Knowledge

Politeness

Source šŸ“

285: 20: 365: 87: 237: 395:
Some studies have shown that women are more likely to use politeness formulas than men, though the exact differences are not clear. Most current research has shown that gender differences in politeness use are complex, since there is a clear association between politeness norms and the stereotypical
391:
to direct statements, such as "You were at the store, weren't you?" There are three types of tags: modal tags, affective tags, and facilitative tags. Modal tags request information of which the speaker is uncertain: "You haven't been to the store yet, have you?" Affective tags indicate concern for
325:... to bring philosophy out of the closets and libraries, schools and colleges, to dwell in clubs and assemblies, at tea-tables and coffeehouses." It provided its readers with educated, topical talking points, and advice on how to carry on conversations and social interactions in a polite manner. 444:
is perhaps the most widely known example of a language that encodes politeness at its core. Japanese has two main levels of politeness, one for intimate acquaintances, family, and friends, and one for other groups, and verb morphology reflects these levels. Besides that, some verbs have special
184:
is when a person refrains from making a comment or asserting their beliefs during a discussion so as to remain polite to others present. It is also when a person goes along with a decision made by someone else so as not to appear impolite, essentially following general social
392:
the listener: "You haven't been here long, have you? Facilitative tags invite the addressee to comment on the request being made: "You can do that, can't you?" Finally, softeners reduce the force of what would be a brusque demand: "Hand me that thing, could you?"
64:
While the goal of politeness is to refrain from behaving in an offensive way so as not to offend others, and to make all people feel relaxed and comfortable with one another, these culturally defined standards at times may be broken within the context of
280:
in the early 18th century. Shaftesbury defined politeness as the art of being pleasing in company: "'Politeness' may be defined a dext'rous management of our words and actions, whereby we make other people have better opinion of us and themselves."
276:, the art of elegant dress and graceful conversation and how to act courteously, especially with women. Influential in this new discourse was a series of essays on the nature of politeness in a commercial society, penned by the philosopher 396:
speech of middle class white women, at least in the UK and US. It is therefore unsurprising that women tend to be associated with politeness more and their linguistic behavior judged in relation to these politeness norms.
449:
forms. This happens also with some nouns and interrogative pronouns. Japanese also employs different personal pronouns for each person according to gender, age, rank, degree of acquaintance, and other cultural factors.
340:" referred to a desired social interaction which valued sober and reasoned debate on matters of interest. Established rules and procedures for proper behavior, as well as conventions, were outlined by 336:
was supposed to conform to a particular manner, with the language of polite and civil conversation considered to be essential to the conduct of coffeehouse debate and conversation. The concept of "
228:
Some cultures, groups, and individuals prefer some ideals of politeness over the other. In this way, politeness is culturally bound, and even within broader cultures, people may disagree.
482:
is oriented towards the need for acknowledgment of the positions or roles of all the participants as well as adherence to formality norms appropriate to the particular situation.
329: 268:
increasingly tried to identify themselves with the elite through their adopted artistic preferences and their standards of behavior. They became preoccupied with precise rules of
170:
is the act of making a request less infringing, such as "If you don't mind..." or "If it isn't too much trouble..."; respects a person's right to act freely. This is a variety of
201:
seeks to establish a positive relationship between parties, and it respects a person's need to be liked and understood. This standard of politeness is determined by
462:, including Japanese. Matsumoto and Ide claim that Brown and Levinson assume the speaker's volitional use of language, which allows the speaker's creative use of 216:
They show an awareness that the relationship is strong enough to cope with what would normally be considered impolite (in the popular understanding of the term);
466:-maintaining strategies toward the addressee. In East Asian cultures like Japan, politeness is achieved not so much on the basis of volition as on discernment ( 321:
in 1711, gave regular advice to its readers on how to be a polite gentleman. Its stated goal was "to enliven morality with wit, and to temper wit with morality
356:, intended to infuse politeness into English coffeehouse conversation, as their explicit purpose lay in the reformation of English manners and morals. 191:
can be when a person offers their opinion in a positive and constructive way to be assistive and helpful during an interaction, or refrains from
277: 410:
Besides and additionally to the above, many languages have specific means to show politeness, deference, respect, or a recognition of the
49:
so as not to offend others and to put them at ease. It is a culturally defined phenomenon, and therefore what is considered polite in one
1123: 372:
There is a variety of techniques one can use to seem polite. Some techniques include expressing uncertainty and ambiguity through
1170: 969:
Politeness in Parliamentary Discourse: A Comparative Pragmatic Study of British and Moroccan MPs' Speech Acts at Question Time
257:, a self-conscious process of the imposition of polite norms and behaviors became a symbol of being a genteel member of the 1155: 458:
Brown and Levinson's theory of politeness has been criticised as not being universally valid, by linguists working with
1023: 776: 738: 573: 134: 564:
Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England
116: 418:(for example, employing certain words in formal occasions, and colloquial forms in informal contexts), and in its 1465: 1108: 112: 879:
Ide, S. (1989). "Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness".
284: 219:
They articulate an awareness of the other person's values, which fulfills the person's desire to be accepted.
19: 649:
Klein, Lawrence E. (1996). "Coffeehouse Civility, 1660-1714: An Aspect of Post-Courtly Culture in England".
435: 414:
of the speaker and the hearer. There are two main ways in which a given language shows politeness: in its
526: 463: 160: 108: 1972: 1490: 1278: 756: 364: 2122: 1206: 852:
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). "Reexamination of the universality of Face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese".
1989: 1557: 1165: 1090: 506: 419: 405: 97: 684:
Klein, Lawrence E. (2002). "Politeness and the Interpretation of the British Eighteenth Century".
101: 1899: 1637: 1423: 1328: 1046: 686: 1572: 1016: 1792: 561: 624: 459: 431: 352: 309: 241: 8: 2117: 1627: 1567: 1428: 1160: 1063: 919: 423: 373: 341: 289: 202: 152: 66: 58: 589:
Klein, Lawrence (1984). "The Third Earl of Shaftesbury and the Progress of Politeness".
2112: 1592: 1221: 1128: 1057: 896: 711: 703: 666: 606: 1933: 1927: 1685: 1678: 1547: 1388: 1246: 900: 865: 772: 734: 715: 569: 557: 521: 516: 491: 441: 427: 254: 1856: 426:
is a common example in Western languages, while some Asian languages extend this to
1693: 1587: 1440: 1140: 1113: 1103: 1009: 888: 861: 695: 658: 598: 32: 2127: 2054: 1767: 1701: 1622: 1051: 562: 297: 892: 245:
fostered a culture of politeness among the middle-classes of early 18th century
1813: 1191: 994:, BBC Radio 4 discussion with Amanda Vickery, David Wootton & John Mullan ( 511: 318: 314: 156: 148: 699: 292:
had to conform to a socially acceptable standard of politeness. The painting,
2106: 1998: 1612: 1597: 1577: 1378: 1363: 1348: 1261: 1256: 1150: 1134: 1073: 411: 346: 328:
The art of polite conversation and debate was particularly cultivated in the
210: 16:
Practical application of good manners or etiquette so as not to offend others
1940: 1864: 991: 1834: 1670: 1632: 1582: 1552: 1520: 1510: 1505: 1418: 1398: 1318: 1118: 1097: 1068: 473: 388: 333: 262: 1652: 1542: 1460: 1383: 1333: 1236: 536: 381: 368:
A polite notice on the side of a bus that reads "please pay as you enter"
265: 258: 175: 1965: 1774: 1742: 1607: 1500: 1480: 1353: 1343: 1303: 1283: 1241: 707: 670: 610: 446: 2013: 1759: 1757: 1750: 1748: 1725: 1602: 1435: 1413: 1403: 1358: 1338: 1308: 1298: 1273: 1196: 1145: 501: 377: 269: 206: 192: 46: 1885: 662: 602: 205:, and often violates etiquette norms in letter. Direct speech acts, 86: 2006: 1827: 1735: 1617: 1537: 1495: 1470: 1445: 1393: 1323: 1268: 1231: 1226: 1216: 1211: 1201: 731:
The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse
496: 337: 54: 2085: 1947: 422:(for example, using special verb forms for polite discourse). The 193:
purporting to agree with something they do not actually agree with
2061: 2047: 1980: 1913: 1878: 1806: 1562: 1485: 1455: 1408: 1368: 1293: 1251: 531: 415: 273: 246: 50: 1920: 1841: 2029: 2021: 1892: 1871: 1820: 1799: 1642: 1373: 1032: 1906: 1848: 1727: 1719: 1515: 1475: 1313: 1175: 453: 236: 2077: 2069: 1527: 1450: 1288: 1001: 430:. Some languages have complex politeness systems, such as 213:
can be considered aspects of positive politeness because:
1647: 344:, such as Harrington's Rota Club. Periodicals, including 1854: 971:(Ph.D. thesis). Rabat, Morocco: Mohammed V University. 477: 467: 1691: 1668: 806:
Gender, Politeness and Pragmatic Particles in French
155:identified four kinds of politeness, deriving from 757:"Introduction: Cultural and Historical Background" 755: 178:. It is also considered a part of being assertive. 733:. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 101. 2104: 45:is the practical application of good manners or 808:. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 762:The Commerce of Everyday Life: Selections from 222:They convey a natural, relaxed, casual setting. 2083: 2067: 1017: 948: 924:Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage 917: 2019: 1996: 1987: 1978: 771:. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's. p. 1. 115:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 1124:Four Cardinal Principles and Eight Virtues 1024: 1010: 975: 454:Criticism of Brown and Levinson's typology 851: 376:and indirectness, polite lying or use of 135:Learn how and when to remove this message 980:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 962:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 926:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 838:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 803: 380:(which make use of ambiguity as well as 363: 283: 235: 18: 1171:Values in Action Inventory of Strengths 2105: 966: 930: 824: 794: 753: 472:, finding one's place), or prescribed 1005: 957: 833: 728: 683: 648: 588: 556: 399: 195:in a way that does not offend others. 174:. There is a greater use of indirect 939: 313:, founded as a daily publication by 113:adding citations to reliable sources 80: 1156:Teachings of the Seven Grandfathers 878: 13: 911: 14: 2139: 985: 944:(in Italian). Bologna: Il Mulino. 539:, expression used to say farewell 625:"First Edition of The Spectator" 85: 872: 845: 57:or simply eccentric in another 1109:Catalogue of Vices and Virtues 815: 785: 760:. In Mackie, Erin Skye (ed.). 747: 722: 677: 642: 617: 582: 568:. Cambridge University Press. 550: 1: 976:Kadar, D.; Haugh, M. (2013). 799:. New York: Harper & Row. 729:Cowan, Brian William (2005). 543: 359: 300: 1758: 1749: 1726: 866:10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 651:Huntington Library Quarterly 436:honorific speech in Japanese 7: 1855: 1692: 1669: 1031: 893:10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 527:Register (sociolinguistics) 485: 478: 468: 10: 2144: 949:Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). 797:Language and Woman's Place 754:Mackie, Erin Skye (1998). 591:Eighteenth-Century Studies 428:avoiding pronouns entirely 403: 387:Additionally, one can use 231: 2039: 1957: 1784: 1711: 1661: 1184: 1082: 1039: 700:10.1017/S0018246X02002716 28:"Your eel, I think, Sir?" 978:Understanding Politeness 933:Women Men and Politeness 507:Intercultural competence 406:Honorifics (linguistics) 182:Non-assertive politeness 76: 967:Moumni, Hassan (2005). 272:, such as when to show 53:can sometimes be quite 2084: 2068: 2020: 1997: 1988: 1979: 827:Women Men and Language 687:The Historical Journal 369: 304: 250: 39: 1573:Righteous indignation 942:Elogio della cortesia 854:Journal of Pragmatics 836:Gender and Politeness 804:Beeching, K. (2002). 367: 307:Periodicals, such as 287: 239: 22: 1091:Bodhipakkhiyā dhammā 958:Watts, R.J. (2003). 460:East-Asian languages 432:Korean speech levels 189:Assertive politeness 109:improve this section 1161:Theological virtues 1064:Positive psychology 951:Culturally Speaking 931:Holmes, J. (1995). 825:Holmes, J. (1995). 795:Lakoff, R. (1975). 629:Information Britain 294:A Club of Gentlemen 203:personal boundaries 199:Positive politeness 168:Negative politeness 71:positive politeness 69:ā€“ this is known as 67:personal boundaries 1593:Self-transcendence 1185:Individual virtues 1129:Nine Noble Virtues 1058:Nicomachean Ethics 935:. London: Longman. 834:Mills, S. (2003). 558:Klein, Lawrence E. 400:Linguistic devices 370: 305: 261:. Upwardly mobile 251: 40: 2100: 2099: 2096: 2095: 1247:Conscientiousness 1114:Epistemic virtues 940:Axia, G. (1999). 522:Politeness theory 517:Politeness maxims 492:Confirmation bias 342:gentleman's clubs 255:Enlightenment era 145: 144: 137: 2135: 2123:Sociolinguistics 2089: 2073: 2025: 2002: 1993: 1984: 1860: 1763: 1754: 1731: 1697: 1674: 1659: 1658: 1588:Self-cultivation 1141:Prussian virtues 1104:Cardinal virtues 1026: 1019: 1012: 1003: 1002: 998:, Sep. 30, 2004) 981: 972: 963: 954: 945: 936: 927: 905: 904: 887:(2ā€“3): 223ā€“248. 876: 870: 869: 849: 843: 839: 830: 819: 813: 809: 800: 789: 783: 782: 759: 751: 745: 744: 726: 720: 719: 681: 675: 674: 646: 640: 639: 637: 636: 621: 615: 614: 586: 580: 579: 567: 554: 481: 471: 324: 302: 290:Gentlemen's club 278:Lord Shaftesbury 153:Stephen Levinson 147:Anthropologists 140: 133: 129: 126: 120: 89: 81: 59:cultural context 2143: 2142: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2092: 2035: 1953: 1780: 1707: 1657: 1180: 1166:Three Treasures 1083:Virtue families 1078: 1052:Moral character 1035: 1030: 988: 914: 912:Further reading 909: 908: 877: 873: 850: 846: 842: 820: 816: 812: 790: 786: 779: 752: 748: 741: 727: 723: 682: 678: 663:10.2307/3817904 647: 643: 634: 632: 623: 622: 618: 603:10.2307/2738536 587: 583: 576: 555: 551: 546: 488: 456: 424:Tā€“V distinction 408: 402: 362: 332:of the period. 322: 298:Joseph Highmore 234: 141: 130: 124: 121: 106: 90: 79: 30: 24:True Politeness 17: 12: 11: 5: 2141: 2131: 2130: 2125: 2120: 2115: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2093: 2091: 2090: 2081: 2074: 2065: 2058: 2051: 2043: 2041: 2037: 2036: 2034: 2033: 2026: 2017: 2010: 2003: 1994: 1985: 1976: 1969: 1961: 1959: 1955: 1954: 1952: 1951: 1944: 1937: 1924: 1917: 1910: 1903: 1896: 1889: 1882: 1875: 1868: 1861: 1852: 1845: 1838: 1831: 1824: 1817: 1810: 1803: 1796: 1788: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1779: 1778: 1771: 1764: 1755: 1746: 1739: 1732: 1723: 1715: 1713: 1709: 1708: 1706: 1705: 1698: 1689: 1682: 1675: 1665: 1663: 1656: 1655: 1650: 1645: 1640: 1635: 1630: 1625: 1620: 1615: 1610: 1605: 1600: 1595: 1590: 1585: 1580: 1575: 1570: 1565: 1560: 1555: 1550: 1545: 1540: 1535: 1530: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1498: 1493: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1473: 1468: 1463: 1458: 1453: 1448: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1426: 1416: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1346: 1341: 1336: 1331: 1326: 1321: 1316: 1311: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1259: 1249: 1244: 1239: 1234: 1229: 1224: 1219: 1214: 1209: 1204: 1199: 1194: 1192:Accountability 1188: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1179: 1178: 1173: 1168: 1163: 1158: 1153: 1148: 1143: 1138: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1101: 1094: 1086: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1077: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1054: 1049: 1043: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1029: 1028: 1021: 1014: 1006: 1000: 999: 987: 986:External links 984: 983: 982: 973: 964: 955: 946: 937: 928: 913: 910: 907: 906: 871: 860:(4): 403ā€“426. 844: 841: 840: 831: 821: 814: 811: 810: 801: 791: 784: 777: 746: 739: 721: 694:(4): 869ā€“898. 676: 641: 616: 597:(2): 186ā€“214. 581: 574: 548: 547: 545: 542: 541: 540: 534: 529: 524: 519: 514: 512:Polite fiction 509: 504: 499: 494: 487: 484: 455: 452: 404:Main article: 401: 398: 361: 358: 319:Richard Steele 315:Joseph Addison 233: 230: 226: 225: 224: 223: 220: 217: 211:Grice's maxims 196: 186: 179: 159:'s concept of 157:Erving Goffman 149:Penelope Brown 143: 142: 93: 91: 84: 78: 75: 38:: 28 July 1920 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2140: 2129: 2126: 2124: 2121: 2119: 2116: 2114: 2111: 2110: 2108: 2088: 2087: 2082: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2066: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2050: 2049: 2045: 2044: 2042: 2038: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2016: 2015: 2011: 2009: 2008: 2004: 2001: 2000: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1986: 1983: 1982: 1977: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1960: 1956: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1943: 1942: 1938: 1936: 1935: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1909: 1908: 1904: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1895: 1894: 1890: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1881: 1880: 1876: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1853: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1837: 1836: 1832: 1830: 1829: 1825: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1787: 1783: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1756: 1753: 1752: 1747: 1745: 1744: 1740: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1724: 1722: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1714: 1710: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1696: 1695: 1690: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1673: 1672: 1667: 1666: 1664: 1660: 1654: 1651: 1649: 1646: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1621: 1619: 1616: 1614: 1613:Sportsmanship 1611: 1609: 1606: 1604: 1601: 1599: 1596: 1594: 1591: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1579: 1578:Righteousness 1576: 1574: 1571: 1569: 1566: 1564: 1561: 1559: 1556: 1554: 1551: 1549: 1546: 1544: 1541: 1539: 1536: 1534: 1531: 1529: 1526: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1507: 1504: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1494: 1492: 1491:Nonattachment 1489: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1469: 1467: 1464: 1462: 1459: 1457: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1345: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1335: 1332: 1330: 1327: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1317: 1315: 1312: 1310: 1307: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1290: 1287: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1258: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1248: 1245: 1243: 1240: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1225: 1223: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1210: 1208: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1187: 1183: 1177: 1174: 1172: 1169: 1167: 1164: 1162: 1159: 1157: 1154: 1152: 1151:Seven virtues 1149: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1098:Brahmavihārās 1095: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1075: 1074:Virtue ethics 1072: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1062: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1040:About virtues 1038: 1034: 1027: 1022: 1020: 1015: 1013: 1008: 1007: 1004: 997: 993: 990: 989: 979: 974: 970: 965: 961: 956: 952: 947: 943: 938: 934: 929: 925: 921: 916: 915: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 875: 867: 863: 859: 855: 848: 837: 832: 828: 823: 822: 818: 807: 802: 798: 793: 792: 788: 780: 778:0-312-16371-1 774: 770: 768:The Spectator 767: 763: 758: 750: 742: 740:0-300-10666-1 736: 732: 725: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 688: 680: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 645: 630: 626: 620: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 585: 577: 575:9780521418065 571: 566: 565: 559: 553: 549: 538: 535: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 489: 483: 480: 475: 470: 465: 461: 451: 448: 445:hyper-polite 443: 439: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 412:social status 407: 397: 393: 390: 389:tag questions 385: 383: 379: 375: 366: 357: 355: 354: 353:The Spectator 349: 348: 343: 339: 335: 331: 326: 320: 316: 312: 311: 310:The Spectator 299: 295: 291: 288:Members of a 286: 282: 279: 275: 271: 267: 264: 260: 256: 248: 244: 243: 242:The Spectator 238: 229: 221: 218: 215: 214: 212: 209:and flouting 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 190: 187: 183: 180: 177: 173: 169: 166: 165: 164: 162: 158: 154: 150: 139: 136: 128: 118: 114: 110: 104: 103: 99: 94:This section 92: 88: 83: 82: 74: 72: 68: 62: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 37: 35: 29: 25: 21: 2076: 2060: 2053: 2046: 2028: 2012: 2005: 1971: 1964: 1946: 1939: 1932: 1926: 1919: 1912: 1905: 1898: 1891: 1884: 1877: 1870: 1863: 1847: 1840: 1835:Brahmacharya 1833: 1826: 1819: 1812: 1805: 1798: 1791: 1773: 1766: 1741: 1734: 1718: 1700: 1684: 1677: 1633:Tranquillity 1583:Self-control 1553:Renunciation 1532: 1511:Philanthropy 1506:Perspicacity 1466:Magnificence 1419:Intelligence 1399:Impartiality 1319:Faithfulness 1207:Authenticity 1133: 1119:Five virtues 1096: 1089: 1069:Trait theory 1056: 995: 977: 968: 959: 953:. Continuum. 950: 941: 932: 923: 920:Levinson, S. 884: 880: 874: 857: 853: 847: 835: 826: 817: 805: 796: 787: 769: 765: 761: 749: 730: 724: 691: 685: 679: 654: 650: 644: 633:. Retrieved 631:. 2010-03-01 628: 619: 594: 590: 584: 563: 552: 474:social norms 457: 440: 409: 394: 386: 371: 351: 345: 334:Conversation 330:coffeehouses 327: 308: 306: 293: 263:middle class 252: 240: 227: 198: 188: 181: 171: 167: 146: 131: 122: 107:Please help 95: 70: 63: 42: 41: 33: 27: 23: 1653:Workmanship 1543:Punctuality 1461:Magnanimity 1384:Hospitality 1334:Forgiveness 1279:Discernment 1237:Cleanliness 996:In Our Time 918:Brown, P.; 881:Multilingua 537:Valediction 382:connotation 266:bourgeoisie 259:upper class 253:During the 176:speech acts 31:Cartoon in 2118:Pragmatics 2107:Categories 1966:Auctoritas 1814:Aparigraha 1793:Adhiį¹­į¹­hāna 1775:Sophrosyne 1743:Eutrapelia 1628:Temperance 1608:Solidarity 1598:Simplicity 1558:Resilience 1533:Politeness 1501:Patriotism 1481:Moderation 1354:Good faith 1344:Generosity 1304:Equanimity 1284:Discipline 1242:Compassion 992:Politeness 960:Politeness 829:. Longman. 764:The Tatler 635:2014-08-15 544:References 447:suppletive 420:morphology 378:euphemisms 360:Techniques 347:The Tatler 43:Politeness 2113:Etiquette 2014:Humanitas 1760:Phronesis 1751:Philotimo 1603:Sincerity 1568:Reverence 1436:Judgement 1424:Emotional 1414:Integrity 1404:Innocence 1359:Gratitude 1339:Frugality 1329:Foresight 1309:Etiquette 1299:Endurance 1274:Diligence 1197:Alertness 1146:Scout Law 1047:Endowment 901:144575072 716:145752613 657:(1): 34. 502:Formality 270:etiquette 172:deference 96:does not 47:etiquette 2007:Gravitas 1990:Dignitas 1736:Ataraxia 1618:Sympathy 1548:Religion 1538:Prudence 1496:Patience 1471:Meekness 1446:Kindness 1394:Humility 1389:Humanity 1324:Fidelity 1269:Courtesy 1232:Chivalry 1227:Chastity 1217:Charisma 1212:Calmness 1202:Altruism 922:(1987). 560:(1994). 497:Courtesy 486:See also 442:Japanese 338:civility 207:swearing 125:May 2024 36:magazine 2062:Sadaqah 2048:Ganbaru 1981:Decorum 1973:Caritas 1928:Śraddhā 1914:Shaucha 1879:Kshanti 1807:Akrodha 1662:Chinese 1563:Respect 1486:Modesty 1456:Loyalty 1441:Justice 1409:Insight 1369:Honesty 1364:Heroism 1294:Empathy 1252:Courage 1222:Charity 1135:PāramÄ«s 1033:Virtues 708:3133532 671:3817904 611:2738536 532:Respect 479:Wakimae 469:wakimae 416:lexicon 374:hedging 274:emotion 247:England 232:History 117:removed 102:sources 51:culture 2128:Virtue 2030:Virtus 2022:Pietas 1941:Upekį¹£Ä 1934:Saddhā 1900:PrajƱā 1893:Muditā 1872:Kshama 1865:Karuį¹‡Ä 1828:Asteya 1821:Ārjava 1800:Ahimsa 1785:Indian 1768:Sophia 1643:Wisdom 1521:Filial 1429:Social 1374:Honour 899:  775:  737:  714:  706:  669:  609:  572:  323:  185:norms. 2086:VirtĆ¹ 2040:Other 1999:Fides 1958:Latin 1948:VÄ«rya 1907:Satya 1886:Mettā 1849:Dhį¹›ti 1728:Arete 1720:Agape 1712:Greek 1638:Trust 1623:Taste 1516:Piety 1476:Mercy 1349:Glory 1314:Faith 1262:Moral 1257:Civil 1176:Yamas 897:S2CID 712:S2CID 704:JSTOR 667:JSTOR 607:JSTOR 303:1730. 77:Types 34:Punch 2078:Sisu 2070:Seny 2055:Giri 1921:Sevā 1842:Dāna 1679:Jing 1528:Pity 1451:Love 1379:Hope 1289:Duty 773:ISBN 766:and 735:ISBN 570:ISBN 464:face 434:and 384:). 350:and 317:and 161:face 151:and 100:any 98:cite 55:rude 1857:HrÄ« 1694:Ren 1648:Wit 889:doi 862:doi 696:doi 659:doi 599:doi 296:by 111:by 2109:: 1702:Yi 1686:Li 1671:De 895:. 883:. 858:12 856:. 710:. 702:. 692:45 690:. 665:. 655:59 653:. 627:. 605:. 595:18 593:. 476:. 438:. 301:c. 163:: 73:. 61:. 26:. 1931:/ 1025:e 1018:t 1011:v 903:. 891:: 885:8 868:. 864:: 781:. 743:. 718:. 698:: 673:. 661:: 638:. 613:. 601:: 578:. 249:. 138:) 132:( 127:) 123:( 119:. 105:.

Index


Punch magazine
etiquette
culture
rude
cultural context
personal boundaries

cite
sources
improve this section
adding citations to reliable sources
removed
Learn how and when to remove this message
Penelope Brown
Stephen Levinson
Erving Goffman
face
speech acts
purporting to agree with something they do not actually agree with
personal boundaries
swearing
Grice's maxims

The Spectator
England
Enlightenment era
upper class
middle class
bourgeoisie

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘