416:
study possible solutions. On the contrary, the
Peruvian commission stated that both parties should present memorandums expressing their points of view. The heads of both representations were appointed to seek a solution, in addition to agreeing on a series of informative communications, until another procedure was necessary to record the points of agreement and divergence. In the heads' talks, it was agreed to adopt a common agenda, for which the two delegations would present memorandums. However, given the irreconcilable differences between the two notes, it was decided to dispense with them.
39:
176:
164:
152:
211:
140:
128:
116:
198:
242:
89:
358:
mouth of the Cuhimbé; from there by the
Putumayo River to the confluence of the Yaguas River; follows a straight line that from this confluence goes to the Atacuari River in the Amazon and from there through the Amazon River to the border between Peru and Brazil established in the Peru-Brazilian Treaty of October 23, 1851.
415:
On
October 31, the second meeting between the Peruvian and Colombian delegations took place. In it, the method to be adopted in the negotiations was discussed, since the Colombian representation maintained that it was up to the Peruvian to present what it considered to be pending problems in order to
373:
On
September 1, 1932, a group of 48 Peruvian citizens from Loreto stormed the small town of Leticia to claim it as Peruvian, expelling the Colombian authorities and sending them to Brazil. This act, initially considered a domestic problem, was the one that gave rise to the Colombian–Peruvian war. The
431:
Faced with
Colombia's refusal to discuss the SucumbĂos issue, the Peruvian side suggested that the discussions result in an equity arbitration constituted ad hoc. Once again, the Peruvian proposal was rejected, with the Colombians suggesting that, for any legal problem, it was necessary to resort to
357:
The border line between the
Peruvian Republic and the Republic of Colombia is agreed, agreed and fixed in the terms that are expressed below: From the point where the meridian of the mouth of the CuhimbĂ© River in Putumayo intersects the San Miguel River or SucumbĂos, go up that same meridian to said
494:
to begin negotiations in order to settle the question of pending limits between the two countries, which it refused. The country was an interested party in the dispute between
Colombia and Peru, not only because of territorial contiguity, but also because there was an area that the three countries
427:
The
Peruvian conclusion was rejected by the Colombian commission, indicating that the Conference held did not discuss the SalomĂłn-Lozano Treaty and that there was no territorial question for the change of border. In addition, he pointed out that the solution to the observations made by Peru was to
423:
to Peru (which had been ceded in exchange for the
Leticia trapeze); the impracticability of the treaty; and the economic, geographical and historical inconveniences of the line drawn by the 1922 treaty. Finally, the Peruvian side concluded that the only possible solution was to change the border,
466:
The
Peruvian delegation continued to insist on a mixed commission for Leticia, slowly putting aside the territorial issue. The mediation of the Brazilian foreign minister was essential for both parties to reach an agreement in Rio de Janeiro. The divergent points between the two parties were
448:
On February 20, 1934, Brazilian Foreign Minister Melo Franco returned to Rio de Janeiro and met with the heads of both parties to seek a solution due to the negotiations being stalled. Both parties formally submitted memorandums, illustrating their positions at the time.
245:
457:
was about to expire, so the Peruvian side requested an extension, a request that was also rejected by the Colombian delegation. Given this, the Peruvian position proposed a mixed commission for the administration of Leticia, a proposal also rejected.
452:
The negotiations continued, insisting on the Peruvian position in several exchanges of territories, all of which were rejected by the Colombian delegation. At that time, the deadline for the administration of Leticia by the
382:
on March 26, 1933, already on May 23, 1933, the diplomatic agreement ending the military actions was signed in Geneva. The Peruvian army vacated Leticia a month later just as the Colombian army returned GĂĽepĂ to Peru.
475:
The Protocol of Friendship and Cooperation between the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Peru was signed on May 24, 1934, ratifying the Salomón–Lozano Treaty, still in force today and accepted by both parties.
419:
Both parties would meet again on November 28 and December 1, 4 and 18. In the sessions, the Peruvian delegation spoke of Colombia's noncompliance with the SalomĂłn-Lozano treaty, by not delivering the
396:
On October 24, 1933, the commission destined to settle the dispute met, which was installed by the Brazilian Foreign Minister Afrânio de Melo Franco. The Peruvian part was made up of VĂctor MaĂşrtua,
428:
sign a series of navigation and trade agreements in the Putumayo and the Amazon. The Peruvian delegation rejected these agreements which were, in their opinion, unimportant.
93:
485:
353:(representing Peru). The Putumayo River was designated as the limit, except in a strip known as the Amazonian trapeze, under the sovereignty of Colombia.
312:
put an end to the military campaign but problems arose due to the subsequent dissolution of Gran Colombia, among them the continuity of the border issue.
770:
319:. That year, tripartite negotiations began, which did not produce results. The areas in dispute between Colombia and Peru were mainly the
315:
Direct and continuous negotiations between Colombia and Peru only began in 1894. Until then, the discussion only concerned the latter and
281:
433:
345:
Once the negotiations were restarted, on March 24, 1922, a direct agreement was reached in Lima, the work of the plenipotentiaries
495:
claimed. The Ecuadorian Congress declared that it would not recognize the validity of the arrangements between its two neighbors.
745:
765:
297:
440:. The Peruvian side rejected that idea, stating that a court was inadequate to solve the problem, insisting on arbitration.
760:
259:
Protocol of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation and Additional Act Between the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Peru
32:
Protocol of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation and Additional Act Between the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Peru
740:
296:
The dispute between Colombia and Peru over the sovereignty of the Amazon basin dates back to the aftermath of the
696:
397:
168:
735:
156:
331:
in 1911. The two countries tried arbitration, without reaching an agreement on who would fulfill that role.
679:
665:
651:
405:
375:
340:
120:
98:
305:
180:
401:
730:
720:
350:
750:
513:"FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC PAPERS, 1934, THE AMERICAN REPUBLICS, VOLUME IV"
374:
clashes took place along the Putumayo River and the Amazon trapeze, recalling clashes such as the
755:
715:
517:
512:
327:
basins. The colonization attempts of both countries led to armed clashes, most notably that of
725:
368:
346:
285:
132:
420:
246:
es:Protocolo de Amistad y CooperaciĂłn entre la RepĂşblica de Colombia y la RepĂşblica del PerĂş
379:
328:
8:
309:
38:
688:
409:
144:
692:
628:
454:
228:
424:
with the luck that the triangle would return to Colombia and the trapeze to Peru.
320:
324:
266:
75:
709:
301:
308:
with Peru over a border dispute in the area of Tumbes, Jaén and Maynas. The
20:
249:
437:
284:
between the two countries, and brought about the official end of the
270:
203:
139:
127:
115:
467:
liquidated, until in May 1934 a definitive agreement was reached.
491:
316:
88:
280:
The Protocol was intended to finally resolve the long-running
629:"El combate de Güepà y los cañoneros Cartagena y Santa Marta"
274:
216:
175:
163:
151:
673:. LibrerĂa Francesa CientĂfica y Casa Editorial E. Rosay.
486:
History of the Ecuadorian–Peruvian territorial dispute
653:
Reseña histĂłrica de los lĂmites entre PerĂş y Colombia
707:
479:
681:Historia de la RepĂşblica del PerĂş (1822-1933)
386:
265:, was an international agreement signed in
37:
771:Military history of Rio de Janeiro (city)
434:Permanent Court of International Justice
334:
663:
591:
567:
543:
708:
16:1934 treaty between Colombia and Peru
362:
13:
14:
782:
664:Porras Barrenechea, RaĂşl (1926).
689:Empresa Editora El Comercio S. A
678:Basadre Grohmann, Jorge (2005).
667:Historia de los lĂmites del PerĂş
240:
209:
196:
174:
162:
150:
138:
126:
114:
87:
643:
621:
470:
443:
404:. The Colombian delegation, by
746:20th century in Rio de Janeiro
609:
597:
585:
573:
561:
549:
537:
525:
505:
461:
400:, Alberto Ulloa Sotomayor and
391:
1:
766:Territorial evolution of Peru
649:
555:
498:
480:The Peruvian-Ecuadorian issue
291:
677:
650:Bustillo, Policarpo (1911).
615:
603:
579:
531:
349:(representing Colombia) and
19:Not to be confused with the
7:
410:Guillermo Valencia Castillo
261:, also known simply as the
10:
787:
741:Treaties concluded in 1934
606:2005, Vol. 14, p. 123—125.
483:
366:
338:
18:
408:, Luis Cano Villegas and
406:Roberto Urdaneta Arbeláez
239:
234:
224:
189:
106:
82:
71:
56:
48:
36:
31:
618:2005, Vol. 16, p. 15–16.
387:Negotiations (1933–1934)
761:Colombia–Peru relations
518:Office of the Historian
402:RaĂşl Porras Barrenechea
378:on February 14 and the
582:2005, Vol. 12, p. 265.
534:2005, Vol. 2, p. 12–13
398:VĂctor AndrĂ©s BelaĂşnde
360:
351:Alberto SalomĂłn Osorio
355:
347:Fabio Lozano Torrijos
341:Salomón–Lozano Treaty
335:Salomón–Lozano Treaty
60:24 May 1934
736:Treaties of Colombia
633:Pañol de la Historia
298:wars of independence
43:Peru–Colombia border
310:Treaty of Guayaquil
282:territorial dispute
28:
592:Porras Barrenechea
568:Porras Barrenechea
544:Porras Barrenechea
421:SucumbĂos Triangle
376:Battle of Tarapacá
145:Guillermo Valencia
26:
455:League of Nations
369:Colombia–Peru War
363:Colombia–Peru War
286:Colombia–Peru War
277:on May 24, 1934.
255:
254:
778:
731:Treaties of Peru
721:1934 in Colombia
702:
686:
674:
672:
660:
658:
637:
636:
625:
619:
613:
607:
601:
595:
589:
583:
577:
571:
565:
559:
553:
547:
541:
535:
529:
523:
522:
509:
244:
243:
215:
213:
212:
202:
200:
199:
179:
178:
167:
166:
155:
154:
143:
142:
131:
130:
121:Roberto Urdaneta
119:
118:
102:
92:
91:
67:
65:
52:Bilateral treaty
41:
29:
25:
786:
785:
781:
780:
779:
777:
776:
775:
751:May 1934 events
706:
705:
699:
684:
670:
656:
646:
641:
640:
627:
626:
622:
614:
610:
602:
598:
590:
586:
578:
574:
570:1926, p. 52-53.
566:
562:
554:
550:
546:1926, p. 46–48.
542:
538:
530:
526:
511:
510:
506:
501:
488:
482:
473:
464:
446:
394:
389:
380:Battle of GĂĽepĂ
371:
365:
343:
337:
294:
241:
210:
208:
197:
195:
185:
173:
169:VĂctor BelaĂşnde
161:
149:
137:
125:
113:
96:
94:Afrânio de Melo
86:
63:
61:
44:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
784:
774:
773:
768:
763:
758:
756:1934 in Brazil
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
716:Peace treaties
704:
703:
697:
675:
661:
645:
642:
639:
638:
620:
608:
596:
584:
572:
560:
548:
536:
524:
503:
502:
500:
497:
484:Main article:
481:
478:
472:
469:
463:
460:
445:
442:
393:
390:
388:
385:
367:Main article:
364:
361:
339:Main article:
336:
333:
293:
290:
267:Rio de Janeiro
253:
252:
237:
236:
232:
231:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
206:
191:
187:
186:
184:
183:
171:
159:
157:VĂctor MaĂşrtua
147:
135:
123:
110:
108:
104:
103:
84:
80:
79:
76:Rio de Janeiro
73:
69:
68:
58:
54:
53:
50:
46:
45:
42:
34:
33:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
783:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
713:
711:
700:
694:
690:
683:
682:
676:
669:
668:
662:
655:
654:
648:
647:
634:
630:
624:
617:
612:
605:
600:
593:
588:
581:
576:
569:
564:
557:
552:
545:
540:
533:
528:
520:
519:
514:
508:
504:
496:
493:
490:Peru invited
487:
477:
468:
459:
456:
450:
441:
439:
435:
429:
425:
422:
417:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
384:
381:
377:
370:
359:
354:
352:
348:
342:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
313:
311:
307:
303:
302:Gran Colombia
299:
289:
287:
283:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
251:
247:
238:
233:
230:
227:
223:
218:
207:
205:
194:
193:
192:
188:
182:
181:Alberto Ulloa
177:
172:
170:
165:
160:
158:
153:
148:
146:
141:
136:
134:
129:
124:
122:
117:
112:
111:
109:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
81:
77:
74:
70:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
35:
30:
22:
726:1934 in Peru
680:
666:
652:
644:Bibliography
632:
623:
611:
599:
594:1926, p. 54.
587:
575:
563:
558:1916, p. 72.
551:
539:
527:
516:
507:
489:
474:
471:The Protocol
465:
451:
447:
444:Second stage
430:
426:
418:
414:
395:
372:
356:
344:
314:
295:
279:
263:Rio Protocol
262:
258:
256:
27:Rio Protocol
462:Third stage
392:First stage
107:Signatories
97: [
83:Negotiators
21:1942 treaty
710:Categories
698:9972205622
499:References
329:La Pedrera
292:Background
250:Wikisource
64:1934-05-24
438:The Hague
235:Full text
225:Languages
133:Luis Cano
556:Bustillo
325:Putumayo
271:Colombia
269:between
204:Colombia
78:, Brazil
72:Location
616:Basadre
604:Basadre
580:Basadre
532:Basadre
492:Ecuador
321:Caquetá
317:Ecuador
304:fought
229:Spanish
190:Parties
62: (
695:
214:
201:
57:Signed
685:(PDF)
671:(PDF)
657:(PDF)
306:a war
101:]
693:ISBN
432:the
323:and
275:Peru
273:and
257:The
217:Peru
49:Type
436:in
248:at
712::
691:.
687:.
631:.
515:.
412:.
300:.
288:.
99:pt
701:.
659:.
635:.
521:.
66:)
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
