Knowledge

Portillo Cáceres v Paraguay

Source 📝

406:, which is a legal action aimed at protecting constitutional rights. While prosecutor Miguel Ángel Rojas repeatedly requested an autopsy for Portillo Cáceres and the medical records of the victims, he did not receive them. Evidence that the well water contained agrochemicals was also excluded from the investigation. While seven Brazilian citizens were accused in the case, none of them were the managers or owners of the Condor Agricola or Hermanos Galhera farms. The District of Curuguaty court ruled on 15 April 2011 that both the National Plant and Seed Quality and Health Service as well as the Ministry of the Environment had failed in their duties and enabled the cause of serious physical harm to the complainants. 387:. The investigation determined that freshwater sources had been contaminated by chemical residues, finding chemical containers on the ground and citing poor management practices. The corporations did not possess environmental permits for their operations and were washing their spraying equipment in local streams. According to one of the inspectors, neither of the corporations met "the most basic standards of environmental control". The two firms were fined, but denied responsibility and their cases were later dropped following an appeal. 315: 261: 453:, and the right to remedy from harm. The resolution found that no progress had been made in the eight years since the events were initially reported and emphasised that Paraguay did not conduct an autopsy for Ruben despite requests to do so on four separate occasions. The resolution also noted that the Paraguayan government had not published the results of urine and blood tests that were conducted on those who had been poisoned. 31: 217:, including the death of one farmer, Rubén Portillo Cáceres, and the poisoning of 22 others as well as negative impacts on the livelihoods of families living in the area. Despite an investigation by local and state officials finding evidence of wrongdoing, the state did not put environmental protection measures into effect and large amounts of chemicals continued to be released near the victims' homes. 306:. The widespread use of agrochemicals in Yerutí has impacted living conditions, domestic economies and the health of residents. Contamination of aquifers and water sources rendered the Yerutí and Kuairû streams unusable for fishing. Residents also experienced the deterioration of their crops, losing fruit trees, as well as the death of their livestock. 469:. The resolution marked the first time that the United Nations Human Rights Committee recognized a connection between environmental protection and the right to life. The decision relied on General Comment No. 36 on the Right to Life, which includes language defining the relationship between the environment and human rights. 351:. Soybeans had also been planted up to the edge of community walkways and there were no protective strips of vegetation to shield residents from pesticides. Inspectors conducted tests for chemicals and found evidence of restricted or banned agricultural insecticides in the Portillo Cáceres family's well water, including 409:
Despite the court's decision, the soybean agribusinesses continued using large amounts of pesticides without environmental protection measures or permits. Claims by the family of Portillo Cáceres were ignored by the State of Paraguay for three years. Rubén's sister Norma, along with the other victims
374:
The two agribusinesses involved in the cultivation of soybeans around Yerutí, Condor SA/KLM SA (Condor Agricola) and Hermanos Galhera Agrovalle del Sol S.A/Emmerson Shinin (Hermanos Galhera), were owned by Brazilians and found to have engaged in negligent practices. Hermanos Galhera supplies soybeans
301:
surrendered in compensation for the embezzlement of public funds. While the 2,212-hectare (5,470-acre) colony has 223 lots, by 2019 there were only 34 registered properties, with industrial soybean fields occupying the untitled public land. Despite Agrarian Reforms meant to prevent the practice, much
456:
The resolution condemned the Paraguayan government for its failure to sanction the corporations involved and ordered the state to conduct an investigation into agrochemical fumigation and to levy administrative and criminal penalties against those responsible. Specifically, the committee recognized
477:
While Paraguay was sanctioned by the United Nations in the case, it was ultimately a formality. As of 2022, there has been no penalty issued for Rubén's death and industrial soybean farming continues to operate up to the border of the family farm. Both Condor Agricola and Hermanos Galhera continue
346:
Following Rubén's death and the mass poisoning incident, Curuguaty Hospital director Angie Duarte collected blood and urine samples from the victims and contacted the Prosecutor's Office, the National Service for Plant and Seed Quality and Health, and the Ministry of Environment. The Prosecutor's
347:
Office office began an investigation and government inspectors arrived on 13 January. They documented several violations of environmental laws, finding that the expansive soybean farming operations that bordered the family farm were not separated by required
438:. The HRC found the complaint admissible, citing the lack of progress in the case over eight years and noting that the claim pertained to the rights to life, the rights to private and family life, and the right to home. 176: 45: 426:
The Human Rights Committee addressed the case's admissibility before considering its merits. Paraguay argued that domestic remedies had not been exhausted by the complainants and that HRC did not possess
503: 238:
is a landmark court case in international toxics regulation. It marked the first instance of the United Nations Human Rights Committee recognizing that a state can violate its obligations under the
441:
The Human Rights Committee issued a resolution on 9 August 2019. The committee concluded that the response by the government of Paraguay to illegal fumigation was inadequate and had violated the
330:
season at the beginning of 2011, the 26-year-old farmer fell ill, experiencing headaches, vomiting, and diarrhea. Three days later, on 6 January 2011, he died while on his way to the hospital in
457:
that the failure of a state to take action "against environmental harm can violate its obligations to protect the rights to life and to private and family life under Articles 6 and 17 of the
774: 242:
by failing to take action in cases of environmental harm. Paraguay was the first country in the world to be condemned by the Human Rights Committee for the death of a person from
744: 268:
94% of arable land in Paraguay is dedicated to the agricultural production of commodities such as soybeans, corn and cotton. Paraguay is the world's seventh-largest producer of
121: 859: 714: 326:
of eastern Paraguay, lived with his family on property adjacent to the transgenic soybean fields of Condor Agricola and Hermanos Galhera. During the soybean
509: 458: 435: 239: 171: 798: 616: 493:
case was emblematic because the notion of "domicile" was applied to an indigenous community in regard to its relationship with its land and territory.
338:. Another 22 other residents of the village also became ill, including Portillo Cáceres's two-year-old son, all of whom were admitted to the hospital. 232:, and residence were violated, and that Paraguay did not adequately demand compliance with environmental regulations or repair the damage caused. 766: 126: 574: 740: 485:, found that extensive pesticide use by agricultural companies had violated the rights of the Campo Agua'ẽ indigenous community of the 213:
who lived next to soybean plantations that had been using illegal agrochemicals. Contamination from negligent practices had resulted
839: 462: 411: 203: 41: 829: 854: 849: 706: 112:, Bamariam Koita, Duncan Laki Muhumuza, Photini Pazartzis, Hernán Quezada, Vasilka Sancin, José Manuel Santos Pais, 288:. Between 2011 and 2013, the import of pesticides to Paraguay nearly quadrupled, from 8.8 to 32.4 million liters. 400:
On 14 January 2011, the family of Portillo Cáceres and other farming families impacted by the poisoning filed an
834: 608: 269: 214: 428: 844: 824: 819: 368: 220:
In a resolution on 9 August 2019, the committee ruled in favor of the farmers, finding that their
255: 323: 566: 117: 486: 450: 364: 229: 8: 466: 335: 243: 157: 672: 445:
of the victims. The resolution found that the government had specifically violated the
298: 676: 650: 402: 662: 225: 177:
First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
147: 139: 297:
colony founded by Paraguay in 1991 on land that an education minister of dictator
143: 105: 415: 109: 88: 803: 667: 813: 767:"UN Human Rights Committee Recognizes Environmental Harm as Rights Violation" 446: 384: 376: 293: 221: 651:"The Human Rights Committee, Environmental Protection and the Right to Life" 442: 302:
of the land is sold or leased to soybean plantations run by Brazilians and
277: 504:
Teitiota v Chief Executive Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
348: 303: 113: 363:. The concentration of lindane, a chemical related to the appearance of 314: 108:, Ilze Brands Kehris, Arif Bulkan, Ahmed Amin Fathalla, Shuichi Furuya, 360: 327: 322:
Rubén Portillo Cáceres, a farmer from the village of Colonia Yerutí in
273: 461:". Paraguay was the first country in the world to be condemned by the 260: 331: 741:"Agrotóxicos, comunidades rurales y derechos humanos en el Paraguay" 481:
Another opinion of the Human Rights Committee in 2021, in the case
285: 281: 210: 380: 356: 181: 30: 434:
as the right to a healthy environment is not recognized by the
352: 410:
of agrochemical poisoning, then submitted a petition to the
367:, was three times the limit established for humans by the 607:
Manzoni, Maximiliano; Acuña, Jazmín (28 November 2019).
421: 202:(Communication No.2751/2016) was a case decided by the 272:, a crop frequently fumigated with pesticides such as 567:"América toxina: agronegocio, infancias y violencias" 510:
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants
459:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
436:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
240:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
172:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
811: 700: 698: 696: 694: 692: 690: 688: 686: 318:Location of Canindeyú Department within Paraguay 209:The case was initiated by a group of farmers in 334:. His death was determined to be the result of 309: 860:United Nations Human Rights Committee case law 804:Video including interviews with family members 683: 602: 600: 598: 596: 594: 592: 705:Wadley, Jago; Hill, Toby (7 December 2022). 606: 478:agricultural operations in the Yerutí area. 655:International and Comparative Law Quarterly 483:Benito Oliveira Pereira et al. v. Paraguay 704: 589: 560: 558: 556: 554: 552: 550: 29: 666: 16:2019 UN Human Rights Committee court case 743:(in Spanish). Agenda Estado de Derecho. 395: 336:toxic levels of pesticides in his system 313: 259: 738: 648: 547: 812: 644: 642: 640: 638: 636: 634: 564: 771:International Justice Resource Center 734: 732: 577:from the original on 28 November 2022 463:United Nations Human Rights Committee 422:United Nations Human Rights Committee 204:United Nations Human Rights Committee 56:Portillo Cáceres y Otros v. Paraguay 42:United Nations Human Rights Committee 747:from the original on 2 February 2023 565:Sández, Fernanda (20 October 2021). 531:Portillo Cáceres y Otros v. Paraguay 375:to the multinational agribusinesses 777:from the original on 2 October 2022 739:Kuipers, Stijn (29 November 2022). 631: 13: 729: 489:to their lands and residence. The 14: 871: 792: 717:from the original on 2 April 2023 619:from the original on 2 April 2023 390: 341: 840:Human rights abuses in Paraguay 465:for the death of a person from 759: 649:Le Moli, Ginevra (July 2020). 522: 1: 541: 249: 472: 310:Pesticide poisoning incident 7: 830:Toxic effects of pesticides 609:"¿Quién le mató a mi papá?" 496: 264:A soybean field in Paraguay 236:Portillo Cáceres v Paraguay 199:Portillo Cáceres v Paraguay 24:Portillo Cáceres v Paraguay 10: 876: 855:United Nations resolutions 850:2019 in the United Nations 253: 93:(Communication №2751/2016) 668:10.1017/S0020589320000123 369:World Health Organization 190: 168: 163: 153: 135: 104: 99: 84: 76: 61: 51: 37: 28: 23: 515: 46:1 ICCR Optional Protocol 256:Agriculture in Paraguay 215:negative health effects 65:9 August 2019 528:The full case name is 412:Human Rights Committee 319: 265: 89:CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 799:Text of full decision 396:District of Curuguaty 317: 263: 835:Pesticide regulation 451:right to family life 365:non-Hodgkin lymphoma 324:Canindeyú Department 100:Committee membership 467:pesticide poisoning 270:transgenic soybeans 244:pesticide poisoning 158:Geneva, Switzerland 773:. 22 August 2019. 487:Ava Guaraní people 320: 299:Alfredo Stroessner 266: 122:Andreas Zimmermann 707:"Toxic Takeaways" 195: 194: 867: 845:Soybean industry 825:2019 in Paraguay 820:2019 in case law 806:, Global Witness 787: 786: 784: 782: 763: 757: 756: 754: 752: 736: 727: 726: 724: 722: 702: 681: 680: 670: 646: 629: 628: 626: 624: 604: 587: 586: 584: 582: 562: 535: 526: 430:ratione materiae 131:, Gentian Zyberi 130: 118:Hélène Tigroudja 72: 70: 33: 21: 20: 875: 874: 870: 869: 868: 866: 865: 864: 810: 809: 795: 790: 780: 778: 765: 764: 760: 750: 748: 737: 730: 720: 718: 703: 684: 647: 632: 622: 620: 605: 590: 580: 578: 563: 548: 544: 539: 538: 527: 523: 518: 499: 475: 424: 398: 393: 344: 312: 258: 252: 124: 106:Yadh Ben Achour 68: 66: 17: 12: 11: 5: 873: 863: 862: 857: 852: 847: 842: 837: 832: 827: 822: 808: 807: 801: 794: 793:External links 791: 789: 788: 758: 728: 711:Global Witness 682: 661:(3): 735–752. 630: 588: 573:(in Spanish). 545: 543: 540: 537: 536: 520: 519: 517: 514: 513: 512: 507: 498: 495: 474: 471: 423: 420: 416:United Nations 397: 394: 392: 389: 343: 340: 311: 308: 254:Main article: 251: 248: 222:rights to life 193: 192: 188: 187: 186: 185: 174: 166: 165: 161: 160: 155: 151: 150: 137: 133: 132: 110:Christof Heyns 102: 101: 97: 96: 95: 94: 86: 82: 81: 78: 74: 73: 63: 59: 58: 53: 52:Full case name 49: 48: 39: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 872: 861: 858: 856: 853: 851: 848: 846: 843: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 821: 818: 817: 815: 805: 802: 800: 797: 796: 776: 772: 768: 762: 746: 742: 735: 733: 716: 712: 708: 701: 699: 697: 695: 693: 691: 689: 687: 678: 674: 669: 664: 660: 656: 652: 645: 643: 641: 639: 637: 635: 618: 614: 610: 603: 601: 599: 597: 595: 593: 576: 572: 568: 561: 559: 557: 555: 553: 551: 546: 533: 532: 525: 521: 511: 508: 506: 505: 501: 500: 494: 492: 488: 484: 479: 470: 468: 464: 460: 454: 452: 448: 447:right to life 444: 439: 437: 433: 431: 419: 417: 413: 407: 405: 404: 391:Legal history 388: 386: 385:Bunge Limited 382: 378: 372: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 342:Investigation 339: 337: 333: 329: 325: 316: 307: 305: 300: 296: 295: 289: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 262: 257: 247: 245: 241: 237: 233: 231: 227: 223: 218: 216: 212: 207: 205: 201: 200: 189: 184: 183: 178: 175: 173: 170: 169: 167: 162: 159: 156: 152: 149: 145: 141: 138: 134: 128: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 92: 91: 90: 87: 83: 79: 75: 64: 60: 57: 54: 50: 47: 43: 40: 36: 32: 27: 22: 19: 779:. Retrieved 770: 761: 749:. Retrieved 719:. Retrieved 710: 658: 654: 621:. Retrieved 612: 579:. Retrieved 570: 530: 529: 524: 502: 490: 482: 480: 476: 455: 443:human rights 440: 432:jurisdiction 429: 425: 408: 401: 399: 373: 349:buffer zones 345: 321: 292: 291:Yerutí is a 290: 278:chlorpyrifos 267: 235: 234: 219: 208: 198: 197: 196: 180: 179:§ 5 ¶¶ 2(b) 164:Laws applied 55: 18: 613:El Surtidor 304:Brasiguayos 230:family life 191:Area of law 125: [ 114:Yuval Shany 85:Citation(s) 814:Categories 542:References 361:endosulfan 328:fumigation 274:bifenthrin 250:Background 154:Decided in 136:Opinion in 69:2019-08-09 44:under the 677:225528974 473:Aftermath 332:Curuguaty 294:campesino 206:in 2019. 781:24 April 775:Archived 751:24 April 745:Archived 721:24 April 715:Archived 623:24 April 617:Archived 581:24 April 575:Archived 571:La tinta 497:See also 286:atrazine 282:paraquat 211:Paraguay 491:Pereira 414:of the 381:Cargill 357:lindane 226:privacy 182:et seq. 148:Spanish 140:English 77:Session 67: ( 62:Decided 675:  449:, the 403:amparo 359:, and 353:aldrin 146:, and 144:French 673:S2CID 516:Notes 129:] 38:Court 783:2023 753:2023 723:2023 625:2023 583:2023 383:and 284:and 663:doi 377:ADM 80:126 816:: 769:. 731:^ 713:. 709:. 685:^ 671:. 659:69 657:. 653:. 633:^ 615:. 611:. 591:^ 569:. 549:^ 418:. 379:, 371:. 355:, 280:, 276:, 246:. 228:, 224:, 142:, 127:de 120:, 116:, 785:. 755:. 725:. 679:. 665:: 627:. 585:. 534:. 71:)

Index


United Nations Human Rights Committee
1 ICCR Optional Protocol
CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016
Yadh Ben Achour
Christof Heyns
Yuval Shany
Hélène Tigroudja
Andreas Zimmermann
de
English
French
Spanish
Geneva, Switzerland
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
et seq.
United Nations Human Rights Committee
Paraguay
negative health effects
rights to life
privacy
family life
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
pesticide poisoning
Agriculture in Paraguay

transgenic soybeans
bifenthrin
chlorpyrifos

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.