702:
354:: It just seemed to me more logical - after all, "Lord" isn't a title in the same way as a peerage, and one doesn't title articles "Mr W.E. Gladstone", does one? After you raised the question I tried to find whether a naming convention had been laid down for Dukes' and Marquesses' sons, but in vain - is there one? Of course, please feel free to move it back if I'm going against accepted practice.
731:
Further, it is not very clear what happened to the title of Baron Sinha after the death of the First Baron. The 2nd Baron Sinha was deemed the product of a polygamous marriage and was also an Indian citizen, both of which would have disqualified him from the peerage. Do you know if the title of Baron
632:
Your message on my talk page was much more cooled headed, I wish you would've used that one on the
Village Pump, which everyone reads. How do you think this can be fixed? My test was to bring this question up, to show the nature of a wiki. Can it be fixed? To some extent, I think so, but never fully,
487:
explains the process. I'm not sure it should be transwikied, though; 30/8 and 33/11 certainly don't display real consensus, and they're slightly short even of the 80% guideline for "rough consensus". Obviously I'm not the most impartial observer, since I voted to keep it, but I think on a VFD debate
850:
You can't take everything a person says in a state of blind rage seriously. Nevertheless, you did two things that caused real, deliberate harm to me in practical terms, whereas all I did to you was say some crude and harsh things when I was very emotional and not thinking normally, and I said those
842:
I'm not on a second chance because I never used up a first chance. I can't believe you'd even try to defend your actions. Blocking someone is a severe, severe insult. To deprive an honest contributor of the right to do volunteer work? I won't even block vandals anymore, because I've learned what it
286:
Sir Alan Stuart, the son of the 9th
Countess of Lennox, is the father of the "first" Earl of Lennox (presumably of the second creation). But the 1st Earl of Lennox was illegitimate, so he could not have inherited the Countess's dignity directly. I would conclude, then, that the title became extinct
866:
My view isn't the only correct one. Other people have made useful changes, and I'm sure if someone would work with me on the articles from an inclusionist standpoint I would have no problem radically reworking the text if it was deemed necessary. But I am not reverting anyone now in any case. I am
488:
where I honestly didn't care whether it was kept or deleted, I wouldn't do anything with a tally like that; it would be certain to raise a fuss. Recounting only the votes that gave a reason (thus negating at least some of the purely political voting) might give you a more meaningful result. —
470:
How did you count the votes on this? It was 20 delete/8 keep/10 transwiki by a conservative count, and 22/11/10 by a liberal count—hardly a consensus for anything, and in hung votes like that the usual practice is to keep—at least, that's what I do when the result is inconclusive.
858:
They were just deleting text. Not only is that easy to do, but it's destructive. So why would I sympathize? I have never reverted serious contributions, and I never would. In fact, as an inclusionist, I tend to be quite conservative and careful when it comes to using reverts.
502:
Although I voted to delete, I would be satisfied with the page being transwikied. I defintely don't think it belongs in
Knowledge, but it may have some use elsewhere. As for the vote, 75% is about the maximum you'll find on a politically charged topic such as this one.
747:
Hi there, saw your comment re this article, needing NPOV'ing. I rereadit and corrected a few typos but it seems pretty neutral to me, unpalatable maybe but then, it was an unattactive periodin history, particularly if you were on the Brown end. Cheers
843:
feels like, but even before that I was always very reluctant to block even an anon under any circumstances. And then publishing the e-mails, and expressing some kind of feigned outrage at my fury? Who would not have been furious at such an injustice?
615:
During my work on the various Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports articles, I came across what looked to me like a father and a son with nearly the same name who had both been inserted into the line of succession in the same place; I left a note on
213:
Unsigned messages will be ignored. You can sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). I reserve the right to disruptively eliminate gigantic blobs of wiki-markup from signatures on a whim if I think they're cluttering up my talk page.
416:
where you got the image from, and I'll tag it for you. (And if you know exactly what this means and are really tired of the constant reminders, please excuse me. They will stop once the tagging project is complete.) Thanks so much.
764:. You may also want to get in private contact with one of the arbitrators either through IRC or email and show them the email transcripts if you feel you still haven't been heard out; a summary of their content may be too vague.
464:
536:
What is the final status of this? I'm unclear on how the proportions amount to consensus.. In other news, is it possible to restore the talk pages? They were at least somewhat important in establishing where the lists came from
780:
I'm confused about why you reverted my comments to the admin board. It looks like you added comments by OneGuy, but why don't those comments show up in the history as added by him? Is there a problem with the database?
633:
in my opinion. But I think if we're all astute and keep an eye on recent changes we can stop most of these little stupid things from appearing in articles by people who intended to betray the trust of
Wikipedians.
834:
Thank you for deleting the e-mail page. Unless the
Simpson quote can be worked into the article context, I feel it is more appropriate for Wikiquote. And no, I'm not going to forget about the things you did.
804:
Heh. Well, the appropriate question in this case, is to ask you if you yourself can see an edit history link (diff) that shows him adding the comment you restored. I've actually seen this happen before.
826:
The request in the e-mail was for you to delete the e-mails from the wiki. The case is over, that kind of evidence cannot be considered anyway, and it is personally insulting to me to post that publicly.
688:. Although there were more than two edits, he changed around pieces of various paragraphs, a sign of attempting a compromise, so this does not count. The block should not have been restored.
724:
Hi, I'm creating a series of articles on colored hereditary peers and baronets. While there seems to be several
Indians that were granted baronetcies I can only find one hereditary peer
761:
218:
Ah. Once again, I have a nice, clean talk page. No comments. No headers. No plaintive requests from vandals. Looks as lovely as newly-fallen snow. I don't suppose it will last either. ~
193:
867:
content to abide by the results of the polls that are currently in progress, even though some are going against me. If you have an opinion on the matter, you might want to vote.
728:
of Indian extraction. There seem to have been no peers or baronets of
African extraction however. Do you happen to know of any other hereditary peers of non-white extraction?
373:
895:
are together is because the two positions were inherited at the same time, down the same line). Any suggestions on making the tables actually useful? Thanks,
793:
Thanks for your comments, but it still doesn't explain why I can't see the comments in the history as added by OneGuy. Is this just a bug in the database? --
463:
436:
P.P.S. - You can put the shotgun down. This is not spam. I actually stopped at your userpage with the express intent of delivering this request. :) D~
620:, but since you noticed my work I assume you're knowledgeable about this kind of thing so I'm giving you a heads-up on the problem I ran into.
319:
315:, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much,
570:
Wow, it looks like an actual article now! It's legible and everything! I'm stunned. Good work. ^_^ Think I'll withdraw my delete vote...
275:)" from the above - why? It went extinct after the 9th Countess, and then her four sons (in unrecorded and indeterminate order) died...
601:
581:
610:
884:
760:
If you feel so strongly about the ignoring of
Everyking's emails as you said on IRC last night, you may want to comment at
205:, feel free to leave a comment, else please move on. Please ignore the gigantic eye in the corner with the pump-action
645:
445:
515:
351:
269:
403:
391:
304:
307:. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the
185:
180:
175:
170:
165:
160:
155:
150:
145:
140:
135:
130:
125:
120:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
235:
907:
I think the vote should not end so soon. There is still the possibility that it could swing the other way.
596:
576:
80:
75:
70:
65:
60:
55:
45:
40:
554:
That brings us to five blocks on
Christmas Willy on Wheels. You're running a little behind the pack :) --
617:
430:
591:
571:
379:
I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its
669:
495:
478:
323:
251:
637:
280:
255:
8:
810:
798:
786:
769:
522:
300:
17:
345:
736:
621:
312:
288:
243:
237:
775:
892:
888:
652:
457:
316:
201:
Spammers: I would like for this page to stay reasonably clean. If you have business
899:
648:
634:
559:
335:
277:
421:
412:
908:
868:
860:
852:
844:
836:
828:
820:
806:
794:
782:
765:
755:
519:
492:
475:
262:
219:
439:
709:
851:
things in reaction to what I think most people would consider an injustice.
701:
484:
880:
685:
449:
334:
I don't think it's really necessary to end those peers by year charts with
891:- I had to make many of theirs ugly too (the reason Lord High Steward and
887:- look at the succession box at the bottom, it's very ugly. Check all the
874:
294:
896:
725:
644:
Hi
Mackensen. Who is Chris Ducat and what has he been up to lately? Re:
555:
339:
627:
549:
329:
656:
538:
504:
418:
338:. Instead, just stick a |} on the end - it's more better, methinks :)
261:
749:
489:
472:
380:
355:
719:
565:
819:
I believe I only did that once. I trust you did not get my e-mail?
762:
Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration/Everyking/Proposed decision
706:
689:
673:
192:
206:
742:
402:
if you claim fair use of someone else's work, and so on. Click
241:
679:
364:
398:
if you wish to release your own work to the public domain,
308:
272:
663:
586:
18:11, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) (that should have been signed)
465:
List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2004
240:
07:28, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) And the range has been banned
229:
590:Sounds like a plan. Merry Christmas, by the way!
446:User talk:Bkonrad#Michigan geography my talk page
879:Medieval England. 14th century. Apparently, the
695:
409:If you don't know what any of this means, just
390:if you wish to release your own work under the
369:Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:
518:. When that'll actually happen I don't know.
271:(link will break with next edit) "(extinct
611:An apparent snarl in a line of succession
303:. I notice it currently doesn't have an
514:It has been listed to be transwikied on
191:
672:to your nice photo of Greetsiel? Thx --
429:P.S. You can help tag other images at
14:
71:/Archive (December 2005–February 2006)
51:/Archive (November 2004–February 2005)
705:for the help in enforcing the 3RR. --
287:upon Lady Lennox's death in 1459. --
885:Henry of Grosmont, Duke of Lancaster
96:/Archive (October 2006–January 2007)
66:/Archive (August 2005–December 2005)
684:Everyking only made 2-3 reverts on
76:/Archive (February 2006–April 2006)
46:/Archive (April 2004–November 2004)
23:
732:Sinha of Raipur is extant? Thanx,
111:/Archive (August 2007–January 2008
24:
920:
358:, 17.28 15th December 2004 (GMT)
126:/Archive (January 2009–June 2009)
121:/Archive (June 2008–January 2009)
116:/Archive (January 2008–June 2008)
101:/Archive (January 2007–June 2007)
91:/Archive (July 2006–October 2006)
56:/Archive (February 2005–May 2005)
41:/Archive (August 2003–April 2004)
700:
516:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Old
406:for a list of the various tags.
352:Granville Charles Henry Somerset
186:/Archive (April 2022–April 2023)
181:/Archive (April 2021–April 2022)
176:/Archive (April 2020–April 2021)
171:/Archive (April 2019–April 2020)
166:/Archive (April 2018–April 2019)
161:/Archive (April 2017–April 2018)
156:/Archive (April 2016–April 2017)
151:/Archive (April 2015–April 2016)
146:/Archive (April 2014–April 2015)
141:/Archive (April 2013–April 2014)
136:/Archive (April 2011–April 2013)
106:/Archive (June 2007–August 2007)
311:, or {{fairuse}} if you claim
131:/Archive (June 2009–April 2011)
61:/Archive (May 2005–August 2005)
392:GNU Free Documentation License
81:/Archive (April 2006–May 2006)
13:
1:
883:wanted to make my life hard.
86:/Archive (May 2006–July 2006)
7:
668:Hi, could you please add a
618:Talk:Hugh Bigod (Justiciar)
10:
925:
460:22:52, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
374:Image:Earl_of_aberdeen.jpg
911:01:25, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
801:06:28, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
789:06:13, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
772:05:33, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
752:23:01, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
739:22:50, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
716:16:30, 2005 Jan 16 (UTC)
692:09:25, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
676:05:36, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
640:23:20, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
624:03:42, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
562:01:04, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
480:17:27, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
431:Knowledge:Untagged_Images
426:03:47, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
342:04:51, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
326:22:02, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
291:00:38, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
283:03:29, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
246:07:48, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
224:the 8th of December, 2004
904:03:22, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
871:20:20, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
863:20:09, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
855:20:00, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
847:19:41, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
839:16:24, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
831:22:08, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
823:22:00, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
813:06:36, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
606:18:11, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
541:00:00, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
525:18:06, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
507:18:03, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
497:17:44, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
350:Re. moving this page to
659:05:49, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
346:Lord Granville Somerset
776:Reverts to admin board
252:User:PolishPoliticians
197:
299:Thanks for uploading
256:User_talk:Jimbo_Wales
250:I'm pretty sure he's
195:
444:I replied to you on
301:Image:Palmerston.jpg
305:image copyright tag
18:User talk:Mackensen
889:Lord High Stewards
440:Michigan geography
356:Donald (Opera hat)
198:
902:
893:Earl of Leicester
714:
653:User_talk:Gadfium
433:. Thanks again.
916:
900:
875:succession boxes
756:Everyking's RFAr
713:
710:
704:
649:User_talk:Cyrius
604:
599:
594:
584:
579:
574:
456:
424:
336:Template:end box
295:Image copyrights
924:
923:
919:
918:
917:
915:
914:
913:
877:
778:
758:
745:
722:
711:
698:
682:
666:
630:
628:Re: Slow Fixes!
613:
602:
597:
592:
582:
577:
572:
568:
552:
550:Willy on Wheels
468:
452:
442:
422:
413:at my talk page
367:
348:
332:
330:Peers by Decade
297:
266:
232:
190:
34:Mackensenarchiv
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
922:
876:
873:
817:
816:
815:
814:
777:
774:
757:
754:
744:
741:
721:
718:
697:
694:
681:
678:
665:
662:
661:
660:
629:
626:
612:
609:
608:
607:
567:
564:
551:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
529:
528:
527:
526:
509:
508:
499:
498:
467:
462:
441:
438:
377:
376:
366:
363:
361:
347:
344:
331:
328:
296:
293:
276:
265:
263:Earl of Lennox
260:
259:
258:
254:, see more at
231:
228:
227:
216:
211:
199:
189:
188:
183:
178:
173:
168:
163:
158:
153:
148:
143:
138:
133:
128:
123:
118:
113:
108:
103:
98:
93:
88:
83:
78:
73:
68:
63:
58:
53:
48:
43:
37:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
921:
912:
910:
905:
903:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
872:
870:
864:
862:
856:
854:
848:
846:
840:
838:
832:
830:
824:
822:
812:
808:
803:
802:
800:
796:
792:
791:
790:
788:
784:
773:
771:
767:
763:
753:
751:
740:
738:
737:Notquiteauden
733:
729:
727:
720:Colored peers
717:
715:
708:
703:
693:
691:
687:
677:
675:
671:
670:copyright tag
658:
654:
650:
646:
643:
642:
641:
639:
636:
625:
623:
619:
605:
600:
595:
589:
588:
587:
585:
580:
575:
566:Wynn Baronets
563:
561:
557:
540:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
524:
521:
517:
513:
512:
511:
510:
506:
501:
500:
496:
494:
491:
486:
483:
482:
481:
479:
477:
474:
466:
461:
459:
455:
451:
447:
437:
434:
432:
427:
425:
420:
415:
414:
407:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
384:
382:
375:
372:
371:
370:
362:
359:
357:
353:
343:
341:
337:
327:
325:
321:
320:Edwin Stearns
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
292:
290:
284:
282:
279:
274:
270:
264:
257:
253:
249:
248:
247:
245:
244:GeneralPatton
242:
239:
238:GeneralPatton
236:
234:He's back...
226:
225:
221:
215:
210:
208:
204:
194:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
172:
169:
167:
164:
162:
159:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:
144:
142:
139:
137:
134:
132:
129:
127:
124:
122:
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
67:
64:
62:
59:
57:
54:
52:
49:
47:
44:
42:
39:
38:
36:
35:
30:
29:Solicitation
19:
906:
881:Earl Marshal
878:
865:
857:
849:
841:
833:
825:
818:
779:
759:
746:
734:
730:
723:
699:
686:Pieces of Me
683:
667:
647:. See also
631:
614:
569:
553:
469:
453:
443:
435:
428:
411:let me know
410:
408:
399:
395:
387:
386:You can use
385:
378:
368:
360:
349:
333:
298:
285:
268:You removed
267:
233:
223:
217:
212:
202:
200:
50:
33:
32:
26:
743:King Tawhio
726:Baron Sinha
635:bernlin2000
485:m:Transwiki
400:{{fairuse}}
396:{{PD-self}}
807:Viriditas
795:Viriditas
783:Viriditas
909:Everyking
869:Everyking
861:Everyking
853:Everyking
845:Everyking
837:Everyking
829:Everyking
821:Everyking
766:Johnleemk
680:Everyking
520:Mackensen
383:status?
381:copyright
365:Image tag
220:Mackensen
388:{{gfdl}}
313:fair use
289:Emsworth
278:James F.
664:Commons
490:Charles
473:Charles
207:shotgun
203:with me
196:The Eye
655:. --
556:Cyrius
523:(talk)
340:ugen64
281:(talk)
657:Curps
622:Bryan
539:Tarek
505:Carrp
458:wiser
450:older
419:Denni
230:Posen
16:<
897:ugen
811:Talk
799:Talk
787:Talk
770:Talk
750:ping
651:and
404:here
324:Talk
309:GFDL
273:1425
707:fvw
696:3RR
690:172
674:Bdk
901:64
809:|
805:--
797:|
785:|
781:--
768:|
735:--
493:P.
476:P.
448:.
394:,
322:|
318:—
222:,
209:.
27:No
712:*
638:∞
603:C
598:M
593:P
583:C
578:M
573:P
560:✎
558:|
471:—
454:≠
423:☯
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.