36:
231:, researchers found politically uninvolved people who viewed candidates on daytime talk shows were likely to find those candidates more likable than their opponents. Studies show that instead of using a candidate's political policy to determine whether or not the candidate represents their interests, non-politically involved people also use a candidate's likability.
135:
defines as the "coverage of breaking events involving top leaders, major issues, or significant disruptions in the routines of daily life". While the purposes of both hard and soft news include informing the public, the two differ from one another in both the information contained within them and the
234:
A study conducted in
Australia concluded hard news is more followed than soft news, except in the realm of sports. The study found that regardless of age and sex, soft news is less likely to be followed than hard news. With the lack in following for soft news, support for increased public engagement
242:
was established, which indicated that the intake of soft news has a positive effect on patterns of voting consistency in people who are otherwise politically unaware. In addition to this, Baum and
Jamison's study found that watching interviews of candidates on soft media helps improve voting
211:
television in a variety of programs especially in a time of national crises. Studies have shown that news presented in this context attracts the attention of otherwise politically uninvolved people. Overall more people tend to watch hard news than soft news shows. However, those who are less
206:
more than five hours of television per day. During this time, they are exposed to a variety of news and information that either directly (hard news) or indirectly (soft news) focuses on politics, foreign affairs, and policy. These topics are aired on
136:
methods that are used to present that information. Communicated through forms of soft media, soft news is usually contained in outlets that primarily serve as sources of entertainment, such as television programs, magazines, or print articles.
152:
is not in flux, the form is. For many
Americans the lines are becoming blurred between hard and soft media as news organizations are blending their broadcasts with news shows and entertainment. Many of these
1129:
1139:
1134:
131:
Soft news is defined as information that is primarily entertaining or personally useful. Soft news is often contrasted with hard news, which
Harvard political scientist
329:"Doing Well and Doing Good: How Soft News and Critical Journalism Are Shrinking the News Audience and Weakening Democracy–And What News Outlets Can Do About It"
148:. These are, in large part, the byproducts of soft media. A fundamental role of the media, either hard or soft, is to inform the public. While the role of
447:
186:) became a source of political information. This illustrates that media organizations across the spectrum are emerging as suppliers of information on
628:
46:
1172:
339:
413:
From Hard to Soft News
Standards? How Political Journalists in Different Media Systems Evaluate the Shifting Quality of News, Fritz Plasser
1119:
478:
565:
Baum, Matthew A.; Jamison, Angela S. (November 2006). "The Oprah Effect: How Soft News Helps
Inattentive Citizens Vote Consistently".
228:
165:
433:
1097:
1214:
621:
1189:
227:
to those people who are generally not politically involved than a candidate's political policies do. For example, in the
1194:
898:
503:
80:
893:
710:
614:
454:
238:
In another study examining the effects of soft news consumption on voting behaviors, the phenomenon known as the
1224:
1124:
935:
774:
212:
politically involved can gain more from watching soft news than those who are highly politically involved.
1075:
735:
715:
257:
1070:
362:
Soft News Goes to War: Public
Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age, Matthew A. Baum
1184:
17:
579:
1256:
1234:
1114:
1037:
62:
328:
289:
Zaller, John (2003). "A New
Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen".
279:
Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings
Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public, Matthew A. Baum
1209:
662:
116:, magazines or print articles. The communication from soft media sources has been referred to as
157:
create a narrative that begins with the first broadcast in the morning and end with the evening
1199:
1062:
990:
955:
672:
574:
335:
1162:
1042:
930:
920:
903:
859:
757:
677:
637:
182:
149:
109:
97:
373:
1179:
1082:
985:
925:
834:
829:
725:
667:
652:
144:
There are many terms that can be associated with soft media, among them are soft news and
8:
1277:
1092:
1022:
324:
220:
176:
132:
1167:
910:
888:
883:
801:
796:
752:
592:
544:
396:
306:
154:
113:
1087:
1047:
1000:
824:
806:
694:
588:
548:
536:
519:
Nguyen, An (2012-10-01). "The Effect of Soft News on Public
Attachment to the News".
499:
472:
224:
596:
310:
54:
1109:
1005:
995:
767:
684:
584:
528:
400:
388:
298:
239:
170:
1027:
854:
532:
493:
58:
374:"Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings"
1057:
972:
962:
950:
866:
839:
784:
730:
252:
203:
302:
1271:
1157:
1104:
1032:
878:
689:
540:
392:
158:
105:
101:
422:
Reaching Women: Soft Media in the 2004 Presidential Election, Diane J. Heith
1251:
1239:
940:
720:
168:, magazines that would otherwise be considered lifestyle or entertainment (
145:
606:
1015:
945:
779:
657:
1229:
1219:
977:
762:
747:
641:
208:
121:
915:
849:
816:
1244:
871:
789:
216:
191:
1204:
1010:
844:
187:
434:"Average American watches 5 hours of TV per day, report shows"
371:
215:
Studies have also shown that exposure to soft news can affect
372:
Reinemann, C.; Stanyer, J.; Scherr, S.; Legnante, G. (2012).
495:
The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media
243:
consistency in otherwise politically uninformed people.
336:
Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government
492:
Shapiro, Robert Y.; Jacobs, Lawrence R. (2013-05-23).
219:' attitudes. Soft media has been shown to increase a
1269:
27:Organizations focused on producing infotainment
622:
491:
43:The examples and perspective in this article
275:
273:
1120:Political polarization in the United States
636:
564:
120:as a way of distinguishing it from serious
629:
615:
1173:Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal
578:
323:
270:
81:Learn how and when to remove this message
431:
100:organizations that primarily deal with
14:
1270:
518:
477:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (
288:
1215:Psychological effects of Internet use
610:
560:
558:
29:
1190:Digital media use and mental health
223:’s likability, which has a greater
112:. Soft media can take the form of
24:
555:
25:
1289:
1195:Effects of violence in mass media
899:Smartphones and pedestrian safety
432:Hinckley, David (March 5, 2014).
235:caused by soft news is rejected.
1168:2021 Facebook company files leak
894:Mobile phones and driving safety
589:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00482.x
436:– via New York Daily News.
34:
1140:2020 U.S. presidential election
1135:2016 U.S. presidential election
512:
485:
345:from the original on 2021-12-09
440:
425:
416:
407:
365:
356:
317:
282:
13:
1:
711:Betteridge's law of headlines
263:
139:
1225:Social aspects of television
1125:Social media use in politics
775:Missing white woman syndrome
533:10.1080/1461670X.2012.664318
7:
736:Least objectionable program
258:Least objectionable program
246:
57:, discuss the issue on the
10:
1294:
1071:Algorithmic radicalization
229:2000 presidential election
197:
166:2004 presidential campaign
1185:Cultural impact of TikTok
1150:
1056:
971:
815:
703:
648:
303:10.1080/10584600390211136
1257:Violence and video games
1235:Social impact of YouTube
1115:Knowledge gap hypothesis
1038:Social-desirability bias
936:Information–action ratio
393:10.1177/1464884911427803
1210:Mass shooting contagion
663:Evolutionary psychology
567:The Journal of Politics
291:Political Communication
1200:Fascination with death
1063:Political polarization
991:Availability heuristic
956:Television consumption
1163:Criticism of Facebook
1043:Social influence bias
931:Information pollution
921:Information explosion
904:Texting while driving
860:Low information voter
758:Pink-slime journalism
202:The average American
183:O: The Oprah Magazine
1180:Criticism of Netflix
986:Availability cascade
926:Information overload
835:Attention management
830:Attention inequality
726:Human-interest story
668:Behavioral modernity
653:Cognitive psychology
325:Patterson, Thomas E.
63:create a new article
55:improve this article
45:may not represent a
1093:Post-truth politics
1023:Mean world syndrome
177:Ladies Home Journal
114:television programs
911:Influence-for-hire
889:Media multitasking
884:Human multitasking
802:Tabloid television
753:Media manipulation
521:Journalism Studies
155:news organizations
1265:
1264:
1088:Fake news website
1048:Spiral of silence
1001:Confirmation bias
825:Attention economy
807:Yellow journalism
695:Social psychology
91:
90:
83:
65:, as appropriate.
16:(Redirected from
1285:
1110:Knowledge divide
1006:Crowd psychology
996:Bandwagon effect
768:Public relations
685:Media psychology
631:
624:
617:
608:
607:
601:
600:
582:
562:
553:
552:
527:(5–6): 706–717.
516:
510:
509:
489:
483:
482:
476:
468:
466:
465:
459:
453:. Archived from
452:
444:
438:
437:
429:
423:
420:
414:
411:
405:
404:
378:
369:
363:
360:
354:
353:
351:
350:
344:
333:
321:
315:
314:
286:
280:
277:
164:During the U.S.
133:Thomas Patterson
86:
79:
75:
72:
66:
38:
37:
30:
21:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1261:
1146:
1061:
1052:
1028:Negativity bias
976:
967:
855:Cognitive miser
811:
704:Media practices
699:
644:
635:
605:
604:
580:10.1.1.580.1696
563:
556:
517:
513:
506:
490:
486:
470:
469:
463:
461:
457:
450:
448:"Archived copy"
446:
445:
441:
430:
426:
421:
417:
412:
408:
376:
370:
366:
361:
357:
348:
346:
342:
331:
322:
318:
287:
283:
278:
271:
266:
249:
200:
142:
87:
76:
70:
67:
52:
39:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1291:
1281:
1280:
1263:
1262:
1260:
1259:
1254:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1237:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1182:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1170:
1160:
1154:
1152:
1151:Related topics
1148:
1147:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1085:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1067:
1065:
1058:Digital divide
1054:
1053:
1051:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1013:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
982:
980:
973:Cognitive bias
969:
968:
966:
965:
963:Sticky content
960:
959:
958:
953:
951:Binge-watching
943:
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
907:
906:
901:
896:
891:
881:
876:
875:
874:
867:Digital zombie
864:
863:
862:
852:
847:
842:
840:Attention span
837:
832:
827:
821:
819:
813:
812:
810:
809:
804:
799:
794:
793:
792:
785:Sensationalism
782:
777:
772:
771:
770:
765:
760:
750:
745:
744:
743:
738:
733:
731:Junk food news
728:
718:
713:
707:
705:
701:
700:
698:
697:
692:
687:
682:
681:
680:
675:
670:
660:
655:
649:
646:
645:
634:
633:
626:
619:
611:
603:
602:
573:(4): 946–959.
554:
511:
504:
498:. OUP Oxford.
484:
439:
424:
415:
406:
387:(2): 221–239.
364:
355:
316:
297:(2): 109–130.
281:
268:
267:
265:
262:
261:
260:
255:
253:Junk food news
248:
245:
199:
196:
141:
138:
89:
88:
49:of the subject
47:worldwide view
42:
40:
33:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1290:
1279:
1276:
1275:
1273:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1186:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1158:Computer rage
1156:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1141:
1138:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1130:United States
1128:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1106:
1105:Filter bubble
1103:
1099:
1098:United States
1096:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1066:
1064:
1059:
1055:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1033:Peer pressure
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
983:
981:
979:
974:
970:
964:
961:
957:
954:
952:
949:
948:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
886:
885:
882:
880:
879:Doomscrolling
877:
873:
870:
869:
868:
865:
861:
858:
857:
856:
853:
851:
848:
846:
843:
841:
838:
836:
833:
831:
828:
826:
823:
822:
820:
818:
814:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
791:
788:
787:
786:
783:
781:
778:
776:
773:
769:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
755:
754:
751:
749:
746:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
723:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
708:
706:
702:
696:
693:
691:
690:Media studies
688:
686:
683:
679:
676:
674:
671:
669:
666:
665:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
650:
647:
643:
642:human factors
639:
632:
627:
625:
620:
618:
613:
612:
609:
598:
594:
590:
586:
581:
576:
572:
568:
561:
559:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
515:
507:
505:9780199673025
501:
497:
496:
488:
480:
474:
460:on 2015-10-22
456:
449:
443:
435:
428:
419:
410:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
375:
368:
359:
341:
337:
330:
326:
320:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
285:
276:
274:
269:
259:
256:
254:
251:
250:
244:
241:
236:
232:
230:
226:
222:
218:
213:
210:
205:
195:
193:
189:
185:
184:
179:
178:
173:
172:
167:
162:
160:
159:entertainment
156:
151:
147:
137:
134:
129:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
106:entertainment
103:
99:
95:
85:
82:
74:
64:
60:
56:
50:
48:
41:
32:
31:
19:
1252:Technophobia
1240:Technophilia
1083:Echo chamber
941:Rage farming
740:
721:Infotainment
570:
566:
524:
520:
514:
494:
487:
462:. Retrieved
455:the original
442:
427:
418:
409:
384:
380:
367:
358:
347:. Retrieved
319:
294:
290:
284:
240:Oprah Effect
237:
233:
214:
201:
181:
175:
169:
163:
146:infotainment
143:
130:
125:
117:
93:
92:
77:
68:
44:
1016:Moral panic
946:Screen time
780:News values
716:Gatekeeping
658:Externality
108:, arts and
1278:Mass media
1230:Social bot
1220:Sealioning
978:Conformity
763:Propaganda
748:Media bias
741:Soft media
464:2015-10-21
381:Journalism
349:2023-05-30
264:References
209:prime-time
140:Background
122:journalism
102:commentary
96:comprises
94:Soft media
916:Infodemic
850:Clickbait
817:Attention
673:Cognition
575:CiteSeerX
549:143212810
541:1461-670X
221:candidate
217:consumers
126:hard news
124:, called
118:soft news
110:lifestyle
71:July 2011
59:talk page
18:Soft news
1272:Category
1245:Neophile
872:Phubbing
790:Hot take
678:Mismatch
597:32777635
473:cite web
340:Archived
327:(2000).
311:56440776
247:See also
204:consumes
192:politics
53:You may
1205:Griefer
1011:Mobbing
845:Chumbox
797:Spiking
401:5731016
198:Effects
161:venue.
595:
577:
547:
539:
502:
399:
309:
225:appeal
188:policy
1076:Youth
638:Media
593:S2CID
545:S2CID
458:(PDF)
451:(PDF)
397:S2CID
377:(PDF)
343:(PDF)
332:(PDF)
307:S2CID
171:Vogue
150:media
98:media
61:, or
640:and
537:ISSN
500:ISBN
479:link
190:and
180:and
585:doi
529:doi
389:doi
299:doi
1274::
591:.
583:.
571:68
569:.
557:^
543:.
535:.
525:13
523:.
475:}}
471:{{
395:.
385:13
383:.
379:.
338:.
334:.
305:.
295:20
293:.
272:^
194:.
174:,
128:.
104:,
1060:/
975:/
630:e
623:t
616:v
599:.
587::
551:.
531::
508:.
481:)
467:.
403:.
391::
352:.
313:.
301::
84:)
78:(
73:)
69:(
51:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.