497:. Not four, not two, but three. Christian doctrine is remarkably specific: not only with cut-and-dried answers to the deep problems of the universe and life, but about the divinity of Jesus, about sin and redemption, heaven and hell, prayer and absolute morality. And yet McGrath has the almighty gall to accuse me of a "glossy", "quick fix", naive faith that science has all the answers.
327:
that there be an external criterion for interpreting texts; but argues that
Dawkins appears unaware that religions and their texts possess internal means of reform and renewal, and that Dawkins seems unaware of the symbolism of several of the Bible passages which he quotes. McGrath cites the works of numerous authors, including
372:
remains the finest critique of
William Paley's naturalistic arguments for deism available ... he can no longer say that Tertullian praised Christian belief because of its absurdity or that religion necessarily makes one violent. The McGraths are frustrated, then, that Dawkins continues to write
435:
set out to tell
Dawkins how wrong he is. Now enter Alister McGrath ... extended essay covers some similar ground to the others, notably in analysing the extent of Dawkins's ignorance of theology. Of course, the point about that attack, from Dawkins's perspective at any rate, is that it is no
500:
Other theologies contradict his
Christian creed while matching it for brash over-confidence, based on zero evidence. McGrath presumably rejects the polytheism of the Hindus, Olympians and Vikings. He does not subscribe to voodoo, or to any of thousands of mutually contradictory tribal beliefs. Is
326:
commanded an ethic of 'out-group affirmation' and
Christians may certainly be accused of failing to live up to this command. But it is there, right at the heart of the Christian ethic". He believes that Dawkins is right when he argues that it is necessary to critique religion, and right to demand
452:
that
Dawkins is often more accurate than McGrath on historical theology. He gives an assessment of the debate between Dawkins and McGrath while arguing that both men fail to make the crucial distinction between belief in God and faith. He finds it hard to disagree with McGrath's conclusion that
501:
McGrath an "ideological fanatic" because he doesn't believe in Thor's hammer? Of course not. Why, then, does he suggest I am exactly that because I see no reason to believe in the particular God whose existence he, lacking both evidence and humility, positively asserts?
395: ... and make many justified criticisms." He adds that "Dawkins asserts that God is so improbable that he cannot exist, and that, if he did, he would need explaining ..." But Craddock believes that Dawkins contradicted himself by asserting that the
457:
is more harmful to science than to religion because "most people have a greater intellectual and emotional investment in religion than in science." If forced to choose between them, as
Dawkins insists they must, "it will be science that they will renounce".
201:, to which Dawkins devotes considerable attention, McGrath interprets the theologian's arguments as an affirmation of a set of internally consistent beliefs rather than as an attempt to formulate a set of irrefutable proofs.
847:
373:
on the a priori, nonscientific assumption that religious believers are either deluded or meretricious, never pausing to consider the evidence not in his favor or the complex beliefs and practices of actual
Christians.
312:
God as "a petty, unjust ... capriciously malevolent bully", McGrath counters that he does not believe in such a god and knows no one personally who does. Setting aside
Dawkins' remarks, McGrath instead points to
256:, but where both can occasionally intertwine. McGrath confirms his position by noting that some prominent scientists are also theists (or at least sympathetic to theism, in Davies' case), pointing specifically to
403:, upon which the universe as we know it depends) needs no such explanation. Craddock concludes, "I am sad that Dawkins, once my hero, has descended to unscientific nonsense. McGrath makes much more sense."
321:
as superior examples of the true nature of
Christianity. "Jesus", McGrath argues, "... was the object, not the agent, of violence". McGrath suggests that "far from endorsing 'out-group hostility',
472:, Dawkins writes that McGrath "has now published two books with my name in the title" and wonders whether the professor intended to build a career by "riding on back". McGrath also published
188:, remarking that the capacity of science to explain itself requires its own explanation – and that the most economical and reliable account of this explanatory capacity lies in the notion of
1010:
301:
as an authority on anthropology, as he considers the work to be more of "a highly impressionistic early work" than a serious text. McGrath also points to Dawkins' lack of training in
509:, which first aired in January 2006 but did not include the interview in the final cut. The interview was included in a DVD set offered for sale on Dawkins's website at one point.
29:
671:
701:
885:
481:
Responding to the charge that he is "dogmatic", Dawkins writes that scientists "...are humble enough to say we don't know". Of McGrath himself, Dawkins remarks,
474:
440:
Appleyard goes on to commend the book as "a fine, dense, yet very clear account, from particular Christian perspective, of the full case against Dawkins."
768:
1110:
738:
582:
518:
143:
69:
860:
132:
and the psychologist Joanna Collicutt McGrath. It is written from a Christian perspective as a response to arguments put forth in
345:
concludes with the suggestions that belief in God has "rebounded", that Dawkins' work is more theatre than scholarship, and that
709:
892:
236:, and others, McGrath advocates a modified version of NOMA which he terms "partially-overlapping magisteria". He posits that
166:
115:
820:
1018:
540:
1274:
1259:
1026:
248:
explanations for two partially overlapping spheres of existence, where the former concerns itself primarily with the
272:
1279:
776:
837:
802:
1269:
1042:
261:
1066:
213:
746:
448:
391:
that the McGraths "attend rationally to evidence, and present their findings unemotionally to answer
1264:
1218:
1190:
159:
985:
249:
1150:
1050:
181:
1105:
1082:
1182:
1174:
1074:
960:
878:
368:
8:
423:
may have achieved, it has inspired very grand refutations. Impressive essays by ...
400:
396:
284:
276:
189:
1100:
424:
378:
177:
1158:
1134:
980:
945:
631:
358:
328:
245:
209:
185:
110:
647:
635:
1166:
1058:
1034:
1002:
920:
832:
332:
297:
292:
280:
134:
1238:
955:
935:
925:
828:
824:
734:
672:"Review: The Dawkins Delusion, by Alister McGrath, with Joanna Collicutt McGrath"
614:
596:
574:
556:
544:
406:
229:
205:
165:
He objects to Dawkins' assertion that faith is a juvenile delusion, arguing that
139:
129:
39:
339:, to demonstrate how closely he feels religious faith to be tied to well-being.
305:
as indicative of an inability to address the most important questions of faith.
940:
428:
336:
257:
193:
817:
1253:
1208:
975:
697:
443:
411:
318:
309:
174:
1233:
1228:
1223:
537:
494:
490:
486:
432:
387:
253:
197:
930:
901:
265:
233:
170:
125:
The Dawkins Delusion? Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine
399:(the seemingly arbitrary values for such constants as the masses of the
1213:
950:
915:
302:
142:. The work was published in the United Kingdom in February 2007 by the
28:
1127:
468:
217:
970:
806:
288:
241:
59:
812:
965:
863:
Article from Sheffield Humanist Society, compiling criticisms of
237:
225:
162:
which refuses to allow its ideas to be examined or challenged."
349:
denotes little more than "panic" on the part of non-believers.
221:
870:
382:
323:
314:
271:
McGrath criticizes Dawkins' portrayal of religion as both an
155:
621:. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. pp. 57–87.
603:. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. pp. 33–37.
505:
Dawkins interviewed McGrath for his television documentary,
180:
as specious. To express his true feelings on the subject of
563:. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. pp. 1–12.
154:
McGrath criticizes Dawkins for what he perceives to be "a
850:
by Nigel Bovey. Two-part Alister McGrath interview about
739:"My Critics Are Wrong to Call Me Dogmatic, Says Dawkins"
173:
as two specific examples. Like Dawkins, McGrath rejects
769:"Richard Dawkins and Alister McGrath-Uncut Interviews"
252:, and the latter concerns itself primarily with the
670:
1111:Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science
169:chose to convert as adults. He cites himself and
1251:
729:
727:
489:. The universe was created by a very particular
886:
724:
461:
291:. McGrath criticizes Dawkins for referencing
287:as well as the basics of Dawkins' theory of
264:, and (atheist but critical of new atheism)
228:. With additional reference to the works of
206:religion specifically conflicts with science
840:by Judith Cole. Alister McGrath interview.
893:
879:
27:
668:
583:Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge
519:Relationship between religion and science
144:Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge
70:Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge
645:
733:
146:and in the United States in July 2007.
1252:
874:
809:, 20 Oct 2017, retrieved 20 July 2020
696:
352:
308:Quoting Dawkins' description of the
204:McGrath proceeds to address whether
190:the monotheistic God of Christianity
184:, McGrath instead cites the work of
848:"In the beginning... there was God"
613:
595:
573:
555:
279:. McGrath examines Dawkins' use of
13:
1019:Manifesto of Evolutionary Humanism
708:. Times Newspapers. Archived from
646:Craddock, Jeremy (16 March 2007).
192:. When considering the subject of
16:Book by theologian Alister McGrath
14:
1291:
857:3 Dec 2006; retrieved 23 Feb 2007
844:6 Feb 2007; retrieved 20 Feb 2007
795:
669:Appleyard, Bryan (3 March 2007).
900:
761:
831:summarising his criticisms of
690:
662:
639:
625:
607:
589:
567:
549:
531:
1:
702:"The Irrevocability of Faith"
524:
493:intelligence who is actually
1043:Letter to a Christian Nation
538:SPCK publication information
128:is a book by the theologian
7:
805:" A critical bookreview by
512:
397:fine tuning of the universe
167:numerous reasonable persons
149:
10:
1296:
1067:God: The Failed Hypothesis
861:"Deluding Who About What?"
462:Dawkins' personal response
377:Jeremy Craddock, a former
214:non-overlapping magisteria
1201:
1119:
1093:
994:
908:
706:Times Literary Supplement
449:Times Literary Supplement
109:
101:
93:
85:
75:
65:
55:
47:
35:
26:
1275:Books by Alister McGrath
1260:Criticism of New Atheism
1219:Flying Spaghetti Monster
1191:The Evolution of Atheism
823:14 February 2007 at the
813:Alister McGrath homepage
745:. London. Archived from
216:(NOMA) as evidence that
160:religious fundamentalism
43:Joanna Collicutt McGrath
986:Michael Schmidt-Salomon
867:. Retrieved 7 May 2007.
419:Whatever else ...
273:evolutionary by-product
1280:2007 non-fiction books
1151:The Irrational Atheist
838:"Religious persuasion"
818:"The Dawkins Delusion"
773:old.richarddawkins.net
648:"Personal incredulity"
503:
485:He's signed up to the
438:
375:
220:is as compatible with
182:irreducible complexity
22:The Dawkins Delusion?
1143:The Dawkins Delusion?
1106:Pitchstone Publishing
1051:The Root of All Evil?
865:The Dawkins Delusion?
852:The Dawkins Delusion?
803:The Dawkins Delusion?
619:The Dawkins Delusion?
601:The Dawkins Delusion?
579:The Dawkins Delusion?
561:The Dawkins Delusion?
483:
417:
364:
343:The Dawkins Delusion?
1183:The Rage Against God
1175:Unscientific America
1075:The Portable Atheist
961:Christopher Hitchens
737:(12 February 2007).
543:3 March 2007 at the
401:elementary particles
369:The Blind Watchmaker
1270:Books about atheism
700:(27 October 2007).
366:... Dawkins's
23:
1101:The Clergy Project
1027:Breaking the Spell
779:on 29 October 2013
425:Marilynne Robinson
379:forensic biologist
353:Critical reception
212:'s supposition of
178:watchmaker analogy
158:conviction" to "a
21:
1247:
1246:
1159:Atheist Delusions
1011:Atheist Manifesto
981:Victor J. Stenger
946:Rebecca Goldstein
842:Belfast Telegraph
632:Publishers Weekly
585:. pp. 21–26.
507:Root of All Evil?
359:Publishers Weekly
329:Kenneth Pargament
210:Stephen Jay Gould
186:Richard Swinburne
121:
120:
116:978-0-281-05927-0
86:Publication place
1287:
1167:The Case for God
1059:God Is Not Great
1035:The God Delusion
1003:The End of Faith
921:Peter Boghossian
895:
888:
881:
872:
871:
833:The God Delusion
807:Alex J. O'Connor
789:
788:
786:
784:
775:. Archived from
765:
759:
758:
756:
754:
735:Dawkins, Richard
731:
722:
721:
719:
717:
694:
688:
687:
685:
683:
674:
666:
660:
659:
657:
655:
643:
637:
629:
623:
622:
615:McGrath, Alister
611:
605:
604:
597:McGrath, Alister
593:
587:
586:
575:McGrath, Alister
571:
565:
564:
557:McGrath, Alister
553:
547:
535:
455:The God Delusion
421:The God Delusion
393:The God Delusion
385:, writes in the
347:The God Delusion
333:Harold G. Koenig
298:The Golden Bough
293:Sir James Frazer
281:Bertrand Russell
135:The God Delusion
81:15 February 2007
77:Publication date
31:
24:
20:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1265:Richard Dawkins
1250:
1249:
1248:
1243:
1239:Regressive left
1197:
1115:
1089:
990:
956:Ayaan Hirsi Ali
936:Richard Dawkins
926:Greta Christina
904:
899:
829:Alister McGrath
825:Wayback Machine
798:
793:
792:
782:
780:
767:
766:
762:
752:
750:
732:
725:
715:
713:
712:on 16 June 2011
695:
691:
681:
679:
667:
663:
653:
651:
644:
640:
630:
626:
612:
608:
594:
590:
572:
568:
554:
550:
545:Wayback Machine
536:
532:
527:
515:
466:In a letter to
464:
407:Bryan Appleyard
355:
262:Francis Collins
230:Sir Martin Rees
208:. He points to
175:William Paley's
152:
140:Richard Dawkins
130:Alister McGrath
94:Media type
78:
42:
40:Alister McGrath
17:
12:
11:
5:
1293:
1283:
1282:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1245:
1244:
1242:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1205:
1203:
1199:
1198:
1196:
1195:
1187:
1179:
1171:
1163:
1155:
1147:
1139:
1135:Darwin's Angel
1131:
1123:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1114:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1097:
1095:
1091:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1079:
1071:
1063:
1055:
1047:
1039:
1031:
1023:
1015:
1007:
998:
996:
992:
991:
989:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
941:Daniel Dennett
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
912:
910:
906:
905:
898:
897:
890:
883:
875:
869:
868:
858:
845:
835:
815:
810:
797:
796:External links
794:
791:
790:
760:
749:on 6 July 2008
723:
698:Kenny, Anthony
689:
661:
650:. Church Times
638:
624:
606:
588:
566:
548:
529:
528:
526:
523:
522:
521:
514:
511:
463:
460:
446:writes in the
436:attack at all.
429:Terry Eagleton
354:
351:
337:Terry Eagleton
285:teapot analogy
258:Owen Gingerich
224:as it is with
151:
148:
119:
118:
113:
107:
106:
103:
99:
98:
95:
91:
90:
89:United Kingdom
87:
83:
82:
79:
76:
73:
72:
67:
63:
62:
57:
53:
52:
49:
45:
44:
37:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1292:
1281:
1278:
1276:
1273:
1271:
1268:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1257:
1255:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1209:Blasphemy Day
1207:
1206:
1204:
1200:
1193:
1192:
1188:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1122:
1118:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1096:
1092:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1005:
1004:
1000:
999:
997:
993:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
976:Michel Onfray
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
913:
911:
907:
903:
896:
891:
889:
884:
882:
877:
876:
873:
866:
862:
859:
856:
853:
849:
846:
843:
839:
836:
834:
830:
826:
822:
819:
816:
814:
811:
808:
804:
800:
799:
778:
774:
770:
764:
748:
744:
740:
736:
730:
728:
711:
707:
703:
699:
693:
678:
673:
665:
649:
642:
636:
633:
628:
620:
616:
610:
602:
598:
592:
584:
580:
576:
570:
562:
558:
552:
546:
542:
539:
534:
530:
520:
517:
516:
510:
508:
502:
498:
496:
492:
488:
482:
479:
477:
476:
471:
470:
459:
456:
451:
450:
445:
444:Anthony Kenny
441:
437:
434:
431:and ...
430:
426:
422:
416:
414:
413:
412:New Scientist
408:
404:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:
384:
381:who is now a
380:
374:
371:
370:
363:
361:
360:
350:
348:
344:
340:
338:
334:
330:
325:
320:
319:New Testament
316:
311:
310:Old Testament
306:
304:
300:
299:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:memetic virus
274:
269:
268:as examples.
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
246:equally valid
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
202:
200:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
172:
168:
163:
161:
157:
147:
145:
141:
137:
136:
131:
127:
126:
117:
114:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
74:
71:
68:
64:
61:
58:
54:
50:
46:
41:
38:
34:
30:
25:
19:
1234:Reason Rally
1229:RationalWiki
1224:Out Campaign
1189:
1181:
1173:
1165:
1157:
1149:
1142:
1141:
1133:
1094:Institutions
1081:
1073:
1065:
1057:
1049:
1041:
1033:
1025:
1017:
1009:
1001:
864:
854:
851:
841:
781:. Retrieved
777:the original
772:
763:
751:. Retrieved
747:the original
742:
714:. Retrieved
710:the original
705:
692:
680:. Retrieved
677:NewScientist
676:
664:
652:. Retrieved
641:
634:14-May-2007
627:
618:
609:
600:
591:
578:
569:
560:
551:
533:
506:
504:
499:
495:three in one
491:supernatural
487:Nicene Creed
484:
480:
475:Dawkins' God
473:
467:
465:
454:
447:
442:
439:
433:H. Allen Orr
420:
418:
410:
405:
392:
388:Church Times
386:
376:
367:
365:
357:
356:
346:
342:
341:
307:
296:
270:
244:co-exist as
203:
198:Quinque viae
196:
164:
153:
133:
124:
123:
122:
18:
995:Major works
931:Jerry Coyne
902:New Atheism
827:Article by
783:18 December
753:18 February
427:, ...
266:Paul Davies
234:Denis Noble
171:Antony Flew
1254:Categories
1214:Ex-Muslims
1120:Opposition
951:Sam Harris
916:Dan Barker
909:Key people
525:References
362:remarked,
303:psychology
1128:Go God Go
743:The Times
469:The Times
275:and as a
254:spiritual
218:Darwinism
66:Publisher
1130:" (2006)
971:PZ Myers
821:Archived
716:21 April
541:Archived
513:See also
317:and the
289:Memetics
250:temporal
242:religion
194:Aquinas'
156:dogmatic
150:Synopsis
60:Religion
48:Language
1202:Related
1083:Godless
966:TJ Kirk
855:War Cry
682:2 March
409:in the
238:science
226:atheism
56:Subject
51:English
36:Authors
1194:(2015)
1186:(2010)
1178:(2009)
1170:(2009)
1162:(2009)
1154:(2008)
1146:(2007)
1138:(2007)
1086:(2008)
1078:(2007)
1070:(2007)
1062:(2007)
1054:(2006)
1046:(2006)
1038:(2006)
1030:(2006)
1022:(2005)
1014:(2005)
1006:(2004)
654:12 May
335:, and
222:theism
415:says
383:vicar
324:Jesus
315:Jesus
102:Pages
97:Print
785:2022
755:2007
718:2008
684:2007
656:2008
240:and
111:ISBN
295:'s
283:'s
138:by
1256::
771:.
741:.
726:^
704:.
675:.
617:.
599:.
581:.
577:.
559:.
478:.
331:,
260:,
232:,
105:75
1126:"
894:e
887:t
880:v
801:"
787:.
757:.
720:.
686:.
658:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
