of the bill have been complied with. There are significant restrictions on amendments to ensure that it is the same bill that has been rejected twice. The 1911 act made clear that the life of a parliament could not be extended without the consent of the Lords.
369:
37:
580:: rather than creating a written constitution, Parliament chose instead to legislate through the usual channels in response to the crisis. This was a pragmatic response, which avoided the further problems of codifying unwritten rules and reconstructing the entire government. It is commonly considered a statute of "constitutional importance", which gives it informal priority in Parliament and in the courts with regard to whether later legislation can change it and the process by which this may happen.
1356:
296:, all money bills were consolidated into a single budget. This denied the Lords the ability to reject individual components, and the prospect of voting down the entire budget was seemingly unpalatable. It was only in 1909 that this possibility became a reality. Prior to the act, the Lords had had rights equal to those of the Commons over legislation but, by convention, did not utilise its right of veto over financial measures.
402:, was asked if he would be prepared to create sufficient peers, which he would only do if the matter arose. This would have meant creating over 400 new Liberal peers. The King, however, demanded that the bill would have to be rejected at least once by the Lords before his intervention. Two amendments made by the Lords were rejected by the Commons, and opposition to the bill showed little sign of reducing. This led
587:. While it replaced conventions regarding the role of the House of Lords, it also relies on several others. Section 1(1) only makes sense if money bills do not arise in the House of Lords, and the provisions in section 2(1) only if proceedings on a public bill are completed in a single session, otherwise they must fail and be put through procedure again.
344:, by 350 votes to 75. This action, according to the Commons, was "a breach of the constitution and a usurpation of the rights of the Commons". The Lords suggested that the Commons demonstrate at the polls the veracity of its claim that the bill represented the will of the people. The Liberal government sought to do so through the
472:("Poll Tax"), was not certified as a money bill and was therefore considered by the Lords. Whilst finance bills are not considered money bills, convention dictates that those parts of a finance bill dealing with taxation or expenditure (which, if in an act alone, would constitute a money bill) are not questioned.
386:
was the main contention, with
Unionists looking to exempt such a law from the Parliament Act procedure by means of a general exception for "constitutional" or "structural" bills. The Liberals supported an exception for bills relating to the monarchy and Protestant succession, but not home rule. On 10
531:
The Lords continued to suggest amendments to money bills over which it had no right of veto; and in several instances these were accepted by the
Commons. These included the China Indemnity Bill 1925 and the Inshore Fishing Industry Bill 1947. The use of the Lords' now temporary veto remains a
376:
The Lords was now faced with the prospect of a
Parliament Act, which had considerable support from the Irish Nationalists. A series of meetings between the Liberal government and Unionist opposition members was agreed. Twenty-one such meetings were held between 16 June and 10 November. The
381:
of the
Commons and the Lords as a means by which to enforce Commons superiority in controversial areas; the number of members of the Lords present would be limited so that a Liberal majority of fifty or more in the House of Commons could overrule the Lords. However, the issue of
307:
attempting to push through significant welfare reforms with considerable popular support, problems seemed certain to arise in the relationship between the houses. Between 1906 and 1909, several important measures were considerably watered down or rejected outright: for example,
455:
of accounts of public money; and the raising or guarantee of any loan or the repayment thereof. But it did not cover any sort of local taxes or similar measures. Some finance bills have not fallen within this criterion; Consolidated Fund and
Appropriation bills have. The
490:, but the Parliament Act 1911 amended the Septennial Act to limit Parliament to five years, reckoned from the first meeting of Parliament after the election. In practice, no election was absolutely forced by that limitation; until the Septennial Act was repealed by the
406:
to declare the King's intention to overcome the majority in the House of Lords by creating sufficient new peers. The bill was finally passed in the Lords on 11 August 1911, by 131 votes to 114, a majority of 17. This reflected a large number of abstentions.
442:
The Lords would only be able to delay money bills for one month, effectively ending their ability to do so. These were defined as any public bill which contained only provisions dealing with the imposition, repeal, remission, alteration, or regulation of
419:, the preamble included the words "it is intended to substitute for the House of Lords as it at present exists a Second Chamber constituted on a popular instead of hereditary basis, but such substitution cannot be immediately brought into operation". The
217:. The following Parliament Act, which looked to prevent a recurrence of the budget problems, was also widely opposed in the House of Lords, and cross-party discussion failed, particularly because of the proposed act's applicability to the passage of an
213:", the House of Commons sought to establish its formal dominance over the House of Lords, which had broken convention in opposing the bill. The budget was eventually passed by the Lords, after the Commons' democratic mandate was confirmed by holding
596:
1411:
539:, which had been under the threat of a Lords veto, now removed. Ulster Protestants had been firmly against the passing of the bill. However, the Government of Ireland Act 1914 never came into force because of the outbreak of the
1446:
1441:
292:, since only the House of Commons had the right to decide upon the resources the monarch could call upon. This did not, however, prevent it from rejecting such bills outright. In 1860, with the repeal of the
498:
on request of the Prime
Minister. The five-year maximum duration in the amended Septennial Act referred to the lifetime of the parliament, and not to the interval between general elections. For example, the
523:), and provided for an earlier dissolution of Parliament only by certain specified legal procedures. The act was repealed in 2022, restoring the previous system of dissolution under the royal prerogative.
438:
on a new footing. As well as the direct issue of money Bills, it set new conventions about how the power the Lords continued to hold would be used. It did not change the composition of the Lords, however.
423:
of the act was "An Act to make provision with respect to the powers of the House of Lords in relation to those of the House of
Commons, and to limit the duration of Parliament." Section 8 defined the
202:
with the ability to delay them for a maximum of two years (the
Parliament Act 1949 reduced this to one). It also reduced the maximum term of a parliament from seven years (as set by the
360:. Following the election, the Lords relented on the budget (which had been reintroduced by the government), and it passed the Lords on 28 April, a day after the Commons vote.
249:
Until the
Parliament Act 1911, there was no way to resolve disagreements between the two houses of Parliament except through the creation of additional peers by the monarch.
390:
The government threatened another dissolution if the
Parliament Act were not passed, and followed through on their threat when opposition in the Lords did not diminish. The
1372:
461:
54:
An Act to make provision with respect to the powers of the House of Lords in relation to those of the House of Commons, and to limit the duration of Parliament.
515:
was not held until 1 May 1997. The reduction in the maximum length of a parliament was seen as a counterbalance to the new powers granted to the Commons. The
285:
on the issue. However, in practice, this gave the Lords a right to demand that such public support be present and to decide the timing of a general election.
1426:
457:
1431:
544:
391:
222:
451:, or on money provided by Parliament, or the variation or repeal of any such charges; supply; the appropriation, receipt, custody, issue or
328:, whereupon the Commons dropped it. This led to a resolution in the House of Commons on 26 June 1907, put forward by Liberal Prime Minister
584:
345:
214:
348:. Liberal representation in the House of Commons fell steeply, but the party retained a majority with the help of a significant number of
416:
153:
269:. This created an informal convention that the Lords would give way when the public was behind the House of Commons. For example,
1281:
495:
273:, which had been a major point of contention between the two main parties since the 1830s, was passed by the Lords in 1869 after
972:
927:
431:
181:
161:
59:
1384:
1246:
1207:
1181:
1156:
548:
520:
512:
508:
504:
500:
394:
produced little change from January. The second dissolution of Parliament now seems to have been contrary to the wishes of
282:
313:
1301:
368:
558:
Legislation passed without the consent of the Lords, under the provisions of the Parliament Act, is still considered
465:
169:
157:
41:
516:
491:
1293:
536:
317:
185:
250:
1360:
1436:
1366:
266:
564:
1400:
349:
469:
377:
discussions considered a wide range of proposals, with initial agreement on finance bills and on a
329:
177:
648:
1309:
745:
652:
234:
597:
List of acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom enacted without the House of Lords' consent
555:. These made special exemptions to the requirement to hold a general election every five years.
1456:
883:
356:
MPs. The IPP saw the continued power of the Lords as detrimental to the prospect of securing
270:
49:
577:
129:
8:
1313:
1173:
644:
559:
487:
372:
Samuel Begg's depiction of the passing of the Parliament Bill in the House of Lords, 1911
333:
203:
173:
115:
1342:
1258:
1191:
1125:
967:
922:
447:; the imposition for the payment of debt or other financial purposes of charges on the
341:
337:
325:
321:
304:
293:
238:
210:
1451:
1297:
1286:
1269:
1242:
1225:
1203:
1177:
1152:
448:
398:. Edward had died in May 1910 while the crisis was still in progress. His successor,
353:
332:, declaring that the Lords' power ought to be curtailed. In 1909, hoping to force an
309:
254:
97:
1129:
519:, in contrast, called for general elections every five years (unless called sooner,
1117:
552:
300:
160:. It is constitutionally important and partly governs the relationship between the
136:
962:
917:
562:, i.e. a fully valid act of Parliament. The importance of this was highlighted in
326:
amended by the Lords to such an extent that it effectively became a different bill
1167:
540:
383:
357:
278:
262:
258:
218:
149:
64:
1265:
435:
274:
165:
1121:
1420:
1273:
543:. Amendments to the Parliament Act 1911 were made to prolong the life of the
403:
378:
336:, the Lords rejected the financial bill based on the government budget (the "
1447:
Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom concerning the House of Commons
265:
had threatened to create eighty new peers by request of the prime minister,
233:, after the House of Lords conceded due to the government's threat that the
176:
provides that the Parliament Act 1911 and the Parliament Act 1949 are to be
1229:
1217:
476:
226:
199:
87:
1442:
Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom concerning the House of Lords
1195:
424:
289:
1401:"HOUSE of LORDS – BRIEFING – REFORM AND PROPOSALS FOR REFORM SINCE 1900"
460:
would have to certify that a bill was a money bill, endorsing it with a
261:
had been passed when the House of Lords dropped their opposition to it:
420:
395:
195:
1332:
1239:
O. Hood Phillips & Jackson: Constitutional and Administrative Law
288:
It was the prevailing wisdom that the House of Lords could not amend
547:
following the outbreak of the First World War, and also that of the
444:
430:
The bill was also an attempt to place the relationship between the
399:
230:
1355:
486:
Parliament had been limited to a maximum of seven years under the
1108:
Jaconelli, Joseph (2005). "Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?".
1327:
Blewett, Neal. "The franchise in the United Kingdom 1885–1918".
303:
majority in the Lords since the Liberal split in 1886. With the
180:
together "as one" in their effects and that the two acts may be
191:
The act effectively removed the right of the House of Lords to
452:
237:
majority in the Lords could be overcome by creating many new
1380:
1032:
480:
192:
1224:. The Oxford History of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
576:
The Parliament Act 1911 can be seen in the context of the
494:, all parliaments were dissolved by the monarch under the
387:
November, the discussions were declared to have failed.
1373:"Joint Committee on House of Lords Reform First Report"
198:
completely, and replaced its right of veto over other
209:
Following the House of Lords' rejection of the 1909 "
744:, University of Chicago Press, 1985, pp. 89–90: see
1285:
1257:
253:had created twelve Tory peers to vote through the
1418:
1236:
1412:Image of the Act on the Parliamentary website
984:
982:
948:
946:
836:
834:
832:
830:
828:
1260:The Constitutional History of Modern Britain
1190:
1038:
1016:
1014:
1012:
742:Britain in Transition: The Twentieth Century
727:
725:
723:
721:
719:
717:
675:
673:
671:
669:
667:
665:
663:
661:
299:There had been an overwhelming Conservative-
1241:(8th ed.). London: Sweet and Maxwell.
1165:
1151:(3rd ed.). London: Cavendish Pub Ltd.
878:
876:
809:
807:
805:
795:
793:
415:At the request of prominent Cabinet member
1067:
1065:
1000:
979:
943:
848:
846:
825:
503:was held five years and one day after the
1427:Constitutional laws of the United Kingdom
1237:Jackson, Paul; Leopold, Patricia (2001).
1107:
1009:
714:
698:
696:
694:
658:
16:UK legislation about the House of Commons
873:
802:
790:
367:
1169:Constitutional & Administrative Law
1166:Barnett, Hilaire; Jago, Robert (2011).
1146:
1062:
843:
1432:United Kingdom Acts of Parliament 1911
1419:
1280:
1202:(14th ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman.
691:
583:It is also mentioned in discussion of
1367:Text of the Act as originally enacted
1216:
1200:Constitutional and Administrative Law
1149:Constitutional and Administrative Law
130:Text of statute as originally enacted
1255:
963:"Parliament Act 1911: Section 1"
918:"Parliament Act 1911: Section 8"
1029:Bradley, Ewing (2007). pp. 187–188.
884:"Parliament Act 1911: Introduction"
223:second general election in December
13:
1321:
952:Joint Committee (2002). Section 7.
861:Joint Committee (2002). Section 6.
215:a general election in January 1910
137:Revised text of statute as amended
14:
1468:
1348:
1098:Bradley, Ewing (2007). pp. 15–16.
511:was held on 9 April 1992 and the
466:Local Government Finance Act 1988
1354:
1315:The Reform of the House of Lords
870:Jackson, Leopold (2001). p. 169.
758:The Reform of the House of Lords
731:Jackson, Leopold (2001). p. 168.
316:, which was intended to address
158:Parliament of the United Kingdom
42:Parliament of the United Kingdom
35:
1140:
1101:
1092:
1089:Bradley, Ewing (2007). pp. 5–6.
1083:
1074:
1053:
1044:
1023:
991:
955:
934:
910:
901:
864:
855:
816:
781:
772:
614:
535:It was used in relation to the
532:powerful check on legislation.
517:Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011
492:Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011
458:Speaker of the House of Commons
1006:Bradley, Ewing (2007). p. 205.
840:Bradley, Ewing (2007). p. 204.
763:
750:
734:
705:
682:
679:Bradley, Ewing (2007). p. 203.
655:. Accessed on 2 December 2011.
637:
537:Government of Ireland Act 1914
427:as the "Parliament Act 1911".
392:December 1910 general election
225:, the act was passed with the
1:
1080:Bradley, Ewing (2007). p. 74.
1071:Barnett, Jago (2011). p. 445.
1059:Bradley, Ewing (2007). p. 57.
1050:Bradley, Ewing (2007). p. 40.
1020:Bradley, Ewing (2007). p. 68.
940:Bradley, Ewing (2007). p. 27.
602:
410:
346:January 1910 general election
244:
186:Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949
630:
320:grievances arising from the
7:
997:Barnett (2002). p. 494–495.
607:
590:
571:
10:
1473:
1339:The Reign of King George V
1172:(8th ed.). New York:
1039:Bradley & Ewing (2007)
907:Ensor (1952). pp. 419–420.
623:, UKHL 56, 4 All ER 1253.
621:Jackson v Attorney General
565:Jackson v Attorney General
363:
21:United Kingdom legislation
1147:Barnett, Hilaire (2002).
1122:10.1017/s0008197305006823
822:Keir (1938). pp. 477–478.
585:constitutional convention
526:
350:Irish Parliamentary Party
135:
128:
121:
111:
106:
96:
86:
81:
71:
58:
48:
34:
29:
1337:Somervell, D.C. (1936).
1310:McKechnie, William Sharp
330:Henry Campbell-Bannerman
73:Territorial extent
1288:King Edward the Seventh
1256:Keir, David L. (1938).
988:Barnett (2002). p. 536.
740:Havighurst, Alfred F.,
711:Barnett (2002). p. 535.
653:UK Statute Law Database
468:, which introduced the
1383:. 2002. Archived from
373:
271:Irish disestablishment
1110:Cambridge Law Journal
973:The National Archives
928:The National Archives
813:Ensor (1952). p. 423.
799:Ensor (1952). p. 422.
787:Ensor (1952). p. 420.
778:Ensor (1952). p. 417.
513:next general election
509:1992 general election
505:2005 general election
501:2010 general election
462:Speaker's certificate
384:home rule for Ireland
371:
1387:on 30 September 2007
1361:Parliament Act, 1911
1174:Taylor & Francis
852:Keir (1938). p. 478.
702:Keir (1938). p. 477.
578:British constitution
170:Houses of Parliament
975:, c. 13 (s. 1)
930:, c. 13 (s. 8)
769:Magnus 1964, p. 534
645:Parliament Act 1949
560:primary legislation
488:Septennial Act 1716
479:could no longer be
314:Education Bill 1906
204:Septennial Act 1716
174:Parliament Act 1949
146:Parliament Act 1911
116:Parliament Act 1949
26:
25:Parliament Act 1911
1437:August 1911 events
1331:32 (1965): 27–56.
1329:Past & Present
968:legislation.gov.uk
923:legislation.gov.uk
888:legislation.gov.uk
374:
342:David Lloyd George
340:") put forward by
322:Education Act 1902
221:Bill. Following a
24:
1359:The full text of
1248:978-0-421-57480-9
1222:England 1870–1914
1209:978-1-4058-1207-8
1183:978-0-415-57881-3
1158:978-1-85941-721-8
688:Magnus 1964, p540
496:royal prerogative
449:Consolidated Fund
310:Augustine Birrell
255:Treaty of Utrecht
142:
141:
107:Other legislation
30:Act of Parliament
1464:
1408:
1405:parliament.co.uk
1396:
1394:
1392:
1377:parliament.co.uk
1358:
1306:
1291:
1277:
1263:
1252:
1233:
1213:
1187:
1162:
1134:
1133:
1105:
1099:
1096:
1090:
1087:
1081:
1078:
1072:
1069:
1060:
1057:
1051:
1048:
1042:
1036:
1030:
1027:
1021:
1018:
1007:
1004:
998:
995:
989:
986:
977:
976:
959:
953:
950:
941:
938:
932:
931:
914:
908:
905:
899:
898:
896:
894:
880:
871:
868:
862:
859:
853:
850:
841:
838:
823:
820:
814:
811:
800:
797:
788:
785:
779:
776:
770:
767:
761:
754:
748:
746:Internet Archive
738:
732:
729:
712:
709:
703:
700:
689:
686:
680:
677:
656:
647:, section 2(2).
641:
624:
618:
553:Second World War
470:Community Charge
432:House of Commons
301:Liberal Unionist
229:of the monarch,
184:together as the
162:House of Commons
150:1 & 2 Geo. 5
74:
65:1 & 2 Geo. 5
39:
38:
27:
23:
1472:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1417:
1416:
1399:
1390:
1388:
1371:
1351:
1324:
1322:Further reading
1304:
1266:A & C Black
1249:
1210:
1184:
1159:
1143:
1138:
1137:
1106:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1084:
1079:
1075:
1070:
1063:
1058:
1054:
1049:
1045:
1037:
1033:
1028:
1024:
1019:
1010:
1005:
1001:
996:
992:
987:
980:
961:
960:
956:
951:
944:
939:
935:
916:
915:
911:
906:
902:
892:
890:
882:
881:
874:
869:
865:
860:
856:
851:
844:
839:
826:
821:
817:
812:
803:
798:
791:
786:
782:
777:
773:
768:
764:
755:
751:
739:
735:
730:
715:
710:
706:
701:
692:
687:
683:
678:
659:
642:
638:
633:
628:
627:
619:
615:
610:
605:
593:
574:
549:1935 parliament
545:1910 parliament
541:First World War
529:
417:Sir Edward Grey
413:
366:
358:Irish Home Rule
338:People's Budget
312:introduced the
279:W. E. Gladstone
277:intervened and
263:King William IV
259:Reform Act 1832
247:
219:Irish Home Rule
211:People's Budget
152:. c. 13) is an
124:
123:Status: Amended
72:
44:
36:
22:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1470:
1460:
1459:
1454:
1449:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1415:
1414:
1409:
1397:
1369:
1364:
1350:
1349:External links
1347:
1346:
1345:
1335:
1323:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1307:
1303:978-0140026580
1302:
1282:Magnus, Philip
1278:
1253:
1247:
1234:
1214:
1208:
1188:
1182:
1163:
1157:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1100:
1091:
1082:
1073:
1061:
1052:
1043:
1041:, p. 153.
1031:
1022:
1008:
999:
990:
978:
954:
942:
933:
909:
900:
872:
863:
854:
842:
824:
815:
801:
789:
780:
771:
762:
749:
733:
713:
704:
690:
681:
657:
649:Digitised copy
635:
634:
632:
629:
626:
625:
612:
611:
609:
606:
604:
601:
600:
599:
592:
589:
573:
570:
528:
525:
436:House of Lords
412:
409:
365:
362:
275:Queen Victoria
246:
243:
166:House of Lords
140:
139:
133:
132:
126:
125:
122:
119:
118:
113:
109:
108:
104:
103:
102:18 August 1911
100:
94:
93:
92:18 August 1911
90:
84:
83:
79:
78:
77:United Kingdom
75:
69:
68:
62:
56:
55:
52:
46:
45:
40:
32:
31:
20:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1469:
1458:
1457:H. H. Asquith
1455:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1433:
1430:
1428:
1425:
1424:
1422:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1368:
1365:
1363:at Wikisource
1362:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1344:
1341:. pp. 17–28.
1340:
1336:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1317:
1316:
1311:
1308:
1305:
1299:
1295:
1290:
1289:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1262:
1261:
1254:
1250:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1218:Ensor, R.C.K.
1215:
1211:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:Bradley, A.W.
1189:
1185:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1164:
1160:
1154:
1150:
1145:
1144:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1104:
1095:
1086:
1077:
1068:
1066:
1056:
1047:
1040:
1035:
1026:
1017:
1015:
1013:
1003:
994:
985:
983:
974:
970:
969:
964:
958:
949:
947:
937:
929:
925:
924:
919:
913:
904:
889:
885:
879:
877:
867:
858:
849:
847:
837:
835:
833:
831:
829:
819:
810:
808:
806:
796:
794:
784:
775:
766:
759:
753:
747:
743:
737:
728:
726:
724:
722:
720:
718:
708:
699:
697:
695:
685:
676:
674:
672:
670:
668:
666:
664:
662:
654:
650:
646:
640:
636:
622:
617:
613:
598:
595:
594:
588:
586:
581:
579:
569:
567:
566:
561:
556:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
533:
524:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
497:
493:
489:
484:
482:
478:
473:
471:
467:
463:
459:
454:
450:
446:
440:
437:
433:
428:
426:
422:
418:
408:
405:
404:H. H. Asquith
401:
397:
393:
388:
385:
380:
379:joint sitting
370:
361:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:, but it was
323:
319:
318:nonconformist
315:
311:
306:
305:Liberal Party
302:
297:
295:
291:
286:
284:
283:1868 election
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:in 1713. The
256:
252:
242:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
207:
205:
201:
197:
194:
189:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
138:
134:
131:
127:
120:
117:
114:
110:
105:
101:
99:
95:
91:
89:
85:
80:
76:
70:
66:
63:
61:
57:
53:
51:
47:
43:
33:
28:
19:
1404:
1391:25 September
1389:. Retrieved
1385:the original
1376:
1338:
1328:
1314:
1287:
1259:
1238:
1221:
1199:
1168:
1148:
1141:Bibliography
1113:
1109:
1103:
1094:
1085:
1076:
1055:
1046:
1034:
1025:
1002:
993:
966:
957:
936:
921:
912:
903:
893:25 September
891:. Retrieved
887:
866:
857:
818:
783:
774:
765:
757:
752:
741:
736:
707:
684:
639:
620:
616:
582:
575:
563:
557:
534:
530:
485:
477:public bills
474:
441:
429:
414:
389:
375:
298:
294:paper duties
287:
248:
235:Conservative
208:
200:public bills
190:
145:
143:
98:Commencement
88:Royal assent
18:
1343:online free
1294:John Murray
1196:Ewing, K.D.
756:McKechnie,
551:due to the
425:short title
290:money bills
206:) to five.
196:money bills
1421:Categories
1292:, London:
1264:. London:
603:References
521:as in 2017
421:long title
411:Provisions
396:Edward VII
352:(IPP) and
251:Queen Anne
245:Background
168:, the two
112:Amended by
50:Long title
1274:463283191
651:from the
631:Citations
267:Earl Grey
178:construed
1452:George V
1312:, 1909:
1284:(1964),
1220:(1952).
1198:(2007).
1130:53581372
608:Case law
591:See also
572:Analysis
445:taxation
400:George V
334:election
281:won the
231:George V
164:and the
60:Citation
1407:. 2000.
1230:5079147
1116:: 149.
364:Passage
241:peers.
239:Liberal
156:of the
67:. c. 13
1333:online
1300:
1272:
1245:
1228:
1206:
1180:
1155:
1128:
527:Result
507:; the
481:vetoed
475:Other
464:. The
354:Labour
227:assent
172:. The
1126:S2CID
453:audit
182:cited
82:Dates
1393:2011
1381:HMSO
1298:ISBN
1270:OCLC
1243:ISBN
1226:OCLC
1204:ISBN
1178:ISBN
1153:ISBN
895:2011
760:p. 2
643:The
434:and
193:veto
144:The
1118:doi
188:.
154:act
1423::
1403:.
1379:.
1375:.
1296:,
1268:.
1194:;
1176:.
1124:.
1114:64
1112:.
1064:^
1011:^
981:^
971:,
965:,
945:^
926:,
920:,
886:.
875:^
845:^
827:^
804:^
792:^
716:^
693:^
660:^
1395:.
1276:.
1251:.
1232:.
1212:.
1186:.
1161:.
1132:.
1120::
897:.
148:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.