163:, International Standard Description of Functions (ISDF), and International Standard Description of Institutions with Archival Holdings (ISDIAH). RiC also aims to be better suited to the management of electronic records than previous standards, whilst still supporting traditional analogue materials. It defines the primary descriptive entities of the model, and how these interrelate within archival description. RiC also aims to modernise the aging current standards, by enabling archival description to better capture the complex relationships records have with each other, and with their creators, holders, and subjects. These groups, individuals, and organisations are referred to as "agents" in RiC. Through these relationships, RiC aims to provide a richer descriptive context than the hierarchical structure of ISAD(G).
147:. The EGAD initially began work on the standard between 2012 and 2016, with a conceptual model (RiC-CM) and an ontology (RiC-O) released for comment during 2016. Version 0.2 was released in 2021, now featuring an independent introduction to archival description (RiC-IAD) and updates to the original RiC-CM and RiC-O. A fourth part of the standard covering Application Guidelines (RiC-AG) is also expected, prior to a completed RiC version 1.0 being released as an official ICA recommendation.
24:
182:
state that a more inclusive development process should have been used given the potentially international application of the model, referring especially to the under-representation of Africa and Asia (acknowledged by EGAD in their introduction to the RiC-CM). Their response also questions the
337:
191:
The EGAD has published an OWL ontology called RiC-O to represent RiC-CM in version 0.1 in
December 2019. An ontology proposal based on the draft of the conceptual model was made available already in 2017.
175:'s Archives and Technology group expressed uncertainty over how the conceptual model should be interpreted by the profession, and how they would engage with and benefit from it in the future.
171:
Version 0.1 of the conceptual model was published for comment in 2016. Among the responses, some have shown confusion as to how it should be applied in practice. A consultation meeting of the
377:
338:
https://blogs.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/archivesandmanuscripts/2017/06/20/researcherspractitioners-and-their-use-of-the-archived-web-iipc-web-archiving-conference-15th-june-2017/
434:
Llanes-Padrón, D., Pastor-Sánchez, J.A. (2017). Records in contexts: the road of archives to semantic interoperability. Program, Vol. 51 Issue: 4, pp.387-405 <
278:
183:
integration of the entire suite of current ICA descriptive standards without first gauging the extent to which these are currently implemented globally.
221:
468:
48:
of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be
399:
100:
206:
72:
257:
P138 Records in
Contexts (RiC): a standard for archival description developed by the ICA Experts Group on Archival Description
351:
79:
252:
143:
for the archival description of records, designed by the Expert Group on
Archival Description (EGAD) established by the
144:
119:
86:
463:
172:
439:
68:
216:
45:
211:
334:
Researchers, practitioners and their use of the archived web. IIPC Web
Archiving Conference 15th June 2017
161:
International
Standard Archival Authority Records — Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families (ISAAR(CPF))
41:
179:
458:
279:"Resource of the Month: Introducing Records in Contexts: The New ICA Standard for Describing Records"
57:
155:
The
Conceptual Model aims to bring together the council's current descriptive standards, namely the
93:
349:
34:
314:. Experts Group On Archival Description, International Council on Archives. September 2016
8:
304:
226:
53:
49:
452:
440:
http://eprints.rclis.org/31993/1/record-in-context-ontology-paper-revised.pdf
423:
435:
250:
231:
160:
350:
Bogdan Florin
Popovici, director Romanian National Archives (2016).
352:"Records In Contexts; Towards A New Level In Archival Description?"
251:
Daniel Pitti; Bill
Stockting; Florence Clavaud (8 September 2016).
140:
305:"Records in Contexts: A conceptual model for archival description"
201:
156:
40:
Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing
157:
378:"Results of the ARA SAT consultation on Records in Contexts"
397:
253:"Presentation of the standard "Records in Context""
450:
222:International Standard Archival Authority Record
244:
369:
343:
375:
259:. International Council on Archives, Paris
436:https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-03-2017-0021
391:
120:Learn how and when to remove this message
207:Describing Archives: A Content Standard
145:International Council on Archives (ICA)
451:
469:Library cataloging and classification
297:
17:
398:Luciana Duranti (compiler) (2016).
13:
400:"Comments on "Records in Context""
14:
480:
283:International Council on Archives
173:Archives and Records Association
22:
376:Jenny Bunn (19 December 2016).
186:
428:
417:
326:
271:
217:Manual of Archival Description
1:
237:
212:Encoded Archival Description
139:, is a conceptual model and
35:general notability guideline
7:
357:. Pokrajinski arhiv Maribor
195:
166:
10:
485:
150:
42:reliable secondary sources
31:The topic of this article
33:may not meet Knowledge's
464:International standards
312:Consultation Draft v0.1
178:In their response, the
69:"Records in Contexts"
285:. 29 September 2022
227:Archival processing
133:Records in Contexts
405:. InterPARES Trust
37:
130:
129:
122:
104:
32:
476:
459:Archival science
443:
432:
426:
421:
415:
414:
412:
410:
404:
395:
389:
388:
386:
384:
373:
367:
366:
364:
362:
356:
347:
341:
330:
324:
323:
321:
319:
309:
301:
295:
294:
292:
290:
275:
269:
268:
266:
264:
248:
180:InterPARES Trust
125:
118:
114:
111:
105:
103:
62:
26:
25:
18:
484:
483:
479:
478:
477:
475:
474:
473:
449:
448:
447:
446:
433:
429:
422:
418:
408:
406:
402:
396:
392:
382:
380:
374:
370:
360:
358:
354:
348:
344:
331:
327:
317:
315:
307:
303:
302:
298:
288:
286:
277:
276:
272:
262:
260:
249:
245:
240:
198:
189:
169:
153:
126:
115:
109:
106:
63:
61:
39:
27:
23:
12:
11:
5:
482:
472:
471:
466:
461:
445:
444:
427:
416:
390:
368:
342:
332:Cooper, Carl,
325:
296:
270:
242:
241:
239:
236:
235:
234:
229:
224:
219:
214:
209:
204:
197:
194:
188:
185:
168:
165:
152:
149:
128:
127:
30:
28:
21:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
481:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
456:
454:
441:
437:
431:
425:, 2019-12-12.
424:
420:
401:
394:
379:
372:
353:
346:
339:
336:. (2017) <
335:
329:
313:
306:
300:
284:
280:
274:
258:
254:
247:
243:
233:
230:
228:
225:
223:
220:
218:
215:
213:
210:
208:
205:
203:
200:
199:
193:
184:
181:
176:
174:
164:
162:
158:
148:
146:
142:
138:
134:
124:
121:
113:
102:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71: –
70:
66:
65:Find sources:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
36:
29:
20:
19:
16:
430:
419:
407:. Retrieved
393:
381:. Retrieved
371:
359:. Retrieved
345:
333:
328:
316:. Retrieved
311:
299:
287:. Retrieved
282:
273:
261:. Retrieved
256:
246:
190:
187:OWL Ontology
177:
170:
154:
136:
132:
131:
116:
107:
97:
90:
83:
76:
64:
15:
289:17 November
232:Finding aid
110:August 2017
46:independent
453:Categories
383:12 January
361:12 January
318:12 January
263:12 January
238:References
80:newspapers
54:redirected
438:> <
44:that are
409:24 March
196:See also
167:Response
141:ontology
202:ISAD(G)
151:Content
94:scholar
58:deleted
442:> .
340:> .
96:
89:
82:
75:
67:
50:merged
403:(PDF)
355:(PDF)
308:(PDF)
135:, or
101:JSTOR
87:books
56:, or
411:2021
385:2018
363:2018
320:2018
291:2023
265:2018
73:news
137:RiC
455::
310:.
281:.
255:.
159:,
52:,
413:.
387:.
365:.
322:.
293:.
267:.
123:)
117:(
112:)
108:(
98:·
91:·
84:·
77:·
60:.
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.