User talk:Mackensen/Archive24

4986:, but the first train in the morning to Worcester stops at Newtonville at 10:39 a.m. The focus of this line is getting commuters to work in Boston, with reverse service to Worcester provided on a limited basis. Similarly {{SEPTA Train]] which calls itself regional rail, has a couple of lines that could qualify, e.g. the Trenton, NJ, and Newark, DE lines, but SEPTA does not distinguish those services from others that are not intercity. Regional apparently just means servicing the greater Philadelphia region. Also note that US Commuter rail operators are state or local governments, with some cooperative agreements between two or three states. Well run ones take advantage of opportunities to generate non-commuter traffic, but that is not their primary business. Another thing to note is the bit about operating on the national rail network. That is a major characteristic of Commuter rail in the US and triggers the need to comply with stringent 5238:

project. I have looked through the contributions of this editor and I find little that would cause any Admin to have reason to issue so much as a warning. So a I ask of you, where is the edit warring, the anti-civil behavior that generally result in the imposition of a block??? I see an editor that raised a WP:ANI for an admin that was edit warring and non-civil, but was simply admonished ... so where is the balance, the equivalence?? I assess your judgment to be biased and questionable. You give an opinion, but have no evidence to provide as to poor behavior by the admin. At worst I see an editor that has likely tried to start afresh, but when identifying a more sinister and badly behaved sock-puppet has exposed themselves to be a former banned user. By all accounts, and looking at their edits, this editor otherwise would have gone unnoticed by any admin.

8888: 7391: 2891: 973: 793: 4859:

strictly American subject (last time I checked, MBTA serves locations only in the United States and doesn't reach into Canada yet...). However, based on what I saw on the regional and commuter rail pages, the point seemed valid, so I proceeded on the premise that the best solution was to keep the existing text but pipe the link to the commuter rail article and remove the potentially inflammatory superscript and poorly placed hidden comment. I'm in Wisconsin and have heard both regional and commuter rail used to describe Metra services locally, so I am impartial as to which is used in the long run.

1833:"That brings us to the second point about the pairing: it assumed that the city project called the "Swampoodle Connector" would be done. The ex-PRR Chestnut Hill line and the ex-Reading Norristown branch run within a few hundred yards of each other near their respective main line junctions, in a North Philadelphia neighborhood called Swampoodle (the area between the two lines is mostly vacant and isolated land). The plan was to build a connecting track between the two so Chestunt Hill West trains would be connected to the Reading side via the Norristown branch. The plan would have a lot of benefits:? 786: 2018:

I'll put a notability tag on the article in a couple of months, as you suggested. I do fear that if I nominate the article again then the same IAR rubbish will be used, so someone else will have to set up the nomination process. What bothers me is the way it was kept. Otherwise I would forget about it. The person telling me that I misbehaved voted to keep the article despite admitting that the subject didn't pass GNG or BAND. That's much worse than anything I did, I think. I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks again for your help, and have a great day!

549: 8005: 4112: 8213: 1323: 8895: 8519: 7398: 5037: 3956: 3836: 3427: 2898: 980: 5189: 1192: 3147: 4257:: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the 491: 8512: 7155: 4501: 3843: 3434: 7294: 6433: 4674: 7113: 4787:

There's not a particularly well-defined way to establish that, though; different agencies use different terms, and there's not even the level of legal definitions like with HSR. I would prefer to keep "regional rail" in the MBTA articles as I feel that is a more accurate description than "commuter rail" given that the system is designed to be used by more than just commuters. "Train station" tends to imply true intercity rail so that would not be my first choice.

5725: 5563: 5374: 5044: 6076: 6049: 5968: 5914: 5860: 5833: 5428: 5347: 5320: 6103: 6022: 5995: 5941: 5887: 5644: 5482: 1434: 5806: 5779: 5698: 5671: 5617: 5536: 5509: 5401: 5752: 5590: 5455: 7267: 4415: 4339: 4062: 670: 1388: 8271: 6482: 5178: 7222: 8781: 4119: 226: 4751:" (especially since the former article has no citations, and no discussion about the use of the term in the US), but the confusing links and giant comments they're leaving are somewhat disruptive. I'm not sure what the best way to end the disruption is, without necessarily chasing away a potentially good editor (although I see you've had to revert them on several occasions) or having to do something like an RFC. Thanks, 6475: 2514: 8012: 3618: 1316: 7174: 8317: 3942: 7738: 7896: 7102: 6298:

any disputes over copyright for this image. If I find any additional information about the photo I will let you know. Beyond this we tell everyone that our only requirement is that you credit the State Archives of Florida. Our credit line is "Courtesy of the State Archives of Florida." If the photographer is noted, "Photo by John Doe, courtesy of the State of Archives of Florida."

3949: 5183: 6898:, which follows something like eight different stations across their histories; none of the individual stations would be worth a GA. (There are of course exceptions where the two structures each have enough history for lengthy articles, but that's not really the case here.) Would you have any objection to the articles being merged? 2607:. That's not to say that the company is not notable; it's that as written the article didn't make it clear how or why the company is notable. The tone was also somewhat promotional (even now, on my talk page, you're referring to "exciting" agreements). Note that if you're connected with the company in some way, you should read 2044:. There was a clear consensus that van der Veen did not satisfy any notability guidelines and the coverage found fell short of GNG. Everything else was irrelevant drama that should have been ignored. The only calls for keeping were adhoms. Ignoring all rules to keep a badly sourced contentious BLP is an exceedingly dumb idea. 8022:, 4 West 54th Street, on Saturday, March 11, 2017 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. for an all-day communal updating of Knowledge entries on subjects related to art and feminism. There will be childcare, snacks, multiple trainings and panel discussions. People of all gender identities and expressions welcomed and encouraged to attend. 2111:

Unfortunately, my personal collection doesn't have a lot of PRR and B&O history, and the 1971-1989 period where all the services came until public control isn't well covered. I'm adding as much as I can from Baer's massive documents and a few other sources, but if you're able to fill in the gaps I'd be very grateful.

2463: 6729:

You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

6141:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

5253:

You were banned for good cause. You came back, stayed under the radar a while, and then got into the same kind of trouble. You avoided some of the obvious mistakes this time around, but you can't really complain at this stage if you keep socking and people keep identifying the socks. If you'd like to

4296:

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent

3595:

This is just a general wonderation really, is there any way for ] to have its parametre {{{1}}}switch based on {{{notemid}}} instead of the usual {{{line}}}? I'm trying this, because I'm thinking of putting service type in notemid, under line name, and assign each type of service a different colour.

2629:

Hi, I just saw, that the article I started drafting yesterday got deleted (Code G11). I checked that code and it said I failed to include enough reliable sources for the article. Well that is obviously true, as there was no reference included. However that was due to the fact that its still in draft,

2149:

On the plus side, I've now got dates accurate to at least the month level for almost all station openings and closings since public subsidy began, including when commuter trains moved to Capital Beltway (August 1982) and when all service moved to New Carrollton (October 30, 1983). (It'll take a while

1990:

I understand your frustration. I think if you were to renominate it, even with the passage of time, people would have trouble getting past this AfD (assuming they bothered reading it, not a given). I have no particular views on the notability of the subject (aside from what I read during the AfD) and

334:

for more efficiently categorizing and licensing all the Hikki Nagasaki photos. I'm not going to replace the original OTRS tag on images you uploaded (though you're more than welcome to) but I may on some of the other images by him, since he's taken the statement off his web site. (The OTRS permission

8403:

first. A claim of fair use cannot be sustained if we have equivalent free pictures. We have free images of the ACS-64, the HHP-8, the AEM-7, and the SC-44. You can't just grab pictures from around the internet and upload them here. Note that I haven't actually deleted any of the images you uploaded;

8025:

This year’s edit-a-thon kicks off at 10:00 a.m. with a conversation about information activism with writer Joanne McNeil and Data & Society Research Institute Fellow Zara Rahman, moderated by Kimberly Drew, the social media manager for the Metropolitan Museum of Art, creator of the Tumblr “Black

4981:

that was edited in the diff above is a good example of why. As it happens I am sitting a ten minute walk away from that station. I use it often. There are several trains to Boston in the morning and from Boston in the evening that stop there, with spotty service during the day. Someone looking at a

3979:

The Museum of Modern Art and Fundacion Cisneros/Colección Patricia Phelps de Cisneros are uniting with international allies to focus on the lives and works of Latin American artists, architects and designers. With keystone events scheduled for October 22 in New York City and other cities throughout

2636:

I think this may be a start for references to be included. There are several more published scientific papers etc that cover the subject. As promotional also carries the implication the article may not be of general interest for the public, our motivation for creating it was that we often met people

1156:

Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Knowledge community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one

8759:

Thank you, I'm aware of all these issues. It doesn't change the fact that two different images shouldn't be at the same filename. It makes a mess of the attribution history. It also makes going back to an earlier version (for whatever reason) awkward and time-consuming. That the images are fair use

6297:

I am looking into this photo and when it was donated. It is a copy negative made from a print loaned to the Archives. With the loan, the State Archives became the copyright holder for all of the images in the collection. I don't know if the photo was published at the time, but we have never had

4858:

I only saw the one that I edited this morning. The commentary seemed a bit excessive and better suited to the talk page than in an HTML comment in the article. The visible link, which itself pointed to a disambiguation page, seemed unproductive to me, especially since it was on an article about a

1149:

Remember, if you find this source useful for your Knowledge work, make sure to include citations with links on Knowledge: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful

6728:

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

6652:

I've seen one or two other cases reported on WP:ANI; I don't think there's a specific procedure yet. It's (so far) uncommon enough that it doesn't need one. I think in each case you report it there, then an admin fixes the move, unmerge the page histories if necessary, indef the person who did it,

2783:

Yeah, I have the opposite preference - Harvard style gets me frustrated going back and forth between the two styles. For now, would a fair compromise be not to convert anything to Harvard style unless a) book (or similar) references represent more than half of citation instances in the text of the

2708:

Why is there a need to divide references into two types for the sake of a single source? Harvard style works well when most sources in an article are books - especially a small number of books - but for an article with mostly online sources it seems silly. I don't understand you comment about "bad

5237:

if you had identified KirksKeyKard as a potential Sockpuppet of BHTPBank prior to this occasion? Surely, if this editor was so transparent in their behavior (i.e. unbecoming that of a WP editor), then this Sockpuppet would have been blocked earlier before they had committed damaging edits to this

4976:

service on the same line. As far as I know that is the only Amtrak line with two levels of service that would justify use of the term Regional as the rest of the world understands it. All the other passenger rail on the tracks of the national network are considered Commuter rail, even though some

4786:

My understanding is that academically in the US, "commuter rail" properly refers to systems like Sounder that have heavily peaked service, while "regional rail" refers to systems like MBTA and indeed SEPTA Regional Rail that run frequent all-day service, reverse peak service, and weekend service.

2110:

added by an IP editor six years ago, and an extremely long bit about the Keolis controversy. For the moment I've completely blanked the section; I should have a decent amount of written-by-me history up in an hour or so, and I'll probably restore the Keolis section as-is until I can pare it down.

2017:

Thanks for the wise advice. Yes, I thought that Internet radio was smaller yet significant, and growing, but the websites I checked that Ivana was on said NOT ENOUGH DATA, so the traffic is minimal. It's not her fault, of course, but that's not significant coverage, in my opinion. Anyway, I guess

1553:

My reading of the discussion is that the existing article history wasn't useful for improving the other two articles. No policy commands this, but it seemed the desired outcome. As for harm, keeping the history invites someone to revert the merge later. As I said, my reading of the discussion was

809:

Expanding coverage of Jewish women on Knowledge makes these women and their creations discoverable, addresses the gender bias on Knowledge in a positive way, and works to correct imbalances archival collecting practice and institutional projects that have historically silenced women's narratives.

743:

Mackensen, I apologize if you took offense at the procedure. If you had just moved around the words in the nominator's proposed hook, that would have been fine. But when you introduce a new hook fact, however small, it must be double-checked for sourcing, etc., by another reviewer. I just recused

8529:

hosts Action Equals History — a unique opportunity for New Yorkers to learn hands-on in a technology training/workshop session about the mechanics, practices and benefits of Knowledge and the Wikimedia projects. This is an opportunity for all to gather, share and work collectively towards a more

4839:

has a lot of discussion about "regional rail" in the context of all-day systems (including some heavy rail and light rail) that have all-day bidirectional service with a regional scope rather than solely serving a CBD. TRR is the premier transportation journal; unfortunately a lot of their newer

1963:

Thanks for going through the trouble of studying that AfD. I understand your decision. I was just wondering if you think I could renominate the article for deletion in a couple of months (I wouldn't make those gigantic mistakes again), or would that be seen as toxic by other contributors? I sure

8736:

I have been updating football club badges for about three years and this is the first time someone has "split" the images. I don't think it is necessary because the images are copyright and as soon as a replacement image is uploaded, the former image no longer has fair use. There is a bot which

3987:

All are invited, with no specialized knowledge of the subject or Knowledge editing experience required. Introductory training on the basics of Knowledge editing will be given throughout the edit-a-thon. Please bring your laptop and power cord; we will have library resources, WiFi, and a list of

2333:

Hi, the reason I tagged those CSD'd those templates was because I did close those discussions, but I later reverted myself when I realized that I had misread the dates and the discussion couldn't be closed yet. I thought I reverted all my edits, but I guess I missed those ones. Hope that clears

1840:

page. I was able to get rid of the copy vios put into that article by this user. There is not a lot of information on this. In the link it talks about someone who worked for the Delaware Valley Association of Rail Passengers. I will try to contact them and see if they have any information. If I

2292:

because it was previously deleted via discussion. However, the previous page that was deleted via discussion was a long time ago. The content of the page is similar but the person is now cited with better sources that show his notability. Can we allow the undeletion of the page to start a new

4534:

The Guggenheim aims to raise awareness of the artists featured in the Tales of Our Time exhibition supported by The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Chinese Art Initiative, and build on the model of campaigns like the Knowledge Edit-a-thon at the Guggenheim: Women in Architecture, Knowledge

2784:

article and b) there's a need to indicate individual page numbers (i.e, not just a single page or a single short range)? That seems like it would keep a consistent style for articles with majority web sources, but the longer articles with heavy book reliance would use Harvard for the books.

2079:

Not deleting under those conditions creates a very bad impression. What was a valid policy based afd was turned into something else by those opposed to deletion. It was disrupted with that drama to prevent removal. Closing like that rewards the creation of drama and encourages disruption.

6292:

Thanks so much, Mackensen! From the sources I've already found, you're right about the four cars ultimately running a UP service between Portland and Seattle. I've received a promising preliminary e-mail from the State Archives of Florida, quoting directly from the Photographic Archivist

4624:

Thank you again for your help on the Aqueduct Racetrack article. I have added some additional information, and I have found references that have allowed me to eliminate almost all of the uses of the nycsubway.org page as a reference. When you have a chance could please check out my work?

1719:

It's been a while hearing from you. The statement was meant to read that the particular license (waiver) only applies to that particular image in question, and does not waive all the remaining images from the website which still has a "No Derivative" condition attached and in effect. -

8365:

stop ruining articles by deleting pictures such as the one of the ACS-64 HHP-8 and AEM-7 in the article Electric locomotive or I will report you for vandalisim and your excuse is image not free but i did fill out the forms correctly about the source of the image and it is fair use

2251:

to the library system--there is an "other" option in the Residence drop down. Barring an answer there, I might be able to go and take a look at the central library to see if I can find something about your questions (though you'd have to direct me on the specific questions asked).

9015:

Mackensen, I was wondering whether you'd be willing to return to your review of this nomination now that Gerda Arendt has proposed a new hook and done some work on the article. You tagged the article for sourcing and had issues with the hook sourcing as well. Thank you very much.

8026:

Contemporary Art,” and the person behind @museummammy on Instagram. Afternoon breakout groups will engage in focused discussions about related issues, including intersectionality and librarianship, power structures in notability guidelines on Knowledge, and radical archives. --

4293:. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. 3645:

established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

1889:. So while I'm not convinced of the actual notability - it's probably fine as just a sentence or two on the SEPTA Regional Rail article unless someone can dig up good primary or secondary coverage of the Vuchnic plan - it definitely was a real plan proposed by real people. 6307:

via interlibrary loan, so I should really be able to flesh out this article over the rest of this month. I'm hoping to get it to GA status by myself, but might you (at some point in the future) be willing to go in on an FA nomination with me for it? I know you have that

2688:

OK, I see. In fact it is the first time I tried to create an article and I am member of the team. In case we still think it reasonable to have an article due to public interest, regarding to COI, I guess it'd be best to find someone not involved for writing the article?

4090: 1867:. The text about the connector is clearly just the words of Matthew Mitchell of DVARP. If this was an actual proposal there would be studies and news coverage. So far I can't find any. What we need are reliable sources. At the moment there's nothing that could merged. 4524:

New and experienced editors are welcome. The event will include a training session for participants who are new to Knowledge, and Knowledge specialists will be on hand to provide basic instruction and editing support. Editors are invited to view the exhibition

5205:! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, 4691:

Hi Mackensen. Thanks for helping with the GA reviews. I have tried to fix things on the page so that it can pass. You haven't responded recently. When you have a chance, could you see what else needs to be done so that it could pass? Thank you and have a good

6129:

All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please

813:

A training session on editing Knowledge will be held at 12:30 pm. Experienced Wikipedians will be on-hand to assist throughout the day. Please bring your laptop and power cord; we will have library resources, WiFi, and a list of suggested topics on hand.

2183:

I have a 1981 B&O "Potomac Valley Service" timetable. It confirms that Hyattsville is still listed on what was then called the "Baltimore Line", but seeing one train each way per day (out of four). Not having much luck so far on Conrail's operations.

4773:

Yes, the endnotes are overkill. That said, my gut reaction is that the IP is right: the term "regional rail" isn't in common use in the United States. Is there a reason we don't call these commuter rail stations (or, better yet, just train stations)?

4427:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

4351:

1697:

Because it's my stated mission to the keep foamers at bay on this project, and one way I do that is by insisting that material be sourced and verifiable. Do you own one of the Sun Lounges? I saw it on a Nickel Plate 765 special last year. Lovely car.

1964:

don't want to see the IAR rubbish again. The subject is not notable. Period. The problem is that this article had been sitting around for ages, and nobody nominated it for deletion, so if I don't do it again I figure that no one might nominate it in

6326:

Morgan's book is excellent; I don't have it but I do have a couple of design books which I think discuss it. White's book on passenger cars probably does too. I'll try to help out but my availability is going to be spotty over the next few weeks.

3635: 1658:

Why do you keep changing the article on the Sun Lounge? I am posting accurate info on that particular car's disposition. I also happen to be a part owner of a pvt car and have forgotten more about SCL psgr cars that most foamers will ever know.

1460:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

5168: 213:

Unsigned messages will be ignored. You can sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right to disruptively eliminate gigantic blobs of wiki-markup from signatures on a whim if I think they're cluttering up my talk page.

6351:

I completely understand, Mackensen. I'm working on reading Morgan's book right now, so hopefully I'll be resuming work on writing the article in a week. Also, I received the following message from the State Archives of Florida today:

7950:

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found

6604: 6261: 5011: 6228:, which looks like it might be PD due to lack of a copyright notice, but again I don't think I can prove it has ever been published. Anyway, I'm curious if you might have any ideas for where to find a nice PD photo or two of the 6302:

I'm hoping that further research can clear it as PD. Worst case scenario, though, I've got some awesome images from that brochure you uploaded that I can use to illustrate the article. And I just obtained a copy of Ric Morgan's

6790:

Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited.

2066:

Deleting under those conditions would have created a very bad impression. Dontreader's intervention on your talk page, which I wasn't previously aware of, only reinforces my view that the AfD could not have an outcome. Best,

7814:

supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you!

4244:

based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your

4720: 1531:

I was thinking that the article history could be useful for editors who might want to, in the future, improve the articles that the DAB references. Is there harm or policy that says this history needs to be deleted?

7010:

you made, do you have any idea where you got that information? I don't see those train names appear in any timetable (though unfortunately timetables.org is missing the April 1995 Keystone timetable), including the

2168:

Because Baer doesn't give any useful details (other than a contradictory hint that Frederick Road was closed before 1979) and they don't show up in any Proquest or Highbeam articles, I'm about stuck on those three.

6894:. I generally hold that when a historic station is replaced by a modern station on the same site (or very close nearby), it's better to keep them on one page for a more logical flow of information. See for example 6700:

I apologize; I wasn't clear. I've just seen this reported on ANI so far. I think these cases belong there so that administrators are generally aware of the tactic. Apparently some of these incidents are tracked at

1464:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

7766: 2804:, by the way. Turns out they were made at Budd's Red Lion plant, off the West Trenton Line, so a lot of the early testing was done on the Reading. Baer has several notes about that in his 1967 and 1968 histories. 5202: 6722: 4297:

when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available

3567:! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the 5275: 5243: 3219:

Thank you! If you can believe it, there was a time when discussion of reviving the use of Turboliners could get one banned on railfan forums. Now that they've been scrapped the issue has died down...a little.

4480: 6926: 6268:. Given the description of the listing I doubt the eBay was ever published so it's probably copyrighted. Surprisingly we don't seem to have any pictures of any of the cars in later revenue service with UP. 5214: 5069:

This will be the holiday party! Celebrate a December holiday with us, or in wiki-fashion, edit the calendar itself and join us to celebrate any holiday of your choice regardless of when it usually happens.

3483:

movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities.

5198: 1815:

it's a proposal, not a line. There's no source in the article. There's an external link to a guy's website, but it doesn't actually discuss the proposed connection (that I could find). The link was added

6948:. I've put as much time, effort, and care into it as my other (large) DYK nominations, but if you're interested in taking it to the next level, I'd be more than willing to work with you on getting it to 6454: 4971:

service but I doubt anyone here who hasn't spent time riding railroads overseas picks up on its European significance. For most Americans its just a marketing name to distinguish it from the high speed

3815: 2041: 2641:

Therefore we'd like to have our article undeleted, and as soon as the draft is done, submit it for review :) (which I obviously was mistaken to believe is the first time we get into risk of deletion).

8760:

and therefore have a limited lifespan doesn't change these considerations. It's unfortunate that the older images weren't split as well but it's easy to overlook in the course of handling rescaling.

7233:

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (

4439:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4363:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5233:

Your statement about interacting with both LiveRail and Bhtpbank is an interesting statement from a highly respected editor, and which begs the question of why you failed to issued a request for a

2504: 660: 521: 2225: 3406: 2224:. I think I've seen reference to Amdot (Amtrak Maryland Department of Transportation) before, but I don't think that branding was long-lived. Here's another story from that period which uses it: 1592:

I think making this a DAB is unnecessary - anyone interested in this specific plot point would be more than capable of locating a relevant article. That said, I don't oppose a DAB page existing.

673: 662: 3921: 7064:

services). For pre-1981 services I would have relied on Bruce Goldberg's book. Untangling Keystone service was always vaguely on my hit list; glad to see you're tackling it. Watch out for the

7060:

2010 me isn't returning my calls. If I had to guess, I found the name in a timetable and assumed the October 28, 1995 end date as the date individual names were dropped (as they were with the

4073: 3973:(Wiki Arte y Cultura Latinoamerica) edit-a-thon is a global campaign to improve Knowledge's coverage of Latin American arts and culture and to counter geocultural systemic bias on Knowledge. 1165:. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Knowledge Library can offer. 7799: 6748: 2315:

I had another look at the deleted content and decided that it differed enough to warrant undeletion. That doesn't stop anyone from renominating it for deletion under different grounds. Best,

6225: 1211:

Experienced Wikipedians will be on-hand to assist throughout the day. Please bring your laptop and power cord; we will have library resources, WiFi, and a list of suggested topics on hand.

6312:

article under your belt, and I'd love to (help) produce an FA of my own some day. Thanks again for all your help, and all your amazing and inspiring contributions to Knowledge and Commons!

681: 677: 4907: 4760: 542: 7279: 1383: 7824: 4946:

I'm not too clear about the distinctions between regional rail and commuter rail, but I did mass-revert the "commentary", and it seemed like those pages should use commuter rail (as the

4197: 7283: 6767: 6354:

I checked out N039552. The original was a loan, and the donor gave all rights to us. No photographer is noted, so “Courtesy of the State Archives of Florida” would be the credit line.

5139: 4055: 3849:

On Sunday, October 16, Wikimedia NYC will host a multimedia tutorial, workshop, and hackathon focused on Wikimedia Commons and the work processes for cultural multimedia wiki-projects.

3976:

Featuring an opening Artists' Panel at 10am, with Sol Aramendi, Sharon Lee De La Cruz, and Marisa Morán Jahn, to be moderated by Rocío Aranda-Alvarado, curator at El Museo del Barrio.

8491: 6755:

to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

4455: 4379: 4065: 3568: 8737:

automatically removes older images. The two files you "split" will be affected by this because the original one will no longer have fair use and someone will eventually delete it. --

1756:, etc (As an example), I would like to know which specific area over their needed improvement? If you can relist it, I will like to work on it to make it proper. Thanks in advance.-- 1138:

You are receiving this message because the Knowledge Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

193: 8332: 6971: 6260:; I started gathering material but never did anything with it. I never found a photo beyond that brochure. Commons has treated material from Florida Memory as presumptively PD; see 3345: 2670:, as written, contained a mission statement and a technical description and wasn't written as an encyclopedia article. Also, if you're connected with the MOVE-II project please see 1775:

for an example of why that argument is a non-starter. My reading of the discussion was a consensus to delete. The issue was less referencing and more the basic claim of notability.

4125:

Join us for a full Saturday of social Knowledge editing at NY Academy of Sciences (drop-in any time!), during which we will create, update, and improve Knowledge articles covering

7947:

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

3014: 4258: 3120:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 2582:

Hi Mackensensen. I am looking to set up a page for Genius Sports, a large sports company that has recently signed a number of exciting agreements with major sports federations.

1142:

Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at

8541:

tools for a variety of different thematic campaigns, and user-testing them with the community. Towards a goal of advancing these tools for wider use with diverse local groups.

7983: 6673:

as spam, absent any other form of notification, will simply have the page deleted. In the interim, I've used the simple {{db|1=some reason}}. tag with a long explanation inside

3852:

The CommonsLab is the concluding "upload party" to the Knowledge @ Open House New York Weekend photo scavenger hunt, and an accompanying Wikimedia Commons multimedia hackathon.

3163: 2771:

When it comes to that, I find Harvard style easier to read than rp, and I recall being advised against rp during a GA review at some point. Admittedly it's personal preference.

2532: 7002:

As expected, the history of what is now the Keystone Service is a long and twisted one. So many service and frequency changes. I'm going to have to do some error correction to

4601: 4270: 693: 3630:(also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned 3582: 1482: 1171: 6589: 3888: 1793:

Why are you convinced that the line does not exist? There is a source that seems credible. If you don't think it is a credible source, may you please explain why it is not.--

8328: 3117: 3106: 1953: 1578:

seem to think there is some value in the material. The others advocated that it deleted based on notability grounds and did not really offer an evaluation of the material. ~

7370: 698: 628: 7795: 6752: 3540: 8320: 8309: 8307: 5279: 5265: 4037: 6181: 6204:

that has lapsed into the public domain, and I've been looking for a PD photograph to go with images I plan to extract from the brochure. I've found a great image from

4473: 4232: 4085: 3168: 2870: 1202:

Library's second annual Wiki Loves Pride Edit-a-thon, during which we will create, update, and improve Knowledge articles pertaining to LGBT art, culture and history.

765: 6498:, a Knowledge celebration and mini-conference as part of the project's global 16th birthday festivities. In addition to the party, the event will be a participatory 4323: 8867: 7952: 7930: 5271: 5239: 3558: 2694: 2652: 1677: 8603: 939:

I'm simply saying that any railroad is probably notable, be it a Class I or a lowly tourist railroad. They're going to receive sufficient coverage to pass the GNG.

5870: 5287: 3361: 1489:

To me, there doesn't appear to be a consensus to delete here. There are 3 delete !votes and 3 suggestions for other keepish actions. I plan to create a DAB as per

1423: 952: 449: 6243: 4967:

has a specific meaning in Europe and many other countries, but it does not have that meaning in the U.S. Amtrak does use the word in its European meaning for the

3638:

with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

448:

appears to have been "recreated" after it had been (I think) deleted by yourself on 16 February 2016. You can read my more detailed explanation in that article's

9008: 8035: 7068:, which was a Harrisburg-Boston from I think 1973-1975. 201 is a real oddity; that's in the era before that Corridor was rebuilt for higher-speed operation too. 3104: 1741: 1477: 439: 8920:

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Knowledge editors and new participants.

7438:

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Knowledge editors and new participants.

3462:

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Knowledge editors and new participants.

3129: 2934:

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Knowledge editors and new participants.

1267: 1016:

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Knowledge editors and new participants.

3279: 3033: 2825: 1483: 714: 9025: 8355: 7504: 7241: 6176: 1502: 7348: 5221: 1457: 1208:

Also featuring a lightning talk by CUNY students at the La Guardia and Wagner Archives on a project to document local 1980s HIV/AIDS activism on Knowledge.

748:. Aside from the review, I also thought the choice of hook was very uninteresting, and knew that I couldn't just change it to one of the alts in prep. Best, 3007: 872: 8990: 8767: 8621: 7664: 7519: 6831: 4661: 4290: 3401: 2690: 2648: 1294: 699: 497: 490: 8839:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

7186: 6792: 4715: 4701: 1095: 924:, or any Class I railroad where I would agree with your argument; this is a tourist railroad that offers paid excursions for $ 37 for a 2.5 hour journey. 461: 290:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

8666: 5865: 5573: 3319: 3099: 2865: 2518: 2506: 445: 7791: 6744: 4922: 8977: 8661: 7491: 7252: 7200: 5126: 3329:

Hey, why did you delete the article on Kayleigh McEnany? By what standard was there a consensus? It sure did not seem like a consensus to delete to me.

1515:

I don't see any consensus to retain the content and apparently there wasn't anything to merge. You don't need the article history to write a DAB page.

394: 9009: 8682: 4891: 3966:(drop-in any time!), during which we will create, update, and improve Knowledge articles pertaining to the lives and works of Latin American artists. 1405: 7697: 7683: 7650: 7632: 7308:(John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Knowledge seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009. 7116: 7047: 6850: 4647: 4584: 4404: 4209: 3761: 2589: 2310: 2294: 1874: 1827: 434: 8425: 8278:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

7347:

for February 20, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at

6991: 6524:

Also featuring an International/Multilingual panel, a Documenting Activism panel, a Multimedia/Tech Panel, a Science panel, an Art panel, and more.

6393: 6373: 6334: 6321: 6283: 7916: 7884: 7877:

I'm fine with that. The current naming situation has bugged me for years, but I never did anything about it. Please feel free to move them around.

7655:

Hey there. Do you have any thoughts on this? Like I said above, I'm happy to do an interview piece instead to take up less of your time. :-) Best,

7136: 7075: 6920: 6702: 6670: 6628: 6437: 6265: 6131: 5247: 4853: 4831: 4796: 4781: 4678: 4275: 4249:

in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the

3725: 3719: 3236:

Sounds familiar ;) - remember that you could get banned when you used a certain template too often? - The topic is on its way to get unattractive (

2813: 2801: 2778: 2766: 2738: 2681: 2234: 2209: 2191: 2178: 2140: 2089: 2074: 1898: 1468:

I believe you did some editing on this article back in the day. Figure there's not much worth in keeping an article on a project that never was...

386: 364: 271: 5003: 4939: 4397: 3253: 3227: 2571: 2485:

It looked like a close paraphrase when I first looked at it, and there's little doubt it was used improperly, but not as bad as I first thought.--

1493:'s suggestion but I would prefer that we retain the past article history as we go forward with that, not start from scratch after your deletion. ~ 9045: 7802:. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to 7319: 7315: 7090: 6576: 4959: 4684: 4328: 4139:

Beginning and experienced Knowledge writers are both welcome, and there will be helpers on hand to assist those new to editing the encyclopedia.

3855:

The event will take the form of a modified unconference, with sessions for photographers/creatives, editors/writers and hackers/software folks!

2667: 2585:

Could you please give me some feedback why the initial page was removed so that I can hopefully submit a more acceptable copy second time round?

2369: 7978: 5508: 4868: 2618: 2496: 2476: 2415: 2322: 2027: 2012: 8947: 8302: 7593: 7461: 6895: 6221: 5778: 5096: 3807: 3785: 1946: 1601: 504: 281: 5832: 3237: 2261: 8726: 8702: 7761: 7424: 7323: 6940: 6928: 6197: 4541: 4492: 4482: 4014:

10:00am - 6:00pm at The Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at MoMA, 4 West 54th Street (between 5th and 6th Avenue)

2449: 1977: 1782: 1724: 946: 933: 826: 777: 767: 757: 734: 478: 8469: 8385: 7162: 7158: 6712: 6684: 6660: 3355: 2053: 6997: 5519: 2384: 2289: 2266:(I suppose I could send the same questions in if you think a citizen of Baltimore City would have a better/quicker chance of an answer.) -- 8830: 5589: 2542:

Hello! Just a quick heads up I reverted some vandalism that was done to your user page! Just thought I'd let you know. Have a good day! --

2107: 1841:

cannot find anything, could the article be deleted, and a summary of the content of the article put into another Septa article? Thanks. --

1587: 1561: 1541: 1522: 8820: 8667: 8485: 7432: 7365: 7204: 7148: 7144: 6546: 5789: 4133: 2200:, which puts West Baltimore replacing both Edmondson Avenue and Frederick Road sometime in mid-1984. Is that one you can access or clip? 1992: 1645: 1623: 1554:

that (a) this article shouldn't exist as a standalone and (b) the content wasn't worth merging elsewhere. That points toward a deletion.

745: 8746: 7638: 1850: 1817: 1802: 8943: 8879: 8869: 7457: 7382: 7372: 7120: 7094: 6102: 5092: 5028: 5013: 3672: 2597: 1217: 1183: 1173: 1106: 899: 7864: 7089:

from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please

4994:

should mention that. It limits the use of rolling stock from the rest of the world, e.g. DMUs, though some wavers have been granted.--

2395: 1162: 8641: 8248: 7428: 7128: 5886: 5535: 4634: 3381: 3299: 3049: 2845: 2275: 1446: 414: 6580:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

3531:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

3348:, I saw a clear consensus among them to delete because there wasn't sufficient significant, in-depth coverage of the subject. Best, 3274: 3206: 3188: 2698: 2656: 2302: 8981:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

8065: 7839:

related to the Network Growth Strategy. As the only significant contributor to the article in years, any qualms about moving it to

7612: 7495:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

7081: 6075: 5643: 5130:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

4289:, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at 3726: 2998:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

2604: 1086:

to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --

6224:, although there is no way to prove it has been published and it could very well still be protected by copyright. I've also found 5967: 1918: 8887: 7711: 7390: 7166: 7132: 6907: 6542: 6494: 6466: 6456: 6421: 5600: 5514: 5147: 5017: 4685: 3113: 3038:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2890: 2431: 2421: 1952: 1820:

by a different user who was banned shortly thereafter for sockpuppetry. In any event, a private website probably isn't reliable.

1765: 1616:

FWIW, I think the delete close was reasonable, and agree that restoring the history isn't a blocker for creating a DAB page. --

972: 7741:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

7244:

closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (

5346: 4743:

thanks to dynamic IPs) on MBTA articles? They may have something of a point as far as the American versus European meanings of "

1244:

Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at MoMA, 4 West 54 Street - between 5th/6th Ave, New York, NY 10019

803:(drop-in any time!), during which we will create, update, and improve Knowledge articles pertaining to Women in Jewish History. 344: 320: 5843: 5784: 4950:

article uses the term "commuter rail"), so I made those changes. I think it would be worth a discussion at the Trains project.

4241: 3658: 3564: 2718: 8279: 7943:

creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

5859: 5697: 5073:

Featuring special guest presentations on structure data, university library meetups, metrics and reporting, and other topics.

1006: 8862: 8637: 8634:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7124: 7086: 6449: 4145: 4103: 4092: 3679: 3377: 3374:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3295: 3292:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3045: 3042:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2841: 2838:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2551: 2387:. I am here to notify you about that the "Neelix Redirect" criterion has separated out from G6 and become CSD X1. Thank you. 2120: 410: 407:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8158: 6639: 6021: 5940: 5913: 4977:

lines have characteristics that could be termed regional in the European sense in that they connect two or more cities. The

3197:, "a fleet of gas turbine trainsets employed by Amtrak, ... a matter of intense controversy in the US railfan community"! -- 2731:

Because I'm up to my eyeballs in false references in the Philadelphia area, and a common tactic is a misleading page range.

516: 8585: 8546: 8503: 8493: 8381: 7974: 7525: 7351:, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! 7331: 7211: 7140: 6984:

looks fantastic. There's a few things I'd tweak, but I have limited access the next few days, so don't let me hold you up.

6605:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive939#What_to_do_about_a_page_turned_into_a_completely_different_article

5427: 5210: 4469: 4319: 4298: 4284: 4266: 3694: 3605: 3578: 3527: 2994: 1995:; if the subject is obviously non-notable then someone else will nominate the article in good time. I'd start by putting a 1711: 1705: 1082: 6213: 5994: 5751: 5670: 5562: 3338: 2349: 8415: 8400: 7778: 6816: 6735: 3994: 3933: 3923: 3899: 2035: 1681: 1027: 7803: 5724: 5373: 5319: 8445: 8360: 8324: 8265: 8240: 7904: 7573: 6864: 5595: 5454: 4069: 2435: 905: 205:, feel free to leave a comment, else please move on. Please ignore the gigantic eye in the corner with the pump-action 8180: 7190: 6913:

No strong objection, but I would note that they're a solid block apart and the current station is on a new alignment.

6876: 6216:) that I inquired about via e-mail, but SMU and GM still claim copyright on them, respectively. I'm also intrigued by 6048: 5481: 4982:

map might think to call it a regional rail station since they might envision that it could also be used to commute to

3706: 908:, can you explain why this railroad is "presumptively notable?" Moreover, it might be important to note that this is 8836: 7903:

I believe I've fixed all the outstanding links to the various trains. However, there are a couple old discussions at

7511: 6631:. This isn't simple spamming calling for simple tagging, so is there a procedure for reporting this sort of thing? -- 5838: 5546: 2577: 287: 8788: 8673:

Hi, I just saw your hook in prep. Before all the hits come in, I'd just like to say that it's a great hook!!! Best,

7940:

updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria

5616: 574:

Wednesday May 25 at NYU Tisch School of Arts, 721 Broadway, 4th floor (same location as Knowledge Day in January) -

9001: 8614: 8194: 7540: 7256: 6113: 5400: 5161: 4612: 4225: 4048: 3914: 3624:

Hello, Mackensen. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

3551: 3497: 3026: 2964: 2375: 1416: 1287: 1123: 1052: 892: 653: 580: 9000:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 8613:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 8193:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 7554:

Nice to see that you've spearheaded a featured article! I remember seeing you around constantly back in the day. —

7539:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 6781:

This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

5805: 5160:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 4611:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 4224:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 4047:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 3913:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 3550:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 3456: 3025:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 1415:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 1286:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 1122:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 891:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 652:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 373:

Great. Also, in case you hadn't seen, Baer's definitive PRR chronology got an update last year; the new files are

233: 8742: 8722: 8534: 7970: 7565: 5206: 4987: 4518: 4465: 4315: 4262: 4202:

And RSVP now for our other event this Sunday in Brooklyn, focusing on Indigenous communities and social justice:

3981: 3861: 3827: 3817: 3664: 3574: 2427: 2150:

for me to finish the MARC article and then fill in the station articles). I'm still missing three closure dates:

1351: 1021: 8858: 6674: 5897: 4991: 4928: 4517:—to enhance Knowledge's coverage of modern and contemporary artists from Greater China. The event will cap off 4250: 2671: 2608: 2283: 1936: 1732: 1636:. I was just surprised to see an assessment of a delete consensus with only 4 of 7 editors !voting to delete. ~ 218: 8934:

movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

7448:

movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

6209: 6169:) 22:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC) ...and that'll teach me to query SuggestBot after a round of vandalism cleanup. 5083:

movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

2951:

movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

1039:

movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

8626:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7830: 7194: 6960:

online, so I'm putting that source on the back burner for now by hiding it in the wiki-markup. All the best!

4003: 3467: 3366:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3284:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2939: 2830:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1788: 640: 399:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

185: 180: 175: 170: 165: 160: 150: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 120: 115: 110: 105: 100: 95: 90: 85: 7958:

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

6867:. You are being notified as one of every registered editor who has edited that article in that past year. -- 6364:

one, or not? I always tend to err on the side of caution, and I'm still skeptical about this. All the best!

3980:

the month (Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Caracas, & others), the campaign aims to further similar goals to

8708: 7840: 7240:

Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Knowledge, an

6620: 6536:

movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

5654: 5541: 4560: 4448: 4372: 4165: 3493: 3418: 3408: 3134: 2960: 2882: 2872: 1151: 1048: 964: 954: 879: 576: 533: 523: 313: 80: 75: 70: 65: 60: 55: 50: 45: 40: 452:

page. I'm inclined to nominate the page for speedy deletion, but I'm not sure. What do you think? Thanks.

7259:

to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

6108: 6086: 4460: 4384: 3631: 2624: 1886: 1347: 1307: 1296: 1274: 1249:

Please note that this entrance is one block north of the main 53rd Street entrance, closer to 5th Avenue.

1205:

All are invited, with no specialized knowledge of the subject or Knowledge editing experience required.

1110: 806:

All are invited, with no specialized knowledge of the subject or Knowledge editing experience required.

7929:

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its

7820: 7599: 6763: 6264:. I think that's a little dubious given the lack of source information, but it's been allowed. See also 4535:

Edit-a-thon at the Guggenheim: Contemporary Art of the Middle East and North Africa, and Art+Feminism.

4019:

Please note that this entrance is one block north of the main 53rd Street entrance, closer to 5th Avenue

8902: 8840: 8826: 8754: 8738: 8718: 8377: 7966: 7924: 7405: 6891: 6598: 6417: 6273: 6269: 6201: 5051: 4978: 4619: 4170:

7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street (between Vesey and Barclay Streets in Manhattan), 40th Floor

3441: 2905: 2221:

Lucky for you I'm a lax archiver (on the talk page, anyway). I do have access and here's the clipping:

1772: 987: 556: 291: 277: 8805:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 8399:

You're welcome to report me for vandalism if you think that's wise but I'd encourage you to read over

8136: 4836: 4511:, in conjunction with a global campaign, the Guggenheim will host its fifth Knowledge edit-a-thon—or, 250:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 8773: 8459: 7693: 7688:

Sorry for the delay here. Let's reconnect in a couple weeks when you have more time and we can talk?

7660: 7646: 7608: 7441:

We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities.

6887: 6827: 6812: 6445: 5892: 5708: 5076:

We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities.

4824:

describes the system as "commuter rail" in the lede. Are there reliable sources discussing the term?

4711: 4697: 4657: 4630: 3682:. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC) 3241: 1885:

DVARP was using the term at least as far back as 1998, in a presentation to the SEPTA board no less:

1846: 1798: 1450: 853: 800: 792: 602:

7:00 pm: MediaWiki tutorial, community involvement and extension ideas, novel uses of wiki technology

7012: 4898:

who mass-reverted the IP. I think at this point it may be worth a discussion at Wikiproject Trains?

3651:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective

3610: 1374:, just inside the park at Central Park West between 81st & 82nd. Enter the park at West 81st St. 8808: 7852: 6967: 6881: 6369: 6317: 6272:

might have captured one of the cars. I haven't gone through his UP photos. I'm also going to check

6239: 5357: 5255: 4999: 4983: 4930:

I reverted those changes and changed the link to use "commuter rail" as the IP editor recommended.

4918: 3324: 3039: 1597: 705:

Please see note on your DYK review. You might want to review my alt, or one of the others. Thanks,

331: 8937:

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7451:

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7035: 7027: 6205: 5978: 4132:

This event also coincides with the year-long celebration of the Academy's 200th Anniversary and a

2954:

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

1042:

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

471:, so it can be re-created at any time. The current article appears to be superior to the old one. 8914: 8731: 8409: 8250: 7912: 7860: 7713: 7417: 7043: 6903: 5762: 5649: 5063: 4903: 4849: 4792: 4756: 3702: 3525:

Featuring a keynote talk this month to be determined! We especially encourage folks to add your

3471: 3449: 3125: 2917: 2809: 2762: 2714: 2205: 2174: 2116: 2085: 2049: 1968:

a thousand years. Please, any suggestions? Perhaps you could find a nominator? Thanks in advance

1894: 1473: 999: 400: 382: 374: 340: 325: 2222: 7007: 6081: 5681: 5086:

After the main meeting, savory and sweet pies and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

3270: 3249: 3202: 3184: 2703: 2527: 1653: 7816: 6759: 5169:

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

4640:

I've been traveling for the last few days but I'll be able to return to the article tomorrow.

4521:, an online campaign dedicated to augmenting Asian content on Knowledge throughout November. 357:

Thanks, that makes sense. I can't imagine there would be a problem with the OTRS permissions.

9021: 8931: 8793: 8431: 7962: 7836: 7569: 7445: 7003: 6533: 6413: 6407: 6032: 5951: 5080: 4436: 4360: 3587: 3480: 3072: 2948: 2537: 2342: 1837: 1441: 1425: 1036: 689: 512: 238: 8436:

As you deleted the article, may I ask you to send it to my sandbox. Many thanks in advance.

8369: 8298: 8236: 8019: 7955:

for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

7757: 7689: 7671: 7656: 7642: 7620: 7604: 6838: 6823: 6808: 6441: 6166: 6150: 6135: 5924: 5703: 5465: 5228: 4707: 4693: 4653: 4626: 4447:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4371:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3963: 3601: 3371: 2747:

Yeah, I'm aware of that, but how does that have anything to do with referencing style? The

2593: 2491: 2444: 2389: 2298: 2097: 2023: 1973: 1926: 1858: 1842: 1810: 1794: 1669: 1199: 7776:. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. 4527: 3262: 8: 9042: 8764: 8699: 8466: 8422: 8394: 8373: 7881: 7680: 7629: 7590: 7561: 7358: 7072: 6988: 6979: 6963: 6917: 6847: 6709: 6657: 6518: 6390: 6365: 6331: 6313: 6280: 6251: 6235: 6173: 6005: 5438: 5352: 5262: 4995: 4914: 4887: 4828: 4821: 4778: 4644: 4246: 3803: 3782: 3775: 3757: 3737: 3716: 3367: 3352: 3224: 2831: 2775: 2735: 2678: 2615: 2568: 2473: 2412: 2366: 2328: 2319: 2231: 2188: 2137: 2133:

Sigh, thanks for the heads-up. I've got a few things at hand and I'll see what I can do.

2071: 2009: 1999: 1943: 1915: 1871: 1824: 1779: 1702: 1593: 1567: 1558: 1519: 943: 785: 731: 475: 361: 17: 8581: 8041: 6550: 5973: 4580: 3893:

And RSVP now for our next event after this, focusing on Latin American art and artists:

3778:; from what I can tell the Reading Viaduct describes the disused portion of the branch. 2248: 1864: 8852: 8405: 7908: 7872: 7856: 7547: 7055: 7039: 6899: 6872: 6858: 6426: 5757: 4968: 4947: 4899: 4845: 4809: 4803: 4788: 4768: 4752: 4305: 4081: 3999: 3698: 3627: 3459:, upcoming editathons, the organization's Annual Meeting, and Chapter board elections. 3121: 3013:

P.S. Prep for our chapter elections next month in September (and add your candidacy!):

2805: 2758: 2726: 2710: 2216: 2201: 2170: 2128: 2112: 2081: 2061: 2045: 1930: 1890: 1721: 1692: 1673: 1620: 1469: 1357: 1143: 378: 352: 336: 8823:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 8114: 7996: 7985: 7907:(a talk page for a longstanding redirect) that I'm not sure what should be done with. 7637:

Sounds good, sorry to bother. :-) We could also do an interview piece, something like

3573:. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, 2040:

This might not be a popular move but I'm going to ask you to reconsider your close of

643: 633: 548: 274:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 8927:, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities. 8906: 8678: 8657: 8648:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

8631: 8347: 8340: 8201: 7409: 6158: 5676: 5055: 4955: 4935: 4423: 4405: 4393: 4347: 4329: 3642: 3487:

Along with the main meeting, hummus and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

3445: 3397: 3388:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3315: 3306:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3266: 3245: 3214: 3198: 3180: 3095: 3086:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3057: 2909: 2861: 2852:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2757:

template is still a convenient marker for the exact page for each citation instance.

2559: 2543: 2523: 1761: 1575: 1371: 991: 929: 753: 710: 570:

software development community, through a community learning night at NYU on May 25.

560: 457: 430: 421:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

8087: 4111: 1836:

I agree that we should be suspicious of this user, and I saw what they did with the

1130: 201:

Spammers: I would like for this page to stay reasonably clean. If you have business

9033: 9017: 8986: 8599: 8481: 8441: 8212: 8109: 8031: 8018:

Join us at the Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at the

7772:

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on

7500: 7006:; there are some things in there that don't match up with timetables. Pulling up a 6681: 6636: 6614: 6585: 6027: 5946: 5627: 5330: 5135: 4863: 4597: 4432: 4356: 4193: 4126: 4033: 3884: 3536: 3334: 3003: 2357: 2336: 2156:

Edmondson Avenue replaced with West Baltimore. It was Edmondson Avenue at the last

1753: 1401: 1334: 1322: 1263: 1091: 868: 685: 624: 484: 307: 7245: 6357: 6217: 1337:

celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means

856:, 15 West 16th Street (between 5th and 6th Avenues), New York City, New York 10011 8294: 8289: 8232: 7753: 7748: 7732: 7676:

That could work. My availability over the next few weeks is pretty awful though.

6507: 6162: 5919: 5735: 5492: 5460: 5411: 5384: 5292: 4883: 3733: 3597: 3285: 2486: 2466: 2457: 2439: 2403: 2197: 2019: 1985: 1969: 1744:, References added their where from Notable places and better from most of these 636: 7234: 3146: 2163:

Frederick Road on the Penn Line: probably still in service in 1980, gone by 1986

1191: 1150:

partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see

268:

first female foreign correspondent, foreign bureau chief, and war correspondent?

9039: 8894: 8761: 8696: 8518: 8463: 8419: 8275: 8048:

And a broader calendar of events on the theme this week/weekend, and the next:

7878: 7677: 7626: 7587: 7581: 7556: 7397: 7352: 7069: 6985: 6914: 6844: 6802: 6706: 6654: 6387: 6328: 6277: 6170: 6059: 6000: 5816: 5433: 5259: 5188: 5036: 4913:

Yes, please start it. Also could you provide diffs to the edits in question? --

4825: 4775: 4641: 4570:

Enter at the 88th Street entrance via the ramp at 88th Street and Fifth Avenue.

4444: 4368: 3955: 3835: 3799: 3779: 3769: 3753: 3713: 3426: 3349: 3221: 3078: 3063: 2897: 2772: 2732: 2675: 2612: 2565: 2470: 2409: 2363: 2316: 2271: 2257: 2228: 2185: 2134: 2068: 2006: 1940: 1912: 1868: 1821: 1776: 1745: 1699: 1641: 1583: 1555: 1537: 1516: 1498: 979: 940: 728: 472: 468: 358: 254: 245: 8004: 7851:

for decades. While it does add the parenthetical, it would parallel well with

4304:

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at

635: 607:

8:00 pm: State of the Wikimedia Foundation and Knowledge / Wikimedia community

8848: 7344: 6945: 6868: 6386:

from 1946–1948 and I'm checking to see what contemporary coverage there was.

5234: 4964: 4817: 4813: 4748: 4744: 4440: 4364: 4077: 3688: 2663: 2377: 1749: 1633: 1617: 1490: 1370:

The picnicking area is the southwest section of the Great Lawn, north of the

1010: 612:

9:00 pm: Monthly WikiSalon in San Francisco video-link, casual bicoastal chat

404: 8511: 2042:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ivana Raymonda van der Veen (2nd nomination)

8690: 8674: 8653: 8649: 8336: 8285: 8227: 7744: 7728: 7154: 6953: 6949: 6502:, with plenary panels, lightning talks, and of course open space sessions. 6499: 6154: 5568: 4951: 4931: 4895: 4389: 3393: 3389: 3311: 3307: 3289: 3091: 3087: 2857: 2853: 2835: 1909: 1757: 1330: 925: 749: 722: 706: 453: 426: 422: 7811: 7723:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

7293: 4500: 3872:

2:00pm - 8:00 pm at NYU ITP, Tisch School of Arts, 721 Broadway, 4th Floor

3842: 3433: 2603:

The specific reason the page was deleted was that, as written, it did not

8982: 8924: 8595: 8538: 8477: 8453: 8437: 8027: 7767:

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

7496: 7305: 7015:

that should include them. However, there were the Harrisburg-Springfield

6695: 6677: 6647: 6632: 6610: 6581: 5622: 5325: 5131: 4860: 4841: 4808:

That distinction makes sense to me, but it's not reflected in our usage.

4593: 4189: 4029: 3880: 3675:

carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.

3634:

was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following

3532: 3330: 2999: 2751: 1632:

I agree that this is reasonable enough so as not to be worth perusing at

1397: 1259: 1087: 864: 620: 541: 301: 7112: 6723:

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

5295:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

4681:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

4451:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4375:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2469:. Maybe a note is required on the talk page, but a G12 isn't justified. 8627: 7798:. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this 7784:

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

7548: 7340: 7332: 6956:

status. Let me know if you're interested. Also, I don't have access to

6309: 5730: 5487: 5406: 5379: 5043: 3194: 2103: 1329:

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" in Manhattan's

8951: 8270: 7465: 6747:. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this 5100: 3501: 2968: 1056: 584: 8813: 8800: 8261: 8254: 8202: 7724: 7717: 7266: 7214:, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators. 6564: 6489: 6054: 5811: 4414: 4338: 3265:

was still interested in the dreaded topic, - certainly my fault ;) --

2928: 2267: 2253: 1637: 1579: 1566:

I assume you got the idea that the content wasn't worth merging from

1548: 1533: 1510: 1494: 567: 8780: 8714: 6481: 4667: 1387: 225: 8571: 8526: 7937:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope

6624: 4180: 1740:

I would like to know the reasoning behind the deletion of the page

1571: 260: 192: 5177: 4118: 2666:

refers to "Unambiguous advertising or promotion"; not references.

8594: