User talk:Mackensen/Archive23

1033:... what started as a discussion and unheated content dispute turned.. difficult when I realized that this was a case of an expert citing himself and giving lots of WEIGHT to his own views, which on that case are somewhat idiosyncratic. Situations where COI and content disputes mix have a great danger of going sideways and I generally avoid getting involved in specific content when I am communicating with an editor about their COI and vice versa. So in this case, i raised it as gently as I could on their Talk page. GregJackP got upset about that, and has taken the view that I am trying to push Praeceptor away, neither of which is what I am trying to do. In my view Praeceptor is kind of borderline - does some very good work, but doesn't pay enough mind to OR and VERIFY and tends to give too much WEIGHT to his own views. I am hopeful he will become one of those experts who come fully in line with our policies and guidelines; that would be wonderful. 5993: 3189: 6613: 6263: 6101: 4933: 3472: 2919: 412:

you've nominated the article it's up to the reviewer to provide feedback, to which you can then respond. You don't need my help for that, although I'd certainly participate during the review. As for which article to nominate I think all three are long enough but I'd worry about the reliance on non-published railfanning sources for the two Zephyrettes. The hardest part about getting Turboliner up to GA status was removing such sources (especially forum posts). That review was also unusually thorough. I think GE steam turbine locomotives is a strong candidate, although you'll want to add individual page numbers for the Solomon books. Are you familiar with Harvard-style notation (cf

1629:

violations, I make my decision on how to proceed based largely on the history of the article: if there is sufficient history to suggest that the article could be salvaged, I prefer to tag as a copyright violation and let the CIU deal with it, but if its a new page and the history is entirely copyright violation-related material I'll axe. In this case, lacking the context you provided, I can see why the deletion was the more preferable of the two options, however its possible that the two vague similar articles will continue to co-exist if the copyright can be addressed. I've seen two similar articles on subject material co-exist for years here -

2421: 1117: 2679: 2567: 3940: 6277: 6115: 4940: 3947: 3479: 2926: 2414: 2200: 1433: 796: 239: 1175: 3829: 1181: 1170: 3196: 6852: 4875: 2686: 2574: 2207: 1440: 803: 246: 918: 4680: 4785: 6620: 4516: 4415: 4050: 2831: 1751: 5930: 2151: 1061: 5666: 6270: 6108: 5804: 5979: 4687: 3796: 3784: 3765: 7048: 4225: 3360: 1592: 1110: 652: 5607: 5986: 3802: 3790: 3778: 3771: 5567: 1949: 1904: 3687: 5772:. That the same IP address made three separate keep arguments doesn't change that. Editors who participated in the discussion didn't find the organization notable. The IP made various assertions but didn't offer any evidence to support them. I couldn't have closed the debate any other way, and I decline to reverse myself. If you like, your next step would be to challenge the outcome at 1240:; I don't believe there was any other NEC service operating at the time that would have had two MHCs and a baggage car. However, that doesn't jive with the text of the article, which claims the MHCs and baggage cars went away in 2001. Got any suspicions whether it's my ID, the uncited article, or the claimed date of the photo that's wrong? 6472:

date column in addition to the acquisition date. I know having unit numbers is somewhat contentious as to Knowledge not being a foamer guide, but I'd also like to think about including those. I've certainly found that listing useful for MBTA Commuter Rail when it comes to identifying locomotives in the photos I'm putting on Commons.

550:) on June 5. Under that system an article is tagged and is deleted after seven days by an uninvolved administrator if no one objects. The objection doesn't have to be substantive; removing the tag is sufficient. By the same token, after the article has been deleted, it may be restored automatically on request. I've done so. Best, 5328:) changed the capitalisation of the name in the lead of this article earlier today, describing the change as "ce", by which I assume they mean copy edit. After this I had made several edits to try and update information on the page, including restoring the capital T for the mid-title instance of "The". Perhaps 3869:

it by relying on an OUTDATED resource, you should ask where the information was shared. In this case, the Arizona Bowl THEMSELVES said Monica McNutt has been added as a sideline reporter, and they did so on Sunday. Next time CONTACT the individual who made the change instead of assuming it is incorrect.

1640:

As an added bonus here though, if the material is in a constant low level edit war, this could help close the war by allowing admins to catch one of the two parties repeatedly attempting to re-add copyrighted material, which would be grounds for a permanent block. If such a course of action nets us a

1628:

Admins have a degree of leeway when it comes to csd which is given so that we can prosecute an article to the best of our ability based on the evidence at hand. I believe that you you know what I'm talking about, since you are also an admin. In my case, when dealing with deletions tagged as copyright

6538:

Thanks for re-adding those. I can compromise on the images given that there's enough space in the article for thumbnails of all the equipment elsewhere (compared to MBTA for example, where there's no way you'd properly integrate almost two dozen equipment images). So the QIT operates a rail service?

6471:

You're doing some absolutely great work digging up sources on these, but I'm not sure that some of your table removals were necessary. I think having images in the table is good - they serve as a nice visual reference that wouldn't fit as inline images in the section - and I'd like to keep the build

1663:

I hope you'll understand, based on my initial reply, why I've reinstated the deletion tag. There's only one subject, shared between two articles. This article started as a copy/paste move, which was then overwritten with copyvios. The responsible user has been banned. We're now cleaning up the mess:

1036:

Working on COI can be controversial, for many reasons. An editor with whom I addressed a COI issue just raised a case about it at Arbcom (!) and at the same time, a case was opened at ANI about other COI matters and I others were working on. At arbcom one of the arbs suggested I step back from COI

411:

First of all I'm flattered by your note and let me say that it's been a pleasure to work with you over the last few years. I'm interested, but let me acknowledge (and you can see from my recent contributions) that I'm busy in real life right now. A GA nomination is a somewhat solitary endeavor: once

6494:

Your points are well-taken and I've restored road numbers and build year (when known, still hunting for the Mafersa coaches). Roster sections attract the worst sort of trivial foaming and I want to keep it out if at all possible. I think in lieu of the 100x100 images I'd like to see a couple proper

3868:

You shouldn't have deleted the sideline reporter from the Arizona Bowl. Monica McNutt WILL be the sideline reporter for the game. Do you know where 506sports gets their bowl game info from? ME! I have supplied 98% of ALL collegiate broadcast assignments ALL SEASON. Before trying to be pompous about

2615:

In conjunction with Archtober and New York Archives Week, the Guggenheim will host its third Knowledge edit-a-thon—or, #guggathon— to enhance articles related to women in architecture on Knowledge. The Guggenheim aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a

1981:

Hi, and thank you for fixing all the copyright violations on train articles. I am about to get the book by Drury, that the violations came from. If I paraphrase the stuff from the book, and add other information from newspapers, and train websites and so on, would it still be a copyright violation?

370:

a few months ago. Long story short, I've never successfully nominated an article for GA before, and I think that that should be my next step in my continued development as a Wikipedian. I'm curious if you might be interested in co-nominating an article with me, as I know you've had a few successful

4616:

Can you please restore the fictional conflict infobox template? It looks identical to the military conflict infobox, but there are some differences in the technical side. In at least one instance, the use of the military conflict infobox for fictional conflicts has skewed some statistical analysis

2727:

In conjunction with Archtober and New York Archives Week, the Guggenheim will host its third Knowledge edit-a-thon—or, #guggathon—to enhance articles related to women in architecture on Knowledge. The Guggenheim aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a

1330:

What was your involvement in the switch-over of Michigan Amtrak station infoboxes by Secondarywaltz out of curiosity? What he did was not consistent with other Amtrak station pages on wiki, and not only that, but some of the replacements he did for the lines aren't even correct. For instance, he

757:

Unfortunately I'm traveling right now and not available to address the issue in depth. I have no objection to re-deleting on the grounds that it was properly deleted as a CSD, provided that Juno has been given an opportunity to make a copy of the article as he requested userfication in good faith.

1686:

Rather than just revert my edit to this page could you please add citation needed where these references are requested. It will make it more obvious where they should be solved. To me it's currently not clear how to contribute to better an already good article and given that banner has been there

1021:

One of the thornier aspects of COI, is when editors come to Knowledge who are primarily interested in promoting their own RW publications and views. This happens pretty frequently. Many experts start out this way and then learn to broaden their approach and become very valued contributors. Some

4391:

That's not really how any of this works. I know enough to know that someone who placed third in a single bike race isn't, on the face of things, notable. I offered above to restore the article if you were prepared to add more information which would explain to people like me (who don't know much

2523:

I am the user that just edited the Amtrak Acela page. It is not high speed rail. It travels the 456 miles from Boston to Washington in 7 hours which is 65.1 mph. You can say the train cars are high speed, but the track, bridges, tunnels and overhead lines are what is limiting the system. The

5748:

I've been informed that you recently deleted the Brough Family Organization. After viewing the debate page I believe there was no "consensus to delete" the page and therefore wonder why you deleted it. If one goes online and uses Google or Bing to search for the Brough Family Organization (or

1289:

Wow, great find on that picture. I knew you were the right person to ask. GMT plus a late train fits the provided time stamp; the Fast Mail didn't arrive until around 11am if I recall which wouldn't match anything (the shadows also indicate mid-morning). Based on what you found, I'm comfortable

4165:

Hello! It's a question of spacing. On a normal resolution computer the image flows into the Notes section, which doesn't look right to me. There's already an interior image of the Parlour Car in the article, and if someone wants to see more images there's a linked curated gallery on Commons at

2731:

The Guggenheim will work alongside ArchiteXX, the founders of WikiD: Women Knowledge Design #wikiD, the international education and advocacy program working to increase the number of Knowledge articles on women in architecture and the built environment. New and experienced editors are welcome.

2619:

1017:

but elsewhere as I encounter them as well. COI issues are complicated here due to the very high value WP places on privacy/anonymity. (I have some thoughts on this on my userpage if you are interested). Because of that, I generally handle COI issues in a relational, non-confronting way - as

2481:

Trainings for new and less experienced Knowledge editors will be offered (in English) at 11:30 a.m., 1:30 p.m., and 3:30 p.m. Tutorials and resources in Spanish will be available online, and participants are also encouraged to work on the Spanish and Portuguese language editions of Knowledge.

4313:

as written about being the 2013 FMB World Tour Champion, nor a description of what that is. (Help me out here, I'm an American football fan but know nothing about competitive biking). There's not much to restore here. I'm happy to undelete in the article namespace with the understanding that

738:

The article wasn't an expired prod, it was PRODed and shortly thereafter I tagged it for CSD as a BLP violation, which is the rationale you cited upon deletion. Restoring it restores the BLP problem. Maybe a better way to go is for Juno to copy the material to work on it offline first? —

386:

in the works right now. If you think another article (ie, not one I created) would be a better idea, I'd be game for that as well. And if you simply don't have the time for or interest in my proposition, I'll completely understand. I just thought it wouldn't hurt to ask. All the best!

4648:

There were only two instances of the fictional template and there were no differences between the two--it simply called the other template. Someone's offsite research project doesn't seem like a great reason to maintain a wrapper, especially given the low usage of the template.

1255:

Peter Van den Bossche takes fantastic pictures, doesn't he? He's pretty reliable so I'd believe the date. We have other 2002 pictures from him in Boston so it fits. I think it's much more likely that the claim in our article is erroneous railfan lore. The time's an odd fit. Per

583:. A team is notable if it "has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization." You can see 596:, which explains how to identify whether a source is reliable. Then, go through the leagues that you've done work on and add the necessary sources so someone else doesn't propose them for deletion. Let me know if you have any questions because I'm here to help! Thanks, 2473:

All are invited, with no specialized knowledge of the subject or Knowledge editing experience required. We will provide training sessions and resources for beginner Wikipedians, WiFi, reference materials, and suggested topics, as well as childcare and refreshments.

1854:

The infobox gives the line length as 118 miles; however, the KML that I'll be adding shortly is 141 miles. Is the 118 miles only from Remsen to Lake Placid? if so, we might want to distinguish between the length of track owned, and the length of service. Cheers,

591:

for deletion because I felt like that team didn't meet this criteria. There's a few sources, but most of them are primary sources (team twitter, website, etc.) and Youtube isn't a reliable source because anyone could add a Youtube video. I'd suggest reading over

361:

You are a Wikipedian whom I admire greatly and really look up to, and I've really enjoyed all my interactions with you over the years. I've been contributing DYKs for quite some time now, and I know you have as well, but I was really inspired by your successful

3443: 2580:

You are invited to join us for a full afternoon and evening of social Knowledge editing at the Guggenheim (drop-in any time, noon-8pm!), during which we will create, update, and improve Knowledge articles covering the lives and works of women in architecture.

3249:

Join at the NY Academy of Sciences, during which we will create, update, and improve Knowledge articles pertaining to the lives and works of women scientists. Note that seating is limited for the Women in Science event, as well as signing up on-wiki, please

5884: 2692:

You are invited to join us for a full day and evening of social Knowledge editing at the Guggenheim (drop-in any time, noon-8pm!), during which we will create, update, and improve Knowledge articles covering the lives and works of women in architecture.

6653:

A videographer will be present to record 1-3 minute Mini-Videos of folks informally speaking, sharing anything about their Knowledge-related projects, whether an edit-a-thon they joined, an article they edited, or a class project they were a part of,

4849: 4737:

The Knowledge training and editathon will take place in the Aaron Douglas Reading Room of the Jean Blackwell Hutson Research and Reference Division, with a reception following in the Langston Hughes lobby on the first floor of the building at 5:00pm.

1335:, when they are in fact not on that line. So, he didn't even get the changes he sought to make correct. Is there a way to convince him to revert this, or will I have to get into a reversion war? This was totally unacceptable to do unilaterally. -- 3615: 2657: 2545: 1641:

permanent solution to an ongoing problem then it could be worth it to take the long route as opposed to the short route. All the same, if you want to re-tag for csd and wait for a deletion-minded admin to come along, I'd be ok with that too.

4280:. Was that claim of significance in the article? perhaps you would consider restoring it as a draft? Rileyschneider is new and just starting to learn about referencing, but all his other articles so far have been on notable mountain bikers. 213:

Unsigned messages will be ignored. You can sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right to disruptively eliminate gigantic blobs of wiki-markup from signatures on a whim if I think they're cluttering up my talk page.

6432:

I disagree. It's a derailment. It's probably a one-day disruption in service for a train which has run since at least 1974, and in a sense since the 1930s depending on your point of view. It's also in no way the first derailment; the

4309:) tagged it for deletion on the grounds that the article didn't assert a claim of notability. I agreed, and deleted it. There's nothing presumptively notable about being a professional mountain bike rider. There's nothing in the 5892: 481:

You're welcome. As you can see I'm looking over the sources for the turbine article now (I own Solomon's UP book, and can read the other on Google). I do have one concern so far relating to a potential GA nomination. The

5749:

Richard Brough Family Organization) he or she will find multiple references and publications referring to the organization. In fact the organization hosts a "Publicity" page that contains links to some of these sources:

3396:

Hello! I saw you deleted the article about Slimgur.com (20:31, 13 June 2015 Mackensen (talk | contribs) deleted page Slimgur (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)), so my suggestion is to take a look about Voat.co

6911:

New and experienced editors are welcome. The event will include a training session for participants who are new to Knowledge and Knowledge specialists will be on hand to provide basic instruction and editing support.

2477:

Please bring your laptop, power cord, and ideas for articles that need to be updated, translated, or created. You are welcome to edit all day or drop by to show your support, and to follow #WikiArte on social media!

1270:. I've no idea what one looked like. The defining characteristic of a Twilight Shoreliner is the branded Viewliner, and we can't see one on this photo. Most images I've seen do show the sleeper on the back. See also 486:

from Solomon's GE and EMD book is really close--phrases, concepts, structure. I think it could stand another rewrite, shortening the language and distilling Solomon's arguments. I may do so myself, but I mention it.

5789: 3160: 5026:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! (One talk this month will be on use of Knowledge press passes for photographers.) Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!

3625: 3565:

5247:

without discussion and left the edit summary "proper title case". The official title of the journal is "Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England" and so this would appear the proper title case, as per

3319:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2956:

We will also include a look at our annual plan and budget ideas, to see if the chapter is able to fiscally sponsor more ongoing projects tied to our core mission of expanding and diversifying free knowledge.

3919: 6831: 6409:

I'd say that the accident is notable enough to be mentioned. As far as I can tell, it is the first derailment. Possibly not notable enough for an article on the limited information available at the moment.

4978:

movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities.

3637: 3517:

2964:

2241:

1465:

837:

278:

3621: 4970:

We will also include a look at our annual plan and budget ideas, and welcome input from community members on the sorts of projects the chapter should support through both volunteer and budgetary efforts.

3509:

5769: 1294:. Now I wish I could fix the article, but finding sources other than ten-year-old listservs is proving difficult. I don't have near as good an Amtrak reference collection as I do for the MBTA. Cheers, 3284: 4136:, which was adding a image of a Amtrak's Pacific Parlour Car. I think that image file is helpful because there are no Hi-level fleets in regular service except them now. So I added that image at the 4074: 3373: 1870:

Yes, because the infobox is more about the company than the service. On reflection that doesn't make sense, but I was writing short-line stubs at the time and that's where my head was. Swapping in

5314:

Thanks for the additional background information. I don't think that this move is uncontroversial. I appreciate the importance of avoiding the use of capital letters where it is inappropriate.

4617:

programs that someone was using for an off-wiki research project. I'm not sure how the programs worked, but I think by switching over to this template would prevent such an occurrence again.--

3031: 1054: 3575: 1728:

This really belongs on the talk page of the article, but there are whole paragraphs which are uncited. Rather than clutter them up with tags I think it's best to with the general tag. Best,

2393: 1072: 5918: 3071:. It might be worth dumping the whole collection on Commons into a cleanup category - every image is good quality and worth having. I'll certainly transfer all the MBTA images regardless. 6592: 1797: 1605: 2751: 2639: 1018:

education more than enforcement. This approach generally works well - people are generally happy to cooperate to ensure that Knowledge content is neutral and the public can trust us.

5036: 218: 6005:

This is by far our biggest event of the year (over 200 participants in the last edition), and every extra hand counts, so please join and volunteer to help us engage new communities!

2379: 2162: 193: 3353: 4295:

The entirety of the article was "Sam Pilgrim (June 4, 1990) is a professional mountain bike rider from Colchester, UK. In 2013 he placed 3rd at Red Bull Joyride in Whistler, B.C."

6801:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — 4662: 5941: 3229:

Join at the Center for Jewish History (drop-in any time!), during which we will create, update, and improve Knowledge articles pertaining to the American Soviet Jewry movement.

4031: 5876: 5795: 5214: 5154: 1637:, and for reasons that escape me they got along fine until just recently. I should think if the copyright gets cleaned up the other two articles will get along fine as well. 517:

team pages that have far less information? Or the more than a dozen other "minor" leagues? How does one of these leagues actually meet standards? I've done work on several.

5743: 5728:

Thanks again to both of you for your prompt and generous assistance. I've found that I really do enjoy the engagement and collaboration that come with a thorough GA review.

3099: 2179: 2855: 6242: 5923: 5130:

I've tried to tread very carefully with the UK-named stations. They do have first-mover advantage and in most cases are the PRIMARYTOPIC (obviously not in these cases).

2004:

In general the approach you describe is fine; I myself have used Drury. The issue in this case is that entire paragraphs were copied wholesale. It's important to avoid

1084: 5958: 5933: 5238: 3834: 2494: 1412: 6750: 5473:

Thanks both, I have put a note on the talk page of the article that I hope summarises the issues raised here. Please feel free to continue the discussion over there.

6080: 5261: 2365: 1927:

Yeah, I screwed up. I was going to decline the speedy, then saw the comment in the closing statement. I reverted myself and deleted the talk page. Sorry about that.

335: 3386: 5868:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

3115: 2029: 1665: 5614:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 4750: 1880:

might make more sense. Alternatively, the text could state the actual lengths in play (it does mention the trackage rights between Utica and Remsen). Good catch!

5762: 5365: 4040: 2898: 2348: 2144: 775: 6302:

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Knowledge editors and new participants.

6140:

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Knowledge editors and new participants.

4084: 2298: 1807: 1540: 5953: 999: 6992: 6386: 5404: 5193:" station...) article doesn't need to be moved? Or that it can be moved to "Hayward station" because the BART station article is already disambiguated?... -- 4377: 4354: 4315: 4259: 2388: 1233: 693: 643: 6062: 3348: 1522: 6676: 6323: 6224: 6161: 3155: 4582:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

4477:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

4097:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2878:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1820:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1371: 4895: 4866: 4851: 4820: 4112: 3021: 2375: 1580: 978: 894: 7036: 682: 6032:

at The Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at the Museum of Modern Art, 4 West 54 Street - between 5th/6th, New York, NY 10019

5244: 2174: 1164:@ Bartel-Pritchard Square entrance (Prospect Park West and 15th St), immediately on the lawn to your left as you walk through the lovely lotus columns. 3401:) -- the article looks also promotional + it's ranked already 11 000+ in Alexa.com (i.e. less visitors) and I think it's insignificant for Knowledge. 5999:

You are invited to join us for the MoMA Art+Feminism edit-a-thon on Saturday, to support the expansion of Knowledge's coverage of women in the arts.

5482: 5468: 5355: 5305: 4671: 3647:

I did not see that thing about Robert Clarke (I wonder if there will be a confirmation in the future, only time will tell but who knows), thank you!

3628:

awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December.

2019: 1357: 1185: 6794: 5712: 5673:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

5454: 5416: 5391: 5137: 4501: 4399: 3669: 765: 748: 494: 461: 439: 7061: 6568: 6548: 6529: 6502: 3109: 3093: 2865: 2109: 2095: 2083: 2069: 2057: 2041: 1991: 1887: 1650: 1315: 1303: 1284: 322: 5703:

Congratulations, Mackensen. I'm glad you asked for a re-review; it must be far more satisfying to have a GA now that a full review has been done.

1844: 5754: 5735: 5172: 5114: 4368: 4335: 4018: 3596: 3453: 2815: 2703: 2591: 1377: 6578:

I just nominated the article for GA status (with an eye towards FA later); I believe it's now ready. I'm going to review a few articles myself.

5697: 5534: 4351:

article doesn't mention it. Don't look at me, I'm not a sports fan at all; I've just been finding sources for Rileyschneider's recent articles.

633: 557: 6886: 4698: 3913: 3620:

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015

1966: 1934: 1864: 1741: 1735: 1675: 1620: 1393: 398: 5783: 4656: 4073:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 2854:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 6825: 6458: 6444: 5505:

Hi, I just noted that you deleted this article. However, I had previously removed the PROD tag which was restored out of process by an IP. --

4563: 4405: 4238: 3437: 3037: 1076: 5638: 5224: 5208: 5184: 2893: 1022:

experts come here intent only on promoting their own papers or views, and end up leaving when they cannot do what they wanted to. Our essay

6798: 6784: 4806: 612: 292: 6858: 5579: 4210: 4181: 3662:

You're welcome. I was somewhat disappointed myself--it really would have been cool for a B-movie veteran like Clarke to be in that scene.

1406: 1249: 729: 268: 6805: 6002:

We encourage both people new to Knowledge, and people who have experience editing online, or have joined us for past edit-a-thon events.

5157:– if there's no objection to that (there's no UK-related station in this case), I'll move that one as soon as I get the go-ahead here. -- 4193:

Hello. Thank you for your reply and I'm sorry for late of my reply. I could understand what means "not fit", and I also don't think the "

3988: 934:

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

4344: 3080: 1722: 1704: 1202: 526: 3209:

No special knowledge of the subject or Knowledge knowledge is required, and there will be Knowledge training workshops for new folks.

2821: 2699: 2670: 2659: 2587: 2558: 2547: 2500: 2320: 4913:

5:30pm - 8:30pm at Sackler Center Media Lab, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, 1071 Fifth Avenue; enter through 89th Street staff entrance

4642: 1010: 7016: 5213:

I'm saying that the Capitol Corridor station (it's more Amtrak than anything else) is where it should be and nothing should moved to

5150: 3423: 3135: 1560: 1037:

matters for a while to get community feedback, and I agreed to do that. That is what GregJackP was referring to on the Talk page.

5403:

You say "We" but this approach doesn't seem to have made is way into the various bits of policy affecting journal titles, including

4022:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

3012:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

2289:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

1513:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

885:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

326:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

6893: 6011: 5970: 5960: 5643: 5584: 4881:

You are invited to join us for an evening of social Knowledge training and editing at the Guggenheim, with a workshop given by the

4606: 2449: 1976: 1013:

that you are not sure what the COI issues are. I work broadly on COI and advocacy issues in Knowledge, mostly on issues raised at

912: 696:

because of an expired prod. Could you please userfy that page for me? I'd like to work on it further and see if I can resubmit it.

288: 230: 220: 6587: 6481: 5992: 5092: 4152: 6612: 6262: 6100: 4932: 4775: 4068: 3984: 3959: 3931: 3921: 3471: 3364: 3188: 2918: 2791: 2308: 1344: 5570:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

4201:. On my new plan, I'd like to show both images at the end of the section by using {{double images}} tag. How about this idea? -- 1264:

was 5:44 AM. If the camera was GMT maybe it's plausible that it's just late and it's cloudy. The thing is, this could also be a

448:

Thanks so much for your thoughtful response, Mackensen. I'll definitely be eager to proceed with a GA nomination, probably with

6897: 6782: 5540: 3298: 2736: 2624: 2371: 1849: 1089: 5674: 7012: 7009:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6717: 6651:

for individuals to share their Knowledge experiences (during pre-meeting, 6-7pm, and in side-office during regular meetup).

6647: 4385: 4267: 3131: 3128:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2009: 1556: 1553:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1550: 416: 353: 2139: 705: 6734: 6369: 6207: 5514: 5022: 4325: 4277: 3648: 3633: 3561: 3344: 3280: 3008: 2285: 1509: 995: 881: 6419: 6017: 4289: 7071: 5841: 4248: 4174:

image with the Parlour Car image, but I do think there's value in showing the Hi-Levels mixed in with Superliners. Best,

3889: 2531: 2445: 2405: 2395: 2314: 2101: 2075: 2033: 1681: 1622: 1064: 670: 4844: 4056: 3656: 3408: 1757: 1049: 5937: 5660: 5601: 4717: 4611: 4522: 4421: 4117: 3331:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3043: 2837: 2158: 2130:

Any chance you could look over recent file moves and do a little cleanup (mostly checking usages got updated)? Thanks

1778: 1769: 1615: 1596: 1546: 1068: 826: 504: 205:, feel free to leave a comment, else please move on. Please ignore the gigantic eye in the corner with the pump-action 2539: 513:

page? Are you saying that every minor league in North America does not meet Wiki standards? Are you deleted the other

371:

GA nominations in the past. I thought perhaps one of my previous railroad-related DYKs might be a good choice, namely

4703: 4579: 4474: 4198: 4094: 3590: 3449: 2875: 1817: 1227: 1174: 4886: 1921: 6985: 6775: 6698: 6397: 6339: 6235: 6177: 6073: 5073:? If neither of you do, I'd be willing to tackle them... Also, should they just be boldly moved, or should another 5054: 5047: 4992: 4768: 3855: 3608: 3531: 3291: 3214: 3176: 3162: 3055: 2978: 2762: 2650: 2511: 2332: 2255: 1533: 1479: 1220: 1180: 1169: 905: 851: 514: 346: 6984:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 6774:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 6396:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 6234:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 6072:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 5046:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 4767:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 3607:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 3412: 3290:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 3054:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 2761:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 2649:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 2510:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 2331:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 1532:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 1219:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 904:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 345:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 6905: 6901: 6660: 6307: 6145: 6050: 5791: 4882: 4167: 3629: 3340: 3276: 3062: 1145: 991: 987: 917: 5813:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

4901: 3753:, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. 6554: 5441: 5378: 5339: 5325: 5285: 4713: 4694: 4635: 4306: 4206: 4148: 3992: 3967:, the project's global 15th birthday festivities. In addition to the party, the event will be a participatory 1840: 6672:

movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

6373:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! (One likely talk this month will be on the

6319:

movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

6211:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! (One likely talk this month will be on the

6157:

movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

3404: 2360: 7059:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

6997:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6762: 5902: 5461:

I've moved the article back to its original location; further discussion should take place on the talk page.

4543: 4442: 4433: 4236:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

3371:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

3120:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1874: 1603:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

1545:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

719: 185: 180: 175: 170: 165: 160: 155: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 120: 115: 110: 105: 100: 95: 90: 85: 3206:

community for one of two edit-a-thons this Sunday, just bring your laptop and an interest in participating!

2769: 6951: 6916: 6872: 6694: 6604: 6594: 6437:

derailed in October 1979 (that one actually killed two people). Coverage of this incident will be routine.

6335: 6254: 6244: 6173: 6092: 6082: 5199: 5163: 5083: 4988: 4924: 4856: 4756: 4506: 3978:

movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

3527: 3486: 3463: 3445: 2974: 2933: 2910: 2900: 2251: 2214: 2191: 2181: 2005: 1475: 1447: 1424: 1414: 1208: 847: 810: 787: 777: 687: 483: 449: 383: 253: 80: 75: 70: 65: 60: 55: 50: 45: 40: 5189:

Just to clarify, are you saying the Amtrak station (and, FTR, it's less an "Amtrak" station than it is a "

6037:

Please note that this entrance is one block north of the main 53rd Street entrance, closer to 5th Avenue.

4088: 3336: 1141: 1101: 1091: 547: 533: 2466:

11:00am - 5:00 pm (drop-in anytime!) at MoMA Cullman Education and Research Building, 4 West 54th Street

1898:

Hi Mackensen, I've just got a notification that says "Your edit on ]] has been reverted by Mackensen. ",

1811: 6627: 6284: 6122: 4947: 4583: 4569: 4478: 4464: 4098: 4080: 2879: 2861: 2849: 1821: 1803: 4539:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4438:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2720:

noon - 8pm (drop-in anytime!) at Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, Garrett Lobby @ 1071 5th Ave by E 88 St

2608:

noon - 8pm (drop-in anytime!) at Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, Garrett Lobby @ 1071 5th Ave by E 88 St

2427:

You are invited to join us for a full Saturday (drop-in any time!) of social Knowledge editing at the

1774:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 6925: 6843: 6833: 6466: 5773: 5478: 5412: 5351: 5257: 4814: 4202: 4160: 4144: 3716: 3419: 3234: 3180: 3166: 1987: 1630: 1340: 3616:

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

1257: 5913: 5110: 5062: 5055: 4381: 4319: 4263: 4006: 3652: 3251: 2047: 1900:

I'm obviously assuming it was the talkpage but why was I reverted ? .... Just a bit confused there

1367: 1266: 1124: 457: 394: 6682: