716:
a result I decided to execute my knowledge prowess through such encyclopediac articles. I am always keen on enhancing knowledge and to share the same with others without expecting anything in return. Maybe I was overexcited and pumped up whenever I get an opportunity to use my knowledge to the best of my efforts. I also admit the fact that my style of writing has also been influenced with the advent of college semester report writing, assignments as we are expected to give an in-depth analysis on explaining a particular segment to gain more marks and also to top the rankings like first class honours etc. My knack of writing is clearly evident with how you are making suggestions on the necessity to trim down unnecessary wordings and to ensure a neutral point of view. I am always eager to apply whatever knowledge I have at my disposal which can benefit me and others and that is why I feel maybe I have exaggerated my style of writing. Hopefully I can turn things around to stay alive and remain upbeat about the weight of expectations on me. Hopefully I can see a glimmer of hope and possibly see light at the end of the tunnel. I strive with the emphasis on improving myself and I guarantee that I can make a resilient comeback and become an inevitable
Knowledge editor.
865:(edit confmict)Finally, even without the sourcing issus, it is really not a good article. It starts with some general vague text about 1556, instead of kdiscussing the history of the actual barony, which is claimed in the infobox to be from the 9th century. Reading the article doesn't really inform readers about the barony, which should be the purpose after all. It's a jumble of largely unrelated paragraphs, e.g. suddenly talking about " In a 1951 ruling, the Lord Lyon found that the Coarbs of St Moluag had existed for centuries without acknowledging any secular authority or hierarchical structure." without any indication what this is about or why this is important. It's a lot more informative to read the existing article on
366:) 16:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC) Hi, Fram. You told 'While this topic deserves an article, it shouldn't be this one. A blatantly one-sided, very badly sourced instead of a neutral, factual one where the sources actually reference the paragraphs they follow instead of being seemingly randomly inserted' I have checked the references. There are many mistakes in them. I am removing those and inserting the correct references. How the government is viewing the matter, what steps they have taken, what international organizations and countries have commented—I can mention these with references. Also, I can include the opinions of those who are attacking. I think that will make it impartial and unbiased. Will I proceed with the article -
699:. Never mind the nonsense of "Generally it is perceived and assumed that people who have fewer economic resources and especially those who have little to no access to even basic facilities tend to become passive investors." People with no access to basic facilities are not the people discussed by the model or the sources... I will keep an eye on your new creations and may request removal of your user rights as I don't think you are the kind of editor who should be autopatrolled or who should be reviewing new pages or pending changes.
1254:
314:
516:
481:
785:
given the historic significance of the title and the numerous sources included in the article. I've observed that we've had several interactions in the past, and it seems like you might be closely monitoring my contributions. I can't help but feel that this might be causing unnecessary friction between us. I would appreciate it if we could focus on constructive dialogue moving forward, rather than actions that could be seen as disruptive.
801:
related to the pahe subject but not to the facts it sourced at all. You are an experienced editor, you should do better. And no, I wasn't "closely monitoring your contributions", I saw the page among the new pages which I was checking. The page was created at 13:33, 22 August 2024, I also edited a page created at 14:19, 22 August 2024, one from 14:03, 22 August 2024, one from 14:46, 22 August 2024, one from 11:22, 22 August 2024, ...
536:
1064:
1609:
if I so please, especially since editing wikipedia is merely a hobby for me afterall. But also I was inclined to add this information after hearing some friends of mine discussing which communes were the richest, so this seems to be pretty useful information. And wouldn't having articles which have loads of detailed information about every aspect of them as is the case for
Contern or also say
932:), and please try to write in your own words instead of closely paraphrasing, like you did here (see how e.g. the aside "- which itself was a developed form of tribalism in Western Europe -" compares to the similar aside in the source "—which we shall see was, inWestern Europe at any rate, itself a developed form of tribalism—"). See
289:, at the time when the length of a state list overwhelmed the general page. Not what you did now. I'll not revert as it is rather tiring to go against so insisting on the need for separate pages for some reason, but it really is not the right way to deal with these things. Please don't create other one-person lists.
1203:
I wanted to extend an olive branch and reach out directly. I know we’ve had our differences in various discussions, and things may have escalated more than they should. My intention is always to contribute constructively, and although we may not always agree, I’m hoping we can find some common ground
815:
Plumber and I collaborated on the article, and he asked me to publish it. I wasn’t aware that this approach violated any specific rules, but I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I'll review the sources with
Plumber to ensure they meet Knowledge's standards, and we'll work together to address
715:
This is an eye opener for me as my article has been termed as delusional and my writing pattern lacks the basic common sense. I admit my mistakes and I take the responsibility for it. I thought of always applying whatever I studied at school or college level to full effect in practical aspects and as
899:
Regarding the mention of the King of Scots, I included it solely to offer additional context (the King of Scots filled a high king position, not superior among equals, emphasising the allodial aspect in medieval
Scotland). It merely serves as a starting point for the actual content. However, I agree
1608:
Alright yes I've found the primary source. And on the topic of whether it's necessary, I understand there's not much point to adding so much information to an article about a small commune but surely if it's all correct, encyclopedic and well sourced then there's nothing detrimental about adding it
1468:
than something worth including. Yes, the inspirations for D&D will inspire D&D, that seems rather logical. The Hugo Award nomination can be removed as well, as the article clearly notes that they are a mockery of the original process, making nominations virtually worthless or meaningless. I
1388:
Geez. I spent a while yesterday trying to figure out what was going on with all the page moves in their contribution history, but I decided I was too tired to work it out and gave up. Glad to see some admins have popped by in the meantime. Can't imagine they'll keep their talk page access for long.
269:
Hi Fram! I just reverted one of your edits and will be reverting a few more. I appreciate you putting the smaller lists inline for the list of
American suffragists by state, but it's not going to work in the long run. I am doing a long-term project where I am listing all suffragists by either state
784:
Fram, I noticed that you deleted the premier baron of the realm page that I created it's the oldest extant title of nobility. Rather than outright deletion, I believe it would have been more constructive to start a discussion about any concerns you had (as you have often poked at me), particularly
635:
on how they captured the plight of daily life situations through their exceptional writing framework. In addition to listening to cricket commentary, I have also given so much emphasis to the prominent notable literary works of the some of the highly talented writers as I have mentioned earlier. I
1560:
This reads to me as AI-generated text, superficially different but using the exact same, rather hollow phrases. And it is typical for AI texts to take part of their info from
Knowledge, which makes it unreliable (circular referencing). So I wouldn't consider it a reliable source, but try to track
1487:
These are all fair points. The release in question was a different RPG rather than D&D, and was directly inspired by
Appendix N rather than by D&D, but your point is correct that the link does not support the claim, so it needs a better source or it should be removed. I will remove all of
1313:
The edit summaries (most of them were machine generated it seems, but a few were accusations of COI, move vandalism, ...). BTW, thank you for not letting my oppose stop you from working together like here, I've always tried to forget whoever supported or opposed me in particular discussions (even
895:
Furthermore, the ruling by Lord Lyon is not arbitrary but grounded in specific findings. He observed that the Coarb of St. Moluag (Baron of the
Bachuil) recognised no higher authority, as their fief is allodial, affirming the Livingstones' status. The concluding paragraph underscores the heraldic
891:
Moreover, I contend that the title stands as one of the oldest in the introduction. To reinforce this claim, I cite an instance where the Duke of Argyll addressed the Baron as "my lord", highlighting the antiquity of the barony and its significant seniority (allodial in origin, predating
Scottish
598:
Hi Fram, I just dropped you a lengthy explanation on why I use technical complex wordings to exaggerate the content articles as I also think of the fact that it is paramount important for me to convert the stub class article into a start class article by capitalizing on my strength in the form of
1228:
I have no problem with you wanting to edit constructively, and have stated in my ANi post explicitly that you are a good-faith editor. But I do hope that in the future, you will try to learn from issues you encounter, and keep your promises of being more careful and going slower, instead of just
800:
First, you should not have created the text someone else created as your own in mainspace, such copy-paste moves are not allowed. Secondly, the first source in the article, claimed to be checkec today, was a weird commercial casino page, not a reliable source at all, where the source was vaguely
1438:
Thanks for clarifying, Fram. How does it look to you now? I have removed the fandom wiki and one of the blog references. I left one blog reference in for the blog by games designer Martin Ralya in the "Legacy and cultural impact" section at the end as I thought it provided evidence of a notable
1229:
continuing in the same vein, which was what lead me to the ANI report. Articles should be factually correct, well sourced, neutral, free from copyright violations, and essentially about their title subject, not a vehicle to add loads of unrelated information or to focus on one tiny aspect only.
694:
is a problem, but the contents of that article were frankly dreadful. Things like "Passive investors do not have the bargaining ability to make crucial decisions as they work under bosses on a contractual basis and are obliged to comply with the terms and conditions set by their employers. " or
981:
I just noticed that this bundled nomination is not formatted correctly. This will result in our editing tool, XFDcloser, taking action on the article in the title and ignoring the other articles you meant to include. You can't just arrange the articles in a list, they have to have the proper
695:"However, there is no guarantee that passive investors can have the ability to enhance their level of independence, and they will not be able to make their own decisions as they always have to depend on what their superiors instruct and act accordingly." are not supported by the sources
1521:. And while the data itself seems mostly sound and well sourced, one of the sections is literally directly copied from what I wrote in the article right here on wikipedia. So before using it I thought it would be best to ask you if that disqualifies the source from being usable, thanks
644:
module in
Business Management. I literally referred to all the notes and tutes and compiled a fresh article right from the scratch and presented it a one step destination so that it can be used as an education tool by others to get a basic idea of what that model is all about.
986:
section on nominating multiple articles and follow the instructions there to redo your list of articles to be considered. It should only take a few minutes but it will save the eventual discussion closer a lot of headaches if you take care of this prior to closure. Thank you.
764:. I have no idea if the other ones are better or deserve deletion or redirecting as well, but the one you created is, like I said, a random selection of examples, not based on an overarching source. An article which exists only of examples is not an encyclopedic article.
1536:
It's hard to be certain, but it looks computer-generated to me. Something like "The town boasts great schools, like the Contern Um Ewent Primary School, " while noting further down that this is the only school, is bizarre if it was written by a human. Compared to e.g.
1488:
those links you have mentioned and will remove the relevant text unless I can find better sources before I consider removing the tag. It's for the best if people don't remove these kind of tags without getting input from a second editor first, so thanks for the input.
1613:
set a precedent that all articles about similar municipalities and towns should strive to be of similar quality. If in the future, all articles about parishes in England were written to the same standard as Siddington, that's beneficial for wikipedia no?
414:, this is a very important topic that needs to be covered properly. If you engage in copyright violations or any other significant policy violations, that will only delay the coverage of this topic on Knowledge. So please be careful to follow Knowledge's
883:
While I concur regarding the absence of the history section, I do not consider the text in question (which is a dedicated section) to be vague. Initially, it elucidates the essence of baronial allodial fiefdoms in Scotland, where the holders are barons
367:
304:
1545:"Contern presents the advantage of offering a pleasant rural environment, close to nature and removed from the hustle and bustle of the capital, yet conveniently located just a short distance away, with considerably more affordable prices."
270:
or national level. Many of the suffragists on the national page need to go to the smaller pages. These lists, like the one for NY will get very long very quickly. Please leave individual state lists as stand-alone. Thank you! :)
599:
writing. I also take inspiration from English literature subject where I have learnt the basic literary techniques like metaphors, similes, euphemism, paradox and I also take note of some of the prominent writers works such as
524:
1593:
If that is even necessary for a 4000-person community. Not every last detail needs to be included. But if you want to include it, yes, either get a reliable primary source for it, or a newspaper or so commenting on it.
832:
Oh, and moving a page to draft is not "deleting" a page, it's making sure that it isn't in the mainspace when the sourcing is so dubious. It hasn't been in the mainspace since 2001, a few more days or weeks won't hurt.
455:
Ah yes, I know of that problematic project, recently I have taken one of their creations to AfD for being unscientific, outdated, and completely unchecked by the translator. Sounds like easy money for them!
396:
You are copying sentences and paragraphs straight from the sources. This is a copyright violation and not allowed on Knowledge. You need to write the article in your own words, summarizing the sources.
1656:
Well a while ago I removed the template there but on the talk page it still says the article has been evaluated as stub class on wikiproject:Luxembourg. I’m wondering as to how it can be reevaluated.
325:
306:
743:
1642:
I don't see it listed as a stub? Normally, near the bottom you would have a stub template (Luxembourg-stub or something similar), you can simply remove this once the article is no longer a stub.
1555:"Leudelange presents an appealing residential option, offering a village-like ambiance away from the hustle of the capital yet conveniently close, and with significantly more affordable prices. "
972:
971:
1089:
354:
1298:, do you mean the edit summary the sockpuppet gave you in the edit summary when they reverted you? Or did you also get something somewhere else? Might be an unaccounted for sock if so. --
319:
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
1288:
1295:
982:
formatting to be a real bundled nomination that will allow XFDcloser to take action on all of the articles. Luckily, the necessary changes aren't complicated. Just go review, the
1005:
1424:
Blogs, fandom wiki, perhaps others (I haven't checked them all, but if there are fora, fan websites, personal websites from non-recognised experts, ... then these as well).
574:
543:
529:
349:
1561:
down where it got its information from and you may find good sources (e.g. the history section of the Leudelange AI page is translated and slightly summarized from
1414:
1056:
914:
The Lord Lyon line came completely out of the blue, no indication at all was given what the "Coarbs of St Moluag" are or what they had to do with the Barony.
588:
1164:
1101:
1204:
moving forward. I’m committed to improving my contributions and continuing to learn. I’d really like to turn this into a more collaborative relationship.
440:
The reason for that mess of a title is that the editor was paid to use AI to translate an article with 0 incentive to anything more than get it past AfC.
389:
1122:
1286:
1041:
1117:
998:
1628:
Also one more thing, I've noticed Contern is still listed as a stub, when it obviously no longer is. How does one go about changing that? Thanks
1509:
896:
privileges linked with an allodial barony, which the Livingstones possess, thereby solidifying their position as barons "by the Grace of God".
562:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under
555:
551:
1562:
1670:
I removed it. Evaluation is not really that important between stub and GA/FA, no one really cares if an article is C-class or B-class.
1409:
Hi,you've flagged the Appendix N article with unreliable sources. Please could you specify which sources so they can be investigated?
674:
1462:
264:
1307:
1151:
746:" for deletion. Why? Why is this article any less desirable than all the other articles titled "Orders of magnitude (quantity)"?
1530:
1439:
person's involvement, but we can remove that as well if you think it is holding the article back from having the flag removed.
525:
279:
1579:
So I should try to track down the original source of the data of median income if I wish add the information to the article?
779:
1382:
1113:
1328:
Always. (Honestly, I'm glad you voted as you did. A well-earned oppose from someone you respect is a badge of honour.) --
1100:
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
559:
385:
330:
794:
1410:
547:
338:
1418:
1404:
1362:
1473:
is warranted either, a random blog (of some quality). Otherwise feel free to remove the tag, it's just my opinion.
680:
1081:
Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
888:(by the Grace of God), owing to the allodial nature of their fiefs and their refusal to acknowledge any superiors.
1464:
to make some point that this release is related to Appendix N, even though it nowhere says that, seems more like
1109:
708:
773:
755:
449:
668:
497:
298:
959:
945:
923:
909:
933:
751:
493:
406:
1433:
509:
465:
1610:
1238:
878:
856:
842:
825:
810:
435:
1679:
1665:
1651:
1637:
1623:
1603:
1588:
1574:
1519:
1497:
1482:
1448:
1398:
1351:
1337:
1323:
1314:
RFAs) as to not let that cloud later actions or interactions, and it's nice to see others act the same.
1189:
929:
323:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
1050:
761:
427:
1454:
1174:
381:
275:
239:
234:
229:
224:
219:
214:
209:
204:
199:
194:
189:
184:
179:
174:
169:
164:
159:
154:
149:
144:
139:
134:
129:
124:
119:
114:
109:
104:
99:
94:
89:
84:
79:
1538:
725:
654:
1277:
955:
905:
471:
320:
74:
69:
64:
59:
54:
49:
44:
39:
34:
1458:
1222:
1033:
747:
687:
637:
363:
326:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 3 § Early Austria disestablishment categories
307:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 3 § Early Austria disestablishment categories
1019:
1244:
1180:
numlock issues. From 1624, so exactly 400 years old! At least, that's what the infobox says...
737:
593:
445:
345:
1518:
this time adding stuff about the economy, and I stumbled across a source which looked useful,
1373:", direct link doesn't work. Top of the talk page says "humanist", but apparently not then...
1218:
852:
821:
790:
632:
1661:
1633:
1619:
1584:
1526:
1493:
1444:
1394:
1333:
1303:
1170:
1156:
505:
373:
271:
8:
951:
901:
628:
423:
641:
624:
411:
377:
359:
1266:
For your tireless efforts in keeping the 'pedia clean, I truly appreciate your work.
1147:
1084:
Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
441:
335:
1214:
866:
848:
817:
786:
721:
650:
620:
1078:
Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
1657:
1629:
1615:
1580:
1522:
1489:
1440:
1390:
1329:
1299:
1195:
1166:
892:
feudalism). I have appropriately attributed this information to credible sources.
616:
501:
563:
1128:
1075:
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
663:
608:
419:
1253:
249:
983:
612:
415:
1465:
1207:
Thank you for considering this, and I hope we can move forward positively.
1143:
1139:
600:
1514:
Hello again, I wanted to once again make some changes to the article for
928:
It also helps if you link to the sources you use wherever possible (e.g.
900:
that the Duke of Argyll's inclusion in the section is irrelevant though.
717:
646:
604:
255:
1366:
1268:
1671:
1643:
1595:
1566:
1474:
1425:
1374:
1370:
1343:
1342:
And it's more realistic to be 99.5% perfect than to be 100% perfect!
1315:
1230:
1181:
1025:
937:
915:
870:
834:
802:
765:
700:
569:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may
496:, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made
457:
398:
290:
253:
1294:
Hi Fram, you mentioned getting hostility and claims of vandalism at
973:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of windmills in Friesland (T–V)
1132:
1010:
989:
579:
251:
1365:(section "Answer Me !! My Lowkey opinion whats going on with you @
1024:
Done, can't recall having seen this before when I did multi-noms.
355:
Draft:Post-resignation violence against Hindus in Bangladesh, 2024
1515:
1004:
Here's what a correctly formatted bundled nomination looks like:
816:
any issues so we can move forward with getting the article live.
515:
480:
1296:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Baidwan sept of Jat-Sikh lineage
1127:
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
1063:
1006:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Korea Jesus Presbyterian Church
1470:
661:
I think, in terms of technique, you might want to think about
256:
544:
Category:1850s disestablishments in the German Confederation
530:
Category:1850s disestablishments in the German Confederation
368:
Post-resignation violence against Hindus in Bangladesh, 2024
285:
The right thing would then have been to split them again
1131:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
640:
few months ago which I in fact learnt as part of my
546:
indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a
15:
847:I stand corrected, thanks for the clarification.
1123:Disambiguation link notification for September 2
564:section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1042:New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
1162:The title is claimed to be exactly years old
1510:Question on reliability of a certain source
1457:needs to go, and I don't see the value of
577:and removing the speedy deletion tag.
744:Orders of magnitude (angular frequency)
636:also ended up writing an article about
265:List of American suffragists by state
475:
13:
1062:
780:Deleting page Baron of the Bachuil
534:
14:
1703:
1363:User talk:Repulsive hegemony card
1361:Oh, and about the hostility, see
1289:Baidwan sept of Jat-Sikh lineage
1252:
950:Alright, thanks for the advice.
514:
479:
312:
1540:from the same site, I note e.g.
1680:09:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
1666:09:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
1652:07:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
1638:20:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
1624:16:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1604:16:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1589:15:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1575:15:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1531:14:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1498:17:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1483:15:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1449:15:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1434:14:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1419:14:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1405:Unreliable Sources- Appendix N
1399:16:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1383:08:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1352:07:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1338:19:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1324:18:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1308:18:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1278:10:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
125:September 2009 - February 2010
1:
1239:06:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1223:16:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
1190:06:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1175:04:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
1152:07:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
195:December 2014 - December 2015
140:November 2010 - February 2011
65:16 August - 30 September 2007
45:December 2006 - February 2007
1469:doubt that the inclusion of
1057:September 2024 Backlog Drive
934:Knowledge:Close paraphrasing
205:September 2016 - August 2017
165:November 2012 - January 2013
110:November 2008 - January 2009
7:
1611:Siddington, Gloucestershire
1118:17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
1087:Interested in taking part?
1034:07:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
1020:05:39, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
999:05:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
960:09:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
946:07:59, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
924:07:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
910:07:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
879:15:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
857:15:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
843:15:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
826:15:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
811:15:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
795:15:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
774:09:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
756:09:26, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
742:You nominated the article "
726:15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
709:07:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
681:17:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
655:17:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
589:07:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
510:01:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
466:07:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
450:19:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
150:August 2011 - February 2012
10:
1708:
1110:MediaWiki message delivery
500:and became a Wikipedian!
492:Hi Fram! On behalf of the
428:06:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
407:06:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
390:16:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
350:18:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
299:07:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
280:20:14, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
220:January 2021 - August 2021
210:September 2017 - June 2019
180:December 2013 - April 2014
1260:The Barnstar of Diligence
1251:
1099:
1061:
690:as not only your writing
560:Categories for discussion
542:A tag has been placed on
331:categories for discussion
230:April 2022 - January 2023
215:July 2019 - December 2020
190:September - November 2014
40:July 2006 - November 2006
1675:
1647:
1599:
1570:
1478:
1429:
1378:
1347:
1319:
1234:
1185:
1029:
941:
919:
874:
838:
806:
769:
704:
556:featured topics category
461:
436:Canines Cushing-syndrome
402:
294:
235:February - December 2023
225:August 2021 - April 2022
75:November - December 2007
688:Barnewall Two-way Model
638:Barnewall Two-way Model
548:disambiguation category
416:policies and guidelines
80:January - February 2008
60:1 June - 15 August 2007
35:August 2005 - June 2006
1067:
571:contest the nomination
558:, under discussion at
539:
55:28 March - 31 May 2007
1066:
686:I've taken a look at
538:
488:Happy First Edit Day!
472:Happy First Edit Day!
200:January - August 2016
160:August - October 2012
135:August - October 2010
115:February - March 2009
1140:Opt-out instructions
886:par la grâce de Dieu
502:The Herald (Benison)
175:June - November 2013
1461:. A link to a store
1245:A barnstar for you!
762:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
738:Orders of magnitude
629:Sonali Deraniyagala
594:My style of writing
240:January - July 2024
170:February - May 2013
120:April - August 2009
1068:
748:Solomonfromfinland
642:behavioral finance
633:Wisława Szymborska
625:Yasmine Gooneratne
540:
494:Birthday Committee
305:CfD nomination at
95:July - August 2008
85:March - April 2008
1284:
1283:
1157:Missing something
1107:
1106:
683:
575:visiting the page
552:category redirect
522:
521:
392:
376:comment added by
333:page. Thank you.
262:
261:
185:May - August 2014
155:March - July 2012
145:March - July 2011
130:March - July 2010
50:1 - 27 March 2007
1699:
1275:
1256:
1249:
1248:
1059:
1051:New pages patrol
1046:
1045:
1018:
997:
867:Clan Livingstone
660:
621:Gabriela Mistral
587:
537:
518:
483:
476:
371:
341:
316:
315:
257:
16:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1512:
1407:
1292:
1280:
1269:
1247:
1198:
1159:
1125:
1055:
1044:
1009:
988:
976:
782:
740:
617:Jacques Prevert
596:
578:
535:
533:
526:Speedy deletion
498:your first edit
490:
474:
438:
357:
339:
317:
313:
310:
287:in the long run
272:Megalibrarygirl
267:
258:
252:
90:May - June 2008
23:
12:
11:
5:
1705:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1626:
1557:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1542:
1541:
1511:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1406:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1291:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1257:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1210:Best regards,
1197:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1158:
1155:
1129:Austro-Daimler
1124:
1121:
1105:
1104:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1085:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1070:
1069:
1060:
1043:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
975:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
952:Daniel Plumber
926:
902:Daniel Plumber
897:
893:
889:
862:
861:
860:
859:
830:
829:
828:
781:
778:
777:
776:
739:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
664:Finnegans Wake
609:Edward Lowbury
595:
592:
532:
528:nomination of
523:
520:
519:
512:
491:
486:
484:
473:
470:
469:
468:
437:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
356:
353:
321:categorization
311:
309:
303:
302:
301:
266:
263:
260:
259:
254:
250:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
237:
232:
227:
222:
217:
212:
207:
202:
197:
192:
187:
182:
177:
172:
167:
162:
157:
152:
147:
142:
137:
132:
127:
122:
117:
112:
107:
102:
100:September 2008
97:
92:
87:
82:
77:
72:
67:
62:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
29:
28:
25:
24:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1704:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1553:
1549:
1548:
1544:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1517:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1467:
1463:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1290:
1287:Hostility on
1279:
1276:
1274:
1273:
1265:
1264:
1261:
1258:
1255:
1250:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1211:
1208:
1205:
1201:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1136:
1134:
1130:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1103:
1098:
1092:
1091:
1086:
1083:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1065:
1058:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1015:
1014:
1007:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
996:
994:
993:
985:
979:
978:Hello, Fram,
974:
961:
957:
953:
949:
948:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
925:
921:
917:
913:
912:
911:
907:
903:
898:
894:
890:
887:
882:
881:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
863:
858:
854:
850:
846:
845:
844:
840:
836:
831:
827:
823:
819:
814:
813:
812:
808:
804:
799:
798:
797:
796:
792:
788:
775:
771:
767:
763:
760:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
745:
727:
723:
719:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
706:
702:
698:
693:
689:
685:
684:
682:
679:
678:
677:
672:
671:
666:
665:
659:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
643:
639:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
613:Gabriel Okara
610:
606:
602:
591:
590:
586:
584:
583:
576:
572:
567:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
531:
527:
517:
513:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
489:
485:
482:
478:
477:
467:
463:
459:
454:
453:
452:
451:
447:
443:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:ZeetBaralWiki
410:
409:
408:
404:
400:
395:
394:
393:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:ZeetBaralWiki
375:
369:
365:
361:
360:ZeetBaralWiki
352:
351:
347:
343:
342:
337:
332:
328:
327:
322:
308:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
247:
246:
241:
238:
236:
233:
231:
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
216:
213:
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
198:
196:
193:
191:
188:
186:
183:
181:
178:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:
123:
121:
118:
116:
113:
111:
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
76:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
32:
31:
30:
27:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1513:
1411:46.208.1.154
1408:
1360:
1293:
1271:
1270:
1259:
1213:Kellycrak88
1212:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1199:
1196:olive branch
1161:
1160:
1137:
1126:
1108:
1090:Sign up here
1088:
1049:
1012:
1011:
991:
990:
980:
977:
885:
783:
741:
696:
691:
675:
673:
670:SerialNumber
669:
662:
601:Maya Angelou
597:
581:
580:
570:
568:
541:
487:
442:Traumnovelle
439:
372:— Preceding
358:
334:
324:
318:
286:
268:
105:October 2008
70:October 2007
20:
1215:Kellycrak88
849:Kellycrak88
818:Kellycrak88
787:Kellycrak88
605:Cat Stevens
348:· he/they)
1658:N1TH Music
1630:N1TH Music
1616:N1TH Music
1581:N1TH Music
1523:N1TH Music
1490:Silverwood
1441:Silverwood
1391:asilvering
1367:User:Frost
1330:asilvering
1300:asilvering
1167:Polygnotus
1200:Hi Fram,
420:Cullen328
1453:I think
1133:Austrian
386:contribs
374:unsigned
21:Archives
1516:Contern
1144:DPL bot
340:Blaster
329:on the
984:WP:AFD
718:Abishe
697:at all
647:Abishe
1466:WP:OR
1369:&
1272:Frost
1142:.) --
1102:here.
692:style
676:54129
336:House
1676:talk
1672:Fram
1662:talk
1648:talk
1644:Fram
1634:talk
1620:talk
1600:talk
1596:Fram
1585:talk
1571:talk
1567:Fram
1563:here
1527:talk
1494:talk
1479:talk
1475:Fram
1471:this
1459:this
1455:this
1445:talk
1430:talk
1426:Fram
1415:talk
1395:talk
1379:talk
1375:Fram
1371:Fram
1348:talk
1344:Fram
1334:talk
1320:talk
1316:Fram
1304:talk
1235:talk
1231:Fram
1219:talk
1186:talk
1182:Fram
1171:talk
1148:talk
1114:talk
1030:talk
1026:Fram
956:talk
942:talk
938:Fram
930:this
920:talk
916:Fram
906:talk
875:talk
871:Fram
853:talk
839:talk
835:Fram
822:talk
807:talk
803:Fram
791:talk
770:talk
766:Fram
752:talk
722:talk
705:talk
701:Fram
667::D
651:talk
631:and
554:, a
550:, a
506:talk
462:talk
458:Fram
446:talk
424:talk
403:talk
399:Fram
382:talk
364:talk
346:talk
295:talk
291:Fram
276:talk
1550:vs.
1389:--
1135:.
573:by
566:.
370:?
1678:)
1664:)
1650:)
1636:)
1622:)
1602:)
1587:)
1573:)
1565:.
1529:)
1496:)
1481:)
1447:)
1432:)
1417:)
1397:)
1381:)
1350:)
1336:)
1322:)
1306:)
1237:)
1221:)
1188:)
1173:)
1150:)
1116:)
1032:)
1016:iz
1008:.
995:iz
958:)
944:)
936:.
922:)
908:)
877:)
869:.
855:)
841:)
824:)
809:)
793:)
772:)
754:)
724:)
707:)
653:)
627:,
623:,
619:,
615:,
611:,
607:,
603:,
585:iz
508:)
464:)
448:)
426:)
418:.
405:)
388:)
384:•
297:)
278:)
1674:(
1660:(
1646:(
1632:(
1618:(
1598:(
1583:(
1569:(
1525:(
1492:(
1477:(
1443:(
1428:(
1413:(
1393:(
1377:(
1346:(
1332:(
1318:(
1302:(
1233:(
1217:(
1184:(
1169:(
1146:(
1138:(
1112:(
1093:.
1053:|
1028:(
1013:L
992:L
954:(
940:(
918:(
904:(
873:(
851:(
837:(
820:(
805:(
789:(
768:(
750:(
720:(
703:(
649:(
582:L
504:(
460:(
444:(
422:(
401:(
380:(
362:(
344:(
293:(
274:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.