User talk:Mackensen/Archive16

474:

one is just one of several. Even in google books, "The Great Hunger" is mostly a translated Norwegian novel (440 references out of 854 in total) from the early 20th century. In terms of famines, there have been famines in China (several), Ukraine, Greenland etc. that have been called "The Great Hunger". As far as I can see the renaming was done with Sony opposing his own suggestion and only Sarah77 and Domer48 supporting. I wasn't involved but I understand your presence on the page in the first place was because of the disruptive activities of editors, including (but not limited to) those two. Please have a look at what I've found and mentioned on the talk page for the article. In light of these FACTS, the naming decision should be re-visited.

4011: 1735:

not examine my words until some days later, when I realised that my reply had compounded the original offence. I'm not going out of my way to cause offence, I'm simply doing so in the normal course of expressing my opinion, apparently without the ability of introspection to see the consequences. This is a new and disturbing discovery for me. Provisionally, I think that the only course of action is for me to be extremely careful in expressing my opinion in future, on any matter relating to Knowledge. --

5113: 4041: 3977: 5812: 5512: 5451: 5250: 4944: 4305: 4152: 3116: 3043: 2939: 2799: 2688: 1521: 1266: 944: 279: 234: 1338:

would still like to avoid the appearance of any prior disputes between us being viewed as relevant to any decision. I ask you only to consider this and exercise discretion as to whether you might recuse as to my own involvement, or let me know what you think. Again, I have had nothing but friendly discussions with you since my first RfC ended, and if you think that it has no bearing on present circumstances, I will rely upon your judgment. —

4021: 4479: 3871: 3861: 1113:. I was about to give a reference, and a link to the Michigan Historical Markers website (which I did not get to put in, as they deleted the article before I could do that). I made one edit, and the Wiki police jumped on this and deleted the article. Frankly, I'm not up to this fight, as it ain't worth it to me. They didn't give me five minutes to work on this before being both officious and overbearing at the same time. 5179: 4031: 3948: 2205: 4763:? I'm just beginning to draft this, but given the recent situations I think this could be valuable to see what community mandates if any exist for changes the Arbitration Committee could be required to accept. My intention was to keep the RFC format exceptionally simple, with a very limited number of "top level" sections that were fairly precise. Please leave any feedback on 502: 5340:

the only really necessary kit is the willingness to spare an hour or so, and a functional telephone! Let me know if that helps any - and of course feel free to decline - I do feel that your insights gained from a long and multi-faceted wiki career, and your take on the wiki in general would be of interest to many (and by many, I guess I certainly mean me!) - cheers,

1689:

itself, or its members. I can't imagine who could possibly be bail for that unprotection; I won't do it. Very little has changed in the proposed decision in the last few days; given that so much of it turned on personality I'm sure it can be (un)profitably discussed on the relevant talk pages. Input is fine; by no stretch can I call what I saw there today input.

1241:

the rest of it, there are only so many ways you can say that service ended in 1927. They don't have a copyright on the thought, just on the words. Moreover, I was going to give a link and a reference. I was also working on this, and they jumped on it before it was little more than barely a glimmer in its daddy's eye, so to speak.

5914:

for a country station. I think this works well. Alternatively you could just do "X railway station" and disambiguate where necessary - that's where the Australian and English systems differ. In Australia there are stations with the same name in three different cities (and I imagine America would have

5885:

Hate to annoy you with this thing again, but User:Deucaon is in all objectivity not really discussing, nor has he yet stated any real reason for his actions. I would let the thing run its course, but like I said its just that I'd really like to start the cleanup while I still have time (I'm generally

5339:

no worries - and with sincere apologies if you were politely declining to preserve my dignity, it is with some trepidation that I let you know that we could actually have a chat via either a dial in, or dial out service (basically, I can call you, or you can call a specific number if you prefer) - so

5054:

Thanks heaps for your response on the checkuser thing, Mackensen - and I'm very pleased that my question has been addressed (I've received other responses privately too - which is great - I'll try and bring something together before too long....). More than one checkuser indicated to me that this was

2302:

A 'good job' note from me too. I saw the DRV and thought, "You know, the person who closes this, no matter what they say, obviously has to be working for the good of Knowledge, since either way it goes they'll be lambasted by the involved parties." You're a braver person than I. Hopefully, no cretins

1912:

Seeing the responses on the talk page, I think it needs to be settled that if two editors who are party to this case happen to contribute to the same discussion, it obviously doesn't necessarily constitute " with, or comment in any way (directly or indirectly) about each other" unless they do in fact

473:

Hi. Having come late to the "debate" on the famine page, I spent a while looking at the naming issue. I want to stress that the current name is a BAD name for the article. It is NOT unambiguous and it is NOT the most common name. There are many Great Hungers in literature and history and the Irish

5305:

I saw your recent thoughtful post about how your roles within wikipedia have changed over the last 5 years - and that you're now back full circle to straight forward article editing - it struck me that not only am I very interested to talk about your experiences, but that others may be interested in

2095:

the work you have done for Knowledge. I have been exasperated as the next man by some of ArbCom's decisions, but fully appreciate what an impossible task you have (had!). For what its worth, I find the lack of respect offered to you, and other Arbs, by some editors really quite despicable. I find it

2016:

I think its too bad that you've withdrawn, and too bad also that you did not choose to take another term. Its completely understandable, though. I've been impressed by your reasoning and contributions, and as no one else has here yet I want to thank you for your long service on the Committee and the

1931:

I must say I feel that Phil has been unjustly entangled in this case. He is entitled to have an opinion on the subject, and (on his conduct immediately prior to the case) as an administrator he was entitled to use his best judgement to handle a situation in which he was not involved and in which he

1745:

Your point is well taken; this is what it looks like from the outside looking in. I can only speak from personal experience that alarms go off in my head (usually) before I go beyond what most consider appropriate. I base that on the feedback I get from other people. Unfortunately this project (and,

1337:

In regards the presently suspended Matthew Hoffman case, as you know there is an RfC currently running on Adam Cuerden. As an involved participant in that RfC I may request to be added to the resumed case as a party if that will not be inappropriate. If so, and having the greatest of respect for you

1116:

I hope you can put together a great article on the subject. My parents loved the interurbans, and their destruction (and the loss of the streetcars in Detroit -- sold to Mexico City around 1955, where they are probably still running) was a tragedy of untold proportions, both for the society and the

5058:

To be very clear - it is my understanding therefore that if an individual checkuser wishes to inform an editor about any checks run on an account, including details of rationales given, the identity of the checkuser, and the date / time of the check, then that would not be prohibited by the privacy

1957:

Phil obviously did not intend what was imputed to him. Lawrence, on the other hand, stepped well over the mark, falsely claiming that Bishonen was "the victim of targeted misogynist harassment", an accusation that completely beggars belief. I did not intervene, having decided to avoid the risk of

1734:

If I might venture a personal insight, it's somewhat more difficult than that. I'm not even aware of being out on a limb in the vast majority of these cases. In the Bishonen matter I was only subjectively conscious of Bishonen coming along and gratuitously dragging up an ancient grievance. I did

1240:

Thanks for the information. Good luck with your stub. FWIW, I don't think it did violate copyright. To begin, the website on Michigan Historical markers is itself quoting from the markers, which have text that is in the public domain. To be sure, I quoted from the historical marker, too. As to

5996:

I'm happy with that. Maybe a little smaller - they are quite large compared to the other systems used around the world? By the way - what's up with the first box of the GSR system (see the Flarp page for an example) - it's adopted a separate colour? Can you tell me how to change that if I need to?

4060:

I saw your notice to spammers. At the RfA talk page, we had about whether thank you notes like these are spam or not. I've been watching for any talk page notices which say this isn't welcome. I wasn't sure from yours, and I really do want to express my appreciation for your active involvement in

3655:

Thanks for speaking up about the issue which came up in my RfA. I was glad to discuss it with the party who raised the issue, but I think I'd rather lose some votes than talk about someone else in such a public forum. A third party's actions had given him good reason to feel so strongly about that

1673:

Some period of discussion should be allowed. If the arbitration committee want to discourage input from the wider community (rather than the particular group involved here), that would be rather a big step to take (much better to politely listen and ignore if that is the choice made). Those banned

1645:

at Flonight's talk page indicating that they will abide by this request. Hopefully this will help move the situation forward, and enable the talk page to be unprotected (with any necessary warnings added) so that any editor (including those uninvolved in this) can comment on the proposed decision.

5624:

Hi Mackensen. We seem tyo have gotten into a mini edit war (edit skirmish?) about Amtrak route templates. The reason why I moved the route maps from outside the infobox is that they don't display correctly when inside it. It ends up with gaps between each line segment. I'm not quite sure why... I

2598:

Well, among other things, that two of our colleagues were arguing over how much they discussed the page (about a line or two above me). I confess to also being tickled to find something that broke down pages that way–I've been looking for such a tool for some time. Now if they'd only update their

2589:

If nothing else, it shows that only a small subset of people have weighed in on the page's contents in a significant way. I'm not sure how this page would compare stat-wise to other policy pages... Either way - having a (currently) controversial page that results in such a big problem even though

2003:

Since I saw that you've completely withdrawn from all remaining arbitrator duties, I just wanted to say you've done a great job. Not that I always agreed with you, but you handled your role professionally and tactfully. I would have supported you for another term if you'd chosen to run, though of

3659:

I had already been planning to reply to you about the admin recall thing. Thanks for your thoughts on that. Honestly, I had created the userbox at because I'd originally intended to use that to show my support for admin recall but without joining the category. However, I recently saw some other

1831:

from this state had to have tackled it before. My grandfather worked for the Escanaba & Lake Superior, so he used to tell me wonderful stories about that part of the state. The IR&HB itself was a lucky snag--ran across Barnett's article and decided we simply had to have an article on it.

1688:

The Arbitration Committee discourages disruptive activity, particularly on case pages. The participation on that page has been rather limited; I suspect most of the community is off happily editing articles and doesn't give a good damn over the issue. Certainly it doesn't care enough to restrain

3579:

as an example. (the things one sees when snooping on other user's pages!.. that snoop is from John's page) The Brit railfans seem to be using a set of images and templates to document what junctions/stations/crossings etc a line has, quite clever stuff. (I see it in use on some other lines like

2286:

Allow me to be the first to say good job on the DRV for this article. While my opinion did change in the debate after reading the admin's original resolution for the AfD, I was impressed by your reasoning and your explanation as to why you endorsed the deletion. This was going to be a difficult

4096:

Can you please tell me if I ask checkuser for user Guivon (this is confirmed puppet of Velebit) and his new puppets it is possible to make check or not. I ask this because last article edits of this user has been in second half of August 2007 and his last edit has been on Guivon talk page on 7

1808:

Saw a red link in your article... I thought I knew UP railways well but I had no idea about that one. :) (I have a very fond memory of my father and I weaseling our way into the SOO line roundhouse in Marquette and then sweet talking our way into the cab of an old F which was in the shops... )

5870:

Mackensen, I'd like to go forward with the general cleanup of the article. I wonder if I could rush a resolution to this matter? The "irrelevance" and "not a proof" justifications Deucaon keeps repeating are clearly not valid in this case, as they do not address the matter at hand.

2415:

All kidding aside, though I can see your reasoning in endorsing the deletion and I respect the consensus determined, I think that the article itself should exist; One cannot address how the phenomenon was dealt with prior to the advent of modern understandings of childhood and

2879:... it's now much bigger and you can really see the detail on SS Chris ... it's one of the best pics of Chris I've seen now that you can zoom in. The trick is this... take the properties of the image while at 100% zoom (any part is fine) and display that URL. For instance ... 3660:

users who weren't giving a chance to a process that I really thought was a good idea, and that's when it occurred to me that if I wanted them to give it more of a chance, I should give the category more of a chance and simply get involved in refining it from within. So I

1078:

Okay, that at least makes some sense. I've been asked some pretty weird questions lately, including a few by email, and wanted to make sure I wasn't missing some joke everyone else was in on. In an abstract way, the comment is probably more humorous than you realise.

5570:

Very well done and well stated in that close sir. I haven't been editing much or keeping track of DRV lately. I just noticed that May seems to be the month for returning to major DRV controversies I have previously closed. ED, Vicki Iseman, Corey Delaney. Fun times...

4132: 2883: 2893: 4537:

Ah yes! My goodness, it's been 25 years since I read that book. I'll have to spring it from the library when I return the stack about hockey goaltenders I got out for an article. Wolfe will no doubt be much more interesting. Well, except for the Ken Dryden book.

5590:

Mackensen, what can I say? Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I've always held your opinion in high esteem, and to see your name in the "support" column meant a great deal to me. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best,

2096:

desperately sad that we, the community, will stand by and let someone be hounded in this manner, but at the same time I know I would have snapped a long time ago and so fully understand your decision. Anyway, please accept this, as but a token of appreciation:

2327:

Agree with the above - thank you for closing this, it was a difficult situation. At least someone can't say it was closed by 'A newbie admin with no closing experience and no notion of policy' like they attempted to do (incorrectly) with Keilana's AfD close.

1137:

Yes, I just added the section. What I'd meant was that there's no need for separate interurban and defunct interurban sections, as all interurbans in Michigan are, by definition, defunct. I'll amend that. Let me see what I can do about the deleted article.

5968:

I'm not ignoring you, I just had to get the styles issue settled (or out of mind) first. The only limitation is that we never quite agreed, or I never quite understood, the railway structure in central Sydney. Otherwise I think things are ready.

5306:

having a listen - I wonder if you might consider sparing an hour or so at some point convenient to you to have a sort of interview / conversation about your wiki experience 'in the whole' - which I'd really like to then 'broadcast' as one of the

1154:

It's really not important. I'm just p.o.'d, and I'll move on to some other project. Indeed, if you put it in your more comprehensive article, everybody will be better served. There really isn't a need to Balkanize this for every little line.

5055:

a policy question about which they were unsure - and I think the key bit here really is "it's up to the checkuser in question to make whatever disclosures he or she deems necessary or proper" - which tallies with what I perceive as practice.

213:

Unsigned messages will be ignored. You can sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right to disruptively eliminate gigantic blobs of wiki-markup from signatures on a whim if I think they're cluttering up my talk page.

5366:

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank

5087:

4454:

2770:

2435:

I'm glad that the DRV rationale doesn't close the door completely on the content of the deleted article. Can I have the deleted article emailed to me or put in my userspace so I can put any useful content into other articles?

5905:

Hey Mackensen - how is your plan on railway station renaming going? Just to clarify, in Australia we use "X railway station, City" where the line is part of a suburban system and "X railway station, State" where it is not. So

4853:

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes

4811:

4660:

4618:

4576:

3823:

3781:

3739:

3697:

3547:

3505:

3463:

3421:

3379:

3337:

3295:

3253:

3202:? I notice him only because he frequently vandalizes the Norman Finkelstein page, which is on my watchlist... But there are 372 blocked sockpuppets, which seems like a candidate for some further action by someone. Any ideas? 5209: 5198: 5190: 5172: 5663:

I agree, I would rather have an integrated infobox too, but not at the expense of the overall apearence. I use the latest version of Internet Explorer, like most users, and I get gaps between every single line segment.

1621: 5390:

I noticed your addition of a temporary inactive list to the MiLB roster temp. I think MiLB uses the terms "temporary inactive list" and "reserve list" interchangeably. If you'll look at the PCL's transactions list

2652:, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection 4443: 2759: 488: 4751: 4276:

Thanks for your input. Could you look at another controversial fragment - about major Gavrilov's imprisonment? I think the sources are not contradictory, and they indicate he was imprisoned; Irpen disagrees.--

5650:

Well, I see about three gaps on Pacific Surfliner even now; I'd rather an integrated infobox because the simplifies page display. I don't recall seeing any when they were unified. What browser are you using?

1355:

When your situation has come up on the mailing list I've recused myself from discussion as a matter of propriety; if Adam's block of you takes center stage I will of course withdraw from the case altogether.

4881:

Hi. Something is wrong with this template--the images are appearing full size on the station pages. I had a look but I don't know the code well enough to be able to fix it. Can you take a look at it. Thanks

1711:

I'm on vacation the next three days. If I make any edits, I'm breaking my vacation and ought to be blocked or de-sysoped. Not a bad idea anyway. Pile up messages if you like; I won't see them until Monday.

5355: 2452: 5106: 5076: 2552:

No problem! The combination of German idealism and Anglo-American philosophy is of some particular interest to me. It was surprising to encounter someone with at least a parallel train of thought. :)

5310:

podcasts? - If you've any questions at all, please do let me know, and I hope you might be agreeable to a friendly, open chat - which I think would be very useful to many in the community... cheers,

5170: 5886:

working on the cleanup of WW2 Yugoslav articles). As for Chetnik collaboration, I can't imagine how POV a source would have to be to actually state the Chetniks did not collaborate with the Axis. --

4450: 2870: 2521:

I just read your user page. I noticed your mention of both Hegel and Mills. Any man who combines German idealism and Anglo/American liberalism is obviously one of good taste and intelligence. :)

4419:

I was wondering if the ombudsman commission has any opinion as to the propriety of an individual checkuser telling an editor (me!) when they have been checked, by whom, and for what rationale.

2766: 3444: 3318: 5362: 5083: 1762:

I well understand that this damaging case has long passed the point for voluntary remedies, and have indeed recognised my own propensities for intemperate expression and invited remedies.

2068:

Full marks for effort and good intentions (as per usual...) as well as thanks. Hopefully you're not going anywhere, there are still railway articles out there... ;) so I shan't say bye. ++

4198: 2649: 889:

Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.

408: 4787: 3402: 3360: 3276: 3234: 1655: 4843: 4836: 3528: 2054:

I'd like to say thanks as well. You were always prepared to discuss things during the IRC case, and handled yourself well in that case and on other cases. Best wishes for the future.

193: 5062:

Thanks once again for engaging - and would it be ok with you to copy your comments to a centralised location for discussion at some point? - I think that would be useful! - cheers,

4251: 3014: 5397:) you'll see his status as "reserve". It seems like "t.i.l." may be the official designation, but they use "reserve" on the roster because it fits better into the allotted space. - 5145:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 4467: 4408:

I've got a quick question for the checkuser ombuds folk that I hope you can help me with (you'll probably recall the emails I've sent over the last few months, and I also piped up

4078:

As I (somewhat) joked on the talk page, commenting in an RfA establishes a relationship between the nominee and the commentor. Now, if you try to upsell me, we may have a problem.

2783: 2104: 1170:

It looks like it got deleted because the text in the wiki article and the text on the website were essentially the same, which violated copyright. I'm setting up a stub article at

893: 928: 5379: 4801: 4794: 2875:

I sorted out how to get the UPDCC site to show the full scale of the entire image at once, without having to stitch the image together from pieces. I used this trick to replace

1041: 5235: 5141:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

5100: 3453: 3446: 3327: 3320: 553:, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries. 531: 5759: 5162: 1630: 1623: 5021:

I cant believe how bad the categorisation seems to be. It shouldnt be unreasonable to suspect 99.9% of articles in a category and any subcategories are actually related...

1851: 5222:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click

4850:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 4808:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 4657:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 4615:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 4573:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3820:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3778:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3736:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3694:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3544:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3502:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3460:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3418:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3376:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3334:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3292:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 3250:, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. 1102: 694:

in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.

4834: 3486: 3411: 3404: 3369: 3362: 3285: 3278: 3243: 3236: 1642: 656: 415:

station in the routebox. Is there anyway you can both fix this for me, and send me some tips on how to do so myself in the future before I submit it as an article? ----

3537: 3530: 3004: 2910: 1641:. Flonight has not left any further messages as yet, so I am posting this message to all those who edited the page in this period, and asking them to consider signing 1511: 5325:

Sounds fascinating, but at the moment I must turn you down--I don't use Skype and I lack the necessary kit anyway. Otherwise I'd be more than willing to do it. Best,

3771: 3764: 2889:

Change the parms in the URL so that DMWIDTH and DMHEIGHT are some huge numbers (i used 6000), and DMX and DMY are 0, and display that. The image URL now would be...

1105:

The Defunct Interurban section says "No need for separate list, all interurbans are defunct." So you can sort this out, as I really did not know where to put them.

556: 4792: 1639:"I protected the page from all editing until the case is closed or edits all agree to make all productive comments about the proposed ruling and not other editors" 6011:

The color thing was a bug, which I've fixed. Still not sure where it crept it. There's no real way to shrink the boxes (save eliminating the termini altogether).

904: 5212:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 4650: 4643: 4422:

I have understood that the commission is not minded to instruct the release of such information, but I'm wondering if that implies a general restriction or not.

730: 698: 4871: 1750:

case, so I'm not sure I can agree that it's a new problem. I also suspect that the Committee, at this stage, will not rely on voluntary guarantees from anyone.

5981: 4683: 3813: 3806: 3729: 3722: 3687: 3680: 3570: 2235:, and found the map template was either created by you, or merely installed by you. Whatever the case may be, it has one error. The Airplane logo should be at 682:

in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.

479: 3028: 2653: 1562: 1218: 5751: 5134:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

5036: 4829: 4513:

Seriously, Conrad was the king of cool. Crazy fighter-jock, third man on the moon, and died in a horrible motorcycle accident. Tom Wolfe was all over him in

4263: 5130:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 3584:

for example...) If you end up doing more lines you might want to consider using that stuff (or maybe you're already aware of it? Maybe I should go read the

3481: 3355: 4608: 4601: 4566: 4559: 1591: 5349: 4730: 4702: 4247: 3495: 3488: 3439: 3397: 3313: 3271: 3010: 1879: 1730: 3565: 3799: 3762: 1250: 1234: 447: 5839:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 5539:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 5478:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 5277:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4971:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4332:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4179:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 3143:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 3070:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2966:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2826:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2715:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1548:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1505: 1478:

Well, there's nothing different from the Michigan Au Sable Valley, the Detroit Zoo, and private logging railroads/industrial tramways. At the moment,

1293:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1181: 1164: 1145: 971:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 306:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 5778: 5762:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

4735: 4678: 4240: 4101: 3600: 2985: 2536:

Why thank you :). Of course, I'm subverting Hegel by detaching him from the Frederican state he so dearly loved, but he's not around to shout at me.

1495: 634: 475: 462: 5332: 3841: 3757: 3715: 1471: 1441: 5745: 4742:

One of the prostitutes says he tried to haggle over the price — he has $ 14 billion! Such haggling would be the true pathology of the whole thing!

4641: 4397: 3013:

selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please

2929: 2710: 2673: 2606: 2147: 1543: 1376: 1344: 4636: 4594: 1962: 1952: 1870: 1775: 1757: 396: 5433: 5419: 4746: 4691: 3804: 3720: 3678: 3523: 3102: 881: 673: 583: 542: 429: 5406: 2591: 1766: 1763: 1696: 1683: 1668: 1007: 627: 5004: 4764: 4684: 4524: 4364: 2998: 2864: 2753: 2321: 2036: 1882: 1326: 538: 5150: 4893: 4085: 3172:"Rhetorical exuberance". Yes, I like that, and I recognise it as an accurate characterisation. I will try to be less rhetorically exuberant. 2561: 2543: 2252: 1992: 1881:

I think you meant remedy 2.1 instead of 3.1 in your statement. That was the best idea I've seen on that case. Thanks for coming up with it.

1771:

When I say "new", I mean it's "a new and disturbing discover to me", no more than that. Obviously it might have been more apparent to you. --

1396:, but maybe it belongs there somewhere. Maybe you can figure it out. I don't think it should be disregarded. If you put that in, maybe the 367: 5894: 4715: 4599: 4557: 4211: 4126: 2510: 2480: 2462: 2363: 2226: 2063: 1902: 1890: 5613: 4547: 4508: 3223: 3210: 2047: 1575: 1088: 1069: 5731: 5719: 5695: 5683: 5658: 4926: 4910: 2275: 2152: 5392: 5059:

policy - but a strong reason would be required to overcome the expectation that all checkuser information be kept as private as possible.

4351: 2347: 1363: 483: 6018: 6006: 5991: 5976: 5934: 5922:

is the title, for example, with the usual name a redirect. Grand Central Terminal or similar I expect would be given the same treatment.

5644: 4876: 3642: 3621: 2923: 2296: 2195: 2142: 2025: 1839: 1371: 1339: 1171: 435: 4250:

election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please

4223: 2141:

As someone with tremendous respect for the careful work the ArbCom does, I'd also like to thank you for your service to the community. —

1921: 1857: 1130: 343: 5900: 5497: 4174: 4135: 3190: 2643: 2024:

Also, I don't think many people approve of what Giano says. I know that I don't, but it seems futile to say anything to him about it.

2080: 1661:

I was about to protect it myself. I rather doubt that any productive commentary could possibly take place if protection were removed.

424: 5385: 5223: 5142: 5118: 4760: 4753: 4736: 3902: 1381: 1212: 349: 4495: 2499: 5963: 5949: 5619: 4061:

the things that went on during my RfA. Not just for the vote, I appreciate that you watched out for what was fair and right. Best,

4030: 2961: 2220: 1935:

He seems to be being penalized simply for making an ill-judged comment, which he withdrew as soon as he understood the problem. --

1387: 3216:

If you're talking about contacting an ISP, probably any Checkuser in the same country. I'll raise the matter on the mailing list.

2445: 1030: 5755: 5319: 2329: 2011: 1052: 5580: 4438: 4290: 4235: 3931:

for nominating me, everyone who had questions or comments, everyone who !voted, everyone who tallied the numbers correctly, and

3883: 1746:

for that matter, the outside world), doesn't always give good feedback soon enough. I recall this being the same problem in the

5911: 1467: 510: 490: 301: 255: 4384: 3673: 2182: 2018: 1719: 4295: 3229: 1939: 402: 4100:

Sorry for disturbing you with this question but because Allison is on wiki break ... This question is connected closed case

1616: 5907: 5395: 4781: 2664:

tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention.

2638: 1739: 903:

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section

468: 5858: 5600: 4072: 4004: 1191: 5394:), you'll see that Laynce Nix was placed on the "temporary inactive list" on May 6. Now, if you check his team's roster ( 5071: 5044: 4482:

December 2007: The soon-to-retire Arbonauts complete one last checkuser before handing over the consoles to the new crew

4376: 3162: 3089: 1349: 383: 5441: 4473: 4113: 1796: 205:, feel free to leave a comment, else please move on. Please ignore the gigantic eye in the corner with the pump-action 355: 5879: 2583: 2132: 5557: 5295: 2851: 2530: 1845: 4991: 1313: 2740: 2281: 2158: 1288: 1036: 994: 5797: 5122:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3185: 1979: 1821: 5135: 735:

is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:

453:

Sorry this is late, but i am happy to inform you that the article made DYK on the 14th. Thanks for your help.

5714: 5678: 5639: 4327: 4269: 1596: 1491: 185: 180: 175: 170: 165: 160: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 120: 110: 105: 100: 95: 90: 85: 1827:

Great, thank you. I was surprised that we lacked the article when I was putting IR&HB together; figured

330: 3138: 1998: 1581: 1096: 595: 80: 75: 70: 65: 60: 55: 50: 45: 40: 5765: 2174:. I was wondering, if you'd consider either allowing me to unblock it, or, unblocking it yourself please. 1863:

I'd been thinking about such a remedy since the start of the month; effectively it's a restraining order.

1729:

You write "At root I think is an unwillingness/inability to back down from a situation until it explodes"

1765:. As I've said, I'll accept any necessary remedy without complaint, in the interests of a lasting peace 1487: 264:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4708:

Noted. The context has changed; a completely new MfD might make more sense then re-opening the old one.

896:. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated. 5840: 5540: 5479: 5473: 5412:

Okay, I wasn't sure about that. How about keeping the double-cross symbol (‡), but calling it reserve?

5278: 5194: 4972: 4333: 4259: 4217: 4180: 3650: 3611: 3144: 3071: 3065: 2967: 2827: 2716: 2623: 1606: 1549: 1479: 1463: 1437: 1393: 1294: 1246: 1230: 1208: 1160: 1126: 1109:

I was trying to create an article. I was quoting from the Michigan Historical marker, which is in the

1026: 972: 639: 605: 307: 265: 5300: 411:

station, and while I'm almost finished, I'm having a lot of trouble fixing the transfer to the proper

3639: 3597: 2907: 2262: 2077: 1818: 1706: 1332: 1059: 4403: 3846: 3581: 2164: 5585: 5562: 5345: 5315: 5067: 4775: 4434: 2821: 2424:

or slivered out over several articles with no comprehensive view. Once the pro-pedophile stuff is

2292: 2232: 1674:

from the pages could e-mail their thoughts. Asking the whole community to do that seems excessive.

5201:

has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (

2590:

only 4 people have contributed substantially to it is a pretty strong argument for its deletion.

4380: 3576: 2669: 2579: 1958:

inflaming things, but frankly I found that statement by far the most shocking in the exchange. --

4426: 1486:, but there's no reason to not include private lines. We already cover (albeit in minor detail) 1416:. It is 1/4 scale 16 gauge railroad, that offers rides on a passenger train through the scenic 5919: 5576: 4119:

If there's a checkuser familiar with the case already then it might be possible. Otherwise no.

2876: 2033: 1959: 1936: 1918: 1854: 1772: 1736: 1429: 1013: 458: 443: 380: 5811: 5606:

You're more than welcome; I hope I haven't helped condemn you to cycle of burnout and regret.

5511: 5450: 5249: 4943: 4304: 4151: 3115: 3042: 2938: 2798: 2687: 1520: 1265: 943: 278: 233: 5827: 5802: 5534: 5527: 5466: 5429: 5402: 5265: 4966: 4959: 4370: 4320: 4270: 4255: 4167: 3158: 3131: 3085: 3058: 2954: 2814: 2703: 2612: 1926: 1536: 1459: 1433: 1425: 1281: 1242: 1226: 1204: 1156: 1122: 1022: 959: 550: 294: 240: 3865: 5231: 5010: 4231: 4091: 2634: 2167: 2127: 2059: 1679: 1651: 1455: 783: 600: 438:

DYK nomination earlier today. I really appreciate it. Now, let's see if it does earn that.

373: 6037: 8: 6015: 5988: 5973: 5854: 5774: 5728: 5692: 5655: 5610: 5493: 5416: 5341: 5329: 5311: 5220:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that

5063: 5001: 4867: 4825: 4769: 4712: 4674: 4632: 4590: 4521: 4505: 4430: 4409: 4394: 4361: 4347: 4208: 4123: 4082: 3837: 3795: 3753: 3711: 3618: 3561: 3519: 3477: 3435: 3393: 3351: 3309: 3267: 3220: 3099: 2995: 2981: 2920: 2861: 2841: 2750: 2730: 2659: 2603: 2540: 2493: 2459: 2360: 2288: 2287:

resolution either way and I just wanted to say thanks for handling it so professionally.

2272: 2192: 2032:

Thanks for your service as an arbitrator, which reflected credit on you and Knowledge. --

2008: 1989: 1949: 1899: 1867: 1836: 1754: 1724: 1716: 1693: 1665: 1572: 1502: 1449: 1360: 1323: 1178: 1142: 1066: 1004: 689: 677: 393: 363: 340: 17: 5700:

Given that the majority of users will view articles using IE, where does this leave us?

5375: 5096: 4463: 4068: 4000: 3669: 3607: 3033: 3024: 2779: 2665: 2575: 2574:

Out of interest - what do you see as the relevance of the wikidash stats to the MfD? --

2557: 2526: 2421: 1976: 1413: 804: 620: 565: 5793: 5572: 5208:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting

4921: 4905: 4888: 4726: 4698: 4283: 4194: 4109: 2476: 2441: 2240: 1886: 1783: 1417: 853: 797: 769: 590: 454: 439: 5688:

Well, I can reproduce it in IE 6; both Firefox and Opera render the page correctly.

3198:

Hi Mackensen, where would I go to see if an abuse report had been/could be filed on

201:

Spammers: I would like for this page to stay reasonably clean. If you have business

5863: 5596: 5502: 5425: 5398: 5240: 5127: 4543: 4491: 3208: 3167: 3154: 3081: 1801: 1602: 1084: 1048: 966: 924: 860: 372: 4040: 5708: 5672: 5633: 5227: 5217: 5186: 5158: 5049: 4227: 2630: 2516: 2425: 2412:

except that you usually have many more people willing to tell you about it. :-)

2400: 2248: 2119: 2055: 1789: 1675: 1647: 1483: 982: 825: 755: 712: 546: 420: 5202: 4847: 4846: