User talk:Mackensen/Archive15

5888:

check of science. The only logical proof against experiment is experimental error. Consensus, existing the theory, and expertise can cast doubt on an experiment, but they are not a logical proof that negates experimental evidence. To imply other wise is a use of the political method. Your “undue” weight rule is seriously flawed. It seems to favor consensus over truth and does not give experimental evidence its proper weight. The principal of “information suppression” is well described in the NPOV Tutorial. Knowledge does nothing to stop “information suppression.” Knowledge claims that NPOV is its highest principal, but it does not enforce it. Apparently consensus is its highest principal. Truth and facts do not make the list. I do not see how content dispute is not a NPOV dispute. I do not see why “information suppression” is allowed under content dispute. “Content dispute” just seems to be a buzz word for doing nothing. I was told by one of your admins that if Knowledge had existed in the Middle Ages, it would say the world was flat. If this is true, you should put this statement on your home page as a warning label.

5869:

scientists understood the significance of the discovery and scientists all over the world began experiments. Pons and Fleishman had been reproducing the experiment for five years and did not expect the difficulty others would have reproducing the experiment. Expectations were raised very high, and when a lot of positive experimental evidence was not appearing, there was a backlash. In the scientific world editors of journals have a lot of power, since scientists must publish or perish. The editor of Nature and other editors decided that cold fusion could not be real, that it was an embarrassment to science and that it needed to be squelched immediately. They also concluded the end justified the means. The used de facto censorship, name calling, and tried to ruin the careers of people who advanced the cold fusion idea. For this reason many of the scientists who continued to work on cold fusion, were retired, had tenure, or worked in another country where the witch hunt was not active.

4496:

may provoke an outcry if you reprimand Durova more than Giano, because your jurisdiction is not supposed to extend to off-site activities, although there is little doubt that a connection can be made between the Durova of the "seminar" and the Durova of the block of !!, but at least vote against any proposal that punishes Giano and leaves Durova with no more than an admonishment. As this proposal stands it encourages attacks from external sites, encourages administrators to form off-wiki groups, and penalises anybody who dares to raise their voice against perceived injustice (as far as I can see there were numerous attempts to shut down the discussion before it reached an "official" body by parties who are not named as participants in this case). I think this is precisely the opposite to the outcome desired by the majority of the community. By the way, I also believe that Giano knew what he was doing (it is insulting to him to believe he acted without thinking), but I think his

4451:

information that would lead to sanction if published here? I'm sure it would ease the strain of being an Arbitrator if all discussion took place off the site as it would all fall outside your remit. It appears the publisher of the "private" "email" has avoided any sanction for the comments contained in that document precisely because it was passed around off Knowledge. The character assassination contained therein (yes, I've seen it at one of those sites which I never knew existed before this case) seems far worse than any rash statements made by Giano, yet it seems that because of the convenience of it being posted off the site it can be swept aside; this, despite the fact it has been confirmed as genuine and the author identified (this is precisely why Giano is coming under fire for posting it), and the mailing list seem to be confirmed to be concerned with Knowledge activities and populated entirely by "senior editors".

4535:

taken. This "responsibility" principle should be self-evident and has already failed in this case. The block couldn't be justified and was overturned, but it appears an air of suspicion hung around !! in the wake of the failed block until the off-site correspondence was revealed. The proposed decision does nothing to remedy that, whatever your good intentions. By sanctioning Giano you make it easier for those who would have shut the the discussion down before any enquiry. He appears to have stated his intention to leave if sanctions are applied and it seems there are few, if any, editors that show his determination in getting to the root of the matter. Next time this happens we'll get the conversation archived and be told "Nothing to see here, move along." (And I thank you for reconsidering, whether my arguments had anything to do with it or not. I shall now stop bothering you ;) ).

5204:

options appear even if no value is given. It adds a reminder prompt for a name if one is not given, and for power type if none is given. If no gauge value is given it automatically fills the field with standard gauge specs. Now I am trying to figure out how to use multiple possibilities. Example: If the user fills the | builder = field with EMD an EMD link is automatically inserted, likewise for a value of BLW, ALCO, etc.. Basically, I'm trying to make the infobox easier to add, as well as provide as much info for the reader as possible with as little effort by the editor which will hopefully in turn become a better experience for the reader. Might be another pointless task, but at least it keeps me busy.. lol

5588:

administrative judgement is not adequate to the task; this is not particularly a function of 'schooling' from the admin corps after RfA, and that though no-one set out to attempt to educate in an appropriate way, it seems to me that this does not transfer the blame for the litany of offenses to the community to such an extent as to suppose no active remedial move is needed for the admin who pressed the buttons. At some point, the effect of on-the-fly feedback to an admin to improve and correct is less than the blaring horns of the standing policies and conventions they must have been very aware of in the first place. (And enough of these waggy-finger/everyone-be-lovely/cheer-up 'remedies', already). .

5673:. I think that if both sides of the dispute are aware that they cannot fall back on what is actually a forbidden action to favor the respective points of view that they would have a far greater incentive to actively engage in productive discussion. You surely can see that if a partisan who wants to preserve the current wording arrogates to himself the power to lock the page in its current state that partisan will have a rather limited incentive to engage in honest discussion. That has happened in the past, may be happening now. I suggest that the focus be on the future and that in the future the opportunity for that misbehavior be removed. 863:

includes frank remarks esp e.g. about the sleeping & huge neglect being discussed recently and widely on cnbc, bloomberg in regard to both US sec of treasury paulson and chairman of the fed rserve ben bernanke where both of them had done about nothing as the markets have been severely damaged by the sub prime lending issue.... and so giving the history of that and the further background about it is key to any market participant knowing where they stand in their own investing and what is likely to happen affecting their future investing... and that includes needing frank commentary that is NOT flattering about both paulson and bernanke etc

1073:

the utter absence of all but two of its members. I completely understand that a few of them might be unwilling to resume work in SBS, and some of them might even have left Knowledge altogether. However, we are certain that there are people intent to continue improving Knowledge's succession boxes and helping others to do so as well. If you are one of them, please return. And even if you cannot help at the moment, but want to contribute at a later time, please let us know by renewing your membership. You can do that very easily by removing the asterisk next to your name in the member list in

4381: 723:? Now I'm an administrator, and granted I speak with an unavoidable bias due to my involvement with the article, but I must make notice of the way the discussion changed. After an original bunch of delete comments, the idea was put forward to change the article to just players who's careers were interrupted by death, and that seemed to be a popular idea. After that idea was put forth there was not a single blatant delete comment, and the consensus (at least I thought anyways) was to change and re-name the article. Am I wrong? 1111: 4920:), until I noticed that diff didn't show three intermediate revisions. I initially thought Hoffman had added all those posts in one go, which might look like overkill to some people. I do remember seeing someone quote that diff somewhere before, but can't find it now. Did you possibly quote that diff from another page? Oh, and not many people may have noticed your question there. you might want to notify Adam of the question (actually, I've pointed it out to him). 4475:

activity, for the same reason we can't sanction editors who may or may not have received private correspondence concerning Durova's block of !!. The Arbitration Committee must act within policy. The community has not seen fit to regulate off-site communications. If this is the impetus for it, then so be it. It is incorrect, and unfair to Giano, to call his statements rash. He knew what he was doing. This is indeed a very silly place if you leave the article-space.

588:, abandon any notion of a DRV, and start a merge discussion. If you like, we can discuss the proper way to handle an AfD when the proper outcome is actually an editorial decision, and whether such an outcome is binding. I've regarded long this as an important but under-appreciated policy gap, and I think it stems for an improper understanding in the community at large as to what AfD is actually for--determining whether content belongs in the encyclopedia 6286: 4765: 4373: 5114:(a simuloid infobox locomotive) for my own learning experience and can't seem to get it to happen, feel free to tweak it if you like.. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Always turns out a bunch of garbage in the image field. If I can figure out all this if, then, else and what have you stuff on templates I've got a few ideas I'd like to play with. So far it's got me baffled. (which doesn't take much these days! lol) 5944: 5896:

control. They could stop publishing articles on controversial science or new science since they cannot do it competently. They could issue warning labels. They could stop “information suppression”. They could enforce NPOV. They could resolve disputes with people who are scientifically knowledgeable and do not have a censorship passion or axe to grind. However Knowledge does not seem to be interested in reform.

4680: 4365: 2179:

uninvolved administrator. This may include any user who was a party to this case, or any other user after a warning has been given. The administrator shall notify the user on his or her talkpage and make an entry on Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles#Log of blocks, bans, and probations. The terms of probation, if imposed on any editor, are set forth in the enforcement ruling below.

5445:. Back in the summer of 2006 when I first started adding infoboxes to CTA articles I couldn't work out how to do the header without hand-coding, which is why all the CTA stations ended up with hand coded infoboxes. Although I was OK with the change to a standard template I always thought that it was sad to see the coloured header go, as it was modeled off of the station signs. Thanks, — 3542:- pure vandalism - so I'll admit that I was following the trend. I've restored the rest of the user's talk page which was full of warnings, etc. (and was truncated to just my block message for some unknown reason). I also received an unpleasant all-caps e-mail which finished with "JERK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" Given all that, if you still think an unblock is warranted, feel free. — 4344:

of Arbcom and the difficult job which you all find yourselves having volunteered for. Whether or not anyone agrees with the position that any of you as individuals or as a committee have taken, there is no doubt that you are genuinely looking out for the project as a whole. I will look forward to reading your further thoughts, hoping you have a good night's sleep. --

871:

else (except a person began a weak listing of wall street persons a year after my listing and that newer listing doesnt have the historical and leading persons) and so iot appears you have pirates who want to tout their own weaker and in this case NON revelevant articles and do so by setting up a deletion / redirect wiping out a hugely far better article page...

1619:(PDF) on the BVG website (which appear to most closely match a hard copy). While I realise this of fairly low priority in the overall scheme of things, it is currently at the top of my list of "little niggles that could possibly be fixed with a quick request". And since I'm not really in a copy-edit mood at the moment: do you still have that info to hand? 2126:

maintained throughout that a full list of Young Ireland publications doesn't make sense for this article. I still don't understand your reasoning for including the list; that it passes WP:LIST is irrelevant, the operative questions are how such a list is germane to that particular article. But these are points better addressed on the talk page. Best,

362:'s first government. As a part of his budget he introduced a new duty on matches, and quipped "ex luce lucellum" (out of light a little profit). For this he was quite reasonably accused of being flippant and got himself into some hot water. I'm sure I've got it wrong, but the desired reading would be "out of accusation a little profit." 6060:

cannot possibly control off-wiki communication; any attempt to do so is just plain silly. All you can do is set appropriate standards for on-wiki behavior, because that's something for which we can hold people accountable. The Arbitration Committee has ruled consistently on this point for years, because there's no sensible alternative.

633:

with FMG, only using it for references and sources. I'm only a new contributor but am very serious about matching right persons based on family and genealogical links among royalty and nobility, referring to FMG and few other credible websites for appropriate sources and informations. I welcome all feedbacks. Kind regards.

1979:?Mackensen... didn't you notice I'd taken it in hand, as an uninvolved admin? And put a long screed of instructions into the RFC? I thought at first I must have forgotten to save, when my write-up and conditions didn't appear in my contribs. Or did you just not see the deletion of it as worth a courtesy note to me? 5388:, as you call it, and I try to be particularly scrupulous about avoiding logical fallacies since I have a low tolerance for them. Yes, I erred last month. I've been admonished formally and am very sorry for my mistakes. If you want me to strikethrough, please say so without casting aspersions on my motives. 4987:. The main reason for that is the preference of some editors (who, apparently, are too lazy to type in the whole "convert" syntax and prefer "x to y" instead :)), as well as maintaining a healthy competition in hopes to foster innovation (a plan which so far has worked splendidly). The set was developed when 3775:

he hurts it. Please outline for me how restricting Giano to talking about articles instead of editing them will benefit the project in any way. (For the record, I do not support John's insulting "moronic" comments above. I find the proposal extremely ill-conceived and counterproductive, but not "moronic.)

6059:

affect Knowledge in a manner not otherwise obvious. To move from the abstract to the concrete, if an administrator makes a bad block, it's frankly irrelevant if they discussed it off-wiki beforehand. The latter is unprovable, uncontrollable, and immaterial. It's a bad block; sanction and move on. You

5676:

I suspect that this has never been suggested nor seen as one of the functions of arbitrators. If those engaged in the discussion agree to the suggestion (as I would think almost all would) that could be a positive step toward resolution of the dispute, a step that continues to avoid the messiness of

4495:

Thanks for the reply, I appreciate you must be busy. As to what I would have you do: I would have you show judgement and common sense. I don't believe you are so bound by legalities that you can not make a decision that shows an element of balance (though perhaps you have come to believe you are). It

4343:

Being just a "little editor" (in this case, meaning I am incompetent when it comes to images), I cannot leave you a cookie or a bouquet of roses or even a marching band. But I greatly appreciate that you have taken the time to be the "spokesman" tonight. I have learned a great deal about the workings

4154:

I think that would be more palatable (even given the fact that sanctions against Giano in this case are anathema to me), though Fred's referring to Giano as "wimpy, wimpy" gives me great pause. The last time I heard someone called "wimpy" was probably in fourth grade. I've never heard one adult refer

3774:

I'm not arguing the "greatness of one individual overrides the project", and I think you know that. I am arguing that Giano's contributions to the project as an article writer far outweigh any perceived disruption his actions in this case caused. And it's not close. He helps the project FAR more than

2576:

The trains from Woodford towards Hainault either terminate there or continue towards West Ruslip or Ealing Broadway. They do not all terminate at Hainault only. Some for the other direction. On LUL in general, it should display Central Line, Jubilee Line etc, not Central, Jubilee etc. I would like to

2250:

one to read the board with any frequency. I occasionally sort-of try and make an effort, and another few admins pop by from time to time too, but it's very taxing work, and I don't foresee mentorship as likely to be any different. Maybe knock it down to 1-2 mentors in all cases involving this sort of

1934:

Thank you very much, Mackensen. What is so bizarre about that process was that the text for solving the original dispute has been written by me, using key material devised by them, and now approved by the complainant. All in the past 48 hours. So what was the walk-out from formal mediation about, and

858:

so the whole of it is like insane persons with NO knowledge repeatedly wiping out such unsually useful info and then esp wiping out my credentials to write the page so showing any reader who is the expert speaking... (and i am llike a global no. one market expert which the info given that was wiped

850:

the main complaint is esp this none of the vandals, and editors etc know anything about the subject and will wipe out expert paragraphs that are esp worthwhile to any person who is knowledgeable and even those expert are not knowledgeable to the degree i am as the pages have a unique huge history

6102:

I apologize for my comment in the RFAr thread. My suggestion was meant in good faith, but it apparently started a pile-on, and under the circumstances, I should have anticipated this. I have struck out my comment and one of the other users has apparently done the same. Hopefully the argument will be

5868:

Pons and Fleishman made their announcement in March of 1989. The announcement was to protect The University of Utah’s patent rights. Some important information like the palladium alloy they used and the length of time it took to get a result (weeks) were not released to protect patent rights. Many

5660:

There is something that (in my mind) the arbitrators (singly or collectively) can do that would be beneficial. There is a clear policy that partisans to a dispute are not to lock a page. That has happened with respect to NOR. It may be happening now - I don't know (I dropped out of the discussion

5570:

I don't normally trouble the arbitrators to precise-ify me on their individual votes, as they don't particularly matter. However, I read this forming decision and found myself feeling out-of-kilter with a few of your comments. I wonder if I might mention a few things about your comments that made me

5249:

OK, another question... I've got the builder field worked out using {{#ifeq:{{lc:{{buildername....... now I am trying to do the same with the AAR wheel arr. and it won't work.. The field disappears completely from the template. Can #ifeq only be used once even if the parameters name has changed? Not

5008:

for an example), and I am planning to expand their feature sets in the near future, making them even more streamlined that the current version of "Convert". While you are quite correct about "C to K" not presently being used anywhere, it is only because it does not do anything beyond what "Convert"

3203:

Sorry for disturbing you again but you know more or less all wiki rules. We are having new sockpuppet master with minimal 10 user accounts. Maybe I am mistaking but IP address is always blocked for small time period. My question is: can we block IP address on period of 12 or more months ? Reason for

2773:

Those are the structural changes. You now have to go through and modify the actual templates in the articles. This isn't a major task; most Central line stations update automatically. The loop stations will need to be altered, but everything else will be fine. I know it looks and sounds complicated,

1755:

and it is rare to find a creator who is still around. I don't know anything about the subject or the websites(?) you are referring to but was just hoping to get lucky in asking you. Honestly I am not even sure how to approach these lists as I have been trying to simply find a general reference for

527:

in post DRV AfDs, an action I undertook in response to your and Tony's persistence -- so I'm hardly shocked. I feel that the readings of policy offered by both the keep commenters and the deletion commenters were reasonable: after certain basic requirements are met, there is a subjective element in

409:

If you are not personally involved in this tit for tat edit unedit then can i ask you to reinstate the original post about the salute show and then my response about the salute show and then lock the entire entry. Someone has it 'in' for the SBG, likewise the SBG will remove the 'attacking' article.

6226:

There was no way to show that without having your name overlap with Dmcdevit's. I moved both yours and Essjay's to the bottom, just below Dmcdevit, to try and show that you both were added after Dmcdevit left. I would have rather kept it the way it was, but there wasn't an easy way to show that.

5864:

I have decided to give up on Knowledge. PCarbon seems to me to have the patience of a saint. PCarbon has told me that he is also quitting Knowledge. I will admit that cold fusion is a complex and unique issue. I think that most people who do not have at least a bachelor’s degree in the physical

5203:

So far, so good. I've changed the image to 200px, it seems that even if the template default size is set to 200px, if the editor puts in | imagesize = with no value it still overrides the default size and places the image in its original size. I also figured out how to make a few of the most common

4255:

Thanks Brad. At least I know now what he meant in his commentary. It makes me view his vote as even more ill-conceived, though, as it's apparent that he would like to see a fabulous contributor like Giano blocked for longer than 3 months, which would be an outright travesty, and a huge detriment to

3786:

I agree that he helps the project--with his article contributions. No one on the committee would dispute that. His article on Hannah Rosebery is as wonderful as anything on this project, and a damn sight better than anything I've ever written. I don't understand your concern. We propose to restrict

3760:

First of all, by arguing the greatness of one individual overrides the project, you're actually encouraging us to focus on personalities. I won't be a party to that. Lsi john, I don't understand your concern. Articles are discussed on talk pages. Whether Giano stays or goes is his decision. I voted

3729:

If you all choose to restrict Giano (one of the best article writers we have) it will further confirm the fears of many editors about the project: that the processes involved are more about personalities than creating great content, and making wise decisions. And you will also be chasing away other

2459:

As I said, I don't believe we ever have, and I don't believe we ever would, except to state that it's up to the bureaucrats. For that matter, even making such a statement might go too far; for the committee to rule as such would imply that we've some level of control over the process. The committee

1996:

I regret that I did not see your note while reviewing the discussion. I was asked by a third party to review the matter as I was completely outside the dispute and came to the same conclusion: that the RFC was invalid as formed, and that direct communication between the parties would be best. Had I

1072:

Despite all these breakthroughs that have made SBS a better, more functional and more user-friendly WikiProject, things move excruciatingly slowly as far as the adoption of proposals and correction/improvement of succession boxes in the mainspace are concerned. As has been mentioned, this is due to

913:

footnote there is NO simple way that is apparent on wikipedia to enter a complaint and a request as t his to stop vandalism and the vandals and ban them there are almost endless articles on submitting disputes that NEVER get to the point of including a button for making any dispute submission etc.

632:

for sources and references on medieval-era nobles and royals. Adam deleted the URL link to FMG whereas there are evidences of two Raymond IVs, Count of Toulouse. I do not understand why he deleted the link and then said it's not true in spite of proven genealogical evidences? I'm in no way involved

5891:

You seem to be overrun with censors who like to throw around words like pseudoscience, pathological science, proto science, and fringe science. These are nonsense words. There only purpose they serve is political name calling. It is not all that complicated. If you are following the scientific

5400:

No, it wasn't necessary, but then neither was the entire thread. Doc is well known for being sensitive over BLP issues and upfront in his motives. It may not have been your intention to poison the well but by creating the spectre of a legal issue where none exists, where the subject of the article

4305:

According to moreshi, Mackensen was on the 2nd secret list of en-WPinvestigations. Doesn't this mean that Mackensen was on the secret list that got the email about !! to start with?? Why did he not recuse himself immediately?. And now, Mackensen's proposal (his odd proposal of a late entry with

4293:

I'm confused. Normally even contributors of opinion to the case cannot jump on board after it has been setup. Now, part way into the proceedings, and after Durova resigns, Giano is lumped in there, and assigned a punishment? No RFC? This is highly irregular. Imagine if you, Mackensen, were on

3799:

That portion was a misunderstanding on my part. The wording led me to think he could only work on FA articles, and even then, only in an advisory role. I apologize. I'm still not clear as to how restricting one of the only people willing to be a gadfly on the ass of the project is a good thing. He

3745:

The 1-year restriction to only discuss Featured Articles is insulting. It leaves the door wide open for any admin to block him if he utters even a single word that is not directly related to a Featured Article. I retract insulting.. its moronic. It actually prevents him from discussing any article

2563:

Well, that's the real trick. If you're dealing with a set of templates serving a complex system of lines (Amtrak, the London Underground, Chicago), a minute change might have unexpected effects. I'm supposed to understand how these things work and I've surprised myself before. Sometimes you simply

893:

this latest round was esp done it appears to destroy my linking to the ending pargraphs i had added to that long article on investment banker(s) that included a sketch of me and my key accomplishments and that was included in links to my listing on my college alumni lists for univ of alabama and

870:

then enter these vandals,,, "article needs cleanup" "article scheduled for deletion" when there is nothing else like this article anywhere and the "investment banking" article is nothing like it being a discussion of organizational structure and the listing of firms and leading bankers is no where

339:

I have been trying for awhile to find a translation for this phrase that you have used a couple of times in reference to the names of arbitration cases, but the only Google hits I can find are of you using it. This may jeopardize my reputation as a polymath, but I need to ask you to please clarify

5895:

There are ways that Knowledge can improve their product. Knowledge could change its rules to incorporate a sense of the scientific method and give experiment its proper weight They could stop using old censorship to justify new censorship. They could bring their nest of scientific censors under

5887:

I have a problem with some of Knowledge’s rules and how they are applied. The rules do not show a grasp of the scientific method. Knowledge has a nest of self appointed scientific censors that do not have a grasp of the scientific method. The scientific method is that experiment is the reality

5575:

Principle 5. I'm thinking that if acted upon with vigour this is likely to sow the seeds for the construction of a new paperwork operation for the review of blocks. I'm not so sure that would work out well in the end, as most processes come to be 'owned' by a smallish number of editors/admins and

5417:

My only intention was to consider possibilities proactively. It mystified me that the page had been deleted without discussion after stable compromise had been so difficult to achive. The cleanest solution that sprang to mind was the legal angle since that could have trumped everything else. I

5159:

Thanks! I changed the default image size to 200, 300 is a bit large. I've got a few other ideas but I've got to do some more reading up on template design. It's been a while since I fooled with any scripting languages, I used to play with allot of Perl and Java, so hopefully if I stare at it long

5031:

I read the signpost, and I've noticed the fast clip of finishing up cases over the past couple of weeks. Despite the fact that you're not running for reelection, I saw that you have contributed to your share of judicial effort during your last weeks on the job. Good show. I hope that the freshmen

4534:

But your self-admitted inability to police that makes it toothless. Sure, they need to be able to justify a block on-site, but they can do what they like off-site in the run-up and aftermath, and even if an undeniable connection is made between the off-site and on-site activities no action can be

4442:

If I'm acting politically then I'm a damn fool--this is political suicide. I do this because I think it's best for the project. Members of the community can flay me alive if it makes them feel better; I'm standing down anyway. Wikitruth is a good place for leaked email anyway; hell of a lot safer

3705:

Sinchang will be the terminus of Line 1 after its extension. It isn't in the template yet, as that would screw up every other article. For now, no trains run through this station on Line 1 anyway, so that template just serves as a little information for future plans. Full information is in the

3217:

map is SOUR Svjetlost !! SOUR has been shortcut for companies during communist Yugoslavia period. Maybe today SOUR Svjetlost exist or maybe not but somebody is having copyright for all published works of this company. I have contacted administrator on commons but after his comments that I need to

2437:

To my knowledge, the committee has never accepted a case for such purposes, or in the resolution of a case explicitly ruled on the matter. While the committee has, on occasion, granted sysop rights, this has always been within the context of a previous decision (usually a suspension). We've never

663:

if you look at the last delete vote ..comes from an ip with no prior history...sorry I dont usually get like this but there seems to have been alot of "personal" feelings about this subject..sorry Im Canadian and the whole crucifiying of celebrity thing seems to be a weird phenomenom to me..check

5872:

Even while this political assault was under way, Nature refused to publish a positive result on the grounds that the issue was already decided. Melvin Miles had an initial negative result which he reported to the DOE committee. The DOE committee told the world about this negative result. When

4478:

Now, you didn't ask this but I'll note that if I had my druthers administrators would not make bad blocks, if they did make bad blocks they would have good sense to take responsibility for them, and that failing that they would not fan the flames of conspiracy and speculated by claiming "private

4474:

As odd as it may seem, that is the assertion I'm making. We as a community, which I represent and of which I am a part, cannot control editors' off-site activities. My statement is practical: Giano could have faced no sanction posting private correspondence off-site, as much as I deplore such an

4239:

From reading dozens of proposed decision pages, I can confirm that Fred often uses "wimpy" (sometimes in triplicate) to refer to a remedy he thinks is much too lenient. There may be a reference there to an old series of TV commercials contrasting sturdy "Hefty" brand plastic trash bags to easily

3556:

I've received a similar communication, but I find it understanble. What we've got here is systemic failure--people labeling something vandalism when it's not, which leads to a cumulative block for vandalism which did not occur (not your fault). That it had to be deleted six times can probably be

1253:

Hi. We've noticed that you haven't voted or commented on any arbitration pages for the last couple of weeks. I assume this is schedule-related and I hope you will be back soon, but in the interim, please let us know if you would like to be moved to inactive on the pending cases for now under the

1007:

The summer has passed (unless you live in the Southern Hemisphere), and for most people holidays are over. Therefore, it is time for work again. Not that work ever stops in Knowledge, but I believe we can at last get over the stage when slow progress can be taken for granted. Like yourself, most

942:. I counted 6 keeps and 9 deletes, with the main delete voter saying that my suggestion took care of most of his objection and most of the delete votes being on the grounds that age 45 was an arbitrary cutoff. My suggestion, which the voters after me thought was good, was to change the list to 747:

I confess I didn't get that impression reading the debate, but I could be wrong. I still saw a rough consensus to delete; certainly the article as it existed was not acceptable to participants. If you'd like to undelete, on the understanding that the article will be substantially restructured, I

5770:

Fair enough. When the one for MD-N is done, you can always move this to a redlink for the Prairie Crossing NCS that I've got in the "To Do list." I've got to give you credit, though. You and TheCatalyst31 are moving pretty fast with these. I'm still trying to get more info on the history of the

5606:

I'm hoping no new bureaucracy springs up from principle 5; it's more a reaction to a perceived failure of the review process. Principles aren't especially actionable in themselves anyway. With FoF 5, all I'm saying is that there is no evidence that Hoffmann is a sockpuppet--not proved is a good

5587:

Remedy 1.1. The big one. I would normally expect to see "a long litany of offenses and infractions has been compiled" in the 'support' section, irrespective of whether the admin was 'warned' or not. Assuming Adam Cuerden intended to act in the execution of his best judgement, then evidently his

4839:

Hi. I saw on WT:RfAr where you indicated that you were going to be inactive on cases opening this week because you didn't think they would finish before the election, and I responded to you on that talkpage. But then I just noticed on my watchlist that you moved yourself to active today. Please

5879:

The experiments have gone on for 18 years. Something like 3500 scientific papers by hundreds of scientists with PhDs in physics and chemistry have been written. Since 1992 nuclear transmutations with unnatural isotope ratios have been found. These nuclear transmutations are proof that nuclear

3392: 3240:

team. Whilst talking to people, your name was suggested :-) What do you think ? Willing to do the job ? If that is the case, it will be necessary that you provide us with information about your real identity. Also, I would rather prefer that ombudsman do not act as CU for reason of conflict of

2178:

3.2) To address the extensive edit-warring that has taken place on articles relating to The Troubles, as well as the Ulster banner and British baronets, any user who hereafter engages in edit-warring or disruptive editing on these or related articles may be placed on Knowledge:Probation by any

862:

so i ask you or someone please end these idiot level attacks and ban such vandals permanently as they are destroying hugely envaluable contributions and the repeated concentrated nature of it makes you think it is like a idiot teen etc... but more than that, likely this the market commentary

854:

then enter the repeated vandals who wipe out whole sections willy nilly all with ZERO knowledge and all using idiot level editing claims as "article needs "cleanup" WHEN the article was a precisely written precision info source for experts, and also for those wanting to learn inside key market

542:

It was not my intention to give offense, and I wish we could have a discussion without you reminding that I've offended you before. I'm certainly not keeping score and I wish that you wouldn't. I thought I was being kind by warning you that I was contemplating a DRV, explaining my reasons, and

2125:

I don't follow your line of reasoning. First of all, I doubt the committee would agree to revisit the matter so soon, and given the speed (lack thereof) at which the committee currently functions, you'd be left waiting at least a month. I'm not sure who "you" and "them" are in this case; I've

2498:

The answer to the first question is and has been apparently no, not really. I've been told that Bureaucrats shy away from closing counter to a "vote" result. Which I find rather concerning for several reasons. However, this is where I think I'll drop this. (Looks at the poor dead horse...) -

2485:

The answer to the first question is yes (that's policy). Your second question doesn't have an answer. If we could answer it then there wouldn't be any such thing as bureaucratic discretion; bureaucrats would promote based on a strict percentage, and there would be defined rules for excluding

564:

My mistake... I had expected an arbitrator to be familiar enough with the finer points of policy to understand that, if a merge is all you desire, a DRV review of the AfD close in completely unnecessary, to the point of being a waste of time. The talk page discussion is, of course, the most

6246:

Hi, Mackensen. Reading the IRC workshop page is a major pain because I have to keep scrolling up and down to read your comment, their response, and then your response to their response. Could it be refactored so it's easier to read, or is that just the way things are done on the workshop?

4450:

yet?), but I find that last statement incomprehensible. Are you really saying that Giano's offence was to post the information here rather than at one of sites which fed the "need for secrecy" paranoia in the first place? Would it help to set up a site for the publication and discussion of

3843:

I'm not even addressing the merits of the concept. I'm talking about the wording that prevents Giano from working on non FA's or discussing them. If he posts one single line that is not tied to a Featured Article, he is in violation of that wording. It's overly restrictive. It is clearly

5668:

until some future time, when it might revert to normal status. That would avoid the opportunity (they'd no doubt call it a "need") for partisans in the dispute to engage in locking. I would hope that the page could be unlocked relatively soon - with the option to lock still remaining,

4301:

Speaking of which: Why nary a word about JeHochman??? No restriction?? No admonishment?? JeHochman was so zealous that he had an ANI for the same behavior the week before Durova's case came out, and during her case, he was blocking and AGF-ing and warning anyone who contested Durova??

4031:

That's difficult to enumerate. In practical terms, he's barred from the noticeboards, deletion discussions, wikiprojects, and dispute resolution, unless it concerns a featured article. Obviously if he had a legitimate need for dispute resolution the remedy would be modified by a motion.

1919:

but Yamla hasn't participated for almost 2 weeks. Meanwhile, the IP block is affecting 3 editors of the page. Could you help decide if the IP block is appropriate? I am one of the editor affected by the IP block and strongly feel that Yamla's action was too harsh. Thank you in advance.

1321:

Hi, I have started a commons deletion request for an image you uploaded here. The image you uploaded here is of course a reasonable fair-use, but I am concerned that the artwork in the game makes it "unfree" and unsuitable for commons. Your thoughts on this would be appreciated. See

3879:(e/c) Ok, so he can't come to your page to discuss your edits to a non FA. No matter how you slice it.. the "FEATURED" wording is overly restrictive. It effectively blocks him from wikipedia and as such, I suggest that you vote for a 90 day block .. which is much shorter than 1 year. 4166:

Well the problem with that is it makes no difference assuming the restriction is followed. The 'unenforced remedy' is not a good remedy. I think that arbitrator only enforcement, and a slightly (less then I proposed) reduced scope would be useful. Just make sure that proposing AfD,

2153:. Not only because of your position in the community, but as an editor. I have not asked you your opinion on YI here, but just look at you response, it's reasonable, calm and productive. Compare that, to the reactions above which I have linked. In what way is this conducive to the 570:

While I have no desire to "keep score", I do notice when individuals make a habit of odd interpretations of policy, and a habit of impugning my judgment. If I were the sort of person who "kept score", be confident that I would have reason to make my words less mild. Best wishes,

5535:. This station lacks a photo and the infobox seems to add a lot of white space to the top of the article. I tested adding a photo and that gets rid of the white space. I don't think that I have a good enough understanding of the infobox markup to try to fix it myself. Thanks, — 2654:

at either of two eastern termini: Epping or Hainault. There is a shuttle service from Woodford to Hainault, but some of these trains continue through Hainault to the western termini. Finally, some of the Hainault trains continue through Hainault to Woodford. Is that correct?

2189:

2) Participants placed on probation are limited to one revert per article per week with respect to the set of articles included in the probation. Any participant may be briefly banned for personal attacks or incivility. Reversion of edits by anonymous IPs do not count as a

3601:) 00:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC) ps. For some reason, although the directions for use say use the succession boxes per geography where possible, lines to the west of Paddington are currently illogically reversed. I'll try and find some time to reverse them at some point! -- 866:

that is the nature of such needed comments and they were done in this article with giving the facts & factual reasoning as to why the action or lack of actions by bernanke and paulson were not great, etc... (and that is done also on cnbc and bloomberg tv channels)

3967:

No. He can edit the following things unrestricted, including the respective talk pages: articles, user pages, templates, categories, images, and portals. He is restricted from anything in "project" (Knowledge:) that does not concern featured articles. Does that help?

5466:

I'd like to help out at RFCU by clerking some. Is that OK? I took the liberty of moving a request over after checking that it was formatted correctly. I don't want to overstep. Also, if useful, I'd like to be able to check the irc channel for clerks and checkusers.

5839:

Given the elapsed time since we started the discussion I will assume that we no longer have anymore questions for each other? Thank you for you feedback on this proposal should you wish to add a final rebutal please feel free to click the above link. Farewell.

6262:

Well, the whole system is arcane and hasn't scaled well. We've (the committee) talked about adopting a new system, but it didn't seem right to try it on a high-profile case. For the moment let's leave it be. I expect I'm done commenting at this point anyway.

5860:

The practical result of what has been done to the cold fusion article is the public will get misleading information on the current status of cold fusion. Since cold fusion is something that can be a major benefit to the human race, this is a serious error.

531:

Incidentally, your gruff notice was a bit offensive to me (also hardly unusual). I did apply more than a little judgment in my closing as I always do. Judgment is not a commodity on which you and like-minded people have a monopoly, you know. Best wishes,

5419: 3910:

Mackensen, you are correct, there are many things I don't understand. So, my new understanding is that he can't edit articles at all, he can only discuss FA's in mainspace, and he can be as disruptive as he wants in user:Talk (current rules not excluded)?

4943: 5677:

a full involvement by the arbitrators. Both resolution and the avoidance of messiness are positive results. I think it's worth doing and I don't think (but cannot know) that the step would be considered an overstepping of authority by the arbitrators.

4443:

there. If someone had just leaked it there in the first place we wouldn't be having this conversation. This business about shooting the messenger is ridiculous, but it's been repeated enough it will stick. Mackensen (talk) 02:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

3616:

I've been wondering about colour; the logo is a dark blue but the only route diagram issued to date has used blue (above ground) and red (below ground) so leaving it white/blank for the moment seems a logical thing to do? Define an emopty one perhaps?

670:

I don't know why I bother (sigh) I just though this was an interesting up-and -comer with a social consciousness and I just got pummeled..my little feelings are pretty hurt Cheers! and what you said about the ips is correct! geez people are paranoid!

834:

i added a footnote at the end as to who i am ... and also then added also a short synopsized timeline that included some major, very major deals, etc i had done... (these are historic and worth noting) so that readers could see who the author was etc

5883:

Now some comments about Knowledge. When working on the cold fusion article I have merely tried to include the experimenters’ point of view. I have not tried to censor or delete the skeptics’ point of view. I have tried to create a NPOV article.

946:. Could you elaborate on your closing of this AfD? If I were closing it and didn't have a hand in the discussion (i.e. somebody else brought up my point instead of me, and I didn't vote), I would have closed it as a no-consensus keep. Thanks! -- 5581:

FoF 5. Just wondering what you mean by 'purely negative declaration'. You're removing some other interpretation I can't see from the words in the finding. Are you saying it's not like the Scots 'not proven to be a puppet', but an actual 'is not a

5615:

a sockpuppet. This is semantic overkill, I suppose. On remedy 1.1, you might see the feedback principle I've just proposed by way of explanation. If no one ever tells you that you're doing it wrong, then you'll just keep doing what you're doing.

1832:

Heya Mackensen. You aren't editing much lately - a shame, as that's one less checkuser I can bug. Would you like to remain listed as active on new arbitration cases and on cases you haven't voted on, or would you like us to move you to inactive?

3734:. My loss would certainly not be on the level of Giano's. I've created a few articles, but nothing like he has. He is great at what he does. And restricting him harms the project--which in my view should be anathema to what ArbCom is all about. 528:

the evaluation of what constitutes a reliable source, and that decision is one susceptible to community determination. In such a circumstance, no overriding policy ground for deletion exists. That is the justification I will offer at the DRV.

627:

I'm in a slight little dispute with Adam Bishop, an administrator over two figures of historic notes, both have same name and the same title of count: Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse. I've used the excellent and very comprehensive website called

4412:. It tails off from being a question into general comments, but hopefully you'll get the gist of what I'm asking about. I did intend to stay away from the site politics, but I find the unequal remedies proposed in this case somewhat worrying. 5971:

indicating that there was a case prior to October 2006 in which it had been determined that Arbcom had no authority over the IRC channels. By any chance would you recall which prior case that was? Thanks in advance for your assistance.

2275:

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

1686:

386:

213:

Unsigned messages will be ignored. You can sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right to disruptively eliminate gigantic blobs of wiki-markup from signatures on a whim if I think they're cluttering up my talk page.

3761:

against a ban because I thought it was an insult and I want for him to stay. I felt I had to make the choice I did, and I've spelled out my reasons why in a rather long-winded fashion at the bottom of the Proposed Decision page. Best,

3483:

Feel free to organize yourself as you feel is the best. You may ask Cary help if you need anything (a list, whatever). Also, if you feel the policy needs changes etc... please do not hesitate to say so and suggest changes. Thank you !

6147:

I just received an e-mail from somebody involved with the Jefferson Park Historical Society, who has a little more info regarding the railroad station. His name is Frank Sureth, and he sent me a link, which I've added as a reference.

3517:)'s deleted contributions, it looks like she's pushing her own band, but I don't know that I'd call it vandalism. Someone might need to explain our content policies to her, but a block seems harsh, unless I'm missing something. Best, 229:, in addition to the customary notices to the parties. I take it that you (or someone you're in contact with) will post some information there regarding which admins have been chosen as the mentors and how they will proceed? Regards, 4122:

Just to interject (which I am quite fond of doing), this measure does seem a big excessive. Could the scope be narrowed a bit (discussions not involving him, that sort of thing). It does seem some restriction would be in order here.

1080:

SBS is a project highly capable of doing some serious work in Knowledge. These potentials are seriously undermined by the unavailability of helpful hands. I hope you shall consider this message seriously before taking any decisions.

4741:

4409: 4309:

If the procedure was "send it to Arbcom" (not to publish the email online) but two members of Arbcom were on the secret list that convicted !!, then how could a fair assessment of blame have taken place under "secret" in Arbcom??

5924:

It says, "please do not modify it". I suppose that only admins can change something there. I'm not an admin nor a user Miranda that archived it, so I'm referring to you, because I saw your username in conclusing part of the case.

4567:

Note the last diff in the note that has been circulated, if you have a copy of it. If not, visit WR, as they have a copy of it. She's very clearly demonstrating (and advocating) votestacking in support of controversial blocks.

2383:). For me this discussion like many similar is simple stupid because saying that there is 7 Holocaust camps when Holocaust museum accept 6 is original work which is against rules of wiki. I am only loosing time with this ... -- 3174:

Okay, thanks for the heads-up. Concerning s-rail, I think NE2 and I went with Previous/Next because all the older rail succession boxes, at least the American ones, did that. I suppose it makes sense to bring it in line with

877:

and esp noting that this ongoing endless attacking has gone on for 1-2 years and so the persons doing this need to be permanently banned as none of it has anything to do with proper editing and proper use of wikipedia...

5797:

Yeah, we're moving fast, but they're really stubby. I just don't know enough on the subject to add more (like which former railroads the service runs over). I'm going to go ahead and move the Prairie Crossing article now.

2720:

Now, this definition is insufficient; it does not allow for these trains which pass through Hainault to Woodford from the western termini, and vice-versa. We need these lines (or something similar) in the "left" template:

5422:. I trust he acted from the best of motives, but neither alternative was particularly appealing. You're right about how we don't need another battleground. He hasn't asked me to strikethrough so I'll leave that alone. 4389:

Same here. It's a shame you're not running for another term; even though I know you weren't a big fan of the job, you've always been a good arbitrator, and your comments on the proposed decision page are truly helpful.

1046:

And the project itself is not the only thing that has been improved; the headers system has been cleared up and rationalised during the last six months, and a new parameter system is being inserted into templates like

2116:, would be obvious for some, now you either agree with them, and should act against me and impose the ban , but do not condone it with silence. How do I reactivate or request comment from the Arbitration Committee? -- 1890: 1752: 3557:

attributed to no-one explaining to a new user why the article was unsuitable. No doubt she wondered why it kept disappearing. I would favor an unblock with time served, and as you raise no objection I'll go ahead.

931: 4917: 1675: 5892:

method you are practicing science. If you are not following the scientific method you are not practicing science. If you make mistakes while following the scientific method, you are still practicing science.

4997:

was still in its infancy and originally provided features pretty much identical to what Convert offers now. However, these individual templates are ultimately capable of much more than straight "convert" (see

4580:

I'm well aware of that. She's been de-sysoped and publicly humiliated. Her methods have been formally repudiated and treated with appropriate scorn. I'm not convinced that any further action could do any good.

5635: 4730: 375: 4652:

The US Attorney General nominee was asked by a senator if Waterboarding was "going a little far", and responded that he wasn't familiar with the technique. I was attempting a joke, which fell on its face per

2787:

OK. It is only those on the Hainault loop which terminate at Woodford, i think, which is where it joins the main Epping branch. Btw, i added Woodford on the left (or was it the right?). Should i delete this?

4297:

This is completely bizarre. If Arbcom want to make a case against Giano, then make a new RFC, and start a new Arbcom case. You don't just chuck another baby into the dirty bathwater of two other babies.

2264: 1729:), most of which is in turn derived from Leigh Rayment's pages or Burke's and Debrett's directly. It was something of a failed experiment; trying to catalogue members of a hereditary legislature by year. 3893:

John, forgive, but I'm left the impression that you don't understand namespaces. This is User talk. This is not covered by the decision. We inserted a specific exemption for Knowledge and Knowledge talk

999: 622: 5821: 5337:

Personally, I think that the color border look better but I agree with you that the info box is easier to use. If there a way to have the color border around the infobox without using the old format?

3354:

Having seen you commenting on the Workshop, should I move you to Active in the Privatemusings case? How about anything else? Are you really sure you don't want three more years of this fun? Regards,

3312:

A 115 pixel logo? That's an evil thought! It looks fine to me at the moment; I've tried Opera, Firefox, and IE. Did you try clearing your cache? Chances are your browser is remembering the old page.

3800:

came to the defense of his innocent friend. For that, he's restricted? Any sanctions against Giano in this case (which is about Durova's egregious misconduct) are outside the pale of what is just.

2920: 2611: 1682: 1077:. The deadline is 31 October; members that do not renew their memberships until 23:59 of that day will be removed from the list, as these members will be assumed to have left the project for good. 932: 720: 4737: 1549:); if you wander over to that fellow's talk page (and his block log) you'll see the circumstances of the block. Whatever this "website" was apparently has an incomplete picture of the situation. 987:, and you're one of the three arbitrators active on the case who haven't voted. No pressure to vote with the five in favor of these proposals as opposed to vote with the two opposed, of course. 2271: 5057:

has a section dedicated to Pittsburgh's light rail system but it is not written. What's needed is a 1-2 paragraph summary of the whole light rail system if you'd like to write it. Cheers.--

2946: 382: 4518:

That's certainly not the intention--note the "responsibility" principle. Any administrator who takes this decision as a license to go underground is taking his wiki-life into his own hands.

887:

i put up a page which was like a 1/2 page in length as i am an author of 5 books and that page came under such crazy level attacks that i let the attackers win and left that info deleted...

3823:

If you approve of what he did, then it follows that you MUST approve of how he did it. That specious "post" of Durova's wasn't seeing the light of day on WP had he not IARed and posted it.

1096: 955: 943: 6076:

has also provided me with some further references specific to IRC. I very much appreciate the assistance you and he (and Thatcher as well) have given me in furthering my understanding.

584:

As a matter of fact, I'm well aware of that finer point. If you trawl through my contributions I believe you'll find me making that point to someone just yesterday. Hence my decision to

4909: 2705:

These all regulate the various possible termini. Ealing Broadway or West Ruislip is a special entry; it denotes multiple termini. For such a situation you need a corresponding line in

3681:

Actually it does. The way the switch expression works, you can list multiple terms like that, and have them point to the same thing. By listing it that way, both CML and CMT point to

2679: 1043:

has been created and added to the project's pages, easing navigation between the different parts of the WikiProject, while shortcuts have been created for the three most basic pages.

1629:

That's an excellent question. I suspect I worked from either our main article or de's main article. Certainly whatever's on the official network map should be authoritative. Cheers,

193: 3863:

I think we're misunderstanding each other. We're talking about the project namespace (Knowledge and Knowledge talk). This has no bearing on the main namespace (articles and Talk:).

3454: 3218:

start debate and discussion about copyright of that map I am givin up. Now administrator of wikipedia and administrator of commons are informed about problem so my job is ended. --

1695: 3929:

For a period of one year, Giano may not participate in any of the pages of the "Knowledge:" or "Knowledge talk" namespaces, except for civil discussion related to featured articles

395: 4749: 4562: 2564:

have to commit the edit then look around various pages to see if it had the desired change. It looks like you were playing the Central Line - what change were you trying to make?

452:

probably shouldn't be editing, but I don't know all the players in the Armenian-Iranian mess well enough to point to a suspect. Do you know the field well enough to take a look?

2284: 2068: 2650:

Okay, before I answer, let me make sure I understand how the Central line operates. There are two western termini: Ealing Broadway and West Ruislip. Trains from there terminate

1916: 763: 652: 6142: 3204:

question is this user is always using 1 IP address. I will not take more of your time because other administrators and checkuser are "playing" with this sockpuppet master. --

1032: 984: 218: 2380: 1036: 6033:, way back in 2005. It's interesting reading. Arbcom is of course not bound by precedent, but I note the case as a demonstration of Arbcom's consistency on the question. 5880:

reactions are occurring. More heat, tritium, He3, and He4 has been found. Some x-rays, gamma rays, and charged particles have been found. Reproducibility has improved.

5384:

I had already explained that the question had been intended as good faith conjecture and had offered to withdraw it if it gave any offense. It was never my intention to

430:, although there are other news sources picking up the story. I'm not going to unlock the article until I'm satisfied the edit-warring ("tit for tat") will cease. Best, 5664:

What arbitrators could do would be take full charge of NOR with respect to locking. I think it's locked now. It could remain locked, but with the understanding that

3153: 3113: 1886: 1878: 423: 4288: 3450: 3143: 3103: 1646: 838:

then repeatedly the page was vandalized by wiping it out repeatedly and putting instead of the page a redirect to the wikipage mentioned above "investment banking"

4017:

I thought I was somewhat clueful.. i'm wrong. That page makes no sense at all to me. In english, please, just what, exactly, is he prevented from doing, and where?

233: 4597:

Are you sure? We could tried and get her fired from her job, or give her home phone number to the GNAA. I hear waterboarding is not supposed to be all that bad.

4574: 2903:, which prefixed its templates with "s-". S-line was intended, after all, as a generic replacement for the vast array of one-shot transportation succession boxes. 1300: 1294: 1939: 1348:

Yea, I saw it was the only contribution of whoever uploaded it there, so I figured your input on it would probably prevent a long discussion on commons. Thanks.

1012:

have been away during most of the summer (and some of you have been away for much longer); this lack of contributors has almost led SBS activity to a standstill.

4855: 3011:

station. Although I thought the station for the Rock Island Branch & Metra Electric Branch were two different stations in close proximity to each other. ----

2706: 2025:

comment from you and was wondering whether you might know the status of the mentor assignment for this article. It needs the attention of someone familiar with

523:

Our definitions of "common sense" are frequently at odds -- you'd be surprised at the amount of negative feedback I've gotten to the cessation of my practice of

5701:

To salvage many articles written for Ido about the Seoul metro I wish to place the very good templates of the english wiki. But the are problems for example at

894:

harvard business school... and that careful editing to destroy those links surely appears to make all these attacks personal and the attackers nut jobs... etc.

6175: 4319: 3508: 3406:

This barnstar is for you for working hard on train-related and train station related articles. I've seen you start some of the articles about Amtrak stations.

2977: 2528:

Do you think you could guide me on how to update or generally edit templates such as S-rail and rail-line? How to show destinations, line colours etc etc etc?

2082: 4721:

is up for DYK. Very nice! Lar and I ate lunch across the street from the building in the photo just a few weeks ago. Pretty little town and great burgers! -

410:

A reasoned response would be a more appropriate way of dealing with the issue - as the basis of the 'attack' is a fabrication or the truth anyway. thank you.

2026: 413: 219: 4427:

That page has gotten longer than I can manage, and my cards are on the table. Could I ask you to repost here? You'll probably get a longer answer that way.

5629: 3431: 2587: 1608: 1000: 874:

the history for both "investment bankers" and "investment banker" (no s) have this whole crazy endless string of attacks in their pages.../ histories...

847:

and it only survied a short few weeks until "JustThatGuy2" and also "Dihydrogen Monoxide" heavily vandalized it again wiping out ??? 1/2 the article and

825:

it was a listing of two things Wall Street investment banks /firms, historically, for 150-200 years AND a listing of major well known investment bankers

5968: 5729: 3643:

I quite liked the white as sortof implied it was an 'under construction/development'planning' route, but I've set a colour. Feel free to change it ;-P --

2983:, which allows the splitting of a line, instead of using the rows/hide parameters. To be honest, the introduction of branching made it a bit redundant. 2330: 1782:

I would request that the page be semi-protected as it has already been vandalized several times today, each time by an anonymous user. Please help. --

6122: 5090: 5002: 3982:

Not the way I read it.. It says he can not participate in namespace 'except' for discussions about FA's. It's poorly written and not well thought out.

1607:-related articles for now, and I was wondering if you could remove one of my distractions by telling me your source for the colours in the very useful 1323: 1316: 1027:

is in a very good shape and I am preparing a further set of guidelines to be proposed for adoption by the project and incorporation into the page; the

6313:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4792:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 3192: 1885:

because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1665: 1653: 1636: 851:

of key important info for wall street persons, like a primaer of key firms, key players, key investment bankers and esp ***key market information...

6136: 5647: 4967: 4439:

Glad it isn't just me that finds it difficult to manage. Here it is anyway, with your statement that provoked it, and my self-indulgent puff struck:

3504: 3168: 2078: 1872: 1573:

Ah, WR has it. I might as well delete my meta page; I never look at it. I've made a post of explanation at WR, since that's where the discussion is.

1311: 784: 4895: 4875: 4667: 4624: 1897: 1330: 968: 437: 3430:

I just remembered another reason why the idea of eliminating railroad systems from station names is a bad idea, and that information came from you(

3407: 1649:

for the sake of anty future ponderers. Thanks for the quick reply, and also for fixing one of the red links in the main article—much appreciated.

1292: 4693: 4638: 2990: 2968: 2932: 2910: 2870: 2845: 2821: 2804: 2792: 2672: 2633: 2605: 2581: 2571: 2558: 2549: 2406:

While I agree, there seems to be a difference of opinion on this. As a question of convention/process, can a case be accepted on those grounds? -

755: 283: 266: 5876:

This is how the “consensus” and de facto censorship came about. Cold fusion was done in by the political method, not by the scientific method.

4647: 4601: 4275: 4215: 4214:

Well if he meant Giano was wimpy, then I suggest a block on Fred for uncivil name calling... but as I said I assumed he meant 90 days was wimpy.

4189: 4071: 4045: 4018: 3983: 3935: 3912: 3880: 3849: 3747: 3376: 2251:

thing, and encourage the retiring arbitrators to help out? By the way, glad to see you back. Tell us if you want to be reactivated on any cases.

1921: 1284: 1271: 482: 469: 369: 6349: 6270: 4950: 4937: 4828: 4332: 2258: 1854: 1767: 1736: 301: 6128: 4569: 4262: 4257: 4156: 4149: 3824: 3801: 3776: 3735: 3578: 3564: 3551: 3082: 1384: 1194: 1188: 6103:

confined for now. I trust that the Arbitration Committee will use its good judgment in determining both the name and disposition of the case.

4223: 4209: 4091: 4079: 4065: 4053: 4039: 3991: 3975: 3920: 3905: 3888: 3870: 3339: 3319: 2221: 2120: 2059: 2046: 2004: 1799: 1556: 1526: 1499: 1483: 1452: 5849: 5559: 4588: 4544: 4525: 4509: 4486: 4479:

support" and then refusing to name names. The committee has sought this information for days and not received it. What would you have us do?

4463: 4434: 4161: 4135: 3943: 3829: 3818: 3806: 3794: 3781: 3692: 3652: 3638: 3531: 2387: 2370: 2133: 1580: 1568: 1536: 6085: 6067: 6040: 5623: 5428: 5418:

didn't know why he would have failed to mention such a thing, but the alternative before me was that he had unilaterally opened the door to

5412: 5079: 4197: 4026: 4012: 3962: 3950:

He can edit anything, except the Knowledge namespace. In the Knowledge namespace, he can edit only that which relates to Featured Articles.

3263: 2090: 1997:

seen your comment I would likely have refrained from action altogether; in no way did I intend to step on your toes and I apologize. Yours,

1352: 1343: 1242: 841:

and that page has absolutely nothing to do with my page(s) as it is mainly a discussion of organizational structure for investment banks...

512: 6213: 6188: 6024: 5998: 5805: 5792: 5765: 5518: 5496: 5370: 4183: 3676: 3626: 3464: 3222: 3062: 3050: 3028: 1396: 980: 599: 557: 6115:

Thank you. I think we're all going to have approach this case carefully; tempers are high and there's history here, most of it bad. Best,

3208: 2503: 2493: 2480: 2467: 2454: 2445: 2432: 2423: 2363:

Well, bringing in outside editors with no stake in the quarrel is one possibility. I'd be happy to intervene personally as a third party.

2033: 1987: 1304: 6236: 5985: 5382: 3432:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trains/Archive:_2007%2C_2#Hammond-Whiting_.28Amtrak_station.29_.26_Hammond_.28NICTD.29

2203: 2165: 1924: 1207: 416: 6156:

Could have been the first station house built. It is the earliest photo we have. Thanks for your interest in Jefferson Park history.

543:

offering you an opportunity to respond. I confess that my note was workmanlike but I disclaim any intention to offend or cause distress.

6030: 5918: 4844: 2682:. Because we have a loop, both the "left" and "right" termini templates will duplicate each other. The left has the following entries: 2240: 1756:

the articles to show there is basic merit in having the article. But some of the lists do not seem to have general references at all.--

1059:

in order to successfully adapt succession boxes to more tricky cases of succession without large, clumsy cells or redundant reasoning.

614: 575: 4725: 1822: 1371: 5956: 5546: 5324: 5286: 5238: 5194: 4408:

I see you requested that you be notified of any follow-up questions for the arbitration case of Durova and Jehochman. I left you one

4294:

trial for corruption, and halfway into the trial, they dragged your maid into the courtroom, and decided to give her a sentence too.

4249: 3094: 1719: 939: 5905: 5689: 5600: 5099: 3443: 2678:

Naturally all of this is complicated by a loop! This requires several alterations, but I'll explain in detail. First, let's look at

1786: 1492:

answered your question. He was the sockpuppet of a user banned by the Arbitration Committee. He was therefore blocked indefinitely.

5938: 3768: 1169: 6256: 4283: 3857: 3755: 495:

ugh i feel like an idiot. ignore all that vandalism information. my internet is too slow to do anything right now! sorry again! --

6221: 5962: 5752: 5714: 3740: 3198: 1175: 344: 5405:

raised the matter of legal action before, does exactly that and hardens the resolve of people who treat this as a battleground.

3363: 2039:

I believe it's in limbo (shock! horror!). In the interim, I'm willing to do some informal mediation. What's at issue presently?

1935:

the subsequent attack via this RfC process? It would be too silly for words if it hadn't been at great personal expense to me.

1867: 1840: 1198: 5967:

Best of the season to you, Mackensen. On seeking an answer to a question I had about IRC and Arbcom's relation to it, I found

5066: 5039: 4787: 4718: 2012: 1623: 1186: 1015:

A couple of members have stayed, however, and things have greatly improved in the project. There is a renovated and functional

925: 317: 4913: 4862: 4325:

I've responded on the Proposed Decision page. I'll delay my rest a few minutes to knock down this ridiculous assertion. Best,

3610: 2209:

I'm not familiar with the case, although I'll read through it later on. I remember one of my friends did about this for their

1258: 4306:

the apparent objective of punishment only - no discussion) to punish Giano gives a very strong impression of partisanship.

3631:

When it's not clear I've used whatever might be "most correct" (in this case dark blue) because the empty color looks awful.

1902: 1805: 6109: 5552:

I've fixed it. It's a known issue with parser functions, the noinclude tags, and extra whitespace. Thanks for the heads-up.

3015: 2341: 2101: 1403: 6011:

case, and Mackensen indicates that the principle had been stated prior to that. I'm looking for the case that came before

5833: 5721: 5706: 5456: 5110:

Hi Mac, Just wondering if you know how to make a default image appear of no image is chosen. I've been fooling around with

2319: 351: 4924: 3730:

potentially good editors (I'm not nearly so new as my account seems), that simply throw up their hands in disgust and say

897:

for example in including the following in alumni listings the destruction of the links within makes the listing worthless

4397: 4353: 4070:

It appears you are restricting him 'to' that. How about reasonable discussions about other articles for whatever reason?

3719: 3425: 2022: 890:

all another example of that crazy kamikazi style of idiot level attacking that has zero to do with proper editing etc...

2154: 2113: 741: 499: 5565: 5526: 5363:

It might be possible to work something out. Let's stick with the newer infobox, and I'll play around with the borders.

4663: 4620: 3524: 2629: 2472:

I understand that. (And hope I'm not belabouring the obvious.) But if the source of the dispute is whether bureaucrats

2141:

All I’m suggesting is that you be a little more proactive in relation to the principles of Knowledge. In particular to

253: 205:, feel free to leave a comment, else please move on. Please ignore the gigantic eye in the corner with the pump-action 5865:

sciences or engineering would have a hard time grasping it. However there are many notable exceptions to this rule.

5571:'pay attention'? (I'm using your talk page as it's not about the decision at large, but copy it there if you prefer). 4272: 3493: 3306: 2893: 2532: 1229: 918:

Thanks for your message. Could you please clarify which specific articles have been the subject of vandalism? Thanks,

690: 536: 456: 276: 272: 6308: 5910: 5873:

Melvin Miles later reported a positive result to the DOE committee, the DOE committee reported the result to no one.

5356: 4142:

A more productive line might be to restrict enforcement to arbitrators, who generally don't block on a hair-trigger.

3417: 1360: 1336:

Thanks for the note; I've commented there. Be advised that it was a different user who uploaded it to commons. Best,

844:

then i changed the name of my page slightly to be instead of investment bankers (to drop the s) to investment banker

5147: 3290: 3250: 2410: 2356: 1439: 1101: 884:

11:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC) note i have not used signing and logging in in the past or ever etc for this reason

831:

and after working on all this a long time including adding links ... for dozens upon dozens of entities and persons

6336: 6152:

The original Train Station was built at ground level and built sometime in the 1800’s. The photo at our website

5758:

Yep. I'm going line-by-line at the moment; I've finished North Central and I've starte on Milwaukee District West.

5735: 5483: 5394: 5085: 4834: 4421: 4311: 4269: 3514: 2781: 2662: 2227: 2158: 2105: 2086: 1882: 1775: 5740:

Did you know there were two Prairie Crossing Stations too? Here's the other for the Milwaukee District North Line(

3811:

He's not restricted for what he did. That I approve of. He's restricted for how he did it. That I cannot condone.

3283: 2817:*sigh* It's close enough for now although i need to sort out the other direction more. I'm busy right now though. 1860:

I'll move you to inactive on all cases save Apartheid, and for future cases. Tell us if you'd like this reversed.

1612: 327: 4815: 3294: 2958: 2586:

Okay. On the first one, I'll need to check and see how it's set up. On the second, it's a simple modification to

1701: 1561:

Hi, Mackensen. You might like to say the same thing at meta, not just on your page, but also on Jimbo's! Cheers.

1235:

No, you made the right call. If Alex101 wants that block lifted he can surely make the request on his talk page.

709: 404: 5018: 2760:

The default entry here is incorrect; it needs Woodford as well. Therefore, we change the default entry to this:

2598:", and the changes will be made system-wide. It might take some time for the job queue to catch up, of course... 1792:

We're keeping up with the vandalism I think, and I'm reluctant to protect an article featured on the main page.

994: 5776: 5652: 3724: 2770:

Then, update the "stations" template by replacing the "Epping or Hainault" entry in the same fashion as above.

2098: 2067:

Hi again, Mac. I wanted to leave a note too to ask you to look into the situation. It's also being "discussed"

2055:

Sorry, Mac, I didn't know you'd responded here. By now, I trust, you're up to speed. Thanks for checking in.

1515: 1472: 1428: 686: 648: 4453:

I was warned that this was a silly place before I started editing here, but now I see the evidence for myself.

816:

i REQUEST YOUR INTERVENTION TO AID STOPPING THE REPEAT VANDALS "JustThatGuy2" and also "Dihydrogen Monoxide"

665: 5044: 4974: 4446:

Coming late to the party, and finding the proceedings here near impossible to follow (is there a decision on

2950: 1090: 806: 185: 180: 175: 170: 165: 160: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 120: 115: 105: 100: 95: 90: 85: 5741: 1973: 1960:

And PS thanks for you offer to be a go-between; if there are problems, we might need your mediation skills.

1955: 6241: 5855: 5023: 4712: 2954: 2450:

I meant in general, not regarding a specific instance. As a principle, or finding of fact, or something. -

1827: 1546: 1069:

pages have been added to most of the headers' pages, as well as to many proper succession templates' ones.

80: 75: 70: 65: 60: 55: 50: 45: 40: 2961:. That being said, the only thing between where we are now and rollout is consensus in favor of the idea. 2438:

claimed oversight over the 'crats, and I think the committee as a whole would be most unwilling to do so.

6104: 5822:

Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee#Proposal for an "Arbitration Committee Public Complaints Commission"

5352: 5054: 3588: 3000: 1519: 1476: 1432: 355: 4058:

Featured article nominations take place in the project namespace. Why should we restrict him from that?

6314: 6197: 5314: 5276: 5228: 5184: 5137: 4793: 3663:

Re sline/CML it seems very odd to have an abbreviation in there without which rail route it refers to.

3164: 811: 332: 4084:

Look, you're going to have to take my word on this. The proposal does not say what you think it says.

3934:

This strictly says he can't participate in anything except disucssions, and then only FA discussions.

2554:

I am more meaning how to edit the templates themselves, then previewing work on the appropriate page.

1039:

is the only one that has yet to be improved, but there is a proposal for that one as well. Even a new

773: 730: 3349: 2945:

Well, since the use of termini is suppressed for National Rail, the essential elements are in place.

2199:

I would address a number of concerns, and might allow us to work in a more productive environment. --

1361: 2614:. And the second one, it doesn't matter on capitals so much for now but it is showing it properly. 1616: 795:

I've apologized on my page, and will fix my comment. You are correct that i very much over-reacted.

5725: 5710: 5436: 5111: 5009:

is capable of. Once its feature base is expanded, that may very well change (or not :)). Cheers,—

2324: 1815: 1811: 1776: 1085: 951: 6055:

The bottom line, really, is that Arbcom is interested in off-wiki activities only as much as they

1645:

I've gone ahead and changed the colours to match the network map, and linked to the source on the

5815: 5694: 4338: 2296: 1751:

thought the Scotland info was wrong. I have been working to clear some of the stuff out of this

1702: 1248: 1218: 822:

the gist is this i created a page "investment bankers" and then worked heavily on it a long time

359: 226: 3478: 2352:

Can you tell me please what is where on wikipedia I can ask for solution about this problem ? --

719:

Hello, I'm just here for your reasons as to why you think consensus for deletion was reached at

5901: 5772: 3068: 2928: 2889: 2625: 1413:

Hi, I read his story on some website, why was he indef. blocked? I don't see any violations of

778: 735: 490: 280: 250: 225:

I've closed the above arbitration case and have posted information about the final decision to

6285: 4764: 2402:"Bureaucrats are free to exercise their discretion in determining the outcome of a discussion" 1221:

for a 364-day old block you made. Any reason why that indefinite block can't be lifted, tho?--

6301: 5780: 5720:

Thank you. The remaining problem is the other stations still red (even if their page exist).

5050: 4780: 4644: 4598: 4447: 4245: 3359: 3160: 3123: 2542:, but I'm happy to answer any and all questions. Do you have a specific line/system in mind? 2237: 1912: 1745: 1650: 1620: 1390: 518: 479: 453: 6072:

Thanks for getting back to me, Mackensen. I will read the above-noted case with interest.

1810:

I just tried to merge the Railroad & National Register of Historic Places infoboxes for

1035:

is the operations centre for the ongoing removal of antiquated and redundant templates. The

6252: 5685: 5340: 5332: 5105: 4903: 4849: 4315: 3997: 3700: 3241:

interest. I have a list of a couple of names, I am contacting three people right now; Best

2617: 2539: 2396: 2219: 2074: 1212: 674: 636: 819:

AND ALSO THE CREATOR OF THE PAGE INVESTMENT BANKING (WHO APPEARS TO BE A RUMANIAN, ETC?)

8: 6346: 6267: 6185: 6166:

So, do you think those separate articles are ready to be merged into this new one now? --

6119: 6064: 6037: 5922:

When archiving, user Miranda has dropped several lines (the suspicious accounts and IPs).

5802: 5762: 5620: 5556: 5493: 5409: 5367: 5076: 4934: 4892: 4872: 4859: 4825: 4722: 4689: 4634: 4585: 4522: 4483: 4431: 4329: 4206: 4146: 4088: 4062: 4036: 3972: 3902: 3867: 3815: 3791: 3765: 3715: 3707: 3689: 3635: 3574: 3561: 3547: 3521: 3470: 3461: 3412: 3373: 3316: 3189: 3179: 3079: 3072: 3059: 3025: 3008: 3001: 2987: 2965: 2907: 2842: 2801: 2778: 2659: 2602: 2568: 2546: 2490: 2464: 2442: 2428:

Clarifying Bureaucrat discretion in interpreting "consensus" in the closure of an RfA. -

2420: 2367: 2130: 2043: 2001: 1940:

Talk:Inversion_(music)#Knowledge:Requests_for_mediation.2FInversion_.28music.29.2FSandbox

1850:, where you cast some votes, so your input on the motion pending there would be helpful. 1796: 1733: 1662: 1633: 1598: 1577: 1553: 1496: 1449: 1381: 1340: 1268: 1239: 965: 947: 922: 752: 596: 554: 509: 466: 434: 366: 263: 17: 5995: 5952: 5845: 5829: 5461: 5096: 4858:, because yours was the only name up there when I first attempted to register my vote. 4279: 4219: 4193: 4075: 4049: 4022: 3987: 3939: 3916: 3884: 3853: 3751: 3498: 3335: 3302: 3269: 3260: 2338: 2255: 2014: 1984: 1864: 1837: 1741:

OK I was hoping you might have had a handy book. It looks like the guy that tagged it

1512: 1469: 1425: 1024: 1020: 991: 881:

it appears esp to be perhaps a personal attack but i have no clue who is behind it etc

682: 658: 644: 324: 259:

Why did you remove it without reference to the talk page, after a month of inactivity?

6131: 5897: 5638:, and I'm sure it could use some cleaning up. Let me know what you think it needs. -- 5541: 5451: 5376: 4658: 4615: 4572: 4540: 4505: 4459: 4417: 4380: 4260: 4180: 4159: 4132: 4009: 3959: 3827: 3804: 3779: 3738: 3672: 3648: 3622: 3606: 3598: 3489: 3246: 3228: 3219: 3205: 2924: 2885: 2867: 2818: 2789: 2669: 2621: 2578: 2555: 2529: 2384: 2353: 2347: 1565: 1074: 767: 724: 299: 5489:

I'm not presently active as a checkuser. You might try asking Deskana or Lar. Best,

3297:

would fix it, but it doesn't seem to have made a difference (at least, not yet). --

3256:

Good choice, Anthere! Thank you for doing this important job, Mackensen. Take care,

201:

Spammers: I would like for this page to stay reasonably clean. If you have business

6232: 6081: 6020: 5981: 5934: 5597: 5442: 5062: 5014: 4991: 4981: 4841: 4403: 4394: 4349: 4241: 3682: 3382: 3355: 3185:. Let me test in my userspace to make sure nothing will break, then I'll go ahead. 1851: 1726: 1540: 1408: 1400: 1281: 1255: 1226: 1028: 828:

then i added more firms involved in capital raising as LBO firms, Hedge funds, etc

714: 696: 341: 230: 2740:

We need to make a similar change to the "right" template. Here's what it has now:

6324: 6248: 6209: 6171: 6097: 6073: 5788: 5748: 5681: 5643: 5532: 5512: 5477: 5348: 4947: 4921: 4803: 3439: 3273: 3133: 3046: 2214: 2142: 1968: 1950: 1758: 1710: 1303:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

1197:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

1040: 701:

If you get a chance I think you are a good person to tell me if the tool I built

443: 288: 279:. Don't play these silly bloody games with me. You know me better than that. -- 271:

See my edit summary. I also take issue with your false accusations of collusion

238: 5611:

a puppet, but there's no evidence for it. We're in no place to state that he is

4360:

Images courtesy of Lsi john, who has unwittingly taken on the role of image guru

3539: 6343: 6264: 6182: 6116: 6061: 6034: 5799: 5759: 5617: 5553: 5490: 5406: 5364: 5311: 5273: 5225: 5181: 5134: 5073: 4958: 4931: 4869: 4822: 4685: 4654: 4630: 4582: 4519: 4480: 4428: 4326: 4203: 4143: 4085: 4059: 4033: 3969: 3899: 3864: 3812: 3788: 3762: 3711: 3686: 3632: 3570: 3558: 3543: 3518: 3458: 3370: 3313: 3186: 3076: 3056: 3022: 2984: 2962: 2904: 2866:

Ok I've sorted it out or got very close. Thank you very much for the tutorial.

2839: 2798: 2775: 2656: 2599: 2565: 2543: 2523: 2487: 2461: 2439: 2417: 2364: 2281: 2127: 2040: 1998: 1793: 1730: 1692: 1659: 1630: 1574: 1550: 1493: 1446: 1414: 1378: 1368: 1337: 1308: 1265: 1236: 1145: 1133: 1120: 1061: 1055: 1049: 962: 919: 790: 749: 705:

could be enhanced beyond the current statistics and time periods I am tracking

629: 593: 551: 506: 463: 431: 392: 363: 311: 260: 3369:

Don't you even dare! Yes, active on Privatemusings, inactive on all the rest.

3289:

On a related note: what is the matter with the enormous image on the template

1725:

Well, it's mainly derived from Knowledge's other articles on the matter (e.g.

422:

The appropriate place to raise objections is on the talk page of the article:

6276: 5948: 5841: 5825: 5092: 4746: 4274:

clarified on their talk pages. Both were referring to the remedy, not giano.

3331: 3298: 3257: 3038: 2900: 2334: 2290: 2252: 2213:

History though. But I will try and help out with the article where needed. --

2150: 2146: 2056: 2030: 1980: 1861: 1834: 1783: 1604: 1532: 1509: 1466: 1422: 1016: 1009: 988: 802: 678: 640: 321: 2109: 1846:

Whatever your answer to Picaroon's question, you remain listed as active on

5536: 5446: 5036: 5032:

arbiters prove themselves to be as dedicated as some of the outgoing ones.

4536: 4501: 4455: 4413: 4173: 4125: 4002: 3952: 3668: 3644: 3618: 3602: 3594: 3485: 3479:

http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2007-November/035415.html

3242: 2200: 2162: 2117: 1894: 1562: 1202: 1031:

has been again updated and a potential restructuring is being planned; the

974: 666:

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2007/09/arden-wohl-wikipedia-page.php

547: 449: 426:. As I've suggested there, your real beef is with the BBC and possibly the 292: 3787:

him from the project space. How does that stop him from editing articles?

2729:

To make that work, we need an additional line in the "stations" template:

904: 6292: 6228: 6127:

I echo the apology. I overreacted to Nick's "tiresome" comment. Regards,

6077: 6016: 5977: 5930: 5742:

http://metrarail.com/Sched/md_n/prairie-crossing_libertyville.shtml).----

5593: 5423: 5389: 5058: 5010: 4755: 4391: 4345: 2838:

I'll take a look. As I side, I figure only the loop needs to be touched.

1929: 1349: 1327: 1222: 933:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of ice hockey players who died young

721:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of ice hockey players who died young

496: 3996:

It is right. Namespace is not mainspace is not the wikipedia namespace.

1676:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

1110: 1023:

has organised archives and a dedicated page for archived proposals; the

448:

I need a checkuser for a fishing expedition. I'm fairly convinced that

6205: 6167: 5784: 5744: 5639: 5506: 5471: 5344: 4771: 4731:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

3435: 3042: 3012: 1961: 1943: 1908: 1819: 706: 611: 572: 533: 376:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

3538:

times which seems pretty excessive. Several of those deletions cited

2774:

but once you've got the hang of it it's pretty straightforward. Best,

907:? id=3892526554193&type=author&find=l+e+cooper], Govt Advisor 5634:

I've just started a sandbox for the proposed article on the combined

5420:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Daniel Brandt deletion wheel war 2

5297: 5259: 5211: 5167: 5120: 2500: 2477: 2451: 2429: 2407: 2265:

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

908: 944:

List of ice hockey players who have died during their playing career

623:

A slight little dispute with Adam Bishop over Raymond IV of Toulouse

6153: 3391: 797: 192: 6204:, but I sent a reply that I hope cleared things up with them. ---- 4372: 4188:(e/c)I took it to mean he thought 90-days was a wimpy punishment. 546:

Anyway, I've taken my own advice and opened a merge discussion at

1603:

Hi! I've decided to concentrate my non-gnomic activities on the

246: 239: 206: 5943: 5702: 3033:

Actually, I just heard from somebody in the region that they're

1003:

membership renewal request—Project in great need of contributors

4672:

Wow, sarcasm is tough to pull off in a text-only environment.

2899:

Well, if memory serves, I approached the idea in the spirit of

2734:| Ealing Broadway, West Ruislip, or Hainault=], ],<br /: --> 1818:, and will we be able to do these to others in the future? ---- 764:

List of ice hockey players who died during their playing career

5974:

I'll watchlist your page so you can reply here if you prefer.

3593:

Ahah! yes, good point. Whitechapel needs doing too then ... --

3569:

No objection. I'll keep an eye out for recurrence. Thanks. —

2476:

use such discretion, and "how much" discretion they have... -

4364: 245:

Why have you restored the name of an infant unnecessarily to

3457:

as separate articles, with appropriate dab notices on each.

3041:). Looks like you're going to have to talk to this man. ---- 592:, not whether it belongs in Place A, as opposed to place B. 6296: 4775: 2210: 5661:

months ago.) It's against policy; it should not happen.

5592:

Not that you asked for my opinion, but there you have it.

4358:

And anyway, the cookie would have clashed with the eyeball

2161:, either way, I can wait a month, I not going anywhere. -- 2157:, or maybe I’m just wasting my time, and the last comment 1893:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

702: 3664: 3330:

D'oh. Should've thought of that. It works fine now! --

3215: 450:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Dfitzgerald

6200:. Granted, I did get tagged for copyright violations by 4563:

Durova used the list to votestack support for her blocks

3237: 2295:

Just to let you know, I've sent you and email. Regards,

2170:

Might I suggest the following as one possible solution:

1708:

Do you have any sources you can list for this article?--

1461:

You haven't answered my question. What did he do wrong?

1445:

Checkuser block confirmed by the Arbitration Committee.

1217:

Hey Mackensen. I just declined an IP unblock request at

2416:

I'm not sure I understand the question. Which grounds?

1305:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

1199:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

1138:

For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,

6143:

Jefferson Park (Metra-CTA Blue Line) article revisited

5576:

thence begin to idiosynchronise (new word?) with them.

2884:

Now i'm just curious. Why is it called S-line\S-rail?

2097:

I have lived up to the spirit and the letter of these

316:

Hi Mackensen. Could you please review and vote on the

1814:, and it didn't work. How were you able to do it for 320:

motion, which is sort of stagnant right now? Thanks.

220:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Great Irish Famine

5820:

Hi Mackensen, Have I answered all your questions at

4044:

Thank you, kindly. 'Featured' is still unnecessary.

1911:

blocked an IP range because of suspected COI at the

6029:Yes, it predates Giano. The case I had in mind was 4171:to the noticeboards, and other things are allowed. 5775:station, so I can prepare for merging it with the 5671:but only to be done by an arbitrator if it is done 3236:You may know that we are looking for changing the 3099:I've gone over all Tramlink articles and replaced 2538:Absolutely. There's already some documentation at 2174:From the Troubles ArbCom that recently concluded. 1889:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at 1324:commons:Image:Farhill Transport, 14th Mar 1939.png 6181:Excellent work there. Yes, I think it's all set. 5927:I believe those dropped lines should be restored. 4946:. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. 4676:in response to sarcasm is downright impossible! 4289:Your Last Minute Addition of Giano to Arbcom Case 1132:and therefore, I've officially declared today as 5779:article. I took my sweet time with a lot of the 5657:You are probably correct to reject arbitration. 5295:D-OH! Fixed it.. I forgot a line of code.. :D -- 4614:Even in context, isn't that going a little far? 2953:may be missing entries, but that's an easy fix. 2714:| Ealing Broadway or West Ruislip=]<br /: --> 2577:learn how to do this and other similar changes. 2329:Hi, Mack. Might you be interested in commenting 2725:East=Ealing Broadway, West Ruislip, or Hainault 3667:doesn't include a railway line in the list. -- 6003:Thanks, Thatcher; however, the link above is 5011:Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) 2610:This is a modification of an earlier request 2246:Thatcher has a point. I do believe he is the 1504:Oh. You never told me he was banned, though. 900:* L E Butch Cooper, Inv Banker, Atty, Author 766:and revise the list. Thanks for the support. 5630:Jefferson Park (Metra-CTA Blue Line) article 4977:, which are maintained as an alternative to 1615:(also unsourced) or the colours used in the 1140:enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Mack! 981:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia 4868:Bishonen accused me of jumping the gun ;). 2460:resolves disputes. It doesn't make policy. 2184:Passed 5-0 at 08:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 1611:, since they do not match the set given in 1531:I thought it was obvious. It says right on 6031:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Njyoder 5160:enough I 'll be able to get back into it.. 3039:http://flickr.com/photos/jttjr/1501696393/ 2195:Passed 7-0 at 08:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 1317:Image:Farhill Transport, 14th Mar 1939.png 1010:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization 318:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration#Huaiwei 6305:was updated with a fact from the article 5666:only arbitrators can lock/unlock the page 4784:was updated with a fact from the article 3389: 1915:article. A discussion was started at the 1873:Possibly unfree Image:Hans von Seeckt.jpg 1174:A record of your Day will always be kept 940:List of ice hockey players who died young 762:Alright, I'll undelete it and move it to 5942: 4379: 4371: 4363: 2949:might be useful but it isn't necessary. 2701:#default=Ealing Broadway or West Ruislip 1535:that he was blocked for being a sock of 610:On that point of policy, we are agreed. 191: 5705:. Can you please have a look. Regards. 4930:I was quoting from someone's evidence. 4745:This has been an automated delivery by 2957:might need new exceptions added; ditto 2921:Category:National Rail s-rail templates 1877:An image that you uploaded or altered, 1367:Hi, Ive left a comment there. Regards, 983:is able to close with one more vote on 905:http://www.booksamillion.com/ncom/books 14: 4788:Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti Street Railway 4719:Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti Street Railway 3007:Hey, thanks for adding the article on 2765:#default=Epping, Hainault, or Woodford 2108:to contend with. Not to mention these 71:/Archive (December 2005–February 2006) 51:/Archive (November 2004–February 2005) 5607:description, actually. He might well 961:Please look up a few sections. Best. 5049:Hi, I noticed your contributions to 4677: 2947:Template:National Rail line/branches 2919:And what other parts of S-rail does 2379:I have given request for comments ( 1658:Looks good, thanks for fixing that! 96:/Archive (October 2006–January 2007) 66:/Archive (August 2005–December 2005) 4240:ripped "wimpy, wimpy, wimpy" ones. 3067:Fixed; there are now two articles: 2797:Probably not doing any harm there. 1613:de:Berliner_Verkehrsbetriebe#Farben 76:/Archive (February 2006–April 2006) 46:/Archive (April 2004–November 2004) 23: 5531:Hi. I applied your new infobox to 5441:Hi. Nice work with the infobox at 1264:Yes, move me to inactive. Thanks, 1109: 111:/Archive (August 2007–January 2008 24: 6361: 6309:Iron Range and Huron Bay Railroad 4973:is a part of the set of "x to y" 3449:Not insurmountable, though: have 3095:Deletion of Tramlink start/insert 2381:Talk:Jasenovac concentration camp 630:Foundation for Medieval Genealogy 126:/Archive (January 2009–June 2009) 121:/Archive (June 2008–January 2009) 116:/Archive (January 2008–June 2008) 101:/Archive (January 2007–June 2007) 91:/Archive (July 2006–October 2006) 56:/Archive (February 2005–May 2005) 41:/Archive (August 2003–April 2004) 6284: 6154:http://jeffersonparkhistory.org/ 4916:. That confused me greatly (see 4763: 4678: 4629:Thatcher was being sarcastic. — 3746:that is not a featured article. 3390: 2680:Template:S-line/LUL left/Central 1917:Conflict of Interest Noticeboard 1883:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images 748:would raise no objection. Best, 350:It's a play on a phrase used by 186:/Archive (April 2022–April 2023) 181:/Archive (April 2021–April 2022) 176:/Archive (April 2020–April 2021) 171:/Archive (April 2019–April 2020) 166:/Archive (April 2018–April 2019) 161:/Archive (April 2017–April 2018) 156:/Archive (April 2016–April 2017) 151:/Archive (April 2015–April 2016) 146:/Archive (April 2014–April 2015) 141:/Archive (April 2013–April 2014) 136:/Archive (April 2011–April 2013) 106:/Archive (June 2007–August 2007) 6222:ArbitrationCommitteeChartRecent 5963:Arbcom ancient history question 5072:Sure, thanks for the heads-up. 3455:Hammond-Whiting railway station 3199:Blocking and copyright problems 2959:Template:National Rail stations 2686:Ealing Broadway=Ealing Broadway 2100:, and the only one involved to 1276:Doing so for all cases, except 1105: 938:You closed an AfD recently for 131:/Archive (June 2009–April 2011) 61:/Archive (May 2005–August 2005) 5777:Jefferson Park (CTA Blue Line) 5250:sure what's going on.. Thanks! 4268:For the record: Both jpgordon 3898:. Nothing else is restricted. 3710:article. I hope this helps. 3159:without ruining any articles. 2923:be added to\can you add this? 2232:I don't think 3-5 admins even 1907:Mackensen, on October 12 2007 1353:01:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 1344:00:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 1331:23:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 1312:05:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 1285:16:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1272:16:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1259:15:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1243:10:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1230:03:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 1208:09:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 1170:00:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 1097:14:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 995:04:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 969:10:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 956:01:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 926:15:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 807:01:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 785:20:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 756:01:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 742:01:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 81:/Archive (April 2006–May 2006) 13: 1: 6337:13:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 6271:05:52, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 6257:05:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 6237:06:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 6214:16:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 6189:16:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 6176:16:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 6137:21:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 6123:20:52, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 6110:20:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 6086:03:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 6068:03:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 6041:03:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 6025:01:41, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 5999:01:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 5986:00:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 5957:17:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 5939:09:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 5906:03:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 5850:20:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 5834:17:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 5806:03:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 5793:03:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 5766:03:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 5753:02:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 5730:20:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 5715:13:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 5690:16:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 5648:18:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 5624:23:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 5601:23:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 5560:03:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 5547:02:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 5519:22:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 5497:22:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 5484:21:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 5457:03:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 5429:12:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 5413:11:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 5395:03:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 5371:12:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 5357:09:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 5325:13:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 5287:13:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 5239:04:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 4910:question on the Workshop page 4694:14:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 4668:14:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 4648:14:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 4639:14:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 4625:13:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 4602:18:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4589:18:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4575:18:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4545:14:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4526:14:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4510:13:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4487:13:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4464:12:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4435:12:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4422:10:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4398:06:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4354:05:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4333:04:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4320:04:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4284:05:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4263:04:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4250:04:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4224:01:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4210:01:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4198:01:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4184:01:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4162:01:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4150:01:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4136:01:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4092:02:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4080:02:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4066:02:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4054:02:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4040:02:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4027:02:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 4013:01:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3992:01:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3976:01:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3963:01:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3944:01:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3921:01:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3906:01:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3889:01:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3871:01:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3858:01:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3830:04:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3819:01:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3807:01:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3795:01:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3782:01:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3769:01:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3756:01:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3741:01:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3720:07:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3693:02:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3677:02:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3653:00:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3639:00:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3627:00:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3611:00:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3579:16:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 3565:16:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 3552:16:28, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 3525:16:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 3494:16:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 3465:19:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 3444:18:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 3418:12:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 3377:14:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 3364:17:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 3340:04:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 3320:04:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 3307:04:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 3264:16:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 3251:21:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 3223:02:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 3209:21:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 3193:04:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 3169:04:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 3083:13:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 3063:13:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 3051:00:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 3029:12:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 3016:01:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2991:23:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2973:More generally, there's also 2969:23:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2951:Template:National Rail colour 2933:23:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2911:22:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2894:22:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2871:13:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2846:19:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2822:18:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2805:18:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2793:17:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2782:17:10, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2673:16:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2663:16:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2634:16:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2606:15:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2582:15:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2572:14:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2559:14:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2550:14:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2533:14:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 1903:IP block due to suspected COI 1806:Railroad/NRHP Infobox comboes 710:18:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 691:14:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 653:13:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 615:17:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 600:16:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 576:16:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 558:16:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 537:16:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 513:00:21, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 500:00:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 483:01:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 470:01:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 457:01:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 438:13:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 417:13:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 396:09:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 370:19:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 345:19:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 328:19:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 302:04:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 284:03:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 267:01:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 254:01:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 234:21:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 86:/Archive (May 2006–July 2006) 5195:21:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 5148:13:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 5100:14:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 5080:00:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 5067:00:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 5040:21:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 5019:14:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 4951:02:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 4938:02:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 4925:02:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 4912:, with you adding this link 4896:00:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 4876:00:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 4863:00:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 4845:04:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 4829:02:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 4816:02:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 4750:02:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 4726:04:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 2955:Template:National Rail lines 2594:", you simply change it to " 2504:20:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2494:20:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2481:19:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2468:19:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2455:19:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2446:19:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2433:19:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2424:19:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2411:19:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2388:18:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2371:18:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2357:18:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 2342:00:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 2320:22:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 2285:14:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 2259:21:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 2241:19:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 2222:18:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 2204:19:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 2166:16:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 2134:20:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 2121:19:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 2091:11:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 2060:20:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 2047:18:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 2034:18:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 2005:16:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 1988:16:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 1974:12:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 1956:12:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 1925:07:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 1898:13:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1868:20:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1855:14:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 1841:02:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 1823:19:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 7: 6350:20:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 5055:Light rail in North America 3426:Train Station naming debate 3139:. It is now safe to delete 3075:. Thanks for the heads-up. 3055:Ouch, my bad. I'll fix it. 2756:#default=Epping or Hainault 1800:16:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 1787:15:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 1768:17:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 1737:21:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1720:20:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1696:09:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1666:12:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 1654:07:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 1637:07:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 1624:02:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 1581:23:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1569:22:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1557:22:38, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1527:22:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1500:22:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1484:22:27, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1453:21:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1440:21:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1404:03:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 1385:01:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 1372:01:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 1065:has also been improved and 565:appropriate way to proceed. 356:Chancellor of the Exchequer 10: 6366: 5636:Jefferson Park (Metra-CTA) 5566:Hoffman decision questions 5527:Possible bug in CTA header 5381:Was this really necessary? 4155:to another in such a way. 3534:article had to be deleted 1124:has been identified as an 5947:Buon Natale e buon anno! 5680:Thanks for your time. -- 3396: 3282:Thanks for backing me up 2689:West Ruislip=West Ruislip 1879:Image:Hans von Seeckt.jpg 1362:User talk:Mackensen/Flarp 1280:where you already voted. 1084:Thank you for your time. 5736:Prairie Crossing (Metra) 5112:User:Dp67/Templates/Test 5086:Reply at Matthew Hoffman 4835:ArbCom activity question 4684:But nice try anyway... — 2228:If wishes were horses... 1848:Allegations of apartheid 1816:Sebring (Amtrak station) 1812:Greenport (LIRR station) 1777:Night of the Long Knives 1278:Allegations of apartheid 424:Talk:Second Battle Group 6315:Did you know? talk page 4794:Did you know? talk page 4717:Hi, I saw your article 3451:Hammond railway station 1703:List of Peers 1180-1189 1219:User_talk:65.222.216.15 405:The Second Battle Group 360:William Ewart Gladstone 227:Talk:Great Irish Famine 6164: 5959: 5783:station articles. ---- 5773:Jefferson Park (Metra) 5653:NOR Arbitraton request 4385: 4377: 4369: 3931: 3725:Your comment at ArbCom 3069:Vermont Street (Metra) 1887:image description page 1301:Template:Accuracy-1911 1295:Template:Accuracy-1911 1254:14-day rule. Regards, 1114: 1102:Happy Mackensen's Day! 340:for us non-Latinists. 197: 6150: 5946: 5781:Long Island Rail Road 5051:Pittsburgh Light Rail 5045:Pittsburgh Light Rail 4448:Jarndyce and Jarndyce 4383: 4375: 4367: 3927: 3400:The Editor's Barnstar 2707:Template:LUL stations 2021:Hi, Mackensen--I saw 1913:Fellowship of Friends 1881:, has been listed at 1113: 859:out PROVES entirely) 462:I do, and he's cool. 195: 6242:IRC arbitration case 5856:Cold Fusion Decision 5024:Shoring up your term 4975:conversion templates 4713:On a lighter note... 3998:Knowledge:Namespaces 3021:Nope, same station. 2540:Template talk:S-line 2486:ineligible "votes." 1828:Arbitration activity 1683:September 2007 issue 505:No worries. Cheers, 5703:Dongdaemun_Staciono 4738:November 2007 issue 3708:Seoul Subway Line 1 3589:Crossrail junctions 3073:Blue Island (Metra) 3009:Blue Island (Metra) 3002:Blue Island (Metra) 2112:. To back up these 18:User talk:Mackensen 5960: 4386: 4378: 4370: 4256:the encyclopedia. 3848:well thought out. 3293:? I thought that 2588:Template:LUL lines 2272:October 2007 issue 2104:. Now I have this 2015:Great Irish Famine 1609:Template:BVG color 1293:TfD nomination of 1187:TfD nomination of 1127:Awesome Wikipedian 1115: 1029:Documentation page 812:Repeated vandalism 586:take my own advice 334:Ex accuso lucellum 198: 6321: 6320: 6134: 5975: 5545: 5505:Thanks, I will. - 5455: 5359: 5343:comment added by 4840:clarify? Thanks, 4800: 4799: 4752: 4666: 4657:. Me = fail ^_^. 4623: 4500:were often rash. 4361: 3423: 3422: 3037:the same station( 2750:Hainault=Hainault 2747:Woodford=Woodford 2709:, which we have: 2698:Woodford=Woodford 2692:Hainault=Hainault 2636: 2620:comment added by 2590:. Where it says " 2287: 2093: 2077:comment added by 1698: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1095: 985:several proposals 693: 677:comment added by 655: 639:comment added by 398: 383:August 2007 issue 291:people. Be nice. 6357: 6334: 6329: 6288: 6281: 6280: 6132: 6106:*** Crotalus *** 5973: 5539: 5515: 5480: 5449: 5443:State/Lake (CTA) 5437:State/Lake (CTA) 5426: 5392: 5338: 5307: 5302: 5269: 5264: 5221: 5216: 5177: 5172: 5130: 5125: 5035:All the best, – 5007: 5001: 4996: 4990: 4986: 4980: 4972: 4966: 4963:Hi, Mackensen! 4813: 4808: 4767: 4760: 4759: 4744: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4662: 4619: 4368:"Dutch doughnut" 4356: 4182: 4178: 4134: 4130: 4011: 4007: 3961: 3957: 3683:Copenhagen Metro 3415: 3410: 3394: 3387: 3386: 3278: 3272: 3184: 3178: 3161:Kevin Steinhardt 3158: 3152: 3148: 3142: 3138: 3132: 3128: 3122: 3118: 3112: 3108: 3102: 2982: 2976: 2766: 2736: 2716: 2615: 2597: 2593: 2325:Sock for arbcom? 2316: 2314: 2312: 2310: 2308: 2279: 2072: 1971: 1966: 1953: 1948: 1765: 1761: 1750: 1744: 1727:List of Earldoms 1717: 1713: 1690: 1651:ObfuscatePenguin 1621:ObfuscatePenguin 1525: 1520:Report a mistake 1482: 1477:Report a mistake 1438: 1433:Report a mistake 1205: 1173: 1165: 1163: 1161: 1159: 1157: 1106: 1089: 781: 776: 770: 738: 733: 727: 672: 634: 390: 297: 6365: 6364: 6360: 6359: 6358: 6356: 6355: 6354: 6330: 6325: 6279: 6244: 6224: 6145: 6100: 5965: 5913: 5911:"Dropped lines" 5858: 5818: 5816:Arbcom Proposal 5738: 5697: 5695:Template:S-rail 5655: 5632: 5568: 5533:Bryn Mawr (CTA) 5529: 5517: 5513: 5482: 5478: 5464: 5439: 5424: 5390: 5386:poison the well 5379: 5335: 5321: 5303: 5298: 5283: 5265: 5260: 5235: 5217: 5212: 5191: 5173: 5168: 5144: 5126: 5121: 5108: 5088: 5047: 5026: 5005: 4999: 4994: 4988: 4984: 4978: 4970: 4964: 4961: 4908:I noticed your 4906: 4852: 4837: 4809: 4804: 4758: 4733: 4715: 4679: 4565: 4406: 4341: 4339:In appreciation 4291: 4174: 4172: 4126: 4124: 4003: 4001: 3953: 3951: 3727: 3703: 3591: 3501: 3473: 3428: 3413: 3408: 3385: 3352: 3350:ArbCom activity 3280: 3276: 3270: 3231: 3201: 3182: 3176: 3156: 3154:Tramlink insert 3150: 3146: 3140: 3136: 3130: 3126: 3120: 3116: 3114:Tramlink insert 3110: 3106: 3100: 3097: 3005: 2980: 2974: 2764: 2733: 2713: 2595: 2591: 2526: 2399: 2350: 2327: 2306: 2304: 2302: 2300: 2298: 2293: 2267: 2230: 2197: 2186: 2019: 1969: 1962: 1951: 1944: 1932: 1905: 1875: 1830: 1808: 1780: 1763: 1759: 1748: 1742: 1715: 1711: 1706: 1678: 1601: 1505: 1462: 1418: 1411: 1393: 1377:Replied there. 1365: 1350:John Vandenberg 1328:John Vandenberg 1319: 1298: 1251: 1249:ArbCom activity 1215: 1203: 1192: 1155: 1153: 1151: 1149: 1147: 1134:Mackensen's day 1104: 1075:SBS's main page 1025:Guidelines page 1005: 977: 936: 901: 814: 793: 779: 774: 768: 736: 731: 725: 717: 699: 661: 625: 521: 493: 446: 428:Daily Telegraph 407: 378: 337: 314: 293: 243: 223: 190: 34:Mackensenarchiv 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6363: 6353: 6352: 6319: 6318: 6289: 6278: 6275: 6274: 6273: 6243: 6240: 6223: 6220: 6219: 6218: 6217: 6216: 6202:CorenSearchBot 6192: 6191: 6144: 6141: 6140: 6139: 6125: 6099: 6096: 6095: 6094: 6093: 6092: 6091: 6090: 6089: 6088: 6048: 6047: 6046: 6045: 6044: 6043: 5969:comment by you 5964: 5961: 5928: 5926: 5923: 5921: 5916: 5915:Hi, Mackensen. 5912: 5909: 5857: 5854: 5853: 5852: 5817: 5814: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5810: 5809: 5808: 5737: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5722:216.86.113.233 5707:216.86.113.233 5700: 5696: 5693: 5654: 5651: 5631: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5590: 5589: 5584: 5583: 5578: 5577: 5567: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5528: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5511: 5500: 5499: 5476: 5463: 5460: 5438: 5435: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5431: 5378: 5375: 5374: 5373: 5334: 5331: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5315: 5290: 5289: 5277: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5242: 5241: 5229: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5198: 5197: 5185: 5163: 5162: 5161: 5153: 5151: 5150: 5138: 5107: 5104: 5087: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5046: 5043: 5025: 5022: 4960: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4954: 4953: 4905: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4893:LessHeard vanU 4879: 4878: 4860:LessHeard vanU 4851: 4848: 4836: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4798: 4797: 4768: 4757: 4754: 4743: 4732: 4729: 4723:Epousesquecido 4714: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4592: 4591: 4564: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4529: 4528: 4513: 4512: 4490: 4489: 4476: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4405: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4340: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4290: 4287: 4266: 4265: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4202:I'd ask Fred. 4186: 4139: 4138: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 3965: 3932: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3874: 3873: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3726: 3723: 3702: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3590: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3500: 3497: 3472: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3427: 3424: 3421: 3420: 3403: 3402: 3397: 3395: 3384: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3351: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3323: 3322: 3279: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3230: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3214:Owner of this 3200: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3144:Tramlink start 3104:Tramlink start 3096: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3004: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2971: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2914: 2913: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2768: 2767: 2758: 2757: 2754: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2738: 2737: 2727: 2726: 2718: 2717: 2703: 2702: 2699: 2696: 2693: 2690: 2687: 2676: 2675: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2525: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2404: 2403: 2398: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2374: 2373: 2349: 2346: 2326: 2323: 2292: 2289: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2229: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2193: 2182: 2173: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2110:edit summaries 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2050: 2049: 2018: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 1991: 1990: 1931: 1928: 1904: 1901: 1891:the discussion 1874: 1871: 1858: 1857: 1829: 1826: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1779: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1705: 1700: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1640: 1639: 1600: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1456: 1455: 1410: 1407: 1392: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1318: 1315: 1297: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1214: 1211: 1191: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1172: 1168: 1144: 1139: 1137: 1131: 1116: 1103: 1100: 1033:Templates list 1004: 998: 979:Hi Mackensen. 976: 973: 972: 971: 948:Idont Havaname 935: 930: 929: 928: 912: 899: 813: 810: 792: 789: 788: 787: 759: 758: 716: 713: 698: 695: 660: 657: 624: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 605: 604: 603: 602: 579: 578: 567: 566: 561: 560: 544: 520: 517: 516: 515: 492: 491:September 2007 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 473: 472: 445: 442: 441: 440: 414:83.104.165.113 406: 403: 401: 377: 374: 373: 372: 336: 331: 313: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 242: 237: 222: 217: 216: 211: 199: 189: 188: 183: 178: 173: 168: 163: 158: 153: 148: 143: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 63: 58: 53: 48: 43: 37: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6362: 6351: 6348: 6345: 6341: 6340: 6339: 6338: 6335: 6333: 6328: 6316: 6312: 6311: 6310: 6304: 6303: 6302:Did you know? 6298: 6294: 6290: 6287: 6283: 6282: 6272: 6269: 6266: 6261: 6260: 6259: 6258: 6254: 6250: 6239: 6238: 6234: 6230: 6215: 6211: 6207: 6203: 6199: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6193: 6190: 6187: 6184: 6180: 6179: 6178: 6177: 6173: 6169: 6163: 6160: 6157: 6155: 6149: 6138: 6135: 6130: 6126: 6124: 6121: 6118: 6114: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6108: 6107: 6087: 6083: 6079: 6075: 6071: 6070: 6069: 6066: 6063: 6058: 6054: 6053: 6052: 6051: 6050: 6049: 6042: 6039: 6036: 6032: 6028: 6027: 6026: 6022: 6018: 6014: 6010: 6006: 6002: 6001: 6000: 5997: 5993: 5990: 5989: 5988: 5987: 5983: 5979: 5970: 5958: 5954: 5950: 5945: 5941: 5940: 5936: 5932: 5919: 5908: 5907: 5903: 5899: 5893: 5889: 5885: 5881: 5877: 5874: 5870: 5866: 5862: 5851: 5847: 5843: 5838: 5837: 5836: 5835: 5831: 5827: 5823: 5807: 5804: 5801: 5796: 5795: 5794: 5790: 5786: 5782: 5778: 5774: 5769: 5768: 5767: 5764: 5761: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5754: 5750: 5746: 5743: 5731: 5727: 5723: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5716: 5712: 5708: 5704: 5692: 5691: 5687: 5683: 5678: 5674: 5672: 5667: 5662: 5658: 5650: 5649: 5645: 5641: 5637: 5625: 5622: 5619: 5614: 5610: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5602: 5599: 5595: 5586: 5585: 5580: 5579: 5574: 5573: 5572: 5561: 5558: 5555: 5551: 5550: 5549: 5548: 5543: 5538: 5534: 5520: 5516: 5510: 5509: 5504: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5498: 5495: 5492: 5488: 5487: 5486: 5485: 5481: 5475: 5474: 5468: 5459: 5458: 5453: 5448: 5444: 5430: 5427: 5421: 5416: 5415: 5414: 5411: 5408: 5404: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5393: 5387: 5383: 5372: 5369: 5366: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5358: 5354: 5350: 5346: 5342: 5326: 5323: 5320: 5319: 5312: 5309: 5308: 5306: 5301: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5288: 5285: 5282: 5281: 5274: 5271: 5270: 5268: 5263: 5256: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5240: 5237: 5234: 5233: 5226: 5223: 5222: 5220: 5215: 5208: 5202: 5201: 5200: 5199: 5196: 5193: 5190: 5189: 5182: 5179: 5178: 5176: 5171: 5164: 5158: 5157: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5149: 5146: 5143: 5142: 5135: 5132: 5131: 5129: 5124: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5113: 5103: 5101: 5098: 5094: 5091: 5081: 5078: 5075: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5056: 5052: 5042: 5041: 5038: 5033: 5029: 5021: 5020: 5016: 5012: 5004: 4993: 4983: 4976: 4969: 4952: 4949: 4945: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4936: 4933: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4926: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4897: 4894: 4890: 4887: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4877: 4874: 4871: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4861: 4857: 4847: 4846: 4843: 4830: 4827: 4824: 4820: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4814: 4812: 4807: 4795: 4791: 4790: 4789: 4783: 4782: 4781:Did you know? 4777: 4773: 4769: 4766: 4762: 4761: 4753: 4751: 4748: 4740: 4739: 4728: 4727: 4724: 4720: 4695: 4691: 4687: 4675: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4665: 4660: 4656: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4646: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4636: 4632: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4622: 4617: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4608: 4603: 4600: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4590: 4587: 4584: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4573: 4571: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4527: 4524: 4521: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4511: 4507: 4503: 4499: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4488: 4485: 4482: 4477: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4465: 4461: 4457: 4454: 4449: 4445: 4444: 4441: 4440: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4433: 4430: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4399: 4396: 4393: 4388: 4387: 4382: 4376:marching band 4374: 4366: 4362: 4359: 4355: 4351: 4347: 4334: 4331: 4328: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4286: 4285: 4281: 4277: 4273: 4270: 4264: 4261: 4259: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4225: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4208: 4205: 4201: 4200: 4199: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4185: 4181: 4179: 4177: 4170: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4160: 4158: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4148: 4145: 4141: 4140: 4137: 4133: 4131: 4129: 4121: 4120: 4093: 4090: 4087: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4064: 4061: 4057: 4056: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4038: 4035: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4010: 4008: 4006: 3999: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3974: 3971: 3966: 3964: 3960: 3958: 3956: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3904: 3901: 3897: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3872: 3869: 3866: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3847: 3831: 3828: 3826: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3817: 3814: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3805: 3803: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3793: 3790: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3780: 3778: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3767: 3764: 3758: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3743: 3742: 3739: 3737: 3733: 3722: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3694: 3691: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3674: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3661: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3637: 3634: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3563: 3560: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3523: 3520: 3516: 3513: 3510: 3506: 3503:In reviewing 3496: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3481: 3480: 3476: 3466: 3463: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3419: 3416: 3411: 3405: 3404: 3401: 3398: 3393: 3388: 3378: 3375: 3372: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3321: 3318: 3315: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3287: 3285: 3275: 3265: 3262: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3239: 3234: 3224: 3221: 3216: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3207: 3194: 3191: 3188: 3181: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3155: 3145: 3135: 3125: 3115: 3105: 3084: 3081: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3061: 3058: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3027: 3024: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3014: 3010: 3003: 2992: 2989: 2986: 2979: 2972: 2970: 2967: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2912: 2909: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2872: 2869: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2847: 2844: 2841: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2823: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2806: 2803: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2791: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2780: 2777: 2771: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2755: 2752: 2749: 2746: 2744:Epping=Epping 2743: 2742: 2741: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2708: 2700: 2697: 2695:Epping=Epping 2694: 2691: 2688: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2681: 2674: 2671: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2661: 2658: 2653: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2613: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2589: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2580: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2570: 2567: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2557: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2548: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2531: 2505: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2492: 2489: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2463: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2444: 2441: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2431: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2409: 2401: 2400: 2389: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2358: 2355: 2345: 2343: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2322: 2321: 2318: 2317: 2288: 2286: 2283: 2280:Delivered by 2277: 2274: 2273: 2260: 2257: 2254: 2249: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2239: 2235: 2223: 2220: 2218: 2217: 2212: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2202: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2185: 2181: 2180: 2175: 2171: 2168: 2167: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2135: 2132: 2129: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2102:sign up to it 2099: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2070: 2061: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2016: 2006: 2003: 2000: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1989: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1967: 1965: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1949: 1947: 1941: 1936: 1927: 1926: 1923: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1900: 1899: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1870: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1856: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1836: 1825: 1824: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1801: 1798: 1795: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1785: 1778: 1769: 1766: 1762: 1754: 1747: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1704: 1699: 1697: 1694: 1691:Delivered by 1688: 1685: 1684: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605:Berlin U-Bahn 1582: 1579: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1533:User:Biophase 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1523: 1521: 1517: 1514: 1511: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1480: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1436: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1424: 1416: 1406: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1391:Thank you ... 1386: 1383: 1380: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1370: 1363: 1354: 1351: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1307:. Thank you. 1306: 1302: 1296: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1257: 1244: 1241: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1201:. Thank you. 1200: 1196: 1190: 1180: 1177: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1141: 1135: 1129: 1128: 1123: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1108: 1107: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1093: 1087: 1082: 1078: 1076: 1070: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1058: 1057: 1052: 1051: 1044: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1013: 1011: 1002: 997: 996: 993: 990: 986: 982: 970: 967: 964: 960: 959: 958: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 934: 927: 924: 921: 917: 916: 915: 910: 909: 906: 898: 895: 891: 888: 885: 882: 879: 875: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 845: 842: 839: 836: 832: 829: 826: 823: 820: 817: 809: 808: 804: 800: 799: 786: 783: 782: 777: 771: 765: 761: 760: 757: 754: 751: 746: 745: 744: 743: 740: 739: 734: 728: 722: 712: 711: 708: 704: 694: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 668: 667: 664:this url out: 656: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 631: 616: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 601: 598: 595: 591: 587: 583: 582: 581: 580: 577: 574: 569: 568: 563: 562: 559: 556: 553: 549: 545: 541: 540: 539: 538: 535: 529: 526: 519:Not surprised 514: 511: 508: 504: 503: 502: 501: 498: 484: 481: 477: 476: 475: 474: 471: 468: 465: 461: 460: 459: 458: 455: 451: 439: 436: 433: 429: 425: 421: 420: 419: 418: 415: 411: 402: 399: 397: 394: 391:Delivered by 388: 385: 384: 371: 368: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 348: 347: 346: 343: 335: 330: 329: 326: 323: 319: 303: 300: 298: 296: 290: 287: 286: 285: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 268: 265: 262: 258: 257: 256: 255: 252: 248: 241: 236: 235: 232: 228: 221: 215: 210: 208: 204: 194: 187: 184: 182: 179: 177: 174: 172: 169: 167: 164: 162: 159: 157: 154: 152: 149: 147: 144: 142: 139: 137: 134: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 62: 59: 57: 54: 52: 49: 47: 44: 42: 39: 38: 36: 35: 30: 29:Solicitation 19: 6331: 6326: 6322: 6307: 6306: 6300: 6245: 6225: 6201: 6165: 6161: 6158: 6151: 6146: 6105: 6101: 6057:demonstrably 6056: 6012: 6008: 6004: 5991: 5966: 5914: 5898:Ron Marshall 5894: 5890: 5886: 5882: 5878: 5875: 5871: 5867: 5863: 5859: 5819: 5739: 5698: 5679: 5675: 5670: 5665: 5663: 5659: 5656: 5633: 5612: 5608: 5591: 5569: 5530: 5507: 5472: 5469: 5465: 5440: 5402: 5385: 5380: 5336: 5333:CTA articles 5317: 5316: 5304: 5299: 5296: 5279: 5278: 5266: 5261: 5258: 5231: 5230: 5218: 5213: 5210: 5187: 5186: 5174: 5169: 5166: 5152: 5140: 5139: 5127: 5122: 5119: 5109: 5106:Loco Infobox 5089: 5048: 5034: 5030: 5027: 4962: 4907: 4904:Lost diff... 4888: 4885: 4853: 4850:I salute you 4838: 4810: 4805: 4801: 4786: 4785: 4779: 4736: 4734: 4716: 4674:Subtle jokes 4673: 4566: 4497: 4452: 4407: 4357: 4342: 4308: 4304: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4267: 4238: 4175: 4168: 4127: 4004: 3954: 3928: 3895: 3845: 3842: 3759: 3744: 3731: 3728: 3704: 3701:Cheonan Asan 3592: 3535: 3511: 3502: 3482: 3477: 3474: 3429: 3399: 3353: 3288: 3281: 3235: 3232: 3202: 3124:s-rail-start 3098: 3034: 3006: 2925:Simply south 2886:Simply south 2883: 2868:Simply south 2819:Simply south 2790:Simply south 2772: 2769: 2759: 2739: 2728: 2719: 2704: 2677: 2670:Simply south 2668:I think so. 2651: 2649: 2622:Simply south 2596:| #default=] 2592:| #default=] 2579:Simply south 2556:Simply south 2530:Simply south 2527: 2473: 2405: 2397:Your comment 2351: 2328: 2297: 2294: 2278: 2270: 2268: 2247: 2233: 2231: 2215: 2198: 2194: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2140: 2066: 2020: 1963: 1959: 1945: 1937: 1933: 1906: 1876: 1859: 1847: 1831: 1809: 1781: 1757: 1746:unreferenced 1709: 1707: 1689: 1681: 1679: 1602: 1543: 1507: 1506: 1489: 1464: 1463: 1420: 1419: 1412: 1397:this comment 1394: 1366: 1320: 1299: 1277: 1252: 1216: 1213:Old IP block 1195:Template:Vdp 1193: 1189:Template:Vdp 1146: 1142: 1126: 1125: 1119: 1118: 1091: 1083: 1079: 1071: 1066: 1060: 1054: 1048: 1045: 1037:Offices page 1014: 1006: 978: 937: 911: 902: 896: 892: 889: 886: 883: 880: 876: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 846: 843: 840: 837: 833: 830: 827: 824: 821: 818: 815: 796: 794: 780:or just talk 772: 769:Croat Canuck 737:or just talk 729: 726:Croat Canuck 718: 700: 669: 662: 626: 589: 585: 548:Talk:Wikinfo 530: 524: 522: 494: 447: 427: 412: 408: 400: 389: 381: 379: 338: 333: 315: 294: 281:Tony Sidaway 251:Tony Sidaway 244: 224: 212: 202: 200: 110: 33: 32: 26: 6293:31 December 5929:Sincerely, 5339:—Preceding 4942:I found it 4842:Newyorkbrad 4645:Thatcher131 4599:Thatcher131 4242:Newyorkbrad 3532:Sonya esman 3356:Newyorkbrad 2978:s-line-jnct 2753:Ongar=Ongar 2616:—Preceding 2238:Thatcher131 2073:—Preceding 2013:Mentors on 1852:Newyorkbrad 1617:network map 1599:BVG colours 1401:Newyorkbrad 1399:. Regards, 1282:Newyorkbrad 1256:Newyorkbrad 1092:The Duke of 1008:members of 673:—Preceding 635:—Preceding 480:Thatcher131 454:Thatcher131 352:Robert Lowe 342:Newyorkbrad 231:Newyorkbrad 6249:hbdragon88 6074:Carcharoth 5682:Minasbeede 5462:RFCU Clerk 4948:Carcharoth 4922:Carcharoth 4772:2 December 4312:85.5.180.9 4000:explains. 3505:Hollerbird 3499:Hollerbird 3409:NHRHS2010 3180:rail start 2216:Solumeiras 2155:discussion 2114:accusation 2079:Sony-youth 1041:SBS navbox 659:Arden Wohl 525:abstaining 6344:Mackensen 6265:Mackensen 6183:Mackensen 6159:Regards, 6117:Mackensen 6062:Mackensen 6035:Mackensen 5917:See this 5800:Mackensen 5760:Mackensen 5618:Mackensen 5554:Mackensen 5491:Mackensen 5407:Mackensen 5377:Your post 5365:Mackensen 5074:Mackensen 5028:Charles, 4932:Mackensen 4886:Gentleman 4870:Mackensen 4823:Mackensen 4686:Wknight94 4643:Amazing. 4631:Wknight94 4583:Mackensen 4520:Mackensen 4481:Mackensen 4429:Mackensen 4327:Mackensen 4271:and Fred 4204:Mackensen 4144:Mackensen 4086:Mackensen 4060:Mackensen 4034:Mackensen 3970:Mackensen 3900:Mackensen 3865:Mackensen 3813:Mackensen 3789:Mackensen 3763:Mackensen 3712:JPBarrass 3687:Mackensen 3633:Mackensen 3571:Wknight94 3559:Mackensen 3544:Wknight94 3540:WP:CSD#G3 3530:Well the 3519:Mackensen 3471:ombudsman 3459:Mackensen 3371:Mackensen 3314:Mackensen 3295:this edit 3238:ombudsman 3229:Ombudsman 3187:Mackensen 3077:Mackensen 3057:Mackensen 3023:Mackensen 2985:Mackensen 2963:Mackensen 2905:Mackensen 2840:Mackensen 2799:Mackensen 2776:Mackensen 2657:Mackensen 2652:primarily 2600:Mackensen 2566:Mackensen 2544:Mackensen 2488:Mackensen 2462:Mackensen 2440:Mackensen 2418:Mackensen 2365:Mackensen 2348:Jasenovac 2282:grafikbot 2128:Mackensen 2041:Mackensen 1999:Mackensen 1794:Mackensen 1731:Mackensen 1693:grafikbot 1660:Mackensen 1647:talk page 1631:Mackensen 1575:Mackensen 1551:Mackensen 1494:Mackensen 1447:Mackensen 1379:Mackensen 1369:The Fulch 1338:Mackensen 1309:Rocket000 1266:Mackensen 1237:Mackensen 1121:Mackensen 1021:talk page 1017:main page 963:Mackensen 920:Mackensen 775:Say hello 750:Mackensen 732:Say hello 594:Mackensen 552:Mackensen 507:Mackensen 464:Mackensen 432:Mackensen 393:grafikbot 364:Mackensen 261:Mackensen 6342:Thanks! 6198:I did it 6129:Mr Which 5996:Thatcher 5842:CyclePat 5826:CyclePat 5582:puppet'? 5353:contribs 5341:unsigned 5318:contribs 5280:contribs 5232:contribs 5188:contribs 5141:contribs 5093:Bishonen 4891:modest! 4821:Thanks! 4747:BrownBot 4664:Evidence 4621:Evidence 4570:Mr Which 4498:comments 4404:Question 4276:Lsi john 4258:Mr Which 4216:Lsi john 4190:Lsi john 4157:Mr Which 4072:Lsi john 4046:Lsi john 4019:Lsi john 3984:Lsi john 3936:Lsi john 3913:Lsi john 3881:Lsi john 3850:Lsi john 3825:Mr Which 3802:Mr Which 3777:Mr Which 3748:Lsi john 3736:Mr Which 3515:contribs 3383:Barnstar 3332:RFBailey 3299:RFBailey 3258:FloNight 3119:...with 2630:contribs 2618:unsigned 2335:Bishonen 2253:Picaroon 2159:is right 2143:WP:CIVIL 2087:contribs 2075:unsigned 2057:Dppowell 2031:Dppowell 2027:the case 1981:Bishonen 1922:Mfantoni 1862:Picaroon 1835:Picaroon 1784:Mcattell 1760:Birgitte 1753:category 1712:Birgitte 1547:contribs 1409:Biophase 1395:... for 989:Picaroon 855:info... 715:Deletion 703:wikirage 697:Wikirage 687:contribs 679:Tweety21 675:unsigned 649:contribs 641:Sundehul 637:unsigned 322:Picaroon 289:WP:CIVIL 6098:Apology 5699:Hello, 5470:Thanks 5118:Tnx! -- 5053:. The 5037:Quadell 5003:ft to m 4992:Convert 4982:Convert 4655:WP:NOTE 4537:Andplus 4502:Andplus 4456:Andplus 4414:Andplus 4176:Prodego 4169:reports 4128:Prodego 4005:Prodego 3955:Prodego 3669:AlisonW 3645:AlisonW 3619:AlisonW 3603:AlisonW 3595:AlisonW 3486:Anthere 3434:). ---- 3243:Anthere 3233:Hello, 3220:Rjecina 3206:Rjecina 2385:Rjecina 2354:Rjecina 2236:WP:AE. 2201:Domer48 2190:revert. 2163:Domer48 2118:Domer48 1895:Liftarn 1563:ElinorD 1508:Cheers, 1465:Cheers, 1421:Cheers, 1415:WP:SOCK 1204:szyslak 1086:Waltham 444:Fishing 295:Prodego 247:Baby 81 240:Baby 81 207:shotgun 203:with me 196:The Eye 6347:(talk) 6268:(talk) 6229:Ral315 6186:(talk) 6162:Frank 6120:(talk) 6078:Risker 6065:(talk) 6038:(talk) 6017:Risker 6013:Giano. 5978:Risker 5931:Kubura 5803:(talk) 5763:(talk) 5621:(talk) 5594:Splash 5557:(talk) 5537:Jeremy 5494:(talk) 5447:Jeremy 5425:Durova 5410:(talk) 5391:Durova 5368:(talk) 5077:(talk) 5059:Loodog 4968:C to K 4959:C to K 4935:(talk) 4873:(talk) 4826:(talk) 4586:(talk) 4523:(talk) 4484:(talk) 4432:(talk) 4392:Ral315 4346:Risker 4330:(talk) 4207:(talk) 4147:(talk) 4089:(talk) 4063:(talk) 4037:(talk) 3973:(talk) 3903:(talk) 3868:(talk) 3816:(talk) 3792:(talk) 3766:(talk) 3732:no mas 3690:(talk) 3636:(talk) 3562:(talk) 3522:(talk) 3475:Hello 3462:(talk) 3374:(talk) 3317:(talk) 3274:s-rail 3190:(talk) 3134:s-note 3080:(talk) 3060:(talk) 3026:(talk) 2988:(talk) 2966:(talk) 2908:(talk) 2901:WP:SBS 2843:(talk) 2802:(talk) 2779:(talk) 2660:(talk) 2603:(talk) 2569:(talk) 2547:(talk) 2524:S-rail 2491:(talk) 2465:(talk) 2443:(talk) 2421:(talk) 2368:(talk) 2151:WP:AGF 2147:WP:NPA 2131:(talk) 2044:(talk) 2002:(talk) 1970:(talk) 1952:(talk) 1797:(talk) 1734:(talk) 1663:(talk) 1634:(talk) 1578:(talk) 1566:(talk) 1554:(talk) 1537:PromX1 1497:(talk) 1450:(talk) 1382:(talk) 1341:(talk) 1269:(talk) 1240:(talk) 1223:Chaser 1019:; the 966:(talk) 923:(talk) 791:DelRev 753:(talk) 597:(talk) 590:at all 555:(talk) 510:(talk) 497:Tm1000 467:(talk) 435:(talk) 367:(talk) 312:Motion 264:(talk) 6332:broil 6327:Royal 6206:DanTD 6168:DanTD 6009:Giano 5992:Giano 5949:Giano 5785:DanTD 5745:DanTD 5640:DanTD 5508:JodyB 5473:JodyB 5345:Zol87 4811:broil 4806:Royal 4696:(UTC) 4384:roses 3436:DanTD 3414:talk 3043:DanTD 3013:DanTD 2291:Email 1909:Yamla 1820:DanTD 1516:Lover 1473:Lover 1429:Lover 1143:Love, 1062:S-hou 1056:s-vac 1050:s-new 707:w3ace 612:Xoloz 573:Xoloz 534:Xoloz 16:< 6297:2007 6253:talk 6233:talk 6210:talk 6172:talk 6082:talk 6021:talk 6007:the 6005:from 5982:talk 5953:talk 5935:talk 5902:talk 5846:talk 5830:talk 5824:. -- 5789:talk 5749:talk 5726:talk 5711:talk 5686:talk 5644:talk 5542:talk 5514:talk 5479:talk 5452:talk 5349:talk 5097:talk 5063:talk 4944:here 4918:here 4914:here 4856:know 4776:2007 4742:you. 4735:The 4690:talk 4635:talk 4541:talk 4506:talk 4460:talk 4418:talk 4410:here 4350:talk 4316:talk 4280:talk 4246:talk 4220:talk 4194:talk 4076:talk 4050:talk 4023:talk 3988:talk 3940:talk 3917:talk 3896:only 3885:talk 3854:talk 3752:talk 3716:talk 3673:talk 3649:talk 3623:talk 3607:talk 3599:talk 3575:talk 3548:talk 3509:talk 3490:talk 3453:and 3440:talk 3360:talk 3336:talk 3303:talk 3291:here 3284:here 3247:talk 3165:talk 3149:and 3129:and 3109:and 3071:and 3047:talk 2929:talk 2890:talk 2735:or ] 2715:or ] 2626:talk 2612:here 2501:jc37 2478:jc37 2452:jc37 2430:jc37 2408:jc37 2339:talk 2331:here 2269:The 2248:only 2234:read 2211:GCSE 2149:and 2083:talk 2069:here 2023:this 1985:talk 1964:Tony 1946:Tony 1938:See 1680:The 1541:talk 1490:have 1176:here 1067:/doc 1053:and 975:Poke 952:Talk 803:talk 683:talk 645:talk 478:OK. 380:The 277:here 275:and 273:here 249:? -- 6291:On 6277:DYK 6133:??? 5613:not 5403:has 5017:); 5015:yo? 5013:• ( 4889:and 4770:On 4756:DYK 3846:not 3665:CML 3536:six 3261:♥♥♥ 3035:not 2474:can 2256:(t) 2071:. 1930:RfC 1865:(t) 1838:(t) 1001:SBS 992:(t) 798:DGG 358:in 325:(t) 6323:-- 6317:. 6299:, 6295:, 6255:) 6235:) 6212:) 6174:) 6084:) 6023:) 6015:-- 5994:. 5984:) 5976:-- 5955:) 5937:) 5904:) 5848:) 5840:-- 5832:) 5791:) 5751:) 5728:) 5713:) 5688:) 5646:) 5609:be 5598:tk 5596:- 5355:) 5351:• 5305:67 5300:DP 5267:67 5262:DP 5257:-- 5219:67 5214:DP 5209:-- 5175:67 5170:DP 5165:-- 5128:67 5123:DP 5102:. 5095:| 5065:) 5006:}} 5000:{{ 4995:}} 4989:{{ 4985:}} 4979:{{ 4971:}} 4965:{{ 4884:A 4854:I 4802:-- 4796:. 4778:, 4774:, 4692:) 4659:ZZ 4637:) 4616:ZZ 4543:) 4508:) 4462:) 4420:) 4352:) 4318:) 4282:) 4248:) 4222:) 4196:) 4078:) 4052:) 4025:) 3990:) 3942:) 3919:) 3887:) 3856:) 3754:) 3718:) 3685:. 3675:) 3651:) 3625:) 3617:-- 3609:) 3577:) 3550:) 3492:) 3442:) 3362:) 3338:) 3305:) 3286:. 3277:}} 3271:{{ 3249:) 3183:}} 3177:{{ 3167:) 3157:}} 3151:{{ 3147:}} 3141:{{ 3137:}} 3131:{{ 3127:}} 3121:{{ 3117:}} 3111:{{ 3107:}} 3101:{{ 3049:) 2981:}} 2975:{{ 2931:) 2892:) 2632:) 2628:• 2359:. 2344:. 2337:| 2333:? 2315:te 2313:ai 2311:hw 2309:et 2307:tl 2305:os 2301:an 2299:Ry 2145:, 2106:BS 2089:) 2085:• 2029:. 1983:| 1942:. 1764:SB 1749:}} 1743:{{ 1716:SB 1510:Je 1488:I 1467:Je 1423:Je 1417:. 1326:. 1225:- 1088:, 954:) 805:) 689:) 685:• 651:) 647:• 550:. 354:, 209:. 27:No 6251:( 6231:( 6208:( 6170:( 6080:( 6019:( 5980:( 5951:( 5933:( 5920:. 5900:( 5844:( 5828:( 5787:( 5747:( 5724:( 5709:( 5684:( 5642:( 5544:) 5540:( 5454:) 5450:( 5347:( 5322:) 5313:/ 5310:( 5284:) 5275:/ 5272:( 5236:) 5227:/ 5224:( 5192:) 5183:/ 5180:( 5145:) 5136:/ 5133:( 5061:( 4688:( 4661:~ 4633:( 4618:~ 4539:( 4504:( 4458:( 4416:( 4395:» 4348:( 4314:( 4278:( 4244:( 4218:( 4192:( 4074:( 4048:( 4021:( 3986:( 3938:( 3915:( 3883:( 3852:( 3750:( 3714:( 3671:( 3647:( 3621:( 3605:( 3597:( 3573:( 3546:( 3512:· 3507:( 3488:( 3438:( 3358:( 3334:( 3301:( 3245:( 3163:( 3045:( 2927:( 2888:( 2624:( 2390:. 2303:P 2081:( 2017:? 1544:· 1539:( 1522:) 1518:( 1513:t 1479:) 1475:( 1470:t 1435:) 1431:( 1426:t 1227:T 1178:. 1164:l 1162:e 1160:i 1158:r 1156:d 1154:e 1152:a 1150:h 1148:P 1136:! 1130:, 950:( 903:[ 801:( 681:( 643:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index